warfarin and edoxaban

Several studies have evaluated the economic evaluation of a group of medications known as novel oral anticoagulant drugs (NOACs) in recent years. The aim of this study is to review and systematically analyze the cost-utility studies results of warfarin compared with other NOAC drugs in atrial fibrillation patients.. A systematic review was performed to identify all studies evaluating the NOAC medications in comparison with warfarin. For this purpose, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 2013 to 2022. Articles were independently screened with inclusion criteria, and full texts were reviewed. First, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. Then, the costs and outcomes of the studies were analyzed, and findings were appraised critically.. A total of 84 costs-per-quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) cases were extracted from the studies in which the share of rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran were 31%, 13%, 29%, and 27%, respectively. The median cost per QALY of rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran was 21 910$/QALY, 22 096$/QALY, 17 765$/QALY, and 24 161$/QALY, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on perspective showed that dabigatran had the highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and edoxaban had the lowest ICER value. Edoxaban and apixaban had the highest and the lowest cost per QALY from an insurance perspective, respectively.. Despite the differences and variations in the economic evaluation studies of NOAC drugs, these drugs have shown acceptable cost-effectiveness in developed and developing countries. Among NOAC drugs, apixaban has the lowest ICER and the highest cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Thailand. However, they have not been listed in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM). A cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to aid policymakers in deciding whether DOACs should be listed in the NLEM. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of DOACs for patients with VTE in Thailand.. A cohort-based state transition model was constructed from a societal perspective with a lifetime horizon. All available DOACs, including apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, were compared with warfarin. A 6-month cycle length was used to capture all costs and health outcomes. The model consisted of nine health states, including VTE on treatment, VTE off treatment, recurrent VTE, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, post-intracranial bleeding, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and death. All inputs were based on a comprehensive literature review. The model outcomes included total cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with a 3% annual discount rate. A fully incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained were calculated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of THB 160,000/QALY ($5003). The robustness of the findings was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. All DOACs were associated with a decreased risk of VTE recurrence and intracranial hemorrhage. In the base-case analysis, apixaban could increase 0.16 QALYs compared with warfarin. An ICER for apixaban was 269,809 Thai baht (THB)/QALY ($8437/QALY). Rivaroxaban had a better QALY than warfarin at 0.09 QALYs with an ICER of 757,363 THB/QALY ($23,682/QALY). Edoxaban and dabigatran could also increase by 0.10 QALYs with an ICER of 709,945 THB ($22,200) and 707,145 THB ($22,122)/QALY, respectively. Our probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that warfarin had a 99.8% possibility of being cost-effective, while apixaban had a 0.2% possibility of being cost-effective at the current WTP. Other DOACs had no possibility of being cost-effective.. All DOACs were not cost-effective for VTE treatment at the current WTP in Thailand. Apixaban is likely to be the best option among DOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Thailand; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is characterized by occlusion of blood flow in a pulmonary artery, typically due to a thrombus that travels from a vein in a lower limb. The incidence of PE is approximately 60 to 120 per 100 000 people per year. Approximately 60 000 to 100 000 patients die from PE each year in the US.. PE should be considered in patients presenting with acute chest pain, shortness of breath, or syncope. The diagnosis is determined by chest imaging. In patients with a systolic blood pressure of at least 90 mm Hg, the following 3 steps can be used to evaluate a patient with possible PE: assessment of the clinical probability of PE, D-dimer testing if indicated, and chest imaging if indicated. The clinical probability of PE can be assessed using a structured score or using clinical gestalt. In patients with a probability of PE that is less than 15%, the presence of 8 clinical characteristics (age <50 years, heart rate <100/min, an oxygen saturation level of > 94%, no recent surgery or trauma, no prior venous thromboembolism event, no hemoptysis, no unilateral leg swelling, and no estrogen use) identifies patients at very low risk of PE in whom no further testing is needed. In patients with low or intermediate clinical probability, a D-dimer level of less than 500 ng/mL is associated with a posttest probability of PE less than 1.85%. In these patients, PE can be excluded without chest imaging. A further refinement of D-dimer threshold is possible in patients aged 50 years and older, and in patients with a low likelihood of PE. Patients with a high probability of PE (ie, >40% probability) should undergo chest imaging, and D-dimer testing is not necessary. In patients with PE and a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher, compared with heparin combined with a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin followed by warfarin alone, direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, are noninferior for treating PE and have a 0.6% lower rate of bleeding. In patients with PE and systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mm Hg, systemic thrombolysis is recommended and is associated with an 1.6% absolute reduction of mortality (from 3.9% to 2.3%).. In the US, PE affects approximately 370 000 patients per year and may cause approximately 60 000 to 100 000 deaths per year. First-line therapy consists of direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, with thrombolysis reserved for patients with systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mm Hg.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heparin; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk; Rivaroxaban; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear.. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8).. For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Diseases; Heart Ventricles; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia. Warfarin reduces the incidence and mortality of strokes in patients with AF. Edoxaban reduces the bleeding risk in patients with AF. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in preventing clinical events in patients with AF through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs were retrieved from medical literature databases. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the primary and safety endpoints. In total, five articles (10 trial comparisons) containing 24,836 patients were retrieved. Of these patients, 16,268 (65.5%) received edoxaban and 8,568 (34.5%) received warfarin. Compared with warfarin, edoxaban significantly reduced the incidence of cardiovascular death (CVD), major bleeding, and non-major bleeding (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.93, I2 : 0.0%; RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.59-0.71, I2 : 75.6%; and RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84, I2 : 79.3%, respectively). Edoxaban did not increase the incidence of stroke, systemic embolic events, myocardial infarction, and adverse events compared with warfarin (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.90-1.11, I2 : 42.8%; RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.67-1.49, I2 : 0.0%; RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.27, I2 : 0.0%; RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10, I2: 46.4%, respectively). This meta-analysis indicated that compared with warfarin, edoxaban can significantly reduce the incidence of CVD and major and non-major bleeding. The anticoagulant effect and safety of edoxaban may be better than those of warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been widely used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is an issue with safety, especially in clinically relevant bleeding. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with NOACs.. Interventions were warfarin, enoxaparin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was the incidence of major GI bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the following indications: AF, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and postsurgical prophylaxis.. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 large observation population studies were included. Compared with warfarin, apixaban showed a decreased the risk of major GI bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.76), and rivaroxaban tended to increase this risk (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85). Dabigatran (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.60), edoxaban (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.65), and enoxaparin (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.63-2.43) did not significantly increase the risk of GI bleeding than did warfarin. In the subgroup analysis, according to indications, apixaban showed a decreased risk of major GI bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) than did warfarin in AF studies. Dabigatran (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55-3.60, and rivaroxaban (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-6.41) increased the risk of major GI bleeding than did apixaban. An analysis of studies on venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism showed that no individual NOAC or enoxaparin was associated with an increased risk of major GI bleeding compared to warfarin.. Individual NOACs had varying profiles of GI bleeding risk. Results of analyses including only RCTs and those including both RCTs and population studies showed similar trends, but also showed several differences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Warfarin care bundles (e.g. genotype-guided warfarin dosing, patient's self-testing [PST] or patient's self-management [PSM] and left atrial appendage closure) are based on the concept of combining several interventions to improve anticoagulation care. NOACs are also introduced for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). However, these interventions have not been compared in head-to-head trials yet. We did a network meta-analysis based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulant interventions for SPAF. Studies comparing these interventions in adults, whether administered alone or as care bundles were included in the analyses. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Thirty-seven studies, involving 100,142 patients were assessed. Compared to usual care, PSM significantly reduced the risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.68). For major bleeding, edoxaban 60 mg (0.80, 0.71-0.90), edoxaban 30 mg (0.48, 0.42-0.56), and dabigatran 110 mg (0.81, 0.71-0.94) significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with usual warfarin care. Cluster rank plot incorporating stroke and major bleeding outcomes indicates that some warfarin care bundles perform as well as NOACs. Both interventions are therefore viable options to be considered for SPAF. Additional studies including head-to-head trials and cost-effectiveness evaluation are still warranted.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Care Bundles; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2009 to July 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A random-effects model was applied in the pooled analysis.. A total of 14 studies (4 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies) were included. Based on the randomized clinical trials, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with decreased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Based on the observational studies, compared with VKAs, the subgroup analysis showed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding.. Based on current data, the use of NOACs is at least non-inferior to the use of VKAs in AF patients for secondary stroke prevention irrespective of NOAC type.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism are the major potentially preventable complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is mandatory for stroke prevention in AF. Following approval of the four NOACs dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, the use of VKA is declining steadily. Increasing age with thresholds of 65 and 75 years is a strong risk factor when determining annual stroke risk in AF patients. Current recommendations such as the "2016 Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation" of the European Society of Cardiology and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update" by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society strengthen the importance of anticoagulation and detection of bleeding risks, of which older age is an important one. While patients aged ≥ 75 years are usually underrepresented in randomised clinical trials, they represent almost 40% of the trial populations in the large NOAC approval studies. Therefore, a sufficient amount of data is available to assess the efficacy and safety for this patient cohort in that specific indication. In this article, the evidence for stroke prevention in AF using either VKA or NOACs is summarised with a special focus on efficacy compared to bleeding risk in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Specifically, we used a model of increased weighing of intracranial bleeding to illustrate the potential benefit of NOACs over VKA in the elderly population. In brief, there are at least two tested strategies with apixaban and edoxaban which even confer an additional clinical net benefit compared with VKA. Furthermore, elderly subgroups of trials for combined antithrombotic treatment following percutaneous coronary interventions in anticoagulated patients are analysed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Given the huge burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related stroke in Asia, stroke prevention represents an urgent issue in this region. We herein performed a network meta-analysis to examine the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with AF.. A systematic search of the publications was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies until July 2019. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were regarded as the effect estimates. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for the ranking probabilities was calculated.. A total of 17 studies were included. For comparisons of NOACs vs warfarin, dabigatran (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.86), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81), apixaban (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.65), but not edoxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, wheres dabigatran (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86), apixaban (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), and edoxaban (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49) decreased the risk of major bleeding. In reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, apixaban and rivaroxaban ranked the best and second best (SUCRA 0.2% and 31.4%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (50.2%), edoxaban (75.2%), and warfarin (93.0%). In reducing the risk of major bleeding, edoxaban, and apixaban ranked the best and second best (1.5% and 30.8%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (48.4%), rivaroxaban (69.2%), and warfarin (100%).. NOACs were at least as effective as warfarin, but more safer in Asians with AF. Apixaban was superior to other NOACs for reducing stroke or systemic embolism, while edoxaban showed a better safety profile than other NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asia; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost of Illness; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This review analyzes results of a large prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 that compared efficacy and safety of warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, and edoxaban, an oral inhibitor of activated coagulation factor X. The review addresses important practical aspects of using edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

There is a lack of clear benefit and a potential risk of bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how treatment with DOACs affects stroke and bleeding outcomes compared with warfarin or aspirin.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case series, and searched electronic databases from 1946 to 2017. Studies evaluating stroke and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients were included.. From 8008 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. For moderate CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate  <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), there was no difference in stroke outcomes between dabigatran 110 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-1.21], rivaroxaban (HR 0.82-0.84, 95% CI 0.25-2.69) and edoxaban (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.18) versus warfarin. Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) and apixaban reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism significantly more than warfarin for moderate CKD patients (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, respectively). Edoxaban and apixaban were associated with reduced major bleeding events (HR 0.50-0.76) compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg showed no significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, there was no difference in stroke outcomes between apixaban, dabigatran [relative risk (RR) 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99] or rivaroxaban (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.89-3.64) versus warfarin. In HD patients, rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with an increased major bleeding risk (RR 1.45-1.76), whereas there was no major bleeding difference with apixaban compared to warfarin.. The heterogeneity of major bleeding and stroke definitions of the 10 included studies.. Clinicians should continue to weigh the risk of stroke versus bleeding before prescribing DOACs in the CKD and dialysis population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants are commonly used drugs in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD to treat atrial fibrillation to reduce stroke and systemic embolism. Some of these drugs are used to treat or prevent deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with CKD who undergo knee and hip replacement surgeries. Warfarin is the only anticoagulant that is approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration in individuals with mechanical heart valves. Each oral anticoagulant affects the coagulation profile in the laboratory uniquely. Warfarin and apixaban are the only anticoagulants that are Food and Drug Administration approved for use in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD. However, other oral anticoagulants are commonly used off label in this patient population. Given the acquired risk of bleeding from uremia, these drugs are known to cause increased bleeding events, hospitalization, and overall morbidity. Each anticoagulant has unique pharmacologic properties of which nephrologists need to be aware to optimally manage patients. In addition, nephrologists are increasingly asked to aid in the management of adverse bleeding events related to oral anticoagulant use in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD. This article summarizes the clinical pharmacology of these drugs and identifies knowledge gaps in the literature related to their use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) are at higher risk for myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death, often require antiplatelet therapy and are therefore exposed to an increased risk of bleeding. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profile of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant CAD.. We performed a trial-level meta-analysis of CAD subgroups from four trials of NOAC versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation, comparing the primary trial endpoints (efficacy: stroke or systemic embolic event; safety: International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding) in patients with versus those without CAD, and used interaction testing to assess for treatment effect modification.. In total, 58,606 patients with established CAD were included in this meta-analysis. NOACs reduced the risk of stroke/systemic embolic event irrespective of presence of CAD (CAD: 0.76 (0.56-1.04); no CAD: hazard ratio 0.77 (0.56-1.06);. The present meta-analysis of four trials supports that NOACs are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and established CAD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been evaluated in clinical trials for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although each of the NOACs have been shown to be at least non-inferior to warfarin for efficacy and safety outcomes, controversy remains over the relative safety of each NOAC inpatient subgroups. This narrative review provides an overview of phase III data on NOAC trials for the prevention of stroke in AF, with a focus on reporting the safety of each agent in key patient subgroups based on age, gender, accumulated risk factors, and primary or secondary prevention of stroke.. A comprehensive literature search was completed and, where data permit, analyses of phase III trials of the NOACs are presented for each patient subgroup.. Analyses of key safety outcomes from NOAC trials were completed using primary trial data, including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. The safety of NOACs was generally consistent and favourable compared with warfarin according to patient age, gender, previous history of stroke, and the presence of risk factors for stroke.. The safety of the NOACs compared with warfarin was generally favourable across different patient subgroups, including those perceived to be at "high risk" for adverse outcomes. However, certain NOACs may be preferable to warfarin in some subgroups, based on indirect analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) require dose reductions according to patient or clinical factors for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess outcomes with reduced-dose NOACs when given as pre-specified in pivotal trials.. Aggregated data abstracted from Phase III trials comparing NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF were assessed by treatment using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) stratified by patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction. Irrespective of treatments, annualized rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were higher in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs than in those eligible for full-dose NOACs (2.70% vs. 1.60% and 4.35% vs. 2.87%, respectively). Effects of reduced-dose NOACs compared with warfarin in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs on stroke or systemic embolism [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.03)] and on major bleeding [RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.97)] were consistent with those of full-dose NOACs relative to warfarin in those eligible for full-dose NOACs [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for stroke or systemic embolism and RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70-1.08) for major bleeding; interaction P, 0.89 and 0.26, respectively]. In addition, NOACs were associated with reduced risks of haemorrhagic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, fatal bleeding, and death regardless of patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction (interaction P > 0.05 for each).. Patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs were at elevated risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications when treated with anticoagulants. NOACs, when appropriately dose-adjusted, had an improved benefit-harm profile compared with warfarin. Our findings highlight the importance of prescribing reduced-dose NOACs for indicated patient populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa; Heart Diseases; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Edoxaban is the last direct oral anticoagulant marketed for the prevention of stroke among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Areas covered: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of edoxaban 60 mg once daily. After the publication of this study, a great number of substudies and post hoc analyses have been published, together with some observational studies. The aim of this review was to update the current evidence about the use of edoxaban in AF patients. Expert opinion: In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, edoxaban 60 mg was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, but significantly reduced the risk of bleeding, major adverse cardiac events and death from cardiovascular causes. The relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban 60 mg compared with warfarin were independent of different clinical conditions, such as prior stroke, age, risk of falls, renal function, hepatic disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, valvular heart disease, or cancer. Data about the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in real-life patients are scarce, but consistent with those of the pivotal clinical trial. Edoxaban seems a cost-effective alternative to warfarin among AF patients with moderate to high thromboembolic risk.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The characteristics and natural history of acute non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOAC)-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are largely unknown. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to compare baseline ICH volume, haematoma expansion and clinical outcomes between NOAC-ICH versus vitamin K antagonists-ICH (VKA-ICH).. We searched PubMed and conference abstracts for observational studies comparing baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH using an appropriate keyword/MeSH term search strategy. Data were extracted following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The main outcome measures were mortality and unfavourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Score: 4-6) at discharge and at 3 months, as well as ICH volumes and haematoma expansion rates in the two groups. Random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird weights were used for pooled estimates calculation.. Twelve studies including 393 NOAC-ICH and 3482 VKA-ICH were pooled in meta-analysis. There was no difference in mean ICH-volume between the two groups (standard mean difference: -0.24; 95% CI -0.52 to 0.04, p=0.093). The rates of haematoma expansion were comparable in NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH (OR: 0.76; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.19, p=0.236). We did not find any difference between patients with NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH in all-cause mortality at discharge (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.05, p=0.077) and unfavourable functional outcome at discharge (OR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.44, p=0.413). The 3-month outcome was also comparable between the two ICH groups. Moderate-to-substantial statistical heterogeneity was noted.. Our results confirm that ICH volume, haematoma expansion, mortality and functional outcome appear to be similar for NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH. Large prospective cohorts and updated meta-analyses are needed to provide more precise estimates.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hematoma; Humans; Mortality; Odds Ratio; Phenprocoumon; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The introduction of NOACs has put a focus on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The number of patients in Stockholm diagnosed with non-valvular AF increased from 41 008 in 2011 to 51 266 in 2017 and their treatment has been markedly improved. Between 2011 and 2017 total oral anticoagulant treatment increased from 51.6% (warfarin) to 77.3% (31% warfarin, 46.3% NOACs) and aspirin decreased from 31.6% to 7.2%. Treatment was especially improved among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2 and elderly high risk patients. We found an excellent persistence with OAC treatment (88% at 1 year and 83% at 2 years). A comparative effectiveness study showed that NOACs were at least as effective and safe as warfarin even among patients ≥80 years or with previous serious bleeds. After a gradual introduction of NOACs with many educational activities apixaban is now the first-line choice for stroke prevention in AF in Stockholm. Swedish guideline goals are fulfilled and outcomes are improved.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Sweden; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have an elevated incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and are at increased risk for thromboembolic events. However, these patients are also at increased risk for bleeding and it is unclear whether they benefit from an oral anticoagulant. Point prevalent on July 1, 2015, only ~28% of dialysis patients with AF were on oral anticoagulation. Warfarin was the most commonly used oral anticoagulant, followed by apixaban, while dabigatran and rivaroxaban were rarely used. This article reviews the current evidence regarding each oral anticoagulant especially as they relate to patients with ESKD.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are administered in fixed doses without anticoagulant monitoring. Randomized trials show that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective as and safer than dose-adjusted warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses indicate that plasma drug levels or anticoagulant activity of the NOACs predict stroke and bleeding. This review examines the historical basis for anticoagulant monitoring, discusses methods to measure and interpret drug levels, and critically assesses the role of routine laboratory monitoring in the management of NOAC therapy.. The predictable anticoagulant response of NOACs has provided the pharmacological basis for their administration in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Although it is possible to accurately measure NOAC drug levels, within-patient variability complicates interpretation of these results. Furthermore, patient characteristics, such as age and renal function, confound the association between NOAC drug levels and clinical outcomes. Information is lacking on the optimal drug level in particular patient groups (eg, elderly, the renally impaired, and those with high bleeding risk), the appropriate dose adjustment to achieve expected levels, and whether routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment will improve clinical outcomes. A benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment over current standard-of-care metrics without such monitoring remains unproven.. Robust evidence from patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to NOACs or warfarin demonstrates that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective and safe as monitored warfarin, with lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage and reduced mortality. Further research is required to determine whether routine laboratory monitoring might provide a net benefit for patients. Until such data are available, clinicians should continue to prescribe NOACs in fixed doses without routine monitoring.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to compensate for the demerits of warfarin. In Japan, three factor Xa inhibitors are used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE): edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Despite problems, such as the inability to monitor their effect and the lack of an antidote, these inhibitors have the same efficacy as conventional treatment with warfarin, and they are associated with a significantly high degree of safety in relation to hemorrhagic complications. East Asians, including Japanese, suffer from hemorrhage more frequently; therefore, DOACs are considered to be highly effective. Although there is no evidence to date, DOACs may be effective in a wide variety of ways, including the possibility that they prevent recurrence over the long term, reduce the length of hospitalization, allow treatment to be started on an outpatient basis, and be effective in cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Japan; Neoplasms; Outpatients; Platelet Count; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Age appropriateness of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is uncertain.. To review oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in older (age >65 years) people and to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs based on efficacy, safety and tolerability using the Fit-fOR-The-Aged (FORTA) classification.. We performed a structured comprehensive review of controlled clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics to assess study and total patient numbers, quality of major outcome data and data of geriatric relevance. The resulting evidence was discussed in a round table with an interdisciplinary panel of ten European experts. Decisions on age appropriateness were made using a Delphi process.. For the eight drugs included, 380 citations were identified. The primary outcome results were reported in 32 clinical trials with explicit and relevant data on older people. Though over 24,000 patients aged >75/80 years were studied for warfarin, data on geriatric syndromes were rare (two studies reporting on frailty/falls/mental status) and missing for all other compounds. Apixaban was rated FORTA-A (highly beneficial). Other non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (including low/high-intensity dabigatran and high-intensity edoxaban) and warfarin were assigned to FORTA-B (beneficial). Phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol and fluindione were rated FORTA-C (questionable), mainly reflecting the absence of data.. All non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin were classified as beneficial or very beneficial in older persons (FORTA-A or -B), underlining the overall positive assessment of the risk/benefit ratio for these drugs. For other vitamin-K antagonists regionally used in Europe, the lack of evidence should challenge current practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Consensus; Dabigatran; Delphi Technique; Europe; Evidence-Based Practice; Female; Humans; Long-Term Care; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Renal impairment increases risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have varied dependence on renal elimination, magnifying the importance of appropriate patient selection, dosing, and periodic kidney function monitoring. In randomized controlled trials of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs were at least as effective and associated with less bleeding compared with warfarin. Each direct oral anticoagulant was associated with reduced risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding compared with warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Renal function decrease appears less impacted by DOACs, which are associated with a better risk-benefit profile than warfarin in patients with decreasing renal function over time. Limited data address the risk-benefit profile of DOACs in patients with severe impairment or on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmaceutical Research; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The goal of this study was to compare the relative efficacy and safety of different types of interventions for stroke prevention in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted with a random effects model of Bayesian framework using Stata version 12.0. Odds ratios (ORs) and their credible intervals (CrIs) were applied for the efficacy and safety evaluation of various medical interventions, including aspirin, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, warfarin, and apixaban. In addition, the ranking of probability of every clinical outcome was estimated by comparing the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.. Compared with dabigatran, both edoxaban and aspirin + warfarin exhibited a higher rate of all-cause stroke (OR, 2.84 [95% CrI, 1.17-6.97]; OR, 3.42 [95% CrI, 1.20-9.84]). With respect to intracranial hemorrhage, aspirin + clopidogrel yielded worse outcomes than 7 treatments, including placebo, apixaban, aspirin, aspirin + dipyridamole, cilostazol, clopidogrel, and dabigatran (OR, 2.21 [95% CrI, 1.45-3.40]; OR, 2.11 [95% CrI, 1.05-4.17]; OR, 1.53 [95% CrI, 1.11-2.15]; OR, 1.78 [95% CrI, 1.01-3.03]; OR, 4.17 [95% CrI, 1.37-14.28]; OR, 1.85 [95% CrI, 1.22-2.86]; and OR, 2.56 [95% CrI, 1.37-4.76]). In terms of ischemic stroke, dabigatran provided better efficacy than placebo, aspirin, and aspirin + dipyridamole (OR, 0.36 [95% CrI, 0.18-0.72]; OR, 0.43 [95% CrI, 0.21-0.84]; and OR, 0.41 [95% CrI, 0.17-0.94]). As for mortality, dabigatran resulted in a lower mortality compared with aspirin, aspirin + clopidogrel, edoxaban, and warfarin (OR, 0.48 [95% CrI, 0.23-0.97]; OR, 0.40 [95% CrI, 0.17-0.92]; OR, 0.27 [95% CrI, 0.10-0.72]; and OR, 0.52 [95% CrI, 0.28-0.92]).. There are still some limitations to our NMA research. For instance, the lack of direct evidence for some therapies resulted in inconsistencies, particularly for warfarin compared with placebo and clopidogrel under different end points. Moreover, the included randomized controlled trials for patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are relatively broad, involving atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and large-artery atherosclerosis stroke. Although further research is needed, dabigatran is highly recommended based on the present NAM for the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases due to the drug's efficacy and safety.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Bayes Theorem; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Dipyridamole; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To conduct a systematic review of real-world (RWD) studies comparing the risk of major bleeding (MB) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin.. MEDLINE, Embase, NHS-EED, and EconLit were searched for RWD studies published between January 2003 and November 2016 comparing MB risk among DOACs and warfarin. Proceedings of clinical conferences from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed.. A total of 4218 citations were identified, 26 of which met eligibility criteria. Most studies were retrospective analyses of administrative claims databases and patient registries (n = 23 of 26); about half were based in the United States (n = 15). Apixaban showed a significantly lower risk of MB versus warfarin in all eight included studies. MB risk was either significantly lower (n = 9 of 16) or not significantly different (n = 7 of 16) between dabigatran and warfarin; there was no significant difference between rivaroxaban and warfarin in all seven included studies. The risk was significantly lower with apixaban versus rivaroxaban (n = 7 of 7) but not significantly different from dabigatran (n = 6 of 7). MB risk was significantly lower (n = 3 of 4) or not significantly different (n = 1 of 4) with dabigatran versus rivaroxaban. No evidence was identified for edoxaban.. DOACs were associated with similar or lower risks of MB versus warfarin. A lower MB risk was consistently observed for apixaban, but less consistently for dabigatran; MB risk was similar between rivaroxaban and warfarin. Among DOACs, the risk of MB with apixaban was consistently lower than with rivaroxaban, but similar to dabigatran.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Antithrombotic therapy using new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been generally shown to have a favorable risk-benefit profile. Since there has been dispute about the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), we sought to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis using Bayesian inference to analyze the risks of GIB and ICH in AF patients taking NOACs.. We analyzed data from 20 randomized controlled trials of 91 671 AF patients receiving anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, or placebo. Bayesian network meta-analysis of two different evidence networks was performed using a binomial likelihood model, based on a network in which different agents (and doses) were treated as separate nodes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were modeled using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.. Indirect comparisons with the Bayesian model confirmed that aspirin+clopidogrel significantly increased the risk of GIB in AF patients compared to the placebo (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01-0.92). Warfarin was identified as greatly increasing the risk of ICH compared to edoxaban 30 mg (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.22-7.24) and dabigatran 110 mg (OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.10-8.45). We further ranked the NOACs for the lowest risk of GIB (apixaban 5 mg) and ICH (apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, and edoxaban 30 mg).. Bayesian network meta-analysis of treatment of non-valvular AF patients with anticoagulants suggested that NOACs do not increase risks of GIB and/or ICH, compared to each other.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Thiazoles; Warfarin

It is unclear if the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants differs compared with warfarin.. To characterize the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken in an academic medical setting. MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published up until August 2016. This search was supplemented by manual bibliography searches of identified trials and other review articles.. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were phase 3 randomized clinical trials, enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, compared a novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) with warfarin, and recorded event data on intraocular bleeding. Data on intraocular bleeding were pooled using inverse-variance, weighted, fixed-effects meta-analysis.. The PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing quality. Independent extraction was performed by 2 investigators.. Intraocular bleeding events and associated risk ratio for novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. Twelve trials investigating 102 627 patients were included. Randomization to novel oral anticoagulants was associated with a 22% relative reduction in intraocular bleeding compared with warfarin (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). There was no significant heterogeneity observed (I2 = 4.8%, P = .40). Comparably lower risks of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants were seen in subgroup analyses, with no significant difference according to the indication for anticoagulation (P for heterogeneity = .49) or the novel oral anticoagulant type (P for heterogeneity = .15). Summary estimates did not differ materially when random-effects meta-analytic techniques were used.. These results suggest that novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of intraocular bleeding by approximately one-fifth compared with warfarin. Similar benefits were seen in both patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Our data have particular relevance for patients at higher risk of spontaneous retinal and subretinal bleeding. These findings may also have important implications in the perioperative period, in which the use of novel oral anticoagulants may be superior. Future studies are required to better characterize the optimal management of patients with both ophthalmic disease and cardiovascular comorbidities requiring anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Eye Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a common arrhythmia. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin and the DOACs dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban. The primary focus is on primary evidence from clinical trials, indirect comparison studies and real-world studies. While there are gaps in the literature, the evidence thus far indicates that rivaroxaban is superior to warfarin and similar to dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, although rivaroxaban may be associated with an elevated bleeding risk compared with other DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Epidemiologic Methods; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are available for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF): dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor); and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (factor Xa inhibitors). This article summarizes the safety and efficacy of DOACs for the prevention of stroke in elderly NVAF patients.. PubMed was searched to identify published results of randomized, controlled trials evaluating DOACs for stroke prevention in elderly NVAF patients. Pharmacologic and dose recommendations were obtained from the package inserts.. DOACs are at least as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with NVAF. Compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage, while some DOACs demonstrated an increase in other bleeding events (e.g., gastrointestinal). The faster onset and offset of action and fewer food and drug interactions of DOACs may be an advantage over warfarin for some patients.. DOACs are an alternative to warfarin with overall equivalent safety and efficacy in elderly patients with NVAF, and may be preferable for some. Stroke risk must always be balanced against potential bleeding risk when determining an optimal anticoagulation treatment plan. Patients' needs and preferences will also impact this decision.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

For more than half a century, warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, has been the anticoagulant of choice. However, direct oral anticoagulants are rapidly gaining in popularity, which poses the need for efficacious reversal agents. This review article summarizes the strategies and agents used to reverse oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

After arthroplasty treatment, some complications commonly occur, such as early revision, infection/dislocation, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aims to use a network meta-analysis to compare effects of 9 anticoagulant drugs (edoxaban, dabigatan, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, heparin, bemiparin, ximelagatran, and enoxaparin) in preventing postoperative complications in arthroplasty patients.. After retrieving PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database from the inception to November 2016, randomized controlled trials were enrolled. The integration of direct and indirect evidences was performed to calculate odd ratios and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves. Nineteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included.. The network meta-analysis results showed that compared with warfarin, edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had a lower incidence rate in asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis, which indicated that edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had better effects on prevention. Similarly, in comparison to enoxaparin, edoxaban and rivaroxaban had better effect; rivaroxaban was better than ximelagatran in preventive effects. Compared with apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatan, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin had a higher incidence rate in clinically relevant non-major bleeding, which showed that preventive effects were relatively poor. In addition, the results of the surface under the cumulative ranking curves showed that rivaroxaban and bemiparin worked best on symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. In terms of bleeding, apixaban and warfarin had better preventive effects.. Our findings suggested that rivaroxaban may work better in terms of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, whereas apixaban had better preventive effects in bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), which is more prevalent among CKD patients than the general population. AF causes stroke or systemic embolism, leading to increased mortality. The conventional antithrombotic prophylaxis agent warfarin is often prescribed for the prevention of stroke, but risk of bleeding necessitates regular therapeutic monitoring. Recently developed direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are expected to be useful as alternatives to warfarin.. To assess the efficacy and safety of DOAC including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin among AF patients with CKD.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register (up to 1 August 2017) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors or factor Xa inhibitors) with dose-adjusted warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events in non-valvular AF patients with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) or eGFR between 15 and 60 mL/min (CKD stage G3 and G4).. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between anticoagulant therapy and all strokes and systemic embolic events as the primary efficacy outcome and major bleeding events as the primary safety outcome. Confidence in the evidence was assessing using GRADE.. Our review included 12,545 AF participants with CKD from five studies. All participants were randomised to either DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) or dose-adjusted warfarin. Four studies used a central, interactive, automated response system for allocation concealment while the other did not specify concealment methods. Four studies were blinded while the other was partially open-label. However, given that all studies involved blinded evaluation of outcome events, we considered the risk of bias to be low. We were unable to create funnel plots due to the small number of studies, thwarting assessment of publication bias. Study duration ranged from 1.8 to 2.8 years. The large majority of participants included in this study were CKD stage G3 (12,155), and a small number were stage G4 (390). Of 12,545 participants from five studies, a total of 321 cases (2.56%) of the primary efficacy outcome occurred per year. Further, of 12,521 participants from five studies, a total of 617 cases (4.93%) of the primary safety outcome occurred per year. DOAC appeared to probably reduce the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism events (5 studies, 12,545 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence) and to slightly reduce the incidence of major bleeding events (5 studies, 12,521 participants: RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; low certainty evidence) in comparison with warfarin.. Our findings indicate that DOAC are as likely as warfarin to prevent all strokes and systemic embolic events without increasing risk of major bleeding events among AF patients with kidney impairment. These findings should encourage physicians to prescribe DOAC in AF patients with CKD without fear of bleeding. The major limitation is that the results of this study chiefly reflect CKD stage G3. Application of the results to CKD stage G4 patients requires additional investigation. Furthermore, we could not assess CKD stage G5 patients. Future reviews should assess participants at more advanced CKD stages. Additionally, we could not conduct detailed analyses of subgroups and sensitivity analyses due to lack of data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Enzalutamide, a novel, oral androgen receptor antagonist used for the treatment of metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, has been shown to improve overall and progression-free survival, prolong time to initiation of chemotherapy, reduce skeletal-related events, and carry a favorable adverse effect profile. Metastatic prostate cancer is a disease of older men, a population with an increased incidence of medical comorbidities warranting anticoagulation. Prostate cancer itself, along with some of its therapies, is also prothrombotic. Enzalutamide interacts with several anticoagulants through various mechanisms, making their concurrent use clinically challenging. As such, complex decisions about anticoagulation in these patients are frequently encountered by treating physicians. In this review, we describe the potential interactions between enzalutamide and various anticoagulants, and suggest management paradigms based on the current body of knowledge for patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and mechanical heart valves.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ranks the most prevailing type of cardiac rhythm disorder and AF patients are associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke compared to others. This study is designed to assess the relative efficacy of several clinical events prevention anticoagulants in patients with AF. Conventional pairwise meta-analysis was performed with fixed-effect model initially, then network meta-analysis was performed with random-effects model within results illustrated by cumulative odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI). The rank probabilities of each treatment outcomes were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We conducted a systematic review and collected key clinical data from 37 studies with respect to 5 anticoagulant treatments for AF. Patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban are associated with a reduced risk of stroke compared to those treated with warfarin (OR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.53 to 0.88; OR 0.68, 95% CrI 0.48 to 0.91). Rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.712) appears to be the most preferable one with respect to vascular events, and both apixaban (SUCRA = 0.720) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.678) are preferable to others with respect to stroke. Dabigatran outperforms others with respect to the outcome of mortality (SUCRA = 0.695), hemorrhage events (SUCRA = 0.747), and myocardial infarction (SUCRA = 0.620). In conclusion, dabigatran has a noticeable and comprehensive advantage compared to others with respect to preventing several complications including hemorrhage events, myocardial infarction, and mortality. In addition, apixaban may be the best choice of preventing stroke, and rivaroxaban is more preferable to others with respect to preventing vascular events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of edoxaban for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are reviewed.. Although warfarin has been an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF and VTE, the need for agents with less monitoring requirements, fewer food and drug interactions, and a lower risk of major bleeding led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Current DOACs work by either directly blocking thrombin (dabigatran) or inhibiting factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Edoxaban is the newest DOAC and only the second Food and Drug Administration-approved anticoagulant for once-daily administration. Unlike apixaban and rivaroxaban, edoxaban does not interact with the cytochrome P-450 system. The results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Hokusai-VTE trials demonstrated edoxaban's noninferiority to warfarin. However, the adverse-effect profile of edoxaban may limit the drug's use in clinical practice; in clinical trials, patients with AF who had a creatinine clearance of ≥95 mL/min had a higher rate of strokes with the use of edoxaban versus warfarin.. A review of the literature showed that edoxaban, the most recently approved DOAC, is noninferior to warfarin for management of VTE (after parenteral anticoagulant therapy) and for stroke risk reduction in many patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban is the fourth non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant now available for clinical use in the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) and in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), after the completion of large-scale randomized comparative clinical trials with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Edoxaban has some peculiar pharmacological properties and outcome data. Here a group of experts in AF and VTE answers a set of questions on its practical use, trying to define the profile of patients that would be most appropriate for its use.

Topics: Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Humans; Medication Therapy Management; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for stroke prevention in many patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is the newest entrant in this class. Results of the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE AF) study demonstrate that edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events, and is associated with significantly less major bleeding, including intracranial bleeding, and reduced cardiovascular mortality. With a net clinical benefit over warfarin, edoxaban is well positioned as a choice among the NOACs, which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. But how will clinicians choose amongst them? The purpose of this paper is to (a) place the ENGAGE AF trial results into context with results of the studies with the other NOACs, and (b) aid clinicians in selection of the right anticoagulant for the right atrial fibrillation patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The novel oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are becoming more common in clinical practice for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The availability of several agents with similar efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in NVAF patients offers more selection, but at the same time requires certain knowledge to make a good choice. This comparative analysis provides an appraisal of the respective clinical trials and highlights much of what remains unknown about four FDA-approved agents: dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban. It details how the DOACs compare to warfarin and to one another summarizes pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic properties, and drug interactions from the stand point of practical consequences of these findings. Common misconceptions and reservations are addressed. The practical application of this data is intended to help choosing the most appropriate agent for individual NVAF patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; beta-Alanine; Clinical Decision-Making; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and the Watchman device represent an alternative to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, no studies compare these new treatments. We performed a network meta-analysis to indirectly compare Watchman and NOACs among AF patients.. We performed a MEDLINE search for studies comparing warfarin with NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) or Watchman in AF patients with reported clinical outcomes. Mixed treatment comparison model generation was performed to directly and indirectly compare NOACs, warfarin and Watchman.. 14 studies with 246,005 patients were included in the analysis, among which 124,823 were treated with warfarin, 120,450 were treated with NOACs and 732 had Watchman implanted. Mean age was 72 ± 9 years, 53% were male, and mean CHADS2 score was 2.1 ± 1.6. Both NOACs and Watchman were superior to warfarin in hemorrhagic stroke prevention (OR = 0.46 [0.30-0.82] and OR = 0.21 [0.05-0.99], respectively). NOACs significantly reduced total stroke (OR = 0.78 [0.58-0.96]) and major bleeding (OR = 0.78 [0.65-0.91]) compared with warfarin. Indirect comparison between NOAC and Watchman revealed no significant differences in outcomes, though there was a trend toward higher rates of ischemic stroke with Watchman compared with NOAC (OR 2.60 [0.60-13.96]) with the opposite findings with hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 0.44 [0.09-2.14]).. NOAC therapy was superior to warfarin for multiple outcomes while Watchman reduced hemorrhagic stroke. Further studies are needed to assess Watchman versus NOAC to optimize therapy for stroke prevention in AF patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Defibrillators, Implantable; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Benefits and/or harms (including costs) of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin therapy need appreciation in relative and absolute terms.. Accordingly, we derived clinically relevant relative and absolute benefit/harm parameters for NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) compared to warfarin from four clinical trials involving atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. For each trial, we tabulated patient numbers enduring four important outcomes and calculated unadjusted relative risk reduction (RRR) and number needed to treat (NNT)/year values (and 95% confidence intervals) for the NAOC compared to warfarin. These outcomes were as follows: stroke/systemic embolism (primary endpoint), hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeds, and death. We also addressed drug acquisition costs.. Each NOAC was noninferior to warfarin for primary-outcome prevention; RRRs were 12-33% and NNT/year values were 182-481, and all but one indicated statistically significant superiority. All the NOACs yielded statistically significant reductions in hemorrhagic stroke risk; RRRs were 42-74% and NNT/year values were 364-528. Major bleeding risk was comparable in both groups. Apixaban yielded a lower NNT/year for preventing death than for primary-outcome prevention. Compared to warfarin, NOAC acquisition costs were 70- to 140-fold greater.. For the primary outcome, the absolute benefits of NOACs were modest (NNT/year values being large). Reduced hemorrhagic stroke rates with NOACs could be due to superior embolic infarct prevention and fewer consequential hemorrhagic transformations. Among apixaban recipients, the absolute mortality benefit exceeded that for the primary outcome, indicating prevention of additional unrelated deaths. The substantially greater NOAC acquisition costs need viewing against probable greater safety and the avoidance of monitoring bleeding risks.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and the associated risk of stroke are emerging epidemics throughout the world. Suboptimal use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention has been widely reported from observational studies. In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for thromboprophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate current practices of anticoagulation in AF, pharmacologic features and adoption patterns of DOACs, their impacts on proportion of eligible patients with AF who receive oral anticoagulants, persisting challenges and future prospects for optimal anticoagulation.. In conducting this review, we considered the results of relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies from real-world practice settings. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus (RIS), Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science were used to source relevant literature. There were no date limitations, while language was limited to English. Selection was limited to articles from peer reviewed journals and related to our topic.. Most studies identified in this review indicated suboptimal use of anticoagulants is a persisting challenge despite the availability of DOACs. Underuse of oral anticoagulants is apparent particularly in patients with a high risk of stroke. DOAC adoption trends are quite variable, with slow integration into clinical practice reported in most countries; there has been limited impact to date on prescribing practice.. Available data from clinical practice suggest that suboptimal oral anticoagulant use in patients with AF and poor compliance with guidelines still remain commonplace despite transition to a new era of anticoagulation featuring DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Medication Errors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Worldwide, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is among the leading causes of death from cardiovascular disease, surpassed only by acute myocardial infarction and stroke. The spectrum of VTE presentations ranges, by degree of severity, from deep vein thrombosis to acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Treatment is based on full anticoagulation of the patients. For many decades, it has been known that anticoagulation directly affects the mortality associated with VTE. Until the beginning of this century, anticoagulant therapy was based on the use of unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists, warfarin in particular. Over the past decades, new classes of anticoagulants have been developed, such as factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors, which significantly changed the therapeutic arsenal against VTE, due to their efficacy and safety when compared with the conventional treatment. The focus of this review was on evaluating the role of these new anticoagulants in this clinical context.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device.. A network meta-analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow-up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All-cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow-up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29-0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22-0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20-0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26-0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18-0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16-0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all-cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68-0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57-0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44-0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25-0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80-0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82-0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82-0.96]) reduced risk of all-cause death as compared to VKA.. The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. As a group, NOACs significantly reduce stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with warfarin. All NOACs are dependent on the kidney for elimination, such that patients with creatinine clearance <25 ml/min were excluded from all the pivotal phase 3 NOAC trials. It therefore remains unclear how or if NOACs should be prescribed to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and those on dialysis. The authors review the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) and those on dialysis. The authors frame the evidence in terms of risk versus benefit to bring greater clarity to NOAC-related major bleeding and efficacy at preventing stroke specifically in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common cardiac source of emboli in cardioembolic stroke which occupies from 1/4 to 1/3 of acute brain infarction in Japan. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been used widely because they are easy to use, their effect in preventing ischemic stroke is higher than or as high as warfarin, their incidence of major hemorrhage is lower than or as low as warfarin, and their incidence of intracranial hemorrhage is much lower than warfarin. However, there seem several issues to address regarding NOAC treatment, such as reversal of anticoagulation, antidotes, monitoring of anticoagulation, rt-PA treatment for acute stroke patients treated with NOACs. In this review, current strategies and issues of anticoagulation for prevention of stroke in NVAF are discussed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) by a meta-analysis.. AF is quite prevalent in patients with HF.. Four phase III clinical trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF were included. Each patient was defined as affected by HF according to the criteria of the trial in which the patient was enrolled. Pre-specified outcomes were the composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE); major, intracranial, and any bleeding; and cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause death.. A total of 55,011 patients were enrolled, 26,384 (48%) with HF, and 28,627 (52%) without HF; 27,518 receiving NOACs and 27,493 receiving warfarin (median, 70 years of age; 36% females; follow-up: 1.5 to 2.8 years). Rates of SSE (relative risk [RR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.07]; p = 0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.03; p = 0.21) were comparable in patients with and without HF. HF patients had reduced rates of any (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.01) and intracranial (RR: 0.74 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.88; p < 0.01) bleeding but increased rates of all-cause (RR: 1.70 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.19; p < 0.01) and CV death (RR: 2.05 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.55; p < 0.01). NOACs, compared with warfarin significantly reduced SSE and major, intracranial, and any bleeding, regardless of the presence or absence of HF (p. Patients with AF and HF had increased mortality but reduced rates of intracranial and any bleeding compared with the no-HF patients, with no differences in rates of SSE and major bleeding. NOACs significantly reduced SSE, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in HF patients. No interactions in efficacy and safety of NOACs were observed between AF patients with and without HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

As a class, the target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) are at least as effective as warfarin, often with superior safety for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prevention of recurrent VTE. Currently, dabigatran, the direct thrombin inhibitor, along with rivaroxaban and apixaban, direct factor Xa inhibitors, has been approved in multiple countries for these indications. Edoxaban, which has received approval for the abovementioned indications in Japan, has demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to or better than warfarin in Phase III clinical trials and is under further regulatory consideration. It is anticipated that the use of TSOACs will increase as practitioners and healthcare systems gain familiarity with these drugs and adopt their use into clinical practice. This review will provide a brief overview of the TSOAC Phase III clinical trials for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with AF and the Phase III clinical trials for the prevention of recurrent VTE, discuss current treatment guidelines, address how TSOACs may help meet national safety goals, and provide clinical decision-making guidance regarding the use of TSOACs for hospitalists.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hospitalists; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The target-specific oral anticoagulants are a class of agents that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. They are effective and safe compared to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, and they are comparable to low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty. For other indications, however, such as the prevention of stroke in patients with mechanical heart valves, initial studies have been unfavorable for the newer agents, leaving warfarin the anticoagulant of choice. Further studies are needed before the target-specific anticoagulants can be recommended for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Concerns also persist about difficulties with the laboratory assessment of anticoagulant effect and the lack of a specific reversal agent. For these reasons, we anticipate that the vitamin K antagonists will continue to be important anticoagulants for years to come.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants represent an alternative to standard therapy with vitamin K antagonists but data regarding gastrointestinal bleeding are still unclear.. To investigate if new oral anticoagulants are associated with an enhanced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Meta-analysis of phase three randomized controlled trials to compare the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients treated with new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) vs warfarin.. Four studies including 71,302 patients were selected. Compared with warfarin, new oral anticoagulants significantly increased gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 1.23; 95% CI 1.03-1.46; p=0.01). Rivaroxaban (RR: 1.46; 95% CI 1.2-1.8; p<0.001) and high dosages of edoxaban (RR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.47; p=0.038) and dabigatran (RR: 1.50; 95% CI 1.20-1.88; p<0.001) significantly increased gastrointestinal bleeding while a null effect was detected with apixaban.. This meta-analysis suggests that rivaroxaban and high dosages of dabigatran and edoxaban should be avoided in patients at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for many indications. These agents include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. All 4 agents are licensed in the United States for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism and rivaroxaban and apixaban are approved for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty. The NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin, but are not only more convenient to administer because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring but also are safer because they are associated with less intracranial bleeding. As part of a theme series on the NOACs, this article (1) compares the pharmacological profiles of the NOACs with that of warfarin, (2) identifies the doses of the NOACs for each approved indication, (3) provides an overview of the completed phase III trials with the NOACs, (4) briefly discusses the ongoing studies with the NOACs for new indications, (5) reviews the emerging real-world data with the NOACs, and (6) highlights the potential opportunities for the NOACs and identifies the remaining challenges.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), manifesting as either deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, is common worldwide including in Japan. The number of patients clinically diagnosed with VTE is increasing with the majority of cases occurring out-of-hospital and of milder severity. Cancer is the largest risk factor for VTE and VTE in cancer patients confers an increased 1-year mortality rate. However, the majority of VTE cases are considered "idiopathic" or "unprovoked." The limited efficacies of unfractionated heparin and warfarin have stimulated the development of new anticoagulant therapies. Recently, parenteral and oral administration of the Xa inhibitors fondaparinux and edoxaban, respectively, was approved in Japan. These agents have the potential to provide safer and more efficacious treatment options for VTE. Although further randomized studies are required to validate the utility of these agents, they are expected to substantially improve quality of life in VTE patients. This review summarizes the current status of VTE management in Japan focusing on current epidemiology and recent advances in anticoagulant therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Humans; Japan; Polysaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a potential alternative to warfarin for preventing thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. However, the efficacy and safety, and the optimal regimen of edoxaban are still controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and the effects of different edoxaban dosages.. A systematic search for randomized controlled trials comparing edoxaban with warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The main measures and outcomes included efficacy end points (thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality) and safety end points (all bleeding events, major bleeding events, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and minor bleeding).. Four studies including 23,001 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolism (risk ratio [RR] = 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], .88-1.13; Z = .01; P = .99). In safety analyses, edoxaban was superior to warfarin in terms of major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and minor bleeding (all P <.00001). In terms of optimal dosing, 30 mg/day edoxaban had a significantly lower risk of all bleeding (RR = .79; 95% CI, .75-.83; Z = 9.07; P <.00001) than 60 mg/day, but was inferior at preventing stroke and systemic embolism (RR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.51; Z = 3.56; P = .0004).. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in terms of efficacy and superior to warfarin in terms of safety. The benefits of edoxaban were related to the dose; efficacy was better at 60 mg/day, but there was lower risk of bleeding at 30 mg/day.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

No pooled analysis has been undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin in the subgroup of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), including edoxaban data from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from inception to April 2015. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software.. Four RCTs were included: 19 122 of 32 512 AF patients with HF were allocated to a NOAC (13 384 receiving single-/high-dose NOAC regimens), and 13 390 to warfarin. Among AF patients with HF, single/high-dose NOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke/systemic embolic (SE) events by 14% [odds ratio0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.98), and had a 24% lower risk of major bleeding(OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86). For low-dose NOAC regimens, comparable efficacy to warfarin for stroke or SE events (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.21) and a non-significant trend for lower major bleeding was observed. Regardless of high- or low-dose NOAC, the incidences of both major bleeding and stroke/SE in AF patients with HF were similar to those without HF. Atrial fibrillation patients with HF on NOACs had a 41% lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage compared with those without HF (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87).. Among AF patients with HF, single-/high-dose NOAC regimens have a better efficacy and safety profile, but low-dose regimens had similar efficacy and safety to warfarin. NOACs were similarly effective or even safer (less intracranial haemorrhage) in AF patients with HF compared with those without HF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Adjustment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban (Lixiana(®)) is a new direct oral anticoagulant recently approved in the EU for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and one or more risk factors. In the large, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, oral edoxaban dosages of 30 and 60 mg once daily for a median treatment duration of 907 days in patients with moderate-to-high-risk nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were noninferior to warfarin for the incidence of first stroke or SEE. Both high-dose and low-dose edoxaban were associated with significantly lower rates than warfarin of major bleeding, including intracranial haemorrhage, and death from cardiovascular causes. Edoxaban has a rapid onset of action, a short half-life, few drug interactions and offers the convenience of oral, once-daily, fixed-dose administration, without the need for coagulation monitoring and without regard to food. Therefore, edoxaban is an effective and well tolerated therapeutic option in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation is central to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and at least one additional stroke risk factor. For decades, the vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin) remained the only oral anticoagulant available for stroke prevention in AF. The non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are now available, and these drugs include the direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. The latter class includes edoxaban, which has recently been approved for stroke prevention in AF by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. In line with other NOACs, edoxaban avoids the many limitations of warfarin associated with variability of anticoagulation effect and multiple food and drug interactions.. In this review, the currently available evidence on edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF is discussed. The pharmacology, efficacy and safety, and current aspects of use of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF for stroke and thromboembolism prevention are reviewed.. Phase III trials on edoxaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF confirms non-inferiority of edoxaban compared to well-managed warfarin both in terms of efficacy and safety. Currently ongoing and future trials as well as real-world data are warranted to confirm its effectiveness and safety for chronic anticoagulation and improve evidence in other areas which are lacking evidence where NOAC use remains controversial.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Risk; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

During the past four years the phase III trials on stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation and on treatment of venous thromboembolism have been completed for four new oral anticoagulants - dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The studies have revealed advantages in terms of a reduced risk of bleeding, most importantly of intracranial bleeding. These anticoagulants also have favourable pharmacokinetics, eliminating the need for routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. There are, however, some differences between the drugs in certain subsets of patients, according to patient characteristics or to indication for treatment. These features are reviewed here. The management of patients in association with invasive procedures or major bleeding is also discussed. Finally, a strategy of how to select patients for warfarin or the new anticoagulants and thereafter possibly also among the latter is outlined.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the standard therapy for anticoagulation in prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). Due to numerous limitations of VKAs, target-specific oral anticoagulants have been developed. Edoxaban is a direct activated factor X inhibitor with attractive features among which are once daily dosing, no need for routine monitoring, and minimal drug-drug interactions. In patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, edoxaban was superior to enoxaparin in preventing VTE. Furthermore, a recent large-scale phase III trial in patients with symptomatic VTE demonstrated that edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing recurrent VTE and reduced bleeding. In the largest trial of anticoagulation in patients with AF to date, edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and reduced bleeding and cardiovascular mortality. This review provides an overview of the pharmacology, clinical trial results, and potential indications for edoxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) occurred in 2.93 per 10,000 cases and mortality of PTE was 14% in Japan according to the surveillance of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists from 2009 to 2011. Anesthesiologists have to evaluate perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk carefully and take adequate measures to prevent PTE. The first step is the assessment of the preoperative probability of VTE and the next step is the assessment of the risk for VTE during and after operation. If a patient has moderate probability of VTE preoperatively, diagnostic procedures are recommended. If the d-dimer is positive, whole-leg ultrasound is recommended. If DVT is positive in proximal vein, further investigation or anticoagulant therapy are considered. Primary preventions of VTE during and after surgeries are as follows. In patients with low or moderate risks for VTE, intermittent pneumatic compression is recommended. In patients with high risks for VTE, pharmacologic prophylaxes are recommended. In recent years newly developed anticoagulants can be available other than low-dose unfractionated heparin. However, the incidence of VTE in Japanese populations is different from western countries. Moreover our own evidence has not fully been accumulated yet. Therefore further investigations for prevention of perioperative VTE in Japan are expected for our own new guidelines.

Topics: Anesthesia, Epidural; Anticoagulants; Biomarkers; Diagnostic Imaging; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heparin; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Warfarin has remained the mainstay of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for the past 60 years. Recently, two new groups of novel oral anticoagulants- direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) have shown promising results in well conducted clinical trials in terms of efficacy, safety and convenience of usage. However, in real world practice these novel agents come with their share of side effects and drawbacks which the prescribing physician must be aware about. In this review we discuss the role of these novel agents in real world clinical practice - their advantages, disadvantages and future directions.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Discovery; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation are among the most common cardiovascular disorders in the United States. For over 50 years, the standard of care has been anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. However, the numerous limitations of vitamin K antagonists led to the development of target-specific oral anticoagulants. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This article compares the basic pharmacologic properties of these anticoagulants, reviews the data supporting their use, and discusses practical clinical issues including measurement of the anticoagulation effect, reversal strategies, and management of patients prior to surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Until about 4 years ago, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulant approved in the United States, and switching between oral anticoagulants has become an option since the emergence of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. What are the reasons one may switch between the agents and how is this done? Discussed in this article are the 4 agents approved in the United States, their characteristics, reasons one may switch, and methods for conversion. After a thorough search of original trial data and recent expert review articles, we have summarized the most recent recommendations below and briefly discuss upcoming oral anticoagulants that show promise.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; United States; Warfarin

For the last decades vitamin K antagonists have been the most effective anticoagulant treatment of atrial fibrillation. New molecules are being designed, mainly due to the great amount of disadvantages in the management of conventional anticoagulation. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban will soon be available as an alternative to warfarin/acenocumarol. All of them have demonstrated to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, with even dabigatran 150 mg bid and apixaban being superior. They have also a lower risk of bleeding, especially regarding severe/fatal and intracranial hemorrhages. This is a real revolution. The advance of these new anticoagulants will be limited only by the higher cost, and will progressively become the protagonists of oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To review novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) trials in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the possible use of risk-stratification tools to guide their use in practice.. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant journal articles published from January 1982 to February 2013. Additional references were obtained from articles extracted during the database search.. NOACs have been developed to optimize VTE management and overcome the limitations of heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The AMPLIFY and EINSTEIN trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively, investigated single-drug management of VTE, whereas the edoxaban Hokusai-VTE trial and dabigatran RE-COVER and RE-COVER II trials investigated the use of NOACs with a heparin lead-in. The AMPLIFY and Hokusai-VTE trials are ongoing but the EINSTEIN and RE-COVER trials have demonstrated that rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively, are non-inferior to parenteral anticoagulants and warfarin in the management of VTE. Differences in study design complicate the application of study results to clinical practice. There are multiple validated DVT protocols that effectively and safely treat patients in outpatient settings. The pulmonary embolism (PE) severity index (PESI), simplified PESI (sPESI), and other prognostic tools have been used to risk stratify patients with PE by estimating mortality risk to guide outpatient eligibility.. NOACs provide physicians with new therapeutic options in the management of VTE. While heparin and VKAs compose the current standard treatment for VTE, their use will likely disappear as physicians grow comfortable with the adoption of NOACs. As studies have not clearly defined the efficacy of these agents in certain patient populations, further data in special patient populations and risk stratification through the use of VTE severity scores could potentially be adapted to guide anticoagulant management and outpatient treatment eligibility.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor X; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Stroke is the most feared complication among patients with atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has been the gold standard for stroke prevention for the past 60 years. However, VKA therapy has many downsides, including risk for bleeding, a narrow therapeutic window, and the need for frequent monitoring, as well as numerous diet and lifestyle considerations that make its use cumbersome. Thus, development of new drugs that can preserve the benefits of VKAs while eliminating the negative aspects of VKA therapy has been enthusiastically sought. This article reviews the anticoagulant agents that are clinically available or under development as alternatives to VKAs for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants, acting either as direct factor-Xa or thrombin inhibitors, have been evaluated for the acute and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are as effective as conventional therapy (heparin/vitamin K antagonists) without safety concerns. Rivaroxaban allows a single-drug regimen even in patients with pulmonary embolism, while dabigatran requires 5-7 days of initial heparin treatment. The results of clinical trials with apixaban and edoxaban will become available in the coming months. Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran are more effective than placebo for the extended treatment of VTE. Apixaban is effective in both therapeutic and prophylactic doses. Considering both efficacy and bleeding complications, all these agents have a favorable net clinical benefit. Dabigatran is as effective and safe as warfarin for the extended treatment of VTE. It is conceivable that the new oral anticoagulants will become the standard therapy for VTE in the next years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulants can complicate the approach to the management of patients undergoing operative interventions. We review new anticoagulants that have been introduced recently to the market or that are undergoing investigations for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixiban, and edoxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in the risk of stroke. Warfarin has been the cornerstone of treatment to reduce stroke risk in AF patients for decades. Although effective in preventing thrombosis, warfarin is difficult to manage and is associated with a 1% to 7% yearly risk of major hemorrhage. Until recently, there were no effective oral alternatives to warfarin. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved in 2010 for the reduction of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF, and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was approved for a similar indication in 2011. Other late-stage orally administered agents that may be approved for this indication include apixaban and edoxaban; others at earlier stages of development will be discussed in this review as well. Nonpharmacological approaches to stroke prevention include left atrial appendage removal, ligation, or occlusion. This review examines advances in the management of stroke risk in AF patients, focusing on recently marketed and late-stage modalities. The advent of alternatives to warfarin for reducing stroke risk in AF patients may improve physicians' ability to offer safe and effective stroke prevention in all AF patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin Proteins; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Chemoprevention; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

As the population ages, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to rise. The most feared complication of this common cardiac arrhythmia is cardioembolic stroke. Strokes related to AF are associated with greater morbidity and mortality than ischemic strokes of most other etiologies and impose a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems around the world. Until recently, warfarin was the sole anticoagulant proven effective for stroke prevention patients with AF at elevated risk, but its narrow therapeutic margin and variable dose response limited clinical utility. The emergence of new anticoagulants that offer equal or superior efficacy, greater safety and the convenience of fixed oral dosing may make warfarin the less preferred option. This review provides an update on recent advancements in antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

The standard effective treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism includes unfractionated and low-molecular weight heparin as well as warfarin, which have major disadvantages. In recent years, new anticoagulants have been developed in an attempt to overcome the known limitations of established treatment and develop improved therapies. This chapter reviews pharmacological properties of the new anticoagulants, the most recent trials assessing their safety and efficacy as well as potential advantages and disadvantages of using these novel drugs in real life.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Warfarin has been the effective treatment in the prophylaxis of cardioembolism, in particular in patients with atrial fibrillation, for more than 50 years. Nevertheless, many patients with atrial fibrillation are not currently treated because of the numerous limits of oral anticoagulation and in those treated the quality of anticoagulation is often poor. Novel oral anticoagulant drugs, the direct thrombin antagonist dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban are more predictable and convenient anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin, mainly because of the non-requirement of regular laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. Current data from phase III clinical trials are available for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, which show to be at least noninferior in efficacy to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. This review focuses on the potential of novel anticoagulants to replace warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Also the place in therapy and the potential limitations of the new agents in clinical practice represent important issues to be considered. The promise of new oral anticoagulants gives us the hope that warfarin will finally be replaced in a near future, but more importantly that anticoagulant undertreatment of atrial fibrillation will be partially overcome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Prevention of stroke and systemic emboli is paramount in the management of atrial fibrillation. Although warfarin is the predominant anticoagulant used in patients with atrial fibrillation, it has significant limitations that have impeded appropriate use of stroke prophylaxis in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation. Consequently, much research has been focused on finding an alternative to warfarin. We review the potential alternatives in development and evaluate the current evidence concerning their safety and efficacy.. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors are potentially well tolerated and effective replacements for warfarin. These agents do not require cofactors and offer selective inhibition at a critical step of amplification in the coagulation cascade. Multiple direct anti-factor Xa agents are currently undergoing evaluation in phase I, II, and III trials. Early results suggest that these novel anticoagulants have favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with minimal-to-no requirements for therapeutic monitoring. Two direct factor Xa inhibitors are emerging from phase II trials (betrixaban and YM150) and three are being evaluated in phase III trials (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation. The phase III trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban have completed enrollment and are in the follow-up phase.. Given the growing population of patients with atrial fibrillation, there is a great interest in finding new therapies for oral anticoagulation. The direct factor Xa inhibitors may offer several promising alternatives to warfarin therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation could not be currently stopped even after successful thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation for at least 2 months. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes between a new oral anticoagulant and warfarin after thoracoscopic ablation. This trial was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study comparing edoxaban and warfarin in patients undergoing thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. This study enrolled 60 patients randomly assigned into 2 groups. The primary endpoint was efficacy outcomes, including stroke and systemic thromboembolic events. The secondary endpoint was safety outcomes including major bleeding and pericarditis. The patients were evaluated at discharge, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. No stroke and thromboembolic events were noted in both treatment groups during the follow-up period. During the 6 months follow-up period, 4 (13%) of 30 patients in the edoxaban group experienced minor bleeding events, whereas none were noted in the warfarin group. Five anticoagulation-related events (bleeding, and prolongation of international normalized ratio), including pericarditis, were noted in both the edoxaban and warfarin groups. No statistically significant difference existed between the 2 groups. In conclusion, this study showed the comparable results of edoxaban to warfarin during the window period of post-thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. Moreover, anticoagulation-related events were rather affected by patient factors and not by the anticoagulant type.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pericarditis; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is the ratio between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts measured in peripheral blood. NLR is easily calculable based on a routine blood test available worldwide and may reflect systemic inflammation. However, the relationship between NLR and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not well-described.. We calculated NLR at baseline in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, a randomized trial comparing edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with AF followed for 2.8 years (median). The association of baseline NLR with major bleeding events, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiovascular death, stroke/systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality were calculated.. The median baseline NLR in 19,697 patients was 2.53 (interquartile range 1.89-3.41). NLR was associated with major bleeding events (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.41-1.80), stroke/systemic embolism (HR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44), MI (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.41-2.12), MACE (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.56-1.84), CV (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.74-2.13) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.83-2.18). The relationships between NLR and outcomes remained significant after adjustment for risk factors. Edoxaban consistently reduced major bleeding. MACE, and CV death across NLR groups vs. warfarin.. NLR represents a widely available, simple, arithmetic calculation that could be immediately and automatically reported during a white blood cell differential measurement to identify patients with AF at increased risk of bleeding, CV events, and mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Early warfarin anticoagulation is recommended in patients undergoing surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. It is unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be a full alternative to warfarin. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in patients early after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.. The Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients after Heart Valve Repair or Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement study was a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, clinical trial conducted from December 2017 to September 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (60 mg or 30 mg once daily) or warfarin for the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical thromboembolic events, or asymptomatic intracardiac thrombosis. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding.. Of 220 participants, 218 (109 per group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 4 patients (3.7%) taking warfarin and none taking edoxaban (risk difference, -0.0367; 95% confidence interval, -0.0720 to -0.0014; P < .001 for noninferiority). The primary safety outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.9%) taking warfarin and 3 patients (2.8%) taking edoxaban (risk difference, 0.0183; 95% confidence interval, -0.0172 to 0.0539; P = .013 for noninferiority).. Edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing thromboembolism and is potentially comparable for risk of major bleeding during the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban 60 mg is approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) not fulfilling any dose-reduction criteria. As edoxaban is partially renally cleared (≈50%), this study compared pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban 60 mg once daily with edoxaban 75 mg once daily in patients with AF with high renal clearance (creatinine clearance > 100 mL/min) over 12 months. Primary PK and pharmacodynamics end points were plasma edoxaban exposure and anti-factor Xa (FXa) concentration. A population PK model estimated edoxaban exposure at steady state. Efficacy and safety outcomes included composites of stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Of 607 patients, 303 and 304 were randomized to edoxaban 60 and 75 mg, respectively. Edoxaban 75 mg provided ≈25% higher exposure than 60 mg. This increase was accurately depicted in the population PK model; anti-factor Xa concentration correlated with edoxaban exposure. Rates of composite and individual outcomes were similarly low between doses. In conclusion, the 25% increase in edoxaban dose (60-75 mg) resulted in ≈25% exposure increase in the 75-mg group. Higher exposure was not associated with reduced stroke risk in patients with AF with high renal clearance.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher rates of stroke and bleeding. Both higher dose edoxaban (60/30 mg) and lower dose edoxaban (30/15 mg) were non-inferior to warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and significantly reduced major bleeding in AF patients in the global study to assess the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban vs standard practice of dosing with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial. Whether the efficacy and safety of these dosing strategies vs. warfarin are consistent in patients with AF and PAD has not been described.. Of 21 105 patients with AF randomized to warfarin, edoxaban 60/30 mg, or edoxaban 30/15 mg, 841 were identified with PAD. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), SSE, and major bleeding. Patients with PAD had higher risk of MACEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.57, P = 0.001] and cardiovascular (CV) death (HRadj 1.49, 95% CI 1.21-1.83, P < 0.001) than those without PAD, but not major bleeding. The efficacy of edoxaban 60/30 mg vs. warfarin was consistent regardless of PAD (SSE HR; PAD 1.16, 95% CI 0.42-3.20; no-PAD 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.02, P-interaction 0.57) as was major bleeding (PAD 0.96, 95% CI 0.54-1.70; no-PAD 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, P-interaction 0.54). Edoxaban 30/15 mg was inferior for SSE, with significant heterogeneity when stratified by PAD status (P-interaction 0.039).. Patients with AF and PAD are at heightened risk of MACEs and CV death vs. those without PAD. The efficacy and safety of edoxaban 60/30 mg vs. warfarin in AF are consistent regardless of PAD; however, edoxaban 30/15 mg is inferior for stroke prevention in AF patients with PAD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

To compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs warfarin in high-risk subgroups.. While underuse of anticoagulation in high-risk patients with AF remains common, substitution of effective and safer alternatives to warfarin, such as edoxaban, represents an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Weight; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Long-term use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is necessary for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The effectiveness and safety of OACs in extremely older patients (ie, aged 80 years or older) with AF and at high risk of bleeding needs to be elucidated.. To examine the effects of very low-dose edoxaban (15 mg) vs placebo across 3 age strata (80-84 years, 85-89 years, and ≥90 years) among patients with AF who were a part of the Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients (ELDERCARE-AF) trial.. This prespecified subanalysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted from August 5, 2016, to December 27, 2019. Patients with AF aged 80 years or older who were not considered candidates for standard-dose OACs were included in the study; reasons these patients could not take standard-dose OACs included low creatinine clearance (<30 mL per minute), low body weight (≤45 kg), history of bleeding from critical organs, continuous use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or concomitant use of antiplatelet drugs. Eligible patients were recruited randomly from 164 hospitals in Japan and were randomly assigned 1:1 to edoxaban or placebo.. Edoxaban (15 mg once daily) or placebo.. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety end point was International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis-defined major bleeding.. A total of 984 patients (mean [SD] age: age group 80-84 years, 82.2 [1.4] years; age group 85-89 years, 86.8 [1.4] years; age group ≥90 years, 92.3 [2.1] years; 565 women [57.4%]) were included in this study. In the placebo group, estimated (SE) event rates for stroke or systemic embolism increased with age and were 3.9% (1.2%) per patient-year in the group aged 80 to 84 years (n = 181), 7.3% (1.7%) per patient-year in the group aged 85 to 89 years (n = 184), and 10.1% (2.5%) per patient-year in the group aged 90 years or older (n = 127). A 15-mg dose of edoxaban consistently decreased the event rates for stroke or systemic embolism with no interaction with age (80-84 years, hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.31; P = .13; 85-89 years, HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.99; P = .05; ≥90 years, HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.68; P = .008; interaction P = .65). Major bleeding and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were numerically higher with edoxaban, but the differences did not reach statistical significance, and there was no interaction with age. There was no difference in the event rate for all-cause death between the edoxaban and placebo groups in all age strata.. Results of this subanalysis of the ELDERCARE-AF randomized clinical trial revealed that among Japanese patients aged 80 years or older with AF who were not considered candidates for standard OACs, a once-daily 15-mg dose of edoxaban was superior to placebo in preventing stroke or systemic embolism consistently across all 3 age strata, including those aged 90 years or older, albeit with a higher but nonstatistically significant incidence of bleeding.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02801669.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is endorsed by guidelines to improve care of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether the benefit of ABC pathway-concordant care is consistent across anticoagulants remains unclear. We assessed the association between ABC-concordant care and outcomes in this post hoc analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, which was reported prior to the initial description of the ABC pathway.. Patients were retrospectively classified as receiving ABC-concordant care based on optimal anticoagulation, adequate rate control, management of co-morbidities and lifestyle measures. Associations between ABC-concordance and outcomes were assessed with adjustment for components of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. Of 20 926 patients, 7915 (37.8%) satisfied criteria of ABC-concordant care, which was associated with significantly lower incidence of stroke or systemic embolic event [stroke/SEE: hazard ratio (HRadj): 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.63], major bleeding (HRadj 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58-0.75), major adverse cardiac events (HRadj 0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.58), primary net clinical outcome (composite of stroke/SEE, major bleeding or death; HRadj 0.61; 95% CI: 0.56-0.65), cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization (HRadj 0.78; 95% CI: 0.74-0.83), CV death (HRadj 0.52; 95% CI: 0.46-0.58), and all-cause mortality (HRadj 0.56; 95% CI: 0.51-0.62), P < 0.001 for each. These associations were qualitatively consistent for both edoxaban and warfarin and across patient subgroups.. Atrial fibrillation Better Care pathway-concordant care is associated with reductions across multiple CV endpoints and all-cause mortality, with benefit in edoxaban- and warfarin-treated patients and across patient subgroups. Increasing implementation of ABC-concordant care may improve clinical outcomes of patients with AF irrespective of anticoagulant.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Pathways; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background We investigated the predictors related to major bleeding events during treatment with edoxaban 15 mg in patients aged ≥80 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk, for whom standard oral anticoagulants are inappropriate, focusing on standard laboratory tests related to bleeding. Methods and Results This was a prespecified subanalysis of the on-treatment analysis set of the ELDERCARE-AF (Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients) trial. Major bleeding was the primary safety end point. The event rates were calculated according to prespecified characteristics at baseline. A total of 984 Japanese patients were randomly assigned to edoxaban 15 mg or placebo (n=492, each). During the study period, 20 and 11 major bleeding events occurred in the edoxaban and placebo groups, respectively. The adjusted analysis revealed that hemoglobin <12.3 g/dL (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.57 [95% CI, 1.10-11.55]) and prothrombin time ≥12.7 seconds; (aHR, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.05-8.02]) independently predicted major bleeding, while creatinine clearance <30 mL/min showed a tendency towards an increase in major bleeding (aHR, 2.68; 95% CI, 0.96-7.46). In patients treated with edoxaban lacking these 3 risk factors, no major bleeding occurred; major bleeding event rates increased with each risk factor. Patients with 3 risk factors were significantly more likely to have a major bleeding event at 11.05%/year (HR, 7.15 [95% CI, 1.92-26.71]). Conclusions In elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with high bleeding risk, baseline hemoglobin <12.3 g/dL, prothrombin time ≥12.7 seconds, and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min may predict major bleeding during treatment with edoxaban 15 mg. Registration URL: ELDERCARE-AF https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique number: NCT02801669.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of prior pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), caused by incomplete clot dissolution after PE. In patients with CTEPH, lifelong anticoagulation is mandatory to prevent recurrence of PE and secondary in situ thrombus formation. Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is commonly used for anticoagulation in CTEPH based on historical experience and evidence. The anticoagulant activity of warfarin is affected by food and drug interactions, requiring regular monitoring of prothrombin time. The lability of anticoagulant effect often results in haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. Thus, lifelong warfarin is a handicap in terms of safety and convenience. Currently, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in CTEPH has increased with the advent of four DOACs. The safety of DOACs is superior to warfarin, with less intracranial bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Edoxaban, the latest DOAC, also has proven efficacy and safety for those diseases in two large clinical trials; the ENGAGE-AF trial and HOKUSAI-VTE trial. The present trial seeks to evaluate whether edoxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in preventing worsening of CTEPH.. The KABUKI trial (is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, warfarin-controlled, non-inferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin (vitamin K Antagonist) in subjects with chronic thromBoembolic pUlmonary hypertension taking warfarin (vitamin K antagonIst) at baseline) is designed to prove the non-inferiority of edoxaban to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with CTEPH.. This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, including positive, negative and inconclusive results.. NCT04730037.. This paper was written per the study protocol V.4.0, dated 29 January 2021.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a known risk of oral anticoagulation; delineating ICH attributes may provide nuanced guidance regarding atrial fibrillation management. We evaluated ICH characteristics and outcomes from Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48), a randomized trial that compared two edoxaban regimens (higher-dose edoxaban regimen 60/30 mg (HDER), lower-dose edoxaban regimen 30/15 mg (LDER)) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients who suffered ICH vs those who did not were compared and independent predictors of ICH were calculated. We also assessed ICH subtype and etiology. Of 21,105 randomized patients, 322 (1.53%) had ≥ 1 ICH for a total of 368 events. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (HDER: HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.35-0.77], LDER: HR 0.22 [0.13-0.38]) and subdural hematoma (HDER: HR 0.29 [0.15-0.55], LDER: HR 0.26 [0.13-0.50]) were lower with both HDER and LDER vs warfarin. Subarachnoid hemorrhage frequency was similar in the HDER vs warfarin groups but lower in LDER. Compared to warfarin, edoxaban was associated with lower risk of spontaneous ICH (HDER: HR 0.47 [0.31-0.69], LDER: HR 0.34 [0.22-0.53]) and traumatic ICH (HDER: HR 0.32 [0.17-0.61], LDER: HR 0.31 [0.16-0.59]). In multivariable analysis, randomization to warfarin, increased age, and risk of falling remained independent predictors of ICH. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, ICH was decreased in edoxaban-treated patients compared to warfarin-treated patients, including ICH of both spontaneous and traumatic causes. Both edoxaban regimens lowered intraparenchymal and subdural hemorrhages compared to warfarin. Patient characteristics and medical history may help guide anticoagulation management.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

In ENSURE-AF study, edoxaban had similar efficacy and safety profile versus enoxaparin-warfarin (enox-warf) in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus enox-warf in patients who were vitamin K antagonists (VKA) naïve or experienced at time of randomisation into ENSURE-AF trial.. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death during the overall study period, 28 days on study drug after cardioversion and 30 days follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding during the on-medication period from time of first dose to last dose of study drug taken + 3 days.. Of 2199 patients enrolled in ENSURE-AF, 1095 were randomised to edoxaban and 1104 to enox-warf. There were numerically fewer primary efficacy endpoint events with edoxaban than enox-warf irrespective of whether VKA experienced or naïve (0.5% vs. 0.9%, 0.3% vs. 1.4%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the primary safety endpoint [odds ratio (OR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-6.81 in anticoagulant experienced patients, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.15-3.60 in anticoagulant naïve patients] and in major bleeding rates regardless of treatment or VKA experience (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.06-6.04, OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.01-9.25, respectively).. Edoxaban had comparable efficacy and safety to optimized anticoagulation with enox-warf. The primary efficacy and safety endpoint outcomes were broadly similar between VKA experienced or naïve patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In ENSURE-AF (NCT02072434), the oral Factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban showed similar efficacy and safety vs enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This ancillary analysis compares primary efficacy and safety end points for patients receiving vs not receiving concomitant antiplatelet therapy (APT) in ENSURE-AF.. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic events, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death during 28 days on study drug after cardioversion plus 30 days of follow-up. The primary safety end point was the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurring between the first and the last dose of study drug.. Of 2199 patients enrolled, 1095 were randomized to edoxaban and 1104 to enoxaparin-warfarin. Patients receiving concomitant APT were older; more naïve to vitamin K antagonist; had lower creatinine clearance; and more likely to have history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, or ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack. In patients receiving vs not receiving concomitant APT, primary efficacy event rate was numerically higher (0.92% vs 0.60%, p = 0.64) and primary safety event rate was significantly higher (3.21% vs 0.92%, p = 0.0096). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified age and APT as covariates correlated with bleeding. There was a trend toward increased bleeding risk in elderly patients receiving vs not receiving concomitant APT.. In ENSURE-AF, thromboembolic events were rare and absolute bleeding event rates were higher with concomitant APT. These findings may be relevant for AF-patients considered for dual therapy; even for a short treatment duration of 1 month.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in older people with frailty and is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Whilst oral anticoagulation is associated with a reduction in this risk, there is a lack of data on the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in people with frailty. This study aims to report clinical outcomes of patients with AF in the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial by frailty status.. Post hoc analysis of 20,867 participants in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, representing 98.8% of those randomised. This double-blinded double-dummy trial compared two once-daily regimens of edoxaban (a DOAC) with warfarin. Participants were categorised as fit, living with pre-frailty, mild-moderate, or severe frailty according to a standardised index, based upon the cumulative deficit model. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism and the safety endpoint was major bleeding.. A fifth (19.6%) of the study population had frailty (fit: n = 4459, pre-frailty: n = 12,326, mild-moderate frailty: n = 3722, severe frailty: n = 360). On average over the follow-up period, the risk of stroke or systemic embolism increased by 37% (adjusted HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58) and major bleeding by 42% (adjusted HR 1.42, 1.27-1.59) for each 0.1 increase in the frailty index (four additional health deficits). Edoxaban was associated with similar efficacy to warfarin in every frailty category, and a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin in all but those living with severe frailty.. Edoxaban was similarly efficacious to warfarin across the frailty spectrum and was associated with lower rates of bleeding except in those with severe frailty. Overall, with increasing frailty, there was an increase in stroke and bleeding risk. There is a need for high-quality, frailty-specific population randomised control trials to guide therapy in this vulnerable population.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00781391 . First registered on 28 October 2008.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Frailty; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

ENSURE-AF (NCT02072434) was the largest prospective randomized clinical trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (AF), which also provides the largest prospective dataset for transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to cardioversion. This ancillary analysis investigated determinants of TOE-detected left atrium thrombi (LAT) in patients scheduled for electrical cardioversion (ECV).. The ENSURE-AF multicentre PROBE evaluation trial compared edoxaban 60 mg once daily (QD) with enoxaparin/warfarin in 2199 subjects undergoing ECV of non-valvular AF. Patients were stratified by the use of TOE, anticoagulant experience, and selected edoxaban dose. Electrical cardioversion was cancelled or deferred when TOEdetected LAT. In total, 1183 subjects were stratified to the TOE arm and LAT was reported in 91 (8.2%). In univariate analysis, age ≥75 years (26.4% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.0308), lower weight (86.5 ± 15.0 vs. 90.7 ± 18.0 kg, P = 0.0309), lower creatinine clearance (80.1 ± 30.6 vs. 93.2 ± 33.9 mL/min, P = 0.0007), heart failure (59.3% vs. 43.0%, P = 0.0029), and diuretic treatment (53.9% vs. 40.1%, P = 0.0141) were more prevalent in the LAT group. Non-significant trends were seen for higher mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (3.0 ± 1.41 vs. 2.7 ± 1.48, P = 0.0571) and more prevalent anticoagulation use prior to enrolment (60.4% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.0795) in the LAT group. In logistic regression analysis, age (P = 0.0202) and heart failure (P = 0.0064) were independently associated with LAT.. Elective ECV is commonly cancelled or deferred due to TOE-detected LAT in patients with non-valvular AF. Age ≥75 years and heart failure were associated with the presence of LAT.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Atria; Heart Diseases; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Numerous scales exist for the classification of major bleeding events. Limited data compare the most commonly used bleeding scales within a single at-risk cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation. Here, we analyze bleeding outcomes according to the ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis), TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction), GUSTO (Global Usage of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries), and BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) bleeding scales in the ENGAGE AF (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation)-TIMI 48 trial (NCT00781391) of edoxaban versus warfarin.. A total of 10 311 bleeding events were reported. In a comparison of the most severe events in each scale, ISTH major bleeding was the most common (n=1289), followed by TIMI major (n=548), GUSTO severe/life-threatening (n=347), and BARC 3c+5 (n=276) bleeding. Lower bleeding risk with edoxaban compared with warfarin was seen regardless of bleeding scale (higher-dose edoxaban regimen range: hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.35-0.62] for BARC 3c+5 versus HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71-0.91] for ISTH major; lower-dose edoxaban regimen range: HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.23-0.45] for BARC 3c+5 versus HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55] for ISTH major). Furthermore, a gradient of more pronounced risk reduction with edoxaban was observed with greater severity of first bleeding event (higher-dose edoxaban regimen: HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.35-0.62] for BARC 3c+5 bleeds versus HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.91] for any BARC bleed; lower-dose edoxaban regimen: HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.23-0.45] for BARC 3c+5 bleeds versus HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.63-0.72] for any BARC bleed). The direction of this trend was consistent for both gastrointestinal bleeding and nongastrointestinal bleeding.. Among patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke, there was a >4-fold difference in the frequency of the most severe bleeding events across commonly used bleeding scales. Furthermore, the relative safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin tended to increase with greater severity of bleeding.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The relative efficacy and safety profile of the oral Factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and established coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been analyzed.. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, two edoxaban regimens were compared with warfarin in 21,105 patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS. The reduction in ischemic events with the higher-dose edoxaban regimen versus warfarin was greater in patients with CAD, while bleeding was significantly reduced with edoxaban regardless of CAD status. The efficacy and safety profile of the lower-dose edoxaban regimen relative to warfarin was unaffected by CAD status.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantations and generator changes are frequently performed in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. In an exploratory analysis, we investigated the outcome of patients undergoing such device procedures in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.. During the trial, 1217 device procedures were performed in 1145 patients, with intervention dates available for 1203 procedures. Two hundred and twenty-five procedures (in 212 patients) were performed >30 days after study drug was stopped and are not included in the event analysis. For most interventions (n = 728, 74%), study drug was interrupted >3 days (median for the entire cohort: 5 days, interquartile range 0-11 days); 250 interventions were performed with ≤3 days study drug interruption. During the first 30 days after the procedure, six strokes/systemic embolic events (SEEs) (three each in the lower-dose edoxaban and warfarin arm) and one major bleeding event (in the lower-dose edoxaban arm) occurred; no stroke/SEEs or major bleeds occurred around the 295 device procedures in the higher-dose edoxaban arm. Two ischaemic and one major bleeding event occurred after the 288 device procedures performed with ≤3 days periprocedural interruption of study drug.. In this first experience of patients undergoing device surgery with edoxaban, a low risk of ischaemic and bleeding events was observed during the first 30 days post-procedure. Our data are in line with current recommendations of no or only brief interruption of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants prior to cardiac device surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Defibrillators, Implantable; Device Removal; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pacemaker, Artificial; Prosthesis Implantation; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Prior studies suggested that the risks of ischaemic stroke and bleeding in patients of Asian race with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be higher than that of non-Asians. In the analysis of ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, we compared clinical outcomes, edoxaban concentration, and anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) activity, between Asian and non-Asian races.. There were 2909 patients of Asian race and 18 195 non-Asian race in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. The risks of thromboembolism and bleeding events were compared for Asians and non-Asians treated with warfarin. The trough levels of edoxaban concentration and anti-FXa activity were also compared and correlated with the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs. warfarin. Compared to non-Asian patients, the Asian population was on average 2 years younger and 20 kg lighter. In the warfarin group, the adjusted risk of ischaemic stroke did not differ significantly for patients of Asian and non-Asian race [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.12, P = 0.56). Asians treated with warfarin had a higher-adjusted risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH: aHR 1.71, P = 0.03) compared with non-Asians. The trough edoxaban concentration and anti-FXa activity were 20-25% lower for Asians compared with non-Asians. Compared to warfarin, higher dose edoxaban significantly reduced ICH while preserving the efficacy of stroke prevention in both Asians and non-Asians. Two of three net clinical outcomes appeared to be more favourably reduced with edoxaban in Asians compared with non-Asians (Pint = 0.063 for primary, 0.037 for secondary, and 0.032 for third net clinical outcomes, respectively).. Compared to warfarin, higher dose edoxaban preserved the efficacy for stroke prevention and was associated with a favourable safety profile for Asians, which may be due to the lower trough edoxaban concentration and anti-FXa activity achieved in patients of Asian race.

Topics: Aged; American Indian or Alaska Native; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Black People; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; White People

To investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with AF were randomized to warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) or edoxaban. The cohort (N = 21 028) included patients across BMI categories (kg/m2): underweight (<18.5) in 0.8%, normal (18.5 to <25) in 21.4%, overweight (25 to <30) in 37.6%, moderately obese (30 to <35) in 24.8%, severely obese (35 to <40) in 10.0%, and very severely obese (≥40) in 5.5%. In an adjusted analysis, higher BMI (continuous, per 5 kg/m2 increase) was significantly and independently associated with lower risks of stroke/systemic embolic event (SEE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, P = 0.0001], ischaemic stroke/SEE (HR 0.87, P < 0.0001), and death (HR 0.91, P < 0.0001), but with increased risks of major (HR 1.06, P = 0.025) and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 1.05, P = 0.0007). There was a significant interaction between sex and increasing BMI category, with lower risk of ischaemic stroke/SEE in males and increased risk of bleeding in women. Trough edoxaban concentration and anti-Factor Xa activity were similar across BMI groups >18.5 kg/m2, while time in therapeutic range for warfarin improved significantly as BMI increased (P < 0.0001). The effects of edoxaban vs. warfarin on stroke/SEE, major bleeding, and net clinical outcome were similar across BMI groups.. An increased BMI was independently associated with a lower risk of stroke/SEE, better survival, but increased risk of bleeding. The efficacy and safety profiles of edoxaban were similar across BMI categories ranging from 18.5 to >40.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Comorbidity; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Overweight; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Remission, Spontaneous; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Hypertension is a risk factor for both stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Data are sparse regarding the interaction between blood pressure and the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), 19,679 patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertension were categorized according to average systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The primary efficacy and safety end points were the time to the first stroke or systemic embolic event and the time to the first International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding event, respectively. Risk was calculated using Cox proportional hazards models based on average SBP and DBP and adjusting for 18 clinical characteristics. The efficacy and safety of a higher dose edoxaban regimen (60/30 mg) versus warfarin were evaluated with stratification by average SBP and DBP. Stroke/systemic embolic event occurred significantly more frequently in patients with elevated average SBP (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.50-2.70 for SBP ≥150 mm Hg relative to 130-139 mm Hg) or DBP (hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.76-3.16 for DBP ≥90 mm Hg relative to 75-<85 mm Hg). The higher dose edoxaban regimen reduced stroke/systemic embolic event across the full range of SBP (P

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Logistic Models; Male; Patient Safety; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who interrupt anticoagulation are at high risk of thromboembolism and death.. Interruption of study drug was frequent in patients with AF and was associated with a substantial risk of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events over the ensuing 30 days. This risk was particularly high in patients who interrupted as a result of an adverse event; these patients deserve close monitoring and resumption of anticoagulation as soon as it is safe to do so.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at an approximately 0.5% to 3% increased risk of thromboembolism during and immediately after catheter ablation. Treatment guidelines recommend periprocedural oral anticoagulation plus unfractionated heparin during ablation. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are the only non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for which there are randomized controlled trials assessing uninterrupted anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is noninferior vs warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism with less major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular AF. The ELIMINATE-AF (Evaluation of Edoxaban Compared With VKA in Subjects Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a multinational, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, blinded-endpoint evaluation (PROBE) study to assess the safety and efficacy of once-daily edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for a dose reduction) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing catheter ablation (http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02942576). A total of 560 patients are planned for randomization to edoxaban or VKA (2:1 ratio) to obtain 450 patients fully compliant with the protocol. Patients will complete 21 to 28 days of anticoagulation prior to the ablation and a 90-day post-ablation period. The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, and major bleeding. The primary safety endpoint is major bleeding. A magnetic resonance imaging substudy will assess the incidence of silent cerebral lesions post-ablation. ELIMINATE-AF will define the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during catheter ablation of AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Catheter Ablation; Clinical Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Peri-operative management of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. To gain information on the peri-operative management of edoxaban, we compared outcomes in patients on warfarin or edoxaban enrolled in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 who underwent a surgery or invasive procedure.. Data from patients undergoing their first surgery/procedure were analysed and results compared by anticoagulant (warfarin vs. higher- or lower-dose edoxaban regimen [HDER and LDER, respectively]). Patients were classified by procedural management: anticoagulant interrupted (last dose 4-10 days pre-procedure) or anticoagulant continued (last dose ≤ 3 days pre-procedure). Stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding (MB), MB or clinically relevant non-MB (CRNMB) and death were assessed from 7 days pre- until 30 days post-procedure. The chi-square test was used to compare outcomes across treatment groups.. In patients requiring surgery/procedure in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, peri-operative rates of SSE, MB and death were not significantly different in patients who received edoxaban or warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

To investigate the characteristics and outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding in women receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial comparing edoxaban with warfarin for acute symptomatic VTE.. Women below 50 years receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of VTE.. We collected data on diagnostic measures, treatment, and clinical outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding events.. Occurrence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) abnormal vaginal bleeding events.. In all, 628 women aged under 50 years were treated with edoxaban and 665 with warfarin. The rate of abnormal vaginal bleeding was 15/100 person-years (py) (95% CI 11-19) in women receiving edoxaban and 9/100 py (95% CI 6-12) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5). Major abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in eight (1.3%) women on edoxaban and in three (0.9%) women receiving warfarin [odds ratio (OR) 2.8; 95% CI 0.8-10.8], and CRNM abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in 53 (8.4%) women treated with edoxaban and in 37 (5.6%) on warfarin therapy (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4). Over 85% of all vaginal bleeds were characterised by heavy menstrual bleeding. Major bleeds frequently required treatment, and in more than 75% of patients anticoagulant therapy was adjusted. The severity of clinical presentation and course of major and CRNM bleeds was mild in most patients.. Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin. Reassuringly, most events could be managed conservatively and had a mild outcome.. Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Hemorrhage; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The EdoxabaN vs. warfarin in subjectS UndeRgoing cardiovErsion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF) (NCT02072434) study was a multicentre prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint evaluation (PROBE) trial comparing edoxaban with enoxaparin/warfarin followed by warfarin alone in 2199 non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients undergoing electrical cardioversion and showed comparable rates of bleeding and thromboembolism between treatments. This prespecified ancillary analysis investigated the impact of edoxaban therapy on treatment satisfaction and utilization of healthcare services.. The Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q2) was completed by study patients on Day 28 post-cardioversion. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. Healthcare resource utilizations were collected from randomization to Day 28 post-cardioversion. Data from patients who received at least one dose of study drugs were analysed. Patients treated with edoxaban were more satisfied than enoxaparin/warfarin in both PACT-Q treatment satisfaction and convenience scores (P < 0.001 for both). Differences in treatment satisfaction scores were greater in patients who underwent non-transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE)-guided cardioversion than in patients who underwent TOE-guided cardioversion. Edoxaban was associated with fewer clinic visits (4.75 visits vs. 7.60 visits; P < 0.001) and fewer hospital days (3.43 days vs. 5.41 days; P < 0.05). Rates of hospitalizations and emergency room visits were not significantly different. Overall, edoxaban therapy was estimated to reduce healthcare costs by €107.73, €437.92, €336.75, and $246.32 per patient in German, Spanish, Italian, and US settings, respectively.. The convenience of edoxaban therapy over warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion may provide greater treatment satisfaction and cost savings to the healthcare system.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Emergency Service, Hospital; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Costs; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Patient Satisfaction; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Sudden death in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID) is sometimes caused in part by pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has drawn attention as a possible embolic source. Warfarin, which is a conventional therapeutic agent, is not easy to control appropriately, and daily management can be especially difficult in SMID patients. On the other hand, edoxaban tosilate hydrate, which has been newly approved for insurance coverage for the treatment of DVT, is not listed in the Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT-PTE guidelines). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy (warfarin vs. edoxaban) in DVT treatment in SMID patients by means of an open-label, randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint is the incidence of hemorrhagic events during 12 months of follow up.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Intelligence; Japan; Motor Activity; Motor Disorders; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

There is limited information about the use of antithrombotic therapies and outcomes of Latin American (LatAm) subjects with atrial fibrillation. The global ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial compared the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin over a median follow-up of 2.8 years.. The authors aimed to compare adjusted outcomes in Latin America versus outside Latin America and to compare outcomes stratified by anticoagulant treatment and region.. The authors analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes, adjusted for baseline characteristics, the Human Development Index, and randomized treatment of 2,661 LatAm versus 18,444 non-Latin American subjects (nLAS).. After multivariable adjustment, LatAm subjects with atrial fibrillation had higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage and death than nLAS. Outcomes with higher-dose edoxaban versus warfarin were at least as favorable in LatAm subjects as in nLAS, with an even greater reduction in hemorrhagic stroke seen in LatAm.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Latin America; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures are increasingly being performed in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Experience regarding the safety of edoxaban in this context is limited. In an exploratory analysis we therefore investigated the outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter AF ablation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.. During the trial, 193 transcatheter AF ablation procedures were performed in 169 patients. For the majority of ablations (n=157, 81%), study drug was interrupted >3days (median time of interruption: 18days, interquartile range 3-30days); 86 ablations were performed with ≤10days, and 36 ablations with ≤3days study drug interruption. During the first 30days after the ablation, one ischemic stroke was observed in the warfarin group and none in the higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER) or lower-dose edoxaban regimen (LDER) group. Three clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events were observed in the warfarin group; one major bleed was seen in the HDER group; one minor bleed occurred in the LDER group. All bleeding events occurred among the patients with ≤10days study drug interruption; in contrast, no ischemic events or deaths were observed in these patients.. In this pilot evaluation of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, treatment with edoxaban was associated with a low risk of ischemic and bleeding events during the first 30days post ablation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to investigate whether genetic variants can identify patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) at an increased risk of bleeding with warfarin.. Hokusai-venous thromboembolism (Hokusai VTE), a randomised, multinational, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, evaluated the safety and efficacy of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with VTE initially treated with heparin. In this subanalysis of Hokusai VTE, patients genotyped for variants in. The analysis included 47.7% (3956/8292) of the patients in Hokusai VTE. Among 1978 patients randomised to warfarin, 63.0% (1247) were normal responders, 34.1% (675) were sensitive responders and 2.8% (56) were highly sensitive responders. Compared with normal responders, sensitive and highly sensitive responders had heparin therapy discontinued earlier (p<0.001), had a decreased final weekly warfarin dose (p<0.001), spent more time overanticoagulated (p<0.001) and had an increased bleeding risk with warfarin (sensitive responders HR 1.38 [95% CI 1.11 to 1.71], p=0.0035; highly sensitive responders 1.79 [1.09 to 2.99]; p=0.0252).. In this study,. NCT00986154.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Phenotype; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

The impact of different types of extracranial bleeding events on health-related quality of life and health-state utility among patients with atrial fibrillation is not well understood.. The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) Trial compared edoxaban with warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Data from the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, prospectively collected at 3-month intervals for up to 48 months, were used to estimate the impact of different categories of bleeding events on health-state utility over 12 months following the event. Longitudinal mixed-effect models revealed that major gastrointestinal bleeds and major nongastrointestinal bleeds were associated with significant immediate decreases in utility scores (-0.029 [-0.044 to -0.014;. All categories of bleeding events were associated with negative impacts on health-state utility in patients with atrial fibrillation. Major bleeds were associated with relatively large immediate decreases in utility scores that gradually diminished over 12 months; clinically relevant nonmajor and minor bleeds were associated with smaller immediate decreases in utility that persisted over 12 months.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Health Status; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The ENSURE-AF study (NCT 02072434) of anticoagulation for electrical cardioversion in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) showed comparable low rates of bleeding and thromboembolism between the edoxaban and the enoxaparin-warfarin treatment arms. This post hoc analysis investigated the relationship between renal function and clinical outcomes.. ENSURE-AF was a multicenter, PROBE evaluation trial of edoxaban 60 mg, or dose reduced to 30 mg/d for weight≤60 kg, creatinine clearance (CrCl; Cockcroft-Gault) ≤50 mL/min, or concomitant P-glycoprotein inhibitors compared with therapeutically monitored enoxaparin-warfarin in 2,199 NVAF patients undergoing electrical cardioversion. Efficacy and safety outcomes and time in therapeutic range in the warfarin arm were analyzed in relation to CrCl in prespecified ranges ≥15 and ≤30, >30 and ≤50, >50 and <80, and ≥80 mL/min, and an exploratory ≥95-mL/min analysis.. A total of 1,095 subjects were randomized to edoxaban and 1,104 to enoxaparin-warfarin. Mean age was 64.3±10 and 64.2±11 years. Mean time in therapeutic range was progressively lower with reducing CrCl strata, being 66.8% in those with CrCl >30 to ≤50 compared with 71.8% in those with CrCl ≥80. The odds ratios for the primary efficacy and safety end points were comparable for the different predefined renal function strata; given the small numbers, the 95% CI included 1.0. In the subset of those with CrCl ≥95, the odds ratios showed consistency with the other CrCl strata. When CrCl was assessed as a continuous variable, there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding with reducing CrCl levels, with no significant differences between the 2 treatment arms. When we assessed CrCl at baseline compared with end of treatment, there were no significant differences in CrCl change between the edoxaban and enoxaparin-warfarin arms. The proportions with worsening of renal function (defined as a decrease of >20% from baseline) were similar in the 2 treatment arms.. Given the small number of events in ENSURE-AF, no effect of renal (dys)function was demonstrated in comparing edoxaban to enoxaparin-warfarin for cardioversion; efficacy and safety of edoxaban remained consistent even in patients with normal or supranormal renal function.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) facilitate the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the pivotal trials of DOACs have not reported outcomes separately for patients managed either as outpatients or in the hospital. We performed a subgroup analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study comparing efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in 8,292 patients with acute VTE. Patients received initial therapy with open-label enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for ≥5 days in the hospital or as an outpatient at the discretion of the treating physician. Edoxaban or warfarin was then given for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent VTE at 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Of the 5,223 consecutively enrolled patients with recorded hospital status and length of stay, 1,414 patients (27.1%) were managed as outpatients and 3,809 were managed in hospital. Among the outpatients, initial presentation was symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in 1,183 patients (83.7%) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 231 patients (16.3%). Among the outpatients with DVT, recurrent VTE occurred in 18 (3.0%) given edoxaban and in 21 (3.6%) given warfarin (risk difference: −0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.6 to 1.4). The principal safety outcome in outpatients occurred in 46 edoxaban patients (7.7%) and in 48 warfarin patients (8.3%; risk difference: −0.59, 95% CI: −3.7 to 2.5). Most outpatients had symptomatic DVT at presentation. In these patients, initial heparin followed by edoxaban had similar efficacy and safety to standard therapy with heparin and warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban-a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)- 60-mg and 30-mg once-daily dose regimens are noninferior versus well-managed warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) with less major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There are no published data from phase 3 clinical trials specifically evaluating the use of NOACs in elderly NVAF patients, especially those considered ineligible for available oral anticoagulants. The Edoxaban Low-Dose for EldeR CARE AF patients (ELDERCARE-AF) study is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study that will compare the safety and efficacy of once-daily edoxaban 15 mg versus placebo in Japanese patients with NVAF ≥80 years of age who are considered ineligible for standard oral anticoagulant therapy. A total of 800 patients (400 in each treatment group) are planned for randomization (1:1) to either edoxaban or placebo using a stratified randomization method with CHADS

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Pyridines; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The choice between initiating a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be challenging. To assist in this decision, we developed a risk score to identify patients for whom a therapeutic benefit of NOACs over VKA is predicted.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomized clinical trial of edoxaban vs. warfarin in 21 105 patients with AF. Cox proportional hazard models identified factors associated with a serious net clinical outcome (NCO) of disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding, and all-cause mortality in VKA naïve patients from the warfarin arm. These were used to develop an integer risk score. Performance was assessed by C-indices and validation by bootstrapping. Kaplan-Meier analyses were stratified by three score categories and treatment arm. Over a median of 2.7 years, 457 NCO events occurred in 2898 patients with a total person-time of 7549.5 years (6.05%/year). The risk prediction model (C = 0.693) for the NCO was translated into a 17-point integer score, with annualized event rates for the low, intermediate, and high-risk categories in the warfarin arm of 3.5%, 9.9%, and 20.8%, respectively. Therapeutic benefit of higher- and lower-dose edoxaban over warfarin was demonstrated in the high- and intermediate-risk, with equal benefit in the low-risk categories (P-interaction 0.008 and 0.014, respectively).. In VKA naive patients with AF, the TIMI-AF score can assist in the prediction of a poor composite outcome and guide selection of anticoagulant therapy by identifying a differential clinical benefit with a NOAC or VKA.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Whether the pattern of atrial fibrillation (AF) modifies the risk/benefit of anticoagulation is controversial. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events and significantly reduced bleeding and cardiovascular mortality. However, detailed analyses by AF pattern have not been reported.. The 21 105 patients were categorized as having paroxysmal (<7 days duration), persistent (≥7 days but <1 year), or permanent (≥1 year or failed cardioversion) AF patterns at randomization. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated during the 2.8 years median follow-up and compared by AF pattern. The primary end point of stroke/systemic embolic event was lower in those patients with paroxysmal AF (1.49%/year), compared with persistent (1.83%/year; P-adj =0.015) and permanent AF (1.95%/year; P-adj =0.004). Overall, all-cause mortality also was lower with paroxysmal (3.0%/year) compared with persistent (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001) and permanent AF (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001). Annualized major bleeding rates were similar across AF patterns (2.86% versus 2.65% versus 2.73%). There was no effect modification by treatment assignment.. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with paroxysmal AF suffered fewer thromboembolic events and deaths compared with those with persistent and permanent AF. The efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban as compared with warfarin was consistent across the 3 patterns of AF.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Better understanding of risk factors for major bleeding events during anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may help physicians when deciding on intensity and duration of treatment. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for major and clinically relevant bleeding in patients receiving the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban or warfarin for the treatment of acute VTE. We analysed data from 8240 patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug in the Hokusai-VTE study. Bleeding risk factors were evaluated in 4118 patients who received edoxaban and significant variables were combined in a prediction model. We used the C-statistic to estimate model discrimination and bootstrap techniques for internal validation. Major bleeding occurred in 56/4118 (1.4 %) patients given edoxaban and in 66/4122 (1.6 %) patients given warfarin. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 349 (8.5 %) and 423 (10.3 %), respectively. Significant risk factors for major bleeding during edoxaban treatment were female sex, concomitant antiplatelet therapy, haemoglobin ≤10 g/dl, history of arterial hypertension, and systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg. The discrimination of the model was high (C-statistic: 0.71) for major bleeding, lower for clinically relevant bleeding (C-statistic: 0.62) and when the model was applied to patients receiving warfarin (C-statistic 0.60). In conclusion, we identified five main predictors of major bleeding in patients receiving edoxaban for the treatment of acute VTE. A risk model based on these factors predicted an increased risk of bleeding with good discrimination.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Decision Support Techniques; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

One of the main determinants of establishing the optimal treatment duration of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the risk of major bleeding during long-term anticoagulant therapy. The 6-variable VTE-BLEED score was recently developed to enable estimation of this bleeding risk. This study aimed at externally validating VTE-BLEED. This was a post-hoc study of the randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, Hokusai-VTE study that compared edoxaban versus warfarin for treatment of VTE. VTE-BLEED was calculated in all 8,240 study patients. The numbers of adjudicated major bleeding events during 'stable anticoagulation', i. e. occurring after day 30, in patients with low (total score <2 points) and high risk of bleeding (total score ≥2 points) were compared for the overall study population, patients randomised to edoxaban or warfarin, and for important patient subcategories. During 'stable' anticoagulation, major bleeding occurred in 1.02 % (40/3,903) and 0.82 % (32/3,899) of patients treated with warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. For the overall study population, the risks of bleeding in the low and high risk groups were 0.51 % and 2.03 %, respectively, for an odds ratio (OR) of 4.04 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 2.51-6.48). ORs were 5.04 (95 %CI: 2.62-9.69) and 3.09 (95 %CI: 1.54-6.22) for warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. VTE-BLEED was consistently able to identify patients at a 2.5- to 11-fold higher bleeding risk across all the predefined subcategories, as well as for the treatment period between day 30 to day 180, and beyond day 180. In conclusion, patients identified as high risk by VTE-BLEED had a four-fold increased risk of bleeding during the chronic phase of treatment.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Disease Progression; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Pyridines; Research Design; Risk; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) instead of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coexisting valvular heart disease (VHD) is of substantial interest.. This study explored outcomes in patients with AF with and without VHD in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial, comparing edoxaban with warfarin.. Valvular heart disease was defined as history or baseline echocardiography evidence of at least moderate aortic/mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, or prior valve surgery (bioprosthesis replacement, valve repair, valvuloplasty). Patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves were excluded from the trial. Comparisons were made of rates of stroke/systemic embolic event (SSEE), major bleeding, additional efficacy and safety outcomes, as well as net clinical outcomes, in patients with or without VHD treated with edoxaban or warfarin, using adjusted Cox proportional hazards.. After adjustment for multiple baseline characteristics, compared with no-VHD patients (n = 18,222), VHD patients (n = 2,824) had a similar rate of SSEE but higher rates of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.26 to 1.56; p <0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.43; p <0.001), and major bleeding (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.42; p = 0.02). Higher-dose edoxaban regimen had efficacy similar to warfarin in the presence of VHD (for SSEE, HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.07, in patients with VHD, and HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.07, in patients without VHD; p interaction [p. The presence of VHD increased the risk of death, major adverse cardiovascular events, and major bleeding but did not affect the relative efficacy or safety of higher-dose edoxaban versus warfarin in AF. (Global Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of Edoxaban (DU-176b) vs. Standard Practice of Dosing With Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48]; NCT00781391).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a specific anti-Xa inhibitor that, in comparison to warfarin, has been found to be noninferior for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and to reduce bleeding significantly in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the higher-dose edoxaban regimen (60/30 mg) in patients with AF and a creatinine clearance of ≤95 mL/min. We report for the first time the clinical characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the FDA-approved population in the ENGAGE AF--TIMI 48 trial.. The patients included had been treated with either warfarin or edoxaban 60/30 mg and had a creatinine clearance of ≤95 mL/min. The primary efficacy was SSE, and the principal safety end point was major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis classification). Median follow-up was 2.8 years.. Patients in the FDA-approved cohort were older, were more likely female, and had higher CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores, as compared with patients not included in the FDA label. The primary end point occurred in 1.63%/y with edoxaban vs 2.02%/y with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, P = .023). Edoxaban significantly reduced the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72, P < .001) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, P = .015). Ischemic stroke rates were similar between the treatment groups (1.31%/y vs 1.39%/y, P = .97). Major bleeding was significantly lower with edoxaban (3.16%/y vs 3.77%/y; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98, P = .023).. In the FDA-approved cohort of the ENGAGE AF--TIMI 48 trial, treatment with edoxaban 60/30 mg was superior to warfarin in the prevention of SSE and significantly reduced cardiovascular death and bleeding, especially fatal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Approval; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

In the multinational, double-blind, double-dummy ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 phase 3 study, once-daily edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban in patients from East Asia.. Patients aged ≥21 years with documented AF and CHADS score ≥2 were randomized to receive once-daily edoxaban higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) regimen or warfarin dose-adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. Patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/min, weighing ≤60 kg, or receiving strong p-glycoprotein inhibitors at randomization or during the study received a 50% dose reduction of edoxaban or matched placebo. This prespecified subanalysis included 1,943 patients from Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea. The annualized rate of stroke/SEE for higher-dose edoxaban was 1.34% vs. 2.62% for warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.90, P=0.02) and 2.52% for lower-dose edoxaban (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.63-1.54, P=0.93). Compared with warfarin (4.80%), major bleeding was significantly reduced for the higher-dose (2.86%; HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, P=0.011) and lower-dose regimens (1.59%; HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.54, P<0.001).. Once-daily edoxaban provided similar efficacy to warfarin while reducing major bleeding risk in the East Asian population.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia, Eastern; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

We studied the concomitant use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) on the efficacy and safety of the anti-Xa agent edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomized trial that compared 2 dose regimens of edoxaban with warfarin. We studied both the approved high-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER; 60 mg daily reduced by one half in patients with anticipated increased drug exposure), as well as a lower-dose edoxaban regimen (LDER; 30 mg daily, also reduced by one half in patients with anticipated increased drug regimen). SAPT (aspirin in 92.5%) was administered at the discretion of the treating physician. Cox proportional hazard regressions stratified by SAPT at 3 months with treatment as a covariate were performed. The 4912 patients who received SAPT were more frequently male, with histories of coronary artery disease and diabetes, and had higher CHADS2Vasc and HAS BLED scores than did the 14 977 patients not receiving SAPT. When compared to patients not receiving SAPT, those receiving SAPT had a higher incidence of major bleeding; (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]=1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.67, P<0.001). SAPT did not alter the relative efficacy of edoxaban compared to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events (SEEs): edoxaban versus warfarin without SAPT, hazard ratio (HRadj for HDER)=0.94; (95% CI: 0.77-1.15) with SAPT, HRadj=0.70 (95% CI: 0.50-0.98), P interaction (Pint)=0.14. (HRadj for LDER versus warfarin without SAPT=1.19 (95% CI 0.99-1.43) With SAPT, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.76-1.39) Pint=0.42. Major bleeding was lower with edoxaban than warfarin both without SAPT, HRadj for HDER=0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95), and with SAPT, HRadj=0.82 (95% CI, 0.65-1.03; Pint=0.91). For LDER without SAPT (HRadj=0.56 [95% CI 0.46-0.67]) and with SAPT (HRadj=0.51 [95% CI 0.39-0.66]).. Patients with AF who were selected by their physicians to receive SAPT in addition to an anticoagulant had a similar risk of stroke/SEE and higher rates of bleeding than those not receiving SAPT. Edoxaban exhibited similar relative efficacy and reduced bleeding compared to warfarin, with or without concomitant SAPT.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

When compared with warfarin, edoxaban significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality in the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial. We studied the possible reasons leading to this reduction.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a double-blind, double-dummy comparison of warfarin with 2 regimens of once-daily edoxaban in 21,105 patients with atrial fibrillation followed for 2.8 years (median). Causes of deaths in the intention-to-treat population were classified as cardiovascular (including fatal bleeding and ischemic stroke), malignancy, or noncardiovascular/nonmalignancy by an independent, blinded, clinical endpoint committee. Deaths also were adjudicated as directly due to bleeding (ie, fatal), or bleeding contributing to death, or neither.. There were 839 total deaths (4.35%/y) in the warfarin arm, compared with 773 (3.99%/y, P = .08) with the higher-dose edoxaban regimen, and 737 (3.80%/y, P = .006) with the lower-dose edoxaban regimen. No significant differences between treatments were observed in (1) any of the 3 most common causes of cardiovascular death (sudden cardiac, heart failure, ischemic stroke), (2) fatal malignancies, (3) other noncardiovascular death. There were 124 fatal bleeds, 65 with warfarin, significantly fewer with the higher-dose (n = 35, P = .003) and lower-dose (n = 24, P < .001) edoxaban regimens. There were 101 bleeding events with warfarin that were either fatal or that contributed to death. There were significantly fewer with the higher-dose (n = 59, P = .001) and lower-dose (n = 54, P < .001) edoxaban regimens.. Fewer total and cardiovascular deaths were observed with edoxaban as compared with warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, and this predominantly resulted from the significantly lower rate of major bleeding with edoxaban. Edoxaban reduces mortality both directly (less fatal bleeding) and indirectly (fewer bleeding-related complications and interruptions in therapy after nonfatal bleeding).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The Hokusai-VTE study revealed that, after initial treatment with heparin, edoxaban was non-inferior to and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This is the first report on the clinical relevance and management of bleeding events with edoxaban. All major bleeding events were classified blindly by three study-independent adjudicators. Pre-defined criteria were used to classify severity of clinical presentation and, separately, the clinical course and outcome into four categories. Major bleeding occurred in 56 patients treated with edoxaban and 65 patients treated with VKA. The severest categories (3 or 4) of the clinical presentation were assigned to 46 % of the major bleeding episodes in edoxaban recipients versus 58 % of the major bleeds in VKA recipients (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.27, p = 0.19). Clinical course was classified as severe (category 3 or 4) in 23 % of the edoxaban and 29 % of the VKA associated bleeds (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.32-1.66, p = 0.46). In conclusion, edoxaban associated major bleeding events have a comparable clinical presentation and course to major bleeds with VKA in patients treated for venous thromboembolism in the Hokusai-VTE study. These results may assure physicians that it is safe to prescribe this medication. If a major bleeding during edoxaban treatment occurs, its clinical presentation and clinical course are not worse than in VKA-treated patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

There are few data on the relative efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants, such as edoxaban, compared with vitamin K antagonists during extended therapy for venous thromboembolism. This analysis evaluates the risk-benefit of extended treatment for up to 12 months with edoxaban compared with warfarin among patients enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE study who continued therapy beyond 3 months.. The Hokusai-VTE trial (NCT00986154) was a randomised, double-blind, event driven non-inferiority trial in 8292 patients comparing edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All patients were treated for at least 3 months and treatment was continued for up to 12 months. The outcomes at 12 months were documented in all patients irrespective of treatment duration. 3633 patients treated with edoxaban and 3594 treated with warfarin who completed 3 months of treatment were eligible for this analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism evaluated for each of the time intervals of 3 months, greater than 3 months to 6 months, greater than 6 months to less than 12 months, and at 12 months, as well as the cumulative incidence occurring between 3 and 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Both on-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were done.. In the on-treatment analysis, the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months was 1·1% (0·8-1·4; 44 of 4118 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group versus 1·2% (0·9-1·6; 51 of 4122) in the warfarin-treated group; between greater than 3 months and 6 months, 0·7% (0·3-1·5; eight of 1076) versus 0·5% (0·2-1·1; five of 1084); between greater than 6 months and less than 12 months, 0·2% (0·0-0·8; two of 896) versus 0·8% (0·03-1·7; seven of 851); and at 12 months, <0·1% (0·0-0·3; one of 1661) versus 0·1% (0·0-0·4; two of 1659). In the on-treatment analysis, the cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism between 3 and 12 months was 0·3% (95% CI 0·2-1·5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0·4% (0·2-1·7; 14 of 3594) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·78, 95% CI 0·36-1·72). The cumulative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) between 3 and 12 months was 3·9% (95% CI 3·3-4·6; 143 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 4·1% (3·5-4·8; 147 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·97, 95% CI 0·77-1·22); cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 0·3% (95% CI 0·2-0·5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0·7% (0·4-1·0; 24 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·22-0·92). Similar results were obtained in the intention-to-treat analysis.. Extended treatment with edoxaban is effective and associated with less major bleeding than warfarin. Edoxaban once daily provides an attractive alternative to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism who require extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Warfarin

The feasibility of magnetic resonance venography (MRV) for measuring change in thrombus volume with a novel anticoagulation regimen versus standard anticoagulation in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been assessed. Our aim was to study the feasibility of MRV to measure change in thrombus volume in patients with acute symptomatic objectively confirmed proximal DVT in an open-label multicenter trial (edoxaban Thrombus Reduction Imaging Study, eTRIS). We randomized patients in a 2:1 allocation ratio to edoxaban 90 mg/day for 10 days followed by 60 mg/day versus parenteral anticoagulation bridging to warfarin for 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome was a surrogate end point of the relative change in MRV-quantified thrombus volume from baseline to Day 14-21. A total of 85 eligible patients from 26 study sites were randomized to edoxaban monotherapy (n=56) versus parenteral anticoagulation as a 'bridge' to warfarin (n=29). The mean relative change in MRV-quantified thrombus volume from baseline to Day 14-21 was similar in patients treated with edoxaban and parenteral anticoagulation as a 'bridge' to warfarin (-50.1% vs -58.9%; 95% confidence interval of treatment difference, -12.7%, 30.2%). However, thrombus extension was observed in eight patients in the edoxaban monotherapy group and in none in the warfarin group. Rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (3.6% vs 3.6%, p=0.45) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (5.4% vs 7.1%, p=0.34) were also similar. No major bleeds occurred in either on-treatment group during the study period. In conclusion, MRV can assess change in thrombus volume in patients with acute DVT randomized to two different anticoagulant regimens.ClinicalTrials.gov IDENTIFIER NCT01662908: INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUG IND APPLICATION EDOXABAN IND # 63266.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Feasibility Studies; Female; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Middle Aged; Phlebography; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are at higher risk of both ischemic and bleeding events compared to younger patients. In a prespecified analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, we evaluate clinical outcomes with edoxaban versus warfarin according to age.. Twenty-one thousand one-hundred and five patients enrolled in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial were stratified into 3 prespecified age groups: <65 (n=5497), 65 to 74 (n=7134), and ≥75 (n=8474) years. Older patients were more likely to be female, with lower body weight and reduced creatinine clearance, leading to higher rates of edoxaban dose reduction (10%, 18%, and 41% for the 3 age groups, P<0.001). Stroke or systemic embolic event (1.1%, 1.8%, and 2.3%) and major bleeding (1.8%, 3.3%, and 4.8%) rates with warfarin increased across age groups (Ptrend<0.001 for both). There were no interactions between age group and randomized treatment in the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. In the elderly (≥75 years), the rates of stroke/systemic embolic event were similar with edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio 0.83 [0.66-1.04]), while major bleeding was significantly reduced with edoxaban (hazard ratio 0.83 [0.70-0.99]). The absolute risk difference in major bleeding (-82 events/10 000 pt-yrs) and in intracranial hemorrhage (-73 events/10 000 pt-yrs) both favored edoxaban over warfarin in older patients.. Age has a greater influence on major bleeding than thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Given the higher rates of bleeding and death with increasing age, treatment of elderly patients with edoxaban provides an even greater absolute reduction in safety events over warfarin, compared to treatment with edoxaban versus warfarin in younger patients.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban exposure-response relationships from the phase III study evaluating edoxaban for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) were assessed by parametric time-to-event analysis. Statistical significant exposure-response relationships were recurrent VTE with hazard ratio (HR) based on average edoxaban concentration at steady state (Cav) (HRCav) = 0.98 (i.e., change in the HR with every 1 ng/mL increase of Cav); the composite of recurrent DVT and nonfatal PE with HRCav = 0.99; and the composite of recurrent DVT, nonfatal PE, and all-cause mortality HRCav = 0.98, and all death using maximal edoxaban concentration (Cmax) with HR (Cmax) = 0.99. No statistical significant exposure-response relationships were found for clinically relevant bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular event. Results support the recommendation of once-daily edoxaban 60 mg, and a reduced 30 mg dose in patients with moderate renal impairment, body weight ≤60 kg, or use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors verapamil or quinidine.

Topics: Aged; Double-Blind Method; Drug Dosage Calculations; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, edoxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, was not found to be inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and was associated with significantly less bleeding. The higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER; 60 mg dose-reduced to 30 mg once daily) has been approved in various countries in Europe, the USA, and Japan. Among patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), symptomatic heart failure (HF) is an independent risk factor for lower time-in-therapeutic range, which reduces the efficacy and safety of VKA therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin across the spectrum of HF severity in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.. Of 14 071 patients randomized to well-controlled warfarin or the HDER, 5926 (42%) had no history of HF, 6344 (45%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II, and 1801 (13%) were in NYHA class III-IV. The efficacy of edoxaban compared with warfarin in preventing stroke/SEE was similar in patients without and with HF regardless of the severity of HF; [HDER vs. warfarin: No-HF: hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.11; NYHA class I-II: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12; NYHA class III-IV: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.25; Pinteraction = 0.97]. Compared with warfarin, HDER was consistently associated with lower risk of major bleeding (No-HF: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; NYHA class I-II: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; NYHA class III-IV: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.17; Pinteraction = 0.96).. The relative efficacy and safety of HDER compared with well-managed warfarin in AF patients with HF were similar to those without HF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor with 50% renal clearance, was noninferior to well-managed warfarin for stroke or systemic embolism (S/SE) prevention and reduced bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin across the range of baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study 48) with a focus on the higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER) and the upper range of CrCl.. A total of 14 071 patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate to high risk for stroke were randomized to warfarin or HDER (60 mg daily or a 50% dose reduction to 30 mg daily for CrCl 30-50 mL/min, body weight of ≤60 kg, or use of a potent phosphorylated glycoprotein inhibitor). CrCl <30 mL/min was exclusionary. End points of S/SE, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding, and the net clinical outcome of S/SE/major bleeding or death were evaluated by intention-to-treat analysis using the prespecified CrCl cut point of 50 mL/min and additional exploratory cut points with the Cockcroft-Gault formula. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) formula for estimating renal function.. The relative risk of S/SE with HDER versus warfarin in patients with CrCl >50 mL/min (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.04) was similar to that in patients with CrCl ≤50 mL/min (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.18; P for interaction=0.94). Several exploratory analyses suggested lower relative efficacy for the prevention of S/SE with HDER compared with warfarin at higher levels of CrCl (CrCl ≤50 mL/min: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.18; CrCl >50-95 mL/min: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; CrCl >95 mL/min: HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.10; P for interaction=0.08). Bleeding rates were lower at all levels of CrCl with HDER (P for interaction=0.11). Because of the preserved effect on bleeding, the net clinical outcome was more favorable with HDER across the range of CrCl (P for interaction=0.73). Similar findings were observed in the sensitivity analysis using the CKD-EPI formula.. Although there was an apparent decrease in relative efficacy to prevent arterial thromboembolism in the upper range of CrCl, the safety and net clinical benefit of HDER compared with warfarin are consistent across the range of renal function.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk; Thiazoles; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation and previous ischemic stroke (IS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulation. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we compared warfarin with edoxaban in patients with versus without previous IS/TIA.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) was a double-blind trial of 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0; median time-in-therapeutic range, 68.4%) versus once-daily edoxaban (higher-dose edoxaban regimen [HDER], 60/30 mg; lower-dose edoxaban regimen, 30/15 mg) with 2.8-year median follow-up. Primary end points included all stroke/systemic embolic events (efficacy) and major bleeding (safety). Because only HDER is approved, we focused on the comparison of HDER versus warfarin.. Of 5973 (28.3%) patients with previous IS/TIA, 67% had CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) >3 and 36% were ≥75 years. Compared with 15 132 without previous IS/TIA, patients with previous IS/TIA were at higher risk of both thromboembolism and bleeding (stroke/systemic embolic events 2.83% versus 1.42% per year; P<0.001; major bleeding 3.03% versus 2.64% per year; P<0.001; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.70% versus 0.40% per year; P<0.001). Among patients with previous IS/TIA, annualized intracranial hemorrhage rates were lower with HDER than with warfarin (0.62% versus 1.09%; absolute risk difference, 47 [8-85] per 10 000 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.92; P=0.02). No treatment subgroup interactions were found for primary efficacy (P=0.86) or for intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.28).. Patients with atrial fibrillation with previous IS/TIA are at high risk of recurrent thromboembolism and bleeding. HDER is at least as effective and is safer than warfarin, regardless of the presence or the absence of previous IS or TIA.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants simplify venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment by obviating the need for coagulation monitoring. Nonetheless, renal function, body weight and P-glycoprotein inhibitors influence drug levels. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether reduction in edoxaban dose based on clinical criteria avoids excess drug exposure and preserves efficacy and safety in the Hokusai-VTE study. After initial heparin, patients received edoxaban or warfarin for 3-12 months. Edoxaban was given once daily at a dose of 60 mg, which was reduced to 30 mg in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/minute, body weight ≤60 kg or receiving certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE and the principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 8292 patients with acute VTE were randomised, 733 and 719 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups met the criteria for dose reduction. These patients were older, more often female or Asian and had more extensive VTE. Edoxaban levels were lower in the 30 mg edoxaban group. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding with the 30 mg and 60 mg edoxaban dose were comparable: VTE rates were 3.0 % and 3.2 % and clinically relevant bleeding rates were 7.9 % and 8.6 %, respectively. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding in the warfarin-treated patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction were 4.2 % and 12.8 %, respectively. The reduced dose edoxaban regimen maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose but was safer than warfarin in patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In patients with pulmonary embolism, right ventricular dysfunction is associated with early mortality. The Hokusai-VTE study used N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and right to left ventricular diameter ratio on CT as indicators of right ventricular dysfunction and reported that recurrent venous thromboembolism rates were lower with edoxaban than warfarin. The aim of the current study was to further explore the significance of right ventricular dysfunction and investigate potential explanations for the superiority of edoxaban-ie, differences in baseline clinical characteristics, duration of initial heparin treatment, bleeding rates, or quality of warfarin treatment.. The Hokusai-VTE trial was a randomised, double-blind, event-driven non-inferiority trial in patients from centres in 37 countries that compared edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Patients received treatment for at least 3 months and up to a maximum of 12 months. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Outcome data at 12 months was collected for all patients irrespective of treatment duration. This prespecified subgroup analysis focuses on the included patients with pulmonary embolism. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism defined as a composite of deep vein thrombosis or non-fatal or fatal pulmonary embolism at 12 months. Recurrence rates with edoxaban and warfarin were compared in patients with and without right ventricular dysfunction. In those with NT-proBNP concentrations of 500 pg/mL or higher, we compared baseline characteristics, duration of heparin treatment, and bleeding leading to study drug discontinuation in the edoxaban and warfarin groups. We also assessed quality of warfarin treatment. All analyses were done with the modified intention-to-treat population. The Hokusai-VTE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00986154.. Between Jan 28, 2010, and Oct 5, 2012, 8292 patients were enrolled from 439 centres, of whom 8240 received at least one dose of study drug. 3319 patients had pulmonary embolism. NT-proBNP was 500 pg/mL or higher in 465 (30%) of 1565 patients given edoxaban and in 507 (32%) of 1599 given warfarin. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 14 (3%) of 465 patients in the edoxaban group and 30 (6%) of 507 in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·26-0·94; p=0·033). The right to left ventricular diameter ratio was 0·9 or higher in 414 (44%) of 937 patients in the edoxaban group and 427 (45%) of 946 in the warfarin group. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 11 (3%) of 414 and 20 (5%) of 427 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·27-1·17; p=0·13). Baseline characteristics, duration of heparin treatment, and rates of bleeding leading to study drug discontinuation were similar in the edoxaban and warfarin groups and the quality of warfarin management was adequate for patients with NT-proBNP concentrations of 500 pg/mL or higher.. Findings from our analysis suggest that edoxaban is more effective than warfarin in the treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with pulmonary embolism and evidence of right ventricular dysfunction.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Survival Rate; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Warfarin; Young Adult

Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is non-inferior for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and is associated with less bleeding than well controlled warfarin therapy. Few safety data about edoxaban in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion are available.. We did a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint evaluation trial in 19 countries with 239 sites comparing edoxaban 60 mg per day with enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The dose of edoxaban was reduced to 30 mg per day if one or more factors (creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, low bodyweight [≤60 kg], or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors) were present. Block randomisation (block size four)-stratified by cardioversion approach (transoesophageal echocardiography [TEE] or not), anticoagulant experience, selected edoxaban dose, and region-was done through a voice-web system. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality, analysed by intention to treat. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Follow-up was 28 days on study drug after cardioversion plus 30 days to assess safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02072434.. Between March 25, 2014, and Oct 28, 2015, 2199 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (n=1095) or enoxaparin-warfarin (n=1104). The mean age was 64 years (SD 10·54) and mean CHA. ENSURE-AF is the largest prospective randomised clinical trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Rates of major and CRNM bleeding and thromboembolism were low in the two treatment groups.. Daiichi Sankyo provided financial support for the study.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation is often avoided in patients with atrial fibrillation who are at an increased risk of falling.. This study assessed the relative efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) trial in patients with atrial fibrillation judged to be at increased risk of falling.. We performed a pre-specified analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, comparing patients with versus without increased risk of falling.. Nine hundred patients (4.3%) were judged to be at increased risk of falling. These patients were older (median, 77 vs. 72 years; p < 0.001), and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. After multivariable adjustment, patients at increased risk of falling experienced more bone fractures caused by falling (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]: 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49 to 2.38; p < 0.001), major bleeding (HRadj: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.64; p = 0.023), life-threatening bleeding (HRadj: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.50; p = 0.013), and all-cause death (HRadj: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.70; p < 0.001), but not ischemic events including stroke/systemic embolic event (HRadj: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.51; p = 0.27). No treatment interaction was observed between either dosing regimens of edoxaban and warfarin for the efficacy and safety outcomes. Treatment with edoxaban resulted in a greater absolute risk reduction in severe bleeding events and all-cause mortality compared with warfarin.. Edoxaban is an attractive alternative to warfarin in patients at increased risk of falling, because it is associated with an even greater absolute reduction in severe bleeding events and mortality. (Effective aNticaoGulation with factor xA next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation [ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48]; NCT00781391).

Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Edoxaban is an oral, once-daily factor Xa inhibitor that is non-inferior to well-managed warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEEs). We examined the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients who were vitamin K antagonist (VKA) naive or experienced.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 randomized 21 105 patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk of stroke to once-daily edoxaban vs. warfarin. Subjects were followed for a median of 2.8 years. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke or SEE. As a pre-specified subgroup, we analysed outcomes for those with or without prior VKA experience (>60 consecutive days). Higher-dose edoxaban significantly reduced the risk of stroke or SEE in patients who were VKA naive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.90] and was similar to warfarin in the VKA experienced (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.24; P interaction = 0.028). Lower-dose edoxaban was similar to warfarin for stroke or SEE prevention in patients who were VKA naive (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.73-1.15), but was inferior to warfarin in those who were VKA experienced (HR 1.31, 95% 1.08-1.60; P interaction = 0.019). Both higher-dose and lower-dose edoxaban regimens significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding regardless of prior VKA experience (P interaction = 0.90 and 0.71, respectively).. In patients with AF, edoxaban appeared to demonstrate greater efficacy compared with warfarin in patients who were VKA naive than VKA experienced. Edoxaban significantly reduced major bleeding compared with warfarin regardless of prior VKA exposure.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin is the most widely used oral anticoagulant worldwide, but serious bleeding complications are common. We tested whether genetic variants can identify patients who are at increased risk of bleeding with warfarin and, consequently, those who would derive a greater safety benefit with a direct oral anticoagulant rather than warfarin.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 was a randomised, double-blind trial in which patients with atrial fibrillation were assigned to warfarin to achieve a target international normalised ratio of 2·0-3·0, or to higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) edoxaban once daily. A subgroup of patients was included in a prespecified genetic analysis and genotyped for variants in CYP2C9 and VKORC1. The results were used to create three genotype functional bins (normal, sensitive, and highly sensitive responders to warfarin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00781391.. 14,348 patients were included in the genetic analysis. Of 4833 taking warfarin, 2982 (61·7%) were classified as normal responders, 1711 (35·4%) as sensitive responders, and 140 (2·9%) as highly sensitive responders. Compared with normal responders, sensitive and highly sensitive responders spent greater proportions of time over-anticoagulated in the first 90 days of treatment (median 2·2%, IQR 0-20·2; 8·4%, 0-25·8; and 18·3%, 0-32·6; ptrend<0·0001) and had increased risks of bleeding with warfarin (sensitive responders hazard ratio 1·31, 95% CI 1·05-1·64, p=0·0179; highly sensitive responders 2·66, 1·69-4·19, p<0·0001). Genotype added independent information beyond clinical risk scoring. During the first 90 days, when compared with warfarin, treatment with edoxaban reduced bleeding more so in sensitive and highly sensitive responders than in normal responders (higher-dose edoxaban pinteraction=0·0066; lower-dose edoxaban pinteraction=0·0036). After 90 days, the reduction in bleeding risk with edoxaban versus warfarin was similarly beneficial across genotypes.. CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes identify patients who are more likely to experience early bleeding with warfarin and who derive a greater early safety benefit from edoxaban compared with warfarin.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pharmacogenetics; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

We designed a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation parallel group Phase 3b clinical trial comparing edoxaban (a new oral factor Xa inhibitor) with enoxaparin/warfarin followed by warfarin alone in subjects undergoing planned electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary efficacy end point is the composite end points of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, from randomization until the end of follow-up (day 56 post cardioversion). The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding, from the first administration of study drug to end of treatment (Day 28 post cardioversion) +3 days. The primary efficacy analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat population whereas the primary safety analysis, on the safety population. The study includes stratification on the following levels: (i) approach to cardioversion (transoesophagel echocardiography or non-transoesophagel echocardiography) as determined by the Investigator; (ii) subject's experience in taking anticoagulants at the time of randomization (anticoagulant-experienced or anticoagulant-naïve); and (iii) assigned edoxaban dose (full 60 mg QD or reduced 30 mg dose QD). A subject with one or more factors (CrCl ≥15 mL/min and ≤50 mL/min, low body weight [≤60 kg], and concomitant use of p-pg inhibitors (excluding amiodarone) will receive a reduced dose (30 mg) of edoxaban if the subject is randomized to the edoxaban group. ENSURE-AF will be the largest prospective randomised trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion, also involving a Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulant-edoxaban.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Research Design; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, the higher-dose edoxaban (HDE) regimen had a similar incidence of ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, whereas a higher incidence was observed with the lower-dose regimen (LDE). Amiodarone increases edoxaban plasma levels via P-glycoprotein inhibition. The current pre-specified exploratory analysis was performed to determine the effect of amiodarone on the relative efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban.. At randomization, 2492 patients (11.8%) were receiving amiodarone. The primary efficacy endpoint of stroke or systemic embolic event was significantly lower with LDE compared with warfarin in amiodarone treated patients vs. patients not on amiodarone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.36-0.99 and HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40, respectively; P interaction <0.01). In patients randomized to HDE, no such interaction for efficacy was observed (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.17 vs. HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05, P interaction = 0.446). Major bleeding was similar in patients on LDE (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.59 vs. HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61, P interaction = 0.131) and HDE (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.38 vs. HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P interaction = 0.392) when compared with warfarin, independent of amiodarone use.. Patients randomized to the LDE treated with amiodarone at the time of randomization demonstrated a significant reduction in ischaemic events vs. warfarin when compared with those not on amiodarone, while preserving a favourable bleeding profile. In contrast, amiodarone had no effect on the relative efficacy and safety of HDE.

Topics: Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants have been evaluated for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which comprises deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The randomized, double-blind Hokusai-VTE trial demonstrated that 60 mg of edoxaban once daily following initial heparin treatment is non-inferior to heparin overlapped with and followed by warfarin for the treatment of VTE, and is associated with significantly fewer bleeding events.. To assess the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin among East Asian patients enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE trial.. The Hokusai-VTE trial enrolled 8292 patients from 439 centers worldwide, including 1109 patients from Japan, China, Korea, and Taiwan. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were symptomatic recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding, respectively.. In the overall East Asian population, the primary efficacy outcome of symptomatic recurrent VTE occurred in 16 of 563 (2.8%) patients in the edoxaban group versus 24 of 538 (4.5%) patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-1.19; P = 0.1601). The primary safety outcome of clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 56 of 563 (9.9%) patients in the edoxaban group versus 93 of 538 (17.3%) patients in the warfarin group (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78; P < 0.001).. Edoxaban is an effective and safer alternative to warfarin in East Asian patients with acute VTE who require anticoagulant therapy, consistent with overall study findings from the Hokusai-VTE trial.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Recurrence; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for stroke and systemic embolism. Trials comparing warfarin with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have demonstrated that, when compared with warfarin, the NOACs are at least as effective in preventing stroke, although detailed analyses characterizing systemic embolic events (SEEs) are lacking.. We performed a prespecified analysis in 21,105 patients with AF enrolled in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, which compared 2 once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and SEE. Of 1,016 patients who met the primary end point, 67 (6.6%) experienced an SEE of which 13% were fatal. Of 73 total SEEs (including recurrent events), 85% involved the extremities, and 41% required a surgical or percutaneous intervention. There were 23 (0.12%/year) SEEs with warfarin versus 15 with higher dose edoxaban (0.08%/year; hazard ratio vs warfarin 0.65; 95% CI 0.34-1.24; P = .19) and 29 with lower dose edoxaban (0.15%/year; hazard ratio vs warfarin 1.24; 95% CI 0.72-2.15; P = .43). In a meta-analysis of 4 warfarin-controlled phase 3 AF trials, NOACs significantly reduced the risk of SEE by 37% (relative risk 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.91; P = .01).. Although considerably less frequent than stroke, systemic embolism is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with AF. Although the overall number of events was too small to show a significant difference in the risk of SEE between edoxaban and warfarin, a meta-analysis of all the NOAC trials demonstrates that NOACs significantly reduce the risk of SEE compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In 21,105 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial demonstrated that both higher dose (60mg/30mg dose reduced) and lower dose (30mg/15mg dose reduced) once-daily regimens of edoxaban were non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism (SE), with significantly lower rates of bleeding and cardiovascular death. Higher dose edoxaban was associated with a greater reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke than lower dose edoxaban, and the FDA approved higher dose edoxaban in patients with creatinine clearance ≤95mL/min. This study evaluated the economic value of higher dose edoxaban vs warfarin based on data from patients in ENGAGE within the FDA-approved population.. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban vs warfarin over a lifetime horizon from the US healthcare system perspective using a Markov model based on a combination of ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial data, US life tables, and published literature on the costs and long-term outcomes of non-fatal cardiovascular and bleeding events. Data from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial were used to calculate age-adjusted event rates for warfarin and hazard ratios (HRs) for the relative impact of edoxaban on embolic and bleeding complications. Based on the wholesale acquisition price, edoxaban and warfarin were assumed to cost $9.24 and $0.36/day, respectively.. For edoxaban vs warfarin, lifetime incremental costs and QALYs were $16,384 and 0.444, respectively, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,862/QALY gained, using data from patients with creatinine clearance ≤95mL/min in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. ICERs were more favorable for patients without compared to those with prior warfarin use; ICERs differed minimally by CHADS2 score.. Despite its higher acquisition cost, edoxaban is an economically attractive alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and SE in patients with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance ≤95mL/min. These results were robust to variation of key model parameters, including assumptions regarding the cost and quality-of-life impact of stroke and bleeding events, and were favorable across both CHADS2 score stroke-risk categories.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The once-daily oral factor Xa inhibitor, edoxaban, is as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism while decreasing bleeding in a phase III trial of patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate-high stroke risk. Limited data regarding cerebrovascular events with edoxaban were reported previously.. We analyzed the subtypes of cerebrovascular events in 21 105 patients participating in Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) comparing outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin versus 2 edoxaban regimens (high dose, low dose). The primary end point for this prespecified analysis of cerebrovascular events was all stroke (ischemic plus hemorrhagic), defined as an abrupt onset of focal neurological deficit because of infarction or bleeding with symptoms lasting ≥24 hours or fatal in <24 hours. Independent stroke neurologists unaware of treatment adjudicated all cerebrovascular events.. Patients randomized to high-dose edoxaban had fewer strokes on-treatment (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.98) than warfarin (median time-in-therapeutic range, 68.4%); patients in the low-dose edoxaban group had similar rates (hazard ratio, 1.10 versus warfarin; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.32). Rates of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were similar with high-dose edoxaban (1.76% per year) and warfarin (1.73% per year; P=0.81), but more frequent with low-dose edoxaban (2.48% per year; P<0.001). Both edoxaban regimens significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke and other subtypes of intracranial bleeds.. In patients with atrial fibrillation, once-daily edoxaban was as effective as warfarin in preventing all strokes, with significant reductions in various subtypes of intracranial bleeding. Ischemic cerebrovascular event rates were similar with high-dose edoxaban and warfarin, whereas low-dose edoxaban was less effective than warfarin.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

At the end of 2 previous trials, an excess of stroke and bleeding was observed in patients with AF randomized to a new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) who transitioned to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA).. The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) trial compared once-daily edoxaban to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF. An end-of-trial transition plan was developed to minimize the risks of stroke due to inadequate anticoagulation and bleeding from excessive anticoagulation during this critical period.. All patients on the blinded study drug at the trial's conclusion were included in this analysis. In pre-specified analyses, stroke, bleeding, and death that occurred through 30 days after the end-of-trial visit were stratified by randomized treatment allocation and open-label anticoagulant selected post-trial.. Of the 13,642 patients taking the blinded study drug at the end of the trial, 9,304 (68.2%) were transitioned to open-label VKA and 4,258 patients (31.2%) to an NOAC. There were 21 strokes evenly distributed across the 3 randomized treatment arms: warfarin 7 (1.90%/year), edoxaban high dose 7 (1.89%/year), edoxaban low dose 7 (1.85%/year). Major bleeding was also similar across the 3 treatment arms: warfarin 11 (2.98%/year), edoxaban high dose 10 (2.69%/year), edoxaban low dose 18 (4.76%/year). In patients transitioned to VKA, 85% of patients had at least 1 INR ≥ 2 by day 14 after the transition and 99% by day 30.. The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 transition plan protected patients from an excess of thrombotic and bleeding events and should be helpful in clinical practice when patients are transitioned between oral anticoagulants. (Global Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of Edoxaban [DU-176b] vs Standard Practice of Dosing With Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [EngageAFTIMI48]; NCT00781391).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Factor Xa; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy by eliminating the need for laboratory monitoring. Edoxaban is an oral, direct inhibitor of factor Xa that is given in a fixed dose once daily.. The Hokusai-VTE study is a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate whether initial low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by edoxaban (60 mg once daily) is non-inferior to LMWH followed by warfarin (International Normalized Ratio of 2.0-3.0) for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The primary efficacy outcome is symptomatic recurrent VTE during the 12-month study period. The principal safety outcome is clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) occurring during or within 3 days of stopping study treatment. A clinical events committee adjudicates all suspected outcome events. A unique study design feature is the flexible treatment duration of between 3 and 12 months to simulate usual clinical practice, and enabled by: (i) double-blinding to minimize bias that could occur if knowledge of the patient's treatment influenced the duration of therapy; and (ii) follow-up for 12 months of all patients and inclusion in the primary efficacy analysis, regardless of the duration of therapy received. A second innovative design feature is the strategy for achieving an appropriate time in therapeutic range in the warfarin group, with central tracking for each participating center and feedback to the investigators.. The standard methods combined with innovative design features should achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Research Design; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. The long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban as compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is not known.. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing two once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in 21,105 patients with moderate-to-high-risk atrial fibrillation (median follow-up, 2.8 years). The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism. Each edoxaban regimen was tested for noninferiority to warfarin during the treatment period. The principal safety end point was major bleeding.. The annualized rate of the primary end point during treatment was 1.50% with warfarin (median time in the therapeutic range, 68.4%), as compared with 1.18% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.99; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 1.07; 97.5% CI, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.005 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend favoring high-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32).. Both once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Currently venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), i.e. deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality all around the world. The Hokusai-VTE study is a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate whether initial heparin (5 days) followed by the oral Xa factor inhibitor edoxaban (60 mg once daily) may be an alternative to the standard therapy, i.e. heparin (5 days) followed by warfarin (INR of 2.0-3.0) for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic VTE. In patients with VTE, including pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dysfunction, treatment with heparin followed by oral edoxaban 60 mg once daily was non inferior to the standard treatment with respect to efficacy and superior with respect to bleeding (fewer fatal and intracranial bleeds, but no statistical significance regarding major bleeding). Reducing the dosage of edoxaban to 30 mg once daily is safe in case of renal impairment and low body weight.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy subjects switching from warfarin.. Seventy-two subjects were randomized to edoxaban 60 mg once daily (n = 48) or matching placebo (n = 24) for 5 days at 24 h after the last dose of warfarin treatment (INR 2.0 to 3.0). Safety/tolerability was the primary outcome measure. Pharmacokinetics, INR, aPTT, anti-FXa, thrombin generation and other coagulation assays were assessed.. Seventy-two subjects were randomized and 64 subjects received at least one dose of edoxaban (n = 43) or placebo (n = 21) after achieving a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 on warfarin treatment. Edoxaban 60 mg administered 24 h post-warfarin appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Adverse events were similar across treatments. For bleeding-related adverse events, eight subjects tested positive for faecal occult blood, five subjects during warfarin treatment and three subjects during edoxaban treatment. The mean (SD) baseline (post-dose of warfarin) INR was 2.31 (0.193) which increased to 3.84 (0.744) over 2 h during the edoxaban treatment (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), returning to post-warfarin baseline within 12 h. A similar time course of effects for the other coagulation assays was observed in accordance with the drugs' mechanisms of action.. In this study of healthy subjects, edoxaban administered 24 h after the last dose of warfarin was safe and well tolerated with transient increases across the various coagulation assays above post-warfarin baseline levels.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Factor Xa (FXa) is a key serine protease in the coagulation cascade and a promising target for a new antithrombotic agent. Edoxaban is an oral, selective and direct FXa inhibitor. The objective of this study was to compare the antithrombotic and haemorrhagic effects of edoxaban with clinically available anticoagulants, warfarin and enoxaparin, in rat models of thrombosis and haemorrhage.. Rats were treated with single oral administration of edoxaban, repeated oral dosing of warfarin for 4 days and single subcutaneous administration of enoxaparin before thrombosis or haemorrhage induction. Thrombosis was induced by the insertion of a platinum wire into the inferior vena cava for 60 min. Tail template bleeding time was measured after making an incision on the tail.. Edoxaban at 0.3, 1 and 3mg/kg exerted dose-dependent and significant inhibition of venous thrombus formation. The 50% thrombus inhibition dose (ED(50)) was 1.9 mg/kg. At supra-therapeutic doses (10 and 20mg/kg), edoxaban significantly but moderately (less than 2-fold) prolonged bleeding time. Warfarin and enoxaparin also dose-dependently inhibited venous thrombosis and prolonged bleeding time. The ED(50) values of warfarin and enoxaparin were 0.12 mg/kg and 500 IU/kg, and the 2-fold bleeding time prolongation doses (BT2) were 0.16 mg/kg and 1700 IU/kg, respectively. The safety margin (ratio of BT2 to ED(50)) of edoxaban (>10.5) was greater than those of warfarin (1.3) and enoxaparin (3.4).. Edoxaban inhibited venous thrombosis comparably to warfarin and enoxaparin, and the attendant bleeding risk of edoxaban was lower than that of warfarin and enoxaparin in rats.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Male; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a once-daily (QD) oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of edoxaban in Japanese patients with NVAF.. A total of 536 NVAF patients (CHADS2 ≥1) were randomized to receive double-blinded edoxaban 30, 45, or 60 mg QD or open-label warfarin (international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0-3.0 for age <70 years; 1.6-2.6 for age ≥70 years) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all bleeding events (major, clinically relevant non-major, and minor bleeds). Patients underwent CT and/or MRI to assess asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic events and pharmacodynamic indices. The mean incidence of all bleeding events for edoxaban 30, 45, and 60mg, and warfarin was 18.5%, 22.4%, 27.7%, and 20.0%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences among the edoxaban groups and no significant differences from the warfarin group. There were no asymptomatic ICH events in any group. One episode of cerebral infarction was observed in the edoxaban 45-mg group. Subgroup analysis suggested low body weight (≤60kg) was associated with higher bleeding risk.. Edoxaban 30, 45, and 60mg QD in patients with NVAF was associated with a numerical increase in all bleeding across the dose range, but this was not statistically significant, nor was any dose compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; International Normalized Ratio; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Edoxaban is an oral, reversible, direct factor Xa inhibitor in phase III clinical development for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). A phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of edoxaban in Asian patients with non-valvular AF with CHADS2 score ≥1. In a multicentre, active-controlled, double-blind edoxaban and open-label warfarin, parallel-group study, a total of 235 patients from four Asian countries were randomly assigned to edoxaban 30 mg qd, 60 mg qd or warfarin dose adjusted to international normalised ratio of 2-3 for three months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of centrally adjudicated all bleeding events (major, clinically relevant non-major and minor). Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic events, biomarkers of thrombus formation and all adverse events (AEs). The incidence of all bleeding events (95% CI) was 20.3% (12.9, 30.4) for edoxaban 30 mg, 23.8% (15.8, 34.1) for edoxaban 60 mg, and 29.3% (20.2, 40.4) for warfarin. A subgroup analysis suggested low body weight (≤60 kg) may affect the incidence of bleeding events with edoxaban. The incidence of study drug-related AEs was 22% for edoxaban 30 mg, 29% for edoxaban 60 mg and 33% for warfarin. No thromboembolic events occurred in any treatment group. In conclusion, this phase II study found a trend for a reduction in the incidence of all bleeding events in Asian AF patients with edoxaban 30 mg and 60 mg compared with warfarin. Adverse events were similar between the edoxaban 60-mg and warfarin groups and were lower with the edoxaban 30-mg group.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The primary objective of this study was to compare the safety of four fixed-dose regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In this 12-week, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational study, 1,146 patients with AF and risk of stroke were randomised to edoxaban 30 mg qd, 30 mg bid, 60 mg qd, or 60 mg bid or warfarin dose-adjusted to a target international normalised ratio of 2.0-3.0. The study was double-blind to edoxaban dose, but open-label to warfarin. Primary outcomes were occurrence of major and/or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and elevated hepatic enzymes and/or bilirubin. Mean age was 65 +/- 8.7 years and 64.4% were warfarin-naïve. Whereas major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 3.2% of patients randomised to warfarin, the incidence of bleeding was significantly higher with the edoxaban 60 mg bid (10.6%; p=0.002) and 30 mg bid regimens (7.8%; p=0.029), but not with the edoxaban 60 mg qd (3.8%) or 30 mg qd regimens (3.0%). For the same total daily dose of 60 mg, both bleeding frequency and trough edoxaban concentrations were higher in the 30-mg bid group than in the 60-mg qd group. There were no significant differences in hepatic enzyme elevations or bilirubin values among the groups. The safety profiles of edoxaban 30 and 60 mg qd in patients with AF were similar to warfarin. In contrast, the edoxaban bid regimens were associated with more bleeding than warfarin. These results suggest that in this three-month study, edoxaban 30 or 60 mg qd are safe and well-tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Anticoagulants; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Atrial Fibrillation; Bilirubin; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Europe, Eastern; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists have been the standard oral antithrombotic used for more than a half century for prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. Their limitations include multiple food and drug interactions and need for frequent monitoring and dose adjustments. Edoxaban is a selective and direct factor Xa inhibitor that may provide effective, safe, and more convenient anticoagulation.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multinational, noninferiority design megatrial comparing 2 exposure strategies of edoxaban to warfarin. Approximately 20,500 subjects will be randomized to edoxaban high exposure (60 mg daily, adjusted for drug clearance), edoxaban low exposure (30 mg daily, adjusted for drug clearance), or warfarin titrated to an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The edoxaban strategies provide for dynamic dose reductions in subjects with anticipated increased drug exposure. Blinded treatment is maintained through the use of sham international normalized ratios in patients receiving edoxaban. Eligibility criteria include electrical documentation of atrial fibrillation ≤12 months and a CHADS(2) score ≥2. Randomization is stratified by CHADS(2) score and anticipated drug exposure. The primary objective is to determine whether edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The primary safety end point is modified International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding. Recruitment began in November 2008. The expected median follow-up is 24 months.. ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 is a phase 3 comparison of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Although widely used in clinical fields, real-world data on the role of warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce.. This retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of NOAC and warfarin in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, we included 16,762 oral anticoagulants-naive acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2016 and June 2019. The main outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause of death.. In total, 1717 warfarin and 15,025 NOAC users were included in the analysis. After 1:8 propensity score matching, during the observation period, all types of NOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin (edoxaban: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.93, rivaroxaban: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96, apixaban: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91, and dabigatran: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Edoxaban (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), apixaban (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90), and dabigatran (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) had lower risks of major bleeding and all-cause of death.. All NOACs were more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Except for rivaroxaban, most NOACs demonstrated a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause of death than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

An increased risk of recurrent stroke is noted in patients with atrial fibrillation despite direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of treatment with each of 4 different DOACs or warfarin after DOAC failure.. We retrospectively analyzed patients with atrial fibrillation with ischemic stroke despite DOAC treatment between January 2002 and December 2016. The different outcomes of patients with DOAC failure were compared, including recurrent ischemic stroke, major cardiovascular events, intracranial hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, mortality, and net composite outcomes according to switching to different DOACs or vitamin K antagonist after index ischemic stroke. We identified 3759 patients with DOAC failure. A total of 84 patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke after switching to different oral anticoagulants, with a total follow-up time of 14 years. Using the vitamin K antagonist group as a reference, switching to any of the 4 DOACs was associated with a 69% to 77% reduced risk of major cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.16-0.39] for apixaban, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.14-0.37] for dabigatran, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09-0.60] for edoxaban, and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.45] for rivaroxaban), and a 69% to 83% reduced risk of net composite outcomes (aHR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.18-0.35] for apixaban, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.11-0.25] for dabigatran, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.17-0.56] for edoxaban, and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.23-0.41] for rivaroxaban).. In Asian patients with DOAC failure, continuing DOACs after index stroke was associated with fewer undesirable outcomes than switching to a vitamin K antagonist. Alternative pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies warrant investigation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The three direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran have been associated with lower risks of fractures compared to warfarin. However, no large scale studies have explored the associations with the newest DOAC, edoxaban, with fracture risk. The present study aims to elucidate the effects of edoxaban on the risk of hip fracture amongst elderly patients by comparing the incidence of new onset hip fracture between edoxaban and warfarin users in a Chinese population.. This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with edoxaban or warfarin use between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019 in Hong Kong, China. Patients with less than one-month exposure, medication switching between warfarin and edoxaban, those who died within 30 days after drug exposure, prior human immunodeficiency virus infection, age <50 years old, and those with prior hip fractures were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:2) between edoxaban and warfarin users using the nearest neighbour method was performed based on demographics, prior comorbidities, and use of different medications. The study outcomes were new onset hip fractures, medically attended falls and all-cause mortality.. A total of 5014 patients including 579 edoxaban users and 4435 warfarin users (median age: 70 years old [interquartile range (IQR): 62-79], 56.66% males) with a median follow-up of 637.5 (IQR: 320-1073) days were included. In the matched cohort, edoxaban users had significantly lower rates of new onset hip fractures, medically attended falls and all-cause mortality. The protective value of edoxaban use against new onset hip fracture (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.03-0.54], p = 0.0051), medically attended falls (HR: 0.47, [0.29-0.75], p = 0.0018) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.61, [0.42-0.87], p = 0.0059) in comparison to warfarin use persisted after matching. The significant relationship between edoxaban use and lower fracture risk was preserved in all sensitivity analyses using different approaches using the propensity score.. Edoxaban use is associated with lower risks of new onset hip fractures, medically attended falls and mortality risks compared to warfarin after propensity score matching.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Hip Fractures; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 60 mg and 30 mg for stroke prevention compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation have not been well-described in a nationwide cohort of Caucasian patients treated in standard clinical practice.. We used Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with atrial fibrillation during June 2016 and November 2018 who were treated with edoxaban or warfarin and computed rates per 100 person-years of thromboembolic, all-cause mortality, and bleeding events using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach to account for baseline confounding. We used weighted pooled logistic regression to compute hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals comparing events between edoxaban 60 mg and warfarin users; edoxaban 30 mg was not included in formal comparisons.. We identified 6451 atrial fibrillation patients, mean age was 72 years and 40% were females. A total of 1772 patients were treated with edoxaban 60 mg, 537 with edoxaban 30 mg, and 4142 with warfarin. The median CHA. Edoxaban 60 mg is a safe and effective treatment compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in routine clinical care for Danish (mainly Caucasian) patients with AF, with non-significantly different risks for stroke and clinically relevant bleeding, but lower all-cause mortality.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients receiving anticoagulants remains an unpreventable adverse event. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have superior efficacy in preventing thromboembolism, their effects on the occurrence of delayed bleeding remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical effect of DOACs on delayed bleeding after gastric ESD.. We retrospectively examined 728 patients who received anticoagulants and were treated for gastric neoplasms with ESD in 25 institutions across Japan. Overall, 261 patients received DOACs, including dabigatran (92), rivaroxaban (103), apixaban (45) and edoxaban (21), whereas 467 patients were treated with warfarin.. Delayed bleeding occurred in 14% of patients taking DOACs, which was not considerably different in patients receiving warfarin (18%). Delayed bleeding rate was significantly lower in patients receiving dabigatran than in those receiving warfarin and lower than that observed for other DOACs. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 65, receiving multiple antithrombotic agents, resection of multiple lesions and lesion size ≥ 30 mm were independent risk factors, and that discontinuation of anticoagulants was associated with a decreased risk of bleeding. In multivariate analysis among patients taking DOACs, dabigatran therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed bleeding.. The effects of DOACs on delayed bleeding varied between agents, but dabigatran therapy was associated with the lowest risk of delayed bleeding. Switching oral anticoagulants to dabigatran during the perioperative period could be a reasonable option to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stomach; Stomach Neoplasms; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening disease usually related to different underlying clinical conditions. The risk of SVT recurrences is high over time in patients with an underlying permanent prothrombotic condition. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent the mainstay of treatment for SVT. Data about the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are reported in the literature for the treatment of acute SVT, but less is known about their application for the secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term DOACs therapy in patients at high-risk of thrombosis, compared to VKA.. This is a retrospective single-centre study including 70 patients with SVT on long-term anticoagulant treatment with VKA followed-up at our Units between January 2017 and December 2019. All the patients were at high thrombotic risk defined as the presence of a permanent prothrombotic condition requiring long-term anticoagulation. During follow-up, 28 patients were shifted to DOACs and their clinical outcomes were compared to those of the patients who continued VKA therapy. All the arterial and venous thrombotic events of the splanchnic and extra-splanchnic districts as well as the haemorrhagic adverse events occurring during follow-up were recorded.. Of the seventy patients enrolled in the study, 36 patients (51.4%) had a single-segment involvement thrombosis (28.5% of portal vein, 7.1% of superior mesenteric vein, 4.3% of splenic vein, 11.5% of hepatic veins) and 34 patients (48.6%) had multi-segment involvement at the time of diagnosis. 42 patients (60%) continued VKA therapy and 28 (40%) were switched to DOACs. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 2-8) during VKA and 1.9 years (range 1-5.2) during DOACs. The incidence of thrombotic events was similar between patients on VKA and those on DOACs. Patients on VKA developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and of the patients on DOACs 1 developed NSTEMI and 1 DVT. No major haemorrhagic events occurred. Minor bleedings occurred in 26% of patients on VKA and in none of the DOACs patients (P: 0.09).. Our results highlight that DOACs could represent an effective and safe alternative to the VKA for secondary prophylaxis in SVT patients at high risk of thrombosis.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Adult; Anticoagulants; Budd-Chiari Syndrome; Duration of Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mesenteric Ischemia; Middle Aged; Portal Vein; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Counseling; COVID-19; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Hospitals, University; Humans; Informed Consent; London; Pandemics; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient Education as Topic; Pyridines; Quarantine; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2; Telemedicine; Tertiary Care Centers; Thiazoles; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation, incomplete adherence to anticoagulants increases risk of stroke. Non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are expensive; we evaluated whether higher copayments are associated with lower NOAC adherence.. Using a national claims database of commercially-insured patients, we performed a cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated a NOAC from 2012 to 2018. Patients were stratified into low (<$35), medium ($35-$59), or high (≥$60) copayments and propensity-score weighted based on demographics, insurance characteristics, comorbidities, prior health care utilization, calendar year, and the NOAC received. Follow-up was 1 year, with censoring for switching to a different anticoagulant, undergoing an ablation procedure, disenrolling from the insurance plan, or death. The primary outcome was adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary outcomes included NOAC discontinuation (no refill for 30 days after the end of NOAC supply) and switching anticoagulants. We compared PDC using a Kruskal-Wallis test and rates of discontinuation and switching using Cox proportional hazards models.. After weighting patients across the 3 copayment groups, the effective sample size was 17,558 patients, with balance across 50 clinical and demographic covariates (standardized differences <0.1). Mean age was 62 years, 29% of patients were female, and apixaban (43%), and rivaroxaban (38%) were the most common NOACs. Higher copayments were associated with lower adherence (P < .001), with a PDC of 0.82 (Interquartile range [IQR] 0.36-0.98) among those with high copayments, 0.85 (IQR 0.41-0.98) among those with medium copayments, and 0.88 (IQR 0.41-0.99) among those with low copayments. Compared to patients with low copayments, patients with high copayments had higher rates of discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.19; P < .001).. Among atrial fibrillation patients newly initiating NOACs, higher copayments in commercial insurance were associated with lower adherence and higher rates of discontinuation in the first year. Policies to lower or limit cost-sharing of important medications may lead to improved adherence and better outcomes among patients receiving NOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Deductibles and Coinsurance; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Medicare Part C; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sample Size; Stroke; Thiazoles; United States; Warfarin

Recent data suggest direct oral anticoagulants are as safe and efficacious as warfarin among select patients with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, real-world treatment patterns of AF stroke prophylaxis in the setting of valvular AF are currently unknown. Accordingly, using the prospective, ambulatory National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry, we sought to characterize overall use, temporal trends in use, and the extent of practice-level variation in the use of any direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin among patients with valvular AF from January 1, 2013, to March 31, 2019.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and GI cancer compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA).. We conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study comparing the bleeding risk associated with DOAC versus VKA in patients with AF and GI cancer. We calculated crude bleeding rates per 100 person-years (PYs) for GI and major bleeding. We then compared rates of bleeding at 1 year after initial oral anticoagulation filled prescription by treatment regimen using inverse probability of treatment weighting and Cox regression.. The unweighted study population included 1476 AF patients with GI cancer (41.6% women, median age 78 years) initiating a DOAC and 652 initiating a VKA. One-year risk of GI bleeding was 5.0% in the DOAC group and 4.7% in the VKA group with a corresponding weighted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63, 1.45). For patients with active cancer, weighted GI bleeding rates were slightly higher in both the VKA and DOAC group, and the weighted HR was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.88). The HR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.76) for all bleedings. Hazard ratios for GI bleeding were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.52) for patients with upper GI cancer, and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.46) in patients with colorectal cancer.. Evidence from this nationwide cohort study suggests a comparable 1-year risk of bleeding associated with DOAC compared with VKA among patients with AF and GI cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dabigatran; Denmark; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants represent a new option for prevention of embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about the impact of non-cardiac comorbidities on the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs.. In a post hoc analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, we analysed 21 105 patients with AF followed for an average of 2.8 years and randomized to either a higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER), a lower-dose edoxaban regimen, or warfarin. We used the updated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to stratify the patients according to the burden of concomitant disease (CCI = 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4). The treatment groups were then compared for safety, efficacy, and net clinical outcomes across CCI categories. There were 32.0%, 7.3%, 42.1%, 12.7%, and 6.0% of patients with CCI scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively. A CCI score ≥4 was associated with significantly higher rates of thromboembolic events, bleeding, and death compared to CCI = 0 (P < 0.05 for each). The annualized rates of the primary net clinical outcome (stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death) for CCI = 0, 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 were 5.9%, 8.7%, 6.6%, 10.3%, and 13.6% (Ptrend < 0.001). There were no significant interactions between treatment with HDER vs. warfarin and efficacy, safety, and net outcomes across the CCI groups (P-interaction > 0.10 for each).. Although increasing CCI scores are associated with worse outcomes, the efficacy, safety, and net clinical outcomes of edoxaban vs. warfarin were independent of the degree of comorbidity present.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

With increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and availability of new reversal agents, the risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) requires better understanding. We compared hemorrhage expansion rates, mortality, and morbidity following tICH in patients treated with vitamin k antagonists (VKA: warfarin) and DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran).. Retrospective chart review of patients from 2010 to 2017 was performed to identify patients with imaging diagnosis of acute traumatic intraparenchymal, subdural, subarachnoid, and epidural hemorrhage with preadmission use of DOACs or VKAs. We identified 39 patients on DOACs and 97 patients on VKAs. Demographic information, comorbidities, hemorrhage size, and expansion over time, as well as discharge disposition and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were collected. Primary outcome was development of new or enlargement of tICH within the first 48 h of initial CT imaging.. Of 136 patients with mean (SD) age 78.7 (13.2) years, most common tICH subtype was subdural hematoma (N = 102/136; 75%), and most common mechanism was a fall (N = 130/136; 95.6%). Majority of patients in the DOAC group did not receive reversal agents (66.7%). Hemorrhage expansion or new hemorrhage occurred in 11.1% in DOAC group vs. 14.6% in VKA group (p = 0.77) at a median of 8 and 11 h from initial ED admission, respectively (p = 0.82). Patients in the DOAC group compared to VKA group had higher median discharge GOS (4 vs. 3 respectively, p = 0.03), higher percentage of patients with good outcome (GOS 4-5, 66.7% vs. 40.2% respectively, p = 0.005), and higher rate of discharge to home or rehabilitation (p = 0.04).. We report anticoagulation-associated tICH outcomes predominantly due to fall-related subdural hematomas. Patients on DOACs had lower tICH expansion rates although not statistically significantly different from VKA-treated patients. DOAC-treated patients had favorable outcomes versus VKA group following tICH despite low use of reversal strategies. DOAC use may be a safer alternative to VKA in patients at risk of traumatic brain hemorrhage.

Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation Factors; Coagulants; Dabigatran; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhage, Traumatic; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Neurosurgical Procedures; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulation prevents thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. Factor Xa inhibitors, like edoxaban, are known to reduce inflammation and proliferation of smooth muscle cells, while vitamin K antagonism can cause vascular calcific damage. The influence of edoxaban compared to warfarin on vascular remodeling, atherosclerosis and arteriogenesis is unknown.. Apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE. There was no difference in hind-limb perfusion restoration between the three groups after 14 days (Co 0.36 ± 0.05 vs. Warf 0.39 ± 0.09 (p = .39), Co vs. Edo 0.51 ± 0.06 (p = .089), Warf vs. Edo (p = .83)) after ligation. Immuno-histologically, there was no difference in smooth muscle cell count in both hindlimbs between the three groups or in the amount of perivascular macrophages in collateral-bearing hindlimb tissue. Edoxaban showed the lowest amount of plaque tissue in the aortic sinus tissue (Co 74 ± 11% vs. Edo 62 ± 12% (p = .024), Co vs. Warf 69 ± 14% (p = .30), Edo vs. Warf (p = .14)) as well as the least amount of fibrosis (Co 3.1 ± 0.9% vs. Edo 1.7 ± 0.6% (p = .027), Co vs. Warf 4.1 ± 0.7% (p = .081), Edo vs. Warf (p < .001)). No difference in mRNA content of inflammatory cytokines in muscle tissue or spleen was detected between the three groups.. These data suggest that treatment with edoxaban unlike warfarin prevents vascular maladaptive remodeling, which may be clinically important.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atherosclerosis; Collateral Circulation; Disease Models, Animal; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrosis; Hindlimb; Ischemia; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout, ApoE; Muscle, Skeletal; Neovascularization, Physiologic; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Vascular Remodeling; Warfarin

ENSURE-AF (NCT02072434) assessed therapy with edoxaban vs enoxaparin-warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing elective electrical cardioversion (ECV).. To evaluate clinical features and primary efficacy (composite of stroke, systemic embolic events, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality during study period) and safety endpoints (composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding during on-treatment period) in patients awaiting ECV of AF with a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided vs a non-TEE-guided strategy.. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study, 2199 patients were randomized to edoxaban 60 mg once-daily (30 mg for creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, weight ≤60 kg and/or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitor) or enoxaparin-warfarin. Primary efficacy endpoint and safety endpoint were reported. Associates of TEE use, efficacy endpoint and safety endpoint were explored using multivariable logistic regression.. In total, 589 patients from the edoxaban stratum and 594 from the enoxaparin-warfarin stratum were allocated to the TEE-guided strategy. Primary efficacy was similar regardless of TEE approach (P = .575). There were no significant differences in bleeding rates, regardless of TEE approach (P = .677). Independent predictors of TEE use were as follows: history of ischaemic stroke/ transient ischaemic attack, hypertension and valvular heart disease. Mean CHA. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were not different between patients undergoing TEE-guided strategy and in those undergoing an optimized conventional anticoagulation approach for ECV of AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Decision-Making; Duration of Therapy; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Enoxaparin; Female; Heart Diseases; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Warfarin

For some years now, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is uncertainty on DOACs' use in some clinical scenarios that are not fully explored by clinical trials, but commonly encountered in the real world. We report a Delphi Consensus on DOAC use in VTE patients. The consensus dealt with seven main topics: (1) clinical superiority of DOACs compared to VKAs; (2) therapeutic options for patients with intermediate risk PE; (3) therapeutic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT); (4) DOACs' role in oncological patients with VTE; (5) role of the reversal agent; (6) safety of low doses of DOACs in VTE patients; (7) DOACs long-term therapy (more than 12 months) in VTE patients; Forty-six physicians (cardiologists, internists, angiologists, oncologists, hematologists, and geriatricians) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a five-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: somewhat agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Votes 1-2 were considered as disagreement, while votes 3-5 as agreement. For each statement an agreement of ≥ 66% among the respondents was considered consensus. A brief discussion about the results for each topic is also reported.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Delphi Technique; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants are prescribed for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation, which is the most common heart arrhythmia worldwide. The vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin is a long-established anticoagulant. However, newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been recently introduced as an alternative. Given the prevalence of atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant choice has substantial clinical and financial implications for healthcare systems. In this study, we explore trends and geographic variation in anticoagulant prescribing in English primary care. Because national guidelines in England do not specify a first-line anticoagulant, we investigate the association between local policies and prescribing data.. Primary care prescribing data of anticoagulants for all NHS practices from 2014 to 2019 in England was obtained from the ePACT2 database. Public formularies were accessed online to obtain local anticoagulation prescribing policies for 89.5% of clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). These were categorized according to their recommendations: no local policies, warfarin as first-line, or identification of a preferred DOAC (but not a preferred anticoagulant). Local policies were cross-tabulated with pooled prescribing data to measure the strength of association with Cramér's V.. Nationally, prescribing of DOACs increased from 9% of all anticoagulants in 2014 to 74% in 2019, while that of warfarin declined accordingly. Still, there was significant local variation. Across geographical regions, DOACs ranged from 53 to 99% of all anticoagulants. Most CCGs (73%) did not specify a first-line choice, and 16% recommended warfarin first line. Only 11% designated a preferred DOAC. Policies with a preferred DOAC indeed correlated with increased prescribing of that DOAC (Cramér's V = 0.25, 0.27, 0.38 for rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban respectively). However, local policies showed a negligible relationship with the classes of anticoagulants prescribed-DOAC or VKA (Cramér's V = 0.01).. Nationally, the use of DOACs to treat atrial fibrillation has increased rapidly. Despite this, significant geographical variation in uptake remains. This study provides insights on how local policies relate to this variation. Our findings suggest that, in the absence of a nationally recommended first-line anticoagulant, local prescribing policies may aid in deciding between individual DOACs, but not in adjudicating between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (i.e. warfarin) as general classes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Utilization; England; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; State Medicine; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The evolution of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) has changed the horizon of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). All 4 NOACs have been tested against dose-adjusted warfarin in well-designed, pivotal, phase III, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and were approved by regulatory authorities for an SPAF indication. However, as traditional RCTs, these trials have important weaknesses, largely related to their complex structure and patient participation, which was limited by strict inclusion and extensive exclusion criteria. In the real world, however, clinicians are often faced with complex, multimorbid patients who are underrepresented in these RCTs. This article is based on a meeting report authored by 12 scientists studying atrial fibrillation (AF) in diverse ways who discussed the management of challenging AF cases that are underrepresented in pivotal NOAC trials.. An advisory board panel was convened to confer on management strategies for challenging AF cases. The article is derived from a summary of case presentations and the collaborative discussions at the meeting.. This expert consensus of cardiologists aimed to define management strategies for challenging cases with patients who underrepresented in pivotal trials using case examples from their routine practice. Although strong evidence is lacking, exploratory subgroup analysis of phase III pivotal trials partially informs the management of these patients. Clinical trials with higher external validity are needed to clarify areas of uncertainty. The lack of clear evidence about complex AF cases has pushed clinicians to manage patients based on clinical experience, including rare situations of off-label prescriptions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiologists; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Consensus; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

To assess the safety (ie, risk of bleeding) and effectiveness (ie, risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE)) separately for four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) versus warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), including those at high risk of bleeding and treated with reduced doses of NOACs.. We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records and claims data from 372 acute care hospitals in Japan for patients with NVAF newly initiated on NOACs or warfarin. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilised weights (s-IPTW). Bleeding risk and stroke/SE risk were expressed as HRs with 95% CIs. Two sensitivity analyses were conducted.. In patients with NVAF primarily treated with reduced-dose NOACs, the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding were significantly lower with NOACs versus warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electronic Health Records; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Recent clinical trials' findings have revealed the therapeutic noninferiority of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) to standard therapy with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). However, few studies have quantitatively analyzed thrombus reduction in the pulmonary artery.. This observational study included 38 symptomatic PTE patients with stable hemodynamics. All patients received an intravenous heparin bolus followed by continual heparin injections immediately after the PTE diagnosis. The heparin was discontinued after edoxaban therapy began in the DOAC group (n = 22) or after the therapeutic range for the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio was achieved in the VKA group (n = 16). The thrombus volumes in the pulmonary arteries were quantitatively analyzed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans, and they were compared at baseline and at 2 weeks after admission.. The pulmonary thrombus volumes declined in the VKA and DOAC groups from 7.9 to 4.2 cm. In relation to pulmonary artery thrombus volume reduction, DOAC monotherapy for PTE may be comparable with standard therapy involving VKAs.

Topics: Aged; alpha-2-Antiplasmin; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Contrast Media; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolysin; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Hydrolases; Prothrombin Time; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may recur during anticoagulation, but the actual rate is not well established. In a post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE trial we evaluated the risk and determinants of recurrent VTE of patients during anticoagulation with heparin, edoxaban or warfarin.. The Hokusai-VTE study showed that in VTE patients edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin with significantly less bleeding. Treatment duration ranged from 3 to 12 months. The recurrent VTE during anticoagulation period was defined as the VTE which occurred from the date of the first to the last dose (+3 days) of study drug.. 147 of 8240 patients (1.8%) had a recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment. Median duration of anticoagulation was 267 days. 80 (54%) patients recurred within the first 30 days, 39 of those during heparin lead-in. 23 of 147 patients died of pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulation (case fatality rate 15.6%). 13 of those fatalities (57%) occurred during the first 30 days; 4 of those during heparin lead-in. The recurrence risk was numerically lower in patients assigned to edoxaban compared to those assigned to warfarin, particularly beyond 30 days. We observed a trend towards a higher proportion of men, high NT-proBNP levels and obesity at the time of diagnosis among patients with early recurrence and mortality in particular.. The risk of recurrent VTE and PE-related mortality during the time of anticoagulation is low but noteworthy. Further studies are warranted to sharpen the risk profile of VTE patients in order to improve treatment and reduce mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. In Brazil, even though low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the gold standard of care for the management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), its cost limits its use and therefore warfarin is commonly prescribed. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as edoxaban, have been introduced as an alternative in this setting.. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban with LMWH (Model 1) and warfarin (Model 2) to support clinicians and hospitals when choosing an anticoagulant to manage CAT.. Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using Markov state-transition models over a timeframe of 5 years, in a hypothetical, 64 years-old patients cancer population with an index VTE event. Transition probabilities, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and risk reductions were either derived from the literature, estimated or calculated. A willingness-to-pay limit of 3 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per head was used. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed for robustness. The main outcome of this study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per QALY gained.. Model 1 base case analysis demonstrated dominance of edoxaban compared to LMWH, with an ICER of $5204.46, representing cost saved per QALY lost. In Model 2, edoxaban was associated with a $736.90 cost increase vs. warfarin, with an ICER of $2541.03. Sensitivity analyses confirmed base-case results.. Edoxaban represents a cost-saving alternative to LMWH for the management of CAT and is cost-effective vs. warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brazil; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Warfarin

The evidence of effectiveness and safety of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among elderly East Asians is limited.. We aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety outcomes associated with NOACs and warfarin among elderly Koreans aged ≥80 years.. Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment service database, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were naïve to index oral anticoagulant between 2015 and 2017 were included in this study (20,573 for NOACs and 4086 for warfarin). Two treatment groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. The clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke, major bleeding including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and a composite of these outcomes were evaluated.. Compared to warfarin, NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.62-0.89]), and composite outcome (0.78 [0.69-0.90]). NOACs showed nonsignificant trends towards to lower risks of GIB and major bleeding than warfarin. The risk of ICH of NOAC group was comparable with the warfarin group. Among NOACs, apixaban and edoxaban showed better composite outcomes than warfarin. Among the clinical outcomes, only ischemic stroke and the composite outcome had a significant interaction with age subgroups (80-89 years and ≥90 years, P-for-interaction = .097 and .040, respectively).. NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke and the composite outcome (ischemic stroke and major bleeding) compared to warfarin in elderly East Asians. Physicians should be more confident in prescribing NOACs to elderly East Asians with AF.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Republic of Korea; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The effect of edoxaban on plasma prothrombin fragment 1+2 (PTF1+2), a sensitive maker of in vivo thrombin generation, has not been fully investigated in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We compared plasma PTF1+2 levels between 25 NVAF patients receiving warfarin and 100 NVAF patients receiving edoxaban and additionally analyzed the association between plasma PTF1+2 levels and the dose of edoxaban. Plasma PTF1+2 levels were significantly higher in patients receiving edoxaban than in those receiving warfarin (141.5 ± 50.0 pmol/l vs 93.1 ± 55.7 pmol/l, p < 0.001). The prevalence of plasma PF1+2 levels above the upper limit (229 pmol/l) of the normal range did not differ between the 2 groups (4% vs 4%), whereas the prevalence of plasma PTF1+2 levels below the lower limit (69 pmol/l) of the normal range was significantly lower in patients receiving edoxaban than in those receiving warfarin (1% vs 48%, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis identified age and warfarin treatment as independent variables associated with the plasma PTF1+2 level. In a subgroup analysis, plasma PTF1+2 levels were significantly higher in 58 receiving edoxaban of 30 mg/day than in 42 receiving edoxaban of 60 mg/day (157.6 ± 50.8 pmol/l vs 121.6 ± 39.8 pmol/l, p = 0.01); however, after adjusting for confounding factors, the dose of edoxaban was not independently associated with the plasma PTF1+2 level. In conclusion, edoxaban sufficiently inhibits thrombin generation unrelated to its dose in NVAF, although its inhibitory effect is weaker compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Prospective Studies; Prothrombin; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Liver Diseases; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The correlation between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKAs) intake and the incidence of intracranial complications after minor head injury (MHI) is still object of debate: preliminary observation seems to demonstrate lower incidence in intracranial bleeding complications (ICH) in patients taking DOACs than VKA. METHODS. This prospective and observational study was performed to clarify the incidence of ICH in patients in DOACs compared to VKAs. Between January 2016 and April 2018 we have recorded in our ED patients with MHI taking oral anticoagulants. Their hemorragic risk score was calculated and recorded for each patient (Has Bled, Atria and Orbit). RESULTS A total of 402 patients with MHI taking anticoagulant were collected: 226 were receiving one of the four DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban) while 176 patients were in therapy with VKA. The rate of intracranial complications was significantly lower in patients receiving DOACs than in patients treated with VKA (p < 0.01). In the VKA group two patients died because of intracranial bleeding. No deaths were recorded in the DOACs group. DISCUSSION patients with MHI who take DOACs have a significant lower incidence of intracranial bleeding complications than those treated with vitamin k antagonists. This statement is supported by the observation that the hemorrhagic risk, measured according to the chosen scores, was similar between the two groups.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Craniocerebral Trauma; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Although novel oral-anticoagulants are widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention, there was only limited evidence for their use in left ventricular (LV) thrombus.. A 41-year-old man who presented with acute onset of right-hand clumsiness and aphasia even under high international normalized ratio (INR: 7.64) from warfarin use. He was previously treated with warfarin for the LV thrombus and non-valvular AF. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multiple acute infarction in the cortex of the bilateral frontal lobes, left parietal lobe, and bilateral central semiovale, which highly suggested embolic stroke.. The repeated transthoracic echocardiogram still revealed LV thrombus (1.27 × 0.90 cm), which failed to respond to warfarin therapy.. Due to acute infarctions occurred under supratherapeutic range of INR, we switched warfarin to edoxaban (dose: 60 mg/day) after INR decreased to less than 2.. The thrombus disappeared after receiving edoxaban for 23 days, and no more recurrent stroke was noted for more than 6 months.. This is the first case demonstrates that while facing ineffective treatment of warfarin for LV thrombus, edoxaban could be safely and effectively used under this situation.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Heart Failure; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Retreatment; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Health Services Misuse; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) have been the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The direct oral anticoagulants dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) are as efficacious as and in some instances superior to vitamin K antagonists in the prevention of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding compared with warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Benefits of direct oral anticoagulants include a rapid onset of therapeutic effect, fixed dose-response relationships without the need for routine monitoring, a short half-life, and infrequent need for periprocedural bridging with a parenteral agent. However, direct oral anticoagulants differ in subsets of patients. Critical care and advanced practice nurses must understand these differences, prescribing considerations, drug aherence interventions, drug-drug interactions, and periprocedural management. This article presents an update and review of direct oral antigcoagulants based on the latest national guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Care Nursing; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Heart Failure; Humans; Obesity; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Whether four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are superior to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear.. This nationwide retrospective cohort study was based on data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, covering patients with NVAF taking edoxaban (n = 4,577), apixaban (n = 9,952), rivaroxaban (n = 33,022), dabigatran (n = 22,371), and warfarin (n = 19,761). Propensity score weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed up until occurrence of study outcomes or end date of study.. In the largest real-world practice study among Asian patients with NVAF, four DOACs were associated with a comparable or lower risk of thromboembolism, and a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. There was consistency even among high-risk subgroups and whether standard-or low-dose regimens were compared.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Liver Diseases; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

We investigated recurrent stroke volume with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) about clinical backgrounds and number of recurrent stroke.. We administered 4 NOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in 101 postcardioembolic strokes with NVAF. In a retrospective study, we measured recurrent stroke volume with magnetic resonance imaging volumetric software and compared them between 10 vitamin K anticoagulant (VKA: warfarin) cases and 13 NOAC cases under anticoagulant therapy.. Of 101 cases, 31 were started with a VKA and switched to NOACs after 10 recurrent strokes. Other 70 cases were directly started with NOACs and 13 cases with NOACs as first anticoagulants had recurrent stroke. The frequency of recurrent stroke during anticoagulant therapy is not different between the VKA group and the 3 NOACs group. Recurrent stroke volume is significantly larger in the VKA group (26.4 cm. Secondary prevention with NOACs after stroke might be more beneficial than a VKA by reducing recurrent infarct volume.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Japan; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

It is well known that warfarin inhibits the synthesis of vitamin K-dependent anticoagulants, including thrombin, protein C and S, and factor Xa, leading, paradoxically, to an initial hypercoagulable state. Edoxaban, a direct inhibitor of activated factor X is widely used for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the effect of edoxaban on circulating coagulation factors, in patients with acute VTE, remains unknown.. We enrolled 57 patients with acute VTE with/without pulmonary embolism treated with edoxaban (n=37) or warfarin (n=20) in a clinical setting. Before treatment and 2 weeks after treatment, we evaluated thrombotic burden using ultrasound or computed tomography angiography. We also evaluated thrombin generation, represented by prothrombin fragment F1+2; thrombus degradation, represented by D-dimer; and levels of anticoagulants, including protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III. Both edoxaban and warfarin treatment improved thrombotic burden and decreased prothrombin fragment F1+2, and D-dimer. Edoxaban treatment preserved protein C and protein S levels. In contrast, warfarin decreased protein C and protein S levels. Neither treatment affected antithrombin III.. Edoxaban improves VTE while preserving protein C and protein S levels, thereby indicating that edoxaban improves thrombotic burden while maintaining levels of anticoagulants.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Protein C; Protein S; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Since 2010, four oral anticoagulants have been approved for marketing in addition to warfarin for treatment of thromboembolic disease. Limited head-to-head data exist comparing these treatments, leaving patients and clinicians with little guidance for selecting a strategy that balances recurrence reduction with bleeding risk. In the dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxban, edoxaban and warfarin comparative effectiveness research study, we compare all five currently available oral anticoagulant agents for the extended treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, as well as no extended treatment, and evaluate whether results differ in specific sub-populations. As our population includes Medicare novel anticoagulant users and large numbers of commercially insured and Medicaid patients, our results will likely be transportable to the majority of US patients experiencing a DVT or pulmonary embolism.. NCT03271450.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

We assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the chronic phase through comparison with conventional warfarin therapy.A total of 807 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with having DVT in the chronic phase were included (484 patients to warfarin therapy and 323 patients to DOAC therapy). The condition of leg veins was assessed 3 to 6 months after starting the therapies by ultrasound examination. Major bleeding and mortality during the therapies were followed-up.There was no significant difference between the two groups in the thrombosis improvement rate (DOAC group: 91.2% versus warfarin group: 88.9%). There was no significant difference between the two groups in major bleeding (DOAC group: 1.8% versus warfarin group: 1.8%). In patients with active cancer, the DOAC group had a borderline higher thrombosis improvement rate than the warfarin group (92.1% versus 80.0%, P = 0.05). The proportion of major bleeding in the patients with active cancer was slightly higher in the warfarin group than in the DOAC group (4.3% versus 2.8%; P = 0.71). Active cancer was not an independent risk factor for major bleeding and recurrence in the DOAC group (OR 2.68, 95% CI 0.51-14.1; P = 0.24 and OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.20-2.07; P = 0.47).In treatment using oral anticoagulants for DVT in the chronic phase, DOACs exhibited equal efficacy and safety as warfarin did. Particularly DOACs appear to be an attractive therapeutic option for cancer-associated DVT in chronic phase, with relatively low anticipated rates of recurrence and major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Chronic Disease; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a cause of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and it is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological complications. We experienced a case of reversible parkinsonism after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and subsequent multiple cerebral infarctions under standard anticoagulation therapy in a patient with CTEPH associated with APS. Strict management using a combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy should be considered in patients with a high titer of triple antiphospholipid antibodies in the perioperative period. We should be aware of the high risk of postoperative neurologic manifestations in patients with APS.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Cerebral Infarction; Chronic Disease; Endarterectomy; Heparin; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Male; Parkinsonian Disorders; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral coagulants (DOAC) have been shown to decrease the frequency of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared with warfarin. However, the precise characteristics, such as the size and locations of the hemorrhage, and outcome and onset time of ICH in patient taking DOAC are not fully elucidated.. We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of symptomatic patients with ICH taking either DOAC or warfarin between January 2012 and December 2015.. Out of 400 consecutive patients with ICH, 15 patients were DOAC-ICH and 24 patients were warfarin-ICH. DOAC-ICH was observed in 6 patients with 10 mg of rivaroxaban, 5 patients with 15 mg of rivaroxaban, and 1 patient with 10 mg of apixaban, 5 mg of apixaban, 30 mg of edoxaban, and 60 mg of edoxaban. Prothrombin time was well controlled in most of the warfarin-ICH patients (83.3%). The locations of ICH were similar in both groups; however, median ICH volume was significantly smaller in DOAC-ICH patients than in warfarin-ICH patients (P < .01) and ICH around basal ganglia seemed to show great difference between the groups. DOAC-ICH patients showed better neurological outcome at the time of discharge than warfarin patients (P < .01), and the ratio of good prognosis was significantly higher in the DOAC-ICH patients than in the warfarin-ICH patients (P < .01). The onset of warfarin-ICH was frequently observed in the morning and evening, whereas DOAC-ICH did not show any specific onset time.. Patients with DOAC-ICH showed smaller ICH volume and better clinical outcomes than patients with warfarin-ICH, and DOAC-ICH did not show any specific onset peak.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Circadian Rhythm; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This report describes the case of a 66-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was initially used to control VTE before chemotherapy. However, switching UFH to warfarin or edoxaban, a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), failed. Chemotherapy was then administered to control the tumor which was thought to have been the main cause of VTE, which had been treated by UFH. After tumor shrinkage was achieved by chemotherapy, we were able to successfully switch from UFH to edoxaban. Controlling the tumor size and activity enabled the use of edoxaban as maintenance therapy for VTE.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Heparin; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Tumor Burden; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Different target activated clotting times (ACTs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been proposed. Moreover, relationships between initial bolus dose of heparin at the start of AF ablation in patients receiving edoxaban anticoagulation therapy and ACT are unclear.. Patients who received anticoagulation with uninterrupted warfarin (control; n = 120) or interrupted edoxaban (n = 120) on the morning of day of ablation were studied. An initial dose of 100 U/kg heparin was administered as a reliable control for warfarin. Initial heparin doses of 120, 130, 140, or 150 U/kg were randomly administered to the edoxaban group.. Edoxaban group showed shorter baseline ACT before the procedure (130 ± 16 seconds) than the warfarin group (152 ± 26 seconds, P < 0.0001). In the warfarin group, 100 U/kg heparin showed 361 ± 48 seconds 15-minute ACT. In the edoxaban group, an increase in initial dose induced prolongation of 15-minute ACT (i.e., 15-minute ACTs of 293 ± 56, 306 ± 39, 311 ± 45, and 319 ± 45 seconds for 120, 130, 140, and 150 U/kg initial doses, respectively). The total heparin required during the procedure was higher in the edoxaban group than in the warfarin group (109 ± 37 vs. 77 ± 21 U/kg/h, P < 0.0001). The 120-150 U/kg dose of heparin in edoxaban group did not cause thromboembolic or major bleeding complications.. Edoxaban interrupted on the day of ablation showed a shorter baseline ACT than uninterrupted warfarin. Edoxaban required a higher initial heparin dose to achieve a similar 15-minute ACT to warfarin. These results are useful for determining the initial heparin dose required to achieve variable target ACTs.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Period; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

The significantly increased incidence of stroke and systemic embolisation caused by atrial fibrillation can be prevented by adequately adjusted anticoagulant therapy. Vitamin K antagonists effectively decrease the risk of thromboembolic events but this effect is influenced by many factors. The development of the new direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOAC) in the last few years provided new opportunities for us to choose the suitable anticoagulant therapy. According to the results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and ENSURE-AF multicenter, randomized trials, edoxaban, the recently introduced DOAC is equally effective as the traditional coumarin therapy, nevertheless, it ensures more tolerable anticoagulation for patients suffering from non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(12): 466-469.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) as well as for prevention and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Pivotal trials have demonstrated non-inferiority and potential superiority compared to warfarin, which increases the options of anticoagulant treatment. In our setting, the Anticoagulant Treatment Units (ATUs) and Primary Care Centres (PCCs) play an important role in the education, follow-up, adherence control and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients. These considerations have motivated us to elaborate the present consensus document that aims to establish clear recommendations that incorporate the findings of scientific research into clinical practice to improve the quality of care in the field of anticoagulation.. A group of experts from the Catalan Thrombosis Group (TROMBOC@T) reviewed all published literature from 2009 to 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence.. As a result of the project, a set of practical recommendations have been established that will facilitate treatment, education, follow-up and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients with ACODs.. Progressive increase in the use of DOACs calls for measures to establish and homogenise clinical management guidelines for patients anticoagulated with DOACs in ATUs and PCCs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This study was conducted to describe the real-world hospital length of stay in patients treated with all of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin for new-onset venous thromboembolism (VTE) at a large, tertiary, academic medical center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 441 patients included, 261 (57%) patients received DOACs versus 180 (41%) patients received warfarin. In the DOAC group, a total of 92 (35%) patients received rivaroxaban, followed by 83 (32%) patients received apixaban, 50 (19%) patients received dabigatran, and 36 (14%) patients received edoxaban. Patients initiated on DOACs had a statistically significant shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients initiated on warfarin (median 3 days, [IQR 0-5] vs. 8 days [IQR 5-11], P < 0.05). Despite the shorter hospital length of stay in patients receiving DOACs, the overall reported differences between the DOACs group and the warfarin group in terms of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding at 3 and 6 months were deemed to be statistically insignificant.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Several studies have compared the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin using results from clinical trials evaluating NOACs. However, the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of warfarin groups ranged across clinical trials, and all were below the therapeutic goal of 70%. We compared the cost effectiveness of edoxaban 60 mg, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and well-managed warfarin with a TTR of 70% in preventing stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding.. For the six treatments, we used a Markov state-transition model to quantify lifetime costs in $US and effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We simulated relative risk ratios of clinical events with each NOAC versus warfarin with a TTR of 70% using published regression models that predict how the incidence of thrombotic or hemorrhagic events changes for each unit change in TTR. We re-ran our analysis for two other estimates of TTR: 65 and 75%.. Treatment with edoxaban 60 mg cost $US127,520/QALY gained compared with warfarin with a TTR of 70% and cost $US41,860/QALY gained compared with warfarin with a TTR of 65%. However, warfarin with a TTR of 75% was more effective and less expensive than all NOACs. For three levels of TTR, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg were dominated strategies.. The comparative cost effectiveness of edoxaban and warfarin is highly sensitive to TTR. At the $US100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, our results suggest that warfarin is the most cost-effective treatment for patients who can achieve a TTR of 70%.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) compared higher-dose edoxaban regimen (HD-ER) and lower-dose edoxaban regimen with well-managed warfarin in 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation. The risk factors and clinical impact of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in this trial have not been described in detail.. MGIB occurred more frequently with HD-ER than warfarin. The rates of life-threatening or fatal GIB were low and similar with both HD-ER and warfarin. Clinical outcomes were generally favorable. The correlation between dose, trough edoxaban level, and the risk of GIB risk suggests GIB is exposure-related.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Female; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Uterine Hemorrhage; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Clinical variables including hypertension could be linked with major bleeding events and death beyond vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) or direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) treatment strategy.. Subgroup analysis of major bleeding (primary endpoint) associated with clinical variables, site of bleeding, ongoing antithrombotics, reversal treatment or blood transfusion, outcomes (secondary endpoints) was performed in patients with bleeding events submitted to hard 5:1 propensity-score matching for hypertension.. Enrolled patients were 2,792 (mean age, 65.6 ± 19.9 years) during 2-year survey including 166,000 visits, of 200,000 inhabitants catchment area; 8,239 patients received warfarin and 3,797 DOACs. Hypertension account for 1,077 (39%) patients; major bleeding for 474 (17%); death for 29 (1%), and 72 (3%) on 1-month and 1-year, respectively. Hypertension, age, glucose, cancer, ischemic vascular disease, and CHA2D2VASc score were more likely to link with major bleeding. On multivariate analysis, only age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; P < 0.001), CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 2 (OR, 2.14; P = 0.001), and glucose (OR, 1.01; P = 0.005) were predictors of major bleeding. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated patients with hypertension as compared with patients without showed 60% versus 20% death on 1-month (P < 0.001). Warfarin compared with DOACs was more likely to present with major bleeding (0.7% versus 0.2%; OR, 2.8; P = 0.005). Receiver operator characteristics analysis showed high value (0.61) of age and glucose over creatinine and systolic arterial pressure (P = NS).. Four in 10 patients with major bleeding showed hypertension; of these 8 in 10 will die within 1 month. Warfarin compared with DOACs was more likely to present with major bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Glucose; Blood Transfusion; Cardiovascular Diseases; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Epistaxis; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hematuria; Hemoptysis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants used for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) include warfarin and the more recently introduced direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban. Information on the comparative safety of these medications in routine clinical practice is lacking. We identified patients with diagnoses for VTE and prescriptions for oral anticoagulants using claims data from a large U.S. insurance database from 2012 to 2017. Marginal structural logistic models were used to examine associations between type of oral anticoagulant and risk of all-cause mortality. Of 62,431 enrolees in this analysis, 51% were female and the mean age was 61.9 years. Initial oral anticoagulant prescriptions were for warfarin (

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Latin America; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Advances in cancer therapy have led to a significant improvement of survival in most types of malignancies over the past few decades. As a result, there is a growing population of cancer survivors, expected to reach 18 million people in 2030 in the US and a similar number in Europe. Interestingly, cancer survivor studies have shown that although about half of these patients eventually die of cancer, one third of them actually die of cardiovascular disease. Arrhythmias represent a significant part of cardiovascular complications and atrial fibrillation is the main arrhythmia occurring in cancer patients.Antithrombotic therapy is a challenge: the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) level in patients on therapy with vitamin K antagonists is achieved in only 12% of them; in these patients, direct oral anticoagulants seem to be effective and safe for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events compared to warfarin and have similar risk of major bleeding. Among the trials, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 provides more data on the efficacy and safety of edoxaban in cancer patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cancer Survivors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of improved antithrombotic treatment in atrial fibrillation after the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on the incidence of stroke and bleeding in a real-life total population, including both primary and secondary care. Methods- All resident and alive patients with a recorded diagnosis for atrial fibrillation during the preceding 5 years in the Stockholm County Healthcare database (Vårdanalysdatabasen) were followed for clinical outcomes during 2012 (n=41 008) and 2017 (n=49 510). Results- Pharmacy claims for oral anticoagulants increased from 51.6% to 73.8% (78.7% among those with CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven efficacy and safety among patients with atrial fibrillation. Concerns have been raised about an excess of stroke among patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) >95 mg/mL treated with edoxaban. We assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in atrial fibrillation patients in relation to CrCl. Methods- In the Korean National Health Insurance Service data during the period from January to December 2016, we identified 9537 edoxaban-treated patients. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were compared between high-dose edoxaban regimen (HDER, 60 mg daily, n=2840) and a propensity score-matched warfarin group (n=2840) and between low-dose edoxaban regimen (LDER, 30 mg daily, n=3016) and matched warfarin group (n=3016). Results- The median follow-up period was 5.0 months (interquartile range, 2-7 months). The mean age was 68 years, and 63% were men in HDER group, and the mean age was 73 years, and 52% were men in LDER group. Compared with warfarin, both HDER and LDER significantly decreased the risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (S/SE; HDER: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; LDER: aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.78), major bleeding (HDER: aHR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26-0.61; LDER: aHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), and mortality (HDER: aHR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.53; LDER: aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73). In patients with CrCl >95 mL/min, the incidence of S/SE was higher with LDER than warfarin and comparable between HDER and warfarin group. There was lower effectiveness for the prevention of S/SE with LDER compared with warfarin at higher CrCl levels ( P for interaction=0.023). Conclusions- In real-world practice, both doses of edoxaban were associated with reduced risks for S/SE, major bleeding, and mortality compared with warfarin. LDER had lower effectiveness for the prevention of S/SE compared with warfarin at higher levels of CrCl (>95 mL/min).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background Anticoagulation in patients with malignancy and atrial fibrillation is challenging because of enhanced risks for thrombosis and bleeding and the frequent need for invasive procedures. Data on direct oral antagonists in such patients are sparse. Methods and Results The ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study 48) trial randomized 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation to edoxaban or warfarin. Patients with malignancy, defined as a postrandomization new diagnosis or recurrence of remote cancer, were followed up over a median of 2.8 years. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of edoxaban versus warfarin. Over a median of 495 days (interquartile range, 230-771 days), 1153 patients (5.5%) were diagnosed with new or recurrent malignancy, most commonly involving the gastrointestinal tract (20.6%), prostate (13.6%), and lung (11.1%). Malignancy was associated with increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.78-3.50) and major bleeding (adjusted HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.07-2.89), but not stroke/systemic embolism (adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.42). Relative outcomes with higher-dose edoxaban versus warfarin were consistent regardless of malignancy status for stroke/systemic embolism ( HR , 0.60 [95% CI, 0.31-1.15] for malignancy versus HR , 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76-1.05] for no malignancy; interaction P=0.25) and major bleeding ( HR , 0.98 [95% CI, 0.69-1.40] for malignancy versus HR , 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-1.05] for no malignancy; interaction P=0.31). There was, however, a significant treatment interaction for the composite ischemic end point (ischemic stroke/systemic embolism/myocardial infarction), with greater efficacy of higher-dose edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with malignancy ( HR , 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.93) compared with no malignancy ( HR , 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88-1.18; interaction P=0.026). Conclusions In patients with atrial fibrillation who develop malignancy, the efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban relative to warfarin is preserved, and it may represent a more practical alternative.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Proportional Hazards Models; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background The aims of the present study were to investigate the relationships between prior direct oral anticoagulant ( DOAC ) therapy and infarct volume and the site of arterial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results From March 2011 through November 2016, consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory and non-valvular atrial fibrillation were recruited. The infarct volume was assessed semi-automatically using initial diffusion-weighted imaging, and the arterial occlusion site was evaluated on magnetic resonance angiography. The effect of prior DOAC treatment on the site of arterial occlusion was assessed by multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis. A total of 330 patients (149 women; median age 79 [quartiles 71-86] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 11 [4-21]) were enrolled. Of these, 239 were on no anticoagulant, 40 were undertreated with a vitamin K antagonist ( VKA ), 22 were sufficiently treated with VKA ( PT - INR ≥1.6), and 29 were on a DOAC before the acute ischemic stroke. The infarct volume on admission differed among the groups (median 14.5 [2.0-59.8] cm

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Angiography; Dabigatran; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Female; Humans; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; International Normalized Ratio; Logistic Models; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background Patients with impaired liver function ( ILF ) were excluded from clinical trials that investigated non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC s in atrial fibrillation patients with ILF . Methods and Results A cohort study based on electronic medical records was conducted from 2009 to 2016 at a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan and included 6451 anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients (aged 76.7±7.0 years, 52.5% male). Patients were classified into 2 subgroups: patients with normal liver function (n=5818) and patients with ILF (n=633, 9.8%). Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the risks of thromboembolism, bleeding, and death associated with use of NOAC s and warfarin in patients with normal liver function and ILF , respectively. In patients with normal liver function, compared with warfarin therapy (n=2928), NOAC therapy (n=4048) was associated with significantly lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88; P<0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.80; P<0.001) with no difference in major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. In patients with ILF , compared with warfarin therapy (n=394), NOAC therapy (n=342) was associated with significantly lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.83; P<0.001), but no difference in stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions In atrial fibrillation patients with ILF , NOAC therapy and warfarin therapy were associated with similar risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hepatic Insufficiency; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- The increased use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to control atrial fibrillation is largely driven by the assumption that they are equally effective as warfarin at preventing ischemic stroke while putting patients at lower risk of hemorrhages. To test this hypothesis, a retrospective study of the relative incidence of strokes among patients taking NOACs versus those taking warfarin is performed. Methods- Relative stroke incidence in the 2 groups of patients was compared using odds ratios and Fisher exact tests for significance using a data set of 71 365 on NOACs and 59 546 patients on warfarin. In addition, the 7033 patients with a record of both warfarin and NOAC use were analyzed as a separate cohort. Results- There is a significantly higher (odds ratio=1.29, <0.001) frequency of ischemic strokes among patients prescribed NOACs compared with those on warfarin. The relative frequency of ischemic strokes was also higher for every individual NOAC compared with warfarin (these higher frequencies are statistically significant for dabigatran and apixaban, though not for edoxaban and rivaroxaban). There is a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhages and nontraumatic hemorrhages in general among patients taking NOACs, consistent with the published literature. Comparisons of the demographic and clinical profiles of the patients taking NOACs to those on warfarin do not show significantly higher background stroke risk in NOAC patients; in fact, patients on NOACs tend to be at lower background risk overall for ischemic strokes. Conclusions- Because NOAC use is associated with higher ischemic stroke risk together with a lower risk of hemorrhages than warfarin use, it can be concluded that patients on warfarin are more strongly anticoagulated. The observed effect could be a secondary consequence of dosage control or alternatively a result of different anticoagulant effects among the different medications.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safer, at least equally efficacious, and cost-effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) but they remain underused, particularly in demented patients. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with AF and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods- We constructed a microsimulation model to estimate the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy (adjusted-dose warfarin and various DOACs) in 70-year-old patients with AF and AD from a US societal perspective. We stratified patient cohorts based on stage of AD and care setting. Model parameters were estimated from secondary sources. Health benefits were measured in the number of acute health events, life-years, and QALYs gained. We classified alternatives as cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained. Results- For patients with AF and AD, compared with warfarin, DOACs increase costs but also increase QALYs by reducing the risk of stroke. For mild-AD patients living in the community, edoxaban increased lifetime costs by $6603 and increased QALYs by 0.076 compared to warfarin, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $86 882/QALY gained. Even though DOACs increased QALYs compared with warfarin for all patient groups (ranging from 0.019 to 0.085 additional QALYs), no DOAC treatment alternative had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$150 000/QALY gained for patients with moderate to severe AD. For patients living in a long-term care facility with mild AD, the DOAC with the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (rivaroxaban) costs $150 169 per QALY gained; for patients with more severe AD, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were higher. Conclusions- For patients with AF and mild AD living in the community, edoxaban is cost-effective compared with warfarin. Even though patients with moderate and severe AD living in the community and patients with any stage of AD living in a long-term care setting may obtain positive clinical benefits from anticoagulation treatment, DOACs are not cost-effective compared with warfarin for these populations. Compared to aspirin, no oral anticoagulation (warfarin or any DOAC) is cost effective in patients with AF and AD.

Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Disease Progression; Health Care Costs; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

In the Hokusai-VTE trial, 733 patients were treated with the reduced dose edoxaban regimen, which maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose, and was safer than warfarin. The prophylactic doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the extended treatment trials. Dabigatran 110 mg was approved by the European Medicine Agency for VTE treatment. Further data from registries and real-world studies will help to clarify whether patients, with other specific characteristics, can benefit from the reduced dose of direct oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Novel anticoagulants, such as factor Xa inhibitors, have entered clinical practice as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic event (SEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is not known whether edoxaban, the fourth-to-market factor Xa inhibitor approved for this indication, will be cost-effective in Taiwan, where the cost of warfarin monitoring is prohibitive.. A Markov model projecting lifetime results of edoxaban 60 mg/30 mg dose-reduced versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF, based on the ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 trial, found edoxaban to be of high value relative to warfarin, from the perspective of the US health care system. We applied Taiwan-specific cost inputs to this model structure to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus warfarin from the perspective of the Taiwanese health care system. Event rates and hazard ratios from the ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 East Asian subpopulation were explored in sensitivity analyses.. Edoxaban was found to be highly cost-effective compared with warfarin, based on guidelines proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), with a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,902 per quality-adjusted life year gained. These results were robust to variation of key model parameters, including assumptions regarding the cost and quality-of-life impact of stroke and bleeding events, and assuming East Asian-specific (as opposed to full-trial-population) rates for combinations of ischemic stroke, SEE, and major bleeding.. Despite its higher acquisition cost, edoxaban is an economically attractive alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and SEE in patients with AF in Taiwan.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Craniocerebral Trauma; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

For patients with atrial fibrillation, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, or NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban) have been proven non-inferior or superior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, and in risk of haemorrhage. In the pivotal NOAC studies, quality of warfarin treatment was poor with mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) 55-65%, compared with ≥70% in Swedish clinical practice.. We compared NOACs (as a group) to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, studying all 12,694 patients starting NOAC treatment within the Swedish clinical register and dosing system Auricula, from July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014, and matching them to 36,317 patients starting warfarin using propensity scoring. Endpoints were thromboembolic events and major bleedings that were fatal or required hospital care. Outcome data were collected from validated Swedish hospital administrative and clinical registers.. Mean age was 72.2 vs 72.3 years, proportion of males 58.2% vs 57.0%, and mean follow-up time 299 vs 283 days for NOACs and warfarin. Distribution of NOACs was: dabigatran 40.3%, rivaroxaban 31.2%, and apixaban 28.5%. Mean TTR was 70%. There were no significant differences in rates of thromboembolic/thrombotic events or gastrointestinal bleeding. NOAC treated patients had lower rates of major bleeding overall, hazard ratio 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.92), intracranial bleeding 0.59 (0.40-0.87), haemorrhagic stroke 0.49 (0.28-0.86), and other major bleeding 0.71 (0.57-0.89).. For patients with atrial fibrillation, NOACs are as effective for stroke prevention as well-managed warfarin but cause fewer major bleedings.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

A 39-year-old man with nephrotic syndrome was admitted due to right dorsal pain. Contrast-enhanced CT led to a diagnosis of renal vein thrombosis and segmental pulmonary thromboembolism. Treatment with heparin and warfarin was started. After 1 month, pulmonary thromboembolism recurred. Warfarin was switched to edoxaban, and steroid therapy was initiated, which led to the remission of nephrotic syndrome and the disappearance of renal vein thrombosis. The efficacy of edoxaban was demonstrated; however, this drug has not been routinely selected for patients with renal disease. Our results suggest that edoxaban is also effective for treating venous thrombosis patients with nephrotic syndrome.

Topics: Adult; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin; Humans; Male; Nephrotic Syndrome; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Renal Veins; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Stroke risk may be more than 3-fold higher among patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5D (CKD-5D) compared to the general population, with the highest stroke rates noted among those 85 years and older. Atrial fibrillation (AF), a strong risk factor for stroke, is the most common arrhythmia and affects >7% of the population with CKD-5D. Warfarin use is widely acknowledged as an important intervention for stroke prevention with nonvalvular AF in the general population. However, use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with CKD-5D and nonvalvular AF continues to be debated by the nephrology community. In this National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) controversies report, we discuss the existing observational studies that examine warfarin use and associated stroke and bleeding risks in adults with CKD-5D and AF. Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants and their potential use for stroke prevention in patients with CKD-5D and nonvalvular AF are also discussed. Data from randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to determine the benefits and risks of oral anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in the setting of AF among patients with CKD-5D.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Few data exist to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CB-A). This study is aimed to clarify the usefulness of DOACs in patients undergoing CB-A.. The patients (average age; 65.8±11.9 years old, male 69%) were stratified into one of five subsets based on the type of anticoagulation (warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban), and underwent CB-A. A brain MRI was performed in all patients the day after the CB-A for AF. A total of 257 (19 on warfarin, 30 on apixaban, 66 on dabigatran, 81 on rivaroxaban, and 61 on edoxaban) patients met the inclusion criteria.. The incidence of silent cerebral ischemic lesion was 1 (11.1%) patients on warfarin, 5 (33.3%) on apixaban, 8 (27.6%) on dabigatran, 10 (21.3%) on rivaroxaban, and 10 (29.4%) on edoxaban (p=0.17). Major ischemic events occurred in one patient (1.6%) on edoxaban and one (5.3%) on warfarin. Minor bleeding complications occurred in 1 patient (5.3%) on warfarin, 2 (6.7%) on apixaban, 1 (1.2%) on rivaroxaban, 5 (7.6%) on dabigatran, and 2 (3.3%) on edoxaban (p=0.24). Of note, major bleeding complications occurred in 2 patients (3.3%) on apixaban, 1 (1.2%) on rivaroxaban, 1 (1.5%) on dabigatran, 1 (1.6%) on edoxaban, and 2 (10.5%) on warfarin (p<0.05).. Warfarin use significantly increased the risk of serious bleeding, in contrast, CB-A did not place the patients at an increased risk of complications under a DOAC treatment. There were no significant differences regarding preventing embolic events among the DOAC drugs.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain; Brain Ischemia; Cryosurgery; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The comparative cost-effectiveness of all oral anticoagulants approved up to date has not been evaluated from the US perspective. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban 60mg, apixaban 5mg, dabigatran 150mg, dabigatran 110mg, rivaroxaban 20mg and warfarin in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients at high-risk of bleeding (defined as HAS-BLED score≥3).. We constructed a Markov state-transition model to evaluate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with each of the six treatments from the perspective of US third-party payers. Probabilities of clinical events were obtained from the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE and ENGAGE AF-TIMI trials; costs were derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and other studies. Because edoxaban is only indicated in patients with creatinine clearance ≤95ml/min, we re-ran our analyses after excluding edoxaban from the analysis.. Treatment with edoxaban 60mg cost $77,565/QALY gained compared to warfarin, and apixaban 5mg cost $108,631/QALY gained compared to edoxaban 60mg. When edoxaban was not included in the analysis, treatment with apixaban 5mg cost $84,128/QALY gained, compared to warfarin. Dabigatran 150mg, dabigatran 110mg and rivaroxaban 20mg were dominated strategies.. For patients with creatinine clearance between 50 and 95ml/min, apixaban 5mg was the most cost-effective treatment for willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP) above $115,000/QALY gained, and edoxaban 60mg was cost-effective when the WTP was between $75,000 and $115,000/QALY gained. For patients with creatinine clearance >95ml/min, apixaban 5mg was the most cost-effective treatment for WTP thresholds above $80,000/QALY gained.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of the contemporary atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with a recent or previous history of cardioembolic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remain to be established.. A total of 447 patients who underwent first-ever contact force (CF)-guided AF ablation with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation were included. Of these, 17 had CS or TIA within 6 months before ablation (Group 1), 30 more than 6 months before ablation (Group 2), and the other 400 without CS or TIA (Group 3). Procedural complications and recurrence of AF and atrial tachyarrhythmias were compared among the 3 groups.. The mean age was 71±7, 66±9, and 61±11 years in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.05, Group 1 versus Group 3). The oral anticoagulants were warfarin (n=108, 24.1%), dabigatran (n=101, 22.6%), rivaroxaban (n=147, 32.9%), apixaban (n=87, 19.5%), and edoxaban (n=4, 0.9%), and did not differ among the 3 groups. Median follow-up period was 14 [IQR 12-22], 13 [12-14], and 12 [10-16] months, respectively. One episode of cardiac tamponade, 2 episodes of arteriovenous fistula, and some minor complications occurred in Group 3, but no complications occurred in Groups 1 and 2 in the periprocedural period. Although one episode of CS occurred 11 days after the procedure in Group 3, there were no periprocedural CS, TIA, or major bleedings in Groups 1 and 2. AF recurrence-free rate after the procedure was 76.5%, 86.7%, and 79.1% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and there was no difference in Kaplan-Meier curves among the 3 groups.. The safety and efficacy of CF-guided AF ablation in the era of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with a recent or previous history of CS or TIA are similar to those in patients without it.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Veins; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

For nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been found noninferior to warfarin for stroke/systemic embolization prevention, and major bleeding events. Recent meta-analysis of NOACs versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) showed that women on warfarin have greater risk of stroke/embolism than men, and when both are treated with NOACs, differences disappear.. NOACs differ in pharmacologic properties, thus they may differ from one another in their effects on women with AF. Using dose-adjusted warfarin as the common comparator, an indirect comparison of rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran 110 and 150 mg, and edoxaban 30 and 60 mg for efficacy (stroke/embolism prevention) and safety (major bleeding events) in women with AF was performed. Data from ROCKET-AF, RE-LY, ENGAGE AF TIMI, and ARISTOTLE were analyzed and compared according to the Bucher method.. No significant difference was found for any NOAC compared with alternatives in safety or efficacy for women with AF. Examination of odds ratio comparisons alone showed possible favorable efficacy in dabigatran 150 mg, and unfavorable efficacy with favorable safety in edoxaban 30 mg.. NOACs may slightly differ in their effect in women; the potential differences are very small and likely clinically negligible. Thus, NOACs can be used interchangeably in women according to patient and physician preferences to increase adherence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Humans; Probability; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Accidental Falls; Atrial Fibrillation; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Diet; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

To estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and cost-effectiveness of high-dose edoxaban compared with adjusted-dose warfarin in patients at risk for stroke who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and a creatinine clearance (Clcr ) of 15-95 ml/minute.. A Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of high-dose edoxaban and adjusted-dose warfarin in patients with a Clcr of 15-95 ml/minute. The model was performed from a U.S. societal perspective and assumed patients initiated therapy at 70 years of age, had a mean CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 or older, diabetes, stroke) score of 3, and no contraindications to anticoagulation. The model assumed a cycle length of 1 month and a lifetime horizon (maximum of 30 years/360 cycles). Data sources included renal subgroup analysis of the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE-AF) trial and other published studies. Outcomes included lifetime costs (2014 US$), QALYs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The robustness of the model's conclusions was tested using one-way and 10,000-iteration probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).. Patients treated with high-dose edoxaban lived an average of 10.50 QALYs at a lifetime treatment cost of $99,833 compared with 10.11 QALYs and $123,516 for those treated with adjusted-dose warfarin. The model's conclusions were found to be robust upon one-way sensitivity analyses. PSA suggested high-dose edoxaban was economically dominant compared with adjusted-dose warfarin in more than 99% of the 10,000 iterations run.. High-dose edoxaban appears to be an economically dominant strategy when compared with adjusted-dose warfarin for the prevention of stroke in NVAF patients with a Clcr of 15-95 ml/minute and an appreciable risk of stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The objective of the study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of oral anticoagulants among atrial fibrillation patients at an increased stroke risk.. A Markov model was constructed to project the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted survival (QALYs) of oral anticoagulants using a private payer's perspective. The distribution of stroke risk (CHADS2 score: congestive heart failure, hypertension, advanced age, diabetes mellitus, stroke) and age of the modeled population was derived from a cohort of commercially insured patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Probabilities of treatment specific events were derived from published clinical trials. Event and downstream costs were determined from the cost of illness studies. Drug costs were obtained from 2015 National Average Drug Acquisition Cost data.. In the base case analysis, warfarin was the least costly ($46 241; 95% CI, 44 499-47 874) and apixaban had the highest QALYs (9.38; 95% CI, 9.24-9.48 QALYs). Apixaban was found to be a cost-effective strategy over warfarin (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio=$25 816) and dominated other anticoagulants. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that apixaban had at least a 61% chance of being the most cost-effective strategy at willingness to pay value of $100 000 per QALY. Among patients with CHADS2 ≥3, dabigatran was the dominant strategy. The model was sensitive to efficacy estimates of apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban and the cost of these drugs.. All the newer oral anticoagulants compared were more effective than adjusted dosed warfarin. Our model showed that apixaban was the most effective anticoagulant in a general atrial fibrillation population and has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50 000/QALY. For those with higher stroke risk (CHADS2≥3), dabigatran was the most cost-effective treatment option.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Insurance, Health; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This commentary focuses on the status of oral anticoagulants, namely, warfarin and the novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy require a cohesive assessment of benefit and risk. A new graphical method to represent the bivariate relation of benefit and risk in trials of antithrombotic drugs is described and illustrated using published data from the four major registration clinical trials of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) totalling 71,683 patients for prevention of thromboembolic events (TE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE-AF TIMI48). A curve representing a null hypothesis defines a region of benefit on a two-dimensional plane. Trial results are summarised by a rectangle defined by standard 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for thrombosis and bleeding risks. Benefit is judged by whether the confidence rectangle contains the null curve. The treatment effect is measured by the distance from the null curve to the opposing corners of the confidence rectangle (termed "corner distance (CD)"). Across trials NOACs reduced the absolute risk of TE compared to warfarin by 0.30 % (95 % CI: -0.56 % to -0.05 %) and reduced major bleeding by 0.88 % (95 % CI: -1.26 % to -0.51 %). Bivariate evaluation showed NOAC superiority to warfarin overall and elucidated dose differences; low dose edoxaban increased bivariate TE-bleeding risk 0.08 % (CD = -0.85 % to 0.78 %), whereas high dose edoxaban reduced risk 1.41 % (CD = -2.07 % to -0.70 %). In conclusion, bivariate evaluation facilitates visual assessment of the safety-efficacy profile of antithrombotic drugs. Its application to trials in atrial fibrillation found NOACs superior to warfarin without substantial differences between agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Statistical; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

In the coming decades, the number of Europeans with atrial fibrillation (AF) is set to rise as the population ages, and so with it will the number of strokes. The risk of thromboembolism (principally stroke and systemic embolism) and death can be reduced by the use of the vitamin K antagonists (VKA, e.g. warfarin) and more so by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as edoxaban.. We modelled the effect of the increasing use of edoxaban in preference to warfarin in a European AF population from both clinical and economic perspectives. We estimate that the introduction of NOACs in 2010 eliminated over 88 000 thromboembolisms and deaths annually, of which over 17 000 were ischaemic strokes. At a 1-year cost of €30k per ischaemic stroke, this strategy saved €510 million annually. Should the use of edoxaban increase from 11% in 2013 to 75% by 2030, we expect that rate of thromboembolism and death will fall from 5.67 to 5.42 total events per million patients per year, which will further eliminate over 12 000 of these events annually. At an inflation-adjusted 1-year cost of approximately €35k per ischaemic stroke, this will save €44.5 million each year. At a conservative rate of increase in the AF population of 2.2-fold from 2005, in 2050 there will be around 180 000 AF-related ischaemic strokes that, at an inflation-adjusted cost of around €62k per stroke, sums to €11 116 million. Should the rate of AF rise 2.6-fold from 2005, then in 2050 there will be 214 500 ischaemic strokes that will cost around €13 300 million.. Our data point to a substantial increase in the human and economic cost burden of AF and so emphasize the need to reduce this burden. This may be achieved by the increased use of oral anticoagulants, particularly with the NOACs such as edoxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Forecasting; Humans; Models, Economic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) have been increasingly used as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation. Yet there is substantial lack of information on how patients on NOACs are currently treated when they have an acute ischemic stroke and the best strategies for treating intracerebral hemorrhage for those on chronic anticoagulation with warfarin or a NOAC. These are critical unmet needs for real world clinical decision making in these emergent patients.. The ARAMIS Registry is a multicenter cohort study of acute stroke patients who were taking chronic anticoagulation therapy prior to admission and are admitted with either an acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage. Built upon the existing infrastructure of American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Get With the Guidelines Stroke, the ARAMIS Registry will enroll a total of approximately 10,000 patients (5000 with acute ischemic stroke who are taking a NOAC and 5000 with anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage who are on warfarin or a NOAC). The primary goals of the ARAMIS Registry are to provide a comprehensive picture of current treatment patterns and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients on NOACs, as well as anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage in patients on either warfarin or NOACs. Beyond characterizing the index hospitalization, up to 2500 patients (1250 ischemic stroke and 1250 intracerebral hemorrhage) who survive to discharge will be enrolled in an optional follow-up sub-study and interviewed at 3 and 6 months after discharge to assess longitudinal medication use, downstream care, functional status, and patient-reported outcomes.. The ARAMIS Registry will document the current state of management of NOAC treated patients with acute ischemic stroke as well as contemporary care and outcome of anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage. These data will be used to better understand optimal strategies to care for these complex but increasingly common emergent real world clinical challenges.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Emergency Treatment; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality Improvement; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; United States; Warfarin

Edoxaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, has been found non-inferior to warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), with a lower rate of intracranial bleeding. The aim of our investigation was to assess the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus warfarin from the perspective of the Italian health-care system. A Markov decision model was used to evaluate lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life expectancy of NVAF patients treated with warfarin or edoxaban. Transition probabilities were obtained from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, cost estimates were based on Italian prices and tariffs, utilities were obtained from the literature. One-way and second-order sensitivity analyses were performed. In the base case, lifetime costs were €18,658 for edoxaban and €14,060 for warfarin. Discounted quality-adjusted survival was 9.022 years for edoxaban and 8.425 years for warfarin, leading to an incremental cost-utility ratio of €7,713 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results were sensitive to time horizon, time in therapeutic range of warfarin and to the relative impact of warfarin versus edoxaban therapy onto quality of life. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed edoxaban to be cost-effective versus warfarin in 92.3 % of the simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000 per QALY. In conclusion, edoxaban proved to be a cost-effective alternative to warfarin in patients with moderate-to-high-risk NVAF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Italy; Markov Chains; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Medical costs that may be avoided when any of the four new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, are used instead of warfarin for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were estimated and compared. Additionally, the overall differences in medical costs were estimated for NVAF and venous thromboembolism (VTE) patient populations combined.. Medical cost differences associated with NOAC use vs warfarin or placebo among NVAF and VTE patients were estimated based on clinical event rates obtained from the published trial data. The clinical event rates were calculated as the percentage of patients with each of the clinical events during the trial periods. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were conducted for the medical-cost differences determined for NVAF patients. A hypothetical health plan population of 1 million members was used to estimate and compare the combined medical-cost differences of the NVAF and VTE populations and were projected in the years 2015-2018.. In a year, the medical-cost differences associated with NOAC use instead of warfarin were estimated at -$204, -$140, -$495, and -$340 per patient for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, among the hypothetical population, the medical-cost differences were -$3.7, -$4.2, -$11.5, and -$6.6 million for NVAF and acute VTE patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. In 2014, for the combined NVAF, acute VTE, and extended VTE patient populations, medical-cost differences were -$10.0, -$10.9, -$21.0, and -$21.0 million for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg apixaban, and 5 mg apixaban, respectively. Medical-cost differences associated with use of NOACs were projected to steadily increase from 2014 to 2018.. Medical costs are reduced when NOACs are used instead of warfarin/placebo for the treatment of NVAF or VTE, with apixaban being associated with the greatest reduction in medical costs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Costs and Cost Analysis; Dabigatran; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Econometric; Myocardial Infarction; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

We compared the cost-utility analysis for edoxaban at both doses with that of dabigatran at both doses, rivaroxaban, and apixaban (non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, NOAC) in a German population. Data of clinical outcome events were taken from edoxaban's ENGAGE-AF, dabigatran's RE-LY, rivaroxaban's ROCKET, and apixaban's ARISTOTLE trials. The base-case analyses of a 65-year-old person with a CHADS2 score >1 gained 0.17 and 0.21 quality-adjusted life years over warfarin for 30 mg od and 60 mg od edoxaban, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 50.000 and 68.000 euro per quality-adjusted life years for the higher and lower dose of edoxaban (Monte Carlo simulation). These findings were also similar to those for apixaban and more cost-effective than the other NOAC regimens. The current market costs for direct oral anticoagulants are high in relation to the quality of life gained from a German public health care insurance perspective. The willingness-to-pay threshold was lowest for 60 mg edoxaban compared to all direct oral anticoagulants and for 30 mg edoxaban compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Germany; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Embolism; Humans; Pyridines; Recurrence; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with almost 300,000 deaths per year in the United States. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offer an alternative to warfarin-based therapy without monitoring requirements and with fewer drug and food interactions. Edoxaban, a direct Xa inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), based upon results of the Hokusai-VTE Phase 3 trial. The trial demonstrated that edoxaban administered once daily after initial treatment with heparin was non-inferior in reducing the risk of VTE recurrence and caused significantly less major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding compared to warfarin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of adults with VTE.. A cost-effectiveness model was developed using patient-level data from the Hokusai-VTE trial, clinical event costs from real-world databases, and drug acquisition costs for warfarin of $0.36 and edoxaban of $9.24 per tablet.. From a U.S. health-care delivery system perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $22,057 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that edoxaban had an ICER <$50,000 per QALY gained relative to warfarin in 67% of model simulations. The result was robust to variation in key model parameters including the cost and disutility of warfarin monitoring.. Despite its higher drug acquisition cost, edoxaban is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for the treatment of VTE.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Although vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the backbone of thromboprophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, their limitations have encouraged the development of a new generation of oral anticoagulants. This review compares the different designs and procedures used to conduct four phase III trials that tested dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban versus VKAs. Although pharmacologic characteristics and results of the main trials are briefly discussed, this review mainly focuses on study designs, enrollment criteria, populations studied, quality metrics, and transition strategies between oral anticoagulants. While each of the trials was of high quality, performed independently, and led by independent academic groups, substantial differences exist in terms of drug pharmacology and trial characteristics. Caution is advised when comparing results across trials as practicing clinicians strive to personalize anticoagulation treatments for their individual patients. We believe that the differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the available novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), coupled with substantial heterogeneity in the trial populations and designs and procedures used to conduct the trials, support an important role for each of the NOACs dependent upon the specific clinical scenario faced by the practicing clinician.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offer an alternative to warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. NOACs are expected to replace warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists for most of their indications in the future. Knowledge of the use of NOACs in the perioperative period is important for optimal care.. Studies that reported on the use of NOACs were identified, focusing on evidence-based guidance relating to the perioperative period. PubMed was searched for relevant articles published between January 2000 and January 2014.. The anticipated expanded clinical use of NOACs such as rivaroxaban (Xarelto™), apixaban (Eliquis™) and dabigatran (Pradaxa™) has the potential to simplify perioperative anticoagulant management because of fewer drug-drug interactions, rapid onset of action, predictable pharmacokinetics and relatively short half-lives. However, coagulation status cannot be monitored by international normalized ratio and no antidotes are currently available. In elective surgery, it is important to discontinue the use of NOACs, with special consideration of renal function as route of elimination. Guidelines for the management of bleeding complications in patients on NOACs are provided, and may be considered for trauma and emergency surgery. Haemodialysis could be considered for bleeding with use of dabigatran. Better options for reversal of the effects of NOACs when bleeding occurs may follow with novel drugs.. Management of NOACs in elective and emergency conditions requires knowledge of time of last intake of drug, current renal function and the planned procedure in order to assess the overall risk of bleeding. Currently no antidote exists to reverse the effects of these drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Elective Surgical Procedures; Emergencies; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Preoperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most frequent sustained arrhythmia, is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. The risk of stroke depends on risk factors such as age, hypertension, heart failure, and vascular disease. Thus, antithrombotic therapy is a cornerstone in the management of AF. Warfarin is successfully used to reduce thromboembolic events. More recently, direct thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) inhibitors have been compared to warfarin in large randomized trials. All new substances have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin concerning thromboembolic events. Severe bleeding, such as fatal and intracranial bleeding, was less frequent with direct oral anticoagulants. Results of the studies and subgroup analyses are discussed. Further trials using direct oral anticoagulants in special populations such as very old and patients with kidney disease are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Edoxaban recently proved non-inferior to warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We conducted an imputed-placebo analysis with estimates of the proportion of warfarin effect preserved by each non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and indirect comparisons between edoxaban and different NOACs.. We performed a literature search (up to January 2014), clinical trials registers, conference proceedings, and websites of regulatory agencies. We selected non-inferiority randomised controlled phase III trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban compared with adjusted-dose warfarin in non-valvular AF. Compared to imputed placebo, all NOACs reduced the risk of stroke (ORs between 0.24 and 0.42, all p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (ORs between 0.55 and 0.59, all p<0.05). Edoxaban 30 mg and 60 mg preserved 87% and 112%, respectively, of the protective effect of warfarin on stroke, and 133% and 121%, respectively, of the protective effect of warfarin on all-cause mortality. The risk of primary outcome (stroke/systemic embolism), all strokes and ischemic strokes was significantly higher with edoxaban 30 mg than dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban. There were no significant differences between edoxaban 60 mg and other NOACs for all efficacy outcomes except stroke, which was higher with edoxaban 60 mg than dabigatran 150 mg. The risk of major bleedings was lower with edoxaban 30 mg than any other NOAC, odds ratios (ORs) ranging between 0.45 and 0.67 (all p<0.001).. This study suggests that all NOACs preserve a substantial or even larger proportion of the protective warfarin effect on stroke and all-cause mortality. Edoxaban 30 mg is associated with a definitely lower risk of major bleedings than other NOACs. This is counterbalanced by a lower efficacy in the prevention of thromboembolism, although with a final benefit on all-cause mortality.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated the benefit of new oral anticoagulants in reducing the risk of vascular events and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, abundant and strict enrollment criteria may limit the validity and applicability of results of RCTs to clinical practice. We estimated the eligibility for participation in RCTs of an unselected group of patients with AF. In addition, we compared features favoring new oral anticoagulant use between patients with versus without stroke. Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy. We applied enrollment criteria of 4 RCTs (RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE-AF-TIMI 48) to 695 patients with AF taking warfarin, prospectively and consecutively collected at a university medical center; 500 patients with and 195 patients without stroke. Time in therapeutic range and bleeding risk scheme (anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation) were also measured.. The proportions of patients fulfilling the trial enrollment criteria varied, ranging from 39% to 72.8%, depending on the differences in indications/contraindications among studies and presence/absence of stroke. The main reasons for ineligibility for RCTs were hemorrhagic risk (anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation [ATRIA] score) (10.8%-40.5%) and planned cardioversion (5.1%-7.7%) for nonstroke patients, and a low creatinine clearance (5.6%-9.2%) and higher risk of bleeding (15.2%-20.8%) for patients with stroke. When compared with nonstroke patients, patients with stroke showed a lower time in therapeutic range (54.4±42.8% versus 65.4±34.9%, especially with severe disability) and a high hemorrhagic risk (ATRIA score) (3.06±2.30 versus 2.18±2.16) (P<0.05 in both cases).. Patients enrolled in RCTs are partly representative of patients with AF in clinical practice. When time in therapeutic range and bleeding tendency with warfarin use were considered, the use of new oral anticoagulants was preferred in patients with stroke than in nonstroke patients, but they were more likely to be excluded in RCTs.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Unnecessary Procedures; Warfarin

Edoxaban is a novel, potent and orally active direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor under development for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Properties of dose response and margin of safety of anticoagulants are the key factors for a positive risk/benefit of novel oral anticoagulants.. To compare the dose response of antithrombotic effect and margin of safety between antithrombotic and hemorrhagic effects of edoxaban with conventional anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin (low molecular weight heparin), lepirudin, and warfarin in rat models of thrombosis and hemorrhage.. Rats were treated with edoxaban, UFH, dalteparin, and lepirudin by continuous intravenous (iv) infusion, or with oral warfarin for 4 days before inducing thrombosis or bleeding. Thrombosis was induced by inserting a platinum wire into the inferior vena cava for 60 minutes. Tail template bleeding time was measured after making an incision on the tail.. In rats, iv infusion of edoxaban inhibited venous thrombosis in a dose-dependent manner. The other anticoagulants also exerted dose-dependent antithrombotic effects. The slopes of the dose-response curves of edoxaban were significantly shallower than the slopes of UFH, dalteparin, and warfarin. At supratherapeutic doses, edoxaban prolonged bleeding time in a rat tail bleeding model. To determine bleeding risk, the margins between antithrombotic and bleeding-time prolongation were compared. The margins of safety of edoxaban were wider than those of UFH, dalteparin, lepirudin, and warfarin.. These results suggest that edoxaban may be more easily controlled and has the potential for a more positive risk/benefit ratio compared to conventional anticoagulants.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin; Hirudins; Male; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Recombinant Proteins; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Osteocalcin plays a role in bone homeostasis. The vitamin K cycle is essential for the gamma-carboxylation of glutamic acid residues in osteocalcin. Some evidence suggests that long-term warfarin therapy, which inhibits the vitamin K cycle and prevents gamma-carboxylation, is associated with increased bone-fracture risk. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of warfarin and edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, on the serum concentration of total, gamma-carboxylated (Gla-osteocalcin) and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (uc-osteocalcin) in rats.. Rats received orally administered warfarin or edoxaban, and 24h later serum and plasma were prepared. Osteocalcin level in serum was measured with ELISA. A Gla-osteocalcin was precipitated by the addition of hydroxyapatite, and the resulting supernatant was used for measuring uc-osteocalcin. Prothrombin time (PT) of plasma was also measured.. Warfarin at 1mg/kg (a dose which prolonged PT 2.62-fold) markedly increased the serum level of uc-osteocalcin and slightly increased the total osteocalcin level compared with control in rats. Serum Gla-osteocalcin significantly decreased by warfarin. Edoxaban at 1mg/kg (an antithrombotic dose) and 54mg/kg (a dose which prolonged PT 2.25-fold) had no effects on total, uc-, and Gla-osteocalcin levels.. This study demonstrates that warfarin impaired the carboxylation of osteocalcin in rats. In contrast, edoxaban at or higher doses than needed for an antithrombotic effect sustained the circulating Gla-osteocalcin level. These findings suggest that edoxaban has no effects on the production of Gla-osteocalcin and thus, may have a lower risk of adverse effects on bone health.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Carboxylic Acids; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Male; Osteocalcin; Osteoporosis; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Prothrombin Time; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Risk Factors; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Warfarin