Page last updated: 2024-11-04

vorinostat and Adverse Drug Event

vorinostat has been researched along with Adverse Drug Event in 9 studies

Vorinostat: A hydroxamic acid and anilide derivative that acts as a HISTONE DEACETYLASE inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA and SEZARY SYNDROME.
vorinostat : A dicarboxylic acid diamide comprising suberic (octanedioic) acid coupled to aniline and hydroxylamine. A histone deacetylase inhibitor, it is marketed under the name Zolinza for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL).

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"In this randomised trial, vorinostat given as a second-line or third-line therapy did not improve overall survival and cannot be recommended as a therapy for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma."9.20Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. ( Baas, P; Buikhuisen, WA; Calvert, H; Chu, Q; Eberhardt, WE; Fennell, D; Fukuoka, K; Gaafar, RM; Hillerdal, G; Kindler, HL; Krug, LM; Lafitte, JJ; Lubiniecki, GM; Manegold, C; Öhman, R; Plummer, R; Smith, M; Sun, X; Tsao, AS, 2015)
"Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor active clinically in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and preclinically in leukemia."9.13Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Bueso-Ramos, C; Chen, C; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Fantin, VR; Ferrajoli, A; Frankel, SR; Garcia-Manero, G; Hardwick, JS; Kantarjian, HM; Koller, C; Loboda, A; Morris, G; Randolph, SS; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Rosner, G; Secrist, JP; Wierda, WG; Yang, H, 2008)
"In this randomised trial, vorinostat given as a second-line or third-line therapy did not improve overall survival and cannot be recommended as a therapy for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma."5.20Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. ( Baas, P; Buikhuisen, WA; Calvert, H; Chu, Q; Eberhardt, WE; Fennell, D; Fukuoka, K; Gaafar, RM; Hillerdal, G; Kindler, HL; Krug, LM; Lafitte, JJ; Lubiniecki, GM; Manegold, C; Öhman, R; Plummer, R; Smith, M; Sun, X; Tsao, AS, 2015)
"Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor active clinically in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and preclinically in leukemia."5.13Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Bueso-Ramos, C; Chen, C; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Fantin, VR; Ferrajoli, A; Frankel, SR; Garcia-Manero, G; Hardwick, JS; Kantarjian, HM; Koller, C; Loboda, A; Morris, G; Randolph, SS; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Rosner, G; Secrist, JP; Wierda, WG; Yang, H, 2008)
" The most common drug-related adverse events were anorexia, nausea, fatigue, and hyperglycemia."2.78Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a phase I clinical trial. ( Chin, K; Doi, T; Hamaguchi, T; Hatake, K; Mehta, A; Noguchi, K; Ohtsu, A; Otsuki, T; Shirao, K, 2013)
"Patients (n = 23) received single doses of 400 mg vorinostat on day 1 (fasted) and day 5 (fed) with 48 hours of pharmacokinetic sampling on both days."2.72A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer. ( Agrawal, NG; Du, L; Frankel, SR; Friedman, EJ; Gottesdiener, KM; Iwamoto, M; Mazina, KE; Ricker, JL; Rubin, EH; Scott, P; Sun, L; Wagner, JA, 2006)
" The existing side effect prediction methods mainly focus on the chemical and biological properties of drugs."1.56Prediction of Side Effects Using Comprehensive Similarity Measures. ( Kim, MH; Lee, T; Seo, S; Yoon, Y, 2020)
"We recorded a total of 31 adverse events (26 grade 1 and five grade 2) in all study participants (n = 20)."1.46No adverse safety or virological changes 2 years following vorinostat in HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy. ( Dantanarayana, A; Elliott, JH; Hagenauer, M; Hoy, JF; Lewin, SR; McMahon, J; Mota, TM; Prince, HM; Purcell, DFJ; Rasmussen, TA; Rhodes, A; Roney, J; Spelman, T; Tennakoon, S; Wightman, F, 2017)

Research

Studies (9)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's3 (33.33)29.6817
2010's4 (44.44)24.3611
2020's2 (22.22)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Morgan, RE1
van Staden, CJ1
Chen, Y1
Kalyanaraman, N1
Kalanzi, J1
Dunn, RT1
Afshari, CA1
Hamadeh, HK1
Seo, S1
Lee, T1
Kim, MH1
Yoon, Y1
Janku, F1
Park, H1
Call, SG1
Madwani, K1
Oki, Y1
Subbiah, V1
Hong, DS1
Naing, A1
Velez-Bravo, VM1
Barnes, TG1
Hagemeister, FB1
Falchook, GS1
Karp, DD1
Wheler, JJ1
Piha-Paul, SA1
Garrido-Laguna, I1
Shpall, EJ1
Fayad, LE1
Neelapu, SS1
Meric-Bernstam, F1
Kurzrock, R1
Fanale, MA1
Krug, LM1
Kindler, HL1
Calvert, H1
Manegold, C1
Tsao, AS1
Fennell, D1
Öhman, R1
Plummer, R1
Eberhardt, WE1
Fukuoka, K1
Gaafar, RM1
Lafitte, JJ1
Hillerdal, G1
Chu, Q1
Buikhuisen, WA1
Lubiniecki, GM1
Sun, X1
Smith, M1
Baas, P1
Mota, TM1
Rasmussen, TA1
Rhodes, A1
Tennakoon, S1
Dantanarayana, A1
Wightman, F1
Hagenauer, M1
Roney, J1
Spelman, T1
Purcell, DFJ1
McMahon, J1
Hoy, JF1
Prince, HM1
Elliott, JH1
Lewin, SR1
Doi, T1
Hamaguchi, T1
Shirao, K1
Chin, K1
Hatake, K1
Noguchi, K1
Otsuki, T1
Mehta, A1
Ohtsu, A1
Rubin, EH1
Agrawal, NG1
Friedman, EJ1
Scott, P1
Mazina, KE1
Sun, L2
Du, L1
Ricker, JL2
Frankel, SR2
Gottesdiener, KM1
Wagner, JA1
Iwamoto, M1
Garcia-Manero, G1
Yang, H1
Bueso-Ramos, C1
Ferrajoli, A1
Cortes, J1
Wierda, WG1
Faderl, S1
Koller, C1
Morris, G1
Rosner, G1
Loboda, A1
Fantin, VR1
Randolph, SS1
Hardwick, JS1
Reilly, JF1
Chen, C1
Secrist, JP1
Richon, VM1
Kantarjian, HM1
Richardson, P1
Mitsiades, C1
Colson, K1
Reilly, E1
McBride, L1
Chiao, J1
Ricker, J1
Rizvi, S1
Oerth, C1
Atkins, B1
Fearen, I1
Anderson, K1
Siegel, D1

Clinical Trials (9)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus or Everolimus or Temsirolimus (mTOR Inhibitor) and Vorinostat (Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor) in Patients With Advanced Cancer[NCT01087554]Phase 1249 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicentre Randomised Phase III Trial Comparing Pembrolizumab Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Advanced Pre-treated Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma[NCT02991482]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-12Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (Vorinostat, MK-0683) in Patients With Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Previously Treated With Systemic Chemotherapy[NCT00128102]Phase 3661 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Effect on HIV Transcription of Vorinostat in Patients Receiving Suppressive Combination Anti-retroviral Therapy[NCT01365065]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Active, not recruiting
MK0683 Phase1 Clinical Study - Solid Tumor -[NCT00373490]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of MK0683 in Patients With Advanced Cancer[NCT00750178]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-01Completed
Phase II Clinical Evaluation of Vorinostat Combined With Salvage Reinduction Chemotherapy Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, Idarubicin and Cytarabine and Vorinostat Maintenance in Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With 50 Years or Older[NCT01039363]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Phase II Randomised Trial of 5-azacitidine Versus 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy[NCT01617226]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) in Patients With Advanced Multiple Myeloma[NCT00109109]Phase 160 participants Interventional2003-12-01Terminated
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Objective Response Rate by Independent Radiological Review

Defined as the best overall response (complete or partial response) across all assessment time-points from randomisation to end of trial treatment, determined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab Arm21.9
Standard Chemotherapy Arm5.6

Overall Survival.

Defined as time from the date of randomisation until death from any cause. Censoring will occur at the last follow-up date. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the OS analysis (Sep 2017 - Aug 2019; approximately 2 years).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab Arm10.7
Standard Chemotherapy Arm12.4

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Independent Radiological Review

To investigate whether treatment with pembrolizumab improves PFS, compared to standard, institutional choice chemotherapy, assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria based on independent radiological review; using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the two treatment arms by a stratified log rank test. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab Arm2.5
Standard Chemotherapy Arm3.4

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Investigator

Investigator assessed PFS, from the date of randomisation until documented progression or death, if progression is not documented. Censoring occurs at the last tumor assessment. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab Arm3.5
Standard Chemotherapy Arm3.7

Time to Treatment Failure.

Time from from randomisation to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including progression of disease, treatment toxicity, refusal and death, by Kaplan Meier method. Censoring will occur at the last follow-up date. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab Arm2.8
Standard Chemotherapy Arm2.3

Percentage of Patients Experienced AEs/SAEs

The safety and tolerability of pembrolizumab treatment will be assessed through analysis of the worst grade of toxicity/adverse events according to CTCAE v4.0 criteria observed over the whole treatment period. Adverse events are collected from study treatment initiation to 30 days after treatment is ceased for any reason. Serious adverse events and events of clinical interest are collected within 90 days after last dose of trial treatment. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experienced any adverse eventExperienced treatment related adverse eventExperienced treatment related adverse event of grade 3-5Experienced treatment related adverse event leading to deathExperienced treatment related adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation
Pembrolizumab Arm70501415
Standard Chemotherapy Arm65521815

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. As specified by the protocol, participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE remained on study until investigator notification to discontinue. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat60
Placebo49

Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) Characterized as Grade 3 or Grade 4 According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. Reporting of AEs per NCI CTCAE is based on 5 grades of severity; Grade 1 (mild; no treatment needed), Grade 2 (moderate; minimal treatment needed), Grade 3 (severe, not life threatening; hospitalization needed), Grade 4 (life threatening; urgent treatment needed) and Grade 5 (death).The final analysis for Grade 3 or 4 AEs was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced Grade 3/4 AEs per NCI CTCAE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat165
Placebo146

Number of Participants Who Experienced an AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who experienced an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat327
Placebo311

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumor elsewhere) or a partial response (PR: ≥30% reduction in the total tumor measurement) per Meso-modified RECIST based on independent radiology review. Meso-modified RECIST was created and validated for disease measurement in pleural mesothelioma. The final analysis for ORR per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol percentage of participants who had a CR or a PR per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review is reported here as the ORR for all randomized participants who had valid baseline data for ORR analysis available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Vorinostat0.63
Placebo0.31

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow up. The final analysis for OS was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. OS analysis is reported here for all randomized participants. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Vorinostat30.7
Placebo27.1

Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 12

Pulmonary function test was conducted using a spirometer for assessment of FVC. FVC is the volume of air forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percent change in FVC from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100)] is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for FVC available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Vorinostat-6.0
Placebo-5.6

Percent Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, Modified for Mesothelioma (LCSS-Meso) Dyspnea Score at Week 12

LCSS-Meso provides participant-reported outcome measures of symptom burden and quality of life. LCSS-Meso includes the disease-related item dyspnea or shortness of breath. The LCSS-Meso item dyspnea is measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) using 100 mm and assigned an individual score based on symptom intensity. Dyspnea VAS score ranges from 0 mm (lowest; no dyspnea) to 100 mm (highest; worst dyspnea). Higher scores indicate dyspnea worsening. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percent change in the LCSS-Meso dyspnea score from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100)] is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for the LCSS-Meso dyspnea score available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Vorinostat141.8
Placebo174.7

Percentage of Participants With ≥10% Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12

Pulmonary function test was conducted using a spirometer for assessment of FVC. FVC is the volume of air forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percentage of participants with ≥10% change (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100) in FVC from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for FVC. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vorinostat24.76
Placebo21.63

Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Change Together With a >10 mm Change From Baseline in the LCSS-Meso Dyspnea Score at Week 12

LCSS-Meso provides participant-reported outcome measures of symptom burden and quality of life. LCSS-Meso includes the disease-related item dyspnea or shortness of breath. The LCSS-Meso item dyspnea is measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) using 100 mm and assigned an individual score based on symptom intensity. Dyspnea VAS score ranges from 0 mm (lowest; no dyspnea) to 100 mm (highest; worst dyspnea). Higher scores indicate dyspnea worsening. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percentage of participants with ≥50% change (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100) and >10 mm absolute change in LCSS-Meso dyspnea score from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for the LCSS-Meso dyspnea score available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vorinostat15.05
Placebo16.39

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per meso-modified-Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Meso-modified RECIST) based on independent radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Meso-modified RECIST was created and validated for disease measurement in pleural mesothelioma. Per meso-modified RECIST, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the total tumor measurement over the nadir measurement or the appearance of ≥1 new lesions. The final analysis for PFS per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. PFS analysis per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review is reported here for all randomized participants. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Vorinostat6.3
Placebo6.1

Area Under the Curve (AUC(0-infinity) at Day 21 (400 mg)

Area Under Curve (AUC(0-infinity))=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 hours. It is obtained from AUC (0 - 24) plus AUC (24 - ∞) (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 21 (400 mg)

InterventionμM·hr (Geometric Mean)
Vorinostat 400 mg8.3

Area Under the Curve (AUC(0-infinity)) at Day 1 (600 mg and 400 mg)

Area Under Curve (AUC(0-infinity))=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to extrapolated infinite time (o- ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). At 600 mg, t=12 hours and at 400 mg, t=24 hours. (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 1 (600 mg and 400 mg)

InterventionμM·hr (Geometric Mean)
Vorinostat 600 mg3.94
Vorinostat 400 mg7.75

Area Under the Curve (AUC(0-infinity)) at Day 3 (600 mg)

Area Under Curve (AUC(0-infinity))=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 hours. It is obtained from AUC (0 - 12) plus AUC (12 - ∞) (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 3 (600 mg)

InterventionμM·hr (Geometric Mean)
Vorinostat 600 mg4.15

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Day 1 (600 mg and 400 mg)

(NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 1 (600 mg and 400 mg)

InterventionμM (Geometric Mean)
Vorinostat 600 mg1.17
Vorinostat 400 mg1.62

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Day 21 (400 mg)

(NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 21 (400 mg)

InterventionμM (Geometric Mean)
Vorinostat 400 mg2.04

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Day 3 (600 mg)

(NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 3 (600 mg)

InterventionμM (Geometric Mean)
Vorinostat 600 mg1.32

Number of Participants With a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

Dose Limiting Toxicity = Drug-related side effects that are serious enough to prevent an increase in dose or level of that treatment (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: 21 Days (first cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vorinostat 600 mg0
Vorinostat 400 mg2

Trials

6 trials available for vorinostat and Adverse Drug Event

ArticleYear
Safety and Efficacy of Vorinostat Plus Sirolimus or Everolimus in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brentuxi

2020
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method;

2015
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method;

2015
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method;

2015
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method;

2015
Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a phase I clinical trial.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2013, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Gas

2013
A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2006, Dec-01, Volume: 12, Issue:23

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dietary Fats; Disease Progression; Dose-Respon

2006
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Blood, 2008, Feb-01, Volume: 111, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res

2008
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Blood, 2008, Feb-01, Volume: 111, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res

2008
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Blood, 2008, Feb-01, Volume: 111, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res

2008
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Blood, 2008, Feb-01, Volume: 111, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res

2008
Phase I trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2008, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Fema

2008

Other Studies

3 other studies available for vorinostat and Adverse Drug Event

ArticleYear
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
    Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2013, Volume: 136, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily

2013
Prediction of Side Effects Using Comprehensive Similarity Measures.
    BioMed research international, 2020, Volume: 2020

    Topics: Area Under Curve; Clonidine; Dasatinib; Drug Interactions; Drug Repositioning; Drug-Related Side Eff

2020
No adverse safety or virological changes 2 years following vorinostat in HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy.
    AIDS (London, England), 2017, 05-15, Volume: 31, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-CD8 Ratio; Drug Interaction

2017