topiramate has been researched along with Exanthema* in 5 studies
1 trial(s) available for topiramate and Exanthema
Article | Year |
---|---|
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation topiramate for chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder.
Topiramate, a novel anticonvulsant, has been reported to rapidly reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in an open-label trial. The present study was designed as a test of topiramate's efficacy as adjunctive therapy in a 7-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.. Forty male veterans with PTSD in a residential treatment program were randomized to flexible-dose topiramate or placebo augmentation. The primary outcome measures were PTSD symptom severity and global symptom improvement.. Baseline Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale scores were 62.1 +/- 13.9 for placebo and 61.0 +/- 22.2 for topiramate. There was a high dropout rate from the study (55% topiramate; 25% placebo), with 40% of topiramate and 10% of placebo dropping because of adverse events (AEs). No significant treatment effects of topiramate versus placebo were observed for the primary treatment outcomes. Subjects reporting central nervous system-related AEs and with higher baseline severity of depression were more likely to discontinue because of AEs.. Primary outcome measures failed to demonstrate a significant effect for topiramate over placebo; however, high dropout rate in the treatment group prohibits definitive conclusions about the efficacy of topiramate in this population. Topics: Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Chronic Disease; Combat Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Exanthema; Fructose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Severity of Illness Index; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Time Factors; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Tract Infections; Veterans | 2007 |
4 other study(ies) available for topiramate and Exanthema
Article | Year |
---|---|
What is This Rash?
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome; Drug Substitution; Epilepsy; Exanthema; Fructose; Humans; Male; Phenytoin; Remission Induction; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome | 2016 |
Retention rate of clobazam, topiramate and lamotrigine in children with intractable epilepsies at 1 year.
Clobazam (CLB), Topiramate (TOP) and Lamotrigine (LAM) are newer second-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used in children. This is a single-centre retrospective observational study of the efficacy, tolerability and retention rate in 224 separate treatment episodes in 194 children, aged 0.1-16.7 years (median 9.4) over an 8 year period. The median age of epilepsy onset was 3.3 years (range 0-15.1). 79% started CLB, TOP or LAM as at least the 3rd AED, with 39% having been withdrawn from at least 2 AEDs. 53% had generalised and 37% idiopathic epilepsies. The maintenance doses for CLB ranged 0.12-3.50 mg/kg/day (mean 0.7); for TOP 0.45-32.0 mg/kg/day (mean 7.1) and for LAM 1.13-16.0 mg/kg/day (mean 5.6). The study comprised 75 person-treatment years for CLB, 56 for TOP, 124 for LAM.. CLB, TOP and LAM were well tolerated with 51%, 37% and 69% remaining on treatment beyond 1 year respectfully. 1 serious adverse event for CLB (inducing seizures) and 2 for LAM (rashes) were reported, and 60%, 47% and 39% had possibly and probably related adverse events for CLB, TOP and LAM respectively. Beyond 12 months seizure improvement (< 50% seizure frequency compared to baseline) was reported in 43%, 35% and 44% on CLB, TOP and LAM, including 5% and 8% remaining seizure free on CLB and LAM respectively.. Our results demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of CLB, TOP and LAM in children with difficult to treat epilepsies and a good response in CLB and LAM, and a reasonable response in TOP beyond 12 months. Topics: Adolescent; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child, Preschool; Clobazam; Epilepsy; Exanthema; Female; Fructose; Humans; Infant; Lamotrigine; Male; Patient Compliance; Retrospective Studies; Sleep Wake Disorders; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines | 2011 |
Cross-reactivity of skin rashes with current antiepileptic drugs in Chinese population.
Due to less experience with the cross-reactivity of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in Chinese population, we surveyed the rates of cross- reactivity of rash among commonly used AEDs in Chinese patients with epilepsy, particularly between the traditional and the new compounds.. We have retrospectively reviewed the medical records concerning all antiepileptic drug treatment in consecutive Chinese patients with epilepsy in our center. The incidence of AED-related rash was determined in 3793 outpatients, taking at least one of the AEDs-carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), clonazepam (CZP), oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), topiramate (TPM), levetiracetam (LEV) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). We have performed telephone interviews among all patients with AEDs-related rash. We described the clinical characteristics of the 18 patients with cross-reactivity involving the AEDs, and the cross- reactivity pattern for CBZ, PHT, OXC, and LTG.. A total of 3.61% (137/3793) of patients experienced a skin rash to at least one AEDs, of these patients, 73 (53.28%) were female and 64 were males (46.72%). While 18 patients had a rash to two or more AEDs. Of patients who had a rash to CBZ and were also prescribed PHT (n = 17), 52.9% had a rash to PHT (abbreviated as CBZ → PHT: 52.9%); of patients who had a rash to PHT and were also prescribed CBZ (n = 13), rate of rash was 69.2% (i.e., PHT → CBZ: 69.2%). Other results: CBZ → LTG: 25% (n = 16); LTG → CBZ: 44.4% (n = 9); CBZ→ OXC: 40% (n = 10); OXC → CBZ: 66.7% (n = 6); LTG → PHT: 20% (n = 5); PHT → LTG: 16.7% (n = 6); OXC → LTG: 25% (n=4); LTG → OXC: 33.3% (n = 3); OXC → PHT: 25% (n = 4); PHT → OXC: 16.7% (n = 6). There was a highly significant mutual risk for cross- reactivity for CBZ and PHT, and OXC, and LTG (p<0.001), mutual risk reached statistical significance for LTG and CBZ (p = 0.01).. Cross-reactivity rates between certain AEDs are high, especially when involving carbamazepine and phenytoin. There were also too few patients with rash to reach definitely conclusions about possible cross-reactivity. Larger numbers of patients would be needed to assess this and the mechanism. Caution should be exercised when prescribing certain AEDs (especially CBZ and PHT, but also OXC, and LTG). Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amines; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; China; Clonazepam; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Exanthema; Female; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Middle Aged; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Topiramate; Triazines; Valproic Acid; Young Adult | 2010 |
Hypersensitivity to topiramate sprinkle capsules does not preclude the use of topiramate tablets.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Capsules; Carbamazepine; Clobazam; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsia Partialis Continua; Exanthema; Excipients; Forecasting; Fructose; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Seizures; Tablets; Time Factors; Topiramate; Valproic Acid | 2004 |