ucb-34714 and Seizures

Brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM) and perampanel (PER) are antiseizure medications (ASMs) approved for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures. So far, no randomised controlled trial directly compared the efficacy and safety of these drugs.. We estimated the comparative efficacy and safety of these ASMs for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy using a network meta-analysis (NMA).. We systematically searched (June week 4, 2021) MEDLINE (accessed by PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). There were no date limitations or language restrictions. Randomised, double-blinded, controlled, parallel-group, add-on studies that compared oral BRV, CNB, ESL, LCM, and PER versus any comparator over maintenance periods of at least 12 weeks and included adult patients with focal seizures uncontrolled by concomitant ASMs were identified. The efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients with ≥ 50% and 100% reduction in baseline seizure frequency during the maintenance period. The tolerability outcomes were the proportions of participants who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. Effect sizes were estimated by network meta-analyses within a frequentist framework. The hierarchy of competing interventions was established using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. Sixteen trials (BRV: n = 3, CNB: n = 1, ESL: n = 4, LCM: n = 4, PER: n = 4) were included, overall enrolling 4507 patients randomised to add-on active treatments (BRV = 803, CNB = 221, ESL =9 90, LCM = 1104, and PER = 1389) and 2246 to add-on placebo. Cenobamate was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction than BRV [odds ratio (OR) 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.66], ESL (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.07-3.48), LCM (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.04-3.32), and PER (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.16-3.70). There was a not statistically significant trend favouring CNB over ESL, LCM and PER for the seizure freedom outcome. Brivaracetam (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.86) and LCM (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.88) were associated with a lower proportion of participants experiencing TEAEs compared to ESL, and patients treated with PER were associated with a higher risk to experience at least one TEAE (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.96) than BRV. According to SUCRA, CNB had the greatest likelihood of being the best option for the ≥ 50% and 100% seizure frequency reduction, and BRV and LCM had the highest probabilities of being the best-tolerated treatments.. Cenobamate ranked best for efficacy, and BRV and LCM were best tolerated over the other comparators. Although NMAs cannot replace direct comparisons, they may support physicians in clinical decision making.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Chlorophenols; Dibenzazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Tetrazoles

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2019. Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. It is estimated that up to 30% of individuals with epilepsy continue to have epileptic seizures despite treatment with an antiepileptic drug. These patients are classified as drug-resistant and require treatment with a combination of multiple antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam is a third-generation antiepileptic drug that is a high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A. In this review we investigated the use of brivaracetam as add-on therapy for epilepsy.. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam when used as add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.. For the latest update we searched the following databases on 7 September 2021: the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web); MEDLINE (Ovid) 1946 to 3 September 2021. CRS Web includes randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the specialised registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Cochrane Epilepsy.. We searched for parallel-group RCTs that recruited people of any age with drug-resistant epilepsy. We accepted studies with any level of blinding (double-blind, single-blind, or unblinded).. In accordance with standard Cochrane methodological procedures, two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion before evaluating trial quality and extracting relevant data. The primary outcome to be assessed was 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Secondary outcomes were: seizure freedom, treatment withdrawal for any reason, treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, the proportion of participants who experienced any adverse events, and drug interactions. We used an intention-to-treat population for all primary analyses, and presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. We did not identify any new studies for this update, therefore the results and conclusions of the review are unchanged. The previous review included six studies involving a total of 2411 participants. Only one study included participants with both focal and generalised onset seizures; the other five trials included participants with focal onset seizures only. Study participants were aged 16 to 80 years. Treatment periods ranged from 7 to 16 weeks. We judged two studies to have low risk of bias and four to have unclear risk of bias. Details on the method used for allocation concealment and how blinding was maintained were insufficient in one study each. One study did not report all outcomes prespecified in the trial protocol, and there were discrepancies in reporting in a further study. Participants receiving brivaracetam add-on were more likely to experience a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency than those receiving placebo (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.14; 6 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Participants receiving brivaracetam were more likely to attain seizure freedom; however, the evidence is of low certainty (RR 5.89, 95% CI 2.30 to 15.13; 6 studies). The incidence of treatment withdrawal for any reason was slightly greater for participants receiving brivaracetam compared to those receiving placebo (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.74; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence). The risk of participants experiencing one or more adverse events did not differ significantly following treatment with brivaracetam compared to placebo (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.17; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). However, participants receiving brivaracetam did appear to be more likely to withdraw from treatment due to adverse events compared with those receiving placebo (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.33; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence).. When used as add-on therapy for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy, brivaracetam may be effective in reducing seizure frequency and may aid patients in achieving seizure freedom. However, add-on brivaracetam is probably associated with a greater proportion of treatment withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo. It is important to note that only one of the eligible studies included participants with generalised epilepsy. None of the included studies involved participants under the age of 16, and all studies were of short duration. Consequently, the findings of this review are mainly applicable to adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Future research should focus on investigating the tolerability and efficacy of brivaracetam during longer-term follow-up, as well as assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam in managing other types of seizures and in other age groups.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures

Clinical considerations for drug treatment of acute seizures involve variables such as safety, tolerability, drug-drug interactions, dosage, route of administration, and alterations in pharmacokinetics because of critical illness. Therapy options that are easily and quickly administered without dilution, well tolerated, and effective are needed for the treatment of acute seizures. The objective of this review is to focus on the clinical considerations relating to the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV BRV) for the treatment of acute seizures in the hospital, focusing on critically ill patients.. This was a scoping literature review of PubMed from inception to April 13, 2021, and search of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 2021 Annual Meeting website for English language publications/conference abstracts reporting the results of IV BRV use in hospitalized patients, particularly in the critical care setting. Outcomes of interest relating to the clinical pharmacology, safety, tolerability, efficacy, and effectiveness of IV BRV were reviewed and are discussed.. Twelve studies were included for analysis. One study showed that plasma concentrations of IV BRV 15 min after the first dose were similar between patients receiving IV BRV as bolus or infusion. IV BRV was generally well tolerated in patients with acute seizures in the hospital setting, with a low incidence of individual TEAEs classified as behavioral disorders. IV BRV demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness and had a rapid onset, with clinical and electrophysiological improvement in seizures observed within minutes. Although outside of the approved label, findings from several studies suggest that IV BRV reduces seizures and is generally well tolerated in patients with status epilepticus.. IV BRV shows effectiveness, and is generally well tolerated in the management of acute seizures in hospitalized patients where rapid administration is needed, representing a clinically relevant antiseizure medication for potential use in the critical care setting.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hospitals; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam is an antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for the treatment of focal seizures, with improved safety and tolerability vs first-generation AEDs. Brivaracetam binds with high affinity to synaptic vesicle protein 2A in the brain, which confers its antiseizure activity. Brivaracetam is rapidly absorbed and extensively biotransformed, and exhibits linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics at therapeutic doses. Brivaracetam does not interact with most metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, and therefore does not interfere with drugs that use these metabolic routes. The favorable pharmacokinetic profile of brivaracetam and lack of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with commonly prescribed AEDs or oral contraceptives allows administration without dose adjustment, and avoids potential untoward events from decreased efficacy of an AED or oral contraceptive due to a drug-drug interaction. Few agents have been reported to affect the pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam. The strong enzyme-inducing AEDs carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital/primidone have been shown to moderately lower brivaracetam plasma concentrations, with no adjustment of brivaracetam dose needed. Dose adjustment should be considered when brivaracetam is coadministered with the more potent CYP inducer, rifampin. Additionally, caution should be used when adding or ending treatment with the strong enzyme inducer, St. John's wort. In summary, brivaracetam (50-200 mg/day) has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and is associated with few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Brain; Carbamazepine; Drug Interactions; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Time to sustained seizure frequency reduction can provide clinically meaningful epilepsy outcomes.. To examine the time course of brivaracetam (BRV) efficacy in adults with focal seizures and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).. Post hoc analysis of data pooled from three randomized controlled trials of oral adjunctive BRV in adults with epilepsy. Patients with focal epilepsy and a subpopulation with FBTCS receiving BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/d (initiated without up-titration) or placebo for 12 weeks were analyzed for time to sustained ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure reduction without interruption from first day until trial ends.. Evaluation included 1160 patients with focal seizures, including 352 patients with FBTCS. Sustained ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% response in focal seizures was higher from day 1 for BRV 100 and 200 mg/d vs placebo (P < .01). Sustained ≥75% and 100% FBTCS reduction from day 1 was higher for BRV 100 and 200-mg/d groups vs placebo (P < .01).. The majority of patients achieving 75%-100% sustained seizure frequency reduction (all focal seizure types and the subpopulation with FBTCS) with oral BRV (100 or 200 mg/d) achieved this response on the first-treatment day.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in clinical trials are typically reported for the full duration of the treatment period including titration and maintenance. Drug-related central nervous system (CNS) TEAEs are common with antiseizure medications (ASMs) and can affect drug tolerability. In this report, we test the hypothesis that drug-related CNS TEAEs have early onset and decrease with time. Unlike prior ASM clinical trials, a novel design was used for brivaracetam (BRV) without initial drug titration allowing assessment of habituation to TEAEs separate from dose titration.. Data were pooled from three studies (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], N01358 [NCT01261325]) in adult patients (≥16 years of age) with focal seizures receiving BRV adjunctive therapy. This post hoc analysis reports data on the prevalence and incidence of all drug-related CNS TEAEs and all TEAEs over time in patients who received BRV doses of 50-200 mg/day (without titration) vs. placebo during a 12-week treatment period.. A total of 1262 patients received the following: placebo (n = 459), BRV 50 mg/day (n = 200), BRV 100 mg/day (n = 353), and BRV 200 mg/day (n = 250). Both the incidence (p < .0001) and prevalence (p < .0001) of drug-related CNS TEAEs (all with frequency ≥ 5%) changed across time with peak TEAEs in week 1 then significantly reducing over the first 6 weeks for prevalence and the first 3 weeks for incidence.. Drug-related CNS TEAEs occurred early and substantially habituated over several weeks. TEAEs of ASMs might be better represented by division into early and late phases to guide clinician monitoring and patient expectations.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To date, there has not been a single randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted to directly compare the efficacy and safety of perampanel to brivaracetam in the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures. This study makes these comparisons through the use of indirect treatment comparison (ITC) methods.. A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs that evaluated either one of perampanel or brivaracetam in the treatment of patients with focal-onset seizures. The Bucher ITC method was then used to compare efficacy and safety outcomes between perampanel and brivaracetam. Additional subgroup analyses, by levetiracetam usage (prior or concomitant), were conducted.. Eight RCTs (four comparing perampanel to placebo, four comparing brivaracetam to placebo) were included in the ITC. For patients taking concomitant levetiracetam, perampanel showed a significantly better responder rate compared to brivaracetam [relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.62 (1.15, 5.99)]. For patients who had previously, or never, taken levetiracetam, there was no difference in the responder rate. In the overall population, both perampanel and brivaracetam were more effective than placebo in terms of responder rate, seizure freedom, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizure responder rate; however, for these outcomes, no evidence of a difference between perampanel and brivaracetam was found. Patients taking brivaracetam showed significantly less dizziness compared to patients taking perampanel. No differences for any other safety outcome were found.. Perampanel and brivaracetam are effective for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures and display similar adverse event profiles. Perampanel demonstrated an improved focal-onset seizure responder rate compared to brivaracetam in patients taking concomitant levetiracetam. This may be due to the similarity in the mechanism of action between brivaracetam and levetiracetam.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Levetiracetam; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

In previous works, alterations of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the brain areas involved in generalized epilepsy have been reported.. We reviewed the alterations of these neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the following brain areas involved in generalized epilepsy: hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus and cerebral cortex. In these brain areas, the neural networks are also actualized. The mechanisms of action of newer antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of generalized epilepsy are also discussed.. Up-dating the neurotransmitter and neuropeptide alterations, we found that hippocampal GABAergic neurons presynaptically inhibit epileptogenic neurons via GABAB receptors. Epilepsy modulating neuropeptides (galanin, neuropeptide Y, dynorphin) are also involved. GABA deficiency, serotonin hyperactivity, dopamine hyperactivity and glutamate excitotoxicity can enhance ictogenesis: neurons containing these neurotransmitters form the main neural circuit. An increased excitability occurs when the alteration of these neurotransmitters is permanent.. In preclinical studies, the GABAB receptor agonist GS 39,783 exerted a good antiepileptic effect. Perampanel, an AMPA receptor antagonist, showed good clinical effects in the treatment of partial-onset seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. In this treatment, perampanel can be combined with other antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam, which shows a high affinity for the synaptic vesicle 2A, exerted a good efficacy in the treatment of adult focal seizures and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cyclopentanes; Epilepsy, Generalized; GABA Antagonists; Humans; Nerve Net; Neurotransmitter Agents; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Receptors, AMPA; Seizures

High prevalence of therapy-resistant epilepsy demands development of anticonvulsants with new mechanisms of action. Brivaracetam is an analogue of levetiracetam which binds to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) and decreases release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Areas covered: Relevant published studies were searched for by predefined strategy in MEDLINE, EBSCO and SCINDEKS electronic databases. Brivaracetam is effective as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients 16 years and older with epilepsy. It reduces baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency per week from 7.3 to 12.8% over placebo. Adverse events rate in patients with brivaracetam is not higher than in patients with placebo. Expert opinion: Brivaracetam is an important step forward in the treatment of therapy-resistant partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Its development was systematic and targeted. Due to its efficacy and excellent safety profile, it is likely that brivaracetam will be often prescribed. In future, efficacy and safety of brivaracetam should be tested in monotherapy settings and also in the first-line therapy of partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Four "third-generation" antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were approved for adjunctive treatment of refractory focal onset seizures during the past 10 years. Long-term efficacy and safety of the drugs were demonstrated in large extension studies and in reports of subgroups of patients not studied in pivotal trials. Reviewing extension study and post-marketing outcome series for the four newer AEDs-lacosamide, perampanel, eslicarbazepine acetate and brivaracetam-can guide clinicians in treating and monitoring patients. AED extension studies evaluate treatment retention, drug tolerability, and drug safety during individualized treatment with flexible dosing and thus provide information not available in rigid pivotal trials. Patient retention in the studies ranged from 75 to 80% at 1 year and from 36 to 68% at 2-year treatment intervals. Safety findings were generally similar to those of pivotal trials, with no major safety risks identified and with several specific adverse drug effects, such as hyponatremia, reported. The third-generation AEDs, some through new mechanisms and others with improved tolerability compared to related AEDs, provide new options in efficacy and tolerability.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Medication Adherence; Nitriles; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy fail to respond to existing medications. Levetiracetam is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) postulated to act by binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A. Brivaracetam is a novel high affinity SV2A ligand with approximately 20-fold higher affinity for SV2A protein than levetiracetam. It is at an advanced stage of clinical development for treatment of epilepsy.. This article reviews animal data, pharmacokinetics, and phase 1-3 data of Brivaracetam treatment of epilepsy. Brivaracetam has broad-spectrum anticonvulsant activity in animal models.. Phase 1 studies indicated that single oral doses of 5-800 mg and repeated oral doses of up to 600 mg were well tolerated and showed favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Phase 2 studies indicated good safety and tolerability of brivaracetam in the dose range of 5-150 mg/day and provided proof of concept for efficacy in treating refractory partial onset seizures. Efficacy and safety have been evaluated in 4 phase 3 studies with dose range of 5-200 mg which have demonstrated efficacy in the range of 100-200 mg/day dose and, in most studies, also with 50 mg/day dose, and good safety and tolerability profile across 5-200 mg doses in adjunctive treatment of refractory partial onset seizures.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Brivaracetam (Briviact(®); BRIVLERA™) is a high affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand available orally (as a tablet or solution) or intravenously (as a bolus or infusion) in various countries worldwide, including the USA, Canada and those of the EU. It is approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults (aged ≥18 years) [USA, EU and Canada] and adolescents (aged 16 to <18 years) [USA and EU] with epilepsy. In multinational, phase III studies in adults and adolescents (aged ≥16 years), oral brivaracetam as adjunctive therapy to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was generally associated with significant median percent reductions over placebo in seizure frequency and significant improvements in the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50 % reduction in seizure frequency compared with placebo. These benefits appeared to be sustained during up to 96 months' therapy in follow-up studies. Whether administered orally or intravenously, adjunctive brivaracetam was generally well tolerated in clinical studies, with the majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) being mild or moderate in intensity. In the absence of head-to-head studies, definitive conclusions on the comparative efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam versus newer AEDs are not yet possible. In the meantime, brivaracetam extends the options currently available for the treatment of POS in patients aged ≥16 years with epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Epilepsy; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

This meta-analysis systematically assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of brivaracetam (BRV) compared with placebo as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset epilepsy.. Electronic and clinical trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of BRV published up to May 2015. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The outcomes of interest included 50% responder rates, seizure freedom, the incidence of withdrawal and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Five trials met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, 20, 50, 100 and 150 mg/day BRV was associated with significantly higher 50% responder rates. In addition, the effect of 50 mg BRV on seizure freedom was significantly different than that of placebo. Both fatigue and nasopharyngitis were significantly associated with 20 mg BRV, whereas fatigue and irritability were associated with 50 mg BRV. Somnolence was associated with 150 mg BRV. No significant differences were observed for the other common TEAEs.. The use of BRV at doses > 5 mg/day resulted in statistically significant reduction in seizure frequency in respect to the 50% responder rate. BRV was reasonably tolerated by patients. These findings warrant confirmation in future studies.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Combined Modality Therapy; Epilepsies, Partial; Fatigue; Humans; Irritable Mood; Placebo Effect; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate long-term retention, reasons for discontinuation, efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in adults with focal seizures by number of lifetime antiseizure medications (ASMs).. Post hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N01358; NCT01261325) and corresponding open-label extension (OLE) (N01379; NCT01339559) of adjunctive BRV in adults (16-80 years of age) with focal seizures. Outcomes were assessed from the first day of BRV treatment in the double-blind (patients randomized to BRV) or open-label trial (patients randomized to placebo) by number of lifetime ASMs (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, or ≥ 7). Lifetime ASMs were defined as previous (stopped before BRV initiation) and concomitant ASMs at BRV initiation.. Seven hundred and forty patients received adjunctive BRV (safety set [SS]; median modal dose: 200 mg/day [N = 737]; median treatment duration: 2.67 years), of whom 13.8 % had 1-2, 20.8 % had 3-4, 21.1 % had 5-6 and 44.3 % had ≥7 lifetime ASMs. Patients with a higher number of lifetime ASMs had a younger age at epilepsy onset, longer epilepsy duration, and higher baseline seizure frequency. Kaplan-Meier estimated retention on BRV at 12 (83.2-65.9 %) and 36 months (63.0-44.1 %) was highest in patients with 1-2 lifetime ASMs and decreased with the number of lifetime ASMs. The estimated proportions of patients who discontinued BRV due to lack of efficacy or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) increased with the number of lifetime ASMs. Efficacy analyses included seven hundred and thirty eight patients (intention-to-treat set [ITT]). Median percentage reductions from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28 days (76.3-39.6 %), 50 % responder rates (66.7-39.8 %), 75 % responder rates (51.0-19.6 %), and continuous seizure freedom for ≥12 months at any time during BRV treatment (35.3-6.1 %) were highest in patients with 1-2 lifetime ASMs and decreased by the number of lifetime ASMs. The overall incidence of TEAEs (SS) was generally similar in each lifetime ASM subgroup (84.4-90.5 %). Discontinuations due to TEAEs increased with the number of lifetime ASMs (7.8-20.1 %). The greatest improvements in QOLIE-31-P scores occurred in the Seizure Worry and Daily Activities/Social Function subscales, with no clear pattern by the number of lifetime ASMs at 12 months and with the highest improvement in patients with 1-2 lifetime ASMs at 24 months. At 24 months, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety subscale scores improved in patients (SS) with 1-2 and 3-4 lifetime ASMs. HADS Depression subscale scores were generally stable independent of the number of lifetime ASMs.. The balance between efficacy, tolerability, and HRQOL was most favorable in patients with focal seizures who had been exposed to one or two ASMs before BRV initiation. However, patients exposed to ≥7 ASMs before BRV initiation also benefitted from long-term adjunctive BRV treatment.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Via measures of efficacy, tolerability, and safety, this open-label, single-center study assessed the overall effectiveness of Brivaracetam (BRV) for the treatment of epilepsy in the context of 'real-world' clinical practice.. Unselected consecutive patients were recruited and stratified into 3 cohorts with either fully prospective, fully retrospective or mixed data collection, dependent on whether their BRV prescriptions were historical, current, or pending. Prospective data were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and at 6-month intervals thereafter, from patient interviews and seizure diaries, and retrospective data from medical records. Efficacy variables were derived from seizure-related changes, and tolerability and safety variables from reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), BRV withdrawal, and changes to questionnaire scores. Additionally, we investigated treatment outcomes for those with previous levetiracetam (LEV) use, a history of psychiatric comorbidity, a learning disability, and of older age.. One hundred and nine patients (58.7% female, mean age 42 years, range: 18 to 72) were included, 59 with prospective follow-up for a minimum of 6 (47 patients, excluding those who withdrew) and a maximum of 24 months (2 patients). Of the full cohort, 87.2% had drug-resistant epilepsy. Retention: At the study end, the median treatment duration was 384 days (range: 6 to 1514 days), and BRV retention was 68.8%. Kaplan-Meier survival functions predicted retention rates of 74.0% and 70.0% at 6 and 12 months respectively.. At the last follow-up, there was a ≥ 50% responder rate of 30.8%, with 12.1% seizure-free. Seizure frequency categories improved in 31.4% of patients, remained the same in 44.2%, and worsened in 24.4%. Monthly tonic-clonic seizure frequency had significantly decreased, and of those reporting these seizures, 58.3% showed reductions and 25.0% showed complete tonic-clonic seizure freedom.. 91.7% of patients reported at least 1 TEAE, with fatigue (30.3%), irritability (29.4%), and depression/low mood (28.4%) as the most common. Only 58.4% of all TEAEs were persistent. Brivaracetam discontinuation due to side effects occurred in 27.5% of the cohort. Depression and anxiety scores remained stable over time, and quality-of-life scores improved. Subgroups: Measures of BRV efficacy and tolerability did not differ according to previous LEV exposure. Tolerability profiles of those with learning disabilities, histories of psychiatric comorbidities, and older age did not greatly differ from the rest of the cohort. Of note, specific history of depression predicted the reporting of suicidal ideation.. The BRIVEST study provides real-world evidence of the effectiveness of BRV, suggesting that neither drug-resistant epilepsy nor previous LEV failure should preclude its use. Furthermore, BRV appears to be well-tolerated, even among those from vulnerable patient populations.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in pediatric patients with epilepsy.. A phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term follow-up trial (N01266; NCT01364597) was conducted on patients (aged 1 month to <17 years at core trial entry; direct enrollers aged 4 to <17 years) treated with BRV. Outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), behavior assessments (Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist [CBCL], Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF]/BRIEF-Preschool version [BRIEF-P]), and efficacy outcomes (percent change in focal seizure frequency, 50% responder rate for all seizure types for patient subgroups <2 years and ≥2 years of age using daily record card data).. Of 257 patients with ≥1 dose of BRV (141 [54.9%] male; mean age = 8.0 years [SD = 4.5]), 36 patients were <2 years of age, and 72.0% of patients had a history of focal seizures. Mean BRV exposure was 3.2 patient-years. At least one TEAE occurred in 93.4% patients, and 32.3% had serious TEAEs. Seven patients died during the trial; no deaths were considered treatment-related. Patients ≥2 years of age had a median decrease in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency of 62.9%, and 50.9% had a ≥50% response in all seizures. Patients <2 years of age had a median decrease in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency of 96.9%, and 68.2% had a ≥50% response in all seizures. Kaplan-Meier estimated treatment retention was 72.7%, 64.5%, 57.8%, 53.3%, 50.1%, and 44.8% at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years, respectively. Mean changes (baseline to last evaluation) for all Achenbach CBCL and BRIEF-P/BRIEF subscale scores were negative, reflecting stability/slight improvement.. Long-term adjunctive BRV treatment was generally well tolerated and efficacious in reducing seizure frequency, and had high retention rates, with generally stable cognitive/behavioral scores in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

This study was undertaken to evaluate safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in patients on one or two concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) and in patients on one specific concomitant ASM.. Post hoc analysis was made of double-blind trials (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, and N01358/NCT01261325) in adults with focal seizures randomized to BRV (50-200 mg/day; approved therapeutic dose range for adults) or placebo with concomitant ASM regimen unchanged throughout a 12-week evaluation period. Outcomes were analyzed in patients on one or two concomitant ASMs, and those on concomitant carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), or valproate (VPA) only.. Patients randomized to BRV with one or two concomitant ASMs, respectively (n = 181/557), reported similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 68.0%/66.4%), drug-related TEAEs (41.4%/41.5%), and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (6.6%/5.4%). Respective values for patients randomized to placebo with one or two concomitant ASMs (n = 95/331) were 60.0%/60.7% (TEAEs), 32.6%/30.2% (drug-related TEAEs), and 2.1%/4.5% (TEAEs leading to discontinuation). The incidences of TEAEs, drug-related TEAEs, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation by specific concomitant ASM (CBZ, LTG, OXC, VPA) were similar to the overall incidences in patients taking one concomitant ASM. In patients on one or two concomitant ASMs, respectively, 50% responder rates were numerically higher on BRV (42.3%/36.8% [n = 175/511]) versus placebo (18.3%/19.5% [n = 93/298]). Patients with one or two ASMs on BRV (n = 175/509) versus placebo (n = 92/298) also had numerically higher 100% responder rates (BRV, 9.1%/4.5%; placebo, 1.1%/.3%) and seizure freedom (6.9%/3.7%; 1.1%/0). For patients taking concomitant CBZ, LTG, OXC, or VPA, efficacy was numerically higher with BRV (n = 54/30/27/27) versus placebo (n = 34/13/10/14-15; 50% responder rates: BRV, 31.5%/30.0%/40.7%/70.4%; placebo, 17.6%/7.7%/20.0%/33.3%; 100% responder rates: BRV, 5.6%/10.0%/11.1%/11.1%; placebo, 0 for all; seizure freedom: BRV, 3.7%/6.7%/7.4%/11.1%; placebo, 0 for all).. Therapeutic doses of BRV were efficacious and well tolerated regardless of the number of concomitant ASMs (one or two) or specific concomitant ASM (CBZ, LTG, OXC, VPA).

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Lamotrigine; Oxcarbazepine; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Despite introduction of several antiseizure medications over the past two decades, treatment options for childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) and juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) remain limited. We report the innovative adaptive design of an ongoing phase 2/3 trial to evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) monotherapy in patients 2-25 years of age with CAE or JAE.. N01269 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04666610; start: July 2021; expected completion: 2024) is a randomized, dose-finding and confirmatory, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. The trial consists of a dose-selection and assessment for futility stage, followed by an optimal-dose stage after interim analysis. Both stages include an up to 2-week screening period, a 2-week placebo-controlled period, and an 11-week active treatment period (10 weeks of initial treatment followed by a 24-hour electroencephalogram [EEG] and an additional week of active treatment for 24-hour EEG assessment). Patients who are absence seizure-free will enter an up to 4-week randomized withdrawal period. Efficacy assessments will be based on 24-hour EEG and seizure diaries.. This two-stage adaptive trial design allows investigation of two potentially efficacious BRV doses, where one dose is dropped in favor of the other dose with a better benefit-risk profile. This allows for a combined phase 2 dose-finding and phase 3 confirmatory efficacy trial, which reduces the number of patients needed to be recruited and reduces trial duration. A randomized withdrawal period is included to evaluate sustainability of treatment effect over time and to allow for placebo control while minimizing placebo exposure. Use of EEG capture in addition to seizure diaries offers a robust mechanism of detecting seizure activity and measuring treatment effect. Positive efficacy and safety/tolerability data may support the use of BRV as monotherapy for CAE or JAE, providing another treatment option and representing long-delayed progress in the treatment of absence seizures in these populations.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy, Absence; Humans; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

This long-term open-label extension (OLE) trial was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) at individualized doses in patients with epilepsy and focal (partial-onset) or generalized onset seizures, or Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD). A secondary objective was to evaluate efficacy of BRV in the subgroups of patients with focal or generalized onset seizures. Patients with epilepsy were eligible to enroll in this OLE (N01125; NCT00175916) and were analyzed if they had completed a previous double-blind BRV trial (N01114 [NCT00175929], N01252 [NCT00490035], N01254 [NCT00504881], N01187 [NCT00357669], and N01236 [NCT00368251]), and were expected to obtain a reasonable benefit from long-term BRV treatment. Patients entered the OLE at the BRV dose recommended at the end of the previous trial, with dose adjustments of BRV and concomitant antiseizure medications permitted. Safety variables included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy variables in patients with focal seizures were percent reduction in focal seizure frequency, 50 % responder rates, and 6- and 12-month seizure-freedom. Eight hundred and fifty-three patients (729 [85.5 %] with focal seizures, 30 [3.5 %] with generalized onset seizures, and 94 [11.0 %] with ULD) were enrolled and included in the Safety Set. Overall, 619 (72.6 %) patients discontinued the trial, mainly due to lack of efficacy (354 [41.5 %]), adverse events (100 [11.7 %]), and patient choice (98 [11.5 %]). During the OLE, 588 (68.9 %) patients received BRV for ≥12 months, 403 (47.2 %) for ≥36 months, and 223 (26.1 %) for ≥96 months. The most common modal dose of BRV was 150 mg/day (415 [48.7 %] patients). In the ULD subgroup, the most common modal BRV dose was 100 mg/day (44/94 [46.8 %] patients), and 37/94 (39.4 %) patients had ≥96 months of BRV exposure. Overall, 720/853 (84.4 %) patients reported TEAEs, 451 (52.9 %) had a drug-related TEAE, and 95 (11.1 %) discontinued BRV due to a TEAE. In the ULD subgroup, 87/94 (92.6 %) patients reported TEAEs, 60 (63.8 %) had a drug-related TEAE, and 16 (17.0 %) discontinued due to a TEAE. In patients with focal seizures, the median reduction in focal seizure frequency from Baseline was 43.1 % (n = 728), the 50 % responder rate was 43.6 % (n = 729), and 6- and 12-month seizure freedom rates were 22.2 % and 15.8 %, respectively (n = 595). Overall, BRV was well-tolerated as long-term adjunctive therapy in patients with focal seizures, gener

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Unverricht-Lundborg Syndrome

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with severely drug-resistant focal seizures versus adults with less drug-resistant disease.. Data were pooled from patients with focal seizures on 1-2 concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) randomized to BRV 50, 100, 200 mg/day, or placebo in 3 phase 3 trials (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], and N01358 [NCT01261325]) with a 12-week treatment period. Outcomes were assessed in patients with ≥ 5 and 0-4 previous ASMs (stopped before trial drug initiation).. In ≥ 5 previous ASMs subgroup (BRV 50, 100, 200 mg/day: n = 26, n = 137, n = 120; placebo: n = 151), percentage reduction over placebo in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency was 13.0% for 50 mg/day (p = 0.38), 18.1% for 100 mg/day (p = 0.006), 19.8% for 200 mg/day (p = 0.004), and 17.0% for all BRV-treated patients (p = 0.001). The 50% responder rate was 26.9%, 29.9%, 30.0%, and 29.7% for BRV 50, 100, 200, and 50-200 mg/day, respectively (placebo: 13.2%); odds ratios versus placebo were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for BRV 100, 200, and 50-200 mg/day. In 0-4 previous ASMs subgroup (BRV 50, 100, 200 mg/day: n = 135, n = 195, n = 129; placebo: n = 267), all BRV dosages showed statistically significant (1) percentage reduction over placebo in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency (21.4-28.7%); (2) differences from placebo in median percentage reduction in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency from baseline (35.5-45.9%; placebo: 21.3%); and (3) odds ratios versus placebo (favoring BRV) for 50% responder rates. In BRV-treated patients, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence (73.8% [217/294] vs. 64.6% [329/509]) and discontinuation due to TEAEs (10.5% vs. 4.5%) were higher in the ≥ 5 versus 0-4 previous ASMs subgroup; serious TEAEs were rare in both subgroups (≥ 5 previous ASMs: 3.1%; 0-4 previous ASMs: 2.9%).. Adjunctive BRV showed efficacy and was generally well tolerated in adults with focal seizures independent of the number of previous ASMs.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

This post hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life during long-term adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in adult patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). Patients (≥ 16 years) were included in this post hoc analysis if they were randomized to BRV or placebo in double-blind, placebo-controlled (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], N01358 [NCT01261325]; core) trials, and received adjunctive BRV in the corresponding long-term follow-up (N01125 [NCT00175916], N01199 [NCT00150800], N01379 [NCT01339559]) trials, and reported FBTCS during the 8-week prospective baseline (core trial). Efficacy (concomitant levetiracetam excluded) and tolerability (concomitant levetiracetam included) were assessed from the first day of BRV in patients who initiated BRV at 50-200 mg/day. Two hundred and eighty-four patients reported FBTCS during baseline (core trials) and were included in the Efficacy Set. Patients (mean age of 37.0 years; 51.8% male; mean epilepsy duration of 22.4 years; median baseline frequency of 2.8 FBTCS per 28 days) received BRV for a median treatment duration of 2.5 years (range< 0.1-11.3) at a median modal dose of 150 mg/day. BRV was discontinued by 175 (61.6%) patients, most commonly (≥ 10% of patients) due to adverse event (18.3%), lack of efficacy (18.3%), and consent withdrawn (11.6%); the median time to discontinuation of BRV due to any reason was 358.5 days. The Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated retention on BRV at 1, 3, and 5 years, were 69.3%, 48.2%, and 37.3%, respectively. The KM-estimated proportion of patients not discontinuing BRV due to lack of efficacy or adverse event were 80.0%, 63.9%, and 57.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Overall, the median percentage reduction in FBTCS frequency from baseline was 76.2%, and the 50% and 75% responder rates for FBTCS were 68.7% and 50.7%, respectively, which were sustained over time across completer cohorts. Sustained 50%, 75%, and 100% response in FBTCS from day 1 of adjunctive BRV treatment during the entire first year was estimated for 32.5%, 21.1%, and 15.0% of patients, respectively (KM analysis), and showed maintenance or improvement in the response to BRV over time. For patients with ≥ 1 year of BRV exposure, 51.3% were free from FBTCS for ≥ 1 year during any time of the treatment period, and 22.8% of patients did not report FBTCS during the first year from the first day of treatment. Clinically meaning

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in children with epilepsy.. This was an interim analysis (cut-off March 15, 2017) of pooled data from two open-label, single-arm, multicentre trials. N01263 (NCT00422422) was a 3-week trial of BRV 0.8-4 mg/kg/day in patients (1 month-<16 years) with epilepsy. Patients who completed this trial could continue into a long-term follow-up trial (N01266, NCT01364597) which also directly enrolled patients (4-<17 years) with focal seizures. After dose-escalation, patients received BRV 1-5 mg/kg/day (maximum 200 mg/day) during long-term evaluation. Data are reported for patients aged 4 to <16 years with focal seizures.. The safety set comprised 149 patients: 34 from the initial trial (26 entered long-term trial) and 115 directly enrolled into the long-term trial. At the cut-off, 90 patients were receiving BRV (total exposure: 299.4 patient-years). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 140/149 (94.0%) patients, most commonly (≥20%) nasopharyngitis (24.8%), pharyngitis (22.1%), convulsion (21.5%), and pyrexia (20.1%). TEAEs considered drug-related by the investigator were reported by 56/149 (37.6%) patients, most commonly somnolence (6.0%). Two patients died; neither death was considered related to BRV. Mean changes from baseline in child behaviour rating scales were small; most patients remained in their baseline category.. In this pooled analysis of two open-label trials including long-term data, adjunctive BRV was generally well tolerated in children aged 4 to <16 years with focal seizures. These findings supported approval of BRV as a new therapy option for children aged ≥4 years with focal seizures.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate long-term safety/tolerability of brivaracetam at individualized doses ≤200 mg/d (primary) and maintenance of efficacy over time (secondary) in adults with focal seizures or primary generalized seizures (PGS) enrolled in phase 3, open-label, long-term follow-up trial N01199 (NCT00150800).. Patients ≥16 years of age who had completed double-blind, placebo-controlled adjunctive brivaracetam trials NCT00175825, NCT00490035, NCT00464269, or NCT00504881 were eligible. Outcomes included safety, efficacy, and quality of life.. The safety set included 667 patients (focal seizures, 97.8%; PGS, 2.2%); the efficacy set included 648 patients with focal seizures and 15 patients with PGS. Overall, 49.2% of patients had ≥48 months of exposure. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 91.2% of all patients (91.3% of focal seizures group), brivaracetam discontinuation due to TEAEs in 14.8%, drug-related TEAEs in 56.7%, and serious TEAEs in 22.8%. The most common TEAEs in the focal seizures group (≥15%) were headache (25.3%) and dizziness (21.9%). Mean changes from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores at last value during 2-year evaluation were -0.7 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.3) and -0.2 (SD = 4.4) overall. In the focal seizures group, median reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28 days was 57.3%, 50% responder rate was 55.6%, and 6-month and 12-month seizure freedom rates were 30.3% and 20.3%, respectively. Efficacy outcomes improved by exposure duration cohort and then stabilized through the 108-month cohort. Mean improvement from baseline in Patient-Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory total score (efficacy set) was 5.7 (SD = 16.1, Cohen's d = 0.35) at month 12 and 6.5 (SD = 18.0, Cohen's d = 0.36) at month 24.. Adjunctive brivaracetam was well tolerated, with a good safety profile in long-term use in adults with epilepsy at individualized doses. Approximately half of the patients remained in the trial at 4 years. Brivaracetam reduced focal seizure frequency versus baseline. Efficacy improved with increasing exposure duration and remained stable through the 9-year cohort.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Time; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objective of the present trial was to assess efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) brivaracetam (BRV) vs. lorazepam (LZP) in patients with epilepsy undergoing evaluation in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) who experienced seizures requiring acute treatment.. This was a phase 2, open-label, randomized, active-control, proof-of-concept trial (EP0087; NCT03021018). Patients (18-70 years) admitted to EMU were randomized 1:1:1 to single-dose bolus IV LZP (dose per investigator's practice), IV BRV 100 mg, or IV BRV 200 mg. Trial medication had to be administered within 30 min of qualifying seizure. Primary efficacy outcome was time to next seizure (clinical observation with electroencephalogram [EEG] confirmation) or to rescue medication use within 12 h of trial medication administration. Secondary outcomes included seizure freedom and rescue medication use within 12 h of trial medication administration. Safety and tolerability outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Overall, 46 patients were randomized, and 45 received trial medication for a qualifying seizure. Patients in the LZP arm had doses from 1 to 4 mg (median: 1 mg). Eleven of 45 patients had a seizure within 12 h of trial medication administration (LZP 5/15 [median time to next seizure: 5.55 h], BRV 100 mg 3/15 [5.97 h], BRV 200 mg 3/15 [3.60 h]). No patients received additional rescue medication to control their qualifying seizure. Most patients were seizure-free over 12 h (LZP 9/15 [60.0%], BRV 100 mg 12/15 [80.0%], BRV 200 mg 12/15 [80.0%]). Rescue medication use within 12 h was numerically higher for LZP (6/15 [40.0%]) vs. BRV 100 mg (1/15 [6.7%]) and vs. BRV 200 mg (2/15 [13.3%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 5/16 (31.3%), 6/15 (40.0%), and 3/15 (20.0%) of LZP, BRV 100 mg, and BRV 200 mg patients; one LZP patient had a serious TEAE (seizure cluster). Most common TEAEs (≥10% of patients) were sedation and somnolence with LZP, and dizziness, headache, and nausea with BRV.. Intravenous LZP, IV BRV 100 mg, and IV BRV 200 mg showed similar efficacy in controlling acute seizure activity in the EMU. Treatment-emergent adverse events were as expected for each medication. Although this trial should be interpreted with caution because of small patient numbers, it suggests a possible role of BRV in the acute treatment of increased seizure activity.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lorazepam; Male; Middle Aged; Proof of Concept Study; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Sleepiness; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with focal seizures by the number of lifetime (previous and concomitant) antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. Post-hoc analysis of data from N01358 (NCT01261325), a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase III trial evaluating BRV 100 and 200 mg/day in patients ≥16 years of age with uncontrolled focal seizures. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were assessed for the 12-week Treatment Period in subgroups of patients with 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, or ≥7 lifetime AEDs.. 764 patients received at least one dose of trial medication (BRV: 503; PBO: 261; Safety Set), of whom 14.3% had 1-2, 20.8% had 3-4, 21.3% had 5-6, and 43.6% had ≥7 lifetime AEDs. In all lifetime AED subgroups, >85% of patients completed the trial. Patients with a higher number of lifetime AEDs had a younger age at epilepsy onset, longer epilepsy duration, and higher baseline seizure frequency. In patients on BRV, 50% responder rates were 49.3%, 44.4%, 47.2% and 27.4% in patients with 1-2 (n = 75), 3-4 (n = 99), 5-6 (n = 108) and ≥7 (n = 219) lifetime AEDs; 75% responder rates were 36.0%, 21.2%, 22.2% and 12.3%. In patients on PBO, 50% responder rates were 35.3%, 25.9%, 20.4% and 15.9% in patients with 1-2 (n = 34), 3-4 (n = 58), 5-6 (n = 54) and ≥7 (n = 113) lifetime AEDs; 75% responder rates were 26.5%, 6.9%, 3.7% and 4.4%. The Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of patients achieving a sustained 50% or 75% response from the first day of treatment was generally higher in patients with a lower number of lifetime AEDs (both in patients on BRV and PBO). In patients on adjunctive BRV, the incidence of drug related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 34.7%, 26.0%, 44.4% and 47.7% in patients with 1-2 (n = 75), 3-4 (n = 100), 5-6 (n = 108) and ≥7 (n = 220) lifetime AEDs; the incidence of discontinuations due to TEAEs was 1.3%, 3.0%, 8.3% and 10.5%.. This post-hoc analysis suggests a numerically higher response to adjunctive BRV in patients with fewer lifetime AEDs. The lowest response was observed in patients with ≥7 lifetime AEDs, although these patients could also benefit from adjunctive BRV treatment. Patients with fewer lifetime AEDs had lower discontinuation of BRV due to TEAEs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This long-term follow-up (LTFU) trial was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) at individualized doses (maximum of 200 mg/day) in patients with focal seizures. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of BRV over time.. Two Phase III, randomized, double-blind, historical-controlled conversion-to-monotherapy trials (N01276: NCT00698581; N01306: NCT00699283) were conducted in patients aged ≥16 years with uncontrolled focal seizures. Patients who completed either of these core trials or who met a protocol-defined exit criterion could enter this LTFU trial (N01315; NCT00761774). Patients entered LTFU at a recommended BRV dose of 100 mg/day, with flexible dosing of 50-200 mg/day, as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy; additional AEDs could be prescribed and adapted in dose if clinically indicated. Safety variables included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy variables included duration of continuous monotherapy, reduction in focal seizure frequency and seizure freedom. Safety and efficacy variables were assessed for all patients in the safety set or efficacy set, respectively, regardless of BRV treatment regimen. In addition, a post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted for patients who completed the BRV monotherapy period in either core trial, and entered the LTFU on BRV monotherapy. For this subgroup, TEAEs were summarized by 3-month time intervals over the first 12 months of LTFU.. 108 patients were enrolled in the LTFU trial between November 2008 and February 2010. 79 (73.1 %) patients discontinued the LTFU trial, most commonly due to lack of efficacy [37 (34.3 %)] and adverse events [16 (14.8 %)]. At core trial baseline, patients had a median of 6.3 focal seizures/28 days and 53 (49.1 %) had failed ≥5 previous lifetime AEDs. During LTFU, 70 (64.8 %) patients had ≥12 months and 56 (51.9 %) patients had ≥24 months of BRV treatment. TEAEs were reported by 98 (90.7 %) patients; most commonly (≥15 % of patients) convulsion (17.6 %), nasopharyngitis (17.6 %), depression (16.7 %) and fatigue (15.7 %). Median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28 days was 56.8 %. Among 86 patients who completed at least 6 months of treatment, 29 (33.7 %) patients were seizure-free for ≥6 months and 22 (25.6 %) were seizure-free for ≥12 months. 50/108 patients were included in the BRV monotherapy subgroup; 33/50 (66.0 %) patients reported a TEAE in the core trials, while 26/50 (52.0 %), 15/37 (40.5 %), 14/33 (42.4 %) and 9/27 (33.3 %) patients reported any TEAE during LTFU months 1-3, 4-6, 7-9 and 10-12, respectively. In the BRV monotherapy subgroup, the most common TEAEs (≥5% of patients) during LTFU months 1-3 were fatigue [3/50 (6.0 %)] and dizziness [3/50 (6.0 %)].. Results from the LTFU trial support the long-term safety of BRV at individualized doses of up to 200 mg/day as a well-tolerated, and effective treatment for patients with focal seizures. Efficacy analyses indicate that seizure reductions with brivaracetam were generally maintained over time.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To assess the effect of brivaracetam (BRV) on steady-state plasma concentrations of commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. Data were pooled from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy studies (NCT00175929, NCT00175825, NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325) in which adults with refractory epilepsy, and receiving stable doses of 1-2 AEDs, initiated adjunctive treatment with BRV (or placebo) for up to 12 weeks, following a 4-8 week baseline period. Concentrations of carbamazepine, carbamazepine epoxide, clobazam, clonazepam, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine (MHD), phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, topiramate, valproic acid and zonisamide, were measured during baseline and during BRV or placebo evaluation periods. Log-transformed data for patients receiving BRV dosages of 50-200 mg/day (or placebo) were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of covariance. Geometric least-squares means ratios of respective AED concentrations (treatment vs baseline) and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Relevant interaction of BRV on the respective AED was inferred if CIs were entirely outside of 0.80-1.25 limits.. Within the population for analysis (n = 1402), relevant interaction was observed for carbamazepine epoxide alone which increased up to 2-fold from baseline due to inhibition of epoxide hydrolase by BRV, and the effect size was not influenced by concomitant valproic acid. Relevant interaction was not observed for other AEDs.. In adults with focal seizures, adjunctive BRV treatment does not affect plasma concentrations of the evaluated AEDs but increases carbamazepine epoxide metabolite. Carbamazepine dose reduction should be considered if tolerability issues arise.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Prediction of brivaracetam effects in children was obtained by scaling an existing adult pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for brivaracetam to children, using an existing population PK model for brivaracetam in children. The scaling was supported by estimating the change from adults to children in the concentration-effect relationship parameters for levetiracetam, a compound interacting with the same target protein (synaptic vesicle protein SV2A).. The existing adult PK/PD model for brivaracetam was applied to a combined adult-pediatric dataset of levetiracetam. This model was then used to predict the effective oral twice-daily dose of brivaracetam in children aged ≥4 to <16 years as adjunctive treatment for focal (partial onset) seizures. The existing model described daily seizure counts using a negative binomial distribution, taking previous-day seizure frequencies into account, and using a mixture model to separate 'placebo-like' and 'responder' subpopulations. The model was adapted to describe aggregated monthly seizure counts for adult patients in the levetiracetam studies: daily seizure counts were only available for children in the levetiracetam studies.. The levetiracetam PK/PD model successfully described both the adult and pediatric data using the same drug effect parameters, and using a model structure similar to the existing adult brivaracetam PK/PD model.. Simulation with the adult brivaracetam PK/PD model in combination with an existing pediatric brivaracetam population PK model allowed characterization of the dose-response curve, suggesting maximum response at brivaracetam 4 mg/kg/day dosing (capped at 200 mg/day, the maximum adult dose) in children aged ≥4 years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Young Adult

The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) with concomitant use of lamotrigine (LTG) or topiramate (TPM) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.. Data were pooled from three randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III studies (NCT00490035/N01252, NCT00464269/N01253, NCT01261325/N01358) of adults with focal (partial-onset) seizures. Patients taking concomitant levetiracetam were excluded from the efficacy populations, but included in the safety populations. This post-hoc analysis reports data from patients taking BRV in the approved therapeutic range (50-200mg/day) concomitantly with LTG or TPM.. The number of patients in each of the three BRV dosage groups was small, particularly for the TPM subgroup. Mean percent reduction over placebo in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/28days for BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day was 8.7, 5.3, and 8.9 in the LTG subgroup (n=220), and 8.4, 21.3, and -4.2 in the TPM subgroup (n=122). The ≥50% responder rate with concomitant LTG or TPM with BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day or placebo was LTG: 28.1%, 36.1%, 34.1%, and 29.1%; and TPM: 14.3%, 44.4%, 25.0%, and 17.5%. There were numerically ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% responder rates for patients taking BRV ≥50mg/day compared with placebo in both subgroups. In the LTG and TPM safety populations (n=245 versus n=125), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported with LTG 68.7% versus 68.4%, and TPM 65.6% versus 57.8% (BRV ≥50mg/day versus placebo). Discontinuations due to TEAEs versus placebo were LTG 7.3% versus 6.3% and TPM 8.2% versus 4.7%. The three most frequently reported TEAEs for both subgroups were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Of these, the incidence of fatigue in the LTG population appeared to increase with dose.. In this post-hoc pooled analysis, BRV administered with concomitant LTG or TPM reduced seizure frequency and was generally well tolerated for BRV doses of 50-200mg/day.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Lamotrigine; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Sleepiness; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for monotherapy (in the USA) and adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in adults, at a dose range of 50-200 mg/day taken in two equal doses, with a recommended starting dose of 100 mg/day. Two Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, historical-controlled, conversion-to-monotherapy studies (N01276, NCT00698581; N01306, NCT00699283) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of conversion to BRV 50 mg/day monotherapy in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures. Patients aged 16-75 years, with 2-40 focal seizures per 4 weeks during an 8-week baseline, and on stable doses of 1-2 AEDs were enrolled. Patients were randomized to BRV 50 or 100 mg/day (3:1) in two equal doses without titration. The treatment period comprised 1-week BRV add-on, 8-week baseline AED tapering, and 8-week BRV monotherapy periods. Primary efficacy endpoint was Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative exit rate due to pre-defined exit criteria at Day 112 (50 mg/day, efficacy population). The upper 95% confidence interval (CI) was compared with the historical control threshold (0.722). Safety and tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; intent-to-treat population). After randomization of 150 patients (N01276: 88; N01306: 62), both studies were terminated due to the confounding effects of a higher-than-expected discontinuation rate. For BRV 50 mg/day, ≥1 exit criterion was met by 26/67 (38.8%) patients (study N01276) and 18/45 (40.0%) patients (study N01306). In both studies, the cumulative exit rate was lower than the historical control threshold (N01276: 0.487, 95% CI 0.347, 0.626; N01306: 0.474, 95% CI 0.310, 0.638). However, with maximum 10% censoring due to early withdrawal (sensitivity analysis), cumulative exit rates were above historical control (N01276: 0.652, 95% CI 0.532, 0.772; N01306: 0.704, 95% CI 0.563, 0.844). Overall incidence of TEAEs was 110/150, 73.3% (treatment period); 78/147, 53.1% (baseline AED tapering period); 41/84, 48.8% (BRV monotherapy period). In conclusion, BRV 50 mg/day monotherapy demonstrated an exit rate lower than historical control. Results should be interpreted with caution as, following termination of both studies, patient numbers were too low to evaluate the efficacy of BRV monotherapy. These are the first published safety and tolerability

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Brivaracetam is a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, recently approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy. The goal of the present analysis was to determine if the dose-response of brivaracetam as monotherapy would fall within the range associated with brivaracetam efficacy as adjunctive therapy. An existing brivaracetam population pharmacokinetic model consisting of first-order absorption, single compartment distribution, and first-order elimination components was extended by estimating the clearance changes due to co-administration of 12 widely prescribed AEDs. Data for the population pharmacokinetic analysis originated from three Phase III add-on trials and two terminated Phase III monotherapy trials. An existing population model of daily seizure rate versus brivaracetam daily average concentration was applied to the data from the three add-on trials. Simulations allowed the assessment of the combined impact of covariate effects on both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of brivaracetam, and indicated that in the absence of other AEDs, only marginal changes in the overall dose-response relationship would be expected. This suggests that brivaracetam can be used as monotherapy without dose modifications.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Computer Simulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Young Adult

Time to onset of sustained ≥50% responder status (SRS) was assessed for the pooled patient population receiving brivaracetam (BRV) 50, 100, or 200 mg/day or placebo in three randomized phase III studies (NCT00464269, NCT00490035, and NCT01261325). Patients were aged ≥16 years with well-characterized focal (partial-onset) seizures (FS) uncontrolled by 1-2 concomitant antiepileptic drugs. After an 8-week baseline period, patients received study drug without up-titration for a 12-week (84-day) treatment period. A patient was a sustained ≥50% responder on a particular day if they completed the entire treatment period through day 84 and was a ≥50% responder (based on percent reduction in FS frequency from baseline) both on that day and every successive day until day 84 (end of treatment period). In the pooled efficacy population (N = 1,160), 15.5%, 18.1%, and 19.4% of patients taking BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/day, respectively, achieved SRS on day 1 versus 6.7% for placebo (p < 0.001). Statistically significant SRS was also achieved for most of the BRV-treated groups in the three separate studies. This suggests that BRV has an early, sustained onset of action in a subset of responders. The incidence of adverse events during the first week was similar to that in the overall treatment period.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Preference-based measures are required to measure the impact of interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. This study assessed the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-3L in adults with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures.. Data from three Phase III studies of an antiepileptic drug (adjunctive brivaracetam; n = 1095) were used. Analysis included correlations between EQ-5D-3L and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31P) and seizure frequency. Known group validity was based on ability of the EQ-5D-3L to discriminate between baseline QOLIE-31P total scores, seizure type and number of antiepileptic drugs using effect sizes (ES). Responsiveness assessed proportions reporting highest or lowest scores, overall change using standardized response means (SRM) and change by responder and clinician/patient evaluation groups using ES.. Correlations were weak to moderate (ρ = 0.2-0.4) between EQ-5D-3L dimensions and QOLIE-31P subscales, apart from medication effects (ρ < 0.1); seizure frequency was not associated with either measure. Known group analysis had small ES. A quarter (24.9%) of patients had a baseline EQ-5D-3L utility score of 1 (full health) but lower average QOLIE-31P scores. SRMs were small (<0.1) in EQ-5D-3L compared with 0.1-0.4 for QOLIE-31P subscales. Results across the studies were mixed for responder status and clinician/patient evaluation of improvement for EQ-5D-3L.. EQ-5D-3L had weak-to-moderate correlations with QOLIE-31P and varied with QOLIE-31P severity groups, but showed less responsiveness than QOLIE-31P. Given this lack of sensitivity, EQ-5D-3L may not be appropriate for measuring the impact of interventions in cost-effectiveness analysis in this population and disease-specific preference-based measures may be more appropriate.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Psychometrics; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Reproducibility of Results; Seizures; Surveys and Questionnaires

Brivaracetam is a selective high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, recently approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model were developed describing brivaracetam plasma concentration and the relationship with daily seizure counts in adequate well-controlled efficacy trials. The effect of body weight on clearance and volume was implemented using allometric scaling, and a range of covariates were investigated for their influence on brivaracetam clearance. The PKPD model described daily seizure counts using a negative binomial distribution, taking previous day seizures into account, and using a mixture model to separate "placebo-like" and "response" subpopulations. The PK and PKPD models provided a good description of the data, documented using visual predictive checks. Coadministration with carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital decreased brivaracetam exposure by 26%, 21%, and 19%, respectively, without significant effects on PD response. Covariate analysis indicated that levetiracetam coadministration reduced the fraction of subjects in the mixture model response population to 4% and identified baseline seizure frequency as a strong predictor for being assigned to the mixture model response population. Simulation allowed characterization of the dose-response curve, suggesting maximum response is obtained at brivaracetam 150-200 mg/day.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for SV2A, for treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures (POS) in adults.. Data were pooled from patients (aged 16-80 years) with POS uncontrolled by 1 to 2 antiepileptic drugs receiving BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/d or placebo, without titration, in 3 phase III studies of BRV (NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325, ClinicalTrials.gov, funded by UCB Pharma). The studies had an 8-week baseline and a 12-week treatment period. Patients receiving concomitant levetiracetam were excluded from the efficacy pool.. In the efficacy population (n = 1,160), reduction over placebo (95% confidence interval) in baseline-adjusted POS frequency/28 days was 19.5% (8.0%-29.6%) for 50 mg/d (p = 0.0015), 24.4% (16.8%-31.2%) for 100 mg/d (p < 0.00001), and 24.0% (15.3%-31.8%) for 200 mg/d (p < 0.00001). The ≥50% responder rate was 34.2% (50 mg/d, p = 0.0015), 39.5% (100 mg/d, p < 0.00001), and 37.8% (200 mg/d, p = 0.00003) vs 20.3% for placebo (p < 0.01). Across the safety population groups (n = 1,262), 90.0% to 93.9% completed the studies. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 68.0% BRV overall (n = 803) and 62.1% placebo (n = 459). Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.0% (BRV) and 2.8% (placebo); 3 patients receiving BRV and one patient receiving placebo died. TEAEs in ≥5% patients taking BRV (vs placebo) were somnolence (15.2% vs 8.5%), dizziness (11.2% vs 7.2%), headache (9.6% vs 10.2%), and fatigue (8.7% vs 3.7%).. Adjunctive BRV was effective and generally well tolerated in adults with POS.. This analysis provides Class I evidence that adjunctive BRV is effective in reducing POS frequency in adults with epilepsy and uncontrolled seizures.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Young Adult

This analysis was conducted to assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of brivaracetam (BRV) for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in patients aged ≥65 years.. Safety/tolerability and efficacy data for patients aged ≥65 years were pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose Phase III studies (NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325). Data were pooled by treatment group: placebo or the proposed therapeutic dose range of 50-200 mg/day: BRV 50, 100, 200mg/day.. Thirty-two patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to placebo or BRV 50-200 mg/day. Of these, 30 patients (93.8%) completed their respective study. In the safety population (n=32), 87.5% placebo- vs 73.3% BRV-treated patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the treatment period; most commonly, headache (25.0% vs 12.5%), paresthesia (0% vs 12.5%), and somnolence (50.0% vs 12.5%) for placebo- vs BRV-treated patients, respectively. During the treatment period, drug-related TEAEs were reported by 62.5% of placebo- vs 53.3% of BRV-treated patients, and serious TEAEs (SAEs) were reported by 0% of placebo- and 4.2% of BRV-treated patients; there were no drug-related SAEs and no deaths. Three SAEs (placebo 1/8; BRV 2/24) and two deaths (placebo 1/8; BRV 1/24) occurred in the post-treatment period. In the efficacy population (n=31), median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28days was 14.0% for placebo vs 25.5%, 49.6%, and 74.9% for BRV 50, 100, and 200 mg/day, respectively. The ≥50% responder rate was 14.3% for placebo vs 25.0%, 50.0%, and 66.7% for BRV 50, 100, and 200 mg/day, respectively.. Safety/tolerability and efficacy findings in this small subgroup of older patients treated with adjunctive BRV are consistent with those observed in the much larger overall pooled population. BRV may be a suitable adjunctive treatment for older patients with uncontrolled focal seizures. Further larger studies in this population are warranted.

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Therapeutics

Secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCS) are among the most devastating types of seizures, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A), has been shown to be useful for the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures. We sought to determine its specific efficacy in treating SGTCS.. Data were pooled from three Phase III studies (NCT00490035; NCT00464269; NCT01261325) of adults with focal seizures taking 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) who received placebo or BRV 50-200mg/day without titration over a 12-week treatment period. We report efficacy and safety/tolerability data for the BRV therapeutic dose range (50-200 mg/day) in patients with focal seizures including baseline SGTCS.. Patients (efficacy population, N=409) had been diagnosed with epilepsy for a mean±standard deviation duration of 22.2±13.1years. Baseline median SGTCS frequency was 3.0 per 28days. The majority (293, 71.6%) had failed ≥2 AEDs prior to study enrollment. The median percent reduction from baseline in SGTCS frequency/28days was: placebo, 33.3%; BRV 50mg/day, 66.6% (p<0.001); BRV 100mg/day, 61.2% (p=0.002); and BRV 200mg/day, 82.1% (p<0.001). The ≥50% responder rate for SGTCS was: placebo, 33.0%; BRV 50mg/day, 61.3% (p=0.003); BRV 100mg/day, 55.0% (p<0.001); and BRV 200mg/day, 64.0% (p<0.001). Freedom from SGTCS was achieved by: placebo, 14.8%; BRV 50mg/day, 22.6%; BRV 100mg/day, 31.0%; and BRV 200mg/day, 36.0% of patients. Time to first SGTCS during the treatment period was longer in patients receiving BRV than placebo (26days vs 8days, hazard ratio 0.55, p<0.001). In the SGTCS safety population (N=487), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 60.6% of patients receiving placebo vs 65.0% of patients receiving BRV ≥50mg/day. Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.1% placebo vs 3.9% BRV ≥50mg/day. Discontinuations due to TEAEs were 3.9% placebo vs 6.3% BRV ≥50mg/day.. In patients with drug-resistant focal seizures, adjunctive BRV is effective in reducing the frequency of SGTCS. Almost one-third (30.4%) of patients were rendered completely free of SGTCS during the 12-week treatment period when taking BRV ≥50mg/day. BRV was well tolerated, with a TEAE profile consistent with that of the overall study population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To explore efficacy and safety/tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), a novel, high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, which also inhibits neuronal voltage-dependent sodium channels, in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures (POS).. This was an exploratory, phase IIb, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in patients 16-65 years with epilepsy experiencing > or =4 POS during 4-week baseline despite 1-2 concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo, BRV 5 mg/day (BRV5), BRV 20 mg/day (BRV20), or BRV 50 mg/day (BRV50), administered BID without uptitration during a 7-week treatment period. Primary efficacy endpoint was POS frequency/week during the treatment period relative to placebo.. A total of 208 patients constituted the intention-to-treat population; 197 completed the study. Estimated percentage reductions over placebo in POS frequency/week were 9.8% (BRV5; p = 0.240), 14.9% (BRV20; p = 0.062), and 22.1% (BRV50; p = 0.004). Median percent reductions from baseline in POS frequency/week were 21.7% (placebo), 29.9% (BRV5; p = 0.086), 42.6% (BRV20; p = 0.014), and 53.1% (BRV50; p < 0.001); > or =50% responder rates were 16.7% (placebo), 32.0% (BRV5; p = 0.047), 44.2% (BRV20; p = 0.002), and 55.8% (BRV50; p < 0.001); seizure freedom rates (POS) during the 7-week treatment period were 1.9% (placebo), 8.0% (BRV5; p = 0.193), 7.7% (BRV20; p = 0.193), and 7.7% (BRV50; p = 0.201). BRV was well-tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and occurred with similar incidence in placebo and BRV groups, and discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events were infrequent (placebo 3.7%; BRV 2.6%).. This interventional study provides preliminary Class I evidence that adjunctive BRV was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients aged 16-65 years with POS.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Young Adult

The pharmacokinetics of Brivaracetam (BRV) and its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier quickly make it a suitable drug for emergencies. In this study, our aim was to investigate the tolerability, safety, and acute efficacy of rapid intravenous (IV) loading of BRV during invasive and non-invasive video-EEG monitoring in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE).. Eleven adult patients, six during stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and five in scalp video-EEG evaluation, received a 10-minute IV infusion of BRV 100 mg after a period of total withdrawal from antiseizure medications (ASMs). The ictal and interictal EEG activity was assessed through visual and spectrographic analysis before and after intravenous BRV administration. Patients completed the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) scale to evaluate tolerability and adverse events.. Rapid BRV IV infusion was well tolerated in all patients. The mean LAEP values showed no significant differences (p = 0.40). Loading BRV resulted in a reduction in interictal activity in six patients. The mean seizure frequency significantly decreased five hours after BRV administration (a 79.2 % reduction across the entire group, p = 0.027). A significant change in spectral band analysis was observed ten minutes after BRV administration.. Our data suggest that rapid BRV IV infusion has a favorable safety profile and is effective in controlling seizure series in the short term. The electrophysiological changes observed ten minutes after the BRV load correlate with its effects on brain dynamics after blood-brain barrier diffusion.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electroencephalography; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on therapy brivaracetam (BRV) in adult patients with epilepsy in a real-world setting.. This multi-center retrospective observational cohort study examined all adult patients who commenced on BRV at 11 Australian epilepsy centers between 2017 and 2020. Primary outcomes were seizure response (≥50% reduction in frequency) and seizure freedom 12 months post BRV commencement, and tolerability. We report three approaches to missing data (complete case analysis, CCA; last observation carried forward, LOCF; and intention to treat, ITT). Secondary outcomes included the durability of early BRV response and continuous seizure freedom from BRV initiation. Subgroup analysis examined patients with focal and generalized epilepsy and patients with refractory (≥4 prior ASMs) and highly refractory (≥7 prior ASMs) epilepsy. Outcomes were also assessed at 'personalized' seizure outcome time points based on baseline seizure frequency.. Baseline and follow-up data were available for 228 patients. The mean age was 41.5 years (IQR 30, 50). Most had focal epilepsy (188/228, 82.5%). Median number of previous ASMs was 4 (2, 7), and concomitant ASMs 2 (2, 3). Twelve-month responder rate was: 46.3% using CCA (95% CI 34.0, 58.9); 39.5% using LOCF (33.1, 46.1); and 15.4% using ITT (10.9, 20.7). Twelve-month seizure freedom was: 23.9% using CCA (14.3, 35.9); 24.6% using LOCF (19.1, 30.7); and 7.9% using ITT (4.7, 12.1). The most frequent adverse effects were sedation or cognitive slowing (33/228, 14.5%), irritability or aggression (16/228, 7.0%), and low mood (14/228, 6.1%). Outcomes were similar using continuous outcome definitions and 'personalized' outcome assessment time points. Early responses were highly durable, with 3-month response maintained at all subsequent time points at 83%, and seizure freedom maintained at 85%. Outcomes were similar in focal (n = 187) and generalizsed (n = 25) subgroups. Outcomes were similar in refractory patients (n = 129), but lower in the highly refractory group (n = 62), however improvement with BRV was still observed with 12-month seizure freedom of 8.3% using CCA (1.0, 27), 6.5% using LOCF (1.8, 15.7); and 3.2% using ITT (0.4, 11.2).. Meaningful real-world responder and seizure freedom rates can be still observed in a refractory epilepsy population. Brivaracetam response can occur early and appears to be maintained with minimal later relapse. The results should be interpreted with caution given the retrospective nature of the study and the quantities of missing data at later time points.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Australia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

There are currently no clinical treatments to prevent posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE). Recently, our group has shown that administration of levetiracetam (LEV) or brivaracetam (BRV) shortly after cortical neurotrauma prevents the development of epileptiform activity in rats, as measured ex vivo in neocortical slices. Due to the low incidence of spontaneous seizures in rodent-based models of traumatic brain injury (TBI), chemoconvulsants have been used to test injured animals for seizure susceptibility. We used a low dose of the voltage-gated potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) to evaluate posttraumatic epileptogenesis after controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury. We then used this assessment to further investigate the efficacy of BRV as an antiepileptogenic treatment.. Sprague-Dawley rats aged P24-35 were subjected to severe CCI injury. Following trauma, one group received BRV-21 mg/kg (IP) at 0-2 min after injury and the other BRV-100 mg/kg (IP) at 30 min after injury. Four to eight weeks after injury, animals were given a single, low dose of 4-AP (3.0-3.5 mg/kg, IP) and then monitored up to 90 min for stage 4/5 seizures.. The chemoconvulsant challenge revealed that within four to eight weeks, CCI injury led to a two-fold increase in percentage of rats with 4-AP induced stage 4-5 seizures relative to sham-injured controls. Administration of a single dose of BRV within 30 min after trauma significantly reduced injury-induced seizure susceptibility, bringing the proportion of CCI-rats that exhibited evoked seizures down to control levels.. This study is the first to use a low dose of 4-AP as a chemoconvulsant challenge to test epileptogenicity within the first two months after CCI injury in rats. Our findings show that a single dose of BRV administered within 30 min after TBI prevents injury-induced increases in seizure susceptibility. This supports our hypothesis that early intervention with BRV may prevent PTE.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Epilepsy, Post-Traumatic; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures

Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice.. BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation.. A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam.. IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Status epilepticus (SE) is defined by abnormally prolonged seizures that may lead to brain damage and death. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability (effectiveness) of intravenous brivaracetam (BRV) as a second-line treatment.. Twenty-one patients (median age 68 years ± 17.28) were prospectively recruited between June 2019 and December 2022. Patients were treated with BRV (50-200 mg) as a second-line add-on therapy for SE. We evaluated the response of SE to the administration of BRV in terms of SE termination and recurrence of epileptic seizures at 6, 12, and 24 h, also monitoring safety. The first-line therapy was represented by intravenous benzodiazepines (mainly diazepam).. Almost a quarter of patients had generalized seizures, whereas the vast majority (76.2%) presented focal seizures. In 52.4% of patients, the underlying cause was cerebrovascular. Fourteen (66.7%) patients displayed a good early response in the subsequent 6 h. At 12 and 24 h, 8 (38%) and 11 (52.4%) patients, respectively, did not present seizures.. The present study highlights the potential of BRV when used as an early add-on therapy in SE, further confirming its good safety profile.

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam (BRV) is an anti-seizure drug for the treatment of focal and generalized epileptic seizures shown to augment short-term synaptic fatigue by slowing down synaptic vesicle recycling rates in control animals. In this study, we sought to investigate whether altered short-term synaptic activities could be a pathological hallmark during the interictal periods of epileptic seizures in two well-established rodent models, as well as to reveal BRV's therapeutic roles in altered short-term synaptic activities and low-frequency band spontaneous brain hyperactivity in these models. In our study, the electrophysiological field excitatory post-synaptic potential (fEPSP) recordings were performed in rat hippocampal brain slices from the CA1 region by stimulation of the Schaffer collateral/commissural pathway with or without BRV (30 μM for 3 h) in control or epileptic seizure (induced by pilocarpine (PILO) or high potassium (h-K

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Fatigue; Pilocarpine; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rodentia; Seizures; Synaptic Vesicles

The maintenance of seizure control over time is a clinical priority in patients with epilepsy. The aim of this study was to assess the sustained seizure frequency reduction with adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in real-world practice. Patients with focal epilepsy prescribed add-on BRV were identified. Study outcomes included sustained seizure freedom and sustained seizure response, defined as a 100% and a ≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency that continued without interruption and without BRV withdrawal through the 12-month follow-up. Nine hundred ninety-four patients with a median age of 45 (interquartile range = 32-56) years were included. During the 1-year study period, sustained seizure freedom was achieved by 142 (14.3%) patients, of whom 72 (50.7%) were seizure-free from Day 1 of BRV treatment. Sustained seizure freedom was maintained for ≥6, ≥9, and 12 months by 14.3%, 11.9%, and 7.2% of patients from the study cohort. Sustained seizure response was reached by 383 (38.5%) patients; 236 of 383 (61.6%) achieved sustained ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency by Day 1, 94 of 383 (24.5%) by Month 4, and 53 of 383 (13.8%) by Month 7 up to Month 12. Adjunctive BRV was associated with sustained seizure frequency reduction from the first day of treatment in a subset of patients with uncontrolled focal epilepsy.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Freedom; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy and accounts for about 10-15% of all newly diagnosed epilepsy cases. However, evidence about the clinical profile of antiseizure medications in the PSE setting is currently limited. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A. The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in patients with PSE treated in a real-world setting.. This was a subgroup analysis of patients with PSE included in the BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST). The BRIVAFIRST was a 12-month retrospective, multicentre study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure-freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs.. Patients with PSE included in the BRIVAFIRST were 75 and had a median age of 57 (interquartile range, 42-66) years. The median daily doses of BRV at 3, 6, and 12 months from starting treatment were 100 (100-150) mg, 125 (100-200) mg and 100 (100-200) mg, respectively. At 12 months, 32 (42.7%) patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50%, and the seizure freedom rates was 26/75 (34.7%). During the 1-year study period, 10 (13.3%) patients discontinued BRV. The reasons of treatment withdrawal were insufficient efficacy in 6 (8.0%) patients and poor tolerability in 4 (5.3%) patients. Adverse events were reported by 13 (20.3%) patients and were rated as mild in 84.6% and moderate in 15.4% of cases.. Adjunctive BRV was efficacious and generally well-tolerated when used in patients with PSE in clinical practice. Adjunctive BRV can be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with PSE.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Italy; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The management of epilepsy in older adults has become part of daily practice because of an aging population. Older patients with epilepsy represent a distinct and more vulnerable clinical group as compared with younger patients, and they are generally under-represented in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Real-world studies can therefore be a useful complement to characterize the drug's profile. Brivaracetam is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A and approved as adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adults with epilepsy.. The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in older patients (≥65 years of age) with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting.. The BRIVAFIRST (BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy) was a 12-month retrospective multicenter study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive brivaracetam. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events and the incidence of adverse events. Data were compared for patients aged ≥65 years of age ('older') vs those aged <65 years ('younger').. There were 1029 patients with focal epilepsy included in the study, of whom 111 (10.8%) were aged ≥65 years. The median daily dose of brivaracetam at 3 months was 100 [interquartile range, 100-175] mg in the older group and 100 [100-200] mg in the younger group (p = 0.036); it was 150 [100-200] mg in both groups either at 6 months (p = 0.095) or 12 months (p = 0.140). At 12 months, 49 (44.1%) older and 334 (36.4%) younger patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50% (p = 0.110), and the seizure freedom rates were 35/111 (31.5%) and 134/918 (14.6%) in older and younger groups, respectively (p < 0.001). During the 1-year study period, 20 (18.0%) patients in the older group and 245 (26.7%) patients in the younger group discontinued brivaracetam (p = 0.048). Treatment withdrawal because of insufficient efficacy was less common in older than younger patients [older: n = 7 (6.3%), younger: n = 152 (16.6%); p = 0.005]. Adverse events were reported by 24.2% of older patients and 30.8% of younger patients (p = 0.185); the most common adverse events were somnolence, nervousness and/or agitation, vertigo, and fatigue in both study groups.. Adjunctive brivaracetam was efficacious, had good tolerability, and no new or unexpected safety signals emerged when used to treat older patients with uncontrolled focal seizures in clinical practice. Adjunctive brivaracetam can be a suitable therapeutic option in this special population.

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Italy; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam (BRV) is licensed as an adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy. We describe our clinical experience with BRV at a large UK tertiary center.. Adults initiated on BRV between July 2015 and July 2020 were followed up until they discontinued BRV or September 2021. Data on epilepsy syndrome, duration, seizure types, concomitant and previous antiseizure medication (ASM) use, BRV dosing, efficacy, and side effects were recorded. Efficacy was categorized as temporary (minimum three months) or ongoing (at last follow-up) seizure freedom, ≥50% seizure reduction, or other benefits (e.g., no convulsions or daytime seizures). Brivaracetam retention was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.. Two-hundred people were treated with BRV, of whom 81% had focal epilepsy. The mean (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time was 707 (688) days, and the dose range was 50-600 mg daily. The mean (IQR) of the previous number of used ASMs was 6.9 (6.0), and concomitant use was 2.2 (1.0). One-hundred and eighty-eight people (94%) had previously discontinued levetiracetam (LEV), mainly due to side effects. 13/200 (6.5%) were seizure free for a minimum of six months during treatment, and 46/200 (23%) had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency for six months or more. Retention rates were 83% at six months, 71% at 12 months, and 57% at 36 months. Brivaracetam was mostly discontinued due to side effects (38/75, 51%) or lack of efficacy (28/75, 37%). Concomitant use of carbamazepine significantly increased the hazard ratio of discontinuing BRV due to side effects (p = 0.006). The most commonly reported side effects were low mood (20.5%), fatigue (18%) and aggressive behavior (8.5%). These side effects were less prevalent than when the same individuals took LEV (low mood, 59%; aggressive behavior, 43%). Intellectual disability was a risk factor for behavioral side effects (p = 0.004), and a pre-existing mood disorder significantly increased the likelihood of further episodes of low mood (p = 0.019).. Brivaracetam was effective at a broad range of doses in managing drug-resistant epilepsy across various phenotypes, but less effective than LEV in those who switched due to poor tolerability on LEV. There were no new tolerability issues, but 77% of the individuals experiencing side effects on BRV also experienced similar side effects on LEV.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Levetiracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Tertiary Care Centers; Treatment Outcome

To report the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in add-on therapy in pediatric patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy. Prognostic factors of clinical outcome were also analyzed.. This Italian multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted on 45 pediatric patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy, treated with BRV for at least 1 month and with a follow-up >6 months. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were assessed at T0 (baseline, BRV introduction) and T1 (6 months after BRV introduction). The response was defined as ≥50% seizure frequency reduction; responders and non-responders were then compared to assess potential prognostic factors.. Forty-five patients (M = 28, mean age 12.4+/-4.4 years) were enrolled (focal epilepsy=14; generalized epilepsy=2; epileptic encephalopathy=29). At T1, 19/45 patients (42.2%) were responders (≥50% seizure frequency reduction), with 4 patients (8.9%) achieving a ≥ 75% seizure reduction and 2 patients (4.4%) becoming seizure free. Epilepsy onset at >12 months of age (p = 0.001), disease duration ≤6 years (p = 0.036), and lower seizure frequency at baseline (p = 0.008) were the prognostic factors significantly associated with a better prognosis. No significant difference emerged for demographics, epilepsy types/etiology, intellectual disability, or therapy variables. At T1, 21 patients (46.6%) discontinued BRV, mainly due to lack of efficacy (13 subjects; 28.9%) and adverse events in 8 patients (17.8%).. Brivaracetam was an effective and tolerated treatment in pediatric patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy, especially when the seizure onset was at >12 months of age, the epilepsy duration ≤6 years, and the seizure frequency before BRV treatment was low. Further and controlled studies are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Humans; Long-Term Care; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

The antiseizure drugs commonly used as first- and second-line treatments for neonatal seizures display poor efficacy. Thus, drug mechanisms of action that differ from these typical agents might provide better seizure control. Perampanel, an AMPA-receptor antagonist, and brivaracetam, a SV2A ligand, might fill that role.. We utilized methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM) to evoke seizures in rats to assess the efficacy of perampanel and brivaracetam treatment in clinically relevant doses.. In postnatal day (P)10 rats, neither perampanel nor brivaracetam suppressed seizure activity. By contrast, in P21 rats, both drugs decreased the severity of seizures. This effect was evident at the 20 and 40 mg/kg doses of brivaracetam and at the 0.9 and 2.7 mg/kg doses of perampanel.. These data indicate that while the efficacy of these drugs may be limited for neonatal seizures, their efficacy increases over early postnatal development.

Topics: Aging; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbolines; Convulsants; Female; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures

Brivaracetam (BRV) was recently introduced for the treatment of patients with focal epilepsy. BRV undergoes relatively few interactions, but one of them leads to the elevation of carbamazepine (CBZ)-10,11-CBZ-epoxide (CBZ-E) if BRV is co-administered with CBZ. This interaction has been considered to be clinically negligible. We present a case series of nine patients. In eight of them, levetiracetam (LEV) was switched to BRV. In the remaining case, oxcarbazepine was replaced by CBZ and added to a stable BRV dose. A marked increase of CBZ-E occurred in every case and was associated with clinically relevant symptoms including blurred vision, diplopia, dizziness, or fatigue in three of them. However, in the remaining six, the elevated CBZ-E levels were not associated with any tolerability problems. The importance of CBZ-E for adverse events under CBZ may have been overemphasized in the past and is not clinically impairing in most cases treated with the combination of BRV and CBZ.

Topics: Adult; Carbamazepine; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

There is an unmet need for well-tolerated antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that effectively control focal onset seizures. This study aimed to evaluate the economic value of new AEDs in the treatment of focal onset seizure, with or without secondary generalization, in Finnish adults and adolescents with epilepsy, comparing brivaracetam with perampanel as adjunctive AEDs.. Economic value was assessed using cost-utility analysis. Periods of AED initiation, titration, response assessment (seizure freedom, ≥ 50% reduction, no response), switching in no response or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and death were simulated using a discrete-event simulation model. Responses and switching were simulated based on a comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary modeled outcome was the 3%/year discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), payer costs (year 2017 Euro) per patient, and net monetary benefit (NMB) were secondary outcomes. Probabilistic and comprehensive deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.. Brivaracetam was more efficacious and had fewer TEAEs than perampanel and other AEDs. Modeled average 5-year QALYs and costs were 3.671 and €28,297 for brivaracetam and 3.611 and €27,979 for perampanel, respectively. The resulting ICER for brivaracetam versus perampanel was only €5345/QALY gained in a deterministic base case scenario. Brivaracetam had a positive NMB and high probability of cost-effectiveness of €1190 and 71% or €1944 and 80% with the assumed willingness to pay of €25,358 or €38,036/QALY gained, respectively. The primary result was robust, with a positive NMB persistent in all sensitivity analysis scenarios. When switching from brivaracetam to perampanel was excluded from the modeling or switching from perampanel to brivaracetam was included, brivaracetam was cost-saving and more effective than perampanel (dominant).. These simulated comparisons demonstrated that brivaracetam was more effective and potentially also more affordable than perampanel. Thus, brivaracetam is likely a cost-effective and net beneficial alternative to perampanel for treatment of focal onset seizures. Plain language summary available for this article.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Bayes Theorem; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Finland; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

This multicenter service evaluation explores the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in an unselected, consecutive population in 'real-life' clinical settings.. We retrospectively collected data from patient records at 11 UK hospitals and epilepsy centers. Consecutive patients prescribed BRV with at least 3 months of follow-up (FU) were included. Apart from reporting effectiveness and tolerability of BRV across the whole cohort, we compared treatment outcomes depending on previous levetiracetam use (LEV+ versus LEV-), comorbid learning disability (LD+ versus LD-), and epilepsy syndrome (focal versus generalized epilepsy).. Two hundred and ninety patients (46% male, median age: 38 years, range: 15 to 77) with ≥3 months of FU were included. The median duration of BRV exposure was 12 months (range: 1 day to 72 months). Overall BRV retention was 71.1%. While 56.1% of patients improved in terms of seizure frequency category (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly seizures), 23.1% did not improve on this measure and 20.8% deteriorated. In terms of seizure frequency, 21% of patients experienced a ≥50% reduction, with 7.0% of all patients becoming seizure-free. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported by 107 (36.9%) patients, but there were no serious AEs. The commonest AEs were sedation/fatigue (18.3%), mood changes (9.0%), and irritability/aggression (4.8%). There were no significant differences in drug retention, seizure frequency outcomes, or AEs between the LEV+ and LEV- subgroups, or between patients with generalized or focal epilepsies. Although 15.5% of patients in the LD+ group achieved a ≥50% reduction, this rate was lower than in the LD- group.. This 'real-life' evaluation suggests that reductions in seizure frequency can be achieved with BRV in patients with highly refractory epilepsy. Brivaracetam may be a useful treatment option in patients who have previously failed to respond to or tolerate LEV, those with LD, or (off-label) those with generalized epilepsies.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy, Generalized; Fatigue; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Young Adult

Brivaracetam (BRV) is indicated for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures with or without secondary generalisation in patients 4 years of age and older in the European Union (EU). An ongoing 12-month, prospective, non-interventional post-marketing study (EP0077; NCT02687711) is collecting real-world information on patients receiving treatment with adjunctive BRV in Europe. In this study, BRV is prescribed according to routine clinical practice and the EU Summary of Product Characteristics. This second interim analysis assessed effectiveness, tolerability and health-related quality of life outcomes for up to 6 months of treatment. At the cut-off date (13 April 2018), 266 patients from five countries had attended Visit 1, 24.1 % (64/266) had completed the study, 37.6 % (100/266) were ongoing, and 38.3 % (102/266) had discontinued. In total, 261 patients had at least one dose of BRV and were included in the analyses. Patients had a mean time since epilepsy diagnosis of 23.2 years, a mean of eight lifetime AEDs (sum of AEDs discontinued prior to study entry and concomitant at study entry), and a median of five focal seizures per 28 days during the 3-month retrospective Baseline. 66.3 % of patients initiated BRV at a dose within the recommended starting range (50-100 mg/day) and 87.1 % of patients received BRV modal doses within the recommended dose range (50-200 mg/day) during the study. Retention rates were 79.1 % (N = 239) at 3 months and 62.1 % (N = 211) at 6 months. The 50 % responder rates for focal seizures were 46.8 % (N = 139) at 3 months and 53.6 % (N = 97) at 6 months. The proportions of patients who were seizure-free were 10.7 % (21/196) and 7.5 % (15/199) at 3 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. Median percent reductions in focal seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline to 3 and 6 months were 34.6 % (N = 139) and 53.3 % (N = 97), respectively. Overall, 44.2 % of patients had an improvement and 15.4 % had a worsening in Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 total score from Baseline to 6 months (N = 52). At least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was reported in 51.0 % (133/261) of patients, and 34.5 % (90/261) of patients had drug-related TEAEs. The most common drug-related TEAEs (≥5% of patients) were drug ineffective (7.7 %), seizure (6.5 %), and fatigue (6.1 %). In this 6-month interim analysis, BRV showed effectiveness when used in clinical practice in five European countries. BRV was

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Young Adult

Topics: Humans; Lorazepam; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Humans; Lorazepam; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Evaluate long-term effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam in clinical practice in patients with focal epilepsy.. This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients aged ≥16 years were started on brivaracetam from November 2016 to June 2017 and followed over 1 year. Data were obtained from medical records at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation for evaluation of safety- and seizure-related outcomes.. A total of 575 patients were included in analyses; most had been treated with ≥4 lifetime antiepileptic drugs. Target dosage was achieved by 30.6% of patients on the first day. Analysis of primary variables at 12 months revealed that mean reduction in seizure frequency was 36.0%, 39.7% of patients were ≥50% responders and 17.5% were seizure-free. Seizure-freedom was achieved by 37.5% of patients aged ≥65 years. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and psychiatric AEs (PAEs) was 39.8% and 14.3%, respectively, and discontinuation due to these was 8.9% and 3.7%, respectively. Somnolence, irritability, and dizziness were the most frequently reported AEs. At baseline, 228 (39.7%) patients were being treated with levetiracetam; most switched to brivaracetam (dose ratio 1:10-15). Among those who switched because of PAEs (n = 53), 9 (17%) reported PAEs on brivaracetam, and 3 (5.7%) discontinued because of PAEs. Tolerability was not highly affected among patients with learning disability or psychiatric comorbidity.. In a large population of patients with predominantly drug-resistant epilepsy, brivaracetam was effective and well-tolerated; no unexpected AEs occurred over 1 year, and the incidence of PAEs was lower compared with levetiracetam.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This is a case series of 25 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidities who started on brivaracetam (BRV) at St George's University Hospitals and Frimley Health in London. Median BRV dose was 150 mg for a median follow-up period of 8 months. Twenty had focal epilepsy, four had generalized epilepsies, and one had unclassified epilepsy; 76% had mood disorders (either depression or bipolar disorder), 12% intellectual disabilities with autism spectrum disorder and challenging behavior, and 12% psychoses. Forty percent of patients presented at least 50% seizure reduction, but none of them became seizure-free. A total of 44% of patients discontinued BRV, 20% because of adverse events, 20% because of inefficacy, and 4% because of both. Depression was reported by 8%, aggressive behavior by 8%, while 4% reported both. A total of 91.6% had received levetiracetam (LEV) before, in whom LEV was discontinued because of psychiatric adverse events (PAEs) in half. Seventy-seven percent of patients who developed PAEs with LEV did not do so on BRV suggesting that BRV is better tolerated than LEV in complex patients with psychiatric comorbidities and that the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) protein modulation is unlikely to be implicated in LEV-related PAEs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Comorbidity; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Levetiracetam; London; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Young Adult

Levetiracetam (LEV), and its newer selective analog brivaracetam (BRV), are two seizure medications that share an innovative mechanism of action targeting the Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A (SV2A), altering neurotransmitter release and decreasing seizure frequency. Behavioral changes are the most significant adverse effects reported by patients taking LEV. We hypothesize that BRV, the more potent SV2A analog, could exert less behavioral side effects, as it requires lower doses than LEV. Using Kainic Acid (KA)-treated and control rats, we measured adverse behavioral effect profiles of LEV, BRV, or Saline, on social and nonsocial behaviors. Our data indicate that both tested drugs had no effect on locomotion, anxiety levels, fear learning, depression-like behavior, and memory retention in rats. However, when considering social interactions, we first confirmed the epilepsy-induced strong increase in aggressive behaviors and specific hippocampal neuronal loss. We furthermore observed, in Sham rats, that LEV-treated animals were 2 times faster to attack at first encounter, had 5 times more aggressive behaviors, and had significantly less social behaviors than control rats. In all circumstances, BRV rats behaved like Saline rats, suggesting that BRV treatment in rats leads to significantly less aggressive behaviors than LEV treatment at the doses used, while there are limited differential effects between these two drugs on other types of behaviors. Since increased aggressiveness has been reported in patients well controlled on LEV, this study indicates based on our findings, that BRV could represent an effective alternative to LEV to limit aggressiveness problems due to this antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Humans; Kainic Acid; Levetiracetam; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Seizures; Synaptic Transmission

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of brivaracetam (BRV) in residential patients at our epilepsy centre.. We assessed retrospectively 33 patients (14 females; mean age 38.2 years, with range 17-63 years) with intellectual disability (ID) and drug-resistant epilepsy using an industry-independent, non-interventional study design based on standardized daily seizure records. Mean seizure frequency was compared between the 3-month baseline period and subsequent 3-month treatment period. Evaluation, including calculation of retention rate, was carried out for the intervals 3-6 and 9-12 months after brivaracetam initiation. Responders were defined as having a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) was applied to allow assessment of qualitative changes in seizure severity, and the Aggressive Behaviour Scale (ABS) gave further insights into challenging behaviour.. The responder rate was 19%, and one non-responder attained an improvement in CGI score. The retention rate after 12 months was 37%. Brivaracetam treatment was stopped because of adverse events (n = 3), lack of efficacy (n = 8) or both (n = 6). Thirteen patients experienced behavioural changes, with aggressive behaviour being the commonest effect. We also observed ataxia (n = 2), gastrointestinal disorder (n = 3) and sedation (n = 2). The ABS showed deterioration, or new occurrence, of aggressive behaviour in 13 patients.. Brivaracetam seems to be effective in a small number of patients suffering from difficult-to-treat epilepsy and intellectual disability. Challenging behaviour was documented in a relevant number of patients, with psychiatric illness being a risk factor for this.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Behavior; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Approval; Drug Interactions; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Brivaracetam is a novel synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand reported to be 10 fold more potent than levetiracetam in animal models of epilepsy. This study reports the binding profile of brivaracetam in the brain of several species in relation to its anticonvulsant properties. The affinity, kinetics and selectivity of brivaracetam and its tritiated form [(3)H]ucb 34714 have been determined by in vitro binding experiments in rat, human and mouse brain and on recombinant human SV2A. Brivaracetam and levetiracetam ex vivo binding to SV2A and anticonvulsant activities in audiogenic mice were compared in relation to dose and time. Brivaracetam bound selectively with 20 fold higher affinity than levetiracetam to SV2A. [(3)H]ucb 34714 bound reversibly and with high affinity to an homogenous population of binding sites in rat and human brain and to human SV2A expressed in CHO cells. The binding sites labeled by [(3)H]ucb 34714 in brain had the pharmacological characteristics of SV2A and no specific binding could be detected in the brain of SV2A(-/-) knock-out mice. The time- and dose-dependency of brivaracetam and levetiracetam for binding to brain SV2A and for providing seizure protection in audiogenic mice correlated well; brivaracetam being more potent and faster than levetiracetam. Brivaracetam is a potent and selective SV2A ligand. From its affinity and pharmacokinetics, simulations predicted that at therapeutically relevant doses, brivaracetam should occupy more than 80% of SV2A in human brain, in line with levels of occupancy observed in pre-clinical models of epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Binding, Competitive; Brain; Cerebral Cortex; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy, Reflex; Female; Humans; Kinetics; Ligands; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mice; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Protein Binding; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Seizures; Substrate Specificity

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Indoles; Levetiracetam; Ligands; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mice; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Seizures; Synaptic Vesicles

Screening of 12,000 compounds for binding affinity to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), identified a high-affinity pyrrolidone derivative, brivaracetam (ucb 34714). This study examined its pharmacological profile in various in vitro and in vivo models of seizures and epilepsy, to evaluate its potential as a new antiepileptic drug.. The effects of brivaracetam and levetiracetam on epileptiform activity and seizure expression were examined in rat hippocampal slices, corneally kindled mice, audiogenic seizure-susceptible mice, maximal electroshock and pentylenetetrazol seizures in mice, hippocampal-kindled rats, amygdala-kindled rats and genetic absence epilepsy rats.. Brivaracetam and levetiracetam reduced epileptiform responses in rat hippocampal slices, brivaracetam being most potent. Brivaracetam also differed from levetiracetam by its ability to protect against seizures in normal mice induced by a maximal electroshock or maximal dose of pentylenetetrazol. In corneally kindled mice and hippocampal-kindled rats, brivaracetam induced potent protection against secondarily generalized motor seizures and showed anti-kindling properties superior to levetiracetam. In amygdala-kindled rats, brivaracetam induced a significant suppression in motor-seizure severity and, contrary to levetiracetam, reduced the after-discharge at a higher dose. Audiogenic seizure-susceptible mice were protected more potently against the expression of clonic convulsions by brivaracetam than by levetiracetam. Brivaracetam induced a more complete suppression of spontaneous spike-and-wave discharges in genetic absence epilepsy rats than levetiracetam.. Brivaracetam has higher potency and efficacy than levetiracetam as an anti-seizure and anti-epileptogenic agent in various experimental models of epilepsy, and a wide therapeutic index.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Electroshock; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Levetiracetam; Ligands; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mice; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures

In the present study, we evaluated the anti-seizure and anti-myoclonic activity of levetiracetam and brivaracetam in an established rat model of cardiac arrest-induced post-hypoxic myoclonus. We found that brivaracetam (0.3 mg/kg, the minimal effective dose) was more potent than levetiracetam (3 mg/kg, the minimal effective dose) against post-hypoxic seizures. The anti-seizure activity of both compounds occurred 30 min following intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration and was maintained over the entire 150 min post-dose observation period. Both brivaracetam and levetiracetam significantly reduced auditory stimulated post-hypoxic myoclonus from a dose 0.3 mg/kg. At that dose, the anti-myoclonic activity of brivaracetam was already maximal whereas it continued to increase in a dose-relation manner with levetiracetam, suggesting that brivaracetam is a more potent agent. The onset and the duration of anti-myoclonic activity of both compounds were similar. These findings demonstrate that brivaracetam possesses more potent anti-seizure and anti-myoclonic activity than levetiracetam in an established rat model of cardiac arrest-induced post-hypoxic myoclonus.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Heart Arrest; Hypoxia; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures

(S)-alpha-ethyl-2-oxopyrrolidine acetamide 2 (levetiracetam, Keppra, UCB S.A.), a structural analogue of piracetam, has recently been approved as an add-on treatment of refractory partial onset seizures in adults. This drug appears to combine significant efficacy and high tolerability due to a unique mechanism of action. The latter relates to a brain-specific binding site for 2 (LBS for levetiracetam binding site) that probably plays a major role in its antiepileptic properties. Using this novel molecular target, we initiated a drug-discovery program searching for ligands with significant affinity to LBS with the aim to characterize their therapeutic potential in epilepsy and other central nervous system diseases. We systematically investigated the various positions of the pyrrolidone acetamide scaffold. We found that (i) the carboxamide moiety on 2 is essential for affinity; (ii) among 100 different side chains, the preferred substitution alpha to the carboxamide is an ethyl group with the (S)-configuration; (iii) the 2-oxopyrrolidine ring is preferred over piperidine analogues or acyclic compounds; (iv) substitution of positions 3 or 5 of the lactam ring decreases the LBS affinity; and (v) 4-substitution of the lactam ring by small hydrophobic groups improves the in vitro and in vivo potency. Six interesting candidates substituted in the 4-position have been shown to be more potent antiseizure agents in vivo than 2. Further pharmacological studies from our group led to the selection of (2S)-2-[(4R)-2-oxo-4-propylpyrrolidin-1-yl]butanamide 83alpha (ucb 34714) as the most interesting candidate. It is approximately 10 times more potent than 2 as an antiseizure agent in audiogenic seizure-prone mice. A clinical phase I program has been successfully concluded and 83alpha will commence several phase II trials during 2003.

Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Amides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Binding Sites; Butyrates; Caco-2 Cells; Cerebral Cortex; Crystallography, X-Ray; Female; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Levetiracetam; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred DBA; Microsomes, Liver; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures; Structure-Activity Relationship