trimethoprim--sulfamethoxazole-drug-combination and Ascites

Bacterial infections are well described complications of cirrhosis that greatly increase mortality rates. Two factors play important roles in the development of bacterial infections in these patients: the severity of liver disease and gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The most common infections are spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and sepsis. Gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria are equal causative organisms. For primary prophylaxis, short-term antibiotic treatment (oral norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin) is indicated in cirrhotic patients (with or without ascites) admitted with gastrointestinal haemorrhage (variceal or non-variceal). Administration of norfloxacin is advisable for hospitalized patients with low ascitic protein even without gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The first choice in empirical treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is the iv. III. generation cephalosporin; which can be switched for a targeted antibiotic regime based on the result of the culture. The duration of therapy is 5-8 days. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and fluoroquinolones--patients not on prior quinolone prophylaxis--were shown to be as effective and safe as cefotaxime. In patients with evidence of improvement, iv. antibiotics can be switched safely to oral antibiotics after 2 days. In case of renal dysfunction, iv albumin should also be administered. Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in patients who have recovered from an episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (secondary prevention). For "selective intestinal decontamination", poorly absorbed oral norfloxacin is the preferred schedule. Oral ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin (added gram positive spectrum) all the more are reasonable alternatives. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is only for patients who are intolerant to quinolones. Prophylaxis is indefinite until disappearance of ascites, transplant or death. Long-term prophylaxis is currently not recommended for patients without previous spontaneous bacterial peritonitis episode, not even when refractory ascites or low ascites protein content is present.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ascites; Bacteremia; Bacterial Infections; Cefotaxime; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Fluoroquinolones; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Liver Cirrhosis; Norfloxacin; Peritonitis; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Primary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Urinary Tract Infections

Bacterial infection is a major cause of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious and common infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Secondary prophylactic antibiotic therapy has been shown to improve outcomes after an episode of SBP but primary prophylaxis to prevent the first episode of SBP remains contentious. The aim of this trial is to assess whether primary antibiotic prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole improves overall survival compared to placebo in adults with cirrhosis and ascites.. The ASEPTIC trial is a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in England, Scotland, and Wales. Patients aged 18 years and older with cirrhosis and ascites requiring diuretic treatment or paracentesis, and no current or previous episodes of SBP, are eligible, subject to exclusion criteria. The trial aims to recruit 432 patients from at least 30 sites. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral co-trimoxazole 960 mg or an identical placebo once daily for 18 months, with 6 monthly follow-up visits thereafter (with a maximum possible follow-up period of 48 months, and a minimum of 18 months). The primary outcome is overall survival. Secondary outcomes include the time to the first incidence of SBP, hospital admission rates, incidence of other infections (including Clostridium difficile) and antimicrobial resistance, patients' health-related quality of life, health and social care resource use, incidence of cirrhosis-related decompensation events, liver transplantation, and treatment-related serious adverse events.. This trial will investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of co-trimoxazole for patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites to determine whether this strategy improves clinical outcomes. Given there are no treatments that improve survival in decompensated cirrhosis outside of liver transplant, if the trial has a positive outcome, we anticipate widespread adoption of primary antibiotic prophylaxis.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT043955365 . Registered on 18 April 2020. Research ethical approval was granted by the Research Ethics Committee (South Central - Oxford B; REC 19/SC/0311) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Ascites; Bacterial Infections; Diuretics; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Peritonitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

To assess the efficacy and safety of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.. A randomized controlled trial.. University-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center.. 60 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and ascites.. Consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive either no prophylaxis or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, one double-strength tablet daily, five times a week (Monday through Friday). Patient entry was stratified by serum bilirubin (> 51 mumol/L [> 3 mg/dL]), ascitic fluid protein (< 1 g/dL), and serum creatinine (> 177 mumol/L [> 2 mg/dL]) levels to ensure that high-risk patients would be similarly distributed in the two groups. The median duration of follow-up for the study patients was 90 days.. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or spontaneous bacteremia as defined by objective criteria.. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or spontaneous bacteremia developed in 27% (8 of 30) of patients who did not receive prophylaxis compared with 3% (1 of 30) of patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.025). Overall, infections developed in 9 of 30 patients (30%) not receiving prophylaxis and in 1 of 30 patients (3%) receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.012). Death occurred in 6 of 30 patients (20%) who did not receive prophylaxis and in 2 of 30 patients (7%) who received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.15). Side effects--particularly, hematologic toxicity--could not be attributed to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in any patient.. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was efficacious, safe, and cost-effective for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis.

Topics: Ascites; Bacteremia; Bacterial Infections; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Peritonitis; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Topics: Abdominal Cavity; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Ascites; Cefotaxime; Diagnosis, Differential; Diet, Sodium-Restricted; Diuretics; Edema; Humans; Inflammation; Liver Cirrhosis; Lower Extremity; Male; Norfloxacin; Paracentesis; Peritonitis; Spironolactone; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Ultrasonography

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Ascites; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic; Male; Norfloxacin; Peritonitis; Staphylococcaceae; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Selective intestinal decontamination with norfloxacin is useful in preventing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients and also in cirrhotic rats. The emergence of norfloxacin-resistant infections in these patients warrants a search for alternative therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole administration on carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) -induced cirrhosis in rats with specific attention to intestinal flora, bacterial translocation, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and survival. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received CCl4 administered weekly by gavage. After eight weeks of CCl4 administration rats were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I received daily overnight trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole diluted in phenobarbital water during follow-up and group II did not. The rats were killed when gravely ill, and a laparotomy was performed to culture samples of cecal stool, mesenteric lymph nodes, and portal and inferior vena caval blood. There was a trend toward a reduction in the incidence of bacterial translocation (8/17 vs 11/14, respectively) and SBP (5/17 vs 7/14, respectively) in treated rats that were killed just before death compared to untreated rats. A decrease in the incidence of bacterial translocation caused by gram-negative bacilli was observed in group I (17.6% vs 78.6%, P < 0.01). The development of ascites was delayed in group I (P < 0.05) and survival was prolonged in group I (P < 0.05), despite a higher CCl4 dose in this group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, long-term prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole administration in CCl4-induced cirrhosis in rats delayed the development of ascites, prolonged survival, and reduced the incidence of gram-negative bacterial translocation but not of SBP, without increasing gram-positive episodes. These data suggest that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole might be a good alternative to norfloxacin for preventing gram-negative bacterial translocation.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Ascites; Bacterial Translocation; Carbon Tetrachloride Poisoning; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental; Male; Peritonitis; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination