zotarolimus and Postoperative-Complications

Although new-generation drug-eluting stents represent the standard of care among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there remains debate about differences in efficacy and the risk of stent thrombosis between the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and the everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the R-ZES compared with EES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. A systematic literature search of electronic resources was performed using specific search terms until September 2014. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing clinical outcomes between patients treated with R-ZES and EES up to maximum available follow-up. The primary efficacy end point was target-vessel revascularization. The primary safety end point was definite or probable stent thrombosis. Secondary safety end points were cardiac death and target-vessel myocardial infarction. Five trials were identified, including a total of 9899 patients. Compared with EES, R-ZES had similar risks of target-vessel revascularization (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.24; P=0.50), definite or probable stent thrombosis (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.86-1.85; P=0.24), cardiac death (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.30; P=0.91), and target-vessel myocardial infarction (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89-1.36; P=0.39). Moreover, R-ZES and EES had similar risks of late definite or probable very late stent thrombosis (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.53-2.11; P=0.87). No evidence of significant heterogeneity was observed across trials.. R-ZES and EES provide similar safety and efficacy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the safety and efficacy of durable polymer drug eluting stents (DES) and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents (biolimus-ES).. Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database search for randomised controlled trials comparing at least two of durable polymer sirolimus eluting stents (sirolimus-ES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (paclitaxel-ES), newer durable polymer everolimus eluting stents (everolimus-ES), Endeavor and Resolute zotarolimus eluting stents (zotarolimus-ES), and biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES.. Safety (death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis) and efficacy (target lesion and target vessel revascularisation) assessed at up to one year and beyond.. 60 randomised controlled trials were compared involving 63,242 patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome treated with a DES. At one year, there were no differences in mortality among devices. Resolute and Endeavor zotarolimus-ES, everolimus-ES, and sirolimus-ES, but not biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES, were associated with significantly reduced odds of myocardial infarction (by 29-34%) compared with paclitaxel-ES. Compared with everolimus-ES, biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES were associated with significantly increased odds of myocardial infarction (by 29%), while Endeavor zotarolimus-ES and paclitaxel-ES were associated with significantly increased odds of stent thrombosis. All investigated DES were similar with regards to efficacy endpoints, except for Endeavor zotarolimus-ES and paclitaxel-ES, which were associated with significantly increased the odds of target lesion and target vessel revascularisations compared with other devices. Direction of results beyond one year did not diverge from the findings for up to one year follow-up. Bayesian probability curves showed a gradient in the magnitude of effect, with everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES offering the highest safety profiles.. The newer durable polymer everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES and the biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES maintain the efficacy of sirolimus-ES; however, for safety endpoints, differences become apparent, with everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES emerging as the safest stents to date.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

We compared 10-year clinical outcomes in diabetes and nondiabetes patients treated with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting (ZES) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (SES). A total of 1,162 patients were randomized to ZES (169 with diabetes) and 1,170 patients were randomized to SES (168 with diabetes). Patients were further stratified by diabetes status at the time of inclusion. A subgroup of patients with diabetes (n = 88) underwent angiographic re-evaluation 10 months after stent implantation. End points included a combined end point of death or myocardial infarction, and the individual end points of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. In patients with diabetes, we found no difference in the combined end point (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 1.24), death (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.25), or in MI (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.91). However, diabetics with ZES more frequently underwent coronary revascularization compared with SES patients (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.66). In patients without diabetes, ZES and SES had similar 10-year rates of all end points (death: OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.39; MI: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.05; revascularization: OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.09). Landmark analysis from 5 to 10 years showed no difference in outcomes between SES and ZES in either subgroup. In conclusion, at 10 years, SES and ZES performed similarly in patients with and without diabetes. Although coronary revascularization was more prevalent in diabetes patients with ZES, this may, in part, have been related to the angiographic follow-up that was offered to a subgroup of diabetes patients.

