tranilast and Coronary-Restenosis

tranilast has been researched along with Coronary-Restenosis* in 17 studies

Reviews

7 review(s) available for tranilast and Coronary-Restenosis

ArticleYear
Pharmacological inhibition of coronary restenosis: systemic and local approaches.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:15

    Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation has revolutionized the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. However, the main limitation of this therapy is stent failure, which is usually caused by in-stent restenosis.. The aim of this article is to critically review the literature on the prevention of in-stent restenosis focusing on drug compounds that have reached clinical testing.. The pathophysiological response following PCI includes many possible targets for antirestenosis treatment. Most notable success is seen with sirolimus (and its analogs) and paclitaxel, both of which target vascular smooth muscular cell proliferation. In view of the systemic side effects of both drugs, the high efficacy of local drug delivery methods reduced enthusiasm for systemic therapy. Cilastazol has shown benefit in restenosis reduction particularly in patients at high risk for stent failure, though further study in broader populations is warranted. Probucol showed variable results, but local drug delivery in combination with sirolimus seems promising. A hypothesized independent antirestenotic effect of pioglitazone in patients with diabetes has not been clearly demonstrated. Initial encouraging results with tranilast have not been replicated in a recent large-scale randomized trial. Colchicine and prednisone have shown promising results but require further investigation in larger clinical trials.

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antioxidants; Cilostazol; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Probucol; Sirolimus; Tetrazoles; Tubulin Modulators; Vasodilator Agents

2014
Understanding the role of transforming growth factor-beta1 in intimal thickening after vascular injury.
    Cardiovascular research, 2007, May-01, Volume: 74, Issue:2

    Intimal thickening is the most important cause of in-stent restenosis. The pathology of intimal thickening is attributable to a local inflammatory response after vascular injury which results in the production of cytokines. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is a profibrotic cytokine that is involved in the induction of intimal thickening. Up-regulation of TGF-beta1 after arterial injury results in the activation of various downstream pathways which stimulate the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, as well as the production of local extracellular matrix proteins. Recent evidence suggests that antagonizing TGF-beta1 activity with direct or indirect inhibitors may attenuate or prevent intimal thickening. Additionally, TGF-beta1 synthesis, activation and downstream regulation may also serve as significant sources of treatment. This review attempts to show the role of TGF-beta1 in the pathology of intimal thickening and underlines the importance of TGF-beta1 as a target for therapy.

    Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Restenosis; Extracellular Matrix Proteins; Humans; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Signal Transduction; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Transforming Growth Factor beta3; Tunica Intima; Up-Regulation

2007
Pharmacologic approaches to restenosis prevention.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2007, Sep-03, Volume: 100, Issue:5A

    Despite significant advances in technology and technique, coronary restenosis remains the primary limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Among patients undergoing PTCA, between 20% and 50% of patients who do not receive a stent and 10%-30% of those who do receive a stent develop restenosis within 6 months of the procedure. Drug-eluting stents, which release high local concentrations of antiproliferative or immunosuppressive agents directly into the vessel wall at the site of the lesion, have dramatically reduced the incidence of restenosis in patients undergoing PTCA. However, even with drug-eluting stents, a significant percentage of higher-risk patients develop in-stent restenosis. These data suggest that a role remains for effective, well-tolerated systemic pharmacologic therapies to further reduce the rate of restenosis. To date, the majority of systemic agents tested for restenosis prevention have failed to show significant benefit. Only 2 agents, probucol and cilostazol, have consistently demonstrated efficacy in preventing restenosis. In addition, the investigational agent AGI-1067 has demonstrated promising efficacy in early clinical trials. Together with drug-eluting stents, these therapies may for the first time reduce the rate of restenosis to near zero, even in high-risk patients, such as individuals with diabetes mellitus.

    Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cilostazol; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Pioglitazone; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Probucol; Risk Factors; Stents; Tetrazoles; Thiazolidinediones; Trapidil; Treatment Outcome

2007
[Drug eluting stents: from evidence based medicine to clinical practice].
    Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie, 2005, Volume: 54, Issue:4

    Drug eluting stents have been developed in order to reduce in-stent restenosis observed with a 20 to 40% rate in bare-stents. Neoinitimal smooth muscular cells proliferation have been characterized as the corner stone of in-stent restenosis. Consequently, many anti-mitotic and anti-inflammatory drugs have been evaluated in a new stent generation, so called coated stents or drug eluting stents. Three major components must be considered to evaluate the beneficial effects: the bare-stent, the drug, and the deliverance system, most usually a polymer. For the present, sirolimus eluting stent and paclitaxel eluting stent are available in the market with the european conformity label considering evidence based medicine established in randomized trials. Both stents have been shown to reduce in-stent restenosis incidence to less than 7%. Long-term follow-up still remain expected and would give answers to two safety queries: what is about the incidence of late stent thrombosis, what is about mal-apposition consequences in clinical feature. Utilization of drug eluting stent in clinical practice must considered materials with european conformity and must applied French society of cardiology guidelines restricting implantation to patients who meet high-risk restenosis criteria. Medicoeconomic approach must be considered beneficial at the present only in patients with high restenosis risk. Long-term antiplatelet regimen of aspirin and clopidogrel must be considered to avoid late stent thrombosis.

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Stents; Tacrolimus

2005
Therapeutic potential of oral antiproliferative agents in the prevention of coronary restenosis.
    Drugs, 2004, Volume: 64, Issue:21

    The treatment of coronary artery disease has reached many milestones - from balloon angioplasty to drug-eluting stents. The last decade witnessed the revolution of bare metal stents with new designs, alloys and strut thicknesses. Yet restenosis, the aphorismic 'Achilles heel', remains to be conquered. The restenosis rates with balloon angioplasty alone are 30-40% and are reduced to 20-30% with stents. Although intravascular brachytherapy proved to be a durable and safely used technique to treat in-stent restenosis, clinical event rates were not reduced to single digits.Drug-eluting stents are showing positive results in this direction, but it is too early to predict their efficacy in various subsets of lesions. With the increased usage of these stents, there are reports of problems such as late stent malapposition, subacute and late thromboses, and aneurysm formations due to the vessel toxicity associated with this method of treatment. Furthermore, when multivessel stenting is considered, the cost of drug-eluting stents is a significant problem given the fact that these are no longer 'zero restenosis' devices. There is a definite need for a simple, safe and durable solution to restenosis. Oral agents are an alternative delivery strategy that can target multiple coronary lesions, which are targets for catheter-based revascularisation with any approved metal stent and with potentially lower cost. Although oral agents have been an interesting option to treat restenosis and several agents have been tested in trials since the 1980s, the results were disappointing. The development of devices such as intravascular ultrasound has led to a greater understanding of restenosis mechanisms, and the focus on pathophysiological mechanisms, which centred mainly on platelets, growth factors and lipids, has changed to inflammation, endothelium and smooth muscle cell proliferation.Accordingly, the targets of pharmaceutical agents have shifted from platelets to cell cycle inhibition, smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, synthesis of extra cellular matrix, and inflammatory mediators. Initial encouraging results with oral drugs such as cilostazol, sirolimus (rapamycin) and thiazolidinediones indicate a definite place for this strategy to reduce restenosis. A desirable oral agent would be anti-inflammatory, inhibit smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation, promote endothelial growth, and be well tolerated and free from significant adverse effects. It may be use

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Prednisolone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Treatment Failure

2004
[Prevention of postangioplasty restenosis].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2003, Volume: 61 Suppl 4

    Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Atherectomy, Coronary; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Humans; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Paclitaxel; Probucol; Radiotherapy; Sirolimus; Stents; Trapidil

2003
Pharmacologic prevention of both restenosis and atherosclerosis progression: AGI-1067, probucol, statins, folic acid and other therapies.
    Current opinion in lipidology, 2003, Volume: 14, Issue:6

    In this article, the authors intend to provide an update on clinical trials of pharmacologic prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions, placed in the perspective of the use of orally administered therapy for the prevention of atherosclerosis progression and clinical events.. AGI-1067, the mono-succinic acid ester of probucol, is a phenolic antioxidant member of a novel class of agents termed v-protectants. It has strong antioxidant properties equipotent to those of probucol and antiinflammatory properties. It inhibits gene expression of VCAM-1 and MCP-1 and has been effective at preventing atherosclerosis in all tested animal models including the non-human primate. In the Canadian Antioxidant Restenosis Trial (CART) 1, AGI-1067 and probucol improved lumen dimensions at the site of percutaneous coronary intervention. AGI-1067 also improved luminal dimensions of non-intervened coronary reference segments in the Canadian Antioxidant Restenosis Trial, which suggests a direct antiatherosclerosis effect. Probucol reduced post-percutaneous coronary intervention restenosis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in other clinical trials. Although statins reduce atherosclerotic events, they do not appear to have a significant effect on restenosis. The failure of folate therapy to protect against restenosis in the Folate After Coronary Intervention Trial (FACIT) occurred despite significant reductions in homocysteine levels.. Prevention of both post-percutaneous coronary intervention restenosis and atherosclerosis progression with a pharmacologic agent such as AGI-1067 may be an attractive treatment paradigm. Two important trials that test the antioxidant/antiinflammatory hypothesis are ongoing with AGI-1067: the Canadian Atherosclerosis and Restenosis Trial 2, which assesses its value for the reduction of both atherosclerosis progression and post-percutaneous coronary interventions restenosis, and the Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events (ARISE) trial which is evaluating its effects on cardiovascular events.

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antioxidants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Folic Acid; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Oxidative Stress; Probucol; Sirolimus; Vitamins

2003

Trials

4 trial(s) available for tranilast and Coronary-Restenosis

ArticleYear
Nine-month outcome of patients treated by percutaneous coronary interventions for bifurcation lesions in the recent era: a report from the Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, Aug-16, Volume: 46, Issue:4

    The aim of this research was to determine the influence of bifurcation lesions on the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the recent era.. The treatment of bifurcation lesions by PCI has been associated with an increased complication rate. Whether recent improvements of interventional practice have translated into improved outcomes in this patient subgroup is unknown.. The 11,482 patients enrolled in the Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) were stratified according to the presence (n = 1,412) or absence (n = 10,068) of at least one bifurcation lesion treated by PCI. Baseline characteristics and outcome of patients undergoing PCI for bifurcation lesions were compared to those of patients treated for nonbifurcation lesions.. Patients treated for bifurcation lesions were less likely to have prior myocardial infarction (MI), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and had a higher proportion of current stable angina (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Bifurcation lesions involved more frequently the left anterior descending coronary artery and were more complex (angulated, eccentric, ostial, and tortuous) than nonbifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions was characterized by less frequent stent implantation (71% vs. 80%); PCI of bifurcation lesions was associated with an increased rate of combined end point death/MI/target vessel revascularization (TVR) at nine months (18% vs. 15%, p = 0.002) because of increased rates of TVR (17% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), whereas death (1%) and MI (1%) were not different between groups.. Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions is associated with higher TVR at follow-up. However, the risk of death, MI, death/MI was similar in patients treated for bifurcation or nonbifurcation lesions.

    Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

2005
Outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era: a report from the Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial.
    Circulation, 2004, Feb-03, Volume: 109, Issue:4

    Diabetes portends an adverse prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether improvements in current clinical practice (stents, IIb/IIIa antagonists) have resulted in substantial improvement of these outcomes remains an issue. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of diabetes on 9-month outcomes of patients undergoing PCI in the current era.. The 11 482 patients enrolled in the Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) Trial were stratified according to the presence (n=2694) or absence (n=8798) of diabetes. Diabetic patients were older; were more likely to be female; had a higher proportion of congestive failure, hypertension, prior CABG, and unstable angina; and had higher body mass index and lower ejection fraction than nondiabetic patients (P<0.01 for all comparisons). The degree of multivessel disease was similar between the two groups. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C lesions were more common in diabetic patients (17% versus 15%, P<0.01). Angiographic and procedural success rates and in-hospital events were similar between the two groups. The primary end point of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) was analyzed as time-to-first event within 9 months of the index PCI. After adjusting for certain baseline characteristics, diabetes was independently associated with death at 9 months (relative risk [RR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.68, P<0.01) and with an increased likelihood of TVR (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.42, P<0.01), as well as the composite end point of death/myocardial infarction/TVR (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.40, P<0.01).. Despite advances in interventional techniques, diabetes remains a significant independent predictor of adverse events in the intermediate term after PCI.

    Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Stents; Treatment Outcome

2004
Results of Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial.
    Circulation, 2002, Sep-03, Volume: 106, Issue:10

    Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a major problem affecting 15% to 30% of patients after stent placement. No oral agent has shown a beneficial effect on restenosis or on associated major adverse cardiovascular events. In limited trials, the oral agent tranilast has been shown to decrease the frequency of angiographic restenosis after PCI.. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tranilast (300 and 450 mg BID for 1 or 3 months), 11 484 patients were enrolled. Enrollment and drug were initiated within 4 hours after successful PCI of at least 1 vessel. The primary end point was the first occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 9 months and was 15.8% in the placebo group and 15.5% to 16.1% in the tranilast groups (P=0.77 to 0.81). Myocardial infarction was the only component of major adverse cardiovascular events to show some evidence of a reduction with tranilast (450 mg BID for 3 months): 1.1% versus 1.8% with placebo (P=0.061 for intent-to-treat population). The primary reason for not completing treatment was > or =1 hepatic laboratory test abnormality (11.4% versus 0.2% with placebo, P<0.01). In the angiographic substudy composed of 2018 patients, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was measured by quantitative coronary angiography. At follow-up, MLD was 1.76+/-0.77 mm in the placebo group, which was not different from MLD in the tranilast groups (1.72 to 1.78+/-0.76 to 80 mm, P=0.49 to 0.89). In a subset of these patients (n=1107), intravascular ultrasound was performed at follow-up. Plaque volume was not different between the placebo and tranilast groups (39.3 versus 37.5 to 46.1 mm(3), respectively; P=0.16 to 0.72).. Tranilast does not improve the quantitative measures of restenosis (angiographic and intravascular ultrasound) or its clinical sequelae.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography

2002
The impact of tranilast on restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the Second Tranilast Restenosis Following Angioplasty Trial (TREAT-2).
    American heart journal, 2002, Volume: 143, Issue:3

    The Tranilast Restenosis Following Angioplasty Trial showed that oral administration of 600 mg/day of tranilast for 3 months markedly reduced the restenosis rate after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for de novo lesions.. We conducted the second multicenter, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. A total of 297 patients with 329 lesions were randomly assigned to treatment with tranilast or a placebo for 3 months after successful PTCA for both de novo and restenotic lesions. Angiographic follow-up examination was done at 3 months, and angiograms were interpreted with a quantitative approach.. Two hundred thirty-nine lesions (72.6%) in 216 of the patients (72.7%) met the criteria and were included in the assessment of restenosis. Lesion restenosis was defined as a loss of 50% or more of the initial gain, and the restenosis rates were 18.8% in the tranilast group (n = 112) and 44.1% in the placebo group (n = 127; P =.00005). The restenosis rate, defined as a percent stenosis of > or = 50% at follow-up examination, was also significantly lower in the tranilast group (25.9% versus 41.9%; P =.012). The numbers of restenotic lesions were 38 (33.9% of 112) in the tranilast group and 30 (23.6% of 127) in the placebo group. In restenotic lesions, the lesion restenosis rate was significantly lower in the tranilast subgroup (18.4% versus 53.3% with the first restenosis criterion; P =.004).. The oral administration of tranilast for 3 months markedly reduced the restenosis rate after PTCA, even in restenotic lesions.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Statistics as Topic

2002

Other Studies

6 other study(ies) available for tranilast and Coronary-Restenosis

ArticleYear
Metal allergy to everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium stents confirmed by positive skin testing as a cause of recurrent multivessel in-stent restenosis.
    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2016, Volume: 87, Issue:4

    A 54-year-old woman treated with cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents (CoCr-EES) for her left distal circumflex and diagonal branch lesions suffered from repeated in-stent restenosis in both lesions. Neointimal proliferation occurred rapidly and almost simultaneously in the two lesions. The cause was established to be metal allergy, as determined by patch tests which were strongly positive for bare metal stents and weakly positive for CoCr-EES. Following the third successive angioplasty, we initiated treatment with prednisolone (30 mg daily) and the anti-allergic and anti-proliferative drug tranilast (300 mg daily). An elective angiogram performed 3 months later showed no evidence of in-stent restenosis in any of the stented lesions. Furthermore, the patient has remained angina-free for 15 months. The unique features of this case include: (1) near-simultaneous repeated multivessel in-stent restenosis in a patient with skin test-documented metal allergy to cobalt-chromium stents; (2) adjunctive systemic medical therapy with prednisolone and tranilast appeared to terminate the malignant restenotic cycle.

    Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Middle Aged; Neointima; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Patch Tests; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prednisolone; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

2016
Geographical differences in the rates of angiographic restenosis and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization after percutaneous coronary interventions: results from the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) Trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006, Jan-03, Volume: 47, Issue:1

    Many cardiologists consider it reasonable to assume in clinical practice that percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents ought to be considered equivalent, if not superior, to bypass surgery. In the absence of a definitive clinical trial to support this view, how should the prudent, cutting-edge cardiologist proceed?. This study assessed the geographical differences in target vessel revascularization (TVR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial.. An aggressive approach to PCI is more common in the U.S. than in other countries. The impact of this approach on restenosis outcomes has not been studied.. Using the PRESTO trial, we compared nine-month ischemic TVR after PCI in U.S.-treated patients (n = 5,026) with rates in other countries (n = 6,458). We defined TVR as repeat intervention for chest pain/positive stress test. Additionally, angiographic restenosis (> or =50% narrowing or > or =50% loss of gain at nine-month follow-up) was compared between U.S. and non-U.S. patients within the prespecified angiographic subset (n = 2,823). Regression models were developed to adjust for clinical and lesion-related characteristics.. Higher rates of TVR (18% vs. 11%), and angiographic restenosis (65% vs. 48%) were observed in patients treated in the U.S. as compared with the other patients (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Patients treated in the U.S. were more likely to be female, diabetic, not currently smoking, to have unstable angina, and to have a prior PCI. In U.S. patients, lesions tended to be longer, but less likely to be American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class C. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic variables, PCI in the U.S. was still associated with increased angiographic restenosis and ischemic TVR.. Angiographic restenosis and ischemia-driven TVR rates were higher in patients treated in the U.S. The difference could only partially be explained by the higher prevalence of measured adverse clinical and angiographic features.

    Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Australia; Canada; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Europe; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retreatment; South Africa; Treatment Outcome; United States

2006
Relation of metformin treatment to clinical events in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous intervention.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2004, Jun-01, Volume: 93, Issue:11

    Diabetic patients undergoing coronary interventions have worse clinical and angiographic outcomes than do patients without diabetes. Metformin, an insulin sensitizer, may decrease the occurrence of these outcomes. Diabetic patients in the Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes Trial were identified through their medical records (n = 2,772). In this trial, 1,110 diabetic patients received nonsensitizer therapy (insulin and/or sulfonylureas) and 887 received sensitizer therapy (metformin with or without additional therapy). Logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) (sensitizer vs nonsensitizer therapy) of any clinical event (death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) and adjusted for multiple risk factors. Multivariate analysis showed no effect of lesion characteristics on clinical outcomes. Compared with patients on nonsensitizer therapy, those on sensitizer therapy showed an adjusted OR of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.91, p = 0.005) for any clinical event. The differences between the nonsensitizer therapy group and the sensitizer group were attributable mainly to decreased rates of death (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.77, p = 0.007) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.66, p = 0.002). In our retrospective analysis, use of metformin in diabetics undergoing coronary interventions appeared to decrease adverse clinical events, especially death and myocardial infarction, compared with diabetic patients treated with nonsensitizer therapy.

    Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Restenosis; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Logistic Models; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies

2004
Highlights from the American Heart Association annual scientific sessions 2001: November 11 to 14, 2001.
    American heart journal, 2002, Volume: 143, Issue:2

    Topics: American Heart Association; Antineoplastic Agents; Carotid Artery Diseases; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents

2002
Tranilast prevents activation of transforming growth factor-beta system, leukocyte accumulation, and neointimal growth in porcine coronary arteries after stenting.
    Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2002, Jun-01, Volume: 22, Issue:6

    N(3,4-dimethoxycinnamoyl) anthranilic acid (tranilast) prevents the synchronous upregulation of isoforms and receptors of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta system after arterial injury and reduces restenosis after human coronary angioplasty. However, the effects of tranilast and the importance of the TGF-beta system in stent restenosis, in which inward remodeling is unimportant but inflammatory cell stimulation of neointima formation is exaggerated, are uncertain. Boston minipigs, treated with tranilast or vehicle, were subjected to endoluminal stenting, and the expression of TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta3, the expression of their signaling receptors ALK-5 and TbetaR-II, leukocyte numbers around the stent struts, and neointima development were assessed over 28 days. Stenting greatly increased early (5-day) mRNA expression of the 2 TGF-beta isoforms and their receptors. Immunohistochemical localization later showed that their concentrations were greatest in regions adjacent to stent struts, where leukocytes and collagen deposition were prevalent. Tranilast suppressed these elevations in TGF-beta mRNAs and reduced their immunoreactive peptides detectable around stent struts. The accumulation of leukocytes and deposition of collagen in these regions was also greatly inhibited by tranilast. These effects were associated with a 48% reduction in maximal neointimal cross-sectional area and 43% reduction in mean neointimal cross-sectional area at 28 days (P<0.05). We conclude that tranilast suppresses neointima development after stenting, effects that can be at least partly attributed to its ability to attenuate the induction of the TGF-beta system and leukocyte accumulation around stent struts.

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Administration Schedule; Hyperplasia; Inflammation; Leukocytosis; Male; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Stents; Swine; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Tunica Intima; Up-Regulation

2002
Late-breaking clinical trials at the American Heart Association's scientific sessions 2001.
    Circulation, 2001, Nov-20, Volume: 104, Issue:21

    Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Restenosis; Heart Diseases; Heart Failure; Humans; ortho-Aminobenzoates; Propafenone

2001