tilmicosin and Fever

tilmicosin has been researched along with Fever* in 1 studies

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for tilmicosin and Fever

Article	Year
Evaluation of the efficacy of tulathromycin as a metaphylactic antimicrobial in feedlot calves. Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine, 2007,Fall, Volume: 8, Issue:3 The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of tulathromycin (DRAX) versus tilmicosin (MIC) or oxytetracycline (TET) as a metaphylactic antimicrobial in feedlot calves. Calves that received DRAX had significantly (P<.05) lower initial undifferentiated fever (UF) treatment and relapse rates; lower overall chronicity, overall mortality, and cause-specific mortality rates; higher average daily gains; and improved quality grades. However, calves that received DRAX also had poorer (P<.05) yield grades compared with calves that received MIC or TET and worse feed conversion compared with calves that received MIC. Net advantages in the DRAX group were 3.79CanDollars/animal and 16.96CanDollars/animal compared with the MIC and TET groups, respectively. Based on these results, DRAX is a more efficacious and cost-effective metaphylactic antimicrobial than MIC or TET in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing UF. In addition, this study presents a comparison between two methods ("deads out" and "deads in") of calculating feedlot performance variables. Topics: Animal Feed; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Canada; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disaccharides; Eating; Female; Fever; Heterocyclic Compounds; Macrolides; Meat; Oxytetracycline; Random Allocation; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Tylosin; Weight Gain	2007

Article

Year

Evaluation of the efficacy of tulathromycin as a metaphylactic antimicrobial in feedlot calves.

Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine, 2007,Fall, Volume: 8, Issue:3

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of tulathromycin (DRAX) versus tilmicosin (MIC) or oxytetracycline (TET) as a metaphylactic antimicrobial in feedlot calves. Calves that received DRAX had significantly (P<.05) lower initial undifferentiated fever (UF) treatment and relapse rates; lower overall chronicity, overall mortality, and cause-specific mortality rates; higher average daily gains; and improved quality grades. However, calves that received DRAX also had poorer (P<.05) yield grades compared with calves that received MIC or TET and worse feed conversion compared with calves that received MIC. Net advantages in the DRAX group were 3.79CanDollars/animal and 16.96CanDollars/animal compared with the MIC and TET groups, respectively. Based on these results, DRAX is a more efficacious and cost-effective metaphylactic antimicrobial than MIC or TET in feedlot calves at ultra-high risk of developing UF. In addition, this study presents a comparison between two methods ("deads out" and "deads in") of calculating feedlot performance variables.

Topics: Animal Feed; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Canada; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disaccharides; Eating; Female; Fever; Heterocyclic Compounds; Macrolides; Meat; Oxytetracycline; Random Allocation; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Tylosin; Weight Gain

2007