Topics: Cause of Death; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Forecasting; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Survival Rate

Patients aged ≥80 years are often treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), but data from randomized studies are scarce owing to underrepresentation in most trials. We assessed 1-year clinical outcome of octogenarians treated with new-generation DES versus younger patients.. We pooled patient-level data of 9,204 participants in the TWENTE, DUTCH PEERS, BIO-RESORT, and BIONYX (TWENTE I-IV) randomized trials. The main clinical end point was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization.. The 671 octogenarian trial participants had significantly more comorbidities. TVF was higher in octogenarians than in 8,533 patients <80 years (7.3% vs 5.3%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.0-1.83, P = .04). The cardiac death rate was higher in octogenarians (3.9% vs 0.8%, P < .001). There was no significant between-group difference in target vessel MI (2.3% vs 2.3%, P = .88) and repeat target vessel revascularization (1.9% vs 2.8%, P = .16). In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 80 years showed no independent association with TVF (adjusted HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76-1.42), whereas the risk of cardiac death remained higher in octogenarians (adjusted HR: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.07-5.52, P < .001). In 6,002 trial participants, in whom data on major bleeding were recorded, octogenarians (n = 459) showed a higher major bleeding risk (5.9% vs 1.9%; HR: 3.08, 95% CI: 2.01-4.74, P < .001).. Octogenarian participants in 4 large-scale randomized DES trials had more comorbidities and a higher incidence of the main end point TVF. Cardiac mortality was higher in octogenarians, whereas there was no increase in MI or target vessel revascularization rates. Treatment of octogenarian patients with new-generation DES appears to be safe and effective.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Risk Adjustment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Polymer coatings of drug-eluting stents (DES) may induce allergic reactions and inflammation, resulting in late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM) with the risk of stent thrombosis. This study evaluated, if biodegradable polymer (BP) reduces the incidence of LASM compared to permanent polymer (PP) after treatment with newer generation DES.. Fifty patients with 59 lesions were randomized (2:1) to elective treatment with second generation PP-DES (n = 32, 39 stents), either Everolimus-eluting or Zotarolimus-eluting stents, or with BP-DES (Biolimus-eluting stents [BES]; n = 18, 20 stents) and underwent optical coherence tomography directly after implantation and after 1 year. After implantation acute stent malappositions (ASM) were documented in 30 stents (51%) distributed to 22 stents treated with PP-DES (56%) and 8 with BP-DES (40%; n.s.). After 1 year, late stent malappositions (LSM) were detected in 14 stents (24 %); ASM persisted (APSM) in 9 stents after one year (7 PP-DES-18%, 2 BES-10%), whereas ASM resolved in 21 stents. In addition, LASM was documented in nine stents including five stents without and four stents with additional APSM. All LASM were located in PP-DES (n = 9; 23%), none in BP-DES (P = 0.022). Compared to the reference lumen area, in-stent lumen area of stents without LASM was smaller due to neointimal hyperplasia (P = 0.021), whereas in-stent lumen area at maximum LASM of stents with LASM was larger due to positive remodeling (P = 0.002).. In conclusion the use of BP-DES reduced the occurrence of LASM due to positive remodeling compared to second generation PP-DES.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Long-term follow-up after a clinical trial of 2 often-used, newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) in a broad patient population is of interest. Comprehensive long-term outcome of eligible nonenrolled patients has never been reported.. To assess 5-year safety and efficacy of 2 newer-generation DESs in randomized participants with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable angina and to evaluate long-term outcomes of nonenrolled eligible patients treated with the same DESs.. The TWENTE (Real-World Endeavor Resolute vs Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente) trial is an investigator-initiated, patient-blinded, randomized, comparative DES trial that enrolled patients from June 18, 2008, to August 26, 2010. Most patients had non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and complex lesions. Of all 1709 eligible patients, 1391 (81.4%) were treated in the TWENTE trial with zotarolimus-eluting (ZES, n = 697) or everolimus-eluting (EES, n = 694) cobalt-chromium stents. The remaining 318 eligible patients (18.6%) were not enrolled but underwent nonrandomized treatment with the same DESs. Data were analyzed from August 26, 2015, to October 11, 2016. Event rates (percentages) were derived from log-rank analysis