ucb-34714 and Epilepsy

The objective of this analysis was to provide a comprehensive analysis of safety data for adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), an antiepileptic drug (AED) of the racetam class, for treatment of focal seizures in patients with epilepsy.. Data were pooled from two phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging trials (N01114 [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00175929], N01193 [NCT00175825]) and three phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 12-week trials (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], and N01358 [NCT01261325]) in patients aged ≥16 years with focal seizures, as well as a phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 16-week trial in patients aged ≥16 years with focal or generalized epilepsy (N01254 [NCT00504881]). Data are presented for the approved therapeutic dose range of 50-200 mg/day. Data for BRV administered intravenously (25-150 mg doses) were pooled separately from one phase III trial (N01258 NCT01405508]) and two clinical pharmacology trials (N01256 [Part B] [UCB Pharma, data on file]; EP0007 [NCT01796899]). Adverse events (AEs) of interest were summarized in relevant categories.. The safety pool comprised 1957 patients: 1271 receiving adjunctive BRV and 686 receiving placebo. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 66.9% with BRV versus 62.8% with placebo. The most frequently reported TEAEs with BRV (≥5% of patients) versus placebo were somnolence (13.3% vs. 7.9%), headache (10.5% vs. 11.5%), dizziness (10.0% vs. 7.0%), and fatigue (8.2% vs. 4.2%). Incidence of psychiatric disorder-related TEAEs was 11.3% with BRV versus 8.2% with placebo. Behavioral disorder-related TEAE incidence was low (4.0% with BRV vs. 2.5% with placebo). Irritability was reported in 2.7% of BRV-treated patients vs. 1.5% of patients receiving placebo; anger, aggression, and agitation were each reported by ≤1% of patients receiving BRV. Treatment-emergent adverse events potentially associated with psychosis were psychotic disorder (three patients on BRV vs. two patients on placebo), auditory hallucination, illusion, visual hallucination (one patient each on BRV), epileptic psychosis, and hallucination (one patient each on placebo). No additional safety concerns were identified in patients with intravenous (IV) BRV administration (n = 104).. These safety data for adjunctive BRV support its acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Fatigue; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Prevention of epilepsy is a great unmet need. Acute central nervous system (CNS) insults such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and CNS infections account for 15%-20% of all epilepsy. Following TBI and CVA, there is a latency of days to years before epilepsy develops. This allows treatment to prevent or modify postinjury epilepsy. No such treatment exists. In animal models of acquired epilepsy, a number of medications in clinical use for diverse indications have been shown to have antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying effects, including medications with excellent side effect profiles. These include atorvastatin, ceftriaxone, losartan, isoflurane, N-acetylcysteine, and the antiseizure medications levetiracetam, brivaracetam, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin, vigabatrin, and eslicarbazepine acetate. In addition, there are preclinical antiepileptogenic data for anakinra, rapamycin, fingolimod, and erythropoietin, although these medications have potential for more serious side effects. However, except for vigabatrin, there have been almost no translation studies to prevent or modify epilepsy using these potentially "repurposable" medications. We may be missing an opportunity to develop preventive treatment for epilepsy by not evaluating these medications clinically. One reason for the lack of translation studies is that the preclinical data for most of these medications are disparate in terms of types of injury, models within different injury type, dosing, injury-treatment initiation latencies, treatment duration, and epilepsy outcome evaluation mode and duration. This makes it difficult to compare the relative strength of antiepileptogenic evidence across the molecules, and difficult to determine which drug(s) would be the best to evaluate clinically. Furthermore, most preclinical antiepileptogenic studies lack information needed for translation, such as dose-blood level relationship, brain target engagement, and dose-response, and many use treatment parameters that cannot be applied clinically, for example, treatment initiation before or at the time of injury and dosing higher than tolerated human equivalent dosing. Here, we review animal and human antiepileptogenic evidence for these medications. We highlight the gaps in our knowledge for each molecule that need to be filled in order to consider clinical translation, and we suggest a platform of preclinical antiepileptogenesis evaluation of potentially repurposable molecu

Topics: Acetylcysteine; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Antioxidants; Atorvastatin; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Ceftriaxone; Dibenzazepines; Drug Repositioning; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Post-Traumatic; Erythropoietin; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; GABA Agents; Gabapentin; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Inflammation; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Isoflurane; Levetiracetam; Losartan; Neuroprotective Agents; Oxidative Stress; Pregabalin; Pyrrolidinones; Sirolimus; Stroke; Topiramate; Translational Research, Biomedical; Vigabatrin

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Half-Life; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Receptors, AMPA; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam is an analogue of levetiracetam that is Food and Drug Administration-approved for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients 16 years and older. In placebo-controlled trials adjunct brivaracetam demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency of seizures. The most commonly reported adverse effects are somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Clinical trials have evaluated brivaracetam for safety and efficacy in adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients 16 years and older for up to 16 weeks. Brivaracetam's mechanism is similar to that of levetiracetam but with greater receptor binding affinity on synaptic vesicle protein 2A and inhibitory effects on sodium channels. Clinically significant differences between these agents are undetermined. Brivaracetam is available as oral tablets, oral solution, and intravenous solution. The Food and Drug Administration-approved dose is 50 mg twice daily, and titration is not required. Brivaracetam does not need dose adjustment for renal impairment and has minimal drug-drug interactions. Current limitations of brivaracetam include lack of head-to-head trials, limited long-term safety and efficacy data, and cost. Overall, brivaracetam is a viable adjunct therapeutic option for refractory partial-onset seizures in those who have failed conventional therapies.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones

High prevalence of therapy-resistant epilepsy demands development of anticonvulsants with new mechanisms of action. Brivaracetam is an analogue of levetiracetam which binds to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) and decreases release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Areas covered: Relevant published studies were searched for by predefined strategy in MEDLINE, EBSCO and SCINDEKS electronic databases. Brivaracetam is effective as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients 16 years and older with epilepsy. It reduces baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency per week from 7.3 to 12.8% over placebo. Adverse events rate in patients with brivaracetam is not higher than in patients with placebo. Expert opinion: Brivaracetam is an important step forward in the treatment of therapy-resistant partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Its development was systematic and targeted. Due to its efficacy and excellent safety profile, it is likely that brivaracetam will be often prescribed. In future, efficacy and safety of brivaracetam should be tested in monotherapy settings and also in the first-line therapy of partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

To comprehensively evaluate the adverse events (AEs) significantly associated with brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in a large selection of randomized control trials.. We conducted an online database search using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Online Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov for all available randomized control trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic effects of brivaracetam. Serious AEs (SAEs), withdrawal, and treatment-emergent adverse effects were then assessed for their association with brivaracetam. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.. Eight RCTs with a total of 2505 patients were included in our study, 1178 of which were randomized with respect to brivaracetam (BRV). Serious AEs, overall withdrawal, AE-related withdrawal and psychiatric adverse events (PAEs) were not significantly associated with BRV treatment. BRV was also not significantly associated with a heightened risk of AE-related withdrawal and PAEs with increasing doses. Of the 17 AEs included in our meta-analysis, three AEs (dizziness, fatigue, and back pain) were found to be significantly associated with BRV treatment. But we did not find that the risk of them was obviously increasing with the increasing doses.. This meta-analysis showed that BRV treatment was reasonably tolerated by patients and rarely caused serious AEs. Further clinical studies will be needed to more concretely determine the safety and tolerability profile of BRV.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Databases, Bibliographic; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

This paper discusses the issues surrounding the tolerability and safety of the commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adolescents and adults. The content includes dose-related adverse effects, idiosyncratic reactions, behavioural and psychiatric comorbidities, chronic problems, enzyme induction and teratogenesis. Twenty-one AEDs are discussed in chronological order of their introduction into the UK, starting with phenobarbital and ending with brivaracetam. Wherever possible, advice is given on anticipating, recognising and managing these issues and thereby improving the lives of people with epilepsy, most of whom will need to take one or more of these agents for life. Avoidance of side effects will increase the possibility of achieving and maintaining long-term seizure freedom. Alternatively, adverse events from AEDs will substantially reduce quality of life and often result in higher healthcare costs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Humans; Phenobarbital; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; United Kingdom

Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in adults with epilepsy. This post-hoc analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of adjunctive BRV in patients with prior levetiracetam (LEV) exposure and whether changes in efficacy were related to the similar mechanism of action of these two drugs. Data were pooled from three Phase III studies (NCT00490035; NCT00464269; NCT01261325) of adults with focal seizures taking 1-2 AEDs who received placebo or BRV 50-200mg/day without titration over a 12-week treatment period. Patients taking concomitant LEV at enrollment were excluded from this analysis. Patients were categorized by their status of prior exposure to LEV, carbamazepine (CBZ), topiramate (TPM), or lamotrigine (LTG), to investigate any consistent trend towards reduced response in AED-exposed subgroups compared to AED-naïve subgroups, regardless of the mechanism of action. Study completion rates, percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency over placebo, ≥50% responder rates, and tolerability were evaluated for each subgroup. A total of 1160 patients were investigated. Study completion rates were similar in the AED-exposed subgroups and AED-naïve subgroups. In subgroups with (531 patients) or without (629 patients) prior LEV exposure, ≥50% responder rates for each dose of BRV compared with placebo were generally higher among the LEV-naïve subgroups than the previously LEV-exposed subgroups. LEV-exposed subgroups receiving BRV doses ≥50mg/day showed greater ≥50% responder rates than those receiving placebo. Similar results were observed for CBZ, TPM, and LTG. Previous treatment failure with commonly prescribed AEDs (LEV, CBZ, TPM, or LTG) is associated with a reduced response to BRV irrespective of the mechanism of action. Hence, this post-hoc analysis indicates that previous treatment failure with LEV does not preclude the use of BRV in patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy fail to respond to existing medications. Levetiracetam is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) postulated to act by binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A. Brivaracetam is a novel high affinity SV2A ligand with approximately 20-fold higher affinity for SV2A protein than levetiracetam. It is at an advanced stage of clinical development for treatment of epilepsy.. This article reviews animal data, pharmacokinetics, and phase 1-3 data of Brivaracetam treatment of epilepsy. Brivaracetam has broad-spectrum anticonvulsant activity in animal models.. Phase 1 studies indicated that single oral doses of 5-800 mg and repeated oral doses of up to 600 mg were well tolerated and showed favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Phase 2 studies indicated good safety and tolerability of brivaracetam in the dose range of 5-150 mg/day and provided proof of concept for efficacy in treating refractory partial onset seizures. Efficacy and safety have been evaluated in 4 phase 3 studies with dose range of 5-200 mg which have demonstrated efficacy in the range of 100-200 mg/day dose and, in most studies, also with 50 mg/day dose, and good safety and tolerability profile across 5-200 mg doses in adjunctive treatment of refractory partial onset seizures.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Brivaracetam is the latest approved antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy and exhibits high affinity as SV2A-ligand. More than two thousand patients have received brivaracetam within randomized placebo-controlled trials. Significant median seizure reduction rates of 30.5% to 53.1% for 50 mg/d, 32.5% to 37.2% for 100 mg/d and 35.6% for 200 mg/d were reported. Likewise, 50% responder rates were 32.7% to 55.8% for 50 mg/d, 36% to 38.9% for 100 mg/d and 37.8% for 200 mg/d. Overall, brivaracetam is well tolerated. The main adverse events are fatigue, dizziness, and somnolence. Immediate switch from levetiracetam to brivaracetam at a conversion ratio between 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible, and might alleviate the behavioral side effects associated with levetiracetam. Brivaracetam has the potential to perform as an important, possibly broad-spectrum AED, initially in patients with drug-refractory epilepsies. Its intravenous formulation may be a new and desirable alternative for status epilepticus, but there is so far no experience in these patients.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones

Brivaracetam (Briviact(®)), a 4-n-propyl analogue of levetiracetam developed by UCB Pharma, has been approved in the EU as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Brivaracetam binds to synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2a (SV2A) in the brain with greater selectivity and 15- to 30-fold higher affinity than levetiracetam, as demonstrated in preclinical models, and has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency of partial onset seizures in clinical trials. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of brivaracetam leading to this first approval for use as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones

Despite availability of effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), many patients with epilepsy continue to experience refractory seizures and adverse events. Achievement of better seizure control and fewer side effects is key to improving quality of life. This review describes the rationale for the discovery and preclinical profile of brivaracetam (BRV), currently under regulatory review as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures. The discovery of BRV was triggered by the novel mechanism of action and atypical properties of levetiracetam (LEV) in preclinical seizure and epilepsy models. LEV is associated with several mechanisms that may contribute to its antiepileptic properties and adverse effect profile. Early findings observed a moderate affinity for a unique brain-specific LEV binding site (LBS) that correlated with anticonvulsant effects in animal models of epilepsy. This provided a promising molecular target and rationale for identifying selective, high-affinity ligands for LBS with potential for improved antiepileptic properties. The later discovery that synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) was the molecular correlate of LBS confirmed the novelty of the target. A drug discovery program resulted in the identification of anticonvulsants, comprising two distinct families of high-affinity SV2A ligands possessing different pharmacologic properties. Among these, BRV differed significantly from LEV by its selective, high affinity and differential interaction with SV2A as well as a higher lipophilicity, correlating with more potent and complete seizure suppression, as well as a more rapid brain penetration in preclinical models. Initial studies in animal models also revealed BRV had a greater antiepileptogenic potential than LEV. These properties of BRV highlight its promising potential as an AED that might provide broad-spectrum efficacy, associated with a promising tolerability profile and a fast onset of action. BRV represents the first selective SV2A ligand for epilepsy treatment and may add a significant contribution to the existing armamentarium of AEDs.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Discovery; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Epilepsy; Humans; Ligands; Membrane Glycoproteins; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam was approved in the E.U. and U.S. at the beginning of 2016 for the adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsies in patients over 16 years of age. This compound is a novel high-affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) ligand, with a selectivity for this protein that is 10- to 30-fold higher than that shown by levetiracetam. Preclinical studies show that brivaracetam might have a stronger anticonvulsant effect and distributes in the brain more quickly, when compared to levetiracetam. The agent has linear and simple pharmacokinetics and a low interaction potential. Six double-blind placebo-controlled studies have assessed doses from 5 to 200 mg/day. Significant efficacy has been observed from doses of 50 mg/day, but there was not a clear dose-effect relationship. Short-term tolerability was excellent with all doses. Adverse events significantly associated with brivaracetam were dizziness, somnolence, fatigue and irritability. An excellent tolerability profile has been found after administration of a formulation for intravenous use.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones

Brivaracetam (Briviact(®); BRIVLERA™) is a high affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand available orally (as a tablet or solution) or intravenously (as a bolus or infusion) in various countries worldwide, including the USA, Canada and those of the EU. It is approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults (aged ≥18 years) [USA, EU and Canada] and adolescents (aged 16 to <18 years) [USA and EU] with epilepsy. In multinational, phase III studies in adults and adolescents (aged ≥16 years), oral brivaracetam as adjunctive therapy to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was generally associated with significant median percent reductions over placebo in seizure frequency and significant improvements in the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50 % reduction in seizure frequency compared with placebo. These benefits appeared to be sustained during up to 96 months' therapy in follow-up studies. Whether administered orally or intravenously, adjunctive brivaracetam was generally well tolerated in clinical studies, with the majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) being mild or moderate in intensity. In the absence of head-to-head studies, definitive conclusions on the comparative efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam versus newer AEDs are not yet possible. In the meantime, brivaracetam extends the options currently available for the treatment of POS in patients aged ≥16 years with epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Epilepsy; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new antiepileptic drug structurally related to levetiracetam but with a 15 to 30-fold increased affinity for the same molecular target, namely the SV2A ligand. BRV is currently under Phase III development as adjunctive treatment for partial onset seizures but data from some Phase III suggest also potential efficacy for primary generalized seizures. Although two studies are negative for the primary efficacy endpoint, global results seem to suggest a wide spectrum of efficacy for both partial onset and primary generalized seizures and a favourable safety and pharmacokinetic profile. This article is aimed at providing a comprehensive overview of current evidence about BRV in the treatment of epilepsy taking into account emerging concerns regarding clinical trials in epilepsy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Young Adult

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting about 1% of the population worldwide. With currently available antiepileptic drugs, one-third of patients continue to suffer from seizures even when treated at maximally tolerated dosages, either in monotherapy or in various drug combinations. Pharmacoresistance is associated with physical risks, reduced life expectancy, reduced quality of life and impairments in social opportunities. The acetamide derivate levetiracetam (LEV) that primarily targets the synaptic vesicle protein 2A has been one of the most successful second-generation antiepileptic drugs.. This article reviews a rationally designed LEV derivative, brivaracetam (BRV), which has an increased affinity to the LEV-binding site. BRV has shown some efficacy in the treatment of progressive myoclonus epilepsy and is under development to be used as an add-on treatment of focal epilepsy. Evidence is given for possible advantages related to the higher intrinsic antiepileptic efficacy of BRV and its antiepileptic potential in relation to a wide spectrum of epilepsy forms and for possible disadvantages related to hepatic metabolism and to a lower therapeutic index related to additional intrinsic activity at the sodium channel. An update on pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and study data published until 2010 on BRV is given.. BRV is a rationally developed third-generation antiepileptic drug with higher binding to SV2A and additional mechanisms of actions. Animal studies are promising regarding its efficacy in a wide spectrum of epilepsy models. Clinical studies have shown good tolerability at dosages of up to 50 mg/day but have yet to identify the optimal dose range and to prove an additional value of the drug in terms of seizure control.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Membrane Glycoproteins; Myoclonic Epilepsies, Progressive; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Pyrrolidinones

Animal-to-man extrapolation and therapeutic dose prediction are illustrated with two molecules designed to treat epilepsy. Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) is the primary molecular target for their anticonvulsive effect, but additional mechanisms may also contribute. Brivaracetam (BRV), currently in phase 3 of clinical development, was used as the benchmark compound. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was built in NONMEM, relating the brain tissue concentrations of BRV in mice and the proportion of animals protected against convulsions in the pharmacological model of audiogenic seizures. Brain concentrations were linked with ex vivo binding to predict brain SV2A occupancy. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed for predicting BRV concentrations in human plasma and brain tissue. Predicted plasma profiles were in good agreement with observations. Predicted human brain concentrations of BRV and the mouse ex vivo binding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model were used to extrapolate brain SV2A occupancy at the human therapeutic dose. Secondly, for another compound also exhibiting selective affinity for the same target, similar pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were built from audiogenic seizure mouse data. Various dosing regimens of the new compound were simulated in order to reach the same brain SV2A occupancy as for the reference compound. These estimations support early development. Assumptions and limitations of the approach are discussed.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Humans; Logistic Models; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mice; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Pharmacology; Physiology; Predictive Value of Tests; Protein Binding; Pyrrolidinones; Tissue Distribution

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder with a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.5-1.0% of the population. Many potent antiepileptic drugs (AED) have been used for treatment but still about 30% of patients are resistant to current AEDs. Some AEDs are also used for the treatment of neuropathic pain.. The aim of this report is to present preclinical and clinical studies of brivaracetam (UCB-34714), a new drug developed by UCB Pharma.. Published results of preclinical studies in several animal models of epilepsy, neuropathic pain, essential tremor and results of Phase I and II evaluations of brivaracetam have been analysed.. Brivaracetam represents a new mechanism of action being a ligand of synaptic vesicle protein 2A. It is undergoing Phase III evaluation after a successful Phase II programme in which was effective as an adjunctive treatment in partial-onset epilepsy (50 mg/day). It is well tolerated, without serious adverse side effects.

Topics: Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Design; Epilepsy; Humans; Pain; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam (UCB 34714) is chemically related to levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra). It possesses a binding affinity for the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ten-fold above that of LEV and also shows an ability to inhibit Na+ channels. This correlates with a higher potency in suppressing epileptiform responses in vitro and a more potent and complete suppression of different seizure types in animals with an acquired or genetic epilepsy. Brivaracetam has been tested in a comprehensive safety pharmacology, toxicology, developmental toxicology, and genotoxicity program. It is of low acute toxicity, target organ for toxic effects is the hepatobiliary tract. Carcinogenicity studies are ongoing. Human pharmacology studies have shown that brivaracetam has a half-life of 8 h and nearly complete bioavailability. Brivaracetam is primarily metabolized via hydrolysis of the acetamide group and CYP2C8-mediated hydroxylation. Its metabolites are not pharmacologically active. Excretion of over 95% of the dose, including metabolites, occurs renally within 72 h. Healthy volunteer studies demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile. Treatment emergent adverse events were mild to moderate, mostly of CNS origin, and resolved within 24 hrs, with decreasing incidence after repeated intake. Drug-drug interaction studies with high dose of brivaracetam (400 mg/d) showed a dose-dependent increase of carbamazepine-epoxide levels. No significant interaction with low doses of phenytoin was observed at the same high dose levels of brivaracetam, and only a moderate pharmacokinetic interaction with an oral contraceptive, without impact on hormonal levels or ovulation, was observed. The pharmacokinetic profile of brivaracetam is unaltered in elderly subjects or those with impaired renal function. Clearance of brivaracetam is reduced in patients with hepatic insufficiency. In the photoparoxysmal response model in patients with photosensitive epilepsy brivaracetam was effective at all tested doses (10 - 80 mg) in reducing or abolishing EEG discharges evoked by a photic stimulus. Phase 2 studies in patients with refractory partial onset seizures have recently been completed.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones

Brivaracetam (UCB-34714), an orally active, high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, is being developed by UCB for the potential treatment of neurological disorders, namely epilepsy and neuropathic pain. By December 2003, UCB reported that phase II epilepsy trials had begun [517569].

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Molecular Structure; Neuralgia; Pyrrolidinones

To evaluate long-term retention, reasons for discontinuation, efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in adults with focal seizures by number of lifetime antiseizure medications (ASMs).. Post hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N01358; NCT01261325) and corresponding open-label extension (OLE) (N01379; NCT01339559) of adjunctive BRV in adults (16-80 years of age) with focal seizures. Outcomes were assessed from the first day of BRV treatment in the double-blind (patients randomized to BRV) or open-label trial (patients randomized to placebo) by number of lifetime ASMs (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, or ≥ 7). Lifetime ASMs were defined as previous (stopped before BRV initiation) and concomitant ASMs at BRV initiation.. Seven hundred and forty patients received adjunctive BRV (safety set [SS]; median modal dose: 200 mg/day [N = 737]; median treatment duration: 2.67 years), of whom 13.8 % had 1-2, 20.8 % had 3-4, 21.1 % had 5-6 and 44.3 % had ≥7 lifetime ASMs. Patients with a higher number of lifetime ASMs had a younger age at epilepsy onset, longer epilepsy duration, and higher baseline seizure frequency. Kaplan-Meier estimated retention on BRV at 12 (83.2-65.9 %) and 36 months (63.0-44.1 %) was highest in patients with 1-2 lifetime ASMs and decreased with the number of lifetime ASMs. The estimated proportions of patients who discontinued BRV due to lack of efficacy or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) increased with the number of lifetime ASMs. Efficacy analyses included seven hundred and thirty eight patients (intention-to-treat set [ITT]). Median percentage reductions from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28 days (76.3-39.6 %), 50 % responder rates (66.7-39.8 %), 75 % responder rates (51.0-19.6 %), and continuous seizure freedom for ≥12 months at any time during BRV treatment (35.3-6.1 %) were highest in patients with 1-2 lifetime ASMs and decreased by the number of lifetime ASMs. The overall incidence of TEAEs (SS) was generally similar in each lifetime ASM subgroup (84.4-90.5 %). Discontinuations due to TEAEs increased with the number of lifetime ASMs (7.8-20.1 %). The greatest improvements in QOLIE-31-P scores occurred in the Seizure Worry and Daily Activities/Social Function subscales, with no clear pattern by the number of lifetime ASMs at 12 months and with the highest improvement in patients with 1-2 lifetime ASMs at 24 months. At 24 months, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety subscale scores improved in patients (SS) with 1-2 and 3-4 lifetime ASMs. HADS Depression subscale scores were generally stable independent of the number of lifetime ASMs.. The balance between efficacy, tolerability, and HRQOL was most favorable in patients with focal seizures who had been exposed to one or two ASMs before BRV initiation. However, patients exposed to ≥7 ASMs before BRV initiation also benefitted from long-term adjunctive BRV treatment.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Via measures of efficacy, tolerability, and safety, this open-label, single-center study assessed the overall effectiveness of Brivaracetam (BRV) for the treatment of epilepsy in the context of 'real-world' clinical practice.. Unselected consecutive patients were recruited and stratified into 3 cohorts with either fully prospective, fully retrospective or mixed data collection, dependent on whether their BRV prescriptions were historical, current, or pending. Prospective data were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and at 6-month intervals thereafter, from patient interviews and seizure diaries, and retrospective data from medical records. Efficacy variables were derived from seizure-related changes, and tolerability and safety variables from reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), BRV withdrawal, and changes to questionnaire scores. Additionally, we investigated treatment outcomes for those with previous levetiracetam (LEV) use, a history of psychiatric comorbidity, a learning disability, and of older age.. One hundred and nine patients (58.7% female, mean age 42 years, range: 18 to 72) were included, 59 with prospective follow-up for a minimum of 6 (47 patients, excluding those who withdrew) and a maximum of 24 months (2 patients). Of the full cohort, 87.2% had drug-resistant epilepsy. Retention: At the study end, the median treatment duration was 384 days (range: 6 to 1514 days), and BRV retention was 68.8%. Kaplan-Meier survival functions predicted retention rates of 74.0% and 70.0% at 6 and 12 months respectively.. At the last follow-up, there was a ≥ 50% responder rate of 30.8%, with 12.1% seizure-free. Seizure frequency categories improved in 31.4% of patients, remained the same in 44.2%, and worsened in 24.4%. Monthly tonic-clonic seizure frequency had significantly decreased, and of those reporting these seizures, 58.3% showed reductions and 25.0% showed complete tonic-clonic seizure freedom.. 91.7% of patients reported at least 1 TEAE, with fatigue (30.3%), irritability (29.4%), and depression/low mood (28.4%) as the most common. Only 58.4% of all TEAEs were persistent. Brivaracetam discontinuation due to side effects occurred in 27.5% of the cohort. Depression and anxiety scores remained stable over time, and quality-of-life scores improved. Subgroups: Measures of BRV efficacy and tolerability did not differ according to previous LEV exposure. Tolerability profiles of those with learning disabilities, histories of psychiatric comorbidities, and older age did not greatly differ from the rest of the cohort. Of note, specific history of depression predicted the reporting of suicidal ideation.. The BRIVEST study provides real-world evidence of the effectiveness of BRV, suggesting that neither drug-resistant epilepsy nor previous LEV failure should preclude its use. Furthermore, BRV appears to be well-tolerated, even among those from vulnerable patient populations.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in pediatric patients with epilepsy.. A phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term follow-up trial (N01266; NCT01364597) was conducted on patients (aged 1 month to <17 years at core trial entry; direct enrollers aged 4 to <17 years) treated with BRV. Outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), behavior assessments (Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist [CBCL], Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF]/BRIEF-Preschool version [BRIEF-P]), and efficacy outcomes (percent change in focal seizure frequency, 50% responder rate for all seizure types for patient subgroups <2 years and ≥2 years of age using daily record card data).. Of 257 patients with ≥1 dose of BRV (141 [54.9%] male; mean age = 8.0 years [SD = 4.5]), 36 patients were <2 years of age, and 72.0% of patients had a history of focal seizures. Mean BRV exposure was 3.2 patient-years. At least one TEAE occurred in 93.4% patients, and 32.3% had serious TEAEs. Seven patients died during the trial; no deaths were considered treatment-related. Patients ≥2 years of age had a median decrease in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency of 62.9%, and 50.9% had a ≥50% response in all seizures. Patients <2 years of age had a median decrease in 28-day adjusted focal seizure frequency of 96.9%, and 68.2% had a ≥50% response in all seizures. Kaplan-Meier estimated treatment retention was 72.7%, 64.5%, 57.8%, 53.3%, 50.1%, and 44.8% at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years, respectively. Mean changes (baseline to last evaluation) for all Achenbach CBCL and BRIEF-P/BRIEF subscale scores were negative, reflecting stability/slight improvement.. Long-term adjunctive BRV treatment was generally well tolerated and efficacious in reducing seizure frequency, and had high retention rates, with generally stable cognitive/behavioral scores in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

We characterised the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam 100 mg intravenous bolus and 15-min infusion versus oral reference tablet in 24 healthy Japanese participants.In this randomised, open-label, three-period crossover study, participants received three 100 mg single doses of brivaracetam, intravenous bolus, infusion, and oral tablets. Maximum plasma concentration (C

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; Epilepsy; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Japan; Pyrrolidinones; Tablets; Therapeutic Equivalency

This long-term open-label extension (OLE) trial was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) at individualized doses in patients with epilepsy and focal (partial-onset) or generalized onset seizures, or Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD). A secondary objective was to evaluate efficacy of BRV in the subgroups of patients with focal or generalized onset seizures. Patients with epilepsy were eligible to enroll in this OLE (N01125; NCT00175916) and were analyzed if they had completed a previous double-blind BRV trial (N01114 [NCT00175929], N01252 [NCT00490035], N01254 [NCT00504881], N01187 [NCT00357669], and N01236 [NCT00368251]), and were expected to obtain a reasonable benefit from long-term BRV treatment. Patients entered the OLE at the BRV dose recommended at the end of the previous trial, with dose adjustments of BRV and concomitant antiseizure medications permitted. Safety variables included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy variables in patients with focal seizures were percent reduction in focal seizure frequency, 50 % responder rates, and 6- and 12-month seizure-freedom. Eight hundred and fifty-three patients (729 [85.5 %] with focal seizures, 30 [3.5 %] with generalized onset seizures, and 94 [11.0 %] with ULD) were enrolled and included in the Safety Set. Overall, 619 (72.6 %) patients discontinued the trial, mainly due to lack of efficacy (354 [41.5 %]), adverse events (100 [11.7 %]), and patient choice (98 [11.5 %]). During the OLE, 588 (68.9 %) patients received BRV for ≥12 months, 403 (47.2 %) for ≥36 months, and 223 (26.1 %) for ≥96 months. The most common modal dose of BRV was 150 mg/day (415 [48.7 %] patients). In the ULD subgroup, the most common modal BRV dose was 100 mg/day (44/94 [46.8 %] patients), and 37/94 (39.4 %) patients had ≥96 months of BRV exposure. Overall, 720/853 (84.4 %) patients reported TEAEs, 451 (52.9 %) had a drug-related TEAE, and 95 (11.1 %) discontinued BRV due to a TEAE. In the ULD subgroup, 87/94 (92.6 %) patients reported TEAEs, 60 (63.8 %) had a drug-related TEAE, and 16 (17.0 %) discontinued due to a TEAE. In patients with focal seizures, the median reduction in focal seizure frequency from Baseline was 43.1 % (n = 728), the 50 % responder rate was 43.6 % (n = 729), and 6- and 12-month seizure freedom rates were 22.2 % and 15.8 %, respectively (n = 595). Overall, BRV was well-tolerated as long-term adjunctive therapy in patients with focal seizures, gener

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Unverricht-Lundborg Syndrome

The primary objective of this long-term follow-up (LTFU) trial was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV). The secondary objective was to evaluate the maintenance of efficacy of BRV (including quality of life) over time.. This open-label, multicenter, flexible-dose trial (N01379 [NCT01339559]) was conducted in adults (≥16 years) with focal or generalized-onset seizures, who had participated in a placebo (PBO)-controlled trial of adjunctive BRV (N01258: NCT01405508 or N01358: NCT01261325).. Seven hundred and sixty-six patients received BRV in this LTFU trial (753 had focal seizures and 13 had generalized-onset seizures). Kaplan-Meier-estimated retention was 71.9% at 12 months, and 53.7% at 36 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 643 (83.9%) patients, most commonly headache (104 [13.6%] patients) and dizziness (100 [13.1%] patients). Two hundred and fifty-seven (33.6%) patients had drug-related TEAEs, most commonly somnolence (49 [6.4%] patients) and dizziness (41 [5.4%] patients). Permanent discontinuation of BRV due to TEAEs occurred in 91 (11.9%) patients. Patients with focal seizures had a median percentage reduction in focal seizure frequency of 52.0% and 51.7% were 50% responders (sustained over time); 26.0% were seizurefree for 6 months, and 17.9% were seizurefree for 12 months. 42.4% of patients at 12 months and 46.8% at 24 months had clinically meaningful improvements in Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Questionnaire 31 total score.. In this select group of patients who entered the LTFU trial, BRV was generally safe and well tolerated. Results indicate the long-term efficacy of BRV in patients with focal seizures.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate long-term safety/tolerability of brivaracetam at individualized doses ≤200 mg/d (primary) and maintenance of efficacy over time (secondary) in adults with focal seizures or primary generalized seizures (PGS) enrolled in phase 3, open-label, long-term follow-up trial N01199 (NCT00150800).. Patients ≥16 years of age who had completed double-blind, placebo-controlled adjunctive brivaracetam trials NCT00175825, NCT00490035, NCT00464269, or NCT00504881 were eligible. Outcomes included safety, efficacy, and quality of life.. The safety set included 667 patients (focal seizures, 97.8%; PGS, 2.2%); the efficacy set included 648 patients with focal seizures and 15 patients with PGS. Overall, 49.2% of patients had ≥48 months of exposure. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 91.2% of all patients (91.3% of focal seizures group), brivaracetam discontinuation due to TEAEs in 14.8%, drug-related TEAEs in 56.7%, and serious TEAEs in 22.8%. The most common TEAEs in the focal seizures group (≥15%) were headache (25.3%) and dizziness (21.9%). Mean changes from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores at last value during 2-year evaluation were -0.7 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.3) and -0.2 (SD = 4.4) overall. In the focal seizures group, median reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28 days was 57.3%, 50% responder rate was 55.6%, and 6-month and 12-month seizure freedom rates were 30.3% and 20.3%, respectively. Efficacy outcomes improved by exposure duration cohort and then stabilized through the 108-month cohort. Mean improvement from baseline in Patient-Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory total score (efficacy set) was 5.7 (SD = 16.1, Cohen's d = 0.35) at month 12 and 6.5 (SD = 18.0, Cohen's d = 0.36) at month 24.. Adjunctive brivaracetam was well tolerated, with a good safety profile in long-term use in adults with epilepsy at individualized doses. Approximately half of the patients remained in the trial at 4 years. Brivaracetam reduced focal seizure frequency versus baseline. Efficacy improved with increasing exposure duration and remained stable through the 9-year cohort.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Time; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objective of the present trial was to assess efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) brivaracetam (BRV) vs. lorazepam (LZP) in patients with epilepsy undergoing evaluation in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) who experienced seizures requiring acute treatment.. This was a phase 2, open-label, randomized, active-control, proof-of-concept trial (EP0087; NCT03021018). Patients (18-70 years) admitted to EMU were randomized 1:1:1 to single-dose bolus IV LZP (dose per investigator's practice), IV BRV 100 mg, or IV BRV 200 mg. Trial medication had to be administered within 30 min of qualifying seizure. Primary efficacy outcome was time to next seizure (clinical observation with electroencephalogram [EEG] confirmation) or to rescue medication use within 12 h of trial medication administration. Secondary outcomes included seizure freedom and rescue medication use within 12 h of trial medication administration. Safety and tolerability outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Overall, 46 patients were randomized, and 45 received trial medication for a qualifying seizure. Patients in the LZP arm had doses from 1 to 4 mg (median: 1 mg). Eleven of 45 patients had a seizure within 12 h of trial medication administration (LZP 5/15 [median time to next seizure: 5.55 h], BRV 100 mg 3/15 [5.97 h], BRV 200 mg 3/15 [3.60 h]). No patients received additional rescue medication to control their qualifying seizure. Most patients were seizure-free over 12 h (LZP 9/15 [60.0%], BRV 100 mg 12/15 [80.0%], BRV 200 mg 12/15 [80.0%]). Rescue medication use within 12 h was numerically higher for LZP (6/15 [40.0%]) vs. BRV 100 mg (1/15 [6.7%]) and vs. BRV 200 mg (2/15 [13.3%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 5/16 (31.3%), 6/15 (40.0%), and 3/15 (20.0%) of LZP, BRV 100 mg, and BRV 200 mg patients; one LZP patient had a serious TEAE (seizure cluster). Most common TEAEs (≥10% of patients) were sedation and somnolence with LZP, and dizziness, headache, and nausea with BRV.. Intravenous LZP, IV BRV 100 mg, and IV BRV 200 mg showed similar efficacy in controlling acute seizure activity in the EMU. Treatment-emergent adverse events were as expected for each medication. Although this trial should be interpreted with caution because of small patient numbers, it suggests a possible role of BRV in the acute treatment of increased seizure activity.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lorazepam; Male; Middle Aged; Proof of Concept Study; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Sleepiness; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with focal seizures by the number of lifetime (previous and concomitant) antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. Post-hoc analysis of data from N01358 (NCT01261325), a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase III trial evaluating BRV 100 and 200 mg/day in patients ≥16 years of age with uncontrolled focal seizures. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were assessed for the 12-week Treatment Period in subgroups of patients with 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, or ≥7 lifetime AEDs.. 764 patients received at least one dose of trial medication (BRV: 503; PBO: 261; Safety Set), of whom 14.3% had 1-2, 20.8% had 3-4, 21.3% had 5-6, and 43.6% had ≥7 lifetime AEDs. In all lifetime AED subgroups, >85% of patients completed the trial. Patients with a higher number of lifetime AEDs had a younger age at epilepsy onset, longer epilepsy duration, and higher baseline seizure frequency. In patients on BRV, 50% responder rates were 49.3%, 44.4%, 47.2% and 27.4% in patients with 1-2 (n = 75), 3-4 (n = 99), 5-6 (n = 108) and ≥7 (n = 219) lifetime AEDs; 75% responder rates were 36.0%, 21.2%, 22.2% and 12.3%. In patients on PBO, 50% responder rates were 35.3%, 25.9%, 20.4% and 15.9% in patients with 1-2 (n = 34), 3-4 (n = 58), 5-6 (n = 54) and ≥7 (n = 113) lifetime AEDs; 75% responder rates were 26.5%, 6.9%, 3.7% and 4.4%. The Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of patients achieving a sustained 50% or 75% response from the first day of treatment was generally higher in patients with a lower number of lifetime AEDs (both in patients on BRV and PBO). In patients on adjunctive BRV, the incidence of drug related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 34.7%, 26.0%, 44.4% and 47.7% in patients with 1-2 (n = 75), 3-4 (n = 100), 5-6 (n = 108) and ≥7 (n = 220) lifetime AEDs; the incidence of discontinuations due to TEAEs was 1.3%, 3.0%, 8.3% and 10.5%.. This post-hoc analysis suggests a numerically higher response to adjunctive BRV in patients with fewer lifetime AEDs. The lowest response was observed in patients with ≥7 lifetime AEDs, although these patients could also benefit from adjunctive BRV treatment. Patients with fewer lifetime AEDs had lower discontinuation of BRV due to TEAEs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This trial evaluated the short-term safety and tolerability, steady-state pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of brivaracetam oral solution in children aged 1 month to < 16 years with epilepsy.. This was a phase IIa, open-label, single-arm, fixed three-step dose escalation trial of 3-weeks duration (N01263; NCT00422422). Patients were taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam oral solution dosage, in two divided daily doses, was increased each week: approximately 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day for patients aged ≥ 8 years, and 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg/day for patients aged < 8 years.. Of the 100 patients enrolled, 90 (90.0%) completed the trial. The safety population comprised 99 patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered drug related by the investigator were reported by 32/99 (32.3%) patients, most commonly (≥ 5%) somnolence (7.1%) and decreased appetite (6.1%). TEAEs were reported by 66/99 (66.7%) patients, most commonly (≥ 5%) convulsion, irritability, pyrexia, somnolence, and decreased appetite. In patients with a history of focal seizures with or without secondary generalization and no primary generalized seizures aged 4 to < 16 years (n = 34), drug-related TEAEs and TEAE incidences were 47.1% and 67.6%, respectively. Steady-state trough brivaracetam and brivaracetam metabolite plasma concentrations increased proportionally with dose. The ≥ 50% responder rates (all seizure types) were 21.3% (all patients, n = 80) and 36.4% (patients with focal seizures, aged 4 to < 16 years, n = 22).. This open-label trial in pediatric patients with epilepsy provides preliminary information that short-term, adjunctive brivaracetam treatment is well tolerated and effective. Plasma concentrations of brivaracetam and metabolites increased with increasing dose.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

To assess the association, if any, between brivaracetam (BRV)-induced elevated carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E) and toxicity and efficacy in patients with epilepsy. Data were pooled from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of adjunctive BRV in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, N01358/NCT01261325). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of interest (ataxia, diplopia, dizziness, nystagmus, somnolence, accidental overdose or poisoning, and toxicity), discontinuations due to TEAEs, and serious TEAEs (SAEs) were assessed in subgroups who did/did not receive carbamazepine (CBZ) at study entry (CBZ+ and CBZ-). Logistic regression analysis evaluated CBZ-E/CBZ plasma concentrations and TEAEs. SAEs suggestive of CBZ-E toxicity were summarized from the BRV safety database up to a cut-off of October 1, 2014. Percent reduction in focal seizure frequency over placebo was assessed in subgroups of CBZ-E/CBZ ratios. Data from 1558 patients were included in the pooled safety population. Of these, concomitant CBZ was received by 184/459 (40.1%) placebo-treated and 315/803 (39.2%) BRV-treated patients (≥50 mg/day). In BRV-treated patients, study completion rates were similar in the CBZ+ (92.7%) and CBZ- (88.7%) groups; incidence of TEAEs of interest was similar (CBZ+ 24.4%; CBZ- 24.2%), and did not appear affected by CBZ dosage; SAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs were CBZ+ 1.6%; CBZ- 3.9% and 2.9%; 9.2%, respectively. Likelihood of TEAEs of interest decreased with increasing CBZ-E/CBZ ratio for BRV-treated patients: odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.74, 1.03; p = 0.112). In the safety database, five SAEs suggestive of CBZ-E toxicity were identified. Efficacy outcomes did not appear to have a consistent pattern across CBZ-E/CBZ ratio subgroups. This post-hoc analysis does not support an association between CBZ-E levels and TEAEs potentially associated with CBZ-E toxicity, or with increases in efficacy. Overall, current evidence does not suggest that BRV dose adjustment is required with concomitant CBZ.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Area Under Curve; Carbamazepine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Young Adult

The aims of the study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of orally administered brivaracetam in paediatric patients and to provide dosing suggestions.. Analysis included 600 brivaracetam plasma concentrations from a phase 2a study (NCT00422422; N01263) in 96 paediatric patients with epilepsy aged 1 month to 16 years, taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling, and a stepwise covariate search was used to determine factors influencing brivaracetam clearance. Simulations were performed to investigate dosing regimens.. The final model consisted of first-order absorption, single compartment distribution and first-order elimination components with allometric scaling of clearance and volume using lean body weight and fixed allometric exponents. Co-administration with phenobarbital or carbamazepine was associated with a 29% (95%CI 17%/39%) and 32% (22%/42%) decrease in exposure, respectively. Co-administration with valproate was associated with an 11% (1%/23%) increase in exposure. Simulations demonstrated that the majority of children were predicted to have an exposure similar to that in adults, using an age-independent dosing regimen of 2.0 mg/kg bid with a maximum of 100 mg bid for body weight >50 kg.. A paediatric dose adaptation of 2.0 mg/kg twice daily with a maximum of 100 mg twice daily for body weight >50 kg is predicted to ensure steady-state plasma concentrations in the same range as in adult patients receiving 100 mg twice daily (highest recommended dose). Data suggest no need to change brivaracetam dosing when used concomitantly with carbamazepine, phenobarbital or valproate.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Models, Biological; Nonlinear Dynamics; Phenobarbital; Pyrrolidinones; Valproic Acid

An intravenous (IV) formulation of brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, has been developed. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of adjunctive IV BRV administered as a bolus or infusion to adults with epilepsy.. A phase III, multicenter, randomized, four-arm, parallel-group study (NCT01405508) of patients aged 16-70 years with focal or generalized epilepsy uncontrolled by 1-2 antiepileptic drugs was undertaken. The study comprised a 7-day baseline period, a 7-day double-blind run-in period (oral BRV 200 mg/day or placebo [PBO] twice daily [BID]), and 4.5-day open-label evaluation period (IV BRV 200 mg/day BID; 2-min bolus or 15-min infusion, total nine doses). Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 PBO/BRV bolus; PBO/BRV infusion; BRV/BRV bolus; BRV/BRV infusion. Safety and tolerability were assessed using adverse events, electrocardiography, vital signs, and laboratory assessments. BRV plasma concentrations were measured before and 15 min after the first and last IV doses.. Of the 105 patients randomized (53.3% women; 77.1% white; mean [standard deviation; SD] age 41.6 [12.2] years), 103 (98.1%) completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence during IV BRV was similar whether IV BRV was initiated first (70.6%) or followed oral BRV (66.0%), and whether it was administered as a bolus (71.2%) or infusion (65.4%). Injection-related TEAEs were reported by 9.6% of patients following bolus and 11.5% following infusion. No serious TEAEs were reported. IV BRV plasma concentrations were higher after the first dose in the conversion groups than initiation groups, and slightly higher in the bolus arm than the infusion arm; concentrations were similar in all patients after the last IV dose.. IV BRV was generally well tolerated, with similar tolerability as a bolus or infusion and independent of de novo administration or as conversion from oral BRV tablets. IV BRV may be an option for patients who are unable to receive oral BRV.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study investigated the effects of steady-state brivaracetam on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy, with and without valproate co-administration. Valproate and brivaracetam inhibit epoxide hydrolase and increase carbamazepine epoxide levels.. Adult patients with epilepsy being chronically treated with carbamazepine alone (n=9) or with carbamazepine and valproate (n=9) received brivaracetam during successive 1-week periods at doses of 50mg, 100mg, 200mg, and 100mg twice daily (bid). Doses of carbamazepine and valproate must have been stable for at least 3 months. Trough plasma concentrations of carbamazepine, carbamazepine epoxide, and diol metabolites were determined on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, and at the end of study visit (ESV, 2-3weeks later).. Eighteen patients with median (range) age of 45 (20-62) years and body weight of 74 (59-124) kg were enrolled and completed the study. In patients treated with carbamazepine alone, brivaracetam dose-dependently increased mean trough levels of carbamazepine epoxide from 1.38μg/mL on Day 1 pre-dose to 2.16μg/mL (+57%) on Day 8 (50mg bid), 2.72μg/mL (+97%) on Day 15 (100mg bid), 3.02μg/mL (+119%) on Day 22 (200mg bid), 2.67μg/mL (+94%) on Day 29 (100mg bid), and 1.22μg/mL (-12%) at ESV, respectively. In patients on carbamazepine and valproate, carbamazepine epoxide increased from 1.98μg/mL at baseline to 2.72μg/mL (+37%), 3.70μg/mL (+87%), 4.43μg/mL (+124%), 3.11μg/mL (+57%), and 1.94μg/mL (-2%), respectively. There was no trend for change in carbamazepine, carbamazepine diol or valproate levels. Brivaracetam levels increased linearly with dose. Brivaracetam was well tolerated.. Carbamazepine epoxide plasma concentrations were approximately doubled by brivaracetam 100 or 200mg bid. Data are consistent with a dose-dependent and reversible inhibition of epoxide hydrolase by brivaracetam. Carbamazepine epoxide was approximately 0.7μg/mL higher in presence of valproate. There is no need to limit brivaracetam dosing when used concomitantly with carbamazepine.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Biomarkers; Carbamazepine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Epoxide Hydrolases; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

We evaluated nonpsychotic behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in patients receiving levetiracetam (LEV) who switched to brivaracetam (BRV). Patients ≥16 years of age, receiving 2-3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including LEV 1-3g/day, and experiencing BAEs within 16 weeks of LEV treatment initiation, enrolled in an open-label Phase 3b study (NCT01653262) comprising a ≤1-week screening period, an immediate switch from LEV to BRV 200mg/day (without titration), and a 12-week treatment period. The percentages of patients with investigator-assessed clinically meaningful reduction in BAEs, shift in maximum BAE intensity, and change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (Patient-Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 [QOLIE-31-P]) were assessed. Of 29 patients enrolled, 26 (89.7%) completed the study. At the end of the treatment period, 27/29 (93.1%) patients switched to BRV had clinically meaningful reductions in BAEs. Physicians reported a reduction in the maximum intensity of primary BAEs in 27/29 (93.1%) patients. Mean change from baseline to Week 12 in QOLIE-31-P total score was 12.1, indicating improved HRQoL. During the treatment period, 23/29 (79.3%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One patient reported a serious TEAE (suicidal ideation and suicide attempt). Two patients discontinued BRV because of TEAEs. Findings from this small study suggest that patients experiencing BAEs associated with LEV may benefit from switching to BRV.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Suicidal Ideation; Suicide, Attempted; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objective of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (and how they are affected by food), CNS pharmacodynamics and the adverse event profile of brivaracetam after single increasing doses.. Healthy males (n = 27, divided into three alternating panels of nine subjects) received two different single oral doses of brivaracetam (10-1400 mg) and one dose of placebo during three periods of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The effect of food on its pharmacokinetics was assessed using a standard two-way crossover design in a further eight subjects who received two single oral doses of brivaracetam (150 mg) in the fasting state and after a high fat meal.. Adverse events, none of which were serious, were mostly CNS-related and included somnolence, dizziness, and decreased attention, alertness, and motor control. Their incidence, severity and duration were dose-related. The maximum tolerated dose was established to be 1000 mg. Severe somnolence lasting 1 day occurred in one subject following 1400 mg. Brivaracetam was rapidly absorbed under fasting conditions, with a median t(max) of approximately 1 h. C(max) was dose-proportional from 10 to 1400 mg, whereas AUC deviated from dose linearity above 600 mg. A high-fat meal had no effect on AUC (point estimate 0.99, 90%CI: 0.92-1.07) but delayed t(max) (3 h) and decreased C(max) (point estimate 0.72, 90%CI: 0.66-0.79).. Brivaracetam was well tolerated after increasing single doses that represent up to several times the expected therapeutic dose. Brivaracetam was found to have desirable pharmacokinetic properties. The most common adverse events were somnolence and dizziness.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones

Nearly half of people with epilepsy (PWE) are expected to develop seizure clusters (SC), with the subsequent risk of hospitalization. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) brivaracetam (BRV) in the treatment of SC.. Retrospective multicentric study of patients with SC (≥ 2 seizures/24 h) who received IV BRV. Data collection occurred from January 2019 to April 2022 in 25 Italian neurology units. Primary efficacy outcome was seizure freedom up to 24 h from BRV administration. We also evaluated the risk of evolution into Status Epilepticus (SE) at 6, 12 and 24 h after treatment initiation. A Cox regression model was used to identify outcome predictors.. 97 patients were included (mean age 62 years), 74 (76%) of whom had a history of epilepsy (with drug resistant seizures in 49% of cases). BRV was administered as first line treatment in 16% of the episodes, while it was used as first or second drug after benzodiazepines failure in 49% and 35% of episodes, respectively. On the one hand, 58% patients were seizure free at 24 h after BRV administration and no other rescue medications were used in 75 out of 97 cases (77%) On the other hand, SC evolved into SE in 17% of cases. A higher probability of seizure relapse and/or evolution into SE was observed in patients without a prior history of epilepsy (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.03 - 4.1) and in case of BRV administration as second/third line drug (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.1 - 9.7). No severe treatment emergent adverse events were observed.. In our cohort, IV BRV resulted to be well tolerated for the treatment of SC and it could be considered as a treatment option, particularly in case of in-hospital onset. However, the underlying etiology seems to be the main outcome predictor.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on therapy brivaracetam (BRV) in adult patients with epilepsy in a real-world setting.. This multi-center retrospective observational cohort study examined all adult patients who commenced on BRV at 11 Australian epilepsy centers between 2017 and 2020. Primary outcomes were seizure response (≥50% reduction in frequency) and seizure freedom 12 months post BRV commencement, and tolerability. We report three approaches to missing data (complete case analysis, CCA; last observation carried forward, LOCF; and intention to treat, ITT). Secondary outcomes included the durability of early BRV response and continuous seizure freedom from BRV initiation. Subgroup analysis examined patients with focal and generalized epilepsy and patients with refractory (≥4 prior ASMs) and highly refractory (≥7 prior ASMs) epilepsy. Outcomes were also assessed at 'personalized' seizure outcome time points based on baseline seizure frequency.. Baseline and follow-up data were available for 228 patients. The mean age was 41.5 years (IQR 30, 50). Most had focal epilepsy (188/228, 82.5%). Median number of previous ASMs was 4 (2, 7), and concomitant ASMs 2 (2, 3). Twelve-month responder rate was: 46.3% using CCA (95% CI 34.0, 58.9); 39.5% using LOCF (33.1, 46.1); and 15.4% using ITT (10.9, 20.7). Twelve-month seizure freedom was: 23.9% using CCA (14.3, 35.9); 24.6% using LOCF (19.1, 30.7); and 7.9% using ITT (4.7, 12.1). The most frequent adverse effects were sedation or cognitive slowing (33/228, 14.5%), irritability or aggression (16/228, 7.0%), and low mood (14/228, 6.1%). Outcomes were similar using continuous outcome definitions and 'personalized' outcome assessment time points. Early responses were highly durable, with 3-month response maintained at all subsequent time points at 83%, and seizure freedom maintained at 85%. Outcomes were similar in focal (n = 187) and generalizsed (n = 25) subgroups. Outcomes were similar in refractory patients (n = 129), but lower in the highly refractory group (n = 62), however improvement with BRV was still observed with 12-month seizure freedom of 8.3% using CCA (1.0, 27), 6.5% using LOCF (1.8, 15.7); and 3.2% using ITT (0.4, 11.2).. Meaningful real-world responder and seizure freedom rates can be still observed in a refractory epilepsy population. Brivaracetam response can occur early and appears to be maintained with minimal later relapse. The results should be interpreted with caution given the retrospective nature of the study and the quantities of missing data at later time points.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Australia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Approximately one quarter of people with an intellectual disability (PwID) have epilepsy of whom nearly three-quarters are pharmaco-resistant. There are higher reported neuropsychiatric side-effects to anti-seizure medication (ASM) in this group. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM with a stronger association with neuropsychiatric symptoms for PwID than other ASMs. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a newer ASM. Recent studies suggest a beneficial effect of swapping people who experience neuropsychiatric events with LEV to BRV. However, there is limited evidence of this for PwID. This evaluation analyses real world outcomes of LEV to BRV swap for PwID compared to those without ID.. We performed a multicentre, retrospective review of clinical records. Demographic, clinical characteristics and reported adverse events of patients switched from LEV to BRV (2016-2020) were recorded at 3 months pre and 6- and 12-month post-BRV initiation. Outcomes were compared between PwID and those without and summarised using cross-tabulations and logistic regression models. A Bonferroni correction was applied.. Of 77 participants, 46 had ID and 52% had a past psychiatric illness. 71% participants switched overnight from LEV to BRV. Seizure reduction of > 50% was seen in 40% patients. Psychiatric illness history was predictive of having neuropsychiatric side-effects with LEV but not BRV (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference for any primary outcomes between PwID versus without ID.. Switching from LEV to BRV appears as well tolerated and efficacious in PwID as those without ID with over 90% still on BRV after 12 months.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Case-Control Studies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome

Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice.. BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation.. A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam.. IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) as 15-min intravenous (IV) infusion and bolus (≤2-min injection).. EP0065 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03405714) was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial in patients ≥1 month to <16 years of age with epilepsy. Patients received up to 5 mg/kg/day BRV (not exceeding 200 mg/day). Enrollment was sequential by descending age, depending on safety review. Outcomes included BRV plasma concentrations before and after IV administration, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and discontinuations due to TEAEs.. Fifty patients were enrolled, received BRV, and completed the trial. Twenty-six patients (52.0%) received 15-min infusions and 24 (48.0%) received bolus injections. Most patients (80.0%) received one IV dose. In the 15-min infusion group, geometric mean (GeoMean) BRV concentrations 15 (±2) min (n = 21) and 3 h (±15 min) (n = 21) post dose were 1903.0 ng/mL (geometric coefficient of variation [GeoCV]: 60.7%) and 1130.3 ng/mL (58.8%), respectively. In the bolus group, GeoMean BRV concentrations 15 (±2) min (n = 19) and 3 h (±15 min) (n = 21) post dose were 1704.8 ng/mL (GeoCV: 74.5%) and 1383.9 ng/mL (85.0%), respectively. Overall, 14 patients (28.0%) had TEAEs (15-min infusion: 8 [30.8%]; bolus: 6 [25.0%]), most commonly (≥5% of patients) somnolence (3 [6.0%]). Ten patients (20.0%) had drug-related TEAEs (15-min infusion: 6 [23.1%]; bolus: 4 [16.7%]). No patients discontinued due to TEAEs, and no deaths occurred.. IV BRV (up to 200 mg/day) was well tolerated in patients ≥1 month to <16 years of age, regardless of whether BRV was administered as 15-min infusion or bolus. No unexpected safety or pharmacokinetic differences were observed between patients receiving 15-min infusions or bolus, and plasma concentrations were in the expected range. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of oral BRV, with no new safety concerns identified.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy and accounts for about 10-15% of all newly diagnosed epilepsy cases. However, evidence about the clinical profile of antiseizure medications in the PSE setting is currently limited. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A. The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in patients with PSE treated in a real-world setting.. This was a subgroup analysis of patients with PSE included in the BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST). The BRIVAFIRST was a 12-month retrospective, multicentre study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure-freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs.. Patients with PSE included in the BRIVAFIRST were 75 and had a median age of 57 (interquartile range, 42-66) years. The median daily doses of BRV at 3, 6, and 12 months from starting treatment were 100 (100-150) mg, 125 (100-200) mg and 100 (100-200) mg, respectively. At 12 months, 32 (42.7%) patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50%, and the seizure freedom rates was 26/75 (34.7%). During the 1-year study period, 10 (13.3%) patients discontinued BRV. The reasons of treatment withdrawal were insufficient efficacy in 6 (8.0%) patients and poor tolerability in 4 (5.3%) patients. Adverse events were reported by 13 (20.3%) patients and were rated as mild in 84.6% and moderate in 15.4% of cases.. Adjunctive BRV was efficacious and generally well-tolerated when used in patients with PSE in clinical practice. Adjunctive BRV can be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with PSE.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Italy; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The management of epilepsy in older adults has become part of daily practice because of an aging population. Older patients with epilepsy represent a distinct and more vulnerable clinical group as compared with younger patients, and they are generally under-represented in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Real-world studies can therefore be a useful complement to characterize the drug's profile. Brivaracetam is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A and approved as adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adults with epilepsy.. The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in older patients (≥65 years of age) with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting.. The BRIVAFIRST (BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy) was a 12-month retrospective multicenter study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive brivaracetam. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events and the incidence of adverse events. Data were compared for patients aged ≥65 years of age ('older') vs those aged <65 years ('younger').. There were 1029 patients with focal epilepsy included in the study, of whom 111 (10.8%) were aged ≥65 years. The median daily dose of brivaracetam at 3 months was 100 [interquartile range, 100-175] mg in the older group and 100 [100-200] mg in the younger group (p = 0.036); it was 150 [100-200] mg in both groups either at 6 months (p = 0.095) or 12 months (p = 0.140). At 12 months, 49 (44.1%) older and 334 (36.4%) younger patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50% (p = 0.110), and the seizure freedom rates were 35/111 (31.5%) and 134/918 (14.6%) in older and younger groups, respectively (p < 0.001). During the 1-year study period, 20 (18.0%) patients in the older group and 245 (26.7%) patients in the younger group discontinued brivaracetam (p = 0.048). Treatment withdrawal because of insufficient efficacy was less common in older than younger patients [older: n = 7 (6.3%), younger: n = 152 (16.6%); p = 0.005]. Adverse events were reported by 24.2% of older patients and 30.8% of younger patients (p = 0.185); the most common adverse events were somnolence, nervousness and/or agitation, vertigo, and fatigue in both study groups.. Adjunctive brivaracetam was efficacious, had good tolerability, and no new or unexpected safety signals emerged when used to treat older patients with uncontrolled focal seizures in clinical practice. Adjunctive brivaracetam can be a suitable therapeutic option in this special population.

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Italy; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam (BRV) is one of our latest antiseizure medications (ASMs). It is an analogue of levetiracetam with limited real-life experience. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical experience with BRV with focus on efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic variability among adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy.. We retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data from patients aged > 18 years who initiated treatment with BRV during 2016-2019 and were followed for > one year or cessation of BRV.. The study cohort consisted of 120 adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. Serum concentrations of BRV were available in 72 patients. After one-year follow-up, the retention rate of BRV was 52%. Fifty-seven patients (48%) were responders (>50 reduction of seizure frequency), of whom six became seizure free. Adverse effects were reported in 78 patients (65%); 37 (31%) experienced psychiatric problems like increased irritability, anxiety and depressive symptoms. The mean daily BRV dose was 159 mg (SD 80 mg) and the mean serum concentration 5.4 μmol/L (SD 4.1 μmol/L). In 24 patients, BRV replaced levetiracetam. Pharmacokinetic variability between patients was considerable; 14-fold variation in concentration/dose (C/D)-ratios. Concomitant use of enzyme-inducing ASMs decreased the C/D-ratio by 48%. There were no significant differences in serum concentrations between responders vs. non-responders, or those who experienced adverse effects or not.. After > 1 year of treatment with BRV, we found a responder rate of 48% in adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. The drug was largely well tolerated, but one third experienced psychiatric adverse effects. The combination of clinical and pharmacokinetic data provides insight into factors contributing to efficacy and tolerability of new ASMs.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To report the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in add-on therapy in pediatric patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy. Prognostic factors of clinical outcome were also analyzed.. This Italian multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted on 45 pediatric patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy, treated with BRV for at least 1 month and with a follow-up >6 months. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were assessed at T0 (baseline, BRV introduction) and T1 (6 months after BRV introduction). The response was defined as ≥50% seizure frequency reduction; responders and non-responders were then compared to assess potential prognostic factors.. Forty-five patients (M = 28, mean age 12.4+/-4.4 years) were enrolled (focal epilepsy=14; generalized epilepsy=2; epileptic encephalopathy=29). At T1, 19/45 patients (42.2%) were responders (≥50% seizure frequency reduction), with 4 patients (8.9%) achieving a ≥ 75% seizure reduction and 2 patients (4.4%) becoming seizure free. Epilepsy onset at >12 months of age (p = 0.001), disease duration ≤6 years (p = 0.036), and lower seizure frequency at baseline (p = 0.008) were the prognostic factors significantly associated with a better prognosis. No significant difference emerged for demographics, epilepsy types/etiology, intellectual disability, or therapy variables. At T1, 21 patients (46.6%) discontinued BRV, mainly due to lack of efficacy (13 subjects; 28.9%) and adverse events in 8 patients (17.8%).. Brivaracetam was an effective and tolerated treatment in pediatric patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy, especially when the seizure onset was at >12 months of age, the epilepsy duration ≤6 years, and the seizure frequency before BRV treatment was low. Further and controlled studies are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To determine the efficacy, tolerance, and safety of BRV in children with epilepsy.. A retrospective study of patients with epilepsy who received treatment with BRV before age 16 years and underwent a minimum follow-up of 3 months.. Sixty-six patients were included in the study. Patients received BRV at a mean age of 8.8 years (range 1-16 years). The majority (93.4 %) had refractory epilepsy, 27 with epileptic encephalopathy. The median maximum dose used was 4.3 mg/kg/day. In 30.3 % of the cases, seizure frequency was reduced by over 50 %, and 9 % remained seizure-free. Greater efficacy was observed in those patients who received higher doses and when a direct switch from levetiracetam (LEV) to BRV was performed. The ineffectiveness of LEV was not related to a failure to respond to BRV treatment. Side effects were identified in 24.2 % of the cases, the most frequent being irritability and drowsiness.. BRV appears to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated AED in children with refractory epilepsy.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice.. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021.. Long-term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5-81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost-to-follow-up), including 10.9% reported as seizure-free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow-up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25-400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short-term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long-term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons.. BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of >50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short-term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long-term outcomes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Patients with intellectual disability (ID) are often excluded from clinical trials, and little is known about the best approach to treat their epilepsy. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) for adjunctive treatment in patients with focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. We analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of BRV in patients with ID and epilepsy who either had or had not previously received treatment with levetiracetam (LEV). Data on efficacy and tolerability were retrospectively collected. After the initial start of BRV in our tertiary epilepsy center, we analyzed medical records at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. 116 patients were included (mean age = 34.9 years, 44% female). All had complete data of 3-month follow-up, 76 of 6-month follow-up, and 39 patients of 1-year follow-up. Median starting dose of BRV was 50.0 mg/day and the mean number of concomitant AEDs was 2.6. Seizure reduction and no side effects were reported in more than half of all patients. The most reported side effects were somnolence, dizziness and aggression. Retention rates for BRV were 84.4%, 75.5% and 58.1% after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Seizure reduction and side effects did not differ significantly between the groups with or without previous LEV treatment. We demonstrate that BRV is effective and well tolerated in patients with epilepsy and ID, even in those where previous LEV treatment failed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Dizziness; Epilepsy; Fatigue; Female; Headache; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Sleepiness; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study aims to assess the cost utility of Brivaracetam compared with the third-generation anti-epileptic drugs used as standard care.. A cost utility analysis of Brivaracetam was carried out with other third-generation comparators. The treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort over a period of 2 years was simulated using the Markov model. Data for effectiveness and the QALYs of each health status for epilepsy, as well as for the disutilities of adverse events of treatments, were analyzed through a studies review. The cost of the anti-epileptics and the use of medical resources linked to the different health statuses were taken into consideration. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation.. Brivaracetam was shown to be the dominant alternative, with Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR) values from -11,318 for Lacosamide to -128,482 for Zonisamide. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis validates these results. The ICUR sensitivity is greater for increases in the price of Brivaracetam than for decreases, and for Eslicarbizapine over the other adjunctives considered in the analysis.. Treatment with Brivaracetam resulted in cost effective and incremental quality adjusted life years come at an acceptable cost.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Epilepsy; Humans; Monte Carlo Method; Pyrrolidinones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Spain

Accurate and individualized prediction of response to therapies is central to precision medicine. However, because of the generally complex and multifaceted nature of clinical drug response, realizing this vision is highly challenging, requiring integrating different data types from the same individual into one prediction model. We used the anti-epileptic drug brivaracetam as a case study and combine a hybrid data/knowledge-driven feature extraction with machine learning to systematically integrate clinical and genetic data from a clinical discovery dataset (n = 235 patients). We constructed a model that successfully predicts clinical drug response [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.76] and show that even with limited sample size, integrating high-dimensional genetics data with clinical data can inform drug response prediction. After further validation on data collected from an independently conducted clinical study (AUC = 0.75), we extensively explore our model to gain insights into the determinants of drug response, and identify various clinical and genetic characteristics predisposing to poor response. Finally, we assess the potential impact of our model on clinical trial design and demonstrate that, by enriching for probable responders, significant reductions in clinical study sizes may be achieved. To our knowledge, our model represents the first retrospectively validated machine learning model linking drug mechanism of action and the genetic, clinical and demographic background in epilepsy patients to clinical drug response. Hence, it provides a blueprint for how machine learning-based multimodal data integration can act as a driver in achieving the goals of precision medicine in fields such as neurology.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Computer Simulation; Epilepsy; Female; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Machine Learning; Male; Middle Aged; Precision Medicine; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

There is an unmet need for well-tolerated antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that effectively control focal onset seizures. This study aimed to evaluate the economic value of new AEDs in the treatment of focal onset seizure, with or without secondary generalization, in Finnish adults and adolescents with epilepsy, comparing brivaracetam with perampanel as adjunctive AEDs.. Economic value was assessed using cost-utility analysis. Periods of AED initiation, titration, response assessment (seizure freedom, ≥ 50% reduction, no response), switching in no response or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and death were simulated using a discrete-event simulation model. Responses and switching were simulated based on a comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary modeled outcome was the 3%/year discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), payer costs (year 2017 Euro) per patient, and net monetary benefit (NMB) were secondary outcomes. Probabilistic and comprehensive deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.. Brivaracetam was more efficacious and had fewer TEAEs than perampanel and other AEDs. Modeled average 5-year QALYs and costs were 3.671 and €28,297 for brivaracetam and 3.611 and €27,979 for perampanel, respectively. The resulting ICER for brivaracetam versus perampanel was only €5345/QALY gained in a deterministic base case scenario. Brivaracetam had a positive NMB and high probability of cost-effectiveness of €1190 and 71% or €1944 and 80% with the assumed willingness to pay of €25,358 or €38,036/QALY gained, respectively. The primary result was robust, with a positive NMB persistent in all sensitivity analysis scenarios. When switching from brivaracetam to perampanel was excluded from the modeling or switching from perampanel to brivaracetam was included, brivaracetam was cost-saving and more effective than perampanel (dominant).. These simulated comparisons demonstrated that brivaracetam was more effective and potentially also more affordable than perampanel. Thus, brivaracetam is likely a cost-effective and net beneficial alternative to perampanel for treatment of focal onset seizures. Plain language summary available for this article.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Bayes Theorem; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Finland; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam is an antiepileptic drug used as an add-on therapy for partial-onset seizures in subjects aged 4 years and older. Owing to potential drug interactions and intersubject variability in plasma concentrations, therapeutic monitoring for brivaracetam may be useful. The aim of this study was to develop a simplified method for measuring brivaracetam plasma concentrations applicable to therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy.. An ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated according to current guidelines for bioanalytical methods. Sample preparation (100 µL) involved only a simple precipitation step by acetonitrile. Brivaracetam-d7 was used as internal standard. The chromatographic analysis was performed by a Synergi Fusion column using 0.1% formic acid in water/acetonitrile as a binary gradient mobile phase, at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Both brivaracetam and the internal standard eluted at 1.01 minutes. This method was applied to measure trough and 1-hour postmorning dose brivaracetam plasma concentrations of 11 patients with epilepsy.. The method was validated over a concentration range of 0.10-10 mcg/mL. The mean recovery was 95%. Both intra- and inter-assay imprecision and inaccuracy were <15% for all quality control samples. The lower limit of quantitation and detection was 0.10 and 0.05 mcg/mL, respectively. No interferences or carry-over was observed. Median (25%-75% quartiles) trough and 1-hour postdosing brivaracetam plasma concentrations were 0.61 mcg/mL (0.47-0.83 mcg/mL) and 1.55 mcg/mL (1.24-2.12 mcg/mL), respectively, at a median dose of 80 mg/d (50-150 mg/d). Large, up to 8-fold, intrasubject fluctuations of brivaracetam concentrations between trough and 1-hour postdosing were observed.. The present assay is faster and simpler than previously published analytical reports for brivaracetam in human plasma and is suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Reproducibility of Results; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Use of certain antiseizure drugs (ASDs) during pregnancy increases the risk of major congenital malformations, while less is known about newer ASDs. Based on the safety of levetiracetam, brivaracetam may be similarly safe in pregnancy; however, no cases have been published to date.. We retrospectively identified three women with epilepsy treated with brivaracetam during pregnancy and described the maternal and neonatal outcomes.. We reviewed the patients' medical records as well as the linked medical records of their infants to identify complications during pregnancy and delivery, neonatal complications, and evidence of major/minor congenital malformations.. Our series included one woman with idiopathic generalized epilepsy and two women with focal epilepsy (brivaracetam doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg daily). One patient with focal epilepsy experienced breakthrough seizures, and lamotrigine was added to brivaracetam. The other women had no neurologic complications during pregnancy. All three women had full-term deliveries without significant complications. Three healthy infants were born with Apgar scores of 9 and 9 and no major congenital malformations. Three minor congenital malformations were observed in two infants.. While the absence of major congenital malformations in these cases is encouraging, further data are needed to determine the safety of brivaracetam in pregnancy.

Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on brivaracetam (BRV) trough serum concentrations. A total number of 368 routinely collected blood samples from 148 inpatients from Mara Hospital (Bethel Epilepsy Center) and von Bodelschwingh Foundation Bethel were retrospectively evaluated. Generalized estimation equations (GEEs) were used for statistical analysis. GEE analyses showed that BRV trough serum concentrations were significantly lower in patients with strong enzyme-inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, and/or phenobarbital/primidone, -49%), but were not affected by concomitant intake of oxcarbazepine or eslicarbazepine. Age and gender did not have a significant effect. An alternative GEE model analyzing the BRV level-to-dose ratios yielded comparable results. Our results from routine therapeutic drug monitoring data indicate that the effect of enzyme-inducing AEDs on BRV serum concentrations is stronger than the 20%-30% reduction in BRV exposure previously reported in pharmacokinetics studies. Further research is necessary to evaluate these differences and to elucidate possible clinical consequences.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child; Dibenzazepines; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxcarbazepine; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

Brivaracetam (BRV) is indicated for adjunctive treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures with or without secondary generalisation in patients 4 years of age and older in the European Union (EU). An ongoing 12-month, prospective, non-interventional post-marketing study (EP0077; NCT02687711) is collecting real-world information on patients receiving treatment with adjunctive BRV in Europe. In this study, BRV is prescribed according to routine clinical practice and the EU Summary of Product Characteristics. This second interim analysis assessed effectiveness, tolerability and health-related quality of life outcomes for up to 6 months of treatment. At the cut-off date (13 April 2018), 266 patients from five countries had attended Visit 1, 24.1 % (64/266) had completed the study, 37.6 % (100/266) were ongoing, and 38.3 % (102/266) had discontinued. In total, 261 patients had at least one dose of BRV and were included in the analyses. Patients had a mean time since epilepsy diagnosis of 23.2 years, a mean of eight lifetime AEDs (sum of AEDs discontinued prior to study entry and concomitant at study entry), and a median of five focal seizures per 28 days during the 3-month retrospective Baseline. 66.3 % of patients initiated BRV at a dose within the recommended starting range (50-100 mg/day) and 87.1 % of patients received BRV modal doses within the recommended dose range (50-200 mg/day) during the study. Retention rates were 79.1 % (N = 239) at 3 months and 62.1 % (N = 211) at 6 months. The 50 % responder rates for focal seizures were 46.8 % (N = 139) at 3 months and 53.6 % (N = 97) at 6 months. The proportions of patients who were seizure-free were 10.7 % (21/196) and 7.5 % (15/199) at 3 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. Median percent reductions in focal seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline to 3 and 6 months were 34.6 % (N = 139) and 53.3 % (N = 97), respectively. Overall, 44.2 % of patients had an improvement and 15.4 % had a worsening in Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 total score from Baseline to 6 months (N = 52). At least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was reported in 51.0 % (133/261) of patients, and 34.5 % (90/261) of patients had drug-related TEAEs. The most common drug-related TEAEs (≥5% of patients) were drug ineffective (7.7 %), seizure (6.5 %), and fatigue (6.1 %). In this 6-month interim analysis, BRV showed effectiveness when used in clinical practice in five European countries. BRV was

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Seizures; Young Adult

Brivaracetam (BRV) is the latest approved antiepileptic drug and acts as a synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of BRV in the clinical setting.. Retrospective, observational multicentre study.. We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients who received BRV in 10 epilepsy centres using a questionnaire that was answered by the reporting neurologist.. Data of 615 epilepsy patients treated with BRV were included in the study.. Efficacy regarding seizure frequency and tolerability of BRV were evaluated. Descriptive statistics complemented by X. Overall, 44% of the patients had a decreased, 38% a stable and 18% an increased seizure frequency. 17% of patients achieved seizure freedom after initiation of BRV. The seizure frequency decreased in 63% of 19 patients with BRV monotherapy. 27% reported adverse effects, but only 10% of patients with monotherapy. Brivaracetam was significantly more often associated with decreased seizure frequency in levetiracetam (LEV) naïve patients (p=0.012), but BRV also led to a decreased seizure frequency in 42% of patients who had been treated with LEV before, including 17% of patients who were completely seizure free. Adverse effects under LEV improved in 62% and deteriorated in 2% of patients after the switch to BRV. At latest follow-up (mean±SD = 26.3±6.5 months), 68% were still on BRV.. The present study shows that results of the phase III studies on BRV match data from real life clinical settings. Brivaracetam seems to be a useful alternative in patients who have suffered adverse effects while taking LEV.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The new anticonvulsant brivaracetam is a levetiracetam analog which binds to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A, and inhibits excitatory neurotransmitters' release. Brivaracetam was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMA) approved in 2016 as adjunctive treatment for focal onset seizures in patients over 16 years of age, and in 2018 for children over four years of age. Our aim was to describe effectiveness and tolerability in real-life pediatric epilepsy clinic.. Cross-sectional retrospective chart review of patients under 20 years of age, treated with brivaracetam. Positive response to treatment was considered when 50% decrease in seizure frequency was noted. In responders to levetiracetam, positive effect was regarded if switching to brivaracetam maintained at least the same seizure control.. Thirty-one patients (67.7% males), aged 13.8 ± 4.07 (6.9-20 years), were treated with brivaracetam 3.8 mg/kg ± 1.8. Age of onset of epilepsy was 5.7 ± 3.7 years; 20 patients had focal epilepsies; and 11 had epileptic syndromes (5 - Lennox-Gastaut, 3 - myoclonic absence, 3 - myoclonic-atonic). Responder rate was 45.2%, with no statistical difference under and over 16 years of age (40% vs. 54.5%, Fisher's exact test). Eight patients had better response to seizures compared to levetiracetam. Gender, duration of epilepsy, and dosage did not affect epilepsy control. Six patients had seizure aggravation. Adverse effects were rare: mild somnolence (6.4%), psychosis (3.2%), and nausea (3.2%).. Brivaracetam is an effective add-on treatment in focal, as well as generalized seizures in children, with negligible side effects, including children who failed previously on levetiracetam. Seizure exacerbation may occur, but it's reason is unclear.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Epilepsy; Epileptic Syndromes; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

More than a third of patients with epilepsy cannot achieve freedom from seizures despite taking multiple medications. This article compares brivaracetam to levetiracetam, and provides guidelines for the safe and effective use of brivaracetam.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Costs; Epilepsy; Humans; Insurance Coverage; Levetiracetam; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrrolidinones

The rate of brivaracetam-related behavioural adverse events is a current focus of discussion. This study aims to assess the effect of brivaracetam on anger levels in patients with epilepsy, adjusted by mood symptoms, history of psychiatric disorders and seizure response.. Prospective analysis of 37 patients assessed for anger levels (STAXI-2), depression-anxiety (HADS) and quality of life (QOLIE-10) before adjunctive brivaracetam treatment and reassessed 3-6 months later. A control group following the same protocol of assessment was used for 1:1 comparison. A high percentage of mood stabilisers were included in this control group.. Brivaracetam was indicated for patients including focal onset (79%) and generalised epilepsies (21%). Nearly 60% of responders and no psychiatric adverse events were found. This was similar to controls. The overall results revealed that brivaracetam was assoiciated with better in anger levels, mood scores and quality of life at baseline. Prior use of levetiracetam or the presence of a psychiatric background did not influence the results. However, improvements in anger levels were seen in the brivaracetam responders.. This study shows that brivaracetam is not associated with an increased level of anger in patients with either focal or generalised epilepsies in the absence of psychiatric comorbidity. However, an improvement in anger levels is possibly influenced by a good seizure response.

Topics: Adult; Anger; Anticonvulsants; Comorbidity; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

The use of cannabidiol (CBD) for treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsies is increasing. CBD is metabolized via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and cytochrome 450 (CYP) enzymes, but information on interactions with common anticonvulsive drugs is incomplete. We report a case series of five patients receiving adjunctive treatment with CBD who showed increases in brivaracetam (BRV) levels by 95% to 280%. Only two patients reported mild adverse events, leading to a reduction of BRV in one patient. One possible mechanism contributing at least partially to increasing BRV level is the inhibition of CYP2C19 by cannabidiol. Further pharmacokinetic studies are required to understand other possible mechanisms of brivaracetam-cannabidiol interaction.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Cannabidiol; Child; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Young Adult

Levetiracetam (LEV), and its newer selective analog brivaracetam (BRV), are two seizure medications that share an innovative mechanism of action targeting the Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A (SV2A), altering neurotransmitter release and decreasing seizure frequency. Behavioral changes are the most significant adverse effects reported by patients taking LEV. We hypothesize that BRV, the more potent SV2A analog, could exert less behavioral side effects, as it requires lower doses than LEV. Using Kainic Acid (KA)-treated and control rats, we measured adverse behavioral effect profiles of LEV, BRV, or Saline, on social and nonsocial behaviors. Our data indicate that both tested drugs had no effect on locomotion, anxiety levels, fear learning, depression-like behavior, and memory retention in rats. However, when considering social interactions, we first confirmed the epilepsy-induced strong increase in aggressive behaviors and specific hippocampal neuronal loss. We furthermore observed, in Sham rats, that LEV-treated animals were 2 times faster to attack at first encounter, had 5 times more aggressive behaviors, and had significantly less social behaviors than control rats. In all circumstances, BRV rats behaved like Saline rats, suggesting that BRV treatment in rats leads to significantly less aggressive behaviors than LEV treatment at the doses used, while there are limited differential effects between these two drugs on other types of behaviors. Since increased aggressiveness has been reported in patients well controlled on LEV, this study indicates based on our findings, that BRV could represent an effective alternative to LEV to limit aggressiveness problems due to this antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Humans; Kainic Acid; Levetiracetam; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Seizures; Synaptic Transmission

We report the most notable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the antiepileptic drugs commercialised in the last four years (eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam and perampanel). Their efficacy and safety are analysed in open-label clinical trials, which are the ones that reproduce their use in everyday life, without the rigid protocols used in clinical trials.. Farmacos antiepilepticos.. Se refieren las caracteristicas farmacocineticas y farmacodinamicas mas destacadas de los farmacos antiepilepticos comercializados en los cuatro ultimos años (acetato de eslicarbacepina, brivaracetam y perampanel). Se analiza su eficacia y tolerabilidad en estudios clinicos abiertos, que son los que reproducen su utilizacion en la vida diaria, sin los protocolos rigidos de los ensayos clinicos.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones

To determine the potential for improvement of tolerability and efficacy by the use of Brivaracetam (BRV) in patients previously treated with Levetiracetam (LEV).. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients treated with BRV at the Freiburg Epilepsy Center.. 102 patients with a minimum follow up of 6 months were included. The mean duration of treatment was 301.6 (± 156.8) days. 60 patients underwent an overnight switch from LEV to BRV, 42 patients have had LEV at some time in the past. Out of 46 patients with a quantifiable seizure baseline and follow-up of 6 months 10 patients (21.7%) had an increase in seizure frequency, 15 (32.6%) were 50%-responders, and 10 patients (21.7%) became newly seizure-free. Patients with an overnight switch from LEV to BRV who had a reduction in seizure frequency had the highest dose ratio of the final BRV dose to LEV (1:10.1) and the biggest difference between the starting and final dose of BRV, suggesting that previously seizure control was limited by the tolerated LEV dosage. The retention rate after 6 months was 80.4%. 28 out of 49 (57.1%) patients directly switched from LEV to BRV because of psychiatric side effects reported an improved tolerability. 10 out of 42 (23.8%) patients not directly switched but with a history of LEV use had predominantly psychiatric side effects during BRV treatment.. Overall, intolerability or ineffectiveness of prior treatment with LEV seems not to preclude a good response to BRV. BRV was substantially better tolerated than LEV.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To assess short-term and longer-term effects of brivaracetam (BRV) on cognition and behavior in a naturalistic clinical setting.. Analyses were based on 43 patients with epilepsy who had undergone a neuropsychological screening before adjunctive treatment with BRV and a follow-up evaluation either after 5 days or 25 weeks. The standard assessment focused on reaction times (Neurocog FX), attention and executive functions (EpiTrack), and verbal memory (short version of the VLMT). Self-perceived cognition and behavior was evaluated by an extended version of the Adverse Events Profile. In addition, health-related quality of life (QOLIE-10) was reassessed at the longer-term interval.. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant improvement under BRV with regard to attention and executive functions (p = .03) without an interaction with the length of the observation interval. A statistical trend in the same direction was also seen for the reaction times (p = .07), but not for the unchanged verbal memory performance. Subjective measures indicated improvements in concentration (p = .02) and especially in comprehension (p < .001), and health-related quality of life (p = .002). Mood and aggression scores were unchanged. At the longer-term follow-up, an at least 50 percent reduction in seizure frequency was observed in 53% of the patients, 21% were seizure free.. These preliminary data point to a favorable cognitive profile of BRV similar to its precursor levetiracetam. Objective gains in attention and executive functions were accompanied by self-reported improvements in concentration and comprehension. Future studies with larger sample sizes and better control conditions are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Attention; Cognition Disorders; Epilepsy; Executive Function; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Photic Stimulation; Pyrrolidinones; Quality of Life; Reaction Time; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odorants; Pyrrolidinones

To assess the efficiency of brivaracetam under real-world conditions in a tertiary referral epilepsy center.. We consecutively collected patients treated at our center with brivaracetam (BRV). After a minimum observation period of six months we retrospectively analyzed the efficiency of BRV.. Data of 101 patients (mean age 42 years, range 18-81 years, 54 females,) were analyzed. The median number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used prior to BRV was 10 (range 2-18). The initial dose of BRV was at least 50mg per day, the mean maintenance dose at cut-off was 168.6mg (median 200mg, range 50-400mg). Efficacy data were assessed for the last three months or at the time of the last observation carried forward if BRV had been discontinued prematurely. Responder rate was 27.8% (n=28) with 7% seizure-free patients. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 37 patients (37%). Most frequent AEs were dizziness (16%) and somnolence (11%). Psychiatric adverse events comprised irritability, aggression, depression and psychosis in single cases. Retention rate after six months was 51.5%. Main reason for discontinuation was a lack of efficacy. In 43 cases LEV and BRV were switched. The switch was performed abruptly without complications. In 26 cases (60%) BRV was discontinued and re-switched to LEV within weeks, mainly due to a lack of better efficacy. After the switch from LEV to BRV we even saw an aggravation both of seizure frequency and severity in 5 cases. Retention rate in patients who had not been on LEV was 57%.. In our hands BRV appeared to be well tolerated and easy to handle. The retention rate was influenced by patients who were switched from LEV and re-switched because BRV was not more efficient. Switching from and re-switching to LEV was easy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Drug Substitution; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate factors predicting efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice.. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients who started BRV between February and November 2016 with observation time between 3 and 12 months.. Of a total of 262 patients (mean age 40, range 5-81 years, 129 male) treated with BRV, 227 (87%) were diagnosed to have focal, 19 (7%) idiopathic generalized and 8 (3%) symptomatic generalized epilepsy, whereas 8 (3%) were unclassified. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 1 day to 12 months, with a median retention time of 6.1 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 1,504 months. The retention rate was 79.4% at 3 months and 75.8% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 41.2% (50% responder rate) with 14.9% seizure-free for 3 months and, at 6 months, 40.5% with 15.3% seizure-free. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 37.8% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, dizziness, and behavioral adverse events (BAEs). BAE that presented under previous levetiracetam (LEV) treatment improved upon switch to BRV in 57.1% (20/35) and LEV-induced somnolence improved in 70.8% (17/24). Patients with BAE on LEV were more likely to develop BAE on BRV (odds ratio [OR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-7.95).. BRV in broad clinical postmarketing use is a well-tolerated anticonvulsant drug with 50% responder rates, similar to those observed in the regulatory trials, even though 90% of the patients included had previously been exposed to LEV. An immediate switch from LEV to BRV at a ratio of 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible. The only independent significant predictor of efficacy was the start of BRV in patients not currently taking LEV. The occurrence of BAE during previous LEV exposure predicted poor psychobehavioral tolerability of BRV treatment. A switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV-induced BAE.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Brain Waves; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new antiepileptic drug candidate rationally designed for high affinity and selectivity for the synaptic vesicle protein 2A. This study explored anti-ictogenic and antiepileptogenic effects of BRV in rats at different stages of development.. Using a rapid kindling model in P14, P21, P28, and P60 rats, we studied two doses of BRV: 10 and 100 mg/kg injected intraperitoneally 30 min before afterdischarge assessment. We also assessed blood and brain concentrations of BRV 30 min after the injection.. BRV 100 mg/kg significantly increased the afterdischarge threshold (ADT) at all ages, whereas BRV at 10 mg/kg increased ADT in P60, P28, and P21 rats. BRV also shortens the afterdischarge duration (ADD), achieving statistical significance with 10 and 100 mg/kg at P60 and with 100 mg/kg at P21. At P60, BRV increases the number of stimulations required to achieve a stage 4-5 seizure in a dose-dependent manner. At P28 and P21, BRV increased the number of stimulations required to develop a stage 4-5 seizure in a dose-dependent manner with almost complete elimination of stage 4-5 seizures. In contrast, at P14, BRV had no effect on the number of stage 4-5 seizures. An age-related decrease in blood and brain concentrations of BRV was observed 30 min after injection of BRV 10 mg/kg, whereas with 100 mg/kg there were no significant age-correlated differences in brain and serum BRV concentrations.. BRV exerted dose-dependent anti-ictogenic effects from P60 to P14 independent of brain maturation. BRV also exhibited antiepileptogenic effects at P60, whereas this effect need to be further evaluated at P28 and P21. We did not observe any effect on epileptogenesis at P14 at either dose.

Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Stimulation; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Kindling, Neurologic; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Brain; Epilepsy; Humans; Ligands; Mice; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Tritium

Screening of 12,000 compounds for binding affinity to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), identified a high-affinity pyrrolidone derivative, brivaracetam (ucb 34714). This study examined its pharmacological profile in various in vitro and in vivo models of seizures and epilepsy, to evaluate its potential as a new antiepileptic drug.. The effects of brivaracetam and levetiracetam on epileptiform activity and seizure expression were examined in rat hippocampal slices, corneally kindled mice, audiogenic seizure-susceptible mice, maximal electroshock and pentylenetetrazol seizures in mice, hippocampal-kindled rats, amygdala-kindled rats and genetic absence epilepsy rats.. Brivaracetam and levetiracetam reduced epileptiform responses in rat hippocampal slices, brivaracetam being most potent. Brivaracetam also differed from levetiracetam by its ability to protect against seizures in normal mice induced by a maximal electroshock or maximal dose of pentylenetetrazol. In corneally kindled mice and hippocampal-kindled rats, brivaracetam induced potent protection against secondarily generalized motor seizures and showed anti-kindling properties superior to levetiracetam. In amygdala-kindled rats, brivaracetam induced a significant suppression in motor-seizure severity and, contrary to levetiracetam, reduced the after-discharge at a higher dose. Audiogenic seizure-susceptible mice were protected more potently against the expression of clonic convulsions by brivaracetam than by levetiracetam. Brivaracetam induced a more complete suppression of spontaneous spike-and-wave discharges in genetic absence epilepsy rats than levetiracetam.. Brivaracetam has higher potency and efficacy than levetiracetam as an anti-seizure and anti-epileptogenic agent in various experimental models of epilepsy, and a wide therapeutic index.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Electroshock; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Levetiracetam; Ligands; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mice; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Piracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures