warfarin and Ischemic-Stroke

The data about the efficacy and safety of warfarin usage in atrial fibrillation (AF) in hemodialysis patients is still limited, especially in the Asia population. The population of this study was end-stage renal disease patients with AF who underwent hemodialysis. The design of the study was a retrospective observational cohort that collected the patient data from 2016 to 2019. The Cox regression model was applied to assess the effect of warfarin on the outcomes. We conducted a survival analysis by comparing Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test. We also measured the time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator of warfarin usage. Among 444 hemodialysis patients, 126 patients with AF matched the inclusion criteria, 88 patients completely followed up. Half patients used warfarin. The mean age was 52.2 ± 12.97 years, the mean follow-up duration was 11 ± 10 months. We observed all-cause death in 86.4% of patients, ischemic stroke in 10.2%, and hemorrhagic stroke in 2.3% of patients. There were no significant differences in all-cause death, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. Warfarin use was not associated with a lower rate for death (HR 0.782; 95% CI, 0.494-1.237, P = 0.293) or ischemic stroke (HR 0.435; 95% CI, 0.103-1.846, P = 0.259) or hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.564; 95% CI, 0.034-9.386, P = 0.689). None of the patients reach the time in the therapeutic range >65%. Our findings suggest that warfarin has no association with mortality, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke events rate in atrial fibrillation patients who underwent hemodialysis in the Indonesian population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Indonesia; Ischemic Stroke; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The annual incidence of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795,000 cases per year in the United States, of which 87% are ischemic in nature. In addition to the management of modifiable high-risk factors to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) play an important role in secondary stroke prevention. This review will discuss the published literature on the use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants in secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), including their pharmacology, efficacy, and adverse effects. We will also highlight the role of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary stroke prevention, along with supporting literature.. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA. However, as shown in recent trials, short-term DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 21-30 days is more effective than SAPT in patients with minor acute non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA. Although short-term DAPT is highly effective in preventing recurrent stroke, a more prolonged course can increase bleeding risks without additional benefit. DAPT for 90 days, followed by aspirin monotherapy for patients with large vessel intracranial atherosclerotic disease, is suitable for secondary stroke prevention. However, patients need to be monitored for both minor (e.g., bruising) and major (e.g., intracranial) bleeding complications. Conversely, oral warfarin and newer direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are the agents of choice for secondary stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular cardioembolic strokes. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to decreased bleeding risks, including ICH, lack of need for international normalized ratio monitoring, no dietary restrictions, and limited drug-drug interactions. The choice between different antiplatelets and anticoagulants for prevention of ischemic stroke depends on the underlying stroke mechanism, cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms, bleeding risk profile, compliance, drug tolerance, and drug resistance. Physicians must carefully weigh each patient's relative benefits and bleeding risks before initiating an antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment regimen. Further studies are warranted to study the optimal duration of DAPT in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis since the benefit is most pronounced in the short term while the bleeding risk remains high during the extended duration of therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors may cause OAC switching.. To examine the phenomenon of OAC switching in patients with AF, including all available evidence; frequency and patterns of switch, clinical outcomes, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, reasons for switch, factors associated with switch and evidence gaps.. Scoping review.. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, up to January 2022.. Of the 116 included studies, 2/3 examined vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct-acting OAC (DOAC) switching. Overall, OAC switching was common and the definition of an OAC switch varied across. Switching from VKA to dabigatran was the most prevalent switch type, but VKA to apixaban has increased in recent years. Patients on DOAC switched more to warfarin than to other DOACs. OAC doses involved in the switches were hardly reported and patients were often censored after the first switch. Switching back to a previously taken OAC (frequently warfarin) occurred in 5%-21% of switchers.The risk of ischaemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in VKA to DOAC switchers compared with non-switchers was conflicting, while there was no difference in the risk of other types of bleeding. The risk of ischaemic stroke in switchers from DOAC versus non-switchers was conflicting. Studies evaluating adherence found no significant changes in adherence after switching from VKA to DOAC, however, an increase in satisfaction with therapy were reported. Reasons for OAC switch, and factors associated with OAC switch were mostly risk factors for stroke and bleeding. Clinical outcomes, adherence and patient-reported outcomes were sparse for switches from DOACs.. OAC switching is common in patients with AF and patients often switch back to an OAC they have previously been on. There are aspects of OAC switching that have received little study, especially in switches from DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for older adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Pairwise and network meta-analyses.. Patients with AF aged ≥75 years.. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for published randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational studies evaluating the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for the prevention of stroke. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings.. This study included 38 studies enrolling 1,022,908 older adult patients with AF. Results from pairwise meta-analyses showed that NOACs were superior to warfarin for all outcomes, except that dabigatran increased the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of SSE and ischemic stroke than warfarin or NOACs. Results of network meta-analyses indicated that apixaban significantly reduced the risk of SSE, major bleedings, and GI bleedings than warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran showed lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin and of intracranial bleeding than rivaroxaban.. NOACs are of at least equal efficacy, or even superior to warfarin. The safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different, as apixaban performs better than the other oral anticoagulants in reducing major bleeding and GI bleeding, whereas dabigatran increased the risk of GI bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Carotid artery stenosis is narrowing of the carotid arteries. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is when this narrowing occurs in people without a history or symptoms of this disease. It is caused by atherosclerosis; that is, the build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls. Atherosclerosis is more likely to occur in people with several risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and smoking. As this damage can develop without symptoms, the first symptom can be a fatal or disabling stroke, known as ischaemic stroke. Carotid stenosis leading to ischaemic stroke is most common in men older than 70 years. Ischaemic stroke is a worldwide public health problem.. To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in preventing neurological impairment, ipsilateral major or disabling stroke, death, major bleeding, and other outcomes.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and three trials registers from their inception to 9 August 2022. We also checked the reference lists of any relevant systematic reviews identified and contacted specialists in the field for additional references to trials.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status and language, comparing a pharmacological intervention to placebo, no treatment, or another pharmacological intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the trials. A third author resolved disagreements when necessary. We assessed the evidence certainty for key outcomes using GRADE.. We included 34 RCTs with 11,571 participants. Data for meta-analysis were available from only 22 studies with 6887 participants. The mean follow-up period was 2.5 years. None of the 34 included studies assessed neurological impairment and quality of life. Antiplatelet agent (acetylsalicylic acid) versus placebo Acetylsalicylic acid (1 study, 372 participants) may result in little to no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 2.47), stroke-related mortality (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.59), progression of carotid stenosis (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71), and adverse events (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.59), compared to placebo (all low-certainty evidence). The effect of acetylsalicylic acid on major bleeding is very uncertain (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.53; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not measure neurological impairment or quality of life. Antihypertensive agents (metoprolol and chlorthalidone) versus placebo The antihypertensive agent, metoprolol, may result in no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to1.16; 1 study, 793 participants) and stroke-related mortality (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.94; 1 study, 793 participants) compared to placebo (both low-certainty evidence). However, chlorthalidone may slow the progression of carotid stenosis (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.91; 1 study, 129 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. Neither study measured neurological impairment, major bleeding, adverse events, or quality of life. Anticoagulant agent (warfarin) versus placebo The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of warfarin (1 study, 919 participants) on major bleeding (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.46; very low-certainty evidence), but it may reduce adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. The study did not measure neurological impairment, ipsilateral major or disabling stroke, stroke-related mortality, progression of carotid stenosis, or quality of life. Lipid-lowering agents (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, probucol, and rosuvastatin) versus placebo or no treatment Lipid-lowering agents may result in little to no difference in ipsilateral major or disabling stroke (atorvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.53; 5 studies, 2235 participants) stroke-related mortality (lovastatin and pravastatin; RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03. Although there is no high-certainty evidence to support pharmacological intervention, this does not mean that pharmacological treatments are ineffective in preventing ischaemic cerebral events, morbidity, and mortality. High-quality RCTs are needed to better inform the best medical treatment that may reduce the burden of carotid stenosis. In the interim, clinicians will have to use other sources of information.. پیشینه: تنگی شریان کاروتید عبارت است از باریک شدن شریان‌های کاروتید. تنگی کاروتید بدون نشانه زمانی است که این تنگی در افراد بدون سابقه یا نشانه‌های این بیماری رخ می‌دهد. این عارضه ناشی از آترواسکلروز (atherosclerosis) است؛ یعنی تجمع چربی، کلسترول و دیگر مواد داخل و روی دیواره‌های شریان. احتمال بروز آترواسکلروز در افرادی که عوامل خطر متعددی دارند، مانند دیابت، هیپرتانسیون، هیپرلیپیدمی و مصرف سیگار، بیشتر است. از آنجایی که این آسیب می‌تواند بدون نشانه ایجاد شود، اولین نشانه می‌تواند یک سکته مغزی کشنده یا ناتوان کننده باشد که به عنوان سکته مغزی ایسکمیک شناخته می‌شود. تنگی کاروتید منجر به وقوع سکته مغزی ایسکمیک در مردان بالای 70 سال شایع‌تر رخ می‌دهد. سکته مغزی ایسکمیک یک مشکل سلامت عمومی در سراسر جهان است. اهداف: ارزیابی تاثیرات مداخلات دارویی در درمان تنگی کاروتید بدون نشانه به منظور پیشگیری از بروز‌اختلالات نورولوژیکی، سکته مغزی ماژور یا ناتوان کننده یک طرفه (ipsilateral)، مرگ‌ومیر، خونریزی شدید، و دیگر پیامدها. روش‌های جست‌وجو: پایگاه ثبت کارآزمایی‌های گروه سکته مغزی (stroke) در کاکرین، CENTRAL؛ MEDLINE؛ Embase؛ دو بانک اطلاعاتی دیگر، و سه پایگاه ثبت کارآزمایی را از زمان شروع به کار تا 9 آگوست 2022 جست‌وجو کردیم. هم‌چنین فهرست منابع مرورهای سیستماتیک مرتبط را که شناسایی شدند، بررسی کرده و برای یافتن منابع بیشتر برای کارآزمایی‌ها با متخصصان این زمینه تماس گرفتیم. معیارهای انتخاب: همه کارآزمایی‌های تصادفی‌سازی و کنترل شده (randomised controlled trials; RCTs) را بدون در نظر گرفتن وضعیت انتشار و زبان نگارش مقاله وارد کردیم، که به مقایسه یک مداخله دارویی با دارونما (placebo)، عدم درمان، یا مداخله دارویی دیگر در درمان تنگی کاروتید بدون نشانه پرداختند. گردآوری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها: از پروسیجرهای استاندارد روش‌شناسی (methodology) کاکرین استفاده کردیم. دو نویسنده مرور به‌طور مستقل از هم به استخراج داده‌ها و ارزیابی خطر سوگیری (bias) در کارآزمایی‌ها پرداختند. در صورت لزوم، نویسنده سوم اختلاف‌نظرات را حل‌وفصل کرد. قطعیت شواهد را برای پیامدهای کلیدی با استفاده از رویکرد درجه‌بندی توصیه، ارزیابی، توسعه و ارزشیابی (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; GRADE) ارزیابی کردیم. نتایج اصلی: تعداد 34 RCT را با 11,571 شرکت‌کننده وارد کردیم. برای انجام متاآنالیز، داده‌هایی از فقط 22 مطالعه با 6887 شرکت‌کننده در دسترس بودند. میانگین دوره پیگیری 2.5 سال بود. هیچ یک از 34 مطالعه وارد شده اختلالات نورولوژیکی و کیفیت زندگی را ارزیابی نکردند. عامل ضد پلاکت (استیل‌سالیسیلیک اسید) در برابر دارونما استیل‌سالیسیلیک اسید (acetylsalicylic acid) در مقایسه با دارونما (1 مطالعه، 372 شرکت‌کننده) ممکن است تفاوتی اندک تا عدم تفاوت را در سکته مغزی ماژور یا ناتوان ک

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Atorvastatin; Carotid Stenosis; Chlorthalidone; Fluvastatin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Metoprolol; Pravastatin; Probucol; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) require oral anticoagulation to prevent ischemic stroke. However, oral anticoagulation may cause bleeding, and patients with AF and a history of bleeding were excluded from pivotal trials comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin in patients with AF and a history of bleeding.. We conducted a systematic review of retrospective studies and clinical trials using the PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to May 2021.. Overall, 56,697 patients from six studies were included. NOACs significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.91; p = 0.005), fatal ischemic stroke (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.61; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98; p = 0.04), major bleeding events (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84; p < 0.001), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.82; p < 0.001), fatal ICH (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.56, p < 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.96; p = 0.01).. NOACs showed better efficacy and safety profile compared with warfarin in patients with AF and a history of bleeding. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with cancer are at higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently there are no definitive data on clinical outcomes for nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) and warfarin in cancer patients with AF. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin. A search through Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library was done from the databases inception to March 2022. Studies that compared NOACs to warfarin in the setting of AF and cancer were included. The primary outcomes were the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), intracranial bleeding, and Major gastrointestinal bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to report the outcomes. A total of 11 studies were included. We found that NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding and combined ischemic stroke/SE in patients with AF and cancer compared with warfarin (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.75, P < 0.0001 and RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.47-0.75, P < 0.0001, respectively). Also, there was lower incidence of Intracranial and major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who received NOACs compared with warfarin (P < 0.0001). Network analyses revealed that apixaban and dabigatran were associated with reduction of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Among patients who diagnosed with AF and cancer, NOACs were associated with lower incidence of major bleeding ischemic stroke/SE compared with warfarin. Furthermore, NOACs were associated with lower gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The VICTORY AF Study was designed to evaluate the risk of the procedure and/or device-related strokes in patients with PersAF on warfarin undergoing ablation with a phased radiofrequency (RF) system.. The VICTORY AF trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, investigational study. PersAF patients on vitamin K antagonism without major structural heart disease or history of stroke/transient ischemic attack undergoing phased RF ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of the procedure and/or device-related stroke within 30 days of the ablation by a board-certified neurologist's assessment. The secondary outcomes were an acute procedural success, 6 months effectiveness (defined as the reduction in AF/atrial flutter episodes lasting ≥10 minutes by 48-hour Holter 6 months postablation) and the number of patients with pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis.. A total of 129 (108 PersAF, 21 long-standing PersAF) patients were treated (mean age: 60.6 ± 7.7; 79.8% male, 54.3% CHA2Ds2-VASc score ≥ 2). Two nondisabling strokes were reported (1.6%); one before discharge and the second diagnosed at the 30-day visit. Due to slow enrollment, the study was terminated before reaching the 95% one-sided upper confidence boundary for stroke incidence. Acute procedural success was 93.8%, and at 6 months, 72.8% of patients demonstrated ≥90% reduction in AF burden, 78.9% were off all antiarrhythmic drugs. There were no patients with PV stenosis of greater than 70%.. VICTORY AF demonstrated a 1.6% incidence of stroke in PersAF undergoing ablation with a phased RF system which did not meet statistical confidence due to poor enrollment. The secondary outcomes suggest comparable efficacy to phased RF in the tailored treatment of permanent AF trial. Rigorous clinical evaluation of the stroke risk of new AF ablation technologies as well as restriction to Vitamin K antagonist anticoagulation appears to be unachievable goals in a clinical multicenter IDE trial of AF ablation in the current era.

Topics: Action Potentials; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Catheters; Catheter Ablation; Electrodes; Female; Heart Rate; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; North America; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant which has been widely used to treat and prevent thromboembolic events. Managing warfarin therapy requires careful monitoring and dose titration. This randomized controlled study was designed to assess the effect of genotype-guided warfarin anticoagulation in Chinese elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. 507 adults were randomized to receive initial dosing as determined by an algorithm containing genetic (VKORC1 and CYP2C9) plus clinical information or only clinical information. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (TTR) over 90 days. Secondary end points included haemorrhagic events, thrombotic events and mortality.. The TTR was significantly different between genetic group and control group. The average TTR was (70.80 ± 24.39) % in the genotype-guided group as compared with (53.44 ± 26.73) % in the control group. This represents a difference of 17.36% (95% CI, 11.82 to 22.89, P < .001). The cumulative incidence of total haemorrhagic events, minor haemorrhagic events, gastrointestinal bleeding and intracerebral bleeding events was not significantly different between two groups (P > .05). Follow-up showed that the cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke events occurred in the genetic group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.39% vs 6.82%), and the genetic group had a significant lower risk than control group in cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke events [HR 0.22, (95% CI 0.065 to 0.77), P < .05].. Genotype-guided dosing could improve the average TTR, and follow-up result showed that genotype-guided therapy resulted in a significantly lower risk of ischaemic stroke events. Further research is required to focus on the clinical benefit of genotype-guided dosing.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

We assessed the cumulative incidence of recurrent stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality associated with restarting antithrombotic treatment, in patients experiencing an anticoagulation-related event (stroke or major bleeding), occurred during anticoagulation therapy for AF.. We performed a retrospective population-based analysis on linked claims data of patients resident in the Veneto Region, treated with DOACs for AF and discharged (2013-2020) from the hospital for stroke, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and major bleeding. To adjust for competing risk of death and reduce confounding, we started the follow up after a 120-days blanking period, counting events in patients resuming oral anticoagulation versus those that did not. Risks of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke (IS)intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and other major bleeding events (MB) were estimated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and propensity score to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Overall, 1029 patients (mean age 77 years) were included in the final cohort: 23% experienced an IS, 18% an ICH, and 59% MB. Of these, 77% resumed anticoagulation. The cumulative incidence of events was significantly lower in patients resuming therapy. In the multivariable analysis considering age, sex and propensity score as covariates, resumption of anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of a cumulative event (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.35-0.57, p < 0.01). Stratifying for the index event, among patients with IS (92% resumed therapy), we observed a risk reduction of 81%; in patients with ICH (64% resumed therapy), we observed a risk reduction of 64% and for patients with MB (76% resuming therapy), we observed a risk reduction of 49%.. In patients with AF who experienced an anticoagulation-related event, resuming oral anticoagulation was associated with better outcomes for all-cause mortality and subsequent events as compared with patients who did not resume treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) by level of kidney function.. We pooled findings from five retrospective cohorts (2011-18) across Australia and Canada of adults with; a new dispensation for a DOAC or warfarin, an AF diagnosis, and a measure of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The outcomes of interest, within 1 year from the cohort entry date, were: (1) the composite of all-cause death, first hospitalization for ischaemic stroke, or transient ischaemic attack (effectiveness), and (2) first hospitalization for major bleeding defined as an intracranial, upper or lower gastrointestinal, or other bleeding (safety). Cox models were used to examine the association of a DOAC vs. warfarin with outcomes, after 1:1 matching via a propensity score. Kidney function was categorized as eGFR ≥60, 45-59, 30-44, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. A total of 74 542 patients were included in the matched analysis. DOAC initiation was associated with greater or similar effectiveness compared with warfarin initiation across all eGFR categories [pooled HRs (95% CIs) for eGFR categories: 0.74(0.69-0.79), 0.76(0.54-1.07), 0.68(0.61-0.75) and 0.86(0.76-0.98)], respectively. DOAC initiation was associated with lower or similar risk of major bleeding than warfarin initiation [pooled HRs (95% CIs): 0.75(0.65-0.86), 0.81(0.65-1.01), 0.82(0.66-1.02), and 0.71(0.52-0.99), respectively). Associations between DOAC initiation, compared with warfarin initiation, and study outcomes were not modified by eGFR category.. DOAC use, compared with warfarin use, was associated with a lower or similar risk of all-cause death, ischaemic stroke, and transient ischaemic attack and also a lower or similar risk of major bleeding across all levels of kidney function.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Kidney; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

The guide for the use of genotype-guided warfarin dosing in patients for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is still lacking.. We aimed to evaluate whether genotype-guided warfarin dosing is superior to conventional clinical dosing for the outcomes of interest in Chinese patients.. Our study consisted of 508 newly recruited and 471 existing Chinese AF patients. Among the total 979 patients, 585 patients received their dose of warfarin determined by a genetic and clinical factor (gene group), while the remaining 394 patients whose dosing was determined empirically in control group. We incorporated CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes into the gene group. The international normalized ratio (INR) measurement and standard protocols were used for further dose adjustment in both groups. The primary outcomes were the percentage of time in the therapeutic range (%TTR) and INR during 12-month follow-up. Secondary safety outcome included bleeding and thrombotic events.. Compared with the control group, the average TTR of the gene group was higher [68.4 ± 20.6% vs 48.5 ± 21.6%, P < 0.001]. The average INR monitoring times to reach the therapeutic time in the gene group was lower (P < 0.001). The risk ratios (RR) for cumulative incidence of total bleeding events, minor bleeding events, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracerebral bleeding events were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Comparing to the analysis using existing 471 patients, the analysis using total 979 patients showed that the gene group experienced a lower (RR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.8), P = 0.008) incidence of cumulative ischemic stroke.. Genotype-guided warfarin administration increases the average TTR, reaches higher TTR levels in the early anticoagulant phase, and significantly reduces the risk of ischemic stroke events.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; East Asian People; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Ischemic Stroke; Pharmacogenetics; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases; Warfarin

Anti-tuberculosis treatment can cause significant drug-drug interaction and interfere with effective anticoagulation. However, there is a lack of evidence and conflicting data on the optimal oral anticoagulation in patients treated for tuberculosis. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients on anti-tuberculosis treatment. Patients on concomitant oral anticoagulation and anti-tuberculosis treatment including rifampin were identified from the Korean nationwide healthcare database. Subjects were censored at discontinuation of either anticoagulation or rifampin. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, death, and ischemic stroke. A total 2090 patients (1153 on warfarin, 937 on NOAC) were included. NOAC users, compared to warfarin users, were older, had a lower prevalence of hypertension, heart failure, ischemic stroke, and aspirin use and a higher prevalence of cancer, with no significant differences in CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antitubercular Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rifampin; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear.. We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders.. Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91-3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.14]).. Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Liver Diseases; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Lifelong oral anticoagulation is recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent stroke. Over the last decade, multiple new oral anticoagulants (OACs) have expanded the number of treatment options for these patients. While population-level effectiveness of OACs has been compared, it is unclear if there is variability in benefit and risk across patient subgroups.. We analyzed claims and medical data for 34,569 patients who initiated a nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC); apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin for nonvalvular AF between 08/01/2010 and 11/29/2017 from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. A machine learning (ML) method was applied to match different OAC groups on several baseline variables including, age, sex, race, renal function, and CHA. The mean age, number of females and white race in the entire cohort of 34,569 patients were 71.2 (SD, 10.7) years, 14,916 (43.1%), and 25,051 (72.5%) respectively. During a mean follow-up of 8.3 (SD, 9.0) months, 2,110 (6.1%) of patients experienced the composite outcome, of whom 1,675 (4.8%) died. The causal ML method identified 5 subgroups with variables favoring apixaban over dabigatran; 2 subgroups favoring apixaban over rivaroxaban; 1 subgroup favoring dabigatran over rivaroxaban; and 1 subgroup favoring rivaroxaban over dabigatran in terms of risk reduction of the primary endpoint. No subgroup favored warfarin and most dabigatran vs warfarin users favored neither drug. The variables that most influenced favoring one subgroup over another included Age, history of ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Race, and myocardial infarction.. Among patients with AF treated with a NOAC or warfarin, a causal ML method identified patient subgroups with differences in outcomes associated with OAC use. The findings suggest that the effects of OACs are heterogeneous across subgroups of AF patients, which could help personalize the choice of OAC. Future prospective studies are needed to better understand the clinical impact of the subgroups with respect to OAC selection.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The development of an optimal stroke prevention strategy, including the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, is particularly important for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are living with dementia, a condition that increases the risk of adverse outcomes. However, data on the role of dementia in the safety and effectiveness of OACs are limited.. To assess the comparative safety and effectiveness of specific OACs by dementia status among older patients with AF.. This retrospective comparative effectiveness study used 1:1 propensity score matching among 1 160 462 patients 65 years or older with AF. Data were obtained from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2021), IBM MarketScan Research Database (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020), and Medicare claims databases maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy; January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017). Data analysis was performed from September 1, 2021, to May 24, 2022.. Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin.. Composite end point of ischemic stroke or major bleeding events over the 6-month period after OAC initiation, pooled across databases using random-effects meta-analyses.. Among 1 160 462 patients with AF, the mean (SD) age was 77.4 (7.2) years; 50.2% were male, 80.5% were White, and 7.9% had dementia. Three comparative new-user cohorts were established: warfarin vs apixaban (501 990 patients; mean [SD] age, 78.1 [7.4] years; 50.2% female), dabigatran vs apixaban (126 718 patients; mean [SD] age, 76.5 [7.1] years; 52.0% male), and rivaroxaban vs apixaban (531 754 patients; mean [SD] age, 76.9 [7.2] years; 50.2% male). Among patients with dementia, compared with apixaban users, a higher rate of the composite end point was observed in warfarin users (95.7 events per 1000 person-years [PYs] vs 64.2 events per 1000 PYs; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7), dabigatran users (84.5 events per 1000 PYs vs 54.9 events per 1000 PYs; aHR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0), and rivaroxaban users (87.4 events per 1000 PYs vs 68.5 events per 1000 PYs; aHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). In all 3 comparisons, the magnitude of the benefits associated with apixaban was similar regardless of dementia diagnosis on the HR scale but differed substantially on the rate difference (RD) scale. The adjusted RD of the composite outcome per 1000 PYs for warfarin vs apixaban users was 29.8 (95% CI, 18.4-41.1) events in patients with dementia vs 16.0 (95% CI, 13.6-18.4) events in patients without dementia. The corresponding adjusted RD estimates of the composite outcome were 29.6 (95% CI, 11.6-47.6) events per 1000 PYs in patients with dementia vs 5.8 (95% CI, 1.1-10.4) events per 1000 PYs in patients without dementia for dabigatran vs apixaban users and 20.5 (95% CI, 9.9-31.1) events per 1000 PYs in patients with dementia vs 15.9 (95% CI, 11.4-20.3) events per 1000 PYs in patients without dementia for rivaroxaban vs apixaban users. The pattern was more distinct for major bleeding than for ischemic stroke.. In this comparative effectiveness study, apixaban was associated with lower rates of major bleeding and ischemic stroke compared with other OACs. The increased absolute risks associated with other OACs compared with apixaban were greater among patients with dementia than those without dementia, particularly for major bleeding. These findings support the use of apixaban for anticoagulation therapy in patients living with dementia who have AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Dementia; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Warfarin

Background Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have been underrepresented in the trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess whether AS impacts outcomes in patients with AF and estimate the effects of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with AF and AS. Methods and Results The registry-based FinACAF (Finnish Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation) study covered all patients with AF diagnosed during 2007 to 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HRs) of first-ever gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, any bleeding, ischemic stroke, and death were estimated with cause-specific hazards regression adjusted for anticoagulant exposure variables. We identified 183 946 patients (50.5% women; mean age, 71.7 [SD, 13.5] years) with incident AF without prior bleeding or ischemic stroke, of whom 5231 (2.8%) had AS. The crude incidence rate of all outcomes was higher in patients with AS than in patients without AS. After propensity score matching, AS was associated with the hazard of any bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and death but not with intracranial bleeding or ischemic stroke (adjusted HRs, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.25-1.48], 1.63 [95% CI, 1.43-1.86], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.38], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.78-1.17], and 1.11 [95% CI, 0.99-1.25], respectively). Among patients with AS, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke when compared with warfarin, while bleeding and mortality did not differ between DOACs and warfarin. Conclusions AS is associated with substantially higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with AF. DOACs may be more effective in preventing ischemic stroke than warfarin in patients with AF and AS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04645537.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) might have a higher risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. To investigate this, we compared the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and its subtypes, as well as ischemic stroke, in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in a real-world setting. We also determined the baseline characteristics associated with both ICH and ischemic stroke.. Patients aged ⩾ 75 years with documented NVAF enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, observational All Nippon Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly Registry between October 2016 and January 2018 were evaluated. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of ischemic stroke and ICH. Secondary endpoints included subtypes of ICH.. Of 32,275 patients (13,793 women; median age, 81.0 years) analyzed, 21,585 (66.9%) were taking DOACs and 8233 (25.5%) were taking warfarin. During the median 1.88-year follow-up, 743 patients (1.24/100 person-years) developed ischemic stroke and 453 (0.75/100 person-years) developed ICH (intracerebral hemorrhage, 189; subarachnoid hemorrhage, 72; subdural/epidural hemorrhage, 190; unknown subtype, 2). The incidence of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.97), ICH (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.83), and subdural/epidural hemorrhage (aHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.72) was lower in DOAC users versus warfarin users. The incidence of fatal ICH and fatal subarachnoid hemorrhage was also lower in DOAC users versus warfarin users. Several baseline characteristics other than anticoagulants were also associated with the incidence of the endpoints. Of these, history of cerebrovascular disease (aHR 2.39, 95% CI 2.05-2.78), persistent NVAF, (aHR 1.90, 95% CI 1.53-2.36), and long-standing persistent/permanent NVAF (aHR 1.92, 95% CI 1.60-2.30) was strongly associated with ischemic stroke; severe hepatic disease (aHR 2.67, 95% CI 1.46-4.88) was strongly associated with overall ICH; and history of fall within 1 year was strongly associated with both overall ICH (aHR 2.29, 95% CI 1.76-2.97) and subdural/epidural hemorrhage (aHR 2.90, 95% CI 1.99-4.23).. Patients aged ⩾ 75 years with NVAF taking DOACs had lower risks of ischemic stroke, ICH, and subdural/epidural hemorrhage than those taking warfarin. Fall was strongly associated with the risks of intracranial and subdural/epidural hemorrhage.. The individual de-identified participant data and study protocol will be shared for up to 36 months after the publication of the article. Access criteria for data sharing (including requests) will be decided on by a committee led by Daiichi Sankyo. To gain access, those requesting data access will need to sign a data access agreement. Requests should be directed to yamt-tky@umin.ac.jp.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Prospective Studies; Registries; Stroke; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Although widely used in clinical fields, real-world data on the role of warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce.. This retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of NOAC and warfarin in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, we included 16,762 oral anticoagulants-naive acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2016 and June 2019. The main outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause of death.. In total, 1717 warfarin and 15,025 NOAC users were included in the analysis. After 1:8 propensity score matching, during the observation period, all types of NOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin (edoxaban: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.93, rivaroxaban: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96, apixaban: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91, and dabigatran: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Edoxaban (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), apixaban (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90), and dabigatran (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) had lower risks of major bleeding and all-cause of death.. All NOACs were more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Except for rivaroxaban, most NOACs demonstrated a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause of death than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Ischemic stroke despite a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is increasingly common and portends a high risk of subsequent ischemic stroke. The efficacy and safety of antithrombotic regimens after the condition are unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke despite DOACs with and without an alternative antithrombotic regimen and determine the risk factors of recurrent ischemic stroke while on anticoagulation.. In a population-based, propensity score-weighted, retrospective cohort study, we compared the clinical outcomes of DOAC-to-warfarin switch, DOAC-to-DOAC switch (DOAC. In patients with NVAF with ischemic stroke despite a DOAC, the increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke with switching to warfarin called for caution against such practice, while the increased ischemic stroke with DOAC-to-DOAC switch demands further studies. Adjunctive antiplatelet agent did not seem to reduce ischemic stroke relapse. Because diabetes mellitus, the use of CYP/P-gp modulators, and LAD were predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke, further investigations should evaluate whether strict glycemic control, DOAC level monitoring, and routine screening for carotid and intracranial atherosclerosis may reduce ischemic stroke recurrence in these patients.. This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with NVAF experiencing an ischemic stroke while being treated with a DOAC, continuing treatment with that DOAC is more effective at preventing recurrent ischemic stroke than switching to a different DOAC or to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

