Page last updated: 2024-10-21

urea and Heart Failure, Systolic

urea has been researched along with Heart Failure, Systolic in 23 studies

pseudourea: clinical use; structure
isourea : A carboximidic acid that is the imidic acid tautomer of urea, H2NC(=NH)OH, and its hydrocarbyl derivatives.

Heart Failure, Systolic: Heart failure caused by abnormal myocardial contraction during SYSTOLE leading to defective cardiac emptying.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Omecamtiv mecarbil improved cardiac function in patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular dysfunction and could be the first in class of a new therapeutic agent."9.15The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial. ( Clarke, CP; Cleland, JG; Francis, DP; Goldman, JH; Greenberg, BH; Lang, CC; Lee, JH; Malik, FI; Mayet, J; Mc Murray, JJ; Monaghan, M; Neyses, L; Nifontov, EM; Saikali, KG; Saltzberg, M; Senior, R; Shaburishvili, T; Teerlink, JR; Tsyrlin, VA; Wasserman, SM; Wolff, AA, 2011)
"Omecamtiv mecarbil improved cardiac function in patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular dysfunction and could be the first in class of a new therapeutic agent."5.15The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial. ( Clarke, CP; Cleland, JG; Francis, DP; Goldman, JH; Greenberg, BH; Lang, CC; Lee, JH; Malik, FI; Mayet, J; Mc Murray, JJ; Monaghan, M; Neyses, L; Nifontov, EM; Saikali, KG; Saltzberg, M; Senior, R; Shaburishvili, T; Teerlink, JR; Tsyrlin, VA; Wasserman, SM; Wolff, AA, 2011)
" This study will provide essential dosing information for the requisite phase III trials which will investigate whether the beneficial effects of omecamtiv mecarbil translate into improved clinical outcomes."2.53Omecamtiv mecarbil: a new cardiac myosin activator for the treatment of heart failure. ( Dorhout, B; Liu, LC; Teerlink, JR; van der Meer, P; Voors, AA, 2016)

Research

Studies (23)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's11 (47.83)24.3611
2020's12 (52.17)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Bernier, TD1
Buckley, LF1
Teerlink, JR5
Diaz, R1
Felker, GM3
McMurray, JJV3
Metra, M1
Solomon, SD2
Adams, KF1
Anand, I1
Arias-Mendoza, A1
Biering-Sørensen, T2
Böhm, M1
Bonderman, D1
Cleland, JGF1
Corbalan, R1
Crespo-Leiro, MG1
Dahlström, U1
Echeverria, LE1
Fang, JC1
Filippatos, G1
Fonseca, C1
Goncalvesova, E1
Goudev, AR1
Howlett, JG1
Lanfear, DE1
Li, J1
Lund, M1
Macdonald, P1
Mareev, V1
Momomura, SI1
O'Meara, E1
Parkhomenko, A1
Ponikowski, P1
Ramires, FJA1
Serpytis, P1
Sliwa, K1
Spinar, J1
Suter, TM1
Tomcsanyi, J1
Vandekerckhove, H1
Vinereanu, D1
Voors, AA2
Yilmaz, MB1
Zannad, F1
Sharpsten, L1
Legg, JC2
Varin, C1
Honarpour, N2
Abbasi, SA1
Malik, FI6
Kurtz, CE2
Swedberg, K1
Massimo, V1
Carlo, P1
Teramoto, K1
Tromp, J1
Lam, CSP1
Shah, SR1
Ali, A1
Ikram, S1
Minamisawa, M1
Liu, J1
Claggett, B1
Papolos, AI1
Prabhu, MM1
Palaian, S1
Kumar, P1
Komamura, K1
Bonapace, S1
Molon, G1
Bellumkonda, L1
Manickam, M1
Jalani, HB1
Pillaiyar, T1
Sharma, N1
Boggu, PR1
Venkateswararao, E1
Lee, YJ1
Jeon, ES1
Jung, SH1
Liu, LC1
Dorhout, B1
van der Meer, P1
Moin, DS1
Sackheim, J1
Hamo, CE1
Butler, J1
Lim, GB1
Shen, YT2
Zhao, X1
Depre, C1
Dhar, SK1
Abarzúa, P1
Morgans, DJ2
Vatner, SF2
Leinwand, LA1
Moss, RL1
Hartman, JJ1
Elias, KA1
Morgan, BP2
Rodriguez, H1
Brejc, K1
Anderson, RL1
Sueoka, SH1
Lee, KH1
Finer, JT1
Sakowicz, R1
Baliga, R1
Cox, DR1
Garard, M1
Godinez, G1
Kawas, R1
Kraynack, E1
Lenzi, D1
Lu, PP1
Muci, A1
Niu, C1
Qian, X1
Pierce, DW1
Pokrovskii, M1
Suehiro, I1
Sylvester, S1
Tochimoto, T1
Valdez, C1
Wang, W1
Katori, T1
Kass, DA1
Dickstein, K1
Cleland, JG1
Senior, R1
Nifontov, EM1
Mc Murray, JJ1
Lang, CC1
Tsyrlin, VA1
Greenberg, BH1
Mayet, J1
Francis, DP1
Shaburishvili, T1
Monaghan, M1
Saltzberg, M1
Neyses, L1
Wasserman, SM1
Lee, JH1
Saikali, KG1
Clarke, CP1
Goldman, JH1
Wolff, AA1
Meijs, MF1
Asselbergs, FW1
Doevendans, PA1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Efficacy of Pulmonary Pressure Guided Therapy in Stable Outpatients With Advanced Heart Failure - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial[NCT05284955]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-02Recruiting
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Mortality and Morbidity in Subjects With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (GALACTIC-HF)[NCT02929329]Phase 38,256 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-06Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Dose Escalation Study to Select and Evaluate an Oral Modified Release Formulation of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Subjects With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction[NCT01786512]Phase 2544 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-26Completed
A Phase II, Multi Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Study of CK-1827452 in Patients With Stable Heart Failure[NCT00624442]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ TSS) at Week 24

"The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire with a 2-week recall period that includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency; symptom burden; symptom stability; physical limitations; social limitations; quality of life; and self-efficacy (the patient's understanding of how to manage their heart failure). The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into a total symptom score. Scores are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where lower scores represent more frequent and severe symptoms and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms.~The change from baseline in KCCQ TSS was analyzed separately for each randomization setting (inpatient and outpatient).~Least squares means are from the mixed model which includes baseline total symptom score value, region, baseline eGFR, scheduled visit, treatment group and interaction of treatment with scheduled visit as covariates." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo: Oupatients6.29
Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Outpatients5.83
Placebo: Inpatients21.15
Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Inpatients23.65

Time to All-cause Death

"All events were adjudicated by an independent external clinical-events committee at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, using standardized definitions based on the recent ACC/AHA standards for endpoint definitions in cardiovascular clinical trials.~Time to all-cause death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with an event are reported. Events that occurred up to the earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020) are included." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo25.9
Omecamtiv Mecarbil25.9

Time to Cardiovascular Death

"Cardiovascular death includes acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure, death due to stroke, death due to cardiovascular (CV) procedures, death due to CV hemorrhage, and death due to other CV causes.~All deaths were adjudicated by an independent external clinical-events committee at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, using standardized definitions based on the recent ACC/AHA standards for endpoint definitions in cardiovascular clinical trials.~Time to cardiovascular death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with a positively adjudicated event during the study is reported." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo19.4
Omecamtiv Mecarbil19.6

Time to Cardiovascular Death or First Heart Failure Event

"The primary outcome was a composite of a heart-failure (HF) event or cardiovascular (CV) death, whichever occurred first, in a time-to-event analysis.~A heart-failure event was defined as an urgent clinic visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization for subjectively and objectively worsening heart failure leading to treatment intensification beyond a change in oral diuretic therapy.~All deaths and HF events were adjudicated by an independent external clinical events committee (CEC) at the Duke Clinical Research Institute, using standardized definitions based on the recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) standards for endpoint definitions in cardiovascular clinical trials.~Time to cardiovascular death or first HF event was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with a positively adjudicated event during the study is reported." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo39.1
Omecamtiv Mecarbil37.0

Time to First Heart Failure Hospitalization

"A HF hospitalization is defined as an event that met all of the following criteria:~The participant was admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of HF;~The length of stay in the hospital extended for at least 24 hours;~The participant exhibited documented new or worsening symptoms due to HF on presentation;~The participant had objective evidence of new or worsening HF;~The participant received initiation or intensification of treatment specifically for HF, including an intravenous diuretic or vasoactive agent, mechanical or surgical intervention, or mechanical fluid removal.~Events were adjudicated by an independent external CEC at the Duke Clinical Research Institute using standardized definitions based on the ACC/AHA standards for endpoint definitions in CV clinical trials.~Time to first HF hospitalization was analyzed using KM methods. Since the median was not calculated, the percentage of participants with a positively adjudicated event is reported." (NCT02929329)
Timeframe: From randomization to up to earliest of last confirmed survival status date or analysis cut-off date (07 August 2020); the overall median duration of follow-up was 21.8 months up to a maximum of 42 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo28.7
Omecamtiv Mecarbil27.7

Dose Escalation Phase: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for a Dosing Interval of 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC12) for Omecamtiv Mecarbil

(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F12030
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F22000
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F21740
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F15070
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F25010
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F26550

Dose Escalation Phase: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Following the Last Dose (Day 7)

(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and 7 days post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1193
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2201
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2171
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1492
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2502
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2601

Dose Escalation Phase: Plasma Concentration of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Prior to Dosing on Day 7

(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F1157
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F2137
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F2134
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F1376
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F2395
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F2476

Dose Escalation Phase: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Following the Last Dose (Day 7)

(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Day 7 at predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and 7 days post-dose.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F13.9
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F22.0
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F24.2
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F12.6
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F22.2
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F24.6

Expansion Phase: Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 20

Heart rate was measured using electrocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventionbpm (Least Squares Mean)
Expansion Phase: Placebo0.57
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg-0.77
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration-2.40

Expansion Phase: Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter (LVEDD) at Week 20

LVEDD was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Expansion Phase: Placebo0.089
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg0.023
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration-0.040

Expansion Phase: Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Diameter (LVESD) at Week 20

LVESD was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Expansion Phase: Placebo-0.242
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg-0.322
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration-0.421

Expansion Phase: Change From Baseline in N-terminal Prohormone B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 20

Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventionpg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Expansion Phase: Placebo502
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg-319
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration-468

Expansion Phase: Change From Baseline in Stroke Volume at Week 20

Stroke volume was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Expansion Phase: Placebo-1.05
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg3.53
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration2.58

Expansion Phase: Change From Baseline in Systolic Ejection Time (SET) at Week 20

Systolic ejection time was measured using echocardiography. Least squares means are from a repeated measures model including treatment group, stratification factor, scheduled visit, interaction of treatment with scheduled visit and the baseline value as covariates. (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 20

Interventionseconds (Least Squares Mean)
Expansion Phase: Placebo0.0000
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg0.0112
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration0.0250

Dose Escalation Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

"An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, including worsening of a preexisting medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered adverse events.~Each adverse event was graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), where Grade 1 = Mild AE, Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe AE, and Grade 4 = life-threatening AE.~A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:~fatal~life threatening~required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~congenital anomaly/birth defect~other medically important serious event" (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to 4 weeks after last dose; treatment duration was 7 days in the dose escalation phase.

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)TEAE Grade ≥ 2TEAE Grade ≥ 3TEAE Grade ≥ 4Serious adverse eventsTEAE leading to discontinuation of study drugFatal adverse events
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F12100000
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg M-F26110100
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg SCT-F26100000
Dose-escalation Cohort 1: Placebo4000000
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F19520220
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg M-F23100000
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 50 mg SCT-F25110100
Dose-escalation Cohort 2: Placebo1100000

Expansion Phase: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Omecamtiv Mecarbil

(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Weeks 2 and 12 at predose and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 2Week 12
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration212318
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg212200

Expansion Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

"An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, including worsening of a preexisting medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered adverse events.~Each adverse event was graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), where Grade 1 = Mild AE, Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe AE, and Grade 4 = life-threatening AE.~A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:~fatal~life threatening~required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~congenital anomaly/birth defect~other medically important serious event" (NCT01786512)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until 4 weeks after last dose; treatment duration was 20 weeks in the expansion phase.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)TEAE Grade ≥ 2TEAE Grade ≥ 3TEAE Grade ≥ 4Serious adverse eventsTEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drugFatal adverse events
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration9561311132123
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg92602883681
Expansion Phase: Placebo916234530124

Expansion Phase: Plasma Concentration of Omecamtiv Mecarbil Prior to Dosing

(NCT01786512)
Timeframe: Predose (before morning dose) at weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, and 20

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 2Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20
Expansion Phase: OM PK-based Titration179161263240239
Expansion Phase: Omecamtiv Mecarbil 25 mg174156165155149

CK-1827452 Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Plasma Concentration (AUClast)

Determined by evaluation of plasma concentrations from blood samples collected prior to dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after initiation of study drug infusion (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 2 days

Interventionhour x nanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Cohort 1/2: 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.0625 mg/kg/h1102.2
Cohort 1/2: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.125 mg/kg/h2314.3
Cohort 1/2: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h4252.7
Cohort 1/2: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h6060.7
Cohort 1/2: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h8495.7
Cohort 3: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h3982.7
Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h8120.5
Cohort 3: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h18450.7
Cohort 4: 0.25 mg.kg.h + 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h4399.0
Cohort 4: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h10624.8
Cohort 4: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h19394.3
Cohort 5: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h59044.6
Cohort 5: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h + 0.075 mg/kg/h43605.5

CK-1827452 Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Determined by evaluation of plasma concentrations from blood samples collected prior to dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after initiation of study drug infusion (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 2 days

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Mean)
Cohort 1/2: 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.0625 mg/kg/h96.1
Cohort 1/2: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.125 mg/kg/h195.0
Cohort 1/2: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h347.1
Cohort 1/2: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h558.1
Cohort 1/2: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h635.9
Cohort 3: 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h165.3
Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h279.9
Cohort 3: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h633.0
Cohort 4: 0.25 mg.kg.h + 0.125 mg/kg/h + 0.025 mg/kg/h177.9
Cohort 4: 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.25 mg/kg/h + 0.05 mg/kg/h403.3
Cohort 4: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h681.4
Cohort 5: 1.0 mg/kg/h + 0.5 mg/kg/h + 0.1 mg/kg/h884.5
Cohort 5: 0.75 mg/kg/h + 0.375 mg/kg/h + 0.075 mg/kg/h726.9

Change From Baseline of Fractional Shortening at Various CK-1827452 Plasma Concentrations

Pooled analysis of the echocardiographic measure fractional shortening from echocardiograms taken at all timepoints. Fractional shortening is the percentage of change from baseline in the left ventricular cavity dimension with systole. Echocardiograms from cohorts 1,2,3,4 and 5 (564 echocardiograms) were binned into either placebo group or 1 of 6 groups based on plasma concentration of CK-1827452. (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 4 days

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of change (Least Squares Mean)
# of Echocardiographic Observations (no units)Fractional Shortening Percent Change from Baseline
>0-100 ng/mL811
>100-200 ng/mL561
>200-300 ng/mL373
>300-400 ng/mL233
>400-500 ng/mL172
>500 ng/mL445

Change From Baseline of Systolic Ejection Time at Various CK-1827452 Plasma Concentrations

Pooled analysis of the echocardiographic measure systolic ejection time from echocardiograms taken at all timepoints. The systolic ejection time is the period during which the aortic valve is open and blood is flowing across the valve. Echocardiograms from cohorts 1,2,3,4 and 5 (564 echocardiograms) were binned into either placebo group or 1 of 6 groups based on plasma concentration of CK-1827452. (NCT00624442)
Timeframe: 4 days

,,,,,
Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
# of Echocardiographic Observations (no units)Ejection Fraction msec Change from Baseline
>0-100 ng/mL841
>100-200 ng/mL6218
>200-300 ng/mL4247
>300-400 ng/mL2458
>400-500 ng/mL2059
>500 ng/mL4680

Reviews

4 reviews available for urea and Heart Failure, Systolic

ArticleYear
Cardiac Myosin Activation for the Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2021, 01-01, Volume: 77, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Myocardium; Recovery

2021
Omecamtiv mecarbil: a new cardiac myosin activator for the treatment of heart failure.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Heart Failure, Systolic; Human

2016
Cardiac Myosin Activators in Systolic Heart Failure: More Friend than Foe?
    Current cardiology reports, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Heart Failure, Systolic; Human

2016
Cardiac myosin activation part 1: from concept to clinic.
    Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2011, Volume: 51, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Heart

2011

Trials

2 trials available for urea and Heart Failure, Systolic

ArticleYear
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 01-14, Volume: 384, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart

2021
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 01-14, Volume: 384, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart

2021
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 01-14, Volume: 384, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart

2021
Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 01-14, Volume: 384, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Female; Heart

2021
The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2011, Aug-20, Volume: 378, Issue:9792

    Topics: Blood Pressure; Cardiac Myosins; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography; Female;

2011

Other Studies

17 other studies available for urea and Heart Failure, Systolic

ArticleYear
Stimulation of Contractility in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 01-14, Volume: 384, Issue:2

    Topics: Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea

2021
Truly galactic?
    European heart journal, 2021, 01-21, Volume: 42, Issue:4

    Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea

2021
Heart failure or heart success?
    Cardiovascular research, 2021, 02-22, Volume: 117, Issue:3

    Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Evidence-Based Medicine; Ferric Compounds; Glycosides; Heart Failure, Systoli

2021
Omecamtiv Mecarbil use in systolic heart failure- Results of the GALACTIC-HF trial.
    Expert review of clinical pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Cardiotonic Agents; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Urea

2021
The effect of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on right ventricular structure and function in chronic systolic heart failure (COSMIC-HF).
    European journal of heart failure, 2021, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea

2021
New saviour for an old problem: Omecamtiv mecarbil for systolic heart failure.
    The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 2021, Volume: 51, Issue:1

    Topics: Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea

2021
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, May-20, Volume: 384, Issue:20

    Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea

2021
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, May-20, Volume: 384, Issue:20

    Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea

2021
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, May-20, Volume: 384, Issue:20

    Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea

2021
Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure. Reply.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2021, 05-20, Volume: 384, Issue:20

    Topics: Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Urea

2021
Exploration of flexible phenylpropylurea scaffold as novel cardiac myosin activators for the treatment of systolic heart failure.
    European journal of medicinal chemistry, 2017, Jul-07, Volume: 134

    Topics: Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiotonic Agents; Drug Design; Echocardiography; Heart; Heart Failure, S

2017
Heart failure: Phase II trial results of omecamtiv mecarbil.
    Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2017, Volume: 14, Issue:2

    Topics: Cardiotonic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Randomized

2017
Improvement of cardiac function by a cardiac Myosin activator in conscious dogs with systolic heart failure.
    Circulation. Heart failure, 2010, Volume: 3, Issue:4

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Cardiac Myosins; Consciousness; Disease Models, Animal; Dobutamine; D

2010
Medicine. Chemically tuned myosin motors.
    Science (New York, N.Y.), 2011, Mar-18, Volume: 331, Issue:6023

    Topics: Actins; Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Triphosphatases; Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Cardiac M

2011
Cardiac myosin activation: a potential therapeutic approach for systolic heart failure.
    Science (New York, N.Y.), 2011, Mar-18, Volume: 331, Issue:6023

    Topics: Actin Cytoskeleton; Actins; Adenosine Triphosphatases; Adenosine Triphosphate; Adrenergic beta-Agoni

2011
Cardiac myosin activation: will theory and practice coincide?
    Lancet (London, England), 2011, Aug-20, Volume: 378, Issue:9792

    Topics: Cardiac Myosins; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Urea

2011
Omecamtiv mecarbil: a promising new drug in systolic heart failure.
    European journal of heart failure, 2012, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Muscle Cells; Myosins; Urea; Ventricular Function, Left

2012