vorinostat has been researched along with Adverse Drug Event in 9 studies
Vorinostat: A hydroxamic acid and anilide derivative that acts as a HISTONE DEACETYLASE inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA and SEZARY SYNDROME.
vorinostat : A dicarboxylic acid diamide comprising suberic (octanedioic) acid coupled to aniline and hydroxylamine. A histone deacetylase inhibitor, it is marketed under the name Zolinza for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL).
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"In this randomised trial, vorinostat given as a second-line or third-line therapy did not improve overall survival and cannot be recommended as a therapy for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma." | 9.20 | Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. ( Baas, P; Buikhuisen, WA; Calvert, H; Chu, Q; Eberhardt, WE; Fennell, D; Fukuoka, K; Gaafar, RM; Hillerdal, G; Kindler, HL; Krug, LM; Lafitte, JJ; Lubiniecki, GM; Manegold, C; Öhman, R; Plummer, R; Smith, M; Sun, X; Tsao, AS, 2015) |
"Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor active clinically in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and preclinically in leukemia." | 9.13 | Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Bueso-Ramos, C; Chen, C; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Fantin, VR; Ferrajoli, A; Frankel, SR; Garcia-Manero, G; Hardwick, JS; Kantarjian, HM; Koller, C; Loboda, A; Morris, G; Randolph, SS; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Rosner, G; Secrist, JP; Wierda, WG; Yang, H, 2008) |
"In this randomised trial, vorinostat given as a second-line or third-line therapy did not improve overall survival and cannot be recommended as a therapy for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma." | 5.20 | Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. ( Baas, P; Buikhuisen, WA; Calvert, H; Chu, Q; Eberhardt, WE; Fennell, D; Fukuoka, K; Gaafar, RM; Hillerdal, G; Kindler, HL; Krug, LM; Lafitte, JJ; Lubiniecki, GM; Manegold, C; Öhman, R; Plummer, R; Smith, M; Sun, X; Tsao, AS, 2015) |
"Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor active clinically in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and preclinically in leukemia." | 5.13 | Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Bueso-Ramos, C; Chen, C; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Fantin, VR; Ferrajoli, A; Frankel, SR; Garcia-Manero, G; Hardwick, JS; Kantarjian, HM; Koller, C; Loboda, A; Morris, G; Randolph, SS; Reilly, JF; Richon, VM; Ricker, JL; Rosner, G; Secrist, JP; Wierda, WG; Yang, H, 2008) |
" The most common drug-related adverse events were anorexia, nausea, fatigue, and hyperglycemia." | 2.78 | Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a phase I clinical trial. ( Chin, K; Doi, T; Hamaguchi, T; Hatake, K; Mehta, A; Noguchi, K; Ohtsu, A; Otsuki, T; Shirao, K, 2013) |
"Patients (n = 23) received single doses of 400 mg vorinostat on day 1 (fasted) and day 5 (fed) with 48 hours of pharmacokinetic sampling on both days." | 2.72 | A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer. ( Agrawal, NG; Du, L; Frankel, SR; Friedman, EJ; Gottesdiener, KM; Iwamoto, M; Mazina, KE; Ricker, JL; Rubin, EH; Scott, P; Sun, L; Wagner, JA, 2006) |
" The existing side effect prediction methods mainly focus on the chemical and biological properties of drugs." | 1.56 | Prediction of Side Effects Using Comprehensive Similarity Measures. ( Kim, MH; Lee, T; Seo, S; Yoon, Y, 2020) |
"We recorded a total of 31 adverse events (26 grade 1 and five grade 2) in all study participants (n = 20)." | 1.46 | No adverse safety or virological changes 2 years following vorinostat in HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy. ( Dantanarayana, A; Elliott, JH; Hagenauer, M; Hoy, JF; Lewin, SR; McMahon, J; Mota, TM; Prince, HM; Purcell, DFJ; Rasmussen, TA; Rhodes, A; Roney, J; Spelman, T; Tennakoon, S; Wightman, F, 2017) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 3 (33.33) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (44.44) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (22.22) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Morgan, RE | 1 |
van Staden, CJ | 1 |
Chen, Y | 1 |
Kalyanaraman, N | 1 |
Kalanzi, J | 1 |
Dunn, RT | 1 |
Afshari, CA | 1 |
Hamadeh, HK | 1 |
Seo, S | 1 |
Lee, T | 1 |
Kim, MH | 1 |
Yoon, Y | 1 |
Janku, F | 1 |
Park, H | 1 |
Call, SG | 1 |
Madwani, K | 1 |
Oki, Y | 1 |
Subbiah, V | 1 |
Hong, DS | 1 |
Naing, A | 1 |
Velez-Bravo, VM | 1 |
Barnes, TG | 1 |
Hagemeister, FB | 1 |
Falchook, GS | 1 |
Karp, DD | 1 |
Wheler, JJ | 1 |
Piha-Paul, SA | 1 |
Garrido-Laguna, I | 1 |
Shpall, EJ | 1 |
Fayad, LE | 1 |
Neelapu, SS | 1 |
Meric-Bernstam, F | 1 |
Kurzrock, R | 1 |
Fanale, MA | 1 |
Krug, LM | 1 |
Kindler, HL | 1 |
Calvert, H | 1 |
Manegold, C | 1 |
Tsao, AS | 1 |
Fennell, D | 1 |
Öhman, R | 1 |
Plummer, R | 1 |
Eberhardt, WE | 1 |
Fukuoka, K | 1 |
Gaafar, RM | 1 |
Lafitte, JJ | 1 |
Hillerdal, G | 1 |
Chu, Q | 1 |
Buikhuisen, WA | 1 |
Lubiniecki, GM | 1 |
Sun, X | 1 |
Smith, M | 1 |
Baas, P | 1 |
Mota, TM | 1 |
Rasmussen, TA | 1 |
Rhodes, A | 1 |
Tennakoon, S | 1 |
Dantanarayana, A | 1 |
Wightman, F | 1 |
Hagenauer, M | 1 |
Roney, J | 1 |
Spelman, T | 1 |
Purcell, DFJ | 1 |
McMahon, J | 1 |
Hoy, JF | 1 |
Prince, HM | 1 |
Elliott, JH | 1 |
Lewin, SR | 1 |
Doi, T | 1 |
Hamaguchi, T | 1 |
Shirao, K | 1 |
Chin, K | 1 |
Hatake, K | 1 |
Noguchi, K | 1 |
Otsuki, T | 1 |
Mehta, A | 1 |
Ohtsu, A | 1 |
Rubin, EH | 1 |
Agrawal, NG | 1 |
Friedman, EJ | 1 |
Scott, P | 1 |
Mazina, KE | 1 |
Sun, L | 2 |
Du, L | 1 |
Ricker, JL | 2 |
Frankel, SR | 2 |
Gottesdiener, KM | 1 |
Wagner, JA | 1 |
Iwamoto, M | 1 |
Garcia-Manero, G | 1 |
Yang, H | 1 |
Bueso-Ramos, C | 1 |
Ferrajoli, A | 1 |
Cortes, J | 1 |
Wierda, WG | 1 |
Faderl, S | 1 |
Koller, C | 1 |
Morris, G | 1 |
Rosner, G | 1 |
Loboda, A | 1 |
Fantin, VR | 1 |
Randolph, SS | 1 |
Hardwick, JS | 1 |
Reilly, JF | 1 |
Chen, C | 1 |
Secrist, JP | 1 |
Richon, VM | 1 |
Kantarjian, HM | 1 |
Richardson, P | 1 |
Mitsiades, C | 1 |
Colson, K | 1 |
Reilly, E | 1 |
McBride, L | 1 |
Chiao, J | 1 |
Ricker, J | 1 |
Rizvi, S | 1 |
Oerth, C | 1 |
Atkins, B | 1 |
Fearen, I | 1 |
Anderson, K | 1 |
Siegel, D | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus or Everolimus or Temsirolimus (mTOR Inhibitor) and Vorinostat (Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor) in Patients With Advanced Cancer[NCT01087554] | Phase 1 | 249 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2010-03-31 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Multicentre Randomised Phase III Trial Comparing Pembrolizumab Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Advanced Pre-treated Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma[NCT02991482] | Phase 3 | 144 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-09-12 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (Vorinostat, MK-0683) in Patients With Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Previously Treated With Systemic Chemotherapy[NCT00128102] | Phase 3 | 661 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Effect on HIV Transcription of Vorinostat in Patients Receiving Suppressive Combination Anti-retroviral Therapy[NCT01365065] | Phase 2 | 20 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-05-31 | Active, not recruiting | ||
MK0683 Phase1 Clinical Study - Solid Tumor -[NCT00373490] | Phase 1 | 16 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of MK0683 in Patients With Advanced Cancer[NCT00750178] | Phase 1 | 30 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-11-01 | Completed | ||
Phase II Clinical Evaluation of Vorinostat Combined With Salvage Reinduction Chemotherapy Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, Idarubicin and Cytarabine and Vorinostat Maintenance in Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With 50 Years or Older[NCT01039363] | Phase 2 | 27 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | Not yet recruiting | |||
Phase II Randomised Trial of 5-azacitidine Versus 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy[NCT01617226] | Phase 2 | 260 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-30 | Completed | ||
Phase II Clinical Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) in Patients With Advanced Multiple Myeloma[NCT00109109] | Phase 1 | 60 participants | Interventional | 2003-12-01 | Terminated | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Defined as the best overall response (complete or partial response) across all assessment time-points from randomisation to end of trial treatment, determined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Pembrolizumab Arm | 21.9 |
Standard Chemotherapy Arm | 5.6 |
Defined as time from the date of randomisation until death from any cause. Censoring will occur at the last follow-up date. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the OS analysis (Sep 2017 - Aug 2019; approximately 2 years).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pembrolizumab Arm | 10.7 |
Standard Chemotherapy Arm | 12.4 |
To investigate whether treatment with pembrolizumab improves PFS, compared to standard, institutional choice chemotherapy, assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria based on independent radiological review; using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the two treatment arms by a stratified log rank test. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pembrolizumab Arm | 2.5 |
Standard Chemotherapy Arm | 3.4 |
Investigator assessed PFS, from the date of randomisation until documented progression or death, if progression is not documented. Censoring occurs at the last tumor assessment. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pembrolizumab Arm | 3.5 |
Standard Chemotherapy Arm | 3.7 |
Time from from randomisation to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including progression of disease, treatment toxicity, refusal and death, by Kaplan Meier method. Censoring will occur at the last follow-up date. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pembrolizumab Arm | 2.8 |
Standard Chemotherapy Arm | 2.3 |
The safety and tolerability of pembrolizumab treatment will be assessed through analysis of the worst grade of toxicity/adverse events according to CTCAE v4.0 criteria observed over the whole treatment period. Adverse events are collected from study treatment initiation to 30 days after treatment is ceased for any reason. Serious adverse events and events of clinical interest are collected within 90 days after last dose of trial treatment. (NCT02991482)
Timeframe: Time from randomization of the first patient until database cutoff date for the primary PFS analysis (Sep 2017 - Feb 2019; approximately 1.5 years).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experienced any adverse event | Experienced treatment related adverse event | Experienced treatment related adverse event of grade 3-5 | Experienced treatment related adverse event leading to death | Experienced treatment related adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation | |
Pembrolizumab Arm | 70 | 50 | 14 | 1 | 5 |
Standard Chemotherapy Arm | 65 | 52 | 18 | 1 | 5 |
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. As specified by the protocol, participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE remained on study until investigator notification to discontinue. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 60 |
Placebo | 49 |
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. Reporting of AEs per NCI CTCAE is based on 5 grades of severity; Grade 1 (mild; no treatment needed), Grade 2 (moderate; minimal treatment needed), Grade 3 (severe, not life threatening; hospitalization needed), Grade 4 (life threatening; urgent treatment needed) and Grade 5 (death).The final analysis for Grade 3 or 4 AEs was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced Grade 3/4 AEs per NCI CTCAE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 165 |
Placebo | 146 |
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who experienced an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 327 |
Placebo | 311 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumor elsewhere) or a partial response (PR: ≥30% reduction in the total tumor measurement) per Meso-modified RECIST based on independent radiology review. Meso-modified RECIST was created and validated for disease measurement in pleural mesothelioma. The final analysis for ORR per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol percentage of participants who had a CR or a PR per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review is reported here as the ORR for all randomized participants who had valid baseline data for ORR analysis available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 0.63 |
Placebo | 0.31 |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow up. The final analysis for OS was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. OS analysis is reported here for all randomized participants. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 30.7 |
Placebo | 27.1 |
Pulmonary function test was conducted using a spirometer for assessment of FVC. FVC is the volume of air forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percent change in FVC from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100)] is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for FVC available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12
Intervention | Percent Change (Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | -6.0 |
Placebo | -5.6 |
LCSS-Meso provides participant-reported outcome measures of symptom burden and quality of life. LCSS-Meso includes the disease-related item dyspnea or shortness of breath. The LCSS-Meso item dyspnea is measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) using 100 mm and assigned an individual score based on symptom intensity. Dyspnea VAS score ranges from 0 mm (lowest; no dyspnea) to 100 mm (highest; worst dyspnea). Higher scores indicate dyspnea worsening. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percent change in the LCSS-Meso dyspnea score from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100)] is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for the LCSS-Meso dyspnea score available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12
Intervention | Percent Change (Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 141.8 |
Placebo | 174.7 |
Pulmonary function test was conducted using a spirometer for assessment of FVC. FVC is the volume of air forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percentage of participants with ≥10% change (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100) in FVC from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for FVC. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 24.76 |
Placebo | 21.63 |
LCSS-Meso provides participant-reported outcome measures of symptom burden and quality of life. LCSS-Meso includes the disease-related item dyspnea or shortness of breath. The LCSS-Meso item dyspnea is measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) using 100 mm and assigned an individual score based on symptom intensity. Dyspnea VAS score ranges from 0 mm (lowest; no dyspnea) to 100 mm (highest; worst dyspnea). Higher scores indicate dyspnea worsening. Baseline measurement was taken before treatment initiation. Per protocol percentage of participants with ≥50% change (percent change calculated: [Week 12 - Baseline]/Baseline*100) and >10 mm absolute change in LCSS-Meso dyspnea score from baseline to Week 12 post treatment initiation is reported here for all randomized participants who had a valid baseline and ≥1 post-baseline value for the LCSS-Meso dyspnea score available. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 15.05 |
Placebo | 16.39 |
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per meso-modified-Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Meso-modified RECIST) based on independent radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Meso-modified RECIST was created and validated for disease measurement in pleural mesothelioma. Per meso-modified RECIST, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the total tumor measurement over the nadir measurement or the appearance of ≥1 new lesions. The final analysis for PFS per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. PFS analysis per Meso-modified RECIST by independent radiology review is reported here for all randomized participants. (NCT00128102)
Timeframe: Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Vorinostat | 6.3 |
Placebo | 6.1 |
Area Under Curve (AUC(0-infinity))=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 hours. It is obtained from AUC (0 - 24) plus AUC (24 - ∞) (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 21 (400 mg)
Intervention | μM·hr (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 400 mg | 8.3 |
Area Under Curve (AUC(0-infinity))=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to extrapolated infinite time (o- ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). At 600 mg, t=12 hours and at 400 mg, t=24 hours. (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 1 (600 mg and 400 mg)
Intervention | μM·hr (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 600 mg | 3.94 |
Vorinostat 400 mg | 7.75 |
Area Under Curve (AUC(0-infinity))=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 hours. It is obtained from AUC (0 - 12) plus AUC (12 - ∞) (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 3 (600 mg)
Intervention | μM·hr (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 600 mg | 4.15 |
(NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 1 (600 mg and 400 mg)
Intervention | μM (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 600 mg | 1.17 |
Vorinostat 400 mg | 1.62 |
(NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 21 (400 mg)
Intervention | μM (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 400 mg | 2.04 |
(NCT00373490)
Timeframe: Day 3 (600 mg)
Intervention | μM (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 600 mg | 1.32 |
Dose Limiting Toxicity = Drug-related side effects that are serious enough to prevent an increase in dose or level of that treatment (NCT00373490)
Timeframe: 21 Days (first cycle)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Vorinostat 600 mg | 0 |
Vorinostat 400 mg | 2 |
6 trials available for vorinostat and Adverse Drug Event
Article | Year |
---|---|
Safety and Efficacy of Vorinostat Plus Sirolimus or Everolimus in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brentuxi | 2020 |
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; | 2015 |
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; | 2015 |
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; | 2015 |
Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; | 2015 |
Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a phase I clinical trial.
Topics: Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Gas | 2013 |
A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dietary Fats; Disease Progression; Dose-Respon | 2006 |
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res | 2008 |
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res | 2008 |
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res | 2008 |
Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Topics: Acetylation; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Dose-Res | 2008 |
Phase I trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Fema | 2008 |
3 other studies available for vorinostat and Adverse Drug Event
Article | Year |
---|---|
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily | 2013 |
Prediction of Side Effects Using Comprehensive Similarity Measures.
Topics: Area Under Curve; Clonidine; Dasatinib; Drug Interactions; Drug Repositioning; Drug-Related Side Eff | 2020 |
No adverse safety or virological changes 2 years following vorinostat in HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy.
Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-CD8 Ratio; Drug Interaction | 2017 |