topiramate and Neuralgia

Hemicrania continua (HC), paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) and short lasting neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNCT and SUNA) are rare syndromes with a difficult therapeutic approach. The aim of this review is to summarize all articles dealing with treatments for HC, PH, SUNCT and SUNA, comparing them in terms of effectiveness and safety.. A survey was performed using the pubmed database for documents published from the 1st January 1989 onwards. All types of articles were considered, those ones dealing with symptomatic cases and non-English written ones were excluded.. Indomethacin is the best treatment both for HC and PH. For the acute treatment of HC, piroxicam and celecoxib have shown good results, whilst for the prolonged treatment celecoxib, topiramate and gabapentin are good options besides indomethacin. For PH the best drug besides indomethacin is piroxicam, both for acute and prolonged treatment. For SUNCT and SUNA the most effective treatments are intravenous or subcutaneous lidocaine for the acute treatment of active phases and lamotrigine for the their prevention. Other effective therapeutic options are intravenous steroids for acute treatment and topiramate for prolonged treatment. Non-pharmacological techniques have shown good results in SUNCT and SUNA but, since they have been tried on a small number of patients, the reliability of their efficacy is poor and their safety profile mostly unknown.. Besides a great number of treatments tried, HC, PH, SUNCT and SUNA management remains difficult, according with their unknown pathogenesis and their rarity, which strongly limits the studies upon these conditions. Further studies are needed to better define the treatment of choice for these conditions.

Topics: Amines; Analgesics; Anticonvulsants; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Female; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Indomethacin; Lamotrigine; Lidocaine; Male; Neuralgia; Paroxysmal Hemicrania; Reproducibility of Results; SUNCT Syndrome; Surveys and Questionnaires; Topiramate; Triazines; Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias

Chronic migraine is a disease that affects 0.5-2.5% of the population, depending on the statistics that are analysed and the definition of chronic migraine that is used. It is extraordinarily disabling, since it does not allow the sufferer to carry out any of their scheduled personal, professional or social activities, and it has a great impact on the patients' quality of life, as measured on disability, quality of life and impact on daily activities scales. Yet, nowadays there are treatments that have proven to be effective in cases of chronic migraine, such as OnabotulinumtoxinA. It is a treatment that is well tolerated and with a high rate of efficacy. Yet it is not only a therapeutic tool, but in the world of headaches it has also opened up the doors to invasive treatments, to the learning of techniques and, in short, to placing headaches in referral units that are usually located in tertiary care hospitals. Furthermore, it has also helped to overcome the idea that patients with headache should be visited exclusively by primary care physicians or general neurologists. This is an opportunity to redefine the field of study and the care for headaches that must be seized. In the future, this is going to be complemented by novel treatments with neurostimulation and probably with monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide. A revolution has begun in our knowledge and capacity to act. It is our duty to give it the importance and usage it deserves both for our patients and for us as specialists.. Posicionamiento de las unidades de cefalea en el ambito de la neurologia: la importancia de la OnabotulinumtoxinA y otras terapias en el tratamiento de la cefalea.. La migraña cronica es una enfermedad que afecta al 0,5-2,5% de la poblacion segun las estadisticas que se analicen y la definicion de migraña cronica que se adopte. Es extraordinariamente incapacitante, ya que no permite realizar las actividades personales, profesionales o sociales programadas, y tiene un gran impacto sobre la calidad de vida de los pacientes, medido en escalas de discapacidad, calidad de vida e impacto en la actividad diaria. Sin embargo, actualmente se dispone de tratamientos que han demostrado eficacia en la migraña cronica, como la OnabotulinumtoxinA. Es un tratamiento bien tolerado y con una tasa de eficacia elevada. Pero no es solo una herramienta terapeutica, sino que ha abierto las puertas en el mundo de la cefalea a la realizacion de tratamientos invasivos, al aprendizaje de tecnicas y, en definitiva, a situar la cefalea en unidades de referencia ubicadas, habitualmente, en hospitales de tercer nivel. Ademas, ha ayudado a eliminar el concepto de que los pacientes con cefalea deben ser atendidos exclusivamente por medicos de atencion primaria o neurologos generales. Esta es una oportunidad que debe aprovecharse para redimensionar el campo del estudio y asistencia de la cefalea. En el futuro, esto va a complementarse con novedosos tratamientos con neuroestimulacion y, probablemente, con anticuerpos monoclonales contra el peptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina. Se ha iniciado una revolucion en nuestro conocimiento y capacidad de actuacion. Es nuestro deber darle la importancia y uso que se merecen tanto para nuestros pacientes como para nosotros como especialistas.

Topics: Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Calcitonin; Cluster Headache; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Forecasting; Fructose; Headache Disorders; Hospital Units; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Nerve Block; Neuralgia; Neurology; Prevalence; Protein Precursors; Spain; Therapies, Investigational; Topiramate; United States

Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug with multiple possible mechanisms of action. Antiepileptic drugs are widely used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage) and fibromyalgia, and many guidelines recommend them.. To assess the analgesic efficacy and associated adverse events of topiramate for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults (aged 18 years and above).. On 8 May 2013, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We reviewed the bibliographies of all randomised trials identified and review articles, and also searched two clinical trial databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, to identify additional published or unpublished data.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with double-blind assessment of participant outcomes following two weeks of treatment or longer (though the emphasis of the review was on studies of eight weeks or longer) that used a placebo or active comparator.. We extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and two study authors examined issues of study quality independently. We performed analysis using two tiers of evidence. The first tier used data where studies reported the outcome of at least 50% pain reduction from baseline, lasted at least eight weeks, had a parallel group design, included 200 or more participants in the comparison, and reported an intention-to-treat analysis. First tier studies did not use last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) or other imputation methods for dropouts. The second tier used data that failed to meet this standard; second tier results were therefore subject to potential bias.. We included four studies with 1684 participants. Three parallel-group placebo comparisons were in painful diabetic neuropathy (1643 participants), and one cross-over study with diphenhydramine as an active placebo (41 participants) was in lumbar radiculopathy. Doses of topiramate were titrated up to 200 mg/day or 400 mg/day. All studies had one or more sources of potential major bias, as they either used LOCF imputation or were of small size.No study provided first tier evidence for an efficacy outcome. There was no convincing evidence for efficacy of topiramate at 200 to 400 mg/day over placebo.Eighty-two per cent of participants taking topiramate 200 to 400 mg/day experienced at least one adverse event, as did 71% with placebo, and the number needed to treat for an additional harmful effect (NNTH) was 8.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9 to 35). There was no difference in serious adverse events recorded (6.6% versus 7.5%). Adverse event withdrawals with 400 mg daily were much more common with topiramate (27%) than with placebo (8%), with an NNTH of 5.4 (95% CI 4.3 to 7.1). Lack of efficacy withdrawal was less frequent with topiramate (12%) than placebo (18%). Weight loss was a common event in most studies. No deaths attributable to treatment were reported.. Topiramate is without evidence of efficacy in diabetic neuropathic pain, the only neuropathic condition in which it has been adequately tested. The data we have includes the likelihood of major bias due to LOCF imputation, where adverse event withdrawals are much higher with active treatment than placebo control. Despite the strong potential for bias, no difference in efficacy between topiramate and placebo was apparent.

Topics: Adult; Diabetic Neuropathies; Fibromyalgia; Fructose; Humans; Neuralgia; Neuroprotective Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Topiramate

Antiepileptic drugs are an effective treatment for various forms of neuropathic pain of peripheral origin, although they rarely provide complete pain relief. Multiple multicentre randomised controlled trials have shown clear efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Theses drugs can be rapidly titrated and are well tolerated. Topiramate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are alternatives for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy, but should be titrated slowly. Carbamazepine remains the drug of choice for trigeminal neuralgia; however, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine are potential alternatives. There is an apparent need for large-scale randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in neuropathic pain in general, and in cancer-related neuropathic pain and neuropathic pain of central origin in particular. Trials with long-term follow-up are required to establish the long-term efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in neuropathic pain. There is only limited scientific evidence to support the idea that drug combinations are likely to be more efficacious and safer than each drug alone; further studies are warranted in this area.