and may differ from straightforward calculation (nominator/denominator). The 5-year follow-up of the TWENTE participants was prespecified in the trial protocol; that of the nonenrolled participants was ad hoc.. Target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.. Of 1709 eligible participants, 1233 (72.1%) were men, 476 (27.9%) were women, and mean (SD) age was 64.6 (10.6) years. Among the 1370 of 1391 TWENTE trial participants (98.5% follow-up), TVF was similar between those in the ZES (16.1%) and EES (18.1%) groups (P = .36). Stent thrombosis rates were low: definite (7 of 697 [1.0%] vs 4 of 694 [0.6%]; P = .37) and occurred after more than 1 year in 3 (0.4%) with ZES vs 4 (0.6%) with EES (P = .69). The 318 nonenrolled eligible patients (308 patients [96.9%] of whom were followed up) were older and had more advanced disease than trial participants. Their TVF rate was higher than that of trial participants (71 of 318 [23.3%] vs 233 of 1391 [17.1%]; P = .02), which partly reflects a difference in cardiac mortality (23 of 318 [7.7%] vs 60 of 1391 [4.5%]; P = .03). Similar 5-year rates were found for myocardial infarction (91 of 1391 [6.7%] vs 22 of 318 [7.2%]; P = .80) and target vessel revascularization (129 of 1391 [9.7%] vs 34 of 318 [11.4%]; P = .36) between trial participants and nonenrolled eligible patients. In all eligible patients (ie, trial participants plus nonenrolled eligible patients), the TVF rate was only slightly higher than in trial participants only (18.3% vs 17.1%).. Long-term outcome data from nonenrolled eligible patients support the validity of the TWENTE trial findings and present, with the trial, a strong case for the long-term safety and efficacy of the newer-generation DESs used.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01066650.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients at high risk of bleeding or thrombosis has not been prospectively studied; limited data are available in patients who have a low restenosis risk.. This study sought to compare a hydrophilic polymer-based, second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with a unique drug fast-release profile versus bare-metal stents (BMS) under similar durations of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).. We randomly assigned 1,606 patients with stable or unstable symptoms, and who on the basis of thrombotic bleeding or restenosis risk criteria, qualified as uncertain candidates for DES, to receive ZES or BMS. DAPT duration was on the basis of patient characteristics, rather than stent characteristics, and allowed for a personalized 1-month dual antiplatelet regimen. The primary endpoint was the risk of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR).. Median DAPT duration was 32 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 30 to 180 days) and did not differ between the groups. In the ZES group, 140 patients (17.5%) reached the primary endpoint, compared with 178 patients (22.1%) in the BMS group (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.95; p = 0.011) as a result of lower MI (2.9% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001) and TVR rates (5.9% vs.10.7%; p = 0.001) in the ZES group. Definite or probable stent thrombosis was also significantly reduced in ZES recipients (2.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.019).. Compared with BMS, DES implantation using a stent with a biocompatible polymer and fast drug-eluting characteristics, combined with an abbreviated, tailored DAPT regimen, resulted in a lower risk of 1-year MACE in uncertain candidates for DES implantation. (Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates [ZEUS] Study; NCT01385319).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Biocompatible Materials; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the RESOLUTE(TM)zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES; Medtronic, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in Japanese patients for the treatment of de novo native coronary lesions.. Both RESOLUTE Japan (R-Japan) and RESOLUTE Japan Small Vessel Study (R-Japan SVS) were prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational studies. R-Japan enrolled 100 patients (reference vessel diameter, 2.5-3.5 mm) and R-Japan SVS enrolled 65 patients (at least 1 lesion suitable for 2.25-mm stent) treated with R-ZES. In R-Japan, in-stent late lumen loss (LLL; the primary endpoint) at 8 months was 0.12 ± 0.22 mm and volume obstruction on intravascular ultrasound was 2.33 ± 3.51%. At 4 years, there were no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR); the target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven TLR) was 5.6% (5/90). In R-Japan SVS, in-stent LLL at 9 months was 0.27 ± 0.33 mm, TLF (primary endpoint) was 4.6% (3/65), without incidence of TLR. At 3 years, TLF was 7.9% (5/63) and clinically driven TLR, 3.2% (2/63).. R-Japan and R-Japan SVS demonstrate substantial suppression of neointimal hyperplasia, low LLL, and excellent and sustained long-term clinical outcome with R-ZES in Japanese patients.

Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Neointima; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described.A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were enrolled from 2003 to 2012. We analyzed 217 restenotic lesions after DES implantation, and compared the morphologic characteristics of the 2nd generation DES restenosis to those of restenosis with 2 first generation DES, sirolimus-(SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES).Baseline characteristics were comparable between the different stent groups. The incidence of focal restenosis was significantly lower for PES than the other stents (49.5% versus 87.0%, 76.2%, and 82.1% for PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). When considering the pattern of restenosis solely within the stent margins, a further clear distinction between PES and other stents was observed (40.0% versus 92.9%, 88.9%, and 81.2% in PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis patterns among SES, EES, and ZES. In multivariate analysis, PES implantation, hypertension, and age were associated with non-focal type of restenosis after DES implantation. After the introduction of EES and ZES into routine clinical practice in 2008, focal restenosis significantly increased from 63.9% to 76.7% and diffuse restenosis significantly decreased from 26.4% to 11.0% (P = 0.045).Focal restenosis was the most common pattern of restenosis in the new generation DES and the incidence of diffuse restenosis significantly decreased with the introduction of the 2nd generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Registries; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

To date, it remains unknown whether different types of new-generation drug-eluting stents have a differential impact on long-term outcomes in diabetic patients.. In this historical cohort study (two Italian centers), we analyzed 400 diabetic patients with 553 coronary lesions treated with new-generation CoCr zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES: 136 patients, 196 lesions) or everolimus-eluting stents (EES: 264 patients, 357 lesions) between October 2006 and August 2012. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) over a 2-year follow-up period. MACE was defined as all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction (MI) and/or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Multivessel revascularization, intervention for restenotic lesion and use of intravascular ultrasound were significantly higher in the R-ZES group, whereas small stent (≤2.5 mm) deployment was significantly higher in the EES group. At 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in occurrence of MACE (R-ZES vs EES: 22.8% vs 18.9%, P = 0.39). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality/MI (10.0% vs 10.3%, P = 0.86) or TLR (12.4% vs 7.4%, P = 0.11). Adjustment for confounders and baseline propensity-score matching did not alter the aforementioned associations.. After 2 years of follow up similar outcomes (MACE, all-cause mortality/MI, TLR) were observed in real-world diabetic patients, including those with complex lesions and patient characteristics, treated with R-ZES and EES.

Topics: Aged; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Japan; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine

It has been shown that triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol results in better clinical outcomes than dual therapy in patients treated with a first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES); however, it is unclear whether triple antiplatelet therapy has a similar efficacy after the implantation of second-generation DES.In the COACT (Cath Olic medical center percutAneous Coronary in Tervention) registry, 1248 study subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with an everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor, Xience V, or Promus) were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups after propensity score matching (n = 724; M = 422 [58.3%]; mean age = 66.1 ± 11.0 years): Group 1: patients treated with dual antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and clopidogrel; n = 362; M = 213 [58.8%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years); Group 2: patients treated with triple antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; n = 362; M = 209 [57.7%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years). The mean follow-up duration was 13 ± 10 months, and the cumulative incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) was 6.3% in Group 1 and 7.7% in Group 2. There were no significant differences in MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) between the 2 groups (OR, 1.210; 95% CI: 0.772-1.898; P = 0.406). Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE did not show any survival benefit for triple antiplatelet therapy, even in patients with acute coronary syndrome.In patients treated with a second-generation DES implantation, there is no added clinical benefit to using triple rather than dual antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aspirin; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Registries; Sirolimus; Tetrazoles; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The RESOLUTE China Registry is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers, observational study of patients in China implanted with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). R-ZES was commercially available before the enrollment began. All patients suitable for R-ZES implantation according to applicable guidelines were candidates for enrollment at 30 centers and were treated per standard hospital practice. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was prescribed for a minimum of 6 months per current European Society of Cardiology guidelines and the device instructions for use. There were 1,800 patients enrolled with a mean age of 61.3 ± 10.9 years, 76% of patients were men, and 61% had complex disease. DAPT use was 94% at 1 year. Target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year was 3.5% (95% confidence interval 2.7% to 4.5%). The rate of cardiac death was 0.6%, target vessel myocardial infarction 2.3%, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization 0.9%. The 1-year rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.5% (8 of 1,750); 0.4% (7 of 1,750) occurred early (0 to 30 days) and 1 event occurred late (1 to 12 months). One stent thrombosis occurred in a patient who had an interruption of DAPT within the first month; all other stent thromboses occurred while on DAPT. Outcomes did not differ significantly between monitored and unmonitored patients (difference in target lesion failure, p = 0.264). In conclusion, the RESOLUTE China Registry confirms the safety and effectiveness of R-ZES in a large real-world Chinese population.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; China; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation drug eluting stent (DES) implantation gradually replaced the first-generation DES in clinical practice. Whether the new DESs in use differ from one another, in terms of clinical outcomes, is still not known. We explored potential differences among DESs.. We followed 9584 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at our institution (2004-2012; mean follow-up, 2.8 years). Patients treated with bare-metal stent (BMS; n = 5599; 58.4%) were compared to 3985 DES counterparts (41.5%). The sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) served as the prototype for comparison to other DES types, using propensity matching. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of total mortality, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft. At 3 years, the composite endpoint was significantly lower in the DES vs. BMS group (17.9% vs. 25.3%; P<.001). Comparisons between SES and each of the five other stent types yielded no significant differences for the primary composite endpoint: SES vs. paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 350 pairs; 18.1% vs. 17.7%; P=.70); vs. zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 474 pairs; 21.8% vs. 23.2%; P=.35); vs. Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 434 pairs; 16.9% vs. 11.7%; P=.70); vs. everolimus-eluting stent (n = 824 pairs; 14.2% vs. 14.1%; P=.60); and vs. biolimus-eluting stent (n = 117 pairs 13.7% vs. 13.4%; P=.60).. Cardiac prognosis did not differ between sirolimus and other DES types. The use of DES was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to BMS.

Topics: Aged; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are prone to an aggressive atherosclerotic process, and the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in treating this is still debated. In recent years, second-generation DES have been increasingly used in SVG intervention. The main objective of this study was to compare midterm clinical outcomes between first- and second-generation DES in SVGs because data regarding the use of second-generation DES in SVG are lacking. Patients treated with first-generation DES (127 patients with 143 lesions) and those treated with second-generation DES (84 patients with 100 lesions) were included in the study. Major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, as well as target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization separately, were evaluated at 30-day, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Older grafts were treated with second-generation DES (11.6 ± 5.3 vs 14.3 ± 6.0 years, p = 0.001). Stent length was longer in the first-generation group (34.1 ± 25.1 vs 30.5 ± 19.4 mm, p = 0.006), and maximum balloon diameter was smaller in the second-generation group (3.42 ± 0.42 vs 3.30 ± 0.41 mm, p = 0.003). Embolic protection device use was higher in the second-generation DES group (55.2% vs 72.0%, p = 0.012). At 18-month follow-up, rates of major adverse cardiac events, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization for the first- and second-generation groups were 24.4% versus 20.2% (p = 0.479), 18.1% versus 14.2% (p = 0.465), and 15.0% versus 10.7% (p = 0.373), respectively. In conclusion, second-generation DES are at least comparable with first-generation DES with regard to clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cause of Death; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Veins

While, theoretically, a drug-eluting stent (DES) with a biodegradable polymer should reduce the incidence of late in-stent thrombosis, this has not been experimentally tested.. This study compared long-term manifestations of the Excel DES, with a biodegradable polymer, to the Endeavor DES, with a biocompatible polymer, in the same individuals.. Forty-eight patients underwent simultaneous implantation of 1 or more Endeavor stents and 1 or more Excel stents, during the same procedure, and were evaluated with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at least 1 year postprocedure. Within-patient comparisons were made between the Excel- and Endeavor-stented segments for efficacy and safety.. A total of 131 stents (69 Endeavor stents and 62 Excel stents) were implanted in 98 lesions among 48 patients. Baseline characteristics of the lesions in the two stented segments groups were comparable. Average follow-up duration was 14.3 ± 2.5 months. In-stent late luminal loss and luminal stenosis were higher in Endeavor-stented segments than in Excel-stented segments (P<.01). The binary restenosis rate was slightly higher in Endeavor-stented segments (4.3% vs. 1.6%; P=.379). In-stent thrombosis, late incomplete stent apposition, and uncovered stent struts were higher in Excel-stented segments than in Endeavor-stented segments (P<.01). There was 1 case of an in-stent coronary aneurysm with an Excel-stented segment. Four segments, in 4 cases (2 in each stent group), required target lesion revascularization.. This study suggested that, compared to DESs with a biocompatible polymer, DESs with biodegradable polymer do not appear to present an advantage for long-term safety.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Biocompatible Materials; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Our purpose was to investigate the clinical outcomes of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in Turkish patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In general, the outcome of drug-eluting stent (DES) placement has a proven efficacy in randomized trials. However, the difference in efficacy between the Zotarolimus and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in unselected Turkish patients is controversial. Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of these two drug-eluting stents in the real-world.. We created a registry and prospectively analyzed data on a consecutive series of all patients who presented to our institution with symptomatic coronary artery disease between February 2005 and March 2007 and who were treated with the zotarolimus- or the paclitaxel-eluting stent. The follow-up period was approximately two years. The primary end-point was major cardiac events, and the secondary end-point was definite stent thrombosis. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee.. In total, 217 patients were treated with either the zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 116) or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 101). The lesions in the 2 arms of the study were treated similarly by conventional technique. At 24-month follow-up the paclitaxel-eluting stent group showed significantly higher non-Q wave myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 5.9%, p: 0.02), Q wave myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 5.9%, p: 0.049), coronary artery binding graft surgery (2.6% vs 6.9%, p: 0.002), and late stent thrombosis (1.7% vs 3.9%, p: 0.046).. Zotarolimus-eluting stents demonstrated better clinical outcomes than Paclitaxel-eluting stents in a daily routine practice of coronary intervention in an unselected Turkish population.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Turkey

Drug-coated balloons are rapidly emerging as a therapeutic alternative for the interventional treatment of peripheral vascular disease. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that an angioplasty balloon coated with the mTOR inhibitor zotarolimus (ZCB) would inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in a novel injury-based superficial femoral artery model in the familial hypercholesterolemic swine.. A total of 44 familial hypercholesterolemic swine were included (12 designated to study tissue pharmacokinetics and 32 to study safety and efficacy). Fogarty balloon denudation was performed in all superficial femoral artery segments, followed by balloon angioplasty. In the pharmacokinetic study, a total of 24 ZCBs (300 μg/cm(2)) were used. Zotarolimus was detected in arterial tissue at 5 minutes (162 ng/mg of tissue), 24 hours (5.9 ng/mg of tissue), and 28 days (0.007 ng/mg of tissue) after ZCB inflation. In the safety and efficacy study, superficial femoral artery segments were randomized to either high-dose (600 μg/cm(2), n=16), low-dose (300 μg/cm(2), n=16), or paired uncoated balloons (high-dose ZCB control, n=16; low-dose ZCB control, n=16). At 28 days, the percentage of angiographic stenosis was similar among all tested groups. Histological analysis demonstrated a reduction in neointimal formation in both ZCB groups compared with controls (high-dose ZCB 44% reduction, P=0.007; low-dose ZCB 22% reduction, P=0.08). There was no evidence of delayed arterial healing or vascular toxicity in any of the ZCB groups.. The single delivery of zotarolimus via coated balloon is feasible, and therapeutic levels are maintained up to 28 days. The ZCB technology appears to be effective in the reduction of neointimal proliferation in the superficial femoral artery of the familial hypercholesterolemic swine.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Catheterization; Clinical Protocols; Femoral Artery; Humans; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II; Infusion Pumps, Implantable; Models, Animal; Neointima; Postoperative Complications; Radiography; Sirolimus; Swine; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases