zithromax and Tooth-Diseases

Erythromycins have been part of our armamentarium against selected bacterial infections since they were discovered in 1952 and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1964. In 1991, two newer, long-acting erythromycin analogues, azythromycin (brand name: Zithromax) and clarithromycin (brand name: Biaxin) were approved by the FDA. They were joined a few years later by a third long-acting form, dirithromycin (brand name: Dynabac).

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Clarithromycin; Delayed-Action Preparations; Erythromycin; Humans; Tooth Diseases

Azithromycin has recently replaced clindamycin oral suspension for prop hylaxis of infective endocarditis (IE) in children. It is also currently recommended by the American Heart Association as an alternative to penicillin, along with clindamycin for prophylaxis of infective endocarditis in adults. The objectives of this paper were to firstly, review the current literature on the efficacy of azithromycin as a suitable prophylactic agent in the prevention of infective endocarditis; and secondly, to review its pharmacological properties as a suitable therapeutic agent in the management of odontogenic infections.. A review of the literature.. The available evidence from animal models on infective endocarditis supports the efficacy of this drug as a prophylactic agent against oral streptococci. The pharmacological properties of this agent would make it a very promising therapeutic adjunct in the management of odontogenic infections. At present there are only a small number of studies available with valuable data on the efficacy of this relatively new drug. Further investigations comparing this compound with other commonly used adjuncts would be of great benefit.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Dental Care; Dental Care for Chronically Ill; Endocarditis, Bacterial; Humans; Middle Aged; Mouth Diseases; Tooth Diseases

Sixty patients with acute odontogenic infections were randomly allocated to oral treatment with azithromycin 500 mg/day once-daily for three days (n = 30) or spiramycin 3,000,000 units three-times daily for seven days (n = 30). Baseline and post-treatment oral specimens were collected from patients to test for pathogenic bacteria. Aerobic bacteria were tested using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, and anaerobic bacteria with a broth microdilution method, for their susceptibility to azithromycin and spiramycin. A greater incidence of resistance was found in the spiramycin group than in the azithromycin group. The bacteriological assessment showed that the normal balance of microflora was re-established in 67% of patients treated with azithromycin vs 53% in the group treated with spiramycin. Clinical cure was higher in the azithromycin treatment group (97%) compared with the spiramycin group (73%). These results indicate that three-day azithromycin, possibly because of its unusual pharmacokinetics, is more effective than seven-day spiramycin in the treatment of odontogenic infections.

Topics: Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Erythromycin; Female; Humans; Male; Mouth Diseases; Spiramycin; Tooth Diseases