vorapaxar and Cardiovascular-Diseases

This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of vorapaxar in reducing cardiovascular risk. Vorapaxar is a tricyclic himbacine-derived reversible inhibitor of platelet surface protease activator receptor-1, which prevents thrombin from activating platelets. Two Phase III clinical trials and multiple subanalyses from the two trials with vorapaxar have been published. In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, vorapaxar, when added to standard therapy, did not reduce the composite cardiovascular end point. In contrary, in a study of secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular diseases, vorapaxar reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or ischemic events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in patients with stable atherosclerosis who were receiving standard therapy. Vorapaxar is approved in the US for use with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in the secondary prevention of thrombogenic cardiovascular events in stable patients with peripheral arterial disease or a history of myocardial infarction. Vorapaxar increases risk of bleeding and is contraindicated in patients with previous cerebrovascular events. It is essential to balance individual patient's bleeding risk to any further cardiovascular benefits that they may get. Future investigation is also needed to evaluate use of vorapaxar with newer antiplatelet agents such as ticagrelor and cangrelor, as well as its role as monotherapy.

Topics: Animals; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lactones; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of vorapaxar, a protease activator receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonist, in the management of atherosclerotic diseases.. Peer-reviewed clinical trials and review articles were identified from MEDLINE and Current Content database (both 1966 to December 31, 2014) using the search terms vorapaxar and protease activator receptor antagonist.. A total of 30 clinical studies were identified (16 clinical trials, including subanalyses, 14 related to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics and drug interactions).. Two phase III clinical trials with vorapaxar have been published. In patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), vorapaxar failed to significantly reduce the primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia with hospitalization, and urgent coronary revascularization). Conversely, in a study of secondary prevention for patients with cardiovascular disease, the composite end point of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke was significantly reduced. In both trials, the safety end points of major/minor bleeding were increased compared with placebo. In the secondary prevention trial, an increased incidence of intracranial hemorrhage led to the exclusion of patients with a prior history of stroke.. Vorapaxar is approved for use with aspirin and/or clopidogrel in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in stable patients with peripheral arterial disease or a history of MI. However, the addition of vorapaxar to other antiplatelets can significantly increase the risk of bleeding. It is, therefore, essential to balance the need for further reduction of risk of thrombotic event with patient's individual bleeding risk.

Topics: Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lactones; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

From the discovery of protease activated receptors (PARs) to the development of first clinically available PAR1 antagonist (vorapaxar) more than two decades of continuous research have passed. There are four different types of PARs named as PAR1, 2, 3 and 4 having a unique mechanism of signaling. These receptors are present in different organs, including the cardiovascular system. Presence of PARs in heart and blood vessels, alteration in the level and activity of the receptors in pathological conditions along with availability of antagonists makes these receptors targetable in several cardiac diseases. Therapeutic benefits of PAR antagonist have been proven in animal model of cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction, viral myocarditis, atherosclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, etc. PAR signaling plays a vital role in mediating cardiac hypertrophy, inflammation and fibrosis. Apart from having cardiac importance PAR antagonist are also continuously experimented for their beneficial effects in improving insulin resistance in metabolic syndromes. In the present review, we have discussed the functions of individual PARs in the heart and blood vessels along with the expected usefulness of PAR modulators in cardiovascular diseases.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated

Platelets are the key in the pathogenesis of atherothrombotic disease such as acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Current anti-platelet treatments are mainly based on inhibition of two important pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A2 (TXA2) mediated (aspirin) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-P2Y12 receptor mediated (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). Despite the dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors have reduced ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the rate of recurrent ischemic complication after ACS remains high. Combination of multiple anti-platelet agents is also associated with increased risk of bleeding. Thrombin is a potent platelet agonist and the increase of its activity has been reported in patients with ACS. Platelet effects of thrombin are mediated by protease-activated receptors (PAR), and PAR-1 is the most important receptor in human platelets. Two PAR-1 antagonists, vorapaxar and atopaxar, have undergone clinical investigation. In this review, we will describe the pharmacology of PAR-1 antagonists and will review and discuss results of randomized clinical trials with PAR-1 antagonists.

Topics: Animals; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Design; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Ligands; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Signal Transduction; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome

Proteinase Activated Receptors (PARs) are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that were discovered in the early 1990's. They are unusual among GPCRs in being activated through proteolytic cleavage of the receptor N-terminus by serine proteinases such as thrombin. Over the last two decades major advances have been made in our understanding of how these receptors function and the roles they play in (patho)physiology. They have also emerged as drug targets for a number of conditions, most notably thrombosis. Recently two different drugs targeting PAR1 have entered clinical trials as anti-platelet agents. This review provides an overview of the proteinase activated receptor family and focuses on the role of PAR1 in regulating the endothelial barrier integrity and its implication on developing PAR antagonists for anti-platelet therapy.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated; Thrombosis

Despite the availability of dual antiplatelet therapy comprised of aspirin and clopidogrel, there is still significant unmet medical need for treating and preventing arterial thrombotic diseases. To achieve further reduction of cardiovascular events without exceeding bleeding tolerability and safety limits, novel antiplatelet strategies might need to trade in antiplatelet efficacy by partial inhibition of an important platelet activation pathway or by differentially targeting pathological versus physiological thrombogenesis pathways. Thrombin, the central enzyme in coagulation and the most potent platelet agonist tested in vitro, is one of the key factors driving the formation of occlusive thrombi. Platelet thrombin receptors, namely protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) and protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR-4), act in concert to elicit robust platelet responses to thrombin. PAR-1 is the high affinity thrombin receptor and represents a novel antithrombotic target. PAR-4 is a low affinity thrombin receptor with less understood function. This review discusses the genetic and pharmacological evidence for PAR-1 target validation and highlights the progresses and challenges in developing oral PAR-1 antagonists, especially SCH 530348 from Merck/Schering-Plough and E-5555 from Eisai Co. Recent patents disclosing several novel chemical series of PAR-1 antagonists from Sanofi-Aventis and Pierre Fabre are also presented.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Thrombin; Thrombin; Thrombosis

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of coronary artery disease and its sequalae is of great significance. Acetil Salycilic Acid (ASA) has continued to dominate the field as a potent antiplatelet agent, due to its ease of use and cost effectiveness. In addition to this, clopidogrel has also been widely used with better long term administration results in patients with atherosclerotic disease. However, interpatient variability and resistance to clopidogrel has opened the doors for further investigative research to find another agent which potentially meets the pharmacokinetic demands whilst having a satisfactory safety profile. Prasugrel and other novel nonthienopyridine derivatives are currently under investigation, with previous trials showing very reassuring outcomes. Patented inventions along with large trials have shown that prasugrel significantly reduces ischemic end points, ultimately resulting in a decrease in Myocardial infarctions, thromboocculusive episodes and death. Further studies are required to support these findings before we are aware of all clinical effects of Prasugrel.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Patents as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Receptors, Thrombin; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Patients with renal disease are often undertreated with antiplatelet therapy due to concerns about bleeding. Vorapaxar blocks platelet activation via the PAR-1 receptor and reduces cardiovascular events in patients with stable atherosclerosis, but with increased bleeding. We examined the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients with impaired renal function. TRA2°P-TIMI 50 randomized patients with stable atherosclerosis to vorapaxar or. We analyzed patients with eGFR assessed who qualified with a history of MI or PAD (without stroke or TIA) (n = 19,932). Cox models assessed the risk of CV events and bleeding by quartile of baseline eGFR in the placebo arm and then by randomized assignment. Net clinical outcome (NCO) was predefined as CV death, MI, stroke, or GUSTO severe bleeding. Patients with lower eGFR tended to be older, female, have hypertension, hyperlipidemia or prior PAD. In the placebo arm, baseline eGFR in the lowest quartile was associated with a 26% higher risk of CV death, MI or stroke (Q1:Q4 HR

Topics: Aged; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome

Risk stratification of patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) for subsequent cardiovascular (CV) events helps identify patients most likely to benefit from secondary prevention therapies. This study externally validated a new risk score (TRS2˚P) for secondary events derived from the TRA2°P-TIMI 50 trial among post-MI patients from two large health care systems.. This retrospective cohort study included 9618 patients treated for acute MI at either the Cleveland Clinic (CC) or Geisinger Health System (GHS) between 2008 and 2013. Patients with a clinic visit within 2-52 weeks of MI were included and followed for CV death, repeat MI, and ischemic stroke through electronic medical records (EMR). The TRS2˚P is based on nine factors determined through EMR documentation. Discrimination and calibration of the TRS2˚P were quantified in both patient populations.. MI patients at CC and GHS were older, had more comorbidities, received fewer medications, and had higher 3-year event rates compared to subjects in the TRA2°P trial: 31% (CC), 33% (GHS), and 10% (TRA2°P-TIMI 50). The proposed risk score had similar discrimination across the three cohorts with c-statistics of 0.66 (CC), 0.66 (GHS), and 0.67 (TRA2°P-TIMI 50). A strong graded relationship between the risk score and event rates was observed in all cohorts, though 3-year event rates were consistently higher within TRS2°P strata in the CC and GHS cohorts relative to TRA2˚P-TIMI 50.. The TRS2˚P demonstrated consistent risk discrimination across trial and non-trial patients with recent MI, but event rates were consistently higher in the non-trial cohorts.

Topics: Aged; Calibration; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Electronic Health Records; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

Clinical trials traditionally use time-to-first-event analysis embedded within the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. However, many patients have >1 event, and this approach may not reflect overall experience. We addressed this by analyzing all cardiovascular events in TRACER.. TRACER randomized 12 944 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes to placebo or to protease-activated receptor 1 antagonist vorapaxar with a median follow-up of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667). Analysis of vorapaxar's effect on recurrent CVD, MI, or stroke was prespecified using the Wei, Lin, and Weissfeld approach. Vorapaxar did not reduce the first occurrence of the primary endpoint of CVD, MI, stroke, revascularization, or rehospitalization for recurrent ischemia, but reduced the secondary composite endpoint of CVD, MI, or stroke (14.7% vorapaxar vs. 16.4% placebo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 0.98; P=0.02; number needed to treat [NNT], 81). Recurrent secondary events occurred in 2.7% of patients. Vorapaxar reduced overall occurrences of ischemic events, first and subsequent (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.98; P=0.02; NNT, 51). Also, there was a trend indicating that vorapaxar reduced the expanded endpoint, including revascularization and rehospitalization for recurrent ischemia (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.01; P=0.09). Vorapaxar increased overall occurrences of moderate and severe Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries bleeding (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.66; P<0.001) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction clinically significant bleeding (HR, 1.550; 95% CI, 1.403 to 1.713; P<0.001).. Vorapaxar reduced overall occurrences of ischemic events, but increased bleeding. These exploratory findings broaden our understanding of vorapaxar's potential and expand our understanding of the value of capturing recurrent events.. ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00527943.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Vorapaxar is a new oral protease-activated-receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist that inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation.. In this multinational, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared vorapaxar with placebo in 12,944 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization.. Follow-up in the trial was terminated early after a safety review. After a median follow-up of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667), the primary end point occurred in 1031 of 6473 patients receiving vorapaxar versus 1102 of 6471 patients receiving placebo (Kaplan-Meier 2-year rate, 18.5% vs. 19.9%; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.01; P=0.07). A composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 822 patients in the vorapaxar group versus 910 in the placebo group (14.7% and 16.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P=0.02). Rates of moderate and severe bleeding were 7.2% in the vorapaxar group and 5.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.58; P<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78 to 6.45; P<0.001). Rates of nonhemorrhagic adverse events were similar in the two groups.. In patients with acute coronary syndromes, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but significantly increased the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. (Funded by Merck; TRACER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00527943.).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty; Cardiovascular Diseases; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Artery Bypass; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1

Thrombin potently activates platelets through the protease-activated receptor PAR-1. Vorapaxar is a novel antiplatelet agent that selectively inhibits the cellular actions of thrombin through antagonism of PAR-1.. We randomly assigned 26,449 patients who had a history of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or peripheral arterial disease to receive vorapaxar (2.5 mg daily) or matching placebo and followed them for a median of 30 months. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. After 2 years, the data and safety monitoring board recommended discontinuation of the study treatment in patients with a history of stroke owing to the risk of intracranial hemorrhage.. At 3 years, the primary end point had occurred in 1028 patients (9.3%) in the vorapaxar group and in 1176 patients (10.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for the vorapaxar group, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.94; P<0.001). Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or recurrent ischemia leading to revascularization occurred in 1259 patients (11.2%) in the vorapaxar group and 1417 patients (12.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.95; P=0.001). Moderate or severe bleeding occurred in 4.2% of patients who received vorapaxar and 2.5% of those who received placebo (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.93; P<0.001). There was an increase in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage in the vorapaxar group (1.0%, vs. 0.5% in the placebo group; P<0.001).. Inhibition of PAR-1 with vorapaxar reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or ischemic events in patients with stable atherosclerosis who were receiving standard therapy. However, it increased the risk of moderate or severe bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. (Funded by Merck; TRA 2P-TIMI 50 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00526474.).

Topics: Aged; Brain Ischemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Retreatment; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Vorapaxar inhibits platelet activation by antagonising thrombin-mediated activation of the protease-activated receptor 1 on human platelets. The effect of adding other antiplatelet drugs to aspirin for long-term secondary prevention of thrombotic events in stable patients with previous myocardial infarction is uncertain. We tested this effect in a subgroup of patients from the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2°P)-TIMI 50 trial.. In TRA 2°P-TIMI 50--a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel trial--we randomly assigned patients with a history of atherothrombosis to receive vorapaxar (2·5 mg daily) or matching placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Patients, and those giving treatment, assessing outcomes, and analysing results were masked to treatment allocation. Patients with a qualifying myocardial infarction within the previous 2 weeks to 12 months were analysed as a pre-defined subgroup. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, analysed by intention to treat. We analysed events by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared groups with a Cox proportional hazard model. TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00526474).. 17,779 of 26,449 patients had a qualifying myocardial infarction and were assigned treatment (8898 to vorapaxar and 8881 to placebo). Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 2·0-2·9). Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 610 of 8898 patients in the vorapaxar group and 750 of 8881 in the placebo group (3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates 8·1%vs 9·7%, HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·72-0·89; p<0·0001). Moderate or severe bleeding was more common in the vorapaxar group versus the placebo group (241/8880 [3·4%, 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate] vs 151/8849 [2·1%, 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate], HR 1·61, 95% CI 1·31-1·97; p<0·0001). Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 43 of 8880 patients (0·6%, 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate) with vorapaxar versus 28 of 8849 (0·4%, 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate) with placebo (p=0·076). Other serious adverse events were equally distributed between groups.. For patients with a history of myocardial infarction, inhibition of protease-activated receptor 1 with vorapaxar reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or ischaemic events when added to standard antiplatelet treatment, including aspirin, and increases the risk of moderate or severe bleeding.. Merck.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis

Vorapaxar specifically and effectively inhibits protease activated receptor-1 and may reduce thrombin-mediated ischemic events without interfering primary hemostasis. In the TRA-2P-TIMI 50 trial, vorapaxar reduced the risk of primary ischemic outcome but with increased bleeding risk. In the

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Vorapaxar, a novel antiplatelet thrombin PAR-1 inhibitor, has been evaluated in TRA2P and TRACER trials. The drug is currently approved for post-myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease indications with concomitant use of clopidogrel and/or aspirin. The FDA ruled that the overall vorapaxar data quality was acceptable, but conducted the sensitivity analyses for potential censoring. This was unusual, intriguing, and directly related to the challenged quality of ticagrelor dataset in PLATO in the previous New Drug Application for an oral antiplatelet agent submitted to the same Agency.. Hence, we compared the FDA-confirmed evidence of conduct and data quality in vorapaxar (TRA2P, and TRACER) with those of ticagrelor (PLATO) trials.. The FDA provides a detailed report on information censoring, and follow-up completeness for 3 trials. TRA2P and TRACER used independent CRO for site monitoring, exhibit no heterogeneity in trial results dependent on geography, and consistent adjudication results with much less censoring than in PLATO.. The data quality and trial conduct in vorapaxar trials were better than testing ticagrelor in PLATO, however, there is still some room for improvement especially with regard to follow-up completeness, and less information censoring.

Topics: Adenosine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Data Accuracy; Humans; Lactones; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, PAR-1; Ticagrelor; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Antithrombotic therapy plays an important role in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) but is associated with bleeding risk. Advanced age may modify the relationship between efficacy and safety.. Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar (a protease-activated receptor 1 antagonist) was analyzed across ages as a continuous and a categorical variable in the 12,944 patients with NSTE ACS enrolled in the TRACER trial. To evaluate the effect of age, Cox regression models were developed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with the adjustment of other baseline characteristics and randomized treatment for the primary efficacy composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization, and the primary safety composite of moderate or severe Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) bleeding.. The median age of the population was 64years (25th, 75th percentiles = 58, 71). Also, 1,791 patients (13.8%) were ≤54years of age, 4,968 (38.4%) were between 55 and 64 years, 3,979 (30.7%) were between 65 and 74 years, and 2,206 (17.1%) were 75years or older. Older patients had higher rates of hypertension, renal insufficiency, and previous stroke and worse Killip class. The oldest age group (≥75years) had substantially higher 2-year rates of the composite ischemic end point and moderate or severe GUSTO bleeding compared with the youngest age group (≤54years). The relationships between treatment assignment (vorapaxar vs placebo) and efficacy outcomes did not vary by age. For the primary efficacy end point, the HRs (95% CIs) comparing vorapaxar and placebo in the 4 age groups were as follows: 1.12 (0.88-1.43), 0.88 (0.76-1.02), 0.89 (0.76-1.04), and 0.88 (0.74-1.06), respectively (P value for interaction = .435). Similar to what was observed for efficacy outcomes, we did not observe any interaction between vorapaxar and age on bleeding outcomes. For the composite of moderate or severe bleeding according to the GUSTO classification, the HRs (95% CIs) comparing vorapaxar and placebo in the 4 age groups were 1.73 (0.89-3.34), 1.39 (1.04-1.86), 1.10 (0.85-1.42), and 1.73 (1.29-2.33), respectively (P value for interaction = .574).. Older patients had a greater risk for ischemic and bleeding events; however, the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in NSTE ACS were not significantly influenced by age.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Secondary Prevention

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Interactions; Humans; Lactones; Oral Surgical Procedures; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Vitamin K