uracil has been researched along with Rheumatoid Arthritis in 5 studies
2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine: a urinary biomarker for bipolar disorder
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"3H-thymidine degradation was prevented by adding 5-nitrouracil to the incubation medium at a concentration of 0." | 5.27 | The significance of 3H-thymidine degradation in cell culture experiments with special reference to rheumatoid arthritis. ( Kankaanpää, PU; Nykänen, PJ; Raunio, PV, 1988) |
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) were reported by 62." | 2.77 | Efficacy and safety of CE-224,535, an antagonist of P2X7 receptor, in treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate. ( Bloom, BJ; Gupta, P; Ishaq, S; Mebus, CA; Park, W; Stock, TC; Wang, X; Wei, N, 2012) |
"3H-thymidine degradation was prevented by adding 5-nitrouracil to the incubation medium at a concentration of 0." | 1.27 | The significance of 3H-thymidine degradation in cell culture experiments with special reference to rheumatoid arthritis. ( Kankaanpää, PU; Nykänen, PJ; Raunio, PV, 1988) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 3 (60.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (20.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 1 (20.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Stock, TC | 1 |
Bloom, BJ | 1 |
Wei, N | 1 |
Ishaq, S | 1 |
Park, W | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Gupta, P | 1 |
Mebus, CA | 1 |
Kopp, HG | 1 |
Moerike, K | 1 |
Kanz, L | 1 |
Hartmann, JT | 1 |
Nykänen, PJ | 1 |
Raunio, PV | 1 |
Kankaanpää, PU | 1 |
Abdrakhmanova, RSh | 1 |
Bilich, IL | 1 |
Mangusheva, MM | 1 |
Bombina, LK | 1 |
Khalfieva, GM | 1 |
Perlík, F | 1 |
Elis, J | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY OF CE-224,535, AN ANTAGONIST OF THE P2X7 RECEPTOR, IN THE TREATMENT OF THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN SUBJECTS WHO ARE INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED ON METHOTREXAT[NCT00628095] | Phase 2 | 100 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-04-07 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
ACR20 response: compared to baseline, greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
CE-224,535 | 33.96 |
Placebo | 36.17 |
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | milligram per liter (mg/L) (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 11.53 | 11.04 | 11.22 | 12.88 | 11.85 |
Placebo | 9.22 | 9.23 | 8.97 | 10.38 | 9.26 |
Nominal times were used for summarizing the pharmacokinetic results (0 hours at randomization [Day 1] and Week 4 [pre-dose]; 1 hour at Week 2 [post-dose]; 2 hours at randomization [post-dose on Day 1]; and 3 hours at Week 2 [post-dose] and Week 4 [post-dose]). (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose), 2 hours post-dose at Day 1; 1, 3 hours post-dose at Week 2; 0 hour (pre-dose), 3 hours post-dose at Week 4
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 hour | 1 hour | 2 hours | 3 hours | |
CE-224,535 | 256 | 3110 | 4280 | 2935 |
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) <2.6 = remission. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline: (n= 53, 47) | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 5.11 | 4.55 | 4.22 | 4.21 | 4.10 |
Placebo | 5.22 | 4.84 | 4.48 | 4.47 | 4.28 |
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0= least difficulty and 3= extreme difficulty. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 1.26 | 1.15 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.97 |
Placebo | 1.38 | 1.22 | 1.19 | 1.23 | 1.04 |
Number of participants who withrew due to lack of efficacy were reported. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 14 | |
CE-224,535 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Number of tender/painful joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | Joints (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline: Tender joints | Baseline: Swollen joints | Week 2: Tender joints | Week 2: Swollen joints | Week 4: Tender joints | Week 4: Swollen joints | Week 8: Tender joints | Week 8: Swollen joints | Week 12: Tender joints | Week 12: Swollen joints | |
CE-224,535 | 13.13 | 11.68 | 10.33 | 8.39 | 8.64 | 7.47 | 8.33 | 7.00 | 7.80 | 6.91 |
Placebo | 14.45 | 12.45 | 12.26 | 9.43 | 10.54 | 7.80 | 9.81 | 7.57 | 8.48 | 6.63 |
Participants measured their pain at the time of assessment on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= no pain and 100 mm= most severe pain. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | mm (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 51.33 | 49.20 | 43.70 | 40.90 | 42.07 |
Placebo | 60.13 | 51.51 | 48.43 | 48.79 | 43.13 |
"Participants answered: Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today? Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= very well and 100 mm= very poorly." (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | mm (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 56.91 | 50.43 | 42.94 | 43.00 | 40.57 |
Placebo | 59.34 | 49.66 | 42.24 | 42.81 | 40.00 |
ACR20 response: compared to baseline, >=20% improvement in tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | |
CE-224,535 | 13.21 | 32.08 | 30.19 |
Placebo | 25.53 | 38.30 | 29.79 |
ACR50 response: compared to baseline, >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >= 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 5.66 | 7.55 | 13.21 | 11.32 |
Placebo | 6.38 | 8.51 | 12.77 | 17.02 |
ACR70 response: compared to baseline, >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >= 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 3.77 | 5.66 | 5.66 | 3.77 |
Placebo | 0.00 | 4.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Physician global assessment of arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm= very good and 100 mm= very poor. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination. (NCT00628095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12
Intervention | mm (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
CE-224,535 | 53.74 | 48.04 | 42.15 | 41.59 | 40.02 |
Placebo | 54.83 | 50.65 | 48.28 | 47.72 | 41.25 |
2 trials available for uracil and Rheumatoid Arthritis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of CE-224,535, an antagonist of P2X7 receptor, in treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzamides; Double-Blind Method; Female; H | 2012 |
[Evaluation of the effectiveness of diucifon in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic scleroderma].
Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antigen-Antibody Complex; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clinical Trials as | 1986 |
3 other studies available for uracil and Rheumatoid Arthritis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Leflunomide and peripheral neuropathy: a potential interaction between uracil/tegafur and leflunomide.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Drug Administra | 2005 |
The significance of 3H-thymidine degradation in cell culture experiments with special reference to rheumatoid arthritis.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Transport; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocytes; Phytohemagglutinins | 1988 |
Pharmacokinetics of (4,5- 14 C)-6-azauridine in rats with adjuvant-induced polyarthritis.
Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Carbon Isotopes; Kinetics; Liver; Rats; Spleen; Time Factors; Triazi | 1971 |