umirolimus and Constriction--Pathologic

umirolimus has been researched along with Constriction--Pathologic* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for umirolimus and Constriction--Pathologic

ArticleYear
In vivo comparison of a polymer-free Biolimus A9-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer-based Biolimus A9 eluting stent and a bare metal stent in balloon denuded and radiated hypercholesterolemic rabbit iliac arteries.
    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2012, Sep-01, Volume: 80, Issue:3

    To evaluate the effect of a polymer-free Biolimus A9-eluting stent [BioFreedom (BF)], compared with that of a biodegradable polymer-based Biolimus A9-eluting stent [BioMatrix Flex (BMF)] and a bare metal stent (BMS) in balloon denuded and radiated hypercholesterolemic rabbit iliac arteries.. Rabbits were fed with 1% cholesterol diet (n = 14) for 14 days, both iliac arteries were balloon denuded and radiated, and then rabbits were switched to 0.15% cholesterol diet. After 4 weeks, BF (n = 8), BMF (n = 8), and BMS (n = 8) were deployed in denuded and radiated areas. Four weeks later animals were euthanized, arterial segments were processed for morphometry.. The neointimal area in vessels implanted with BF stents was significantly less than that seen in vessels implanted with BMS (0.90 mm(2) ± 0.14 vs. 1.29 mm(2) ± 0.23, P <0.01). Percent fibrin and fibrin score were higher with BMF stents compared to BMS (P <0.03 and <0.04) and giant cell number was significantly higher with both BMF and BF stents (P < 0.01 for both). Percent endothelialization was significantly higher and % uncovered struts were lower with BMS compared to either BMF or BF stents (P < 0.05 for both).. This study demonstrates that compared to BMS, BF stents significantly decreased neointimal hyperplasia.

    Topics: Absorbable Implants; Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Agents; Constriction, Pathologic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Fibrin; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperplasia; Iliac Artery; Inflammation; Male; Metals; Neointima; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors

2012
Clinical studies with sirolimus, zotarolimus, everolimus, and biolimus A9 drug-eluting stent systems.
    Current pharmaceutical design, 2010, Volume: 16, Issue:36

    The introduction of the drug-eluting stent (DES) has revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology during the past decade. Initial pivotal randomized clinical trials showed a large reduction in restenosis rates and the need for repeat intervention with DES compared with bare-metal stents. The three main components of a DES are 1) the stent platform, 2) a coating facilitating elution of the drug (mostly a polymer), and 3) a antiproliferative/anti-inflammatory drug. Currently, two classes of drugs are widely used in DES, Taxanes, including its best-known member Paclitaxel, and Rapamycins, which include Sirolimus and its analogues such as Everolimus, Zotarolimus and Biolimus A9. The first DES to receive United States Food and Drug Administration approval was the Sirolimus-eluting stent. Recently, two other stent types eluting a Sirolimus-analogue were approved; the Zotarolimus-eluting stent and the Everolimus-eluting stent. Biolimus A9-eluting stents, using biodegradable polymers, are currently approved and marketed outside of the United States. This review article focusses on the clinical studies that have been performed with DES eluting Sirolimus or its analogues.

    Topics: Constriction, Pathologic; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus; Stents

2010