ularitide and Acute-Disease

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. No direct comparisons between ularitide-a synthetic natriuretic peptide being evaluated in ADHF-and other vasoactive substances are available. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine haemodynamic effect sizes from randomized double-blind trials in ADHF.. Eligible studies enrolled patients with ADHF requiring hospitalization and haemodynamic monitoring. Patients received 24-48 h of infusion with a vasoactive substance or comparator. Primary outcome measure was pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). Treatment effects were quantified as changes from baseline using mean differences between study drug and comparator. Results were analysed using random-effects (primary analysis) and fixed-effects meta-analyses. Twelve randomized, double-blind studies were identified with data after 3, 6, and 24 h of treatment (n = 622, 644, and 644, respectively). At 6 h, significant PAWP benefits for ularitide over placebo were seen (Hedges' g effect size, -0.979; P < 0.0001). On meta-analysis, treatment difference between ularitide and pooled other agents was statistically significant (-0.501; P = 0.0303). Effect sizes were numerically higher with ularitide than other treatments at 3 and 24 h. After 6 h, a significant difference in effect size between ularitide and all other treatments was observed for right atrial pressure (Hedges' g, -0.797 for ularitide and -0.304 for other treatments; P = 0.0274).. After 6 h, ularitide demonstrated high effect sizes for PAWP and right atrial pressure. Improvements in these parameters were greater with ularitide vs. pooled data for other vasoactive drugs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in acute heart failure is still unacceptably high. There is an unmet need for new therapy options with new drugs with a new mode of action. One of the drugs currently in clinical testing in Phase III is ularitide, which is the chemically synthesized form of the human natriuretic peptide urodilatin. Urodilatin is produced in humans by differential processing of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in distal renal tubule cells. Physiologically, urodilatin appears to be the natriuretic peptide involved in sodium homeostasis. Ularitide exerts its pharmacological actions such as vasodilation, diuresis, and natriuresis through the natriuretic peptide receptor/particulate guanylate cyclase/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway. In animal models of heart failure as well as Phase I and II clinical studies in heart failure patients, ularitide demonstrated beneficial effects such as symptom relief and vasodilation, while still preserving renal function. Subsequently, the pivotal acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) Phase III study, called TRUE-AHF, was started with the objectives to evaluate the effects of ularitide infusion on the clinical status and cardiovascular mortality of patients with ADHF compared with placebo. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data supporting the potential use of ularitide in the treatment of ADHF.

Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Diuretics; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Rats, Wistar; Vasodilation

Treatment for acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has not changed much in the last two decades. Currently available therapies have variable efficacy and can be associated with adverse outcomes. Natriuretic peptides properties include diuresis, natriuresis, vasorelaxation, inhibition of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and are thus chosen in the treatment of ADHF. Two forms of natriuretic peptides are currently available for the treatment of ADHF. Urodilatin (INN: ularitide) represents another member of the natriuretic peptide family with a unique molecular structure that may provide distinct benefits in the treatment of ADHF. Early clinical exploratory and Phase II studies have demonstrated that ularitide has potential cardiovascular and renal benefits. Ularitide is currently being tested in the Phase III TRUE-AHF clinical study. TRUE-AHF has features that may be different when compared with other recent outcome studies in ADHF. These distinct differences aim to maximize clinical effects and minimize potential adverse events of ularitide. However, whether this rationale translates into a better outcome needs to be awaited.

Topics: Acute Disease; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Treatment Outcome

Acute heart failure is a major cause of emergency hospital admission, with significant impact on health resources and patient outcomes. With no new treatments for over 20 years, the advent of new innovative therapies may facilitate a radical change in our approach to such patients. In this article, we examine the current evidence for the use of current intravenous vasodilators in AHF management, and review the potential of novel therapies currently in development.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Intravenous; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Benzoates; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Agents; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptides; Nitrates; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Relaxin; Snake Venoms; Vasodilator Agents

Acute heart failure is a public health issue with morbidity and mortality exceeding that of myocardial infarction. Novel compounds for the treatment of acute heart failure are clearly needed and fall into the general categories of inotropic, vasodilatory and other compounds in phase I to III of development. Furthest along are omecamtiv mecarbil (a cardiac myosin activator), ularitide (a natriuretic and diuretic peptide) and relaxin (a vasodilator). Each compound has a unique set of assets and liabilities that will aid in the understanding of the syndrome and application to the right patients at the right time in this heterogeneous syndrome. This review will explore current and future novel pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of acute heart failure.

Topics: Acute Disease; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Relaxin; Urea; Vasodilator Agents

Heart failure is the most frequent cause of hospitalization in elderly population. Unlike the therapy of congestive heart failure, there was only a modest progress in the medical treatment for acutely decompensated heart failure over the past several decades. Moreover, current treatment is associated with many limitations in clinical practice. The family of natriuretic peptides consists of several structurally similar polypeptides (ANP, BNP, CNP, urodilatin, DNP). ANP and BNP are the most characterized substances and represent an important compensatory mechanisms in heart failure because of their vasodilatory, natriuretic and antiproliferative effects. Nesiritide is a recombinant human BNP which has been shown to be effective in treating heart failure in several clinical trials. However, a recent meta-analysis revealed a nesiritide-associated increased 30-day-mortality rate. The results of initial small-sized trials suggest beneficial hemodynamic effects of urodilatin in decompensated heart failure. Despite of being approved for the treatment of decompensated heart failure in some countries, the clinical relevance of nesiritide is currently unclear. Urodilatin might represent a potential alternative.

