ve-821 and Ovarian-Neoplasms

To explore the effect of ataxia telangiectasia mutated and RAD3 related protein (ATR) expression and ATR kinase activity on the sensitivity to cisplatin in ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells.. SiRNA targeting ATR was transfected into SKOV3 cells for 48 h to reduce the ATR protein level, and ATR kinase inhibitor VE-821 was used for 12 h to inhibit the ATR pathway activity. The alteration of cell viability was examined by CCk-8 assay. Expression levels of ATR, p-ATR and γ-H2AX proteins were detected by Western blot. The DNA double strand breaks (DSB) marker γ-H2AX and homologous recombination repair key protein RAD51 and their co-localization in the cells were examined under the confocal microscope. The status of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in single cells was visualized by alkaline comet assay. Finally, the cell cycle distribution was assessed using flow cytometry.. DDP caused evident DNA double strands breaks and activated ATR kinase pathway. ATR-siRNA notably reduced ATR protein level, the 48 h IC(50) value of DDP was 72.12 µmol/L and 41.25 µmol/L, respectively, in the NC-siRNA and ATR-siRNA groups (P < 0.05). Confocal microscopic assay presented decreased recruitment of RAD51 at the DSB loci and comet assay showed enhanced DSB in the cells after ATR knocking down. After the inhibition of ATR kinase by VE-821, the 48 h IC(50) value of DDP was 75.32 µmol/L and 45.64 µmol/L, respectively, in the DMSO and VE-821 groups (P < 0.05 for both), confocal microscopic assay demonstrated reduced RAD51 recruitment, and comet assay showed increased DSB in cells after ATR kinase inhibition. Flow cytometry showed that percentage of cells distributed in G(0)/G(1), S and G(2)/M phases was 71.2%, 13.4% and 15.4%, repectively, after 40 µmol/L DDP treatment for 24 h. Compared with that of control group (G(0)/G(1): 54.2%, S: 21.3% and G(2)/M: 24.4%), DDP induced G(0)/G(1) phase arrest. DDP intervention resulted in the cell cycle status (G(0)/G(1): 43.2%, S: 20.4%, G(2)/M: 36.4%) in the ATR-siRNA group and (G(0)/G(1): 40.2%, S: 22.5%, G(2)/M: 37.3%) in the VE-821 group, indicating that the inhibition of ATR or ATR kinase could abrogate the effect of G(0)/G(1) phase arrest induced by DDP.. Suppression of ATR can affect the homologous recombination repair in ovarian cancer cells, leading to accumulation of DNA double strand breaks in the cell nuclei as well as reduction of DDP-caused G(0)/G(1) phase arrest, finally enhances the sensitivity to cisplatin in the ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; DNA Repair; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyrazines; RNA, Small Interfering; Sulfones; Transfection

Replication stress and DNA damage activate the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint signaling pathway that licenses repair and cell survival processes. In this study, we examined the respective roles of the ATR and Chk1 kinases in ovarian cancer cells using genetic and pharmacologic inhibitors in combination with cisplatin, topotecan, gemcitabine, and the PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888), four agents with clinical activity in ovarian cancer. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated depletion or inhibition of ATR sensitized ovarian cancer cells to all four agents. In contrast, while cisplatin, topotecan, and gemcitabine each activated Chk1, RNAi-mediated depletion or inhibition of this kinase in cells sensitized them only to gemcitabine. Unexpectedly, we found that neither the ATR kinase inhibitor VE-821 nor the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 blocked ATR-mediated Chk1 phosphorylation or autophosphorylation, two commonly used readouts for inhibition of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. Instead, their ability to sensitize cells correlated with enhanced CDC25A levels. In addition, we also found that VE-821 could further sensitize BRCA1-depleted cells to cisplatin, topotecan, and veliparib beyond the potent sensitization already caused by their deficiency in homologous recombination. Taken together, our results established that ATR and Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize ovarian cancer cells to commonly used chemotherapy agents and that Chk1 phosphorylation status may not offer a reliable marker for inhibition of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. A key implication of our work is the clinical rationale it provides to evaluate ATR inhibitors in combination with PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-deficient cells.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins; Benzimidazoles; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; cdc25 Phosphatases; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Checkpoint Kinase 1; Cisplatin; Deoxycytidine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Immunoblotting; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phosphorylation; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Protein Kinases; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Pyrazines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; RNA Interference; Signal Transduction; Sulfones; Topotecan