trandolapril and Proteinuria

Trandolapril is a well known angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with many cardiovascular (CV) indications. The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of trandolapril and to focus on its clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine. Various populations have been studied in large clinical trials including patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), diabetics, patients with hypertension (HTN), stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and prevention of proteinuria. Long-term treatment with trandolapril in patients with reduced left ventricular function soon after AMI significantly reduced the risk of overall mortality, mortality from CV causes, sudden death, and the development of severe CHF. Treatment with trandolapril after AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction appears to be of considerable importance in patients with diabetes mellitus by saving lives and substantially reducing the risk of progression to severe CHF as well. Moreover, trandolapril reduces progression to proteinuria in high-risk patients. Some of the advantages of trandolapril over other ACE inhibitors are the wide spectrum of patient populations studied, the well established dosage and its proven trough-to-peak effect ratios permitting a safe once-a-day administration.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Drug Administration Schedule; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Indoles; Myocardial Infarction; Proteinuria; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

SEVERAL MECHANISMS: The progression in renal failure first implies hemodynamic mechanisms and among which angiotensin II has a central role, but also an increase in proteinuria and the induction of many inflammatory and mitogenic mediators that enhance fibrosis (TGF-beta), an effect stimulating the thrombotic mechanism. Among these factors of progression in renal failure, hypertension and proteinuria are the two major factors. Proteinuria is "nephrotoxic" and leads to glomerular and tubulo-interstitial lesions. THE ROLE OF ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) affect the different mechanisms that lead to glomerulosclerosis: antihypertensive effect, with the normalisation of blood pressure having demonstrated its determining role in the production of nephrosis in various epidemiological studies; hemodynamic effect with a decrease in glomerular capillary pressure, in the filtration fraction, and inhibition of the bradykinin deterioration; antiproteinuric effect superior to that of other anti-hypertensive drugs (excepting angiotensin II-receptor antagonists). Two indications ACE inhibitors have demonstrated their efficacy in slowing the progression of renal failure in two large pathological fields: diabetic nephropathy in which this effect is demonstrated in type I diabetes, although the results are not as obvious in type II diabetes in which the nephropathy is multi-factor. The recent French and American recommendations are that ACE inhibitors should be used in first intention in diabetic nephropathies and aimed at tight blood pressure control; non-diabetic nephropathies Two pivotal studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ACE inhibitors in nephropathies whatever their type. These data have led to propose ACE inhibitors in first intention in patients exhibiting chronic nephropathies, whether hypertensive or not THE COMBINATION WITH OTHER HYPERTENSIVE DRUGS: Calcium channel blockers have a beneficial trophic effect in renoprotection and can be combined with ACE inhibitors, particularly in the case of diabetic nephropathies. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor antagonists have comparable effect on hemodynamics and glomerulosclerosis factors. Clinically, the decrease in proteinuria is identical. Endothelin antagonists have also been studied in renoprotection and appear to have a beneficial effect when combined with ACE inhibitors. GLOBALLY: ACE inhibitors remain the only treatment with demonstrated lon

Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium Channel Blockers; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelins; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension; Indoles; Irbesartan; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Proteinuria; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Angiotensin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles; Verapamil

Diabetic nephropathy management should include the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin receptor blocker with additional antihypertensive medications to reduce proteinuria and cardiovascular events. Some studies suggest that adding a nondihydropyridine rather than a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) may more effectively lower proteinuria. We hypothesized that a trandolapril/verapamil SR (T/V) fixed-dose combination (FDC) was superior to a benazepril/amlodipine (B/A) FDC for reducing albuminuria in 304 hypertensive diabetic nephropathy patients when treated for 36 weeks. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the primary end point; adjusted percentage change in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), which increased (mean T/V, 29.29%; mean B/A, 8.49%; difference, 20.80%; P=.34); or in change in absolute UACR, which decreased (mean [g/g] T/V, -0.11; mean [g/g] B/A, -0.08; difference -0.03; P=.78). There were significant reductions in log UACR (mean change in T/V, -0.28; P<.01; mean change in B/A, -0.31; P<.001) and diastolic blood pressure in both groups and in systolic blood pressure in the B/A group. T/V was not superior to B/A for reducing UACR. Both ACEI/CCB FDCs may reduce albuminuria; in the case of T/V, this appears to be independent of systolic blood pressure reduction in patients who had previously been treated and had baseline blood pressure levels of 142/77 mm Hg.

Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Treatment Outcome; Verapamil

Tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF) is a marker of progression of diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy, correlating with creatinine clearance (CCr), and functional outcome. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) slow the rate of decline of renal function in proteinuric patients.. To examine whether ACEIs affect TIF, directly or indirectly.. Prospective 3-year follow-up study.. We enrolled 49 patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN), treating some with ACE inhibitors (n = 26, 1-2 mg/day temocapril or trandolapril) and some with calcium-channel blockers (CCB, n = 23, 2.5-5 mg/day amlodipine). Blood pressure, serum creatinine, and urinalysis were measured monthly, and 24-h endogenous creatinine clearance (CCr) at least once a year.. In the CCB group, TIF was positively correlated with the rate of decline in CCr (dCCr), consistent with previous observations. In the ACEI group, dCCr was lower (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.03), and the TIF-dCCr correlation was absent.. In the absence of post-treatment histological data, it is not possible to say whether ACEIs have an effect on TIF. However, ACEIs appear to slow the progression of renal failure in IgAN, regardless of the degree of TIF at presentation.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Creatinine; Disease Progression; Female; Fibrosis; Glomerulonephritis, IGA; Humans; Indoles; Kidney Tubules; Male; Nephritis, Interstitial; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Thiazepines

To compare the effect of fixed-dose trandolapril-verapamil (FDTV) with that of trandolapril on proteinuria in normotensive, type 2 diabetic patients.. A total of 60 normotensive, type 2 diabetic patients with 24-h proteinuria >300 mg were randomly assigned to two groups for open-label treatment. One group received 2 mg trandolapril/180 mg verapamil FDTV once daily; the other group received 2 mg trandolapril once daily. Study drugs were administered for 6 months in both groups. Creatinine clearance and 24-h urinary protein excretion were measured at the beginning and the end of the study. Patients were evaluated monthly for blood pressure, fasting blood glucose level, heart rate, and adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA.. Both groups experienced a statistically significant (P < 0.005) mean decrease in mean proteinuria from baseline: FDTV ([mean +/- SD] 1200 +/- 200 to 540 +/- 79 mg; P < 0.001) and trandolapril (1,105 +/- 212 to 750.9 +/- 134 mg; P < 0.005). A significantly greater reduction from baseline in proteinuria was observed in the FDTV group compared with the trandolapril group. Patients who received trandolapril experienced a statistically significant (P < 0.05) decrease in mean creatinine clearance (91.1 +/- 3.4 to 75.3 +/- 3 ml/min; P < 0.05) compared with patients who received FDTV (88.3 +/- 3.6 to 82.9 +/- 3.5 ml/min; P > 0.05). Final fasting blood glucose was significantly lower in the FDTV group (139 +/- 19) compared with the trandolapril group (154 +/- 22; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in mean baseline or final measurements of blood pressure, mean heart rate, or frequency of adverse events.. Our results suggest that FDTV is more effective than trandolapril in reducing proteinuria in normotensive, type 2 diabetic patients. This effect on proteinuria is not related with blood pressure reduction.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Rate; Humans; Indoles; Infant, Newborn; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Reference Values; Verapamil

We tested whether the combination of verapamil (V) or amlodipine (A) with trandolapril (T) affected proteinuria differently from T alone in patients with nondiabetic nephropathies.. After T, 2 mg, in open conditions for 1 month, 69 patients were randomly assigned to be administered T, 2 mg, combined with V, 180 mg, plus a placebo or T, 2 mg, plus A, 5 mg, once a day in a double-blind fashion. Patients were followed up for 8 months.. Proteinuria diminished significantly after T treatment from mean protein excretion of 3,078 +/- 244 (SEM) to 2,537 +/- 204 mg/24 h (P = 0.018). In the randomized phase, there was a slight reduction in proteinuria in both groups without significant differences within and between treatments (T + V, protein from 2,335 +/- 233 to 2,124 +/- 247 mg/24 h; T + A, protein from 2,715 +/- 325 to 2,671 +/- 469 mg/24 h). The selectivity index (SI; calculated as the ratio of immunoglobulin G to albumin clearance) was slightly and not significantly reduced in patients treated with T plus V from a median of 0.20 (interquartile range, 0.13) to 0.16 (interquartile range, 0.15; P = not significant), whereas it significantly increased from 0.20 (interquartile range, 0.14) to 0.30 (interquartile range, 0.14; P = 0.0001) in patients treated with T plus A. Modifications in SI and serum creatinine levels at the end of the study from randomization were significantly directly correlated (r = 0.45; P = 0.001). The number of patients reporting adverse effects was significantly higher in the T plus A than T plus V group (63.8% versus 33.3%; P = 0.016).. In patients with nondiabetic proteinuric nephropathies treated with T, the combination of V or A does not significantly increase its antiproteinuric effect.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Safety; Treatment Outcome; Verapamil

Guidelines recommend lower threshold and goal blood pressure (BP) for patients with proteinuria. BP reduction could be accompanied by a different fall in proteinuria depending of the antihypertensive drug. The objective was to compare proteinuria reduction when BP is lowered to the same level with different drugs.. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.. 12 Spanish centres.. A total of 119 patients with primary renal disease, blood pressure > 130/85 mmHg, proteinuria > 1 g/day, and creatinine clearance > or = 50 ml/min.. After a 4-week run-in placebo period, patients were randomized to: atenolol 50 mg/day; trandolapril 2 mg/day; verapamil 240 mg/day or verapamil 180 + trandolapril 2 mg/day combination; forced double-dose titration was carried out at the 4th week. Treatment duration was 6 months.. Changes in BP, 24 h proteinuria, serum albumin and calcium.. BP was significantly reduced with the four treatments [SBP/DBP (mmHg]: atenolol 12.2/9.9; trandolapril 12.9/9.3; verapamil 8.2/7.9 and verapamil + trandolapril 13.6/11.3) without differences between them. A significant fall in proteinuria was seen in the trandolapril, 40.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24.3-56.2%], and verapamil + trandolapril groups, 48.5% (95% CI, 31.7-64.3%) accompanied with increases in serum albumin (trandolapril: from 3.86 +/- 0.64 to 4.03 +/- 0.67 g/dl; verapamil + trandolapril: from 4.15 +/- 0.58 to 4.40 +/- 0.51 g/dl).. In patients with proteinuric primary renal disease, adequate dose titration of antihypertensive drugs may provide a substantial BP reduction. Only angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (trandolapril) treatment, alone or better combined with verapamil, reduces proteinuria and increases serum albumin.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium; Calcium Channel Blockers; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Indoles; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Serum Albumin; Spain; Verapamil

The severity of proteinuria is the main predictive factor in the progression of renal failure in chronic nephropathies. Therefore, action aimed at reducing proteinuria should be a priority in the treatment of these patients. Various antihypertensive drugs, in particular the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), have a greater antiproteinuric effect, although it is difficult to establish whether this is due only to their effect on arterial blood pressure (BP) or to other mechanisms associated with blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS).. The evolution of proteinuria after two successive treatment periods was studied prospectively for 2 years in 22 patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. In period I, which lasted for 12 months, BP was strictly controlled (<125/75 mmHg) and the patients received random and double-blind treatment with a beta-blocker (betaB), atenolol; a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), verapamil; an ACEI, trandolapril; or a fixed combination of the latter two. In period II, all of the patients received treatment openly for an additional 12 months with a fixed combination of verapamil+trandolapril at half the dose of the preceding period, to obtain conventional control of BP at <140/90 mmHG:. The mean level for basal SBP/DBP was 136+/-14/86+/-7 mmHg, which decreased in period I to 121+/-15/76+/-8 mmHg (P=0.01) and to 124+/-5/78 +/-8 mmHg (P<0.05) at 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively. There were no differences in the BP reached in the four therapy groups; however, proteinuria only decreased in the patients treated with trandolapril alone or in combination with verapamil. In period II, BP levels rose to 134+/-10/84+/-8 mmHg (P<0.05); this increase in BP was accompanied by an increase in proteinuria in those patients who had received the ACEI alone or in combination in the previous period, while in patients previously treated with a betaB or a CCB, proteinuria decreased, in spite of the increase in BP.. With equal BP control, treatment with the ACEI trandolapril alone, or in combination with a CCB, has a greater antiproteinuric effect than that obtained with other antihypertensive drugs, but this effect is attenuated if BP is not strictly controlled.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diet, Sodium-Restricted; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Proteinuria; Time Factors; Verapamil

Trandolapril is a newly developed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) whose characteristic is that it undergoes hepatic excretion. ACEI appears to have a specific reno-protective and antiproteinuric role in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis(CGN). Although renally excreted ACEI tend to accumulate and cause side-effects in patients with renal dysfunction, the pharmacokinetics of trandolapril were not affected by renal dysfunction. We compared the effect of other renally excreted ACEI with those of trandolapril on serum creatinine (s-Cr), creatinine clearance(Ccr), proteinuria and total protein(TP) in CGN patients who switched from another ACEI to trandolapril. Twelve hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure(nine males and three females, ranging from 30 to 72 years of age) who were treated by other renally excreted ACEIs for long periods(2 to 8 years) with some effects on proteinuria and renal function, were enrolled in the present study. After ACEI therapy, s-Cr had decreased(2.09 to 1.80 mg/dl, p < 0.01) as well as proteinuria(1.65 to 0.71 g/day, p < 0.01). A single daily oral dose of 1 mg of trandolapril was administered to these patients regardless of their blood pressure status and renal functions. After change to trandolapril therapy, s-Cr(2.25 to 2.06 mg/dl, p < 0.01) and urinary protein(1.82 to 1.34 g/day, p < 0.05) significantly decreased. On the contrary, both Ccr and TP significantly increased at the level of 39.4 to 44.4 ml/min(p < 0.05) and 6.80 to 7.02 g/dl (p < 0.01), respectively. No apparent side effects, such as hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, anemia or worsening of the existing renal dysfunction except for coughing, were observed in these patients. Furthermore, none of the 12 patients treated with trandolapril required discontinuation of the compound. In conclusion, it was shown from this study that trandolapril is effective for the treatment of hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency irrespective of the original diseases. Thus, it can be envisaged that trandolapril is one of the most appropriate agents compared to other renally excreted ACEI for these patients with renal insufficiency. We recommend the change from other ACEIs to trandolapril, when renal dysfunction might be due to ACEI accumulation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Chronic Disease; Female; Glomerulonephritis; Humans; Hypertension, Renal; Indoles; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Renal Insufficiency

Non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists such as verapamil are equally effective in reducing proteinuria as ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. To date it is unknown whether verapamil elucidates such an antiproteinuric capacity in non-diabetic renal disease.. We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, random cross-over study which compared the antiproteinuric effect of 6 weeks treatment with verapamil SR (360 mg) to that of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril (4 mg), and their fixed combination vera/tran (180 mg verapamil SR and 2 mg trandolapril) in 11 non-diabetic patients with proteinuria of 6.6 (5.1-8.8) g/day, a creatinine clearance of 87 (74-106) ml/min, and a 24-h blood pressure of 136/85 (126/76-157/96) mmHg at baseline.. Twenty-four-hour mean arterial pressure did not change during verapamil, whereas both trandolapril and vera/tran induced a significant reduction in MAP. Verapamil showed no significant effects on renal haemodynamics. Trandolapril and vera/tran did not significantly change GFR, but ERPF increased and FF decreased during both treatments (P<0.05). The antiproteinuric response of verapamil was significantly less compared to that of trandolapril and vera/tran (-12% (-17/-1) vs -51% (-56/-25) and -41% (-50/-19) respectively). The blood pressure and antiproteinuric response during verapamil tended to be greater in hypertensive patients than in normotensive patients, although this difference was not significant. Baseline blood pressure was related to the change in blood pressure during verapamil (r = -0.70; P < 0.02).. The antiproteinuric and antihypertensive response of verapamil is less than that of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril in patients with non-diabetic renal disease. In contrast to the antiproteinuric response of trandolapril, the antiproteinuric reponse of verapamil seems to be completely dependent from effective blood pressure reduction. The fixed combination of verapamil and ACE inhibition at half doses has similar effects as ACE inhibition at full dose.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Indoles; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Pulse; Verapamil

The degree of proteinuria in patients with diabetes correlates strongly with both an increase in progression of nephropathy as well as cardiovascular events. Moreover, post hoc analyses of recent clinical trials support the concept that reductions of blood pressure and proteinuria correlate with a slowed progression of nephropathy. Both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists, (non-DHPCAs) reduce both arterial pressure and proteinuria in those with diabetic nephropathy.. The present randomized, open label, parallel group designed study tests the hypothesis that, at similar levels of blood pressure, the combination of an ACE inhibitor, trandolapril (T) with the non-DHPCA, verapamil (V) produces a greater reduction in proteinuria over either agent alone at one year. Thirty-seven participants, mean age 59.6 +/- 5.8 years, with nephropathy (baseline creatinine 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dl and proteinuria of 1342 +/- 284 mg/dl) secondary to type 2 diabetes completed the study. Doses of drug were titrated in each group over eight weeks to achieve a goal blood pressure of < 140/90 mm Hg. All participants were counseled to ingest a sodium diet of < 120 mEq/day.. Proteinuria reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the T+V group compared to either T alone (-33 +/- 8%, T vs. -62 +/- 10%, T+V; P < 0.001) or V alone (-27 +/- 8%, V vs. -62 +/- 10%, T+V; P < 0.001). No significant differences in either glomerular filtration rate, arterial pressure, fasting blood glucose or urinary sodium excretion were noted at one year. The mean daily dose of the individual components of T+V (2.9 +/- 0.8 mg, T/219 +/- 21.1 mg V) was significantly lower than the dose of either T alone 5.5 +/- 1.1 mg/day (P < 0.01) or V alone 314.8 +/- 46.3 mg, given in two divided doses (P < 0.01).. These data support the concept that the combination of an ACE inhibitor with a non-DHPCA reduce proteinuria to a greater extent than either agent alone. This added antiproteinuric effect occurs at lower doses of each drug and is independent of further reductions in arterial pressure. These findings could have ramifications for slowing renal disease progression in patients with nephropathy from type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Verapamil

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most important causes of the end-stage renal failure and its prevalence is found to be increasing. The presence of hypertension and progressive proteinuria is among the important findings. In this study, the effects of double and triple combinations of trandolapril, telmisartan, and verapamil on proteinuria were investigated in diabetic patients with nephropathy. Seventy-eight patients (mean age: 56.11 ± 11.26 years; 47 females and 31 males) with overt proteinuria and DN were included in this study. The patients were divided into four groups: Group I (n: 18, trandolapril + telmisartan), Group II (n: 20, trandolapril + verapamil), Group III (n: 20, trandolapril +telmisartan + verapamil), and Group IV (n: 20, telmisartan + verapamil). At the end of a three-month therapy, within and between group comparisons were done about the effects of the use of double or triple drug combinations on proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), electrolytes, serum albumin, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)- cholesterol, and HbA1C. There was no significant difference among groups in terms of age, gender, diabetes duration, body mass index, and retinopathy frequency. The decreases in proteinuria and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) were significant in all groups. The decrease in proteinuria was independent of the decrease in MABP [the reduction rate in proteinuria was 39% (P <0.001) in Group I, 37% (P <0.001) in Group II, 42% (P <0.001) in Group III, and 43% (P <0.001) in Group IV; the reduction rate in MABP was 10.6% (P <0.001) in Group I, 13.7% (P <0.001) in Group II, 17.5% (P <0.001) in Group III, and 15.4% (P <0.001) in Group IV]. Decrease in HbA1C (before and after treatment) was significant in Groups III and IV when com- pared to Groups I and II. Any adverse event, like hyperkalemia, was not observed. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of GFR, LDL-cholesterol, albumin, and potassium. All the patients tolerated the drugs well. In conclusion, in patients with DN, both double or triple combinations of trandolapril, telmisartan and verapamil resulted in significant decreases in proteinuria and MABP. Triple combinations did not have any superiority over double combinations. Therefore, the suitable drug combinations may be chosen according to the clinical status of a patient.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Telmisartan; Verapamil; Young Adult

1. Hypertension plays a critical role in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but it has also been postulated that antihypertensive drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) show class-specific renoprotective actions beyond their blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. 2. Because this notion has recently been questioned, in the present study we compared the effects of a RAS-dependent antihypertensive therapy (a combination of trandolapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and losartan, an angiotensin-II (AngII) receptor subtype 1A receptor antagonist) with a 'RAS-independent' antihypertensive therapy (a combination of labetalol, an alfa- and beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist with the diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide and furosemide) on the progression of CKD after 5/6 renal ablation (5/6 NX) in Ren-2 renin transgenic rats (TGR), a model of AngII-dependent hypertension. Normotensive transgene-negative Hannover Sprague-Dawley (HanSD) rats after 5/6 NX served as controls. 3. RAS-dependent and -independent antihypertensive therapies normalized BP and survival rate, and prevented the development of cardiac hypertrophy and glomerulosclerosis to the same degree in 5/6 NX HanSD rats and in 5/6 NX TGR. The present findings show that renoprotection, at least in rats after 5/6 NX, is predominantly BP-dependent. When equal lowering of BP was achieved, leading to normotension, cardio- and renoprotective effects were equivalent irrespective of the type of antihypertensive therapy. 4. These findings should be taken into consideration in attempts to develop new therapeutic approaches and strategies aimed to prevent the progression of CKD and to lower the incidence of ESRD.

Topics: Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cardiomegaly; Creatinine; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diuretics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furosemide; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Indoles; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Labetalol; Losartan; Proteinuria; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Transgenic; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System

Prolonging the survival of transplant kidneys is a major task of modern nephrology. It has recently been shown that deteriorating renal function and substantial graft loss were observed in 55% of renal allograft recipients with recurrent IgA nephropathy (IgAN) at long-term follow-up. To gain a useful insight into the therapeutic approach towards protecting allograft kidneys from deteriorating graft function, we compared the histological characteristics of post-transplant IgAN to primary IgAN and investigated the effects of an ACE inhibitor.. Twenty-one patients with post-transplant IgAN and 63 patients with primary IgAN were included in the histopathological study. The effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment in post-transplant IgAN was also studied in 10 patients.. The prevalence of glomeruli with adhesions and/or cellular crescents in primary IgAN was significantly greater than in post-transplant IgAN (P<0.05), but the proportion of glomeruli with segmental sclerosis was similar in both groups. The rate of global obsolescence, and the degree of interstitial fibrosis in post-transplant IgAN were significantly greater than in primary IgAN (P<0.05). The degree of glomerular obsolescence and the severity of interstitial fibrosis correlated with the severity of glomerular lesion in primary IgAN, but not in post-transplant IgAN. In primary IgAN, glomerular diameter significantly correlated with the proportions of glomerular obsolescence, but not in post-transplant IgAN, suggesting that allograft kidneys may be in a hyperfiltration state. Both the blood pressure and the urinary protein excretion significantly improved after ACE-inhibitor treatment (P<0.001).. In post-transplant IgAN, histopathological lesions indicative of acute inflammatory insults were suppressed, and glomerular hypertrophy, which may relate to haemodynamic burden such as hyperfiltration, was prominent. Preliminary study of ACE-inhibitor treatment in 10 patients showed favourable effects. A future long-term follow-up study is required to establish the effectiveness of ACE inhibitors in treatment of post-transplant IgAN.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Fibrosis; Glomerulonephritis, IGA; Humans; Hypertension; Indoles; Kidney; Kidney Glomerulus; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Postoperative Complications; Proteinuria; Sclerosis

We previously showed that chronic administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to rats with passive Heymann nephritis (PHN), a model of membranous nephropathy with proteinuria and increased renal synthesis of endothelin-1 (ET-1), reduces urinary proteins and partially limits the exaggerated ET-1 renal synthesis. Here we compared the effect of an ETA receptor antagonist and an ACE-inhibitor given as single therapies with a combination of the two drugs in uninephrectomized PHN rats.. PHN was induced with a single i.v. injection of rabbit anti-Fx1A antibody in 40 male Sprague Dawley rats. To accelerate the onset of renal damage rats underwent uninephrectomy seven days later and were subsequently treated until eight months with the ETA receptor antagonist LU-135252 (50 mg/kg b.i.d. p.o.) or the ACE-inhibitor trandolapril (1 mg/kg in the drinking water) or the combination of the two drugs.. Either LU-135252 or trandolapril given alone prevented the increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Combined therapy was even more effective than single drugs. While LU-135252 and trandolapril reduced proteinuria by 23 to 25%, the drug combination resulted in 45% lowering of urinary proteins. Serum creatinine was significantly decreased by the combination, but not by the single drugs. Glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial damage were more reduced by combined therapy than by LU-135252 or trandolapril alone.. These data suggest that contemporary blocking angiotensin II (Ang II) and ET-1 in an accelerated model of PHN had an additive renoprotective effect than single blocking Ang II or ET-1 and would represent a therapeutic advantage for renal disease patients who do not completely respond to ACE inhibitors.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; Blood Pressure; Endothelin-1; Glomerulonephritis; Indoles; Kidney; Male; Phenylpropionates; Proteinuria; Pyrimidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

In glomerular disease proteinuria usually has a circadian pattern with maximum excretion during the day. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) results in a 50% reduction of proteinuria as measured in 24-h urine collections. We questioned whether anti-proteinuric treatment by blockade of the RAS is as effective during the day as during the night.. We analysed data from two intervention studies on proteinuria in patients with non-diabetic renal disease. In the first study, six hospitalized patients (proteinuria 5.8 +/- 2.9 g/day) were treated with the renin-inhibitor remikiren 600 mg o.d. during 8 days. In the second study eight ambulant patients (proteinuria 7.5 +/- 2.7 g/day) were treated during 6 weeks with the ACE-inhibitor trandolapril 4 mg o.d. Urine was collected in a day- and in a night-time portion.. Daytime proteinuria declined from 0.29 +/- 0.15 to 0.22 +/- 0.11 g/h (P < 0.05) during remikiren and from 0.33 +/- 0.14 to 0.16 +/- 0.08 g/h (P < 0.05) during trandolapril. Night-time proteinuria, however, was not significantly reduced from 0.23 +/- 0.11 to 0.19 +/- 0.11 g/h during remikiren and from 0.29 +/- 0.17 to 0.20 +/- 0.12 g/h during trandolapril. Both interventions effectively lowered blood pressure during the day as well as the night.. In both studies relative nocturnal therapy resistance to the antiproteinuric effect of RAS blockade was found, despite 24-h efficacy of blood pressure effect. This may have clinical relevance because it contributes to rest-proteinuria and thus may affect long term renal function outcome. It may be worthwhile to explore alternative therapeutic regimens to improve the nocturnal antiproteinuric response.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Circadian Rhythm; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System

Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the progression to glomerulosclerosis with the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB). The results with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are more consistent. Moreover, only two studies have examined the combined effects of these drug classes on the development of glomerulosclerosis. The aim of the study presented here was to test the hypothesis that nonhypotensive doses of the combination (VT) of a nondihydropyridine CCB, verapamil (V), and an ACE-inhibitor, trandolapril (T), will slow the development of glomerulosclerosis better than either agent alone in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). SHRSP were randomized to treatment in one of three groups with nonhypotensive doses of these agents; a fourth group served as control (C). The control rats developed significant increases in proteinuria compared with the other groups (C, 190 +/- 35 mg.kg-1.d-1 versus VT, 19 +/- 12 mg.kg-1.d-1; P < 0.05). This finding correlated with the degree of glomerulosclerosis (mean severity grading for C, 3.31 +/- 0.21 versus VT, 1.6 +/- 0.51; P < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant reduction in arterial pressure between these groups (C, 282 +/- 5 versus VT, 259 +/- 13 mm Hg; P = 0.12). Despite persisting hypertension, the rise in proteinuria was also attenuated in both the V group (57 +/- 21 mg.kg-1.d-1) and the T group (43 +/- 24 mg.kg-1.d-1). However, compared with the control rats, kidney morphology was unchanged. Lastly, creatinine clearance was better preserved in the VT group compared with the control group (C, 0.57 +/- 0.01 versus VT, 0.74 +/- 0.06 mL.min-1.100 g-1; P < 0.05). It was concluded that the combination of nonhypotensive doses of VT attenuates the rise in proteinuria and progression to glomerulosclerosis. This study supports the concept that VT may have effects on the glomerulus that are independent of blood pressure reduction.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Creatinine; Disease Progression; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Hypertension; Indoles; Kidney; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Proteinuria; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Verapamil