Topics: Acute Disease; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Drug Approval; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptide, C-Type; Peptide Fragments; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Survival Rate

Although we have recently witnessed substantial progress in management and outcome of patients with chronic heart failure, acute heart failure (AHF) management and outcome have not changed over almost a generation. Vasodilators are one of the cornerstones of AHF management; however, to a large extent, none of those currently used has been examined by large, placebo-controlled, non-hemodynamic monitored, prospective randomized studies powered to assess the effects on outcomes, in addition to symptoms. In this article, we will discuss the role of vasodilators in AHF trying to point out which are the potentially best indications to their administration and which are the pitfalls which may be associated with their use. Unfortunately, most of this discussion is only partially evidence based due to lack of appropriate clinical trials. In general, we believe that vasodilators should be administered early to AHF patients with normal or high blood pressure (BP) at presentation. They should not be administered to patients with low BP since they may cause hypotension and hypoperfusion of vital organs, leading to renal and/or myocardial damage which may further worsen patients' outcome. It is not clear whether vasodilators have a role in either patients with borderline BP at presentation (i.e., low-normal) or beyond the first 1-2 days from presentation. Given the limitations of the currently available clinical trial data, we cannot recommend any specific agent as first line therapy, although nitrates in different formulations are still the most widely used in clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Disease; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Benzoates; Elapid Venoms; Endothelin-1; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptide, C-Type; Nitrates; Peptide Fragments; Prognosis; Pyridines; Receptors, Endothelin; Relaxin; Tetrazoles; Vasoconstriction; Vasodilator Agents

In patients with acute heart failure, early intervention with an intravenous vasodilator has been proposed as a therapeutic goal to reduce cardiac-wall stress and, potentially, myocardial injury, thereby favorably affecting patients' long-term prognosis.. In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 2157 patients with acute heart failure to receive a continuous intravenous infusion of either ularitide at a dose of 15 ng per kilogram of body weight per minute or matching placebo for 48 hours, in addition to accepted therapy. Treatment was initiated a median of 6 hours after the initial clinical evaluation. The coprimary outcomes were death from cardiovascular causes during a median follow-up of 15 months and a hierarchical composite end point that evaluated the initial 48-hour clinical course.. Death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 236 patients in the ularitide group and 225 patients in the placebo group (21.7% vs. 21.0%; hazard ratio, 1.03; 96% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.25; P=0.75). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant between-group difference with respect to the hierarchical composite outcome. The ularitide group had greater reductions in systolic blood pressure and in levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide than the placebo group. However, changes in cardiac troponin T levels during the infusion did not differ between the two groups in the 55% of patients with paired data.. In patients with acute heart failure, ularitide exerted favorable physiological effects (without affecting cardiac troponin levels), but short-term treatment did not affect a clinical composite end point or reduce long-term cardiovascular mortality. (Funded by Cardiorentis; TRUE-AHF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01661634 .).

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Infusions, Intravenous; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Troponin T

The TRUE-AHF is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial which is evaluating the effects of a 48-h infusion of ularitide (15 ng/kg/min) on the short- and long-term clinical course of patients with acute heart failure. Noteworthy features of the study include the early enrolment of patients following their initial clinical presentation (within 12 h), and entry blood pressure criteria and thresholds for the adjustment of drug infusion rates, which aim to minimize the risk of hypotension. The trial has two primary endpoints: (i) cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up; and (ii) the clinical course of patients during their index hospitalization. Cardiovascular mortality is evaluated in this event-driven trial by following all randomized patients for the occurrence of death until the end of the entire study without truncation at an arbitrarily determined early time point. The clinical course during the index hospitalization is evaluated using the hierarchical clinical composite endpoint, which combines information regarding changes in symptoms and the occurrence of in-hospital worsening heart failure events and death into a single ranked metric that captures interval clinical events and minimizes the likelihood of missing data and confounding due to intensification of background therapy. The design of the TRUE-AHF trial capitalizes on lessons learned from earlier trials and aims to evaluate definitively the potential benefit of ularitide in patients with acute heart failure.. NCT01661634.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Global Health; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Acute decompensated heart failure is a growing public health care problem worldwide. The goals of treatment are immediate hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement followed by persistent follow-up with adherence to chronic heart failure guidelines. Controversies have centered around the best treatment options and avoidance of serious adverse events. This article highlights our current understanding of acute decompensated heart failure, discusses the controversy surrounding currently available new vasoactive treatments, and details future potential therapies.

Topics: Acute Disease; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Guideline Adherence; Heart Failure; Humans; Hydrazones; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Simendan; Vasodilator Agents