ximelagatran and Neoplasms

Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events, especially in people receiving anticoagulation treatments.. To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in people with cancer.. We conducted a literature search including a major electronic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid); handsearching conference proceedings; checking references of included studies; use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed and a search for ongoing studies in trial registries. As part of the living systematic review approach, we run searches continually, incorporating new evidence after it is identified. Last search date 14 May 2018.. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of long-term treatment with LMWHs, DOACs or VKAs in people with cancer and symptomatic VTE.. We extracted data in duplicate on study characteristics and risk of bias. Outcomes included: all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and health-related quality of life (QoL). We assessed the certainty of the evidence at the outcome level following the GRADE approach (GRADE handbook).. Of 15,785 citations, including 7602 unique citations, 16 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These trials enrolled 5167 people with cancer and VTE.Low molecular weight heparins versus vitamin K antagonistsEight studies enrolling 2327 participants compared LMWHs with VKAs. Meta-analysis of five studies probably did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWHs compared to VKAs on mortality up to 12 months of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.13; risk difference (RD) 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 45 fewer to 48 more; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis of four studies did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWHs compared to VKAs on major bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.12; RD 4 more per 1000, 95% CI 19 fewer to 48 more, moderate-certainty evidence) or minor bleeding (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.27; RD 38 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 92 fewer to 47 more; low-certainty evidence), or thrombocytopenia (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.69). Meta-analysis of five studies showed that LMWHs probably reduced the recurrence of VTE compared to VKAs (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77; RD 53 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 29 fewer to 72 fewer, moderate-certainty evidence).Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonistsFive studies enrolling 982 participants compared DOACs with VKAs. Meta-analysis of four studies may not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of DOACs compared to VKAs on mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.21; RD 12 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 51 fewer to 37 more; low-certainty evidence), recurrent VTE (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.31; RD 14 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 27 fewer to 12 more; low-certainty evidence), major bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.57, RD 8 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 22 fewer to 20 more; low-certainty evidence), or minor bleeding (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.22; RD 21 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 54 fewer to 28 more; low-certainty evidence). One study reporting on DOAC versus VKA was published as abstract so is not included in the main analysis.Direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparinsTwo studies enrolling 1455 participants compared DOAC with LMWH. The study by Raskob did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of DOACs compared to LMWH on mortality up to 12 months of follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.25; RD 27 more per 1000, 95% CI 30 fewer to 95 more; low-certainty evidence). The data also showed that DOACs may have shown a likely reduction in VTE recurrence up to 12 months. For the long-term treatment of VTE in people with cancer, evidence shows that LMWHs compared to VKAs probably produces an important reduction in VTE and DOACs compared to LMWH, may likely reduce VTE but may increase risk of major bleeding. Decisions for a person with cancer and VTE to start long-term LMWHs versus oral anticoagulation should balance benefits and harms and integrate the person's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.Editorial note: this is a living systematic review (LSR). LSRs offer new approaches to review updating in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events in patients including those receiving anticoagulation treatments.. To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and oral anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer.. We conducted a comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including 1. a February 2013 electronic search of: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE, and EMBASE; 2. a handsearch of conference proceedings; 3. checking of references of included studies; 4. use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed; and 5. a search of clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing studies.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing long-term treatment with LMWH versus oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or ximelagatran) in patients with cancer and symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE.. Using a standardized data form, we extracted data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest: survival, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and postphlebitic syndrome. We assessed the quality of evidence at the outcome level following the GRADE approach.. Of 9559 identified citations, 10 RCTs (11 reports) were eligible and reported data for 1981 patients with cancer. We excluded 14 studies in which patients with cancer constituted study subgroups, but did not report outcome data for them. Meta-analysis of seven RCTs comparing LMWH with VKA found no statistically significant survival benefit (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.14) but a statistically significant reduction in VTE (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.71). The remaining findings did not exclude a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWH compared with VKA for the outcomes of major bleeding (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.52 to 2.19), minor bleeding (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.55), or thrombocytopenia (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.66). We judged the quality of evidence as low for mortality, major bleeding, and minor bleeding, and as moderate for recurrent VTE.One RCT comparing dabigatran with VKA did not exclude beneficial or harmful effects of one agent over the other. One RCT comparing six months' extension of anticoagulation with 18 months of ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily versus no extended ximelagatran did not exclude beneficial or harmful effects for the outcomes of reduction in VTE, mortality, and minor bleeding. One RCT comparing once-weekly subcutaneous injection of idraparinux for three or six months versus standard treatment (parenteral anticoagulation followed by warfarin or acenocoumarol) suggested a reduction in recurrent VTE (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.11) at six months, but did not exclude beneficial or harmful effects for the outcomes of mortality (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.48) and major bleeding (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.39 to 2.83).. For the long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer, LMWH compared with VKA reduces venous thromboembolic events but not mortality. The decision for a patient with cancer and VTE to start long-term LMWH versus oral anticoagulation should balance the benefits and harms and integrate the patient's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events and the risk of recurrent thromboembolic events while on anticoagulation.. To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and ximelagatran) for the long term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer.. A comprehensive search was undertaken including a January 2007 search of electronic databases; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1). MEDLINE (1966 onwards; accessed via OVID), EMBASE (1980 onwards; accessed via OVID) and ISI the Web of Science. Hand search of the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and of the American Society of Hematology. Checking of references of included studies, relevant papers and related systematic reviews. Use of "related article" feature in PubMed; and (5) search of ISI the Web of Science for papers citing landmark studies.. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing long term treatment with LMWH versus oral anticoagulants (VKA or ximelagatran) in patients with cancer and symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE.. Using a standardized data form we extracted data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest: survival, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia and postphlebitic syndrome.. Of 3986 identified citations, eight RCTs were eligible and reported data for patients with cancer. Their overall methodological quality was moderate. Meta-analysis of six RCTs showed that LMWH, compared to VKA provided no statistically significant survival benefit (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14) but a statistically significant reduction in VTE (HR = 0.47; 95% (Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.32 to 0.71). There was no statistically significant difference between LMWH and VKA in bleeding outcomes (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.31) or thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.74). One RCT compared tinzaparin and dalteparin and showed no differences in the outcomes of interest. One RCT compared a six months extension of anticoagulation with 18 months Ximelagatran 24mg twice daily versus placebo. It showed a reduction in VTE (HR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.30) with no apparent effect on survival or bleeding.. For the long term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer, LMWH compared to VKA reduces venous thromboembolic events but not death. The decision for a patient with cancer and VTE to start long term LMWH versus oral anticoagulation should balance the benefits and downsides and integrate the patient's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Old burdens and new perspectives of the long-term anticoagulant therapy. Long-term anticoagulant therapy (LAT) has increasingly improved the prognosis in various diseases thus becoming an indispensable tool in our day-to-day therapeutic arsenal. However its use is influenced by various uncertainty factors. The optimal range of anticoagulation can unfortunately only be partially achieved due to the several factors influencing it. Thromboembolic and bleeding episodes occur mainly at times when the state of anticoagulation diverges from the ideally set therapeutic range. Quality of the ongoing therapy can only partially be improved by increasing the frequency of the controls. This however is also inherent partly in the treatment indication and also in the personality of the given patient (compliance). Heparin preparations are rarely used for long-term anticoagulant therapy due to the inevitable injectable form of administration. The more easily applicable LMWH-s' actions are also influenced by several uncertainty factors. In cases of idiopathic deep vein thrombosis, extension of the LAT therapy could be beneficial and is recommended beyond 6 months in order to prevent recurrence of the acute event and postthrombotic syndrome, irrespective of the proof of the genetic predisposition. Several clinical observations suggest that LAT could hinder propagation of malignant tumors and this presumption has already been supported by experimental data. The favourable effect has primarily been associated with and experienced with the use of LMWH-s. Prolonged LAT may even change the perspectives of thrombolytic therapy in venous thrombosis, improving its late efficacy. A new and simply applicable anticoagulant may help further spreading of LAT.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Coumarins; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Neoplasms; Patient Compliance; Thromboembolism; Thrombolytic Therapy; Thrombosis

Thrombin is a central bioregulator of coagulation and is therefore a key target in the therapeutic prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The current mainstays of anticoagulation treatment are heparins, which are indirect thrombin inhibitors, and coumarins, such as warfarin, which modulate the synthesis of vitamin K-dependent proteins. Although efficacious and widely used, heparins and coumarins have limitations because their pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant effects are unpredictable, with the risk of bleeding and other complications resulting in the need for close monitoring with their use. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) provide a more predictable anticoagulant response, but their use is limited by the need for subcutaneous administration. In addition, discontinuation of heparin treatment can result in a thrombotic rebound due to the inability of these compounds to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) are able to target both free and clot-bound thrombin. The first to be used was hirudin, but DTIs with lower molecular weights, such as DuP 714, PPACK, and efegatran, have subsequently been developed, and these agents are better able to inhibit clot-bound thrombin and the thrombotic processes that take place at sites of arterial damage. Such compounds inhibit thrombin by covalently binding to it, but this can result in toxicity and nonspecific binding. The development of reversible noncovalent DTIs, such as inogatran and melagatran, has resulted in safer, more specific and predictable anticoagulant treatment. Oral DTIs, such as ximelagatran, are set to provide a further breakthrough in the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Binding Sites; Biological Availability; Blood Coagulation; Comorbidity; Coumarins; Drug Design; Embolism; Female; Forecasting; Glycine; Guanidines; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hirudin Therapy; Humans; Neoplasms; Pipecolic Acids; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic; Prodrugs; Safety; Serine; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thrombin; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Blood Coagulation Factors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endothelium, Vascular; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Hemostasis; Humans; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Stilbenes; Thrombosis