zithromax and Pharyngitis

Antibiotics provide only modest benefit in treating sore throat, although their effectiveness increases in people with positive throat swabs for group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS). It is unclear which antibiotic is the best choice if antibiotics are indicated. This is an update of a review first published in 2010, and updated in 2013, 2016, and 2021.. To assess the comparative efficacy of different antibiotics in: (a) alleviating symptoms (pain, fever); (b) shortening the duration of the illness; (c) preventing clinical relapse (i.e. recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution); and (d) preventing complications (suppurative complications, acute rheumatic fever, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis). To assess the evidence on the comparative incidence of adverse effects and the risk-benefit of antibiotic treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2023, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Elsevier, and Web of Science (Clarivate) up to 19 March 2023.. Randomised, double-blind trials comparing different antibiotics, and reporting at least one of the following: clinical cure, clinical relapse, or complications and/or adverse events.. Two review authors independently screened trials for inclusion and extracted data using standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies according to the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and used the GRADE approach to assess the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes. We reported the intention-to-treat analysis, and also performed an analysis of evaluable participants to explore the robustness of the intention-to-treat results.. We included 19 trials reported in 18 publications (5839 randomised participants): six trials compared penicillin with cephalosporins; six compared penicillin with macrolides; three compared penicillin with carbacephem; one compared penicillin with sulphonamides; one compared clindamycin with ampicillin; and one compared azithromycin with amoxicillin in children. All participants had confirmed acute GABHS tonsillopharyngitis, and ages ranged from one month to 80 years. Nine trials included only, or predominantly, children. Most trials were conducted in an outpatient setting. Reporting of randomisation, allocation concealment, and blinding was poor in all trials. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence mainly due to lack of (or poor reporting of) randomisation or blinding, or both, heterogeneity, and wide confidence intervals. Cephalosporins versus penicillin We are uncertain if there is a difference in symptom resolution (at 2 to 15 days) for cephalosporins versus penicillin (odds ratio (OR) for absence of symptom resolution 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 1.12; 5 trials, 2018 participants; low-certainty evidence). Results of the sensitivity analysis of evaluable participants differed (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; 5 trials, 1660 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Based on an analysis of evaluable participants, we are uncertain if clinical relapse may be lower for cephalosporins compared with penicillin (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.99; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 50; 4 trials, 1386 participants; low-certainty evidence). Very low-certainty evidence showed no difference in reported adverse events. Macrolides versus penicillin We are uncertain if there is a difference between macrolides and penicillin for resolution of symptoms (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.35; 6 trials, 1728 participants; low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis of evaluable participants resulted in an OR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.09; 6 trials, 1159 participants). We are uncertain if clinical relapse may be different (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.03; 6 trials, 802 participants; low-certainty evidence). Children treated with macrolides seemed to experience more adverse events than those treated with penicillin (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.15; 1 trial, 489 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the test for subgroup differences between children and adults was not significant. Azithromycin versus amoxicillin Based on one unpubli. We are uncertain if there are clinically relevant differences in symptom resolution when comparing cephalosporins and macrolides with penicillin in the treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis. Low-certainty evidence in children suggests that carbacephem may be more effective than penicillin for symptom resolution. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding the other comparisons in this review. Data on complications were too scarce to draw conclusions. Antibiotics have a limited effect in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis and the results do not demonstrate that other antibiotics are more effective than penicillin. In the context of antimicrobial stewardship, penicillin can be used if treatment with an antibiotic is indicated. All studies were conducted in high-income countries with a low risk of streptococcal complications, so there is a need for trials in low-income countries and disadvantaged populations, where the risk of complications remains high.

Topics: Adult; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Child; Chronic Disease; Humans; Infant; Macrolides; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Streptococcus pyogenes; Systematic Reviews as Topic

Antibiotics provide only modest benefit in treating sore throat, although their effectiveness increases in people with positive throat swabs for group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS). It is unclear which antibiotic is the best choice if antibiotics are indicated. This is an update of a review first published in 2010, and updated in 2013, 2016, and 2020.. To assess the comparative efficacy of different antibiotics in: (a) alleviating symptoms (pain, fever); (b) shortening the duration of the illness; (c) preventing clinical relapse (i.e. recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution); and (d) preventing complications (suppurative complications, acute rheumatic fever, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis). To assess the evidence on the comparative incidence of adverse effects and the risk-benefit of antibiotic treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis.. We searched the following databases up to 3 September 2020: CENTRAL (2020, Issue 8), MEDLINE Ovid (from 1946), Embase Elsevier (from 1974), and Web of Science Thomson Reuters (from 2010). We also searched clinical trial registers on 3 September 2020.. Randomised, double-blind trials comparing different antibiotics, and reporting at least one of the following: clinical cure, clinical relapse, or complications and/or adverse events.. Two review authors independently screened trials for inclusion and extracted data using standard methodological procedures as recommended by Cochrane. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies according to the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and used the GRADE approach to assess the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes. We have reported the intention-to-treat analysis, and also performed an analysis of evaluable participants to explore the robustness of the intention-to-treat results.. We included 19 trials reported in 18 publications (5839 randomised participants): six trials compared penicillin with cephalosporins; six compared penicillin with macrolides; three compared penicillin with carbacephem; one compared penicillin with sulphonamides; one compared clindamycin with ampicillin; and one compared azithromycin with amoxicillin in children. All participants had confirmed acute GABHS tonsillopharyngitis, and ages ranged from one month to 80 years. Nine trials included only, or predominantly, children. Most trials were conducted in an outpatient setting. Reporting of randomisation, allocation concealment, and blinding was poor in all trials. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence mainly due to lack of (or poor reporting of) randomisation or blinding, or both; heterogeneity; and wide confidence intervals. Cephalosporins versus penicillin We are uncertain if there is a difference in symptom resolution (at 2 to 15 days) for cephalosporins versus penicillin (odds ratio (OR) for absence of symptom resolution 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 1.12; 5 trials; 2018 participants; low-certainty evidence). Results of the sensitivity analysis of evaluable participants differed (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; 5 trials; 1660 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain if clinical relapse may be lower for cephalosporins compared with penicillin (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.99; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 50; 4 trials; 1386 participants; low-certainty evidence). Very low-certainty evidence showed no difference in reported adverse events. Macrolides versus penicillin We are uncertain if there is a difference between macrolides and penicillin for resolution of symptoms (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.35; 6 trials; 1728 participants; low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis of evaluable participants resulted in an OR of 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.09; 6 trials; 1159 participants). We are uncertain if clinical relapse may be different (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.03; 6 trials; 802 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Azithromycin versus amoxicillin Based on one unpublished trial in children, we are uncertain if resolution of symptoms is better with azithromycin in a single dose versus amoxicillin for 10 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.05; 1 trial; 673 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis for per-protocol analysis resulted in an OR of 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.73; 1 tri

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amoxicillin; Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Clindamycin; Humans; Infant; Macrolides; Middle Aged; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

The emergence of high-level resistance to ceftriaxone is giving rise to serious concern about absence of effective treatment options to cure gonococcal infections. Increasing the dosage regimen can be applied to ceftriaxone and azithromycin, but the emergence of high-level resistance has already been reported. Spectinomycin is another active drug but has low efficacy in the treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhoea. Conventional antibiotics could be introduced for gonococcal treatment, but they have some limitations, such as the absence of clinical trials and breakpoint. Combining antibiotics is another promising method to cure patients and to prevent the emergence of resistance. The most important strategy to maintain the efficacy of antibiotics is rapid detection and dissemination control of novel resistant isolate.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Barbiturates; Ceftriaxone; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gonorrhea; Humans; Isoxazoles; Macrolides; Morpholines; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Neisseriaceae Infections; Oxazolidinones; Pharyngitis; Spectinomycin; Spiro Compounds; Triazoles

The standard duration of treatment for children with acute group A beta hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis with oral penicillin is 10 days. Shorter duration antibiotics may have comparable efficacy.. To summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy of two to six days of newer oral antibiotics (short duration) compared to 10 days of oral penicillin (standard duration) in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2012, Issue 3) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to March week 3, 2012) and EMBASE (January 1990 to April 2012).. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short duration oral antibiotics to standard duration oral penicillin in children aged 1 to 18 years with acute GABHS pharyngitis.. Two review authors scanned the titles and abstracts of retrieved citations and applied the inclusion criteria. We retrieved included studies in full, and extracted data. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality.. We included 20 studies with 13,102 cases of acute GABHS pharyngitis. The updated search did not identify any new eligible studies; the majority of studies were at high risk of bias. However, the majority of the results were consistent. Compared to standard duration treatment, the short duration treatment studies had shorter periods of fever (mean difference (MD) -0.30 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.45 to -0.14) and throat soreness (MD -0.50 days, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.22); lower risk of early clinical treatment failure (odds ratio (OR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94); no significant difference in early bacteriological treatment failure (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.20) or late clinical recurrence (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). However, the overall risk of late bacteriological recurrence was worse in the short duration treatment studies (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48), although no significant differences were found when studies of low dose azithromycin (10 mg/kg) were eliminated (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.22). Three studies reported long duration complications. Out of 8135 cases of acute GABHS pharyngitis, only six cases in the short duration treatment versus eight in the standard duration treatment developed long-term complications in the form of glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever, with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.64).. Three to six days of oral antibiotics had comparable efficacy compared to the standard duration 10-day course of oral penicillin in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis. . In areas where the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease is still high, our results must be interpreted with caution.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Infant; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

The standard duration of treatment for acute group A beta hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis with oral penicillin is 10 days. Shorter duration antibiotics may have comparable efficacy.. To summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy of two to six days of newer oral antibiotics (short duration) compared to 10 days of oral penicillin (standard duration) in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, issue 4), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register; the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); MEDLINE (1966 to October 2007); OLDMEDLINE (1950 to December 1965); and EMBASE (January 1990 to November 2007).. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short duration oral antibiotics to standard duration oral penicillin in children aged 1 to 18 years with acute GABHS pharyngitis.. Two review authors scanned the titles and abstracts of retrieved citations and applied the inclusion criteria. We retrieved included studies in full and extracted data. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality.. Twenty studies were included with 13,102 cases of acute GABHS pharyngitis. Compared to standard duration treatment, the short duration treatment had shorter periods of fever (mean difference (MD) -0.30 days, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.14) and throat soreness (MD -0.50 days, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.22); lower risk of early clinical treatment failure (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94); no significant difference in early bacteriological treatment failure (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.20), or late clinical recurrence (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). However, the overall risk of late bacteriological recurrence was worse in the short duration treatment (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48), although no significant differences were found when studies of low dose azithromycin (10mg/kg) were eliminated (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.22). Three studies reported long duration complications with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.64).. Three to six days of oral antibiotics had comparable efficacy compared to the standard duration 10 day oral penicillin in treating children with acute GABHS pharyngitis. In countries with low rates of rheumatic fever, it appears safe and efficacious to treat children with acute GABHS pharyngitis with short duration antibiotics. In areas where the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease is still high, our results must be interpreted with caution.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

Oral sex is recently becoming a general sexual behavior among the youths in this country. Oral sex is often performed without a condom because they do not have to worry about pregnancy in oral sex. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae which are sexually transmitted diseases are infected with not only the genital tract but also the pharynx. Oral sex attracts attention as a new route of infection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. It is very imoportant that gential Chlamydia and gonococcal infections should be detected early and treated to protect from re-infection, because these infections are causes of infertility. If Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are detected from a genital tract in a youth, pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae examinations should be performed.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacteriological Techniques; Cephalosporins; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydia trachomatis; Clarithromycin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gonorrhea; Humans; Male; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; Ofloxacin; Pharyngitis; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Sexual Behavior

Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic chronic valvular heart disease is an important preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in suburban and rural India. Its diagnosis is based on clinical criteria. These criteria need verification and revision in the Indian context. Furthermore, there are glaring differences in management protocols available in literature. These facts prompted Indian Academy of Pediatrics to review the management of rheumatic fever.. Management of Rheumatic fever was reviewed and recommendation was formulated at national consultative meeting on 20th May 2007 at New Delhi.. To formulate uniform guidelines on management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in the Indian context. Guidelines were formulated for the management of streptococcal pharyngitis, acute rheumatic fever and its cardiac complication as well as secondary prophylaxis for recurrent episodes.. (1) Streptococcal eradication with appropriate antibiotics (Benzathine penicillin single dose or penicillin V oral or azithromycin). (2) Diagnosis of rheumatic fever based on Jones criteria. (3) Control inflammatory process with aspirin with or without steroids (total duration of treatment of 12 weeks). (4) Treatment of chorea according to severity (therapy to continue for 2-3 weeks after clinical improvement). (5) Protocol for managing cardiac complication like valvular heart disease, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. (6) Secondary prophylaxis with benzathine penicillin and management of anaphylaxis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Humans; Penicillin G Benzathine; Pharyngitis; Rheumatic Fever; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Streptococcal Infections

Azithromycin has become a frequent choice for the treatment of group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis. In this study, our objective was to determine the optimal dose of azithromycin for treatment of GAS tonsillopharyngitis in children and adults by analyzing trials that used different dose regimens.. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials that involved bacteriological confirmation of GAS tonsillopharyngitis, random assignment to receive either azithromycin or a 10-day comparator antibiotic, and assessment of bacteriological eradication by throat culture after therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were bacteriological and clinical cure rates.. Nineteen trials involving 4626 patients were included in the analysis. One trial used 10-day course of 2 different comparator antibiotics, and 2 trials compared 2 dose regimens of azithromycin with a 10-day course of comparator antibiotic; all other trials compared 1 dose regimen of azithromycin with a single 10-day course of comparator antibiotic. In children, azithromycin administered at 60 mg/kg per course was superior to the 10-day courses of comparators (P < .00001), with bacterial failure occurring 5 times more often in patients receiving the 10-day courses of antibiotics. Azithromycin administered at 30 mg/kg per course was inferior to the 10-day courses of comparators (P = .02), with bacterial failure occurring 3 times more frequently in patients receiving azithromycin. Three-day regimens were inferior to 5-day regimens (P = .002). In adults, no studies compared dosages by weight. Three-day regimens of 500 mg/day showed a trend favoring azithromycin over the 10-day courses of comparators (P = .14); 5-day regimens were inferior to 3-day regimens (P = .006). Clinical cure rates were significantly different for the different azithromycin regimens, with differences that resembled those for bacterial cure rate.. This analysis suggests that azithromycin administered at a dosage of 60 mg/kg in children or administered for 3 days at a dosage of 500 mg/day in adults is more effective than other treatment regimens in producing eradication and clinical cure of GAS tonsillopharyngitis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Humans; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

Pharyngitis is one of the most common infectious diseases affecting children. Group A streptococci are the leading bacterial cause of pharyngitis in children and adults. Because inappropriate antibiotic treatment for pharyngitis is becoming a major issue, only true group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) infections, proven by rapid antigen test or culture, should be treated with antibiotics. GABHS pharyngitis is often a mild and self-limiting infection in the absence of antimicrobial therapy. However, antimicrobial treatment must be administered to eradicate the pathogen from the throat, limit the spread of the infection and prevent possible progression to rheumatic fever, suppurative disease or toxin-mediated complications. Penicillin V for 10 days is the standard therapy and is effective in the management of GABHS pharyngitis. However, there are drawbacks to penicillin V therapy, including the length of the dosing regimen, which are leading to decreasing penicillin prescription rates in many countries. In addition bacteriologic treatment failures have been documented in up to 35% of GABHS patients treated with penicillin V, particularly in children <6 years old. A number of mechanisms may be responsible for these failures, but poor compliance with the standard 10-day penicillin treatment is likely to be a major factor. There is growing evidence to suggest that children with GABHS pharyngitis can be effectively treated with non-penicillin V antibiotics, which have the advantage of simpler and shorter dosing regimens compared with penicillin V. Among the antibiotics that have been tested clinically, azithromycin is the most widely studied. A total dose of 60 mg/kg azithromycin, given either as 12 mg/kg once daily for 5 days or 20 mg/kg once daily for 3 days, provides the best rate of GABHS eradication. Thus a total dose of 60 mg/kg azithromycin given during 3 or 5 days constitutes an alternative treatment to standard penicillin therapy in cases of penicillin hypersensitivity, when patient nonadherence to a 10-day penicillin regimen is suspected or for patients who fail therapy with a beta-lactam.

Topics: Azithromycin; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Disease; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Otitis Media; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this review is to examine the use of short-course antibacterial therapy of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngotonsillitis, compared with traditional 10-day therapy. In preparing this paper we reviewed the medical literature of studies comparing 10 days of penicillin with shorter courses of antibacterial therapy. Short-course therapy of 6 days of amoxicillin, 4 to 5 days of cephalosporins, and 5 days of azithromycin was found to be as, or more effective than traditional 10-day penicillin therapy. The benefits of short-course therapy include superior compliance and adherence, lower incidence of adverse effects, less effect on the bacterial flora, improved patient and parent satisfaction, and lower drug costs. In conclusion, short courses of amoxicillin, cephalosporins, and macrolides provide superior or equal efficacy to a 10-day course of penicillin therapy in the treatment of GABHS pharyngotonsillitis.

Topics: Acute Disease; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Child; Humans; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

An orally administered antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of pharyngitis caused by group A beta-hemolytic streptococci that could be given once daily and for less than 10 days would be convenient and might improve compliance, decrease cost, and result in fewer side effects compared with a regimen given multiple times daily for 10 days. Previous attempts to administer oral penicillin once daily or for less than 10 days were not successful. Several cephalosporins and azithromycin have been reported to be effective when administered once daily or for less than 10 days. However, large, comprehensive studies have not been performed. In addition, the spectra of these cephalosporins and azithromycin are much broader than that of penicillin, and, even when they are administered for short courses, they are more expensive. Therefore, these novel regimens cannot be endorsed and should not supplant penicillin as the agent of choice. In contrast, once-daily amoxicillin therapy appears to be effective, is inexpensive, and has a narrower spectrum of antimicrobial activity; if these findings are confirmed by additional investigations, it could become an alternative regimen for the treatment of pharyngitis caused by group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Child; Humans; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Time Factors

We carried out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing 3-5 days of azithromycin with other antibiotics that are typically given in longer courses for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections. For acute otitis media (19 comparisons including 3421 patients), acute sinusitis (11 comparisons including 1742 patients) and acute pharyngitis (16 comparisons including 2447 patients), azithromycin had similar clinical failure rates to the other antibiotics [random effects odds ratios 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.54; 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.39; and 1.07, 95% CI 0.59-1.94, respectively]. The difference in clinical failures was <0.5%, and no 95% CIs exceeded 2.0%. There was no heterogeneity between studies. Subtle differences between comparators could have been due to chance. There were no significant differences in bacteriological outcomes. Azithromycin was discontinued because of adverse events in only 37 of 4870 (0.8%) patients. Short courses of azithromycin are as effective as longer courses of other antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections. Convenience of dosing should be balanced against the increased cost of this regimen for the treatment of these common infections, where often no antibiotic may be indicated at all.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chi-Square Distribution; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Odds Ratio; Otitis Media; Pharyngitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections; Sinusitis

Azithromycin is an azalide antimicrobial agent active in vitro against major pathogens responsible for infections of the respiratory tract, skin and soft tissues in children. Pathogens that are generally susceptible to azithromycin include Haemophilus influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella spp., Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Azithromycin is also generally active against erythromycin- and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Azithromycin is administered once daily, achieves clinically relevant concentrations at sites of infection, is slowly eliminated from the body and has few drug interactions. In children, azithromycin is usually given as either a 3-day course of 10 mg/kg/day or a 5-day course with 10 mg/kg on the first day, followed by 5 mg/kg/day for a further 4 days. These standard regimens were as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, cefaclor and amoxicillin in the treatment of children with otitis media. Azithromycin was also as effective as either phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V), erythromycin, clarithromycin or cefaclor against streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis in children, but appears to result in more recurrence of infection than phenoxymethylpenicillin in this indication, necessitating a dosage of 12 mg/kg/day for 5 days. Community-acquired pneumonia, bronchitis and other respiratory tract infections in children responded as well to azithromycin as to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefaclor, erythromycin or josamycin. Azithromycin was similar or superior to ceftibuten in mixed general practice populations of patients. However, symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections resolved more rapidly with azithromycin than with erythromycin, josamycin or cefaclor. Skin and soft tissue infections responded as well to azithromycin as to cefaclor, dicloxacillin or flucloxacillin, and oral azithromycin was as effective as ocular tetracycline in treating trachoma. Although not as well tolerated as phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis, azithromycin is at least as well tolerated as most other agents used to treat respiratory tract and other infections in children and was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Adverse events that do occur are mostly gastrointestinal and tend to be mild. Azithromycin is an effective and well tolerated alternative to first-line agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue infections in children, offerring the convenience of a short, once-daily regimen.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Infant; Otitis Media; Pharyngitis; Respiratory Tract Infections; Streptococcal Infections; Tonsillitis

The most frequent bacterial cause of pharyngitis/tonsillitis, a common infection in children, is group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. Prevention of acute rheumatic fever is the principal goal of treatment, although antibiotic therapy may also relieve the signs and symptoms of infection, shorten the infective period and prevent suppurative complications. Penicillin is the drug of choice. Alternatives are required, however, for patients allergic to penicillin and may be needed if the rate of bacteriologic failure with penicillin observed during the past decade continues. Erythromycin is generally effective in this infection, but its use, especially in children, is complicated by the need for multiple daily doses, a lengthy treatment period and a high rate of gastrointestinal side effects. The newer macrolides clarithromycin and azithromycin offer lower rates of gastrointestinal complaints and more convenient dosing. Clarithromycin is recommended for twice daily and azithromycin for once daily administration. Because of its prolonged tissue half-life, the recommended duration of azithromycin therapy is 5 days, compared with 10 days for penicillin, erythromycin and clarithromycin. Newer macrolides are rational alternatives to erythromycin for streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis in penicillin-allergic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Clarithromycin; Erythromycin; Humans; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Tonsillitis

Group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis is one of the few conditions for which antibiotics are advocated among common upper respiratory infections. Although a 3-day course of azithromycin is attracting attention as a treatment of choice for the condition, it is not clear if the efficacy of the treatment is comparable with that of treatment with cephalosporins. A prospective, randomized, comparative multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy of azithromycin (AZM) given once daily for 3 days with that of cefcapene-pivoxyl (CFPN-PI) divided into three daily doses for 5 days. 88 patients (male: 38, mean age: 16.5) were treated with AZM and 69 (male: 34, mean age: 16.9) with CFPN-PI. The symptoms of all but 5 (2 for AZM and 3 for CFPN-PI) of the patients were resolved by the 8th day of the treatment. By the 4th day of the treatment, criteria for clinical efficacy were fulfilled in 71 (80.7%) subjects who were treated with AZM and in 48 (67.6%) of those treated with CFPN-PI (p = 0.07). The same figures on the 8th day of the treatment were 86 (97.7%) and 68 (95.8%), respectively (p = 0.66), confirming there was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the two treatments. Mild adverse reactions were reported by two patients treated with AZM and by none treated with CFPN-PI. The clinical efficacy of a 3-day course with AZM was comparable with that of a 5-day course of CFPN-PI for GAS tonsillopharyngitis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Chi-Square Distribution; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The azithromycin immediate-release formulation (AZ-IR) provides effective treatment for group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in adults. Single-dose therapy with a novel azithromycin extended-release (AZ-ER) formulation could reduce treatment failure and eliminate non-compliance contributing to antimicrobial resistance. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre trial was conducted comparing AZ-ER (single oral 2-g dose) with AZ-IR (3 days, 500 mg once daily) for the treatment of group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis in adults and adolescents (n = 598). The primary endpoint was bacteriological eradication at test -of-cure (TOC; day 24-28) in the bacteriological per-protocol population (n = 420). Bacteriological eradication was achieved in 85.4% (175/205) and 81.4% (175/215) of subjects in the AZ-ER and AZ-IR groups, respectively (95% CI -3.1-11.1). Clinical cure at TOC occurred in 99.0% of subjects in the AZ-ER group and in 96.7% in the AZ-IR group. At long-term follow-up, bacteriological recurrence was observed in 5.5% (9/163) and 7.7% (12/156), respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated; and most adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in intensity. The most frequent treatment-related AE was diarrhoea, or loose stools, in 11% of both treatment groups. AZ-ER-treated and AZ-IR-treated subjects had AE burdens (AE days/patient-year) of 7.6 days and 9.2 days, respectively. A similar trend in favour of AZ-ER was noted for treatment-related diarrhoea burden (1.9 days vs. 2.5 days). A single 2-g dose of AZ-ER is as effective and well tolerated as 3 days of AZ-IR (500 mg once daily) for treating group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis in adults and adolescents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study evaluated the natural history of acute tonsillopharyngitis associated with atypical bacterial infections, showing that Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae organisms are frequently found in children with acute tonsillopharyngitis. The study also demonstrated, for what we believe to be the first time, that, unless adequately treated, acute tonsillopharyngitis associated with infection with M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae may have a negative outcome with a high risk of recurrence of respiratory illness.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Bacterial; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Chlamydophila Infections; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Mycoplasma Infections; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Pharyngeal Diseases; Pharyngitis; Recurrence; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Azithromycin; Cefixime; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Nasopharynx; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Treatment Outcome

To compare a 3-day azithromycin vs. a 10-day penicillin V regimen for treatment of acute group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis in children and to determine whether viral infection and/or pharyngeal GAS carriage in patients and adult contacts affect clinical and bacteriologic efficacy.. This multicenter, randomized, comparative, open label study compared 3-day, once daily 10 mg/kg azithromycin oral suspension with a 10-day regimen of 100,000 IU/kg/day penicillin V oral suspension in three divided doses in children with acute GAS pharyngitis. Clinical and bacteriologic efficacy and tolerability of the antibiotics were evaluated. Recurrence of symptoms and infection was monitored for 6 months.. In total, 292 children (age range, 2 to 12 years) received at least one dose of study medication. Clinical success (cure/improvement) with either antibiotic was similar at the end of therapy (Day 14; azithromycin, 95%; penicillin V, 97%) and at Day 28 (azithromycin, 94%; penicillin V, 95%). Bacteriologic eradication was significantly less with azithromycin than with penicillin V at Day 14 (azithromycin, 38%; penicillin V, 81%; P < 0.001) and at Day 28 (azithromycin, 31%; penicillin V, 68%; P < 0.001). There was no associated increase in GAS-related sequelae. The lower incidence of bacteriologic eradication with azithromycin was not the result of possible concomitant viral infections in the patients, GAS carriage in one parent/guardian or any reduced susceptibility in pretreatment GAS isolates. Both antibiotics were equally well-tolerated.. Treatment with 3-day, once daily 10 mg/kg azithromycin for GAS pharyngitis is associated with similar high levels of clinical efficacy, but lower levels of bacteriologic eradication, than with 10-day 100,000 IU/kg/day penicillin V.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Penicillin V; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Treatment Outcome

Three-day, 10 mg/kg/day azithromycin (AZM) studies in pediatric acute group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis have shown contradictory bacteriologic results. This study investigates the efficacy and tolerability of two dosages of 3-day azithromycin (20 mg/kg/day and 10 mg/kg/day) compared with 10-day penicillin V.. This was a prospective, comparative, randomized, multicenter trial. Children were scheduled to return for visits at 14 days (main end point) and 1 month after the onset of treatment for clinical and bacteriologic assessment. Molecular tools were used to compare pre- and posttreatment group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS) isolates.. Between November, 1997, and July, 1998, 501 patients (169 AZM 10 mg, 165 AZM 20 mg, 167 penicillin V) between 2 and 12 years old were enrolled; 500 were assessable for safety, 469 for intent to treat analysis and 420 for efficacy in the per protocol analysis. Before treatment 25 (7.9%) of 315 GABHS stains isolated from patients receiving AZM were resistant to this compound. On Day 14 pretreatment GABHS were eradicated from 78 (57.8%) of the 135 children receiving the AZM 10 mg regimen, 131 (94.2%) of the 139 receiving AZM 20 mg and 123 (84.2%) of the 146 taking penicillin. One month after the outset of treatment, bacteriologic relapses were observed in 40.5% (n = 30) of the children receiving AZM 10 mg, 14.8% (n = 18) of children taking AZM 20 mg and 13.2% (n = 15) of those treated with penicillin V. AZM 20 mg/kg/day was statistically superior to AZM 10 mg/kg/day microbiologically on Day 14 (P = 0.0001) and Day 30 (P = 0.0001) and clinically on Day 14 (P = 0.0035). AZM 20 mg/kg/day was statistically equivalent both microbiologically and clinically to standard therapy with penicillin V at all endpoints. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two azithromycin groups [AZM 10 mg, 31 of 169 (18.3%); AZM 20 mg, 37 of 164 (23%)] but significantly higher than those observed in the penicillin V group [5 of 166 (3%); P < 0.0001]. Most treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal and of mild-to-moderate severity. Fourteen patients withdrew from the trial because of adverse events (1 in the penicillin V group, 7 in the AZM 10 mg group and 6 in the AZM 20 mg group).. This is the first study to demonstrate a daily dose-dependent difference in microbiologic efficacy of a regimen; 3-day AZM 20 mg/kg/day is a more effective regimen than 3-day AZM 10 mg/kg/day for pediatric GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Penicillin V; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome

To compare the safety and efficacy of a short course (5 days) of ceftibuten vs. azithromycin for 3 days for treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis in children.. A multicenter, open label, prospective, randomized trial in which patients > or =3 to < or =16 years of age with proven GABHS pharyngitis were randomized to receive either once daily ceftibuten for 5 days or azithromycin for 3 days. Patients were evaluated for clinical outcomes and/or for adverse events at days 6 to 8, 13 to 15 and 33 to 35 posttherapy. Microbiologic assessments (pharyngeal cultures) were conducted at baseline and at each follow-up visit.. A total of 132 patients in the ceftibuten arm and 116 in the azithromycin arm were enrolled in the safety analysis, whereas 126 and 101, respectively, were enrolled for ceftibuten and azithromycin efficacy evaluation. Clinical success (cure or marked amelioration) at days 6 to 8 was recorded in 98 and 94% in the 2 groups, respectively. In the bacteriologic efficacy analysis at 6 to 8 days, the GABHS strain was eradicated in 76% of the patients treated with ceftibuten and in 76% of those receiving azithromycin. At 33 to 35 days, 84% of the patients in the ceftibuten arm and 71% in the azithromycin arm were GABHS-negative, and bacteriologic relapse was observed in 4 and 7% of the ceftibuten and azithromycin cases, respectively. Both treatments were well-tolerated by all patients.. Ceftibuten and azithromycin allow simple treatment schedules (i.e. once daily administration, short duration of treatment). The somewhat higher eradication rate recorded after ceftibuten administration is consistent with the overall superior bactericidal activity of beta-lactams compared with macrolides vs. GABHS in vitro.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Ceftibuten; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Treatment Outcome

An open, comparative multicenter study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin (10 mg/kg) given once daily for three days in comparison with cefaclor (30 mg/kg) divided into three daily doses and given for a period of ten days. One hundred and twenty-two children aged 1-12 years with clinical symptoms of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis and a positive throat culture were randomly allocated to the treatment groups. Overall, the clinical success (cure or improvement) of both regimens was identical in the evaluable patients (86.3%, 44 of 51 patients in either treatment group). In contrast, bacterial eradication after completion of treatment was lower with azithromycin than with cefaclor. Possible reasons for this discrepancy between clinical success and eradication rates could be antibiotic resistance, pre-disease carriage or insufficient dosage. Both agents were well tolerated; only mild or moderate side effects most frequently involving the gastrointestinal tract, were recorded in either therapy group.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cefaclor; Cephalosporins; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

A comparison was made of the clinical effectiveness of azithromycin (once daily for three days at a dose of 10 mg/kg in children or 500 mg/day in adults) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefaclor (standard doses for 7 to 14 days) in acute ear, nose and throat infections in an open randomized study. The group with azithromycin included 37 otitis media, 24 pharyngotonsillitis and 6 maxillary sinusitis (n = 67). The amoxicillin/clavulanic acid group, 22 otitis media, 19 pharyngotonsillitis and 6 maxillary sinusitis (n = 47) and the cefaclor group, 15 otitis media, 12 pharyngotonsillitis and 4 maxillary sinusitis (n = 31). Fifteen days after beginning treatment, 97% (65/67) of the patients who received azithromycin had improved or cured, compared with 85% (40/47) of those who received amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and 84% (26/31), cefaclor (p < 0.02). Pathogens were not eradicated in 3% (2/58) of the patients who received azithromycin, compared with 13% (4/28) who received amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and 15% (4/28) cefaclor. Patients with azithromycin showed an earlier clinical improvement and more rapid normalization of the leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and acute phase proteins. No patient with azithromycin had adverse effects, versus 15% (7/47) for patients with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and 16% (5/31) for cefaclor. Treatment compliance was 100, 83 (39/47) and 84% (26/31), respectively (p < 0.01). We conclude that azithromycin treatment for three days is faster and more effective clinically and analytically than standard treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or cefaclor in acute infections of the ear, nose and throat.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cefaclor; Cephalosporins; Clavulanic Acid; Female; Humans; Male; Maxillary Sinusitis; Otitis Media; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Tonsillitis

The economic impacts in terms of cost and effectiveness (speed of resolution of symptoms) of 3- and 5-day courses of azithromycin and a 10-day course of roxithromycin were compared in a randomized, open study in patients with symptoms suggestive of beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Direct medical costs and absence from work were recorded and symptom scores and compliance were used to assess the effectiveness of therapies. Although no differences between treatment groups in terms of overall clinical response rates were detected 2 and 4 weeks after the start of treatment, more rapid resolution of symptoms was achieved with 3- and 5-day courses of azithromycin than with a 10-day course of roxithromycin. There was also a significant reduction in the time absent from work in the azithromycin treatment groups. The total costs of care over the 4-week evaluation period were lower for the 3- and 5-day azithromycin courses (US$193.60 and US$195.30 respectively) than for roxithromycin (US$202.10). The major cost components were absence from work (58.6%), visits to the physician (15.3%) and utilization of antibiotics (14.9%). Compliance was significantly better (P < 0.01) in patients prescribed azithromycin for 3 and 5 days (58.0% and 42.9% respectively) than in those who received roxithromycin (20.3%) and a significantly longer symptom-free period (P < 0.01) was reported in azithromycin- compared with roxithromycin-treated patients. These findings support the hypothesis that a 3- or 5-day course of azithromycin is as effective as a 10 day course of roxithromycin in the treatment of patients with pharyngitis and is associated with lower costs. Furthermore, azithromycin is associated with faster resolution of symptoms and improved patient compliance.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Roxithromycin; Socioeconomic Factors; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of a 3-day course of azithromycin oral suspension (10 mg/kg of body weight once daily) were compared with those of penicillin V (50,000 U/kg/day in two divided doses) in children aged 3 to 12 years for the treatment of symptomatic pharyngitis caused by the group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS). For the 154 evaluable patients, the original infecting strain of GABHS was eliminated at the end of follow-up (34 to 36 days after treatment started) from 67 (85.8%) of 78 penicillin-treated patients and 41 (53.9%) of 76 azithromycin-treated patients (P < 0.0001). Overall clinical success was achieved in 71 (91.0%) of 78 penicillin V-treated patients and 57 (75.0%) of 76 azithromycin-treated patients (P < 0.05). Potential drug-related adverse events were reported for 5.5 and 8.6% of the penicillin V- and azithromycin-treated patients, respectively (P = 0.6). In the present study, a once-daily (10 mg/kg), 3-day oral regimen of azithromycin was as safe as a 10-day course of penicillin but did not represent an effective alternative to penicillin for the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis, even for those children with azithromycin-susceptible strains.

Topics: Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Penicillin V; Pharyngitis; Streptococcus

For many years alternatives to penicillin have been studied for the management of pediatric group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis. As a result of its pharmacokinetic profile azithromycin is unique among these alternative antimicrobials in allowing once daily dosing and shorter duration of treatment. However, the optimum dose (e.g. 10 or 12 mg/kg/day) and duration (e.g. 3 or 5 days) of azithromycin therapy have not been defined yet.. An open, comparative multicenter study was conducted in 343 children with clinical symptoms of GABHS pharyngitis and a positive culture to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin (10 mg/kg) once daily for 3 days compared with penicillin V three times daily for 10 days.. Among the evaluable patients bacteriologic eradication documented at follow-up visits was inferior with azithromycin when compared with penicillin V therapy: at Days 9 to 20 (mean, 12 days), negative cultures in 65% (99 of 152 patients) vs. 82% (128 of 126 patients) (P < 0.001); and at Days 17 to 57 (mean, 25 days), in 55% vs. 80% (P < 0.001). Overall clinical success (cure or improvement) was achieved in 93% (149 of 160 patients) of azithromycin-treated and in 89% (143 of 160 patients) of penicillin-treated patients (P > 0.50). There was no correlation between bacteriologic response and clinical outcome, as assessed shortly after completion of therapy or during 6-month follow-up. Both treatments were well-tolerated.. In the present study on GABHS pharyngitis in children, a once daily (10-mg/kg), 3-day oral regimen of azithromycin was as clinically effective and as safe as traditional penicillin but appeared inferior in eliminating GABHS from the throat.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Penicillin V; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes

The efficacy and safety of azithromycin and penicillin V in the treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis in paediatric patients were compared in a double-blind, double-dummy prospective study. A total of 489 children (age range, 2-13 years) were randomized to receive treatment with penicillin V (125-250 mg 4 x daily for 10 days) or azithromycin in an oral suspension (10 or 20 mg/kg 1 x daily for 3 days). Only patients with baseline cultures positive for Streptococcus pyogenes and complete clinical and microbiological assessments at the end of the therapy and follow-up one month later were included in the efficacy analysis. A satisfactory clinical response (cure or improvement) was recorded in 99% of the 10 mg/kg azithromycin group, 100% of the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group, and 97% of the penicillin V group at the end of therapy (day 12-14). At the follow-up evaluation (day 28-30), relapse rates in patients cured or improved at the end of therapy were 6%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 98% in both azithromycin groups and 92% in patients who received penicillin V (p = 0.011); pathogen recurrence was recorded at follow-up in 4% of the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group and in 6% of both the 10 mg/kg azithromycin and penicillin V groups. Treatment-related adverse events, the majority of mild to moderate severity, occurred in 13% of patients in the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group, 9% in the 10 mg/kg azithromycin group, and 5% in the penicillin V group. Azithromycin in a dosage of 10 or 20 mg/kg/day one daily for three days was as safe and effective as penicillin V administered four times daily in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Penicillin V; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome

Azithromycin (AZM), a new macrolide antibiotic, in fine granules and in capsules was studied for pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluations. 1. Antibacterial activities. MIC profile of AZM was as follows: 0.78 approximately 1.56 micrograms/ml against Staphylococcus aureus, < or = 0.025 approximately 0.10 microgram/ml against Streptococcus pyogenes, 0.10 approximately 0.39 and 6.25 micrograms/ml against Streptococcus pneumoniae, < or = 0.025 approximately 0.39 microgram/ml against Moraxella(Branhamella) catarrhalis, 0.39 approximately 3.13 micrograms/ml against Haemophilus influenzae, and 0.20 approximately 6.25 micrograms/ml against Haemophilus parainfluenzae. 2. Absorption and excretion. The elimination half-life of AZM after its administration at 10 mg/kg/day for three days was 28.1 approximately 46.1 hours. The cumulative urinary excretion rate in the first 120 hours after start of treatment was 4.01 approximately 8.47%. 3. Clinical evaluation. AZM was given to 76 pediatric patients to treat following infections: pharyngitis in seven, tonsillitis in 11, bronchitis in 11, pneumonia in 19, Mycoplasma pneumonia in eight, scarlet fever in 13, infective enteritis in one, SSTI in four, and otitis media in two. Effectiveness of AZM was assessed in 75 patients and the drug was rated "excellent" or "good" in 71 resulting in an efficacy rate of 94.7%, 87.0% of the 46 cases indicated that AZM had eradicated bacteria identified before the treatment. One patient complained of moderate diarrhea which disappeared after treatment of anti-diarrheic. Abnormal laboratory changes were reported in 12 patients in the following: decreased leukocytes in eight, increased eosinophils in two, increased platelet count in one, and increased GPT in one. All cases of abnormality was deemed mild in severity and clinically insignificant.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Capsules; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Respiratory Tract Infections; Tonsillitis

Azithromycin (AZM), 10% fine granules or 100 mg capsules, were given orally to 27 children with various pediatric infections. The results of the study are shown below. 1. Pharmacokinetic investigation. We studied plasma and urinary concentrations after 100 mg AZM capsules were given. One patient received 8.3 mg/kg of AZM once a day for 3 days, and AZM concentration in plasma was 0.033 microgram/ml 48 hours after the final dosing. Doses of 8.3 and 12.5 mg/kg body weight of AZM were respectively given to two patients once daily for 3 days. As a result, AZM concentrations in urine during a period between 96 and 120 hours post-dosing were 1.67 and 4.53 micrograms/ml, respectively, and urinary excretion rate in 120 hours after the first dosing was 10.54% in the patient that was given 12.5 mg/kg. 2. Clinical investigation. Clinical efficacies were examined in 24 patients. Excellent results were obtained in 7 patients, good results in 14 patients, hence the clinical efficacy rate was 87.5%. Bacteriologically, Haemophilus influenzae strains isolates from 2 patients were eradicated in 1 and decreased in the other. Safety was evaluated in 26 patients. An adverse reaction was observed in 1 patient (urticaria). Abnormal laboratory test results were observed in 2 patients, decreased WBC in 1 and elevation of eosinophils in the other. The above results suggest that AZM is a useful oral antibiotic for pediatric patients with infection with susceptible organisms.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Respiratory Tract Infections

Azithromycin (AZM), a new macrolide antibiotic, in fine granules and in capsules was administered at a standard dose of 10 mg/kg once daily for 3 days to pediatric patients with bacterial infections. AZM was studied for its pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation. 1. AZM possessed potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria that had been clinically isolated. 2. Plasma samples were collected from two patients diagnosed as having pneumonia or enteritis, and urine samples were collected from one patient diagnosed as having pneumonia for drug level determination. The drug concentrations in plasma were 0.095 and 0.204 microgram/ml just before the end of treatment, and 0.017 and 0.096 microgram/ml at 48 hours post-treatment. The drug concentrations in urine were 5.16 micrograms/ml and 5.63 micrograms/ml during a period between 24 and 48 hours and between 48 and 72 hours after the start of treatment, respectively. 3. The drug was found effective in 37 of 38 cases with various pediatric infections. AZM treatment eradicated bacteria in 17 of 30 strains (56.7%). 4. One patient complained of mild vomiting, while abnormal laboratory test results indicating mild eosinophilia were reported in four cases.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Capsules; Child; Child, Preschool; Enteritis; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Respiratory Tract Infections

Azithromycin (AZM) is a new oral macrolide antibiotic drug. AZM either in 10% fine granules form or in 100 mg capsule form was studied for its pharmacokinetics and treatment efficacy in pediatric patients with various infections. 1. Pharmacokinetics. Plasma and urine samples were collected from four patients with pharyngitis and post-dosing drug levels were determined. The drug was given once daily at 10 mg/kg body weight for 3 days. The drug concentrations found in plasma at 96 hours after the first dosing (48 hours after the final dosing) lay in a range of 0.02 and 0.04 microgram/ml and in urine at 120 hours after the first dosing (72 hours after the final dosing) in a range between 3.2 and 7.7 micrograms/ml. AZM was found in two patients but no effect was observed on blood levels of theophylline determined between 48 and 96 hours after the first dosing in the treatment of underlying bronchial asthma. 2. Clinical study results. Clinical studies of AZM was carried out in 25 pediatric patients with bacterial infections that mainly affected the respiratory tract. The patients received either 10% fine granules at 10 or 20 mg/ kg body weight or 100 mg capsules at 10 mg/kg body weight once daily over 3 to 6 days. The drug was found markedly effective in six patients, moderately effective in thirteen patients, while the investigators could not assess the drug efficacy in six patients. Although no side effect was reported in the study, two patients experienced slight decrease in WBC.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Respiratory Tract Infections; Tonsillitis

Azithromycin (AZM) was studied for its concentrations in plasma and urine, efficacy and safety. 1. Plasma and urine samples were collected from one patient diagnosed as having Mycoplasma pneumonia for drug level determination. The drug was given once daily at 9.7 mg/kg body weight for three days. The drug concentrations in plasma was 0.149 microgram/ml in 12 hours after the start of the treatment, and 0.095 microgram/ml at the point of 24 hours after the end of the treatment. Urinary recovery rate up to 72 hours post-dosing was 6.39%. 2. The effectiveness of AZM was assessed in 19 patients with following diagnoses: pharyngitis in two patients, bronchitis in four, pneumonia in seven and Mycoplasma pneumonia in six. The drug was rated "excellent" in 11, "good" in seven, "poor" in one, resulting in an efficacy rate of 94.7%. 3. AZM eradicated two strains of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae identified in patients. 4. The AZM MIC's were 0.39 microgram/ml against Staphylococcus aureus, 0.20 microgram/ml against S. pneumoniae, < or = 0.0008 microgram/ml against Mycoplasma pneumoniae. 5. One patient complained of mild diarrhea, while another showed a slight increase in eosinophils, suggesting an abnormal laboratory change. In conclusion, AZM was found useful in treatment of pediatric infections.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Respiratory Tract Infections

To compare three traditional measures of compliance with antibiotic therapy (parent report diary, preregimen and postregimen bottle-weight difference, and urine bioassay for antibiotic activity), with a deuterium oxide tracer measure of compliance.. Clinical trial in which all four compliance measures were used for subjects participating in a comparison of the efficacy of azithromycin and penicillin in treating group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection. Subjects were 41 children, aged 3 to 15 years (average age, 7.9 years), in a suburban pediatric private practice, who had positive rapid streptococcal antigen test results.. Of the 41 subjects, 20 children were randomly assigned to receive azithromycin and 21 to receive penicillin. Compliance was uniformly high by all four measures. Parent diaries indicated that all doses were administered. Urine bioassays were obtained for 40 subjects, and all showed antibiotic activity. Differences in bottle weights were obtained for 27 subjects and showed that 142% of the prescribed medication was missing from the bottles at the end of the regimen. The deuterium oxide measure was obtained for 40 subjects and showed that 107% of the prescribed azithromycin and 92% of the prescribed penicillin were ingested. The correlation coefficient between measured and expected deuterium enrichment was 0.89. There was no significant correlation between the bottle-weight measure and the deuterium oxide tracer.. The bottle-weight measure overestimates compliance; the deuterium oxide tracer is feasible for use in an office setting and produces a high correlation between the expected urinary enrichment and the measured enrichment. Increased use of this quantitative and direct measure would improve the accuracy of compliance measurement in trials of pediatric liquid medications.

Topics: Adolescent; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Deuterium; Deuterium Oxide; Drug Packaging; Erythromycin; Female; Humans; Male; Parents; Patient Compliance; Penicillin V; Pharyngitis; Regression Analysis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis; Water

The efficacy and safety of azithromycin and clarithromycin were compared in an open multicentre study involving 380 adult patients with acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, or acute streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis. Patients were assigned randomly to receive azithromycin as a single dose of 500 mg daily for three days, or clarithromycin 250 mg bid for ten days. Overall clinical efficacy was found to be similar in each treatment group at day 10-14, with a satisfactory outcome (cured or improved) in 95% of azithromycin and 96% of clarithromycin patients. Bacteriological efficacy was also similar, with eradication of the pathogen in 94% and 95% of isolates, respectively, in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups. In otitis media, a satisfactory clinical response was seen in 97% of patients in each treatment group. Azithromycin therapy resulted in a clinical response rate of 93% in sinusitis patients, with bacteriological eradication in 93% of patients. Two patients (who were cured clinically) had persistent pathogens. Similarly, clarithromycin achieved clinical response and bacteriological eradication in 95% and 92% of sinusitis patients, respectively. Pathogens persisted in two patients with clinical cure, and in one case of clinical failure. In pharyngitis or tonsillitis, Streptococcus pyogenes was eradicated successfully in 95% of patients in both groups, and the clinical success rates were 96% and 97% for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. No case of clinical failure was associated with persistence of S. pyogenes infection. At the follow-up assessment of this diagnosis group, reinfection had occurred in three (8%) azithromycin patients and one (3%) clarithromycin patient, and all but one patient remained asymptomatic. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with 8.4% of patients on azithromycin and 7.4% on clarithromycin reporting adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal. It was concluded that a three-day course of azithromycin was as effective and well-tolerated as a ten-day course of clarithromycin in adults with acute upper respiratory tract infections.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Child; Clarithromycin; Drug Administration Schedule; Erythromycin; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Otitis Media; Pharyngitis; Respiratory Tract Infections; Sinusitis; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

Of 96 children (aged 2-12 years) with either acute pharyngitis or acute tonsillitis, 49 received a single daily dose of azithromycin 10 mg/kg (maximum 500 mg) for three days, and 47 received penicillin V at a dose of 125 mg or 250 mg qid (depending on body weight) for ten days. Clinical assessments and laboratory safety tests were performed during and after therapy. Before enrollment, all patients were screened for group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS) with a rapid test, and a throat swab was taken for confirmatory culture. The presence of GABHS at baseline was confirmed in 41 azithromycin- and 44 penicillin V-treated patients. Cure or improvement was seen in 98% and 100% of azithromycin- and penicillin V-treated patients, respectively. At day 11, bacterial eradication was achieved in 39/41 (95%) azithromycin-treated patients, 38 (93%) of whom were considered clinically cured, while one patient (2%) relapsed. In the penicillin V group, 42/44 (95%) had GABHS eradicated, with 41 (93%) clinically cured and three patients (7%) improved. The remaining two patients in each group were clinically cured despite persistence of Streptococcus pyogenes. At follow-up evaluation (day 30), re-occurrence was observed in 5/37 (14%) and 3/40 (8%) of azithromycin- and penicillin V-treated patients, respectively; all patients were asymptomatic. Both drugs were well-tolerated with only two patients in the azithromycin group complaining of side effects. Treatment related laboratory test abnormalities were observed in 6/47 (13%) and 4/45 (9%) azithromycin- and penicillin V-treated patients, respectively, but none was judged to be clinically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Acute Disease; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Erythromycin; Female; Humans; Male; Penicillin V; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

In this open study, 93 children (aged 2-12 years) with a clinical diagnosis of pharyngitis or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (culture and/or ELISA test positive) were given azithromycin, as a single daily dose of 10 mg/kg (maximum 500 mg) for three days (n = 46); or erythromycin ethylsuccinate, 30-50 mg/kg daily given in three divided doses, for ten days (n = 47). Forty-four of 46 azithromycin patients, and 46 of 47 erythromycin patients, had S. pyogenes isolated at baseline and were included in the clinical and bacteriological analyses. At the end of treatment (day 10-12), 38 (86%) of the 44 azithromycin patients were considered cured, four (9%) improved, one (2%) failed and one relapsed. In the erythromycin group, 30 of 46 (65%) were considered cured, 15 (33%) improved and one (2%) failed. Eradication of S. pyogenes was achieved in 40 of 44 (91%) and 45 of 46 (98%) azithromycin and erythromycin patients, respectively. Re-occurrence of S. pyogenes, assessed 28-32 days after start of treatment, occurred in five of 37 (14%) azithromycin patients (three with clinical symptoms) and five of 39 (13%) erythromycin patients (four with clinical signs). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical or bacteriological efficacy between the two groups. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with side-effects (mainly gastrointestinal) reported in five of 46 (11%) azithromycin patients and in six of 47 (13%) erythromycin patients, one of whom withdrew from treatment. No laboratory abnormalities were observed in the azithromycin patients, but were recorded in two of 43 (5%) erythromycin patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Acute Disease; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Erythromycin; Female; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

The safety and efficacy of azithromycin was compared with that of penicillin V in a multicenter study of the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis in outpatients. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either azithromycin 500 mg once on day 1 followed by 250 mg once daily for 4 days, or penicillin V (V-Cillin K) 250 mg every 6 hours for 10 days. Two hundred and forty-two patients from 29 centers were evaluable at the 11th day after enrollment. Five of 229 (2.2%) azithromycin-treated patients were not evaluable because their enrollment isolates of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) were resistant to the drug. In both treatment groups, 99% of patients were clinically cured or improved. Eradication of GABHS occurred in 91% of azithromycin-treated patients compared with 96% of penicillin-treated patients (p = 0.21). Of the patients who had a recurrence of GABHS, clinical evidence of infection occurred in 3 of 13 (23%) patients who had been treated with azithromycin and in 7 of 10 (70%) patients treated with penicillin. Adverse events, generally mild to moderate gastrointestinal complaints, were significantly more common in the azithromycin-treated patients (16.6%) than in penicillin-treated patients (1.7%) (p less than 0.001). Discontinuation because of side effects occurred with similar frequency in both groups. Azithromycin appears to be a safe and effective alternative treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis in adult outpatients.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Azithromycin; Erythromycin; Female; Humans; Male; Penicillin V; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections

The European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP) performs annual sentinel surveillance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility to therapeutically relevant antimicrobials across the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). We present the Euro-GASP results from 2019 (26 countries), linked to patient epidemiological data, and compared with data from previous years.. Agar dilution and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) gradient strip methodologies were used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility (using EUCAST clinical breakpoints, where available) of 3239 N. gonorrhoeae isolates from 26 countries across the EU/EEA. Significance of differences compared with Euro-GASP results in previous years was analysed using Z-test and the Pearson's χ2 test was used to assess significance of odds ratios for associations between patient epidemiological data and antimicrobial resistance.. European N. gonorrhoeae isolates collected between 2016 and 2019 displayed shifting MIC distributions for; ceftriaxone, with highly susceptible isolates increasing over time and occasional resistant isolates each year; cefixime, with highly-susceptible isolates becoming increasingly common; azithromycin, with a shift away from lower MICs towards higher MICs above the EUCAST epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF); and ciprofloxacin which is displaying a similar shift in MICs as observed for azithromycin. In 2019, two isolates displayed ceftriaxone resistance, but both isolates had MICs below the azithromycin ECOFF. Cefixime resistance (0.8%) was associated with patient sex, with resistance higher in females compared with male heterosexuals and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). The number of countries reporting isolates with azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF increased from 76.9% (20/26) in 2016 to 92.3% (24/26) in 2019. Isolates with azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF (9.0%) were associated with pharyngeal infection sites. Following multivariable analysis, ciprofloxacin resistance remained associated with isolates from MSM and heterosexual males compared with females, the absence of a concurrent chlamydial infection, pharyngeal infection sites and patients ≥ 25 years of age.. Resistance to ceftriaxone and cefixime remained uncommon in EU/EEA countries in 2019 with a significant decrease in cefixime resistance observed between 2016 and 2019. The significant increase in azithromycin "resistance" (azithromycin MICs above the ECOFF) threatens the effectiveness of the dual therapy (ceftriaxone + azithromycin), i.e., for ceftriaxone-resistant cases, currently recommended in many countries internationally and requires close monitoring.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Azithromycin; Cefixime; Ceftriaxone; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Gonorrhea; Homosexuality, Male; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Pharyngitis; Sexual and Gender Minorities

