vitamin-k-semiquinone-radical and Ischemic-Attack--Transient

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are equally or potentially superior in terms of effectiveness in the prevention of ischemic stroke and carry a lower associated risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to Vitamin K antagonists. Nevertheless, ischemic strokes also occur in patients who are being treated with NOAC. In those particular patients, knowledge about the underlying stroke etiology, clinical presentation, acute management, and complication rates is scarce.. Systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive clinical overview in terms of presentation, laboratory, imaging parameters and outcomes of patients suffering from acute cerebral ischemic events (i.e. TIA and acute ischemic stroke) while on treatment with a NOAC. Only if available, comparison to VKA is presented which was not the primary focus of this analysis.. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE from January 1, 2006, to November 20, 2018.. 52 studies providing detailed information on a total of 12247 patients were included. We excluded case reports and case series with less than five patients.. We systematically assessed study quality using a bias tool and pooled consistent data.. Existing data indicates milder stroke severity and smaller infarct size of acute ischemic stroke on treatment with NOAC compared to stroke occurrence on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Established risk factors for ischemic events also play a role in stroke while on NOACs, albeit the underlying etiology remains poorly understood. Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy seem to be safe and effective, but patient selection for recanalization therapies is challenging.. Limited quality of published data, duplicate cases, statistical issues of data pooling, possible incomplete retrieval of identified research and reporting bias might have limited our findings.. Acute ischemic events despite treatment with NOAC therapy are insufficiently investigated.. PROSPERO: CRD42018074853.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Reperfusion; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Vitamin K

Anticoagulation in catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is of paramount importance for prevention of thromboembolic events, and recent studies favor uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to uninterrupted VKAs for anticoagulation in CA by performing a meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies comparing NOACs with uninterrupted VKAs in patients who underwent CA for AF from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2015. Odds ratio (OR) and Peto's OR (POR) were used to report for event rates >1% and <1%, respectively. A total of 11,686 patients with AF who underwent CA in 25 studies were included in this analysis. There was no significant difference between NOACs and uninterrupted VKAs in occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attacks (POR 1.35, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.94) and major bleeding (POR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.31), which were consistent in subgroup analysis of interrupted and uninterrupted NOACs. A lower risk of minor bleeding was observed with NOACs (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00), and no major differences were observed for the risk of thromboembolic events, cardiac tamponade or pericardial effusion requiring drainage, and groin hematoma. NOACs, whether interrupted preprocedure or not, were associated with equal rates of stroke or TIA and major bleeding complications and less risk of minor bleeding compared with uninterrupted VKAs in CA for AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observational Studies as Topic; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Strokes, whether ischaemic or haemorrhagic, are the most feared complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its treatment. Vitamin K antagonists have been the mainstay of stroke prevention. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants have been introduced. The advantages and disadvantages of these treatment strategies have been extensively discussed. In this narrative review, we discuss dilemmas faced by primary care clinicians in the context of stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in patients with AF. We discuss the classification of stroke, the different types of stroke seen with AF, the prognosis of AF-related strokes, the early management after AF-related stroke or TIA and the therapeutic options after anticoagulant-associated intracerebral haemorrhage. Most importantly, we aim to dispel common misconceptions on the part of non-stroke specialists that can lead to suboptimal stroke prevention and management.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Management; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Prognosis; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The majority of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) will require anticoagulation therapy for reducing the risk of stroke, the most devastating complication of AF. Although traditionally vitamin K antagonists have been used for this purpose, they have important limitations that interfere with their use in clinical practice. Different clinical trials have shown the benefits of new oral anticoagulants over warfarin, but patients included in the ROCKET-AF trial were found to be at a higher risk of AF-related complications. Moreover, rivaroxaban has been proven to be effective and safe in patients with AF and moderate renal dysfunction as well as in those with ischemic heart disease. Rivaroxaban is taken only once daily; this may improve medication adherence and, secondarily, it provides a higher protection and reduction in the risk of stroke. This article provides an extensive review of the available evidence about rivaroxaban, with a special focus on nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Embolism; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Vitamin K

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Brain Infarction; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Among the different subtypes of ischaemic strokes, almost 20 % are of cardiac origin. Different are the causes of cardioembolic stroke, but the most common is the atrial fibrillation, a supraventricular arrhythmia. Appropriate use of antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke depends on whether the underlying cause is cardioembolic or of presumed arterial origin. Adequate antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention after cerebral ischaemia of presumed arterial origin, whether for patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of cardiac origin, mainly due to atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are highly effective in preventing recurrent ischaemic stroke but have important limitations and are thus underused. Current guidelines still regard Vitamin K Antagonists at INR 2·0-3·0 to be the standard treatment after cerebral ischaemia of cardiac origin for patients who can tolerate them. In this setting antiplatelet therapy provides an alternative when oral anticoagulation is contraindicated or when patient choice or compliance limits choice of therapy, but is much less effective than VKAs. Recent trial data performed with new anticogulants such as the factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors will need to be taken into account, in order to prevent several of the clinical problems actually related to VKAs use.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Vitamin K

New oral anticoagulant drugs are emerging as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Two agents are direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and the third is a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). They have been separately compared to warfarin in large randomised trials. Our objective was to indirectly compare the three agents to each other for major efficacy and safety outcomes. Studies were assessed for comparability and the odds ratios of selected outcomes for each anticoagulant versus one another were estimated indirectly. The three cohorts differed significantly in terms of CHADS(2) score and the number of individuals with a past history of stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism. The estimated odds ratio of stroke or systemic embolism was 1.35 for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.04), 0.97 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.81), 1.22 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.18), 0.88 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.34) and 0.90 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p=0.43). The estimated odds ratio of major bleeding was 1.10 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.36), 1.28 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.02), 0.74 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.004), 0.87 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.17) and 0.68 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p<0.001). In conclusion, the available data indicate no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. It appears however that apixaban is associated with less major bleeding than dabigatran 150 mg or rivaroxaban and that rivaroxaban is less effective than dabigatran 150 mg in preventing stroke or systemic embolism. Such an indirect comparison should be used only to generate hypotheses which need to be tested in a dedicated randomised trial comparing the three drugs directly.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K; Warfarin

People who have had a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or non-disabling ischaemic stroke have an annual risk of major vascular events of between 4% and 11%. Aspirin reduces this risk by 20% at most. Secondary prevention trials after myocardial infarction indicate that treatment with vitamin K antagonists is associated with a risk reduction approximately twice that of treatment with antiplatelet therapy.. To compare the efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists and antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of vascular events after cerebral ischaemia of presumed arterial origin.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 15 September 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3), MEDLINE (2008 to September 2011) and EMBASE (2008 to September 2011). In an effort to identify further relevant trials we searched ongoing trials registers and reference lists. We also contacted authors of published trials for further information and unpublished data.. Randomised trials of oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol) versus antiplatelet therapy for long-term secondary prevention after recent transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke of presumed arterial origin.. Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data.. We included eight trials with a total of 5762 participants. The data showed that anticoagulants (in any intensity) are not more efficacious in the prevention of vascular events than antiplatelet therapy (medium intensity anticoagulation: relative risk (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.14; high intensity anticoagulation: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.13). There is no evidence that treatment with low intensity anticoagulation gives a higher bleeding risk than treatment with antiplatelet agents: RR 1.27 (95% CI 0.79 to 2.03). However, it was clear that medium and high intensity anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, with an INR of 2.0 to 4.5, were not safe because they yielded a higher risk of major bleeding complications (medium intensity anticoagulation: RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.94; high intensity anticoagulation: RR 9.0, 95% CI 3.9 to 21).. For the secondary prevention of further vascular events after TIA or minor stroke of presumed arterial origin, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that vitamin K antagonists in any dose are not more efficacious than antiplatelet therapy and that medium and high intensity anticoagulation leads to a significant increase in major bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Cause of Death; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Vitamin K

To assess whether the combined analysis of all phase III trials of nonvitamin-K-antagonist (non-VKA) oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack shows a significant difference in efficacy or safety compared with warfarin.. We searched PubMed until May 31, 2012, for randomized clinical trials using the following search items: atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, warfarin, and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Studies had to be phase III trials in atrial fibrillation patients comparing warfarin with a non-VKA currently on the market or with the intention to be brought to the market in North America or Europe. Analysis was performed on intention-to-treat basis. A fixed-effects model was used as more appropriate than a random-effects model when combining a small number of studies.. Among 47 potentially eligible articles, 3 were included in the meta-analysis. In 14 527 patients, non-VKAs were associated with a significant reduction of stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratios, 0.85 [95% CI, 074-0.99]; relative risk reduction, 14%; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; number needed to treat, 134 over 1.8-2.0 years) compared with warfarin. Non-VKAs were also associated with a significant reduction of major bleeding compared with warfarin (odds ratios, 0.86 [95% CI, 075-0.99]; relative risk reduction, 13%; absolute risk reduction, 0.8%; number needed to treat, 125), mainly driven by the significant reduction of hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratios, 0.44 [95% CI, 032-0.62]; relative risk reduction, 57.9%; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; number needed to treat, 139).. In the context of the significant limitations of combining the results of disparate trials of different agents, non-VKAs seem to be associated with a significant reduction in rates of stroke or systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, and major bleeding when compared with warfarin in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Cardioembolism accounts for approximately 20% of ischaemic strokes, and is associated with high mortality and propensity to recurrences. Approximately, 30% of ischaemic strokes remain cryptogenic despite improved imaging modalities and technological improvements to identify their cause. Of the long list of various cardiac conditions associated with an increased risk of cardioembolic strokes, non-valvular atrial fibrillation is the most common cause. Unsurprisingly, the stroke risk associated with these conditions is highly variable and non-homogenous, with many risk factors additive to the overall risk profile. Treatment with vitamin K-antagonists substantially reduces the long-term complications associated with cardioembolism in some high-risk patients, for example, in atrial fibrillation. Careful selection of antithrombotic drug regime needs to be carried out in patients individually to minimise the risk of bleeding encountered with such therapy. Apart from atrial fibrillation, there is relatively limited evidence for the role of antithrombotic therapy for other cardiac conditions associated with cardioembolism and how long one should treat.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Arteriosclerosis; Blood Coagulation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry; Coumarins; Drug Antagonism; Drug Synergism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism and Thrombosis; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Embolism; Thrombophlebitis; Vitamin K

The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term effectiveness and safety of newly initiated anticoagulation with edoxaban (EDO) versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)-guided direct electrical current cardioversion (DCC).. A propensity score-matched cohort observational study was performed comparing the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban versus well-controlled VKA therapy among a cohort of consecutive non-valvular AF patients scheduled for DCC. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE).. A total of 130 AF patients receiving edoxaban 60-mg (EDO) treatment were compared with the same number of VKA recipients. The cumulative incidence of major bleedings was 1.54% in the EDO group and 3.08% in the VKA group (P = 0.4). The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.54% in the EDO group and 2.31% in the VKA group (P = 0.9). A non-significant trend in improved adherence was observed between the EDO and VKA groups with a total anticoagulant therapy discontinuation rate of 4.62% (6/130) vs 6.15% (8/130), respectively (P = 0.06).. Our study provides the evidence of a safe and effective use of edoxaban in this clinical setting, justified by no significant difference in major bleedings and thromboembolic events between edoxaban and well-controlled VKA treatments.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Vitamin K

The purpose of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy among a cohort of elderly patients (ie, those aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-life setting.. A propensity score-matched cohort observational study was performed comparing the safety and efficacy of edoxaban versus VKA therapy among a cohort of elderly (aged ≥75 years) patients with AF in a real-life setting. Follow-up data were obtained through outpatient visits at 1, 3, and every 6 months. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism.. A total of 130 patients receiving edoxaban 60 mg (EDO) treatment were compared with the same number of VKA recipients. The mean follow-up was 16 (2.6) months. The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events in the EDO and VKA groups was 1.5% (2 of 130) and 2.3% (3 of 130), respectively (P < 0.6). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding events was 1.5% (2 of 130) in the EDO group and 3.1% (4 of 130) in the VKA group (P < 0.4). The total anticoagulant therapy discontinuation rate was 2.3% (3 of 130) in the EDO group and 4.6% (6 of 130) in the VKA group (P < 0.3). A nonsignificant trend in improved adherence was observed between the EDO and VKA groups (81% vs 78%; P = 0.6).. Edoxaban therapy showed a good real-life performance among elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with AF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Propensity Score; Pyridines; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

The uninterrupted use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for electrophysiology procedures has been more and more recommended. The clinical practice in our service recommends the continuous use of these drugs for atrial flutter ablation. There is little evidence as to the uninterrupted use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in this scenario.. To compare the rates of complications related with the uninterrupted use of different types of oral anticoagulants in patients referred to atrial flutter (AFL) ablation.. Historical, single-center cohort of ablation procedures by AFL conducted from November 2012 to April 2016. The primary outcome was the occurrence of hemorrhagic or embolic complication during the procedure. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in follow-up. The statistical significance level was 5%.. There were 288 ablations per AFL; 154 were carried out with the uninterrupted use of OAC (57.8% with VKA and 42.2% with NOAC). Mean age was 57 ± 13 years. The rate of hemorrhagic complication during the procedure was 3% in each group (p = NS). The rate of stroke/TIA was, respectively, of 56/1,000 people-year in the VKA group against zero/1,000 people-year in the NOAC group (p = 0.02).. In our population there were no hemorrhagic complications regarding the procedure of OAC use uninterruptedly, including NOACs. There was higher occurrence of stroke/TIA in the follow-up of the group of patients undergoing VKAs; however, this difference may not only be a result of the type of OAC used.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Flutter; Catheter Ablation; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

This study examined characteristics and treatment persistence among patients prescribed oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We identified 15,244 patients (51.8% male, 72.7% aged ≥70) with NVAF and no prior OAC therapy who were prescribed apixaban (n = 1,303), rivaroxaban (n = 5,742), dabigatran (n = 1,622) or vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs, n = 6,577) between 1-Dec-2012 and 31-Oct-2014 in German primary care (IMS® Disease Analyzer). We compared OAC persistence using Cox regression over patients' entire follow-up and using a data-driven time-partitioned approach (before/after 100 days) to handle non-proportional hazards. History of stroke risk factors (stroke/transient ischaemic attack [TIA] 15.2%; thromboembolism 14.1%; hypertension 84.3%) and high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score≥3 68.4%) was common. Apixaban-prescribed patients had more frequent history of stroke/TIA (19.7%) and high bleeding risk (72.6%) than other OACs. 12-month persistence rates were: VKA 57.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56.0-59.0%), rivaroxaban 56.6% (54.9-58.2%), dabigatran 50.1% (47.2-53.1%), apixaban 62.9% (58.8-67.0%). Over entire follow-up, compared to VKA, non-persistence was similar with apixaban (adjusted hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.95-1.24) but higher with rivaroxaban (1.21, 1.14-1.29) and dabigatran (1.53, 1.40-1.68). Using post-hoc time-partitioned approach: in first 100 days, non-persistence was higher with apixaban (1.37, 1.17-1.59), rivaroxaban (1.41, 1.30-1.53) and dabigatran (1.91, 1.70-2.14) compared to VKA. Compared to apixaban, rivaroxaban non-persistence was similar (1.03, 0.89-1.20), dabigatran was higher (1.39, 1.17-1.66). After 100 days, apixaban non-persistence was lower than VKA (0.66, 0.52-0.85); rivaroxaban (0.97, 0.87-1.07) and dabigatran (1.10, 0.95-1.28) were similar to VKA. Furthermore, rivaroxaban (1.46, 1.13-1.88) and dabigatran (1.67, 1.26-2.19) non-persistence was higher than apixaban. This study describes real-world observations on OAC use, particularly early apixaban use following approval for NVAF, in Germany. We identified potential differential OAC prescribing and higher persistence with apixaban than other OACs after 100 days' treatment. Larger studies are needed with longer follow-up to establish long-term patterns.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is recommended by guidelines.. The German Competence NETwork on Atrial Fibrillation established a nationwide prospective registry including 9,574 AF patients, providing the opportunity to analyse AF management according to German healthcare providers.. On enrolment, 896 (9.4 %) patients reported a prior ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Stroke patients were significantly older, more likely to be female, had a higher rate of cardiovascular risk factors, and more frequently received anticoagulation (almost exclusively VKA) than patients without prior stroke history. Following enrolment, 76.4 % of all stroke patients without VKA contraindications received anticoagulation, which inversely associated with age (OR 0.95 per year; 95 % CI 0.92-0.97). General practitioners/internists (OR 0.40; 95 % CI 0.21-0.77) and physicians working in regional hospitals (OR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29-0.77) prescribed anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention less frequently than physicians working at university hospitals (reference) and office-based cardiologists (OR 1.40; 95 % CI 0.76-2.60). The impact of the treating healthcare provider was less evident in registry patients without prior stroke.. In the AFNET registry, anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention was prescribed in roughly three-quarters of AF patients, a significantly higher rate than in primary prevention. We identified two factors associated with withholding oral anticoagulation in stroke survivors, namely higher age and-most prominently-treatment by a general practitioner/internist or physicians working at regional hospitals.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiology; Female; General Practitioners; Germany; Guideline Adherence; Hospitals; Hospitals, University; Humans; Internal Medicine; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Survivors; Vitamin K; Warfarin; Young Adult

Essential information regarding efficacy and safety of vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) is still lacking in current literature. The aim of our study was to compare the risks of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and major bleeds between patients without CKD (eGFR >60 ml/min), and those with moderate (eGFR 30-60 ml/min), or severe non-dialysis dependent CKD (eGFR <30 ml/min).. We included 300 patients without CKD, 294 with moderate, and 130 with severe non-dialysis dependent CKD, who were matched for age and sex. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for the endpoint of stroke or TIA and the endpoint of major bleeds as crude values and adjusted for comorbidity and platelet-inhibitor use.. Overall, 6.2% (45/724, 1.7/100 patient years) of patients developed stroke or TIA and 15.6% (113/724, 4.8/100 patient years) a major bleeding event. Patients with severe CKD were at high risk of stroke or TIA and major bleeds during VKA treatment compared with those without renal impairment, HR 2.75 (95%CI 1.25-6.05) and 1.66 (95%CI 0.97-2.86), or with moderate CKD, HR 3.93(1.71-9.00) and 1.86 (95%CI 1.08-3.21), respectively. These risks were similar for patients without and with moderate CKD. Importantly, both less time spent within therapeutic range and high INR-variability were associated with increased risks of stroke or TIA and major bleeds in severe CKD patients.. VKA treatment for AF in patients with severe CKD has a poor safety and efficacy profile, likely related to suboptimal anticoagulation control. Our study findings stress the need for better tailored individualised anticoagulant treatment approaches for patients with AF and severe CKD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

