zithromax and Periapical-Periodontitis

zithromax has been researched along with Periapical-Periodontitis* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for zithromax and Periapical-Periodontitis

ArticleYear
Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Microorganisms Isolated from Periapical Periodontitis Lesions.
    The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 2016, Volume: 57, Issue:3

    Periapical periodontitis usually results from microbial infection, with these microorganisms occasionally migrating to the root canal, which can lead to further, potentially life-threatening, complications. Here, the susceptibility of 27 bacterial strains to various antimicrobial agents was evaluated. These strains comprised 13 species; 16 of the strains were clinical isolates from periapical lesions. Each strain was inoculated onto blood agar plates containing one of the antimicrobial agents. The plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 96 hr and the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined. Ten strains required an MIC of 32 μg/ml or greater for amoxicillin, 6 for cefmetazole, and 5 for cefcapene among β-lactam antibiotics; 8 strains required an MIC of 32 μg/ml or greater for clindamycin, 4 for azithromycin, and 11 for clarithromycin among macrolide antibiotics; 3 strains required an MIC of 32 μg/ml or greater for ciprofloxacin and 2 for ofloxacin among fluoroquinolones. The effect of cefcapene on 5 strains was evaluated after biofilm formation to investigate the relationship between biofilm formation and susceptibility. All strains showed a decrease in susceptibility after biofilm formation. The results revealed that several antimicrobial agents commonly used in a clinical setting, including amoxicillin, cefmetazole, and clindamycin, are potentially effective in the treatment of orofacial odontogenic infections. The development of resistant strains, however, means that this can no longer be guaranteed. In addition, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin were more effective than the 3 β-lactam antibiotics tested. These results suggest that sensitivity testing is needed if odontogenic infections are to be treated safely and effectively.

    Topics: Actinomyces; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Biofilms; Campylobacter; Cefmetazole; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Clarithromycin; Clindamycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fusobacteria; Haemophilus; Humans; Klebsiella; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Ofloxacin; Periapical Periodontitis; Porphyromonas; Propionibacterium; Staphylococcus hominis; Veillonella

2016
Periodontal tissue disposition of azithromycin in patients affected by chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases.
    Journal of periodontology, 1999, Volume: 70, Issue:9

    The recognition that periodontal diseases are associated with specific pathogens has led to interest in the use of antibacterial drugs for inhibition of these microorganisms. On these bases, the present study was aimed at evaluating the tissue distribution of the new macrolide antibiotic azithromycin in patients subjected to oral surgery for chronic inflammatory diseases of both marginal and periapical periodontium.. Thirty-two patients were treated with azithromycin 500 mg/day orally for 3 consecutive days, and drug concentrations in plasma, saliva, normal gingiva, and pathological periodontal tissues were evaluated. For this purpose, samples of blood, saliva, normal gingiva, granulation tissue, and radicular granuloma or cyst wall (from dentigerous cyst) were collected during oral surgery or 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 days after the end of pharmacological treatment; then, azithromycin levels were measured by a microbiological plate assay, using Micrococcus luteus NCTC 8440 as the indicator organism.. The concentrations of azithromycin in plasma, saliva, normal gingiva, and pathological tissues reached the highest values 12 hours after the last dose (0.37+/-0.05 mg/l, 2.12+/-0.30 mg/l, 6.30+/-0.68 mg/kg, and 11.60+/-1.50 mg/kg, respectively) and then declined gradually. Consistent levels of the drug in normal gingiva and pathological tissues could be detected, however, up to 6.5 days, indicating that azithromycin was retained in target tissues for a long time after the end of treatment. Moreover, azithromycin levels in both normal gingiva and pathological tissues exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations of most pathogens involved in the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases. Notably, azithromycin levels in pathological tissues were significantly higher than those in normal gingiva 0.5, 2.5, and 4.5 days after the last dose.. The present results indicate a marked penetration of azithromycin into both normal and pathological periodontal tissues, suggesting that azithromycin represents a promising option in both adjunctive and prophylactic treatments of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chronic Disease; Dentigerous Cyst; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gingiva; Granulation Tissue; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Micrococcus; Middle Aged; Periapical Granuloma; Periapical Periodontitis; Periapical Tissue; Periodontitis; Periodontium; Saliva; Tissue Distribution

1999