vorinostat has been researched along with Thrombopenia in 12 studies
Vorinostat: A hydroxamic acid and anilide derivative that acts as a HISTONE DEACETYLASE inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA and SEZARY SYNDROME.
vorinostat : A dicarboxylic acid diamide comprising suberic (octanedioic) acid coupled to aniline and hydroxylamine. A histone deacetylase inhibitor, it is marketed under the name Zolinza for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL).
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" A phase I study was initiated to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma." | 9.30 | Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Bandyopadhyay, D; Bose, P; Deng, X; Dent, P; Gordon, SW; Kmieciak, M; Lee, HM; Matherly, SC; McGuire, WP; Nguyen, T; Poklepovic, AS; Roberts, JD; Ryan, AA; Shafer, DA; Shrader, EE; Sterling, RK; Tombes, MB, 2019) |
"A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of the oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)." | 9.16 | Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. ( Hamada, T; Iwatsuki, K; Kato, Y; Noguchi, K; Shimamoto, T; Sugaya, M; Tobinai, K; Tsuboi, R; Wada, H, 2012) |
"The activity and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) were evaluated in patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)." | 9.12 | Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). ( Chiao, JH; Duvic, M; Frankel, SR; Hazarika, P; Kelly, C; Ni, X; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Talpur, R; Zhang, C, 2007) |
" A phase I study was initiated to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma." | 5.30 | Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Bandyopadhyay, D; Bose, P; Deng, X; Dent, P; Gordon, SW; Kmieciak, M; Lee, HM; Matherly, SC; McGuire, WP; Nguyen, T; Poklepovic, AS; Roberts, JD; Ryan, AA; Shafer, DA; Shrader, EE; Sterling, RK; Tombes, MB, 2019) |
"A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of the oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)." | 5.16 | Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. ( Hamada, T; Iwatsuki, K; Kato, Y; Noguchi, K; Shimamoto, T; Sugaya, M; Tobinai, K; Tsuboi, R; Wada, H, 2012) |
"The activity and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) were evaluated in patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)." | 5.12 | Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). ( Chiao, JH; Duvic, M; Frankel, SR; Hazarika, P; Kelly, C; Ni, X; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Talpur, R; Zhang, C, 2007) |
" In conclusion, the poor results obtained with lenalidomide in combination with vorinostat and dexamethasone provide no arguments that could justify further investigation of this drug combination for the treatment of relapsed PTCL." | 2.79 | Lenalidomide in combination with vorinostat and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL): report of a phase I/II trial. ( Egle, A; Greil, R; Hopfinger, G; Lang, A; Linkesch, W; Melchardt, T; Nösslinger, T; Weiss, L, 2014) |
" There was no clear relationship between vorinostat dosage and drug exposure over the dose range studied." | 2.78 | A pediatric phase 1 trial of vorinostat and temozolomide in relapsed or refractory primary brain or spinal cord tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. ( Ahern, C; Ames, MM; Blaney, SM; Fouladi, M; Gilbertson, RJ; Horton, T; Hummel, TR; Ingle, AM; McGovern, RM; Reid, JM; Wagner, L; Weigel, B, 2013) |
"Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m(2)/d with escalations planned in 30% increments." | 2.75 | Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of vorinostat: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium report. ( Adamson, PC; Ames, MM; Blaney, SM; Fouladi, M; Gilbertson, RJ; Ingle, AM; Park, JR; Reid, JM; Schaiquevich, P; Speights, R; Stewart, CF; Sun, J; Zwiebel, J, 2010) |
" One week later, daily vorinostat dosing was begun and continued until toxicity or disease progression occurred." | 2.75 | Phase I study of vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic dysfunction: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group study. ( Belani, CP; Beumer, JH; Egorin, MJ; Harvey, RD; Holleran, J; Ivy, SP; Kummar, S; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Ramalingam, SS; Sarantopoulos, J; Shibata, S; Yerk, M, 2010) |
"Oral vorinostat 400 mg qd was generally well tolerated but did not demonstrate efficacy as defined by tumor response in this small group of heavily pre-treated patients." | 2.73 | Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. ( Blumenschein, GR; Chen, C; Chiao, JH; Frankel, SR; Kies, MS; Kumar, AJ; Lu, C; Papadimitrakopoulou, VA; Ricker, JL, 2008) |
"Vorinostat was well tolerated at 300 mg b." | 2.73 | Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. ( Cheson, BD; Coiffier, B; Crump, M; Frankel, SR; Jacobsen, ED; Randolph, SS; Ricker, JL; Sun, L; Xie, H, 2008) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 3 (25.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 8 (66.67) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (8.33) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Ramos, JC | 1 |
Sparano, JA | 1 |
Chadburn, A | 1 |
Reid, EG | 1 |
Ambinder, RF | 1 |
Siegel, ER | 1 |
Moore, PC | 1 |
Rubinstein, PG | 1 |
Durand, CM | 1 |
Cesarman, E | 1 |
Aboulafia, D | 1 |
Baiocchi, R | 1 |
Ratner, L | 1 |
Kaplan, L | 1 |
Capoferri, AA | 1 |
Lee, JY | 1 |
Mitsuyasu, R | 1 |
Noy, A | 1 |
Gordon, SW | 1 |
McGuire, WP | 1 |
Shafer, DA | 1 |
Sterling, RK | 1 |
Lee, HM | 1 |
Matherly, SC | 1 |
Roberts, JD | 1 |
Bose, P | 1 |
Tombes, MB | 1 |
Shrader, EE | 1 |
Ryan, AA | 1 |
Kmieciak, M | 1 |
Nguyen, T | 1 |
Deng, X | 1 |
Bandyopadhyay, D | 1 |
Dent, P | 1 |
Poklepovic, AS | 1 |
Hummel, TR | 1 |
Wagner, L | 1 |
Ahern, C | 1 |
Fouladi, M | 2 |
Reid, JM | 2 |
McGovern, RM | 1 |
Ames, MM | 2 |
Gilbertson, RJ | 2 |
Horton, T | 1 |
Ingle, AM | 2 |
Weigel, B | 1 |
Blaney, SM | 2 |
Prebet, T | 1 |
Braun, T | 1 |
Beyne-Rauzy, O | 1 |
Dreyfus, F | 1 |
Stammatoullas, A | 1 |
Wattel, E | 1 |
Ame, S | 1 |
Raffoux, E | 1 |
Delaunay, J | 1 |
Charbonnier, A | 1 |
Adès, L | 1 |
Fenaux, P | 1 |
Vey, N | 1 |
Hopfinger, G | 1 |
Nösslinger, T | 1 |
Lang, A | 1 |
Linkesch, W | 1 |
Melchardt, T | 1 |
Weiss, L | 1 |
Egle, A | 1 |
Greil, R | 1 |
Geeleher, P | 1 |
Loboda, A | 1 |
Lenkala, D | 1 |
Wang, F | 1 |
LaCroix, B | 1 |
Karovic, S | 1 |
Wang, J | 1 |
Nebozhyn, M | 1 |
Chisamore, M | 1 |
Hardwick, J | 1 |
Maitland, ML | 1 |
Huang, RS | 1 |
Park, JR | 1 |
Stewart, CF | 1 |
Schaiquevich, P | 1 |
Sun, J | 1 |
Speights, R | 1 |
Zwiebel, J | 1 |
Adamson, PC | 1 |
Ramalingam, SS | 1 |
Kummar, S | 1 |
Sarantopoulos, J | 1 |
Shibata, S | 1 |
LoRusso, P | 1 |
Yerk, M | 1 |
Holleran, J | 1 |
Lin, Y | 1 |
Beumer, JH | 1 |
Harvey, RD | 1 |
Ivy, SP | 1 |
Belani, CP | 1 |
Egorin, MJ | 1 |
Wada, H | 1 |
Tsuboi, R | 1 |
Kato, Y | 1 |
Sugaya, M | 1 |
Tobinai, K | 1 |
Hamada, T | 1 |
Shimamoto, T | 1 |
Noguchi, K | 1 |
Iwatsuki, K | 1 |
Duvic, M | 1 |
Talpur, R | 1 |
Ni, X | 1 |
Zhang, C | 1 |
Hazarika, P | 1 |
Kelly, C | 1 |
Chiao, JH | 2 |
Reilly, JF | 1 |
Ricker, JL | 3 |
Richon, VM | 1 |
Frankel, SR | 3 |
Blumenschein, GR | 1 |
Kies, MS | 1 |
Papadimitrakopoulou, VA | 1 |
Lu, C | 1 |
Kumar, AJ | 1 |
Chen, C | 1 |
Crump, M | 1 |
Coiffier, B | 1 |
Jacobsen, ED | 1 |
Sun, L | 1 |
Xie, H | 1 |
Randolph, SS | 1 |
Cheson, BD | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Sequential Phase I/Randomized Phase II Trial of Vorinostat and Risk-Adapted Chemotherapy With Rituximab in HIV-Related B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT01193842] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 107 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-10-06 | Completed | ||
A Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma[NCT01075113] | Phase 1 | 16 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-08-10 | Completed | ||
A Phase I Study of SAHA and Temozolomide in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Primary Brain or Spinal Cord Tumors[NCT01076530] | Phase 1 | 27 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-02-28 | Completed | ||
A Phase I/II Study of Vorinostat in Combination With Low Dose Ara-C for Patients With Intermediate-2 or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes[NCT00776503] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 52 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase II, Prospective, Single-center Study of Lenalidomide in Combination With CHOP in Patients With Untreated PTCL[NCT04423926] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 91 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-06-10 | Recruiting | ||
Phase I Clinical Study of MK-0683 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)[NCT00771472] | Phase 1 | 10 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-08-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Clinical Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) in Patients With Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)[NCT00097929] | Phase 2 | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-05-01 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The percentage of participants surviving without events (relapse or death) one year after starting treatment. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH | 75.6 |
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH | 82.2 |
The percentage of participants surviving one year after starting treatment. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH | 77.6 |
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH | 86.7 |
"Percentage of participants with complete response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Phase II) according to treatment arm. Participants are planned to be treated for a total of 6 cycles (21 day cycle length). Participants with CR after Cycle 4 will receive two additional cycles of chemotherapy and complete 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Participants who achieve a partial response (PR) only after Cycle 4 may continue on protocol therapy or they may be removed from the study at the AMC discretion of the physician (local Principal Investigator). Participants with stable disease after 4 cycles (i.e., who did not achieve at least a PR) or progressive disease at any time will be removed from study.~In phase II, there are two arms: Vorinostat RPTD+rituximab-DA-EPOCH arm (VR-DA-EPOCH) and Rituximab-DA-EPOCH arm (DA-R-EPOCH)." (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH | 67.5 |
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH | 76.2 |
Recommended phase II dose of vorinostat is defined as the dose level at which 0/6 or 1/6 subjects experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT) with the next higher dose having at least 2/3 or 2/6 subjects encountering DLT (Phase I). Toxicities will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Using a 3+3 design, the recommended phase II dose is defined as the level at which 0/6 or 1/6 patients experiences at dose-limiting toxicity in the first cycle. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 21 days
Intervention | Mg per day of Vorinostat (Number) |
---|---|
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH | 300 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in absolute CD8 counts. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | cells/mm^3 (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
End of cycle 2 | Treatment discontinuation | 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |
Phase I: VR-CHOP, Dose Level 1 | -172 | -81 | -16 | 128 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1 | 35.5 | -164.5 | -56 | 604 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2 | -115 | 211 | 275 | 154 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in HIV viral load. Undetectable viral load results were treated as 0 values. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | copies per milliliter (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
End of cycle 2 | Treatment discontinuation | 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |
Phase I: VR-CHOP, Dose Level 1 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1 | -14518 | -4517 | -55116 | 0 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2 | -12.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in absolute CD4 counts. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | cell/mm^3 (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
End of cycle 2 | Treatment discontinuation | 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |
Phase I: VR-CHOP, Dose Level 1 | -218 | -190 | -175 | -84 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1 | 92 | -39 | 76 | 169 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2 | -9 | -29 | 31 | 31 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in EBV viral load. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | IU/mL (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
End of Cycle 2 | At treatment discontinuation | 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2 | -2436.1 | -1.92 | -1.92 | -1.15 |
Phase II, DA-R-EPOCH | 0 | -0.28 | 0 | -2.7 |
Phase II, VR-DA-EPOCH | -0.61 | -2.9 | -1.55 | -0.56 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in (HHV)-8 viral load. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | copies per 100uL (Median) |
---|---|
12-month follow-up | |
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH | 0 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in (HHV)-8 viral load. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | copies per 100uL (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
At treatment discontinuation | 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in HIV viral load. Undetectable viral load results were treated as 0 values. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months
Intervention | median change in copies per mL (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
End of Cycle 2 | At treatment discontinuation | 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH | -25 | -22.5 | -18 | -20 |
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH | -20 | -87 | -20 | 0 |
The percentage of participants with AEs and their worst severity will be tabulated for each treatment arm. If a participant has more than one AE, the most severe AE is analyzed. All adverse events will be assessed by the investigator from the first dose of protocol therapy through the post-treatment discontinuation visit. Participants are planned to be treated for a total of 6 cycles (21 day cycle length), or roughly 4 months. After this evaluation, assessment and reporting of AEs will only be required for all grade 5 AEs and any serious AE (SAE) that the investigator considers related to protocol therapy. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Death | Life-threatening | Severe | Moderate | Mild | |
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH | 20.0 | 28.9 | 31.1 | 17.8 | 0 |
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH | 28.9 | 37.8 | 20.0 | 8.9 | 2.2 |
Serial plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at 24-48, 48-72, and 72-96 hours after the start of the first chemotherapy infusion. Doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The clearance was determined by dividing the drug-infusion rate by the steady-state concentrations, which was the average of the three time points. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 24-48, 48-72, and 72-96 hours after the start of the first chemotherapy infusion
Intervention | Liter/hour (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Doxorubicin | Etoposide | Vincristine | |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1 | 78.6 | 3.0 | 22.4 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2 | 76.0 | 2.4 | 16.8 |
The percentage of participants whose best tumor response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Based on clinical, radiologic (CT), and pathologic criteria, CR requires 1) complete disappearance of all detectable disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, 2) bone marrow aspirate and biopsy to confirm a CR if initially positive or if clinically indicated by new abnormalities in the peripheral blood counts or blood smear, 3) negative PET results, depending on typically, variably, or unknown pre-treatment FDG status, and 4) spleen and/or liver, if considered to be enlarged before therapy on physical examination or CT scan, not being palpable on physical examination and considered normal size by imaging studies, and nodules related to lymphoma disappeared. PR includes 1) ≥50% decrease in sum of product of diameters (SPD), 2) no increase in size of nodes, liver, or spleen, 3) splenic/hepatic nodules regressed by ≥ 50% SPD, 4) no new sites of disease (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Complete response | Partial Response | |
Phase I: Arm C (VR-CHOP) Dose Level 1 | 100 | 0 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1 | 83.3 | 16.7 |
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2 | 83.3 | 16.7 |
"A DLT was defined as any of the following (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 3.0):~Grade 3 (severe)-4 (life-threatening) neutropenia with fever ≥ 38.5ºC~Grade 3-4 neutropenia with an infection requiring antibiotic or antifungal treatment~Grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 5 days~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia~Other Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, including a decrease in hemoglobin, only at the discretion of the principal investigator~Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic event, except which are manageable by supportive care or non-prohibited therapies" (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 1 |
"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1
Intervention | µM (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=6) | Day 28 (n=5) | |
Vorinostat | 0.83 | 1.17 |
"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1
Intervention | hours (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=5) | Day 28 (n=4) | |
Vorinostat | 1.94 | 2.30 |
"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1
Intervention | hours (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=6) | Day 28 (n=5) | |
Vorinostat | 2.91 | 3.73 |
"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1
Intervention | µM*hr (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=6) | Day 28 (n=5) | |
Vorinostat | 4.59 | 5.59 |
A laboratory AE is defined as any unfavorable & unintended change in the chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of study product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. A clinical AE is defined similarly but also includes changes in structure or function of the body. (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Day 1 up until 30 days post study completion or early termination (up to approximately 506 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Clinical AEs | Laboratory AEs | |
Vorinostat | 10 | 6 |
11 trials available for vorinostat and Thrombopenia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Impact of Myc in HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with EPOCH and outcomes with vorinostat (AMC-075 trial).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; | 2020 |
Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemical and Drug I | 2019 |
A pediatric phase 1 trial of vorinostat and temozolomide in relapsed or refractory primary brain or spinal cord tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Child, Pr | 2013 |
Combination of vorinostat and low dose cytarabine for patients with azacitidine-refractory/relapsed high risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cytarabine; Do | 2014 |
Lenalidomide in combination with vorinostat and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL): report of a phase I/II trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy | 2014 |
Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of vorinostat: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium report.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy | 2010 |
Phase I study of vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic dysfunction: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group study.
Topics: Anorexia; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatig | 2010 |
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic | 2012 |
Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Dehydration; Disease Progression; Disease-Fre | 2007 |
Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Agents; Capsules; Car | 2008 |
Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug | 2008 |
1 other study available for vorinostat and Thrombopenia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Predicting Response to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Using High-Throughput Genomics.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Autoantigens; Cell Line, Tumor; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Re | 2015 |