Topics: Amines; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Lamotrigine; Neuralgia; Oxcarbazepine; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines

To date there is no evidence-based data for efficacious treatment of neuropathic pain in dogs with Chiari-like malformation (CM) and syringomyelia (SM). The objective of this prospective cross-over study was to compare the effect of gabapentin versus topiramate, as an add-on treatment to carprofen, on quality of life (QoL) of dogs experiencing signs of neuropathic pain due to CM/SM. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the QoL: (1) on day 0; (2) after 1 week of carprofen only; (3) after 2 weeks on carprofen and gabapentin; and (4) after 2 weeks on carprofen and topiramate. No significant difference was observed between VAS after gabapentin or topiramate (P=0.91). However, an improvement in QoL was observed when gabapentin was compared with baseline (P=0.009), but not for topiramate. In conclusion, the addition of gabapentin was more effective in improving QoL than carprofen alone, but the study failed to identify that gabapentin was more efficacious than topiramate. Perhaps the more favourable side effect profile of the former makes it more suitable for the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with CM/SM but further placebo-controlled trials are required to assess the efficacy of these drugs.

Topics: Amines; Analgesics; Animals; Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Female; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Male; Neuralgia; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Syringomyelia; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy.. Patients with moderate to extreme pain (0-4 Categorical Pain Scale score > or = 2) were randomized to placebo or topiramate (100, 200, or 400 mg/day) in three similar double-blind trials. The primary efficacy analysis was pain reduction from final visit to baseline in the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the intent-to-treat populations.. After 18-22 weeks of double-blind treatment, pain reductions were numerically greater with topiramate in two studies but differences between topiramate and placebo in VAS scores or in the secondary efficacy endpoints did not reach statistical significance in any of the three studies. Across all studies, 24% of topiramate-treated patients and 8% of placebo-treated patients discontinued due to adverse events; groups did not differ in the occurrence of serious adverse events.. These studies did not find topiramate to be significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain scores in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Several design features may have precluded the studies from having sufficient sensitivity to differentiate effective and ineffective treatments. The study design and results are instructive for other investigators designing future clinical studies in neuropathic pain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetic Neuropathies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Fructose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Neuroprotective Agents; Pain Measurement; Topiramate

Using identical methods, three simultaneous placebo-controlled trials of topiramate for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) did not reach significance. This independent yet concurrent placebo-controlled trial used different methods to assess topiramate efficacy and tolerability in PDN.. This 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial included 323 subjects with PDN and pain visual analog (PVA) score of at least 40 on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Topiramate (n = 214) or placebo (n = 109) was titrated to 400 mg daily or maximum tolerated dose. Short-acting rescue analgesics were permitted only during the first 6 weeks.. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for mean body weight (topiramate, 101.4 kg; placebo, 95.7 kg; p = 0.028). Twelve weeks of topiramate treatment reduced PVA scale score (from 68.0 to 46.2 mm) more effectively than placebo (from 69.1 to 54.0 mm; p = 0.038). Fifty percent of topiramate-treated subjects and 34% of placebo-treated subjects responded to treatment, defined as >30% reduction in PVA scale score (p = 0.004). Topiramate monotherapy also reduced worst pain intensity (p = 0.003 vs placebo) and sleep disruption (p = 0.020 vs placebo). Diarrhea, loss of appetite, and somnolence were the most commonly reported adverse events in the topiramate group. Topiramate reduced body weight (-2.6 vs +0.2 kg for placebo; p < 0.001) without disrupting glycemic control.. Topiramate monotherapy reduced pain and body weight more effectively than placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Appetite; Appetite Depressants; Body Weight; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Humans; Leg; Male; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Patient Dropouts; Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

Dysaesthetic pain is a common neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Both tricyclic antidepressants (i.e., amitriptyline and duloxetine) and antiepileptic drugs (i.e., carbamazepine, gabapentin and pregabalin) represent first-line treatment of neuropathic pain. However, topiramate, an antiepileptic drug, also demonstrated clinical efficacy in these patients. In this report we describe the case of a 42-year-old woman with an 8-year history of multiple sclerosis who developed dysaesthetic pain in the lower limbs, and was successfully treated with topiramate at a final dose of 150 mg/day. About 8 months after beginning topiramate treatment, the patient had not shown any dysaesthetic pain, and no adverse events related to topiramate had been recorded.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Female; Fructose; Humans; Lower Extremity; Multiple Sclerosis; Neuralgia; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

Painful ejaculation (PE) is an uncommon condition and it is usually associated with prostatitis, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia, ejaculatory duct obstruction, radical prostatectomy, and prostate radiation. Topiramate (TPM) is a new antiepileptic drug with recognized efficacy in neuropathic pain.. The study is aimed to evaluate TPM efficacy in ejaculation pain.. Following a spinal cord injury, a 53-year-old man was referred to our institute for persistent PE. Neurological examination showed mild hypoesthesia of the genital area. Urogenital examination, neurophysiological tools, and computed tomography of the dorso-lumbar spine were normal.. The main outcome measure was the visual analogue scale.. Since pain was refractory to conventional neuropathic pharmacological therapies, TPM was introduced up to 150 mg daily with a dramatic improvement of PE.. TPM may be considered as a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of PE.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Ejaculation; Fructose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Spinal Cord Injuries; Topiramate

SUNCT Syndrome (short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjuntival injection and tearing) combines neuralgic, migraineus and autonomic headaches, three of four primary ones described in the International Classification of the IHS (International Headache Society). This work describes a paediatric case evaluated under MIDAS score in which a new therapeutic approach with topiramate (TPM) was used.

Topics: Adolescent; Conjunctiva; Fructose; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Neuralgia; Syndrome; Tears; Topiramate

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered at 5 Hz frequency and suprathreshold intensity progressively increases the size of muscle evoked potentials (MEPs) and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP) in normal subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of topiramate (TPM) at different doses on cortical excitability variables tested with rTMS. We tested the facilitation of the MEP size and CSP duration evoked by focal rTMS in eight patients before and after treatment with TPM at different doses for chronic neuropathic pain. In each patient, rTMS (5 Hz frequency-120% resting motor threshold) was applied at baseline and during the TPM induction phase (drug intake schedule: week I 25 mg/day, week II 50 mg/day, week III 75 mg/day, week IV 100 mg/day) and total TPM plasma concentrations were measured. The effects on the MEP size of 5 Hz-rTMS delivered over repeated sessions were tested in eight control subjects. TPM had no effect on the resting motor threshold. Antiepileptic treatment at increasing doses abolished the normal rTMS-induced MEP facilitation. ANOVA showed that this was a dose-related effect. Accordingly, in patients receiving TPM at higher doses (75 and 100 mg) rTMS failed to elicit the MEP facilitation. TPM left the progressive lengthening of the CSP during the rTMS train unchanged. In control subjects, rTMS applied over repeated sessions elicited a constant increase in MEP size. Our results suggest that TPM modulates the excitatory intracortical interneurons probably by altering rTMS-induced synaptic potentiation. These drug-induced effects are related to TPM doses and plasma concentrations. In conclusion, rTMS may be useful for quantifying the effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs and for assessing individual responses to different drugs but acting through similar mechanisms, thus combining functional neurophysiological information and laboratory data.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Chronic Disease; Differential Threshold; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Stimulation; Electromyography; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Fructose; Humans; Middle Aged; Motor Cortex; Neuralgia; Neuroprotective Agents; Topiramate; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Cluster headache is marked by its circadian rhythmicity and the hypothalamus appears to have a significant influence over cluster pathogenesis. However, as not all cluster patients present in the same manner and not all respond to the same combination of medications, there is likely a nonhypothalamic form of cluster headache. A patient is presented who began to develop cluster headaches after receiving bilateral greater occipital nerve (GON) blockade. His headaches fit the IHS criteria for cluster headache but had some irregularities including frequent side shifting of pain, irregular duration and time of onset and the ability of the patient to sit completely still during a headache without any sense of agitation. This article will suggest that some forms of cluster headache are not primarily hypothalamic influenced and that the GON may play a significant role in cluster pathogenesis in some individuals.

Topics: Afferent Pathways; Anesthetics, Local; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anticonvulsants; Circadian Rhythm; Cluster Headache; Fructose; Functional Laterality; Headache Disorders; Humans; Hypothalamus; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Nerve Block; Neuralgia; Orbit; Spinal Nerves; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triamcinolone; Trigeminal Caudal Nucleus

Topics: Adult; Female; Fructose; Humans; Male; Multiple Sclerosis; Neuralgia; Neuroprotective Agents; Pain Measurement; Reflex; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Fructose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Topiramate