zithromax and Vomiting

To evaluate the toxicity of azithromycin in neonates, infants, and children.. A systematic review was performed for relevant studies using Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. We calculated the pooled incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with azithromycin based on prospective studies (RCTs and prospective cohort studies) and analyzed the risk difference (RD) of ADRs between azithromycin and placebo or other antibiotics using meta-analysis of RCTs.. We included 133 studies with 4243 ADRs reported in 197,675 neonates, infants, and children who received azithromycin. The safety of azithromycin as MDA in pediatrics was poorly monitored. The main ADRs were diarrhea and vomiting. In prospective non-MDA studies, the most common toxicity was gastrointestinal ADRs (938/1967; 47.7%). The most serious toxicities were cardiac (prolonged QT or irregular heart beat) and idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS). Compared with placebo, azithromycin did not show increased risk ADRs based on RCTs (risk difference - 0.17 to 0.07). The incidence of QT prolonged was higher in the medium-dosage group (10-30 mg/kg/day) than that of low-dosage group (≤ 10 mg/kg/day) (82.0% vs 1.2%).. The safety of azithromycin as MDA needs further evaluation. The most common ADRs are diarrhea and vomiting. The risk of the most serious uncommon ADRs (cardiac-prolonged QT and IHPS) is unknown.

Topics: Age of Onset; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Diarrhea; Humans; Incidence; Long QT Syndrome; Placebos; Prospective Studies; Pyloric Stenosis, Hypertrophic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Vomiting

Single-dose azithromycin is effective in the treatment of severe cholera in children, but its effectiveness in adults has not been evaluated.. We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the equivalence of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin (each given in a single 1-g dose of two 500-mg tablets) among 195 men with severe cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 or O139. Patients were hospitalized for five days. A stool culture was performed daily. Primary outcome measures were clinical success (the cessation of watery stools within 48 hours after drug administration) and bacteriologic success (the inability to isolate V. cholerae after 48 hours).. Therapy was clinically successful in 71 of 97 patients receiving azithromycin (73 percent) and in 26 of 98 patients receiving ciprofloxacin (27 percent) (P<0.001) and bacteriologically successful in 76 of 97 patients receiving azithromycin (78 percent) and in 10 of 98 patients receiving ciprofloxacin (10 percent) (P<0.001). Patients who were treated with azithromycin had a shorter duration of diarrhea than did patients treated with ciprofloxacin (median, 30 vs. 78 hours); a lower frequency of vomiting (43 percent vs. 67 percent); fewer stools (median, 36 vs. 52); and a lower stool volume (median, 114 vs. 322 ml per kilogram of body weight). The median minimal inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin for the 177 isolates of V. cholerae O1 was 0.25 mug per milliliter, which was 11 to 83 times as high as that in previous studies at this site.. Single-dose azithromycin was effective in the treatment of severe cholera in adults. The lack of efficacy of ciprofloxacin may result from its diminished activity against V. cholerae O1 strains currently circulating in Bangladesh. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00229944.).

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bangladesh; Cholera; Ciprofloxacin; Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Male; Treatment Outcome; Vibrio cholerae; Vomiting

This study was performed to examine the effect of the coadministration of azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitor indinavir (Crixivan). In an open-label, parallel-design study, 32 healthy male and female volunteers were given indinavir (800 mg tid) for 5 days. One hour prior to the first dose of indinavir on day 5, 18 subjects received 1200 mg azithromycin (Zithromax), and 14 subjects received matching placebo. Serial samples of plasma were obtained for 8 hours following the morning dose of indinavir on days 4 and 5 and assayed for indinavir by HPLC/UV. Twenty-seven subjects completed the study. Following coadministration of azithromycin with indinavir, there was no significant change between day 5 and day 4 in AUC (20.7 mg.hr/ml and 23.1 mg.hr/ml; 90% CI on the ratio 81%-100%) or Cmax (9.88 mg/ml and 10.3 mg/ml; 90% CI 86%-108%). The day 5 to day 4 difference in indinavir concentrations following coadministration with azithromycin was not significantly different from the day 5 to day 4 difference with placebo (AUC p = 0.68; Cmax p = 0.074). Therefore, azithromycin does not significantly alter the kinetics of indinavir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Area Under Curve; Azithromycin; Female; Half-Life; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Patient Dropouts; Vomiting

Azithromycin is commonly used to treat Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We compared its gastrointestinal side effects using 1 g single, 2 g single or 2 g split (i.e. 1 g plus 1 g 6-12 h later) dosing, representing our clinic's changing guidelines over the study period.. We recruited consecutive sexual health clinic patients who received azithromycin (and 500 mg ceftriaxone) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea. Each patient received a text message 48 h after their attendance to complete a questionnaire.. Patients received 1 g single (n = 271), 2 g single (218) or 2 g split (105) doses. Vomiting was less common for 1 g versus 2 g single dose [1.1% versus 3.7%; risk difference (RD): -2.6%; 95% CI: -0.2 to -5.4] and 2 g split versus 2 g single dose (0.9% versus 3.7%; RD: -2.8%; 95% CI: -0.3 to -5.8). Nausea was less common for 1 g versus 2 g single dose (13.7% versus 43.1%; RD: -29.5%; 95% CI: -21.7 to -37.2) and 2 g split versus 2 g single dose (16.4% versus 43.1%; RD: -26.8; 95% CI: -17.2 to -36.3). Diarrhoea was less common for 1 g versus 2 g single dose (25.5% versus 50.9%; RD: -25.5%; 95% CI: -17.0 to -33.9) and 2 g split versus 2 g single dose (30.9% versus 50.9%; RD: -20.0; 95% CI: -9.1 to -30.9). Almost all were willing to retake the same dosing for gonorrhoea in the future: 97% for 1 g single; 94% for 2 g single; and 97% for 2 g split dose.. Azithromycin 2 g split dose for gonorrhoea resulted in significantly less vomiting, nausea and diarrhoea than a 2 g single dose.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Ceftriaxone; Diarrhea; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Gonorrhea; Humans; Nausea; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Vomiting

In late 2019, a new coronavirus-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-was discovered in Wuhan, China, and the World Health Organization later declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. Numerous drugs have been repurposed and investigated for therapeutic effectiveness in the disease, including those from "Solidarity," an international clinical trial (azithromycin, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, the fixed combination lopinavir/ritonavir, and remdesivir).. Our objective was to evaluate adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting for drugs when used in the treatment of COVID-19 compared with use for other indications, specifically focussing on sex differences.. We extracted reports on COVID-19-specific treatments from the global ADR database, VigiBase, using an algorithm developed to identify reports that listed COVID-19 as the indication. The Solidarity trial drugs were included, as were any drugs reported ≥ 100 times. We performed a descriptive comparison of reports for the same drugs used in non-COVID-19 indications. The data lock point date was 7 June 2020.. In total, 2573 reports were identified for drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19. In order of frequency, the most reported ADRs were electrocardiogram QT-prolonged, diarrhoea, nausea, hepatitis, and vomiting in males and diarrhoea, electrocardiogram QT-prolonged, nausea, vomiting, and upper abdominal pain in females. Other hepatic and kidney-related events were included in the top ten ADRs in males, whereas no hepatic or renal terms were reported for females. COVID-19-related reporting patterns differed from non-pandemic reporting for these drugs.. Review of a global database of suspected ADR reports revealed sex differences in the reporting patterns for drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19. Patterns of ADR sex differences need further elucidation.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adenosine Monophosphate; Alanine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antiviral Agents; Azithromycin; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Chloroquine; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Databases, Pharmaceutical; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Drug Eruptions; Drug Repositioning; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Long QT Syndrome; Lopinavir; Male; Nausea; Oseltamivir; Ritonavir; Sex Distribution; Sex Factors; Vomiting

Topics: Acetaminophen; Acetazolamide; Altitude; Altitude Sickness; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antitrichomonal Agents; Azithromycin; Diarrhea; Diuretics; Fatigue; Hand Disinfection; Hand Sanitizers; Headache; Humans; Nausea; Nepal; Rest; Running; Tinidazole; Vomiting

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Cough; Disease Progression; Emergency Medical Technicians; Female; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Pertussis Vaccine; Severity of Illness Index; Unconsciousness; Vomiting; Whooping Cough

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child, Preschool; Cholera; Dehydration; Diagnosis, Differential; Diarrhea; Epidemics; Fluid Therapy; Haiti; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Vibrio cholerae; Vomiting

Acute urticaria is a common and disturbing disorder in children and has a versatile etiology.. To investigate the association of acute urticaria with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in hospitalized children.. Hospitalized children with acute urticaria from Taiwan who did not respond to antihistamine treatment and avoidance of food allergens were studied from February 1, 2006, to July 31, 2007. These patients with urticaria were compared with those who had other respiratory tract diseases and were classified into 2 groups: urticaria patients with and without M pneumoniae infection. The presence of M pneumoniae infection was determined by positive serologic findings.. Sixty-five patients with acute urticaria and 49 patients with other respiratory tract diseases were enrolled in this study. Patients with urticaria had significantly less febrile duration but significantly higher platelet and lymphocyte counts than those with other respiratory tract diseases. Of the 65 patients with urticaria, 21 (32%) showed serologic evidence of M pneumoniae infection. Patients with M pneumoniae-associated urticaria received azithromycin treatment and needed a shorter time for improvement (P = .01) and complete resolution (P = .04). The total IgE levels and the results of specific IgE tests were not significantly different between urticaria patients with and without M pneumoniae infection.. This study found that in Taiwan one-third of acute childhood urticaria leading to patient hospitalization was related to M pneumoniae infection. Therefore, children with urticaria who are not responding to antihistamine treatment and abstinence from food allergens should be encouraged to undergo serologic examinations for M pneumoniae to diagnose this antibiotic-responsive disorder.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Alanine Transaminase; Allergens; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Azithromycin; Blood Cell Count; C-Reactive Protein; Case-Control Studies; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Fever; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Length of Stay; Male; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Respiratory Tract Infections; Taiwan; Urticaria; Vomiting

Seven-week-old 32-week premature triplets were hospitalized because of rhinorrhea, cough with color change and posttussive emesis. One infant had a positive direct fluorescent antibody test for Bordetella pertussis, so all were treated with 5 days of azithromycin. Two of the infants were subsequently diagnosed with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and underwent surgical pyloromyotomies 6 and 7 weeks, respectively, after the initial admission.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bordetella pertussis; Cough; Cyanosis; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Pyloric Stenosis, Hypertrophic; Rhinitis; Triplets; Vomiting; Whooping Cough