Page last updated: 2024-11-04

vorinostat and Thrombopenia

vorinostat has been researched along with Thrombopenia in 12 studies

Vorinostat: A hydroxamic acid and anilide derivative that acts as a HISTONE DEACETYLASE inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA and SEZARY SYNDROME.
vorinostat : A dicarboxylic acid diamide comprising suberic (octanedioic) acid coupled to aniline and hydroxylamine. A histone deacetylase inhibitor, it is marketed under the name Zolinza for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL).

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" A phase I study was initiated to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma."9.30Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Bandyopadhyay, D; Bose, P; Deng, X; Dent, P; Gordon, SW; Kmieciak, M; Lee, HM; Matherly, SC; McGuire, WP; Nguyen, T; Poklepovic, AS; Roberts, JD; Ryan, AA; Shafer, DA; Shrader, EE; Sterling, RK; Tombes, MB, 2019)
"A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of the oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)."9.16Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. ( Hamada, T; Iwatsuki, K; Kato, Y; Noguchi, K; Shimamoto, T; Sugaya, M; Tobinai, K; Tsuboi, R; Wada, H, 2012)
"The activity and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) were evaluated in patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)."9.12Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). ( Chiao, JH; Duvic, M; Frankel, SR; Hazarika, P; Kelly, C; Ni, X; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Talpur, R; Zhang, C, 2007)
" A phase I study was initiated to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma."5.30Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Bandyopadhyay, D; Bose, P; Deng, X; Dent, P; Gordon, SW; Kmieciak, M; Lee, HM; Matherly, SC; McGuire, WP; Nguyen, T; Poklepovic, AS; Roberts, JD; Ryan, AA; Shafer, DA; Shrader, EE; Sterling, RK; Tombes, MB, 2019)
"A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of the oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)."5.16Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. ( Hamada, T; Iwatsuki, K; Kato, Y; Noguchi, K; Shimamoto, T; Sugaya, M; Tobinai, K; Tsuboi, R; Wada, H, 2012)
"The activity and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) were evaluated in patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)."5.12Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). ( Chiao, JH; Duvic, M; Frankel, SR; Hazarika, P; Kelly, C; Ni, X; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Talpur, R; Zhang, C, 2007)
" In conclusion, the poor results obtained with lenalidomide in combination with vorinostat and dexamethasone provide no arguments that could justify further investigation of this drug combination for the treatment of relapsed PTCL."2.79Lenalidomide in combination with vorinostat and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL): report of a phase I/II trial. ( Egle, A; Greil, R; Hopfinger, G; Lang, A; Linkesch, W; Melchardt, T; Nösslinger, T; Weiss, L, 2014)
" There was no clear relationship between vorinostat dosage and drug exposure over the dose range studied."2.78A pediatric phase 1 trial of vorinostat and temozolomide in relapsed or refractory primary brain or spinal cord tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. ( Ahern, C; Ames, MM; Blaney, SM; Fouladi, M; Gilbertson, RJ; Horton, T; Hummel, TR; Ingle, AM; McGovern, RM; Reid, JM; Wagner, L; Weigel, B, 2013)
"Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m(2)/d with escalations planned in 30% increments."2.75Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of vorinostat: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium report. ( Adamson, PC; Ames, MM; Blaney, SM; Fouladi, M; Gilbertson, RJ; Ingle, AM; Park, JR; Reid, JM; Schaiquevich, P; Speights, R; Stewart, CF; Sun, J; Zwiebel, J, 2010)
" One week later, daily vorinostat dosing was begun and continued until toxicity or disease progression occurred."2.75Phase I study of vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic dysfunction: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group study. ( Belani, CP; Beumer, JH; Egorin, MJ; Harvey, RD; Holleran, J; Ivy, SP; Kummar, S; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Ramalingam, SS; Sarantopoulos, J; Shibata, S; Yerk, M, 2010)
"Oral vorinostat 400 mg qd was generally well tolerated but did not demonstrate efficacy as defined by tumor response in this small group of heavily pre-treated patients."2.73Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. ( Blumenschein, GR; Chen, C; Chiao, JH; Frankel, SR; Kies, MS; Kumar, AJ; Lu, C; Papadimitrakopoulou, VA; Ricker, JL, 2008)
"Vorinostat was well tolerated at 300 mg b."2.73Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. ( Cheson, BD; Coiffier, B; Crump, M; Frankel, SR; Jacobsen, ED; Randolph, SS; Ricker, JL; Sun, L; Xie, H, 2008)

Research

Studies (12)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's3 (25.00)29.6817
2010's8 (66.67)24.3611
2020's1 (8.33)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Ramos, JC1
Sparano, JA1
Chadburn, A1
Reid, EG1
Ambinder, RF1
Siegel, ER1
Moore, PC1
Rubinstein, PG1
Durand, CM1
Cesarman, E1
Aboulafia, D1
Baiocchi, R1
Ratner, L1
Kaplan, L1
Capoferri, AA1
Lee, JY1
Mitsuyasu, R1
Noy, A1
Gordon, SW1
McGuire, WP1
Shafer, DA1
Sterling, RK1
Lee, HM1
Matherly, SC1
Roberts, JD1
Bose, P1
Tombes, MB1
Shrader, EE1
Ryan, AA1
Kmieciak, M1
Nguyen, T1
Deng, X1
Bandyopadhyay, D1
Dent, P1
Poklepovic, AS1
Hummel, TR1
Wagner, L1
Ahern, C1
Fouladi, M2
Reid, JM2
McGovern, RM1
Ames, MM2
Gilbertson, RJ2
Horton, T1
Ingle, AM2
Weigel, B1
Blaney, SM2
Prebet, T1
Braun, T1
Beyne-Rauzy, O1
Dreyfus, F1
Stammatoullas, A1
Wattel, E1
Ame, S1
Raffoux, E1
Delaunay, J1
Charbonnier, A1
Adès, L1
Fenaux, P1
Vey, N1
Hopfinger, G1
Nösslinger, T1
Lang, A1
Linkesch, W1
Melchardt, T1
Weiss, L1
Egle, A1
Greil, R1
Geeleher, P1
Loboda, A1
Lenkala, D1
Wang, F1
LaCroix, B1
Karovic, S1
Wang, J1
Nebozhyn, M1
Chisamore, M1
Hardwick, J1
Maitland, ML1
Huang, RS1
Park, JR1
Stewart, CF1
Schaiquevich, P1
Sun, J1
Speights, R1
Zwiebel, J1
Adamson, PC1
Ramalingam, SS1
Kummar, S1
Sarantopoulos, J1
Shibata, S1
LoRusso, P1
Yerk, M1
Holleran, J1
Lin, Y1
Beumer, JH1
Harvey, RD1
Ivy, SP1
Belani, CP1
Egorin, MJ1
Wada, H1
Tsuboi, R1
Kato, Y1
Sugaya, M1
Tobinai, K1
Hamada, T1
Shimamoto, T1
Noguchi, K1
Iwatsuki, K1
Duvic, M1
Talpur, R1
Ni, X1
Zhang, C1
Hazarika, P1
Kelly, C1
Chiao, JH2
Reilly, JF1
Ricker, JL3
Richon, VM1
Frankel, SR3
Blumenschein, GR1
Kies, MS1
Papadimitrakopoulou, VA1
Lu, C1
Kumar, AJ1
Chen, C1
Crump, M1
Coiffier, B1
Jacobsen, ED1
Sun, L1
Xie, H1
Randolph, SS1
Cheson, BD1

Clinical Trials (7)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Sequential Phase I/Randomized Phase II Trial of Vorinostat and Risk-Adapted Chemotherapy With Rituximab in HIV-Related B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT01193842]Phase 1/Phase 2107 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-06Completed
A Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma[NCT01075113]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-10Completed
A Phase I Study of SAHA and Temozolomide in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Primary Brain or Spinal Cord Tumors[NCT01076530]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Vorinostat in Combination With Low Dose Ara-C for Patients With Intermediate-2 or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes[NCT00776503]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase II, Prospective, Single-center Study of Lenalidomide in Combination With CHOP in Patients With Untreated PTCL[NCT04423926]Phase 1/Phase 291 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-10Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Study of MK-0683 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)[NCT00771472]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase II Clinical Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) in Patients With Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)[NCT00097929]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Event-free Survival (EFS) (Phase II)

The percentage of participants surviving without events (relapse or death) one year after starting treatment. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH75.6
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH82.2

Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II)

The percentage of participants surviving one year after starting treatment. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH77.6
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH86.7

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Phase II)

"Percentage of participants with complete response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Phase II) according to treatment arm. Participants are planned to be treated for a total of 6 cycles (21 day cycle length). Participants with CR after Cycle 4 will receive two additional cycles of chemotherapy and complete 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Participants who achieve a partial response (PR) only after Cycle 4 may continue on protocol therapy or they may be removed from the study at the AMC discretion of the physician (local Principal Investigator). Participants with stable disease after 4 cycles (i.e., who did not achieve at least a PR) or progressive disease at any time will be removed from study.~In phase II, there are two arms: Vorinostat RPTD+rituximab-DA-EPOCH arm (VR-DA-EPOCH) and Rituximab-DA-EPOCH arm (DA-R-EPOCH)." (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH67.5
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH76.2

Recommended Phase II Dose of Vorinostat Determined According to Dose-limiting Toxicities Graded Using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0) (Phase I)

Recommended phase II dose of vorinostat is defined as the dose level at which 0/6 or 1/6 subjects experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT) with the next higher dose having at least 2/3 or 2/6 subjects encountering DLT (Phase I). Toxicities will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Using a 3+3 design, the recommended phase II dose is defined as the level at which 0/6 or 1/6 patients experiences at dose-limiting toxicity in the first cycle. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 21 days

InterventionMg per day of Vorinostat (Number)
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH300

Change in CD8 Cell Counts (Phase I)

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in absolute CD8 counts. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

,,
Interventioncells/mm^3 (Median)
End of cycle 2Treatment discontinuation6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
Phase I: VR-CHOP, Dose Level 1-172-81-16128
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 135.5-164.5-56604
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2-115211275154

Change in Plasma Associated Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) (Phase I)

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in HIV viral load. Undetectable viral load results were treated as 0 values. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

,,
Interventioncopies per milliliter (Median)
End of cycle 2Treatment discontinuation6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
Phase I: VR-CHOP, Dose Level 128000
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 1-14518-4517-551160
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2-12.5000

Changes in Absolute CD4 Cell Counts (Phase I)

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in absolute CD4 counts. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

,,
Interventioncell/mm^3 (Median)
End of cycle 2Treatment discontinuation6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
Phase I: VR-CHOP, Dose Level 1-218-190-175-84
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 192-3976169
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2-9-293131

Changes in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Viral Load

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in EBV viral load. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

,,,
InterventionIU/mL (Median)
End of Cycle 2At treatment discontinuation6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 10000
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 2-2436.1-1.92-1.92-1.15
Phase II, DA-R-EPOCH0-0.280-2.7
Phase II, VR-DA-EPOCH-0.61-2.9-1.55-0.56

Changes in Human Herpes Virus (HHV)-8 Viral Load

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in (HHV)-8 viral load. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventioncopies per 100uL (Median)
12-month follow-up
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH0

Changes in Human Herpes Virus (HHV)-8 Viral Load

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in (HHV)-8 viral load. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Interventioncopies per 100uL (Median)
At treatment discontinuation6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH000

Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load

Differences from baseline (specified follow-up assessment minus baseline) in HIV viral load. Undetectable viral load results were treated as 0 values. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

,
Interventionmedian change in copies per mL (Median)
End of Cycle 2At treatment discontinuation6-month follow-up12-month follow-up
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH-25-22.5-18-20
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH-20-87-200

Percentage of Participant Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) for Each Treatment Arm as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0) (Phase II)

The percentage of participants with AEs and their worst severity will be tabulated for each treatment arm. If a participant has more than one AE, the most severe AE is analyzed. All adverse events will be assessed by the investigator from the first dose of protocol therapy through the post-treatment discontinuation visit. Participants are planned to be treated for a total of 6 cycles (21 day cycle length), or roughly 4 months. After this evaluation, assessment and reporting of AEs will only be required for all grade 5 AEs and any serious AE (SAE) that the investigator considers related to protocol therapy. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DeathLife-threateningSevereModerateMild
Phase II: DA-R-EPOCH20.028.931.117.80
Phase II: VR-DA-EPOCH28.937.820.08.92.2

Pharmacokinetic Clearance (Phase I)

Serial plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at 24-48, 48-72, and 72-96 hours after the start of the first chemotherapy infusion. Doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The clearance was determined by dividing the drug-infusion rate by the steady-state concentrations, which was the average of the three time points. (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: 24-48, 48-72, and 72-96 hours after the start of the first chemotherapy infusion

,
InterventionLiter/hour (Mean)
DoxorubicinEtoposideVincristine
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 178.63.022.4
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 276.02.416.8

Tumor Response (Phase I)

The percentage of participants whose best tumor response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Based on clinical, radiologic (CT), and pathologic criteria, CR requires 1) complete disappearance of all detectable disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, 2) bone marrow aspirate and biopsy to confirm a CR if initially positive or if clinically indicated by new abnormalities in the peripheral blood counts or blood smear, 3) negative PET results, depending on typically, variably, or unknown pre-treatment FDG status, and 4) spleen and/or liver, if considered to be enlarged before therapy on physical examination or CT scan, not being palpable on physical examination and considered normal size by imaging studies, and nodules related to lymphoma disappeared. PR includes 1) ≥50% decrease in sum of product of diameters (SPD), 2) no increase in size of nodes, liver, or spleen, 3) splenic/hepatic nodules regressed by ≥ 50% SPD, 4) no new sites of disease (NCT01193842)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post treatment

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responsePartial Response
Phase I: Arm C (VR-CHOP) Dose Level 11000
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 183.316.7
Phase I: VR-DA-EPOCH, Dose Level 283.316.7

Part I: Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

"A DLT was defined as any of the following (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 3.0):~Grade 3 (severe)-4 (life-threatening) neutropenia with fever ≥ 38.5ºC~Grade 3-4 neutropenia with an infection requiring antibiotic or antifungal treatment~Grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 5 days~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia~Other Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, including a decrease in hemoglobin, only at the discretion of the principal investigator~Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic event, except which are manageable by supportive care or non-prohibited therapies" (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vorinostat1

Part I: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax)

"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1

InterventionµM (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=6)Day 28 (n=5)
Vorinostat0.831.17

Part I: The Amount of Time it Takes for the Drug Concentration to Decrease by Half (T1/2)

"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=5)Day 28 (n=4)
Vorinostat1.942.30

Part I: Time at Which Cmax Occurs (Tmax)

"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1

Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1 (n=6)Day 28 (n=5)
Vorinostat2.913.73

Part I: Total Drug Exposure (Area Under the Concentration Curve, AUC[0-24 Hours])

"Blood samples taken as follows:~Day 1 & Day 28 of Cycle 1: pre dose, and 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10, 12 and 24 hours after dosing of vorinostat." (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Days 1 & 28 of Cycle 1

InterventionµM*hr (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=6)Day 28 (n=5)
Vorinostat4.595.59

Parts I & II: Number of Participants Experiencing Clinical or Laboratory Adverse Experiences (AE)

A laboratory AE is defined as any unfavorable & unintended change in the chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of study product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. A clinical AE is defined similarly but also includes changes in structure or function of the body. (NCT00771472)
Timeframe: Day 1 up until 30 days post study completion or early termination (up to approximately 506 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical AEsLaboratory AEs
Vorinostat106

Trials

11 trials available for vorinostat and Thrombopenia

ArticleYear
Impact of Myc in HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with EPOCH and outcomes with vorinostat (AMC-075 trial).
    Blood, 2020, 09-10, Volume: 136, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; CD4 Lymphocyte Count;

2020
Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    American journal of clinical oncology, 2019, Volume: 42, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemical and Drug I

2019
A pediatric phase 1 trial of vorinostat and temozolomide in relapsed or refractory primary brain or spinal cord tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study.
    Pediatric blood & cancer, 2013, Volume: 60, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Child, Pr

2013
Combination of vorinostat and low dose cytarabine for patients with azacitidine-refractory/relapsed high risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Leukemia research, 2014, Volume: 38, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cytarabine; Do

2014
Lenalidomide in combination with vorinostat and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL): report of a phase I/II trial.
    Annals of hematology, 2014, Volume: 93, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy

2014
Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of vorinostat: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium report.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Aug-01, Volume: 28, Issue:22

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy

2010
Phase I study of vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic dysfunction: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Oct-10, Volume: 28, Issue:29

    Topics: Anorexia; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatig

2010
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2012, Volume: 39, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic

2012
Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).
    Blood, 2007, Jan-01, Volume: 109, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Dehydration; Disease Progression; Disease-Fre

2007
Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2008, Volume: 26, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Agents; Capsules; Car

2008
Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2008, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug

2008

Other Studies

1 other study available for vorinostat and Thrombopenia

ArticleYear
Predicting Response to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Using High-Throughput Genomics.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2015, Volume: 107, Issue:11

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Autoantigens; Cell Line, Tumor; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Re

2015