urea has been researched along with Heart Failure, Systolic in 23 studies
pseudourea: clinical use; structure
isourea : A carboximidic acid that is the imidic acid tautomer of urea, H2NC(=NH)OH, and its hydrocarbyl derivatives.
Heart Failure, Systolic: Heart failure caused by abnormal myocardial contraction during SYSTOLE leading to defective cardiac emptying.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Omecamtiv mecarbil improved cardiac function in patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular dysfunction and could be the first in class of a new therapeutic agent." | 9.15 | The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial. ( Clarke, CP; Cleland, JG; Francis, DP; Goldman, JH; Greenberg, BH; Lang, CC; Lee, JH; Malik, FI; Mayet, J; Mc Murray, JJ; Monaghan, M; Neyses, L; Nifontov, EM; Saikali, KG; Saltzberg, M; Senior, R; Shaburishvili, T; Teerlink, JR; Tsyrlin, VA; Wasserman, SM; Wolff, AA, 2011) |
"Omecamtiv mecarbil improved cardiac function in patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular dysfunction and could be the first in class of a new therapeutic agent." | 5.15 | The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial. ( Clarke, CP; Cleland, JG; Francis, DP; Goldman, JH; Greenberg, BH; Lang, CC; Lee, JH; Malik, FI; Mayet, J; Mc Murray, JJ; Monaghan, M; Neyses, L; Nifontov, EM; Saikali, KG; Saltzberg, M; Senior, R; Shaburishvili, T; Teerlink, JR; Tsyrlin, VA; Wasserman, SM; Wolff, AA, 2011) |
" This study will provide essential dosing information for the requisite phase III trials which will investigate whether the beneficial effects of omecamtiv mecarbil translate into improved clinical outcomes." | 2.53 | Omecamtiv mecarbil: a new cardiac myosin activator for the treatment of heart failure. ( Dorhout, B; Liu, LC; Teerlink, JR; van der Meer, P; Voors, AA, 2016) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 11 (47.83) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 12 (52.17) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Bernier, TD | 1 |
Buckley, LF | 1 |
Teerlink, JR | 5 |
Diaz, R | 1 |
Felker, GM | 3 |
McMurray, JJV | 3 |
Metra, M | 1 |
Solomon, SD | 2 |
Adams, KF | 1 |
Anand, I | 1 |
Arias-Mendoza, A | 1 |
Biering-Sørensen, T | 2 |
Böhm, M | 1 |
Bonderman, D | 1 |
Cleland, JGF | 1 |
Corbalan, R | 1 |
Crespo-Leiro, MG | 1 |
Dahlström, U | 1 |
Echeverria, LE | 1 |
Fang, JC | 1 |
Filippatos, G | 1 |
Fonseca, C | 1 |
Goncalvesova, E | 1 |
Goudev, AR | 1 |
Howlett, JG | 1 |
Lanfear, DE | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Lund, M | 1 |
Macdonald, P | 1 |
Mareev, V | 1 |
Momomura, SI | 1 |
O'Meara, E | 1 |
Parkhomenko, A | 1 |
Ponikowski, P | 1 |
Ramires, FJA | 1 |
Serpytis, P | 1 |
Sliwa, K | 1 |
Spinar, J | 1 |
Suter, TM | 1 |
Tomcsanyi, J | 1 |
Vandekerckhove, H | 1 |
Vinereanu, D | 1 |
Voors, AA | 2 |
Yilmaz, MB | 1 |
Zannad, F | 1 |
Sharpsten, L | 1 |
Legg, JC | 2 |
Varin, C | 1 |
Honarpour, N | 2 |
Abbasi, SA | 1 |
Malik, FI | 6 |
Kurtz, CE | 2 |
Swedberg, K | 1 |
Massimo, V | 1 |
Carlo, P | 1 |
Teramoto, K | 1 |
Tromp, J | 1 |
Lam, CSP | 1 |
Shah, SR | 1 |
Ali, A | 1 |
Ikram, S | 1 |
Minamisawa, M | 1 |
Liu, J | 1 |
Claggett, B | 1 |
Papolos, AI | 1 |
Prabhu, MM | 1 |
Palaian, S | 1 |
Kumar, P | 1 |
Komamura, K | 1 |
Bonapace, S | 1 |
Molon, G | 1 |
Bellumkonda, L | 1 |
Manickam, M | 1 |
Jalani, HB | 1 |
Pillaiyar, T | 1 |
Sharma, N | 1 |
Boggu, PR | 1 |
Venkateswararao, E | 1 |
Lee, YJ | 1 |
Jeon, ES | 1 |
Jung, SH | 1 |
Liu, LC | 1 |
Dorhout, B | 1 |
van der Meer, P | 1 |
Moin, DS | 1 |
Sackheim, J | 1 |
Hamo, CE | 1 |
Butler, J | 1 |
Lim, GB | 1 |
Shen, YT | 2 |
Zhao, X | 1 |
Depre, C | 1 |
Dhar, SK | 1 |
Abarzúa, P | 1 |
Morgans, DJ | 2 |
Vatner, SF | 2 |
Leinwand, LA | 1 |
Moss, RL | 1 |
Hartman, JJ | 1 |
Elias, KA | 1 |
Morgan, BP | 2 |
Rodriguez, H | 1 |
Brejc, K | 1 |
Anderson, RL | 1 |
Sueoka, SH | 1 |
Lee, KH | 1 |
Finer, JT | 1 |
Sakowicz, R | 1 |
Baliga, R | 1 |
Cox, DR | 1 |
Garard, M | 1 |
Godinez, G | 1 |
Kawas, R | 1 |
Kraynack, E | 1 |
Lenzi, D | 1 |
Lu, PP | 1 |
Muci, A | 1 |
Niu, C | 1 |
Qian, X | 1 |
Pierce, DW | 1 |
Pokrovskii, M | 1 |
Suehiro, I | 1 |
Sylvester, S | 1 |
Tochimoto, T | 1 |
Valdez, C | 1 |
Wang, W | 1 |
Katori, T | 1 |
Kass, DA | 1 |
Dickstein, K | 1 |
Cleland, JG | 1 |
Senior, R | 1 |
Nifontov, EM | 1 |
Mc Murray, JJ | 1 |
Lang, CC | 1 |
Tsyrlin, VA | 1 |
Greenberg, BH | 1 |
Mayet, J | 1 |
Francis, DP | 1 |
Shaburishvili, T | 1 |
Monaghan, M | 1 |
Saltzberg, M | 1 |
Neyses, L | 1 |
Wasserman, SM | 1 |
Lee, JH | 1 |
Saikali, KG | 1 |
Clarke, CP | 1 |
Goldman, JH | 1 |
Wolff, AA | 1 |
Meijs, MF | 1 |
Asselbergs, FW | 1 |
Doevendans, PA | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Efficacy of Pulmonary Pressure Guided Therapy in Stable Outpatients With Advanced Heart Failure - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial[NCT05284955] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-03-02 | Recruiting | ||
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Mortality and Morbidity in Subjects With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (GALACTIC-HF)[NCT02929329] | Phase 3 | 8,256 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-01-06 | Completed | ||
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Dose Escalation Study to Select and Evaluate an Oral Modified Release Formulation of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Subjects With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction[NCT01786512] | Phase 2 | 544 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-02-26 | Completed | ||
A Phase II, Multi Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Study of CK-1827452 in Patients With Stable Heart Failure[NCT00624442] | Phase 2 | 45 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-04-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire with a 2-week recall period that includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency; symptom burden; symptom stability; physical limitations; social limitations; quality of life; and self-efficacy (the patient's understanding of how to manage their heart failure). The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into a total symptom score. Scores are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where lower scores represent more frequent and severe symptoms and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms.~The change from baseline in KCCQ TSS was analyzed separately for each randomization setting (inpatient and outpatient).~Least squares means are from the mixed model which includes baseline total symptom score value, region, baseline eGFR, scheduled visit, treatment group and interaction of treatment with scheduled visit as covariates." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo: Oupatients | 6.29 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Outpatients | 5.83 |
Placebo: Inpatients | 21.15 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Inpatients | 23.65 |
"All events were adjudicated by an independent external clinical-events committee at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, using standardized definitions based on the recent ACC/AHA standards for endpoint definitions in cardiovascular clinical trials.~Time to all-cause death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with an event are reported. Events that occurred up to the earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020) are included." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 25.9 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil | 25.9 |
"Cardiovascular death includes acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure, death due to stroke, death due to cardiovascular (CV) procedures, death due to CV hemorrhage, and death due to other CV causes.~All deaths were adjudicated by an independent external clinical-events committee at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, using standardized definitions based on the recent ACC/AHA standards for endpoint definitions in cardiovascular clinical trials.~Time to cardiovascular death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with a positively adjudicated event during the study is reported." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 19.4 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil | 19.6 |
"The primary outcome was a composite of a heart-failure (HF) event or cardiovascular (CV) death, whichever occurred first, in a time-to-event analysis.~A heart-failure event was defined as an urgent clinic visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization for subjectively and objectively worsening heart failure leading to treatment intensification beyond a change in oral diuretic therapy.~All deaths and HF events were adjudicated by an independent external clinical events committee (CEC) at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, using standardized definitions based on the recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) standards for endpoint definitions in cardiovascular clinical trials.~Time to cardiovascular death or first HF event was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with a positively adjudicated event during the study is reported." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 39.1 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil | 37.0 |
"A HF hospitalization is defined as an event that met all of the following criteria:~The participant was admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of HF;~The length of stay in the hospital extended for at least 24 hours;~The participant exhibited documented new or worsening symptoms due to HF on presentation;~The participant had objective evidence of new or worsening HF;~The participant received initiation or intensification of treatment specifically for HF, including an intravenous diuretic or vasoactive agent, mechanical or surgical intervention, or mechanical fluid removal.~Events were adjudicated by an independent external CEC at the Duke Clinical Research Institute using standardized definitions based on the ACC/AHA standards for endpoint definitions in CV clinical trials.~Time to first HF hospitalization was analyzed using KM methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with a positively adjudicated event is reported." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 28.7 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil | 27.7 |
(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng*hr/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1 | 2030 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2 | 2000 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2 | 1740 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1 | 5070 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2 | 5010 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2 | 6550 |
(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and 7 days post-dose.
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1 | 193 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2 | 201 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2 | 171 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1 | 492 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2 | 502 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2 | 601 |
(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1 | 157 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2 | 137 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2 | 134 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1 | 376 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2 | 395 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2 | 476 |
(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and 7 days post-dose.
Intervention | hours (Mean) |
---|---|
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1 | 3.9 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2 | 2.0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2 | 4.2 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1 | 2.6 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2 | 2.2 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2 | 4.6 |
Heart rate was measured using electrocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20
Intervention | bpm (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Expansion Phase: Placebo | 0.57 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | -0.77 |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | -2.40 |
LVEDD was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20
Intervention | cm (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Expansion Phase: Placebo | 0.089 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | 0.023 |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | -0.040 |
LVESD was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20
Intervention | cm (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Expansion Phase: Placebo | -0.242 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | -0.322 |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | -0.421 |
Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20
Intervention | pg/mL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Expansion Phase: Placebo | 502 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | -319 |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | -468 |
Stroke volume was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20
Intervention | mL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Expansion Phase: Placebo | -1.05 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | 3.53 |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | 2.58 |
Systolic ejection time was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20
Intervention | seconds (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Expansion Phase: Placebo | 0.0000 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | 0.0112 |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | 0.0250 |
"An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, including worsening of a preexisting medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered adverse events.~Each adverse event was graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), where Grade 1 = Mild AE, Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe AE, and Grade 4 = life-threatening AE.~A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:~fatal~life threatening~required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~congenital anomaly/birth defect~other medically important serious event" (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to 4 weeks after last dose; treatment duration was 7 days in the dose escalation phase.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) | TEAE Grade ≥ 2 | TEAE Grade ≥ 3 | TEAE Grade ≥ 4 | Serious adverse events | TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug | Fatal adverse events | |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Placebo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Placebo | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Weeks 2 and 12 at predose and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose.
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 12 | |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | 212 | 318 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | 212 | 200 |
"An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, including worsening of a preexisting medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered adverse events.~Each adverse event was graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), where Grade 1 = Mild AE, Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe AE, and Grade 4 = life-threatening AE.~A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:~fatal~life threatening~required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~congenital anomaly/birth defect~other medically important serious event" (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after last dose; treatment duration was 20 weeks in the expansion phase.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) | TEAE Grade ≥ 2 | TEAE Grade ≥ 3 | TEAE Grade ≥ 4 | Serious adverse events | TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug | Fatal adverse events | |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | 95 | 61 | 31 | 11 | 32 | 12 | 3 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | 92 | 60 | 28 | 8 | 36 | 8 | 1 |
Expansion Phase: Placebo | 91 | 62 | 34 | 5 | 30 | 12 | 4 |
(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Predose (before morning dose) at weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | |
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration | 179 | 161 | 263 | 240 | 239 |
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg | 174 | 156 | 165 | 155 | 149 |
Determined by evaluation of plasma concentrations from blood samples collected prior to dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after initiation of study drug infusion (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 2 days
Intervention | hour x nanogram/milliliter (Mean) |
---|---|
Cohort 1/2: 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.0625 mg/kg/h | 1102.2 |
Cohort 1/2: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.125 mg/kg/h | 2314.3 |
Cohort 1/2: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h | 4252.7 |
Cohort 1/2: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h | 6060.7 |
Cohort 1/2: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h | 8495.7 |
Cohort 3: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h | 3982.7 |
Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h | 8120.5 |
Cohort 3: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h | 18450.7 |
Cohort 4: 0.25 mg.kg.h + 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h | 4399.0 |
Cohort 4: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h | 10624.8 |
Cohort 4: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h | 19394.3 |
Cohort 5: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h | 59044.6 |
Cohort 5: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h + 0.075 mg/kg/h | 43605.5 |
Determined by evaluation of plasma concentrations from blood samples collected prior to dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after initiation of study drug infusion (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 2 days
Intervention | nanogram/milliliter (Mean) |
---|---|
Cohort 1/2: 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.0625 mg/kg/h | 96.1 |
Cohort 1/2: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.125 mg/kg/h | 195.0 |
Cohort 1/2: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h | 347.1 |
Cohort 1/2: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h | 558.1 |
Cohort 1/2: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h | 635.9 |
Cohort 3: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h | 165.3 |
Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h | 279.9 |
Cohort 3: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h | 633.0 |
Cohort 4: 0.25 mg.kg.h + 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h | 177.9 |
Cohort 4: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h | 403.3 |
Cohort 4: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h | 681.4 |
Cohort 5: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h | 884.5 |
Cohort 5: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h + 0.075 mg/kg/h | 726.9 |
Pooled analysis of the echocardiographic measure fractional shortening from echocardiograms taken at all timepoints. Fractional shortening is the percentage of change from baseline in the left ventricular cavity dimension with systole. Echocardiograms from cohorts 1,2,3,4 and 5 (564 echocardiograms) were binned into either placebo group or 1 of 6 groups based on plasma concentration of CK-1827452. (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 4 days
Intervention | Percentage of change (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
# of Echocardiographic Observations (no units) | Fractional Shortening Percent Change from Baseline | |
>0-100 ng/mL | 81 | 1 |
>100-200 ng/mL | 56 | 1 |
>200-300 ng/mL | 37 | 3 |
>300-400 ng/mL | 23 | 3 |
>400-500 ng/mL | 17 | 2 |
>500 ng/mL | 44 | 5 |
Pooled analysis of the echocardiographic measure systolic ejection time from echocardiograms taken at all timepoints. The systolic ejection time is the period during which the aortic valve is open and blood is flowing across the valve. Echocardiograms from cohorts 1,2,3,4 and 5 (564 echocardiograms) were binned into either placebo group or 1 of 6 groups based on plasma concentration of CK-1827452. (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 4 days
Intervention | msec (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
# of Echocardiographic Observations (no units) | Ejection Fraction msec Change from Baseline | |
>0-100 ng/mL | 84 | 1 |
>100-200 ng/mL | 62 | 18 |
>200-300 ng/mL | 42 | 47 |
>300-400 ng/mL | 24 | 58 |
>400-500 ng/mL | 20 | 59 |
>500 ng/mL | 46 | 80 |
4 reviews available for urea and Heart Failure, Systolic
Article | Year |
---|---|
Cardiac Myosin Activation for the Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Myocardium; Recovery | 2021 |
Omecamtiv mecarbil: a new cardiac myosin activator for the treatment of heart failure.
Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Heart Failure, Systolic; Human | 2016 |
Cardiac Myosin Activators in Systolic Heart Failure: More Friend than Foe?
Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Heart Failure, Systolic; Human | 2016 |
Cardiac myosin activation part 1: from concept to clinic.
Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Heart | 2011 |
2 trials available for urea and Heart Failure, Systolic
Article | Year |
---|---|
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart | 2021 |
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart | 2021 |
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart | 2021 |
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart | 2021 |
The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Cardiac Myosins; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography; Female; | 2011 |
17 other studies available for urea and Heart Failure, Systolic
Article | Year |
---|---|
Stimulation of Contractility in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea | 2021 |
Truly galactic?
Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea | 2021 |
Heart failure or heart success?
Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Evidence-Based Medicine; Ferric Compounds; Glycosides; Heart Failure, Systoli | 2021 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil use in systolic heart failure- Results of the GALACTIC-HF trial.
Topics: Cardiotonic Agents; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Urea | 2021 |
The effect of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on right ventricular structure and function in chronic systolic heart failure (COSMIC-HF).
Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea | 2021 |
New saviour for an old problem: Omecamtiv mecarbil for systolic heart failure.
Topics: Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea | 2021 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea | 2021 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea | 2021 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea | 2021 |
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure. Reply.
Topics: Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea | 2021 |
Exploration of flexible phenylpropylurea scaffold as novel cardiac myosin activators for the treatment of systolic heart failure.
Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Drug Design; Echocardiography; Heart; Heart Failure, S | 2017 |
Heart failure: Phase II trial results of omecamtiv mecarbil.
Topics: Cardiotonic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Randomized | 2017 |
Improvement of cardiac function by a cardiac Myosin activator in conscious dogs with systolic heart failure.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Consciousness; Disease Models, Animal; Dobutamine; D | 2010 |
Medicine. Chemically tuned myosin motors.
Topics: Actins; Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Triphosphatases; Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Cardiac M | 2011 |
Cardiac myosin activation: a potential therapeutic approach for systolic heart failure.
Topics: Actin Cytoskeleton; Actins; Adenosine Triphosphatases; Adenosine Triphosphate; Adrenergic beta-Agoni | 2011 |
Cardiac myosin activation: will theory and practice coincide?
Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea | 2011 |
Omecamtiv mecarbil: a promising new drug in systolic heart failure.
Topics: Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Muscle Cells; Myosins; Urea; Ventricular Function, Left | 2012 |