zithromax and Pyloric-Stenosis

With the continued high prevalence of chlamydia worldwide and high risk of transfer from mothers to their infant during delivery, a need for safe and effective therapies for infants who acquire a chlamydial infection remains. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic treatments, including oral erythromycin, azithromycin, and trimethoprim, for neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis.. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception to July 14, 2017. We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that evaluated the effects of erythromycin, azithromycin, or trimethoprim in neonates with chlamydial conjunctivitis. A meta-analysis using a random-effects generic inverse-variance method was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.. We found 12 studies (n = 292 neonates) and were able to meta-analyze 7 studies that used erythromycin at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight per day for 14 days. The clinical and microbiological cure were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94%-100%) and 97% (95% CI, 95%-99%), respectively, and adverse gastrointestinal effects occurred in 14% (95% CI, 1%-28%) of the neonates. The microbiological cure in the study that assessed azithromycin at 20 mg/kg per day were 60% (95% CI, 27%-93%) when it was given in a single dose and 86% (95% CI, 61%-100%) when given in a 3-day course. Two studies reported compliance with treatments, and 1 study reported no pyloric stenosis events. Because of the risk of bias and the few neonates included across the studies, the certainty of evidence is low to very low. No studies assessed trimethoprim.. Although evidence suggests that erythromycin at 50 mg/kg per day for 14 days results in higher numbers of cure than does azithromycin, compliance and risk of pyloric stenosis related to their use for other infections in neonates will factor into treatment recommendations. More data are needed to compare these treatments directly.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bias; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydia trachomatis; Conjunctivitis, Bacterial; Drug Administration Schedule; Erythromycin; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Pyloric Stenosis; Risk Factors; Trimethoprim

The safety profile of erythromycin is notable for the frequent occurrence of intolerable gastrointestinal effects. One of the more serious of these is infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS). A recent cluster of IHPS cases prompted an epidemiological investigation which identified oral erythromycin chemoprophylaxis of pertussis as the major risk factor. Evidence suggests an association between early postnatal erythromycin exposure and IHPS. There is no substantive evidence of a risk associated with prenatal exposure, with the single published case-control study to date producing negative findings. The epidemiological investigations of the association with early postnatal exposure have reported significantly elevated odds ratios but have a variety of methodological limitations that prevent definitive conclusions being made. Nevertheless, the concordance of findings across studies increases the strength of evidence favouring an association. The prominent gastrokinetic properties of erythromycin have been postulated as the mechanism behind this phenomenon. A comprehensive assessment of this potential adverse effect should consider its biological plausibility in light of known gastrointestinal physiology, its modulation by erythromycin, and the known pathophysiology of IHPS. Gastrointestinal motor activity in the fasted mammal consists of three phases, phase III being large amplitude contractions called migrating motor complexes (MMC) that can be initiated by motilin and erythromycin. The gastrokinetic effects of erythromycin are variable and complex and include effects on the timing, duration, amplitude and distribution of MMCs. It has been speculated that the motilinomimetic effects of erythromycin on antral smooth muscle function, such as the MMC, may mediate the effect via work hypertrophy. Although intuitively plausible and consistent with hypertrophic obstructive changes similar to IHPS observed in hyperplastic rat ileum after artificially induced mechanical obstruction, there is no direct evidence of this phenomenon. Further complicating the association is the limitations of our knowledge about the pathophysiology of IHPS, including numerous genetic abnormalities, increased parietal cell mass, and gastric hyperacidity. The implications of the reported findings with erythromycin on the benefit-risk profiles of newer macrolides and azalides must be considered. The available data on the comparative gastrokinetic properties of macrolides are signifi

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Digestive System; Erythromycin; Female; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Hypertrophy; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Pyloric Stenosis; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pyloric Stenosis

Prior studies have reported increased risks of congenital heart defects (CHD) and pyloric stenosis (PS) after prenatal exposure to macrolide antibiotics. We sought to assess the association between maternal use of erythromycin and nonerythromycin macrolides and the risks of CHD and PS.. Among participants in the Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study from 1994 through 2008, we identified 4132 infants with CHD and 735 with PS as cases, and 6952 infants without any malformation as controls. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with use of erythromycin or nonerythromycin macrolides in each trimester using conditional logistic regression and adjusting for risk factors for CHD and PS, fever, specific types of infections, and their associated treatments.. During the first trimester, 0.4% and 0.7% of control women had used erythromycin and nonerythromycin macrolides, respectively. Compared to non-use during pregnancy, first-trimester exposure to erythromycin was not associated with an increased risk of CHD (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-2.6) or PS (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-3.0). The corresponding ORs for nonerythromycin macrolides were 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.3) for CHD and 1.7 (95% CI, 0.6-4.6) for PS. We found no association between third-trimester exposure to erythromycin or nonerythromycin macrolides and the risk of PS. Hypothesis generation analyses did not identify appreciable associations between maternal use of macrolides and other common specific birth defects.. We found no meaningful associations between the risks of CHD, PS, and other common malformations in relation to use of macrolides in pregnancy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Clarithromycin; Erythromycin; Female; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Logistic Models; Macrolides; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Pyloric Stenosis; Risk