SARS-CoV-19 infection is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. We present a case of acute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke in a patient with SARS-CoV-19 infection despite being on warfarin with supratherapeutic INR (International Normalized Ratio).. A 68-year-old Caucasian female with multiple comorbidities was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection. A rapid antigen test confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, and intravenous remdesivir was initiated. On the fifth day of admission, the patient experienced sudden onset confusion, slurred speech, left-sided hemiplegia, right-sided eye deviation, and left-sided facial droop. Imaging studies revealed an occlusion of the distal anterior M2 segment of the right middle cerebral artery, and an MRI of the brain confirmed an acute right MCA infarction. Notably, the patient was receiving warfarin therapy with a supratherapeutic INR of 3.2.. This case report highlights the potential for thromboembolic events, including stroke, in patients with COVID-19 infection, even when receiving therapeutic anticoagulation therapy. Healthcare providers should be vigilant for signs of thrombosis in COVID-19 patients, particularly those with pre-existing risk factors. Further research is necessary to understand the pathophysiology and optimal management of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; COVID-19; Female; Humans; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; International Normalized Ratio; Ischemic Stroke; Stroke; Warfarin

We aimed to assess the prevalence of prior anticoagulation therapy (warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs]) among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in China and investigate the associations between prior anticoagulation therapy and initial stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes.. We included consecutive patients with AIS and known history of AF admitted to hospitals in the China Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) program from January 2019 to July 2019. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between prior anticoagulation therapy and initial stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes.. Of 7181 patients (median [IQR] age, 75.0 [68.0-81.0] years; 48.7% men), 700 (9.7%), 129 (1.8%), and 255 (3.6%) patients received prior subtherapeutic warfarin (international normalized ratio [INR] <2.0), therapeutic warfarin (INR ≥2.0), and NOACs therapy, respectively. A total of 6499 patients had a preadmission CHA. Among patients with AIS and AF in China, the proportion of patients with inadequate anticoagulation prior to stroke remained substantially high. Prior NOACs therapy was associated with reduced stroke severity and less in-hospital mortality or DAMA.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

To compare outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. A total of 71 consecutive patients with AF who underwent MT due to AIS between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped as warfarin versus DOAC group. CHA. HAS-BLED score was significantly higher in DOAC group (p = 0.006) There were no significant differences in stroke severity, successful recanalization rates, post-procedural complications and mRS 90th day scores between patients with warfarin and DOACs. CHA. MT is safe and effective in patients receiving warfarin or DOACs. HASBLED and CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Warfarin

Warfarin treatment quality is calculated as time in therapeutic range (TTR). TTR ≥ 70 % is considered reducing the risk of adverse events for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The association of TTR and adverse events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is however poorly investigated. The aim is to explore this further.. Swedish cohort study based on national healthcare registers between 2009 and 2018, including Swedish Renal Registry, Swedish Stroke Register and AuriculA - the Swedish national quality register for AF and anticoagulation. Investigating the effect of individual TTR (iTTR) and iTTR ≥ 70 % versus <70 % on the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding and death for patients with CKD GFR category 3-5 (G3-G5) including patients on dialysis (G5D) and non-valvular AF (NVAF).. Of 2379 included patients 21.9 % had G3, 47.5 % G4, 10.8 % G5 and 19.8 % G5D. TTR in G3 was 75.6 %, G4 72.2 %, G5 67.6 % and G5D 62.0 %. Increase by 10 percentage points iTTR conferred lower risk of major bleeding, ischemic stroke and death for all patients (hazard ratio 0.91 (95 % Confidence interval 0.87-0.94), 0.92 (0.85-0.99) and 0.88 (0.85-0.90)). iTTR≥ 70 % versus <70 % was associated with lower risk of bleeding and death in all patients (0.63 (0.51-0.77) and (0.51 (0.43-0.61)), and a non-significant tendency towards lower stroke risk (0.67 (0.43-1.06)).. Warfarin treatment quality worsens with decreasing GFR. Higher iTTR confers lower risk of bleeding, ischemic stroke and death in patients with NVAF and G3-G5D. iTTR ≥ 70 % was associated with better safety profile. Close monitoring of patients with CKD on warfarin is recommended.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Warfarin

We aimed to analyze the characteristics and mechanisms of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who received prior anticoagulant therapy.. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with NVAF and AIS between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into non-anticoagulant, adequate anticoagulant, and insufficient anticoagulant groups according to their prior anticoagulant status. Patients with prior anticoagulant therapy were further divided into warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant groups.. A total of 749 patients (661 without anticoagulants, 33 with adequate anticoagulants, and 55 with insufficient anticoagulants) were included. Patients with adequate anticoagulant had a milder National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at presentation ( P =0.001) and discharge ( P =0.003), a higher proportion of Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 at discharge ( P =0.011), and lower rates of massive infarction ( P =0.008) than patients without anticoagulant. Compared with the non-anticoagulant group, the proportion of intravenous thrombolysis was significantly lower in the adequate anticoagulant ( P <0.001) and insufficient anticoagulant ( P =0.009) groups. Patients in the adequate anticoagulant group had higher rates of responsible cerebral atherosclerotic stenosis ( P =0.001 and 0.006, respectively) and competing large artery atherosclerotic mechanisms ( P =0.006 and 0.009, respectively) than those in the other 2 groups. Compared with warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant was associated with higher rates of Modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at discharge ( P =0.003).. Adequate anticoagulant therapy may be associated with milder stroke severity and better outcomes at discharge in patients with NVAF. Competing large artery atherosclerotic mechanisms may be associated with anticoagulant failure in patients with NAVF with prior adequate anticoagulant therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Warfarin is associated with paradoxical procoagulant effect that leads to a transient hypercoagulable state and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This clinical dilemma is further confounded when the patient has multiple comorbidities and the optimal treatment strategies are unclear.. We report a 78-year-old male with valvular heart disease, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, who received bioprosthetic valve replacement and developed AIS related to the paradoxical procoagulant effect of warfarin. Emergent cerebral angiography with mechanical thrombectomy was performed, and recanalization was successfully achieved. After shifting warfarin to nonvitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC), the paradoxical procoagulant effect ameliorated.. This report describes the roles of endovascular therapy and NOAC in patients with similar highly complex conditions and has clinical relevance for therapeutic plans in the clinical setting.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Thrombectomy; Warfarin

To assess whether Roberts' age-adjusted warfarin loading protocol is effective in Chinese patients and whether the SAMeTT2R2 score can predict international normalized ratio (INR) control. Roberts' protocol for warfarin titration was applied to patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated with ischemic stroke at the Department of Neurology between 2014 and 2019. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were recorded. A minimum of 1-year follow-up was used to calculate the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the INR. A total of 94 acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF were included in the study. Seventy-seven (81.9%) of the patients had attained stable INR (2.0-3.0) at the fifth dose, and 90.0% of the patients had achieved stable INR on the ninth day. Seventeen (18.1%) of the patients had an INR > 4 during dose-adjustment period. Patients with INR > 4 had significantly lower body weight (53.8 vs. 63.1 kg, P = 0.014), lower rate of achievement of stable INR (35.3% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.000), and lower rate of TTR ≥ 65% (23.5% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.001), but with no significant increase in bleeding risk. A total of 89 patients underwent long-term INR follow-up, of which 58 (65.2%) patients achieved TTR ≥ 65%. Patients with poor TTR had significantly lower body weight (56.3 vs. 63.7 kg, P = 0.020) and lower rate of stable INR achievement (64.5% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.002). All 94 patients had SAMeTT2R2 score ≥ 2. There was no linear association between SAMeTT2R2 score and the rate of TTR ≥ 65% (P

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Weight; East Asian People; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

An increased risk of recurrent stroke is noted in patients with atrial fibrillation despite direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of treatment with each of 4 different DOACs or warfarin after DOAC failure.. We retrospectively analyzed patients with atrial fibrillation with ischemic stroke despite DOAC treatment between January 2002 and December 2016. The different outcomes of patients with DOAC failure were compared, including recurrent ischemic stroke, major cardiovascular events, intracranial hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, mortality, and net composite outcomes according to switching to different DOACs or vitamin K antagonist after index ischemic stroke. We identified 3759 patients with DOAC failure. A total of 84 patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke after switching to different oral anticoagulants, with a total follow-up time of 14 years. Using the vitamin K antagonist group as a reference, switching to any of the 4 DOACs was associated with a 69% to 77% reduced risk of major cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.16-0.39] for apixaban, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.14-0.37] for dabigatran, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09-0.60] for edoxaban, and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.45] for rivaroxaban), and a 69% to 83% reduced risk of net composite outcomes (aHR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.18-0.35] for apixaban, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.11-0.25] for dabigatran, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.17-0.56] for edoxaban, and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.23-0.41] for rivaroxaban).. In Asian patients with DOAC failure, continuing DOACs after index stroke was associated with fewer undesirable outcomes than switching to a vitamin K antagonist. Alternative pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies warrant investigation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are less likely to receive anticoagulation than nonfrail patients with AF despite frailty being associated with poorer clinical outcomes including stroke. Using a population-based cohort, we sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in frail patients with AF.. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 83 635 patients aged at least 65 years with AF and frailty (≥5 Hospital Frailty Risk Score) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. To account for the differences between patients receiving OAC or not and across different OAC regimens, propensity score-weighting was used. Net adverse clinical event, defined as the first event of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death, was compared. In addition, each individual outcome was examined separately.. In the study population (57.1% women; mean age, 78.5±7.2 years), a total of 14 968 net adverse clinical event, 3718 ischemic stroke, 5536 major bleeding, and 6188 cardiovascular death occurred. In comparison with no OAC use, OAC use was associated with lower risks of net adverse clinical event (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.82]), ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]), and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.49-0.55]), but no difference was observed for major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.10]). Compared with warfarin, all four individual direct OAC were associated with decreased risks of net adverse clinical event, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and cardiovascular death. The associations for OAC use (compared to no OAC use) or direct OAC use (compared to warfarin) with favorable outcomes were more prominent in individuals with a higher CHA. Among frail patients with AF, OAC treatment was associated with a positive net clinical outcome. Direct OACs provided lower incidences of stroke, bleeding, and mortality, compared with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Frail Elderly; Frailty; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Few studies assessed the association between major adverse cardiovascular events and adherence to warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with AF using claims data (July 2014-April 2019). Using the initial 3-month medication possession rate (MPR), patients were categorized into adherent (MPR ≥ 0.8) or non-adherent (MPR < 0.8) groups. Propensity score matching of non-adherent group to adherent group was conducted for warfarin (1:1) and DOAC (1:3), respectively. Incidence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause death was assessed in the matched cohort (67,147 patients). The hazard ratio (HR) for adherence to OAC was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model with adjusting covariate including age and sex. The risk for ischemic stroke, MI, and all-cause death was lower in the DOAC adherent group than in the DOAC non-adherent group (HR: 0.78; 95% confidence intervals: 0.73-0.84; 0.75, 0.60-0.94; 0.54, 0.51-0.57, respectively). Adherence to OAC was not associated with the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (1.01, 0.85-1.20). Commitment programs to improve adherence in patients with AF could maximize drug effectiveness and safety.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with left ventricular thrombus are at high risk for ischemic stroke and systemic embolization. The mainstay of treatment is anticoagulation, but it remains unclear if direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a safe and effective treatment strategy compared to warfarin. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in an integrated health system in the United States.. Consecutive patients with left ventricular thrombus on transthoracic echocardiogram from May 2010 to April 2020 were identified. Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs and warfarin were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Among 433 patients with left ventricular thrombus, 134 (30.9%) were treated with DOACs and 299 (69.1%) were treated with warfarin. Patients were followed for a median of 3.4 years. For the primary effectiveness outcome of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and transient ischemic attack, no significant difference was observed between use of DOACs compared to warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.18, p = 0.21). For the primary safety outcome of intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other bleed requiring hospitalization, DOAC usage was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87, p = 0.0008).. In this diverse population-based cohort of patients, DOAC treatment for left ventricular thrombus appears to be as safe and effective as warfarin treatment. These findings support the use of DOACs for patients with left ventricular thrombus.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Thrombosis; United States; Warfarin

