topiramate and Dizziness

topiramate has been researched along with Dizziness* in 16 studies

Reviews

3 review(s) available for topiramate and Dizziness

ArticleYear
Unveiling the relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications for migraine: pairwise and network-meta analysis.
    The journal of headache and pain, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    A large number patients struggle with migraine which is classified as a chronic disorder. The relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications for migraine play a key role in managing this disease.. We conducted an extensive literature search for popular prophylactic medications that are used for migraine patients. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were carried out sequentially for determining the relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications. Summary effect for migraine headache days, headache frequency, at least 50% reduction in headache attacks, all-adverse events, nausea, somnolence, dizziness, withdrawal and withdrawal due to adverse events were produced by synthesizing both direct and indirect evidence.. Patients with three interventions exhibited significantly less average migraine headache days compared with those treated by placebo (topiramate, propranolol, divalproex). Moreover, topiramate and valproate exhibited a significantly increased likelihood of at least 50% reduction in migraine headache attacks compared to placebo. Patients with topiramate and propranolol also exhibited significantly reduced headache frequency compared to those with placebo. On the other hand, patients with divalproex exhibited significantly higher risk of nausea compared to those with placebo, topiramate, propranolol, gabapentin and amitriptyline. Finally, divalproex was associated with an increased risk of withdrawal compared to placebo and propranolol.. Topiramate, propranolol and divalproex may be more efficacious than other prophylactic medications. Besides, the safety and tolerability of divalproex should be further verified by future studies.

    Topics: Adult; Amines; Amitriptyline; Anticonvulsants; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dizziness; Female; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Nausea; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid

2017
Vertigo as a migraine phenomenon.
    Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2013, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Migraine is a complex disorder with many different manifestations. There has been an increasing interest in the association of migraine and vertigo. Many different terms have been developed to describe this concept, the more popular being vestibular migraine, migrainous vertigo, and migraine-associated vertigo. The most commonly cited diagnostic criteria are that of Neuhauser though this has yet to be included in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (2nd edition). At this time, there is a lack of consensus regarding migraine-related vertigo and its pathomechanism. Regardless, a few randomized controlled prospective studies have been performed to evaluate the efficacy of various medications. Topiramate has been shown to be effective for migraine-related vertigo. At this time there is no specific treatment for migraine-related dizziness outside of conventional migraine management. The genetics have yet to be fully realized though an autosomal dominant familial migraine vertigo disorder has been identified.

    Topics: Animals; Comorbidity; Dizziness; Fructose; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Kindling, Neurologic; Migraine Disorders; Models, Neurological; Nystagmus, Pathologic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Topiramate; Trigeminal Nerve; Vertigo; Vestibule, Labyrinth; Visual Perception

2013
Topiramate.
    Epilepsia, 1999, Volume: 40 Suppl 5

    Six studies are cited to demonstrate that topiramate is effective as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures in adults. Subsequent studies indicate that topiramate is also effective as monotherapy in adults and as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in children, tonic-clonic seizures of nonfocal origin in children and adults, and drop attacks in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Adverse effects for adults and children included dizziness, fatigue, ataxia, confusion, somnolence, nephrolithiasis, paresthesia, and weight loss. More adverse effects were observed at higher doses. Topiramate exhibits rapid absorption, long duration of action, and minimal interaction with other antiepileptic drugs.

    Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Ataxia; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Fatigue; Fructose; Humans; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

1999

Trials

8 trial(s) available for topiramate and Dizziness

ArticleYear
A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative trial of levetiracetam and topiramate as adjunctive treatment for patients with focal epilepsy in Korea.
    Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2019, Volume: 97

    The objective of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive treatment for patients with focal seizures in Korea.. In this Phase IV, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT01229735), adults were randomized to treatment with LEV (1000-3000 mg/day) or TPM (200-400 mg/day). Only patients achieving LEV ≥1000 mg/day or TPM ≥100 mg/day after a 4-week up-titration entered the 20-week dose-finding and subsequent 28-week maintenance periods. The primary outcome was the 52-week retention rate; others included safety and exploratory efficacy outcomes.. Of 343 randomized patients (LEV 177; TPM 166), 211 (61.5%) completed the trial. In the full analysis set (FAS), retention rate was 59.1% with LEV vs 56.6% with TPM (p = 0.7007), while in the prespecified sensitivity analysis, based on data from patients who received drug doses in the recommended range (LEV 176; TPM 113), it was 59.1% with LEV vs 42.5% with TPM (p = 0.0086). In the FAS, median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline was 74.47% with LEV and 67.86% with TPM (p = 0.0665); ≥50% responder rate was 69.0% vs 64.8% (p = 0.4205), and the 6-month seizure-freedom rate was 35.8% vs 22.3% (p = 0.0061). In the sensitivity analysis, differences between groups were greater, favoring LEV. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 70.6% with LEV vs 77.1% with TPM; most frequently somnolence (20.3%), dizziness (18.1%), and nasopharyngitis (13.6%) with LEV; and decreased appetite (15.7%), dizziness (14.5%), and headache (14.5%) with TPM. Discontinuations due to TEAEs were 7.9% with LEV and 12.7% with TPM.. In this open-label trial, the 52-week retention rate was not significantly different between LEV and TPM. However, LEV was associated with a substantially higher seizure freedom rate and a more favorable safety profile than TPM in this population of Korean patients with focal seizures.

    Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Headache; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Seizures; Sleepiness; Topiramate

2019
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam with concomitant lamotrigine or concomitant topiramate in pooled Phase III randomized, double-blind trials: A post-hoc analysis.
    Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2018, Volume: 80

    The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) with concomitant use of lamotrigine (LTG) or topiramate (TPM) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.. Data were pooled from three randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III studies (NCT00490035/N01252, NCT00464269/N01253, NCT01261325/N01358) of adults with focal (partial-onset) seizures. Patients taking concomitant levetiracetam were excluded from the efficacy populations, but included in the safety populations. This post-hoc analysis reports data from patients taking BRV in the approved therapeutic range (50-200mg/day) concomitantly with LTG or TPM.. The number of patients in each of the three BRV dosage groups was small, particularly for the TPM subgroup. Mean percent reduction over placebo in baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency/28days for BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day was 8.7, 5.3, and 8.9 in the LTG subgroup (n=220), and 8.4, 21.3, and -4.2 in the TPM subgroup (n=122). The ≥50% responder rate with concomitant LTG or TPM with BRV 50, 100, and 200mg/day or placebo was LTG: 28.1%, 36.1%, 34.1%, and 29.1%; and TPM: 14.3%, 44.4%, 25.0%, and 17.5%. There were numerically ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% responder rates for patients taking BRV ≥50mg/day compared with placebo in both subgroups. In the LTG and TPM safety populations (n=245 versus n=125), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported with LTG 68.7% versus 68.4%, and TPM 65.6% versus 57.8% (BRV ≥50mg/day versus placebo). Discontinuations due to TEAEs versus placebo were LTG 7.3% versus 6.3% and TPM 8.2% versus 4.7%. The three most frequently reported TEAEs for both subgroups were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Of these, the incidence of fatigue in the LTG population appeared to increase with dose.. In this post-hoc pooled analysis, BRV administered with concomitant LTG or TPM reduced seizure frequency and was generally well tolerated for BRV doses of 50-200mg/day.

    Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Lamotrigine; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Sleepiness; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

2018
Cognitive effects of topiramate in migraine patients aged 12 through 17 years.
    Pediatric neurology, 2010, Volume: 42, Issue:3

    Neuropsychologic data are presented from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with placebo, topiramate 50 mg/day, and topiramate 100 mg/day. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and cognitive adverse events were used to evaluate neurocognitive effects of topiramate. Topiramate 100 mg/day vs placebo was associated with slight statistically significant score increases, indicating slowing, from baseline vs placebo in three CANTAB measures: five-choice reaction time (P = 0.028), pattern recognition memory mean correct latency (P = 0.027), and rapid visual information processing mean latency (P = 0.040). No other patterns related to topiramate treatment were observed in measurements of learning, memory, and visual information processing, except for potential improvement with topiramate 100 mg/day vs placebo in spatial span total errors (accuracy test) (P = 0.040). The most common cognitive and neuropsychiatric adverse events with a higher incidence in the topiramate 50 and 100 mg/day groups vs placebo were anorexia (9% and 11% vs 3%), insomnia (9% and 3% vs 3%), fatigue (6% and 9% vs 6%), and dizziness (6% and 9% vs 0%). Thus, topiramate 100 mg/day was associated with modest increases in psychomotor reaction times. Learning, memory, and executive function were unchanged. The tolerability profile, including cognitive adverse events, appeared to be acceptable.

    Topics: Adolescent; Anorexia; Child; Cognition Disorders; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Neuroprotective Agents; Neuropsychological Tests; Reaction Time; Recognition, Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Space Perception; Topiramate; Visual Perception

2010
Tolerability and safety of topiramate in Chinese patients with epilepsy : an open-label, long-term, prospective study.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2007, Volume: 27, Issue:10

    This study focused on (i) evaluating the long-term tolerability and safety of topiramate in Chinese patients with epilepsy, and (ii) comparing the tolerability and safety of topiramate monotherapy versus polytherapy in the same population.. This was a prospective, open-label, long-term (36 months) clinical trial. 320 patients (275 adults and 45 children) with epilepsy were recruited into the study; of these, 156 patients had generalised seizures, 151 patients had partial seizures and 13 patients had unclassifiable seizures. All patients received topiramate approximately 200 mg/day either as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy. At each visit, a physical examination and routine laboratory analysis were performed, and the adverse event (AE) profile was obtained by face-to-face interview.. 268 patients received topiramate

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; China; Dizziness; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Fructose; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Memory Disorders; Paresthesia; Prospective Studies; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2007
A dose-comparison trial of topiramate as monotherapy in recently diagnosed partial epilepsy.
    Neurology, 2003, Jan-28, Volume: 60, Issue:2

    To evaluate topiramate as monotherapy in adults and children with recently diagnosed, localization-related epilepsy, comparing two dosages of topiramate in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.. Adults and children (>/=3 years of age) were eligible if the maximum interval since epilepsy diagnosis was 3 years and patients had one to six partial-onset seizures during a 3-month retrospective baseline. At study entry, patients (N = 252) were untreated or receiving one antiepileptic drug for less than 1 month. After randomization to 50 or 500 mg/d topiramate (25 or 200 mg/d if weight

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Child; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Fatigue; Female; Fructose; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paresthesia; Proportional Hazards Models; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

2003
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in adult patients with refractory partial epilepsy.
    Epilepsia, 2000, Volume: 41, Issue:9

    The efficacy and safety of topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult Chinese patients with refractory partial epilepsy were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.. A total of 46 patients who had four or more complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization within an 8-week baseline phase were enrolled. Patients were assigned randomly to receive TPM (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23). TPM or placebo was titrated to target doses of 300 mg/d for 6 weeks and maintained at stabilized levels for another 8 weeks. Concomitant antiepileptic drugs remained at constant previous levels during the trial.. In all, 41 patients completed the trial (TPM group, n = 20; placebo group, n = 21). The proportion of patients with a > or =50% reduction from baseline in complex partial seizures was 11 of 23 (47.8%) in the TPM group and 3 of 23 (13.0%) in the placebo group (p = 0.01). In addition, patients treated with TPM had significantly better investigator (p = 0.014) and patient (p = 0.0005) global assessment scores than patients in the placebo group. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Two patients with TPM therapy complained of weight loss. Routine blood cell counts and other laboratory results showed no significant changes from baseline in either treatment group.. TPM 300 mg/d is effective and well tolerated as treatment for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Fructose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

2000
Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures.
    Epilepsia, 1996, Volume: 37, Issue:6

    In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial, we compared topiramate (TPM) with placebo as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. TPM was titrated either to the target dosage of 800 mg/ day [400 mg twice daily (b.i.d)] or to the maximal tolerated dose if lower. Twenty-eight (28) patients were randomized to each treatment group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the net median percent reduction relative to placebo in average monthly seizure rate was 54% for patients in the TPM group (p < 0.001). None of the placebo-treated patients and 43% of the patients treated with TPM experienced > or = 50% reduction in seizures (p = 0.001), and 36% of patients assigned to TPM had a 75-100% reduction in seizures (p < 0.01). Secondarily generalized seizures were also significantly reduced in the TPM group (p = 0.044). The most common adverse events (AE) reported in the TPM group were fatigue, impaired concentration, weight loss, dizziness, and paresthesias. AE occurring either during the rapid titration of TPM or at high dosages led 21% of TPM-treated patients to withdraw from the study. Half of these occurred during the titration study period. No serious AE or clinically important changes in clinical laboratory measures were observed. The present study further establishes the favorable profile and good benefit/risk ratio of TPM in resistant partial epilepsy.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Attention; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Fatigue; Female; Fructose; Headache; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Middle Aged; Paresthesia; Placebos; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

