ulipristal and Endometriosis

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue (glands and stroma) outside the uterine cavity. This condition is oestrogen-dependent and thus is seen primarily during the reproductive years. Owing to their antiproliferative effects in the endometrium, progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) have been advocated for treatment of endometriosis.. To assess the effectiveness and safety of PRMs primarily in terms of pain relief as compared with other treatments or placebo or no treatment in women of reproductive age with endometriosis.. We searched the following electronic databases, trial registers, and websites: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, the Central Register of Studies Online (CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) platform, from inception to 28 November 2016. We handsearched reference lists of articles retrieved by the search.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in all languages that examined effects of PRMs for treatment of symptomatic endometriosis.. We used standard methodological procedures as expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Primary outcomes included measures of pain and side effects.. We included 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 960 women. Two RCTs compared mifepristone versus placebo or versus a different dose of mifepristone, one RCT compared asoprisnil versus placebo, one compared ulipristal versus leuprolide acetate, and four compared gestrinone versus danazol, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, or a different dose of gestrinone. The quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. The main limitations were serious risk of bias (associated with poor reporting of methods and high or unclear rates of attrition in most studies), very serious imprecision (associated with low event rates and wide confidence intervals), and indirectness (outcome assessed in a select subgroup of participants). Mifepristone versus placebo One study made this comparison and reported rates of painful symptoms among women who reported symptoms at baseline.At three months, the mifepristone group had lower rates of dysmenorrhoea (odds ratio (OR) 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.17; one RCT, n =352; moderate-quality evidence), suggesting that if 40% of women taking placebo experience dysmenorrhoea, then between 3% and 10% of women taking mifepristone will do so. The mifepristone group also had lower rates of dyspareunia (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.51; one RCT, n = 223; low-quality evidence). However, the mifepristone group had higher rates of side effects: Nearly 90% had amenorrhoea and 24% had hot flushes, although the placebo group reported only one event of each (1%) (high-quality evidence). Evidence was insufficient to show differences in rates of nausea, vomiting, or fatigue, if present. Mifepristone dose comparisons Two studies compared doses of mifepristone and found insufficient evidence to show differences between different doses in terms of effectiveness or safety, if present. However, subgroup analysis of comparisons between mifepristone and placebo suggest that the 2.5 mg dose may be less effective than 5 mg or 10 mg for treating dysmenorrhoea or dyspareunia. Gestrinone comparisons Ons study compared gestrinone with danazol, and another study compared gestrinone with leuprolin.Evidence was insufficient to show differences, if present, between gestrinone and danazol in rate of pain relief (those reporting no or mild pelvic pain) (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.56; two RCTs, n = 230; very low-quality evidence), dysmenorrhoea (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.33; two RCTs, n = 214; very low-quality evidence), or dyspareunia (OR. Among women with endometriosis, moderate-quality evidence shows that mifepristone relieves dysmenorrhoea, and low-quality evidence suggests that this agent relieves dyspareunia, although amenorrhoea and hot flushes are common side effects. Data on dosage were inconclusive, although they suggest that the 2.5 mg dose of mifepristone may be less effective than higher doses. We found insufficient evidence to permit firm conclusions about the safety and effectiveness of other progesterone receptor modulators.

Topics: Danazol; Dysmenorrhea; Dyspareunia; Endometriosis; Estrenes; Female; Gestrinone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Leuprolide; Mifepristone; Norpregnadienes; Oximes; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Progesterone

In view of the spate of recent publications related to mifepristone and some second generation progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs), this appears to be an opportune time to view the clinical status of these compounds.. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials have been conducted with mifepristone, CDB-4124 (Proellex), CDB-2914 (VA 2914, Ulipristal) and asoprisnil (J867). All these PRMs are effective in the treatment of uterine fibroids where they are associated with a reduction in pain, bleeding and improvement in quality of life and decrease in fibroid size. CDB-4124 is also efficacious in endometriosis. Long-term treatment with PRMs may be associated with endometrial thickening on ultrasound and there have been reports of endometrial hyperplasia. Several reassuring recent publications have done much to explain the mechanism underlying these endometrial changes. The most common histological finding is cystic glandular dilatation often associated with both admixed estrogen (mitotic) and progestin (secretory) epithelial effects. This histology has not been previously encountered in clinical practice and should not be confused with endometrial hyperplasia. The endometrial thickness is related to this cystic glandular dilatation.. At this stage of development, PRMs cannot be administered for longer than 3 or 4 months. Even over this time, there is improvement of symptoms associated with fibroids and endometriosis. Clinicians and pathologists need to be aware that the endometrial thickening and histological appearance do not represent endometrial hyperplasia.

Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Endometriosis; Endometrium; Estrenes; Female; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Leiomyoma; Mifepristone; Norpregnadienes; Oximes; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Progesterone; Time Factors; Uterine Neoplasms

To evaluate the effect of ulipristal on Bax/Bcl-2, cytochrome C, Ki-67 and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in surgically induced endometriosis in a rat model.. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, experimental study at the Experimental Research Center of the Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Endometriosis was induced in 40 female Wistar albino rats by transplanting two autologous fragments of uterine horn onto bowel mesentery. After a 4-week induction period, we formed two groups: the first group was treated with ulipristal (UPA+) for 8 weeks, while the second group was treated only with the vehicle used for ulipristal (UPA-). We measured the volumes and masses of the implants both before and after treatment. A pathologist examined the sections microscopically for histological hallmarks of endometriosis. Immunostaining for Bax/Bcl-2, cytochrome C, Ki-67 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) was assessed in both groups.. Ulipristal reduced the average implant volume and mass, indicating that the drug is effective (P=0.01). The treatment induced a greater than 50% reduction in the volume and mass of endometrial implants, and the histological findings correspond to this result. The overall Bax positivity rate was higher in the group treated with ulipristal (42.37% vs. 21.05% for UPA+ and UPA-, respectively) (P=0.0062). The overall Bcl-2 positivity rate was smaller in the group treated with ulipristal (15% vs. 40% for UPA+ and UPA-, respectively) (P=0.0593). The cytochrome C global positivity rate was 5% in the UPA- group and increased to 50% in the UPA+ treatment group (P<0.0001). The COX-2 positivity rate decreased from 75% in the UPA- treatment group to 10% in the UPA+ treatment group (P<0.0001) and the Ki67 positivity rate also decreased from 55% in the UPA- group to 10% in the UPA+ treatment group (P<0.0002).. Treatment with ulipristal contributed to the regression and atrophy of endometriotic lesions in rats. The immunohistochemical expression profiles of Bax/Bcl-2 and cytochrome C revealed a pro-apoptotic effect of ulipristal. We also observed a reduced cellular proliferation, indicated by a decrease in Ki-67 expression and an anti-inflammatory effect, shown by a decrease in COX-2 expression after treatment with ulipristal.

Topics: Animals; bcl-2-Associated X Protein; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cytochromes c; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Endometriosis; Endometrium; Female; Ki-67 Antigen; Norpregnadienes; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Wistar

All current major medications in treating endometriosis are effective in treating pain, most likely through suppression of proliferation of the implants, yet their effectiveness is relatively short term and they all have many undesirable, and sometimes severe, side effects. There is pressing need for novel, more effective medications in treating endometriosis with less and/or milder side effects.. Using a recently established immortalized endometrial stromal cell line, we carried out cell proliferation assays for cells treated with trichostatin A (TSA), RU486, CDB-2914, and N-acetylcysteine, and ICI 182780. Gene expression levels for PR-A, PR-B, AR, Fas and FasL were measured. Protein expression levels for ERalpha, ERbeta, and AR were also measured.. Cell proliferation assay results for NAC, H2O2, CDB, and RU486 were nearly identical or similar to what have been reported based on primary cell cultures or in vivo studies. TSA, CDB, RU486 and NAC all had various antiproliferative effects. TSA had a more potent and longer lasting antiproliferative effect than CDB and NAC, even in the presence of an oxidant, H2O2. Its antiproliferative effect was concentration-dependent. ICI did not have a significant antiproliferative effect. PR-A, PR-B, AR, and FasL expression were all increased as compared with untreated cells.. The cell line appears to be an adequate model for stromal components of endometriotic implants. That ICI has no inhibitory effect on endometrial proliferation may explain why a phase II clinical trial on its use to treat endometriosis did not advance to later stages. The upregulation of PR-B and AR may be responsible for antiproliferative effects induced by TSA, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI). HDACIs may be promising therapeutics in treating endometriosis due to their antiproliferative effects as well as the potential to restore gene dysregulation through chromatin remodeling.

Topics: Acetylcysteine; Cell Line; Cell Proliferation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endometriosis; Endometrium; Enzyme Inhibitors; Estradiol; Fas Ligand Protein; fas Receptor; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydroxamic Acids; Mifepristone; Norpregnadienes; Receptors, Androgen; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; RNA, Messenger; Stromal Cells

CDB(VA)-2914 (17alpha-acetoxy-11beta-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione) is a synthetic steroid that demonstrates potent progesterone antagonist activity in vitro and in vivo. Its binding and antagonist potency with respect to the glucocorticoid receptor is significantly reduced compared to that of mifepristone, indicating that CDB(VA)-2914 belongs to a new class of dissociated progesterone receptor modulators that have reduced antiglucorticoid activity. The pharmacological effects of CDB(VA)-2914 have been examined in a variety of animal models, the results of which are reviewed in this paper. CDB(VA)-2914 inhibits ovulation in rats in a dose-dependent manner upon single-dose oral administration and exhibits antifertility activity during continuous low-dose administration. CDB(VA)-2914 is also effective in animal models of postcoital contraception. This paper also presents the results of metabolism studies undertaken to link the results of the animal models to potential human applications. Because of its unique pharmacological profile, CDB(VA)-2914 is a promising candidate for use in contraception as well as treatment of uterine fibroids and endometriosis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Contraceptives, Postcoital, Synthetic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endometriosis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Mifepristone; Models, Chemical; Norpregnadienes; Protein Binding; Receptors, Progesterone; Steroids