tipranavir and HIV-Infections

The development of tipranavir and darunavir, second generation non-peptidic HIV protease inhibitors, with marked improved resistance profiles, has opened a new perspective on the treatment of antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced HIV patients with poor viral load control. The aim of this study was to determine the virologic response in ART experienced patients to tipranavir-ritonavir and darunavir-ritonavir based regimens.. A computer based literature search was conducted in the databases of HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative), Medline and Cochrane library. Meta-analysis was performed by including randomized controlled studies that were conducted in ART experienced patients with plasma viral load above 1,000 copies HIV RNA/ml. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for viral loads of <50 copies and <400 copies HIV RNA/ml at the end of the intervention were determined by the random effects model. Meta-regression, sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were done. The number of HIV-1 patients who were on either a tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen and achieved viral load less than 50 copies HIV RNA/ml was significantly higher (overall OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 2.61-4.52) than the number of HIV-1 patients who were on investigator selected boosted comparator HIV-1 protease inhibitors (CPIs-ritonavir). Similarly, the number of patients with viral load less than 400 copies HIV RNA/ml was significantly higher in either the tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen treated group (overall OR = 3.0; 95% CI, 2.15-4.11). Meta-regression showed that the viral load reduction was independent of baseline viral load, baseline CD4 count and duration of tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen.. Tipranavir and darunavir based regimens were more effective in patients who were ART experienced and had poor viral load control. Further studies are required to determine their consistent viral load suppression effect as the duration of treatment is more prolonged.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) are potent antiretroviral drugs that represent a pivotal component of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). PIs have evolved over the years to gain in potency, convenience, tolerability and genetic barrier to resistance.. Updated summary of evidence-based information about the efficacy and safety of PIs on initial, simplification and rescue interventions in HIV patients.. Review of available data reported in peer-reviewed journals, medical conferences and treatment guidelines.. Due to their characteristics, PIs are, and will remain, a cornerstone component in most lines of antiretroviral therapy. The antiviral activity, tolerability and convenience of PIs have improved significantly in recent years. Differences between compounds within this class may favour their use in specific situations, such as the friendly metabolic profile of atazanavir in patients with cardiovascular disease or the high genetic barrier of darunavir or tipranavir in heavily pretreated individuals with HIV.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Metabolome; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

This review focuses on the use of tipranavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine for the treatment of HIV infection that has become resistant to protease inhibitors and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.. Tipranavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir are boosted protease inhibitors highly active against HIV that has developed mutations that confer resistance to other protease inhibitors. For both drugs, there are scores to predict activity based on a combination of mutations. Best results are obtained when each drug is combined with one and preferably two other completely active antiretrovirals. The interaction profile and toxicity profile is better for darunavir/ritonavir, which in addition has shown positive outcomes in clinical trials of patients with early failure.Etravirine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor highly active against HIV that has developed mutations that confer resistance to nevirapine or efavirenz. Clinical trials results suggest that etravirine should be used with other active antiretrovirals. Best results for etravirine have been obtained in combination with darunavir/ritonavir in patients with extensive protease inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance. The role of etravirine for the treatment of early failure of efavirenz-based or nevirapine-based regimens remains to be elucidated. Resistance to etravirine requires the accumulation of multiple reverse transcriptase mutations different from K103N, which has no impact on activity.. Tipranavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine are very important additions to the therapeutic armamentarium against HIV that has become resistant to protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Since 1996, the prognosis of those living with HIV and AIDS has improved significantly due to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Treatment failure can occur clinically, immunologically or virologically. Until recently, treatment options for those individuals harboring resistance to the three initial licensed classes of drug have been limited. These three classes are the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs). New drugs are now available in these classes (second generation NNRTIs and novel PIs) as well as new classes of drugs, integrase inhibitors, CCR5 antagonists and fusion inhibitors. If these new drugs are used appropriately with other active antiretroviral agents, it is probable that antiretroviral therapy can achieve the optimum outcome of HIV therapy - durable suppression of HIV viraemia. This article is a review of currently available antiretroviral agents including the new classes and second generation drugs, resistance pathways and treatment options for salvage therapy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclohexanes; Darunavir; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Maraviroc; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Tipranavir (Aptivus) is a selective nonpeptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) that is used in the treatment of treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection. Tipranavir is administered orally twice daily and must be given in combination with low-dose ritonavir, which is used to boost its bioavailability. The durable efficacy of tipranavir, in combination with low-dose ritonavir (tipranavir/ritonavir 500 mg/200 mg twice daily), has been demonstrated in well designed trials in treatment-experienced adults infected with multidrug-resistant strains of HIV-1. In treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection receiving an optimized background regimen, viral suppression was greater and immunological responses were better with regimens containing tipranavir/ritonavir than with comparator ritonavir-boosted PI-containing regimens. The efficacy benefit appeared to be more marked in patients receiving two fully active drugs in the regimen, with the combination of tipranavir/ritonavir and enfuvirtide (for the first time) appearing to be the most successful. Although tipranavir is generally well tolerated, clinical hepatitis and hepatic decompensation, and intracranial haemorrhage have been associated with the drug. Tipranavir also has a complex drug-interaction profile. Thus, tipranavir, administered with ritonavir, is an effective treatment option for use in the combination therapy of adults with HIV-1 infection who have been previously treated with other antiretroviral drugs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Tipranavir (TPV), a protease inhibitor, has box warnings for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure and death). A box warning is a labeling statement about serious adverse events leading to significant injury and/or death. A box warning is the most serious warning placed in the labeling of a prescription medication. As a result of the respective morbidity and mortality associated with ICH and hepatic failure, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was searched for reports of these adverse events in HIV-infected patients receiving a tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen. This search comprised part of the FDA's safety analysis for traditional approval. From July 2006 to March 2007, 10 cases of ICH were identified in AERS. From June 2005 to March 2007, 12 cases of liver-associated deaths were identified. One patient experienced liver failure and fatal ICH. Most patients with these events had additional risk factors. Among patients with liver-associated deaths, 3 had HIV-RNA less than 400 copies per milliliter at the time of hepatic failure. Among 10 patients who discontinued TPV/r when hepatic failure developed, median number of days post-TPV/r to death was 23 (range, 2-69 days). Review of AERS did not identify new safety concerns regarding ICH. Among most patients with liver-associated deaths, death appears to occur soon after hepatic failure develops. If considering TPV/r, careful assessment of risk/benefit is suggested for patients at risk for ICH and hepatic failure.

Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Liver Failure; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Highly active antiretroviral therapy can provide sustained viral suppression and a beneficial immunological response in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced pediatric patients infected with HIV. While there have been many antiretroviral studies in adults infected with HIV, considerably less information is available in similar HIV-infected pediatric or adolescent patients. Tipranavir, a new-generation protease inhibitor approved for use in adults with resistant HIV strains, has recently been studied in HIV-infected children and adolescents. In this article, we summarize available pharmacokinetic, safety, tolerability and efficacy data obtained from children and adolescents treated with a pediatric tipranavir formulation.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Antiretroviral rescue therapy has been revolutionized by the development of new drugs in the last few years: enfuvirtide (a fusion inhibitor), tipranavir/ritonavir (a high genetic barrier protease inhibitor), darunavir/ritonavir (a high genetic barrier protease inhibitor), etravirine (a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor active against nevirapine- and efavirenz- resistant HIV), maraviroc (a CCR5 coreceptor inhibitor) and raltegravir (an integrase inhibitor). The use of these drugs in rescue regimens has allowed the goal of antiretroviral rescue therapy to be the same as that in treatment naive-patients: to achieve a viral load lower than 50 copies of RNA of HIV/ml. Raltegravir is the first integrase inhibitor available for clinical use in Spain. This drug is primarily metabolized through UGT1A1-mediated glucuronidation and consequently has a low potential for interactions with drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P450 pathway. Raltegravir has been demonstrated to have high efficacy in two large clinical trials of rescue therapy, especially when combined with darunavir/ritonavir and enfuvirtide. Preliminary data suggest that raltegravir could also be an effective drug in treatment-naive patients and as substitution therapy in patients with toxicity due to boosted protease inhibitor therapy. The drug's unusual mechanism of action has reopened the possibility of a positive effect on latent HIV reservoirs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclohexanes; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Forecasting; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Maraviroc; Nitriles; Peptide Fragments; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

Once patients have a triple class virological failure, their treatment options are limited and there is an increased risk of death. In order to construct active treatment regimens, new potent antiretroviral agents are available for these patients. The virological target in patients with treatment failure is now plasma HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml when 2 or more potent drugs are identified. If at least two active drugs cannot be identified, the current regimen should be maintained until new drugs become available, assuming that there is an immunological and clinical stability, in order to avoid the use of a single-active drug that usually leads to rapid development of resistance, further limiting the future treatment options. In this article, the current state of knowledge about these new agents available and the guidelines of main societies are reviewed.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Organic Chemicals; Peptide Fragments; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir is a nonpeptidic protease inhibitor that has activity against human immunodeficiency virus strains resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Tipranavir 500 mg is coadministered with ritonavir 200 mg. Tipranavir is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and, when combined with ritonavir in vitro, causes inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A in addition to induction of glucuronidase and the drug transporter P-glycoprotein. As a result, drug-drug interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir and other coadministered drugs are a concern. In addition to interactions with other antiretrovirals, tipranavir-ritonavir interactions with antifungals, antimycobacterials, oral contraceptives, statins, and antidiarrheals have been specifically evaluated. For other drugs such as antiarrhythmics, antihistamines, ergot derivatives, selective serotonin receptor agonists (or triptans), gastrointestinal motility agents, erectile dysfunction agents, and calcium channel blockers, interactions can be predicted based on studies with other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and what is known about tipranavir-ritonavir CYP and P-glycoprotein utilization. The highly complex nature of drug interactions dictates that cautious prescribing should occur with narrow-therapeutic-index drugs that have not been specifically studied. Thus, the known interaction potential of tipranavir-ritonavir is reported, and in vitro and in vivo data are provided to assist clinicians in predicting interactions not yet studied. As more clinical interaction data are generated, better insight will be gained into the specific mechanisms of interactions with tipranavir-ritonavir.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir is a recently approved nonpeptidic protease inhibitor specifically developed for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in treatment-experienced patients with protease inhibitor-resistant infection. It is active against a wide range of drug-resistant laboratory- and patient-derived isolates. Tipranavir requires pharmacokinetic boosting by ritonavir (200 mg) to achieve therapeutic levels with twice-daily dosing and must be administered with food for optimal absorption. It is a potent protease inhibitor with a unique drug-resistance profile that offers advantages in the management of cases of multidrug-resistant HIV infection. Tipranavir (in combination with ritonavir) is both an inhibitor and inducer of cytochrome p450, with significant potential for drug-drug interactions, and therefore, it must be used cautiously when administered to patients who are receiving other drugs. Evolution of drug resistance after treatment failure with tipranavir is complex and is not yet fully understood. There is limited overlap in the resistance mutations that predict response to tipranavir and another new protease inhibitor, darunavir, which is active against drug-resistant isolates. Tipranavir is associated with elevations in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, as well as elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and can cause the typical gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with all protease inhibitors.

Topics: Cholesterol; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Triglycerides

Despite the availability of a growing number of potent antiretroviral agents, efforts to completely suppress viral replication in patients with HIV-1 infection are limited because of the increasing risk of resistance. Tipranavir (TPV) is the first in a class of antiretroviral agents known as nonpeptidic protease inhibitors (PIs). TPV exhibits a resistance profile distinct from that of other currently available PIs, making it a potential option for treatment experienced patients with resistance to multiple Pls.. This article discusses the clinical pharmacology and efficacy of TPV in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in patients who are highly treatment experienced or harbor PI-resistant virus.. A search was conducted of English language, peer-reviewed articles and abstracts indexed on the MEDLINE and Current Contents databases (1966-May 2007) using the terms tipranavir, Aptivus, nonpeptidic protease inhibitor, human immunodeficiency virus, and protease resistance. Product information and abstracts from national and international AIDS and retrovirus meetings (2005-2006) were also reviewed.. Use of TPV in combination with ritonavir (TPV/r) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration based on 2 Phase III studies. In these studies, HIV-infected patients with extensive treatment experience with antiretroviral agents, including PIs, nucleoside analogues, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, were randomized to receive TPV/r or a ritonavir-boosted comparator PI. All patients had evidence of resistance to multiple PIs. The specific comparator (amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, or saquinavir) was selected for each patient with the aid of resistance testing. Each patient also received an optimized background regimen of antiretroviral agents, which could include enfuvirtide. At 24, 48, and 96 weeks, the TPV/r group had higher rates of virologic response (defined as > or =1 log10 decrease in HIV RNA) and viral suppression (to <400 and <50 copies/mL) than did the comparator group.. Although TPV has a mechanism of action similar to that of earlier-generation PIs, it has activity against HIV-1 strains with resistance to multiple PIs. Currently, TPV/r is indicated for use in highly treatment experienced patients with multiple PI resistance.

Topics: Adult; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Drug-drug interactions are a major practical concern for physicians treating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) because of the many medications that HIV-positive patients must take. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions can occur at different levels (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) and are difficult to predict. Of all the processes that give rise to drug interactions, metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) is the most frequent. Moreover, medications prescribed to HIV-positive patients may also be CYP3A inhibitors and inducers: Tipranavir, in the absence of ritonavir, is a CYP3A inducer, and ritonavir is a CYP3A inhibitor. Fortunately, the drug interactions between tipranavir coadministered with ritonavir and other antiretroviral medications or with other medications commonly used in HIV therapy are well characterized. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetic interactions between tipranavir/ritonavir and 11 other antiretroviral medications and between tipranavir/ritonavir and drugs used to treat opportunistic infections such as fungal infections, antiretroviral-treatment-related conditions such as hyperlipidemia, and side effects such as diarrhea.

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir [PNU 140690, tipranivir, Aptivus] is a second-generation HIV dihydropyrone (a sulphonamide derivative), nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (NPPI) discovered by Pharmacia & Upjohn (now Pfizer) in the US. The compound is in development with Boehringer Ingelheim. Tipranavir has potent in vitro activity against a variety of HIV-1 laboratory strains and clinical isolates, including those resistant to ritonavir, as well as HIV-2. Tipranavir has been shown to act synergistically with other antiretroviral agents. The limited bioavailability of the hard gel (and first available) formulation of tipranavir led to the development of a soft capsule formulation that has better oral bioavailability. Pharmacia Corporation (now Pfizer) considers that the resistance profile of tipranavir may be sufficiently unique for it to be effective against protease inhibitor resistant virus. On 16 April 2003, Pharmacia Corporation was acquired by, and merged into, Pfizer. In February 2000, Boehringer Ingelheim acquired exclusive worldwide rights to tipranavir. Tipranavir was launched in the US in mid-2005. In June 2005, the US FDA granted accelerated approval to tipranavir capsules for use in combination treatment, based on 24-week data from ongoing clinical trials. The approved dose is Aptivus 500 mg taken with ritonavir 200 mg, twice daily. Aptivus 250 mg soft gel capsules are expected to be available in the second half of 2005. A submission was made to the FDA in October 2004 seeking accelerated approval. In May 2005, the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee of the FDA recommended the approval of tipranavir. The positive recommendation is based on data from the RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 studies. Also in October 2004, Boehringer Ingelheim submitted a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for tipranavir for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents in patients who are protease inhibitor experienced. In July 2005, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) issued a positive opinion for tipranavir in the European Union. If approved, the drug will be marketed in Europe too under the name Aptivus. Marketing authorisation under exceptional circumstances (accelerated approval) is expected before the end of 2005.A phase III clinical programme (RESIST- Randomised Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multi-drug ReSistant Patients with Tipranavir) was launched by Boehringer Ingelheim in Februa

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was discovered in 1982, but treatment strategies were not introduced until 5 years later. Early regimens consisted of one or two drugs and often led to treatment failure. Since the advent in 1995 of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which consists of at least three agents, a dramatic improvement has been seen in the number of patients attaining undetectable viral loads, improved CD4 counts, and improved survival. However, early HAART often consisted of drugs with complex dosing schedules, strict food requirements, treatment-limiting adverse effects, and the need to take 16-20 pills/day. These treatment barriers often led to patient nonadherence, with subsequent treatment failure and development of resistant strains. The CD4 count and viral load are the most important surrogate markers used to determine if treatment is indicated. Current guidelines suggest starting treatment in patients who are symptomatic with an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining illness regardless of CD4 count or viral load, as well as in asymptomatic patients with a CD4 count of 350 cells/mm(3) or below. In patients with CD4 counts above 350 cells/mm(3) and viral loads above 100,000 copies/ml, some clinicians prefer to defer treatment, whereas others will consider starting therapy; treatment is deferred in patients with CD4 counts above 350 cells/mm(3) and viral load s below 100,000 copies/ml. If therapy is started, the selection of appropriate agents is based on comorbidities (liver disease, depression, cardiovascular disease), pregnancy status, adherence potential (dosage regimen, pill burden, dosing frequency), food restrictions (dosing with regard to meals), adverse drug effects, and potential drug-drug interactions. Within the last 8 years, newer antiretroviral agents have focused on ways to improve adherence, such as convenient dosing (fewer pills), pharmacokinetic and formulation changes to reduce dosing frequency or pill burden, and coformulated dosage forms that contain two or three drugs in one convenient pill. Other improvements include increased potency of newer agents, agents sensitive to a highly resistant virus, improved adverse-effect profile (e.g., less gastrointestinal effects, improved lipid profiles), as well as protease inhibitor boosting with ritonavir, which takes advantage of the potent cytochrome P450 inhibitory action of ritonavir. This review focuses on the concepts of antiretroviral therapy, barrier

Topics: Adenine; Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Investigational; Emtricitabine; Enfuvirtide; Furans; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Organophosphonates; Patient Compliance; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

Tipranavir is a non-peptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor. It binds strongly and selectively, has a favourable resistance profile, and is administered orally twice daily with a subtherapeutic dosage of ritonavir in a 'boosted' regimen (TPV/r) in order to increase its bioavailability. Analysis of clinical isolates from treatment-experienced patients identified the following tipranavir resistance-associated HIV protease mutations: L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D, I84V. In two large, well designed phase III trials in protease inhibitor-experienced, HIV-infected patients, the RESIST (Randomised Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multidrug reSistant patients with Tipranavir)-1 and -2 studies, oral TPV/r 500mg/200mg twice daily achieved a significantly better virological response after 24 weeks than standard ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. This held true for the proportion of patients achieving a >or=1 log(10) decrease in plasma HIV-RNA levels (viral load) [42% and 41% vs 22% and 15%; both p < 0.0001; primary endpoint] and other virological parameters (the proportion of patients with undetectable viral load and total viral load reduction). In addition, a significantly larger increase in CD4+ cell count was achieved with TPV/r than comparator regimens in these trials. The most common adverse events in clinical trials of tipranavir were gastrointestinal. The incidence of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events in the RESIST trials was 8% (pooled data).

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir is a newly approved protease inhibitor that belongs to the class of 4-hydroxy-5,6-dyhydro-2-pyrones. It exhibits potent in vitro activity against both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and HIV-2, including clinical isolates with multiple protease inhibitor-resistant mutations. Tipranavir requires coadministration with ritonavir to achieve clinically meaningful serum concentration. In randomized, phase III, open-label trials, it was found to be superior to the currently available boosted protease inhibitors in highly treatment-experienced patients with multiple protease inhibitor mutations. Thus, it provides a welcome new option for salvage antiretroviral therapy. The most common adverse effects associated with tipranavir are diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Common laboratory abnormalities include elevations of total cholesterol, triglycerides and liver enzymes.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Molecular Structure; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Darunavir; Diarrhea; Dizziness; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Headache; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The past decade has seen many exciting achievements and advances in the treatment of HIV infection. One of the key components in this ever-evolving remedial strategy has been medicinally efficacious enzymatic inhibitors targeting the essential viral aspartyl protease. While the use of currently approved HIV protease inhibitors in concert with drugs that target the reverse transcriptase has dramatically ameliorated the disease state for many individuals, highly-structured dosing regimens accompanied by adverse side-effect profiles have led to a significant level of patient non-compliance. In addition, the development of and selection for resistant mutants have limited the long-term therapeutic outlook of the current protease inhibitors. The need for complementary agents in this salutary class addressing these challenges and opportunities is vividly clear. To this end, much attention and focus has been placed on cyclic, non-peptidic protease inhibitors, exemplified by dihydropyrones and ureas, and their possible future role in this medicinal campaign. The strategies to their design as well as their biological, pharmacokinetic and resistance profiles, and their clinical application will be discussed.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Disulfides; Drug Resistance, Viral; Furans; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Molecular Structure; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Triazines; Urea

Although protease inhibitors (PIs) have dramatically improved outcomes in HIV-infected patients, half still fail treatment with PI-based combination therapy. Genetic pressure from incomplete viral suppression rapidly selects for HIV variants with protease gene mutations that confer reduced susceptibility to PI drugs. A number of specific amino acid substitutions have been associated with PI resistance. However, high-level resistance to individual PIs requires the accumulation of several primary and secondary mutations, developing along drug-specific, step-wise pathways. HIV variants resistant to saquinavir and ritonavir usually contain L90M and V82A substitutions, respectively. Indinavir resistance may be linked to substitutions at positions 46 or 82. Resistance to nelfinavir is primarily associated with D30N but may alternatively be found with L90M. Resistance during exposure to amprenavir can follow development of I50V, which also may confer resistance to lopinavir. Failure during treatment with atazanavir is closely linked to 150L. The overlapping of these pathways can lead to multiple-PI resistance, limiting therapeutic options in antiretroviral-experienced patients. Reduced susceptibility to more than one PI is most likely to be associated with amino acid substitutions at six positions: 10, 46, 54, 82, 84 and 90. Other mutations (D30N, G48V, I50V or I50L) are relatively specific for particular PIs and are less likely to produce cross resistance. Certain resistance mutations selected by exposure to one PI may actually increase susceptibility to others. Patients newly diagnosed with HIV infection are increasingly found to harbour virus that is resistant to the more commonly used drugs. Newer PIs may select for mutations that result in less cross resistance with older agents.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genetic Variation; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Treatment-experienced patients with HIV may harbor virus that has accumulated several mutations conferring decreased susceptibility to one or more antiretroviral drugs. For clinicians treating these patients, identifying a tolerable antiretroviral regimen with a reasonable chance of a durable virologic effect represents a major challenge. The first priority is to identify and correct the mechanisms responsible for previous treatment failure. Resistance testing and drug level monitoring may be useful in this setting. The patient's history of antiretroviral drug tolerability, comorbidities, and concomitant medications should be considered. Patients embarking on multiple-drug regimens will require close monitoring for adherence, toxicities, and drug-drug interactions. The guiding principle when constructing a rescue or salvage regimen is to achieve a cumulative activity score greater than 2, recognizing that some agents will have only partial activity. Some new drugs are available that may be helpful if used carefully with an active background regimen.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Tipranavir is a potent and selective non-peptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor with a markedly improved resistance profile compared with traditional, peptidomimetic protease inhibitors. The presence of five or fewer protease gene mutations or one or two protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations (PRAMs) is associated with reduced susceptibility to currently available protease inhibitors. However, 16-20 mutations (including three or more PRAMs) may be needed to confer resistance to tipranavir. Tipranavir-based therapy achieved sustained viral suppression for more than 48 weeks in a small phase II trial in multiple protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-infected patients. A large dose-finding study demonstrated potent virological reduction through 14 days of functional monotherapy in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients with 6 to >20 protease gene mutations at baseline. Two large, ongoing, phase III trials in patients with multi-drug resistant HIV infection are comparing the efficacy of tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200mg twice daily plus a patient-individualised background antiretroviral regimen versus other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens. In general, tipranavir has been well tolerated in clinical trials. As with other protease inhibitors, the most common adverse events with tipranavir have been gastrointestinal disturbances.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV) is the first of a new class of non-peptidic protease inhibitors (NPPIs). It is a sulphonamide-containing dihydropyrone, which is highly selective for the HIV protease enzyme and demonstrates potent in vitro activity against wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-2. The IC90 for TPV was 0.1 microM against clinical HIV isolates. Since CYP3A is the major cytochrome P450 isoform for the phase I metabolism of TPV, its exposure is markedly enhanced in the presence of ritonavir (RTV). In one clinical study, using the new self emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) formulation of TPV, plasma concentrations in excess of 20 microM were maintained for 12 hours, allowing for twice-a-day dosing following administration of TPV 300 mg/RTV(r) 200 mg twice a day. The 20 microM target represents 10-fold the IC90 for multiple protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant strains. Both in vitro data and pharmacokinetic results indicate that TPV will be active in vivo against PI-resistant viruses, when given twice a day in combination with low dose RTV. Of 105 HIV viral isolates taken from patients who had been heavily pretreated with PI-based regimens: 90% were fully susceptible to TPV; 8% exhibited intermediate resistance; and 2% were more than 10-fold resistant. In patients who had failed at least two PI-based regimens, only 12.2% of the HIV isolates exhibited four to 10-fold reduced susceptibility to TPV after one year of treatment with a regimen containing the NPPI (Study BI1182.2). A reduction of approximately 1.5 log10 copies/mL in the plasma viral load (pVL) was observed in treatment-naive patients after 15 days of monotherapy with TPV (300 or 1200 mg twice a day) co-administered with RTV (200 mg twice a day) (TPV/r) in a dose-ranging study (Study BI1182.3). The safety and efficacy of TPV (500 or 1250 mg) plus ritonavir (100 mg twice a day) plus two new nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) was studied in patients failing their first PI-containing regimen (Study BI1182.4). Similar decreases in pVLs (1.44-1.79 log10 copies/mL) were observed after 16 weeks of treatment with either dose of TPV/r. Two doses of TPV/r plus efavirenz (EFV) and a new NRTI have been studied in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients who had failed two or more PI-containing regimens (BI1182.2). Between 50% and 78.9% of patients maintained a pVL < 50 copies/mL for 48 weeks. Clinical studies have shown that TPV/r-associated adverse events are generally gastroin

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV) is a non-peptidic protease inhibitor belonging to the class of 4-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrones, which exhibits potent and specific activity against HIV type I (HIV-1) and 2 (HIV-2). Clinically effective plasma levels of TPV are achieved by concomitant administration of ritonavir (RTV). Therefore, TPV has been coadministered with RTV in clinical trials. TPV has demonstrated antiviral activity against HIV-1 isolates that are resistant to reverse-transcriptase and selected peptidic protease inhibitors. Therefore, TPV is emerging as one of the newer drugs in the armamentarium against HIV-1 in patients demonstrating multi-drug resistance. TPV administered orally to humans exhibits linear pharmacokinetics at doses of 100 - 2000 mg. Steady-state plasma levels are attained within 7 days of initiating multiple dosing. The half-life of the drug is approximately 6 h at steady-state. The plasma concentration is lower with repeated dosing than predicted from single-dose studies due to induction of the cytochrome p450 3A4 isoform of the liver microsomal enzyme system. Phase II clinical trials have shown that the administration of TPV and RTV in combination is safe and generally well-tolerated in HIV-1-infected adults. Phase III trials are underway to compare the efficacy of this drug versus other antiretroviral regimens. Gastrointestinal toxicity has been described with TPV, the most frequently reported side effects being diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. There is no known evidence of teratogenicity or effect on fertility. TPV dosed twice-daily, in the range of 500 - 1250 mg and combined with 100 - 200 mg of RTV has been shown to substantially and durably reduce viral load in HIV-1-infected drug-naive and experienced patients.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Efforts to develop therapeutically relevant HIV protease inhibitors as medicinal agents in confronting the AIDS crisis have been aided by the wealth of fundamental information acquired during related drug discovery campaigns against other aspartyl proteases. This knowledge base was brought to full force with the broad screening identification of small, nonpeptidic, inhibitory molecules as templates for chemical elaboration. Significantly, the ability to collect crystallographic data on the inhibitor-enzyme complexes in a rapid fashion afforded the opportunity for a structure-based approach to drug discovery. Iterative cycles of synthesis, biological testing, and structural information gathering followed by prudent design modifications afforded compounds suitable for clinical evaluation. Displaying high enzymatic inhibition (Ki = 8 pM), potent in vitro antiviral cell culture activity (IC90 = 100 nM), and a useful pharmacokinetic profile, PNU-140690E (Tipranavir disodium) has entered into clinical studies. Promising results from these early trials supported further evaluation of this compound in HIV-infected individuals. PNU-140690E is currently under extensive clinical study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-HIV Agents; Biological Availability; Drug Design; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Models, Molecular; Pyridines; Pyrones; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfonamides

Ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) was evaluated as initial therapy in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients because of its potency, unique resistance profile, and high genetic barrier. Trial 1182.33, an open-label, randomized trial, compared two TPV/r dose combinations versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). Eligible adults, who had no prior antiretroviral therapy were randomized to twice daily (BID) 500/100 mg TPV/r, 500/200 mg TPV/r, or 400/100 mg LPV/r. Each treatment group also received Tenofovir 300 mg + Lamivudine 300 mg QD. The primary endpoint was a confirmed viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL at week 48 without prior antiretroviral regimen changes. Primary analyses examined CD4-adjusted response rates for non-inferiority, using a 15% non-inferiority margin. At week 48, VL<50 copies/mL was 68.4%, 69.9%, and 72.4% in TPV/r100, TPV/r200, and LPV/r groups, respectively, and TPV/r groups showed non-inferiority to LPV/r. Discontinuation due to adverse events was higher in TPV/r100 (10.3%) and TPV/r200 (15.3%) recipients versus LPV/r (3.2%) recipients. The frequency of grade ≥3 transaminase elevations was higher in the TPV/r200 group than the other groups, leading to closure of this group. However, upon continued treatment or following re-introduction after treatment interruption, transaminase elevations returned to grade ≤2 in >65% of patients receiving either TPV/r200 or TPV/r100. The trial was subsequently discontinued; primary objectives were achieved and continuing TPV/r100 was less tolerable than standard of care for initial highly active antiretroviral therapy. All treatment groups had similar 48-week treatment responses. TPV/r100 and TPV/r200 regimens resulted in sustained treatment responses, which were non-inferior to LPV/r at 48 weeks. When compared with the LPV/r regimen and examined in the light of more current regimens, these TPV/r regimens do not appear to be the best options for treatment-naïve patients based on their safety profiles.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Young Adult

To evaluate the long-term (up to week 292) safety, efficacy and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients. Long-term follow up of patients enrolled in the randomized, open-label pediatric trial (1182.14/PACTG1051).. HIV-1-infected pediatric patients (2-18 years) who participated in the PACTG 1051 trial were followed for ritonavir-boosted tipranavir-based regimen efficacy, safety and tolerability through week 292.. In patients <12 years of age, 51/62 (82%) were receiving drug at week 48 and 13/62 (21%) at week 288. Among adolescents (12-18 years of age), 35/53 (66%) were receiving drug at week 48 and 2/53 (4%) at week 288. Among patients 2 to <6 years of age, 18/25 (72%) had viral loads <400 copies/mL at week 48. By week 292, 9/25 (36%) of patients had viral loads <400 copies/mL. Among older patients, week 48 responder rates were 35% (13/37 of patients 6 to <12 years of age) and 32% (17/53 of patients 12 to 18 years of age). By week 292, 6/37 (16%) of those 6 to <12 years of age and 2/53 (4%) of those 12 to 18 years of age had viral loads <400 copies/mL. Overall safety and tolerability profiles were best for children who initiated treatment between 2 and <6 years of age. Drug-related adverse events (investigator defined) were similar across all age groups (55-65%).. Pediatric patients who begin treatment at the earlier ages, and who are stable on a ritonavir-boosted tipranavir-based regimen at week 48, generally continue to demonstrate good safety, tolerability and virologic efficacy profiles up to 292 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The POTENT trial compared the safety and efficacy of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), each with an optimized background regimen (OBR) in triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients with resistance to more than one protease inhibitor (PI).. POTENT was a prospective, open-label study of triple-class (PI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTI], nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTI]), treatment-experienced, HIV-positive patients. Subjects were randomized to either TPV/r (500/200 mg twice daily) or DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily) on a genotype-guided, investigator-selected OBR. CD4+ counts and HIV viral loads were assayed at key timepoints. The primary endpoint was time to virologic failure (viral load ≥500copies/mL). POTENT was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. Thirty-nine patients were treated with either TPV/r (n = 19) or DRV/r (n = 20); 82% were male, 77% White, with mean age of 43.6 years. Mean baseline HIV RNA was 3.9 log(10) copies/mL. Median prior antiretrovirals was 11, with no prior raltegravir or maraviroc exposure. Raltegravir was the most common novel class agent in the OBRs (n = 14 TPV/r; n = 12 DRV/r). In both groups, patients achieved mean viral load decreases ≥2 log(10) copies/mL by week 8, and by week 12 mean CD4+ counts rose by 40-50 cells/mm3. Total observation time was 32 weeks. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 21% (TPV/r) and 25% (DRV/r) of patients.. TPV/r- and DRV/r-based regimens showed similar short-term safety and efficacy. These data support the use of next-generation PIs such as tipranavir or darunavir with novel class antiretroviral agents (integrase inhibitors, CCR5 antagonists, or fusion inhibitors).

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

This phase 2, randomized, active-controlled, 48-week study assessed the noninferiority of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase inhibitor elvitegravir to comparator ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced subjects.. Subjects had HIV RNA levels 1000 copies/mL and 1 protease resistance mutation. Subjects received nucleoside or nucleotide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with or without T-20 and either CPI/r or once-daily elvitegravir at a dose of 20 mg, 50 mg, or 125 mg (blinded to dose) with ritonavir. After week 8, the independent data monitoring committee stopped the elvitegravir 20 mg arm and allowed subjects in the elvitegravir 50 mg and 125 mg arms to add protease inhibitors. The primary end point was the time-weighted average change from baseline in HIV RNA level through week 24 (DAVG(24)).. A total of 278 subjects with a median of 11 protease and 3 thymidine analog mutations were randomized and treated. One-half of subjects received NRTIs without expected antiviral activity. Compared with the DAVG(24) for the CPI/r arm (-1.19 log(10) copies/mL), the elvitegravir 50 mg arm was noninferior (-1.44 log(10) copies/mL), and the elvitegravir 125 mg arm was superior (-1.66 log(10) copies/mL; P = .021). Efficacy was impacted by activity of background agents. There was no relationship between elvitegravir dosage and adverse events.. Elvitegravir was well-tolerated and produced rapid virologic suppression that was durable with active background therapy. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT00298350.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quinolones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Despite being among the most potent protease inhibitors, the use of tipranavir (TPV) is hampered by a high pill burden and frequent side effects compared with other boosted protease inhibitors. A total of 10 patients receiving TPV/ritonavir (TPV/RTV) 500/200 for longer than 6 months were randomized to stay on the same dosing schedule or switch to TPV/RTV 500/100. Although all patients on TVP/RTV 500/200 remained stable for the next 12 weeks, 3 out of 5 patients who switched doses experienced benefits in terms of reducing aminotransferases and total cholesterol. Fasting triglycerides were also reduced in 2 of them. Plasma HIV-RNA remained undetectable in all patients, despite the observed decline in TPV trough concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The effect of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) subtype on in vitro susceptibility and virological response to darunavir (DRV) and lopinavir (LPV) was studied using a broad panel of primary isolates, and in recombinant clinical isolates from treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients in the Phase III trial, AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In naive Subjects (ARTEMIS).. Patients received DRV/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily (n=343) or LPV/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg total daily dose (n=346), plus a fixed daily dose of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.. DRV demonstrated high antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 major group (M) and outlier group (O) primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with a median 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) of 0.52 nM. Most (61%) patients in ARTEMIS harboured HIV-1 subtype B; other prevalent subtypes were C (13%) and CRF01_AE (17%); 9% harboured other subtypes. Median EC(50) values (interquartile range) for DRV were 1.79 nM (1.3-2.6) for subtype B, 1.12 nM (0.8-1.4) for C and 1.27 nM (1.0-1.7) for CRF01_AE. Virological response to DRV/r (HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml [intent-to-treat, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm]) was 81%, 87% and 85% for patients with subtype B, C and CRF01_AE infections, respectively. Similar results were observed in the LPV/r treatment group.. In vitro susceptibility to DRV was comparable across HIV-1 subtypes in a broad panel of primary isolates and in recombinant clinical isolates. Once daily DRV/r 800/100 mg and LPV/r 800/200 mg were highly effective in ARTEMIS irrespective of the HIV-1 subtype studied, confirming their broad anti-HIV-1 activity.

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Typing; Nelfinavir; Neuraminidase; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Gender-related differences in the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir [tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)] were evaluated in a subanalysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug Resistant Patients with Tipranavir (RESIST) trials. Data from HIV-1-infected women (203; TPV/r = 117) and men (1280; TPV/r = 629) showed no significant gender-related differences in HIV RNA response rates (at 48 weeks) and safety (at 96 weeks) despite higher mean steady-state plasma TPV trough concentrations in women. Significantly greater increases in CD4 cell count (+81.2 vs. +48.6; P = 0.0012) were observed in women at week 48.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence often require opioid replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic interactions between HIV therapy and opioid dependence treatment medications can occur. HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NLX) therapy sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of open-label, twice daily tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with ritonavir 200 mg (TPV/r). Twelve subjects were enrolled and 10 completed the study. Prior to starting TPV/r, the geometric mean BUP AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 43.9 ng h/mL and 5.61 ng/mL, respectively. After achieving steady-state with TPV/r (> or = 7 days), these values were similar at 43.7 ng h/mL and 4.84 ng/mL, respectively. Similar analyses for norBUP, the primary metabolite of BUP, demonstrated a reduction in geometric mean for AUC(0-24h) [68.7-14.7 ng h/mL; ratio=0.21 (90% CI 0.19-0.25)] and C(max) [4.75-0.94 ng/mL; ratio=0.20 (90% CI 0.17-0.23)]. The last measurable NLX concentration (C(last)) in the concentration-time profile, never measured in previous BUP/NLX interaction studies with antiretroviral medications, was decreased by 20%. Despite these pharmacokinetic effects on BUP metabolites and NLX, no clinical opioid withdrawal symptoms were noted. TPV steady-state AUC(0-12h) and C(max) decreased 19% and 25%, respectively, and C(min) was relatively unchanged when compared to historical control subjects receiving TPV/r alone. No dosage modification of BUP/NLX is required when co-administered with TPV/r. Though mechanistically unclear, it is likely that decreased plasma RTV levels while on BUP/NLX contributed substantially to the decrease in TPV levels. BUP/NLX and TPV/r should therefore be used cautiously to avoid decreased efficacy of TPV in patients taking these agents concomitantly.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The risk and course of serum transaminase elevations (TEs) and clinical hepatic serious adverse event (SAE) development in ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg BID recipients, who also received additional combination antiretroviral treatment agents in clinical trials (TPV/r-based cART), was determined.. Aggregated transaminase and hepatic SAE data through 96 weeks of TPV/r-based cART from five Phase IIb/III trials were analyzed. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of underlying liver disease (+LD or -LD). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) probability estimates for time-to-first US National Institutes of Health, Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Grade 3/4 TE and clinical hepatic SAE were determined and clinical actions/outcomes evaluated. Risk factors for DAIDS Grade 3/4 TE were identified through multivariate Cox regression statistical modeling.. Grade 3/4 TEs occurred in 144/1299 (11.1%) patients; 123/144 (85%) of these were asymptomatic; 84% of these patients only temporarily interrupted treatment or continued, with transaminase levels returning to Grade < or = 2. At 96 weeks of study treatment, the incidence of Grade 3/4 TEs was higher among the +LD (16.8%) than among the -LD (10.1%) patients. K-M analysis revealed an incremental risk for developing DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs; risk was greatest through 24 weeks (6.1%), and decreasing thereafter (>24-48 weeks: 3.4%, >48 weeks-72 weeks: 2.0%, >72-96 weeks: 2.2%), and higher in +LD than -LD patients at each 24-week interval. Treatment with TPV/r, co-infection with hepatitis B and/or C, DAIDS grade >1 TE and CD4+ > 200 cells/mm3 at baseline were found to be independent risk factors for development of DAIDS Grade 3/4 TE; the hazard ratios (HR) were 2.8, 2.0, 2.1 and 1.5, respectively. Four of the 144 (2.7%) patients with Grade 3/4 TEs developed hepatic SAEs; overall, 14/1299 (1.1%) patients had hepatic SAEs including six with hepatic failure (0.5%). The K-M risk of developing hepatic SAEs through 96 weeks was 1.4%; highest risk was observed during the first 24 weeks and decreased thereafter; the risk was similar between +LD and -LD patients for the first 24 weeks (0.6% and 0.5%, respectively) and was higher for +LD patients, thereafter.. Through 96 weeks of TPV/r-based cART, DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs and hepatic SAEs occurred in approximately 11% and 1% of TPV/r patients, respectively; most (84%) had no significant clinical implications and were managed without permanent treatment discontinuation. Among the 14 patients with hepatic SAE, 6 experienced hepatic failure (0.5%); these patients had profound immunosuppression and the rate appears higher among hepatitis co-infected patients. The overall probability of experiencing a hepatic SAE in this patient cohort was 1.4% through 96 weeks of treatment. Independent risk factors for DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs include TPV/r treatment, co-infection with hepatitis B and/or C, DAIDS grade >1 TE and CD4+ > 200 cells/mm3 at baseline.. US-NIH Trial registration number: NCT00144170.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; Hepatitis, Viral, Human; HIV Infections; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Liver; Liver Failure; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Transaminases; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients.. Open-label randomized pediatric trial (1182.14/PACTG1051) comparing TPV/r at two doses including an optimized background regimen.. HIV-1-infected patients (2-18 years) with plasma viral load 1500 copies/ml or more were randomized to TPV/r 290/115 or 375/150 mg/m twice-daily oral solution and optimized background regimen. Week 48 efficacy, safety and tolerability results were evaluated.. Children (n = 115; 97% treatment experienced) were randomized to low or high dose therapy. Eighty-eight remained on-treatment through 48 weeks. Baseline characteristics were similar between dose groups. At study entry, half of the HIV-1 isolates were resistant to all protease inhibitors. At 48 weeks, 39.7% low-dose and 45.6% high-dose TPV/r recipients had viral load less than 400 copies/ml and 34.5 and 35.1%, respectively, achieved viral load less than 50 copies/ml. Vomiting, cough and diarrhea were the most frequent adverse events. Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in 6.3% of patients. No grade 4 alanine aminotransferase or grade 3/4 aspartate aminotransferase elevations were reported.. TPV/r achieved a sustained virologic response, showed a good safety profile and was well tolerated at either dose. In pediatric patients with high baseline resistance profiles, high-dose TPV/r tended to demonstrate a better sustained response.

Topics: Adolescent; Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Vomiting

Thymidine-based nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some protease inhibitors of HIV are associated with lipoatrophy, relative central fat accumulation and insulin resistance. The latter associations have not been well evaluated prospectively in adults commencing antiretroviral therapy. We studied the effects of protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens on body composition, insulin sensitivity and adipocytokine levels.. 48-week substudy of a randomized, open-label, three-arm trial.. Hospital and community HIV clinics.. 140 HIV-infected adults naive to antiretroviral therapy.. Tipranavir/ritonavir [500/200 mg twice a day (TPV/r200)] or [500/100 mg twice a day (TPV/r100)] or lopinavir/ritonavir [400/100 mg twice a day (LPV/r)], each with tenofovir + lamivudine.. Body composition [dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for limb fat; L4, abdominal computed tomography for visceral adipose tissue (VAT)]; and fasting metabolic parameters. The primary analysis was change in limb fat mass in each TPV/r group vs. LPV/r.. Limb fat increased in all three groups: LPV/r (1.17 kg) versus TPV/r200 (0.83 kg; P = 0.16) and TPV/r100 (0.41 kg; P = 0.07). VAT decreased in all groups: LPV/r (-3 cm) vs. TPV/r200 (-9 cm; P = 0.04) and TPV/r100 (-6 cm; P = 0.40). No significant change in insulin sensitivity was observed, including by oral glucose tolerance testing. The increase in leptin levels was significantly correlated with the increase in limb fat mass (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001). Despite increased limb fat, adiponectin levels increased, but significantly more with TPV/r200 (+6010 ng/ml; P < 0.0001) or TPV/r100 (+4497 ng/ml; P = 0.002) when compared with LPV/r (+1360 ng/ml).. Unlike many other antiretroviral regimens, TPV/r or LPV/r with tenofovir-lamivudine increased subcutaneous fat without evidence for increasing visceral fat or insulin resistance over 48 weeks.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Body Composition; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Lopinavir; Male; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Given the limited treatment options for patients with high-level resistance, antiretroviral (ARV) regimens based on concomitant use of 2 ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) were considered a therapeutic option.. Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) study 1182.51 examined the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and efficacy of RTV-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r), alone and in combination with comparator PIs (CPIs) in 315 triple-class-experienced, HIV-infected patients.. Two weeks after single PI therapy, the addition of TPV/r reduced plasma trough levels 52%, 80%, and 56% for lopinavir (LPV), saquinavir (SQV), and amprenavir (APV) recipients, respectively. After 2 weeks, a TPV/r-only regimen reduced HIV viral load (VL) by a median of 1.06 log(10) copies/mL. VL reductions at 2 weeks between single-boosted CPIs were difficult to compare, because the numbers of patients maintaining their previous failing PI after randomization were different. At week 4, patients initiating treatment with TPV-containing regimens sustained VL reduction (median decrease of 1.27 log(10) copies/mL). Patients adding TPV to regimens at week 2 achieved median reductions from a baseline of 1.19 log(10), 0.96 log(10), and 1.12 log(10) copies/mL at week 4 in dual-boosted LPV, SQV, and APV groups, respectively. At 24 weeks, VL reductions (median: -0.24 to -0.47 log(10) copies/mL) were comparable between treatment groups.. The efficacy of a dual PI regimen depended on the presence of TPV, with additional recycled CPIs having limited activity, even in drug-resistant patient populations with plasma trough concentrations regarded as likely to be adequate in this study. No clear guidelines exist about ARV plasma trough concentrations in treatment-experienced patients, however.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Antiretroviral therapy including tipranavir boosted with ritonavir (TPV/r) has shown superior viral suppression and immunological response compared with comparator ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (CPI/r) regimens in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. This study assesses the influence of adverse events (AEs) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and change in HRQOL in patients treated with TPV/r versus CPI/r regimens.. Changes in HRQOL over 48 weeks were assessed using Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) data combined from two randomized, open-label, Phase III studies (RESIST-1 and RESIST-2). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to compare physical health and mental health summary scores and 10 subscale scores, and to compare scores of patients with and without AEs. To compare AE incidences in the two treatment groups, AEs were exposure-adjusted.. There were 984 patients in the HRQOL analysis. AE occurrence and severity resulted in significantly lower MOS-HIV scores across both treatment arms (P<0.05). Overall incidence of AEs was higher in the CPI/r versus TPV/r group (562.8 versus 514.4 per 100 patient-exposure years); treatment-related AEs were more frequent in the TPV/r group (75.0 versus 56.6 per 100 patient-exposure years). HRQOL was maintained in patients on TPV/r over 48 weeks of treatment across all summary and subscale scores. Compared with CPI/r, TPV/r was associated with a significant but small (SD<0.2) improvement in pain scores (+4.8 points; P<0.05).. HRQOL was maintained across both summary and all subscale scores from baseline to 48 weeks in the TPV/r and CPI/r treatment arms, despite the incidence of treatment-related AEs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Surveys; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quality of Life; Sulfonamides

To assess the resistance profile of tipranavir.. Resistance analyses were performed on Boëhringer Ingelheim-sponsored studies examining the safety and efficacy of tipranavir in highly treatment-experienced individuals at 24 weeks. Virologic response rates based on the presence of baseline primary protease inhibitor mutations and based on baseline tipranavir susceptibility were evaluated, and the development of protease mutations during treatment with tipranavir was analyzed.. Virologic response rates in tipranavir-treated individuals were reduced when isolates with substitutions at amino acid positions I13, V32, M36, I47, Q58, D60 V82 or I84 were present at baseline. In addition, virologic response rates to tipranavir decreased when the number of baseline protease inhibitor (PI) mutations was five or more. Individuals who received tipranavir without concomitant enfurvitide and had five or more baseline PI mutations group began to lose antiviral response between weeks 4 and 8. However, individuals taking enfuvirtide with tipranavir were able to achieve greater than 1.5 log10 reductions in viral load from baseline out to 24 weeks even if they had five or more baseline PI mutations. Virologic response rates to tipranavir decreased when the baseline phenotype for tipranavir had a greater than three-fold shift in the 50% effective concentration (EC50) from reference. The most common protease mutations that developed in tipranavir-treated individuals who experienced virologic failure were L10I/V/S, I13V, L33V/I/F, M36V/I/L V82T, V82L, and I84V. The resistance profile in treatment-naive individuals was not characterized.. Baseline genotypic and phenotypic data provide valuable information on the likelihood of a virologic response to tipranavir.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation; Phenotype; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of three doses of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) in highly treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients with protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant isolates were evaluated. A 24-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial was conducted. All patients were three-drug class experienced and had taken at least two PI-based regimens. All had at least one primary PI mutation and had plasma HIV-RNA > 1000 copies/ml. Patients remained on their background non-PI antiretroviral medications for the first 14 days. After this 14-day period of functional TPV/r monotherapy, the background antiretroviral medications were optimized based on treatment history and the screening genotype. A total of 216 patients were randomized. All groups [TPV/r 500 mg/100 mg (n = 73), 500 mg/200 mg (n = 72), and 750 mg/200 mg (n = 71) twice daily] achieved an approximate 1 log10 reduction in the median HIV-RNA at week 2. A significant reduction was sustained through 24 weeks in the TPV/r 500 mg/200 mg and 750 mg/200 mg groups. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved optimal median TPV trough concentrations and lower interpatient variability. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and headache. The TPV/r 750 mg/200 mg group had the highest rate of grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and study discontinuations due to AEs. All doses of TPV/r tested in this study were associated with HIV-1 viral load reductions through 24 weeks. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved the best efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile in this highly treatment-experienced population and was selected for the pivotal phase 3 studies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To compare the relative antiviral efficacy of TMC114 with low-dose ritonavir (TMC114/r) and tipranavir with low-dose ritonavir (TPV/r) vs. control protease inhibitor (CPI) in treatment-experienced patients, using data from the POWER 1/2 and RESIST 1/2 trials. These trials recruited antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV RNA > 1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and at least one primary PI mutation, and used optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with or without enfuvirtide, plus investigator-selected CPI in the control arms.. For the POWER trials, data from the 600/100 mg twice a day (bid) dose and CPI arms (n=201) were included, while all data from the RESIST trials (TPV/r 500/200 mg bid and CPI; n=1159) were included. The difference in week 24 efficacy (intent to treat) for the new PI vs. CPI was compared between the trials.. Overall baseline characteristics were well matched across the trials. At week 24, 72% of TMC114/r patients achieved a > or =1 log(10) copies/mL reduction in HIV RNA compared with 40% of TPV/r patients (for CPI patients, this percentage was 21 and 18%, respectively, in the POWER and RESIST trials). The treatment benefit of TMC114/r over CPI in the POWER trials was greater (outside the 95% confidence intervals) than the benefit of TPV/r over CPI in the RESIST trials, for the 24-week HIV RNA endpoints of 1 log(10) copies/mL reduction, <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL, and also for the mean rise in CD4 count. In sensitivity analysis, this difference in efficacy was strongest for those who did not also use enfuvirtide.. Given the caveats of this type of analysis (for example, possible differences in trial conduct, and undetected differences in baseline resistance profiles), the efficacy benefits of TMC114/r vs. CPI in the POWER trials appear to be greater than the benefits of TPV/r vs. CPI in the RESIST trials, for patients who did not also use enfuvirtide.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

BI 1182.2, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study, evaluated efficacy and tolerability of the protease inhibitor (PI) tipranavir (TPV; 500 mg twice daily or 1000 mg twice daily) administered with ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) in combination with 1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in multiple PI-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.. Forty-one patients were evaluated in 2 arms: low-dose (19 patients) or high-dose (22 patients) ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA concentrations at weeks 16, 24, 48, and 80 and percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels lower than the limit of quantitation. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), grade 3/4 abnormalities, and serious AEs.. Of all patients, 59% were still receiving TPV/r (14 in low-dose arm and 10 in high-dose arm) at week 80. Patients in both arms had a median >2.0-log10 reduction in plasma viral load. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that a similar proportion of patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL at week 80 (43% vs. 32%; P = 0.527). The most frequently observed AEs were diarrhea, headache, and nausea.. TPV/r combined with other active antiretroviral agents can provide a durable treatment response for highly treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Didanosine; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Tipranavir is a novel, nonpeptidic protease inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with activity against clinical HIV-1 isolates from treatment-experienced patients. HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic data from phase II and III clinical trials of tipranavir with protease inhibitor-experienced patients were analyzed to determine the association of protease mutations with reduced susceptibility and virologic response to tipranavir. Specific protease mutations were identified based on stepwise multiple-regression analyses of phase II study data sets. Validation included analyses of phase III study data sets to determine if the same mutations would be selected and to assess how these mutations contribute to multiple-regression models of tipranavir-related phenotype and of virologic response. A tipranavir mutation score was developed from these analyses, which consisted of a unique string of 16 protease positions and 21 mutations (10V, 13V, 20M/R/V, 33F, 35G, 36I, 43T, 46L, 47V, 54A/M/V, 58E, 69K, 74P, 82L/T, 83D, and 84V). HIV-1 isolates displaying an increasing number of these tipranavir resistance-associated mutations had a reduced phenotypic susceptibility and virologic response to tipranavir. Regression models for predicting virologic response in phase III trials revealed that each point in the tipranavir score was associated with a 0.16-log10 copies/ml-lower virologic response to tipranavir at week 24 of treatment. A lower number of points in the tipranavir score and a greater number of active drugs in the background regimen were predictive of virologic success. These analyses demonstrate that the tipranavir mutation score is a potentially valuable tool for predicting the virologic response to tipranavir in protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Models, Biological; Models, Molecular; Mutation; Phenotype; Protein Conformation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Regression Analysis; Sulfonamides

Improved treatment options are needed for patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir has demonstrated antiviral activity against many protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-1) trial is an ongoing, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) with an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients.. Six hundred twenty antiretroviral-experienced patients were treated at 125 sites in North America and Australia. Before randomization, all patients underwent genotypic resistance testing, which investigators used to select a CPI/r and an optimized background regimen. Patients were randomized to receive TPV/r or CPI/r and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed reduction in the HIV-1 load of > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline level without treatment change at week 24.. Mean baseline HIV-1 loads and CD4+ cell counts were 4.74 log10 copies/mL and 164 cells/mm3, respectively. At week 24, a total of 41.5% of patients in the TPV/r arm and 22.3% in the CPI/r arm had a > or = 1-log10 reduction in the HIV-1 load (intent-to-treat population; P<.0001). Mean increases in the CD4+ cell count of 54 and 24 cells/mm3 occurred in the TPV/r and CPI/r groups, respectively. Adverse events were slightly more common in the TPV/r group and included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Elevations in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels and in cholesterol/triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r group.. TPV/r demonstrated superior antiviral activity, compared with investigator-selected, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, at week 24 in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir, a novel protease inhibitor, has demonstrated antiviral activity against protease inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-2) trial is an ongoing, open-label, phase III trial comparing ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) plus an optimized background regimen with an individually optimized, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients.. Patients at 171 sites in Europe and Latin America who had received > or = 2 previous protease inhibitor regimens, had triple-antiretroviral class experience, had an HIV-1 RNA level > or = 1000 copies/mL, and had genotypically demonstrated primary protease inhibitor resistance were eligible. After genotypic resistance tests were performed, a protease inhibitor and optimized background regimen were selected before randomization. Patients were randomized to receive either TPV/r or comparator protease inhibitor-ritonavir (CPI/r) and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed HIV-1 load reduction > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline value without a treatment change at week 24.. A total of 863 patients were randomized and treated. At baseline, the mean HIV-1 load was 4.73 log10 copies/mL, and the mean CD4+ cell count was 218 cells/mm3. The preplanned 24-week efficacy analyses of 539 patients demonstrated treatment response rates of 41% in the TPV/r arm and 14.9% in the CPI/r arm (intent-to-treat analysis; P<.0001). The mean CD4+ cell count increased by 51 cells/mm3 in the TPV/r arm and by 18 cells/mm3 in the CPI/r arm. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Grade 3 or greater elevations in serum transaminase, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r arm.. TPV/r had superior antiviral activity and increased immunologic benefits, compared with CPI/r, at week 24 among treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Australia; Canada; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Probability; Pyridines; Pyrones; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; United States; Viral Load

Topics: Australia; Canada; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Pyridines; Pyrones; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; United States; Viral Load

Tipranavir (TPV), a novel nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (NPPI), was administered to treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients over 14 days in a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) formulation, in combination with ritonavir (RTV). Of the 31 patients enrolled, 10 were randomized to receive TPV 1200 mg twice daily (TPV 1200), 10 patients received TPV 300 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 300/200), and 11 patients received TPV 1200 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 1200/200). The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 4.96 log10 copies/mL and 244 cells/mm, respectively. After 14 days, the median decrease in viral load was -0.77 log10 in the TPV 1200 group, -1.43 log10 in the TPV/r 300/200 group, and -1.64 log10 in the TPV/r 1200/200 group. TPV exposure was increased by 24- and 70-fold in the TPV/r 300/200 and 1200/200 groups, respectively, compared with TPV 1200 alone. There were no significant differences across treatment arms with regard to drug-related adverse events. TPV/r appeared to be safe, effective, and well tolerated during 14 days of treatment.

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

A new method termed "Relative Principal Components Analysis" (RPCA) is introduced that extracts optimal relevant principal components to describe the change between two data samples representing two macroscopic states. The method is widely applicable in data-driven science. Calculating the components is based on a physical framework that introduces the objective function (the Kullback-Leibler divergence) appropriate for quantifying the change of the macroscopic state affected by the changes in the microscopic features. To demonstrate the applicability of RPCA, we analyze the thermodynamically relevant conformational changes of the protein HIV-1 protease upon binding to different drug molecules. In this case, the RPCA method provides a sound thermodynamic foundation for analyzing the binding process and thus characterizing both the collective and the locally relevant conformational changes. Moreover, the relevant collective conformational changes can be reconstructed from the informative latent variables to exhibit both the enhanced and the restricted conformational fluctuations upon ligand association.

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-HIV Agents; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Models, Molecular; Principal Component Analysis; Protein Binding; Protein Conformation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Thermodynamics

Optimizing antiretroviral drug combination on an individual basis can be challenging, particularly in settings with limited access to drugs and genotypic resistance testing. Here we describe our latest computational models to predict treatment responses, with or without a genotype, and compare their predictive accuracy with that of genotyping.. Random forest models were trained to predict the probability of virological response to a new therapy introduced following virological failure using up to 50 000 treatment change episodes (TCEs) without a genotype and 18 000 TCEs including genotypes. Independent data sets were used to evaluate the models. This study tested the effects on model accuracy of relaxing the baseline data timing windows, the use of a new filter to exclude probable non-adherent cases and the addition of maraviroc, tipranavir and elvitegravir to the system.. The no-genotype models achieved area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.82 and 0.81 using the standard and relaxed baseline data windows, respectively. The genotype models achieved AUC values of 0.86 with the new non-adherence filter and 0.84 without. Both sets of models were significantly more accurate than genotyping with rules-based interpretation, which achieved AUC values of only 0.55-0.63, and were marginally more accurate than previous models. The models were able to identify alternative regimens that were predicted to be effective for the vast majority of cases in which the new regimen prescribed in the clinic failed.. These latest global models predict treatment responses accurately even without a genotype and have the potential to help optimize therapy, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Computer Simulation; Developing Countries; Drug Substitution; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quinolones; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

A major sanctuary site for HIV infection is the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). The α4β7 integrin gut homing receptor is a promising therapeutic target for the virus reservoir because it leads to migration of infected cells to the GALT and facilitates HIV infection. Here, we developed a core-shell nanoparticle incorporating the α4β7 monoclonal antibody (mAb) as a dual-functional ligand for selectively targeting a protease inhibitor (PI) to gut-homing T cells in the GALT while simultaneously blocking HIV infection. Our nanoparticles significantly reduced cytotoxicity of the PI and enhanced its in vitro antiviral activity in combination with α4β7 mAb. We demonstrate targeting function of our nanocarriers in a human T cell line and primary cells isolated from macaque ileum, and observed higher in vivo biodistribution to the murine small intestines where they accumulate in α4β7+ cells. Our LCNP shows the potential to co-deliver ARVs and mAbs for eradicating HIV reservoirs.

Topics: Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Ileum; Integrins; Intestine, Small; Macaca mulatta; Mice; Nanoparticles; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; T-Lymphocytes

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is the major drug metabolic enzyme, and is involved in the metabolism of antiretroviral drugs, especially protease inhibitors (PIs). This study was undertaken to examine the effect of methamphetamine on the binding and metabolism of PIs with CYP3A4. We showed that methamphetamine exhibits a type I spectral change upon binding to CYP3A4 with δAmax and KD of 0.016±0.001 and 204±18 μM, respectively. Methamphetamine-CYP3A4 docking showed that methamphetamine binds to the heme of CYP3A4 in two modes, both leading to N-demethylation. We then studied the effect of methamphetamine binding on PIs with CYP3A4. Our results showed that methamphetamine alters spectral binding of nelfinavir but not the other type I PIs (lopinavir, atazanavir, tipranavir). The change in spectral binding for nelfinavir was observed at both δAmax (0.004±0.0003 vs. 0.0068±0.0001) and KD (1.42±0.36 vs.2.93±0.08 μM) levels. We further tested effect of methamphetamine on binding of 2 type II PIs; ritonavir and indinavir. Our results showed that methamphetamine alters the ritonavir binding to CYP3A4 by decreasing both the δAmax (0.0038±0.0003 vs. 0.0055±0.0003) and KD (0.043±0.0001 vs. 0.065±0.001 nM), while indinavir showed only reduced KD in presence of methamphetamine (0.086±0.01 vs. 0.174±0.03 nM). Furthermore, LC-MS/MS studies in high CYP3A4 human liver microsomes showed a decrease in the formation of hydroxy ritonavir in the presence of methamphetamine. Finally, CYP3A4 docking with lopinavir and ritonavir in the absence and presence of methamphetamine showed that methamphetamine alters the docking of ritonavir, which is consistent with the results obtained from spectral binding and metabolism studies. Overall, our results demonstrated differential effects of methamphetamine on the binding and metabolism of PIs with CYP3A4. These findings have clinical implication in terms of drug dose adjustment of antiretroviral medication, especially with ritonavir-boosted antiretroviral therapy, in HIV-1-infected individuals who abuse methamphetamine.

Topics: Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Atazanavir Sulfate; Catalytic Domain; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Inactivation, Metabolic; Lopinavir; Methamphetamine; Microsomes, Liver; Molecular Docking Simulation; Nelfinavir; Protein Binding; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Although both tipranavir (TPV) and darunavir (DRV) represent important options for the management of patients with multi-protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), currently there are no studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in the Mexican population. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TPV versus DRV as a salvage therapy in HIV-1 treatment-experienced patients.. This was a comparative, prospective, cohort study. Patients with HIV and triple-class drug resistance evaluated at the Hospital de Infectología "La Raza", National Medical Center, were included. All patients had the protease and retrotranscriptase genotype; resistance mutation interpretation was done using the Stanford database.. A total of 35 HIV-1 triple-class drug-resistant patients were analyzed. All of them received tenofovir and raltegravir, 22 received darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), and 13 received tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) therapies. The median baseline RNA HIV-1 viral load and CD4+ cell count were 4.34 log (interquartile range [IQR], 4.15-4.72) and 267 cells/mm3 (IQR, 177-320) for the DRV/r group, and 4.14 log (IQR, 3.51-4.85) and 445 cells/mm3 (IQR, 252-558) for the TPV/r group. At week 24 of treatment, 91% of patients receiving DRV/r and 100% of patients receiving TPV/r had an RNA HIV-1 viral load < 50 copies/mL and a CD4+ cell count of 339 cells/mm3 (IQR, 252-447) and 556 cells/mm3 (IQR, 364-659), respectively.. No significant difference was observed between DRV/r and TPV/r in terms of virological suppression in HIV-1 patients who were highly experienced in antiretroviral therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mexico; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

A fluorogenic substrate for HIV-1 protease was designed and used as the basis for a hypersensitive assay. The substrate exhibits a kcat of 7.4 s(-1), KM of 15 μM, and an increase in fluorescence intensity of 104-fold upon cleavage, thus providing sensitivity that is unmatched in a continuous assay of HIV-1 protease. These properties enabled the enzyme concentration in an activity assay to be reduced to 25 pM, which is close to the Kd value of the protease dimer. By fitting inhibition data to Morrison's equation, Ki values of amprenavir, darunavir, and tipranavir were determined to be 135, 10, and 82 pM, respectively. This assay, which is capable of measuring Ki values as low as 0.25 pM, is well-suited for characterizing the next generation of HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

Topics: Carbamates; Darunavir; Fluorescence; Fluorescent Dyes; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Kinetics; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

The correlations of genotypic and phenotypic tests with treatment, clinical history and the significance of mutations in viruses of HIV-infected patients are used to establish resistance mutations to protease inhibitors (PIs). Emerging mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease confer resistance to PIs by inducing structural changes at the ligand interaction site. The aim of this study was to establish an in silico structural relationship between natural HIV-1 polymorphisms and unusual HIV-1 mutations that confer resistance to PIs.. Protease sequences isolated from 151 Mexican HIV-1 patients that were naïve to, or subjected to antiretroviral therapy, were examined. We identified 41 unrelated resistance mutations with a prevalence greater than 1%. Among these mutations, nine exhibited positive selection, three were natural polymorphisms (L63S/V/H) in a codon associated with drug resistance, and six were unusual mutations (L5F, D29V, L63R/G, P79L and T91V). The D29V mutation, with a prevalence of 1.32% in the studied population, was only found in patients treated with antiretroviral drugs. Using in silico modelling, we observed that D29V formed unstable protease complexes when were docked with lopinavir, saquinavir, darunavir, tipranavir, indinavir and atazanavir.. The structural correlation of natural polymorphisms and unusual mutations with drug resistance is useful for the identification of HIV-1 variants with potential resistance to PIs. The D29V mutation likely confers a selection advantage in viruses; however, in silico, presence of this mutation results in unstable enzyme/PI complexes, that possibly induce resistance to PIs.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Base Sequence; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutation; Oligopeptides; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

In highly antiretroviral-experienced patients with a multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, recommended regimens should preferentially contain 3 active components, including a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r). Tipranavir/r (TPV/r), a non-peptidic PI, has been specifically developed for patients resistant to the usual antiretroviral classes including PIs. This paper discusses the role of TPV/r in patients experiencing multiple PI resistance.. Virological, immunological, and safety outcomes were collected between 2003 and 2007 at 7 clinical units. Virus resistance assessment was based on 3 different genotypic tests. The 207 patients evaluated had previously received nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and PIs.. The main drugs co-administered with TPV/r were 1 or 2 NRTIs associated, in half of the patients, with enfuvirtide. After 12 weeks, viral load was <50 copies/ml in 38% of the patients (44% with enfuvirtide), while median CD4 counts had increased from 150 to 250 cells/mm³. Genotypic testing suggested that most of the patients had viruses susceptible to TPV. Lipid and transaminase levels were slightly modified, and less than 10% of treatment discontinuations were due to gastrointestinal events.. A regimen including TPV/r associated with at least 1 active component is a valuable option in highly ARV-experienced patients with multi-resistance to the usual ARV classes including PIs.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The data on the use of tipranavir and enfuvirtide in pregnancy are very limited. We performed a pharmacokinetic profile in a pregnant woman with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection at 37 weeks gestation. Tipranavir levels were in the therapeutic range and the cord blood concentration at delivery was relatively high when compared with other protease inhibitors. No enfuvirtide was detected in the fetal compartment. Tipranavir and enfuvirtide were successfully used in pregnancy, but possible toxicities must be kept in mind.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Enfuvirtide; Female; Fetal Blood; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Plasma; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

We compared tipranavir and darunavir concentrations measured at steady state in 20 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients enrolled in the EASIER-ANRS 138 clinical trial who switched from enfuvirtide to raltegravir while maintaining the same background regimen. The geometric mean ratios of the observed predose concentration (C(trough)), maximum concentration of drug observed in plasma (C(max)), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) before (day 0) and after (week 24) the switch were 0.49, 0.76, and 0.67 and 0.82, 0.68, and 0.64 for tipranavir and darunavir, respectively. The virologic consequences of these drug interactions have yet to be determined.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To explore the potential of deep HIV-1 sequencing for adding clinically relevant information relative to viral population sequencing in heavily pre-treated HIV-1-infected subjects.. In a proof-of-concept study, deep sequencing was compared to population sequencing in HIV-1-infected individuals with previous triple-class virological failure who also developed virologic failure to deep salvage therapy including, at least, darunavir, tipranavir, etravirine or raltegravir. Viral susceptibility was inferred before salvage therapy initiation and at virological failure using deep and population sequencing genotypes interpreted with the HIVdb, Rega and ANRS algorithms. The threshold level for mutant detection with deep sequencing was 1%.. 7 subjects with previous exposure to a median of 15 antiretrovirals during a median of 13 years were included. Deep salvage therapy included darunavir, tipranavir, etravirine or raltegravir in 4, 2, 2 and 5 subjects, respectively. Self-reported treatment adherence was adequate in 4 and partial in 2; one individual underwent treatment interruption during follow-up. Deep sequencing detected all mutations found by population sequencing and identified additional resistance mutations in all but one individual, predominantly after virological failure to deep salvage therapy. Additional genotypic information led to consistent decreases in predicted susceptibility to etravirine, efavirenz, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and indinavir in 2, 1, 2 and 1 subject, respectively. Deep sequencing data did not consistently modify the susceptibility predictions achieved with population sequencing for darunavir, tipranavir or raltegravir.. In this subset of heavily pre-treated individuals, deep sequencing improved the assessment of genotypic resistance to etravirine, but did not consistently provide additional information on darunavir, tipranavir or raltegravir susceptibility. These data may inform the design of future studies addressing the clinical value of minority drug-resistant variants in treatment-experienced subjects.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure

Genotypes of samples from protease inhibitor-naïve patients in Frankfurt's HIV Cohort were analyzed with five tipranavir resistance prediction algorithms. Mean scores were higher in non-B than in B subtypes. The proportion of non-B subtypes increased with increasing scores, except in weighted algorithms. Virtual and in vitro phenotype analyses of samples with increased scores showed no reduced tipranavir susceptibility. Current algorithms appear suboptimal for interpretation of resistance to tipranavir in non-B subtypes; increased scores might reflect algorithm bias rather than "natural resistance."

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) and darunavir (DRV/r) have been approved in patients with virological resistance to multiple protease inhibitors (PIs). Whether the HIV-1 from these patients with virological failure to first-generation PIs remains susceptible to TPV/r or DRV/r is questionable. The susceptibilities of HIV-1 isolates to second-generation PIs in patients who experienced virological failure in three time periods were analysed: 9-2006 to 4-2007 (period 1), 5-2007 to 12-2007 (period 2) and 1-2008 to 8-2008 (period 3). A total of 53 subjects were enrolled, and 51 subject isolates (96.2%) were resistant to ≥1 PIs. The mutation scores for TPV and DRV, and the percentage of isolates with resistance to TPV or DRV, increased significantly from period 1 to period 3. Our data revealed a significant increase in the levels of genotypic resistance to TPV and DRV over the past two years in patients with virological failure to first-generation PIs.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Taiwan; Treatment Failure

Multi-class HIV-1 resistant variants are not rare nowadays. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing (including virtual phenotype) constitutes an important tool for optimizing antiretroviral treatment.. To report a case of discrepancy between resistance interpretation and virological outcome.. A case of a multi-drug experienced patient is presented. Genotypic and/or virtual phenotypic testing analysis was used.. The patient after 10 years of antiretroviral therapy with 11 different regimens unable to produce full virological suppression and with a rapidly declining CD4 count, achieved a successful virological outcome with a scheme containing Tipranavir boosted with low dose of ritonavir. Of note, the patient was screened for Tipranavir 1182.48 study and was found ineligible after genotypic analysis.. Virologic suppression was achieved despite the fact that neither an active agent was included in the backbone regimen nor the resistance profile could ensure the effectiveness of Tipranavir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutagenesis, Insertional; Peptide Hydrolases; Phenotype; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To define a routine algorithm for the specific diagnosis and complete follow-up of HIV-1 group O (HIV-O) infections in Cameroun.. During 18 months, samples referred to Centre Pasteur du Cameroun for HIV testing or viral monitoring were screened for HIV-O infection with an in-house serotyping assay. HIV-O viral load was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction in the LTR gene and resistance genotyping was performed on pol and env sequences.. Of the 7030 samples tested, 78 HIV-O infections (1.1%) were identified, including 7 M and O dually seroreactive samples (9%). All treatment-naive patients and 59% of the patients receiving HAART had detectable viral loads. Analysis of pol sequences from 15 treatment-naive patients revealed a high number of polymorphisms in the protease region, with natural residues implicated in genotypic resistance to tipranavir and saquinavir for HIV-1 group M according to the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites virales algorithm. Six patients (40%) harbored the 181C mutation conferring natural resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Among antiretroviral-treated patients, major resistance mutations described for HIV-1 group M were found.. HIV-O prevalence remains relatively low in Cameroun. The cocirculation of groups M and O in this country leads to replicative dual infections. HIV-O-infected patients in this region can now benefit from effective and specific tools for a complete monitoring of infection. However, further studies are needed to understand long-term response to antiretrovirals of these complex variants.

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genes, env; Genes, pol; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Prevalence; Pyridines; Pyrones; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The aim of the study was to describe Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) system-wide uptake of three HIV protease inhibitors: atazanavir, darunavir and tipranavir.. This retrospective cohort study evaluated VHA uptake of three target antiretrovirals and lopinavir/ritonavir in each complete 90-day quarter since approval to December 2007 using VHA HIV Clinical Case Registry data. We assessed uptake using number of new prescriptions, number of providers and facilities prescribing target agents, provider type, clinic type, facility size and location within four US regions.. Overall, 6551 HIV-infected veterans received target antiretrovirals. Uptake was generally greatest within the first year after Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, and then slightly declined and plateaued. Geographically, early adoption of new antiretroviral drugs tended to occur in the Western USA, as evidenced by comparison of uptake patterns of new antiretrovirals to use of all antiretroviral agents. A small percentage of prescribers of all antiretrovirals were responsible for new prescriptions for target medications, particularly for darunavir and tipranavir. Providers at almost 50% of VHA facilities were prescribing these agents within the first year.. Uptake of new antiretrovirals in the VHA generally reflected overall prescribing of all antiretrovirals, suggesting a lack of VHA impediments to new antiretrovirals in the healthcare system. Some regional variation in uptake among the targeted antiretrovirals occurred over time but tended to resolve after the first several months. Providers responsible for early prescribing of the target medications were limited to a fraction of providers who tended to be physicians who practised in infectious disease (ID) clinics at medium-sized facilities.

Topics: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Drug Approval; Drug Prescriptions; Electronic Health Records; Female; Health Facility Size; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Veterans

HIV infected patients often take at least three anti-HIV drugs together in Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and/or Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitor Therapy (PI/r) to suppress the viral replications. The potential drug-drug interactions affect efficacy of anti-HIV treatment and major source of such interaction is competition for the drug metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P450 (CYP). CYP3A4 isoform is the enzyme responsible for metabolism of currently available HIV-1 protease drugs. Hence administration of these drugs in HARRT or PI/r leads to increased toxicity and reduced efficacy in HIV treatment. We used computational molecular docking method to predict such interactions by which to compare experimentally measured metabolism of each HIV-1 protease drug. AutoDock 4.0 was used to carry out molecular docking of 10 HIV-protease drugs into CYP3A4 to explore sites of reaction and interaction energies (i.e., binding affinity) of the complexes. Arg105, Arg106, Ser119, Arg212, Ala370, Arg372, and Glu374 are identified as major drug binding residues, and consistent with previous data of site-directed mutagenesis, crystallography structure, modeling, and docking studies. In addition, our docking results suggested that phenylalanine clusters and heme are also participated in the binding to mediate drug oxidative metabolism. We have shown that HIV-1 protease drugs such as tipranavir, nelfinavir, lopinavir, and atazanavir differ in their binding modes on each other for metabolic clearance in CYP3A4, whereas ritonavir, amprenavir, indinavir, saquinavir, fosamprenavir, and darunavir share the same binding mode.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Computational Biology; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

In Brazil, where three distinct HIV-1 subtypes (B, F, and C) cocirculate, a significant portion of the HIV-infected population has been exposed to antiretroviral drugs. This study analyzes the antiretroviral resistance profiles of HIV-1-infected individuals failing antiretroviral therapy. Genotypic resistance profiles of 2474 patients presenting virologic failure to antiretroviral therapy in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, were generated and analyzed. Resistance mutations to protease inhibitors and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were less common in subtype C viruses, whereas nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations were less common in subtype F viruses. The thymidine analog mutation pathway known as pathway 1 was more prevalent in subtype B viruses than in subtype C viruses, whereas pathway 2 was more prevalent in subtype C viruses. Selected resistance mutations varied according to subtype for all three classes of antiretrovirals. We describe two distinct pathways of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance (to nevirapine and efavirenz). Although cross-resistance to etravirine should occur more frequently among individuals failing nevirapine treatment, the prevalence of cross-resistance to etravirine, darunavir, and tipranavir was found to be low. We found that increases in the number of resistance mutations will be related to increases in the viral load. Special attention should be given to resistance profiles in non-B subtype viruses. The accumulation of knowledge regarding such profiles in the developing world is desirable.

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Brazil; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Nevirapine; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

The effect of enfuvirtide (ENF) in 11 HIV-1 heavily antiretroviral-experienced children and adolescents enrolled in the HIV-1 Paediatric Spanish cohort was further investigated. Patients who received ENF with novel drugs (etravirine, darunavir, and/or tipranavir) reached and maintained undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and showed immunological recovery within the first 3 months of therapy that was maintained during the follow-up. Viremia was not fully suppressed in patients who did not combine ENF with novel drugs but interestingly, immunological benefit was observed in half of these patients. Therefore, ENF showed a greater and more stable efficacy when administrated with novel drugs.

Topics: Adolescent; Child; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Nitriles; Peptide Fragments; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The primary objective was to assess HIV-1 susceptibility to the protease inhibitor (PI) tipranavir and other antiretroviral (ARV) agents among treatment-experienced patients (TEP). Secondarily, clinicians' use of resistance testing was examined.. UTILIZE was an observational study conducted at 40 sites in the United States. Patients currently failing a PI-based regimen were randomized to receive either a genotype (GT) or combined phenotype-genotype test (PGT) and a treatment decision was made at the second study visit.. 246 patients enrolled, 236 had resistance test results, and 139 (59%) had evidence of HIV-1 resistance to >or=1 PI. Among these 139 patients, more than 50% had viruses that remained sensitive to tipranavir and darunavir, whereas susceptibility to other PIs was markedly lower (<22%). Increasing prior PI exposure was associated with reduced susceptibility to most ARV agents. After obtaining resistance test results, 83% of patients changed therapy. Newly available or investigational ARVs were used frequently. The reason investigators most often cited for changing therapy was the patient resistance test results (82%) and the most common reason for not changing therapy was the inability to construct an active regimen. The majority of patients who exhibited PI resistance received two or more active agents in the new regimen.. Overall, 59% of TEPs failing a PI-based regimen had HIV-1 with PI resistance. The majority of these patients' viruses remained sensitive to either tipranavir or darunavir. Investigators used results from resistance assays to construct a new regimen, frequently with newer agents. In PI-experienced patients, tipranavir and darunavir remain the most likely available active PIs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Random Allocation; Sulfonamides; United States; Young Adult

Genotypic interpretation systems (GISs) for darunavir and tipranavir susceptibility are rarely tested by the use of independent data sets. The virtual phenotype (the phenotype determined by Virco [the "Vircotype"]) was used to interpret all genotypes in Québec, Canada, and phenotypes were determined for isolates predicted to be resistant to all protease inhibitors other than darunavir and tipranavir. We used multivariate analyses to predict relative phenotypic susceptibility to darunavir and tipranavir. We compared the performance characteristics of the Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida scoring algorithm, the Stanford HIV database scoring algorithm (with separate analyses of the discrete and numerical scores), the Vircotype, and the darunavir and tipranavir manufacturers' scores for prediction of the phenotype. Of the 100 isolates whose phenotypes were determined, 89 and 72 were susceptible to darunavir and tipranavir, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the presence of I84V and V82T and the lack of L10F predicted that the isolates would be more susceptible to darunavir than tipranavir. The presence of I54L, V32I, and I47V predicted that the isolates would be more susceptible to tipranavir. All GISs except the system that provided the Stanford HIV database discrete score performed well in predicting the darunavir resistance phenotype (R(2) = 0.61 to 0.69); the R(2) value for the Stanford HIV database discrete scoring system was 0.38. Other than the system that provided the Vircotype (R(2) = 0.80), all GISs performed poorly in predicting the tipranavir resistance phenotype (R(2) = 0.00 to 0.31). In this independent cohort harboring highly protease inhibitor-resistant HIV isolates, reduced phenotypic susceptibility to darunavir and tipranavir was rare. Generally, GISs predict susceptibility to darunavir substantially better than they predict susceptibility to tipranavir.

Topics: Algorithms; Amino Acid Substitution; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Databases, Factual; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Multivariate Analysis; Mutation; Phenotype; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quebec; Sulfonamides

The presence of resistance mutations in patients failing tipranavir or darunavir was examined at the national drug resistance database of the Spanish AIDS Research Network. Although mutations emerging during tipranavir and darunavir failures differed considerably, cross-resistance was found in up to half of the patients tested. Interestingly, mutation 54L, which is associated with tipranavir hypersusceptibility, was selected in half of the darunavir failures. Thus, resistance testing seems mandatory to ensure the benefit of the sequential use of these drugs.

Topics: Darunavir; Databases, Factual; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Spain; Sulfonamides

Ritonavir-related adverse events have been reported in patients taking tipranavir/ritonavir at the licensed dosage of 500/200 mg twice daily (bid). The aim of this open-label, prospective, single-arm pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a ritonavir dose reduction to 100 mg bid guided by the tipranavir virtual inhibitory quotient (vIQ) in HIV-infected patients receiving tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg bid whose viral load was <50 copies/ml and whose tipranavir vIQ was >60. Viral load, blood chemistry, and tipranavir and ritonavir trough concentrations (C(trough)) in plasma were determined at baseline and up to 48 weeks. If the tipranavir vIQ fell to <40, the ritonavir dose was increased to 200 mg bid. The primary endpoint was the percentage of treatment failure after 48 weeks. Eleven patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median (IQR) CD4+ T-cell count and vIQ were 380 (231-520) cells/mm(3) and 233.4 (73.8-584.8), respectively. Ten patients (90.9%) maintained a viral load <50 copies/ml at week 48. Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) tipranavir C(trough) decreased from 24.7 (12.9-47.5) mg/l at baseline to 13.6 (7.1-26.2) mg/l at week 48 (p = 0.194), but the ritonavir dose had to be raised in only one patient. Median triglycerides and ALT concentrations decreased from 177.2 (132.9-292.4) mg/dl and 59 (23-128) IU/l at baseline to 158.0 (131.0-186.0) mg/dl and 28 (20-71) IU/l at week 48 (p = 0.047, p = 0.041), respectively. As a conclusion, ritonavir-dose reduction to 100 mg bid as a treatment-simplification strategy guided by the tipranavir vIQ in patients receiving salvage therapy with tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg bid seems to be safe enough to be tested in adequately powered clinical trials.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Blood Chemical Analysis; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Weighted genotypic resistance scores represent a step towards excellence in the interpretation of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) resistance to antiretroviral drugs. They can predict phenotypic resistance and clinical response better than any other unweighted score. With the addition of mutations associated with an increased response and the refinement of the initial weighted score in a different dataset of individuals, the updated tipranavir score will doubtlessly be a thorough and user-friendly tool that narrows the gap existing between basic science in HIV-1 resistance to antiretrovirals and daily point-of-care clinical practice. The accuracy of the design and the steps used in its validation represent a milestone in HIV-1 resistance knowledge that should also be applied to other antiretroviral drugs in the future.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Validation Studies as Topic

The purpose of this study was to develop a tipranavir-weighted mutation score that provides guidance to treating physicians on the relative effect of specific protease mutations on tipranavir activity.. Weights were developed using data from RESIST tipranavir-treated patients based on regressions of virological response at weeks 8 and 24, accounting for baseline CD4(+) T-cell count and background regimen activity. The resulting weighted score and cutoffs were validated using a set of cohort patients external to the tipranavir development programme. Response rates were tabulated for the new weighted score and compared with other tipranavir mutation scores used in clinical practice.. The final weights were 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 47V (+4), 58E and 84V (+3), 36I, 43T and 54A/M/V (+2), 10V, 33F and 46L (+1), 24I and 76V (-2), 50L/V (-4), and 54L (-6). Tipranavir-weighted score susceptibility categories were susceptible ≤3, partially susceptible >3 but ≤10, and resistant ≥11. Week 48 response rates for RESIST patients were 34.6%, 15.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Using the external cohort data (n=150), the weighted score was highly associated with week 8 viral load reduction (P=0.0027). Only one other score achieved statistical significance.. The tipranavir-weighted score developed and externally validated here, in three datasets representing a broad population of treatment-experienced patients, can be used to make clinical decisions about whether to consider tipranavir in a treatment-experienced patient who has limited treatment options.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Weight; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of severe liver events among HIV-infected patients treated with drug combinations including tipranavir boosted with ritonavir (TPV/r).. One hundred and fifty patients were selected because they started a regimen that included TPV/r (500/200 mg twice a day) and had clinical visits at least every 3 months. Patients who discontinued TPV/r before their first visit were included.. Twelve (8%) individuals developed grade>or=3 transaminase elevation (G>or=3TE). Nine (6%) patients discontinued TPV/r due to liver events. Six (8.6%) of 70 hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients and 6 (7.5%) of 80 subjects without HCV co-infection developed G>or=3TE (P=1). Liver fibrosis was evaluable in 48 (63%) of 76 individuals with hepatitis B virus and/or HCV infection. Four (13%) of 30 subjects with moderate-to-severe fibrosis and none of 18 with mild fibrosis showed G>or=3TE (P=0.3). None of nine patients with cirrhosis showed G>or=3TE.. Liver tolerability of TPV/r was generally good in a cohort of patients with a high proportion of HCV co-infection, including subjects with advanced fibrosis. The presence of HCV co-infection was not associated with an increased risk of severe transaminase elevations.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Female; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Transaminases

To evaluate changes in resistance to tipranavir/r (TPV/r) and darunavir/r (DRV/r) in patients who had failed a TPV/r-including regimen.. HIV genotypes obtained both at baseline and at tipranavir/r failure (TPVF) were analyzed in 47 HIV-infected patients failing a TPV/r-including regimen. Genotypes were evaluated through the Stanford mutation score: patients were ranked for TPV/r and DRV/r resistance as susceptible (class 1), potential low-level (class 2), low-level (class 3), intermediate-level (class 4), and high-level resistance (class 5). Values are expressed as median (interquartile range) or as frequency (%).. Forty-seven patients were eligible. At baseline (tipranavir initiation), the scoring for TPV/r was: class 3 = 4 (8.5%); class 4 = 31 (66%); and class 5 = 12 (25.5%). Corresponding scores for DRV/r were: class 2 = 1 (2%), class 3 = 12 (25.5%), class 4 = 32 (68%), and class 5 = 2 (4.5%). At TPVF, a shift toward a higher TPV/r scoring class was seen in 16 (34.1%) patients (P = 0.001), whereas a shift toward a higher DRV/r scoring class was observed in 9 (19.2%) patients (P = 0.2381). After TPVF, 25/47 patients (53%) were treated with a DRV/r-containing regimen. After 24 weeks (on-treatment analysis), the median HIV RNA decrease was 3.04 (2.13-3.45) log10 copies per milliliter in DRV/r group versus -0.04 (-0.44; 0.50) log10 copies per milliliter in patients not treated with a DRV/r-containing regimen (P < 0.0001); CD4 increase was 126 (70-169) cells per cubic millimeter in DRV/r group versus -42 (-121; 42) (P < 0.0001).. Treatment with TPV/r did not significantly increase the resistance score to DRV/r and did not preclude the efficacy of subsequent treatment with DRV/r.

Topics: Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure

Topics: Child; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV Wasting Syndrome; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

For intensively pretreated pediatric patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, the treatment options available are limited. We report the case of a highly treatment-experienced 12-year-old boy with multidrug-resistant HIV-1, who was successfully treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including ritonavir-boosted tipranavir oral solution, a novel non-peptic protease inhibitor, and enfuvirtide.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Remission Induction; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) develops guidelines for VHA providers that delineate specific criteria for use of certain complex, costly medications indicated for specialized populations. These criteria are disseminated to all VHA facilities.. To (a) assess the concordance with VHA guidelines for use of 4 antiretrovirals (atazanavir, darunavir, enfuvirtide, and tipranavir), and (b) to describe prescribing of these agents before and after implementation of the guideline criteria.. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated all veterans in VHA care who received their first outpatient prescription for a target antiretroviral between its FDA approval date and December 31, 2007, using outpatient prescription records obtained from the VHA Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Clinical Case Registry (CCR:HIV), an observational registry database created through extraction of specific clinical data from the VHA's electronic medical record. Adherence to the VHA guideline criteria was assessed using CCR:HIV data overall and during 3 time periods: (a) pre-criteria: from FDA approval date to criteria implementation date (range 38 days to 192 days), (b) early-criteria: the first 6 months after criteria implementation, and (c) late-criteria: from 180 days after criteria implementation until December 31, 2007 (range 184 days to 1,525 days).. VHA providers prescribed target antiretroviral medications in accordance with the VHA guidelines for use more than 70% of the time. Comparing the pre-criteria with the post-criteria period (i.e., early-criteria and late-criteria combined), no significant differences in the percentages of veterans satisfying all VHA criteria were observed for any drug except atazanavir (P = 0.010). For atazanavir in the post-criteria period compared with the pre-criteria period, significantly more antiretroviral-naive veterans met criteria for cardiovascular disease or risk (72.8% post-criteria vs. 45.5% pre-criteria, P = 0.045), and significantly more antiretroviral-experienced veterans met criteria for resistance to other protease inhibitors requiring the need for ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (61.7% vs. 50.5%, respectively, P < 0.001); however, fewer antiretroviral-experienced veterans met criteria for having documented intolerance to other protease inhibitors (78.9% vs. 89.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). Fewer darunavir-treated patients in the post-criteria period than in the pre-criteria period met the criteria for treatment experience including failure of at least 1 prior protease inhibitor regimen (87.8% vs. 96.0%, respectively, P = 0.002). Adherence to all darunavir criteria significantly waned over time (early-criteria 78.8% vs. late-criteria 62.5%, P < 0.001). Overall, adherence to atazanavir criteria increased over time (66.3% early-criteria vs. 72.9% late-criteria, P < 0.001).. After implementation of antiretroviral specific guideline criteria, the proportion of veterans prescribed a target antiretroviral medication in accordance with VHA guideline criteria varied by agent and improved only for atazanavir. Although adherence to criteria for atazanavir, enfuvirtide, and tipranavir persisted or improved during the post-criteria period, darunavir adherence to criteria waned over time, perhaps indicating that later prescribing patterns reflected changing practice patterns and the need for updated criteria. Revisiting and updating criteria may be especially important for HIV due to the speed with which new information becomes available.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Darunavir; Enfuvirtide; Guideline Adherence; Guidelines as Topic; Health Plan Implementation; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Oligopeptides; Peptide Fragments; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs

A reversal of key HIV protease mutations against tipranavir has been observed in a patient undergoing a late salvage antiretroviral therapy. Our patient initially introduced tipranavir/ritonavir in absence of an optimized background and novel drug classes, and nevertheless he experienced a virological-immunological benefit. Our report is a contribution to the present debate around the role of each single HIV protease mutation, and the validation of mutational "scores" (like the so-called tipranavir weighted score), to be applied to last-generation protease inhibitor compounds initially targeted on patients with limited, residual therapeutic options.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Information about the relationship between pharmacological parameters and an early virological response to tipranavir (TPV) is scarce. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who had received TPV as part of a salvage regimen were analyzed retrospectively. A virological response was defined as a decline in the HIV RNA level of > or = 1 log unit or to <50 copies/ml between weeks 4 and 12 of therapy. The virtual inhibitory quotient (vIQ) was calculated as the ratio of the TPV plasma trough concentration (C(trough))/virtual change in the 50% inhibitory concentration. Three genotypic inhibitory quotients (gIQs) were calculated by using different TPV resistance mutation scores (from the International AIDS Society-USA [IAS-USA], Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug-Resistant Patients with Tipranavir [RESIST], and Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales [ANRS] trials). The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and likelihood ratios for a positive result (LHR+) and a negative result (LHR-) [LHR+ = sensitivity/(1-specificity); LHR- = (1-sensitivity)/specificity] were calculated. A total of 57 HIV-infected patients were analyzed. A virological response was achieved by 77% of the patients. TPV resistance mutations, TPV C(trough), vIQs, and gIQs were all significantly associated with a virological response. The vIQ had the best PPV and NPV (97% and 78%, respectively). The values of the LHR+ were 7.8 for vIQ, 3.4 for the RESIST gIQ, 3.3 for the IAS-USA gIQ, 3.1 for the ANRS gIQ, 2.2 for TPV C(trough), and 1.3 for the IAS-USA and RESIST scores. The values of LHR- were 0 for the RESIST score, 0.07 for vIQ, 0.09 for the IAS-USA score, 0.27 for the RESIST gIQ, 0.32 for the IAS-USA gIQ, 0.37 for the ANRS gIQ, and 0.48 for TPV C(trough). HIV-infected patients who initiate a salvage regimen based on TPV may benefit from baseline drug resistance testing and TPV plasma concentration determination, as vIQ is the best predictor of a virological response.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir, a non-peptidic protease inhibitor which shows in vitro efficacy against some HIV-1-resistant strains, can be used in salvage therapies for multi-experienced HIV patients due to its peculiar resistance profile including 21 mutations at 16 protease positions according to International AIDS Society (IAS). Other genotypic scores, however, which attribute a different weight to single amino-acid substitutions, have been recently proposed. To validate the clinical utility of four different genotypic scores for selecting tipranavir responders, the baseline resistance pattern of 176 HIV heavily experienced patients was correlated with virological success (HIV-RNA<50 copies/ml) after 24 weeks of a new treatment based on tipranavir/ritonavir. Virological suppression after 24 weeks was reached by 42.5% of patients. With univariate analysis, genotypic scores were all associated with outcome but showed a low accuracy with ROC analysis, with the weighted score (WS) by Scherer et al. demonstrating the best performance with an AUC of 68%. Only 52% of patients classified as susceptible (WS< or =3) responded to the new therapy. The following variables were significantly associated (p<0.05) to failure with multivariate analysis: WS, log peak of HIV-RNA, IAS mutations: L33F, I54AMV, Q58E, and non-IAS mutation: N37DES. On the contrary, the use of T20 in T20-naïve patients and the V82AFSI and F53LY non-IAS mutations were associated with virological success. The study suggests that even if the "weighted" scores are able to interpret correctly the antiretroviral resistance profile of multi-experienced patients, it is difficult to individuate a cut-off which can be easily applied to this population for discriminating responders.

Topics: Adult; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Pyridines; Pyrones; Research Design; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Tipranavir (TPV) is a recently approved nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (PI) of HIV-1 and has been indicated for those infected with PIs-resistant HIV-1. However, in clinical practice, whether the HIV-1 from the patients with virological failure to the regimens containing first-line PIs remains susceptible to TPV/r may be questionable.. To assess the resistance levels to TPV of HIV-1 from patients with treatment failure to first-line PIs, patients who experienced virological failure were tested for genotypic resistance of HIV-1 since August 2006 in National Taiwan University Hospital. Patients were enrolled for this analysis if their failed regimens contained > 12 weeks of atazanavir or lopinavir/ritonavir (defined as ATV group and LPV/r group, respectively), but were excluded if they experienced both or other PIs. The levels of genotypic resistance to TPV/r were determined by TPV mutation score.. Till May 2008, 21 subjects in ATV group and 20 subjects in LPV/r group were enrolled. The TPV mutation scores in subjects in LPV/r group were significantly higher than these in ATV group (median, 3 vs 1, P = 0.007). 95.2% subjects in ATV group and only 45% subjects in LPV/r group had an estimated maximal virological response to TPV/r (P < 0.001). The resistance levels to TPV/r correlated with the duration of exposure to first-line PIs, whether in ATV or LPV/r group.. Cross-resistance from first-line PIs may impede the effectiveness of TPV/r-containing salvage therapy. TPV/r should be used cautiously for patients with virological failure to LPV/r especially long duration of exposure.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Young Adult

In recent years, novel antiretroviral drugs have become available for multi-experienced HIV-infected patients with limited options. We enrolled seven advanced HIV-patients, failing multiple previous HAART regimens, in virological failure on their current HAART regimen and showing recent clinical and immunological progression. All patients were prescribed a double-boosted tipranavir plus enfuvirtide based regimen, in addition to zidovudine, tenofovir and lamivudine for salvage therapy. To assess susceptibility to tipranavir, the tipranavir genotypic resistance score was calculated and two years later this was re-evaluated on an updated tipranavir genotypic score algorithm. At baseline, CD4 were 139/mcL (more or less 145), HIV-1 RNA was 822,700 cp/mL. All patients achieved HIV-1 RNA levels less than 400 cp/mL between 12 weeks and 24 weeks of observation; two reached less than 50 cp/mL during this period. At 48 weeks three patients had reached less than 50 cp/mL; three other patients had HIV RNA less than 200 cp/mL. At 72 and 96 weeks HIV viraemia was less than 50 cp/mL in six patients; CD4 T-cell counts 285/mcL (more o less 198). No AIDS-defining events were recorded. Adverse events did not need to stop or change HAART. Strong 3 NRTI backbone could help efficacy and durability, and frequent evaluations in complex patients can help to manage toxicity.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Progression; Enfuvirtide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Peptide Fragments; Phenotype; Pyridines; Pyrones; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The expected effectiveness of protease inhibitors was assessed according to the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS), Rega and Stanford 2007 resistance algorithms in 93 and 87 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients, respectively, infected with B and non-B subtype viruses. Either B or non-B subtypes were considered fully susceptible to protease inhibitors, except to tipranavir/ritonavir, for which the 2007 ANRS algorithm scored non-B subtypes as naturally resistant when this algorithm was extended to these subtypes.

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Viral; Europe; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

To identify mutations associated with the virological response (VR) to a tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen, 143 patients previously treated with protease inhibitor (PI) were studied. VR was defined by a decrease of at least 1 log(10) in, or undetectable, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA at month 3. The effect of each mutation in the protease, considering all variants at a residue as a single variable, on the VR to TPV/r was investigated. Mutations at six residues were associated with a lower VR (E35D/G/K/N, M36I/L/V, Q58E, Q61D/E/G/H/N/R, H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y, and L89I/M/R/T/V), and one mutation was associated with a higher VR (F53L/W/Y). The genotypic score M36I/L/V-53L/W/Y + Q58E + H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y + L89I/M/R/T/V was selected as providing a strong association with VR. For the seven patients with a genotypic score of -1 (viruses with only mutation at codon 53), the percentage of responders was 100% and the percentages were 79%, 56%, 33%, 21%, and 0% for those with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The percentage of patients showing a response to TPV/r was lower for patients infected with non-clade B viruses (n = 16, all non-B subtypes considered together) than for those infected with clade B viruses (n = 127) (25% and 59%, respectively; P = 0.015). Most mutations associated with VR to TPV/r had not previously been associated with PI resistance. This is consistent with phenotypic analysis showing that TPV has a unique resistance profile. Mutations at five positions (35, 36, 61, 69, and 89) were observed significantly more frequently in patients infected with a non-B subtype than in those infected with the B subtype, probably explaining the lower VR observed in these patients.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) has proven potent efficacy when used in heavily pretreated patients, harboring protease inhibitor-associated resistance mutations. Limited data are available on resistance pattern emerging in patients failing DRV/r and on subsequent remaining protease inhibitor options.. Analysis of baseline and failure resistance genotypes were performed in patients experiencing virologic failure (>200 copies/ml) after at least 3 months on a DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily)-containing regimen.. Twenty-five highly protease inhibitor-experienced patients were included. Baseline median human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA was 5 log10 copies/ml and number of total-protease inhibitor, major-protease inhibitor and DRV-associated-resistance mutations was 13, 4 and 3, respectively. Median viral replication duration on DRV/r selective pressure was 34 weeks. Emergence of DRV-associated-resistance mutations was observed in 72% (18/25) of patients, at codons L89I/M/V (32%), V32I (28%), V11I (20%), I47V/A (20%), I54L/M (20%), L33F/I (16%) and I50V (16%). A high risk of DRV resistance was observed in patients with 2 and 3 baseline DRV-associated-resistance mutations and in patients with more than 24 weeks of ongoing viral replication. According to 2007 ANRS algorithm, isolates classified as susceptible to ritonavir-boosted tipranavir decreased from baseline to failure from 76 to 60% and susceptible to DRV/r from 32 to 12%.. Emerging mutations observed after DRV/r failure were those already described to impact the DRV efficacy. Our study provided recommendations to firstly, reconsider lowering the cutoff number of DRV mutations to two; secondly, avoid keeping patients on a DRV-failing regimen for more than 24 weeks and thirdly, to examine the efficacy of using tipranavir after DRV failure.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

The feline AIDS model for HIV-1 treatment failed in the 1990s, due to structural features resembling protease inhibitor (PI) resistant HIV-1 variants. Widespread drug-resistance to PIs now invokes the possibility of rescuing feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) as a model for PI treatment. We here analyzed susceptibility of FIV to second generation PIs, lopinavir, atazanavir, and the structurally unrelated non-peptidic PI tipranavir. We found that FIV protease resembles HIV-1 protease drug resistance mutations limiting binding of lopinavir and atazanavir but not tipranavir. All three PIs were found to inhibit FIV replication in a concentration-dependent manner, but only tipranavir inhibited FIV similarly to HIV-1. This drug inhibited FIV synergistically with ritonavir. Inhibition of protease activity was confirmed by Western blot analysis. In molecular docking simulations, tipranavir displayed energetically favorable interactions with the catalytic cavity of the mature dimeric FIV protease. The calculated hydrogen bond network was similar to that found in HIV-1 protease/tipranavir complexes and involved atoms in the protein backbone. We also modeled the interaction of tipranavir with an immature protease monomer, suggesting that inhibition of protease dimerization may be a secondary modality for FIV inhibition by tipranavir. In conclusion, tipranavir is the first FDA-approved non-reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1 to show anti-FIV properties. The tipranavir response by FIV may 1) support the idea of using FIV as a small animal model for PI-resistant HIV-1, thus expanding access to animal AIDS models; and 2) pave the way for development of novel broad-based inhibitors for treatment of drug resistant HIV-1.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Cats; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir-resistance associated mutations (TPV-RAMs) are often observed among patients with HIV-1 subtype A/E infection. Data regarding TPV resistance in subtype A/E is still limited.. To determine the prevalence of TPV-RAMs among protease inhibitor-naïve, HIV-1 subtype A/E infected patients.. Genotypic resistance testing was conducted among HIV-1-infected patients who were PI-naïve.. We studied 112 patients (mean age, 40.7 years; 58% male). Median CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA were 192cells/mm(3) and 4.2logcopies/mL, respectively. Ninety-three patients (83%) infected with subtype A/E; the others had subtype B. The most common TPV-RAMs were M36I (88%), H69K (61%), and I13V (48%). Median number of TPV-RAMs was 3 mutations. Patients with subtype A/E had higher prevalence of I13V (54% vs. 21%, P=0.011), M36I (96% vs. 53%, P<0.001), H69K (68% vs. 26%, P=0.001), and >2 TPV-RAMs (62% vs. 21%, P=0.002). In multivariate analysis, only subtype A/E was associated with the occurrence of >2 TPV-RAMs (OR 9.83; 95%CI, 1.95-39.57; P=0.006).. TPV-RAMs previously described by IAS-USA are commonly observed in PI-naïve patients with HIV-1 subtype A/E infection. Further studies to define virologic response of subtype A/E to TPV and clinical validation of TPV-RAMs in HIV-1 subtype A/E are essentially needed.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Approval; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Solutions; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; HIV Infections; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that tipranavir may be associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. We studied 2 large cohorts to estimate the background rate of intracranial hemorrhage and compared it with rates reported among persons who had been exposed to tipranavir.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Anti-HIV Agents; California; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Medicaid; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Risk Factors; Sulfonamides; United States; Veterans

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

The new non-peptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir is used boosted with ritonavir in a 500/200 mg bid scheme. Multiple drug interactions are described for both drugs because of their different action in CYP450 3A4 and p-glycoprotein. In this retrospective analysis of 22 patients during therapy with tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV) 500 mg/200 mg bid, we found significantly decreased TPV-trough levels in combination with tenofovir (15.32+/-5.22 microg/ml) in comparison to TPV trough levels without tenofovir (20.21+/-14.87 microg/ml). Therapeutic drug monitoring of TPV is recommended.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Organophosphonates; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Patient Compliance; Prognosis; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retreatment; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

In the past, bleeding events have been described for patients with haemophilia taking HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Recently, the FDA published a warning concerning intracranial haemorrhage in patients taking the HIV-1 protease inhibitor tipranavir co-administered with ritonavir.. We investigated (i) platelet aggregation in vivo in HIV-1-infected adult patients (n = 5) immediately before and 2 and 4 h after dosing of tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg. To further characterize the effects, we then evaluated (ii) platelet aggregation and (iii) thromboxane B2 (TxB2) formation (ELISA) with increasing tipranavir concentrations (TPV(conc)) in vitro of up to 100,000 ng/mL. Platelet aggregation was stimulated either with 2 microM ADP (ADP) or 10 mg/L collagen (COL). TPV(conc) were measured with validated EPI-LC-MS/MS. Intraindividual comparisons of values at time points and TPV(conc), respectively, were carried out with repeated samples ANOVA.. Platelet aggregation (mean, maximal light transmission A(max)) was significantly decreased in patients 4 h post-dose in collagen- (from 79.8% to 57.1%; P < 0.001) and in ADP-stimulated (from 58.5% to 54.0%; not significant) samples at a median (range) TPV(conc) of 62 500 ng/mL (22,990-67,500). These results could be reproduced in vitro at TPV(conc) 50,000 ng/mL (A(max)ADP/A(max)COL = 20.7/36.9%; P = 0.003/<0.001) and 100 000 ng/mL (A(max)ADP/A(max)COL = 14.5/17.1%; P < 0.001/<0.001). Median (range) TxB2 concentrations were reduced (P = 0.07) from 327 ng/mL (187-500) at baseline to 265 ng/mL (152-428) at 5000 ng/mL and were significantly reduced (P < 0.001) to 187 ng/mL (81-362) at a TPV(conc) of 50,000 ng/mL, respectively.. Five HIV-1-infected patients on tipranavir-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy presented marked decreases in platelet aggregation. In vitro these effects were reproduced and decreased TxB2 formation was also demonstrated. Inhibition of platelet aggregation while receiving tipranavir treatment might contribute to increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Adult; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Thromboxane B2

The virological response (VR) to a tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV-RTV)-based regimen had been shown to be associated with a number of mutations in the protease gene, the use of enfuvirtide (T20), and the TPV phenotypic inhibitory quotient (IQ). The role of the TPV genotypic IQ (gIQ) has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the TPV gIQ and the VR at 48 weeks to TPV-based salvage regimens. Patients placed on regimens containing two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus TPV-RTV 500/200 mg twice a day with or without T20 were prospectively studied. Regular follow-up was performed over the study period. VR, considered a viral load (VL) decrease of >or=1 log unit and/or the achievement of <50 copies/ml with no VL rebound of >0.5 log unit compared to the maximal VL decrease at week 48, was assessed. Thirty-eight patients who had received multiple drugs were included. At week 48 the VL decrease was -1.48 (interquartile range [IQR], -2.88 to -0.48), 15 patients (39.5%) had VLs of <50 copies/ml, and the CD4+ cell count increase was 37 cells/mm3 (IQR, -30 to +175). Twenty subjects (52.6%) achieved VRs. The TPV gIQ and optimized background score (OBS) were independently associated with higher VL decreases. The TPV gIQ and OBS were also independent predictors of a VR at week 48. TPV gIQ and OBS cutoff values of 14,500 and 2, respectively, were associated with a higher rate of VR. The TPV gIQ was shown to be able to predict the VR at 48 weeks to TPV-containing salvage regimens better than the TPV trough concentration or TPV-associated mutations alone. A possible TPV gIQ cutoff value of 14,500 for reaching a VR at week 48 was suggested. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate the calculation of TPV gIQ as a new tool for the optimization of TPV-based salvage therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemophilia A; Hemorrhage; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Risk; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

A 55-year-old HIV-infected patient on antiretroviral treatment with Ritonavir-boosted Tipranavir as part of HAART developed intracranial haemorrhage during the acute phase of cryptococcal meningitis. CT scan and MRI confirmed the intracranial haemorrhage. Positive cryptococcal antigen and cultures of both blood and CSF confirmed the diagnosis of meningitis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans. There was no evidence of any bleeding disorder, use of aspirin or antiplatelet agents. The patient was treated with Liposomal Amphotericin B for cryptococcal meningitis. No special treatment was needed for the intracranial haemorrhage, but Tipranavir was discontinued and replaced by Kaletra and Saquinavir. Intracranial haemorrhage could be related to Tipranavir and cryptococcal meningitis was a predisposing factor. Headache stopped 3 days after starting antifungal treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of intracranial haemorrhage related to Tipranavir treatment after the end of the "RESIST" studies and the only one related to meningitis.

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Anti-HIV Agents; Causality; Cryptococcus neoformans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Meningitis, Cryptococcal; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Tipranavir (TPV) and darunavir (DRV) are potent against protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant viruses. Efficacy of these compounds when confronting distinct HIV subtypes is not known.. All clinical specimens from HIV-positive patients sent to our institution for drug resistance testing between 1999 and 2006 were analysed. The prevalence of TPV and DRV resistance mutations was assessed based on the latest International AIDS Society-USA panel list. Phenotypic susceptibility to DRV and TPV was examined in a subset of these samples using the PhenoSense assay.. A total of 1364 genotypes were analysed, including 1178 from individuals infected with clade B (285 drug naive) and 186 with non-B subtypes (137 drug naive). The mean number (+/-SD) of DRV resistance-associated mutations was higher in clade B than non-B (0.4 +/- 0.9 versus 0.06 +/- 0.3; P < 0.001), and more frequent among PI-experienced than drug-naive patients (0.6 +/- 1.02 versus 0.02 +/- 0.21; P < 0.001). In contrast, the mean number of TPV resistance-associated mutations was higher in non-B than B subtypes (2.7 +/- 1 versus 1.2 +/- 1.6; P < 0.001), regardless of PI experience. Susceptibility to TPV and DRV was examined in 29 drug-naive patients infected with non-B subtypes (1A, 3C, 2CRF01_AE, 9CRF02_AG, 1CRF12_BF, 3CRF14_BG, 3F and 7G). All showed susceptibility to DRV and 93% to TPV. Interestingly, two subtype F specimens showed reduced TPV susceptibility, with fold-changes of 2.7 and 2.1, respectively.. Non-B subtypes show a greater number of TPV resistance-associated mutations than B viruses, regardless of PI exposure. While HIV clade has no influence on DRV susceptibility, some F subtypes may show reduced TPV susceptibility.

Topics: Chi-Square Distribution; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genes, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

The impact of tipranavir plasma levels (TPV C(min)) on virological response was examined in 36 antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected individuals. Although TPV C(min) did not predict outcome in patients with less than five or more than eight baseline TPV-associated resistance mutations, TPV C(min) values were greater in responders than in nonresponders with five to seven baseline TPV-associated resistance mutations (38.8 vs. 13.8 g/ml, p = 0.017). Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring might be helpful in ensuring a viral response in this subset of patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

A new high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of tipranavir in human plasma is described. Quantitative recovery following liquid-liquid-extraction with diethylether from 100 microl of human plasma was achieved. Subsequently, the assay was performed with 67 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate-acetonitrile as a mobile phase, a Phenomenex C 18 column and UV detection at 255 nm. Linear Standard curves were obtained for concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 400 microg/ml. The calculated intra- and inter-day coefficents of variation were below 7%.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Monitoring; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir is one of the latest approved HIV protease inhibitors. This non-peptidic molecule is an strong inducer of cytochrome P450 and has to be co-administered with low doses ritonavir as pharmacokinetic booster to achieve effective antiviral activity in vivo. As expected, significant drug interactions may occur in patients treated with tipranavir/ritonavir, including diminished exposure to some antiretroviral agents. Although a few interactions can be managed with adequate drug dosing others preclude to use these medications in combination.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Induction; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

A simple method for the quantification of tipranavir, the first non-peptidic HIV protease inhibitor, was developed and validated. Quinoxaline, as internal standard, was added to 50 microl of plasma before a liquid-liquid extraction by 600 microl of protein precipitation solution. The extracts were diluted before being injected in the chromatographic system. Chromatographic separation was made on a C18 column using potassium phosphate buffer (pH 3.2) and acetonitrile with gradient. Detection was performed by an UV detector at 260 nm. Relative error at three control quality concentrations ranged from -1.81 to 1.72%. Intra-day (CV%) and inter-day (CV%) precision ranged from 0.94 to 2.55% and from 3.07 to 4.24%, respectively. LOQ and LOD were 0.090 microg/ml and 0.035 microg/ml, respectively. Mean recovery was 87.1%+/-2.4%. Calibration curve was linear up to 180 microg/ml. Concentration range when optimized (0.703-180 microg/ml) proved to be adequate to measure tipranavir concentration in HIV-1-positive patients, therefore this method could be suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of this drug.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Sulfonamides

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir (TPV) is a novel non-peptidic protease inhibitor (PI). It binds strongly and selectively to the HIV-1 protease, is orally administered twice daily, boosted with low doses of ritonavir, and shows a favourable resistance profile. In the two registrational trials, named RESIST 1 and 2, TPV/ritonavir 500/200 mg b.i.d., along with an optimised antiretroviral backbone, provided better virologic responses than controls receiving standard of care ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimens. A total of 21 mutations at 16 protease codons have been shown to impact on TPV susceptibility and response rates. The TPV mutation score includes L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D and I84V. Viruses containing eight or more of these mutations are generally resistant to the drug. TPV use is associated with an excess of grade 3/4 liver enzyme elevations compared with other ritonavir-boosted PIs, and the potential for drug-drug interactions is relevant and must be considered when prescribing TPV.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Porphyria Cutanea Tarda; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

In RESIST, enfuvirtide co-administered with ritonavir-boosted tipranavir was associated with higher plasma tipranavir concentrations, which seldom rose above those associated with an increased risk of grade 3/4 transaminase elevations. Transaminase elevation rates (6.5%) and clinical hepatic event rates (5.9 events/100 person exposure years) were lower in the tipranavir/ritonavir with enfuvirtide group than in the tipranavir/ritonavir without enfuvirtide group. Observed increases in plasma tipranavir concentrations thus had no apparent effect on the risk of hepatotoxicity.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Escalating drug resistance in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients has made management increasingly difficult. In clinical trials, tipranavir (TPV) has produced potent and durable responses in such patients, although experience in clinical cohorts is limited. A retrospective clinical case review was undertaken of triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients receiving optimized boosted TPV-containing regimens and T20 with up to 108 weeks follow-up. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) resistance profiles were characterized using International Aids Society (IAS)-USA scoring and 'TPV resistance score' (TPV-RS) at baseline and failure. Five of 12 patients had undetectable virus (<50 copies/mL) after median 84 weeks (range 60-108), and 1/12 < had 700 copies/mL after 40 weeks. Six of 12 patients failed after 36 (range 12-48) weeks and were more likely to have > or = 3 TPV-RS mutations than non-failures (P = 0.06). Presence of a major IAS-USA mutation at baseline was strongly associated with absence of a 1 log viral load drop at 24 weeks (P = 0.02). TPV-containing regimens showed impressive efficacy and tolerability in this heavily experienced cohort.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Genotype; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Patient Selection; Pyridines; Pyrones; Research Design; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Week 48 HIV-RNA treatment response to the protease inhibitor tipranavir co-administered with ritonavir was compared with that of lopinavir co-administered with ritonavir in patients whose baseline isolates had varying lopinavir genotypic mutation scores. With increasing lopinavir mutation scores, the proportion of patients achieving a week 48 treatment response was increased in the tipranavir/ritonavir compared with the lopinavir/ritonavir arm. Tipranavir/ritonavir therapy improves treatment response rates compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients whose viruses have reduced susceptibility to lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anticonvulsants; Contraindications; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phenobarbital; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Viral Load

Since the mid-1990s, combination therapies to treat HIV-1 infection have greatly reduced morbidity and mortality from AIDS in developed countries with access to the medications. However, the development of viral resistance to available antiretrovirals is one of the many limitations to therapy that has emerged. Of the 24 licensed antiretroviral medications and medication combinations in the US, tipranavir is one of the few agents to specifically target highly treatment-experienced patients with multi-drug resistant HIV-1. It displays activity against the virus that is cross-resistant to other protease inhibitors. In this review, issues in treating multi-drug resistant HIV-1 and the potential clinical utility of tipranavir in the US will be discussed.

Topics: Adult; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; United States

A simple HPLC assay to determine plasma concentration of tipranavir is presented. A liquid/liquid extraction of the drugs in ethyl acetate/hexane from 250 microL of plasma is followed by a reversed phase isocratic HPLC assay with UV detection at 205 nm. The imprecision and inaccuracy are lower than 10%, the low limit of quantitation is 0.4 mg/L. Thus, this method can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of tipranavir in HIV infected patients.

Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Contraindications; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Selection; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Risk Factors; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Peptide Fragments; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Treatment options for HIV-1 infected individuals who have received extensive previous antiretroviral therapy are limited. We compared efficacy and safety of the novel non-peptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir co-administered with ritonavir plus an optimised background regimen with that of an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI-ritonavir) in such patients.. We did a combined analysis of 48-week data from two ongoing, randomised, open-label, multinational, phase III, RESIST studies. HIV-1-infected adults with 3 months or longer previous triple antiretroviral class experience, two or more previous protease inhibitor regimens, HIV-1 RNA 1000 copies per mL or greater, and genotypically demonstrated primary resistance to protease inhibitor, were eligible. Primary endpoints were proportion of treatment responders (with reduction in viral load of 1 log(10) copies per mL or greater below baseline without treatment change) at 48 weeks and time to treatment failure through 48 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis). The RESIST studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00054717 (RESIST-1) and NCT00144170 (RESIST-2).. 3324 patients were screened; 746 received tipranavir-ritonavir and 737 CPI-ritonavir. 486 (65.1%) patients on tipranavir-ritonavir and 192 (26.1%) on CPI-ritonavir remained on assigned treatment until week 48. At week 48, more patients achieved and maintained treatment response in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group (251 [33.6%] vs 113 [15.3%]; p<0.0001). Median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group (113 days vs 0 days; p<0.0001). Gastrointestinal system disorders and raised transaminase, cholesterol, and triglycerides were more frequent in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group.. Compared with CPI-ritonavir, tipranavir-ritonavir with an optimised background regimen provides better virological and immunological responses over 48 weeks in patients who have received extensive previous antiretroviral treatment.

Topics: Adult; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Topics: HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To compare baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors among HIV-1 isolates of subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG, and to identify polymorphisms that determine the differences in susceptibility.. A total of 42 samples of drug-naive patients infected with subtypes G (n=19), CRF02_AG (n = 10), F (n = 6) and C (n = 7) were phenotyped and genotyped with the Antivirogram and the ViroSeq 2.0 genotyping system, respectively. A Bayesian network approach was used for a preliminary analysis of the collected data and the dependencies indicated by the network were statistically confirmed.. CRF02_AG samples were found to be more susceptible to nelfinavir and ritonavir than other subtypes. Hypersusceptibility to these drugs was associated with the 70R polymorphism. 37D/S/T was associated with reduced susceptibility to indinavir and 89M with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. Susceptibility to tipranavir was the lowest among the subtype F samples and the highest for subtype G samples, with samples carrying 57R being more susceptible than samples carrying 57K.. Our study suggests that there are baseline susceptibility differences between subtypes and these differences are due to naturally occurring polymorphisms in these subtypes. The predictive value for phenotype of these polymorphisms was even valid in subtypes where these polymorphisms are less prevalent. Taking into account such polymorphisms should improve current algorithms for interpretation of genotyping results in a subtype-independent way.

Topics: Algorithms; Bayes Theorem; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Models, Genetic; Nelfinavir; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Fifty-five patients placed on tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg twice a day (27 with enfuvirtide and 28 without) underwent tipranavir and ritonavir plasma concentration measurements by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Markedly higher tipranavir and ritonavir trough concentrations were observed in enfuvirtide recipients. The modelling of sparse plasma samples using a first order absorption and elimination monocompartmental model without time lag predicted higher tipranavir elimination half-life and volume of distribution in enfuvirtide takers. This unexpected drug-drug interaction warrants further investigation.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Enfuvirtide; Female; Half-Life; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antifungal Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Bronchoscopy; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nelfinavir; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumocystis Infections; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nucleosides; Nucleotides; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

Topics: Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Drug Approval; HIV Infections; Humans; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Drug Approval; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

A new protease inhibitor, used with ritonavir, for resistant HIV.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Virus Replication

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Viral Load

Topics: Administration, Oral; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retreatment; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Contraindications; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Drug Approval; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Liver; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Despite the increasing number of antiretroviral compounds, the number of useful drug regimens is limited owing to the high frequency of cross-resistance.. We studied in vitro two-drug combinations using three protease inhibitors (PIs), tipranavir, amprenavir and lopinavir, on isolates (003 and 004) derived from patients with resistance to multiple PIs compared with the drug-susceptible isolate 14aPre in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Drug interactions were determined by median dose-effect analysis, with the combination index calculated at several inhibitory concentrations (IC).. In 14aPre experiments, the combination tipranavir + lopinavir demonstrated synergy at low concentrations (IC(50)), an additive effect at IC(75) and antagonism at IC(90)-IC(95); tipranavir + amprenavir were antagonistic at all concentrations except IC(95), where they were synergic; and the lopinavir + amprenavir combination was always antagonistic. In 003 and 004 infections, tipranavir + lopinavir and tipranavir + amprenavir combinations were antagonistic, and lopinavir + amprenavir were synergic, at all concentrations, with the exception of being additive at IC(95).. Our in vitro experiments did not show any advantage in combining second generation PIs as a therapeutic strategy in naive or multi-treatment failure subjects, with the exception of tipranavir + amprenavir at IC(95) in infections by a wild-type isolate.

Topics: Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Viral; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Furans; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

We have developed and validated an assay, using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), for the quantification of the novel protease inhibitors (PIs) atazanavir and tipranavir. The sample pre-treatment consisted of protein precipitation with a mixture of methanol and acetronitrile using 100 microl plasma for atazanavir and 50 microl for tipranavir. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Inertsil ODS3 column (50 mm x 2.0 mm i.d., particle size 5 microm), with a quick stepwise gradient using an acetate buffer (pH 5) and methanol, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The analytical run time was 5.5 min. The triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operated in the positive ion-mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used for drug quantification. The assay was linear over a concentration range of 0.05-10 microg/ml for atazanavir and 0.1-75 microg/ml for tipranavir. Saquinavir-d5 was used as internal standard. The intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation were less than 3.8% for atazanavir and less than 10.4% for tipranavir. Accuracies were within +/-7.3 and +/-7.2% for atazanavir and tipranavir, respectively. Both drugs were stable under various relevant storage conditions. The validated concentration ranges proved to be adequate to measure concentrations of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals. The developed method could easily be combined with a previously developed LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of protease inhibitors.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Sulfonamides

Resistance to anti-HIV medications is an ongoing dilemma. A recent study in 16 European countries and Israel found primary drug resistance mutations in 10% of 1,633 people newly diagnosed with HIV disease who had never taken anti-HIV therapy. French clinicians have reported that 78% of viral samples taken between 1997 and 2002 from over 2,000 chronically infected people showed some resistance to at least one antiretroviral drug, and 25% had some resistance to three major drug classes (excluding fusion inhibitors). Similar findings have been reported in the U.S. and Britain. As a significant number of people with HIV find themselves with fewer treatment options, researchers struggle to develop medications that remain effective against genetically varied forms of the virus. Tipranavir, the first in a new category of protease inhibitors (PIs), appears to be such a drug. Studies have shown that tipranavir (formerly known as PNU-140690) durably reduces viral load in some people whose dominant HIV strain is resistant to at least two other PIs. The quality of tipranavir resistance that does develop has also been examined, and the extent of this agent's usefulness in people needing salvage therapy is under investigation.

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Synergism; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Topics: HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Although the use of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PI) has substantially benefited HIV-1-infected individuals, new PI are urgently needed, as broad PI resistance and therapy failure is common.. The antiviral activity of tipranavir (TPV), a non-peptidic PI, was assessed in in vitro culture for 134 clinical isolates with a wide range of resistance to currently available peptidomimetic PI. The susceptibility of all 134 variants was then re-tested with the four PI simultaneously with TPV, using the Antivirogram assay.. Of 105 viruses with more than tenfold resistance to three or four PI and an average of 6.1 PI mutations per sample, 95 (90%) were susceptible to TPV; eight (8%) had four- to tenfold resistance to TPV and only two (2%) had more than tenfold resistance.. The substantial lack of PI cross-resistance to TPV shown by highly PI-resistant clinical isolates makes TPV an attractive new-generation HIV inhibitor.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Microbial; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation; Phenotype; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

Pharmaceutical companies are on the brink of offering HIV clinicians new drugs designed to work specifically against drug-resistant strains of the virus. Several already approved drugs can also be effective against resistant strains. For instance, amprenavir is currently available and has a smaller degree of susceptibility to protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant strains than the other four PIs on the market. Also, DAPD, a dioxolane purine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), shows in vitro activity against drug-resistant strains of HIV. Information on Lamivudine and tipranavir is also presented.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Dioxolanes; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Purine Nucleosides; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides