zotarolimus and Thrombosis

Several previously published trials comparing Zotarolimus Eluting Stents (ZES) with Sirolimus Eluting Stents (SES), Paclitaxel Eluting Stents (PES) or Everolimus Eluting Stents (EES) at a follow up period of 1 year, were continually being followed up in order to assess the long-term outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the long-term (2-5 years) adverse clinical outcomes which were associated with ZES versus SES, PES and EES following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were generated and the analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software. In this analysis with a total number of 17,606 participants, ZES and EES were associated with similar adverse outcomes including Stent Thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiac events and repeated revascularization. When ZES were compared with SES and PES during the long-term, MI and definite or probable ST were significantly lower with ZES, with RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56; P = 0.0001 and RR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.33-2.75; P = 0.0004 respectively whereas the other adverse outcomes were similarly manifested. Future research should be able to confirm this hypothesis.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The increasing use of drug eluting stents in interventional cardiology calls for assessment of their efficacy and safety, both among drug-eluting and bare-metal stents, in the context of rational decision making.. We searched for papers that compared any of the sirolimus-eluting stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent, drug- eluting stent, biodegradable stent, everolimus-eluting stent, zotarolimus-resolute eluting stent, biolimus- eluting stent, bare-metal stent and zotarolimus-eluting stent. The search was contacted through Medline, the Cochrane database, Embase, TCTMD, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Trial Results, CardioSource, abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular meetings. We also searched for further articles cited by selected papers. Furthermore, important conferences and relevant proceedings and abstracts, such as the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, European Society of Cardiology, and Euro-PCR, were also searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials (RCTs), size of study (≥100 patients), duration more than 6 months and definition of reported endpoints (target vessel revascularization, thrombosis, myocardial infarction and cardiac death). Analysis of the data was performed for short-term (less than a year) and long-term outcomes (more than a year). A mixed treatment comparison approach was utilised for the data analysis.. Based on the rankings of each treatment, a distinct difference between the 2nd and 1st generation stents was identified. We can conclude that everolimus, zotarolimus-resolute and biolimus eluting stents carry the highest probabilities of being superior for all endpoints.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Death; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Although new-generation drug-eluting stents represent the standard of care among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there remains debate about differences in efficacy and the risk of stent thrombosis between the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and the everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the R-ZES compared with EES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. A systematic literature search of electronic resources was performed using specific search terms until September 2014. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing clinical outcomes between patients treated with R-ZES and EES up to maximum available follow-up. The primary efficacy end point was target-vessel revascularization. The primary safety end point was definite or probable stent thrombosis. Secondary safety end points were cardiac death and target-vessel myocardial infarction. Five trials were identified, including a total of 9899 patients. Compared with EES, R-ZES had similar risks of target-vessel revascularization (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.24; P=0.50), definite or probable stent thrombosis (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.86-1.85; P=0.24), cardiac death (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.30; P=0.91), and target-vessel myocardial infarction (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89-1.36; P=0.39). Moreover, R-ZES and EES had similar risks of late definite or probable very late stent thrombosis (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.53-2.11; P=0.87). No evidence of significant heterogeneity was observed across trials.. R-ZES and EES provide similar safety and efficacy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are purported to have a lower risk of stent thrombosis than first-generation DES. However, few studies have examined the frequency of late stent thrombosis (LST) and very LST (VLST) in patients with second-generation DES, and the safety of discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial.. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify all reported cases of definite LST and VLST in patients with second-generation DES. Inclusion was restricted to cases with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in which the time from percutaneous coronary intervention and time from discontinuation of DAPT to LST/VLST was reported.. A total of 26 cases (15 ZES and 11 EES) in 11 publications were included. We identified 17 cases of LST and 9 cases of VLST. The median time from percutaneous coronary intervention to LST/VLST in ZES patients was 121 days (interquartile range [IQR], 89-292) and in EES patients was 364 days (IQR, 269-504). For the 5 patients who discontinued taking acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel simultaneously, the median time to event was 20 days (IQR, 10-60). For the 7 patients who discontinued taking clopidogrel but continued taking acetylsalicylic acid, the median time to event was 190 days (IQR, 135-303).. With only a few reported cases of LST/VLST in the literature, available data suggest that thrombotic events might be rare with second-generation DES. Moreover, LST/VLST appears to occur later after DAPT discontinuation in patients with second-generation DES than in those with first-generation DES.

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiotonic Agents; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

To investigate the safety and efficacy of durable polymer drug eluting stents (DES) and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents (biolimus-ES).. Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database search for randomised controlled trials comparing at least two of durable polymer sirolimus eluting stents (sirolimus-ES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (paclitaxel-ES), newer durable polymer everolimus eluting stents (everolimus-ES), Endeavor and Resolute zotarolimus eluting stents (zotarolimus-ES), and biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES.. Safety (death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis) and efficacy (target lesion and target vessel revascularisation) assessed at up to one year and beyond.. 60 randomised controlled trials were compared involving 63,242 patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome treated with a DES. At one year, there were no differences in mortality among devices. Resolute and Endeavor zotarolimus-ES, everolimus-ES, and sirolimus-ES, but not biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES, were associated with significantly reduced odds of myocardial infarction (by 29-34%) compared with paclitaxel-ES. Compared with everolimus-ES, biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES were associated with significantly increased odds of myocardial infarction (by 29%), while Endeavor zotarolimus-ES and paclitaxel-ES were associated with significantly increased odds of stent thrombosis. All investigated DES were similar with regards to efficacy endpoints, except for Endeavor zotarolimus-ES and paclitaxel-ES, which were associated with significantly increased the odds of target lesion and target vessel revascularisations compared with other devices. Direction of results beyond one year did not diverge from the findings for up to one year follow-up. Bayesian probability curves showed a gradient in the magnitude of effect, with everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES offering the highest safety profiles.. The newer durable polymer everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES and the biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES maintain the efficacy of sirolimus-ES; however, for safety endpoints, differences become apparent, with everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES emerging as the safest stents to date.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) is a new drug-eluting stent that delivers zotarolimus, a synthetic analogue of sirolimus, through a biocompatible phosphorylcholine polymer coating. ZES has shown promising results compared with bare-metal stents, but its safety and efficacy against sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting (PES) stents is yet to be established.. We aimed to summarize current evidence from randomized trials comparing ZES with SES and PES.. We searched the Medline, Embase and CENTRAL databases for randomized studies comparing ZES with SES and PES for percutaneous coronary intervention. Relevant clinical and angiographic outcomes were extracted and combined using random and fixed-effect models for heterogeneous and homogenous outcomes, respectively.. Seven randomized trials met the inclusion criteria: ZES group, n=3787; SES group, n=2606; PES group, n=1966. Compared with SES, ZES was associated with significantly higher odds of clinically driven target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-3.14) and target lesion revascularization (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.36-4.46). Compared with SES, ZES had higher in-stent restenosis (OR 6.13, 95% CI 3.96-9.50), late lumen loss 'in-stent' (mean difference [MD] 0.39 mm, 95% CI 0.34-0.44) and late lumen loss 'in-segment' (MD 0.18 mm, 95% CI 0.15-0.21). ZES was associated with higher in-stent late lumen loss than PES (MD 0.18 mm, 95% CI 0.07-0.28). There were no differences in mortality, reinfarction or stent thrombosis with ZES compared with SES and PES.. ZES is not superior to PES and is inferior to SES in terms of angiographic outcomes and clinically driven revascularization.

Topics: Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Failure; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphorylcholine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Types and characteristics of current-available drug-eluting stents(DES) are introduced in this review. Currently, DESs with agents of "limus family" are mainly used because of their efficacy and safety. Two representative performances, angiographic late loss and incidence of late acquired incomplete stent apposition, are compared between these DESs. Furthermore, patient-to-patient variation in amount of neointimal hyperplasia, which is chiefly associated with clinical outcomes, tends to be larger for the DES with larger average angiographic late loss. Thrombotic complications are unexpectedly more frequent in the DES with larger late loss within first one year according to the randomized clinical trials, however, persistent influences to vascular wall become dominant factors stent thrombosis at very late phases.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.. The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha.. A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1;. Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Polymer-free drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in combination with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has shown superior safety and efficacy outcomes compared with bare-metal stents among patients with high-bleeding risk (HBR) treated with 1-month DAPT. The safety and efficacy of the newer-generation durable-polymer DES Resolute Onyx compared with polymer-free DES among HBR patients treated with 1-month DAPT is unknown.. The Onyx ONE global randomized trial is an international, prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study enrolling HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The trial will randomize up to 2,000 patients in a 1:1 fashion to receive either the durable-polymer Resolute Onyx DES or the polymer-free Biosensors BioFreedom DES. After index procedure, patients in both arms will be treated with 1 month of DAPT (aspirin and oral P2Y12 inhibitor), followed by single antiplatelet therapy thereafter. The primary end point is the composite end point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. The powered secondary end point is target lesion failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. Patient follow-up is planned for 1, 2, and 6 months and 1 and 2 years after the procedure.. The Onyx ONE global randomized trial is the first study to directly compare the safety and efficacy of a durable polymer DES (Resolute Onyx) with a polymer-free DES (BioFreedom) in HBR patients treated with 1 month of DAPT.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Research Design; Risk; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis

Limited data is available on the long-term outcome of patients with increased cardiovascular event risk, treated with newer-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES).. We therefore assessed 3-year follow-up data of high-risk versus low- to intermediate-risk patients of the randomized DUTCH PEERS trial (NCT01331707). In both risk groups we also compared patients treated with Resolute Integrity versus Promus Element DES. Patients were categorized as "high-risk" if they met ≥1 of the following criteria: (1) diabetes (17.9%); (2) previous myocardial infarction (21.9%); (3) previous coronary revascularization (25.8%); (4) chronic renal failure (3.5%); (5) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% (1.5%); and (6) age ≥75 years (17.3%).. At the 3-year follow-up, the incidence of the composite endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) (13.2 vs. 7.5%; logrank p < 0.001) and 2 of its components - cardiac death (4.7 vs. 1.5%; logrank p < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (7.3 vs. 4.7%; logrank p = 0.03) - was higher in high-risk (n = 957) versus low- to intermediate-risk patients (n = 854). Among high-risk patients, treatment with Resolute Integrity (n = 481) and Promus Element stents (n = 476) was similarly safe and efficacious (TVF: 13.3 vs. 13.1%; logrank p = 0.95; definite-or-probable stent thrombosis: 1.7 vs. 1.7%; logrank p = 1.00).. The newer-generation Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents showed similar results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating high-risk patients, who had significantly higher event rates than patients with low-to-intermediate risk.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The prevalence of factors that are associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis (ST), including smoking, diabetes mellitus, and small stent size, is different in women and men who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Thus, gender may potentially modify the relation between stent type and the incidence of ST during long-term follow-up. We explored the data of Patient Related Outcomes With Endeavor Versus Cypher stenting Trial (PROTECT) to evaluate this hypothesis. PROTECT randomized 2,061 women and 6,648 men who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for various indications to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stenting (E-ZES) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stenting (C-SES). Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for at least 3 months. Data on study end points were collected until 5 years after randomization, including ST, death, and cardiovascular events. We analyzed end points and treatment effect (E-ZES vs C-SES) in relation to gender. Women were on average 4.7 years older (65.8 vs 61.1), had a higher prevalence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, were less often smokers, and had a shorter total stent length than men. At discharge and throughout follow-up, a slightly lower fraction of women were using dual antiplatelet therapy. During 5-year follow-up, definite or probable ST was observed in 36 women (1.8%) and 152 men (2.4%; log-rank p = 0.15). E-ZES reduced the incidence of ST compared with C-SES in women (hazard ratio 0.58) and men (hazard ratio 0.61), with no evidence of heterogeneity (p = 0.89). In conclusion, in PROTECT, women and men had similar cumulative incidence of ST at 5 years after stent placement. The favorable effect of the study stent E-ZES over C-SES was not modified by gender.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

In acute myocardial infarction (MI), novel highly deliverable drug-eluting stents (DES) may be particularly valuable as their flexible stent designs might reduce device-induced traumas to culprit lesions. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions with 2 novel durable polymer-coated DES in patients with acute MI.. The prospective, randomized DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) multicenter trial compares Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents in 1811 all-comer patients, of whom 817 (45.1%) were treated for ST-segment elevation MI or non-ST-segment elevation MI and the 2-year outcome is available in 99.9%. The primary clinical endpoint is target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel related MI, or target vessel revascularization.. Of all 817 patients treated for acute MI, 421 (51.5%) were treated with Resolute Integrity and 396 (48.5%) with Promus Element stents. At the 2-year follow-up, the rates of TVF (7.4% vs 6.1%; P = .45), target lesion revascularization (3.1% vs 2.8%; P = .79), and definite stent thrombosis (1.0% vs 0.5%; P = .69) were low for both stent groups. Consistent with these findings in all patients with acute MI, outcomes for the 2 DES were favorable and similar in both, with 370 patients with ST-segment elevation MI (TVF, 5.1% vs 4.9%; P = .81) and 447 patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI (TVF, 9.0% vs 7.5%; P = .56).. Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents were both safe and efficacious in treating patients with acute MI. The present 2-year follow-up data underline the safety of using these devices in this particular clinical setting.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Netherlands; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have been shown to be superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and comparable to Resolute ZES at eight-month angiography in patients treated for total coronary occlusions (TCO). This study investigated clinical outcome at three-year follow-up.. The PRISON III trial investigated the efficacy and safety of SES against ZES (Endeavor and Resolute) in two study phases. In the first phase, 51 patients were randomised to receive SES and 46 to Endeavor ZES. In the second phase, 103 and 104 patients were randomised to SES or Resolute ZES, respectively. Between one and three years there were only a few additional clinical events in all groups. As a result, the rates of target lesion revascularisation 12.2% vs. 19.6%, p=0.49, target vessel failure 14.3% vs. 19.6%, p=0.68, and definite or probable stent thrombosis 4.1% vs. 2.2% were comparable between SES and Endeavor ZES at three years. In the second study phase, the rates of target lesion revascularisation 10% vs. 5.9%, p=0.42, target vessel failure 10% vs. 7.9%, p=0.79 and definite or probable stent thrombosis 1.0% vs. 0% were similar between SES and Resolute ZES.. The present study demonstrated a low incidence of clinical events between one- and three-year follow-up with either SES compared to Endeavor ZES or SES versus Resolute ZES in patients treated for total coronary occlusions.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

To assess three-year clinical outcome following randomised use of the second-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES). For Resolute ZES and randomised use, outcome data ≥3 years are relatively scarce.. The TWENTE trial examined 1,391 patients with stable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, of whom 21.6% were diabetics, 70.1% had complex B2 or C lesions and 77.4% had "off-label" indications for DES use. Three-year follow-up data were obtained in 1,381 patients (99.3%; 10 withdrawals). Adverse clinical events were independently adjudicated. The primary endpoint target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation, was 12.1% for Resolute ZES and 13.4% for XIENCE V EES (p=0.50). Cardiac death rates were 1.9% vs. 3.5% (p=0.06); the other individual components of TVF also showed no significant between-group differences. The rates of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs. 1.6%, p=0.82) and very late stent thrombosis (0.6% vs. 0.4%, p=1.0) did not differ between the groups.. Three-year follow-up data of patients included in the randomised TWENTE trial demonstrated similar and sustained safety and efficacy of Resolute ZES and XIENCE V EES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

We compared 5-year clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs; Endeavor Sprint, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs; Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) coronary implantation. We randomized 2,332 patients to either ZESs (n = 1,162, n = 169 diabetic patients) or SESs (n = 1,170, n = 168 diabetic patients) stratified according to presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. End points included major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and definite stent thrombosis. Among diabetic patients, MACE occurred more frequently in patients treated with ZESs than SESs (48 [28.4%] vs 31 [18.5%]; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 2.93, p = 0.032) because of a higher rate of TVR (32 [18.9%] vs 14 [8.3%]; OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.02, p = 0.006). Among nondiabetic patients, ZES and SES had similar MACE rates at 5-year follow-up but SES was associated with a significantly higher risk of definite stent thrombosis (10 [1.0%] vs 23 [2.3%]; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.91, p = 0.028). Moreover, during the last 4 years, ZES had fewer MACE, TVR, and stent thrombosis events among nondiabetic patients. In conclusion, SES remains superior to ZES in patients with diabetes throughout the 5-year follow-up, however, among nondiabetic patients, SES demonstrated a highly dynamic performance with favorable initial results followed by a late catch-up that included an overall higher risk of stent thrombosis.

Topics: Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the implantation of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, California) and Xience V everolimus-eluting stents (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) following strict discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after 12 months.. Only limited long-term follow-up data are available from head-to-head comparisons of second-generation drug-eluting stents.. The randomized TWENTE (The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente) trial is an investigator-initiated study performed in a population with many complex patients and lesions and only limited exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to ZES (n = 697) or EES (n = 694).. Two-year follow-up information was available on all patients. The rate of continuation of DAPT beyond 12 months was very low (5.4%). The primary endpoint of target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, did not differ between ZES and EES (10.8% vs. 11.6, p = 0.65), despite fewer target lesion revascularizations in patients with EES (2.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.03). The patient-oriented composite endpoint was similar (16.4% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.75). Two-year rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis were 1.2% and 1.4%, respectively (p = 0.63). Very late definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred only in 2 patients in each study arm (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 1.00).. After 2 years of follow-up and stringent discontinuation of DAPT beyond 12 months, Resolute ZES and Xience V EES showed similar results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating patients with a majority of complex lesions and off-label indications for drug-eluting stents. (The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente [TWENTE]; NCT01066650).

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The use of drug-eluting stent (DES) instead of bare-metal stent (BMS) in patients at high stent thrombosis or bleeding risk as well as in those at low restenosis risk (ie, uncertain DES candidates) remains a matter of debate. Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (E-ZES) (Santa Rosa, CA) is a hydrophilic polymer-based second-generation device with unique drug fast-release profile, which may allow for a shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration without safety concerns.. The primary objective is to assess whether E-ZES implantation followed by a shorter than currently recommended course of DAPT will decrease the incidence of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events as compared with BMS in undefined DES recipients. Actual duration of DAPT regimen will be dictated by patients' characteristics and not by stent type and, as such, can be as short as 30 days after intervention in both stent groups.. The ZEUS study is an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted at 20 clinical sites in Italy, Switzerland, Portugal, and Hungary. With 1,600 individuals, this study will have 85% power to detect a 33% difference in the primary end point consisting of the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.. The ZEUS trial aims to assess whether the use of E-ZES, followed by a DAPT duration regimen based on patients' characteristics and not by stent type, is superior to conventional BMS implantation in undefined DES recipients who qualify for the presence of high thrombosis, bleeding, or low restenosis risk criteria.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hungary; Italy; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Portugal; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Switzerland; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uncertainty

The current recommendation is for at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. However, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy with specific types of drug-eluting stents remains unknown.. To assess the clinical noninferiority of 3 months (short-term) vs 12 months (long-term) of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with zotarolimus-eluting stents.. The OPTIMIZE trial was an open-label, active-controlled, 1:1 randomized noninferiority study including 3119 patients in 33 sites in Brazil between April 2010 and March 2012. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Eligible patients were those with stable coronary artery disease or history of low-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents.. After PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents, patients were prescribed aspirin (100-200 mg daily) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) for 3 months (n = 1563) or 12 months (n = 1556), unless contraindicated because of occurrence of an end point.. The primary end point was net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, or major bleeding); the expected event rate at 1 year was 9%, with a noninferiority margin of 2.7%. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; a composite of all-cause death, MI, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or target lesion revascularization) and Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis.. NACCE occurred in 93 patients receiving short-term and 90 patients receiving long-term therapy (6.0% vs 5.8%, respectively; risk difference, 0.17 [95% CI, -1.52 to 1.86]; P = .002 for noninferiority). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated MACE rates at 1 year of 8.3% (128) in the short-term group and 7.4% (114) in the long-term group (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.87-1.45]). Between 91 and 360 days, no statistically significant association was observed for NACCE (39 [2.6%] vs 38 [2.6%] for the short- and long-term groups, respectively; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.66-1.60]), MACE (78 [5.3%] vs 64 [4.3%]; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.88-1.70]), or stent thrombosis (4 [0.3%] vs 1 [0.1%]; HR, 3.97 [95% CI, 0.44-35.49]).. In patients with stable coronary artery disease or low-risk ACS treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents, 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy was noninferior to 12 months for NACCE, without significantly increasing the risk of stent thrombosis.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01113372.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk; Sirolimus; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine

The Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) utilizes the same metallic platform and anti-restenotic drug as the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) but is coated with a more biocompatible polymer with enhanced drug-release kinetics. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of 2 zotarolimus-eluting stent generations.. In two randomized trials with broad inclusion criteria (ISAR-TEST 2 and ISAR-TEST 5), 1,000 patients were treated with R-ZES and 339 patients treated with E-ZES. In both trials follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The efficacy endpoint of interest was target lesion revascularization and the safety endpoints were the combined incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction related to target vessel as well as the incidence of definite stent thrombosis at 2-year follow-up.. The incidence of target lesion revascularization at 2 years was 12.0% in the R-ZES group and 16.0% in the E-ZES (HR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.52-1.00], P = .052). The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was 5.5% vs. 4.8% (HR 1.15, [95% CI: 0.66-2.02], P = .62) and of definite stent thrombosis was 0.4% vs. 0.6% (HR 0.68, [95% CI: 0.12-3.72], P = .66), respectively. All measures of angiographic restenosis were in favor of the R-ZES; in-stent late lumen loss was 0.29 ± 0.56 with the R-ZES versus 0.58 ± 0.55 with the E-ZES (P < .0001).. Comparison of the 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved zotarolimus-eluting stents suggested that the R-ZES as compared to the E-ZES displayed overall superior antirestenotic efficacy. Both devices were associated with a similar low risk of adverse safety events through 2 years.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Death; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Limited data are available regarding the direct comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) for chronic total occlusion (CTO).. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the non-inferiority of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor Sprint®, n=80) to a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher®, n=80) in patients with CTO lesion with a reference vessel diameter ≥ 2.5mm. The primary endpoint was in-segment binary restenosis rate at 9-month angiographic follow-up. Key secondary endpoints included target vessel failure (TVF; including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) and Academic Research Consortium-defined definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) within 12 months. The ZES was non-inferior to the SES with respect to the primary endpoint, which occurred in 14.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-22.2) and in 13.7% (95%CI: 5.8-21.6) of patients, respectively (non-inferiority margin, 15.0%; P for non-inferiority <0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of TVF (10.0% vs. 17.5%; P=0.168) nor in the rate of ST (0.0% vs. 1.3%; P=0.316) during the 12-month clinical follow-up.. The effectiveness and safety of ZES are similar to those of SES and therefore it is a good treatment option in patients undergoing PCI for CTO with DESs.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Data on clinical outcomes among patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor™ stent versus the sirolimus-eluting Cypher™ stent favor the sirolimus-eluting stent. However, a separate comparison of clinical outcome among patients treated for multiple lesions with these stents is lacking. We performed this comparison within the SORT OUT III trial data set.. Among 2332 patients randomized in SORT OUT III, 695 were treated for multiple lesions with zotarolimus-eluting (n = 350) or sirolimus-eluting (n = 345) stents and followed for 18 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE); composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR); was the primary endpoint.. Zotarolimus-eluting compared to sirolimus-eluting stent treatment was associated with increased MACE rate (13.2% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio 5.29 with 95% confidence interval: 2.59-10.8). All secondary endpoints; all cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, TVR, target lesion revascularization, in-stent restenosis, and definite stent thrombosis; were observed more frequently among zotarolimus-eluting stent treated patients. For all endpoints, hazard ratios were 1.6 to 4.6 times higher than in the overall results of the SORT OUT III trial.. We observed better clinical outcomes among patients treated for multiple lesions with the sirolimus-eluting stent compared to those treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy and the risk-benefit ratio for long-term dual-antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting remain poorly defined. We evaluated the impact of up to 6 versus 24 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy in a broad all-comers patient population receiving a balanced proportion of Food and Drug Administration-approved drug-eluting or bare-metal stents.. We randomly assigned 2013 patients to receive bare-metal, zotarolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, or everolimus-eluting stent implantation. At 30 days, patients in each stent group were randomly allocated to receive up to 6 or 24 months of clopidogrel therapy in addition to aspirin. The primary end point was a composite of death of any cause, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident. The cumulative risk of the primary outcome at 2 years was 10.1% with 24-month dual-antiplatelet therapy compared with 10.0% with 6-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.29; P=0.91). The individual risks of death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or stent thrombosis did not differ between the study groups; however, there was a consistently greater risk of hemorrhage in the 24-month clopidogrel group according to all prespecified bleeding definitions, including the recently proposed Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification.. A regimen of 24 months of clopidogrel therapy in patients who had received a balanced mixture of drug-eluting or bare-metal stents was not significantly more effective than a 6-month clopidogrel regimen in reducing the composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00611286.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk; Sirolimus; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

We sought to compare the long-term safety of two devices with different antiproliferative properties: the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES; Medtronic, Inc) and the Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (C-SES; Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) in a broad group of patients and lesions.. Between May 21, 2007 and Dec 22, 2008, we recruited 8791 patients from 36 recruiting countries to participate in this open-label, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older undergoing elective, unplanned, or emergency procedures in native coronary arteries. Patients were randomly assigned to either receive E-ZES and C-SES (ratio 1:1). Randomisation was stratified per centre with varying block sizes of four, six, or eight patients, and concealed with a central telephone-based or web-based allocation service. The primary outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3 years and was analysed by intention to treat. Patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957.. PROTECT randomised 8791 patients, of whom 8709 provided consent to participate and were eligible: 4357 were allocated to the E-ZES group and 4352 patients to the C-SES group. At 3 years, rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis did not differ between groups (1·4% for E-ZES [predicted: 1·5%] vs 1·8% [predicted: 2·5%] for C-SES; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·58-1·14, p=0·22). Dual antiplatelet therapy was used in 8402 (96%) patients at discharge, 7456 (88%) at 1 year, 3041 (37%) at 2 years, and 2364 (30%) at 3 years.. No evidence of superiority of E-ZES compared with C-SES in definite or probable stent thrombosis rates was noted at 3 years. Time analysis suggests a difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis between groups is emerging over time, and a longer follow-up is therefore needed given the clinical relevance of stent thrombosis.. Medtronic, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

This was designed to assess the outcomes of side branch (SB) stenosis after implantation of three drug-eluting stents (DES). From 2,645 patients in the ZEST (Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent with Sirolimus-Eluting and PacliTaxel-Eluting Stent for Coronary Lesions) Trial, 788 patients had 923 bifurcation lesions with SB ≥ 1.5 mm were included. SB was treated in 150 lesions, including 35 (3.8%) receiving SB stenting. Of untreated SB with baseline stenosis < 50%, the incidences of periprocedural SB compromise was similar in the zotarolimus (15.8%), sirolimus (17.2%), and paclitaxel (16.6%) stent groups (P = 0.92). At follow-up angiography, delayed SB compromise occurred in 13.9%, 3.2%, and 9.4% (P = 0.010) of these groups. When classified into four groups (< 50%, 50%-70%, 70%-99%, and 100%), 9.0% of untreated SB were worsened, whereas improvement and stationary were observed in 9.6% and 81.4%. In a multivariable logistic regression model, main branch (MB) stenosis at follow-up (%) was the only independent predictor of SB stenosis worsening (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04; P < 0.001). After MB stenting in bifurcation lesions, a minority of SB appears to worsen. DES with strong anti-restenotic efficacy may help maintain SB patency.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Blood Vessels; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Odds Ratio; Paclitaxel; Predictive Value of Tests; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to compare late safety and efficacy outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).. Despite higher late lumen loss and binary restenosis with ZES compared with SES, it is uncertain whether differences in early angiographic measures translate into more disparate late clinical events.. Clinical outcomes were prospectively evaluated through 5 years in the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) that randomized 436 patients of relatively low anatomic and clinical risk to treatment with ZES (n = 323) or SES (n = 113) and evaluated a primary endpoint of 8-month angiographic late lumen loss.. At 5 years (completeness of follow-up: 95.2%), pre-specified endpoints of all-cause mortality (5.2% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.02), myocardial infarction (1.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.03), and the composite event rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.009) and major adverse cardiac events (14.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower among patients treated with ZES. Rates of target lesion (8.1% ZES vs. 6.5% SES, p = 0.68) and target vessel revascularization were similar between treatment groups. Stent thrombosis was infrequent and similar in both groups (0.7% ZES vs. 0.9% SES, p = 1.0). Between 9 months and 5 years, progression of major adverse cardiac events was significantly more common with SES than with ZES (16.7% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.015).. Despite initially higher angiographic late lumen loss, rates of clinical restenosis beyond the protocol-specified angiographic follow-up period remain stable with ZES compared with the rates for SES, resulting in similar late-term efficacy. Over 5 years, significant differences in death, myocardial infarction, and composite endpoints favored treatment with ZES. (The Medtronic Endeavor III Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Trial [ENDEAVOR III]; NCT00217256).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In low-risk patients, the zotarolimus-eluting stent has been shown to reduce rates of restenosis without increasing the risk of stent thrombosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of the zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease who were receiving routine clinical care with no direct follow-up.. We did a single-blind, all-comer superiority trial in adult patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and at least one target lesion. Patients were treated at one of five percutaneous coronary intervention centres between January, 2006, and August, 2007. Computer-generated block randomisation and a telephone allocation service were used to randomly assign patients to receive the zotarolimus-eluting or the sirolimus-eluting stent. Data for follow-up were obtained from national Danish administrative and health-care registries. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events within 9 months: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation. Intention-to-treat analyses were done at 9-month and 18-month follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00660478.. 1162 patients (1619 lesions) were assigned to receive the zotarolimus-eluting stent, and 1170 patients (1611 lesions) to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent. 67 patients (72 lesions) had stent failure, and six patients were lost to follow-up. All randomly assigned patients were included in analyses at 9-month follow-up; 2200 patients (94%) had completed 18-month follow-up by the time of our assessment. At 9 months, the primary endpoint had occurred in a higher proportion of patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent than in those treated with the sirolimus-eluting stent (72 [6%] vs 34 [3%]; HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.43-3.23; p=0.0002). At 18-month follow-up, this difference was sustained (113 [10%] vs 53 [5%]; 2.19, 1.58-3.04; p<0.0001). For patients receiving the zotarolimus-eluting stent and those receiving the sirolimus-eluting stent, all cause-mortality was similar at 9-month follow-up (25 [2%] vs 18 [2%]; 1.40, 0.76-2.56; p=0.28), but was significantly different at 18-month follow-up (51 [4%] vs 32 [3%]; 1.61, 1.03-2.50; p=0.035).. The sirolimus-eluting stent is superior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent for patients receiving routine clinical care.. Cordis and Medtronic.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retreatment; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The increased frequency of very late (>1 year) stent thrombosis (VLST) has raised concerns with regard to the safety of sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES).. Experimental and preliminary clinical findings with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have suggested a favorable safety profile.. The ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial is a single-blind randomized ZES versus PES clinical trial in 1,548 patients with de novo native coronary lesions; the primary end point-9-month target vessel failure-was previously reported, annual clinical follow-up is planned for 5 years, and this report describes the 3-year outcomes.. The ZES compared with PES reduced target vessel failure (12.3% vs. 15.9%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 1.00, p = 0.049), myocardial infarctions (MI) (2.1% vs. 4.9%, HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.80, p = 0.005), and cardiac death plus MI (3.6% vs. 7.1%, HR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p = 0.004). Although the overall 3-year rate of Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis did not differ significantly (1.1% vs. 1.7%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.64, p = 0.380), VLST (between 1 and 3 years) was significantly reduced in ZES patients (1 event vs. 11 events; 0.1% vs. 1.6%, HR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.71, p = 0.004). Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 3 years was similar with ZES versus PES (6.5% vs. 6.1%, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.65, p = 0.662).. Three-year follow-up results from the ENDEAVOR IV trial indicate similar antirestenosis efficacy but improved clinical safety associated with ZES compared with PES, due to significantly fewer peri-procedural and remote MIs associated with fewer VLST events. (A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The RESOLUTE trial examined the safety and efficacy of a next-generation zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent, Resolute (Medtronic CardioVascular Inc., Santa Rosa, California).. Revascularization benefits associated with current drug-eluting stents are often diminished in the presence of complex coronary lesions and in certain patient cohorts. Resolute uses a new proprietary polymer coating that extends the duration of drug delivery to match the longer healing duration often experienced in more complex cases.. The RESOLUTE trial was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study of the Resolute stent in 139 patients with de novo coronary lesions with reference vessel diameters > or =2.5 and < or =3.5 mm and lesion length > or =14 and < or =27 mm. The primary end point was 9-month in-stent late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months; acute device, lesion, and procedure success; and 9-month target vessel failure (TVF), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, neointimal hyperplastic (NIH) volume, and percent NIH volume obstruction.. The 9-month in-stent late lumen loss was 0.22 +/- 0.27 mm. Cumulative MACE were 4.3%, 4.3%, 7.2%, and 8.7% at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Acute lesion, procedure, and device success rates were 100.0%, 95.7%, and 99.3%, respectively. At 9 months, TLR was 0.0%, TVF was 6.5%, stent thrombosis was 0.0%, NIH volume was 6.55 +/- 7.83 mm(3), and percent NIH volume obstruction was 3.73 +/- 4.05%.. In this feasibility study, the Resolute stent demonstrated low in-stent late lumen loss, minimal neointimal hyperplastic ingrowth, low TLR, no stent thrombosis, and acceptable TVF and MACE. (The RESOLUTE Clinical Trial; NCT00248079).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; New Zealand; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

To evaluate the 5-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in the ENDEAVOR I first-in-human study.. ENDEAVOR I was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study of the Endeavor ZES in 100 consecutive patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) due to de novo, stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries.. Patients with single or multivessel CAD were eligible to participate, but only one lesion per patient was treated. The lesion had to have > or = 50% stenosis, be < or = 15 mm in length, and located in a vessel with a reference diameter of 3.0-3.5 mm. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel failure (TVF), and stent thrombosis were evaluated 5 years after stent implantation.. The cumulative incidence of MACE was 2.0% at 1 year, 3.0% at 2 years, 6.1% at 3 years, 7.2% at 4 years, and 7.2% at 5 years. At 5 years, there were seven patients who had eight events; four noncardiac (cancer) deaths, three cases of TLR, of which one presented as a non-Q-wave MI because of a stent thrombosis at 10 days after the index procedure. There were no late or very late stent thromboses by any definition. TVF at 5 years was 5.2%.. Use of the Endeavor ZES to treat symptomatic CAD due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries resulted in sustained clinical benefits to 5 years, with low rates of MACE, TLR, TVF, and stent thrombosis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Massachusetts; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; New Zealand; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis rates compared to bare-metal stents. Most trials using DES enrolled selected patient and lesion subtypes, and primary endpoint focused on angiographic metrics or relatively short-term outcomes. When DES are used in broader types of lesions and patients, important differences may emerge in long-term outcomes between stent types, particularly the incidence of late stent thrombosis. PROTECT is a randomized, open-label trial comparing the long-term safety of the zotarolimus-eluting stent and the sirolimus-eluting stent. The trial has enrolled 8,800 patients representative of those seen in routine clinical practice, undergoing elective, unplanned, or emergency procedures in native coronary arteries in 196 centers in 36 countries. Indications for the procedure and selection of target vessel and lesion characteristics were at the operator's discretion. Procedures could be staged, but no more than 4 target lesions could be treated per patient. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy was prespecified to achieve similar lengths of treatment in both study arms. The shortest predefined duration was 3 months, as per the manufacturer's instructions. The primary outcome measure is the composite rate of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 3 years, centrally adjudicated using Academic Research Consortium definitions. The main secondary end points are 3-year all-cause mortality, cardiac death, large nonfatal myocardial infarction, and all myocardial infarctions. This large, international, randomized, controlled trial will provide important information on comparative rates of stent thrombosis between 2 different DES systems and safety as assessed by patient-relevant long-term clinical outcomes.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Incidence; Prosthesis Design; Research Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

The E-Five registry was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis across a wide range of patients treated in real-world clinical practice settings.. Early clinical trials with the Endeavor ZES have demonstrated low rates of target lesion revascularization with a favorable safety profile including low late stent thrombosis with up to 4 years of follow-up. A clinical registry was designed to complement controlled trial data by examining a large patient population, including high-risk patient subsets.. The E-Five registry is a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter global registry conducted at 188 centers worldwide. Adult patients (n = 8,314) with coronary artery disease who underwent single-vessel or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. The primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months. A secondary analysis stratified patients by standard versus extended-use clinical and lesion characteristics.. Overall 12-month outcome rates were MACE 7.5%; cardiac death 1.7%; myocardial infarction (all) 1.6%; target lesion revascularization 4.5%; and stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium definite and probable) 1.1%. The 12-month MACE rates were 4.3% and 8.6% for standard- and extended-use patients, respectively (p < 0.001).. This large, international multicenter registry provides important information regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of the Endeavor ZES across standard and extended-use patients in the real-world setting. Rates of MACE and measures of safety including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were low and consistent with pooled results of clinical trials. (E-Five Registry: A World-Wide Registry With The Endeavor Zotarolimus Eluting Coronary Stent [eFive Registry]; NCT00623441).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Stenosis; Europe; Female; Humans; Israel; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; South America; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

We performed this study to investigate the vascular response in early period after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Endeavor Sprint, Medtronic CardioVascular, Minneapolis, Minnesota) implantation.. The ZES has different characteristics, with biocompatible polymer and rapid drug-elution, compared with the first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).. The ENDEAVOR OCT (Evaluation in 3 Months Duration of Neointimal Coverage after Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation by Optical Coherence Tomography) trial is a prospective, single-center study evaluating vascular healing patterns with optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 3 months after stent implantation. A total of 31 ZES in 30 patients underwent serial OCT at immediate post-intervention and 3 months. Neointimal growth and malapposition were analyzed at each stent strut of cross-sectional OCT images with 0.5-mm intervals.. The incidence of malapposition at post-intervention and 3 months was 6.0% and 0.2%, respectively. However, late acquired malapposition was not detected at 3 months. Of 31 stents, 27 stents (87.1%) were covered completely with neointima, but the remaining 4 stents had 2 (0.8%), 4 (0.9%), 4 (1.2%), and 6 (1.4%) uncovered struts. Overall mean percentage of covered stent struts was 99.9 +/- 0.4%. This finding was consistent among groups with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris (99.9 +/- 0.3% vs. 99.9 +/- 0.4%, p = 0.92). Intracoronary thrombus was documented in 1 stent (3.2%) among 31 stents.. Most of the stent struts were covered with neointima, and late acquired malapposition was not found at 3 months after ZES implantation. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that ZES might have a favorable in vivo vascular response at 3 months after stent implantation. (Evaluation of Zotarolimus Eluting Stent at 3 Months Using Optical Coherence Tomography [ENDEAVOR OCT]; NCT00815139).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

A novel zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ZoMaxx, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) was compared with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (Taxus Express2) in a randomized trial of percutaneous intervention for de novo coronary artery stenosis. The primary end point was defined as noninferiority of in-segment late lumen loss after 9 months.. The ZoMaxx stent system elutes 10 microg/mm zotarolimus using a phosphorylcholine polymer loaded onto a novel stainless steel stent platform containing a 0.0007-inch inner layer of tantalum.. Twenty-nine investigative sites in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand enrolled 401 patients, 396 of whom received a study stent.. After 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly greater in the ZoMaxx group (in-stent 0.67 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 0.45 +/- 0.48 mm; p < 0.001; in-segment 0.43 +/- 0.60 mm vs. 0.25 +/- 0. 45 mm; p = 0.003), resulting in significantly higher rates of >50% angiographic restenosis (in-stent 12.9% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.03; in-segment 16.5% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.007). The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval on the difference in in-segment late lumen loss between the 2 treatment groups (0.27 mm) exceeded the 0.25 mm value pre-specified for noninferiority. There were no significant differences between ZoMaxx and Taxus-treated groups with respect to target lesion revascularization (8.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.14), major adverse cardiac events (12.6% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.43), or stent thrombosis (0.5% in both groups).. After 9 months, the ZoMaxx stent showed less neointimal inhibition than the Taxus stent, as shown by higher in-stent late loss and restenosis by qualitative coronary angiography.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The second-generation everolimus and zotarolimus drug eluting stents (DES) have shown superiority for repeat revascularisation and safety to the first-generation devices for stable patients. However, the benefit of those devices in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has remained questionable due to concern regarding stent thrombosis (ST) seen with the first-generation devices. We review the outcomes of patients with STEMI treated in our centre at a time when the second-generation DES became the standard of care.. All patients who presented to our institution with STEMI and underwent emergency percutaneous intervention (PCI) in 2012 with second-generation DES were identified. Case notes and electronic records were reviewed. Patients undergoing staged PCI to non-culprit lesions were excluded. Patients who died during the primary cardiac event with cardiogenic shock were also excluded.. A total of 399 patients (mean age 65+/-12, 274 (76%) male) were identified. Thirty-five patients (8.7%) died during hospitalisation with cardiogenic shock and were excluded from the subsequent analysis. A further 35 patients died during follow-up. Patients received a mean of 1.15 DES. Median follow-up time was 4.7 years. Median door to reperfusion time was 90 minutes. The all-cause mortality rate for STEMI survivors was 9.6%. Cardiac mortality rate was 3.6%. Thirty-one patients (8.5%) re-presented with symptoms leading to repeat coronary angiography. In-stent restenosis (ISR) was observed only in eight patients (2.2%). The significant factors associated with re-presentation were smoking and medication non-compliance.. Early mortality rates following emergency PCI for STEMI remain high despite low reperfusion times. The five-year follow-up data would suggest that STEMI survivors have good outcomes with the second-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Cause of Death; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The use of short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial. To investigate efficacy and safety of short-duration DAPT, we performed a detailed comparison of intra-stent conditions by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation with short-term and standard DAPT.. Eighty-two consecutive patients with stable angina pectoris who received Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZESs; Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) were enrolled. Patients were assigned to 3-month (3M group: 41 patients) and standard (standard group: 41 patients) DAPT. In the 3M group, clopidogrel was discontinued 3 months after stent implantation. In the standard group, DAPT was maintained until follow-up OCT. At 9 months, neointimal proliferation was significantly larger in the 3M group, but there were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of uncovered and malapposed strut. The prevalence of abnormal intra-stent tissue (AIT) at 9 months was equivalent between groups. A multiple regression analysis revealed malapposition at 9 months as the strongest independent predictor of AIT at 9 months, and the prevalence of AIT was not associated with DAPT duration. Over 2 years, cardiac events were equal between groups; however, major bleeding was higher tendency in the standard group than in the 3M group.. This OCT study indicated that reducing DAPT's duration may provide acceptable arterial healing in patients with implanted R-ZESs.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Data concerning the effect of current smoking on solely new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. We investigated the impact of current smoking on 2-year clinical outcomes between durable-polymer (DP)-coated DES (zotarolimus-eluting [ZES] and everolimus eluting [EES]) and biodegradable-polymer (BP)-coated biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Finally, a total of 8357 AMI patients with current smoking underwent successful PCI with new-generation DES (ZES, EES, and BES) were enrolled and divided into three groups as ZES (n = 3199), EES (n = 3987), and BES group (n = 1171). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death (cardiac death [CD] or non-cardiac death), recurrent AMI (re-MI), any revascularization (target lesion revascularization [TLR], target vessel revascularization [TVR], and non-TVR). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST).. The 2-year adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of MACE for ZES vs. EES (1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.843-1.321; p = 0.638), ZES vs. BES (HR, 0.885; 95% CI, 0.626-1.251; p = 0.488), EES vs. BES (HR, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.633-1.250; p = 0.499), and ZES/EES vs. BES (HR, 0.891; 95% CI, 0.648-1.126; p = 0.480) were similar. The occurrence of ST after adjustment were also comparable. In addition, the 2-year adjusted HR for all-cause death, CD, re-MI, TLR, TVR, and non-TVR were not different.. In this study, DP-DES and BP-DES showed comparable safety and efficacy during 2-year follow-up periods. Therefore, DP-DES or BP-DES are equally acceptable in AMI patients with current smoking undergoing PCI.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Smoking; Thrombosis

Early cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is related to stent thrombosis (ST). The use of second-generation everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents is associated with low restenosis rates and short duration of clopidogrel usage. Non-cardiac surgery in recently stent-implanted patients is associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Chronic renal failure patients awaiting renal transplantation may also undergo coronary stent implantation prior to surgery. Here we aimed to investigate the safety of early (3 months) DAPT interruption in second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES)-implanted renal transplant recipients.. In total, 106 previously stent-implanted chronic renal failure patients who underwent renal transplantation were retrospectively enrolled. Three groups were formed according to stent type and the duration of DAPT: early-interruption (3 months from DES implantation), lateinterruption (3-12 months from DES implantation), and bare-metal stent (BMS; at least 1 month from BMS implantation) groups.. Comparison among BMS, DES-early and DES-late groups indicated no difference in ST, myocardial infarction, death, and MACEs. In addition, no difference was observed in ST (p=0.998), myocardial infarction (p=0.998), death (p=0.999), and MACEs (p=0.998) between DES-early and DES-late groups.. Early (3 months) interruption of antiplatelet treatment with second-generation stents before renal transplantation seems to be safe and does not lead to increase in the occurrence of ST and MACEs.

Topics: Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Preoperative Period; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

First-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced short-term stent failure as compared to bare-metal stents due to the inhibition of neointima hyperplasia, but instead increased the risk of very-late stent failure. Although better outcomes have been reported for second-generation DES than for first-generation DES, the difference in the angioscopic findings at 1-year follow-up has not been adequately elucidated among second-generation DES.. Consecutive 161 patients who received angioscopic examination at 1 year after implantation of second-generation DES, i.e. Nobori biolimus-eluting stents (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) (N-BES, n=25), Xience everolimus-eluting stents (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA; X-EES, n=95), or Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Resolute Integrity; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA; R-ZES, n=41), in de novo native coronary lesions were analyzed.. Maximum neointima coverage grade (N-BES, 0.9±0.3; X-EES, 1.2±0.4; R-ZES, 1.5±0.5; p<0.001) was the highest in R-ZES and lowest in N-BES. Heterogeneity score was higher in R-ZES than in N-BES (N-BES, 0.8±0.4; X-EES, 0.9±0.4; R-ZES, 1.1±0.5; p=0.007). Maximum yellow color grade and prevalence of thrombus were not different. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only stent type was associated with maximum neointima coverage grade; stent type and total stent length were associated with heterogeneity score; and stenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and total stent length were associated with maximum yellow color grade.. Neointima coverage and heterogeneity were mainly determined by stent type even among second-generation DES, while yellow color was determined mainly by whether target lesion was of ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioscopy; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Our objective was to clarify whether thrombogenic problems with stent struts are resolved at 3 months after 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Twenty-one patients with stable angina pectoris having 28 (22 zotarolimus-eluting, 6 everolimus-eluting) stents with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were evaluated. Stent strut coverage and malapposition were evaluated by OCT immediately after PCI and at 3-month follow-up. Acute strut malapposition was observed in 26 out of 28 analyzed stents (92.9 %). At 3-month follow-up, 7 (26.9 %) of those 26 stents with strut malapposition were completely resolved, and the mean percentages of uncovered struts and malapposed struts were 8.3 and 2.0 % when analyzed by each individual stent. When analyzing a total of 30,060 struts, 807 struts (2.7 %) demonstrated acute strut malapposition. Among these, 219 struts (27.1 %) demonstrated persistent strut malapposition. On the basis of receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a strut-to-vessel (S-V) distance ≤160 µm on post-stenting OCT images was the corresponding cutoff point for resolved malapposed struts (sensitivity 78.1 %, specificity 62.8 %, area under the curve 0.758). The S-V distance of persistent malapposed struts on post-stenting OCT images was longer than that of resolved malapposed struts (235 ± 112 vs. 176 ± 93 µm, p < 0.01). At 3 months after PCI, the prevalence rates of uncovered and malapposed struts were relatively low in 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent. Our results suggest that OCT-guide PCI with an S-V distance ≤160 µm may be recommended especially in patients with planed short-term DAPT.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Tomography, Optical Coherence

This study compared safety and efficacy of first- and second-generation DES in an unrestricted, real-life population of diabetic patients undergoing PCI.. The study was a subanalysis of diabetic patients from the all-comer Katowice-Zabrze Registry of patients undergoing PCI with the implantation of either first- (Paclitaxel-, Sirolimus-eluting stents) or second-generation DES (Zotarolimus-, Everolimus-, Biolimus-eluting stents). Efficacy defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke) and safety defined as stent thrombosis (ST) were evaluated at 1 year.. From the total of 1916 patients, 717 were diabetics. Among them, 257 (36%) were treated with first-generation DES (230 [89%] Paclitaxel-eluting stents, 27 [11%] Sirolimus-eluting stents), 460 with second-generation DES (171 [37%] Zotarolimus-eluting stents, 243 [53%] Everolimus-eluting stents, 46 [10%] Biolimus-eluting stents). Rate of MACCE was equal in both groups (p=0.54). Second-generation DES had a better safety profile than first-generation DES (log-rank for cumulative ST at 1 year p<0.001). First-generation DES was a risk factor for ST (HR 5.75 [1.16-28.47], p=0.03) but not for MACCE (HR 0.89 [0.6-1.32], p=0.57).. In a real-life setting of diabetic patients undergoing PCI, second-generation DES had lower risk of ST and similar MACCE rate compared to first-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Poland; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

It has been shown that triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol results in better clinical outcomes than dual therapy in patients treated with a first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES); however, it is unclear whether triple antiplatelet therapy has a similar efficacy after the implantation of second-generation DES.In the COACT (Cath Olic medical center percutAneous Coronary in Tervention) registry, 1248 study subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with an everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor, Xience V, or Promus) were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups after propensity score matching (n = 724; M = 422 [58.3%]; mean age = 66.1 ± 11.0 years): Group 1: patients treated with dual antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and clopidogrel; n = 362; M = 213 [58.8%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years); Group 2: patients treated with triple antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; n = 362; M = 209 [57.7%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years). The mean follow-up duration was 13 ± 10 months, and the cumulative incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) was 6.3% in Group 1 and 7.7% in Group 2. There were no significant differences in MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) between the 2 groups (OR, 1.210; 95% CI: 0.772-1.898; P = 0.406). Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE did not show any survival benefit for triple antiplatelet therapy, even in patients with acute coronary syndrome.In patients treated with a second-generation DES implantation, there is no added clinical benefit to using triple rather than dual antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aspirin; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Registries; Sirolimus; Tetrazoles; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To explore the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease treated with overall new drug-eluting stent (DES) options.. Recent available data have shown the feasibility and the safety of new DESs, mainly evaluating the everolimus-eluting stents in the setting of ULMCA disease.. Patients with ULMCA disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were prospectively evaluated. The study objective was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2-year clinical follow-up.. A total of 154 patients were analyzed. The mean EuroSCORE and SYNTAX scores were 4.7 ± 2.6 and 27.5 ± 8.3, respectively. Distal location was present in 126 patients (81.8%) and 96 lesions (76.3%) were true Medina bifurcations. The 2-stent technique was used in 73 cases (57.9%). Everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were implanted in 68 patients (44.2%), 46 patients (29.9%), and 40 patients (25.9%), respectively. At a median clinical follow-up of 551.5 days (interquartile range, 360.8-1045.5 days), MACEs occurred in 29 patients (18.8%). Ten patients (6.5%) died, and 2 deaths (1.3%) were adjudicated as cardiac. No patient had myocardial infarction or definite stent thrombosis (ST). One probable and 1 possible ST were adjudicated. TVR was required in 19 patients (12.3%) and target lesion revascularization was required in only 7 patients (4.5%).. In our experience, despite the presence of complex distal left main lesions, new DESs in ULMCA disease appear to be promising in terms of safety and efficacy at 2-year clinical follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Metformin impairs endothelialization of drug eluting stents (DES) due to convergent signaling at the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. We assessed whether metformin will continue to adversely affect stent endothelialization despite design improvements in newer generation DES.. Rabbit iliac artery stenting with newer generation DES was performed followed by 14 days of either normal chow diet or one with metformin (100 mg/kg/day) added. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess stent endothelialization after sacrifice.. In the metformin-treated group there was significantly less endothelialization compared to the placebo-treated group. Paclitaxel-eluting stents in placebo-treated group had the greatest degree of endothelialization with significantly less in its metformin-treated counterpart and all-limus eluting stent groups.. Metformin inhibited stent endothelialization in newer generation DES despite improvements in stent design. By impairing stent endothelialization, metformin may increase the risk for thrombotic complications after newer generation DES placement.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Hypoglycemic Agents; Iliac Artery; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metformin; Paclitaxel; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Tubulin Modulators

Polymer-coating represents a key component of drug-eluting stent (DES) technology and its possible impact on vessel-wall healing is a matter of debate. The clinical impact of different polymer-coating may be assessed by comparing the outcome of patients treated by DES having the same stent platform and drug, and differing in the polymer. Thus, we compared the clinical outcome of patients treated by Endeavor Zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) and Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) as they differ in the polymer-coating only.. At our Institution, E-ZES was available during a first period and then it was substituted by the R-ZES during a second period. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were prospectively collected. Clinical follow-up was prospectively obtained up to 1-year. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-month.. A total of 467 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled: 233 patients treated with E-ZES and 234 with R-ZES. Patients treated by R-ZES had similar clinical characteristics and worse angiographic characteristics compared with those treated by E-ZES. At 12-month follow-up, MACE rate was significantly lower in the R-ZES group compared with E-ZES group (4.2% vs. 14.6%; P < 0.01). This difference was due to nonsignificantly lower rates of death and myocardial infarction and to significant lower rate of target-lesion-revascularization (R-ZES 3.4% vs. E-ZES 10.3%, P < 0.01).. The results of this study suggest that the clinical outcome of patients treated by DES differing for the polymer coating only may be different. Polymer coating is a pivotal, probably underrated, component of DES technology which may influence the clinical performance of DES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Rome; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

A 73-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with anterior acute myocardial infarction due to subacute thrombosis after coronary stenting with a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), which is a newly developed drug-eluting stent that has been widely used since May 2009 in Japan. Five days before, she underwent implantation with a ZES in the left anterior descending artery due to stable angina pectoris. After stenting, the intravascular ultrasonography showed no malapposition from the proximal to the distal edge of the stent. She received aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day from 2 weeks before the stent was implanted. When we investigated the single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP2C19 in this patient, both CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 were detected, and she was classified as a poor metabolizer. This report is the first to describe subacute stent thrombosis following the implantation of a newly developed ZES in a Japanese patient, which may be related to clopidogrel resistance.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Resistance; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Genotype; Humans; Phenotype; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombectomy; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

To assess clinical performance of the second-generation Endeavor Resolute(®) drug-eluting stents (DES) in an unrestricted high-risk cohort of patients.. New-generation DESs aim to further increase its clinical safety and efficacy by means of more biocompatible components limiting inflammatory response, assuring strut coverage and preserving endothelial vascular function.. Between January 2008 and April 2009 820 unselected consecutive high-risk patients (1,352 lesions) treated with the Endeavor Resolute(®) stent were enrolled in an independent multicenter registry. Primary end-points of this registry were immediate procedural outcome, incidence of target lesion failure (TLF, defined as composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) and rate of ARC stent thrombosis at 12-months follow-up.. High-risk patient/lesion profile included acute coronary syndrome diagnosis in 57% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 23% and ACC/AHA type B2/C lesion in 74%. Endeavor Resolute(®) stent was used in an off-label indication in 52% of cases with stent/patient ratio of 1.93 and average stented segment of 39.8±26.6 mm. Immediate procedural success was accomplished in 96.0% of cases and at median 12-month follow-up TLF rate was 7.1% with 4.0% of clinically driven repeat revascularizations and 1.1% of definite/probable stent thrombosis incidence. At multivariable analysis, nor off-label Endeavor Resolute(®) stent use or multiple stent implantations were associated to an increased risk of adverse events.. Extensive use of the new Endeavor Resolute(®) stent was associated with favorable procedural and 12-month outcomes despite the treatment of unselected complex clinical and anatomical presentation. Endeavor Resolute(®) stent showed excellent safety and efficacy profile also in off-label indications.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Product Labeling; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In this study we compared the outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) versus the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients treated at a tertiary medical center, with up to one year of follow-up.. Unselected consecutive patients were retrospectively recruited following stenting with the ZES (n = 197) or EES (n = 190). The first 100 consecutive patients in each cohort underwent syntax scoring. The primary endpoint of the study was target vessel failure, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization, target lesion failure, acute stent thrombosis, total death, cardiac death, and non-fatal myocardial infarction.. The two groups were similar, including for Syntax scores (19.6 ± 12.8 versus 20.6 ± 13.6), number of stents per patient (2.9 ± 1.9 versus 2.9 ± 2.1), and cardiovascular risk factors. By one year, the primary outcome occurred in 20.8% EES versus 26.7% ZES (P = 0.19) patients. The secondary endpoints were as follows: target lesion revascularization (8.9% versus 20.6%, P = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (18.9% versus 25.6%, P = 0.142), definite and probable stent thrombosis (0% versus 2.5%), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.7% versus 3.6%), and mortality (3.2% versus 5.1%) for the EES versus the ZES, respectively.. EES had similar target vessel failure to ZES, but superior target lesion revascularization and target lesion failure at one year of follow-up in an unselected cohort of patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Iowa; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We compared safety and efficacy outcomes of 3 limus-based drug-eluting stents in the 'all-comers' PROENCY (PROmus/ENdeavor/CYpher) registry.. Limited data are available on head-to-head comparisons of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the sirolimus- eluting stent (SES) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.. PROENCY was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational study including consecutive patients undergoing planned treatment with EES, ZES, or SES. Seventeen centers were designated to place an EES or SES, 14 other centers were designated to place EES or ZES. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Unadjusted and propensity-adjusted outcomes were compared between groups.. A total of 1921 patients were enrolled in the study from February to December 2008, of which 1704 patients received only study stents and were analyzed. At 12 months, the unadjusted major adverse event rate was significantly lower in the EES group versus the ZES group (3.1% vs 8.7%; P=.001) and the SES group (5.2% vs 9.6%; P=.01). This was mainly driven by lower TVR rates [2.6% with EES vs 8.2% with ZES [P<.001] and 4.1% with EES vs 7.0% with SES [P=.05]. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable. Adjusted analyses confirmed the unadjusted results.. There were no differences in safety outcomes of EES, ZES, and SES at 12 months in PROENCY. However, differences in efficacy were observed between the 3 "limus"-based stents in a real-world patient population.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Germany; Humans; Incidence; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To present data from the cohort of patients in the all-comers Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) registry (E-Five) who underwent 2-year follow-up.. The Endeavor ZES has been shown to be safe and efficacious for treatment of single, de novo lesions in patients with stable coronary artery disease. E-Five evaluated the ZES in over 8,000 real-world patients, at 188 sites followed to 1 year. A subset of sites continued follow-up through 2 years to evaluate late-term safety and effectiveness of the ZES in this population with diverse clinical and lesion characteristics.. E-Five, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized global registry, collected 2-year outcomes for 2,116 patients from 26 centers. Sites were selected for participation based on patient accrual rates and the ability to continue follow-up activities for an additional year. Complete data was available for 2,054 patients. To observe whether or not a sustained benefit was achieved, data for all patients from the selected sites were included in the analysis.. The outcomes in the 2-year cohort tracked with the results of randomized controlled trials using the Endeavor ZES. One year results were MACE 7.5%, TLR 4.5%, and ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis 0.6%. Outcomes at 2 years for MACE, TLR, and ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis were 8.5, 5.1, and 0.7%, respectively.. Long-term efficacy and safety outcomes were maintained between 1 and 2 years for the 2-year patient cohort, with only a small number of additional MACE, TLR, and very late stent thrombosis events.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Asia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Our purpose was to investigate the clinical outcomes of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in Turkish patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In general, the outcome of drug-eluting stent (DES) placement has a proven efficacy in randomized trials. However, the difference in efficacy between the Zotarolimus and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in unselected Turkish patients is controversial. Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of these two drug-eluting stents in the real-world.. We created a registry and prospectively analyzed data on a consecutive series of all patients who presented to our institution with symptomatic coronary artery disease between February 2005 and March 2007 and who were treated with the zotarolimus- or the paclitaxel-eluting stent. The follow-up period was approximately two years. The primary end-point was major cardiac events, and the secondary end-point was definite stent thrombosis. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee.. In total, 217 patients were treated with either the zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 116) or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 101). The lesions in the 2 arms of the study were treated similarly by conventional technique. At 24-month follow-up the paclitaxel-eluting stent group showed significantly higher non-Q wave myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 5.9%, p: 0.02), Q wave myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 5.9%, p: 0.049), coronary artery binding graft surgery (2.6% vs 6.9%, p: 0.002), and late stent thrombosis (1.7% vs 3.9%, p: 0.046).. Zotarolimus-eluting stents demonstrated better clinical outcomes than Paclitaxel-eluting stents in a daily routine practice of coronary intervention in an unselected Turkish population.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Turkey

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) may be associated with an increased risk for stent thrombosis when compared with bare-metal stents. In endothelial cells, rapamycin induces tissue factor (TF) by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). However, the effect of mTOR inhibition on TF activity and thrombus formation in vivo has not yet been studied. Moreover, it is unclear whether second-generation DES substances everolimus and zotarolimus have an effect on endothelial TF expression.. In a mouse carotid artery photochemical injury model, rapamycin (182 +/- 27.5 microg/L) decreased time to thrombotic occlusion by 40%, increased TF activity, and abrogated p70S6K phosphorylation when compared with controls. In vitro, rapamycin, everolimus, and zotarolimus (each 10(-7) mol/l) enhanced TNF-alpha-induced TF expression by 2.2-, 1.7-, and 2.4-fold, respectively, which was paralleled by an increase in TF surface activity. Similar to rapamycin, everolimus and zotarolimus abrogated TNF-alpha-induced p70S6K phosphorylation under these conditions.. Rapamycin increases TF activity and promotes arterial thrombosis in vivo at concentrations relevant in patients undergoing DES implantation; this effect may increase the thrombogenicity of DES. Since everolimus and zotarolimus augment endothelial TF expression and activity in vitro in a similar manner as rapamycin, these findings may also be relevant for second generation DES.

Topics: Animals; Blotting, Western; Carotid Artery Diseases; Carotid Artery, Common; Cells, Cultured; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Sirolimus; Thromboplastin; Thrombosis; Tubulin Modulators

The Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent has been shown to reduce the restenosis rate compared to bare metal stents and has impacted other clinical measures such as mortality, acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and target vessel revascularisation (TVR).. Using pooled efficacy data from the Endeavor clinical trial programme, a model was developed to compare the cost effectiveness of the Endeavor drug eluting stent (DES) with the Driver bare meal stent (BMS) over a four year time period. Endeavor was more costly but had an improved clinical outcome compared to Driver BMS over four years with a 4% reduction in deaths, 33% reduction in AMI and a 45% reduction in TVR. Late stent thrombosis was the only event showing an increased incidence for Endeavor of 0.2% compared to 0% for Driver. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was pound3,757/quality adjusted life years (QALY).. Although much controversy has surrounded the appropriate way to assess the cost effectiveness of DES technology, a comprehensive analysis is presented and this suggests that by using extended clinical trial data out to four years, the Endeavor DES in particular, but DES technologies in general, are cost-effective approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug-Eluting Stents; Health Care Costs; Humans; Markov Chains; Metals; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; National Health Programs; Prosthesis Design; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

Zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs) demonstrated greater in-segment late luminal loss and in-segment binary restenosis rates compared to sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in several studies. However, no data are available in direct comparison between the clinical outcomes of the 2 stents in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ZESs and SESs in real-world patients with STEMI. A total of 873 patients with STEMI (306 patients in the ZES group and 567 patients in the SES group) were enrolled in a nationwide prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) from January 2007 to January 2008. The primary end points were major adverse cardiac events, a composite of all causes of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during a 12-month clinical follow-up. During 1 year of follow-up, the primary end points occurred in 140 patients (16.0%). The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the occurrence of multivessel disease were more common in the SES group. The SES group had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 to 2.16, p = 0.02), target lesion revascularization (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.59, p = 0.046), and target vessel revascularization (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.24, p = 0.013). However, no significant differences were found in death or myocardial infarction (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.05, p = 0.129). In conclusion, SESs provided superior angiographic outcomes, translating into better clinical outcomes and negating any change in STEMI patient safety profiles compared to ZESs.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

To retrospectively evaluate the 12-month effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients enrolled in the E-Five Registry.. The E-Five Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry of 8314 patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease treated with the Endeavor (ZES). Patients were treated at 188 centres located in 37 countries across Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific.. There were 2721 (32.7%) patients with diabetes (DM) and among these patients 682 were insulin-treated (ITDM) and 2039 were non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (NITDM). Interventions All enrolled patients received an Endeavor ZES and were followed for 12 months.. The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularisation (TLR), target vessel revascularisation (TVR), target vessel failure (TVF) and stent thrombosis.. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients had higher rates of MACE (9.7% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), TLR (5.3% vs 4.0%, p=0.028) and Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definite and probable stent thrombosis (1.5% vs 0.9%, p=0.041). Compared with non-DM patients, ITDM patients had higher rates of MACE (12.6% vs 6.4%, p<0.001). ITDM patients had higher rates of death (6.7% vs 1.7%, p<0.001), cardiac death (4.5% vs 1.2%, p<0.001) and TLR (6.5% vs 4.0%, p=0.011) than non-DM patients.. The Endeavor ZES performed well in DM patients; however, DM patients experienced higher rates of adverse clinical events compared with non-DM patients. TRIAL REG NO:. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NTC00623441.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 3 drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with large vessel diameter and single coronary artery lesions.. The efficacy of 3 DESs may be similar.. A total of 411 consecutive patients who visited 3 university hospitals from June 2004 to December 2007 and had a single coronary lesion which was treated with the use of a DES that was 3.5 mm in diameter were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 3 stent groups: Paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES, n = 105), Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES, n = 259), and Zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES, n = 47). The study end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) for 12 months.. Baseline characteristics were not different. Late loss was higher in the ZES group than the other stents (0.5 +/- 0.4 mm in SES vs 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm in PES, 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm in ZES, P = 0.001). The total MACE-free survival rate was not significantly different between the SES group and the PES group (98.8% in SES vs 97.1% in PES, P = 0.252) or the PES group and the ZES group (97.1% in PES vs 93.6% in ZES, P = 0.301). However, the SES group showed a significantly better MACE-free survival rate compared with the ZES group (98.8% in SES vs 93.6% in ZES, P = 0.018).. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of DES in a large vessel diameter and single coronary artery is excellent and SES appears to show better angiographic and clinical outcomes than ZES.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hospital Mortality; Hospitals, University; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy remains controversial.. Between December 2006 and March 2008, 823 patients were enrolled in a prospective multicenter registry for 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100-200mg+clopidogrel 75 mg daily) followed by aspirin mono-therapy after zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). Major exclusion criteria were: cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis (ST)-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) within 48h, previous drug-eluting stent implantation, severe left ventricular dysfunction, bifurcation lesions requiring 2-stenting, left main and graft lesions. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, MI, or ST at 1 year. The median duration of dual antiplatelet therapy was 95 days (interquartile range 90-101). At 1 year, 3 patients (0.4%) had cardiac deaths, 3 patients (0.4%) had MI, and 4 patients (0.5%) had definite or probable ST, leading to the primary outcome in 5 patients (0.6%). Death, MI, or any revascularization occurred in 68 patients (8.3%). Among patients who were event-free at 3 months (n=812), clopidogrel was discontinued at 3 months in 661 patients and was continued for longer than 3 months in 151 patients. Discontinuation of clopidogrel at 3 months did not increase the primary outcome (HR 0.90; 95%CI, 0.09-9.02), death, MI, or any revascularization (HR 0.89; 95%CI, 0.48-1.67) after adjustment for the propensity score.. Three-month dual antiplatelet therapy seems to be feasible after ZES implantation in relatively low-risk patients.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We report here the final 5-year follow-up results from the ENDEAVOR II trial, which was the first randomised trial evaluating the Endeavor(tm) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with single, de novo coronary artery lesions.. Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive ZES or BMS and were followed by telephone or clinic visit up to five years. We evaluated TVF and its components (target vessel revascularisation [TVR], Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction, or cardiac death attributed to the target vessel) at five years. Additionally, we report rates of MACE, TLR, and stent thrombosis (protocol- and ARC-defined) through five years. ENDEAVOR II enrolled 1,197 patients (598 ZES, 599 BMS). At five years of follow-up, the rates of TVF (15.4% vs 24.4%), TVR (10.7% vs 20.1%), MACE (15.4% vs 24.6%), and TLR (7.5% vs 16.3%) remained significantly lower in ZES patients compared with BMS patients. ARC definite and probable very late (>1 year) stent thrombosis remained low (0.2% ZES and 0.3% BMS) through five years.. After five years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes with sustained safety compared with BMS in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to investigate the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients from a "real-world" clinical practice.. From January to March 2006, 100 patients undergoing routine or emergency percutaneous intervention were prospectively enrolled at one institution. Overall, 39% of the patients were diabetics and 80.8% of lesions were type B2/C. A total of 140 lesions were successfully treated with 174 ZES, and procedural success was 98%. Mean vessel diameter was 2.69 mm and mean lesion length was 16.0 mm; at 6-month angiographic follow-up (completed in 96%), in-stent late lumen loss was 0.66 mm, and in-segment restenosis was 8.2%. Angiographic restenosis was increased among diabetics (15.5 vs. 2.6%, p=0.009), and diabetes was the only significant predictor of angiographic restenosis (OR=15.27 [95%CI 2.45-95.04], p=0.003). By IVUS (performed in 88% at 6-month), % volume obstruction was 14.4+/-13.4%, and there was no late acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA). At 1-year, overall MACE rate was 6%, including 5 TLRs (4% of patients), with no occurrence of stent thrombosis.. In this prospective "real-world" experience, the ZES demonstrated favourable angiographic and IVUS results in complex patients, with overall in-stent late lumen loss of 0.66 mm, and absence of late acquired ISA. At 1-year, there were no safety concerns including absence of death and stent thrombosis.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Hyperplasia; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, some studies found an increased rate of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) and late stent thrombosis (ST) in DES compared to traditional bare-metal stents (BMS). Endeavor stent, a new cobalt-alloy DES coated with phosphorylcholine and zotarolimus, has been reported to have a very favorable safety profile with few documented late-acquired ISA and late ST. In the present report, we described an interesting case with coexistent ISR, late ISA and mural thrombus in an Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent 8 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Drug-eluting stent (DES) therapy reduces restenosis in patients with diabetes when compared with bare metal stent implantation. There are significant differences between commercially available DES platforms both in terms of design characteristics and clinical outcomes. Randomized active-comparator inter-DES trials powered for clinical endpoints are unlikely to be performed in patients with diabetes, however, direct comparison randomized trials utilizing surrogate endpoints support a superior anti-restenotic efficacy with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents. Thrombotic stent occlusion may be higher in patients with diabetes compared with nondiabetic patients, though there is no clear signal of a safety differential between the two platforms. Insufficient data on comparative performance in diabetics exist in relation to the approved zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stent platforms. If all other factors are equal, then there seems to be no reason why the diabetic patient should not receive treatment with the sirolimus-eluting stent, which appears to have superior antirestenotic efficacy in this patient group.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Metals; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Everolimus; Humans; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis