Page last updated: 2024-11-05

viloxazine and ADDH

viloxazine has been researched along with ADDH in 21 studies

Viloxazine: A morpholine derivative used as an antidepressant. It is similar in action to IMIPRAMINE.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Out of 27 enrolled subjects, 25 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis."3.11Impact of a High-Fat Meal and Sprinkled Administration on the Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules (Qelbree ( Adeojo, LW; Kosheleff, AR; Liranso, T; Nasser, A; Odebo, O; Schwabe, S; Wang, Z, 2022)
"Treatment with viloxazine ER resulted in a statistically significant improvement in primary and key secondary endpoints, indicating improvements in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomology, executive function, and overall clinical illness severity in adults."3.11A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Chaturvedi, SA; Childress, A; Cutler, AJ; Fry, N; Hull, JT; Kosheleff, AR; Liranso, T; Nasser, A; Odebo, O; Rubin, J; Schwabe, S, 2022)
" Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, ECGs, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale."2.94A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Once-daily SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release) in the Treatment of Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in School-age Children. ( Adewole, T; Busse, GD; Chowdhry, F; Cutler, AJ; Findling, RL; Fry, N; Hull, JT; Jones, NJ; Liranso, T; Nasser, A; Schwabe, S, 2020)
"Viloxazine has a long history of clinical use in Europe as an antidepressant, and has recently been repurposed into an extended-release form for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the USA."2.72Viloxazine in the Management of CNS Disorders: A Historical Overview and Current Status. ( Candler, SA; Findling, RL; Garcia-Olivares, J; Nasser, AF; Newcorn, JH; O'Neal, W; Schwabe, S; Yu, C, 2021)
" However, its pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability make viloxazine ER a useful addition to the collection of FDA approved ADHD treatments."1.72Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of extended release viloxazine in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ( Burton, S; Childress, A, 2022)

Research

Studies (21)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's0 (0.00)24.3611
2020's21 (100.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Faraone, SV6
Gomeni, R6
Hull, JT10
Busse, GD8
Melyan, Z5
Rubin, J9
Nasser, A12
Wang, Z3
Kosheleff, AR3
Adeojo, LW1
Odebo, O3
Liranso, T5
Schwabe, S5
Hafeez, S1
Saquib, J1
Qureshi, NE1
Fava, M2
O'Neal, W4
Childress, A3
Burton, S1
Chaturvedi, SA2
Fry, N4
Cutler, AJ3
Singh, A1
Balasundaram, MK1
Lujan, B1
Goodell, K1
Erlich, D1
Radonjić, NV1
Bellato, A1
Khoury, NM1
Cortese, S1
Price, MZ1
Price, RL1
Adewole, T2
Chowdhry, F1
Jones, NJ1
Findling, RL2
Faison, SL1
Maletic, V2
Qin, P1
Lopez, F1
Candler, SA1
Nasser, AF1
Yu, C1
Garcia-Olivares, J1
Newcorn, JH1
Lamb, YN1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) 400 and 600 mg Efficacy and Safety in Adolescents With ADHD - A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Pivotal Trial[NCT03247556]Phase 3297 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-20Completed
Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) 100 and 200 mg Efficacy and Safety in Children With ADHD - A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Pivotal Trial[NCT03247530]Phase 3477 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-20Completed
Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) 200 and 400 mg Efficacy and Safety in Children With ADHD - A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Pivotal Trial[NCT03247543]Phase 3313 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-31Completed
Evaluation of SPN 812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) 200 and 400 mg Efficacy and Safety in Adolescents With ADHD - A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Pivotal Trial[NCT03247517]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-02Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SPN-812 in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT04016779]Phase 3374 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-20Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by 50% Responder Rate Per the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of responders at Week 7 (End of Study). A responder was defined as a subject who had a 50% or greater reduction (improvement) in their change from baseline Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 7 (End of Study). Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of responders. (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Week 7 (End of Study)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo32.9
400mg SPN-81248.2
600mg SPN-81246.0

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

"The first Key Secondary Endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale score at Week 7 (End of Study). The CGI-I scale is a single item assessment of how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing." (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Week 7 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.9
400mg SPN-8122.4
600mg SPN-8122.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Parent Short Form (C3PS)

