Page last updated: 2024-10-20

uracil and Disease Exacerbation

uracil has been researched along with Disease Exacerbation in 39 studies

2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine: a urinary biomarker for bipolar disorder

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The current study investigated the effects of alogliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)."9.22Alogliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor, Prevents the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The Study of Preventive Effects of Alogliptin on Diabetic Atherosclerosis (SPEAD-A). ( Gosho, M; Jinnouchi, H; Kaneto, H; Katakami, N; Kosugi, K; Kuribayashi, N; Mita, T; Onuma, T; Osonoi, T; Shimomura, I; Shiraiwa, T; Umayahara, Y; Watada, H; Yamamoto, T; Yokoyama, H; Yoshii, H, 2016)
"The feasibility of combining UFT plus leucovorin (LV) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin was investigated in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer."9.12Concurrent irinotecan, oxaliplatin and UFT in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I study. ( Craven, O; Palmer, K; Saunders, MP; Sheikh, HY; Sjursen, A; Swindell, R; Valle, JW; Wilson, G, 2007)
"A total of 41 metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received tegafur/uracil (UFT)+leucovorin (LV)+oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/LV+irinotecan."9.11UFT/leucovorin and oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Civitelli, S; Correale, P; De Martino, A; Fiaschi, AI; Francini, G; Giorgi, G; Lorenzi, M; Marsili, S; Marzocca, G; Messinese, S; Petrioli, R; Pozzessere, D; Sabatino, M; Tani, F; Tanzini, G, 2004)
"To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer."9.10Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. ( Ansari, RH; Bell, WN; Colwell, B; Levin, J; McGuirt, PV; Pazdur, R; Schilsky, RL; Thirlwell, MP; West, WH; White, RL; Wong, A; Yates, BB, 2002)
"To determine the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer."9.09Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Beck, T; Bell, WN; Chevlen, EM; Hochster, H; Hohneker, J; Levin, J; Lokich, J; Mani, S; McGuirt, C; O'Rourke, MA; Schilsky, RL; Weaver, CH; White, R, 2000)
"UFT (with leucovorin) and irinotecan both have single-agent activity in colorectal cancer, with non-cross-resistant mechanisms of action."9.09UFT/leucovorin plus irinotecan in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Hill, M; Price, T, 2000)
"Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6."9.09Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. ( Hollis, D; Mayer, RJ; Meropol, NJ; Niedzwiecki, D; Schilsky, RL, 2001)
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking."9.05Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020)
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin."7.96Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020)
"The efficacy of Fluorouracil (FU) in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is greatly limited by drug resistance."7.91ABHD5 blunts the sensitivity of colorectal cancer to fluorouracil via promoting autophagic uracil yield. ( Chen, Y; Hao, J; Li, F; Li, J; Liang, H; Luo, X; Ou, J; Peng, Y; Sun, W; Wang, L; Wu, S; Xie, G; Xie, X; Yang, W; Zha, L; Zhang, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhou, Q, 2019)
") UFT (250 mg/m(2)/day) for 21 days of a 28-day cycle combined with increasing intravenous (i."6.70Phase I trial of weekly irinotecan combined with UFT as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer. ( Alonso, V; Antón, A; Escudero, P; Herrero, A; Isla, MD; Martinez-Trufero, J; Mayordomo, JI; Sáenz, A; Tres, A; Zorrilla, M, 2001)
"We recently established a metastasis model in nude mice using the MKL-4 cell line, a contransfectant of the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line with fgf-4 and lacZ in which micrometastases in several organs can be quantitatively observed."5.30Postsurgical oral administration of uracil and tegafur inhibits progression of micrometastasis of human breast cancer cells in nude mice. ( Dickson, RB; Fujioka, A; Fukumori, H; Kurebayashi, J; Kurosumi, M; Nukatsuka, M; Saito, H; Sonoo, H; Takeda, S; Unemi, N, 1997)
" The current study investigated the effects of alogliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)."5.22Alogliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor, Prevents the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The Study of Preventive Effects of Alogliptin on Diabetic Atherosclerosis (SPEAD-A). ( Gosho, M; Jinnouchi, H; Kaneto, H; Katakami, N; Kosugi, K; Kuribayashi, N; Mita, T; Onuma, T; Osonoi, T; Shimomura, I; Shiraiwa, T; Umayahara, Y; Watada, H; Yamamoto, T; Yokoyama, H; Yoshii, H, 2016)
"The feasibility of combining UFT plus leucovorin (LV) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin was investigated in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer."5.12Concurrent irinotecan, oxaliplatin and UFT in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I study. ( Craven, O; Palmer, K; Saunders, MP; Sheikh, HY; Sjursen, A; Swindell, R; Valle, JW; Wilson, G, 2007)
"A total of 41 metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received tegafur/uracil (UFT)+leucovorin (LV)+oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/LV+irinotecan."5.11UFT/leucovorin and oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Civitelli, S; Correale, P; De Martino, A; Fiaschi, AI; Francini, G; Giorgi, G; Lorenzi, M; Marsili, S; Marzocca, G; Messinese, S; Petrioli, R; Pozzessere, D; Sabatino, M; Tani, F; Tanzini, G, 2004)
"To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer."5.10Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. ( Ansari, RH; Bell, WN; Colwell, B; Levin, J; McGuirt, PV; Pazdur, R; Schilsky, RL; Thirlwell, MP; West, WH; White, RL; Wong, A; Yates, BB, 2002)
"To determine the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer."5.09Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Beck, T; Bell, WN; Chevlen, EM; Hochster, H; Hohneker, J; Levin, J; Lokich, J; Mani, S; McGuirt, C; O'Rourke, MA; Schilsky, RL; Weaver, CH; White, R, 2000)
"UFT (with leucovorin) and irinotecan both have single-agent activity in colorectal cancer, with non-cross-resistant mechanisms of action."5.09UFT/leucovorin plus irinotecan in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Hill, M; Price, T, 2000)
"Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6."5.09Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. ( Hollis, D; Mayer, RJ; Meropol, NJ; Niedzwiecki, D; Schilsky, RL, 2001)
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking."5.05Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020)
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin."3.96Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020)
"The efficacy of Fluorouracil (FU) in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is greatly limited by drug resistance."3.91ABHD5 blunts the sensitivity of colorectal cancer to fluorouracil via promoting autophagic uracil yield. ( Chen, Y; Hao, J; Li, F; Li, J; Liang, H; Luo, X; Ou, J; Peng, Y; Sun, W; Wang, L; Wu, S; Xie, G; Xie, X; Yang, W; Zha, L; Zhang, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhou, Q, 2019)
"Twenty-four patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support were given intramuscular methotrexate in combination with oral UFT (tegafur and uracil) and oral leucovorin (the MUL regimen)."3.69Preliminary results. UFT/methotrexate/leucovorin for breast Ca patients in progression after HDCT/PBPC support. ( Ayala, F; Casado, A; Diaz-Rubio, E; López-Martin, JA; Martin, M; Nieto, Y; Rodriguez-Lescure, A, 1997)
"Our aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin."2.71Phase I dose escalation study of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. ( Chen, JS; Huang, JS; Liau, CT; Lin, YC; Rau, KM; Wang, HM; Yang, TS, 2005)
") UFT (250 mg/m(2)/day) for 21 days of a 28-day cycle combined with increasing intravenous (i."2.70Phase I trial of weekly irinotecan combined with UFT as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer. ( Alonso, V; Antón, A; Escudero, P; Herrero, A; Isla, MD; Martinez-Trufero, J; Mayordomo, JI; Sáenz, A; Tres, A; Zorrilla, M, 2001)
"Of the 136 patients with prostate cancer enrolled in this study from April 1990 to December 1992, 69 received endocrine plus UFT therapy and the remaining 67 received endocrine-only therapy."2.69Endocrine plus uracil/tegafur therapy for prostate cancer. ( Kawada, Y; Kuriyama, M; Ohshima, S; Ono, Y; Shimizu, H; Takahashi, Y, 1999)
"Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) traditionally has involved a progression of phases, from conventional lifestyle interventions and monotherapy, to combination therapy involving oral agents, to insulin initiation and its use either alone or with oral pharmacotherapy."2.46The physiologic role of incretin hormones: clinical applications. ( Cefalu, WT, 2010)
"Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures."2.42Palliative treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. ( Glimelius, B, 2003)
"Injury to the CNS leads to formation of scar tissue, which is important in sealing the lesion and inhibiting axon regeneration."1.39Perivascular fibroblasts form the fibrotic scar after contusive spinal cord injury. ( Blumenthal, E; Bray, E; Krishnan, V; Lai-Hsu, C; Lee, JK; Luo, X; Lyapichev, K; Park, KK; Ramos, J; Soderblom, C; Tsoulfas, P, 2013)
"In advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), FOLFOX4 has been accepted as a standard chemotherapeutic regimen."1.34UFT as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer responsive to the FOLFOX4 regimen. ( Brugnatelli, S; Corazza, GR; Gattoni, E; Luchena, G; Riccardi, A; Sagrada, P; Scalamogna, R; Tinelli, C; Tronconi, MC, 2007)
"We recently established a metastasis model in nude mice using the MKL-4 cell line, a contransfectant of the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line with fgf-4 and lacZ in which micrometastases in several organs can be quantitatively observed."1.30Postsurgical oral administration of uracil and tegafur inhibits progression of micrometastasis of human breast cancer cells in nude mice. ( Dickson, RB; Fujioka, A; Fukumori, H; Kurebayashi, J; Kurosumi, M; Nukatsuka, M; Saito, H; Sonoo, H; Takeda, S; Unemi, N, 1997)

Research

Studies (39)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's3 (7.69)18.2507
2000's18 (46.15)29.6817
2010's15 (38.46)24.3611
2020's3 (7.69)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Wiegand, J1
Buggisch, P1
Mauss, S1
Boeker, KHW1
Klinker, H1
Müller, T1
Günther, R1
Serfert, Y1
Manns, MP1
Zeuzem, S1
Berg, T1
Hinrichsen, H1
C-Registry, GH1
Zhang, Q1
Wang, Q1
Wang, X1
Li, J2
Shen, L1
Peng, Z1
Iveson, T1
Carter, AM1
Shiu, KK1
Spooner, C1
Stevens, D1
Mullamitha, S1
Siebenhüner, A1
De Dosso, S1
Meisel, A1
Wagner, AD1
Borner, M1
Lee, BM1
Chung, SY1
Chang, JS1
Lee, KJ1
Seong, J1
Arnold, D1
Prager, GW1
Quintela, A1
Stein, A1
Moreno Vera, S1
Mounedji, N1
Taieb, J1
Matsuda, C1
Ishiguro, M1
Teramukai, S1
Kajiwara, Y1
Fujii, S1
Kinugasa, Y1
Nakamoto, Y1
Kotake, M1
Sakamoto, Y1
Kurachi, K1
Maeda, A1
Komori, K1
Tomita, N1
Shimada, Y1
Takahashi, K1
Kotake, K1
Watanabe, M1
Mochizuki, H1
Nakagawa, Y1
Sugihara, K1
Patel, AK1
Duh, MS1
Barghout, V1
Yenikomshian, MA1
Xiao, Y1
Wynant, W1
Tabesh, M1
Fuchs, CS1
Shitara, K1
Doi, T1
Dvorkin, M1
Mansoor, W1
Arkenau, HT1
Prokharau, A1
Alsina, M1
Ghidini, M1
Faustino, C1
Gorbunova, V1
Zhavrid, E1
Nishikawa, K1
Hosokawa, A1
Yalçın, Ş1
Fujitani, K1
Beretta, GD1
Cutsem, EV1
Winkler, RE1
Makris, L1
Ilson, DH1
Tabernero, J1
Ou, J1
Peng, Y1
Yang, W1
Zhang, Y1
Hao, J1
Li, F1
Chen, Y1
Zhao, Y1
Xie, X1
Wu, S1
Zha, L1
Luo, X2
Xie, G1
Wang, L1
Sun, W1
Zhou, Q1
Liang, H1
Charbonnel, B1
Schweizer, A1
Dejager, S1
Soderblom, C1
Blumenthal, E1
Bray, E1
Lyapichev, K1
Ramos, J1
Krishnan, V1
Lai-Hsu, C1
Park, KK1
Tsoulfas, P1
Lee, JK1
Hayakawa, N1
Matsumoto, K1
Sato, A1
Sakamoto, H1
Ezaki, T1
Maeda, T1
Ninomiya, A1
Nakamura, S1
Mita, T1
Katakami, N1
Yoshii, H1
Onuma, T1
Kaneto, H1
Osonoi, T1
Shiraiwa, T1
Kosugi, K1
Umayahara, Y1
Yamamoto, T1
Yokoyama, H1
Kuribayashi, N1
Jinnouchi, H1
Gosho, M1
Shimomura, I1
Watada, H1
Saab, S1
Virabhak, S1
Parisé, H1
Johnson, S1
Wang, A1
Misurski, D1
Gonzalez, YS1
Juday, T1
Knops, E1
Schübel, N1
Heger, E1
Neumann-Fraune, M1
Kaiser, R1
Inden, S1
Kalaghatgi, P1
Sierra, S1
Chen, JS2
Rau, KM2
Chen, YY1
Huang, JS2
Yang, TS2
Lin, YC2
Liau, CT2
Lee, KD1
Su, YC1
Kao, RH1
Cefalu, WT1
Flynn, C1
Bakris, GL1
Glimelius, B1
Usuki, H1
Ishimura, K1
Yachida, S1
Hagiike, M1
Okano, K1
Izuishi, K1
Karasawa, Y1
Goda, F1
Maeta, H1
Petrioli, R1
Sabatino, M1
Fiaschi, AI1
Marsili, S1
Pozzessere, D1
Messinese, S1
Correale, P1
Civitelli, S1
Tanzini, G1
Tani, F1
De Martino, A1
Marzocca, G1
Lorenzi, M1
Giorgi, G1
Francini, G1
Sakon, M1
Nagano, H1
Monden, M1
Wang, HM1
Kibrik, BS1
Chelnokova, OG1
Kopp, HG1
Moerike, K1
Kanz, L1
Hartmann, JT1
Bhandari, MS1
Pienta, KJ1
Fardig, J1
Olson, K1
Smith, DC1
Chao, Y1
Li, CP1
Chao, TY1
Su, WC1
Hsieh, RK1
Wu, MF1
Yeh, KH1
Kao, WY1
Chen, LT1
Cheng, AL1
Sheikh, HY1
Valle, JW1
Palmer, K1
Sjursen, A1
Craven, O1
Wilson, G1
Swindell, R1
Saunders, MP1
Vormittag, L1
Kornek, GV1
Gruhsmann, B1
Lenauer, A1
Föger, A1
Depisch, D1
Lang, F1
Scheithauer, W1
Scalamogna, R1
Brugnatelli, S1
Tinelli, C1
Sagrada, P1
Gattoni, E1
Tronconi, MC1
Riccardi, A1
Luchena, G1
Corazza, GR1
Martin, M1
Casado, A1
López-Martin, JA1
Rodriguez-Lescure, A1
Nieto, Y1
Ayala, F1
Diaz-Rubio, E1
Kurebayashi, J1
Nukatsuka, M1
Fujioka, A1
Saito, H1
Takeda, S1
Unemi, N1
Fukumori, H1
Kurosumi, M1
Sonoo, H1
Dickson, RB1
Ono, Y1
Ohshima, S1
Takahashi, Y1
Kuriyama, M1
Kawada, Y1
Shimizu, H1
Mani, S1
Hochster, H1
Beck, T1
Chevlen, EM1
O'Rourke, MA1
Weaver, CH1
Bell, WN2
White, R1
McGuirt, C1
Levin, J2
Hohneker, J1
Schilsky, RL3
Lokich, J1
Price, T1
Hill, M1
Meropol, NJ1
Niedzwiecki, D1
Hollis, D1
Mayer, RJ1
Alonso, V1
Escudero, P1
Zorrilla, M1
Isla, MD1
Herrero, A1
Mayordomo, JI1
Martinez-Trufero, J1
Sáenz, A1
Tres, A1
Antón, A1
West, WH1
Wong, A1
Colwell, B1
Thirlwell, MP1
Ansari, RH1
White, RL1
Yates, BB1
McGuirt, PV1
Pazdur, R1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With UFT vs. Observation in Curatively Resected Stage II Colon Cancer[NCT00392899]Phase 32,025 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT04923529]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Treatments[NCT02500043]Phase 3507 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-24Completed
An Open,Multi-Center,Phase II Clinical Trial tO Evaluate Efficacy and Safety oF TAXOL(PACLITAXEL),UFT,and LEUCOVORIN in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer[NCT00154778]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). The assessment of DCR was based on Investigator review of radiologic images and following RECIST criteria (version 1.1, 2009). (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102+BSC44.1
Placebo+BSC14.5

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to < 10 mm.~PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference." (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102+BSC4.5
Placebo+BSC2.1

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last follow-up or cut-off date, whichever comes first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the data cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC5.7
Placebo+BSC3.6

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for target lesions were defined as target lesions with at least 20 % relative increase in the sum of diameters with reference to the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum and this sum demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions or Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All alive participants with no disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at the last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC2.0
Placebo+BSC1.8

Time to Deterioration of European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score From Baseline

The ECOG performance status was used to evaluate participant's disease progression and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0 = normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for < 50% of the time; 3= in bed for > 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to >=2, or from 2 to >=3. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: At the time of randomization (Day 1 Cycle 1) and within 24 hours prior to start of study treatment in every cycle (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC4.3
Placebo+BSC2.3

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30 Score): Global Health Status

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Last Collection CycleSafety Follow-Up
TAS-102+BSC-2.7-5.9-4.1-3.6-5.9-8.8-9.5-4.32.4-14.4-16.7-8.30.0-8.8-16.5

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30 Score): Global Health Status

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Last Collection CycleSafety Follow-Up
Placebo+BSC-5.9-7.3-1.4-1.711.115.620.016.716.725.025.033.333.333.333.3-9.8-8.9

EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Gastric-specific Module (EORTC QLQ-STO22): Percentage of Participants With Overall Compliance

The Quality of Life Questionnaire Stomach Cancer Module 22 (QLQ-STO22) assessed symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, dietary restrictions, pain QS22, reflux, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste problems, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1='Not at all', 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4='Very much'). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DysphagiaDietary RestrictionsPain QS22RefluxAnxietyDry MouthBody ImageHair LossTaste Problems
Placebo+BSC78.278.278.278.278.278.278.278.278.2
TAS-102+BSC86.686.686.686.686.686.485.886.686.6

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)

Any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication was considered an adverse event (AE). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs/TESAEs were defined as events that started on or after treatment or started before treatment and worsened after the start of treatment through 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAETESAE
Placebo+BSC15170
TAS-102+BSC319143

Reviews

8 reviews available for uracil and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials?
    International journal of colorectal disease, 2020, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disea

2020
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma after Second Progression and the Role of Trifluridine-Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Switzerland.
    Oncology research and treatment, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop

2020
Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 04-01, Volume: 29, Issue:4

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Neopla

2018
Combination therapy with DPP-4 inhibitors and insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: what is the evidence?
    Hospital practice (1995), 2013, Volume: 41, Issue:2

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Weight; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-P

2013
The physiologic role of incretin hormones: clinical applications.
    The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 2010, Volume: 110, Issue:3 Suppl 2

    Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Progr

2010
Noninsulin glucose-lowering agents for the treatment of patients on dialysis.
    Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2013, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Biguanides; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dise

2013
Palliative treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
    Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society, 2003, Volume: 92, Issue:1

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Enzyme Inh

2003
[Recent progress in chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma].
    Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, 2004, Aug-10, Volume: 93, Issue:8

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; C

2004

Trials

15 trials available for uracil and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
A randomised-controlled trial of 1-year adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil versus surgery alone in stage II colon cancer: SACURA trial.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2018, Volume: 96

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Alogliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor, Prevents the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The Study of Preventive Effects of Alogliptin on Diabetic Atherosclerosis (SPEAD-A).
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Atherosclerosis; Blood Glucose; Carotid Arteries; Carotid Artery Diseases; Carotid Intima-Medi

2016
A multiple-center phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin and tegafur-uracil/leucovorin for chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2009, Volume: 63, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy

2009
UFT/leucovorin and oxaliplatin alternated with UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    British journal of cancer, 2004, Jan-26, Volume: 90, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; C

2004
Phase I dose escalation study of oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2005, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progression; Do

2005
Phase II trial of oral uracil/tegafur plus leucovorin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma.
    Cancer, 2006, Apr-15, Volume: 106, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot

2006
An open, multi-centre, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, UFT, and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    British journal of cancer, 2006, Jul-17, Volume: 95, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Th

2006
Concurrent irinotecan, oxaliplatin and UFT in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I study.
    British journal of cancer, 2007, Jan-15, Volume: 96, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Che

2007
Endocrine plus uracil/tegafur therapy for prostate cancer.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 1999, Volume: 13, Issue:7 Suppl 3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Ch

1999
Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2000, Volume: 18, Issue:15

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neopla

2000
UFT/leucovorin plus irinotecan in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 2000, Volume: 14, Issue:10 Suppl 9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplas

2000
Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
    Cancer, 2001, Apr-01, Volume: 91, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplasti

2001
Phase I trial of weekly irinotecan combined with UFT as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2001, Volume: 37, Issue:18

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Coh

2001
Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Mar-15, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neopla

2002

Other Studies

16 other studies available for uracil and Disease Exacerbation

ArticleYear
Hepatitis C therapy with direct antiviral agents in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: real-world experience of the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsches Hepatitis C-Register).
    European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 31, Issue:11

    Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Car

2019
Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme.
    BMC cancer, 2020, Feb-03, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Pr

2020
The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio Are Prognostic Factors in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy.
    Gut and liver, 2018, May-15, Volume: 12, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Blood Platelets; Cap

2018
Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Dr

2018
ABHD5 blunts the sensitivity of colorectal cancer to fluorouracil via promoting autophagic uracil yield.
    Nature communications, 2019, 03-06, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: 1-Acylglycerol-3-Phosphate O-Acyltransferase; Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Autophagy; B

2019
Perivascular fibroblasts form the fibrotic scar after contusive spinal cord injury.
    The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013, Aug-21, Volume: 33, Issue:34

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antigens; Blood Vessels; CD13 Antigens; Cell Count; Cicatrix; Collage

2013
Efficacy of tegafur-uracil (UFT) administration in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with a history of both alternative antiandrogen therapy and estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate therapy.
    International urology and nephrology, 2014, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineo

2014
Cost-Effectiveness of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Treatments in Patients Coinfected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the United States.
    Advances in therapy, 2016, Volume: 33, Issue:8

    Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocel

2016
HCV Resistance Profile Evolution in a GT1b, DAA-Naive Patient Before, On, and After Failing Triple DAA Therapy.
    Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2017, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Drug Co

2017
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in gastric cancer tissue and effect of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines.
    Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2003, Volume: 6 Suppl 1

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dihydrouracil Dehyd

2003
[Problems of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of caseous pneumonia].
    Problemy tuberkuleza i boleznei legkikh, 2004, Issue:12

    Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Diagnosis, Differential; Di

2004
Leflunomide and peripheral neuropathy: a potential interaction between uracil/tegafur and leflunomide.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2005, Volume: 78, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Drug Administra

2005
UFT/leucovorin and mitomycin C as salvage treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer - a retrospective analysis.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2007, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neo

2007
UFT as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer responsive to the FOLFOX4 regimen.
    Oncology, 2007, Volume: 72, Issue:5-6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progressi

2007
Preliminary results. UFT/methotrexate/leucovorin for breast Ca patients in progression after HDCT/PBPC support.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 1997, Volume: 11, Issue:9 Suppl 10

    Topics: Adult; Anemia; Antidotes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Diarrhea

1997
Postsurgical oral administration of uracil and tegafur inhibits progression of micrometastasis of human breast cancer cells in nude mice.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 1997, Volume: 3, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Bone Marrow; Bone Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease Progression;

1997