Topics: Adolescent; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Heterophile; Antifungal Agents; Azithromycin; Exudates and Transudates; Female; Humans; Infectious Mononucleosis; Palatine Tonsil; Pharyngitis; Ultrasonography

Test of cure (TOC) for. The Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Unit at Public Health England undertook testing of gonococcal and chlamydial nucleic acids within neat urine stored in different conditions over 25 days to provide evidence of the stability of the nucleic acid prior to recruitment. Individuals diagnosed with uncomplicated NG or CT infection were recruited from three sexual health clinics. Individuals were asked to return nine self-taken samples from the site of infection over a course of 35 days. Survival analyses of time to first negative NAAT result for NG and CT infection and univariate regression analysis of factors that affect time to clearance were undertaken.. At room temperature, chlamydial DNA in urine is stable for up to 3 weeks and gonococcal DNA for up to 11 days. We analysed data for 147 infections (81 NG and 66 CT). The median time to clearance of infection was 4 days (IQR 2-10 days) for NG infection and 10 days (IQR 7-14 days) for CT infection. Vaginal CT infections took longer to clear (p=0.031). NG infection in men who have sex with men took longer to clear (p=0.052).. Chlamydial and gonococcal nucleic acids are stable in urine before addition of preservatives, longer than recommended by the manufacturer. The TOC results suggest that it may be possible to undertake TOC for NG and CT infections earlier than current guidelines suggest and that anatomical site of infection may affect time to clearance of infection.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Ceftriaxone; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydia trachomatis; Doxycycline; Feasibility Studies; Female; Gonorrhea; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; Pharyngitis; Proctitis; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urethritis; Vulvovaginitis; Young Adult

An 18-year-old woman presented to clinic with acute pharyngitis with 4/4 Centor criteria. Rapid streptococcal antigen test was negative. The patient, who was allergic to penicillin, was prescribed azithromycin. Ultimately, after 5 days and without any corticosteroids, she presented to the emergency department with 10/10 chest pain and was admitted to the intensive care unit. CT showed nodular lung disease and blood cultures on admission grew

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chest Pain; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Fusobacterium; Fusobacterium Infections; Heart Arrest; Humans; Lemierre Syndrome; Pharyngitis

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Ceftriaxone; Computer Simulation; Disease Transmission, Infectious; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Gonorrhea; Humans; Male; Neisseria meningitidis; Pharyngitis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Humans; Pharyngitis; Unnecessary Procedures

Herein we report a case of cat scratch disease on account of its atypical presentation.. A 21-year-old woman presented erythema nodosum associated with painful bilateral inguinal adenopathy, odynophagia, joint pain and evening urticaria in a setting of impaired general condition. Initial serological testing for Bartonella henselae was negative. PCR for Bartonella henselae performed on an adenectomy fragment was positive. A favourable outcome was achieved with azithromycin.. This case shows an atypical and severe presentation of cat scratch disease and raises the problem of sensitivity of serotyping.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Arthralgia; Azithromycin; Bartonella henselae; Bartonella Infections; Cats; Erythema Nodosum; Female; Humans; Ketoprofen; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Diseases; Pharyngitis; Pristinamycin; Urticaria; Wound Infection; Young Adult

Group A streptococci (GAS) are responsible for up to 30% of cases of pharyngitis in children, and such children do not benefit from treatment with antibiotics. During the last decade, increased resistance to macrolides has emerged as a critical issue in the treatment of GAS pharyngitis. The objective of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance of group A beta haemolytic Streptococcus isolated from outpatient children. From 2002 to 2006, 96 GAS strains were obtained from the pharynx of outpatients having symptoms of acute pharyngitis. Antibiotic resistance was determined by disc susceptibility tests according to CLSI standards. The presence of ermA, ermB and mefA was established by the amplification of streptococcal DNA with specific primers. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests revealed that all the strains tested were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, penicillin and ceftriaxone. Simultaneously, high levels of resistance to macrolides were evident; 78% of the isolates were resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin. No significant change in the yearly or seasonal incidence of resistance was observed. We describe high antimicrobial resistance of GAS to macrolides in outpatient children (78%), which can be explained by the frequent use of macrolides in the treatment of such individuals. Therefore, macrolides should not be the first drug of choice.

Topics: Azithromycin; Bacterial Proteins; Child; Child, Preschool; Clindamycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Erythromycin; Genes, Bacterial; Humans; Latvia; Macrolides; Membrane Proteins; Methyltransferases; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes

Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Humans; India; Penicillin G Benzathine; Pharyngitis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rheumatic Fever; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Streptococcal Infections

In recent years, the number of the patients with pharyngeal infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis is believed to be on the rise due to diversification in sexual behaviors. In addition, pharyngeal infection by C. trachomatis is often asymptomatic, and this is also believed to be a major factor for the increase of the disease. In this study, we conducted a survey among general females and commercial sex workers (CSWs) to study their sexual behavior and prevalence of chlamydial infections (in uterine cervix and pharynx). The results showed that orogenital contact has become a common act, even for general females. Chlamydial infections of uterine cervix were found in 33.3% and 7.9% of CSWs and general females, respectively. Chlamydial infections of pharynx were found in 22.5% and 5.2% of CSWs and general females, respectively. The evaluation of treatments of these infections with clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and azithromycin showed that 7, 10, and 14 days administrations of 400 mg clarithromycin, 7, 10, and 14 days administrations of 300 mg levofloxacin, and a single dose of 1000 mg of azithromycin, would eradicate 100% of C. trachomatis for infections of uterine cervix. For pharyngeal infections, 10 and 14 days administrations of clarithromycin and levofloxacin were shown to eradicate 100% of C. trachomatis. However, the eradication rates for 7 days administrations of clarithromycin and levofloxacin were 83.9% and 86.2%, respectively, and the rate for a single dose of azithromycin was 85.0%. From these results, it was thought that more than 10 days of administrations of clarithromycin or fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents such as levofloxacin are necessary to treat pharyngeal chlamydial infection. Clinical significance of pharyngeal chlamydial infection is still not clear; however, this study have shown the need for more detailed investigations using culture assay, in corporation with doctors in otolaryngology and internal medicine.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydia trachomatis; Clarithromycin; Female; Humans; Japan; Levofloxacin; Ofloxacin; Pharyngitis; Prevalence; Sex Work; Sexual Behavior; Uterine Diseases

To report a case of persistent hiccups associated by azithromycin therapy.. A 76-year-old man presented with persistent hiccups after beginning azithromycin for the treatment of pharyngitis. Hiccups were persistent and exhausting. Discontinuation of azithromycin and therapy with baclofen finally resolved hiccups. No organic cause of hiccups was identified despite extensive investigation.. Pharmacotherapeutic agents have been uncommonly associated with hiccups. Corticosteroids (dexamethasone and methylprednisolone), benzodiazepines (midazolam) and general anaesthesia have been the specific agents mentioned most frequently in the literature as being associated with the development of hiccups. Few cases of drug-induced hiccups have been reported related to macrolide antimicrobials. Using the Naranjo adverse effect reaction probability scale this event could be classified as possible (score 5 points), mostly because of the close temporal sequence, previous reports on this reaction with other macrolides and the absence of any alternative explanation for hiccups. Our hypothesis is that a vagal mechanism mediated by azithromycin could be the pathogenesis of hiccups in our patient.. Diagnosis of drug-induced hiccups is difficult and often achieved only by a process of elimination. However, macrolide antimicrobials have been reported to be associated with hiccups and vagal mechanism could explain the development of this side-effect.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Hiccup; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis

In the present study, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of azithromycin and roxithromycin for 200 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from outpatients with tonsillopharyngitis were determined using Etest. All but one (99.5%) of the isolates were sensitive to both antibiotics; the MIC of the resistant isolate being 12 mg/l to azithromycin and 32 mg/l to roxithromycin. In this region, macrolides remain the drug of choice for the treatment of patients with S. pyogenes tonsillitis who present allergy to penicillin. The routine testing of susceptibility of S. pyogenes to macrolides in northern Israel is not justified.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Israel; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Roxithromycin; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

A total of 341 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes from Vienna, Austria and three Hungarian cities were tested for susceptibility to four macrolides and 12 other antibiotics. All isolates were fully susceptible to penicillin and the other beta-lactams tested. A high level of tetracycline resistance was found in Austria (26.7%) and in Hungary (30.5%). The rate of resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin was 4.7% in Vienna and 3.7% in the Hungarian communities. In both countries, the MIC(90) values of erythromycin and clarithromycin were 0.12 mg/L and the MIC(90) of josamycin was 0.5mg/L. The M phenotype of resistance conferred by the mefA genes was predominant (n = 9) among the macrolide-resistant isolates (n = 14).