The management of antithrombotic therapy after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in anticoagulated patients is not well defined. We analyzed the risks and benefits of antiplatelet therapy (AG) against the resumption of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (AVK) in a series of patients.. Retrospective study of ICH in anticoagulated patients. We registered demographic data, history of hypertension (HT), time of follow-up and new cerebral vascular events (ICH, stroke [IC]).. We evaluated 88 patients, mean age 69±9 years, 50% men, 73% hypertensive. During the acute phase 18 patients died and the follow-up was lost in 31. Of the remaining (n=39), AVKs were resumed in 25 and changed to AG in 14. Comparing the characteristics of both groups, the anticoagulated group was younger (P=.005) and the embolic sources were more often of higher risk (P=.003). After an average follow-up of 54±31 months, the distribution of events was: IC (AVKs 8%, AG 14.3%, P=.6), ICH (AVKs 24%, AG 7.1%, P=.38), IC or ICH (AVKs 32%, AG 21.4%, P=.48) and death (AVKs 29%, AG 7.1%, P=.21). This trend of increased risk of new events in patients with AVKs was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier curves, although without statistical differences.. Restarting AVK treatment after ICH in anticoagulated patients could increase the risk of new bleeding events and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to define a better and appropriate antithrombotic therapy after ICH related with anticoagulation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Vitamin K

We investigated whether CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores could be used to predict 1-year prognosis in stroke recurrence, mortality, and mortality of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Patients were selected from a national prospective registry in China. The clinical prediction of the scores was examined using the C statistic. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to analyze the relevant risk factors.. Thousand two hundred and ninety-seven of 22,216 patients were enrolled in the study. For stroke recurrence rate, the C statistic value was 0.53 (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.32) for CHADS2 and 0.55 (OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.24) for CHA2DS2-VASc; adding baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score to these two scores, the value of C statistic was 0.58 (OR 1.25 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.37) and 0.58 (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.27), respectively.. Both CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores have limitations in predicting the 1-year prognosis of stroke/TIA patients with NVAF in China. The predictive value of these two scores improved by adding the baseline NIHSS score.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Logistic Models; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Self Report; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Survival Rate; Vitamin K

In primary prevention, aspirin reduces the risk of stroke but not of myocardial infarction in women while in men only the risk of myocardial infarction but not stroke could be significantly reduced. Only aspirin has been shown to be safe and effective in large randomized trials in the first 48 hours after ischemic stroke. Aspirin/dipyridamole and clopidogrel both reduce the risk of a combined cardiovascular outcome in long-term secondary prevention compared to aspirin alone. More potent antiplatelet drugs or combination of aspirin and clopidogrel prevent more ischemic events, but also lead to more bleeding complications. No benefit of oral anticoagulants could be shown in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. In patients with atrial fibrillation oral anticoagulation is more effective than aspirin in stroke prevention. The choice between oral anticoagulants and aspirin in these patients depends on age and the individual risk factor profile. Patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis have a higher risk of intracerebral bleeding with oral anticoagulation compared to high dose aspirin. Aspirin is the recommended treatment in stroke patients with a patent foramen ovale.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Prevention; Recurrence; Safety; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Vitamin K

Transoesophageal echocardiography has improved the detection of potential sources of cerebral embolism. We report our experience with a group of 38 patients under 45 years of age who were examined after an arterial ischaemic cerebral event. We observed 4 patients (2 males, 2 females; age 17, 24, 38 and 40 years) with an atrial septal aneurysm. Cerebral ischaemia was permanent in 3 patients and temporary in 1 and a cerebral embolism was the most probable cause based on angiographic findings. The atrial septal aneurysm was only diagnosed by transoesophageal echocardiography (type IA in case 3, IB in the others). A patent foramen ovale was observed in 3 and this abnormality, which is known to have a high prevalence in the general population, could at most be an aggravating factor. In our series, we can assume a causal association between atrial septal aneurysm and stroke in young patients (10.5% among 38 young stroke patients vs 3% of 30 patients referred for other reasons). The treatment is still under discussion although the consensus would favour surgery if another heart malformation is associated, if a visible thrombus is identified or if repeated cerebrovascular events occur despite adequate anticoagulation. Studies conducted in large series of patients should provide more adequate therapeutic schemas.

Topics: 4-Hydroxycoumarins; Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Female; Heart Aneurysm; Heart Septum; Humans; Indenes; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Vitamin K