zabofloxacin and Pulmonary-Disease--Chronic-Obstructive

zabofloxacin has been researched along with Pulmonary-Disease--Chronic-Obstructive* in 2 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for zabofloxacin and Pulmonary-Disease--Chronic-Obstructive

ArticleYear
Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, Phase III, non-inferiority trial.
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015, Volume: 10

    A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, -7.7%-8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference, -0.2%; 95% confidence interval, -9.0%-8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation.

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Function Tests; Treatment Outcome

2015

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for zabofloxacin and Pulmonary-Disease--Chronic-Obstructive

ArticleYear
Clinical Role of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test in Prediction of the Response to Treatment for Exacerbations.
    Journal of Korean medical science, 2020, Jan-13, Volume: 35

    The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) is a validated, eight-item questionnaire used to quantify the health status of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the CAT questionnaire as a tool to assess the response to treatment in acute exacerbations of COPD in an outpatient setting.. A multicenter, phase 3 randomized controlled trial was conducted previously to examine the efficacy and safety of oral zabofloxacin for the treatment of COPD exacerbations. In the present post hoc analysis of the original study, patients with COPD exacerbation were categorized as responders or non-responders according to the respiratory symptoms persisting on day 10 (visit 3) of treatment. The CAT questionnaire was completed daily by patients at home from the initial visit to the second visit on day 5. Subsequently, the questionnaire was completed in the presence of a physician on days 10 (visit 3) and 36 (visit 4). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the association between CAT scores and the therapeutic response.. The CAT scores decreased more rapidly in responders compared to non-responders during the first 5 days (23.3-20.4 vs. 23.5-22). Among responders, patients with higher severity of illness also revealed higher CAT scores on the first day of an exacerbation (mild, 19.8; moderate, 21.4; severe, 23.8; very severe, 28.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that a change in the CAT score during the first 3 days influenced the therapeutic response. A significant decrease in scores in the domains of sputum production, chest tightness, and activities of daily living was seen among responders.. Early improvement in CAT scores may be associated with a more favorable response to the treatment of COPD exacerbations.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01658020.. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0000532.

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Function Tests; Severity of Illness Index; Sputum; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thorax; Treatment Outcome

2020