zotarolimus and Constriction--Pathologic

The aim of this study was to assess, after 2 years of follow-up, the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with native coronary lesions.. Early drug-eluting stents were associated with a small but significant incidence of very late stent thrombosis (VLST), occurring >1 year after the index procedure. The ZES has shown encouraging results in clinical trials.. The ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions), a randomized (1:1), single-blind, controlled trial (n = 1,548) compared ZES versus PES in patients with single de novo coronary lesions. Two-year follow-up was obtained in 96.0% of ZES and 95.4% of PES patients. The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF), and safety end points included Academic Research Consortium-defined stent thrombosis. Economic end points analyzed included quality-adjusted survival, medical costs, and relative cost-effectiveness of ZES and PES.. The TVF at 2 years was similar in ZES and PES patients (11.1% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.232). There were fewer myocardial infarctions (MIs) in ZES patients (p = 0.022), due to fewer periprocedural non-Q-wave MIs and fewer late MIs between 1 and 2 years. Late MIs were associated with increased VLST (PES: 6 vs. ZES: 1; p = 0.069). Target lesion revascularization was similar comparing ZES with PES (5.9% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.295), especially in patients without planned angiographic follow-up (5.2% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.896). The cost-effectiveness of ZES and PES was similar.. After 2 years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness comparable to PES, with fewer MIs and a trend toward less VLST. (The ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial: A Trial of a Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Constriction, Pathologic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Assessment; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis (PVS) is a complication of radiofrequency PV isolation (PVI). Reported restenosis rates after balloon dilatation and bare-metal stent implantation are high. Drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) has not been reported in the setting of PVS.. Patients suspected of having PVS after PVI based on clinical symptoms and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) follow-up (FU) were referred for PV DES. One or more branches of the affected PV as documented by angiography were stented (paclitaxel or zotarolimus DES). Follow-up consisted of repeat PV angiography and TEE. Over a period of 2 years, five patients were treated with a total of eight DES. A paclitaxel DES was used in seven of eight implants. Mean FU was 12 ± 14 months during which all patients remained asymptomatic. Transesophageal echocardiography Doppler maximal flow velocity (V(max)) of the affected PVs rose from 58 ± 6 cm/s pre-PVI to 207 ± 20 cm/s pre-DES (+358%, P < 0.0001). After DES, V(max) decreased acutely with 86 ± 15 cm/s (-58%, P < 0.01). During FU, V(max) remained stable in three patients and increased moderately in one. Angiography at 3 months confirmed absence of restenosis in the first three patients and moderate (40%) restenosis in one patient. In one patient, an increase of V(max) back to pre-DES values correlated with a 65% peri-stent stenosis, treated with a redo DES. In total, after seven primary DES only one (asymptomatic) proximal margin restenosis required re-stenting.. Initial experience with DES for PV stenosis suggests an excellent stent patency rate. Transesophageal echocardiography Doppler measurements provide a viable way of monitoring stent patency.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Constriction, Pathologic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Pulmonary Veins; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases

The introduction of the drug-eluting stent (DES) has revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology during the past decade. Initial pivotal randomized clinical trials showed a large reduction in restenosis rates and the need for repeat intervention with DES compared with bare-metal stents. The three main components of a DES are 1) the stent platform, 2) a coating facilitating elution of the drug (mostly a polymer), and 3) a antiproliferative/anti-inflammatory drug. Currently, two classes of drugs are widely used in DES, Taxanes, including its best-known member Paclitaxel, and Rapamycins, which include Sirolimus and its analogues such as Everolimus, Zotarolimus and Biolimus A9. The first DES to receive United States Food and Drug Administration approval was the Sirolimus-eluting stent. Recently, two other stent types eluting a Sirolimus-analogue were approved; the Zotarolimus-eluting stent and the Everolimus-eluting stent. Biolimus A9-eluting stents, using biodegradable polymers, are currently approved and marketed outside of the United States. This review article focusses on the clinical studies that have been performed with DES eluting Sirolimus or its analogues.

Topics: Constriction, Pathologic; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus; Stents