vitamin-k-semiquinone-radical and Tachycardia--Ventricular

Thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) can result in significant morbidity. Thromboembolic prophylaxis after catheter ablation can be achieved by the use of antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonists, or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The relative safety and efficacy of these modes of prophylaxis are uncertain. We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who received warfarin or DOACs for thromboembolic prophylaxis after catheter ablation of VT.. Anticoagulation with DOACS was started after left ventricular VT ablation in a series of 42 consecutive patients with structural heart disease (67 ± 11 years, 3 women, ejection fraction 32 ± 14%). Duration of hospital stay, bleeding episodes, and thromboembolic events were compared to a historic consecutive group of patients (n = 38, 65 ± 13 years, 14 women, ejection fraction 36 ± 13%) in whom anticoagulation with a formerly described protocol of heparin and vitamin K antagonist was used after VT ablation procedures. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the group where DOACs were used as compared to vitamin K antagonists (3.3 ± 1.8 vs. 5.0 ± 2.5 days postablation; p = 0.001) without an increase of bleeding or thromboembolic events.. Anticoagulation with DOACs is safe and shortens hospital stay in patients with structural heart disease undergoing left ventricular VT ablation procedures.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation, the most frequent arrhythmia, has a growing incidence with increasing age and the most important complication of the disease is thromboembolic events that may be prevented by antivitamin K. They are the most efficient therapeutic class for the prevention of these events but they are associated with an increased haemorrhagic risk leading to a reduced prescription in general practice. Optimisation of the management should be based on an individual evaluation of the thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risks, taking into account age, the presence of an associated heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, history of cerebrovascular event, history of previous haemorrhagic event and the ability to achieve a stable target INR. The challenge in ventricular arrhythmias lies in identifying a high risk of sudden death, mainly related to ventricular fibrillation. In patients with structural heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction is the strongest predictor of sudden death. Non invasive markers such as non sustained ventricular tachycardia, late ventricular potentials, decreased heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity, and repolarization altemans are further elements to assess risk. However, most of these markers have a poor positive predictive value and a low specificity. In patients with normal hearts, genetic predisposition may in the future identify high risk patients. The electrophysiologic study with programmed ventricular stimulation remains a costly and invasive method and only has a strong positive predictive value in ischemic cardiomyopathy. More precise algorithms for risk stratification are thus needed that may help the strategy of therapy with prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the future.

Topics: 4-Hydroxycoumarins; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Atrial Fibrillation; Baroreflex; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Diabetes Complications; Electrocardiography; Heart Diseases; Heart Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Indenes; International Normalized Ratio; Myocardial Ischemia; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Thromboembolism; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Fibrillation; Vitamin K