tropisetron and Acute-Disease

The antiemetic effectiveness of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in combination with dexamethasone in patients receiving short-term infusion chemotherapy has been well demonstrated. Less information is available about the efficacy of the same antiemetic combination in patients treated with regimens of chemotherapy in which the drugs are delivered in continuous infusion of several hours. The purpose of this study was to report the effectiveness of a double administration of antiemetic drugs in patients treated with strong emesis-inducing drugs for several days. In this study, 19 male and 13 female patients with osteosarcoma, ages 9 to 45 years, treated with chemotherapy, received intravenous tropisetron 5 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg every 12 hours during the first two cycles of the preoperative treatment: cisplatin 120 mg/m2 over 48 hours followed by Adriamycin 75 mg/m2 delivered in 24 hours and continuous infusion of ifosfamide 15 g/m2 over 120 hours. The assessment of the antiemetic efficacy was performed three times every day: from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm, from 4:00 pm to 12:00 am, and from 12:00 am to 8:00 am. The patients were followed from the beginning of the treatment until 2 hours after its end, when they were discharged from hospital. Complete protection from emesis was obtained in 80% of the 256 days of treatment: 81% during the first cycle (cisplatin 120 mg/m2 in 48 hours followed by Adriamycin 75 mg/m2 delivered in 24 hours) and 79% during the second cycle (continuous infusion of ifosfamide 15 g/m2 in 120 hours). In both cycles, complete protection declined from the first to the last day of treatment (from 100% to 62% during the first cycle and from 100% to 63% during the second cycle). These results indicate that when chemotherapy is administered in a protracted infusion, higher doses of antiemetic agents are necessary to achieve acceptable antiemetic activity.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Child; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Doxorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Ifosfamide; Indoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Osteosarcoma; Serotonin Antagonists; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tropisetron; Vomiting

The antiemetic efficacy of granisetron, ondansetron and tropisetron was evaluated in patients treated with cisplatin-Adriamycin (CDP/ADM) and ifosfamide (IFO) by continuous infusion (CI). In all, 90 patients with osteosarcoma were randomly assigned to receive granisetron (2 mg/m2), or ondansetron (5.3 mg/m2), or tropisetron (3.3 mg/m2) plus dexamethasone 8 mg/m2. Chemotherapy consisted of CDP (120 mg/m2, 48-h CI) followed by ADM (75 mg/m2, 24-h CI) and then, in the second cycle, delivered 3 weeks later, IFO 15 g/m2 (120-h CI). Complete protection (CP) from emesis was obtained on 59% of the 717 days of treatment, without significant differences among the three study drugs. A significantly higher rate of CP was obtained during chemotherapy with IFO than with CDP/ ADM (69% vs 44%; P<0.0001). The rate of CP declined from the first to the last day of treatment for both CDP/ADM (61% to 27%, P<0.0001) and IFO (95% to 43%) cycles (P<0.0001). When CDP/ ADM and IFO are delivered on multiple days by CI, granisetron, ondansetron and tropisetron have the same antiemetic efficacy, which declines from the first day onward through successive days.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Cisplatin; Doxorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Extremities; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Ifosfamide; Indoles; Male; Ondansetron; Osteosarcoma; Tropisetron; Vomiting

Several studies have confirmed the efficacy of high-dose metoclopramide and, more recently, serotonin antagonists, with and without dexamethasone, in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Most of these trials have been reported from Western countries. There is little or no information about the efficacy and tolerability of these agents in ethnic groups in other countries. Furthermore, many patients in the developing countries cannot afford serotonin antagonists. The result is a critical need to evaluate these agents and justify their increasingly common use. The authors performed a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron with and without dexamethasone against high-dose metoclopramide cocktail in patients receiving a uniform dose of cisplatin (100 mg/m2). Metoclopramide 2 mg/kg was combined with clemastine, dexamethasone, and lorazepam. These drugs were initially repeated at short intervals and subsequently given in the oral form for the next 5 days. Tropisetron 5 mg was administered intravenously 15 minutes immediately before cisplatin therapy and followed up with oral therapy for 5 days. The third group received the same doses of tropisetron along with dexamethasone before cisplatin and twice daily thereafter. The authors randomized 301 episodes. The patient characteristics were well balanced between the three groups. Acute nausea and vomiting were completely prevented in almost two thirds of patients receiving metoclopramide and tropisetron plus dexamethasone. These results are significantly superior to those of tropisetron alone (p < 0.01). Similarly, delayed nausea and vomiting were significantly better controlled with metoclopramdie cocktail and tropisetron plus dexamethasone than with tropisetron alone. Side effects were generally mild; however, they were more frequent with metoclopramide. The authors conclude that metoclopramide-based combination antiemetic therapy continues to be a cheaper alternative to serotonin antagonists and equally effective. Metoclopramide-based therapy, however, is more labor intensive, and issues related to administrative errors, side effects, and compliance gain increasing importance. The identification of persons at a higher risk for metoclopramide-induced side effects may help minimize the unacceptable consequences of therapy.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Nausea; Prospective Studies; Serotonin Antagonists; Tropisetron; Vomiting

Tropisetron (Navoban") suppresses nausea and vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy by antagonizing central and peripheral 5-HT3 receptors. In this open-label study, tropisetron was evaluated in 873 patients who were either refractory to antiemetic treatment during previous chemotherapy or at high risk of emesis as a result of current chemotherapy. The most commonly used agents alone or in combination were cyclophosphamide (35%), fluorouracil (30%), carboplatin (24%) and cisplatin (21%). The primary tumors were breast cancer (27%), lung cancer (16%), gynecological cancers (12%) and lymphoma (9%). Tropisetron was administered as a 15 min infusion prior to chemotherapy and an additional oral 5 mg dose was taken by 80% of the patients on subsequent days. During course 1, complete response to tropisetron was obtained in 64% of patients on day 1, 54% on day 2, 63% on day 3, 71% on day 4 and 77% on day 5. Very similar response rates were found for the six chemotherapy courses. There were few failures after complete and partial response, at maximum 3 and 15%, respectively. Moreover, 24-38% of those with partial response and 7-29% of those with failure could achieve a complete response during the following cycle. The treatment was well tolerated, the most frequently reported adverse events being constipation (3.7%) and headache (2.6%).

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Serotonin Antagonists; Tropisetron; Vomiting

There is still controversy as to what constitutes the optimal therapy for acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced emesis and nausea. We conducted a three-armed randomized multi-centre study in 193 chemotherapy-naive patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy inducing both acute and delayed symptoms (cisplatin > or = 50 mg/m2, carboplatin > or = 300 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide > or = 750 mg/m2, ifosfamide > or = 1.5 g/m2 on day 1). Group A: 1 x 5 mg tropisetron i.v. on day 1 + 2, then 10 mg p.o. (oral dose now recommended: 5 mg); group B: tropisetron as for A+dexamethasone, 20 mg i.v., on days 1 + 2, then 4 mg i.v./p.o.; group C: tropisetron as for A+metoclopramide, 20 mg i.v. +2 x 10 mg p.o. on day 1, then 3 x 10 mg p.o. Treatment was continued for at least 2 days after the end of chemotherapy. Tropisetron+dexamethasone was significantly superior to tropisetron alone both for acute (P = 0.0064) and delayed (P = 0.0053) emesis. Complete control of acute and delayed emesis (nausea) was achieved in 80% (75%) and 53% (46%) in group A, 97% (90%) and 80% (58%) in group B, and 86% (80%) and 49% (45%) in group C. Patients completely asymptomatic during the whole cycle accounted for 26% of those in group A, 49% in group B and 28% in group C. The most frequent adverse events were constipation (16.6%), headache (7.3%) and tiredness (7.3%). Once-daily tropisetron+dexamethasone over several days is well tolerated and is a simple means of achieving further significant improvement in the efficacy of tropisetron against acute and delayed symptoms.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Dexamethasone; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Nausea; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Tropisetron; Vomiting

Topics: Acute Disease; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Granisetron; Humans; Indoles; Nausea; Ondansetron; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tropisetron

This randomised, open, parallel group study compared the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron with metoclopramide plus lorazepam in 102 patients receiving a first course of non-cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Control of acute vomiting by tropisetron was significantly superior to that of the metoclopramide regimen, with total control (no vomiting) in 45% of 51 patients in the tropisetron group compared with 22% of 51 patients in the metoclopramide group (P = 0.013); total and partial control (< 5 vomits) occurred in 67 and 47% of patients, respectively (P = 0.044). The incidences of acute nausea and of delayed nausea and emesis were similar in the two treatment groups. Both tropisetron and metoclopramide were well tolerated; no adverse effects were attributed to tropisetron administration with the exception of headache. One patient in the metoclopramide group reported confusion and tremor thought to be related to the antiemetic therapy. Tropisetron is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced vomiting. The control of acute nausea was similar in the two treatment groups, but tropisetron was superior to a metoclopramide-based regimen in the control of acute vomiting.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Nausea; Tropisetron; Vomiting

Forty-seven patients receiving non-cisplatin-containing chemotherapy were entered in a prospective study in which the efficacy of ondansetron plus dexamethasone and tropisetron plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting was evaluated. Thirty-nine patients were evaluable for cross-over analysis. During the 24 hours following the start of chemotherapy, 97% of patients on ondansetron plus dexamethasone reported total control of vomiting compared with 82% of those on tropisetron plus dexamethasone (p = 0.026). Thus, both 5-HT3- receptor antagonists combined with dexamethasone were highly effective in controlling acute vomiting induced by non-cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The observed difference between the treatments may be caused by different dose schedules of ondansetron and tropisetron. A double-blind design with equal number of placebo-controlled administrations is needed to ascertain whether there is a significant pharmacological difference between ondansetron and tropisetron.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Ondansetron; Serotonin Antagonists; Tropisetron; Vomiting

Acute pancreatitis (AP) causes morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to investigate the protective effect of tropisetron against AP induced by cerulein. Cerulein (50μg/kg, 5 doses) was used to induce AP in mice. Six hours after final cerulein injection, animals were decapitated. Hepatic/pancreatic enzymes in the serum, pancreatic content of malondialdehyde (MDA), pro-inflammatory cytokines and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity were measured. Tropisetron significantly attenuated pancreatic injury markers and decreased the amount of elevated serum amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), MPO activities and pro-inflammatory cytokines levels caused by AP in mice. Tropisetron didn't affect the pancreatic levels of MDA. Our results suggest that tropisetron could attenuate cerulein-induced AP by combating inflammatory signaling. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm its efficacy in patients with AP.

Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Ceruletide; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Indoles; Lipase; Male; Malondialdehyde; Mice; NF-kappa B; Pancreas; Pancreatitis; Peroxidase; Protective Agents; Signal Transduction; Tropisetron

The 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonists, including tropisetron, ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron are agents used effectively for supportive care. They are used for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced emesis. Despite their overall excellent safety profile, some electrocardiographic changes related to heart rate and repolarization were reported. Ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron were studied on this manner. But to our knowledge, there is no information about the cardiac side effects of tropisetron. In this study, we aimed to determine the acute effects of tropisetron on ECG parameters related to repolarization, heart rate, and systemic blood pressure.. Fifty-five cancer patients who received tropisetron for the prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting were enrolled into this single center, prospective study. Standard 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at baseline and 30 min after tropisetron (5 mg given over 1 min IV bolus) administration. P wave durations and corrected QT intervals were measured; P wave dispersion and QTc dispersion were calculated.. In comparison with baseline, mean heart rate significantly decreased 30 min after administration of tropisetron. Tropisetron did not result in a significant change in P wave duration, corrected QT interval, P dispersion, and QTc dispersion.. In this study, tropisetron did not show any ventricular and atrial arrhythmogenic effect because of repolarization abnormalities. Only it may cause a slight decrease in heart rate.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiotoxins; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pilot Projects; Tropisetron

Tropisetron is a novel selective antagonist of the type-3 serotonin (5-HT3) receptor, with proven efficacy in the control of emesis related to cancer treatment. Epirubicin in doses of > 100 mg/m2 has a high emetogenic potential. This study was designed to determine whether a single intravenous administration of tropisetron could prevent acute nausea and vomiting in patients treated with high dose epirubicin. Forty chemotherapy naive breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin at a dose of 110 mg/m2 on an outpatient basis were enrolled in the study. Tropisetron 5 mg i.v. was used as antiemetic prophylaxis. "On demand" treatment with tropisetron 5 mg p.os was used for the rescue of patients who failed on the initial i.v. dose. Complete control of acute nausea and vomiting had 62.5% (95% C.I. 47.2-77.8), partial control 15% (95% C.I. 3.8-26.2) and 22.5% (95% C.I. 9.3-35.7) insufficient control or failure. Headache was the most common adverse event reported in 3 patients (7.5%) and constipation in 2 patients (5%). Interestingly, patients with a negative experience of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy and those treated for metastatic disease, had a better control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In conclusion, a single 5 mg i.v. dose of tropisetron is safe and effective in preventing acute emesis in patients treated with high dose epirubicin.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antiemetics; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Modality Therapy; Constipation; Epirubicin; Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Headache; Humans; Indoles; Injections, Intravenous; Middle Aged; Nausea; Treatment Outcome; Tropisetron; Vomiting

Intraplantar administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists ICS 205-930 and MDL 72222 (1-100 micrograms; 50 microliters) produced dose-related analgesia against formalin-induced acute- and Freunds adjuvant-induced chronic-inflammatory pain in rats. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists had greater effect in the chronic pain test than in the acute paradigm. In both tests, ICS 205-930 was more potent than MDL 72222. These data further support the involvement of peripheral 5-HT3 sites in inflammatory pain, and suggest the utility of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists as peripheral analgesics.

Topics: Acute Disease; Analgesics; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease; Indoles; Male; Nociceptors; Pain Measurement; Rats; Serotonin Antagonists; Tropanes; Tropisetron