1996
Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate (600 mg daily) for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy.
    Epilepsia, 1996, Volume: 37, Issue:8

    We wished to evaluate adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures with topiramate (TPM) for efficacy and safety in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study.. Sixty outpatients with epilepsy (47 men and 13 women, mean age 32.9 years) were studied. All had a documented history of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures. After an 8-week baseline during which patients had at least one seizure per week, 30 patients each were randomized to TPM 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or placebo for 12 weeks.. TPM was significantly superior to placebo, as indicated by all efficacy assessments: greater median percent reduction from baseline in the average monthly seizure rate (46 vs. -12%, p = 0.004); greater number of treatment responders (patients with > or = 50% reduction in seizure rate) (47 vs. 10%, p = 0.001), and better investigator (p = 0.002) and patient (p = 0.010) global assessments of treatment. Among TPM-treated patients, the most commonly reported adverse events (AE) were headache, somnolence, fatigue, dizziness, and abnormal thinking. Most AE were mild or moderate in severity.. The results of the present trial indicate that TPM 600 mg/day is effective in the treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Care; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy, Generalized; Fatigue; Female; Fructose; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

1996

Other Studies

5 other study(ies) available for topiramate and Dizziness

ArticleYear
Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A National Database Study of 541 Patients.
    World neurosurgery, 2022, Volume: 167

    Dural venous sinus stenting (VSS) is an effective intervention for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) refractory to medical treatment. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy by utilizing a large multi-institutional sample.. Five hundred forty-one patients >18 years old who underwent VSS within 3 years of IIH diagnosis were queried using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes from the TriNetX Analytics Network. Patient demographics, baseline symptoms, procedures, and clinical outcomes were evaluated within 1 year postoperatively. Outcomes examined were headache, tinnitus, blindness/low vision, optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt, and use of medications (acetazolamide, methazolamide, furosemide, topiramate, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate) for IIH. Prestent and poststent data were compared using Fisher exact test, and the odds ratios were computed using the Baptista-Pike method.. The mean age at VSS was 36.7 ± 10.6; 92% were female, 65% of patients were Caucasian, 25% were Black/African American, 1% were Asian, and 9% were of other/unknown race. Within the 1-year follow-up, acetazolamide and topiramate use were significantly reduced post-VSS (P < 0.0001∗; odds ratio, 0.45; confidence interval, 0.35-0.57 and P = 0.03∗; odds ratio, 0.71; confidence interval, 0.52-0.95, respectively). Also, headaches, visual disturbance, dizziness/giddiness, and tinnitus significantly improved post-VSS (P < 0.005∗). Finally, the number of CSF shunt procedures and ONSF procedures demonstrated no significant change post-VSS (P > 0.05).. VSS is an effective and safe procedure resulting in significant improvement of headaches, visual impairment, dizziness, and tinnitus, acetazolamide and topiramate usage were lower after VSS in patients with IIH. The paucity of pre-VSS and post-VSS CSF shunt and ONSF procedure data does not provide enough evidence to establish significance.

    Topics: Acetazolamide; Cranial Sinuses; Dizziness; Female; Headache; Humans; Intracranial Hypertension; Male; Pseudotumor Cerebri; Stents; Tinnitus; Topiramate

2022
Pharmacotherapy failure and progression to botulinum toxin injection in vestibular migraine.
    The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2020, Volume: 134, Issue:7

    Given the lack of evidence on patients with medically refractory vestibular migraine, this study aimed to identify factors associated with pharmacotherapy failure and progression to botulinum toxin injection in vestibular migraine.. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on definite vestibular migraine patients from September 2015 to July 2019 who completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory at least six weeks apart... The study comprised 47 patients (mean age = 50.2 ± 15.8 years), with a mean follow-up time of 6.0 ± 6.0 months. The mean pre-treatment Dizziness Handicap Inventory score was 57.5 ± 23.5, with a mean reduction of 17.3 ± 25.2 (p < 0.001) at last follow up. Oscillopsia (r = 0.458, p = 0.007), failure of first medication (r = 0.518, p = 0.001) and pre-treatment Dizziness Handicap Inventory question 15 (an emotional domain question) score (r = 0.364, p = 0.019) were the only variables significantly correlated with progression to botulinum toxin injection.. Motion hypersensitivity, failure of first medication, and fear of social stigmatisation suggest a decreased treatment response. These symptoms may require more aggressive treatment at an earlier stage.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Botulinum Toxins; Dizziness; Female; Humans; Injections; Male; Middle Aged; Migraine Disorders; Nortriptyline; Propranolol; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Topiramate; Treatment Failure; Verapamil; Young Adult

2020
Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis.
    Epilepsia, 2017, Volume: 58, Issue:10

    Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) is a common epilepsy syndrome that is often poorly controlled by antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Comparative AED effectiveness studies in this condition are lacking. We report retention, efficacy, and tolerability in a cohort of patients with MTLE-HS.. Clinical data were collected from a European database of patients with epilepsy. We estimated retention, 12-month seizure freedom, and adverse drug reaction (ADR) rates for the 10 most commonly used AEDs in patients with MTLE-HS.. Seven hundred sixty-seven patients with a total of 3,249 AED trials were included. The highest 12-month retention rates were observed with carbamazepine (85.9%), valproate (85%), and clobazam (79%). Twelve-month seizure freedom rates varied from 1.2% for gabapentin and vigabatrin to 11% for carbamazepine. Response rates were highest for AEDs that were prescribed as initial treatment and lowest for AEDs that were used in a third or higher instance. ADRs were reported in 47.6% of patients, with the highest rates observed with oxcarbazepine (35.7%), topiramate (30.9%), and pregabalin (27.4%), and the lowest rates with clobazam (6.5%), gabapentin (8.9%), and lamotrigine (16.6%). The most commonly reported ADRs were lethargy and drowsiness, dizziness, vertigo and ataxia, and blurred vision and diplopia.. Our results did not demonstrate any clear advantage of newer versus older AEDs. Our results provide useful insights into AED retention, efficacy, and ADR rates in patients with MTLE-HS.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amines; Anticonvulsants; Ataxia; Benzodiazepines; Carbamazepine; Clobazam; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Databases, Factual; Diplopia; Dizziness; Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Female; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Hippocampus; Humans; Lamotrigine; Lethargy; Male; Middle Aged; Oxcarbazepine; Pregabalin; Retrospective Studies; Sclerosis; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines; Valproic Acid; Vertigo; Vigabatrin; Vision Disorders; Young Adult

2017
Evaluation of toxicity of topiramate exposures reported to poison centers.
    Human & experimental toxicology, 2005, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Published literature on the toxicity of a topiramate overdose is limited to case reports. This retrospective study of poison center data was performed to examine the severity of topiramate overdoses. Data on single substance exposures to topiramate reported to the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS) in 2000 and 2001 were retrospectively analysed. A total of 567 cases met the inclusion criteria, of which 39% occurred in adults over 19 years of age and 30.2% in children < or = 4 years old. The majority of patients (62.1%) experienced no toxicity. The most common clinical effects reported were drowsiness/lethargy (15.5%), dizziness/vertigo (4.9%), agitation (4.9%), confusion (3.9%), nausea (2.6%) and vomiting (2.5%). Symptomatic patients were older than asymptomatic patients and adults were more likely to be managed in a healthcare facility (P <0.0001). Patients who received gastrointestinal decontamination experienced less serious outcomes than those without decontamination (P <0.02). It is concluded that clinicians should expect relatively mild mental status changes in adults or children with toxicity from topiramate overdose. Serious toxic effects, such as CNS depression with respiratory depression or persistent non-anion gap metabolic acidosis, are infrequent.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Dizziness; Drug Overdose; Female; Fructose; Humans; Male; Poison Control Centers; Psychomotor Agitation; Retrospective Studies; Sleep Stages; Topiramate; United States

2005
Valproate and other anticonvulsants for psychiatric disorders.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2000, Dec-11, Volume: 42, Issue:1094

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Acetates; Adult; Amines; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anticonvulsants; Bipolar Disorder; Carbamazepine; Cognition Disorders; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Lamotrigine; Nausea; Obesity; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Topiramate; Triazines; Valproic Acid

2000