topiramate and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

topiramate has been researched along with Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2* in 25 studies

Reviews

10 review(s) available for topiramate and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

ArticleYear
Benefits of weight loss of 10% or more in patients with overweight or obesity: A review.
    Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2022, Volume: 30, Issue:4

    Modest weight loss (5%-10%) is clinically meaningful in patients with overweight or obesity. However, greater weight loss may be required to achieve improvements in or remission of certain weight-related complications. Therefore, this study reviewed the effect of large weight loss (≥10%). Most studies reporting large weight loss and relevant outcomes used bariatric surgery or lifestyle modifications.. Benefits of large weight loss were observed in patients with various overweight- or obesity-related complications, including improvements in comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Improvements in glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risk factors were observed in patients who achieved large weight loss through lifestyle interventions or pharmacotherapy (phentermine/topiramate 15/92 mg once daily or subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly). Other benefits associated with large weight loss included reduced cancer risk and improvements in knee osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, fertility-related end points, and health-related quality of life. While costly, bariatric surgery is currently the most cost-effective intervention, although most weight-management programs are deemed cost-effective.. Overall, large weight loss has a major beneficial impact on overweight- and obesity-related complications. Large weight loss should be the main treatment target when modest weight loss has had insufficient effects on obesity-related complications and for patients with severe obesity.

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Obesity; Overweight; Phentermine; Quality of Life; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2022
Phentermine/Topiramate: Pediatric First Approval.
    Paediatric drugs, 2022, Volume: 24, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Child; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fructose; Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Obesity; Phentermine; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Sympathomimetics; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2022
Metabolic syndrome and peripheral neuropathy.
    Muscle & nerve, 2021, Volume: 63, Issue:3

    Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are both global health challenges with well-established diagnostic criteria and significant impacts on quality of life. Clinical observations, epidemiologic evidence, and animal models of disease have strongly suggested MetS is associated with an elevated risk for cryptogenic sensory peripheral neuropathy (CSPN). MetS neuropathy preferentially affects small unmyelinated axons early in its course, and it may also affect autonomic and large fibers. CSPN risk is linked to MetS and several of its components including obesity, dyslipidemia, and prediabetes. MetS also increases neuropathy risk in patients with established type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In this review we present animal data regarding the role of inflammation and dyslipidemia in MetS neuropathy pathogenesis. Several studies suggest exercise-based lifestyle modification is a promising treatment approach for MetS neuropathy.

    Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diet Therapy; Disease Progression; Dyslipidemias; Exercise; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Prediabetic State; Risk Factors; Small Fiber Neuropathy; Topiramate

2021
    Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019, Volume: 475, Issue:2227

    Patients with POAG have lower corneal endothelial cell density than healthy controls of the same age. This may be attributed to mechanical damage from elevated IOP and toxicity of glaucoma medications.. Mycophenolic acid was detected in all cats. The dose 10 mg/kg given q12h for 1 week was tolerated (n = 3). The efficacy of MMF as an immunosuppressant and long-term safety in cats of this dosage regimen is unknown.. T

    Topics: Acetylcholine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Actinobacteria; Action Potentials; Adalimumab; Adaptation, Physiological; Adipates; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adrenal Glands; Adsorption; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Aldosterone; Amino Acids; Ammonia; Amoxicillin; AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Animals; Antacids; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antirheumatic Agents; Apgar Score; Area Under Curve; ARNTL Transcription Factors; Arterial Pressure; Arthritis, Juvenile; Athletes; Attention; Biodegradation, Environmental; Biofilms; Biofuels; Biological Therapy; Biomass; Biomimetic Materials; Bioreactors; Birth Weight; Bismuth; Blood Flow Velocity; Bone and Bones; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Calcium; Calcium Channels; Capsaicin; Carbon; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cardiomegaly, Exercise-Induced; Cartilage; Cartilage, Articular; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Cats; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Death; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Membrane; Charcoal; Chemokine CCL2; Child; Child, Preschool; Chondrogenesis; Chronic Disease; Circadian Clocks; Circadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Clarithromycin; Coccidioides; Coccidioidomycosis; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Coinfection; Color; Coloring Agents; Computer Simulation; Computers, Molecular; Consensus; Corticosterone; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Density Functional Theory; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Dialysis Solutions; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doxorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Electrolytes; Endocardium; Endocrine Disruptors; Endocytosis; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Escherichia coli Proteins; Esters; Evolution, Molecular; Executive Function; Feasibility Studies; Female; Ferric Compounds; Fluorescence; Fluorescent Dyes; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Frailty; Free Radical Scavengers; Gabapentin; Geriatric Assessment; Glucaric Acid; Glucocorticoids; Glucose; Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers; Heart Rate; Heart Ventricles; HEK293 Cells; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Hep G2 Cells; Hepatocytes; Humans; Hungary; Hydrogen Sulfide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Immunologic Factors; Immunomodulation; Immunosuppressive Agents; Independent Living; Indocyanine Green; Infant; Infant Formula; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Inflorescence; Insulin Resistance; Insulins; International Agencies; Iron; Isotonic Solutions; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kinetics; Lactones; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Liver Neoplasms; Macular Edema; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Magnetosomes; Male; Medical Audit; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Nude; Middle Aged; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Motor Activity; Multiple Sclerosis; Mycophenolic Acid; Netherlands; Neuropsychological Tests; Nuclear Energy; Organs at Risk; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Oxidation-Reduction; Palladium; Pericardium; Perinatal Death; Peritoneal Dialysis; Phantoms, Imaging; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Phospholipids; Phosphorylation; Physical Conditioning, Human; Physical Endurance; Pilot Projects; Polyketides; Polymers; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postoperative Period; Potassium; Powders; Pramipexole; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregabalin; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Protein Structure, Secondary; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Puberty; Pulmonary Circulation; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Quantum Dots; Radiometry; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, CCR2; Receptors, Transferrin; Regeneration; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design; Restless Legs Syndrome; Retina; Retinoid X Receptor alpha; Retrospective Studies; Rhenium; Risk Factors; RNA, Messenger; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Sodium; Sodium Fluoride; Solvents; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Stereoisomerism; Stroke; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Tetracycline; Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Thermodynamics; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Tinidazole; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Topiramate; Toxoplasma; Toxoplasmosis, Cerebral; Transferrin; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation; Upper Extremity; Uremia; Uveitis; Vascular Remodeling; Ventricular Fibrillation; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Function, Right; Ventricular Remodeling; Verapamil; Veterans; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Zea mays; Zirconium

2019
Topiramate monotherapy for weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 114

    To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of topiramate as monotherapy for weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from inception to June 2015. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated topiramate monotherapy versus control agents or placebo for weight loss in obese type 2 diabetes patients.. Of the 284 studies identified, 5 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Topiramate decreased weight by a mean difference of 3.4kg (95% CI, -3.79 to -3.04) compared to placebo. Mean HbA1c reduction of -0.4% (95% CI, -0.58 to -0.32) and mean BMI reduction of -1.43kg/m(2) (95% CI, -1.83 to -1.03) were both significantly observed with topiramate (p<0.00001). Serious and total adverse events occurred more commonly among topiramate users, with a risk ratio for serious adverse events of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.00-2.87). All but one study had high risk of bias.. Topiramate monotherapy reduced weight in obese type 2 diabetes patients, but increased adverse events including serious adverse events. Given these safety concerns and the absence of data on clinically meaningful efficacy endpoints, clinicians should generally avoid use of topiramate alone for this indication.

    Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fructose; Humans; Neuroprotective Agents; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2016
Combination phentermine and topiramate extended release in the management of obesity.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:8

    Losing ≥ 5% of initial weight improves quality of life and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in obese individuals. Lifestyle modification, the cornerstone of weight reduction, may be complemented by pharmacotherapy. In 2012, the FDA approved the combination of phentermine and topiramate extended release (ER) for chronic weight management, as an adjunct to lifestyle modification.. This review examines the safety and efficacy of phentermine-topiramate ER, as determined by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A preliminary study confirmed the benefit of combining the two medications for improving weight loss and reducing adverse effects, as compared to using equivalent-dose monotherapy alone.. Across RCTs, groups prescribed phentermine 15 mg/topiramate ER 92 mg lost an average of 10% of initial weight, ∼ 8% more than placebo and 2% more than phentermine 7.5 mg/topiramate 46 mg. Weight loss reduced the risk of developing type 2 diabetes and improved CVD risk factors. Phentermine-topiramate ER, however, was associated with increased heart rate, the clinical significance of which is being investigated in an FDA-required CVD outcomes study. The medication also must be used with caution in women of child-bearing age because of an increased risk to infants of oral cleft.

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Drug Combinations; Fructose; Humans; Life Style; Obesity; Phentermine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2015
Can medical therapy mimic the clinical efficacy or physiological effects of bariatric surgery?
    International journal of obesity (2005), 2014, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    The number of bariatric surgical procedures performed has increased dramatically. This review discusses the clinical and physiological changes, and in particular, the mechanisms behind weight loss and glycaemic improvements, observed following the gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding bariatric procedures. The review then examines how close we are to mimicking the clinical or physiological effects of surgery through less invasive and safer modern interventions that are currently available for clinical use. These include dietary interventions, orlistat, lorcaserin, phentermine/topiramate, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, pramlintide, dapagliflozin, the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner, gastric pacemakers and gastric balloons. We conclude that, based on the most recent trials, we cannot fully mimic the clinical or physiological effects of surgery; however, we are getting closer. A 'medical bypass' may not be as far in the future as we previously thought, as the physician's armamentarium against obesity and type 2 diabetes has recently got stronger through the use of specific dietary modifications, novel medical devices and pharmacotherapy. Novel therapeutic targets include not only appetite but also taste/food preferences, energy expenditure, gut microbiota, bile acid signalling, inflammation, preservation of β-cell function and hepatic glucose output, among others. Although there are no magic bullets, an integrated multimodal approach may yield success. Non-surgical interventions that mimic the metabolic benefits of bariatric surgery, with a reduced morbidity and mortality burden, remain tenable alternatives for patients and health-care professionals.

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Bariatric Surgery; Benzazepines; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exercise; Feeding Behavior; Female; Fructose; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Homeostasis; Humans; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Lactones; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Phentermine; Receptors, Glucagon; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

2014
Obesity drug therapy.
    Minerva endocrinologica, 2013, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Obesity is a chronic disease, and it requires chronic therapy. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases are leading causes of mortality in the modern world. All of them are strongly linked to obesity. While treating obesity, those conditions are also managed. Obese patients should always be treated through lifestyle interventions, though the results of such interventions are modest. Pharmacotherapy is a second step in the treatment of obesity, approved only when weight loss targets were not reached through lifestyle intervention. During the history of antiobesity drugs, many of them were withdrawn because of their side effects. Various guidelines recommend prescribing drug therapy for obesity through consideration of the potential benefits and limitations. Orlistat deactivates intestinal lipase and inhibits intestinal fat lipolysis. It is actually the only drug on the European market approved for the treatment of obesity. Orlistat therapy reduces weight to a modest extent, but it reduces the incidence of diabetes beyond the result achieved with lifestyle changes. Recently, some effective antiobesity drugs like sibutramine and rimonabant have been removed from the market due to their side effects. The new combination of topimarate and fentermine is approved in the US but not in Europe. The cost effectiveness of long-term pharmacotherapy of obesity is still an unresolved question.

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite; Combined Modality Therapy; Comorbidity; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Drug Combinations; Exercise Therapy; Fructose; Gastrointestinal Hormones; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Intestines; Lactones; Leptin; Life Style; Models, Biological; Neuropeptides; Obesity; Orlistat; Phentermine; Phytotherapy; Piperidines; Plant Preparations; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Topiramate

2013
Topiramate and type 2 diabetes: an old wine in a new bottle.
    Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topiramate, a marketed antiepileptic drug, has been used to treat seizures and allied neurological problems since 1999. Recently, a series of newer findings for the use of topiramate have cropped up, which include Type 2 diabetes and obesity. In a series of clinical studies, a subset of neurological patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) serendipitously showed better glycaemic control when treated with topiramate. It has since been demonstrated that topiramate can act both as an insulin secretagogue and sensitiser in T2DM animal models. Pathogenesis of Type 2 diabetes involves both beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Therefore, an agent that has dual action (insulin secretagougue and sensitisation) is preferred for T2DM. Topiramate seems to act through multiple mechanisms to ameliorate diabetic symptoms, some of them unknown. Hence, it becomes imperative to discuss its probable modes of action. Topiramate raises new hope as an antidiabetic agent or a potential new chemotype with a better safety profile for the treatment of T2DM.

    Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fructose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Obesity; Topiramate

2008
Emerging concepts in the medical and surgical treatment of obesity.
    Frontiers of hormone research, 2008, Volume: 36

    The relentless rise in the prevalence of obesity predicts an exponential increase in the incidence of obesity-related complications. Medical and surgical treatments are necessary to prevent and treat obese co-morbidities, thereby avoiding disability and premature death. Interventions for obesity should be evaluated not by weight loss alone but against the new incidence in obesity-related co-morbidities, their remission or improvement. In combination with lifestyle measures, currently available pharmacological therapies -- rimonabant, orlistat and sibutramine -- achieve 5-10% weight loss, although a return to baseline is the norm after cessation of medication. All these agents demonstrate approximately 0.5% reduction in HbA1c in diabetic subjects; orlistat also reduces the new incidence of type 2 diabetes. Modest improvement in lipid profiles and reduced calculated cardiovascular risk is observed, but data on improvement of other co-morbidities are sparse. In contrast, surgical procedures that restrict food ingestion and/or curtail the absorptive surface area of the gut consistently achieve substantial weight loss, typically 20-35%, effect resolution of co-morbid conditions and improve quality of life. Although mortality is low, complications and hospitalisation are not uncommon after bariatric surgery. Intriguingly, surgical patients experience a reduction in appetite and report changes in food preference. Accentuation of the normal gastrointestinal hormonal response to food intake and possible changes in vagal afferent signalling are proposed to induce satiety. Increased understanding of body weight homeostasis and appetite regulation has provided an impressive list of potential targets for drug development, with the promise that single or combination therapy may ultimately challenge the supremacy of bariatric surgery.

    Topics: Adipose Tissue; Amyloid; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety; Appetite Regulation; Bariatric Surgery; Body Mass Index; Bupropion; Cholecystokinin; Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Depression; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fluoxetine; Fructose; Ghrelin; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Isoxazoles; Lactones; Leptin; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Oxyntomodulin; Peptide YY; Piperidines; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Sertraline; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Topiramate; Zonisamide

2008

Trials

8 trial(s) available for topiramate and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

ArticleYear
Prevention of type 2 diabetes in subjects with prediabetes and metabolic syndrome treated with phentermine and topiramate extended release.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    OBJECTIVE To evaluate over 108 weeks the effect of phentermine and topiramate extended release (PHEN/TPM ER) treatment on progression to type 2 diabetes and/or cardiometabolic disease in subjects with prediabetes and/or metabolic syndrome (MetS) at baseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Subanalysis of a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of overweight/obese subjects (BMI ≥27 to ≤45 kg/m(2)) with two or more comorbidities. Subjects were randomized to placebo, PHEN 7.5 mg/TPM ER 46 mg (7.5/46), or PHEN 15 mg/TPM ER 92 mg (15/92) plus lifestyle modifications for 108 weeks. Percent weight loss in the intent-to-treat population using multiple imputation (ITT-MI), annualized incidence rate of progression to type 2 diabetes, and changes in glycemia, lipid parameters, blood pressure, and waist circumference were evaluated. RESULTS At baseline, 475 subjects met the criteria for prediabetes and/or MetS. After 108 weeks, subjects with prediabetes and/or MetS in the placebo, 7.5/46, and 15/92 groups experienced mean percent weight loss of 2.5, 10.9, and 12.1%, respectively (ITT-MI; P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), associated with reductions of 70.5 and 78.7% in the annualized incidence rate of type 2 diabetes for those receiving 7.5/46 and 15/92, respectively (ITT, P < 0.05), versus placebo. The ability of PHEN/TPM ER to prevent diabetes was related to degree of weight lost and was accompanied by significant improvements in cardiometabolic parameters. PHEN/TPM ER was well tolerated by this subgroup over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS PHEN/TPM ER plus lifestyle modification produced significant weight loss and markedly reduced progression to type 2 diabetes in overweight/obese patients with prediabetes and/or MetS, accompanied by improvements in multiple cardiometabolic disease risk factors.

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fructose; Humans; Life Style; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Phentermine; Placebos; Prediabetic State; Topiramate

2014
Weight-loss therapy in type 2 diabetes: effects of phentermine and topiramate extended release.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:12

    Treatment algorithms for type 2 diabetes recommend weight loss for disease management. The safety and efficacy of treatment with phentermine (PHEN)/topiramate (TPM) extended release (ER) plus lifestyle modification for weight loss and glycemic benefits were assessed in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 56-week studies of obese/overweight adults with type 2 diabetes.. The OB-202/DM-230 Study was a 56-week phase 2 trial that randomized subjects to receive once-daily placebo or PHEN/TPM ER 15 mg/92 mg (15/92). The primary end point was change in HbA₁c level. A post hoc analysis of a subpopulation with type 2 diabetes from a second study, CONQUER, is also presented. All subjects made lifestyle modifications, and comorbidities were managed to the standard of care.. The study groups comprised 130 subjects with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the OB-202/DM-230 Study (mean baseline HbA₁c 8.7% [72 mmol/mol]) and 388 subjects with type 2 diabetes in the CONQUER Study (mean baseline HbA1c 6.8% [51 mmol/mol]). At week 56 in the OB-202/DM-230, change in weight (from intent-to-treat sample with last observation carried forward [ITT-LOCF]) was -2.7% for placebo and -9.4% for PHEN/TPM ER 15/92 (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo). Change in HbA1c level (from ITT-LOCF) was -1.2% (-13.1 mmol/mol) for placebo and -1.6% (-17.5 mmol/mol) for PHEN/TPM ER 15/92 (P = 0.0381). In both the OB-202/DM-230 and CONQUER, greater numbers of patients randomized to receive PHEN/TPM ER treatment achieved HbA₁c targets with reduced need for diabetic medications when compared with the placebo group. Common adverse events included paraesthesia, constipation, and insomnia.. PHEN/TPM ER plus lifestyle modification can effectively promote weight loss and improve glycemic control as a treatment approach in obese/overweight patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Humans; Life Style; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Phentermine; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

2014
An open-label drug-drug interaction study of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate and glyburide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2013, Volume: 33, Issue:12

    Topiramate is approved for epilepsy and migraine headache management and has potential antidiabetic activity. Because topiramate and antidiabetic drugs may be co-administered, the potential drug-drug interactions between topiramate and glyburide (glibenclamide), a commonly used sulfonylurea antidiabetic agent, was evaluated at steady state in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This was a single-center, open-label, phase I, drug interaction study of topiramate (150 mg/day) and glyburide (5 mg/day alone and concomitantly) in patients with T2DM. The study consisted of 14-day screening, 48-day open-label treatment, and a 7-day follow-up phase. Serial blood and urine were obtained and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry for topiramate, glyburide, and its active metabolites M1 (4-trans-hydroxy-glyburide) and M2 (3-cis-hydroxy-glyburide) concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by model-independent methods. Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline and safety parameters were monitored throughout the study.. Of 28 enrolled patients, 24 completed the study. Co-administration of topiramate resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the glyburide area under the concentration-time curve (25 %) and maximum plasma concentration (22 %), and reduction in systemic exposure of M1 (13 %) and M2 (15 %). Renal clearance of M1 (13 %) and M2 (12 %) increased during treatment with topiramate. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate were unaffected by co-administration of glyburide. Co-administration of topiramate and glyburide was generally tolerable in patients with T2DM.. Glyburide did not affect the pharmacokinetics of topiramate. Co-administration of topiramate decreased systemic exposure of glyburide and its active metabolites; combined treatment may require dosing adjustments of glyburide as per clinical judgment and glycemic control.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Female; Fructose; Glyburide; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Topiramate; Young Adult

2013
Quality of life and objective measures of diabetic neuropathy in a prospective placebo-controlled trial of ruboxistaurin and topiramate.
    Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011, May-01, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    The Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) is a validated comprehensive questionnaire designed to capture the entire spectrum of DN related to large fiber, small fiber, and autonomic neuropathy not captured in existing instruments. We aimed to determine if the Norfolk QOL-DN could be used to capture changes in QOL that correlate with nerve fiber-specific objective measures in a placebo-controlled trial of two agents that affect different nerve fibers.. Sixty patients with DN were allocated to treatment on ruboxistaurin (RBX) (n = 18), topiramate (TPX) (n = 18), or placebo (n = 18). QOL-DN was administered and objective measures of nerve function were performed at entry and end of the study period.. Total QOL scores improved significantly in the active treatment groups (RBX -9.56 ± 4.13; TPX -12.22 ± 2.76) but not in placebo (-5.56 ± 3.49). There were differences in nerve function improvement between treatments. Neurological symptom scores (NSS) improved with TPX from 5.5 (2.3) to 4.3 (0.65) (p = .007), sensory scores improved with TPX from 15.5 (1.79) to 8.3 (1.19) (p < .001), motor scores did not change, and sensory and motor impairment scores improved with TPX from 18.8 (2.15) to 12.1 (1.71) (p = .003). Total neuropathy scores (TNS) improved with TPX from 24.35 (2.61) to 16.35 (2.02) (p = .001). Neuropathy total symptom score-6 (NTSS-6) changes were significant for both treatments: RBX 4.38 (0.75) to 1.49 (0.38) (p < .001) and TPX 7.57 (1.3) to 4.26 (0.95) (p = .036). Changes in QOL-DN large fiber subscores correlated (Spearman's rank) significantly with changes in NTSS-6 (r = 0.55; p < .0001), NSS (r = 0.31; p < .04), neuropathy impairment score (NIS) (r = 0.35; p < .02), and TNS (r = 0.48; p < .0006). Changes in QOL-DN small fiber subscores correlated significantly with changes in NTSS-6 total scores (r = 0.40; p < .005) and intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (r = -0.29; p < .05).. Ruboxistaurin produced significant improvement in large fiber measures while TPX produced significant changes in small fiber measures. The Norfolk QOL-DN tool differentiated between these changes captured in the fiber-specific domains. Correlations were found between objective measures of neuropathy and total QOL, but those with nerve fiber domain scores were modest and reinforce the need to quantify QOL as an endpoint in neuropathy independent of other measures.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Female; Fructose; Humans; Indoles; Male; Maleimides; Middle Aged; Placebos; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Research Design; Surveys and Questionnaires; Topiramate

