warfarin and Esophageal-Neoplasms

warfarin has been researched along with Esophageal-Neoplasms* in 2 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for warfarin and Esophageal-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Thromboembolism in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer treated with anthracycline, platinum, and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy: a report from the UK National Cancer Research Institute Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009, Aug-10, Volume: 27, Issue:23

    Data concerning the prevalence of and outcomes related to thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy are limited.. This was a prospective, exploratory analysis of TEs in a randomized, controlled trial of 964 patients recruited between 2000 and 2005 and treated with epirubicin/platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for advanced/locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Regimens were epirubicin (E), cisplatin (C), fluorouracil (F; ECF); E, C, capecitabine (X; ECX); E, F, oxaliplatin (O; EOF); and EOX. Continuously infused F was administered via a central venous access device (CVAD) with 1 mg of warfarin for thromboprophylaxis. The principal outcome was the incidence of TEs (venous and arterial) in the whole treated patient cohort, according to chemotherapy, associated with CVADs and TE-related prognoses.. The incidences of any, of venous, and of arterial TEs among 964 treated patients were 12.1% (95% CI, 10.7 to 14.3), 10.1% (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.3), and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.4) respectively. There were fewer TEs in the O compared with the cisplatin groups (EOF/EOX v ECF/ECX: 7.6% v 15.1%; P = .0003). C was identified as a risk factor for TE in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.76; P = .001). There was no difference in the incidence of TEs for the F group compared with the capecitabine groups. The incidence of CVAD-related thrombosis was 7.0% (ECF/EOF arms). Overall survival was worse for patients who experienced TEs versus no TEs (median survival, 7.4 v 10.5 months; HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.99; P = .043).. This analysis has prospectively quantified the incidence/pattern of TEs among patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer who were treated with four triplet regimens, has demonstrated a differential thrombogenic effect according to platinum use, and has noted a poorer outcome associated with TE during treatment. Chemotherapy-related TE should contribute to the risk/benefit assessment of treatment.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Anticoagulants; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Catheterization, Central Venous; Cisplatin; Deoxycytidine; Epirubicin; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Prospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Thromboembolism; United Kingdom; Warfarin

2009

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for warfarin and Esophageal-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Endoscopic mucosal resection of early oesophageal neoplasia in patients requiring anticoagulation: is it safe?
    Surgical endoscopy, 2016, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has become the standard treatment for early oesophageal neoplasia. The mucosal defect caused by EMR usually takes several weeks to heal. Despite guidelines on high-risk endoscopic procedures in patients on anticoagulation, evidence is lacking whether EMR is safe in such patients. We investigated the immediate and delayed bleeding risk in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic oesophageal EMR comparing patients requiring warfarin anticoagulation with a control group.. Warfarin was stopped 5 days before the planned EMR and restarted on the evening following the procedure. Patients with high-risk conditions, such as recent pulmonary thromboemboli, received bridging with low molecular weight heparin. All EMRs were performed when the INR was <1.5. Bleeding events on the day of the EMR and within 3 months post-procedure were documented.. One hundred and seventeen consecutive patients with early oesophageal neoplasia were included. Sixty-eight EMRs were performed in 15 patients requiring anticoagulation. One patient on warfarin was readmitted 10 days after EMR with haematemesis and melaena. Out of 400 EMRs in 102 controls, 26 immediate bleeding events occurred requiring endoscopic intervention. One delayed bleeding event (melaena) occurred in the control group. The number of bleeding events did not differ between groups [p = 0.99; odds ratio 1.01 (0.30-3.44)], neither for acute (p = 0.76) nor delayed bleeding (p = 0.24).. EMR of early oesophageal neoplasia can be safely performed in patients requiring anticoagulation when warfarin is discontinued 5 days before the endoscopic intervention and reinstituted on the evening of the procedure day.

    Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Barrett Esophagus; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Case-Control Studies; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Warfarin

2016