zotarolimus and Necrosis

Both paclitaxel and zotarolimus are currently employed in vascular interventional therapies, such as drug-eluting stents, and are under investigation for use in other novel drug-device combination products. Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antiproliferative properties and antimigration effects, whereas zotarolimus is a potent mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with antiproliferative and antiinflammatory properties. This study was intended to compare paclitaxel and zotarolimus for intravascular applications in which drug exposure time may be reduced, such as in drug-coated balloons. These applications are generally aimed at reducing neointimal hyperplasia by limiting smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and inflammatory cell recruitment, while minimally interfering with vessel reendothelialization after balloon denudation. In the cellular models described in this study, transient exposure of zotarolimus resulted in the sustained inhibition of SMC proliferation and reduced endothelial cell (EC) proinflammatory cytokine expression, while not affecting EC migration and viability. Transient exposure of paclitaxel inhibited SMC proliferation, EC migration, and overall cell viability, with no effect on expression of the proinflammatory biomarkers studied.

Topics: Apoptosis; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Death; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Coronary Vessels; Cytokines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Myocytes, Smooth Muscle; Necrosis; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Time Factors

We sought to compare the incidence of myonecrosis after elective implantation of bare metal stents with that of drug-eluting stents. The data of stable patients who were treated with stenting in a single native coronary artery were analyzed retrospectively. The stents used were bare metal in 119, sirolimus-eluting (Cypher Select Plus) in 119 patients, paclitaxel-eluting (Taxus Liberté) in 120, zotarolimus-eluting (Endeavor Sprint) in 122, and everolimus-eluting (Xience V) in 72. Endpoints included post-procedural myonecrosis (any elevation of creatine kinase-MB), myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB>3 times the upper limit of normal), and large myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB>5 times the upper limit of normal). The incidences of myonecrosis (16.7%-18.9%), myocardial infarction (3.3%-8.4%), and large myocardial infarction (1.7%-5.6%) were not significantly different among stent types. At the 30-day follow-up, there were 2 deaths in patients who had Taxus Liberté stents, one death each in those with Xience V and bare metal stents, and no cases of stroke or target vessel revascularization. In this study, bare metal stents and the 4 drug-eluting stents were associated with similar low incidences of myonecrosis, myocardial infarction, and large myocardial infarction.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Creatine Kinase, MB Form; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardium; Necrosis; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Singapore; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation

Myocardial infarction (MI) after drug-eluting stent placement has been associated with an unfavorable late prognosis. Although the etiology of periprocedural MI is multifactorial, sidebranch occlusion may be an important contributing factor. We sought to identify the incidence of sidebranch occlusion during zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) placement and to relate sidebranch occlusion to the occurrence of periprocedural MI.. Angiograms were reviewed from patients randomly assigned to treatment with a ZES (597 patients; 943 sidebranches) or a PES (619 patients; 977 sidebranches). Sidebranch occlusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 or 1. Sidebranch occlusion was correlated with frequency of MI, as assessed by the creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme. Sidebranch occlusion occurred less often after the first stent deployment in patients treated with ZES (2.2%) than in patients treated with PES (4.0%; P=0.032). A similar reduction in the frequency of sidebranch occlusion at any point during the procedure was found in patients treated with ZES (2.9% versus 4.8% in PES patients; P=0.042). Multivariable predictors of sidebranch occlusion included baseline sidebranch stenosis, complex lesion morphology, smaller baseline minimal lumen diameters, and the use of a PES. Of the 20 patients with MI within 30 days of the procedure, 30% had evidence of sidebranch occlusion during the stent procedure.. Patients treated with ZES were less likely to develop sidebranch occlusion during stent placement than patients treated with PES. Less frequent sidebranch occlusion with ZES may have contributed to the lower frequency rates of periprocedural MI in this study.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Creatine Kinase, MB Form; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardium; Necrosis; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome