ximelagatran and Coronary-Disease

ximelagatran has been researched along with Coronary-Disease* in 4 studies

Reviews

3 review(s) available for ximelagatran and Coronary-Disease

ArticleYear
Thrombin, an ideal target for pharmacological inhibition: a review of direct thrombin inhibitors.
    American heart journal, 2005, Volume: 149, Issue:1 Suppl

    Topics: Acute Disease; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Disease; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Syndrome; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

2005
Novel uses for current and future direct thrombin inhibitors: focus on ximelagatran and bivalirudin.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2004, Volume: 13, Issue:5

    Ximelagatran and bivalirudin are direct thrombin inhibitors that have been studied for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis and have potential advantages over the traditional indirect thrombin inhibitors (i.e., warfarin, unfractionated heparin and low molecular-weight heparin). They are both reversible inhibitors of thrombin and block both circulating and fibrin-bound thrombin. Ximelagatran and bivalirudin possess favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles including wider therapeutic indices, faster onsets of action and less interpatient variability compared to indirect thrombin inhibitors. Ximelagatran has shown favourable clinical trial results in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and atrial fibrillation. Similarly, bivalirudin has shown positive results in patients with acute coronary syndromes, however, further investigation is needed. Ximelagatran and bivalirudin have shown promising results in the management of thrombosis and the results of future studies confirming their use for the aforementioned indications are anticipated.

    Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Disease; Double-Blind Method; Hirudins; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Syndrome; Thrombosis

2004
Traditional versus modern anticoagulant strategies: summary of the literature.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2002, Oct-15, Volume: 59, Issue:20 Suppl 6

    Traditional and modern anticoagulant therapies for the management, prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and key findings of primary studies are summarized. Significant advances have been made during the past decade in the prevention and treatment of VTE and the treatment of ACS. Numerous trials have demonstrated that low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are at least as effective as and have challenged unfractionated heparins (UFHs) as the standard of care for the treatment of VTE and ACS. For VTE, a number of new antithrombotic agents have been developed and are currently under development, including oral direct thrombin inhibitors and synthetic pentasaccharides, such as fondaparinux, in addition to LMWHs. For ACS, various new treatment modalities, such as the broader use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stents, are available, in addition to new pharmacologic agents, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and innovative thrombolytics. Most of these agents and treatment modalities require the use of an anticoagulant as adjuvant therapy. Evidence suggests that LMWHs can be used safely and, in addition to being more practical, have been shown to improve outcomes compared with traditional anticoagulants in certain patient populations. LMWHs demonstrate superior clinical outcomes over traditional anticoagulants for VTE prophylaxis and treatment and ACS treatment. Primary studies of new agents, including oral direct thrombin inhibitors and synthetic pentasaccharides for the treatment of ACS are promising; however, more data are needed on their safety and efficacy.

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Coronary Disease; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Polysaccharides; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

2002

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for ximelagatran and Coronary-Disease

ArticleYear
Clinical trials update from the European Society of Cardiology: CHARM, BASEL, EUROPA and ESTEEM.
    European journal of heart failure, 2003, Volume: 5, Issue:5

    This article contains a series of reports on recent research developments in the field of heart failure. Reports of key presentations made at the European Society of Cardiology meeting, held in Vienna, Austria, between 30 August and 3 September 2003 are reported. In the CHARM study, candesartan reduced cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions for heart failure, both in patients who were already taking an ACE-inhibitor and in those who were ACE intolerant. However, results in patients with preserved left ventricular function were less conclusive. The BASEL study supports the use of B-type natriuretic peptide testing to confirm the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnoea. In EUROPA, the largest ever study of secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, long-term treatment with perindopril reduced the incidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac arrest. The ESTEEM study showed that the oral thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran plus aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in the prophylaxis of major cardiovascular events following MI.

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Aspirin; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Disease; Europe; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Perindopril; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tetrazoles

2003