zibotentan and Prostatic-Neoplasms

Recently, novel therapies of prostate cancer, such as immunotherapy, endothelin receptor antagonists, novel androgen receptor antagonist and novel taxanes, and others have been introduced into clinical practice. This study was performed to summarize these results of immunotherapy and endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and derive a more precise estimation of their effect on future treatment. The PubMed database, references of published trials, and review articles were searched. Two reviewers independently extracted data of these trials. We used hazard ratios (HRs) to assess the effects on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or time to disease progression (TTP), and relative risk (RR) for the different types of toxicity. In addition, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) give a sense of the precision of the estimate. Nine randomized controlled trials were ultimately identified. The pooled HR showed that immunotherapy could prolong OS significantly in patients with CRPC compared to placebo (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58-0.83, p < 0.001). Endothelin receptor antagonists also had modest benefits (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00, p = 0.046). Nevertheless, there were no significant benefits from both therapies on PFS or TTP. In addition, immunotherapy led to more fatigue, pyrexia, chills, and endothelin receptor antagonists led to more peripheral edema, anemia, and dyspnea. Our article suggested that the very acceptable toxicity and improving OS in patients with CRPC made immunotherapy an attractive option for such patients. However, future studies with thoughtful clinical trial designs are warranted.

Topics: Atrasentan; Disease-Free Survival; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Immunotherapy; Male; Orchiectomy; Proportional Hazards Models; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Tissue Extracts

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in Western countries. Until the last decade, the main available therapeutic options were based on hormonal therapy. For castration-refractory prostate carcinoma, from 2004, the combination of chemotherapy with docetaxel and prednisone has shown to improve survival in this subset of patients. Many agents have been tested either alone or in combination with this standard therapy, trying to find synergistic effects between drugs, and to target specific pathways that influence tumor growth, invasiveness, angiogenesis, and the development of distant metastasis. Endothelin antagonists have been recently studied, as they can get involved in many of these oncogenic pathways, and results are encouraging; nevertheless, the right setting to use them, whether to use them in monotherapy or in combination with other agents, and if they really improve the survival of our patients, are questions that remain to be addressed. In this review, we summarize the role of endothelins in tumoral biology and specifically in prostate carcinoma natural history, and the results obtained in the clinical trials involving this new therapeutic group.

Topics: Atrasentan; Bone and Bones; Carcinoma; Cell Proliferation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endothelins; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines

Despite multiple advances in prostate cancer therapy, treatment options for castration resistant disease are very limited. While data from recent studies are encouraging, there is no drug that has significantly improved results of standard chemotherapy. Some of the most consistent results are provided by antiangiogenic agents, showing high response rates and manageable toxicity. We describe some of the main therapeutic angiogenesis inhibitors in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. These agents include vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antiangiogenic and inmunomodulatory agents and endothelin receptor antagonists.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Atrasentan; Benzenesulfonates; Castration; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelins; Humans; Indoles; Lenalidomide; Male; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrroles; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sorafenib; Sunitinib; Thalidomide; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Patients with prostate cancer who have progression of their disease while on androgen deprivation therapy have limited therapeutic options. Docetaxel is currently the only agent that increases overall survival in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer; additional agents are needed.. This review will describe the importance of endothelin-1 (ET-1) for growth of prostate cancer cells, development of bone metastases, and pain responses; the preclinical data for zibotentan, a specific inhibitor of the ET(A) receptor; and the clinical development of atrasentan, a first-generation ET receptor inhibitor, and zibotentan, a more selective inhibitor of the ET(A) receptor.. Readers will understand the importance of ET-1 as a novel pathway to target for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer due to its association with prostate cancer growth, metastases to bone, and pain. Readers will learn about the preclinical and clinical development of zibotentan, including the promising Phase II results that have resulted in an extensive Phase III clinical trials program.. Modulating the activity of ET-1 through the ET(A) receptor is a novel target for treating patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. There are currently three ongoing Phase III trials with zibotentan, a selective ET(A) inhibitor, to determine the effect of this agent on overall survival in these patients.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Humans; Male; Molecular Structure; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines

Overexpression of the endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor has been found in a number of human cancer cell lines. Activation of the ET(A) receptor by endothelin-1 (ET-1) promotes cell proliferation and survival in these tumors, whereas activation of the endothelin B (ET(B)) receptor results in an opposing effect. Therefore, blockade of ET(A) may have antitumor effects, while sparing ET(B)-mediated effects such as induction of apoptosis and clearance of ET-1.. ZD4054 is an orally bioavailable, specific ET(A) antagonist currently being investigated in prostate cancer. In receptor-binding studies, ZD4054 only bound to ET(A), with no binding detected towards ET(B). Prostate cancer cell lines are known to produce ET-1 and there is a relative increase in expression of ET(A) to ET(B) in these cancers. There is also an association of greater ET(A) expression in higher grade versus lower grade tumors, suggesting that ET(A) may be involved in the malignant transformation process. As ET-1 may also mediate nociceptive effects and osteoblastic effects, there is much interest in clinically assessing ZD4054 in prostate cancer.. The data describing the endothelin axis, the role of ET(A) and ET(B) in malignancy, and the effects of ET(A) antagonist ZD4054 in prostate cancer, as demonstrated in preclinical and clinical studies, are reviewed.. Further investigation of ZD4054 in prostate cancer is warranted, and Phase III trials are already planned in patients with non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with rising prostate specific antigen values, metastatic (asymptomatic) CRPC, and in metastatic CRPC in combination with docetaxel, assessing either differences in progression-free survival and overall survival or overall survival alone.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Bone Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Male; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Receptor, Endothelin A

Endothelins are a family of peptide compounds which exert regulatory control over cellular processes important for growth, survival, invasion, and angiogenesis. In particular, endothelin-1, acting primarily through the endothelin-A receptor, is implicated in the neoplastic growth of multiple tumor types. In preclinical models, endothelin antagonism inhibits tumor cell proliferation, invasiveness, and new vessel formation, as well as attenuates osteoblastic and pain-related responses to tumor. Clinical testing of an orally bioavailable endothelin antagonist has demonstrated benefit in PSA progression, markers of bone turnover, and pain in men with prostate cancer, but has not demonstrated significant improvement in survival or time to cancer progression. Although this class of drugs is promising for targeted anti-cancer therapy, their role in treatment remains to be defined by completion of future clinical trials.

Topics: Atrasentan; Bosentan; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Endothelin; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides

Recent advances in the understanding of prostate cancer biology and its progression to bone metastasis have led to the development of drugs directed against precise molecular alterations in the prostate tumor cell and host cells in the normal bone environment such as osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Endothelins (ETs) and their receptors have emerged as a potential target in prostate cancer bone metastasis. By activating the ETA receptor, ET-1 is pathogenically involved in facilitating several aspects of prostate cancer progression, including proliferation, escape from apoptosis, invasion, and new bone formation, processes that are general to many malignancies. Notwithstanding, there are a number of features specifically driven by the ET axis in prostate cancer, such as creating and perpetuating a unique interaction between the metastatic prostate cancer cell and the bone microenvironment (osteoblast, osteoclast, and stroma) or altering the equilibrium in pain modulation. These features have led to the preferential clinical evaluation of atrasentan (ABT-627) as a biological therapy in prostate carcinoma, first in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Biological activity of atrasentan in patients with prostate cancer has been shown by the suppression of biochemical markers of prostate cancer progression in bone, and clinical activity is evidenced by a consistent trend demonstrating a delay in time to disease progression when compared with placebo, especially in patients with bone metastases. Further studies of atrasentan and other selective ET-1 antagonists (ZD4054) are ongoing.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Atrasentan; Bone Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines

PURPOSE As part of the ENTHUSE (Endothelin A Use) program, the efficacy and safety of zibotentan (ZD4054), an oral specific endothelin A receptor antagonist, has been investigated in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study, patients received intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 of 21-day cycles plus oral zibotentan 10 mg or placebo once daily. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to pain and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, pain and PSA response, progression-free survival, health-related quality of life, and safety. Results A total of 1,052 patients received study treatment (docetaxel-zibotentan, n = 524; docetaxel-placebo, n = 528). At the time of data cutoff, there had been 277 and 280 deaths, respectively. There was no difference in OS for patients receiving docetaxel-zibotentan compared with those receiving docetaxel-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.18; P = .963). No significant differences were observed on secondary end points, including time to pain progression (median 9.3 v 10.0 months, respectively) or pain response (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.16; P = .283). The median time to death was 20.0 and 19.2 months for the zibotentan and placebo groups, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events in zibotentan-treated patients were peripheral edema (52.7%), diarrhea (35.4%), alopecia (33.9%), and nausea (33.3%). CONCLUSION Docetaxel plus zibotentan 10 mg/d did not result in a significant improvement in OS compared with docetaxel plus placebo in patients with metastatic CRPC.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Orchiectomy; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Taxoids; Treatment Failure

Understanding the extent of disease in asymptomatic patients with castration resistant prostate cancer is important when making treatment decisions and designing clinical trials. The ENTHUSE M0 (ENdoTHelin A USE) trial (NCT00626548) was a large phase III study comparing the endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan with placebo in patients with nonmetastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer. The study was stopped prematurely after early efficacy review indicated that it was unlikely to meet its co-primary objectives of improved overall and progression-free survival vs placebo. Screening failed in an unexpectedly high number of patients. We investigated this screening failure rate to promote better classification of patients thought to have nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and inform the design of future clinical trials in this setting.. The number of patients enrolled in and subsequently excluded from study was analyzed by geographic region and by the specialty of the investigating clinician (oncology or urology) who enrolled the study patients.. Of 2,577 patients enrolled in a total of 350 hospital based centers in 39 countries screening failed in 1,155 (45%). The most common reason for screening failure was the detection of metastatic disease in 32% of all screened patients and in 71% of those in whom screening failed. The leading reasons for failed screening did not differ between investigator specialties overall or by geographic region.. The high frequency of asymptomatic metastasis in men thought to have nonmetastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer highlights the importance of periodic staging assessments for the condition. Optimal treatment modalities may differ for metastatic and nonmetastatic disease.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Orchiectomy; Prostate; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Survival Rate

Endothelin-1 and the endothelin A (ET(A) ) receptor have been implicated in prostate cancer progression in bone. This study aimed to determine whether the specific ET(A) receptor antagonist, zibotentan, prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases who were pain-free or mildly symptomatic for pain.. Patients were randomized 1:1 to zibotentan 10 mg/day or placebo, plus standard prostate cancer treatment. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included times to pain progression, chemotherapy use, new bone metastases, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using a log-rank test.. A total of 594 patients were randomized (zibotentan, n = 299; placebo, n = 295). Median OS was 24.5 months in zibotentan-treated patients versus 22.5 months for placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95.2% confidence interval, 0.69-1.10; P = .240). No statistically significant differences were observed for any secondary efficacy endpoints. Peripheral edema (44%) and headache (31%) were the most commonly reported adverse events in the zibotentan group. Cardiac failure events were higher in the zibotentan group than placebo (any grade, 5.7% and 1.7%; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3, 3.0% and 1.0%, respectively); these were manageable and reversible.. In this large, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, treatment with zibotentan 10 mg/day did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS in this patient population. Zibotentan had an acceptable safety profile.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Humans; Male; Orchiectomy; Placebos; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Survival; Treatment Outcome

To assess the maximum well-tolerated dose (MWTD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of zibotentan, a novel specific endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.. Patients with metastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were treated with escalating doses of oral zibotentan (ZD4054) 10-200 mg once daily. The initial cohort received 28 daily doses (Period 1). Patients who had evidence of clinical benefit and who had not met any of the criteria for withdrawal were allowed to receive zibotentan at their current dose level until they no longer derived clinical benefit (Period 2). PK of zibotentan and changes in prostate-specific antigen and bone markers were also assessed.. Sixteen patients were evaluable for the safety and single-dose PK analyses. Eleven patients completed Period 1, and nine patients proceeded to Period 2. DLTs were encountered at 22.5 mg; one patient had grade 3 dyspnea and peripheral edema and a second patient had grade 3 headache and intraventricular hemorrhage. Enrollment was expanded at the 15 mg dose level to further determine the safety and tolerability of zibotentan. No DLTs were seen at 15 mg, and the most frequent adverse events were headache, peripheral edema, fatigue, nasal congestion and nausea.. The MWTD for zibotentan was 15 mg orally daily. The predominant adverse events observed were consistent with those reported for this class of drugs, and prolonged stable disease was noted in some patients. Phase III studies with zibotentan in men with metastatic CRPC are ongoing.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Castration; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Zibotentan (ZD4054) is a specific endothelin A receptor antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). In a Phase II trial in patients with pain-free or mildly symptomatic metastatic HRPC, zibotentan was well tolerated with a promising signal for prolonged overall survival compared with placebo. As part of this trial, the impact of zibotentan compared with placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed.. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily oral zibotentan 10 or 15 mg, or matching placebo. Patients were allocated to one of two questionnaires; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) or the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), supplemented by PR25, specific for prostate cancer. Questionnaires were completed at baseline and every 4 weeks until disease progression when study treatment was discontinued.. Compliance with questionnaire completion was >90% (286 of 312 patients) of the intention-to-treat population at baseline. Of baseline completers who were available for assessment (i.e., had not clinically progressed), 89% (164 of 184) and 83% (73 of 88) completed questionnaires at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. HRQoL scores from both questionnaires were high at baseline and remained high throughout the study, with scores being similar in the zibotentan and placebo groups. However, some floor and ceiling effects were seen in the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.. High-baseline HRQoL scores were maintained throughout treatment with zibotentan. The FACT-P instrument was selected to further assess the impact of zibotentan on HRQoL in the Phase III clinical trial program.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

This two-part study assessed the safety and tolerability of combined treatment with zibotentan (ZD4054), a specific endothelin A receptor antagonist, plus docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.. Part A was an open-label, dose-finding phase to determine the safety and toxicity profile of zibotentan in combination with docetaxel. Patients received once-daily oral zibotentan 10 mg (initial cohort) or 15 mg in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) for up to 10 cycles. Part B was a double-blind phase which evaluated the safety and preliminary activity of zibotentan plus docetaxel. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive zibotentan (at the highest tolerated dose identified in part A) plus docetaxel or placebo plus docetaxel.. Six patients were enrolled in part A (n  = 3, zibotentan 10 mg; n = 3, zibotentan 15 mg). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, thus zibotentan 15 mg in combination with docetaxel was evaluated in part B (n = 20, zibotentan plus docetaxel; n = 11, placebo plus docetaxel). CTCAE grade ≥3, most commonly neutropenia or leucopenia, were reported in 10 (50%) and nine (82%) patients in the zibotentan and placebo groups, respectively. One (17%) patient receiving placebo achieved complete response, two (22%) patients receiving zibotentan achieved partial response and stable disease occurred in six (67%) and three (50%) patients receiving zibotentan and placebo, respectively.. The tolerability of zibotentan plus docetaxel was consistent with the known profiles of each drug. Sufficient preliminary activity was seen with this combination to merit continued development.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Docetaxel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Orchiectomy; Pain; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

To report the final analysis of a Phase II trial, which investigated the safety and efficacy of the specific endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan (AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. Patients with CRPC and bone metastases who were pain free or mildly symptomatic for pain were randomized to receive once-daily oral tablets of zibotentan 10 mg, 15 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the time to progression and secondary endpoints included overall survival, change in the number of bone metastases, and safety.. In total, 312 patients were randomized (placebo, n= 107; zibotentan 10 mg, n= 107; zibotentan 15 mg, n= 98). The median duration of study treatment and median follow-up time were 4 and 22 months, respectively. At the final analysis, there were no statistical differences of the primary outcome of time to progression between treatment groups, although an improvement in overall survival was observed in the zibotentan groups compared to placebo. Consistent with the previous analyses for overall survival, hazard ratios (HRs) of less than one were sustained for both zibotentan 15 mg (HR, 0.76; 80% CI, 0.61-0.94; P= 0.103) and 10 mg (HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.67-1.02; P= 0.254). The most commonly reported adverse events considered to be related to zibotentan treatment were peripheral oedema, headache and nasal congestion.. The results obtained in the present study support endothelin A receptor antagonism as an approach for treating patients with CRPC. To confirm the survival signal observed in the present study, zibotentan is being investigated further in the ENdoTHelin A USE (ENTHUSE) Phase III clinical trial programme.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Epidemiologic Methods; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Orchiectomy; Pain; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Treatment Outcome

The endothelin-A receptor (ETAR) has been implicated in the progression of prostate cancer.. To investigate the safety and efficacy of the specific ETAR antagonist ZD4054 in patients with metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC).. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial in patients attending cancer centres with HRPC and bone metastases who were pain free or mildly symptomatic for pain.. Patients were randomised to receive once-daily oral tablets of ZD4054 10 mg, or ZD4054 15 mg, or placebo.. The primary end point was time to progression, defined as clinical progression, requirement for opiate analgesia, objective progression of soft-tissue metastases, or death in the absence of progression. Secondary end points included overall survival, time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and safety. Statistical significance was preset at 20%.. A total of 312 patients were randomised (ZD4054 10 mg, n=107; ZD4054 15 mg, n=98; placebo, n=107). At the primary analysis, median time to progression was 3.6 mo, 4.0 mo, and 3.8 mo in the placebo, ZD4054 10 mg, and ZD4054 15 mg groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between ZD4054 groups and placebo (hazard ratio [HR] vs placebo for the ZD4054 10mg group: 0.88 [80% CI: 0.71-1.09]; HR vs placebo for the ZD4054 15 mg group: 0.83 [80% CI: 0.66-1.03]). However, a signal for prolonged overall survival was observed in the ZD4054 treatment groups versus placebo, based on 40 deaths. At a subsequent analysis after 118 deaths, this survival benefit was confirmed (HR vs placebo for the ZD4054 10 mg group, 0.55 [80% CI: 0.41-0.73], p=0.008; HR vs placebo for the ZD4054 15 mg group, 0.65 [80% CI: 0.49-0.86], p=0.052) but the differences in time to progression remained nonsignificant. Median overall survival was 17.3 mo, 24.5 mo, and 23.5 mo in the placebo group, the ZD4054 10 mg group, and the ZD4054 15 mg group, respectively. Discordance between results for time to progression and overall survival may be due to the sensitivity of the definition of progression. Adverse events were in line with the expected pharmacologic effects of an ETAR antagonist.. The primary end point of time to progression was not achieved in this study, but an improvement was seen in overall survival in both active treatment arms. ZD4054 was well tolerated.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00090363.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bone Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Pain Measurement; Probability; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Receptor, Endothelin A; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Zibotentan, an endothelin-A receptor antagonist, has been used in the treatment of various cardiovascular disorders and neoplasia. Castrated athymic nude mice receiving zibotentan for a preclinical xenograft efficacy study experienced weight loss, gastrointestinal bloat, and the presence of an audible respiratory click. Human side effects have been reported in the nasal cavity, so we hypothesized that the nasal cavity is a target for toxicity in mice receiving zibotentan. Lesions in the nasal cavity predominantly targeted olfactory epithelium in treated mice and were more pronounced in castrated animals. Minimal lesions were present in vehicle control animals, which suggested possible gavage-related reflux injury. The incidence, distribution, and morphology of lesions suggested direct exposure to the nasal mucosa and a possible systemic effect targeting the olfactory epithelium, driven by a type 2 immune response, with group 2 innate lymphoid cell involvement. Severe nasal lesions may have resulted in recurrent upper airway obstruction, leading to aerophagia and associated clinical morbidity. These data show the nasal cavity is a target of zibotentan when given by gavage in athymic nude mice, and such unanticipated and off-target effects could impact interpretation of research results and animal health in preclinical studies.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Lymphocytes; Male; Mice; Mice, Nude; Nasal Cavity; Olfactory Mucosa; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Bone metastasis is a painful complication of advanced prostate cancer. Endothelin-1 is a tumor-secreted factor that plays a central role in osteoblast activation and the osteosclerotic response of prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Antagonists that block the activation of the endothelin A receptor (ETAR), located on osteoblasts, reduce osteoblastic bone lesions in animal models of bone metastasis. However, ETAR antagonists demonstrated limited efficacy in clinical trials of men with advanced prostate cancer who also received standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Previous data from our group suggested that, in a mouse model, ETAR antagonists might only be efficacious when androgen signaling in the osteoblast is lowered beyond the ability of standard ADT. This notion was tested in a mouse model of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Castrated and sham-operated male athymic nude mice underwent intracardiac inoculation of the ARCaPM castration-resistant prostate cancer cell line. The mice were then treated with either the ETAR antagonist zibotentan or a vehicle control to generate four experimental groups: vehicle+sham (Veh+Sham), vehicle+castrate (Veh+Castr), zibotentan+sham (Zibo+Sham), and zibotentan+castrate (Zibo+Castr). The mice were monitored radiographically for the development of skeletal lesions. The Zibo+Castr group had significantly longer survival and a single incidental lesion. Mice in the Zibo+Sham group had the shortest survival and the largest number of skeletal lesions. Survival and skeletal lesions of the Veh+Sham and Veh+Castr groups were intermediate compared with the zibotentan-treated groups. We report a complex interaction between ETAR and androgen signaling, whereby ETAR blockade was most efficacious when combined with complete androgen deprivation.

Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Male; Mice; Orchiectomy; Osteoblasts; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Receptor, Endothelin A

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment options in the UK for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been limited, and there is no standard approach, particularly in the second-line setting. The absence of a standard approach is further confounded by the differing definitions and terminologies still used in clinical practice to describe this group of patients (e.g. androgen-independent prostate cancer, hormone refractory prostate cancer, CRPC). With multiple new treatment options emerging, it will be critical to identify key considerations in our decision-making process and to establish an optimum, standardized approach to treatment so that new therapies can be assimilated into an mCRPC treatment algorithm and our routine clinical practice. Most UK oncologists consider patients with advanced, symptomatic prostate cancer as eligible for chemotherapy, although a poor performance status, significant co-morbid factors, advancing age, and the presence of asymptomatic disease with slowly rising prostate-specific antigen levels would prevent chemotherapy use. The decision to retreat with chemotherapy is largely driven by prior response to first-line chemotherapy. Many UK oncologists feel that UK clinical practice is likely to change over the next 5 years, with abiraterone acetate, MDV3100 and cabazitaxel likely to have the most positive impacts in the treatment of mCRPC.. To evaluate the current management of patients with advanced prostate cancer by UK oncologists. To gain insights into the future role of emerging therapies.. A semi-structured questionnaire was issued by the British Uro-oncology Group to society members during a closed meeting in September 2010. Emerging therapies evaluated were: abiraterone acetate, aflibercept, bevacizumab, cabazitaxel, custirsen, MDV3100, sipuleucel-T and zibotentan.. Eighty of 98 (82%) surveys were completed. Responders had on average 189 new referrals, and treated 126 patients with advanced prostate cancer each year. Chemotherapy was used by 86% of responders for patients with symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), although poor performance status, advancing age and slowly rising prostate-specific antigen levels would prevent chemotherapy use. The decision to retreat with chemotherapy was largely driven by prior response to first-line chemotherapy, with docetaxel preferred for those responding. Many (78%) felt that UK clinical practice was likely to change over the next 5 years, and that abiraterone acetate, MDV3100 and cabazitaxel would have the most positive impact. Opinions regarding the future use of aflibercept and custirsen were mixed. Few (≤3%) would use zibotentan or bevacizumab in the future based on recent negative phase III study results, or because of cost and complexity for sipuleucel-T.. Although emerging therapies for mCRPC mean that the future is bright, guidelines are needed to ensure optimum use and sequencing of treatments. Additional costs and anticipated workload associated with new agents will require careful consideration.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Androstenols; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Attitude of Health Personnel; Benzamides; Bevacizumab; Forecasting; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Orchiectomy; Phenylthiohydantoin; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Retreatment; Surveys and Questionnaires; Taxoids; Therapies, Investigational; Thionucleotides; Tissue Extracts; Urology

Topics: Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines

Despite that greater knowledge of prostate cancer biology has led to the isolation of many new and promising targets, treatment of metastatic prostate cancer is still challenging. New agents targeting these molecules are currently under development in large randomized phase III trials, to improve overall survival and the quality of life of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostatic cancer (CRPC). Cytotoxic chemotherapy (docetaxel-based chemotherapy) demonstrated clinical benefit on overall survival, but could be improved. Drugs targeting directly or not the androgen receptor such as abiraterone or new specific peripheral anti-androgens (MDV3100) are very promising. Bone targeted therapies (endothelin1 receptor A inhibitor, RANK ligant, metabolic irradiation) are also very promising and are in development in large phase III trials. Antiangiogenic therapies could also be effective in CRPC. Autologous vaccin against prostatic acid phosphatase seems to prolong overall survival and other vaccin and immunotherapy strategies are in development (anti-CTLA4 antibody). A recent analogue of thalidomide, probably more efficient, lenalidomide is also in development.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Androstenols; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bone Neoplasms; Castration; Denosumab; Epothilones; ErbB Receptors; Furans; Humans; Immunotherapy; Ketones; Male; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; RANK Ligand

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoactive peptide but also mitogenic and pro-angiogenic. ET-1 exerts its actions via two G protein-coupled receptors, ETA and ETB. ET-1 is involved in the progression of prostate cancer. Its actions affect the tumor cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, angiogenesis, migration, invasion, metastasis to the bone growth. Inhibitors of receptors of ET-1 in clinical development are the atrasentan and ZD4054. This article reports on controlled, randomized, phase II and III studies on this new therapeutic class.

Topics: Atrasentan; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines

To investigate potential differences in zibotentan pharmacokinetics between Japanese and Caucasian patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) following single and multiple dosing.. In the Japanese study, 18 patients received a single dose of zibotentan 5, 10 or 15 mg followed by 72 h washout before 26 days' once-daily dosing. In the Caucasian study, 21 patients received a single dose of zibotentan 5, 10 or 15 mg followed by 72 h washout before 12 days' once-daily dosing.. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between populations. Absorption of zibotentan was rapid with maximum plasma concentrations typically achieved within 3 h of dosing. Mean clearance, 17.9 and 18.7 ml/min in Japanese and Caucasian patients, respectively (range 7.0 - 36.3 ml/min in Japanese patients and 7.8 - 29.5 ml/min in Caucasian patients) and volume of distribution, 14.0 and 15.6 l for Japanese and Caucasian patients, respectively (range 7.9 - 29.1 l in Japanese patients and 9.6 - 23.8 l in Caucasian patients) were relatively low, and t1/2 was approximately 12 h (range 5.7 - 18.8 h in Japanese patients and 5.0 - 22.9 h in Caucasian patients) following single dosing. Little accumulation was observed following daily dosing and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics were predictable. Exposure levels achieved in some Japanese patients receiving zibotentan 15 mg were higher than those observed in Caucasian patients, however, this may be due to differences in body weight, as exposure levels were similar when data were normalized for body weight. Zibotentan was well tolerated in both populations.. There are no clinically relevant differences in the disposition and pharmacokinetics of zibotentan between Japanese and Caucasian patients with HRPC.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Body Weight; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Half-Life; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Tissue Distribution; White People

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic