vinflunine and Carcinoma--Non-Small-Cell-Lung

Vinflunine belongs to the class of vinca alkaloids and acts by disrupting the microtubule dynamics during cell cycle; this agent is currently available for previously treated advanced transitional cell carcinoma in Europe. The aim of this invited review is to evaluate the potential role of vinflunine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Areas covered: The potential role of vinflunine in NSCLC is discussed on the basis of the available data, including full papers and meeting abstracts. Relevant preclinical studies describing the pharmacological properties of vinflunine are also included. The review also summarizes clinical studies, including phase I trials involving NSCLC among other tumors as well as phase II/III trials specifically addressing this malignancy. Additionally, the safety profile and the current regulatory status of vinflunine is discussed. Expert opinion: Vinflunine is active as single agent and as part of platinum-based combinations in NSCLC. It results non-inferior to docetaxel in a randomized phase III trial including previously treated NSCLC patients; additionally, its safety profile is generally considered manageable. Ultimately, further studies are needed to confirm the role of vinflunine in NSCLC, in consideration of the evolving evidence regarding targeted therapies and immune check-point inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vinblastine

Vinflunine is a novel microtubule inhibitor of the vinca alkaloid class currently in development for the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (TCCU) and other solid tumors. This review summarizes the clinical activity of vinflunine as a single agent or in combination with other antineoplastic drugs. Vinflunine is active against a variety of tumor types, including advanced TCCU, metastatic breast cancer, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, and malignant pleural mesothelioma. It has a manageable and noncumulative toxicity profile, and its specific mechanism of action has been linked to a reduced potential for peripheral sensory neuropathy. The activity and tolerability of this agent warrant further investigation. Phase 3 trials are underway to further define the extent of clinical benefit provided by vinflunine in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Mesothelioma; Mice; Pleural Neoplasms; Tubulin Modulators; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urothelium; Vinblastine

Erlotinib, the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the intra-venous vinflunine vinca alkaloid microtubule inhibitor have been shown to be effective in the setting of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) palliative patients with acceptable toxicities. This phase I study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety of an all-oral combination. A potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction was also investigated.. Patients with unresectable stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC who failed one or two previous chemotherapy regimens were treated with flat doses of oral vinflunine from day 1 to day 5 and from day 8 to day 12 every 3 weeks and erlotinib daily on a continuous basis. The dose levels of vinflunine/erlotinib were 95/100, 115/100, 115/150 and 135/100 mg.. Thirty patients were enroled. The recommended dose was 115/150 mg and the MTD 135/100 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 febrile neutropenia (1 patient) and related death (1 patient). Non-haematologic grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue, condition aggravated, hypokalaemia, tumour pain, acneiform dermatitis, diarrhoea, hyperbilirubinaemia and pulmonary haemorrhage, in one patient each. Of 25 patients evaluable for tumour response, 2 patients had partial response and 20 patients had stable disease.. The recommended doses for oral vinflunine and erlotinib combination were, respectively, 115 mg/day from day 1 to day 5 and from day 8 to day 12 every 3 weeks and 150 mg/day. There was no mutual impact on pharmacokinetics. The combination was safe but evaluation in phase II is needed to further refine the activity and toxicity that can be expected with prolonged administration of this dose schedule.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; ErbB Receptors; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Quinazolines; Vinblastine

Vinflunine (VFL) (Javlor(®)), a novel fluorinated semisynthetic vinca alkaloid has shown significant antitumor activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We propose to define the recommended dose (RD) of VFL in combination with carboplatin in advanced NSCLC patients.. This phase I and pharmacokinetic study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to establish the RD of VFL in combination with carboplatin. Twenty-one chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with a first-line chemotherapy of VFL and carboplatin both given on day 1 every 3 weeks with 3 dose levels.. Five patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity consisting of constipation in 2 patients and febrile neutropenia in 2 patients. One patient experienced grade 3 abdominal pain concurrent with grade 4 neutropenia. The combination of VFL (320 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin AUC6 was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. The RD was established at the dose of VFL (320 mg/m(2)) combined with carboplatin AUC5. At the RD, 12 patients received a median number of 3 cycles of the combination. Neither VFL nor carboplatin seemed to be influencing the pharmacokinetics of the other. Among 19 patients evaluable for tumor response, 7 had a partial response and 7 experienced stable disease.. The combination of VFL (320 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin AUC 5 given once every 3 weeks is established as the RD of the combination, which was shown to be active in these chemonaive NSCLC patients.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Survival Rate; Tissue Distribution; Vinblastine

Vinflunine (Javlor) has shown significant antitumour activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We propose to define the recommended dose of vinflunine in combination with gemcitabine for treatment of advanced NSCLC in chemonaive patients.. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to establish the recommended dose of vinflunine (VFL) administered on day 1 every 21 days combined with gemcitabine given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.. Nineteen patients were included in this study. Three patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity, with constipation in one patient, hypertension in one patient, and constipation and febrile neutropenia in one patient. The combination of VFL 320 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. The recommended dose was established at the dose of VFL 320 mg/m² combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m². Neither VFL nor gemcitabine seemed to be influencing the pharmacokinetics of each other. All patients were evaluable for tumor response. Seven presented a partial response and eight experienced a stable disease.. The combination of VFL 320 mg/m² administered on day 1 combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks is established as the RD and was shown to be active in these chemonaive NSCLC patients.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Large Cell; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Deoxycytidine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gemcitabine; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Survival Rate; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome; Vinblastine

A multicenter phase I/II trial of vinflunine administered in combination with cisplatin at 80 mg/m(2) was conducted in order to determine the dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended dose of the combination. An eventual mutual pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction when vinflunine and cisplatin were coadministered was also evaluated. The study was also intended to define the response rate of vinflunine in combination with cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the recommended dose.. Patients were required to have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC not amenable to curable treatment or stage IV disease. Patients may have had previous surgery for NSCLC but were to be chemonaive and have at least 1 bidimensional measurable lesion outside an irradiated area.. The recommended dose was established at cisplatin 80 mg/m2 combined with vinflunine 320 mg/m(2). No unexpected adverse events were seen. Pharmacokinetic analysis supported the absence of mutual pharmacokinetic interaction when vinflunine and cisplatin are given in combination. Treatment of 53 patients at this recommended dose demonstrated a tumor response rate of 32.1% in the intent-to-treat population; disease control was achieved in 79.2% of the patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated at 5 months and 10.4 months, respectively, and the 1-year survival rate was 43.4%.. These results place the vinflunine/cisplatin combination among the most active doublets in this treatment setting and warrant further development in phase III trials of first-line treatment of patients with advanced metastatic NSCLC.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Large Cell; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cisplatin; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Survival Rate; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome; Vinblastine

To compare vinflunine (VFL) to docetaxel in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced treatment failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.. Randomized, multicenter, phase III study, 551 patients received either vinflunine 320 mg/m(2) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days until disease progression or serious toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The noninferiority analysis was based on a 10% difference (types I/II error rates: 5%/20%). Secondary end points included response rate (ORR), response duration, overall survival (OS), clinical benefit, quality of life (QOL), and safety.. Median PFS was 2.3 months for each arm (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 0.841 to 1.199). ORR, stable disease, median OS, were 4.4% versus 5.5%, 36.0% versus 39.6%, 6.7 versus 7.2 months (HR, 0.973; 95% CI, 0.805 to 1.176), respectively. No significant difference in patient benefit and QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung). No unexpected adverse events were observed. Grade higher than 0 (vinflunine v docetaxel) anemia (82.1% v 79.8%), neutropenia (49.3 v 39.02%), thrombocytopenia (30.6% v 14.3%), febrile neutropenia (3.3% v 4.7%), constipation (39.2% v 11.7%), fatigue (36.6% v 33.9%), injection site reaction (31.9% v 0.7%), nausea (26.7% v 23.7%), vomiting (23.8% v 14.2%), alopecia (19.8% v 35.4%), stomatis (19.4% v 12.4%), abdominal pain (20.1% v 3.6%), myalgia (14.7% v 6.6%), peripheral neuropathy (10.7% v 15.0%), arthralgia (7.0% v 7.7%), diarrhea (6.2% v 12.4%), edema (1.5% v 5.4%), and nail disorders (1.1% v 5;1%) were observed.. This noninferiority phase III study showed similar efficacy end points for vinflunine and docetaxel. Despite higher rates of some adverse effects (anemia, abdominal pain, constipation, fatigue) the overall toxicity profile of vinflunine was manageable. Therefore, VFL may be another option in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chi-Square Distribution; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Europe; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Platinum Compounds; Quality of Life; Singapore; Taxoids; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vinblastine; Young Adult

A multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial designed to determine the efficacy of single-agent vinflunine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. The objectives were to assess efficacy in terms of tumour response rate (primary end point), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to evaluate the toxicity associated with this treatment. Patients with advanced NSCLC with progressive disease having failed prior platinum-based first-line treatment for advanced disease. Five responses out of the 63 treated patients were documented by WHO criteria and validated by an independent panel review (IRP), yielding a response rate of 7.9% (95% CI: 2.6-17.6) in the intent-to-treat analysis and 8.3% (95% CI: 2.8-18.4) in the evaluable population. Disease control was achieved in 35 out of 60 evaluable patients (58.3%). The median duration of response (complete response+partial response), according to modified WHO criteria was 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.6-NR). Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.4-3.8), and the median survival was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.8-9.2). Grades 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 50% of patients; febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients (3.2%); grades 3-4 myalgia and grade 3 constipation were experienced by 10 (15.9%) and six (9.5%) of patients, respectively. Constipation was manageable, non-cumulative and could be prevented with laxative prophylaxis. The encouraging results from this phase II study with vinflunine warrant further investigations in phase III trials as second- or first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma, as a single agent or in combination with other active drugs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cisplatin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Salvage Therapy; Survival Rate; Vinblastine

A prognostic index for second-line chemotherapy of NSCLC was previously developed, based on individual patient data (IPD) of nine randomized trials. In order to validate the prognostic score in an external dataset, we analysed IPD of a non-inferiority phase III trial comparing vinflunine vs. docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Primary endpoint of this analysis was overall survival (OS). The following variables were considered for survival analysis and score calculation: gender, performance status, stage of disease, tumour histology, type of first-line treatment, response to first-line treatment. Cox model, stratified by treatment arm, was used for multivariate analysis. Individual prognostic scores were derived, and patients were divided into 3 categories: <5 (best), 5-9 (intermediate), >9 (worst). All 551 patients enrolled in the trial had complete information for the calculation of prognostic score. Median OS in the whole group was 6.9 months, with similar efficacy in the two treatment arms. Median OS was 12.9, 6.9 and 3.8 months in the best, intermediate and worst category, respectively. Cox model showed a significant effect comparing intermediate vs. best category (Hazard Ratio 1.79, 95%CI 1.31-2.47, p=0.0003) and comparing worst vs. best category (Hazard Ratio 3.25, 95%CI 2.18-4.83, p<0.0001). The C-index of the model was high (0.926), indicating a good discrimination according to the proposed three risk categories. Prognostic ability of our score for candidates to second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC was successfully validated, allowing the identification of subgroups of patients with more vs. less favourable outcome. Prognostic score could be useful in daily decision-making in clinical practise, because a better understanding of factors conditioning life expectancy of patients could greatly help a careful evaluation of risks and benefits associated with therapeutic decisions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome; Vinblastine

Aberrant expression of beta-tubulin isotypes is frequently described in tumor tissues and tubulin-binding agent (TBA)-resistant cell lines. There is limited understanding of the role of specific beta-tubulin isotypes in cellular sensitivity to TBAs, and to gain insights into the functional role of betaII- and betaIVb-tubulin, we examined these isotypes in lung cancer cell lines NCI-H460 (H460) and Calu-6. Drug-treated clonogenic assays revealed that small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of either betaII- or betaIVb-tubulin hypersensitized the lung cancer cell lines to Vinca alkaloids, with the effects more pronounced following betaIVb-tubulin knockdown. In contrast, there was no change in paclitaxel sensitivity following knockdown of either isotype. Cell cycle analysis revealed a greater propensity for the betaII- and betaIVb-tubulin knockdown cells to undergo G2-M cell cycle block following 5 nmol/L vincristine treatment, with the betaIVb knockdown cells being more sensitive than the betaII-tubulin knockdown cells compared with control. In contrast to betaII-tubulin knockdown, betaIVb-tubulin knockdown cells showed a significant increase in the sub-G1 population (cell death) following treatment with both 5 and 40 nmol/L of vincristine compared with controls. Importantly, betaIVb-tubulin knockdown in H460 cells caused a significant dose-dependent increase in Annexin V staining in response to vincristine but not paclitaxel. Therefore, increased sensitivity to induction of apoptosis is one mechanism underlying the Vinca alkaloid hypersensitivity. This study provides direct evidence that betaII- or betaIVb-tubulins have functionally distinct roles and expression of these isotypes may serve as strong predictors of Vinca alkaloid response and resistance.

Topics: Apoptosis; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Division; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Delivery Systems; G2 Phase; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Protein Isoforms; RNA Interference; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Small Interfering; Transfection; Tubulin; Vinblastine; Vinca Alkaloids; Vincristine

Vinca alkaloids are an important class of anticancer agents and semisynthetic vinca alkaloids are developed to improve the therapeutic index of this class of drugs. In the present study, a direct comparison was made between vinflunine and vinorelbine regarding their radiosensitizing and cell cycle effects.. Four human tumour cell lines were tested under identical experimental conditions, using equitoxic concentrations of vinflunine and vinorelbine.. Vinflunine and vinorelbine induced a comparable radiosensitizing effect (p-value never below 0.01) when cells were incubated for 24 h immediately prior to radiation. Regarding the cell cycle effects, a statistically significant concentration-dependent G2/M block was seen after 24 h incubation with vinorelbine in all tested cell lines. Similar results, with small cell line-related differences, were observed with vinflunine.. The radiosensitizing effects of both semisynthetic vinca alkaloids were comparable (not statistically different) and nearly always cell line-specific and concentration-dependent. The cell cycle effects could be related to the observed radiosensitizing effects. Considering the more favourable toxicity profile of vinflunine, this agent might be more promising than vinorelbine for chemoradiation studies in the clinic.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Gamma Rays; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Microtubules; Molecular Structure; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tongue Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Vinblastine; Vinorelbine