tropisetron and Dizziness

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramosetron hydrochloride for the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy in patients with hematological malignancies. A total of 30 patients with hematological malignancies were included in the ramosetron group. Ramosetron (0.3 mg i.v.) was administered 0.5 h before chemotherapy. The impact of ramosetron on anorexia, nausea and vomiting as well as other adverse effects were assessed. Meanwhile, another 39 patients received tropisetron (o.d. for 3 days). As compared to the tropisetron group, the response rate of the ramosetron group in controlling anorexia within 18-24 h after chemotherapy was higher (p < 0.05); within 18-24 h after chemotherapy, the complete response rate and effective rate in controlling nausea was higher (p < 0.05); within 12-18 h and 18-24 h after chemotherapy, the complete response rate and effective rate in controlling vomiting was higher (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both groups. We conclude that ramosetron belongs to a new generation of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and that it is a safe, economic and effective antiemetic drug.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Appetite; Benzimidazoles; Constipation; Dizziness; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Flushing; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Headache; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Thirst; Treatment Outcome; Tropisetron; Vomiting

The anti-emetic efficacy of a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone was studied in 33 patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation. Another 50 patients receiving conventional anti-emetic therapies in bone marrow transplantation served as control. On the first and second days of preconditioning chemotherapy, 51% and 36% respectively of patients in the tropisetron and dexamethasone group did not experience vomiting, compared with only 12% and 10% of control group patients (P < 0.001). The mean number of episodes of vomiting in the tropisetron and dexamethasone group was also significantly lower than in the control group (0.97+/-1.65 vs 3.50+/-2.45 and 1.30+/-1.40 vs 4.44+/-2.91 respectively, both P < 0.001). Control of vomiting in the two groups was not significantly different during days 3-6. Analysis of patients receiving busulfan and cyclophosphamide as the preconditioning regimen still showed better anti-emetic control in the tropisetron and dexamethasone group than in the control group on the first two days of treatment (total control rate 33.3% vs 6.5% and 44.4% vs 12.9% respectively, P < 0.001). Patients given tropisetron and dexamethasone combination more frequently suffered from dizziness and burning sensation of the chest. However, diarrhea and extrapyramidal symptoms were the most frequent adverse effects seen after using conventional anti-emetic combination. The combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone was thus superior to conventional anti-emetic combinations in preventing vomiting during preconditioning period of bone marrow transplantation. The adverse effects of this combination were minimal and well tolerated by patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Busulfan; Carmustine; Child; Cyclophosphamide; Cytarabine; Dexamethasone; Dizziness; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Headache; Heartburn; Humans; Indoles; Leukemia; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Podophyllotoxin; Transplantation Conditioning; Tropisetron; Vomiting; Whole-Body Irradiation