The second Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3PS) Composite T-score at Week 7 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for the assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3PS is completed by a child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 45 items with subsets of items related to six content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, executive functioning, learning problems, defiance/aggression and peer relations. The parent rates his/her child on the first 43 items of the C3PS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently]) based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank. Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.6
400mg SPN-812-7.5
600mg SPN-812-6.9

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Self Report Short Form

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS) Composite T score at Week 7 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3-SRS, which is only validated in children/adolescents 8-18 years of age, is comprised of 41 items with subsets of items related to five content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, learning problems, aggression and family relations. The subject rates himself/herself on the first 39 items of C3-SRS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently] based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.4
400mg SPN-812-5.4
600mg SPN-812-6.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA)

Another secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) Total score to Week 7 (End of Study). The SIPA is a 112-item screening/diagnostic instrument for parents of adolescents 11-19 years of age that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions. Items 1-90 are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (where SD=Strongly Disagree, D=Disagree, NS=Not Sure, A=Agree, and SA=Strongly Agree) and yields a raw score for 3 Domains (Adolescent Domain, Parent Domain, and Adolescent-Parent Domain) that focus on a parent's perception of their child's personality and on the parent's characteristics and behaviors. The sum of the 3 Domain scores yields the Total (Parent Stress) score (range: 90-450; higher total scores indicate higher levels of stress). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-16.1
400mg SPN-812-23.3
600mg SPN-812-14.5

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P)

The third Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Total Average score at Week 7 (End of Study). The WFIRS instrument evaluates ADHD-related functional impairment. The WFIRS-P is completed by the child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 50 items grouped into six domains: Family (10 items), School (10 items, includes learning [4 items] and behavior [6 items]), Life Skills (10 items), Child's Self-Concept (3 items), Social Activities (7 items), and Risky Activities (10 items). The parent/guardian rates each item on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=never or not at all to 3= very often or very much) based on their child's behavior past month. A Total Average score was computed by calculating mean rating of all 50 items (ranging from 0 to 3, where a higher value represents more severe functional impairment). Lower change from baseline Total Average scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.23
400mg SPN-812-0.32
600mg SPN-812-0.23

Efficacy of SPN-812 Assessed by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 7 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) symptoms of ADHD. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). A Total score is calculated by adding the responses of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-13.2
400mg SPN-812-18.3
600mg SPN-812-16.7

"Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Categorical Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [the Percentage of Subjects Who Were 'Improved]"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who were improved by visit; improved was defined as a subject who had a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 = Very Much Improved or 2 = Much Improved. Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who were improved." (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7

,,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7
400mg SPN-81215.233.147.246.148.256.560.6
600mg SPN-81213.625.437.839.145.346.647.9
Placebo8.417.123.729.534.437.534.5

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale and the Inattention Subscale of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score and Inattention subscale score at Week 7 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-5 symptoms of ADHD, including 9 items for the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale and 9 items for the Inattention subscale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). Each subscale score is calculated by adding the responses of all respective 9 items (range: 0-27; the higher the subscale score, the more severe the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity or Inattention symptoms). Lower change from baseline subscale scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247556)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Hyperactivity/impulsivityInattention
400mg SPN-812-8.3-10.1
600mg SPN-812-7.6-8.7
Placebo-6.4-7.1

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by 50% Responder Rate Per the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of responders at Week 6 (End of Study). A responder was defined as a subject who had a 50% or greater reduction (improvement) in their change from baseline Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of responders. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo19.8
100mg SPN-81234.2
200mg SPN-81241.2

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

"The first Key Secondary Endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale score at Week 6 (End of Study). The CGI-I scale is a single item assessment of how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing." (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.1
100mg SPN-8122.7
200mg SPN-8122.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Parent Short Form (C3PS)

The second Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3PS) Composite T-score at Week 6 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for the assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3PS is completed by a child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 45 items with subsets of items related to six content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, executive functioning, learning problems, defiance/aggression and peer relations. The parent rates his/her child on the first 43 items of the C3PS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently]) based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.8
100mg SPN-812-9.1
200mg SPN-812-9.2

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS) Composite T score at Week 6 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3-SRS, which is only validated in children/adolescents 8-18 years of age, is comprised of 41 items with subsets of items related to five content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, learning problems, aggression and family relations. The subject rates himself/herself on the first 39 items of C3-SRS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently] based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.5
100mg SPN-812-5.3
200mg SPN-812-4.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI-4-SF)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI-4-SF) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). The PSI-4 questionnaire evaluates the magnitude of stress in the parent-child relationship based on the parent's perception of the child's characteristics, the personal characteristics of the parent, and the interaction between the parent and the child. The PSI-4-SF was developed for parents of children ages 1 month to 12 years. The PSI-4-SF consists of 36 items divided into three domains: parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where SD=Strongly Disagree, D=Disagree, NS=Not Sure, A=Agree, and SA=Strongly Agree. The total score ranges between 90 and 450; higher total scores indicate higher levels of stress. Lower change from baseline total scores (<0) represent better outcome. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-8.5
100mg SPN-812-8.5
200mg SPN-812-10.1

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P)

The third Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Total Average score at Week 6 (End of Study). The WFIRS instrument evaluates ADHD-related functional impairment. The WFIRS-P is completed by the child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 50 items grouped into six domains: Family (10 items), School (10 items, includes learning [4 items] and behavior [6 items]), Life Skills (10 items), Child's Self-Concept (3 items), Social Activities (7 items), and Risky Activities (10 items). The parent/guardian rates each item on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=never or not at all to 3= very often or very much) based on their child's behavior past month. A Total Average score was computed by calculating mean rating of all 50 items (ranging from 0 to 3, where a higher value represents more severe functional impairment). Lower change from baseline Total Average scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.22
100mg SPN-812-0.36
200mg SPN-812-0.39

Efficacy of SPN-812 Assessed by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) symptoms of ADHD. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). A Total score is calculated by adding the responses of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-10.9
100mg SPN-812-16.6
200mg SPN-812-17.7

"Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Categorical Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [the Percentage of Subjects Who Were 'Improved]"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who were improved by visit; improved was defined as a subject who had a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 = Very Much Improved or 2 = Much Improved. Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who were improved." (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6

,,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
100mg SPN-81223.930.540.746.546.345.0
200mg SPN-81210.931.838.948.248.150.7
Placebo9.118.926.729.330.729.5

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale and the Inattention Subscale of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score and Inattention subscale score at Week 6 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-5 symptoms of ADHD, including 9 items for the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale and 9 items for the Inattention subscale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). Each subscale score is calculated by adding the responses of all respective 9 items (range: 0-27; the higher the subscale score, the more severe the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity or Inattention symptoms). Lower change from baseline subscale scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247530)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Inattention subscaleHyperactivity/impulsivity Subscale
100mg SPN-812-8.6-8.0
200mg SPN-812-9.2-8.7
Placebo-5.7-5.5

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by 50% Responder Rate Per the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of responders at Week 8 (End of Study). A responder was defined as a subject who had a 50% or greater reduction (improvement) in their change from baseline Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 8 (End of Study). Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of responders. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Week 8 (End of Study)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo25.8
200mg SPN-81236.0
400mg SPN-81241.2

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

"The first Key Secondary Endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale score at Week 8 (End of Study). The CGI-I scale is a single item assessment of how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing." (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Week 8 (End of Study)

Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.1
200mg SPN-8122.6
400mg SPN-8122.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Parent Short Form (C3PS)

The second Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3PS) Composite T-score at Week 8 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for the assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3PS is completed by a child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 45 items. The parent rates his/her child on the first 43 items of the C3PS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently]) based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to raw score(s). Raw score is converted to T-score to account for age (6-11 yrs or 12-18 yrs) and sex (male or female); the difference between T-score at Week 8 and the T-score at Baseline is then computed. A lower change from baseline T-score (<0) at Week 8 represent a better outcome. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.3
200mg SPN-812-9.1
400mg SPN-812-7.8

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS) Composite T score at Week 8 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3-SRS, validated in 8-18 years olds, is comprised of 41 items. The subject rates himself/herself on the first 39 items of C3-SRS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently] based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw score is converted to T-score to account for age (8-11 yrs or 12-18 yrs) and sex (male or female); the difference between T-score at Week 8 and the T-score at Baseline is then computed. A lower change from baseline T-score (<0) at Week 8 represent a better outcome. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.3
200mg SPN-812-3.9
400mg SPN-812-5.4

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI-4-SF)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI-4-SF) Total score at Week 8 (End of Study). The PSI-4 questionnaire evaluates the magnitude of stress in the parent-child relationship based on the parent's perception of the child's characteristics, the personal characteristics of the parent, and the interaction between the parent and the child. The PSI-4-SF was developed for parents of children ages 1 month to 12 years. The PSI-4-SF consists of 36 items divided into three domains: parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where SD=Strongly Disagree, D=Disagree, NS=Not Sure, A=Agree, and SA=Strongly Agree. The total score ranges between 90 and 450. Lower change from baseline total scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.8
200mg SPN-812-9.2
400mg SPN-812-11.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P)

The third Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Total Average score at Week 8 (End of Study). The WFIRS instrument evaluates ADHD-related functional impairment. The WFIRS-P is completed by the child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 50 items grouped into six domains: Family (10 items), School (10 items, includes learning [4 items] and behavior [6 items]), Life Skills (10 items), Child's Self-Concept (3 items), Social Activities (7 items), and Risky Activities (10 items). The parent/guardian rates each item on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=never or not at all to 3= very often or very much) based on their child's behavior past month. A Total Average score was computed by calculating mean rating of all 50 items (ranging from 0 to 3). Lower change from baseline Total Average scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.24
200mg SPN-812-0.35
400mg SPN-812-0.33

Efficacy of SPN-812 Assessed by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 8 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) symptoms of ADHD. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A Total score is calculated by adding the responses of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-11.7
200mg SPN-812-17.6
400mg SPN-812-17.5

"Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Categorical Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [the Percentage of Subjects Who Were 'Improved]"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who were improved by visit; improved was defined as a subject who had a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 = Very Much Improved or 2 = Much Improved. Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who were improved." (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8
200mg SPN-81213.225.831.341.948.551.051.047.3
400mg SPN-81210.424.936.737.444.449.544.847.8
Placebo4.114.521.426.632.730.336.135.5

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale and the Inattention Subscale of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score and Inattention subscale score at Week 8 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-5 symptoms of ADHD, including 9 items for the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale and 9 items for the Inattention subscale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Each subscale score is calculated by adding the responses of all respective 9 items (range: 0-27; the higher the subscale score, the more severe the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity or Inattention symptoms). Lower change from baseline subscale scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247543)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (End of Study)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Hyperactivity/impulsivity subscaleInattention subscale
200mg SPN-812-8.4-8.9
400mg SPN-812-8.3-8.6
Placebo-5.1-6.2

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by 50% Responder Rate Per the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of responders at Week 6 (End of Study). A responder was defined as a subject who had a 50% or greater reduction (improvement) in their change from baseline Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of responders. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo27.0
200mg SPN-81245.8
400mg SPN-81244.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

"The first Key Secondary Endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale score at Week 6 (End of Study). The CGI-I scale is a single item assessment of how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing." (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.0
200mg SPN-8122.5
400mg SPN-8122.4

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3-PS)

The second Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3PS) Composite T-score at Week 6 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for the assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3PS is completed by a child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 45 items with subsets of items related to six content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, executive functioning, learning problems, defiance/aggression and peer relations. The parent rates his/her child on the first 43 items of the C3PS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently]) based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.7
200mg SPN-812-6.4
400mg SPN-812-8.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS) Composite T score at Week 6 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3-SRS, which is only validated in children/adolescents 8-18 years of age, is comprised of 41 items with subsets of items related to five content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, learning problems, aggression and family relations. The subject rates himself/herself on the first 39 items of C3-SRS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently] based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.4
200mg SPN-812-5.5
400mg SPN-812-4.5

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA)

Another secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) Total score to Week 6 (End of Study). The SIPA is a 112-item screening/diagnostic instrument for parents of adolescents 11-19 years of age that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions. Items 1-90 are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (where SD=Strongly Disagree, D=Disagree, NS=Not Sure, A=Agree, and SA=Strongly Agree) and yields a raw score for 3 Domains (Adolescent Domain, Parent Domain, and Adolescent-Parent Domain) that focus on a parent's perception of their child's personality and on the parent's characteristics and behaviors. The sum of the 3 Domain scores yields the Total (Parent Stress) score (range: 90-450; higher total scores indicate higher levels of stress). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-13.7
200mg SPN-812-12.0
400mg SPN-812-15.3

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P)

The third Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Total Average score at Week 6 (End of Study). The WFIRS instrument evaluates ADHD-related functional impairment. The WFIRS-P is completed by the child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 50 items grouped into six domains: Family (10 items), School (10 items, includes learning [4 items] and behavior [6 items]), Life Skills (10 items), Child's Self-Concept (3 items), Social Activities (7 items), and Risky Activities (10 items). The parent/guardian rates each item on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=never or not at all to 3= very often or very much) based on their child's behavior past month. A Total Average score was computed by calculating mean rating of all 50 items (ranging from 0 to 3, where a higher value represents more severe functional impairment). Lower change from baseline Total Average scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.19
200mg SPN-812-0.27
400mg SPN-812-0.31

Efficacy of SPN-812 Assessed by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) symptoms of ADHD. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). A Total score is calculated by adding the responses of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-11.4
200mg SPN-812-16.0
400mg SPN-812-16.5

"Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Categorical Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [the Percentage of Subjects Who Were 'Improved]"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who were improved by visit; improved was defined as a subject who had a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 = Very Much Improved or 2 = Much Improved. Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who were improved." (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6

,,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
200mg SPN-81214.127.039.849.451.950.7
400mg SPN-81216.532.146.355.653.751.9
Placebo4.817.021.928.532.531.6

Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale and the Inattention Subscale of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score and Inattention subscale score at Week 6 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-5 symptoms of ADHD, including 9 items for the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale and 9 items for the Inattention subscale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). Each subscale score is calculated by adding the responses of all respective 9 items (range: 0-27; the higher the subscale score, the more severe the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity or Inattention symptoms). Lower change from baseline subscale scores (<0) represent a better outcome. (NCT03247517)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscaleInattention subscale
200mg SPN-812-7.7-8.7
400mg SPN-812-8.4-8.7
Placebo-5.1-6.6

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Emotional Control Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Emotional Control scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Emotional Control scale is one of four Behavioral Regulation Index-related scales; it captures an individual's ability to modulate their emotional responses appropriately. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 10 items yields the Emotional Control raw score (range: 10-30), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Emotional Control T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.0
SPN-812-3.1

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Inhibit Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Inhibit scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Inhibit scale is one of four Behavioral Regulation Index-related scales; it captures the ability to control impulses, appropriately stop verbal, attentional, physical behavior at the proper time. Subject's rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 8 items yields the Inhibit raw score (range: 8-24), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Inhibit T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.4
SPN-812-7.8

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Initiate Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Initiate scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Initiate scale is one of five Metacognition Index-related scales; it captures an individual's ability to begin a task or activity without external prompting and to independently generate ideas. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 8 items yields the Initiate scale raw score (range: 8-24), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Initiate T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.4
SPN-812-7.1

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Organization of Materials Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Organization of Materials scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Organization of Materials scale is one of five Metacognition Index-related scales; it captures one's ability to keep areas orderly and maintain materials. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 8 items yields the Organization of Materials raw score (range: 8-24), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Organization of Materials T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.4
SPN-812-7.1

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Plan/Organize Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Plan/Organize scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Plan/Organize scale is one of five Metacognition Index-related scales; it captures an individual's ability to anticipate events, set goals, pre-plan, organize, and carry out tasks systematically. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 10 items yields the Plan/Organize raw score (range: 10-30), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Plan/Organize T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.3
SPN-812-9.7

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Self-Monitor Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Self-Monitor scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Self-Monitor scale is one of four Behavioral Regulation Index-related scales; it reflects an individual's ability to recognize the effect of their own behavior on others. The subject rates each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 6 items yields the Self-Monitor raw score (range: 6-18), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Self-Monitor T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.7
SPN-812-7.3

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Shift Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Shift scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Shift scale is one of four Behavioral Regulation Index-related scales; it captures one's ability to move freely from one situation/activity/aspect of problem to another and think flexibly to aid problem-solving. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 6 items yields the Shift raw score (range: 6-18), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Shift T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.8
SPN-812-7.2

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Task Monitor Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Task Monitor scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Task Monitor scale is one of five Metacognition Index-related scales; it captures an individual's ability to assess performance for mistakes during or after finishing a task. The subject rates each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 6 items yields the Task Monitor raw score (range: 6-18), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Task Monitor T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.4
SPN-812-7.9

"Effect of SPN-812 on the Working Memory Scale of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)"

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Working Memory scale T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The Working Memory scale is one of five Metacognition Index-related scales; it captures one's ability to hold information in mind in order to complete a task and stay with, or stick to, an activity. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 8 items yields the Working Memory raw score (range: 8-24), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline Working Memory T-score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.9
SPN-812-10.1

Effect of SPN-812 on 30% Clinical Response Rate as Assessed by the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS)

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects with a 30% or greater reduction in their change from baseline Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total score at Week 6. The AISRS is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults. The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. A Total score is calculated by summating the ratings of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms). The Total score is converted to a percent change from baseline. 30% responder rate values can range between 0 and 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who are responders." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo47.6
SPN-81260.0

Effect of SPN-812 on 50% Clinical Response Rate as Assessed by the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS).

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects with a 50% or greater reduction in their change from baseline Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total score at Week 6. The AISRS is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults. The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. A Total score is calculated by summating the ratings of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms). The Total score is converted to a percent change from baseline. 50% responder rate values can range between 0 and 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who are responders." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo32.9
SPN-81239.2

Effect of SPN-812 on Clinical Response Rate as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects with a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 (responders) at Week 6. The CGI-I scale is a single item clinician-rated assessment of how much the subject's condition (ADHD) has improved, worsened or has not changed relative to his/her baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Responder rate values can range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who are responders." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo37.8
SPN-81248.5

Effect of SPN-812 on Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Symptoms as Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale of the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS)

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score at Week 6. The AISRS is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults. The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (9 items). The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score is calculated by summating the ratings of all 9 Hyperactivity/Impulsivity items (range: 0-27; the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms). A lower change from baseline Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.8
SPN-812-7.2

Effect of SPN-812 on Inattention Symptoms as Assessed by the Inattention Subscale of the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS)

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Inattention subscale score at Week 6. The AISRS is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults. The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (9 items). The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The Inattention subscale score is calculated by summating the ratings of all 9 Inattention items (range: 0-27; the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms). A lower change from baseline Inattention subscale score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.1
SPN-812-8.5

Effect of SPN-812 on Symptoms of Anxiety as Assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Scale

"An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total score at Week 6. The GAD-7 is a self-reported 7-item questionnaire for screening and measuring the severity of generalized anxiety disorder. The subject rates each item on 4-point scale (0-3), where 0 = Not at all, 1 = Several days, 2 = Over half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day. The total score is calculated by summated the ratings of all 7 items. The total score can range between 0 to 21; the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms of anxiety. A lower change from baseline GAD-7 total score (<0) represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.6
SPN-812-1.6

Effect of SPN-812 on the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. The BRI captures the ability to maintain appropriate regulatory control of one's own behavior and emotional responses. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 30 items yields the BRI raw score (range: 30-90), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline BRI T-score (<0) represents a better outcome. (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.4
SPN-812-7.2

Effect of SPN-812 on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

"An additional secondary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score at Week 6. The CGI-I scale is a single item clinician-rated assessment of how much the subject's condition (ADHD) has improved, worsened or has not changed relative to his/her baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. A CGI-I score <4 represents a better outcome." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.9
SPN-8122.6

Effect of SPN-812 on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale

The Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score at Week 6. The CGI-S is a single item clinician-rated assessment of the severity of subject's condition (ADHD symptoms) in relation to the clinician's total experience with patients with ADHD. The CGI-S is evaluated on a 7-point scale with 1 = Normal, not at all ill, asymptomatic, 2 = Borderline Ill, 3 = Mildly Ill, 4 = Moderately Ill, 5 = Markedly Ill, 6 = Severely Ill, and 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients. Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing. A lower change from baseline CGI-S score (<0) represents a better outcome. (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
SPN-812-1.4

Effect of SPN-812 on the Clinical Response Rate as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale

"An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects with a Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score of 1 or 2 (responders) at Week 6. The CGI-S is a single item clinician-rated assessment of the severity of subject's condition (ADHD symptoms) in relation to the clinician's total experience with patients with ADHD. The CGI-S is evaluated on a 7-point scale with 1 = Normal, not at all ill, asymptomatic, 2 = Borderline Ill, 3 = Mildly Ill, 4 = Moderately Ill, 5 = Markedly Ill, 6 = Severely Ill, and 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients. Responder rate values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who are responders." (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Placebo25.2
SPN-81230.8

Effect of SPN-812 on the Global Executive Composite (GEC) of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning (GEC) and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales (Metacognition Index [MI] and Behavioral Regulation Index [BRI]) that assess aspects of executive function and problems with self-regulation from the perspective of the individual. Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 70 items yields the GEC raw score (range: 70-210), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline GEC T-score (<0) represents a better outcome. (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.8
SPN-812-9.3

Effect of SPN-812 on the Metacognitive Index (MI) of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A)

An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Metacognition Index (MI) T-score at Week 6. The BRIEF-A is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales. MI reflects individual's ability to problem solve (includes initiate activity, generate ideas, sustain working memory, plan/organize approaches, monitor success/failure, and organize materials/environment). Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience within the last month. The sum of 40 items yields the MI raw score (range: 40-120), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated). T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score. A lower change from baseline MI T-score (<0) represents a better outcome. (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

InterventionT-score (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-6.5
SPN-812-9.8

Efficacy of SPN-812 on Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as Assessed by the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score

The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total score at Week 6. The AISRS is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults. The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (9 items). The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. A Total score is calculated by summating the ratings of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). A lower change from baseline AISRS Total score (<0) represents a better outcome. (NCT04016779)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-11.7
SPN-812-15.5

Reviews

3 reviews available for viloxazine and ADDH

ArticleYear
Nonstimulant Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    CNS drugs, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sys

2023
Viloxazine in the Management of CNS Disorders: A Historical Overview and Current Status.
    CNS drugs, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperac

2021
Viloxazine: Pediatric First Approval.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hype

2021

Trials

7 trials available for viloxazine and ADDH

ArticleYear
A post hoc analysis of the effect of viloxazine extended-release capsules on learning and school problems in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2023, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2023
Impact of a High-Fat Meal and Sprinkled Administration on the Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules (Qelbree
    European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2022, Volume: 47, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Area Under Curve;

2022
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    CNS drugs, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Capsules; Central Nervous System Stimulants; C

2022
Authors' Reply to Singh and Balasundaram: Comment on "A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder".
    CNS drugs, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Capsules; Central Nervous System Stimulants; D

2022
Predicting efficacy of viloxazine extended-release treatment in adults with ADHD using an early change in ADHD symptoms: Machine learning Post Hoc analysis of a phase 3 clinical trial.
    Psychiatry research, 2022, Volume: 318

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants;

2022
A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Once-daily SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release) in the Treatment of Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in School-age Children.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2020, Volume: 42, Issue:8

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Rel

2020
Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Viloxazine Extended-Release (SPN-812) and Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System S

2021

Other Studies

11 other studies available for viloxazine and ADDH

ArticleYear
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Executive Function Outcome of Treatment with Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Four Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Paediatric drugs, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2021
Viloxazine: A new miracle drug for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or just another non-stimulant?
    Asian journal of psychiatry, 2022, Volume: 67

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Humans; Methylphen

2022
The role of placebo response in the efficacy outcome assessment in viloxazine extended-release pivotal trials in paediatric subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022, Volume: 88, Issue:11

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Clinical Tr

2022
Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of extended release viloxazine in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2022, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Delayed-Act

2022
Comment on: "A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder".
    CNS drugs, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Capsules; Central Nervous System Stimulants; D

2022
Response of peer relations and social activities to treatment with viloxazine extended-release capsules (Qelbree
    Brain and behavior, 2023, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Delayed-Action Preparations; Doubl

2023
Viloxazine (Qelbree) for ADHD.
    American family physician, 2023, Volume: 107, Issue:3

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Humans; Morpholines; Viloxazine

2023
Extended-Release Viloxazine Compared with Atomoxetine for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    CNS drugs, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride

2023
Early response to SPN-812 (viloxazine extended-release) can predict efficacy outcome in pediatric subjects with ADHD: a machine learning post-hoc analysis of four randomized clinical trials.
    Psychiatry research, 2021, Volume: 296

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Central Ner

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2021, Volume: 75, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Probability; Treatment Out

2021
Viloxazine ER (Qelbree) for ADHD.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2021, 06-28, Volume: 63, Issue:1627

    Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Age Factors; Attention Deficit Disord

2021