Hemoglobin levels and platelet counts have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular conditions. We aimed to assess the impact of oral anticoagulant use for patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant anemia or thrombocytopenia.. We used medical data from a multicenter health care system in Taiwan including 37,074 patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on hemoglobin and platelet levels: Group 1 (hemoglobin >10g/dL and platelet>100 K/µL; n = 29,147), Group 2 (hemoglobin<10 g/dL or platelet<100 K/µL; n = 7078), and Group 3 (hemoglobin <10 g/dL and platelet <100 K/µL; n = 849). Patients in each category were further stratified as 3 groups according to their stroke prevention strategies: no oral anticoagulant use (non-OAC), warfarin, or nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. A higher hemoglobin or platelet level was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism but lower risks of intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding. The composite risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding were higher in Group 3 or Group 2, compared with Group 1 (6.79% a year vs 6.41% year vs 4.13% year). Compared to non-OACs, warfarin was not associated with a lower composite risk in the 3 groups. NOACs were associated with a lower composite risk in Group 1 (adjusted hazard ratio:0.68, [95% confidence interval:0.60-0.76]) and Group 2 (adjusted hazard ratio:0.73, [95% confidence interval:0.53-0.99]) but was nonsignificant in Group 3.. Patients with atrial fibrillation with anemia or thrombocytopenia were a high-risk population. Compared with no OAC use, NOACs were associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced anemia (hemoglobin <10g/dL) or thrombocytopenia (platelet <100 K/µL) but not for those with both conditions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemoglobins; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombocytopenia; Warfarin

We determined the long-term event incidence among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in terms of history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and oral anticoagulation.. Patients aged ≥75 years with documented nonvalvular atrial fibrillation enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, observational All Nippon Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly Registry between October 2016 and January 2018 were divided into 2 groups according to history of stroke/TIA. The primary end point was the occurrence of stroke/systemic embolism within 2 years, and secondary end points were major bleeding and all-cause death within 2 years. Cox models were used to determine whether there was a difference in the hazard of each end point in patients with/without history of stroke/TIA, and in ischemic stroke/TIA survivors taking direct oral anticoagulants versus those taking warfarin.. Of 32 275 evaluable patients (13 793 women [42.7%]; median age, 81.0 years), 7304 (22.6%) had a history of stroke/TIA. The patients with previous stroke/TIA were more likely to be male and older and had higher hazard rates of stroke/systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.97-2.58]), major bleeding (1.25, 1.05-1.49), and all-cause death (1.13, 1.02-1.24) than the other groups. Of 6446 patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA, 4393 (68.2%) were taking direct oral anticoagulants and 1668 (25.9%) were taking warfarin at enrollment. The risk of stroke/systemic embolism was comparable between these 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.71-1.14]), while the risk of major bleeding (0.67, 0.48-0.94), intracranial hemorrhage (0.57, 0.39-0.85), and cardiovascular death (0.71, 0.51-0.99) was lower among those taking direct oral anticoagulants.. Patients aged ≥75 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and previous stroke/TIA more commonly had subsequent ischemic and hemorrhagic events than those without previous stroke/TIA. Among patients with previous ischemic stroke/TIA, the risk of hemorrhagic events was lower in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique Identifier: UMIN000024006.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Prospective Studies; Registries; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Evidence-based stroke clinical practice guidelines provide guidance as how to best manage patients with cerebrovascular disease. Where there are grey zones, the clinician decides what she/he feels is the most appropriate in that circumstance. This study was performed to determine how adult neurologists in Singapore would use antiplatelets(AP) and anticoagulants(AC) for their ischemic stroke patients in various settings where the evidence is uncertain.. A standardised questionnaire was sent to adult neurologists in Singapore. The questions evaluated their preferred type and dose of AP, use of heparin prior to initiating warfarin, and their preferred treatments in 6 different clinical scenarios.. A total of 31/33 neurologists responded (93.9%). For long term secondary prevention, 71.0% preferred aspirin only, 22.6% clopidogrel/ticlopidine only, 6.5% aspirin plus dipyridamole. Anticoagulation with warfarin was initiated with a heparin bolus by 45.2%. AC were preferred by 80.6% for stroke in evolution, 80.6% for presumed basilar artery thrombosis, 54.8% for crescendo TIAs. For patients awaiting CEA, 58.1% preferred AP, 32.3% AC. For patients on preferred AP developing another cerebrovascular event with no new underlying cause, 48.4% would change AP, 25.8% would add another AP. For patients on adequate AC for non-cardioembolism developing another cerebrovascular event, 54.8% would add anti-platelet, 19.4% would increase AC.. The widespread use of aspirin for long-term secondary prevention is similar to other countries. The variation in the use of antithrombotic agents in other settings may reflect the lack of sufficient evidence to guide therapy in the various specific stroke patient management scenarios.. neurologist, practice, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, stroke, cerebrovascular disease.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Female; Heparin; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Neurologists; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Singapore; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes among patients from the PROTECT-AF (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and PREVAIL (Evaluation of the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage [LAA] Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) trials with matched patients from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry using patient-level data.. Patients undergoing LAAO in clinical practice generally have more comorbidities than trial participants.. Propensity-matched analyses, with up to 3 registry patients matched to each trial patient, were performed using Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray models.. A total of 1,904 registry patients were matched to 667 trial LAAO patients; 1,010 registry patients were matched to 348 warfarin patients. Compared with registry patients, trial LAAO patients experienced more pericardial effusion requiring intervention (3.8% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001), periprocedural ischemic stroke (0.9% vs 0.2%, P = 0.005), and failed device implantation (7.5% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). The 425-day risk of ischemic stroke in trial LAAO patients was higher than in registry patients (2.70% vs 1.21%; HR: 1.951; P = 0.03); warfarin patients had comparable rates of ischemic stroke compared with registry patients (1.15% vs 1.29%; HR: 0.728; P = 0.57). Hemorrhagic stroke risk was similar among trial LAAO and registry patients (P = 0.88). Hemorrhagic stroke risk was greater among warfarin patients versus registry patients (1.44% vs 0.20%; HR: 5.871, P = 0.03). Mortality was lower in trial LAAO patients than in registry patients (2.92% vs 6.23%; HR: 0.477; P = 0.004), a difference attributable to noncardiovascular deaths. Mortality was similar (P = 0.44) among trial warfarin (4.48%) and registry (5.86%) patients.. In clinical practice, patients who meet trial criteria and undergo LAAO experience a lower risk of ischemic stroke, a similar risk of hemorrhagic stroke, and a higher risk of death after implant versus LAAO trial patients. (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [PROTECT-AF], NCT00129545; Evaluation of the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage [LAA] Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy [PREVAIL], NCT01182441).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Embolism; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The objective of this study was to determine associations between use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and stroke and bleeding-related outcomes for older people ≥80 years with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to determine trends over time in prescribing of OAC for this population.. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. People aged ≥80 years with AF receiving (1) no OAC; (2) warfarin; or (3) a non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) between 2011 and 2019 were included. Propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts (no OAC, warfarin or a NOAC) on characteristics including age, sex, ethnicity, and co-morbidities. Cox proportional hazard models were used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. The proportion of people aged ≥80 years receiving any OAC increased from 32.4% (n = 27,647) in 2011 to 43.6% (n = 110,412) in 2019. After propensity score matching, n = 169,067 individuals were included in the cohorts receiving no OAC or a NOAC. Compared to no OAC, participants receiving a NOAC had a lower risk of incident dementia (hazHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71), all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48-0.50), first-time ischaemic stroke (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91), and a higher risk of major bleeding (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11). Compared to participants receiving warfarin, participants receiving a NOAC had a lower risk of dementia (HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.93), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.72-0.76), ischaemic stroke (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and major bleeding (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.90). Similar results were observed when only including people with additional bleeding risk factors.. The proportion of people aged ≥80 years receiving OAC has increased since the introduction of NOACs, but remains low. Use of a NOAC was associated with improved outcomes compared to warfarin, and compared to no OAC, except for a small but statistically significant higher risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dementia; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Warfarin

To investigate effects of appropriately and inappropriately dosed apixaban/rivaroxaban versus warfarin on effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Cohort study with nested case-control analyses using primary care electronic health records (IQVIA Medical Research Data UK database).. UK primary care.. Patients aged ≥18 years with NVAF newly prescribed apixaban (N=14 701), rivaroxaban (N=14 288) or warfarin (N=16 175) between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2018, and followed up to 31 December 2018.. Incident cases of ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and intracranial bleeding (ICB). Cases were matched to controls on age, sex and OAC naïve status. Using logistic regression, adjusted ORs with 95% CIs were calculated for the outcomes comparing apixaban/rivaroxaban use (appropriate or inappropriate dosing based on the product label criteria) and warfarin.. For IS/SE, ORs (95% CIs) for apixaban versus warfarin were 1.19 (0.92-1.52) for appropriate dose and 1.01 (0.67-1.51) for inappropriate dose; for rivaroxaban versus warfarin, estimates were 1.07 (0.83-1.37) for appropriate dose and 1.21 (0.78-1.88) for inappropriate dose. For ICB, ORs (95% CIs) for apixaban versus warfarin were 0.67 (0.44-1.00) for appropriate dose and 0.45 (0.21-0.95) for inappropriate dose; for rivaroxaban versus warfarin, estimates were 0.81 (0.55-1.20) for appropriate dose and 1.14 (0.56-2.31) for inappropriate dose.. Dosing appropriateness in NVAF was not associated with a significant difference in IS/SE risk or increase in ICB risk versus warfarin. These findings may reflect residual confounding and biases that were difficult to control, as also seen in other observational studies. They should, therefore, be interpreted with caution, and prescribers should adhere to the dosing instructions in the respective Summary of Product Characteristics. Further studies on this topic from real-world populations are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; United Kingdom; Warfarin

Long-term anticoagulant therapy in oldest-old persons poses the risk of bleeding complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term benefits of anticoagulant therapy for oldest-old stroke survivors with AF.. Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were 90 years of age or older and were prescribed an anticoagulant on discharge were identified from a set of data from a prospective follow-up registry of 1,484 consecutive patients admitted for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack over a 4-year period beginning in 2014. The outcome measures were stroke and death following discharge.. Of the 77 identified patients with AF who were 90 years of age or older, 71 were prescribed an anticoagulant (median age 93 years, 73% women). Thirty-nine patients were given a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) (median age 92 years, 69% women), and 32 were given warfarin (median age 93 years, 78% women). During the follow-up period (median 466 days), 9 patients (13%) had stroke recurrence (recurrence rate: 14%/year), and 25 patients (35%) died (mortality rate: 33%/year). The type of all recurrent strokes was ischemic, and no fatal bleeding occurred. There was no difference in the incidence of recurrent strokes according to anticoagulant type (DOAC 15%/year, warfarin 13%/year, P = 0.743), but a higher proportion of patients on warfarin died (21% vs. 47%, P = 0.002).. Given that a higher proportion of oldest-old stroke survivors with AF on anticoagulant therapy have recurrent ischemic stroke rather than hemorrhagic stroke, long-term anticoagulant therapy may be justified for secondary stroke prevention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Survivors; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is effective for prevention of embolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, the effectiveness and safety of DOAC in AF patients who have bioprosthetic heart valve (BPHV) is largely unknown.. We retrospectively identified patients with AF and BPHV, using the diagnostic code and medical device and surgery information from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, between 2013 and 2018. A 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort (n = 724 taking warfarin; n = 362 taking DOAC) was constructed and analyzed for the primary clinical outcome, a composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism. Important secondary outcomes included major bleeding, all-cause death, and the net clinical outcome, defined as a composite of all embolic events, major bleeding, and death.. The mean age was 78.9±6.8 years old, and 45% (n = 489) were male. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.7±1.4. DOAC was non-inferior to warfarin for preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-2.34), major bleeding (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.32-2.03) and all-cause death (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.73-1.63). As for the net clinical outcome, DOAC was also similar to warfarin (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76-1.47). These outcomes were not different in various subgroups analyzed.. In this nationwide Korean AF population with a BPHV, DOAC was at least as effective and safe as warfarin for the prevention of systemic embolic events. These results suggest that DOAC may be an excellent alternative to warfarin in AF patients with BPHV.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) are often prescribed for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) taking oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, the risk-benefit balance of ASDs prescription for patients with NVAF taking OACs is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between ASDs and clinical outcomes in patients taking OACs for NVAF.. This study is a subanalysis of an historical registry study from 71 centers in Japan. We included patients taking vitamin K antagonists for NVAF and excluded those with mechanical heart valves or a history of pulmonary thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis. We registered consecutive patients in February 2013 and followed them up until February 2017. The primary outcomes were ischemic events, major bleedings, and all-cause mortality. Ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and hemorrhagic stroke comprised the secondary outcomes.. We included 7826 patients with a mean age of 73 years, 5274 (67%) of whom were males. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for ischemic events, major bleedings, and all-cause mortality in the ASD group compared with the no-ASD group were 0.998 (0.78-1.27), 0.98 (0.81-1.18), and 1.22 (1.02-1.47), respectively, while those for ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and hemorrhagic stroke were 0.96 (0.74-1.24), 0.82 (0.36-1.88), and 1.17 (0.69-1.99), respectively.. ASDs were significantly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with NVAF taking OACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Female; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Warfarin

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a potential alternative to oral anticoagulants in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Compared with anticoagulants, LAAO decreases major bleeding risk, but there is uncertainty regarding the risk for ischemic stroke compared with anticoagulation.. To determine the optimal strategy for stroke prevention conditional on a patient's individual risks for ischemic stroke and bleeding.. Decision analysis with a Markov model.. Evidence from the published literature informed model inputs.. Women and men with nonvalvular AF and without prior stroke.. Lifetime.. Clinical.. LAAO versus warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. The primary end point was clinical benefit measured in quality-adjusted life-years.. The baseline risks for stroke and bleeding determined whether LAAO was preferred over anticoagulants in patients with AF. The combined risks favored LAAO for higher bleeding risk, but that benefit became less certain at higher stroke risks. For example, at a HAS-BLED score of 5, LAAO was favored in more than 80% of model simulations for CHA. Results were consistent using the ORBIT bleeding score instead of the HAS-BLED score, as well as alternative sources for LAAO clinical effectiveness data.. Clinical effectiveness data were drawn primarily from studies on the Watchman device.. Although LAAO could be an alternative to anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with AF and high bleeding risk, the overall benefit from LAAO depends on the combination of stroke and bleeding risks in individual patients. These results suggest the need for a sufficiently low stroke risk for LAAO to be beneficial. The authors believe that these results could improve shared decision making when selecting patients for LAAO.. None.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background We sought to examine outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation with valve repair/replacement. Methods and Results Two atrial fibrillation cohorts from Medicare were identified from 2015 to 2019. They comprised patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter mitral valve repair (MV repair cohort) and surgical aortic or mitral bioprosthetic or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (bioprosthetic cohort). Each cohort was divided into warfarin and DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) groups. Study outcomes included mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. Inverse probability weighting was used for adjustment between the 2 groups in each cohort. The MV repair cohort included 1178 patients. After a median of 468 days, DOACs were associated with lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.82],

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

A 61-year-old man presented with transient dysarthria and left upper extremity numbness. Head MRI showed an acute infarct in the left temporal lobe and multiple old infarcts in the bilateral cortices. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a patent foramen ovale with a large shunt. No deep vein thrombosis was found. He suffered a recurrent cerebral infarction while taking antiplatelet therapy. An insertable cardiac monitor was implanted on the 41st day, and the antiplatelet treatment was changed to warfarin. The insertable cardiac monitor did not detect atrial fibrillation, even when the patient had a recurrent transient ischemic attack on the 57th day under warfarin therapy. The patient underwent percutaneous foramen ovale closure on the 63rd day. On postoperative days 18-25, an insertable cardiac monitor detected brief atrial fibrillation, and he took rivaroxaban for three months. Atrial fibrillation may occur secondary to percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for cryptogenic stroke. The insertable cardiac monitor may help diagnose the pathogenesis of secondary atrial fibrillation and determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Foramen Ovale; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

While clinical guidelines recommend direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over warfarin to treat isolated nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, guidelines are silent regarding nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treatment among individuals with cancer, reflecting the paucity of evidence in this setting. We quantified relative risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (primary outcomes), and all-cause and cardiovascular death (secondary outcomes) among older individuals with cancer and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation comparing DOACs and warfarin.. This retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry and linked US Medicare data from 2010 through 2016, and included individuals diagnosed with cancer and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who newly initiated DOAC or warfarin. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to control confounding. We used competing risk regression for primary outcomes and cardiovascular death, and Cox proportional hazard regression for all-cause death.. Among 7675 individuals included in the cohort, 4244 (55.3%) received DOACs and 3431 (44.7%) warfarin. In the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, there was no statistically significant difference among DOAC and warfarin users in the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 versus 1.19 events per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 1.41 [95% CI, 0.92-2.14]), major bleeding (3.08 versus 4.49 events per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.90 [95% CI, 0.70-1.17]), and cardiovascular death (1.88 versus 3.14 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.82 [95% CI, 0.59-0.1.13]). DOAC users had significantly lower risk of all-cause death (7.09 versus 13.3 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94]) compared to warfarin users.. Older adults with cancer and atrial fibrillation exposed to DOACs had similar risks of stroke and systemic embolism and major bleeding as those exposed to warfarin. Relative to warfarin, DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of cardiovascular death and a lower risk of all-cause death.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Medicare; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Dysarthria; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Endocarditis, Non-Infective; Facial Paralysis; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The article outlines aspects of the current state of the problem of the priority choice of an oral anticoagulant for indefinite prevention of stroke and systemic thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. The advantages of direct oral angicoagulants over warfarin are presented, as well as a comparative analysis of the individual characteristics of the main direct oral angicoagulants from the point of view of personification of preventive therapy in accordance with modern treatment standards. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy has been reviewed in terms of the net clinical benefit. Particular attention is paid to the age-related aspects of choosing an anticoagulant for indefinite prophylaxis; an assessment of anticoagulants is presented in accordance with the FORTA concept, which regulates the use of drugs in elderly patients. In conclusion, recommendations are formulated for the choice of an anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation in the most common clinical situations. As a general rule, the choice of a particular drug should be individualized based on risk factors, tolerability, net clinical benefit, patient preference, potential adverse interactions, and other clinical characteristics.. В статье представлены аспекты современного состояния проблемы приоритетного выбора перорального антикоагулянта для бессрочной профилактики инсульта и системных тромбоэмболий у пациентов с фибрилляцией предсердий. Изложены преимущества прямых пероральных антикоагулянтов перед варфарином, а также продемонстрирован сопоставительный анализ индивидуальных особенностей основных прямых пероральных антикоагулянтов с точки зрения персонификации превентивной терапии в соответствии с современными стандартами лечения. Вопросы эффективности и безопасности терапии пероральными антикоагулянтами рассмотрены с учетом чистой клинической выгоды. Особое внимание уделено возрастным аспектам выбора антикоагулянта для бессрочной профилактики, представлена оценка антикоагулянтов в соответствии с концепцией FORTA, регламентирующей применение лекарственных препаратов у пожилых пациентов. В заключение сформулированы рекомендации по выбору антикоагулянта у больных с фибрилляцией предсердий при наиболее часто встречающихся клинических ситуациях. Важное правило выбор конкретного препарата должен быть индивидуализирован на основании факторов риска, переносимости, чистой клинической выгоды, предпочтений пациента, потенциальных нежелательных взаимодействий и других клинических характеристик.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Neurologists; Stroke; Warfarin

Evidence of clinical outcomes for oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet treatment (APT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) is very limited.. In this nationwide retrospective cohort study collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, 1223 patients with AF and CLI taking direct-acting oral coagulants (DOACs), warfarin, or APT were identified from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. We used propensity score stabilized weighting (PSSW) to balance covariates across study groups.. After PSSW, DOAC (n = 446) was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE), all major adverse limb events, and all major bleeding events compared with warfarin (n = 237). DOAC was associated with lower risks of IS/SE, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and all major adverse limb events and a comparable risk of major bleeding events compared with APT (n = 540). DOAC has a lower risk of composite net-clinical-benefit outcome (IS/SE, AMI, all major adverse limb events, plus all major bleeding events) compared with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.65; P < 0.0001) or APT (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.34-0.56; P < 0.0001). The composite net-clinical-benefit outcome was comparable for warfarin vs APT. The reduced risk of net-clinical-benefit outcome for DOAC vs warfarin or APT persisted in high subgroups including age > 75 years, presence of diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease.. DOAC was associated with a significantly lower risk of composite net-clinical-benefit outcome than either warfarin or APT in patients with AF and concomitant CLI. Further prospective study is necessary to validate the findings in the future.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Extremities; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Ischemic Stroke; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Warfarin

It is essential for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients to receive timely revascularization. However, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is not recommended for AIS patients with warfarin associated hypocoagulability. Meanwhile, monotherapy of coagulation factors or vitamin K is unable to reverse anticoagulation of warfarin in emergency. Thus, developing an effective IVT strategy poses a challenging task for these fragile population. Herein, an 82-year-old male, on regular administration with warfarin because of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), suffered from AIS and had an elevated international normalized ratio value of 1.72 and prolonged prothrombin time of 18.2 s at stroke onset. For normalizing INR, combination of 4 factor prothrombin complex concentrate, fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K1 were administrated. Finally, the patient successfully received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), with an obviously neurological improvement. This case shows a feasible role of IVT therapy with rt-PA after reversal of coagulation regarding AIS patients with warfarin-related hypocoagulability.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants have been evaluated in the general population, but proper evidence for their safe use in the geriatric population is still missing. We compared the bleeding risk of a direct oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) among French geriatric patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ≥80 years.. We performed a sequential observational prospective cohort study, using data from 33 geriatric centres. The sample comprised 908 patients newly initiated on VKAs between September 2011 and September 2014 and 995 patients newly initiated on rivaroxaban between September 2014 and September 2017. Patients were followed up for up to 12 months. One-year risks of major, intracerebral, gastrointestinal bleedings, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality were compared between rivaroxaban-treated and VKA-treated patients with propensity score matching and Cox models.. Major bleeding risk was significantly lower in rivaroxaban-treated patients (7.4/100 patient-years) compared with VKA-treated patients (14.6/100 patient-years) after multivariate adjustment (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99) and in the propensity score-matched sample (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85). Intracerebral bleeding occurred less frequently in rivaroxaban-treated patients (1.3/100 patient-years) than in VKA-treated patients (4.0/100 patient-years), adjusted HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.44) and in the propensity score-matched sample HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.80). Major lower bleeding risk was largely driven by lower risk of intracerebral bleeding.. Our study findings indicate that bleeding risk, largely driven by lower risk of intracerebral bleeding, is lower with rivaroxaban than with VKA in stroke prevention in patients ≥80 years old with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Mortality; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Limited data support the benefits of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among atrial fibrillation patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of NOACs compared with those of warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients with prior GIB.. Oral anticoagulant-naive individuals with atrial fibrillation and prior GIB between January 2010 and April 2018 were identified from the Korean claims database. NOAC users were compared with warfarin users by balancing covariates using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and the composite outcome (combined ischemic stroke and major bleeding). Fatal events from each outcome were evaluated as secondary outcomes.. A total of 42 048 patients were included (24 781 in the NOAC group and 17 267 in the warfarin group). The mean time from prior GIB to the initiation of oral anticoagulant was 3.1±2.6 years. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups (mean age, 72 years; men, 56.8%; and mean CHA. NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke and major bleeding than warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients with prior GIB.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence and its risk of stroke rise with ageing. We aimed to investigate the outcomes of NOAC and warfarin in AF patients aged ≥ 85 years.. This is a retrospective study using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 15,361 patients aged ≥ 85 years with AF on oral anticoagulants were identified. The end points included ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding, all-cause mortality and composite adverse events (ICH or major bleeding or all-cause mortality). Clinical outcomes were compared between each NOAC and warfarin after propensity matching.. Before propensity matching, patients taking warfarin were older, more female with more comorbidities than NOACs users. After propensity matching, baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between matched subjects receiving warfarin and each NOAC. Compared to warfarin, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of ICH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.496), mortality (HR 0.558) and adverse events (HR 0.628), while rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke (HR 0.781), ICH (HR 0.453), mortality (HR 0.558) and adverse events (HR 0.636). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR 0.488) and adverse events (HR 0.557) compared to warfarin. (all P < .05).. For the efficacy, NOACs were associated with a comparable or lower risk of ischaemic stroke compared to warfarin. For adverse events, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and composite adverse events. In the elderly AF population, NOACs could be a more favourable choice for stroke prevention.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Mortality; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Warfarin

Comparing kidney disease progression among patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin has not been well studied. We hypothesized that apixaban would be associated with lower risks of progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and progression to incident kidney failure than warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Retrospective cohort study.. Medicare recipients with stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD and incident AF who received a new prescription for apixaban or warfarin from 2013 through 2017.. Apixaban or warfarin.. Progression to incident kidney failure or, separately, to a more advanced stage of CKD.. Marginal structural cause-specific proportional hazards models with inverse probability weighting to estimate marginal hazard ratios (HRs) for each outcome. HRs compared apixaban to warfarin in intention-to-treat and censored-at-drug-switch analyses.. 12,816 individuals met inclusion criteria (50.3% received apixaban; 49.7% received warfarin). After weighting, the mean age of the cohort was 80 ± 7 years, 51% were women, and 88% were White. Approximately 84% had stage 3, 15% had stage 4, and 1% had stage 5 CKD. In the intention-to-treat analysis, apixaban, relative to warfarin, was associated with an HR of developing incident kidney failure of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.22) and of CKD stage progression of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99). Corresponding HRs for censored-at-drug-switch analyses were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.56-1.17) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Results were similar for a series of subgroup and sensitivity analyses.. CKD was defined based on diagnosis codes from claims; findings may not be generalizable to non-Medicare CKD populations.. Apixaban, compared with warfarin, was associated with lower risk of CKD stage progression, but not with incident kidney failure.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Medicare; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; United States; Warfarin

This study aims to determine whether door-to-needle times (DNT) for reversal of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (1) have improved over time, (2) differ between warfarin and dabigatran and (3) are comparable to ischaemic stroke (IS) thrombolysis DNT, and (4) whether reversal is monitored.. Retrospective review of all warfarin- and dabigatran-associated ICH presenting to Christchurch Hospital over a 15-year period. DNT data from 2013-2018 were compared between warfarin-related ICH (WRICH), dabigatran-related ICH (DRICH) and IS thrombolysis.. 172 WRICH were identified. Over time there were significant reductions in door-to-first-reversal-agent (r=-0.21, p=0.01), scan-to-first-reversal-agent (r=-0.27, p=0.001) and scan-to-prothrombin-complex-concentrate (PCC) (r=-0.33, p=0.001) times. In the 2013-2018 cohort, WRICH had significantly slower DNT, door-to-scan time and scan-to-needle time compared to DRICH and IS thrombolysis (all p<0.001). There was no statistical difference between DRICH and IS. Median DNT was 183 minutes for WRICH, 72 minutes for DRICH and 52 minutes for IS. Median time to repeat international normalised ratio was 231 minutes, and the median time to repeat thrombin clotting time was 825 minutes.. Door-to-any-reversal-agent and scan-to-PCC times have improved over time, but they remain significantly longer than IS thrombolysis times. Monitoring of reversal is inadequate, particularly for WRICH receiving PCC.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Retrospective Studies; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Current guidelines allow the administration of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV r-tPA) to warfarin-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who have an international normalized ratio (INR) of ≤1.7. However, concerns remain about the safety of using IV r-tPA in this situation due to a conceivable risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), lack of dedicated randomized controlled trials and the conflicts in the available data. We aimed to determine the risk of sICH in warfarin-treated patients with subtherapeutic INR who received IV r-tPA for AIS in our large volume comprehensive center.. Patients who had received IV r-tPA for AIS in a 9.6-year period were retrospectively investigated (n = 834). Patients taking warfarin prior to presentation were identified (n = 55). One patient was excluded due to elevated INR beyond the acceptable range for IV r-tPA treatment. Because of the significant difference in the sample size (54 vs 779), warfarin group was matched with 54 non-warfarin patients adjusted for independent risk factors for sICH (age, admission NIHSS, history of diabetes). Good outcome was defined as mRS of 0-2 on discharge and sICH was defined as an ICH causing increase in NIHSS ≥4 or death. Warfarin-treated group was further dichotomized based on INR (1-1.3 vs 1.3-1.7) and safety and outcome measures were compared between resultant groups.. No significant difference was found between warfarin-treated and the non-warfarin groups in terms of chance of good outcome on discharge (27.8% in warfarin group vs 26.4% in non-warfarin group; p-value >0.05), or the rate of occurrence of sICH (3.7% in warfarin group vs 11.1% in non-warfarin group; p-value >0.05). Furthermore, rate of sICH (5.1% in patients with INR <1.3 versus 0.0% in patients with INR 1.3-1.7; p-value >0.05) or chance of good outcome on discharge (28.2% of patients with INR <1.3 versus 26.7% in patients with INR 1.3-1.7; p-value >0.05) were not found to be different after the warfarin-treated group was dichotomized.. Administration of IV r-tPA for AIS in warfarin-treated patients with subtherapeutic INR <1.7 does not increase the risk of sICH.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Clinical Decision-Making; Databases, Factual; Drug Monitoring; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Ischemic Stroke; Male; New York; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Up to now we have had few evidences on the Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs)' efficacy and safety in preventing device-related thrombosis (DRT) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). After LAAC implantation, short-term anticoagulation (NOACs or warfarin) was prescribed. Baseline clinical characteristics, procedural parameters and postoperative follow up data were collected and compared between the two groups. From May 2014 to June 2018, 361 consecutive patients underwent LAAC implantation in our center. 170 patients received warfarin for 45 days at least after LAAC implantation, who were compared with 170 age-matched patients on NOACs. The basic clinical characteristics, as well as procedural parameters were comparable between the two groups, while the NOACs group had higher average CHA2DS2-VASc score (3.3  ±  1.6 vs. 2.9  ±  1.5, P = 0.022*). At 45 days follow up, 289 (86.5%) patients received transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and the overall incidence of DRT was 2.4%. The DRT rate was not significantly different between the NOACs and warfarin groups (2.7% vs. 2.1%, P > 0.05), while the NOACs group showed lower all bleeding rate (1.2% vs. 9.0%, P < 0.01). The rates of ischemic stroke as well as major bleeding were comparable between the two groups. Except for 7 DRTs and 1 major peri-device leakage (> 5 mm), anticoagulation was terminated in all other patients. During the follow-up thereafter (mean 868 days), the rates of all-cause death, ischemic stroke and bleeding were comparable between the two groups. Short-term NOACs after LAAC appear to be as effective as warfarin in preventing DRT, with lower bleeding rate.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in place of warfarin, but evidence about their effectiveness and safety in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited.. To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with valvular AF.. New-user retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.. U.S.-based commercial health care database from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.. Adults with valvular AF who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin.. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding.. Among a total of 56 336 patients with valvular AF matched on propensity score, use of DOACs (vs. warfarin) was associated with lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.70]) and major bleeding events (HR, 0.67 [CI, 0.63 to 0.72]). The results for the effectiveness and safety outcomes remained consistent for apixaban (HRs, 0.54 [CI, 0.47 to 0.61] and 0.52 [CI, 0.47 to 0.57], respectively) and rivaroxaban (HRs, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86] and 0.87 [CI, 0.79 to 0.96], respectively); with dabigatran, results were consistent for the major bleeding outcome (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.68 to 0.97]) but not for effectiveness (HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.81 to 1.31]).. Relatively short follow-up; inability to ascertain disease severity.. In this comparative effectiveness study using practice-based claims data, patients with valvular AF who were new users of DOACs had lower risks for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding than new users of warfarin. These data may be used to guide risk-benefit discussions regarding anticoagulant choices for patients with valvular AF.. None.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Stroke severity can be mitigated by preceding anticoagulant administration in acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated if such mitigative effects are different between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. We collected data from a regional multicenter stroke registry. Ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients with AF were included. Background characteristics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission, lesion characteristics, and in-hospital death were analyzed according to preceding antithrombotic agents at onset.. A total of 2173 patients had AF; 628 were prescribed warfarin, 272 DOACs, 429 antiplatelets alone, and 844 no antithrombotics. The NIHSS score on admission was lowest in the DOACs group compared to the other groups. In neuroimaging analysis, small ischemic lesions were observed more frequently in the DOACs group, while large ischemic lesions were less frequent in this group. When the no antithrombotics group was used as a reference, the adjusted odds ratio for moderate to severe stroke was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.78) in the DOACs group, while it was 0.98 (0.77-1.24) in the warfarin group and 0.94 (0.72-1.22) in the antiplatelets group. In-hospital mortality was lowest in the DOACs group compared to the other groups.. Preceding DOAC administration might mitigate the severity of stroke in AF patients more strongly than other antithrombotics, possibly leading to a better outcome in patients with stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Middle Aged; Warfarin

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulants, and patients are increasingly on oral anticoagulants and PPI co-therapy. However, evidence is lacking on the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants when co-administered with PPIs.. Among patients initiating oral anticoagulants (warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs], i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) during 2013-2017, those concomitantly prescribed PPIs were identified (n = 19,851). The primary endpoint was hospitalization for major upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and secondary endpoints were death and ischemic stroke.. During a mean 1.4 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 512 (2.58%) patients. Overall, NOACs were associated with lower upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities and concomitant medications (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.94), compared to warfarin. There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk among the individual NOACs. This trend of reduced risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NOACs compared to warfarin was consistent for both regular and reduced doses, throughout bleeding risk groups, and other subgroup analyses. NOACs were also associated with lower risk of death compared to warfarin. The risk for ischemic stroke was not significantly different among the oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.. In patients on oral anticoagulant and PPI co-therapy, NOACs were associated with lower risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality compared to warfarin, while there was no difference among the oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. In patients on PPI therapy, NOACs may preferred over warfarin for decreasing risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Embolism; Health Expenditures; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Japan; Models, Econometric; Myocardial Infarction; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

The anticoagulant response to warfarin, a narrow therapeutic index drug, increases with age, which may make older patients susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small differences in bioavailability between generic and brand products. Using US Medicare claims linked to electronic medical records from two large hospitals in Boston, we designed a cohort study of ≥ 65-year-old patients. Patients were followed for a composite effectiveness outcome of ischemic stroke or venous thromboembolism, a composite safety outcome, including major hemorrhage, and a 1-year all-cause mortality outcome. After propensity score fine-stratification and weighting to account for > 90 confounders, hazard ratios comparing brand vs. generic warfarin initiators (95% confidence intervals) for the effectiveness, safety, and all-cause mortality outcomes, were 0.97 (0.65-1.46), 0.94 (0.65-1.35), and 0.84 (0.62-1.13), respectively. Results from subgroup analyses of patients with atrial fibrillation, CHADS-VASc score ≥ 3, and HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 were consistent with the primary analysis.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Drugs, Generic; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Medicare; Treatment Outcome; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dicloxacillin; Embolism; Floxacillin; Heart Valves; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are high-priority medications, frequently used with clinically important benefit and serious harm. Our objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in a population where anticoagulation management and DOACs were readily available. A retrospective cohort study of all adults living in British Columbia with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and a first prescription for an OAC was conducted. Co-primary outcomes were ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included a net clinical outcome composite and analysis of discontinuation, switching, and key subgroups. We estimated the effects of treatment using time-to-event models with high-dimensional propensity score adjustment to control confounding. After adjustment for prescribing bias, a cohort (n = 20,113, 43.8% female, mean age 72.4 years) with a mean follow-up of 18.1 months showed that patients taking warfarin tended to be poorer, sicker, and less likely to have a cardiologist prescriber. Outcome event rates were not significantly different for DOACs compared to warfarin [adjusted rate ratio of 1.15 (0.91, 1.46) for systemic embolism, 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) for major bleeding, and 0.98 (0.90, 1.06) for net clinical outcome]. Only the effect of age on net clinical outcome met our strict criteria for predicting which group might be superior. Switch of drug class was associated with increased risk of events (p < 0.003). In this population, we found no difference in important clinical outcomes between warfarin and DOACs. Switching compared to not switching was associated with harm.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; British Columbia; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Ischemic stroke (IS) and major bleeding, which are serious adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), could have seasonal variations, but there are few reports.Methods and Results:In the Shinken Database 2004-2016 (n=22,018), 3,581 AF patients (average age, 63.5 years; 2,656 men, 74.2%; 1,388 persistent AF, 38.8%) were identified. Median CHADS. Significant seasonal variations were observed for IS, ECH, and ICH events in AF patients, and were consistently the highest in winter. A small peak of ECH was observed in summer, which seemed, in part, to be related to increased DOAC use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Comorbidity; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Seasons; Tokyo; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) between rivaroxaban and warfarin in hospitalized acute stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Japan.. This was a retrospective, observational study using a Japanese hospital claims database. Data of NVAF patients who were started on oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment during hospitalization were extracted and LOS-OAC (period from the initiation of index OAC therapy to the end of hospitalization or censoring date) and medical costs were compared between rivaroxaban and warfarin treatments. To compare LOS-OAC, a time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis period was from April 2012 to December 2015.. This study included 773 rivaroxaban users and 1077 warfarin users. After the propensity score matching, 546 patients for each treatment constituted the matched cohorts. Although the rivaroxaban users had a similar LOS-OAC to warfarin users (median, 18 vs. 19 days,. It is not possible to say that the only confounder was stroke severity and therefore other possible known and unknown confounders could not be ruled out.. The rivaroxaban users had a 3-day shorter LOS-OAC after IPTW-adjustment. Using rivaroxaban was associated with 4-5 days shorter LOS-OAC than using warfarin in patients with mild or moderate stroke, though treatment selection did not have a large impact in patients with severe stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Length of Stay; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate population-based electronic health record (EHR) definitions of atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD) subtypes, time trends in prevalence and prognosis.. A total of 76 019 individuals with AF were identified in England in 1998-2010 in the CALIBER resource, linking primary and secondary care EHR. An algorithm was created, implemented, and refined to identify 18 VHD subtypes using 406 diagnosis, procedure, and prescription codes. Cox models were used to investigate associations with a composite endpoint of incident stroke (ischaemic, haemorrhagic, and unspecified), systemic embolism (SSE), and all-cause mortality. Among individuals with AF, the prevalence of AF with concomitant VHD increased from 11.4% (527/4613) in 1998 to 17.6% (7014/39 868) in 2010 and also in individuals aged over 65 years. Those with mechanical valves, mitral stenosis (MS), or aortic stenosis had highest risk of clinical events compared to AF patients with no VHD, in relative [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.13 (1.02-1.24), 1.20 (1.05-1.36), and 1.27 (1.19-1.37), respectively] and absolute (excess risk: 2.04, 4.20, and 6.37 per 100 person-years, respectively) terms. Of the 95.2% of individuals with indication for warfarin (men and women with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 and ≥2, respectively), only 21.8% had a prescription 90 days prior to the study.. Prevalence of VHD among individuals with AF increased from 1998 to 2010. Atrial fibrillation associated with aortic stenosis, MS, or mechanical valves (compared to AF without VHD) was associated with an excess absolute risk of stroke, SSE, and mortality, but anticoagulation was underused in the pre-direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era, highlighting need for urgent clarity regarding DOACs in AF and concomitant VHD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty; Cause of Death; Embolism; England; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Phenotype; Prevalence; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Warfarin

Approximately 20% of ischaemic stroke patients exhibit spontaneous arterial recanalization, attributable to endogenous fibrinolysis, which strongly relates to improved functional outcome. The impact of oral anticoagulants on endogenous fibrinolysis is unknown. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that apixaban enhances endogenous fibrinolysis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. In a prospective cross-sectional analysis, we compared endogenous fibrinolysis in NVAF patients (n = 180) taking aspirin, warfarin, or apixaban. In a prospective longitudinal study, patients were tested before and after apixaban (n = 80). Endogenous fibrinolysis was assessed using the Global Thrombosis Test (GTT) and thromboelastography (TEG). Endogenous fibrinolysis [measured by GTT lysis time (LT)] was shorter on apixaban compared with warfarin or aspirin [median 1850 (IQR 1591-2300) vs. 2758 (2014-3502) vs. 2135 (1752-2463) s, P < 0.0001]. Among TEG indices, a small but significant difference in clot lysis time (CLT) was observed [apixaban 60.0 (45.0-61.0) vs. warfarin 61.0 (57.0-62.0) vs. aspirin 61.0 (59.0-61.0) min, P = 0.036]. Apixaban improved endogenous fibrinolysis measured using the GTT [LT pre-treatment 2204 (1779-2738) vs. on-treatment 1882 (1607-2374) s, P = 0.0003], but not by using TEG. Change in LT (ΔLT) with apixaban correlated with baseline LT (r = 0.77, P < 0.0001). There was weak correlation between ΔLT and ΔCLT in response to apixaban (r = 0.28, P = 0.02) and between on-apixaban LT and CLT (r = 0.25, P = 0.022).. Apixaban enhances endogenous fibrinolysis, with maximal effect in those with impaired fibrinolysis pre-treatment. Apixaban-treated patients exhibit more favourable fibrinolysis profiles than those taking warfarin or aspirin. Whether apixaban may confer additional thrombotic risk reduction in NVAF patients with impaired fibrinolysis, compared to warfarin, merits further study.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Cross-Sectional Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Clot Lysis Time; Fibrinolysis; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Thrombelastography; Warfarin