2011
Efficacy and safety of topiramate in combination with metformin in the treatment of obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    International journal of obesity (2005), 2007, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    To investigate the efficacy and safety of topiramate in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin.. This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All subjects received a non-pharmacological program of diet, exercise and behavioral modification throughout the study; the assigned diet was 600 kcal/day less than the subject's individually calculated energy expenditure. After a 6-week single-blind placebo run-in, subjects were randomized to placebo, topiramate 96 mg/day or topiramate 192 mg/day. Following an 8-week titration period, subjects remained on their assigned dose for 52 weeks. However, the sponsor ended the study early in order to develop a new controlled-release formulation with the potential to enhance tolerability and simplify dosing in this patient population. A total of 646 obese men and women (age: 18-75 years, body mass index: 27-50 kg/m(2)) with an established history of type 2 diabetes mellitus controlled by metformin monotherapy were randomized. Efficacy was assessed in a pre-determined modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population of 307 subjects whose randomization date would have allowed them to complete 24 weeks on study medication before the announcement of study termination.. Joint primary efficacy parameters were mean percent change in weight and change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 24.. Subjects in the placebo, topiramate 96 mg/day and topiramate 192 mg/day groups lost 1.7%, 4.5% (P<0.001) and 6.5% (P<0.001), respectively, of their baseline body weight and had absolute decreases in HbA(1c) of 0.1%, 0.4% (P<0.001) and 0.6% (P<0.001) (MITT, last observation carried forward). Topiramate-treated subjects also experienced statistically significant decreases in systolic blood pressure. Most common adverse events were paresthesia and events related to the central nervous system.. Topiramate was effective for weight reduction and improvement in glycemic control in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin monotherapy. Further study in obese diabetics is warranted.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fructose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

2007
Weight loss and metabolic effects of topiramate in overweight and obese type 2 diabetic patients: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
    International journal of obesity (2005), 2007, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    To examine the metabolic effects and body composition changes after topiramate treatment of obese type 2 diabetic patients (DM2) for 11 months.. Thirty-eight DM2 on diet or sulfonylurea treatment participated in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Thirteen placebo-treated and nine topiramate-treated patients completed the trial. Patients were randomized to treatment with topiramate 96 mg b.i.d. or placebo (6-week run-in phase, 2-months titration phase, 9-months maintenance phase).. Insulin sensitivity was measured with euglycaemic hyperinsulinemic clamps. Weight, HbA1c, fasting glucose, blood lipids and safety variables were measured at regular intervals. Body composition was determined with computerized tomography. Meal tests were performed to evaluate postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Three-day diet recalls were carried out to evaluate energy ingestion.. The mean age was 58.6+/-7.1 years, body weight 98.1+/-16.1 kg, BMI 33.0+/-4.5 kg/m(2), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.3+/-0.9%. In topiramate-treated patients, there were significant reductions in HbA1c (1.1+/-0.9%), fasting plasma glucose, body weight (-6.6+/-3.3%), as well as body fat, lean body mass, postprandial glucose and free fatty acid levels but there were no significant changes in insulin sensitivity. The daily average energy intake decreased more in the topiramate group than in the placebo group. Paresthesia and central nervous system-related side effects were the main causes for the dropout rate.. Topiramate treatment of overweight DM2 reduced body weight and body fat, and was associated with a marked improvement in glycaemic control whereas no significant improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was demonstrated. Further studies are required to clarify whether this effect might occur through changes in insulin sensitivity in the liver and/or pancreatic insulin secretion.

    Topics: Adipocytes; Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Body Composition; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dietary Fats; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fructose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Overweight; Placebos; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2007
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate controlled release in the treatment of obese type 2 diabetic patients.
    Diabetes care, 2007, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    This is a randomized, placebo-controlled study of the weight-loss efficacy and safety of a controlled-release (CR) formulation of topiramate in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet and exercise alone or in combination with metformin.. Patients with type 2 diabetes, BMI > or =27 kg/m2, A1C >6.5 and <11.0%, treated with diet and exercise alone or in combination with metformin monotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized to placebo or topiramate CR titrated up to 175 mg/day. Treatment consisted of a 7-week titration phase followed by a 9-week maintenance phase.. A total of 111 subjects were randomized and analyzed. By the end of week 16, patients in the placebo and topiramate groups lost 2.5 and 6.0 kg, which represented 2.3 and 5.8%, respectively, of their baseline body weight (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). A1C improved from a baseline of 7.4% in the placebo and 7.6% in the topiramate groups to 7.1 and 6.7%, respectively, representing a 0.4 and 0.9% reduction from baseline, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). Topiramate also significantly reduced blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion. Adverse events were predominantly neuropsychiatric or central and peripheral nervous system related.. Topiramate CR treatment produced significant weight loss and meaningful improvements in A1C and blood pressure in obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet and exercise or in combination with metformin. However, the central nervous system and psychiatric adverse event profile of topiramate CR makes it unsuitable for the treatment of obesity and diabetes.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Reducing; Double-Blind Method; Exercise; Female; Fructose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Placebos; Safety; Topiramate

2007
Topiramate in the treatment of obese subjects with drug-naive type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of topiramate as an adjunct to diet and exercise in drug-naive, obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.. Drug-naive individuals with type 2 diabetes, body mass index (BMI) of > or =27 and <50 kg/m(2) and haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) of <10.5% were enrolled into the study. All the individuals participated in a non-pharmacologic weight loss program (Pathways to Change((R)); Johnson & Johnson Healthcare Systems, Piscataway, NJ, USA) throughout the trial. After a 6-week placebo run-in, the subjects were randomized to placebo, topiramate 96 mg/day or topiramate 192 mg/day. Subjects were scheduled for 8-week titration and 52-week maintenance phases. The study was ended early; efficacy data were reported for a predefined modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (n = 229), with 40 weeks of treatment. All the subjects who provided any safety data were included in the safety population (n = 535).. Baseline mean weight was 103.7 kg, BMI 36 kg/m(2) and HbA(1c) 6.7% across all treatment groups. By the end of week 40, the placebo, the topiramate 96 mg/day and topiramate 192 mg/day groups lost 2.5, 6.6 and 9.1% of their baseline body weight respectively (p < 0.001 vs. placebo, MITT population using last observation carried forward). The decrease in HbA(1c) was 0.2, 0.6 and 0.7% respectively (p < 0.001 vs. placebo, MITT). Topiramate significantly reduced blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion; a weight-loss-independent HbA(1c) improving effect of topiramate was demonstrated. Adverse events were predominantly related to central nervous system (CNS).. Topiramate as an add-on treatment to lifestyle improvements produced significant weight loss and improved glucose homeostasis in obese, drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes. These treatment advantages should be balanced against the occurrence of adverse events in the CNS.

    Topics: Albuminuria; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases; Obesity; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

2007

Other Studies

7 other study(ies) available for topiramate and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

ArticleYear
Prevalence of Antiobesity Treatment and Weight-Inducing Antihyperglycemic Agents Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2022, Volume: 44, Issue:3

    Nearly 90% of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are either overweight or obese, placing them at high risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. The main objective of this study was to assess the use of antiobesity medications and antihyperglycemic agents that produce weight gain among patients with T2DM who qualify for National Institutes of Health guideline-recommended pharmacologic weight loss therapy.. Among adults with T2DM who qualified for antiobesity treatment (N = 2910), only 40 participants (2.2%; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3) were on pharmacologic antiobesity treatment within 30 days of survey interview. The only antiobesity medications identified were liraglutide (n = 34 [1.9%]), phentermine (n = 4 [0.2%]), orlistat (n = 1 [0.1%]), and phentermine/topiramate (n = 1 [0.0%]). Among those who were on antihyperglycemic treatment (n = 2401), 1661 (66%; 95% CI, 63.1-68.8) were on weight-inducing antihyperglycemic agents; however, a downward trend in the use of these agents over time was observed (from 78.4% in 2005-2006 to 53.3% in 2015-2016; P < 0.0005).. This is the first national epidemiologic study evaluating the use of antiobesity medications and weight-inducing antihyperglycemic agents among patients with T2DM who qualify for weight loss therapy. This study documents that patients are not on guideline-directed weight loss therapy. Furthermore, weight loss goals are likely compromised by 66% of individuals being on weight-inducing antihyperglycemic therapy. Use of antiobesity medications could play a significant role in promoting weight loss and potentially lead to a healthier lifestyle, which could reduce microvascular and macrovascular complications. Stronger recommendations in using guideline-directed therapy in obesity complicated by T2DM are necessary.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Nutrition Surveys; Obesity; Orlistat; Phentermine; Prevalence; Topiramate; United States; Weight Loss

2022
Disruption of the hippocampal and hypothalamic blood-brain barrier in a diet-induced obese model of type II diabetes: prevention and treatment by the mitochondrial carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, topiramate.
    Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2019, Jan-08, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Type II diabetes is a vascular risk factor for cognitive impairment and increased risk of dementia. Disruption of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB) and blood-brain barrier (BBB) are hallmarks of subsequent retinal edema and central nervous system dysfunction. However, the mechanisms by which diet or metabolic syndrome induces dysfunction are not understood. A proposed mechanism is an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress. Inhibition of mitochondrial carbonic anhydrase (mCA) decreases ROS and oxidative stress. In this study, topiramate, a mCA inhibitor, was examined for its ability to protect the BRB and BBB in diet-induced obese type II diabetic mice.. BBB and BRB permeability were assessed using. High-fat feeding caused increased entry of. Blood-brain barrier and blood-retinal barrier dysfunction were examined in a mouse model of diet-induced obese type II diabetes. These studies demonstrate that there are spatial and temporal differences in

    Topics: Animals; Blood-Brain Barrier; Blood-Retinal Barrier; Capillary Permeability; Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, High-Fat; Hippocampus; Hypothalamus; Male; Mice; Obesity; Oxidative Stress; Tight Junction Proteins; Topiramate

2019
Cardiometabolic Disease Staging Predicts Effectiveness of Weight-Loss Therapy to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Pooled Results From Phase III Clinical Trials Assessing Phentermine/Topiramate Extended Release.
    Diabetes care, 2017, Volume: 40, Issue:7

    To assess the ability of medication-assisted weight loss to prevent diabetes as a function of the baseline weighted Cardiometabolic Disease Staging (CMDS) score.. We pooled data from 3,040 overweight and obese participants in three randomized controlled trials-CONQUER, EQUIP, and SEQUEL-assessing efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate extended release (ER) for weight loss. In these double-blind phase III trials, overweight/obese adult patients were treated with a lifestyle intervention and randomly assigned to placebo versus once-daily oral phentermine/topiramate ER. The weighted CMDS score was calculated using baseline quantitative clinical data including waist circumference, blood glucose, blood pressure, and blood lipids. Incident diabetes was defined based on serial measures of fasting glucose, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test glucose, and/or HbA. The absolute decrease in 1-year diabetes incidence rates in subjects treated with medication versus placebo was greatest in those with high-risk CMDS scores at baseline (10.43-6.29%), intermediate in those with moderate CMDS risk (4.67-2.37%), and small in the low-risk category (1.51-0.67%). The number of participants needed to treat to prevent one new case of diabetes over a 56-week period was 24, 43, and 120 in those with baseline CMDS scores of ≥60, 30-59, and 0-29, respectively.. Numbers needed to treat to prevent one case of type 2 diabetes are markedly lower in patients with high-risk scores. CMDS can be used to quantify risk of diabetes in overweight/obese individuals and predict the effectiveness of weight-loss therapy to prevent diabetes.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fructose; Humans; Life Style; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Phentermine; Topiramate; Waist Circumference; Weight Loss

2017
A candidate-gene association study of topiramate-induced weight loss in obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2016, Volume: 26, Issue:2

    Clinical response to topiramate can vary greatly in obese patients. Identifying genetic variants associated with treatment response could help gain insight into the mechanism of action of topiramate. Little is known about the relationship between genetic variability and topiramate treatment response. We performed a large-scale candidate-gene study to identify genetic risk factors predictive of topiramate-induced weight loss.. We collected DNA samples from patients who had previously participated in clinical trials to assess the efficacy of topiramate for the treatment of obesity. A custom chip containing single nucleotide polymorphisms from ∼ 480 candidate genes was utilized to genotype a discovery cohort of 445 obese patients from a clinical study. Variants predictive of topiramate-induced weight loss were identified and further tested in an independent replication cohort of drug-naive, obese patients with type 2 diabetes (N=139).. We identified a haplotype in INSR that may contribute to differential topiramate-induced weight loss. Carriers and noncarriers of an INSR haplotype lost 9.1 and 7.0% of body weight, respectively (P = 6.5 × 10(-6), P adj = 0.001). This finding was replicated, with carriers and noncarriers losing 9.5 and 7.3% of body weight, respectively (P Bonf=0.02), in the independent replication cohort. We also identified an SNP in HNF1A that may be associated with topiramate response and an SNP in GRIA3 that may be associated with nonpharmacologic treatment response.. According to our preliminary findings, genetic variation in the INSR and HNF1A genes may differentially affect weight loss in obese individuals treated with topiramate and genes related to insulin action are implicated in modulating topiramate response. However, these findings need to be further replicated in additional larger samples.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fructose; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2016
FPIN’s clinical inquiries. Medications for weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    American family physician, 2012, Mar-15, Volume: 85, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fluoxetine; Fructose; Humans; Lactones; Orlistat; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Topiramate

2012
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy relieved with use of oral topiramate.
    Southern medical journal, 2003, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Diabetic peripheral neuropathy affects 5 to 50% of people with diabetes in the United States. It is a progressive disorder that results in a gradual decrease in peripheral sensation and eventually complete loss of sensation. Patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy are challenging to treat because of intolerable adverse medication effects and the development of tolerance to medical treatment. We present the case of a patient with peripheral neuropathy that was unresponsive to usual therapies. She experienced significant relief with the administration of topiramate. Topiramate is an anticonvulsant that is gaining recognition in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain syndromes.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Female; Fructose; Humans; Middle Aged; Neuroprotective Agents; Pain; Topiramate

2003
Long-term effects of topiramate on bipolar mood instability, weight change and glycemic control: a case-series.
    European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2001, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topiramate is an antiepileptic agent, which is being investigated as a mood-stabilizer. Three obese individuals with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder and type II diabetes mellitus received topiramate treatment in combination with antipsychotics and valproate or carbamazepine. In addition to improved mood stability, these individuals lost between 16 to 20.5% of their pre-topiramate body weight and also achieved significant glycemic control.

    Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Bipolar Disorder; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fructose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Time; Topiramate; Weight Loss

2001