uracil has been researched along with Chronic Hepatitis C in 144 studies
2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine: a urinary biomarker for bipolar disorder
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5334s evaluated the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir before and during combined administration of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, plus dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) and weight-based ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected adults." | 9.34 | Raltegravir pharmacokinetics before and during treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir in adults with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection: AIDS Clinical Trials Group sub-study A5334s. ( Alston-Smith, BL; Cohen, DE; Cramer, YS; Morse, GD; Rosenkranz, SL; Schmidt, J; Sulkowski, M; Venuto, CS; Wyles, DL, 2020) |
"Ombitasvir + paritaprevir combined with ritonavir and dasabuvir ± ribavirin is an effective treatment for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C who have coagulation disorders." | 8.12 | Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ Ritonavir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin Combinations in Patients with Genotype 1 Hepatitis C and Inherited Bleeding Disorders. ( Ar, C; Bozcan, S; Canbakan, B; Gültürk, İ; Hatemi, İ; Özdemir, S; Sonsuz, A; Yıldırım, S, 2022) |
"BACKGROUND In the European Union, a tablet with fixed doses of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir combined with dasabuvir is an authorized treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection." | 8.12 | A Real-World Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Paritaprevir/Ombitasvir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir, with or without Ribavirin, in 587 Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C at the Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. ( Bacinschi, X; Gales, L; Haineala, B; Iliescu, L; Mercan, A; Popescu, GC; Rodica, A; Serban, D; Toma, L; Zgura, A, 2022) |
"Hepatic decompensation is a fatal on-treatment side effect during chronic hepatitis C treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD)." | 7.96 | Precipitating factors causing hyperbilirubinemia during chronic hepatitis C treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir. ( Chang, YL; Hou, MC; Huang, YH; Lan, KH; Lee, WP; Wang, YK; Wang, YW, 2020) |
"Hepatic decompensation is a severe on-treatment adverse event for chronic hepatitis C treated with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD)." | 7.88 | Hepatic decompensation during paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir treatment for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis and compensated cirrhosis. ( Chen, WT; Chen, YC; Hsieh, YC; Huang, CH; Jeng, WJ; Lin, CY; Lin, SM; Sheen, IS; Tai, DI; Teng, W, 2018) |
" The study included patients from 16 hepatologic centres involved in the AMBER, investigator-initiated study on treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients within a programme preceding EU registration of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir±dasabuvir±ribavirin." | 7.88 | Durability of virologic response, risk of de novo hepatocellular carcinoma, liver function and stiffness 2 years after treatment with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir±dasabuvir±ribavirin in the AMBER, real-world experience study. ( Berak, H; Białkowska, J; Bolewska, B; Fleischer-Stępniewska, K; Flisiak, R; Garlicki, A; Janczewska, E; Karpińska, E; Karwowska, K; Nazzal, K; Piekarska, A; Simon, K; Tomasiewicz, K; Tronina, O; Tuchendler, E; Zarębska-Michaluk, D; Łucejko, M, 2018) |
"Ombitasvir-paritaprevir-ritonavir-dasabuvir may cause type B lactic acidosis." | 7.85 | Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Dasabuvir (Viekira Pak)-Induced Lactic Acidosis. ( Hiensch, RJ; Oberg, CL; Poor, HD, 2017) |
"Pruritus observed during OBV/PTV/r ± DSV treatment of chronic hepatitis C is associated with increased on-treatment serum bile acid levels, possibly due to ritonavir-induced alterations of bile acid transport." | 7.85 | Anti-HCV treatment with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir is associated with increased bile acid levels and pruritus. ( Fauler, G; Kessler, HH; Leber, B; Mangge, H; Posch, A; Rainer, F; Spindelboeck, W; Stadlbauer, V; Stauber, RE; Streit, A, 2017) |
"Among 41 patients treated, 35 (85%) patients had genotype 1b HCV infection, 6 (15%) had co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus, 35 (85%) failed previous peginterferon and ribavirin therapy, 25 (61%) had compensated liver cirrhosis, and 3 (7%) had liver transplantation." | 7.85 | Real-life efficacy and safety of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in chronic hepatitis C patients in Hong Kong. ( But, DY; Chan, CK; Chan, HL; Chan, KH; Fung, J; Hui, YT; Lai, CL; Lai, MS; Lam, YS; Lao, WC; Li, C; Lui, GC; Seto, WK; Tsang, OT; Wong, GL; Wong, VW; Yuen, MF, 2017) |
" However, ribavirin is associated with adverse events that can limit its use." | 6.90 | Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with low-dose ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1a infection without cirrhosis. ( Bank, L; Bernstein, D; Epstein, M; Krishnan, P; Lucey, MR; Martinez, M; Nelson, DR; Pockros, PJ; Polepally, AR; Poordad, F; Ravendhran, N; Reindollar, R; Sedghi, S; Trinh, R; Unnebrink, K, 2019) |
" However, evening atazanavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir regimens are not recommended in combination with the 3D regimen." | 6.82 | Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions Between Hepatitis C Antiviral Agents Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir and HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors. ( Awni, W; Dutta, S; Khatri, A; Menon, R; Podsadecki, T; Trinh, R; Wang, H, 2016) |
" Data were analyzed to assess the on-treatment and off-therapy HCV viral load and on-treatment adverse events." | 5.48 | Real-world effectiveness and safety of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection in Taiwan. ( Chen, DS; Chen, PJ; Hong, CM; Kao, JH; Liu, CH; Liu, CJ; Su, TH; Tseng, TC; Yang, HC, 2018) |
"5%) patients (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, diuretics, tacrolimus); four patients required further adjustment of antihypertensive drugs or tacrolimus dosage on-treatment." | 5.48 | Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir Plus Dasabuvir Regimen in the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Patients with Severe Renal Impairment and End-Stage Renal Disease: a Real-Life Cohort. ( Chmelova, K; Frankova, S; Kreidlova, M; Merta, D; Senkerikova, R; Sperl, J, 2018) |
" Treatment in the post-transplantation setting may be complicated by significant drug-drug interactions between antiviral agents and standard immune suppressive treatment regimens." | 5.48 | Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir regimen may be used safely in combination with sirolimus for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. ( Dolman, GE; Gelson, WT; Selby, P, 2018) |
" In the phase II/III clinical studies, ALT and bilirubin increases were reversible with continued dosing or after treatment cessation." | 5.46 | Exposure-Safety Response Relationship for Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, Dasabuvir, and Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: Analysis of Data from Five Phase II and Six Phase III Studies. ( Awni, W; DaSilva-Tillmann, B; Dutta, S; Lin, CW; Liu, W; Menon, R; Podsadecki, T; Shulman, N, 2017) |
"The patient early terminated treatment due to dengue fever but eventually achieved SVR12." | 5.43 | Four weeks of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir encountering dengue fever resulted in sustained virological response in an HCV patient: A case report. ( Huang, CF; Jang, TY; Lu, PL; Yu, ML, 2016) |
"AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5334s evaluated the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir before and during combined administration of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, plus dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) and weight-based ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected adults." | 5.34 | Raltegravir pharmacokinetics before and during treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir in adults with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection: AIDS Clinical Trials Group sub-study A5334s. ( Alston-Smith, BL; Cohen, DE; Cramer, YS; Morse, GD; Rosenkranz, SL; Schmidt, J; Sulkowski, M; Venuto, CS; Wyles, DL, 2020) |
"We conducted a nonrandomized clinical trial of 12 or 24 weeks of paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) with or without ribavirin in persons with HCV-1/HIV coinfection suppressed with antiretroviral therapy." | 5.34 | Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-HCV Genotype 1 Coinfection Resulting in High Rate of Sustained Virologic Response and Variable in Normalization of Soluble Markers of Immune Activation. ( Alston-Smith, BL; Anthony, DD; Balagopal, A; Bhattacharya, D; Cohen, DE; Damjanovska, S; Kowal, CM; Shive, CL; Smeaton, LM; Sulkowski, MS; Wyles, DL, 2020) |
"The direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) combination of ombitasvir and paritaprevir (administered with ritonavir) with (3D regimen) or without (2D regimen) dasabuvir has shown very high efficacy rates in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection." | 5.24 | Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Anti-Hepatitis C Virus Treatment with Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, with or Without Dasabuvir, in Subjects with Renal Impairment. ( Awni, WM; Dutta, S; Khatri, A; Marbury, TC; Menon, RM; Preston, RA; Rodrigues, L; Wang, H, 2017) |
"Paritaprevir (administered with ritonavir, PTV/r), ombitasvir (OBV), and dasabuvir (DSV) are direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection." | 5.20 | Drug-drug interaction profile of the all-oral anti-hepatitis C virus regimen of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir. ( Awni, WM; Badri, PS; Coakley, EP; Dutta, S; Hu, B; Khatri, A; Menon, RM; Podsadecki, TJ; Polepally, AR; Wang, H; Wang, T; Zha, J, 2015) |
"Ombitasvir, paritaprevir (given with low-dose ritonavir), and dasabuvir are direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) used with or without ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection." | 4.95 | Effects of Mild and Moderate Renal Impairment on Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, Dasabuvir, and Ribavirin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic HCV Infection. ( Badri, PS; Eckert, D; Menon, RM; Mensing, S; Polepally, AR, 2017) |
"A fixed-dose tablet comprising ombitasvir (an NS5A replication complex inhibitor), paritaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and ritonavir (a cytochrome P450 inhibitor) taken in combination with dasabuvir (an NS5B polymerase inhibitor) is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in several countries, including the USA (copackaged as Viekira Pak(™)) and those of the EU (Viekirax(®) and Exviera(®))." | 4.91 | Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir Plus Dasabuvir: A Review in Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Infection. ( Deeks, ED, 2015) |
"To review the data with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection." | 4.91 | Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir tablets for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. ( Gale, SE; Klibanov, OM; Santevecchi, B, 2015) |
"BACKGROUND In the European Union, a tablet with fixed doses of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir combined with dasabuvir is an authorized treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection." | 4.12 | A Real-World Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Paritaprevir/Ombitasvir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir, with or without Ribavirin, in 587 Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C at the Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. ( Bacinschi, X; Gales, L; Haineala, B; Iliescu, L; Mercan, A; Popescu, GC; Rodica, A; Serban, D; Toma, L; Zgura, A, 2022) |
"Ombitasvir + paritaprevir combined with ritonavir and dasabuvir ± ribavirin is an effective treatment for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C who have coagulation disorders." | 4.12 | Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ Ritonavir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin Combinations in Patients with Genotype 1 Hepatitis C and Inherited Bleeding Disorders. ( Ar, C; Bozcan, S; Canbakan, B; Gültürk, İ; Hatemi, İ; Özdemir, S; Sonsuz, A; Yıldırım, S, 2022) |
"The 12-week regimen of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (OPrD) has shown high efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)." | 4.02 | Effectiveness of 8- and 12-Week Treatment with Ombitasvir/ Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Patients in a Real-Life Setting in Romania: the AMETHYST Study. ( Baroiu, L; Cijevschi, C; Diculescu, M; Gheorghe, L; Iliescu, L; Luca, MC; Miftode, E; Mihai, C; Pojoga, C; Sparchez, ZA; Sporea, I; Stanciu, C; Streinu-Cercel, A; Trifan, A, 2021) |
"mbitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OMV/PTV/r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) combination has demonstrated excellent rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) and a very good safety profile in patients with the chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 or 4 infections." | 3.96 | Real-world efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir ± ribavirin combination therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 infection: The Turkey experience experience. ( Asan, A; Aygen, B; Barut, Ş; Batırel, A; Bilgin, H; Çelen, MK; Çelik, İ; Demirtürk, N; Ersöz, G; Karakeçili, F; Kınıklı, S; Mıstık, R; Şimşek, F; Türker, N; Turkish Society Of Clinical Microbiology And Infectious Diseases, TSGFVHOT; Ural, O; Yıldız, O; Zararsız, G, 2020) |
"To assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of mini-tablet formulations of ombitasvir (OBV), paritaprevir (PTV), ritonavir, and dasabuvir (DSV) with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in children infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1." | 3.96 | Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir Mini-Tabs Plus Ribavirin for Children Aged 3-11 Years with Hepatitis C Genotype 1a. ( Hsu, EK; Jolley, CD; Jonas, MM; Leung, DH; Liu, L; Lobritto, SJ; Molleston, JP; Narkewicz, MR; Rosenthal, P; Wen, J; Yao, BB; Zha, J, 2020) |
"Hepatic decompensation is a fatal on-treatment side effect during chronic hepatitis C treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD)." | 3.96 | Precipitating factors causing hyperbilirubinemia during chronic hepatitis C treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir. ( Chang, YL; Hou, MC; Huang, YH; Lan, KH; Lee, WP; Wang, YK; Wang, YW, 2020) |
"We conducted an observational prospective study, on 232 patients with chronic kidney disease, undergoing treatment with paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir and dasabuvir, for chronic hepatitis C infection - genotype 1b." | 3.96 | Safety and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease. ( Iliescu, EL; Mercan-Stanciu, A; Toma, L, 2020) |
"Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir ± ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV) regimens show high efficacy and good tolerability in clinical trials for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GT) 1 or 4." | 3.91 | Real-world safety and effectiveness of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir ± ribavirin in hepatitis C virus genotype 1- and 4-infected patients with diverse comorbidities and comedications: A pooled analysis of post-marketing observational studi ( Back, D; Bondin, M; Bourgeois, S; Buggisch, P; Charafeddine, M; Crown, E; Curescu, M; Dorr, P; Ferenci, P; Flisiak, R; Kleine, H; Larrey, D; Marra, F; Norris, S, 2019) |
" The patients were taking sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and received OBV/PTV/r+DSV for 12 weeks." | 3.88 | Concomitant use of sorafenib with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir: Effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. ( Giménez-Manzorro, A; Herranz-Alonso, A; Matilla-Peña, A; Revuelta-Herrero, JL; Sanjurjo-Sáez, M, 2018) |
" The study included patients from 16 hepatologic centres involved in the AMBER, investigator-initiated study on treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients within a programme preceding EU registration of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir±dasabuvir±ribavirin." | 3.88 | Durability of virologic response, risk of de novo hepatocellular carcinoma, liver function and stiffness 2 years after treatment with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir±dasabuvir±ribavirin in the AMBER, real-world experience study. ( Berak, H; Białkowska, J; Bolewska, B; Fleischer-Stępniewska, K; Flisiak, R; Garlicki, A; Janczewska, E; Karpińska, E; Karwowska, K; Nazzal, K; Piekarska, A; Simon, K; Tomasiewicz, K; Tronina, O; Tuchendler, E; Zarębska-Michaluk, D; Łucejko, M, 2018) |
"Hepatic decompensation is a severe on-treatment adverse event for chronic hepatitis C treated with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD)." | 3.88 | Hepatic decompensation during paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir treatment for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis and compensated cirrhosis. ( Chen, WT; Chen, YC; Hsieh, YC; Huang, CH; Jeng, WJ; Lin, CY; Lin, SM; Sheen, IS; Tai, DI; Teng, W, 2018) |
"Pruritus observed during OBV/PTV/r ± DSV treatment of chronic hepatitis C is associated with increased on-treatment serum bile acid levels, possibly due to ritonavir-induced alterations of bile acid transport." | 3.85 | Anti-HCV treatment with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir is associated with increased bile acid levels and pruritus. ( Fauler, G; Kessler, HH; Leber, B; Mangge, H; Posch, A; Rainer, F; Spindelboeck, W; Stadlbauer, V; Stauber, RE; Streit, A, 2017) |
"Ombitasvir-paritaprevir-ritonavir-dasabuvir may cause type B lactic acidosis." | 3.85 | Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Dasabuvir (Viekira Pak)-Induced Lactic Acidosis. ( Hiensch, RJ; Oberg, CL; Poor, HD, 2017) |
"Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasabuvir (PrOD) is a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus." | 3.85 | Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasabuvir plus ribavirin therapy and inhibition of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin: a case report. ( Ashby, CR; Jankovich, RD; Jodlowski, TZ; Puglisi, GM; Smith, SM, 2017) |
"Among 41 patients treated, 35 (85%) patients had genotype 1b HCV infection, 6 (15%) had co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus, 35 (85%) failed previous peginterferon and ribavirin therapy, 25 (61%) had compensated liver cirrhosis, and 3 (7%) had liver transplantation." | 3.85 | Real-life efficacy and safety of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in chronic hepatitis C patients in Hong Kong. ( But, DY; Chan, CK; Chan, HL; Chan, KH; Fung, J; Hui, YT; Lai, CL; Lai, MS; Lam, YS; Lao, WC; Li, C; Lui, GC; Seto, WK; Tsang, OT; Wong, GL; Wong, VW; Yuen, MF, 2017) |
"To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice of the combination of OBV/PTV/r+DSV with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naïve and previously treated adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection." | 3.83 | Effectiveness and Safety of Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir With or Without Ribavirin for HCV Genotype 1 Infection for 12 Weeks Under Routine Clinical Practice. ( Chamorro-de-Vega, E; Collado Borrell, R; Escudero-Vilaplana, V; Fernandez-Llamazares, CM; Gimenez-Manzorro, A; Herranz, A; Ibañez-Garcia, S; Lallana Sainz, E; Lobato Matilla, E; Lorenzo-Pinto, A; Manrique-Rodriguez, S; Marzal-Alfaro, M; Ribed, A; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, CG; Romero Jimenez, RM; Sanjurjo, M; Sarobe Gonzalez, C, 2016) |
" However, ribavirin is associated with adverse events that can limit its use." | 2.90 | Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with low-dose ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1a infection without cirrhosis. ( Bank, L; Bernstein, D; Epstein, M; Krishnan, P; Lucey, MR; Martinez, M; Nelson, DR; Pockros, PJ; Polepally, AR; Poordad, F; Ravendhran, N; Reindollar, R; Sedghi, S; Trinh, R; Unnebrink, K, 2019) |
" Intensive or sparse pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for assessments of plasma drug concentrations." | 2.90 | Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients. ( Alves, K; Ding, B; Luo, Y; Menon, RM; Mobashery, N; Wang, H; Yu, C; Zha, J; Zhao, W, 2019) |
" However, information about the rate of adverse events (AEs) across different DAA regimens is limited." | 2.87 | Outcome and adverse events in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with direct-acting antivirals: a clinical randomized study. ( Andersen, ES; Bukh, J; Christensen, PB; Fahnøe, U; Gerstoft, J; Kjær, MS; Laursen, AL; Mössner, B; Pedersen, MS; Røge, BT; Schønning, K; Sølund, C; Weis, N, 2018) |
" Overall there was a low rate of serious adverse events (n = 6, 2." | 2.87 | Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin for HCV in Brazilian Adults with Advanced Fibrosis. ( Affonso-de-Araújo, ES; Álvares-da-Silva, MR; Alves, K; Brandão-Mello, CE; Cheinquer, H; Coelho, HS; Cohen, DE; Ferraz, ML; Ferreira, PRA; Furtado, J; Lari, SA; Liu, L; Martinelli, A; Mendes-Correa, MC; Nunes, EP; Parana, R; Pessoa, MG; Pilot-Matias, T; Ramalho-Madruga, JV; Shulman, NS; Silva, G; Tripathi, R, 2018) |
" Adverse events occurred in 151 (72." | 2.82 | Real-world effectiveness and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir ± ribavirin in hepatitis C: AMBER study. ( Berak, H; Bialkowska, J; Bolewska, B; Fleischer-Stępniewska, K; Flisiak, R; Garlicki, A; Halota, W; Horban, A; Jabłkowski, M; Janczewska, E; Jaroszewicz, J; Karpińska, E; Karwowska, K; Knysz, B; Kryczka, W; Lucejko, M; Madej, G; Mozer-Lisewska, I; Nazzal, K; Piekarska, A; Pisula, A; Rostkowska, K; Simon, K; Tomasiewicz, K; Tronina, O; Tudrujek, M; Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska, M; Wiercińska-Drapało, A; Zarębska-Michaluk, D, 2016) |
" However, evening atazanavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir regimens are not recommended in combination with the 3D regimen." | 2.82 | Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions Between Hepatitis C Antiviral Agents Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir and HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors. ( Awni, W; Dutta, S; Khatri, A; Menon, R; Podsadecki, T; Trinh, R; Wang, H, 2016) |
" Drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies of the 3D regimen and commonly used medications were conducted in healthy volunteers to provide information on coadministering these medications with or without dose adjustments." | 2.82 | Drug-Drug Interactions Between the Anti-Hepatitis C Virus 3D Regimen of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir and Eight Commonly Used Medications in Healthy Volunteers. ( Chiu, YL; Ding, B; Dumas, EO; Khatri, A; King, JR; Menon, RM; Podsadecki, TJ; Polepally, AR; Shuster, DL, 2016) |
" OBV/PTV/r+DSV±RBV was associated with a generally better mental and physical health, more favorable tolerability, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events." | 2.82 | Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials. ( Arama, V; Campbell, A; Caruntu, FA; Conway, B; Curescu, M; Dalgard, O; Dore, GJ; Fuster, F; Ghesquiere, W; Greenbloom, S; Janczewska, E; Kapoor, M; Knysz, B; Liu, X; Liu, Y; Luo, Y; Mazur, W; Motoc, A; Podsadecki, T; Sasadeusz, J; Shaw, D; Skoien, R; Soza, A; Streinu-Cercel, A; Sullivan, D; Tornai, I, 2016) |
" This phase 1, drug-drug interaction, open-label, multiple-dose study enrolled 32 healthy subjects to receive the 3D or 2D regimen in combination with sofosbuvir." | 2.82 | Drug-Drug Interactions between Sofosbuvir and Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir with or without Dasabuvir. ( Awni, WM; Cohen, D; Ding, B; Dutta, S; King, JR; Menon, RM; Podsadecki, TJ, 2016) |
" These data indicate that the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen can be administered with dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine without dose adjustment." | 2.82 | Drug-Drug Interaction between the Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimen of Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir plus Dasabuvir and the HIV Antiretroviral Agent Dolutegravir or Abacavir plus Lamivudine. ( Khatri, A; Menon, R; Podsadecki, T; Trinh, R; Zhao, W, 2016) |
" Plasma samples were collected through 144 hours after administration for pharmacokinetic assessments." | 2.80 | Pharmacokinetics and safety of co-administered paritaprevir plus ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in hepatic impairment. ( Awni, WM; Bernstein, BM; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Khatri, A; Lawitz, EJ; Marbury, TC; Menon, RM; Mullally, VM; Podsadecki, TJ, 2015) |
"02), while it increased the risk of serious adverse events (p = 0." | 2.55 | Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir with or without Ribavirin for Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. ( Abdel-Daim, MM; Abushouk, AI; Ahmed, H; Loutfy, SA; Menshawy, A; Mohamed, A; Negida, A, 2017) |
" The number and percentage of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and TEAEs consistent with hepatic decompensation were reported." | 2.55 | Safety of the 2D/3D direct-acting antiviral regimen in HCV-induced Child-Pugh A cirrhosis - A pooled analysis. ( Cohen, DE; Cohen, E; Feld, JJ; Foster, GR; Fried, MW; Larsen, L; Mobashery, N; Nelson, DR; Poordad, F; Tatsch, F; Wedemeyer, H, 2017) |
" Dasabuvir exhibits linear pharmacokinetics with a terminal half-life of approximately 5-8 h, allowing for twice-daily dosing." | 2.55 | Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Dasabuvir. ( Dutta, S; Khatri, A; King, JR; Menon, RM; Zha, J, 2017) |
"There has been a revolution in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C." | 2.53 | Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: optimizing current IFN-free treatment and future perspectives. ( Asselah, T; Boyer, N; Marcellin, P; Martinot-Peignoux, M; Saadoun, D, 2016) |
" Direct-acting antiviral therapy is efficacious and safe even in patients with advanced liver disease and/ or previous virological failure; Model-for-End-Liver-Disease <10 and alanine aminotransferase reduction during therapy were found to be reliable predicting markers of sustained-virological-response." | 1.51 | Efficacy, Safety, and Predictors of Direct-acting antivirals in Hepatitis C Virus Patients with Heterogeneous Liver Diseases. ( Cescon, M; De Pace, V; Galli, S; Maggi, F; Morelli, MC; Pistello, M; Ravaioli, M; Re, MC; Vero, V, 2019) |
"7%): 4 due to severe adverse events (including 3 deaths) and 1 patient´s decision." | 1.51 | Effectiveness, safety/tolerability of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 with/without HIV-1 co-infection, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage IIIb-V and dialysis in Spanish clinical practice - Vie-KinD study. ( Ahumada, A; Aldamiz-Echevarría, T; Baliellas, C; Barril, G; Benlloch, S; Bonet, L; Carmona, I; Castaño, MA; Castro, Á; de Álvaro, C; de Los Santos, I; Delgado, M; Devesa-Medina, MJ; García-Buey, L; García-Samaniego, J; Gea-Rodríguez, F; González-Parra, E; Gutiérrez, ML; Jiménez-Pérez, M; Laguno, M; Londoño, MC; Losa, JE; Mallolas, J; Manzanares, A; Martín-Granizo, I; Montero-Alonso, M; Montes, ML; Morán-Sánchez, S; Morano, L; Muñoz-Gómez, R; Navascués, CA; Polo-Lorduy, B; Riveiro-Barciela, M; Rivero, A; Roget, M; Serra, MÁ, 2019) |
" The patients were evaluated in respect of demographic, clinical and virological data, sustained virologic response (SVR) and adverse events." | 1.51 | [EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF OMBITASVIR/PARITAPREVIR/RITONAVIR AND DASABUVIR IN PATIENTS WITH HCV 1B GENOTYPE INFECTION: REAL WORLD DATA]. ( Skorokhodova, N; Tsarova, O; Zhyvytsia, D, 2019) |
"Our findings suggest that OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV is safe and effective in real-life use in patients with compensated cirrhosis, HCV-GT1 infection, and age over 65." | 1.48 | Safety and efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir plus ribavirin in patients over 65 years with HCV genotype 1 cirrhosis. ( Aghemo, A; Ascione, A; Bruno, S; Craxì, A; De Luca, M; Fontanella, L; Gasbarrini, A; Giannini, EG; Izzi, A; Marzioni, M; Melazzini, M; Messina, V; Montilla, S; Orlandini, A; Petta, S; Puoti, M; Sangiovanni, V; Trotta, MP; Villa, E; Zignego, AL, 2018) |
"The simplified regimen of OBV/PTV/r+DSV administered for 12 weeks is effective and safe in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis." | 1.48 | Twelve weeks of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir without ribavirin is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis: results from a real-world cohort study. ( Chamorro-de-Vega, E; De Lorenzo-Pinto, A; Escudero-Vilaplana, V; Gimenez-Manzorro, A; Herranz-Alonso, A; Iglesias-Peinado, I; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, CG; Sanjurjo Saez, M, 2018) |
" RBV was dosed by physician discretion between 200 mg weekly and 200 mg daily." | 1.48 | High Efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir in hepatitis C genotypes 4 and 1-infected patients with severe chronic kidney disease. ( Afghani, AA; Alghamdi, AS; Alghamdi, MN; AlMousa, A; Alswat, K; AlZanbagi, A; Aseeri, M; Assiri, AM; Babatin, MA; Sanai, FM, 2018) |
"5%) patients (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, diuretics, tacrolimus); four patients required further adjustment of antihypertensive drugs or tacrolimus dosage on-treatment." | 1.48 | Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir Plus Dasabuvir Regimen in the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Patients with Severe Renal Impairment and End-Stage Renal Disease: a Real-Life Cohort. ( Chmelova, K; Frankova, S; Kreidlova, M; Merta, D; Senkerikova, R; Sperl, J, 2018) |
" Data were analyzed to assess the on-treatment and off-therapy HCV viral load and on-treatment adverse events." | 1.48 | Real-world effectiveness and safety of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection in Taiwan. ( Chen, DS; Chen, PJ; Hong, CM; Kao, JH; Liu, CH; Liu, CJ; Su, TH; Tseng, TC; Yang, HC, 2018) |
" Treatment in the post-transplantation setting may be complicated by significant drug-drug interactions between antiviral agents and standard immune suppressive treatment regimens." | 1.48 | Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir regimen may be used safely in combination with sirolimus for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. ( Dolman, GE; Gelson, WT; Selby, P, 2018) |
" Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drug regimens are safe and highly effective, allowing administration of treatment also in elderly." | 1.46 | Efficacy and safety of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir with ribavirin for the treatment of HCV genotype 1b compensated cirrhosis in patients aged 70 years or older. ( Bataga, S; Brisc, C; Caruntu, FA; Chiriac, S; Cijevschi Prelipcean, C; Curescu, M; Gheorghe, L; Girleanu, I; Goldis, A; Iacob, S; Miftode, E; Mihai, C; Preda, C; Rogoveanu, I; Singeap, AM; Sporea, I; Stanciu, C; Stefanescu, G; Trifan, A, 2017) |
"New highly effective treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are now available, but safety and efficacy data on the use of anti-HCV therapies in patients with renal failure, particularly those requiring PD, remain limited." | 1.46 | Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in a patient receiving daily peritoneal dialysis. ( Cole, J; Stark, JE, 2017) |
" In the phase II/III clinical studies, ALT and bilirubin increases were reversible with continued dosing or after treatment cessation." | 1.46 | Exposure-Safety Response Relationship for Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, Dasabuvir, and Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: Analysis of Data from Five Phase II and Six Phase III Studies. ( Awni, W; DaSilva-Tillmann, B; Dutta, S; Lin, CW; Liu, W; Menon, R; Podsadecki, T; Shulman, N, 2017) |
" Details of serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded." | 1.46 | Effectiveness, safety and clinical outcomes of direct-acting antiviral therapy in HCV genotype 1 infection: Results from a Spanish real-world cohort. ( Albillos, A; Ampuero, J; Arenas, J; Bañares, R; Calleja, JL; Crespo, J; Diago, M; Fernandez, I; García-Eliz, M; García-Samaniego, J; Gea, F; Jorquera, F; Lens, S; Llaneras, J; Llerena, S; Mariño, Z; Morillas, RM; Muñoz, R; Navascues, CA; Pascasio, JM; Perelló, C; Rincón, D; Rodriguez, CF; Ruiz-Antorán, B; Sacristán, B; Serra, MA; Simon, MA; Torras, X; Turnes, J, 2017) |
"Among 2,053 patients enrolled and dosed with study drug, 410 (20%) were receiving concomitant ARAs; of these, 308 (15%) were taking concomitant PPIs." | 1.43 | Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir Plus Dasabuvir With or Without Ribavirin in HCV-Infected Patients Taking Concomitant Acid-Reducing Agents. ( Asselah, T; Bennett, M; Forns, X; Liu, L; Moller, J; Pedrosa, M; Planas Vila, R; Reau, N; Rustgi, V; Shiffman, ML, 2016) |
"The patient early terminated treatment due to dengue fever but eventually achieved SVR12." | 1.43 | Four weeks of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir encountering dengue fever resulted in sustained virological response in an HCV patient: A case report. ( Huang, CF; Jang, TY; Lu, PL; Yu, ML, 2016) |
"Hepatic decompensation and acute liver failure are rare but severe complications of Ritonavir-boosted Paritaprevir, Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir plus Ribavirin therapy in patients with compensated cirrhosis." | 1.43 | A Case of Acute Liver Failure during Ritonavir-Boosted Paritaprevir, Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir Therapy in a Patient with HCV Genotype 1b Cirrhosis. ( Andreone, P; Magalotti, D; Martino, E; Masetti, M; Scuteri, A; Zoli, M, 2016) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 127 (88.19) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 17 (11.81) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Sonsuz, A | 1 |
Bozcan, S | 1 |
Hatemi, İ | 1 |
Özdemir, S | 1 |
Canbakan, B | 1 |
Yıldırım, S | 1 |
Gültürk, İ | 1 |
Ar, C | 1 |
Bacinschi, X | 1 |
Popescu, GC | 1 |
Zgura, A | 1 |
Gales, L | 1 |
Rodica, A | 1 |
Mercan, A | 1 |
Serban, D | 1 |
Haineala, B | 1 |
Toma, L | 2 |
Iliescu, L | 2 |
Londoño, MC | 2 |
Riveiro-Barciela, M | 2 |
Ahumada, A | 1 |
Muñoz-Gómez, R | 1 |
Roget, M | 1 |
Devesa-Medina, MJ | 1 |
Serra, MÁ | 2 |
Navascués, CA | 2 |
Baliellas, C | 1 |
Aldamiz-Echevarría, T | 2 |
Gutiérrez, ML | 1 |
Polo-Lorduy, B | 2 |
Carmona, I | 1 |
Benlloch, S | 1 |
Bonet, L | 1 |
García-Samaniego, J | 2 |
Jiménez-Pérez, M | 1 |
Morán-Sánchez, S | 2 |
Castro, Á | 1 |
Delgado, M | 3 |
Gea-Rodríguez, F | 1 |
Martín-Granizo, I | 2 |
Montes, ML | 1 |
Morano, L | 2 |
Castaño, MA | 1 |
de Los Santos, I | 1 |
Laguno, M | 1 |
Losa, JE | 1 |
Montero-Alonso, M | 1 |
Rivero, A | 1 |
de Álvaro, C | 1 |
Manzanares, A | 2 |
Mallolas, J | 1 |
Barril, G | 1 |
González-Parra, E | 1 |
García-Buey, L | 2 |
Wiegand, J | 1 |
Buggisch, P | 3 |
Mauss, S | 2 |
Boeker, KHW | 1 |
Klinker, H | 1 |
Müller, T | 1 |
Günther, R | 1 |
Serfert, Y | 1 |
Manns, MP | 2 |
Zeuzem, S | 3 |
Berg, T | 2 |
Hinrichsen, H | 2 |
C-Registry, GH | 1 |
De Pace, V | 1 |
Morelli, MC | 1 |
Ravaioli, M | 1 |
Maggi, F | 1 |
Galli, S | 1 |
Vero, V | 1 |
Re, MC | 1 |
Cescon, M | 1 |
Pistello, M | 1 |
Venuto, CS | 2 |
Cramer, YS | 1 |
Rosenkranz, SL | 1 |
Sulkowski, M | 1 |
Wyles, DL | 3 |
Cohen, DE | 11 |
Schmidt, J | 1 |
Alston-Smith, BL | 2 |
Morse, GD | 2 |
Manuel Sousa, J | 1 |
Vergara, M | 1 |
Pulido, F | 1 |
Sánchez Antolín, G | 1 |
Hijona, L | 1 |
Carnicer, F | 1 |
Rincón, D | 2 |
Salmerón, J | 2 |
Mateos-Muñoz, B | 1 |
Jou, A | 1 |
Rubín, Á | 1 |
Escarda, A | 1 |
Aguilar, P | 1 |
Carrión, JA | 3 |
Hernández-Guerra, M | 1 |
Chimeno-Hernández, S | 1 |
Espinosa, N | 1 |
Morillas, RM | 4 |
Andrade, RJ | 1 |
Gallego, A | 2 |
Magaz, M | 1 |
Moreno-Planas, JM | 1 |
Estébanez, Á | 1 |
Rico, M | 1 |
Menéndez, F | 1 |
Sampedro, B | 1 |
Izquierdo, S | 1 |
Zozaya, JM | 1 |
Rodríguez, M | 1 |
Lorente, S | 1 |
Von-Wichmann, MÁ | 1 |
Iliescu, EL | 1 |
Mercan-Stanciu, A | 1 |
Tatar, B | 1 |
Köse, Ş | 1 |
Ergun, NC | 1 |
Turken, M | 1 |
Onlen, Y | 1 |
Yılmaz, Y | 1 |
Akhan, S | 1 |
Almomen, A | 1 |
Maher, HM | 1 |
Alzoman, NZ | 1 |
Shehata, SM | 1 |
Al-Taweel, SM | 1 |
Alanazi, AA | 1 |
Örmeci, N | 2 |
Gülşen, MT | 1 |
Sezgin, O | 3 |
Aghayeva, S | 1 |
Demir, M | 1 |
Köksal, I | 1 |
Güner, R | 1 |
Erarslan, E | 1 |
Asiller, ÖÖ | 2 |
Balkan, A | 1 |
Yaraş, S | 3 |
Çalışkan Kartal, A | 1 |
Balagopal, A | 2 |
Smeaton, LM | 2 |
Quinn, J | 1 |
Vu, V | 1 |
Alston-Smith, B | 1 |
Santana-Bagur, JL | 1 |
Anthony, DD | 2 |
Sulkowski, MS | 4 |
Talal, AH | 1 |
Martinello, M | 1 |
Bajis, S | 1 |
Dore, GJ | 3 |
Damjanovska, S | 1 |
Shive, CL | 1 |
Kowal, CM | 1 |
Bhattacharya, D | 1 |
Aygen, B | 2 |
Demirtürk, N | 1 |
Yıldız, O | 2 |
Çelen, MK | 1 |
Çelik, İ | 1 |
Barut, Ş | 1 |
Ural, O | 1 |
Batırel, A | 1 |
Mıstık, R | 1 |
Şimşek, F | 1 |
Asan, A | 1 |
Ersöz, G | 1 |
Türker, N | 1 |
Bilgin, H | 1 |
Kınıklı, S | 1 |
Karakeçili, F | 1 |
Zararsız, G | 1 |
Turkish Society Of Clinical Microbiology And Infectious Diseases, TSGFVHOT | 1 |
Rosenthal, P | 1 |
Narkewicz, MR | 1 |
Yao, BB | 1 |
Jolley, CD | 1 |
Lobritto, SJ | 1 |
Wen, J | 1 |
Molleston, JP | 1 |
Hsu, EK | 1 |
Jonas, MM | 1 |
Zha, J | 4 |
Liu, L | 3 |
Leung, DH | 1 |
Yardeni, D | 1 |
Dizengof, V | 1 |
Nevo-Shor, A | 1 |
Abufreha, N | 1 |
Dahari, H | 1 |
Etzion, O | 1 |
Wang, YK | 1 |
Lee, WP | 1 |
Wang, YW | 1 |
Huang, YH | 1 |
Hou, MC | 1 |
Chang, YL | 1 |
Lan, KH | 1 |
Fedorchenko, SV | 1 |
Martynovych, T | 1 |
Klimenko, Z | 1 |
Solianyk, I | 1 |
Trifan, A | 2 |
Stanciu, C | 2 |
Sporea, I | 2 |
Baroiu, L | 1 |
Diculescu, M | 2 |
Luca, MC | 1 |
Miftode, E | 2 |
Cijevschi, C | 1 |
Mihai, C | 2 |
Sparchez, ZA | 1 |
Pojoga, C | 1 |
Streinu-Cercel, A | 2 |
Gheorghe, L | 3 |
Moon, JS | 1 |
Sherman, KE | 1 |
Morelli, G | 1 |
Darling, JM | 1 |
Muir, AJ | 1 |
Khalili, M | 1 |
Fishbein, DA | 1 |
Hinestrosa, F | 1 |
Shiffman, ML | 3 |
Di Bisceglie, A | 1 |
Rajender Reddy, K | 2 |
Pearlman, B | 1 |
Lok, AS | 3 |
Fried, MW | 5 |
Stewart, PW | 2 |
Peter, J | 1 |
Wadsworth, S | 1 |
Kixmiller, S | 1 |
Sloan, A | 1 |
Vainorius, M | 1 |
Horne, PM | 1 |
Michael, L | 1 |
Dong, M | 1 |
Evon, DM | 3 |
Segal, JB | 1 |
Nelson, DR | 6 |
Yates, KB | 1 |
Tonnerre, P | 2 |
Martin, GE | 1 |
Gerdemann, U | 1 |
Al Abosy, R | 1 |
Comstock, DE | 1 |
Weiss, SA | 1 |
Wolski, D | 1 |
Tully, DC | 1 |
Chung, RT | 2 |
Allen, TM | 1 |
Kim, AY | 2 |
Fidler, S | 1 |
Fox, J | 1 |
Frater, J | 1 |
Lauer, GM | 2 |
Haining, WN | 1 |
Sen, DR | 1 |
Flisiak, R | 6 |
Flisiak-Jackiewicz, M | 1 |
Welzel, TM | 2 |
Sarrazin, C | 4 |
Baumgarten, A | 1 |
Christensen, S | 1 |
Teuber, G | 1 |
Stein, K | 1 |
Deterding, K | 2 |
van Bömmel, F | 1 |
Heyne, R | 1 |
John, C | 1 |
Zimmermann, T | 1 |
Lutz, T | 1 |
Schott, E | 1 |
Hettinger, J | 1 |
Kleine, H | 2 |
König, B | 1 |
Hüppe, D | 1 |
Wedemeyer, H | 7 |
Golin, CE | 2 |
Stewart, P | 1 |
Alston, S | 1 |
Reeve, B | 1 |
Sterling, RK | 2 |
Lim, JK | 2 |
Reau, N | 3 |
Sarkar, S | 2 |
Reddy, KR | 1 |
Di Bisceglie, AM | 3 |
Rockstroh, JK | 1 |
Feld, JJ | 6 |
Chevaliez, S | 2 |
Cheng, K | 1 |
Maasoumy, B | 1 |
Herman, C | 2 |
Hackett, J | 1 |
Dawson, GJ | 1 |
Cloherty, G | 2 |
Pawlotsky, JM | 3 |
Lin, CW | 1 |
Menon, R | 5 |
Liu, W | 1 |
Podsadecki, T | 9 |
Shulman, N | 1 |
DaSilva-Tillmann, B | 3 |
Awni, W | 3 |
Dutta, S | 9 |
Asselah, T | 4 |
Dumas, EO | 4 |
Shaw, D | 3 |
Hazzan, R | 1 |
Forns, X | 4 |
Pilot-Matias, T | 6 |
Lu, W | 1 |
Petta, S | 2 |
Marzioni, M | 2 |
Russo, P | 1 |
Aghemo, A | 2 |
Alberti, A | 1 |
Ascione, A | 2 |
Antinori, A | 2 |
Bruno, R | 1 |
Bruno, S | 3 |
Chirianni, A | 1 |
Gaeta, GB | 1 |
Giannini, EG | 2 |
Merli, M | 1 |
Messina, V | 2 |
Montilla, S | 2 |
Perno, CF | 1 |
Puoti, M | 2 |
Raimondo, G | 1 |
Rendina, M | 1 |
Silberstein, FC | 1 |
Villa, E | 2 |
Zignego, AL | 2 |
Pani, L | 1 |
Craxì, A | 3 |
Czarny, P | 1 |
Merecz-Sadowska, A | 1 |
Majchrzak, K | 1 |
Jabłkowski, M | 2 |
Szemraj, J | 1 |
Śliwiński, T | 1 |
Karwowski, B | 1 |
Poordad, F | 7 |
Larsen, L | 4 |
Cohen, E | 2 |
Mobashery, N | 2 |
Tatsch, F | 1 |
Foster, GR | 1 |
Yu, ML | 3 |
Chen, YL | 1 |
Huang, CF | 3 |
Lin, KH | 1 |
Yeh, ML | 2 |
Huang, CI | 2 |
Hsieh, MH | 2 |
Lin, ZY | 2 |
Chen, SC | 2 |
Huang, JF | 2 |
Dai, CY | 2 |
Chuang, WL | 2 |
Leventer-Roberts, M | 1 |
Hammerman, A | 1 |
Brufman, I | 1 |
Hoshen, M | 1 |
Braun, M | 1 |
Ashur, Y | 1 |
Lieberman, N | 1 |
Balicer, R | 1 |
Liu, CH | 1 |
Liu, CJ | 1 |
Su, TH | 1 |
Yang, HC | 1 |
Hong, CM | 1 |
Tseng, TC | 1 |
Chen, PJ | 1 |
Chen, DS | 1 |
Kao, JH | 1 |
Ahmed, H | 1 |
Abushouk, AI | 1 |
Menshawy, A | 1 |
Mohamed, A | 1 |
Negida, A | 1 |
Loutfy, SA | 1 |
Abdel-Daim, MM | 1 |
Butt, AA | 1 |
Yan, P | 1 |
Simon, TG | 1 |
Abou-Samra, AB | 1 |
Stark, JE | 2 |
Cole, J | 1 |
Stauber, RE | 1 |
Fauler, G | 1 |
Rainer, F | 1 |
Leber, B | 1 |
Posch, A | 1 |
Streit, A | 1 |
Spindelboeck, W | 1 |
Stadlbauer, V | 1 |
Kessler, HH | 1 |
Mangge, H | 1 |
González-Colominas, E | 1 |
Torras, X | 3 |
Mojal, S | 1 |
Lens, S | 3 |
López, D | 1 |
Mariño, Z | 2 |
Ardèvol, M | 1 |
Pagès, N | 1 |
Solà, R | 1 |
Yang, JF | 1 |
Lin, YH | 1 |
Liang, PC | 1 |
Tempestilli, M | 1 |
Fabbri, G | 1 |
Mastrorosa, I | 1 |
Timelli, L | 1 |
Notari, S | 1 |
Bellagamba, R | 1 |
Libertone, R | 1 |
Lupi, F | 1 |
Zaccarelli, M | 1 |
Agrati, C | 1 |
Ammassari, A | 1 |
Sanai, FM | 1 |
Alghamdi, AS | 1 |
Afghani, AA | 1 |
Alswat, K | 1 |
AlZanbagi, A | 1 |
Alghamdi, MN | 1 |
AlMousa, A | 1 |
Aseeri, M | 1 |
Assiri, AM | 1 |
Babatin, MA | 1 |
Boglione, L | 1 |
Cusato, J | 1 |
Pinna, SM | 1 |
De Nicolò, A | 1 |
Cariti, G | 1 |
Di Perri, G | 1 |
D'Avolio, A | 1 |
Chamorro-de-Vega, E | 2 |
Gimenez-Manzorro, A | 3 |
Rodriguez-Gonzalez, CG | 2 |
Escudero-Vilaplana, V | 2 |
De Lorenzo-Pinto, A | 1 |
Iglesias-Peinado, I | 1 |
Herranz-Alonso, A | 2 |
Sanjurjo Saez, M | 1 |
Iacob, S | 2 |
Curescu, M | 3 |
Cijevschi Prelipcean, C | 1 |
Stefanescu, G | 1 |
Girleanu, I | 1 |
Chiriac, S | 1 |
Brisc, C | 1 |
Goldis, A | 1 |
Bataga, S | 1 |
Rogoveanu, I | 1 |
Preda, C | 1 |
Caruntu, FA | 2 |
Singeap, AM | 1 |
Ferreira, VL | 1 |
Leonart, LP | 1 |
Tonin, FS | 1 |
Borba, HHL | 1 |
Pontarolo, R | 1 |
Minichini, C | 1 |
Starace, M | 1 |
De Pascalis, S | 1 |
Macera, M | 1 |
Occhiello, L | 1 |
Caroprese, M | 1 |
Vitrone, M | 1 |
Iovinella, V | 1 |
Guerrera, B | 1 |
Masarone, M | 1 |
Coppola, N | 1 |
Sperl, J | 1 |
Kreidlova, M | 1 |
Merta, D | 1 |
Chmelova, K | 1 |
Senkerikova, R | 1 |
Frankova, S | 1 |
Isakov, V | 1 |
Paduta, D | 1 |
Viani, RM | 1 |
Enejosa, JV | 1 |
Pasechnikov, V | 1 |
Znoyko, O | 1 |
Ogurtsov, P | 1 |
Bogomolov, PO | 1 |
Maevskaya, MV | 1 |
Chen, X | 1 |
Shulman, NS | 4 |
De Luca, M | 1 |
Melazzini, M | 1 |
Trotta, MP | 1 |
Sangiovanni, V | 1 |
Izzi, A | 1 |
Orlandini, A | 1 |
Fontanella, L | 1 |
Gasbarrini, A | 2 |
Dolman, GE | 1 |
Selby, P | 1 |
Gelson, WT | 1 |
Janczewska, E | 4 |
Łucejko, M | 2 |
Karpińska, E | 2 |
Zarębska-Michaluk, D | 3 |
Nazzal, K | 2 |
Bolewska, B | 2 |
Białkowska, J | 1 |
Berak, H | 3 |
Fleischer-Stępniewska, K | 2 |
Tomasiewicz, K | 3 |
Karwowska, K | 2 |
Simon, K | 3 |
Piekarska, A | 3 |
Tronina, O | 3 |
Tuchendler, E | 1 |
Garlicki, A | 3 |
Ding, B | 4 |
Wang, H | 4 |
Zhao, W | 2 |
Yu, C | 1 |
Alves, K | 2 |
Luo, Y | 2 |
Menon, RM | 8 |
Cerban, R | 1 |
Pietrareanu, C | 1 |
Ester, C | 1 |
Iacob, R | 1 |
Gheorghe, C | 1 |
Popescu, I | 1 |
Revuelta-Herrero, JL | 1 |
Matilla-Peña, A | 1 |
Sanjurjo-Sáez, M | 1 |
Sølund, C | 1 |
Andersen, ES | 1 |
Mössner, B | 1 |
Laursen, AL | 1 |
Røge, BT | 1 |
Kjær, MS | 1 |
Gerstoft, J | 1 |
Christensen, PB | 1 |
Pedersen, MS | 2 |
Schønning, K | 2 |
Fahnøe, U | 2 |
Bukh, J | 2 |
Weis, N | 2 |
Palladino, C | 1 |
Ezeonwumelu, IJ | 1 |
Marcelino, R | 1 |
Briz, V | 1 |
Moranguinho, I | 1 |
Serejo, F | 1 |
Velosa, JF | 1 |
Marinho, RT | 2 |
Borrego, P | 1 |
Taveira, N | 1 |
Hsieh, YC | 1 |
Jeng, WJ | 1 |
Huang, CH | 1 |
Teng, W | 1 |
Chen, WT | 1 |
Chen, YC | 1 |
Lin, SM | 1 |
Tai, DI | 1 |
Lin, CY | 2 |
Sheen, IS | 2 |
Puigvehí, M | 1 |
De Cuenca, B | 1 |
Viu, A | 1 |
Diago, M | 2 |
Turnes, J | 2 |
Gea, F | 2 |
Pascasio, JM | 2 |
Cabezas, J | 1 |
Badia, E | 1 |
Olveira, A | 1 |
Montoliu, S | 1 |
Cordero, P | 1 |
Castro, JL | 1 |
Molina, E | 1 |
Sánchez-Ruano, JJ | 1 |
Moreno, J | 1 |
Antón, MD | 1 |
Moreno, JM | 1 |
De la Vega, J | 1 |
Calleja, JL | 2 |
Lee, TY | 1 |
Yang, SS | 1 |
Wolf, HM | 1 |
Eibl, MM | 1 |
Müller, CJ | 1 |
Grebely, J | 1 |
Conway, B | 2 |
Cunningham, EB | 1 |
Fraser, C | 1 |
Moriggia, A | 1 |
Gane, E | 1 |
Stedman, C | 1 |
Cooper, C | 1 |
Castro, E | 1 |
Schmid, P | 1 |
Petoumenos, K | 1 |
Hajarizadeh, B | 1 |
Marks, P | 1 |
Erratt, A | 1 |
Dalgard, O | 2 |
Lacombe, K | 1 |
Bruneau, J | 1 |
Daulouede, JP | 1 |
Powis, J | 1 |
Bruggmann, P | 1 |
Matthews, GV | 1 |
Kronborg, I | 1 |
Dunlop, A | 1 |
Hellard, M | 1 |
Applegate, TL | 1 |
Crawford, S | 1 |
Gietka, A | 1 |
Dybowska, D | 1 |
Mazur, W | 2 |
Belica-Wdowik, T | 1 |
Dobracki, W | 1 |
Tudrujek-Zdunek, M | 1 |
Deroń, Z | 1 |
Buczyńska, I | 1 |
Sitko, M | 1 |
Czauż-Andrzejuk, A | 1 |
Lorenc, B | 1 |
Białkowska-Warzecha, J | 1 |
Citko, J | 1 |
Laurans, Ł | 1 |
Jaroszewicz, J | 2 |
Socha, Ł | 1 |
Adamek, B | 1 |
Horban, A | 2 |
Halota, W | 2 |
Baka-Ćwierz, B | 1 |
Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska, M | 2 |
Holmes, JA | 1 |
Carlton-Smith, C | 1 |
Brown, J | 1 |
Gustafson, JL | 1 |
Silva, ST | 1 |
Robidoux, M | 1 |
Kvistad, D | 1 |
Alatrakchi, N | 1 |
Zhang, H | 1 |
Fabrizi, F | 1 |
Negro, F | 1 |
Bondin, M | 2 |
Cacoub, P | 1 |
Ning, HB | 1 |
Liu, JP | 1 |
Xiao, EH | 1 |
Li, K | 1 |
Shang, J | 1 |
Pessoa, MG | 1 |
Ramalho-Madruga, JV | 1 |
Nunes, EP | 1 |
Cheinquer, H | 1 |
Brandão-Mello, CE | 1 |
Mendes-Correa, MC | 1 |
Ferraz, ML | 1 |
Ferreira, PRA | 1 |
Álvares-da-Silva, MR | 1 |
Coelho, HS | 1 |
Affonso-de-Araújo, ES | 1 |
Furtado, J | 1 |
Parana, R | 1 |
Silva, G | 1 |
Lari, SA | 1 |
Tripathi, R | 1 |
Martinelli, A | 1 |
Wu, J | 1 |
Huang, P | 1 |
Fan, H | 1 |
Tian, T | 1 |
Xia, X | 1 |
Fu, Z | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Ye, X | 1 |
Yue, M | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 1 |
Üçbilek, E | 1 |
Özdoğan, O | 1 |
Ateş, F | 1 |
Altıntaş, E | 1 |
Karaali, R | 1 |
Turan, D | 1 |
Erdem, İ | 1 |
Karakaya, F | 1 |
Ateş, K | 1 |
Özer Etik, D | 1 |
Suna, N | 1 |
Öcal, S | 1 |
Selçuk, H | 1 |
Dağlı, Ü | 1 |
Çolak, T | 1 |
Hilmioğlu, F | 1 |
Boyacıoğlu, AS | 1 |
Haberal, M | 1 |
Ferenci, P | 4 |
Bourgeois, S | 2 |
Norris, S | 1 |
Larrey, D | 1 |
Marra, F | 1 |
Dorr, P | 1 |
Charafeddine, M | 1 |
Crown, E | 1 |
Back, D | 1 |
Bennett, M | 2 |
Sepe, TE | 1 |
Reindollar, RW | 2 |
Everson, G | 2 |
Phillips, RW | 1 |
Siddique, A | 1 |
Sullivan, JG | 2 |
Abunimeh, M | 1 |
Younes, Z | 3 |
Lee, YC | 1 |
Hu, TH | 2 |
Hung, CH | 2 |
Lu, SN | 2 |
Chen, CH | 3 |
Wang, JH | 1 |
Jensen, SB | 1 |
Pham, LV | 1 |
Serre, SBN | 1 |
Tang, Q | 1 |
Ghanem, L | 1 |
Ramirez, S | 1 |
Humes, D | 1 |
Pihl, AF | 1 |
Filskov, J | 1 |
Sølund, CS | 1 |
Dietz, J | 1 |
Fourati, S | 1 |
Krarup, H | 1 |
Gottwein, JM | 1 |
Sedghi, S | 1 |
Pockros, PJ | 1 |
Ravendhran, N | 1 |
Reindollar, R | 1 |
Lucey, MR | 1 |
Epstein, M | 1 |
Bank, L | 1 |
Bernstein, D | 1 |
Trinh, R | 5 |
Krishnan, P | 1 |
Polepally, AR | 6 |
Unnebrink, K | 1 |
Martinez, M | 1 |
Lin, CL | 1 |
Tung, SY | 1 |
Hsieh, SY | 1 |
Chien, RN | 1 |
Amador, J | 1 |
Reeve, BB | 1 |
Serper, M | 1 |
Zhyvytsia, D | 1 |
Tsarova, O | 1 |
Skorokhodova, N | 1 |
Preda, CM | 1 |
Baicus, C | 1 |
Sandra, I | 1 |
Oproiu, A | 1 |
Manuc, T | 1 |
Constantinescu, I | 1 |
Gavrila, D | 1 |
Dumitru, R | 1 |
Vasilescu, C | 1 |
Tieranu, C | 1 |
Istratescu, D | 1 |
Voiosu, T | 1 |
Manuc, M | 1 |
Jacobson, IM | 1 |
Baykal, T | 1 |
Bourlière, M | 1 |
Tam, E | 2 |
Desmond, P | 1 |
Jensen, DM | 1 |
Varunok, P | 2 |
Hassanein, T | 1 |
Xiong, J | 2 |
Bernstein, B | 3 |
Kowdley, KV | 3 |
Coakley, E | 3 |
Sigal, S | 1 |
Crawford, D | 1 |
Weiland, O | 1 |
Aguilar, H | 2 |
Ray, K | 1 |
Gentile, I | 1 |
Buonomo, AR | 1 |
Borgia, G | 1 |
Cohen, D | 3 |
Agarwal, K | 1 |
Xie, W | 2 |
Kwo, PY | 1 |
Mantry, PS | 2 |
Te, HS | 1 |
Vargas, HE | 1 |
Brown, R | 1 |
Gordon, F | 1 |
Levitsky, J | 1 |
Terrault, NA | 1 |
Burton, JR | 1 |
Setze, C | 1 |
Badri, P | 1 |
Vilchez, RA | 1 |
Höner zu Siederdissen, C | 1 |
Cornberg, M | 2 |
Gamal, N | 1 |
Vitale, G | 1 |
Andreone, P | 2 |
Badri, PS | 2 |
Wang, T | 1 |
Khatri, A | 9 |
Hu, B | 1 |
Coakley, EP | 1 |
Podsadecki, TJ | 4 |
Awni, WM | 4 |
Klibanov, OM | 1 |
Gale, SE | 1 |
Santevecchi, B | 1 |
Minaei, AA | 1 |
Lalezari, J | 1 |
Galen, E | 1 |
Rustgi, V | 2 |
Felizarta, F | 1 |
McGovern, B | 1 |
King, M | 1 |
Beinhardt, S | 1 |
Peck-Radosavljevic, M | 2 |
Hofer, H | 1 |
Colombo, M | 1 |
Horváth, G | 1 |
Halász, T | 1 |
Makara, M | 1 |
Hunyady, B | 1 |
Deeks, ED | 1 |
Marbury, TC | 2 |
Lawitz, EJ | 1 |
Mullally, VM | 1 |
Bernstein, BM | 1 |
Bailly, F | 1 |
Pradat, P | 1 |
Virlogeux, V | 1 |
Zoulim, F | 1 |
Recker, K | 1 |
Zhang, S | 1 |
Bastian, ND | 1 |
Griffin, PM | 1 |
Pedrosa, M | 2 |
Berenguer, M | 1 |
Lovell, S | 1 |
Lopez-Talavera, JC | 1 |
Buti, M | 1 |
Esteban, R | 1 |
Knysz, B | 2 |
Liu, Y | 1 |
Skoien, R | 1 |
Ghesquiere, W | 1 |
Soza, A | 1 |
Fuster, F | 1 |
Greenbloom, S | 1 |
Motoc, A | 1 |
Arama, V | 1 |
Tornai, I | 1 |
Sasadeusz, J | 1 |
Sullivan, D | 1 |
Liu, X | 1 |
Kapoor, M | 1 |
Campbell, A | 1 |
Chtioui, H | 1 |
Buclin, T | 1 |
Cattaneo, D | 1 |
Sollima, S | 1 |
Charbe, N | 1 |
Resnati, C | 1 |
Clementi, E | 1 |
Gervasoni, C | 1 |
Waring, JF | 1 |
Abel, S | 1 |
Davis, JW | 1 |
Moreno, C | 1 |
Horsmans, Y | 1 |
Elkhashab, M | 1 |
Bernstein, DE | 1 |
Fu, B | 1 |
Howieson, K | 1 |
Pangerl, A | 1 |
Pathak, L | 1 |
King, JR | 3 |
Smith, MA | 1 |
Lim, A | 1 |
Cheng, EY | 1 |
Saab, S | 3 |
Holt, CD | 1 |
Busuttil, RW | 1 |
Husa, P | 1 |
Boyer, N | 1 |
Saadoun, D | 1 |
Martinot-Peignoux, M | 1 |
Marcellin, P | 1 |
Shuster, DL | 1 |
Chiu, YL | 1 |
Planas Vila, R | 1 |
Moller, J | 1 |
Parisé, H | 3 |
Virabhak, S | 3 |
Wang, A | 2 |
Marx, SE | 1 |
Sanchez Gonzalez, Y | 1 |
Misurski, D | 3 |
Johnson, S | 2 |
Parfieniuk-Kowerda, A | 1 |
Mensing, S | 2 |
Eckert, D | 1 |
Johnson, SJ | 1 |
Filipovic, I | 1 |
Samp, JC | 1 |
Backus, LI | 1 |
Belperio, PS | 1 |
Shahoumian, TA | 1 |
Loomis, TP | 1 |
Mole, LA | 1 |
Gonzalez, YS | 1 |
Juday, T | 1 |
Saadi, T | 1 |
Khoury, J | 1 |
Preston, RA | 1 |
Rodrigues, L | 1 |
Collado Borrell, R | 1 |
Ibañez-Garcia, S | 1 |
Lallana Sainz, E | 1 |
Lobato Matilla, E | 1 |
Lorenzo-Pinto, A | 1 |
Manrique-Rodriguez, S | 1 |
Fernandez-Llamazares, CM | 1 |
Marzal-Alfaro, M | 1 |
Ribed, A | 1 |
Romero Jimenez, RM | 1 |
Sarobe Gonzalez, C | 1 |
Herranz, A | 1 |
Sanjurjo, M | 1 |
Bialkowska, J | 1 |
Rostkowska, K | 1 |
Madej, G | 1 |
Lucejko, M | 1 |
Pisula, A | 1 |
Kryczka, W | 1 |
Wiercińska-Drapało, A | 1 |
Mozer-Lisewska, I | 1 |
Tudrujek, M | 1 |
Oberg, CL | 1 |
Hiensch, RJ | 1 |
Poor, HD | 1 |
Knops, E | 1 |
Schübel, N | 1 |
Heger, E | 1 |
Neumann-Fraune, M | 1 |
Kaiser, R | 1 |
Inden, S | 1 |
Kalaghatgi, P | 1 |
Sierra, S | 1 |
Ravinetto, R | 1 |
De Weggheleire, A | 1 |
Dorlo, TP | 1 |
Francque, S | 1 |
Sokkab, A | 1 |
Pouget, C | 1 |
Meessen, B | 1 |
Tabernero, P | 1 |
Newton, PN | 1 |
Lynen, L | 1 |
Puglisi, GM | 1 |
Smith, SM | 1 |
Jankovich, RD | 1 |
Ashby, CR | 1 |
Jodlowski, TZ | 1 |
Chan, HL | 1 |
Tsang, OT | 1 |
Hui, YT | 1 |
Fung, J | 1 |
Lui, GC | 1 |
Lai, CL | 1 |
Wong, GL | 1 |
Chan, KH | 1 |
But, DY | 1 |
Lai, MS | 1 |
Lao, WC | 1 |
Chan, CK | 1 |
Lam, YS | 1 |
Seto, WK | 1 |
Li, C | 1 |
Yuen, MF | 1 |
Wong, VW | 1 |
Jang, TY | 1 |
Lu, PL | 1 |
Masetti, M | 1 |
Magalotti, D | 1 |
Martino, E | 1 |
Scuteri, A | 1 |
Zoli, M | 1 |
Todt, D | 1 |
Schlevogt, B | 1 |
Grundhoff, A | 1 |
Fischer, N | 1 |
Steinmann, E | 1 |
Steiner, S | 1 |
Bucsics, T | 1 |
Schwabl, P | 1 |
Mandorfer, M | 1 |
Scheiner, B | 1 |
Aichelburg, MC | 1 |
Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K | 1 |
Trauner, M | 1 |
Reiberger, T | 1 |
Crespo, J | 1 |
Ruiz-Antorán, B | 1 |
Fernandez, I | 1 |
Perelló, C | 1 |
Sacristán, B | 1 |
García-Eliz, M | 1 |
Llerena, S | 1 |
Llaneras, J | 1 |
Rodriguez, CF | 1 |
Ampuero, J | 1 |
Jorquera, F | 1 |
Simon, MA | 1 |
Arenas, J | 1 |
Bañares, R | 1 |
Muñoz, R | 1 |
Albillos, A | 1 |
Ponziani, FR | 1 |
Siciliano, M | 1 |
Lionetti, R | 1 |
Pasquazzi, C | 1 |
Gianserra, L | 1 |
D'Offizi, G | 1 |
Pompili, M | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interferon-Free Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection in Participants With HIV-1 Coinfection Receiving Concurrent Antiretroviral Therapy (C_ASCENT)[NCT02194998] | Phase 2 | 46 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-09-16 | Terminated (stopped due to The study closed to accrual before the planned accrual goal was attained due to the availability of newer directly-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for HCV.) | ||
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Ombitasvir (OBV), Paritaprevir (PTV), Ritonavir (RTV) With or Without Dasabuvir (DSV) and With or Without Ribavirin (RBV) in Pediatric Subjects With Genotype 1 or 4[NCT02486406] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 64 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-10-28 | Completed | ||
THE PRIORITIZE STUDY: A Pragmatic, Randomized Study of Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C: Transforming Decision-Making for Patients, Providers, and Stakeholders[NCT02786537] | Phase 4 | 1,275 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-06-30 | Completed | ||
Use of a Patient-Centered Electronic App to Increase Emergency Department Patient's Knowledge on HCV Infection, Disease Progression, and Care to Improve the HCV Care Continuum[NCT04162938] | 308 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-03-24 | Recruiting | |||
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET (PROP UP)[NCT02601820] | 1,601 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-11-30 | Completed | |||
An Open-Label, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir in Treatment-Naïve Adults With Genotype 1b Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Without Cirrhosis (GARNET)[NCT02582632] | Phase 3 | 166 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-11-24 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT 450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 Coadministered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Asian Adults With GT1b Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) In[NCT02517528] | Phase 3 | 104 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-07-20 | Completed | ||
Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of the Co-administration of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 in Healthy Chinese Subjects[NCT02534870] | Phase 1 | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced, Non-Cirrhotic Asian Adults With Subgenotype 1b Chronic Hepa[NCT02517515] | Phase 3 | 650 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-07-31 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Practice of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ Ritonavir and Dasabuvir Administered for 8 Weeks (3D8) in Treatment-naïve Genotype 1b Hepatitis C Virus Infected Patients: Analysis of Data From Hepa-C Registry.[NCT03122132] | 200 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2017-02-20 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C -An Observational Study in Kuwait[NCT02798315] | 40 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2016-05-25 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in France[NCT02618928] | 735 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-12-15 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C -An Observational Study in Austria (REAL)[NCT02582658] | 173 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-10-06 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Colombia (outCome)[NCT02851069] | 66 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2017-02-23 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin and Patient Support Program in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Israel (CITRINE STUDY)[NCT02803138] | 256 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2016-07-07 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, + Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Romania[NCT02807402] | 522 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2016-07-14 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Germany (LIFE-C)[NCT02615145] | 472 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-12-03 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Hungary - VERITAS[NCT02636608] | 244 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-11-27 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence (RWE) of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Poland (HCV RWE PMOS)[NCT02640547] | 394 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-11-26 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/Ritonavir - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Belgium[NCT02581163] | 314 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-10-07 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C -An Observational Study in Ireland[NCT02582671] | 101 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-11-05 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Canada (AMBER)[NCT02581189] | 565 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-10-13 | Completed | |||
Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, ± Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Greece[NCT02725866] | 216 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2016-04-05 | Completed | |||
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir With Low-Dose Ribavirin QD in Subjects With Genotype 1a Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection (GEODE II)[NCT02609659] | Phase 3 | 105 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-10-28 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Daclatasvir Plus Asunaprevir Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C : Prospective Cohort Study[NCT02639585] | Phase 4 | 32 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2015-12-31 | Recruiting | ||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 Co-administered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Treatment-Experienced Adults With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C V[NCT01715415] | Phase 3 | 395 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-11-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Open-label Study of Harvoni ® (Sofosbuvir Ledipasvir Fixed Dose Combination) in Subjects Infected With Chronic Hepatitis C and Advanced Heart Failure or Lung Disease[NCT02858180] | Phase 4 | 15 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 Co-administered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Treatment-Naïve Adults With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus [NCT01716585] | Phase 3 | 636 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-11-30 | Completed | ||
Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 With ABT-333 and With or Without RBV in HCV Genotype 1 and ABT-450/r/ABT-267 With RBV in HCV GT4-Infected Adult Liver or Renal Transplant Recipie[NCT01782495] | Phase 2 | 129 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-02-25 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Combination of ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Coadministered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Adults With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection Taking Methadone or Buprenorphine[NCT01911845] | Phase 2 | 38 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 Coadministered With Ribavirin (RBV) in Adults With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Cirrhosis (TURQUOIS[NCT01704755] | Phase 3 | 381 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-10-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Open-Labeled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Co-administered With Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir Co-administered With Pegylated Interferon a-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Experienced Adult[NCT01854528] | Phase 3 | 148 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Co-administered With and Without Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir Co-administered With Pegylated Interferon α-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve A[NCT01854697] | Phase 3 | 311 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-03-31 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/ABT-450/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir in Adults With Genotype 1b Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Cirrhosis (TURQUOISE-III)[NCT02219503] | Phase 3 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-09-30 | Completed | ||
An Open Label, Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Safety of Kidney Transplant From HCV Positive Donors Into HCV Negative Recipient[NCT03801707] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 54 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-03-22 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir/ABT-450/Ritonavir (Ombitasvir/ABT-450/r) and Dasabuvir Co-administered With or Without Sofosbuvir (SOF) and Ribavirin (RBV) in Direct-Acting Antiviral Agent (DAA) Tre[NCT02356562] | Phase 2 | 29 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-02-03 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Co-Administration of Ombitasvir/ABT-450/Ritonavir (Ombitasvir/ABT-450/r) With Sofosbuvir (SOF) With or Without Ribavirin (RBV) in Subjects With Genotype 2 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus [NCT02292719] | Phase 2 | 70 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-12-19 | Completed | ||
Dynamics of Viral Reservoir in HIV-positive Patients With or Without HCV Coinfection in the Era of Direct-acting Antiviral and Antiretroviral Drugs[NCT02836782] | 600 participants (Anticipated) | Observational [Patient Registry] | 2016-04-30 | Recruiting | |||
Nationwide Hepatitis C NAT+ Cardiac Transplant Experience[NCT04493385] | 500 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2019-09-16 | Recruiting | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
HIV-1 VF was defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA results ≥ 200 copies/mL. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation to 4 weeks after last dose of HCV study treatment. HIV-1 RNA was measured at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28. The durations for HCV study treatment for Cohorts A/C and Cohorts B/D were 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 1 |
HCV VF was defined as follows: confirmed increase from nadir in HCV RNA (defined as two consecutive HCV RNA measurements of >1 log10 IU/mL above nadir) at any time point; failure to achieve HCV RNA
Timeframe: From treatment initiation to either 24 weeks (for Cohort A and C) or 12 weeks (for Cohort B and D). The duration for HCV study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 1 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 1 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
Participants who had diagnoses leading to premature HCV study treatment or HIV-1 ARV discontinuation post treatment initiation. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation to end of study follow-up at 48 weeks.The duration for HCV study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively. The duration for ARV treatment for all cohorts was 48 weeks.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 1 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
"Participants with an observed laboratory abnormalities grade 3 or higher post treatment initiation.~If entry (pre-treatment) lab result was grade 3, then a grade 4 result was required to meet this outcome.~Severity grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0." (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation to 30 days post date of last dose of HCV study treatment (whether planned or premature discontinuation). The duration for HCV study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 5 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 3 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 3 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
Participants who experienced at least one observed SAEs as defined by ICH after initiating HCV study treatment through 30 days post date of last dose of HCV study treatment. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation to 30 days post date of last dose of HCV study treatment (whether planned or premature discontinuation). The duration for HCV study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 1 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 1 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 2 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
"Participants with signs/symptoms of grade 3 or higher post treatment initiation.~Participants with grade 3 sign/symptom prior to treatment initiation must have had one grade higher than pre-treatment to meet this outcome.~Severity grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0." (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation to 30 days post date of last dose of HCV study treatment (whether planned or premature discontinuation). The duration for HCV study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 2 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 3 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
Participants with one or more genotype mutations in protease conferring major resistance to any HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors (PI) antiretroviral drug, from a plasma sample drawn following confirmed HIV-1 VF outcome. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At confirmation of HIV-1 virologic failure.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 0 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 0 |
"SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA less than the assay LLOQ (<15 IU/mL) at 12 weeks post HCV treatment discontinuation.~A two-sided 90% confidence interval was calculated for the percentage of participants with SVR12 response using Clopper-Pearson method.~For those whose HCV early responses prior to SVR12 evaluation met the guidelines for HCV Virologic Failure (VF), their SVR12 outcome was defined as non-response. Those missing a HCV RNA result from the week 12 post HCV treatment discontinuation visit (and missing all subsequent evaluations) were considered non-responders. However, if HCV RNA evaluations subsequent to week 12 post treatment discontinuation were non-missing, then the first HCV RNA subsequent to week 12 post treatment discontinuation was instead used to define the primary outcome." (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks after last dose of HCV study treatment. The duration for study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 95.2 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 60 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 100 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 100 |
"SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA less than the assay LLOQ (<15 IU/mL) at 24 weeks post treatment discontinuation.~A two-sided 90% confidence interval was calculated for the percentage of SVR24 response using method of Clopper-Pearson.~For those whose HCV early responses prior to SVR24 evaluation met the guidelines for HCV VF, their SVR24 outcome was defined as non-response. Those missing a HCV RNA result from the week 24 post HCV treatment discontinuation visit (and missing all subsequent evaluations) were considered non-responders. However, if HCV RNA evaluations subsequent to week 24 post treatment discontinuation were non-missing, then the first HCV RNA subsequent to week 24 post treatment discontinuation was instead used to define the primary outcome." (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks after the date of last dose of HCV study treatment. The duration for study treatment for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 90.5 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 60 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 93.3 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 100 |
Absolute change from baseline in IP-10 (Interferon gamma-induced protein 10) concentration in plasma, calculated as value at the later time point minus baseline value. Baseline was defined as the date of first treatment dose. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At baseline, end of HCV treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks post EOT. The EOT for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline to EOT | Change from baseline to 12 weeks post EOT | |
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | -244.4 | -127 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | -22.2 | -29.1 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | -116 | -83.1 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | -61.1 | -114.9 |
Absolute change from baseline in sCD14 levels in plasma calculated as value at the later time point minus baseline value. Baseline was defined as the date of first treatment dose. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At baseline, end of HCV treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks post EOT. The EOT for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline to EOT | Change from baseline to 12 weeks post EOT | |
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 307.6 | 145.2 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | -1,063.2 | -894.2 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | -380.3 | -22.6 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 318.2 | -987.0 |
Levels of IP-10 (Interferon gamma-induced protein 10) concentration in plasma. Baseline was defined as the date of first treatment dose. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At baseline, end of HCV treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks post EOT. The EOT for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IP-10 at baseline | IP-10 at EOT | IP-10 at 12 weeks post EOT | |
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 379 | 100.9 | 94.6 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 120.2 | 60.4 | 85.5 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 225.5 | 76.6 | 82.5 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 196.4 | 182.6 | 159.5 |
Levels of sCD14. Baseline was defined as the date of first treatment dose. (NCT02194998)
Timeframe: At baseline, end of HCV treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks post EOT. The EOT for Cohorts A and C and Cohorts B and D was 24 and 12 weeks, respectively.
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
sCD14 at Baseline | sCD14 at EOT | sCD14 at 12 weeks post EOT | |
Cohort A [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 1,832.0 | 2,126.5 | 1,977.3 |
Cohort B [INI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 2,226.8 | 1,132.8 | 1,367.4 |
Cohort C [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 24 Weeks] | 3,157.0 | 2,421.1 | 3,424.5 |
Cohort D [PI-based ART + PTV/r/OBT + DSV +/- RBV 12 Weeks] | 3,092.0 | 2,801.3 | 2,608.3 |
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing. The amount of dasabuvir present was measured up to 12 hours after dosing. For two subjects in the 15-29 kg group, the 24 h concentration was used as the 12 h concentration due to the significant sampling time deviation. For one subject in the 30-44 kg group, the 24 h concentration was used as the 12 h concentration due to the significant sampling time deviation. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng•h/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 3960 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 5960 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 4630 |
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing. The amount of ombitasvir present was measured up to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng•h/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 1270 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 1490 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 1060 |
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing. The amount of paritaprevir present was measured up to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng•h/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 2180 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 8640 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 5770 |
AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing. The amount of ritonavir present was measured up to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng•h/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 6570 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 14100 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 8900 |
Cmax is the peak concentration that a drug or drug metabolite achieves in a specified compartment after the drug has been administrated and before administration of a second dose. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 579 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 830 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 671 |
Cmax is the peak concentration that a drug or drug metabolite achieves in a specified compartment after the drug has been administrated and before administration of a second dose. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 99.6 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 116 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 83.7 |
Cmax is the peak concentration that a drug or drug metabolite achieves in a specified compartment after the drug has been administrated and before administration of a second dose. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 294 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 1540 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 870 |
Cmax is the peak concentration that a drug or drug metabolite achieves in a specified compartment after the drug has been administrated and before administration of a second dose. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Week 2
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 1090 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 1830 |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 1180 |
SVR24 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) < lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 24 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last dose of study drug (Week 36 or 48 depending on treatment duration)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants in Parts 1 and 2 of the Study | 96.9 |
Adult Tablet, 12-17 YR, ≥ 45 kg | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, 15 to 29 kg | 100.0 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, 30 to 44 kg | 88.9 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, ≥ 45 kg | 100.0 |
Mini-tablet, 3-8 YR, 15 to 29 kg | 92.9 |
Mini-tablet Total | 92.3 |
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization during treatment is defined as ALT ≤ the upper limit of normal (ULN) at the final treatment visit for participants with ALT > ULN at baseline. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: 12 or 24 weeks after starting study drug, depending on treatment duration
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Adult Tablet,12-17 YR, ≥ 45 kg, ALT Normalization | 87.5 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, 15 to 29 kg, ALT Normalization | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, 30 to 44 kg, ALT Normalization | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 3-8 YR, 15 to 29 kg, ALT Normalization | 80.0 |
Mini-tablet Total, ALT Normalization | 87.5 |
Participants in Parts 1 and 2 of the Study, ALT Normalization | 87.5 |
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) < lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last dose of study drug (Week 24 or 36 depending on treatment duration)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants, Total | 98.4 |
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) < lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last dose of study drug (Week 24 or 36 depending on treatment duration)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Adult Tablet, 12-17 YR, ≥ 45 kg | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, 15 to 29 kg | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, 30 to 44 kg | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 9-11 YR, ≥ 45 kg | 100 |
Mini-tablet, 3-8 YR, 15 to 29 kg | 92.9 |
Mini-tablet Total | 96.2 |
Minimum plasma concentration (Ctrough; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 8 | |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 165 | 191 |
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 110 | 168 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 215 | 264 |
Minimum plasma concentration (Ctrough; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 8 | |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 21.8 | 20.9 |
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 24.7 | 29.6 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 28.2 | 30.4 |
Minimum plasma concentration (Ctrough; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 8 | |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 18.0 | 23.5 |
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 9.86 | 17.3 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 16.1 | 18.4 |
Minimum plasma concentration (Ctrough; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT02486406)
Timeframe: At Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 8 | |
≥ 45 kg Body Weight | 29.8 | 58.2 |
15 - 29 kg Body Weight | 16.1 | 91.8 |
30 - 44 kg Body Weight | 32.1 | 38.1 |
"Efficacy of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Treatment with Zepatier (Elbasvir/Grazobevir) with Ribavirin (RBV) for 16 weeks when used in Genotype 1a patients with Baseline RASs (NS5a Resistance Associated Substitutions or RAPs -Resistance Associated Polymorphisms).~Efficacy defined as HCV RNA undetectable 12 weeks post treatment. Table excludes Genotype 1b patients." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV-16 Weeks | 34 |
Number/Percentage of patients with persistence of viral cure, SVR (SVR = Sustained Virologic Response)- defined as undetectable HCV RNA at least 24 weeks following HCV Treatment. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-end of treatment up to 153 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR | 255 |
EBR/GZR With Ribavirin | 17 |
SOF/LDV | 146 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 2 |
PrOD | 14 |
PrOD With RBV | 36 |
Percentage of Cirrhotic patients with persistence of viral cure, SVR, (SVR= Sustained Virologic Response) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at least 24 weeks following HCV Treatment. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Up to 132 weeks post HCV treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR | 43 |
EBR/GZR With RBV | 7 |
SOF/LDV | 35 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 7 |
PrOD | 6 |
PrOD With RBV | 7 |
Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline and Average On-Treatment Score
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | -1.0 |
EBR/GZR | -2.1 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -3.7 |
SOF/LDV | -2.2 |
Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 1.5 |
EBR/GZR | -1.2 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -7.2 |
SOF/LDV | -2.0 |
PrOD With RBV | -1.9 |
PrOD | -3.0 |
"HCV-PRO, a survey for patients with HCV that measures physical, emotional, and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life, was used to assess 'overall functioning and well-being'. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive change (End of treatment to baseline) suggests improvements in functional well-being.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | -0.9 |
EBR/GZR | 5.6 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 2.5 |
SOF/LDV | 6.9 |
PrOD With RBV | 3.2 |
PrOD | 9.9 |
"HCV-PRO, a survey designed to assess functional status of patients with HCV and measures physical, emotional, and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life, was used to assess functional well-being. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive change (End of treatment to baseline) suggests improvements in functional well-being.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered. End of Treatment -Baseline were used to calculate CHANGE in outcome. Number of subjects reflects participants from both Phase 1 and 2." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: End of Treatment - Baseline
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 3.2 |
EBR/GZR | 6.1 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 6.3 |
SOF/LDV | 6.8 |
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Mean change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | -0.8 |
EBR/GZR | -0.7 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 0.4 |
SOF/LDV | -0.8 |
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Mean change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement in symptom. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.0 |
EBR/GZR Regimen | -0.8 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -0.7 |
SOF/LDV | -0.5 |
PrOD With RBV Regimen | -0.2 |
PrOD | -2.2 |
"Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement.~The estimates of mean change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes. The model expressed mean score as a function of DAA regimen, cirrhosis status, HCV genotype, sex, age, race, and previous treatment status." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 1.3 |
EBR/GZR | -1.4 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -3.9 |
SOF/LDV | -0.7 |
PrOD With RBV | 2.5 |
PrOD | 0.7 |
"Participants completed the Patient Reported Outcomes surveys (PROs) 'PROMIS Nausea/Vomiting -4 Short Form' at baseline and during treatment. Raw scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a range of 45.0-80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea/vomiting.~Results presented as mean difference from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores (highest/worst) score during treatment.~A negative (-) PROMIS change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. Estimates of mean change were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline and Average On-Treatment Score
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | -0.3 |
EBR/GZR | -0.6 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -1.6 |
SOF/LDV | -0.4 |
Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 2.2 |
EBR/GZR Regimen | -0.9 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -10.2 |
SOF/LDV | -3.4 |
PrOD Regimen With RBV | -0.2 |
PrOD | -4.1 |
Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline-On Treatment (up to 16 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | -1.3 |
EBR/GZR | -1.2 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -2.4 |
SOF/LDV | -1.4 |
"HCV-PRO, a survey for patients with HCV that measures physical, emotional, and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life, was used to assess 'Overall Functioning and Well-being'. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive change (End of treatment to baseline) suggests improvements in functional well-being.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 0.0 |
EBR/GZR | 4.3 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 4.7 |
SOF/LDV | 4.7 |
PrOD With RBV | 3.1 |
PrOD | 8.6 |
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Median change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Baseline and Average On-treatment Score)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR (Elbasvir/Grazoprevir) With RBV | 0.0 |
EBR/GZR (Elbasvir/Grazoprevir) | 0.0 |
SOF/LDV (Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir) With RBV | -2.0 |
SOF/LDV (Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir) | -1.0 |
PrOD (Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir) With RBV (Phase 1 Only) | 0.0 |
PrOD (Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir) | -1.0 |
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Median change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of median change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline -on Treatment (12-16 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | -1.0 |
EBR/GZR | 0.0 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 0.5 |
SOF/LDV | -0.5 |
"Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement.~The estimates of change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 0.4 |
EBR/GZR | 0.0 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | -6.1 |
SOF/LDV | 0.0 |
PrOD With RBV | 0.0 |
PrOD | 0.0 |
"Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for change represent improvement.~The estimates of change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline- On Treatment (up to 16 weeks)
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 0.0 |
EBR/GZR | 0.0 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 0.0 |
SOF/LDV | 0.0 |
The number of participants with adverse events that led to early treatment discontinuation (defined as duration less than originally prescribed treatment regimen) (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Treatment start date through treatment completion (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR Regimen | 12 |
SOF/LDV Regimen | 4 |
"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site).~Number of subjects reflects participants randomized during Phase 1 only." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 -24 weeks post-treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 9 |
EBR/GZR | 108 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 6 |
SOF/LDV | 88 |
PrOD With RBV | 77 |
PrOD (Phase 1 Only) | 42 |
"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as patients who have undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site).~mITT with imputation (missing=failure). Total number of subjects reflects participants from Phase 1 only." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post-treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 9 |
EBR/GZR | 108 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 6 |
SOF/LDV | 88 |
PrOD With RBV | 77 |
PrOD | 42 |
"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site).~Number of subjects reflects participants who started EBR/GZR or SOF/LDV- based treatment (with or without RBV) during Phase 1 and 2." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12-24 weeks post HCV treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 40 |
EBR/GZR | 516 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 14 |
SOF/LDV | 335 |
Mean change (delta) in FIB-4, an indirect non-invasive measure of liver fibrosis, calculated as baseline median -long term follow up median, following SVR after any of the study treatment regimens. Change in FIB-4 where negative values indicate improvement in liver fibrosis score and positive values indicate worsening of fibrosis score. There is no upper or lower limit for change. FIB-4 = age (years) * AST(IU/L)/Platelets (10^3/L) * ALT^.5(IU/L). In general, Score of 0-1.29 is low risk for advanced fibrosis, 1.30-1.67: intermediate risk for advanced liver fibrosis, >2.67: high risk for advanced fibrosis. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 years post treatment discontinuation
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR, SOF/LDV or PrOD Based HCV Treatment | -1.36 |
"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation at discretion of provider).~mITT with imputation (missing=failure). Total number of subjects reflects participants from EBR/GZR with or without RBV and SOF/LDV with or without RBV randomized during Phase 1 and Phase 2." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post-treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR With RBV | 40 |
EBR/GZR | 516 |
SOF/LDV With RBV | 14 |
SOF/LDV | 335 |
"The Voils Medication Adherence Survey (VMAS) was used to evaluate medication adherence during HCV treatment. Participants responded to three questions about the extent of adherence during the past seven days of treatment (during early and late on-treatment occasions). Participants responded using a five-point ordinal scale of missed dosing from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). On each occasion participants were coded as being Non-adherent if any response was > 1, otherwise they were coded as Adherent. Probability estimates of percentage of patients reporting non-adherence were calculated per HCV treatment (Direct Acting Antiviral-DAA) regimen: 1)EBR/GZV (elbasvir/grazoprevir, 2)SOF/LDV (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir), 3)PrOD" (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12-16 weeks of HCV treatment
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
EBR/GZR | 23 |
SOF/LDV | 19 |
PrOD | 26 |
"HCV-PRO score, a validated PROMIS survey used to evaluate overall functioning and well-being in HCV patients, was utilized to compare long-term 'within treatment' changes of functional well-being. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive estimate (Post treatment to baseline) suggests baseline functional well-being improvement.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Treatment start date up to 2 years post-treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
9 months post treatment | 20 months post treatment | |
EBR/GZR Regimen | 8.02 | 9.87 |
SOF/LDV Regimen | 9.90 | 11.54 |
Change in HCV-associated symptoms was calculated as the mean differences of mean scores from multiple surveys from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-- Fatigue, nausea, belly pain, sleep disturbance, and diarrhea) and functional status (well-being) when comparing baseline to early post-treatment and late post treatment surveys. Mean change scores were calculated by comparing baseline to early post-treatment (1 yr) and late post-treatment (approximately 3 years) surveys. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement.Negative numbers suggest better symptoms (improvement in HCV-associated symptoms). PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35.HCV-PRO positive estimates suggest baseline functional well-being improvement. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 1 year post treatment discontinuation (Early post-tx)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nausea | Belly Pain | Diarrhea | Fatigue | Sleep Disturbance | Cognitive Impairment | HCV-PRO | |
EBR/GZR Regimen | 0.00 | -0.82 | -1.12 | -2.08 | 0.65 | -0.54 | 8.02 |
SOF/LDV Regimen | -4.99 | -6.47 | -5.77 | -7.59 | -1.72 | -4.48 | 9.90 |
Number of participants who achieved SVR (sustained virologic response), defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment with RASs (Resistant Associated Substitutions) after treatment with EBR/GZR or SOF/LDV regimen (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post HCV treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
With NS5a RAS | Without NS5a RAS | |
EBR/GZR Regimen | 47 | 485 |
SOF/LDV Regimen | 42 | 286 |
"HCV-specific Functional Well-Being was measured using the disease-specific HCV-PRO. The scale includes 16 items that measure physical, emotional and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life.~The Means provided are the HCV-PRO Mean Change Scores, calculated as Baseline HCV-PRO mean score minus T5 HCV-PRO mean score.~Change scores were calculated for two subgroups: (1) Patients who achieved SVR and (2) patients who did not achieve SVR.~HCV-PRO mean change scores could range from +/- 100. Higher change scores (+) indicate better HCV-PRO outcomes.~To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a >5% change from baseline was set as the minimally important change (MIC) threshold. A 5% change in HCV-PRO = 4 points; therefore HCV-PRO change scores > +/- 4.0 were considered clinically meaningful." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 year post-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Chronic HCV Patients Who Achieved SVR | 7.0 |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Did Not Achieve SVR | 0.6 |
"HCV-specific Functional Well-Being was measured using the disease-specific HCV-PRO.~The means provided are the HCV-PRO Mean Change Scores, calculated as Baseline HCV-PRO mean score minus T4 HCV-PRO mean score. Change scores were calculated for two subgroups: (1) Patients who achieved SVR and (2) patients who did not achieve SVR.~HCV-PRO Mean Change Scores could range from +/- 100. Higher change scores (+) indicate better HCV-PRO outcomes.~To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a >5% change from baseline was set as the minimally important change (MIC) threshold. A 5% change in HCV-PRO = 4 points; therefore HCV-PRO change scores > +/- 4.0 were considered clinically meaningful." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3-months post-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Chronic HCV Patients Who Achieved SVR | 6.5 |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Did Not Achieve SVR | 2.0 |
"Change in Overall Symptom Burden from Baseline to 1 year post-treatment was measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). The total Overall Symptom Burden mean change score (TMSAS) was calculated as Baseline TMSAS mean score minus T5 TMSAS mean score.~Lower scores (-) indicate better outcomes. Change scores were calculated for two subgroups: (1) Patients who achieved SVR and (2) patients who did not achieve SVR.~TMSAS Mean Change Scores could range from +/- 4. To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a >5% change from baseline was set as the minimally important change (MIC) threshold. A 5% change in the TMSAS = 0.3 points; therefore TMSAS change scores > +/- 0.3 were considered clinically meaningful" (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 year post-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Chronic HCV Patients Who Achieved SVR | -0.2 |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Did Not Achieve SVR | 0 |
"Change in Overall Symptom Burden from Baseline to 3-months post-treatment was measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS).~The total Overall Symptom Burden mean change score (TMSAS) was calculated as Baseline TMSAS mean score minus T4 TMSAS mean score.~Lower scores (-) indicate better outcomes. Change scores were calculated for two subgroups: (1) Patients who achieved SVR and (2) patients who did not achieve SVR.~TMSAS Mean Change Scores could range from +/- 4.~To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a >5% change from baseline was set as the minimally important change (MIC) threshold. A 5% change in the TMSAS = 0.3 points; therefore TMSAS change scores > +/- 0.3 were considered clinically meaningful." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3-months post-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Chronic HCV Patients Who Achieved SVR | -0.2 |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Did Not Achieve SVR | -0.1 |
"Cumulative out of pocket (OOP) costs incurred by patients during HCV treatment was measured by a survey recording 5 direct and 5 indirect costs of treatment. OOP costs were collected early on-treatment (T2), late on-treatment (T3), and early post-treatment (T4) in case patients paid bills after treatment ended.~The Mean is the average dollar ($$) amount for Total OOP Cost of HCV Treatment for the cohort, calculated by summing the OOP costs for each patient reported at T2+T3+T4." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Chronic HCV Patients During and After HCV Treatment | 582.50 |
"Change in Symptoms was measured using surveys below. Change scores were calculated as baseline mean minus T4 mean. Lower change scores (-) indicate symptom improved~PROMIS Fatigue mean change score range = +/- 53.9~PROMIS Sleep Disturbance mean change score range = +/- 47.1~PROMIS Nausea mean change score range = +/- 44.0~PROMIS Diarrhea mean change score range = +/- 42.8~PROMIS Anger mean change score range = +/- 50.5.~PROMIS Anxiety mean change score range = +/- 41.4~PROMIS Depression mean change score range = +/- 43.1~PROMIS Cognitive Concern mean change score range = +/- 39.5~PROMIS Pain mean change score range = +/- 36.4~PROMIS Belly Pain mean change score range = +/- 50.2~Headache HIT-6 mean change score range = +/- 42 A 5% change from baseline is considered the clinically minimally important change (MIC). The 5% MIC = +/- 2.5 points.~Change scores were calculated for two subgroups: Patients who did and did not achieve SVR" (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3-months post-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depression change score | Anger change score | Anxiety change score | Cognitive Concerns change score | Pain Interference change score | Fatigue change score | Sleep change score | Belly Pain change score | Diarrhea change score | Nausea change score | Headache change score | |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Achieved SVR | -2.3 | -2.1 | -1.7 | -1.4 | -2.3 | -4.1 | -3.1 | -2.3 | -0.1 | -1.5 | -1.5 |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Did Not Achieve SVR | 0.2 | 0.7 | -0.7 | 0 | -1.7 | -2.9 | -0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | -0.3 | -1.1 |
"HCV-specific Functional Well-Being was measured using the disease-specific HCV-PRO. The scale includes 16 items that measure physical, emotional and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life.~The Means provided are the HCV-PRO Mean Change Scores, calculated as Baseline HCV-PRO mean score minus T2 HCV-PRO mean score or Baseline HCV-PRO mean score minus T3 HCV-PRO mean score.~HCV-PRO mean change scores range from +/- 100. Higher change scores (+) indicate better HCV-PRO outcomes.~To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a >5% change from baseline was set as the minimally important change (MIC) threshold. A 5% change in HCV-PRO = 4 points; therefore HCV-PRO change scores > +/- 4.0 were considered clinically meaningful." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Change in HCV-PRO mean score from T1 to T2 | Change in HCV-PRO mean score from T1 to T3 | |
Chronic HCV Patients on Therapy | 3.2 | 3.8 |
"Change in Overall Symptom Burden was measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Patients indicate the presence or absence of a symptom, and if present, rate the symptom on severity, frequency and interference. The total MSAS score (TMSAS) can range from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (symptom present and worst severity, frequency and distress). Change in TMSAS score is calculated as Baseline TMSAS mean score minus T2 TMSAS mean score or Baseline TMSAS mean score minus T3 TMSAS mean score.~Change scores could range from +/- 4.0. Higher scores (+) indicate worse symptom burden.~To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a >5% change from baseline was set as the minimally important change (MIC) threshold. A 5% change in the TMSAS = 0.3 points; therefore TMSAS change scores > +/- 0.3 were considered clinically meaningful." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Change in TMSAS score from T1 to T2 | Change in TMSAS score from T1 to T3 | |
Chronic HCV Patients on Therapy | -0.10 | -0.1 |
"Change in Treatment-Related Symptoms was measured using multiple surveys from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Mean CHANGE Scores were calculated as baseline mean score minus T2 mean score or baseline mean score minus T3 mean score. Lower change scores (-) indicate symptoms improved.~PROMIS Fatigue-7 mean change score range = +/- 53.9~PROMIS Sleep Disturbance-8a mean change score range = +/- 47.1~PROMIS Nausea/Vomiting-4 mean change score range = +/- 44.0~PROMIS Diarrhea-6 mean change score range = +/- 42.8~PROMIS Anger-5 mean change score range = +/- 50.5.~PROMIS Anxiety-4 mean change score range = +/- 41.4~HIT-6 mean change score range = +/- 42~To aid in interpretation of clinical significance, a 5% change from baseline is considered a minimally important change (MIC). The 5% MIC change in a PROMIS or HIT-6 score is +/- 2.5 points." (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in Fatigue Mean Score from T1 to T2 | Change in Sleep disturbance score from T1 to T2 | Change in Nausea/Vomiting mean score from T1 to T2 | Change in Diarrhea mean score from T1 to T2 | Change in Irritability mean score from T1 to T2 | Change in Anxiety mean score from T1 to T2 | Change in headache HIT-6 mean score from T1 to T2 | Change in Fatigue mean score from T1 to T3 | Change in sleep disturbance score from T1 to T3 | Change in nausea/vomiting mean score from T1 to T3 | Change in Diarrhea mean score from T1 to T3 | Change in anger mean score from T1 to T3 | Change in anxiety mean score from T1 to T3 | Change in headache HIT-6 mean score from T1 to T3 | |
Chronic HCV Patients on Therapy | -1.1 | -1.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | -1.2 | -1.5 | 0.2 | -1.1 | -1.8 | -0.2 | 0.6 | -0.8 | -1.4 | -0.1 |
"Change in Symptoms was measured using surveys below. Change scores were calculated as baseline mean minus T5 mean. Lower change scores (-) indicate symptom improved~PROMIS Fatigue mean change score range = +/- 53.9~PROMIS Sleep Disturbance mean change score range = +/- 47.1~PROMIS Nausea mean change score range = +/- 44.0~PROMIS Diarrhea mean change score range = +/- 42.8~PROMIS Anger mean change score range = +/- 50.5.~PROMIS Anxiety mean change score range = +/- 41.4~PROMIS Depression mean change score range = +/- 43.1~PROMIS Cognitive Concern mean change score range = +/- 39.5~PROMIS Pain mean change score range = +/- 36.4~PROMIS Belly Pain mean change score range = +/- 50.2~Headache HIT-6 mean change score range = +/- 42 A 5% change from baseline is considered the clinically minimally important change (MIC). The 5% MIC = +/- 2.5 points.~Change scores were calculated for two subgroups: Patients who did and did not achieve SVR" (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 year post-treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depression change score | Anger change score | Anxiety change score | Cognitive Concern change score | Pain Interference change score | Fatigue change score | Sleep Disturbance change score | Belly Pain change score | Diarrhea change score | Nausea change score | Headache HIT-6 Change score | |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Achieved SVR | -2.2 | -2.2 | -2.0 | -1.7 | -1.9 | -3.6 | -3.1 | -2.6 | -0.3 | -1.4 | -1.5 |
Chronic HCV Patients Who Did Not Achieve SVR | -0.9 | -0.3 | -0.4 | 0.3 | -0.8 | -0.6 | -1.3 | -3.7 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.7 |
Medication adherence was measured using the Voils' Medication Adherence Survey (VMAS). The VMAS consists of 3 items that evaluated the extent of adherence using a 5-point Likert scale from 1=None of the time to 5=All of the time. The 3 items assess how often participants missed doses, skip doses, or do not take doses over the past 7 days and are averaged into a single score. A dichotomous variable was created to categorize patients as 100% (adherent) or <100% (nonadherent) during HCV treatment at early treatment (T2) and late treatment (T3). (NCT02601820)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Nonadherence rate (%) early on-treatment (T2) | Nonadherence rate (%) late on-treatment (T3) | |
Patients With Baseline Alcohol Abuse | 5.9 | 13.7 |
Patients With Baseline Mental Health Disturbance | 4.5 | 9 |
Patients With Baseline Substance Use | 5.5 | 9 |
Patients Without Baseline Alcohol Abuse | 4 | 7.2 |
Patients Without Baseline Mental Health Disturbance | 4.2 | 7.6 |
Patients Without Baseline Substance Use | 4.3 | 7.8 |
SVR12 is defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs without any confirmed quantifiable (≥ LLOQ) post-treatment value before or during that SVR window. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 97.9 |
SVR12 is defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs without any confirmed quantifiable (≥ LLOQ) post-treatment value before or during that SVR window. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 97.8 |
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) < lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs without any confirmed quantifiable (≥ LLOQ) post-treatment value before or during that SVR window. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 97.6 |
SVR12 is defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs without any confirmed quantifiable (≥ LLOQ) post-treatment value before or during that SVR window. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 98.2 |
SVR12 is defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs without any confirmed quantifiable (≥ LLOQ) post-treatment value before or during that SVR window. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 98.1 |
SVR12 is defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs without any confirmed quantifiable (≥ LLOQ) post-treatment value before or during that SVR window. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 98.7 |
On-treatment virologic failure is defined as breakthrough (confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment, or confirmed increase from nadir in HCV RNA (two consecutive HCV rna measurements > 1 log^10 IU/mL above nadir) at any time point during treatment) or failure to suppress during treatment (all on-treatment values of HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ) with at least 6 weeks (defined as study drug duration ≥ 36 days) of treatment. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks while on treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 0.6 |
On-treatment virologic failure is defined as breakthrough (confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment, or confirmed increase from nadir in HCV RNA (two consecutive HCV rna measurements > 1 log^10 IU/mL above nadir) at any time point during treatment) or failure to suppress during treatment (all on-treatment values of HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ) with at least 6 weeks (defined as study drug duration ≥ 36 days) of treatment. Confidence interval calculated using the Wilson score method. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks while on treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 0 |
Relapse12 is defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between end of treatment and 12 weeks after last actual dose of active study drug (up to and including the SVR12 window) excluding reinfection among participants with HCV RNA < LLOQ at final treatment visit who complete treatment and have post-treatment HCV RNA data. Completion of treatment is defined as a study drug duration ≥ 51 days for participants who receive 8 weeks of treatment. HCV reinfection is defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after the end of treatment in a participant who had HCV RNA < LLOQ at final treatment visit, along with the post treatment detection of a different HCV genotype, subtype, or clade compared with baseline, as determined by phylogenetic analysis of the NS3 or NS5A, and/or NS5B gene sequences. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 1.2 |
Relapse12 is defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between end of treatment and 12 weeks after last actual dose of active study drug (up to and including the SVR12 window) excluding reinfection among participants with HCV RNA < LLOQ at final treatment visit who complete treatment and have post-treatment HCV RNA data. Completion of treatment is defined as a study drug duration ≥ 51 days for participants who receive 8 weeks of treatment. HCV reinfection is defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after the end of treatment in a participant who had HCV RNA < LLOQ at final treatment visit, along with the post treatment detection of a different HCV genotype, subtype, or clade compared with baseline, as determined by phylogenetic analysis of the NS3 or NS5A, and/or NS5B gene sequences. Confidence interval calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT02582632)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir | 1.2 |
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 12 weeks following therapy. 95% confidence interval (CI) is calculated using Wilson's score method. The lower bound of the 95% CI for the percentage of participants with SVR12 must exceed 67% to achieve superiority. (NCT02517528)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 + ABT-333 + Ribavirin | 100 |
SVR24 is defined as HCV RNA less than the LLOQ at 24 weeks following therapy. 95% CI is calculated using Wilson's score method. The lower bound of the 95% CI for the percentage of participants with SVR12 must exceed 67% to achieve superiority. SVR24 is primary outcome measure only for China. (NCT02517528)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 + ABT-333 + Ribavirin | 100 |
On treatment virologic failure is defined as confirmed HCV RNA greater than or equal to the LLOQ at any point during treatment after HCV RNA less than LLOQ, confirmed increase from the lowest value post-baseline in HCV RNA (two consecutive HCV RNA measurements greater than 1 log10 IU/mL above the lowest value post-baseline) at any time point during treatment, or HCV RNA greater than or equal to LLOQ persistently during treatment with at least 6 weeks (greater than or equal to 36 days) of treatment. 95% CI is calculated using Wilson's score method. (NCT02517528)
Timeframe: Within 12 weeks after first dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 + ABT-333 + Ribavirin | 0 |
Virologic relapse is defined as confirmed HCV RNA greater than or equal to LLOQ between end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drugs among participants completing treatment and with HCV RNA less than LLOQ at the end of treatment. Completion of treatment is defined as a study drug duration greater than or equal to 77 days. 95% CI is calculated using Wilson's score method. (NCT02517528)
Timeframe: Within 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 + ABT-333 + Ribavirin | 0 |
Virologic relapse is defined as confirmed HCV RNA greater than or equal to LLOQ between end of treatment and 24 weeks after the last dose of study drugs among participants completing treatment and with HCV RNA less than LLOQ at the end of treatment. Completion of treatment is defined as a study drug duration greater than or equal to 77 days. 95% CI is calculated using Wilson's score method. (NCT02517528)
Timeframe: Within 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 + ABT-333 + Ribavirin | 0 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after HCV RNA < LLOQ during active treatment; confirmed increase of > 1 log(subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest value post-baseline in HCV RNA during active treatment; or all on-treatment values of HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ with at least 6 weeks of active treatment. (NCT02517515)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Naïve) | 1.1 |
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Experienced) | 0 |
Post-treatment relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of active study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA levels < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT02517515)
Timeframe: From the end of treatment through 12 weeks after the last dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Naïve) | 0 |
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Experienced) | 0 |
Post-treatment relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between the end of treatment and 24 weeks after the last dose of active study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA levels < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT02517515)
Timeframe: From the end of treatment through 24 weeks after the last dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Naïve) | 0 |
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Experienced) | 0 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Naïve) | 99.5 |
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Experienced) | 100 |
SVR24 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Naïve) | 99.5 |
Double-blind 3-DAA (Treatment-Experienced) | 100 |
(NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks
Intervention | percentage of planned duration of RBV (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 101.0 |
"The PAM-13 item scale is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Based on responses to the 13-item measure, the score is calculated by adding up the raw scores (range of the sum: 13 - 52) and mapping up the value onto a scale of 0-100 indicating strength of agreement with the 13 items. A higher score indicates that the patient is likely to participate more actively in health care processes and takes more responsibility for his or her health." (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 7.60 |
SVR12 defined as the HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (i.e. at least 70 days) after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 100 |
Breakthrough defined as at least 1 documented HCV RNA less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0 |
Relapse defined as HCV RNA less than 50 IU/mL at EoT followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL. (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0 |
Virological response defined as HCV RNA level less than 50 IU/mL. (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 100 |
Percentage of the DAA dose taken in relation to the target dose of DAA (cumulative dose taken divided by target dose in percent), presented as the number of participants taking > 95% to ≤ 105% of the target dose and those taking > 80% to ≤ 95% of the target dose. (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
> 95% to ≤ 105% of target dose | > 80% to ≤ 95% of target dose | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 38 | 1 |
Percentage of the RBV dose taken in relation to the target dose of RBV (cumulative dose taken divided by target dose in percent), presented as the number of participants taking > 95% to ≤ 105% of the target dose and those taking > 80% to ≤ 95% of the target dose. (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
> 95% to ≤ 105% of target dose | > 80% to ≤ 95% of target dose | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 32 | 1 |
Percentage of participants using each component of the PSP, including personal support, educational and information material (printed, online) and additional digital and mobile resources (web-portal, app, and reminders). (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Personal support | Educational/information material - printed | Educational/information material - online | Additional resources - web portal | Additional resources - app | Additional resources - reminders | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 28 | 24 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
On-treatment virologic failure defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented HCV RNA less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL). Relapse (defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at EoT or at the last on-treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL post-treatment). (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (i.e. at least 70 days) after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
On-treatment virologic failure | Relapse | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0 | 0 |
Premature study drug discontinuation category is defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug and who experienced no on-treatment virologic failure. The final SVR non-response category was defined as missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria. (NCT02798315)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (i.e. at least 70 days) after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Premature study drug discontinuation | Missing SVR12 data / other | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0 | 0 |
"PAM 13 is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management, consisting of 13 questions. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score, then transformed to a scale with a theoretical range 0 to 100, based on calibration tables, with higher PAM scores indicating higher patient activation." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.44 |
(NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percent glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -7.07 |
Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Participants with missing HCV RNA were counted as virological failure. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 20, 24, or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 90.7 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 94.4 |
Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: 8, 12, or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.5 |
RVR 4 was defined as participants with HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at week 4. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 49.0 |
Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 1.2 |
"Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The Core Population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12 included all core population participants who~had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~or had HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 20, 24, or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 95.5 |
"Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The Core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR24 included all core population participants who~had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 126 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~or had HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 126 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 32, 36, or 48 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 94.8 |
(NCT02618928)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 8 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.
Intervention | percentage of days (Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 98.5 |
The BMQ consists of 2 sections and 18 questions to screen for patients' beliefs, attitudes and concerns about their medication. The BMQ-Specific section comprises two 5-item subscales assessing the necessity of and concerns about the prescribed medication (Specific-Necessity and Specific-Concerns). The BMQ-General section comprises two 4-item subscales assessing beliefs that medicines are harmful and overused by doctors in general (General-Harm and General-Overuse). The 18 items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 5. High scores in the Specific-Concerns scale represent the notion that adverse reactions are potentially harmful when taking medication on a regular basis, and high scores in the Specific-Necessity scale indicate the patient's need to adhere to medication to maintain health. High scores in the General-Harm and General-Overuse scales represent an overall negative perception of medication. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Specific Concerns | Specific Necessity | General Overuse | General Harm | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -0.100 | -0.099 | 0.119 | 0.135 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.044 | 0.088 | 0.087 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status with a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable)." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 6.8 | 10.6 | 10.4 |
"The Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) questionnaire was used to assess the impact of fatigue on the quality of life of patients.~The FIS consists of 40 items, each of which is scored 0 (no problem) to 4 (extreme problem), providing a total score from of 0 to 160, where a lower score = less fatigue impact" (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -6.78 | -18.27 | -16.75 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 5.2 | 0.4 | -1.5 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -1.2 | -5.5 | -7.4 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 1.6 | -7.2 | -9.5 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 8, 12, or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 1.3 | -4.9 | -8.7 |
"SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following:~On-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough [at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment] or failure to suppress [each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL]);~Relapse, defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened);~Death~Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virologic failure;~Insufficient virological response reported or HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-EOT and none of the above criteria~Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria." (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 20, 24, or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On-treatment virological failure | Relapse | Death | Premature treatment discontinuation | Insufficient virological response reported | Missing/none of the above | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 11 | 7 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 30 |
Concomitant medication other than for chronic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir until after the last dose. (NCT02618928)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 8 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any co-medication | Beta blocking agents | Analgesics | Thyroid therapy | Peptic ulcer / gastro-oesophageal reflux disease | Benzodiazepine derivatives | ACE inhibitors | Diuretics | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 351 | 60 | 58 | 46 | 45 | 40 | 39 | 37 |
(NCT02618928)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose (12 to 28 weeks depending on treatment regimen). The median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 84 (4, 167) days.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Any adverse event | Serious adverse event | Pregnancy | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 163 | 20 | 1 |
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels < 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 84.8 |
SVR12 is defined as HCV RNA levels < 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug in the Core Population Sufficient Follow-up (CPSFU). (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 95.9 |
The percentage of participants with on-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough [defined as at least one documented HCV RNA <50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA >= 50 IU/mL during treatment]). (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 1.2 |
The percentage of participants with relapse (defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at EoT followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL) (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.0 |
The percentage of participants with virological response (HCV RNA <50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EoT, defined as last intake of ABBVIE REGIMEN or ribavirin [RBV]). (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 94.5 |
Adherence to RBV is defined as percentage of target dose (adherence=cumulated dose taken/ [initially prescribed dose x planned duration]). (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of treatment
Intervention | percentage of planned RBV dose taken (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 95.7 |
The WPAI questionnaire was used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, work productivity impairment and daily activity impairment. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity: Presenteeism - percentage of impairment while working due to health problem; Total work productivity impairment - percentage of overall work impairment due to health problem Absenteeism - percentage of work time missed due to health problem; Total activity impairment - percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problem (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Day 0 to post treatment week 12
Intervention | percentage (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Change from baseline in absenteeism | Change from baseline in presenteeism | Change from baseline in total work impairment | Change from baseline in total activity impairment | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.1 | -10.6 | -10.5 | -8.3 |
The AbbVie PSP included educational and information material (including printed, online, pillbox), digital and mobile resource (web-portal), digital and mobile resources (reminders). The PSP utilization and satisfaction assessment evaluated the frequency of utilization (usually daily, several times per week, usually once weekly, less than once weekly) and patient's overall satisfaction (very good, good, satisfactory) with their respective PSP. (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Participants Using at least 1 PSP since last visit | Personal support - satisfaction Very Good | Personal support satisfaction - Good | Personal support satisfaction - Satisfactory | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 65.4 | 34.6 | 7.7 | 3.8 |
Deviations from the target dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN were defined as the actual duration is shortened/prolonged (exceedence) for more than 7 days. (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Early discontinuation | Exeedance | Not deviated | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 7.9 | 1.8 | 90.3 |
Adherence to the ABBVIE REGIMEN was defined as percentage of target dose (adherence=cumulated number of pills taken / [initially prescribed number of pills x planned duration]) and categorized as follows: >105%, >95% to <=105%, >80% to <=95%, >50% to <=80%, <=50%. (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
> 105% Adherence | >95% - <=105% Adherence | >80% - <=95% Adherence | >50% - <=80% Adherence | <=50% Adherence | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 1.8 | 88.5 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 3.0 |
Adherence to RBV is defined as percentage of target dose (adherence=cumulated number of pills taken / [initially prescribed number of pills x planned duration]) and categorized as follows: >105%, >95% - <=105%, >80% - <=95%, >50% - <=80%, <=50%. (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks of treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
> 105% Adherence | >95% - <=105% Adherence | >80% - <=95% Adherence | >50% - <=80% Adherence | <=50% Adherence | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 3.3 | 85.0 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Percentage of participants with co-morbidities and/or co-infections at baseline (Day 0). (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Day 0
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All co-morbidities and co-infections | HCV co-infections | Liver and/or CHC related co-morbidities | Chronic kidney disease | Psychiatric disorders | Diabetes mellitus | Lipid disorder | Hyperthyroidism | Hypothyroidism | Cardiovascular disease | Immunologically medicated disease | Psychoactive substance dependency | Other | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 57.6 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 15.2 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 23.0 | 1.2 | 10.9 | 20.6 |
Percentage of participants taking at least 1 concomitant medication (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Day 0 to end of treatment (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients Taking at least 1 co-medication | Analgesics | Antidepressants | Beta blocking agents | Calcium channel blockers | Thyroid therapy | Vitamins | Blood glucose lowering drugs | Drugs used in addictive disorders | ACE inhibitors | Angriotensin II antagonists | Anti-asthmatics | Benzodiazepine derivatives | Antithrombotic | Drugs for peptic ulcer/gastroesophageal reflux dis | Angiotensin II Antagonists | Antipsychotics | Diuretics | ACE inhibitors, combinations | Insulin and analogues | Mineral supplements | Antieplieptics | Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products | Drugs used in benign prostatic hypertrophy | Herbal medicine | Vasodilators for cardiac diseases | Anti-dementia drugs | Antibacterials | Anti-gout preparations | Drugs for functional gastrointestinal disorders | HMG COA reductase inhibitors | Hypnotics and sedatives | Immunosuppressive agents | Lipotropics | Vasoprotectives | Anti-adrenergic antihypertensives | Antibiotics for dermatological use | Antiemetics and anti nauseants | Antigloucoma | Antihistamines | Antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents, cytostatic | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 49.1 | 12.3 | 11.7 | 9.9 | 8.8 | 7.6 | 5.8 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status (utility). The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. The EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) records the participant's self-rated health status on a vertical graduated scale from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst imaginable health state and 100 indicating the best imaginable health state. An increase in EQ-5D-5L VAS score indicates improvement. (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Day 0 and post treatment week 12
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
EQ-5D-5L: Index Score Basline | EQ-5D-5L: Index Score 12 Weeks EOT | EQ-5D-5L: VAS Score Basline | EQ-5D-5L: VAS Score 12 Weeks EOT | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.83 | 0.88 | 70.4 | 79.4 |
"The PAM-13 item scale is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Responses are summed and averaged to come up with an overall score of level 1 through level 4. The responses to the 13 questions are summed and transformed into a PAM Score between 0 and 100; a higher score indicates more knowledge and confidence to take action for self-management." (NCT02582658)
Timeframe: Day 0 and End of Treatment (EoT)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
PAM-13 Day 0 | PAM-13 EOT | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN +/- Ribavirin (RBV) | 63.3 | 62.6 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by participants. The 5 items in the questionnaire comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate VAS. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life. For the VAS, the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Participant responses to the EQ-5D-5L were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post EoT (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.039 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by participants. The 5 items in the questionnaire comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate VAS. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life. For the VAS, the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Participant responses to the EQ-5D-5L were used to generate a HSI. HSI ranges is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post EoT (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.046 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by participants. Participants also rated their perception of their overall health on a separate VAS. The scale is numbered from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post EoT (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 7.5 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by participants. Participants also rated their perception of their overall health on a separate VAS. The scale is numbered from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post EoT (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 4.0 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by participants. Participants also rated their perception of their overall health on a separate VAS. The scale is numbered from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 5.7 |
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, designed for self-completion by participants. The 5 items in the questionnaire comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate VAS. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life. For the VAS, the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Participant responses to the EQ-5D-5L were used to generate a health status index (HSI). HSI ranges is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: EoT (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.005 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) level ˂50 IU/mL 12 weeks after end of treatment (EoT) (defined as after last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN [paritaprevir/ritonavir - ombitasvir ± dasabuvir] or ribavirin [RBV]). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (i.e. 70 to 126 days) after the last dose of study drug (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 87.7 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented HCV RNA <50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 1.5 |
RVR4 was defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at Week 4. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 66.2 |
Relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at EoT or at the last on-treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL post-treatment in participants who were treated. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (i.e. at least 70 days) after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 1.5 |
Relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at EoT followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL post treatment in participants who completed treatment (actual duration of ABBVIE REGIMEN is not shortened more than 7 days) and had HCV RNA results available in the SVR12 window. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (i.e. at least 70 days) after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 1.8 |
SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL 24 weeks after EoT. During the course of the study, standard of care was changing and it was no longer common practice to assess SVR24. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after EoT (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 44.4 |
Viral breakthrough was defined as at least 1 documented HCV RNA <50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 0.0 |
Virologic response is defined as HCV RNA level <50 IU/mL. (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 95.4 |
Premature study drug discontinuation was defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug (ABBVIE REGIMEN or RBV) and who experienced no on-treatment virologic failure (defined as breakthrough [at least 1 documented HCV RNA ˂50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL during treatment] or failure to suppress [each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL]). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Up to EoT, maximum of 24 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Premature Termination ABBVIE REGIMEN | No Premature Termination ABBVIE REGIMEN | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 4 | 61 |
Co-morbidities/co-infections were defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infections (human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] or hepatitis B virus [HBV], tuberculosis, schistosomiasis), liver/chronic hepatitis C (CHC) related co-morbidities (liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, auto-immune hepatitis, Wilson disease, cryoglobulinemia, porphyria cutanea tarda, auto-immune skin disease), and other co-morbidities (chronic kidney disease, psychiatric disorders, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, lipid disorder, cardiovascular disease, immunologically mediated disease, hyper-/hypothyroidism, hemophilia, Thalassemia, sickle cell anemia, V. Willebrand disease, psychoactive substance dependency, kidney transplant, or other). (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0)
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All co-morbidities and co-infections | HCV Co-infections | Liver and/or CHC related co-morbidities | Other Co-morbidities | Kidney Transplantation | Chronic Kidney Disease | Psychiatric Disorders | Diabetes Mellitus | Lipid Disorder | Hypothyroidism | Cardiovascular disease | Hemophilia | Other | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 58 | 2 | 5 | 57 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 4 | 17 | 28 | 2 | 40 |
"This includes all participants that took at least 1 concomitant medication from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with the ABBVIE REGIMEN until after the last dose.~Abbreviations: ACE= angiotensin-converting-enzyme; GERD=gastroesophageal reflux." (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: Day 0 to EoT, maximum 24 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number taking at least 1 co-medication | Beta Blocking Agents | Thyroid Therapy | Vitamins | Angiotensin II Antagonists | Drugs for Peptic Ulcer and GERD | Blood glucose lowering | Diuretics | Analgesics | Calcium Channel Blockers | ACE Inhibitors | Mineral Supplements | Antidepressants | Corticosteroids | Drugs for treatment of bone disease | HMG COA Reductase Inhibitors | Anti-anemic | Antibacterials | Antithrombotic | Dermatologicals | Drugs for Constipation | Immunosuppressive agents | Anti-asthmatics | Insulin and Analogues | Anti-andrenergic Antihypertensives | Anti-arrhythmics | Antidiarrheals | Anti-inflammatory/antirheumatic products | Antineoplastic,immunomodulating agents, cytostatic | Antipsychotics | Antivirals for HIV, combinations | Antivirals, reverse transcriptase inhibitors HIV | Benzodiazepine derivatives | Bile therapy | Blood substitutes/perfusion solutions | Hemostatics/vitamin K | Lipotropics | Other antivirals, HIV treatment | Other Sex hormones | Vasoprotectives | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 55 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"For a participant to be include in this analysis, the participant needed to meet each and any of the following SVR12 non-response categories:~On-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough [defined as at least one documented HCV RNA <50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL during treatment] or failure to suppress [each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL]);~Relapse (defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at actual EoT followed by HCV RNA ≥50 IU/mL post-treatment for participants who completed treatment [not more than 7 days shortened]);~Premature study drug discontinuation with no on-treatment virologic failure;~Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria (including participants with missing SVR12 data).~Abbreviations: EoT=end of treatment." (NCT02851069)
Timeframe: During treatment and 12 weeks (i.e. at least 70 days) after the last dose of study drug (up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-response 12 weeks after EoT | On-treatment virologic failure | Relapse | Premature treatment discontinuation | Missing SVR12 data/None of the above criteria | |
ABBVIE REGIMEN ± Ribavirin (RBV) | 12.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 70.6 |
Premature study drug discontinuation was defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug with no on-treatment virologic failure. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 1.8 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL at end of treatment or at the last on-treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL post-treatment. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0 |
The number of participants with missing SVR12 data or SVR12 nonresponder participants who did not meet criteria for on-treatment virologic failure, relapse, premature treatment discontinuation, and who did not have an Insufficient virological response reported was documented. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 25.9 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL). (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 1.3 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.0 |
"Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The core population with sufficient follow-up data 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug (CPSFU12) was defined as all participants who fulfilled one of the following criteria:~evaluable HCV RNA data ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~an HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to AE) or virologic failure" (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (at least 70 days) after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 95.8 |
Viral breakthrough was defined as at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.0 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment. (NCT02803138)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 82.0 |
"PAM 13 is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management, consisting of 13 questions. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score, then transformed to a scale with a theoretical range 0 to 100, based on calibration tables, with higher PAM scores indicating higher patient activation" (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | -3.94 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | -4.00 |
Concomitant medication other than for chronic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir until after the last dose. (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 263 |
Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 98.1 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL. (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 99.6 |
"Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12 included all core population participants who~had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir~or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~or had HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir with dasabuvir due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 98.5 |
Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: 12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.00 |
Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment. (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.8 |
(NCT02807402)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.
Intervention | percentage of days (Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 94.5 |
The BMQ consists of 2 sections and 18 questions to screen for patients' beliefs, attitudes and concerns about their medication. The BMQ-Specific section comprises two 5-item subscales assessing the necessity of and concerns about the prescribed medication (Specific-Necessity and Specific-Concerns). The BMQ-General section comprises two 4-item subscales assessing beliefs that medicines are harmful and overused by doctors in general (General-Harm and General-Overuse). The 18 items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 5. High scores in the Specific-Concerns scale represent the notion that adverse reactions are potentially harmful when taking medication on a regular basis, and high scores in the Specific-Necessity scale indicate the patient's need to adhere to medication to maintain health. High scores in the General-Harm and General-Overuse scales represent an overall negative perception of medication. (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Specific Concerns | Specific Necessity | General Overuse | General Harm | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 0.06 | -0.21 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | -0.26 | -0.07 | 0.01 | -0.02 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of Treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. with a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable)." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of Treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 8.36 | 12.7 | 15.2 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | 10.9 | 13.9 | 18.8 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of Treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | -1.4 | -3.8 | -8.7 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | -1.3 | -15.4 | -7.5 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of Treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | -8.5 | -10.4 | -9.3 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | -23.3 | -16.7 | -70.0 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of Treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | -10.4 | -10.5 | -11.5 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | -2.9 | -9.5 | -8.9 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of Treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | -8.7 | -11.5 | -20.7 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | -18.5 | -17.0 | -72.3 |
(NCT02807402)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose (16 or 28 weeks depending on the treatment regimen). The over all median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 84 (28, 175) days.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Any adverse event | Serious adverse events | Pregnancies | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 82 | 17 | 0 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir With RBV | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(NCT02807402)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Any comorbidity or coinfection | Any coinfection | Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV | Coinfection with hepatitis B virus | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 335 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
"SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following:~On-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough [at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment] or failure to suppress [each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL]);~Relapse, defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened);~Death;~Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virological failure;~Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria." (NCT02807402)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
On-treatment virologic failure | Relapse | Death | Premature treatment discontinuation | None of the above criteria | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
The PAM-13 item scale is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a higher level of knowledge, skill and confidence. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Baseline, EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
2 DAA+RBV | 1.91 |
3DAA | 0.01 |
3DAA+RBV | -0.74 |
(NCT02615145)
Timeframe: up to post-treatment Week 48 (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Total | 59.1 |
2 DAA+RBV | 64.4 |
3DAA | 54.1 |
3DAA+RBV | 66.0 |
(NCT02615145)
Timeframe: up to post-treatment Week 48 (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 70.0 |
Genotype 1 Participants | 69.3 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 71.0 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 68.3 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 76.6 |
RVR4 is defined as participants with HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at Week 4. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 57.0 |
All Genotype 1 Participants | 57.2 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 62.1 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 54.7 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 55.3 |
SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than the lower limit of quantification (< 50 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 88.1 |
All Genotype 1 Participants | 88.4 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 77.9 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 93.9 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 85.1 |
SVR24 is defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL 24 Weeks After EoT. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks After EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 95.0 |
All Genotype 1 Participants | 95.4 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 92.8 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 96.5 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 91.9 |
SVR48 is defined as participants with HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL 48 weeks after EoT. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: 48 Weeks After EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 92.7 |
Genotype 1 Participants | 93.2 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 89.0 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 95.1 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 88.0 |
Virological response is defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL. End of Treatment (EoT) is defined as the last intake of ABBVIE REGIMEN or RBV. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: EoT, (treatment period was 12 weeks or 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 93.4 |
All Genotype 1 Participants | 94.8 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 89.0 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 97.8 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 80.9 |
The FACIT-F Scale is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue during the past 7 days and its impact upon daily activities and function. Scores range from 0 - 100, with higher scores indicating a lesser degree of fatigue. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Baseline, EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks), 12 and 48 weeks after EoT
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
EoT | 12 Weeks EoT | 48 Weeks EoT | |
2 DAA+RBV | 4.17 | 12.5 | 13.3 |
3DAA | 6.45 | 9.92 | 9.68 |
3DAA+RBV | 4.49 | 10.2 | 10.3 |
"PRISM is a visual quantitative method to assess the perceived burden of suffering due to illness. The distance between the center of the self (yellow disk) and the illness disk (red disk) is called self-illness separation (SIS) and is measured in cm (range is 0 - 27). The smaller the distance, the higher the burden of suffering." (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 and 48 weeks after EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | cm (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks EoT | 48 Weeks EoT | |
2 DAA+RBV | 5.41 | 10.2 |
3DAA | 7.05 | 10.1 |
3DAA+RBV | 5.31 | 10.3 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total activity impairment indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems." (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Baseline, EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks),12 and 24 weeks after EoT
Intervention | percentage impairment of activity (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
EoT | 12 Weeks EoT | 24 Weeks EoT | |
2 DAA+RBV | 7.0 | -7.7 | -11.3 |
3DAA | -3.0 | -13.3 | -12.3 |
3DAA+RBV | -2.8 | -10.5 | -16.3 |
Total | -2.1 | -11.9 | -13.4 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total work productivity impairment indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems." (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Baseline, EoT (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks),12 and 24 weeks after EoT
Intervention | percentage of overall work impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
EoT | 12 Weeks EoT | 24 Weeks EoT | |
2 DAA+RBV | 5.0 | -4.2 | -3.2 |
3DAA | 4.4 | -3.8 | -7.2 |
3DAA+RBV | 7.5 | -5.4 | -9.7 |
Total | 5.5 | -4.3 | -7.4 |
Documented by participant interview and/or participant diary. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12 or Week 24
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN | |
3DAA | 83 |
Documented by participant interview and/or participant diary. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12 or Week 24
Intervention | days (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN | RBV | |
2 DAA+RBV | 84 | 84 |
3DAA+RBV | 84 | 81 |
Total | 83 | 81 |
"The number of participants meeting the following SVR12 non-response categories:~On-treatment virological failure (breakthrough) defined >= 1 documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA >= 50 IU/mL during treatment or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value >= 50 IU/mL)~Relapse defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at EoT followed by HCV RNA >= 50 IU/mL post-treatment in participants who completed treatment (<= 7 days shortened)." (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Up to post-treatment Week 12 (treatment period was 12 or 24 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
On-Treatment Virological Failure | Relapse | |
All Genotype 1 Participants | 3 | 5 |
All Participants | 6 | 5 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 3 | 1 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 0 | 4 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 3 | 0 |
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence. If an AE meets any of the following criteria, it is considered serious: results in death, is life threatening, results in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly, results in significant disability/incapacity, or is an important medical event. TEAEs are defined as any reported event that begins or worsens in severity after initiation of study drug through 30 days post-study drug dosing. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: up to 30 days post treatment (treatment period was 12 weeks or 24 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
≥ 1 TEAE | ≥ 1 Serious TEAE | Pregnancy | |
2 DAA+RBV | 16 | 1 | 0 |
3DAA | 65 | 7 | 0 |
3DAA+RBV | 43 | 5 | 0 |
Total | 124 | 13 | 0 |
Planned duration of treatment was 12 or 24 weeks. (NCT02615145)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12 or Week 24
Intervention | percentage of planned treatment duration (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
ABBVIE REGIMEN | RBV | |
All Genotype 1 Participants | 98.6 | 94.1 |
All Participants | 98.7 | 95.4 |
Genotype 1a Participants | 97.7 | 95.3 |
Genotype 1b Participants | 99.1 | 83.5 |
Genotype 4 Participants | 99.8 | 99.8 |
"PAM-13 is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management, consisting of 13 questions. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score, then transformed to a scale with a theoretical range 0 to 100, based on calibration tables, with higher PAM scores indicating that the participant is likely to participate more actively in health care processes and takes more responsibility for his or her health." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | 0.85 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 0.22 |
(NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Up to post treatment week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 179 |
Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: 12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0 |
Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Participants with missing HCV RNA were counted as virological failure. (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 94.5 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL. (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 97.1 |
Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment. (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 1.3 |
"Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The Core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR24 included all core population participants who~had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 126 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~or had HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 126 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 36 or 48 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 96.6 |
(NCT02636608)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.
Intervention | percentage of days (Mean) |
---|---|
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 93.1 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable). The higher the score the better the health status." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBV | 2.77 | 5.98 | 6.07 |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Without RBV | 5.70 | 9.18 | 10.5 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -2.1 | -1.7 | 1.0 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0.6 | -5.7 | -7.3 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -0.5 | -6.7 | -8.5 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks after end of treatment | 24 weeks after end of treatment | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | -2.3 | -8.1 | -7.3 |
Concomitant medication other than for chronic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir until after the last dose. (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any concomitant medication | Beta blocking agents | ACE inhibitors | Diuretics | Peptic ulcer / gastro-oesophageal reflux disease | Calcium channel blockers | Blood glucose-lowering drugs | Mineral supplements | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 169 | 78 | 53 | 42 | 42 | 34 | 27 | 25 |
(NCT02636608)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose (16 or 28 weeks depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Adverse events | Serious adverse events | Pregnancies | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 29 | 6 | 0 |
"SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following:~On-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough [at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment] or failure to suppress [each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL]);~Relapse, defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened);~Death;~Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virologic failure;~None of the above criteria or missing SVR12 data" (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
On-treatment virologic failure | Relapse | Death | Premature treatment discontinuation | None of the above criteria | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
"Adherence to ribavirin is expressed as a percentage of the target dose, and was calculated as:~Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose * planned duration) * 100" (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
> 105% | > 95% to ≤ 105% | > 80% to ≤ 95% | > 50% to ≤ 80% | ≤ 50% | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 1.0 | 78.1 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 8.6 |
"Adherence to the ABBVIE treatment regimen is expressed as a percentage of the target dose and was calculated as:~Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose * planned duration) * 100~The ABBVIE regimen consists of paritaprevir/r and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir." (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
> 105% | > 95% to ≤ 105% | > 80% to ≤ 95% | > 50% to ≤ 80% | ≤ 50% | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 3.4 | 93.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
"At the end of treatment visit participants were asked to indicate which of the following PSP services they had used:~Personal support (e.g., Care Coach)~Printed educational material~Online educational materials~Web-portal~App" (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any | Personal support | Printed educational material | Online educational material | Web-portal | App | None/missing | |
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 141 | 134 | 128 | 58 | 65 | 54 | 38 |
At the end of treatment visit participants were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with each of the PSP services they had used. (NCT02636608)
Timeframe: End of treatment (weeks 12 or 24 depending on treatment regimen)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Personal support72564016 | Printed educational material72564016 | Online educational material72564016 | Web-portal72564016 | App72564016 | ||||||||||||||||
Good | Satisfactory | Poor | Very good | |||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 95 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin | 0 |
Concomitant medication other than for chromic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with the ABBVIE REGIMEN until after the last dose. (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
2 DAA + RBV | 10 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 103 |
3 DAA + RBV | 64 |
Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 96.8 |
Genotype 1a | 100.0 |
Genotype 1b | 96.6 |
Genotype 4 | 95.0 |
Sustained virologic response is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 36 or 48 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 96.3 |
Genotype 1a | 100.0 |
Genotype 1b | 96.0 |
Genotype 4 | 95.0 |
Virologic response is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL. (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 95.5 |
Genotype 1a | 100.0 |
Genotype 1b | 95.1 |
Genotype 4 | 100.0 |
"Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12 included all core population participants who~had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE regimen,~or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~or had HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE regimen due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 97.6 |
Genotype 1a | 100.0 |
Genotype 1b | 97.4 |
Genotype 4 | 95.0 |
"Rapid virological response at week 4 (RVR4) was defined as participants with HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at week 4.~Due to the non-interventional character of the study, many participants did not have an HCV RNA assessed at treatment week 4 since this is not generally recommended in the label. Participants with missing data at the RVR4 time point were considered as virological failures." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 3.7 |
Genotype 1a | 0.0 |
Genotype 1b | 4.0 |
Genotype 4 | 5.0 |
Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: 12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 0.0 |
Genotype 1a | 0.0 |
Genotype 1b | 0.0 |
Genotype 4 | 0.0 |
Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment. (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Genotype 1 (Total) | 0.6 |
Genotype 1a | 0.0 |
Genotype 1b | 0.6 |
Genotype 4 | 0.0 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
2 DAA + RBV | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
3 DAA + RBV | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
"The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. with a separate visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable)." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
2 DAA + RBV | 4.10 | 7.93 | 6.54 |
3 DAA + RBV | 5.13 | 7.01 | 9.20 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 7.41 | 9.11 | 11.8 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks post treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
2 DAA + RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3 DAA + RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
2 DAA + RBV | -5.0 | -5.0 | -10.0 |
3 DAA + RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | -10.0 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
2 DAA + RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | -5.0 |
3 DAA + RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | -10.0 |
"The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity.~Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of treatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment
Intervention | percent impairment (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
End of treatment | 12 weeks post treatment | 24 weeks post treatment | |
2 DAA + RBV | -5.0 | -5.0 | -10.0 |
3 DAA + RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 0.0 | 0.0 | -10.0 |
(NCT02640547)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose. The median duration of treatment was 84 days.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Any adverse event | Serious adverse events | Pregnancies | |
2 DAA + RBV | 8 | 3 | 0 |
3 DAA + RBV | 42 | 8 | 0 |
3 DAA Without RBV | 19 | 3 | 0 |
(NCT02640547)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Any comorbidity or coinfection | Any coinfection | Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV | Coinfection with hepatitis B virus | |
Genotype 1 (Total) | 224 | 15 | 8 | 8 |
Genotype 1a | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Genotype 1b | 214 | 13 | 6 | 8 |
Genotype 4 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
"SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following:~Relapse, defined as HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened);~Death;~Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virological failure;~Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria." (NCT02640547)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Relapse | Death | Premature treatment discontinuation | Missing SVR12 data/None of the above | |
Genotype 1 (Total) | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
Genotype 1a | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Genotype 1b | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
Genotype 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 |
Premature study drug discontinuation was defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug with no on-treatment virologic failure. (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 1.6 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL at end of treatment or at the last on-treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL post-treatment. (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 1.9 |
The number of participants with missing SVR12 data or SVR12 nonresponder participants who did not meet criteria for on-treatment virologic failure, relapse, premature treatment discontinuation, and who did not have an Insufficient virological response reported was documented. (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 5.8 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL). (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 1.6 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL. (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 2.3 |
Viral breakthrough was defined as at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.3 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment. (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 92.9 |
"SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. The core population (CP) consisted of participants who met all inclusion criteria and were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). The core population with sufficient follow-up data 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug (CPSFU12) was defined as all CP participants who fulfilled one of the following criteria:~evaluable HCV RNA data ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~an HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to AE) or virologic failure" (NCT02581163)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Core population (CP) | CPSFU12 | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 87.7 | 93.8 |
Premature study drug discontinuation was defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug with no on-treatment virologic failure. (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 2.0 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL at end of treatment or at the last on treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL post-treatment. (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 0 |
The number of participants with missing SVR12 data or SVR12 nonresponder participants who did not meet criteria for on-treatment virologic failure, relapse, premature treatment discontinuation, and who did not have an Insufficient virological response reported was documented. (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 1.0 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL). (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 0 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL. (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: From the end of treatment through the end of study (maximum of 48 weeks post-treatment)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 0 |
Viral breakthrough was defined as at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 0 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment. (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 97.0 |
"SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. The core population (CP) consisted of participants who met all inclusion criteria and were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). The core population with sufficient follow-up data 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug (CPSFU12) was defined as all CP participants who fulfilled one of the following criteria:~evaluable HCV RNA data ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~an HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to AE) or virologic failure" (NCT02582671)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Core population (CP) | CPSFU12 | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 | 97.0 | 98.0 |
Premature study drug discontinuation was defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug with no on-treatment virologic failure. (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 2.1 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL at end of treatment or at the last on-treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL post-treatment. (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 2.1 |
The number of participants with missing SVR12 data or SVR12 nonresponder participants who did not meet criteria for on-treatment virologic failure, relapse, premature treatment discontinuation, and who did not have an Insufficient virological response reported was documented. (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 6.6 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL). (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 1.3 |
Relapse was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL. (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 2.6 |
Viral breakthrough was defined as at least 1 documented hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.9 |
Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment. (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 93.8 |
"SVR12 was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. The core population (CP) consisted of participants who met all inclusion criteria and were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). The core population with sufficient follow-up data 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug (CPSFU12) was defined as all CP participants who fulfilled one of the following criteria:~evaluable HCV RNA data ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~an HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to AE) or virologic failure" (NCT02581189)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Core population (CP) | CPSFU12 | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 86.6 | 94.1 |
Premature study drug discontinuation was defined as participants who prematurely discontinued study drug with no on-treatment virologic failure. (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 2.3 |
Relapse was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL at end of treatment or at the last on-treatment HCV RNA measurement followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL post-treatment. (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.9 |
The number of participants with missing SVR12 data or SVR12 nonresponder participants who did not meet criteria for on-treatment virologic failure, relapse, premature treatment discontinuation, and who did not have an Insufficient virological response was documented. (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 3.8 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as breakthrough (at least 1 documented plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment) or failure to suppress (each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL). (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.5 |
Relapse was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL. (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.9 |
Viral breakthrough was defined as at least 1 documented plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 50 IU/mL during treatment. (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 0.0 |
Virologic response was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL at the end of treatment. (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 93.9 |
"SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug. The core population (CP) consisted of participants who met all inclusion criteria and were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). The core population with sufficient follow-up data 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug (CPSFU12) was defined as all CP participants who fulfilled one of the following criteria:~evaluable HCV RNA data ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN~an HCV RNA value ≥50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline~HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥70 days after the last actual dose of the ABBVIE REGIMEN due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to AE) or virologic failure" (NCT02725866)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Core population (CP) | CPSFU12 | |
Participants With HCV Genotype 1 or 4 | 91.1 | 95.6 |
The percentage of participants with hemoglobin <10 g/dL during treatment is provided. (NCT02609659)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA + RBV 600 mg | 0 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment; confirmed increase of > 1 log(subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest value post-baseline in HCV RNA during treatment; or all on-treatment values of HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ with at least 6 weeks of treatment. (NCT02609659)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA + RBV 600 mg | 1.0 |
Post-treatment relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug, excluding reinfection, among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA levels < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT02609659)
Timeframe: From the end of treatment through 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA + RBV 600 mg | 4.1 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA + RBV 600 mg | 89.5 |
The mean change in hemoglobin (g/L) from baseline to each study visit and to the final treatment visit (up to 12 weeks) is provided. (NCT02609659)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12, and the Final Treatment Visit (up to 12 weeks)
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Final Treatment Visit | |
3-DAA + RBV 600 mg | -6.4 | -8.9 | -11.2 | -12.4 | -12.1 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01715415)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 96.0 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01715415)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 96.7 |
Normalization is defined as alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN) at final treatment visit for participants with alanine aminotransferase greater than ULN at baseline. (NCT01715415)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 96.9 |
Placebo | 12.8 |
Virologic failure was defined as rebound (hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] ≥ lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] after HCV RNA < LLOQ or increase in HCV RNA of at least 1 log10 IU/mL) or failure to suppress (all on-treatment values of plasma HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ with at least 36 days of treatment) during treatment. (NCT01715415)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 0 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01715415)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 96.3 |
Participants were considered to have virologic relapse after treatment if they had confirmed quantifiable plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (≥ LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01715415)
Timeframe: Within 12 weeks post-treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 2.4 |
Assessment for discontinuation due to adverse events and serious adverse events, as addressed by adverse events and laboratory tests. Final study visit is 12 weeks after treatment. (NCT02858180)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after completing treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Heart Failure Cohort | 0 |
Lung Disease Cohort | 0 |
The primary safety endpoint is the number of subjects who complete a full course of therapy. (NCT02858180)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Heart Failure Cohort | 0 |
Lung Disease Cohort | 1 |
The secondary outcome of efficacy will be determined by the number of subjects with hepatitis c virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) below a measurable laboratory limit, 12 weeks after completing therapy. (NCT02858180)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after completing treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Heart Failure Cohort | 10 |
Lung Disease Cohort | 3 |
The secondary outcome of efficacy will be determined by the number of subjects with hepatitis c virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) below a measurable laboratory limit, 4 weeks after completing treatment. (NCT02858180)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after completing treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Heart Failure Cohort | 8 |
Lung Disease Cohort | 3 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01716585)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 95.7 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01716585)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 98.0 |
Normalization is defined as alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN) at final treatment visit for participants with alanine aminotransferase greater than ULN at baseline. (NCT01716585)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 97.0 |
Placebo | 15.8 |
Virologic failure was defined as rebound (hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] ≥ lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] after HCV RNA < LLOQ or increase in HCV RNA of at least 1 log10 IU/mL) or failure to suppress (all on-treatment values of plasma HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ with at least 36 days of treatment) during treatment. (NCT01716585)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 0.2 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01716585)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 96.4 |
Participants were considered to have virologic relapse after treatment if they had confirmed quantifiable plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (≥ LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01716585)
Timeframe: Within 12 weeks post-treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 1.5 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as confirmed increase of > 1 log(subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest value post-baseline HCV RNA during treatment, or confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ at any point during treatment after HCV RNA < LLOQ, or HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ persistently during treatment with at least 6 weeks (≥ 36 days) of treatment. (NCT01782495)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks (for 12-week treatment) or 24 weeks (for 24-week treatment)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A | 0 |
Arm B | 3.7 |
Arm C | 0 |
Arm D | 0 |
Arm E | 0 |
Arm F | 0 |
Arm G | 0 |
Arm H | 0 |
Arm I | 0 |
Arm J | 0 |
Arm K | 0 |
Post-treatment relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA levels < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01782495)
Timeframe: From the end of treatment through 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A | 3.0 |
Arm B | 0 |
Arm C | 0 |
Arm D | 0 |
Arm E | 0 |
Arm F | 4.8 |
Arm G | 0 |
Arm H | 0 |
Arm I | 0 |
Arm J | 0 |
Arm K | 0 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A | 97.1 |
Arm B | 96.3 |
Arm C | 100 |
Arm D | 100 |
Arm E | 100 |
Arm F | 95.5 |
Arm G | 100 |
Arm H | 66.7 |
Arm I | 100 |
Arm J | 100 |
Arm K | 100 |
SVR24 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A | 97.1 |
Arm B | 96.3 |
Arm C | 100 |
Arm D | 100 |
Arm E | 100 |
Arm F | 95.5 |
Arm G | 100 |
Arm H | 66.7 |
Arm I | 100 |
Arm J | 100 |
Arm K | 100 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantification [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 97.4 |
Virologic failure during treatment was defined as rebound (confirmed HCV RNA greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantitation [≥ LLOQ] after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment, or confirmed increase from the lowest value post baseline in HCV RNA [2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements > 1 log(subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest value post baseline] at any time point during treatment) or fail to suppress (HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ) persistently during treatment with at least 6 weeks [≥ 36 days] of treatment. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), and Treatment Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 0 |
Participants were considered to have virologic relapse after treatment if they had confirmed quantifiable plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) ≥ lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA < LLOQ at the end of treatment. Completion of treatment was defined as a study drug duration ≥ 77 days. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: From the end of treatment through 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV | 0 |
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose at one visit between treatment week 2 and treatment week 12, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. A total of 22/38 participants consented for intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC24 in ng*hr/mL)] was estimated using noncompartmental analyses. For ABT-450, ritonavir, and ABT-267, the AUC from time 0 to the last measureable concentration (AUCt in ng*hr/mL) was calculated instead of AUC24 due to time deviations at 24 hours. The AUCt values are approximately equivalent to AUC24. For ABT-333, ABT-333 M1, and RBV, the AUC from time 0 to 12 hours (AUC12 in ng*hr/mL) after the morning dose was calculated using the 24-hour concentration as the 12-hour concentration as dosing was twice a day and a 12-hour sample was not collected in this study. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0) and 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng*hr/mL (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT-450 | Ritonavir | ABT-267 | ABT-333 | ABT-333 M1 metabolite | Ribavirin | |
Buprenorphine ± Naloxone | 27438.94 | 14303.27 | 1523.48 | 5666.15 | 3086.73 | 33362.24 |
Methadone | 37174.89 | 11375.38 | 1486.72 | 5021.41 | 2950.36 | 33499.39 |
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose at one visit between treatment week 2 and treatment week 12, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. A total of 22/38 participants consented for intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0) and 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT-450 | Ritonavir | ABT-267 | ABT-333 | ABT-333 M1 metabolite | Ribavirin | |
Buprenorphine ± Naloxone | 3269.50 | 1261.92 | 102.00 | 805.08 | 469.92 | 3389.17 |
Methadone | 2973.30 | 888.70 | 95.98 | 671.90 | 439.64 | 3232.00 |
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose at one visit between treatment week 2 and treatment week 12, and analyzed using validated analytical methods. A total of 22/38 participants consented for intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling. Minimum plasma concentration (C trough; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0) and 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT-450 | Ritonavir | ABT-267 | ABT-333 | ABT-333 M1 metabolite | Ribavirin | |
Buprenorphine ± Naloxone | 170.01 | 167.35 | 33.75 | 223.76 | 86.98 | 2555.83 |
Methadone | 458.53 | 136.87 | 32.78 | 147.95 | 71.10 | 2632.00 |
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose at one visit between treatment week 2 and treatment week 12, and analyzed using validated analytical methods. A total of 22/38 participants consented for intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling. The time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax; measured in hours) was directly determined from the concentration-time data. (NCT01911845)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (time 0) and 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | hours (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT-450 | Ritonavir | ABT-267 | ABT-333 | ABT-333 M1 metabolite | Ribavirin | |
Buprenorphine ± Naloxone | 4.38 | 4.18 | 4.69 | 4.25 | 4.40 | 3.72 |
Methadone | 6.81 | 7.01 | 5.26 | 4.05 | 4.65 | 5.83 |
Virologic failure during treatment was defined as rebound (confirmed HCV RNA greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantitation [≥ LLOQ] after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment, or confirmed increase from the lowest value post baseline in HCV RNA [2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements > 1 log(subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest value post baseline] at any time point during treatment), or fail to suppress (HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ persistently during treatment with at least 6 weeks [≥ 36 days] of treatment). (NCT01704755)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), and Treatment Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 12 Weeks | 0.5 |
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 24 Weeks | 1.7 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01704755)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 12 Weeks | 91.8 |
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 24 Weeks | 96.5 |
A sustained virologic response is defined as plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than the lower limit of quantification (< LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01704755)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 12 Weeks | 91.8 |
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 24 Weeks | 96.5 |
Participants were considered to have virologic relapse after treatment if they had confirmed quantifiable plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) ≥ lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01704755)
Timeframe: within 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 12 Weeks | 5.9 |
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333, Plus RBV for 24 Weeks | 0.6 |
The SF-36v2 is a general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises a total of 36 items (questions) targeting a participant's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain scores were aggregated into an MCS score (from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental function and well-being). (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Treatment Visit (up to Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and up to Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
3-DAA/RBV | -1.3 |
TPV/RBV | -9.8 |
The SF-36v2 is a general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises a total of 36 items (questions) targeting a participant's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain scores were aggregated into a PCS score (range = 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental function and well-being). (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Treatment Visit (up to Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and up to Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
3-DAA/RBV | 0.4 |
TPV/RBV | -7.7 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The LLOQ for the assay was 25 IU/mL. (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA/RBV | 100.0 |
TPV/RBV | 66.0 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The LLOQ for the assay was 25 IU/mL. (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA/RBV | 99.0 |
TPV/RBV | 66.0 |
Virologic failure during treatment was defined as HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) confirmed greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (≥ LLOQ) after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment or confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01854528)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of treatment (12 weeks for 3-DAA/RBV and 24 or 48 weeks for TPV/RBV)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA/RBV | 0 |
TPV/RBV | 19.1 |
Participants who completed treatment with plasma HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (
Timeframe: Between end of treatment (Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV) and Post-treatment (up to Week 12 Post-treatment)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
3-DAA/RBV | 0 |
TPV/RBV | 6.3 |
SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring HRQoL covering 2 summary measures: PCS and MCS; it consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, and general health perception. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both PCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL). (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | 0.5 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | -5.5 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | 0.4 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | 2.2 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | -5.5 |
SF-36V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and MCS; it consists of 8 subscales. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have choices per item. Scoring is done for both MCS subscale scores and summary scores; for each, the range is 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL). (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment up to 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and up to 24 or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | -4.2 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | -5.8 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | -0.3 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | -0.1 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | -6.4 |
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) confirmed greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) between the end of treatment and 24 weeks post treatment among participants completing treatment and with HCV RNA less than the LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: Within 24 weeks post treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | 0 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | 0 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | 1.2 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | 0 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | 6.3 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | 97.1 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | 82.4 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | 98.8 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | 97.6 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | 78.0 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma HCV RNA level < LLOQ) 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 24 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | 95.7 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | 82.4 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | 97.6 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | 97.6 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | 78.0 |
The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma HCV RNA level < LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | 97.1 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | 82.4 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | 98.8 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | 97.6 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | 78.0 |
"Participants in Arms A, C or D demonstrating any of the following were considered virologic failures and discontinued therapy:~Confirmed increase from nadir in HCV RNA (defined as 2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements of >1 log10 IU/mL above nadir) at any time point during treatment~Failure to achieve HCV RNA < LLOQ by Week 6 or~Confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ (defined as 2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements ≥ LLOQ) at any point after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment after HCV RNA < LLOQ.~Participants in Arms B and E followed virologic stopping criteria described in the TPV Summary of Product Characteristics; they were considered virologic failures and discontinued therapy as follows:~HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Week 4 to Week 12, discontinue TPV and pegIFN and RBV~HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Week 12, discontinue pegIFN and RBV~Confirmed HCV RNA > lower limit of detection (LLOD) at Week 24, discontinue pegIFN and RBV~Confirmed HCV RNA > LLOD at Week 36, discontinue pegIFN and RBV." (NCT01854697)
Timeframe: 12 weeks for Arms A, C and D and 24 weeks or 48 weeks for Arms B and E
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1a | 2.9 |
Arm B: TPV/PR in GT1a | 5.9 |
Arm C: 3-DAA + RBV in GT1b | 0 |
Arm D: 3-DAA in GT1b | 1.2 |
Arm E: TPV/PR in GT1b | 12.2 |
On-Treatment Virologic Failure is defined as confirmed HCV RNA >= LLOQ after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment, or confirmed increase from nadir (local minimum value) in HCV RNA [2 consecutive HCV RNA measurements > 1 log10 IU/mL above nadir] at any time point during treatment, or failure to suppress during treatment [all on-treatment values of HCV RNA >= LLOQ] with at least 6 weeks [defined as active study drug duration ≥ 36 days] of treatment. (NCT02219503)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir Plus Dasabuvir | 0 |
Post- Treatment Relapse is defined as confirmed HCV RNA >= LLOQ between end of treatment and 12 weeks after last actual dose of active study drug [up to and including the SVR12 assessment time point] for a participant with HCV RNA < LLOQ at Final Treatment Visit who completes treatment. (NCT02219503)
Timeframe: Post-treatment Day 1 to Post-treatment Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir Plus Dasabuvir | 0 |
"Sustained Virologic Response 12 (SVR12) is defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than the lower limit of quantification (< LLOQ; < 25 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.~The primary efficacy endpoints were non-inferiority and superiority of the percentage of participants who achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment in each treatment arm compared with the historical threshold for sofosbuvir and peginterferon (pegIFN)/RBV for the treatment of subjects with HCV GT1b infection and cirrhosis." (NCT02219503)
Timeframe: Post-treatment Day 1 to Post-treatment Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir Plus Dasabuvir | 100 |
Proportion of patients with undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at 12 weeks after completion of HCV treatment was to test the efficacy of the treatment. (NCT03801707)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Intervention Group | 28 |
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 and 12 months post-transplant was to test the safety of utilizing of HepC positive kidneys. (NCT03801707)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months
Intervention | ml/min/1.73m^2 (Median) | |
---|---|---|
eGFR at 6 months | eGFR at 12 months | |
Intervention Group | 54 | 46 |
Graft survival at 6 and 12 months measuring safety of utilizing HepC positive kidneys. (NCT03801707)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
6 months graft survival | 12 months graft survival | |
Intervention Group | 30 | 30 |
Patient's survival at 6 and 12 months measuring safety of utilizing of HepC positive kidneys. (NCT03801707)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
6 months patient survival | 12 months patient survival | |
Intervention Group | 30 | 30 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of active drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part 1, 3-DAA With SOF With or Without RBV | 95.5 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma HCV RNA level
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last dose of active drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part 2, 3-DAA With RBV | 85.7 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after < LLOQ during treatment, confirmed increase of > 1 log (subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest post-baseline HCV RNA during treatment, or HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ persistently during treatment with at least 6 weeks of treatment. (NCT02356562)
Timeframe: Up to week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part 1, 3-DAA With SOF With or Without RBV | 0.0 |
Part 2, 3-DAA With RBV | 14.3 |
Post-treatment relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants completing treatment and with HCV RNA < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT02356562)
Timeframe: Within 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part 1, 3-DAA With SOF With or Without RBV | 4.8 |
Part 2, 3-DAA With RBV | 0.0 |
On-treatment virologic failure was defined as confirmed increase of > 1 log(subscript)10(subscript) IU/mL above the lowest value post-baseline HCV RNA during treatment; confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment, or HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ at end of treatment with at least 6 weeks of treatment for 12-week and 8-week treatment or at least 26 days of treatments for 6-week treatment. (NCT02292719)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A (Genotype [GT]3, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm B (GT3, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm C (GT2, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm D (GT2, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm E (GT3, Cirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm F (GT3, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Post-treatment relapse was defined as confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ between the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug among participants who completed treatment with HCV RNA levels < LLOQ at the end of treatment. (NCT02292719)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after the last actual dose of active study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A (Genotype [GT]3, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm B (GT3, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm C (GT2, Noncirrhotic) | 10.0 |
Arm D (GT2, Noncirrhotic) | 55.6 |
Arm E (GT3, Cirrhotic) | 0 |
Arm F (GT3, Noncirrhotic) | 0 |
SVR12 was defined as plasma hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) level less than the lower limit of quantification [
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A (Genotype [GT]3, Noncirrhotic) | 100 |
Arm B (GT3, Noncirrhotic) | 90.9 |
Arm C (GT2, Noncirrhotic) | 90.0 |
Arm D (GT2, Noncirrhotic) | 44.4 |
Arm E (GT3, Cirrhotic) | 100 |
Arm F (GT3, Noncirrhotic) | 100 |
24 reviews available for uracil and Chronic Hepatitis C
Article | Year |
---|---|
Progress Toward Hepatitis C Virus Elimination: Therapy and Implementation.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glo | 2020 |
Ombitasvir and paritaprevir boosted with ritonavir and combined with dasabuvir for chronic hepatitis C.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug C | 2017 |
Safety of the 2D/3D direct-acting antiviral regimen in HCV-induced Child-Pugh A cirrhosis - A pooled analysis.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; C | 2017 |
Safety and Efficacy of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir with or without Ribavirin for Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; G | 2017 |
Sustained Virological Response in Special Populations with Chronic Hepatitis C Using Interferon-Free Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Cohort Studies.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropan | 2018 |
Expert opinion on the management of renal manifestations of chronic HCV infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Aminoisobutyric Acids; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofur | 2018 |
[Advances in combination therapy of ombitasvir and dasabuvir for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection].
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepaci | 2018 |
Evolutionary Pathways to Persistence of Highly Fit and Resistant Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitor Escape Variants.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Aminoisobutyric Acids; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cycl | 2019 |
Dasabuvir: A Non-Nucleoside Inhibitor of NS5B for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Antiviral Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sulfonami | 2014 |
[All-oral, interferon-free therapies for patients with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection].
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clini | 2014 |
ABT-450: a novel agent for the treatment of CHC genotype 1: focus on treatment-experienced patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials, | 2015 |
Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir tablets for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical | 2015 |
ABT-450/ ritonavir and ABT-267 in combination with ABT-333 for the treatment of hepatitis C virus.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; H | 2015 |
Interferon-free antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the transplant setting.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic; Clinical Trials | 2015 |
Interferon-free therapy for hepatitis C: The hurdles amid a golden era.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Ch | 2015 |
[New era in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C - novel direct acting antivirals].
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clini | 2015 |
Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir Plus Dasabuvir: A Review in Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance; Drug Resist | 2015 |
Management of direct-acting antiviral agent failures.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; C | 2015 |
Dasabuvir (ABT333) for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype I: a new face of cure, an expert review.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Antiviral Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepacivir | 2016 |
Profile of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Carrier Proteins; Cyclopropanes; Drug Inter | 2015 |
[Possibilities of IFN-free therapy of hepatitis C].
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Ther | 2015 |
Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: optimizing current IFN-free treatment and future perspectives.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclop | 2016 |
Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: optimizing current IFN-free treatment and future perspectives.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclop | 2016 |
Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: optimizing current IFN-free treatment and future perspectives.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclop | 2016 |
Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: optimizing current IFN-free treatment and future perspectives.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclop | 2016 |
Effects of Mild and Moderate Renal Impairment on Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, Dasabuvir, and Ribavirin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic HCV Infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Area Under Curve; Carbamates; | 2017 |
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Dasabuvir.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Animals; Antiviral Agents; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepaciviru | 2017 |
32 trials available for uracil and Chronic Hepatitis C
Article | Year |
---|---|
Raltegravir pharmacokinetics before and during treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir in adults with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection: AIDS Clinical Trials Group sub-study A5334s.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; | 2020 |
Intrahepatic Viral Kinetics During Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection: The AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5335S Substudy.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; | 2020 |
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-HCV Genotype 1 Coinfection Resulting in High Rate of Sustained Virologic Response and Variable in Normalization of Soluble Markers of Immune Activation.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Biomarkers; Carbamates; Coinfec | 2020 |
A Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Antivirals for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: The PRIORITIZE Study.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antivir | 2021 |
Epigenetic scars of CD8
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antigens, Viral; Antiviral Agents; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Chromatin; | 2021 |
HCV core antigen as an alternate test to HCV RNA for assessment of virologic responses to all-oral, interferon-free treatment in HCV genotype 1 infected patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, C | 2017 |
Ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir plus dasabuvir for 8 weeks in previously untreated patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection without cirrhosis (GARNET): a single-arm, open-label, phase 3b trial.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropan | 2017 |
Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir+dasabuvir+ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b-infected cirrhotics (TURQUOISE-IV).
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinatio | 2018 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir in Healthy Chinese Subjects and HCV GT1b-Infected Chinese, South Korean and Taiwanese Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Carbamates; China; Cyclopropanes; | 2019 |
Outcome and adverse events in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with direct-acting antivirals: a clinical randomized study.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anemia; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropane | 2018 |
Dynamic changes in innate immune responses during direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV infection.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Chemokines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin for HCV in Brazilian Adults with Advanced Fibrosis.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Brazil; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Co | 2018 |
Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with or without sofosbuvir for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection who failed a prior course of direct-acting antiviral therapy.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropan | 2019 |
Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with low-dose ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1a infection without cirrhosis.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule | 2019 |
Retreatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Retreatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Retreatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Retreatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Treatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Treatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Treatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
Treatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2014 |
HCV RNA assay sensitivity impacts the management of patients treated with direct-acting antivirals.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Antiviral Agents; Biological Assay; Cyclopropanes; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, C | 2015 |
An interferon-free antiviral regimen for HCV after liver transplantation.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Carbamates; Cyclop | 2014 |
Drug-drug interaction profile of the all-oral anti-hepatitis C virus regimen of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cy | 2015 |
Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir plus ribavirin in HCV genotype 1-infected patients on methadone or buprenorphine.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Buprenorph | 2015 |
Pharmacokinetics and safety of co-administered paritaprevir plus ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in hepatic impairment.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhib | 2015 |
Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r, dasabuvir and ribavirin for cirrhotic HCV patients with thrombocytopaenia and hypoalbuminaemia.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dru | 2015 |
Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, C | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, C | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, C | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir compared to IFN-containing regimens in genotype 1 HCV patients: The MALACHITE-I/II trials.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, C | 2016 |
Serum miR-122 may serve as a biomarker for response to direct acting antivirals: effect of paritaprevir/R with dasabuvir or ombitasvir on miR-122 in HCV-infected subjects.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Biomarkers; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Co | 2016 |
Sustained virologic response of 100% in HCV genotype 1b patients with cirrhosis receiving ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir for 12weeks.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administra | 2016 |
Sustained virologic response of 100% in HCV genotype 1b patients with cirrhosis receiving ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir for 12weeks.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administra | 2016 |
Sustained virologic response of 100% in HCV genotype 1b patients with cirrhosis receiving ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir for 12weeks.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administra | 2016 |
Sustained virologic response of 100% in HCV genotype 1b patients with cirrhosis receiving ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir for 12weeks.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administra | 2016 |
Drug-Drug Interactions between Sofosbuvir and Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir with or without Dasabuvir.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Dr | 2016 |
Drug-Drug Interactions between Sofosbuvir and Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir with or without Dasabuvir.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Dr | 2016 |
Drug-Drug Interactions between Sofosbuvir and Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir with or without Dasabuvir.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Dr | 2016 |
Drug-Drug Interactions between Sofosbuvir and Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir with or without Dasabuvir.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Dr | 2016 |
Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions Between Hepatitis C Antiviral Agents Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir and HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropan | 2016 |
Drug-Drug Interactions Between the Anti-Hepatitis C Virus 3D Regimen of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, and Dasabuvir and Eight Commonly Used Medications in Healthy Volunteers.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Inte | 2016 |
Exposure-Efficacy Analyses of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/Ritonavir with Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1-Infected Patients.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dou | 2016 |
Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Anti-Hepatitis C Virus Treatment with Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, with or Without Dasabuvir, in Subjects with Renal Impairment.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combinat | 2017 |
Drug-Drug Interaction between the Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimen of Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir plus Dasabuvir and the HIV Antiretroviral Agent Dolutegravir or Abacavir plus Lamivudine.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes | 2016 |
Real-world effectiveness and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir ± ribavirin in hepatitis C: AMBER study.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Diarrhea; Drug Therap | 2016 |
88 other studies available for uracil and Chronic Hepatitis C