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Austria; Azithromycin; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactams; Clarithromycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Erythromycin; Female; Humans; Hungary; Josamycin; Macrolides; Membrane Proteins; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pharyngitis; Pharynx; Skin; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tetracycline Resistance; Tonsillitis; Vagina

Topics: Actinomycetaceae; Actinomycetales Infections; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Pharyngitis

A total of 2865 strains of the causative organisms isolated from the patients with acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis at the primary medical institutions were used in this study. The MICs of levofloxacin (LVFX) and other oral antimicrobial drugs were determined and evaluated by the NCCLS guideline. LVFX, cefditoren (CDTR) and cefcapene (CFPN) were potently active against 773 isolates of Hemophilus influenzae, the MIC50S of LVFX being < or = 0.06 microgram/mL and also the same as the MIC90S of LVFX. LVFX was the most active against 496 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. The MIC50S of LVFX were < or = 0.06 microgram/mL and were lower than those of CDTR, cefdinir (CFDN) and cefpodoxime (CPDX) (MIC50S: 0.5 microgram/mL). The MIC90S of these cephems were markedly higher than the respective MIC50S, whereas MIC50 of LVFX was 0.12 microgram/mL, only twice the MIC50. Against the majority of Streptococcus pyogenes (555 isolates) and Streptococcus spp. (495 isolates), CDTR, CFDN, CPDX and CFPN were highly active (MICs: < or = 0.06 microgram/mL), and clarithromycin (CAM) and azithromycin (AZM) were also active against these organisms (MICs: 0.12 to 0.25 microgram/mL). Against S. pneumoniae (92 isolates), CDTR and CFDN were active (MIC50S: 0.12 and 0.25 microgram/mL, respectively). However, the MIC90S of these drugs were 4-8 times the MIC50S. Against Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis (454 isolates), LVFX was potently active, the MIC90 of LVFX being < or = 0.06 microgram/mL and MIC90S of the other cephems being 0.5 microgram/mL or more. When the susceptibility of these strains to LVFX was evaluated by the NCCLS guideline, about 3% of other Streptococcus spp. were resistant to the drug but no test strains resistant to LVFX were detected in H. influenzae, S. pyogenes or Enterobacteriaceae. On the other hand, the percentages of strains susceptible to the cephems tested were 60-90%, which were quite different according to kinds of drugs and species used. Furthermore, the strains of S. pneumoniae resistant to CFDN and CPDX, and those to CAM and AZM were 21-25% and 50% or more, respectively, whereas no LVFX-resistant strains were detected. The major pathogens isolated from patients with pharyngitis and tonsillitis in the primary institutions were highly susceptible to LVFX. These results suggest that LVFX is a useful drug which is potently active against the strains resistant to oral cephem and macrolide antibiotics.

Topics: Acute Disease; Ampicillin; Anti-Infective Agents; Azithromycin; Cefdinir; Cefpodoxime; Ceftizoxime; Cephalosporins; Clarithromycin; Enterobacteriaceae; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Levofloxacin; Ofloxacin; Penicillin G; Pharyngitis; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Humans; Penicillin Resistance; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections

We compared recommended doses of 2 oral macrolide antibiotics (10 days of clarithromycin, 5 days of azithromycin) for eradicating group A streptococci from the throats of individuals aged > or = 12 years with symptomatic pharyngitis and a positive throat culture. Patients received either clarithromycin (250 mg b.i.d. for 10 days [n=260]) or azythromycin (500 mg on day 1, followed by 250 mg q.d. for 4 days [n=265]). Follow-up throat cultures were obtained both at 13--19 days and at 28--38 days. We evaluated 392 patients (median age, 26 years; clarithromycin, 194 patients; azyithromycin, 198 patients). Ten days of clarithromycin therapy was more effective than 5 days of azithromycin therapy in eradicating the organism (91% [176/194] vs. 82% [162/198]; P=.012). More than 97% of all streptococcal isolates were macrolide-sensitive. Whether these bacteriologic eradication rates were the result of the 2 macrolides compared or were due to differences in duration of therapy could not be determined, but the statistically significant difference in eradication of group A streptococci does raise additional questions about shortened courses of macrolide therapy for this common infection.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Clarithromycin; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Disease; Adenoids; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Tonsillitis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Infant; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillin V; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

35 children between 9 months and 12 years of ages were given 9.1 to 12.2 mg/kg of azithromycin (AZM) once a day for 3 days. In the treatment of pediatric infectious diseases, we studied pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safetiness of AZM. After administration of 10 mg/kg/day of AZM for 3 days, the elimination half-life was calculated to be 3.8 +/- 16.3 hours (n = 6, mean +/- S.D.). The excretion rate of AZM in the urine within 120 hours of administration was 9.0 +/- 2.3% (n = 5). For the evaluation of efficacy of AZM, we treated 33 cases of children with pharyngotonsillitis, bronchitis, mycoplasma bronchitis, pneumonia, mycoplasma pneumonia, atypical pneumonia, and SSTI. The efficacy rate of these cases were 93.9%. 6 strains of bacteria were identified as causative agents. All strains were eradicated upon the treatment. One case of elevated GOT and GPT and two cases of elevated GPT were observed. No clinical adverse reactions were observed. In conclusion, AZM was useful for the treatment of pediatric infectious diseases were examined.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bronchitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Infant; Male; Mycoplasma Infections; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia; Tonsillitis

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Penicillin V; Penicillins; Pharyngitis; Prognosis; Streptococcal Infections

Azithromycin (AZM), a newly developed azalide antibiotic, was administered at a standard dose of 10 mg/kg once daily for 3 days to pediatric patients with bacterial infections and the therapeutic efficacy of AZM was investigated. 1. A total of 12 patients with the following diseases was evaluated: pharyngitis in two, tonsillitis in four, bronchitis in one, Mycoplasma pneumonia in one, scarlet fever in two and enteritis in two. The drug was rated "excellent" in eight cases and "good" in four. 2. Eleven strains were isolated from patients: five strains of Streptococcus pyogenes, four strains of Haemophilus influenzae, and two strains of Haemophilus parainfluenzae. Isolated bacteria were eradicated in eight strains and persisting in one, resulting in 88.9% in eradication rate. No follow-up examinations in post-treatment were performed in two cases. 3. No adverse reaction was reported, while one case of eosinophilia was noted as an abnormal laboratory test value. 4. As far as compliance is concerned, patients claimed that the formulation of the drug is "easy to take" or "ordinary". With the results presented as above, we have concluded that AZM is a useful antibiotic in pediatric patients with bacterial infections.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Capsules; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Female; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Streptococcus pyogenes; Tonsillitis

Azithromycin (AZM) was orally administered to 12 pediatric patients with the following bacterial infections: pharyngitis in four cases, tonsillitis in one, pharyngo-bronchitis in two, and mycoplasmal pneumonia in five. In eleven of the twelve cases (91.7%) was the drug found effective. Neither abnormal clinical findings nor abnormal laboratory test results changes were observed. Eleven of the twelve pediatric patients claimed that the formulation of the drug is easy to take. The above results suggest that AZM is a useful antibiotic drug in the treatment of pediatric patients with bacterial infections.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Tonsillitis

Fine granules or capsules of azithromycin (AZM) were given to 32 pediatric patients for the treatment of the following diseases: pharyngitis in three cases; tonsillitis in one; bronchitis in six; pneumonia in six; mycoplasmal pneumonia in 14; pertussis and enteritis in one, each. Effectiveness of AZM was evaluated in 30 cases and the drug was rated "excellent" in 18 patients, "good" in 11 and "fair" in one, resulting in a total efficacy rate of 96.7%. Three strains of bacteria were isolated from 3 patients as the causative organisms including: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae, from three different patients, respectively. One patient complained of mild diarrhea, another patient mild urticaria. Abnormal laboratory test results were reported as follows: one patient showed a slight decrease in leukocyte count, three patients showed slight increases in eosinophils, and one patient had slight elevations in GOT and GPT. The above results suggest that AZM is a useful antibiotic drug in the treatment of pediatric patients with various bacterial infections.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pharyngitis; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Tonsillitis

Azithromycin activity in vivo has been studied in a group of children with acute respiratory tract infections in order to test the efficacy and tolerability of this antibiotic. The study involved 135 children treated with a single daily 10 mg/kg dose of azithromycin for three consecutive days. Ten days after this treatment 100% of children with otitis media, tracheobronchitis, or rhinosinusitis and 95.9% of children with pharyngo-tonsillitis were cured. Recurrences were never observed. Azithromycin proved remarkably effective for treatment of acute respiratory infections and otitis media in children. Tolerability and therapeutic compliance were excellent.

Topics: Acute Disease; Azithromycin; Bacteria; Bronchitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Otitis Media; Pharyngitis; Respiratory Tract Infections; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Tonsillitis; Tracheitis

Azithromycin is an azalide antibiotic. On the basis of data in adults, azithromycin appears to have a greater distribution into tissues, a longer elimination half-life, and a lower incidence of adverse effects than the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin. However, little about the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in children is known. The objective of our study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin after oral administration of multiple doses of suspension to children with streptococcal pharyngitis. Fourteen children (6 to 15 years of age) received a single oral dose of 10 mg of azithromycin per kg of body weight on day 1 followed by single daily doses of 5 mg/kg on days 2 to 5. Each child fasted overnight before receiving the final dose on day 5. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after this last dose. Concentrations of azithromycin in serum were measured by a specific high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. The mean +/- standard deviation for maximum concentration of drug in serum, time to maximum concentration of drug in serum, and area under the curve (0 to 24 h) were 383 +/- 142 ng/ml, 2.4 +/- 1.1 h, and 3,109 +/- 1,033 ng.h/ml, respectively. Concentrations in serum at 0 h (predose) and at 24, 48, and 72 h after the final dose were 67 +/- 31, 64 +/- 24, 41 +/- 17, and 29 +/- 14 ng/ml, respectively. Thus, once-daily administration of azithromycin resulted in sustained systemic exposure to the drug.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Erythromycin; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Suspensions