umirolimus and Peripheral-Arterial-Disease

Endovascular treatment of below-the-knee region disease is often challenging because of the involvement of arterial bifurcations. Several cases have been reported on the use of coronary stents for the treatment of these patients, but limited evidence is available on the use of dedicated coronary bifurcation devices. We here report the endovascular treatment of a symptomatic bifurcation lesion in below-the-knee region, using a self-expanding Biolimus A9-eluting stent in combination with a "conventional" coronary drug-eluting stent.

Topics: Angiography; Angioplasty, Balloon; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Leg; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Prosthesis Design; Radiography, Interventional; Sirolimus; Tibial Arteries; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are now considered the most promising device to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD) and minimize restenosis. There is uncertainty however on the best antirestenotic drug for such devices. In particular, biolimus (i.e. umirolimus) and everolimus are two of the most promising agents, given the extensive data in support of their coronary safety and efficacy, but their comparative effectiveness for peripheral interventions is not established.. Building upon our extensive experience in the percutaneous treatment of infra-inguinal artery disease with DES, we compared the acute and longterm outlook of patients treated with biolimus-eluting stents (BES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES). We collected baseline, procedural and outcome details on all patients undergoing infra-inguinal BES or EES implantation. The endpoints of interest were death, amputation, revascularization, their composite, and change in Fontaine class. A total of 80 patients were included (20 treated with BES and 60 with EES). Most features were similar in the two groups, despite longer lesions in the EES group. Unadjusted analysis showed similar results irrespective of the drug used, with composite endpoint occurring, respectively, in 4 (20.0%) and 10 (16.7%) (p=0.741).. However, analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting showed significant differences in the risk of revascularization (hazard ratio of BES vs EES=9.55 [95% confidence interval 2.16-42.23], p=0.003) and composite endpoint (hazard ratio=5.11 [1.33-19.62], p=0.018). In conclusion, EES appear superior to BES for endovascular therapy of infrainguinal artery disease. Dedicated randomized trials are required to definitely confirm or disprove these findings.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation, Surgical; Cardiovascular Agents; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endovascular Procedures; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Limb Salvage; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome