umirolimus has been researched along with Atherosclerosis* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for umirolimus and Atherosclerosis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Long-term coronary arterial response to biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents in comparison with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and bare-metal stents: five-year follow-up optical coherence tomography study.
The long-term coronary arterial response of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BES) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the coronary arterial response of biodegradable polymer BES at 5 years after stent implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as compared with that of durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and bare-metal stents (BMS).. Five-year follow-up OCT was performed in 30 patients with 33 stents (10 with 12 BES; 10 with 11 SES; 10 with 10 BMS). Quantitative parameters and qualitative characteristics of the neointima were evaluated. A total of 5178 struts (BES, n = 2056; SES, n = 1410; BMS, n = 1712) were analyzed.. Uncovered struts were found in 15 out of 2055 struts in the BES (weighted estimate 0.01%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.00-0.33%) and 54 out of 1410 struts in the SES (0.11%, 95% CI: 0.00-3.33%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01-1.95, p = 0.13). None of 1712 struts were uncovered in the BMS. Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of neointimal tissue showed that the frequency of lipid-laden neointima tended to be lower in the BES (2.26%, 95% CI: 0.38-12.3%) compared with the SES (9.90%, 95% CI: 4.37-20.9%; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.03-1.16, p = 0.07), and was similar to the BMS (2.23%, 95% CI: 0.54-8.74%; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.13-7.14, p = 0.98).. Biodegradable polymer BES shows a favorable coronary arterial response compared with SES, but different response with BMS at 5 years follow-up. The observed frequency of in-stent neoatherosclerosis within BES was similar to BMS and tended to be lower than SES. Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lipids; Male; Metals; Neointima; Polymers; Sirolimus; Stents; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence | 2014 |
In vivo comparison of a polymer-free Biolimus A9-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer-based Biolimus A9 eluting stent and a bare metal stent in balloon denuded and radiated hypercholesterolemic rabbit iliac arteries.
To evaluate the effect of a polymer-free Biolimus A9-eluting stent [BioFreedom (BF)], compared with that of a biodegradable polymer-based Biolimus A9-eluting stent [BioMatrix Flex (BMF)] and a bare metal stent (BMS) in balloon denuded and radiated hypercholesterolemic rabbit iliac arteries.. Rabbits were fed with 1% cholesterol diet (n = 14) for 14 days, both iliac arteries were balloon denuded and radiated, and then rabbits were switched to 0.15% cholesterol diet. After 4 weeks, BF (n = 8), BMF (n = 8), and BMS (n = 8) were deployed in denuded and radiated areas. Four weeks later animals were euthanized, arterial segments were processed for morphometry.. The neointimal area in vessels implanted with BF stents was significantly less than that seen in vessels implanted with BMS (0.90 mm(2) ± 0.14 vs. 1.29 mm(2) ± 0.23, P <0.01). Percent fibrin and fibrin score were higher with BMF stents compared to BMS (P <0.03 and <0.04) and giant cell number was significantly higher with both BMF and BF stents (P < 0.01 for both). Percent endothelialization was significantly higher and % uncovered struts were lower with BMS compared to either BMF or BF stents (P < 0.05 for both).. This study demonstrates that compared to BMS, BF stents significantly decreased neointimal hyperplasia. Topics: Absorbable Implants; Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Agents; Constriction, Pathologic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Fibrin; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperplasia; Iliac Artery; Inflammation; Male; Metals; Neointima; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors | 2012 |