ticagrelor and Coronary-Artery-Disease

Optimal antithrombotic therapy during the chronic maintenance period in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown. We compared five kinds of mainstream chronic maintenance antithrombotic strategies at least one year after the acute phase: aspirin alone, clopidogrel alone, ticagrelor alone, continued dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for a period of time, and maintenance with aspirin combined with a low-dose anticoagulant such as rivaroxaban.. Ten randomized, controlled trials were selected using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library through February 2023. The primary outcome was main adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and secondary outcomes include net adverse clinical events (NACEs), cardiac death, all-cause death, ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, total bleeding, and major bleeding. A network meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effects model. Data extraction was performed by three independent reviewers.. Our search identified ten eligible randomized controlled trials enrolling a total of 82,084 patients comparing different chronic maintenance antithrombotic strategies. As for the primary endpoint, there was no statistical difference in MACE outcomes between any two of the five methods. As for the secondary endpoint, there was no statistical difference in NACE, major bleeding, all-cause death, cardiac death, and stent thrombosis between any two methods. The aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban group had a lower incidence of ischemic stroke compared to the aspirin group (OR = 0.49, 95% CrI 0.26-0.91). And the prolonged DAPT group had a higher total bleeding rate compared to aspirin group (OR = 2.4, 95% CrI 1.1-5.9).. In terms of MACE, NACE, all-cause death, cardiac death, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding, there were no significant differences between using aspirin alone, clopidogrel alone, and ticagrelor alone; extending DAPT duration; and using aspirin combined with low-dose rivaroxaban for chronic maintenance antithrombotic regimens. However, choosing aspirin combined with low-dose rivaroxaban can reduce the incidence of ischemic stroke, and prolonged DAPT may have a higher rate of total bleeding. However, it is important to note that this study is based on indirect comparisons, and there is currently a lack of direct evidence comparing various maintenance antiplatelet therapy regimens. Further high-quality studies are needed to address this gap and provide more conclusive evidence on the comparative effectiveness of different maintenance antiplatelet strategies.

Topics: Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor

The relative safety and efficacy of de-escalation, extended duration (ED) (>12-months), and standard dual antiplatelet therapy for 12-months (DAPT-12) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial.. Online databases were queried to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs). ED-DAPT, high-potency (HP) DAPT, shorter duration (SD) DAPT, and low-dose (LD) DAPT were compared with DAPT-12. A trial sequential, bivariate, influential, and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to determine the pooled estimates. A total of 30 RCTs comprising 81 208 (40 839 experimental, 40 369 control arm) patients with CAD were included in the quantitative analysis. On NMA, compared with DAPT-12, all types of de-escalation, HP-DAPT-12, and ED-DAPT strategies had a statistically non-significant difference in the incidence of MACE at a median follow-up of 1-year. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of stroke, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and all-cause mortality between DAPT-12 and all other strategies. The network estimates showed a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding with DAPT for 3-months followed by P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.84), while a higher risk of bleeding with HP-DAPT for 12 months (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16-2.06). The net clinical benefit and rankograms also favoured DAPT-3 (P2Y12) and discouraged the use of HP-DAPT-12 and ED-DAPT. A subgroup analysis of 19 RCTs restricted to patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mirrored the findings of pooled analysis. A sensitivity analysis revealed no influence of any individual study or individual strategy on net ischemic estimates. The trial sequential analysis (TSA) illustrated a consistently non-significant difference at the interim analysis of trials, reaching the futility area for MACE, while the cumulative Z-values line surpassed the monitoring boundary as well as the required information size for major bleeding favouring de-escalation strategy.. DAPT for three months followed by ticagrelor-only and use of aspirin + clopidogrel after a short period of high potency DAPT appears to be a safe strategy for treating post-PCI patients. However, given the methodological limitations and inclusion of a small number of trials in novel de-escalation strategies, these findings need validation by future large scale RCTs.

Topics: Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor and clopidogrel are antiplatelet drugs that act by binding to the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Previous studies have compared between them regarding the endothelial function effect.. This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence comparing the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).. In August 2021, the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched systematically for eligible trials. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with CAD.. Seven trials (n = 511) were included in our systematic review. Ticagrelor resulted in a greater elevation of the level of progenitor cells CD34+ KDR+ and CD34+ 133+ (P = 0.036 and P = 0.019, respectively), with a lower rate of endothelial cell apoptosis rate (P < 0.001). Moreover, ticagrelor showed superiority regarding nitric oxide, radical oxygen species, and soluble P-selectin levels (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, and P = 0.019, respectively). Flow-mediated dilation findings differed between the studies (P = 0.004 vs. P = 0.39).. Ticagrelor appears to exert an additional improvement in endothelial function compared with clopidogrel in patients with coronary heart disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

An increasing body of data indicates that a reduction of ticagrelor maintenance dose (MD) in stabilized patients might improve ticagrelor's safety profile and adherence to the treatment. The aim of this review was to discuss the rationale and summarize the current pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes-based evidence from reduced MD of ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).. A narrative systematic review based on a literature search using the PubMed database from its inception through to June 2020. A search strategy included a combination of relevant search terms regarding ticagrelor reduced MD. The pre-determined inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized or observational trials; (2) presentation of clinical or pharmacodynamic results; (3) evaluation of any ticagrelor MD below 90 mg BID in patients with CAD.. Studies evaluating the following ticagrelor reduced MD have been identified: 90 mg QD, 60 mg BID, 60 mg QD, 45 mg BID, 22.5 mg BID. Majority of trials assessing doses <60 mg BID were performed in Asian patients only. Antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor in CAD decreases with the dose, however even reduced MDs provide sufficient platelet inhibition, which is greater than in clopidogrel-treated patients. De-escalation of ticagrelor dose shows a propensity towards a reduced rate of bleeding and non-bleeding adverse events.. Ticagrelor doses below 90 mg BID generally show an acceptable profile of platelet inhibition. The number of studies reporting clinical outcomes in CAD patients receiving reduced MD of ticagrelor are limited, however available results indicate that in a stable setting this strategy offers improved safety with preserved efficacy in the prevention of thrombotic events.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Elective Surgical Procedures; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Perioperative Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor has been shown to offer potential outcome benefits in acute coronary syndromes and for the long-term cardiovascular prevention, reducing mortality and the recurrence of ischemic events. However, data from real-world and recent meta-analyses have suggested that the anti-ischemic benefits of ticagrelor could be lower than expected, potentially outweighed by an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic impact of ticagrelor as compared to the conventional antiplatelet agents (ASA and clopidogrel) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), enclosing patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable CAD.. Literature and main scientific session abstracts were searched for studies comparing a ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimen vs different antiplatelet agents in patients with CAD. The primary efficacy endpoint was mortality, and the primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).. We included 15 randomized clinical trials, with a total population of 73,402 patients (55% randomized to ticagrelor). At a mean follow-up of 15 ± 11.3 months, the ticagrelor based strategy did not significantly reduce mortality as compared to the traditional therapy (OR[95%CI] = 0.88[0.70,1.09], p = 0.24; phet<0.00001), with comparable results and no interaction according to patients' presentation (p interaction = 0.80). A similar result was achieved for cardiovascular mortality, whereas the reduction of recurrent myocardial infarction was significant (OR[95%CI] = 0.84[0.78,0.90], p < 0.00001; phet = 0.76). As for the risk of stroke, the largest reduction was observed in stable patients, while a neutral effect was observed in the ACS subgroup (p int = 0.35). Major bleeding events were increased in ticagrelor-treated patients (OR [95%CI] = 1.40 [1.06, 1.84], p = 0.02; phet<0.00001), especially ICH (OR [95% CI] = 1.45[1.13,1.84], p = 0.003; phet = 0.93), and mainly among non-ACS patient. No interaction for any outcome endpoint was observed according to patients' age.. Based on the current meta-analysis, a ticagrelor-based strategy for the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease is associated to a significant increase in major bleeding complications and especially for intracranial hemorrhage, as compared to a strategy based on conventional antiplatelet agents, while resulting in a neutral effect on survival. However, a significant reduction of recurrent myocardial infarction was observed with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet treatment, consisting of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors, is essential for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This meta-analysis investigated whether ticagrelor, a novel P2Y12 inhibitor, was superior to clopidogrel and prasugrel in efficacy and safety for DM patients undergoing PCI. PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials in which ticagrelor was administered. Eligible studies were independently scrutinized to extract data and assess the trials' quality. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 8 studies consisting of 1056 patients were included. Results showed that ticagrelor reduced the major adverse cardiac events incidence compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the overall (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.79; P = 0.008) and subgroup analyses compared with clopidogrel (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.80; P = 0.01). No difference was observed in mortality rates (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.23-1.45; P = 0.25), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.28-1.60; P = 0.37), stroke (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.10-3.01; P = 0.49), and total bleeding (OR = 1.70; 95% CI, 0.91-3.17; P = 0.10) between the ticagrelor and control groups. In DM patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the overall and in the subgroup of clopidogrel. There was no difference regarding mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. More randomized controlled trials are required to further validate these results.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Randomized trials did not consistently support superiority of ticagrelor, as monotherapy or in combination with aspirin, in terms of efficacy or safety, in patients with atherosclerotic artery disease.. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and scientific session abstracts were searched for trials of patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (with >1,000 participants and a follow-up ≥3 months) randomly assigned to ticagrelor-based or conventional antiplatelet therapies. Trial-level hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a fixed- or random-effect model (in case of significant heterogeneity) with the inverse variance weighting. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Other outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding.. Overall 77,489 patients received either ticagrelor-based (n = 38,721) or conventional antiplatelet regimens (n = 38,768) in 6 trials. The primary outcome occurred in 4.5% of patients treated with experimental therapy and 4.9% of patients treated with control therapy (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.01; P = .07). Overall, patients treated with ticagrelor-based versus conventional antiplatelet regimens showed no significant difference in terms of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding after 20 months. However, in trials of patients with coronary artery disease as primary diagnosis, the risk for all-cause death (HR = 0.84 [0.77-0.91], P < .001) and MI (HR = 0.87 [0.80-0.94], P = .007) was significantly reduced by experimental therapy.. In patients with atherosclerotic artery disease, the benefit of ticagrelor-based therapies was confined to patients treated for coronary artery disease. The drug significantly reduced the risk for all-cause death and MI without excess risk of bleeding in these patients. In consideration of limitations of subgroup analyses, these results need further validation.

Topics: Atherosclerosis; Cause of Death; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Antiplatelet therapy, the cornerstone of post coronary stenting antithrombotic therapy, reduces the rate of hard clinical endpoints in patients treated both conservatively and invasively following an acute coronary syndrome, as well as in those patients with chronic stable coronary disease who receive a coronary stent. The development of newer antiplatelet and direct anticoagulant agents provides new options in the antithrombotic management of patients with coronary artery disease, enabling different therapeutic combinations to be tailored to an individual patient's bleeding and ischemic risk profile. In this review, we will summarize the history of dual antiplatelet therapy, discuss the latest evidence and future perspectives in treating patients with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor

Coronary artery disease (CAD) patients had a higher risk of first-ever stroke than general population even when they were on antiplatelet treatment. It was unknown whether more potent antiplatelet inhibitor ticagrelor which also provided adenosine-mediated protection would improve the primary stroke prevention for CAD. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CERNTRAL were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of over 30-day use of ticagrelor versus other antiplatelet drugs or placebo in patients with acute or chronic coronary syndrome. RCTs involving patients with any stroke history were excluded. Based on 5 RCTs with 45,843 patients, ticagrelor-involving regimens significantly reduced first-ever strokes (risk ratio [RR] 0.81; 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.71-0.94; I

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel with those of clopidogrel in CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers.. PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or cohort studies up to January 2020. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular (CV) death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and stroke. The secondary endpoint was bleeding. Pooled effects were measured by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's regression test and adjusted by trim and fill method.. Twelve studies comprising 5829 CV patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were included. Patients who received ticagrelor or prasugrel showed a lower risk of MACE than those who received clopidogrel (RR 0.524; 95% CI: 0.375, 0.731). The former also had lower risks of CV death (RR 0.409; 95% CI: 0.177, 0.946), all-cause death (RR 0.441; 95% CI: 0.263, 0.739), MI (RR 0.554; 95% CI: 0.414, 0.741) and stent thrombosis (RR 0.587; 95% CI: 0.348, 0.988) than the latter patient group. The risk of stroke was not significantly different between patients receiving the alternatives and those receiving clopidogrel (RR 0.605; 95% CI: 0.257, 1.425). Major and minor bleeding risk was not significantly different between patients treated with alternatives and clopidogrel (RR 1.019; 95% CI: 0.827, 1.260 and RR 1.235; 95% CI: 0.581, 2.628, respectively).. CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers can expect better clinical outcome on using prasugrel or ticagrelor rather than clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Alleles; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is an antiplatelet agent acting through direct and reversible competitive inhibition of the platelet P2Y. This review aims to inform about recent findings on ticagrelor, by appraising the current body of evidence on its use in different clinical scenarios, particularly in DM, ranging from pharmacology to clinical outcomes and future directions.. The results of the THEMIS trial, conducted in DM patients with stable coronary artery disease and no prior stroke or myocardial infarction, showed that although ticagrelor in addition to aspirin reduced the risk of ischemic events, this was associated with a parallel increase in bleeding complications. However, patients with history of percutaneous coronary intervention seemed to benefit more from adjunctive ticagrelor therapy. Careful bleeding and ischemic risk stratification remains crucial to define the best antithrombotic strategy for the individual patient.

Topics: Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Traditionally, aspirin has played a significant role in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, emerging antithrombotic regimens with better efficacy and safety have challenged the foundation of aspirin. Aspirin-free strategies consisting of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have now been tested in several large randomized controlled trials. In this article, we provide a contemporary overview of these data and suggest an algorithm to inform clinical decision with respect to antiplatelet pharmacotherapy after PCI.

Topics: Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a P2Y

Topics: Animals; Coronary Artery Disease; Endothelium, Vascular; Hemodynamics; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Signal Transduction; Ticagrelor

Antithrombotic treatment is a key component of secondary prevention following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although dual antiplatelet therapy is standard therapy post-ACS, duration of treatment is the subject of ongoing debate. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients with history of myocardial infarction reduced the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death. Similarly, in patients with stable coronary artery disease, two-thirds of whom had a history of myocardial infarction, dual antithrombotic therapy with very-low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin also resulted in improved ischaemic outcomes. In the absence of head-to-head comparison, choosing the most appropriate treatment strategy can be challenging, particularly when it comes to balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding. We aim to review the evidence for currently available antithrombotic treatments and provide a practical algorithm to aid the decision-making process.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Algorithms; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Decision Making; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

More potent antithrombotic strategies have significantly reduced the rate of recurrent ischemic events in cardiovascular disease. Ticagrelor, in particular, has significantly improved the outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes, offering potential benefits also in terms of survival. In addition, more recent data have suggested that the advantages of ticagrelor could be extended also to non-coronary atherothrombotic disease, although with contrasting results, especially for mortality reduction. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a newer antiplatelet strategy with ticagrelor as compared to traditional antiplatelet regimens in patients with coronary or non-coronary atherothrombotic disease.. Literature and main scientific session abstracts were searched for studies comparing a ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimen vs. different antiplatelet agents in the secondary prevention of cardiac, cerebral or vascular atherothrombotic events. The primary efficacy endpoint was mortality, primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction and stroke.. We included 10 randomized clinical trials, for a total population of 73,121 patients, 54.9% randomized to ticagrelor. At a mean follow-up of 13.4 ± 12.6 months, a newer antiplatelet strategy based on ticagrelor was associated with a significant reduction in mortality as compared to a traditional therapy (OR[95%CI] = 0.92[0.86,0.99], p=0.02; phet = 0.14), however, such benefits were more evident in patients with coronary artery disease, while not in non-coronary trials, with a significant interaction between patients' setting and the prognostic impact of ticagrelor (p int = 0.03). A similar result was achieved for cardiovascular mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, while for the risk of stroke, the largest advantages were observed in patients with a previous cerebrovascular accident. Major bleeding events were increased in ticagrelor treated patients (OR [95%CI] = 1.11 [1.02, 1.20], p=0.01; phet = 0.0003), although not affecting overall mortality, as confirmed by meta-regression analysis.. Based on the current meta-analysis, a newer antiplatelet strategy based on ticagrelor is associated with a significant reduction in mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events, as compared to a traditional treatment, among patients treated for coronary disease but not among those with non-coronary atherothrombotic disease. However, ticagrelor therapy was associated with a significant increase in major bleeding complications.

Topics: Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Recently, several newer antiplatelet treatment strategies have been used in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Apart from the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel, double dose clopidogrel (DDC), triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT) consisting of aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol and other newer antiplatelet agents have shown to be effective in different ways. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the adverse clinical outcomes and the bleeding events which were observed when DDC was compared to the other antiplatelet regimens in patients with CAD.. English publications comparing DDC with other antiplatelet regimens were searched from MEDLARS/MEDLINE, EMBASE, www.ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the study endpoints. Statistical analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software whereby odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.. A total number of 23,065 participants were included. Results of this analysis showed major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, cardiac death, stroke, stent thrombosis, revascularization and myocardial infarction (MI) to have been similarly manifested in patients who were treated with DDC versus the control group with OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.78-1.22; p = 0.83, OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.77-1.17; p = 0.62, OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.20; p = 0.81, OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.65-1.48; p = 0.94, OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.40-1.75; p = 0.64, OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.52-1.49; p = 0.63, and OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.21; p = 0.45 respectively. Any minor and major bleedings were also similarly manifested. When DDC was compared to DAPT, no significant difference was observed in any bleeding event with OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.86-2.91; p = 0.14. Even when DDC was compared with either ticagrelor or prasugrel or TAPT, still no significant difference was observed in terms of bleeding outcomes.. In patients with CAD, adverse clinical outcomes were not significantly different when DDC was compared to the other antiplatelet regimens. In addition, bleeding events were also similarly manifested when DDC was compared to DAPT, TAPT or ticagrelor/prasugrel.

Topics: Aspirin; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Evidence from randomized head-to-head comparison between prasugrel and ticagrelor is rare regarding clinical endpoints.. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were queried with the terms "prasugrel," "ticagrelor," and "randomized." Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the same terms were also surveyed using clinicaltrials.gov, escardio.org, pcronline.org, and tctmd.com. The clinical endpoints were death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and stent thrombosis (ST) for efficacy, and any bleeding for safety.. A total number of 2068 patients in 12 RCTs, whose longest follow-up period was 6 months, was included in this study. The risks of death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-1.62, P = 0.647), MI (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 0.71-3.62, P = 0.252), stroke (OR: 1.45, 95%CI: 0.25-8.36, P = 0.680), and ST (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.20-2.81, P = 0.677) were similar between prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. While the incidence of bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definitions was also comparable (OR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.45-1.52, P = 0.539), that according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria was lower in prasugrel than ticagrelor (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.24-0.97, P = 0.042).. Although the efficacy was similar between prasugrel and ticagrelor, prasugrel may be associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with ticagrelor during short- to mid-term follow-up period after PCI. Further studies are warranted in a larger patient population during longer-term follow up to validate these findings.

Topics: Adenosine; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

This review aims to summarize and discuss safety and effectiveness of the long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).. Ticagrelor is an orally administered, direct, and reversible inhibitor of the P2Y

Topics: Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors occurs each time clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor are given to patients with suspected coronary artery disease before definition of the coronary anatomy. In acute coronary syndromes, the practice of administering oral P2Y12 inhibitors upstream has been the object of significant controversy in recent years, following the publication of two trials of pretreatment in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, respectively. The introduction in the market of cangrelor - the first intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor - represents a new opportunity but also a new challenge for clinicians. This article reviews current recommendations and supporting evidence surrounding pretreatment with oral and intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Atherothrombosis and coronary artery disease affect more than 13 million individuals only in the United States, about 8 millions in Europe and are the major causes of death worldwide. In particular chronic stable angina impairs patient quality of life, is associated with an important health spending and increased patient mortality; it is a prominent symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD), the latter being prevalent worldwide in patients. A key role in pathophysiology of cardiovascular acute events is played by activated platelets. Aspirin and adenosine diphosphate antagonist in addition to it is recommended for 1 year for reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction with a weak recommendation to continue thereafter. P2Y12 receptor antagonists, in addition to aspirin, have been shown in the last years, to reduce ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome but their role in secondary prevention is still new and unclear. The aim of our paper is to review the long-term effect of therapy with ticagrelor on the basis of recent evidence based data.. We performed an online search on the major search engines. All the randomized controlled trials were summarized in the table.. We included in our paper six randomized controlled trials and we mentioned about ten post - hoc analysis, sub studies and registries. All studies included the type the therapy and a mid or long term clinical follow up.. The studies reported in our paper and in particular PEGASUS - TIMI 54 study showed the merit to placing attention of prevention secondary ischemic events after acute coronary syndrome in the context of treatment with dual anti - platelet therapy; it proved a clinical benefit in patients treated with ticagrelor (60 mg x 2) for 3 years. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these results cannot be generalized to patients with higher bleeding risk or low ischemic risk. In fact prolonged therapy with ticagrelor 60 mg in combination with aspirin could be considered valuable in patients with repeated acute ischemic events or with several coronary revascularizations over time (especially in patients with lower bleeding risk).

Topics: Adenosine; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Studies have linked on-treatment platelet reactivity (PR) to adverse clinical outcomes. Because new P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have been predominantly tested against clopidogrel, data on pharmacodynamic comparisons between these 2 drugs are scarce. We compared ticagrelor with prasugrel in a network meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing PR in patients with coronary artery disease treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel. All studies using prasugrel and/or ticagrelor providing platelet function measurement data using VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), platelet reactivity index (PRI) vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, or maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) by light transmission aggregometry were considered eligible. Mixed treatment comparison models directly compared ticagrelor and prasugrel and indirectly compared them using clopidogrel as a comparator with data presented as mean difference (95% confidence interval). Data were extracted from 29 studies, including 5,395 patients. Compared with clopidogrel 75 mg, both prasugrel 10 mg and ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily were associated with lower PRU (mean difference -117 [-134.1, -100.5] and -159.7 [-182.6, -136.6], respectively), a lower PRI (-24.2 [-28.2, -20.3] and -33.6 [-39.9, -27.6], respectively), and lower MPA (-11.8 [-17, -6.3] and -20.7 [-28.5, -12.8], respectively). Similar results were obtained with clopidogrel 150 mg. Ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily was associated with lower PRU (-42.5 [-62.9, -21.9]), lower PRI (-9.3 [-15.6, -3.5]), and lower MPA (-8.9 [-16.4, -1.2]) compared with prasugrel 10 mg. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor achieved significantly lower on-treatment PR compared with prasugrel, with both being superior to clopidogrel standard or high dose.

Topics: Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Research Design; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel has been the mainstay of both acute and chronic phase coronary artery disease, reducing importantly the risk of adverse events. Despite a correct compliance, a non-negligible rate of adverse events still happens. New compounds, with improved properties, are now clinically available (such as prasugrel or ticagrelor) or under advanced development. The aim of the present review is the description of these new compounds, particularly prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

New P2Y12 inhibitors can be classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous drugs (cangrelor and elinogrel). These P2Y12 inhibitors might be superior to clopidogrel for reducing ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new oral or intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients.. Twelve randomized, placebo-controlled studies and two subgroup analyses of included studies on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were included. The database consisted of 82,784 patients, with 43,875 (53%) on new oral P2Y12 inhibitors and 38909 (47%) on intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly decreased MACEs (odds ratio: 0.85, p<0.0001 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.04 for STEMI) and all-cause death (OR: 0.88, p=0.04 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.01 for STEMI). Among new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors, only cangrelor significantly decreased the risk of MACEs. An increase in TIMI major bleeding was observed only by prasugrel among the new P2Y12 inhibitors.. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors reduce ischemic events, but there is no obvious increase in major bleeding in patients with CAD, and the risk/benefit ratio is particularly favorable for STEMI patients. Moreover, only cangrelor is beneficial for ischemic events in patients on new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Reduction Behavior; Smoking; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenosine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Platelets play a key role in the initiation of hemostatic mechanisms during vascular injury. When contemplating prescription of antiplatelet agents (APAs) for patients as primary prevention for cardiovascular events, the physician should carefully weigh the potential benefits of cardiovascular risk reduction with the likelihood of harm, related mostly to hemorrhagic complications. The role of APAs in secondary prevention of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease is well established, however, optimal duration of therapy and intensity of patient treatment are not settled and probably need to be individualized per patient. We describe the data emerging from contemporary trials on the efficacy and safety of the use of oral APAs in various patient subpopulations. We also discuss the advantages and potential roles of new APAs during and following acute coronary syndromes, percutaneous coronary interventions, and symptomatic atherosclerosis. We propose certain strategies and directions for future research to enhance the safety and efficacy prevention by optimizing the beneficial effects of APAs along with other contemporary treatment modalities of primary and secondary prevention.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Clopidogrel and ticagrelor, antagonists to P2Y(12) receptor molecules on platelet membranes, significantly ameliorate acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery thrombosis, the most common cause of death in the developed world. A personal account is given here of the foundational research that lead to the identification of P2Y receptors, carried out 50 years ago in the Melbourne University Zoology Department headed by Geoffrey Burnstock. In Christmas 1962, I made the serendipitous observation of large hyperpolarizing changes across the membranes of smooth muscle cells in the taenia coli of the intestine on stimulating its nerve supply. I then showed that these potentials relaxed the muscle and were not due to noradrenaline or acetylcholine, which were then the only substances known to be released from nerves. I called these non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) terminals in the laboratory and showed that this NANC transmitter acted at receptor molecules on the muscle cells, promoting efflux of potassium ions, and so the observed potential changes. In 1968, Graeme Campbell showed that ATP relaxed the taenia coli muscle, and in 1969, David Satchell, using purine chromatography, showed that ATP was likely to be released from NANC terminals. The receptor molecules involved were shown to be exceptionally sensitive to 2-methylthio-ATP (Satchell and Macguire, 1975, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 195, 540), and so belonged to the class P2Y receptors as designated by Abbracchio and Burnstock, with subclasses P2Y(1)-P2Y(12). The discovery of the role of P2Y(12) receptors in increasing thrombosis lead to the focused research that resulted in clopidogrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Adenosine; Animals; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; History, 20th Century; Humans; Muscle, Smooth; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet therapy is used widely with proven benefit for the prevention of further ischemic cardiac complications in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The limitations of conventional antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel, as well as the fact that rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high with use of these agents, underscore the need to investigate alternate agents that may further reduce event rates while limiting bleeding risk. The selection of antiplatelet therapy is further influenced by the following: ticagrelor was approved in July 2011 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and clopidogrel is slated to become available as a generic productin 2012. We provide an overview of emerging agents for the treatment of CAD and ACS, including the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel, and a new class of oral protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) inhibitors, vorapaxar and atopaxar.The recently approved P2Y(12) antagonists prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate enhanced ability to prevent adverse cardiac outcomes. However, this comes at a cost of a potential increased risk of bleeding. New adverse effects have also emerged, including dyspnea for all of the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists (ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel) and ventricular pauses for ticagrelor. In addition, the newer P2Y(12) antagonists have a faster onset and offset. Two of these agents, cangrelor and elinogrel, are available as intravenous formulations, which may provide additional benefits in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Trials with the PAR-1 inhibitors have also shown trends toward reductions in cardiac events, but not without the possibility of increased bleeding. More than ever, as the arsenal of antiplatelet therapy expands, health care providers need to understand the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic differences between conventional and emerging antiplatelet therapies for patients with ACS and CAD. Health care providers must also carefully assess patient-specific factors such as risk of thrombosis, concomitant disease states, age, drug adherence, and aspirin dose, and plan for those patients who will be undergoing CABG when selecting antiplatelet therapy in order to optimally balance bleeding and thrombosis risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain life-threatening disorders associated with high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in treatment over the last decade. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation via P2Y(12) receptors plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ACS. The current standard of treatment involves dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and the thienopyridine clopidogrel. Numerous studies and wide use in clinical practice have established the value of this approach in the treatment of ACS. However, clopidogrel treatment has a number of limitations, including a delayed onset of action due to the need for metabolic activation, variable and reduced antiplatelet effects in patients with certain genotypes, and prolonged recovery of platelet function due to irreversible P2Y(12) receptor binding. Prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, has demonstrated more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) than clopidogrel, although this thienopyridine also requires metabolic activation and treatment is associated with a significantly increased risk of life-threatening and fatal bleeding. The recently approved oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of current therapy due to its unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. It is a member of a new chemical class, the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidines, and is a potent P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. Ticagrelor is rapidly absorbed, with a median time to maximum concentration of 1.3-2.0 hours. Ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation to an active form and binds rapidly and reversibly to the P2Y(12) receptor. As well as exerting effects via platelet P2Y(12) receptors, ticagrelor may confer additional benefits via inhibition of non-platelet P2Y(12) receptors. The pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor is not significantly affected by age, gender or administration with food, nor by prior treatment with, or responsiveness to, clopidogrel. Ticagrelor is primarily metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme, rapidly produces plasma concentration-dependent IPA that is greater and more consistent than that observed with clopidogrel, and can also enhance platelet inhibition and overcome non-responsiveness in patients previously treated with clopidogrel. Importantly, the pharmacodynamic characteristics of ticagrelor are not influenced by CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genotypes. This article summarizes our current knowledge r

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Interactions; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

ADP plays a pivotal role in localized platelet activation and recruitment, and, with that, in the maintenance of thrombus integrity, making it a suitable target for the control of intravascular thrombosis. The limited distribution of one of its receptors, the P2Y12 receptor, primarily to platelets makes it an especially attractive pharmacologic target. For the last several decades the thienopyridine family of P2Y12 antagonists have provided the vast majority of clinical data confirming the clinical benefit of selective P2Y12 inhibition. Recently, new thienopyridine plus nonthienopyridine P2Y12 antagonists have become available or are being studied that will further improve our treatment of patients with coronary disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Stents; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

For many years clopidogrel was the 'gold standard' ADP receptor antagonist in patients with coronary artery disease in combination with acetylsalicylic acid, i.e. in elective/stable patients after coronary stent implantation and in patients with acute coronary syndromes with/without percutaneous coronary intervention. For the latter group, in which the risk of atherothrombotic events is increased, the new ADP receptor-antagonists, e.g. prasugrel and ticagrelor, have shown their superiority over clopidogrel. This is mainly based on the fact that up to 30% of patients with acute coronary syndromes tend to be low- or non-responders to therapy due to non-genetic and/or genetic causes. Nevertheless, there is still room for the use of clopidogrel in the majority of patients with coronary artery disease. This review summarizes the latest knowledge of clopidogrel and its current indications.

Topics: Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists are the cornerstone of oral antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, especially after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Currently, the therapeutic agents available to block the receptor include clopidogrel and prasugrel; ticagrelor is not available everywhere. Clopidogrel was the gold standard, but recently it has been challenged by prasugrel and ticagrelor. One pitfall of clopidogrel is that in some patients it cannot induce optimal platelet reactivity inhibition in connection with several factors, including some genetic polymorphisms of enzymes participating in its bioabsorption or metabolism. This variability of response can be evaluated by platelet reactivity monitoring. This comprehensive review provides the available data regarding the genotypic and phenotypic interaction with the response to P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists and discusses the concept of personalized antiplatelet therapy based on a genotypic or phenotypic profile.

Topics: Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The use of oral antiplatelet therapy in reducing vascular events has been extensively studied. Currently available oral antiplatelet agents include aspirin and the thienopyridine P2Y12 receptor antagonists. These classes are combined frequently in the setting of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Resistance to either or both of these agents is a major concern, as antiplatelet resistance has been linked to an increase in thrombotic events and worse clinical outcomes. As a result, there is a need for newer, more effective antiplatelet agents to address the limitations of currently available therapy. Prasugrel, a third generation thienopyridine, has been approved by both the FDA and European Commission. Two additional P2Y12 agents, ticagrelor and cangrelor are in advanced stages of development. The possible advantages of prasugrel over clopidogrel include a faster onset of action, reduced inter-patient variability and more potent platelet inhibition. Ticagrelor is an oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist with greater platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor is being developed as an intravenous P2Y12 antagonist with a very fast onset and offset, which may offer advantages particularly in the setting of coronary intervention. These emerging antiplatelet agents may offer advantages such as faster onset of action, greater potency and reversibility of platelet inhibition. This article summarizes the available clinical data on the upcoming P2Y12 antiplatelet agents in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Animals; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prodrugs; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

In this study, we review the evidence for both long-standing and newer oral antiplatelet agents as secondary prevention in coronary artery disease, and give our opinion on where each agent's treatment role lies.. Platelets play a pathological role in acute coronary syndromes and are therefore a major therapeutic target. The caveat to this is that their physiological haemostatic role means there must be a careful balance between preventing ischaemia and not promoting bleeding. In addition to accepted oral agents (aspirin and clopidogrel), more potent antiplatelet agents have recently become available (prasugrel and ticagrelor) at a cost of increased bleeding.. There is now a choice of three antiplatelet agents to be used in conjunction with aspirin for secondary prevention with dual antiplatelet therapy. Clinicians must now 'tailor' the correct therapy for each patient, depending on their presentation, clinical features and stage of risk.

Topics: Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Thromboxane A2; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, in conjunction with heparin, is the most common antithrombotic strategy in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) used to reduce peri-procedural ischaemic complications. However, there remains significant inter-individual variability in post-treatment platelet inhibition with this current established therapy. This review focuses on recent developments in oral antiplatelet agents used in PCI, which promise to overcome, at least in part, current shortfalls.. Genetic polymorphisms and medication interactions involving CYP3A4 or CYP2C19, patient compliance and higher platelet reactivity in certain subgroups, such as those with diabetes, are important factors contributing to inter-individual variability in post-treatment platelet inhibition. Higher clopidogrel doses have been associated with improved clinical outcomes, especially in those presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Newer agents, namely prasugrel and ticagrelor, have been shown to have greater potency and superior clinical outcomes. However, this comes with a price of increased bleeding complications.. Whereas more potent antiplatelet therapies are associated with improved outcome, balancing the risk of bleeding and peri-procedural ischaemic complications remains a key aspect to consider when choosing among the ever-increasing number of agents available. The role of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) needs to be re-examined in the current context of such potent oral antiplatelet agents. Further research will hopefully help to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy in patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Standard double antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) used in patients with coronary artery disease during acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or in conjunction with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has some limitations. Relatively large proportion of patients has "laboratory" resistance to clopidogrel - an essential component of standard therapy. Basic weakness of this agent is necessity to be converted into active metabolite by CYP 450 enzymes. Other drugs potentially interfere with this conversion. The puzzle of clinical value of obvious laboratory interaction of clopidogrel with its conjecturally almost obligatory companions proton pump inhibitors is still unresolved. It has been shown recently that loss of function alleles of some CYP450 genes especially CYP2C19*2 are responsible for reduced reaction of platelets to clopidogrel. Detection of this allele is possible. However practical application of such genetic testing is subject of disagreement among experts. Another way for therapy guidance is use of platelet function testing. But at present there is no agreement concerning preferable test. Studies aimed at clarification of practical role of some laboratory test are close to completion. Recognition of resistance by any method calls forth administration of higher doses of clopidogrel or use of novel agents. CURRENT trial has recently demonstrated advantages of clopidogrel double dose in ACS patients subjected to PCI. Novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor have been shown to be superior to clopidogrel in large randomized trials. Direct P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor seems to be especially attractive because of effect on total mortality and acceptable rate of bleeding. Among agents under study thrombin receptor blockers appear most promising.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptor, PAR-1; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

High platelet reactivity has been linked to recurrent ischemic events in patients treated with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy, in patients with arterial diseases and particularly in patients treated with coronary artery stenting. The limitations of clopidogrel have served as a major rationale for the development of new P2Y(12) blockers that have superior pharmacodynamic profiles uninfluenced by concomitant therapies or specific genotypes. Ticagrelor is the first direct-acting reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. Extensive Phase II investigations have addressed the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety-related properties of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. The recently completed PLATO trial demonstrated promise for ticagrelor as a major treatment strategy for a wide spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Ticagrelor is now being reviewed by the FDA as a P2Y(12) receptor blocker to treat patients with coronary artery disease and, once accepted, will be in widespread use as an antiplatelet agent. Thus, it is both appropriate and timely to review available data and provide a comprehensive review of ticagrelor.. We discuss the rationale for the development of ticagrelor, a reversible and potent P2Y(12) receptor blocker. The data regarding ticagrelor based on preclinical and clinical studies are examined. We researched articles about 'AZD6140' and 'ticagrelor' in PubMed from 2006 to 2010 and also reviewed data presented at recent cardiology meetings.. This is an updated and comprehensive review of ticagrelor. The advantages and disadvantages of ticagrelor and available P2Y(12) receptor blockers such as clopidogrel and prasugrel are discussed, thus providing a clear picture to readers.. Ticagrelor has an important role as an antiplatelet agent in the settings of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention and once accepted will be in widespread use.

Topics: Adenosine; Arteries; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The need for safe and effective antiplatelet agents motivates scientists towards a non-ceasing research which has through the past few years provided patients suffering from coronary artery disease, submitted or not to percutaneous intervention or heart surgery with safe and life-saving pharmaca; after ticlopidine and clopidogrel and just recently, ticagrelor and prasugrel have been developed with the aim to provide adequate protection against thrombotic cardiovascular episodes and avoid significant bleeding events. Herein, we are presenting through an updated literature research and recent patents data the novel agents ticagrelor and prasugrel, which promise improved effectiveness combined with an increased level of safety.

Topics: Adenosine; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor (AZD6140), a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, is the first orally available antagonist of the ADP receptor of the P2Y12 subtype. Ticagrelor inhibits platelets in a reversible manner and does not require hepatic bioactivation. The pharmacology of ticagrelor indicates that it provides more consistent, more rapid and more potent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. Preclinical and clinical studies with ticagrelor have demonstrated that this drug has excellent oral bioavailability. The Phase III clinical study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) has shown that ticagrelor reduced ischemic events and all-cause mortality without an increase in major bleeding complications. Potential advantages of ticagrelor include more flexibility in its use if rapid onset of action is needed before percutaneous coronary interventions or when cessation is required before coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Potential disadvantages include more side effects such as dyspnea, ventricular pauses or an increase in concentrations of uric acid and creatinine. However, ticagrelor did not only reduce death due to vascular causes but also all-cause mortality. Further clinical trials in indications other than acute coronary syndrome are awaited.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet therapy remains a cornerstone of modern management of atherothrombotic vascular disease. For many years, aspirin has been the mainstay of initial antiplatelet drug management in coronary heart disease, while the need for inhibition of other platelet activation pathways has led to the development of various other antiplatelet drugs, such as clopidogrel. An improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in thrombogenesis has paved the way for further development of newer antiplatelet drug therapies. Various clinical studies have probed the effectiveness and risk profile of the newer antiplatelet drugs, such as prasugrel, in comparison with currently available drugs. Some newer agents such as prasugrel are close to being approved for clinical use, whereas other agents such as cangrelor and AZD6140 are in phase 3 clinical trials. New drug classes, such as the thromboxane receptor antagonists (such as NCX-4016 and S18886), as well as platelet adhesion antagonists and thrombin receptor antagonists are similarly being evaluated for their efficacy and risk profile in phase I and II trials.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Design; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Naphthalenes; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propionates; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Platelets are major players in arterial thrombosis, and antiplatelet therapy has a clear clinical benefit in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular events. In particular, aspirin and clopidogrel have become cornerstones in the treatment of patients with atherothrombosis. However, despite the proven efficacy of antiplatelet drugs, cardiovascular events remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Furthermore, a considerable variability in platelet reactivity during treatment with established oral antiplatelet therapy has prompted the search for novel drugs against platelet-dependent thrombosis. Possible benefits of upcoming drugs include a more efficient platelet inhibition and a reversible effect on platelet function. Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, terutroban, E5555, SCH 530348 and cilostazol are discussed. This review highlights the rationale for important oral antiplatelet drugs in development and provides clinical perspectives on their pharmacological advantages and challenges.

Topics: Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cilostazol; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Resistance; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Tetrazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboxane A2; Ticagrelor

THEMIS is a double-blind, randomized trial of 19,220 patients with diabetes mellitus and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) comparing ticagrelor to placebo, in addition to aspirin. The present study aimed to describe the proportion of patients eligible and reasons for ineligibility for THEMIS within a population of patients with diabetes and CAD included in the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry.. The THEMIS eligibility criteria were applied to REACH patients. THEMIS included patients ≥50 years with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD as determined by either a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or documentation of angiographic stenosis of ≥50% of at least one coronary artery. Patients with prior myocardial infarction or stroke were excluded. In REACH, 10,156 patients had stable CAD and diabetes. Of these, 6515 (64.1%) patients had at least one exclusion criteria. From the remaining population, 784 patients did not meet inclusion criteria (7.7%) mainly due to absence of aspirin treatment (7.2%), yielding a 'THEMIS-eligible population' of 2857 patients (28.1% of patients with diabetes and stable CAD). The main reasons for exclusion were a history of myocardial infarction (53.1%), use of oral anticoagulation (14.5%), or history of stroke (12.9%). Among the 4208 patients with diabetes and a previous PCI, 1196 patients (28.4%) were eligible for inclusion in the THEMIS-PCI substudy.. In a population of patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease, a sizeable proportion appear to be 'THEMIS eligible.'. http://www.. gov identifier: NCT01991795.

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

There are no studies specifically designed to rule out a drug-drug interaction (DDI) when cangrelor is used among patients who have been pretreated with ticagrelor.. This study sought to rule out a DDI among cangrelor-treated patients who have been pretreated with ticagrelor.. Compared with placebo, adding cangrelor to patients pretreated with ticagrelor resulted in a significant reduction in PRU at 30 minutes and 1 hour after starting infusion. At 2 hours after stopping cangrelor/placebo infusion, PRU were low and similar in both groups (16.9 vs 12.6; mean difference: 4.3; 95% CI: -28.6 to 37.3), meeting the noninferiority primary endpoint (predefined noninferiority margin 45 PRU). Consistent findings were shown with all PD assays. PK tracked PD findings with no differences between groups in plasma levels of ticagrelor and its metabolite.. Compared with placebo, the use of cangrelor in patients pretreated with ticagrelor results in enhanced platelet inhibition with no differences in PK/PD profiles after discontinuation of drug infusion indicating the absence of a DDI. (PD and PK Profiles of Switching Between Cangrelor and Ticagrelor Following Ticagrelor Pre-treatment [SWAP-5]; NCT04634162).

Topics: Blood Platelets; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The role of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease has been questioned by the results of the FREEDOM trial, which showed superiority of coronary artery bypass graft(CABG) over first generation drug-eluting stents (DES) including a reduction in mortality. In the light of safer and more efficacious stents and significantly better medical management, those results that date back to 2012 need to be revisited. TUXEDO-2 is a study designed to compare two contemporary stents in Indian diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease.. The primary objective of the TUXEDO-2 study is to compare the clinical outcomes of PCI with ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz vs Xience when combined with contemporary optimal medical therapy (OMT) in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. The secondary objective is to compare clinical outcomes between a pooled cohort from both arms of the study (Supraflex Cruz + Xience; PCI arm) vs CABG based on a performance goal derived from the CABG arm of the FREEDOM trial (historical cohort). The tertiary objective is a randomized comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin for the composite of ischemic and bleeding events.. In this prospective, open-label, multi-centre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, controlled study, 1,800 patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease (inclusion criteria similar to FREEDOM trial) with indication for coronary revascularization will be randomly assigned to Supraflex Cruz or Xience stents and also to ticagrelor- or prasugrel- based antiplatelet strategies. All patients will receive guideline directed OMT and optimal PCI including image- and physiology-guided complete revascularization where feasible. The patients will be followed through five years to assess their clinical status and major clinical events. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of target lesion failure at one-year for Supraflex Cruz vs Xience (primary objective) with an expected event rate of 11% and a non-inferiority margin of 4.5%. For PCI vs CABG (secondary objective), the primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at one-year and yearly up to five years, with a performance goal of 21.6%. For ticagrelor vs prasugrel (tertiary objective), the primary endpoint is composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding as per the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) at one-year with expected event rate of 15% and a non-inferiority margin of 5%.. The TUXEDO-2 study is a contemporary study involving state-of-the-art PCI combined with guideline directed OMT in a complex subset of patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease. The trial will answer the question as to whether a biodegradable polymer coated ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz stent is an attractive option for PCI in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. It will also help address the question whether the results of FREEDOM trial would have been different in the current era of safer and more efficacious stents and modern medical therapy. In addition, the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin will be evaluated. (CTRI/2019/11/022088).

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

There are disparities in the adherence to guideline-recommended therapies after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We therefore sought to evaluate the effect of guideline-adherent medical secondary prevention on 1-year outcome after CABG.. Data were taken from the randomized 'Ticagrelor in CABG' trial. From April 2013 until April 2017, patients who underwent CABG were included. For the present analysis, we compared patients who were treated with optimal medical secondary prevention with those where 1 or more of the recommended medications were missing.. Follow-up data at 12 months were available in 1807 patients. About half (54%) of them were treated with optimal secondary prevention. All-cause mortality [0.5% vs 3.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.14 (0.05-0.37), P < 0.01], cardiovascular mortality [0.1% vs 1.7%, HR 0.06 (0.01-0.46), P = 0.007] and major adverse events [6.5% vs 11.5%, HR 0.54 (0.39-0.74), P < 0.01] were significantly lower in the group with optimal secondary prevention. The multivariable model for the primary end point based on binary concordance to guideline recommended therapy identified 3 independent factors: adherence to guideline recommended therapy [HR 0.55 (0.39-0.78), P < 0.001]; normal renal function [HR 0.99 (0.98-0.99), P = 0.040]; and off-pump surgery [HR 2.06 (1.02-4.18), P = 0.045].. Only every second patient receives optimal secondary prevention after CABG. Guideline adherent secondary prevention therapy is associated with lower mid-term mortality and less adverse cardiovascular events after 12 months.

Topics: Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Prognosis; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To conduct a health economic evaluation of ticagrelor in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) from a multinational payer perspective. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ticagrelor were evaluated in the overall effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study (THEMIS) trial population and in the predefined patient group with prior percutaneous coronary intervention.. A Markov model was developed to extrapolate patient outcomes over a lifetime horizon. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were compared with conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds [€47 000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in Sweden and €30 000/QALY in other countries].Treatment with ticagrelor resulted in QALY gains of up to 0.045 in the overall population and 0.099 in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Increased costs and benefits translated to ICERs ranged between €27 894 and €42 252/QALY across Sweden, Germany, Italy, and Spain in the overall population. In patients with prior PCI, estimated ICERs improved to €18 449, €20 632, €20 233, and €13 228/QALY in Sweden, Germany, Italy, and Spain, respectively, driven by higher event rates and treatment benefit.. Based on THEMIS results, ticagrelor plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone may be cost-effective in some European countries in patients with T2DM and CAD and no prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Additionally, ticagrelor is likely to be cost-effective across European countries in patients with a history of PCI.

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Ticagrelor

Switching P2Y

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

It remains unclear whether aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management (<1.8 mmol/L) can slow the process of vein graft stenosis. This study aimed to explore the impact of baseline LDL-C levels on vein graft patency in patients on ticagrelor with or without aspirin 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).. This was a post hoc analysis of the DACAB (Different Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) trial (NCT02201771), a randomized controlled trial (ticagrelor + aspirin or ticagrelor vs aspirin) of patients undergoing CABG in China. The study subjects were stratified as LDL-low (baseline LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, 148 patients with 430 vein grafts) versus LDL-high (baseline LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L, 352 patients with 1030 vein grafts). The primary outcome was the 1-year vein graft patency (Fitzgibbon grade A) assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography or coronary angiography.. In general, baseline LDL-C is not associated with 1-year vein graft patency after CABG. Regardless of the baseline LDL-C levels, ticagrelor + aspirin was superior to aspirin alone in maintaining vein graft patency. The primary factor causing early vein graft disease might not be atherosclerosis but thrombosis.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; China; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

The optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains unknown.. This post hoc analysis of the Ticagrelor in Coronary Artery Bypass (TiCAB) trial examined the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs aspirin in patients with and patients without CKD. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), namely, the composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, all-cause death, and major bleeding.. Chronic kidney disease was present in 276 of 1843 randomized patients (15%). Patients with CKD vs patients without CKD had higher 1-year rates of MACCE (13% vs 8.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 2.39; P = .01) and major bleeding (5.6% vs 3.1%, HR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.28; P = .04). The 1-year rate of MACCE was increased with ticagrelor vs aspirin in patients with CKD (18.2% vs 8.9%, HR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.30; P = .03), but not in patients without CKD (8.5% vs 8.1%, HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.49; P = .79; P. Among patients with CKD and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, those who received ticagrelor had a higher incidence of MACCE but a similar incidence of major bleeding compared with those who received aspirin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The CD36 scavenger receptor is a mediator of both atherogenesis and thrombosis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CD36+ microparticles (MPs) released from platelets for cardiovascular event presentation in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and the effects of different antiplatelet drugs on MPs.. A total of 101 aspirin-treated CAD patients, who were planned to undergo coronary angiography (CAG), were randomized to either a standard clopidogrel regimen or ticagrelor treatment. Total Annexin V-(AV)+ MPs, CD61+/AV+ MPs, and CD36+/CD61+/AV+ MPs were quantified by flow cytometry at baseline, before and immediately after the operation. The ADP-induced platelet inhibition rate was measured by thromboelastogram (TEG) examination 1 h before the operation.. The high levels of CD36+ MPs derived from activated platelets are related to an increased risk of PCI in CAD patients. Ticagrelor significantly reduced the number of CD61+/AV+ MPs and CD36+/CD61+/AV+ MPs. This trial registration number is ChiCTR1800014908 and the date of registration is 2018.05.01.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of atherothrombotic events. Ticagrelor reduces ischaemic events compared to clopidogrel, with the greatest risk reduction in patients with both DM and CKD. How CKD status affects the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of different ticagrelor maintenance dose regimens in patients with DM is unknown.. In this randomized, crossover study, patients with DM on treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) were stratified according to CKD status and randomized to ticagrelor 90 or 60 mg bid. PK/PD assessments were performed at baseline, after 7-10 days of ticagrelor (peak and trough), and after 7-10 days of alternative ticagrelor regimen (peak and trough). PK assessments included plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its major metabolite. PD assessments included vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-platelet reactivity index (PRI), VerifyNow P2Y12, and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). A total of 92 patients with DM (CKD, n = 44; non-CKD, n = 48) were randomized. Levels of platelet reactivity were lower with the 90 mg compared with the 60 mg ticagrelor dose, which was statistically significant in non-CKD but not in CKD patients for most PD measures. There were no significant differences in the primary endpoint (trough levels of VASP-PRI following ticagrelor 90 mg dosing) between cohorts (31 ± 20 vs. 25 ± 14; P = 0.105). VerifyNow and LTA provided similar findings. PK assessments tracked PD profiles showing increased plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its major metabolite in CKD compared to non-CKD patients.. In patients with DM, although ticagrelor maintenance dose regimens (60 and 90 mg) yield potent P2Y12 inhibition, levels of platelet reactivity tended to be higher and subject to broader variability in non-CKD compared with CKD patients.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT02539160.

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Coronary endothelial and microvascular function play important roles in cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the effect of ticagrelor on coronary artery function and tested the antiplatelet effect of low dose ticagrelor in East-Asian patients.. Sixty-one consecutive patients with non-significant coronary disease were included in the study. Initially, patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive drugs: ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day (bid; n = 22), ticagrelor 45 mg bid (n = 19) or clopidogrel 75 mg once a day (qd; n = 20) and then divided into two groups (ticagrelor vs clopidogrel) for evaluation of coronary artery function, and three groups for evaluation of antiplatelet function. Endothelial dysfunction was measured by coronary flow reserve (CFR), and changes in the levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), cluster of differentiation (CD) 40 ligand, and P-selectin. Microvascular function was evaluated as index of microvascular resistance (IMR). Platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.. The levels of CFR, ADMA, and CD 40 ligand were not different between the two groups. However, P-selectin was lower in the ticagrelor group compared with clopidogrel group. IMR was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group compared with clopidogrel group (median, 15.0 [interquartile range, 12.0 to 21.0] vs. 47.5 [23.0 to 67.5], p = 0.014). There was significant difference in platelet inhibition among the three groups (ticagrelor 90 mg bid vs. ticagrelor 45 mg bid vs. clopidogrel 75 mg qd; 85.57 ± 47.63 vs. 120.33 ± 51.09 vs. 256.42 ± 55.10, p < 0.001).. It is hypothesized that ticagrelor might ameliorate the coronary microvascular function. When compared with clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor exhibited satisfactory antiplatelet effect in the present study.

Topics: Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

To compare the efficacy and safety of a dual therapy (rivaroxaban and ticagrelor) with a triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin) in Chinese elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A total of 106 elderly Chinese patients with NAVF after PCI were randomly divided into a dual therapy group treated with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily and rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily after PCI, and a triple therapy group treated with aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg once daily combined with the dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist warfarin once daily. The mean follow-up time was 1 year. The primary endpoint was the composite death rate from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke or stent thrombosis. The safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (a composite value of major, minor and minimal bleeding).. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the basic characteristics of the patients. The primary composite endpoint of the dual therapy group after 1 year was not significantly different from the triple therapy group (16.7% vs 15.2%, P = 0.86; HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.24), but there was a significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhage (7.4% vs 26.9% P = 0.01; HR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62-0.83) between the 2 groups.. In elderly Chinese patients with NVAF undergoing PCI, the efficacy of dual (ticagrelor plus rivaroxaban) treatments was comparable to the triple antithrombotic regime (warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy). The overall incidence of bleeding was significantly reduced with dual treatment compared to the triple treatment regime.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

THEMIS (The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study) (n = 19,220) and its pre-specified THEMIS-PCI (The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) (n = 11,154) subanalysis showed, in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (median duration 10.0 years; HbA. In these post hoc analyses, the authors examined whether the primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, MI, stroke: 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]), primary safety outcome (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-defined major bleeding) and net clinical benefit varied with diabetes-related factors.. Outcomes were analyzed across baseline diabetes duration, HbA. In THEMIS, the incidence of 3-point MACE increased with diabetes duration (6.7% for ≤5 years, 11.1% for >20 years) and HbA. Ticagrelor plus aspirin yielded generally consistent and favorable net clinical benefit across the diabetes-related factors in THEMIS-PCI but not in the overall THEMIS population.

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Shortened dual antiplatelet therapy followed by potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. To explore sex differences and evaluate the association of sex with outcomes among patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor plus aspirin.. This was a prespecified secondary analysis of TWILIGHT, an investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 187 sites across 11 countries. Study participants included patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stents, were planned for discharge with ticagrelor plus aspirin, and who had at least 1 clinical and at least 1 angiographic feature associated with high risk of ischemic or bleeding events. Data were analyzed from May to July 2020.. At 3 months after PCI, patients adherent to ticagrelor and aspirin without major adverse event were randomized to either aspirin or placebo for an additional 12 months along with ticagrelor.. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 12 months after randomization. The primary ischemic end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.. Of 9006 enrolled patients, 7119 underwent randomization (mean [SD] age, 63.9 [10.2] years; 5421 [76.1%] men). Women were older (mean [SD] age, 65.5 [9.6] years in women vs 63.4 [10.3] years in men) with higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (347 women [21.2%] vs 764 men [14.7%]). The primary bleeding end point occurred more often in women than men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.64; P = .01). After multivariate adjustment, incremental bleeding risk associated with female sex was no longer significant (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.95-1.52; P = .12). Ischemic end points were similar between sexes. Ticagrelor plus placebo vs ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with lower risk of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding in women (adjusted HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92; P = .02) and men (adjusted HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.73; P < .001; P for interaction = .69). Ischemic end points were similar between treatment groups in both sexes.. These findings suggest that the higher bleeding risk in women compared with men was mostly attributable to baseline differences, whereas ischemic events were similar between sexes. In this high-risk PCI population, the benefits of early aspirin withdrawal with continuation of ticagrelor were generally comparable in women and men.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02270242.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Sex Distribution; Sex Factors; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Withholding Treatment

This study sought to determine the agreement between cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and invasive measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the evaluation of nonculprit lesions after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In addition, we investigated whether fully quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion is superior to semiquantitative and visual analysis.. The agreement between CMR and FFR in the evaluation of nonculprit lesions in patients with STEMI with multivessel disease is unknown.. Seventy-seven patients with STEMI with at least 1 intermediate (diameter stenosis 50% to 90%) nonculprit lesion underwent CMR and invasive coronary angiography in conjunction with FFR measurements at 1 month after primary intervention. The imaging protocol included stress and rest perfusion, cine imaging, and late gadolinium enhancement. Fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and visual analysis of myocardial perfusion were compared against a reference of FFR. Hemodynamically obstructive was defined as FFR ≤0.80.. Hemodynamically obstructive nonculprit lesions were present in 31 (40%) patients. Visual analysis displayed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 0.83), with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 70%. For semiquantitative analysis, the relative upslope of the stress signal intensity time curve and the relative upslope derived myocardial flow reserve had respective AUCs of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.77) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.81). Fully quantitative analysis did not augment diagnostic performance (all p > 0.05). Stress myocardial blood flow displayed an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.85), with a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 77%. Similarly, MFR displayed an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71 to 0.90), with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 71%.. CMR and FFR have moderate-good agreement in the evaluation of nonculprit lesions in patients with STEMI with multivessel disease. Fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and visual analysis yield similar diagnostic performance.

Topics: Aged; Cardiac Catheterization; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine; Male; Middle Aged; Perfusion Imaging; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Women experience worse ischemic and bleeding outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. To assess the association of sex with patient outcomes at 2 years after contemporary PCI and with the efficacy and safety of 2 antiplatelet strategies.. This study is a prespecified subgroup analysis of the investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized GLOBAL LEADERS study evaluating 2 strategies of antiplatelet therapy after PCI in an unselected population including 130 secondary/tertiary care hospitals in different countries. The main study enrolled 15 991 unselected patients undergoing PCI between July 2013 and November 2015. Patients had an outpatient clinic visit at 30 days and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the index procedure. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2019.. Eligible patients were randomized to either the experimental or reference antiplatelet strategy. Experimental strategy consisted of 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy, while the reference strategy comprised of 12 months of DAPT followed by 12 months of aspirin monotherapy.. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of all-cause mortality and new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years. The secondary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding.. Of the 15 968 patients included in this study, 3714 (23.3%) were women. The risk of the primary end point at 2 years was similar between women and men (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20). Compared with men, women had higher risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding (adjusted HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.67) and hemorrhagic stroke at 2 years (adjusted HR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.92-11.81). At 2 years, there was no between-sex difference in the efficacy and safety of the 2 antiplatelet strategies. At 1 year, compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of bleeding in men (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98) but not in women (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.80-1.89; P for interaction = .045).. Compared with men, women experienced a higher risk of bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke after PCI. The effect of 2 antiplatelet strategies on death and Q-wave myocardial infarction following PCI did not differ between the sexes at 2 years.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01813435.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Secondary Prevention; Sex Factors; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Recruitment and retention in trials may bias the results and subsequently complicate their interpretation and validity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of recruitment and retention on all-cause mortality in a large all-comers trial.. The recruitment rate in each investigating center of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial was assessed and the 130 centers were subdivided into low and high recruiters according to the median, with all-cause mortality then compared between the two groups. Vital status was obtained from public records in patients with incomplete follow-up.. The trial randomized 15,991 (7.86%) of 203,483 eligible patients with percutaneous coronary intervention during the recruitment period, of whom 15,267 (95.47%) completed follow-up, 23 (0.14%) patients withdrew consent and formally requested to be deleted from the database; 183 (1.14%) withdrew consent but only objected to future data collection; 303 (1.89%) discontinued the study; and 215 (1.34%) were lost to follow-up. Vital status was finally obtained in all but 31 patients (99.81%). Patients from low recruiters had a significantly lower all-cause mortality than high ones (2.26% vs. 3.24%; hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.87; p = 0.002). There was a significant difference in all-cause mortality among the incomplete follow-up groups (log-rank p < 0.001) with a significantly higher mortality in the 183 patients who withdrew consent than those who completed follow-up (7.38% vs. 2.99%, p = 0.002).. Recruitment and retention significantly impacted all-cause mortality. Search for vital status through public domains is of paramount importance in the interpretation and validity of large clinical trials.

Topics: Aged; Biomedical Research; Coronary Artery Disease; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stents; Ticagrelor

To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at baseline and the occurrence of dyspnoea reported as adverse event (AE) that may lead to treatment non-adherence.. This is a non-prespecified, post hoc analysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial (n = 15 991), comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI with the reference strategy of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. Impact of COPD and dyspnoea AE (as a time-dependent covariate) on clinical outcomes was evaluated up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was a 2-year all-cause mortality or non-fatal, centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction. The presence of COPD (n = 832) was the strongest clinical predictor of 2-year all-cause mortality after PCI [hazard ratio (HR) 2.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21-3.66; P adjusted = 0.001] in this cohort (n = 15 991). No differential treatment effects on 2-year clinical outcomes were found in patients with and without COPD (primary endpoint: HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.58-1.35; P = 0.562; P int = 0.952). Overall, at 2 years dyspnoea was reported as an AE in 2101 patients, more frequently among COPD patients, irrespective of treatment allocation (27.2% in experimental arm vs. 14.5% in reference arm, P = 0.001). Its occurrence was not associated with a higher rate of the primary endpoint (P adjusted = 0.640) in the experimental vs. the reference arm.. In this exploratory analysis, COPD negatively impacted long-term prognosis after PCI. Despite higher incidence of dyspnoea in the experimental arm, in particular among COPD patients, the safety of the experimental treatment strategy appeared not to be affected.. NCT01813435.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Impaired renal function (IRF) is associated with increased risks of both ischemic and bleeding events. Ticagrelor has been shown to provide greater absolute reduction in ischemic risk following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in those with versus without IRF.. A pre-specified sub-analysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial (n = 15,991) comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy (after 1-month ticagrelor and aspirin dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT]) with 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients stratified according to IRF (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m. At 2 years, patients with IRF (n = 2171) had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality or centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI](hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.98, p. IRF negatively impacted long-term prognosis after PCI. There were no differential treatment effects found with regard to all-cause death or new Q-wave MI after PCI in patients with IRF treated with ticagrelor monotherapy.. The trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01813435.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding, direct-acting, oral, P. To determine whether ticagrelor can trigger ischemic preconditioning and influence microvascular function, we designed this prospective, open-label, pilot study that enrolled patients with stable multivessel CAD requiring staged, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants will be randomized in 1:1 ratios either to ticagrelor (loading dose (LD) 180 mg, maintenance dose (MD) 90 mg bid) or to clopidogrel (LD 600 mg, MD 75 mg) from 3 to 1 days before the scheduled PCI. The PCI operators will be blinded to the randomization arm. The primary endpoint is the delta (difference) between ST segment elevations (in millimeters, mm) as assessed by intracoronary electrocardiogram (ECG) during the two-step sequential coronary balloon inflation in the culprit vessel. Secondary endpoints are 1) changes in coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and FFR measured in the culprit vessel and reference vessel at the end of PCI, and 2) angina score during inflations. This study started in 2018 with the aim of enrolling 100 patients. Based on the rate of negative FFR up to 30% and a drop-out rate up to 10%, we expect to detect an absolute difference of 4 mm among the study arms in the mean change of ST elevation following repeated balloon inflations. All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Catholic University of Sacred Heart.. Ticagrelor might improve ischemia tolerance and microvascular function compared to clopidogrel, and these effects might translate to better long-term clinical outcomes.. EudraCT No. 2016-004746-28. No. NCT02701140.  TRIAL STATUS: Information provided in this manuscript refers to the definitive version (n. 3.0) of the study protocol, dated 31 October 2017, and includes all protocol amendments. Recruitment started on 18 September 2018 and is currently ongoing. The enrollment is expected to be completed by the end of 2019.. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Roma, Polo di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Female; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Humans; Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial; Male; Microvessels; Middle Aged; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Preoperative Care; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Resistance; Young Adult

This study assessed the ability of the dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score in stratifying ischemic and bleeding risk in a contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) population.. The DAPT score is recommended by guidelines as a tool to stratify ischemic and bleeding risk. Its utility in contemporary PCI is unknown.. The study studied patients in GLOBAL LEADERS (A Clinical Study Comparing Two Forms of Anti-platelet Therapy After Stent Implantation) who were free of major ischemic and bleeding events and adhered to antiplatelet strategy during the first year after PCI. The primary ischemic endpoint was the composite of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. The primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5. Outcomes from 12 to 24 months after PCI were compared according to the DAPT score.. Of 11,289 patients that were event-free after the first year, 6,882 and 4,407 patients had low (<2) and high (≥2) DAPT scores, respectively. Compared with a low DAPT score, patients with a high DAPT score had a higher rate of the composites of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis (0.70% vs. 1.55%; p < 0.0001). The rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding was 0.54% and 0.30% in the low and high DAPT score groups, respectively (p = 0.058). The effect of ticagrelor versus aspirin monotherapy on primary ischemic and bleeding endpoints during the second year were no different among the 2 groups.. The DAPT score can stratify ischemic but not bleeding risk in a contemporary PCI population during the second year. The score did not provide additional value for selection of antiplatelet strategy beyond the first year.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clinical Decision Rules; Clinical Decision-Making; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Progression-Free Survival; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

The REDUAL PCI trial (Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting) demonstrated that, in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention, bleeding risk was lower with dabigatran plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor (dual therapy) than warfarin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor and aspirin (triple therapy). Dual therapy was noninferior for risk of thromboembolic events. Whether these results apply equally to patients at higher risk of ischemic events due to lesion complexity or clinical risk factors is unclear.. The primary end point was time to first major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event. The composite efficacy end point was death, thromboembolic event, or unplanned revascularization. Our prespecified subgroup analysis categorized patients by presence of procedural complexity and/or clinical complexity factors at baseline. A modified dual antiplatelet therapy score categorized patients according to degree of clinical risk.. Of 2725 patients, 43.1% had clinical complexity factors alone, 9.9% procedural factors alone, 10.0% both, and 37.0% neither. Risk of the primary bleeding end point was lower in both dabigatran dual therapy groups than warfarin triple therapy groups, regardless of procedural and/or clinical lesion complexity (interaction. In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, dabigatran 110 and 150 mg dual therapy reduced bleeding risk compared with warfarin triple therapy, with a similar risk of thromboembolic outcomes, irrespective of procedural and/or clinical complexity and modified dual antiplatelet therapy score. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT02164864.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Thromboembolism; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 loss-of-function (LOF) variants treated with clopidogrel have increased risk of ischemic events. Whether genotype-guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy improves ischemic outcomes is unknown.. To determine the effect of a genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor strategy on ischemic outcomes in CYP2C19 LOF carriers after PCI.. Open-label randomized clinical trial of 5302 patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were enrolled at 40 centers in the US, Canada, South Korea, and Mexico from May 2013 through October 2018; final date of follow-up was October 2019.. Patients randomized to the genotype-guided group (n = 2652) underwent point-of-care genotyping. CYP2C19 LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor and noncarriers clopidogrel. Patients randomized to the conventional group (n = 2650) were prescribed clopidogrel and underwent genotyping after 12 months.. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia at 12 months. A secondary end point was major or minor bleeding at 12 months. The primary analysis was in patients with CYP2C19 LOF variants, and secondary analysis included all randomized patients. The trial had 85% power to detect a minimum hazard ratio of 0.50.. Among 5302 patients randomized (median age, 62 years; 25% women), 82% had ACS and 18% had stable CAD; 94% completed the trial. Of 1849 with CYP2C19 LOF variants, 764 of 903 (85%) assigned to genotype-guided therapy received ticagrelor, and 932 of 946 (99%) assigned to conventional therapy received clopidogrel. The primary end point occurred in 35 of 903 CYP2C19 LOF carriers (4.0%) in the genotype-guided therapy group and 54 of 946 (5.9%) in the conventional therapy group at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43-1.02]; P = .06). None of the 11 prespecified secondary end points showed significant differences, including major or minor bleeding in CYP2C19 LOF carriers in the genotype-guided group (1.9%) vs the conventional therapy group (1.6%) at 12 months (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P = .58). Among all randomized patients, the primary end point occurred in 113 of 2641 (4.4%) in the genotype-guided group and 135 of 2635 (5.3%) in the conventional group (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.07]; P = .16).. Among CYP2C19 LOF carriers with ACS and stable CAD undergoing PCI, genotype-guided selection of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with conventional clopidogrel therapy without point-of-care genotyping, resulted in no statistically significant difference in a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia based on the prespecified analysis plan and the treatment effect that the study was powered to detect at 12 months.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742117.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Inhibitors; Female; Genotype; Genotyping Techniques; Hemorrhage; Heterozygote; Humans; Loss of Function Mutation; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Point-of-Care Testing; Precision Medicine; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in East Asian patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in East Asian patients with CAD treated with PCI.. A total of 12383 patients with CAD undergoing PCI who received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were consecutively enrolled in the ticagrelor group (. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of MACCEs and an increased risk of TIMI bleeding events in East Asian patients with CAD receiving PCI.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Preoperative Care; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus who have not had a myocardial infarction or stroke are at high risk for cardiovascular events. Whether adding ticagrelor to aspirin improves outcomes in this population is unclear.. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients who were 50 years of age or older and who had stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus to receive either ticagrelor plus aspirin or placebo plus aspirin. Patients with previous myocardial infarction or stroke were excluded. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding as defined by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria.. A total of 19,220 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 39.9 months. Permanent treatment discontinuation was more frequent with ticagrelor than placebo (34.5% vs. 25.4%). The incidence of ischemic cardiovascular events (the primary efficacy outcome) was lower in the ticagrelor group than in the placebo group (7.7% vs. 8.5%; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 0.99; P = 0.04), whereas the incidence of TIMI major bleeding was higher (2.2% vs. 1.0%; hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.82 to 2.94; P<0.001), as was the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (0.7% vs. 0.5%; hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.48; P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.1%; hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 4.15; P = 0.11). The incidence of an exploratory composite outcome of irreversible harm (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, fatal bleeding, or intracranial hemorrhage) was similar in the ticagrelor group and the placebo group (10.1% vs. 10.8%; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.02).. In patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke, those who received ticagrelor plus aspirin had a lower incidence of ischemic cardiovascular events but a higher incidence of major bleeding than those who received placebo plus aspirin. (Funded by AstraZeneca; THEMIS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01991795.).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In this secondary analysis of the PACIFY randomized trial, we assessed whether dose and timing of fentanyl have implications for the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor loading during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Among 212 patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary angiography, a total of 70 required PCI and received 180 mg oral ticagrelor. Of these, thirty-two patients received no fentanyl and 38 received fentanyl (with variability in the timing of administration and cumulative dose among those randomized to fentanyl, given that both were provided at the interventional cardiologist's discretion). A time-weighted cumulative fentanyl exposure variable was calculated based on total dose of fentanyl and proximity in time of fentanyl administrations to the ticagrelor load. Patients were stratified based on receiving above or below the median time-weighted cumulative dose. Outcomes included ticagrelor concentrations by mass spectrometry (24-hour area under the curve) and platelet function measured using both VerifyNow platelet reactivity units (PRU) and light-transmission aggregometry (LTA).. Unadjusted ticagrelor 24-hour area under the curve was significantly lower across the categories of increasing fentanyl exposure (P=.02). In adjusted regression models, this difference only remained when comparing the no-fentanyl group with the time-weighted cumulative dose above the median group (P=.04). Similarly, with the no-fentanyl group as the reference, adjusted models testing 2-hour PRU and LTA values demonstrated significant differences (with less platelet inhibition for both tests) only among those with time-weighted cumulative fentanyl exposures above the median value (5.1 μg/min).. We have previously shown that fentanyl slows absorption of oral ticagrelor, attenuating its effect on platelet inhibition. We now demonstrate this mechanism appears to be dose- and time-dependent.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Fentanyl; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intraoperative Period; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The main aim of the current work was to investigate the application of ticagrelor in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAHD) and its effects on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), heart rate (HR) and myocardial enzymes. Seventy-four postoperative patients who underwent stenting for CAHD were selected as subjects, randomly divided into control group (n=37) and observation group (n=37). The control group was treated with clopidogrel after operation, while the observation group was given ticagrelor treatment. The plasma BNP, HR, myocardial zymogram and adverse cardiac events were compared between the two groups. SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analysis and the count data was analyzed by χ2 test and the measurement data was detected by t-test The levels of BNP, HR, creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) and troponin (cTnI) in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group at 3 months after treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris and arrhythmia between the two groups at 3 months after treatment (P>0.05). The utilization of ticagrelor in patients with postoperative stenting for CAHD improved the BNP, HR and myocardial enzyme level in patients, and also reduced the incidence of adverse cardiac events.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Enzymes; Female; Heart; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardium; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Stents; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The dose and time point for switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor remain controversial, especially for Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with complicated coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, the purpose of this study was to further explore the optimal dose and time point for the switching strategy to balance the increase in platelet inhibition and the decrease in adverse events in Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. From July 2017 to December 2017, the prospective, randomized, open-label study (the SwitcHIng from clopidogrel to ticagrelor study) assigned the eligible Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI (n = 102) for 90 mg of ticagrelor at 12 h (T-90 mg-12 h), 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h (T-90 mg-24h) or 180 mg ticagrelor at 24 h (T-180 mg-24 h) after the last dose of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the comparison of maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) values at 2 h after switching strategies among the three groups. In addition, the MPA values at baseline, 8 h and before discharge and the rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were evaluated, the incidences of bleeding episodes and dyspnea during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up in our study were also recorded. The MPA was measured by light transmittance aggregometry in our study. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model and one-way ANOVA were used to compare data for the primary endpoint.. The MPA values were significantly decreased in the T-180 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group (P = 0.017) and decreased numerically compared with the T-90 mg-24 h group (P = 0.072) at 2 h. In particular, the MPA values were markedly reduced in the T-90 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group at 8 h after switching treatment (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference among the three groups in all bleedings and dyspnea events.. The optimal treatment strategy recommended in this study for Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI is 180 or 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last dose of clopidogrel. In addition, a negative interaction was detected in this study between the overlap for clopidogrel and ticagrelor at 12 h after the last dose of clopidogrel.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03577652; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03577652.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

The GLOBAL LEADERS (GLOBAL LEADERS: A Clinical Study Comparing Two Forms of Anti-platelet Therapy After Stent Implantation) study randomly assigned 15,991 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin. Apart from Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), all study endpoints were analyzed as investigator reported.. This was a pre-specified ancillary study assessing whether experimental therapy is noninferior, and if met, superior, to conventional treatment for the coprimary efficacy endpoint of all-cause death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or urgent target vessel revascularization and superior in preventing BARC 3 (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) or 5 bleeding (coprimary safety endpoint) at 2 years with a 0.025 significance level to preserve nominal 5% alpha error.. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated investigator-reported and eventually unreported events of 7,585 patients from the 20 top-enrolling participating sites.. The 2-year coprimary efficacy endpoint occurred in 271 (7.14%) and in 319 (8.41%) patients in the experimental and conventional groups, respectively (rate ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.99), fulfilling noninferiority (p noninferiority <0.001), but not superiority (p superiority = 0.0465). The rates of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding did not differ (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.33; p = 0.986). A time-dependent treatment effect was observed with the experimental strategy being associated with a lower risk of MI (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.88; p interaction = 0.062) and definite stent thrombosis (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.63; p interaction = 0.007) after 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention.. Ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month DAPT was noninferior, but not superior, to conventional treatment in the prevention of ischemic events, and it did not decrease major bleeding risk as compared with conventional treatment. (GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-Study [GLASSY]; NCT03231059).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to assess if prior oral anticoagulant agent (OAC) use modifies the lower bleeding risk observed with dabigatran dual therapy (dabigatran twice daily plus a P2Y. In the RE-DUAL PCI (Randomized Evaluation of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy With Dabigatran Versus Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, the primary outcome of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was lower with dabigatran dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent PCI.. A total of 2,725 patients were randomized to dual therapy with dabigatran (110 or 150 mg twice daily) plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor or triple therapy with warfarin plus aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Subgroup analysis compared risk for major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and a composite thromboembolic endpoint in patients with prior OAC use and in those who were OAC treatment naive.. Risk for major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was reduced with both dabigatran dual therapies compared with warfarin triple therapy in both the prior OAC use group (hazard ratios: 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42 to 0.81] and 0.61 [95% CI: 0.41 to 0.92] with 110 and 150 mg dabigatran, respectively) and the OAC-naive group (hazard ratios: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.38 to 0.63] and 0.76 [95% CI: 0.59 to 0.97] with 110 and 150 mg dabigatran) (p for interaction = 0.42 and 0.37, 110 and 150 mg dabigatran, respectively). The risk for thromboembolic events seemed similar with dabigatran dual therapy (both doses) and warfarin triple therapy across subgroups.. Bleeding risk was reduced with dabigatran dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation after PCI, regardless of whether they were prior OAC users or OAC treatment naive. These results suggest that it is also safe to switch patients on OAC pre-PCI to dabigatran dual therapy post-PCI.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to evaluate dabigatran dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy in patients with or without diabetes mellitus in the RE-DUAL PCI (Randomized Evaluation of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy With Dabigatran Versus Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial.. It is unclear whether dual therapy is as safe and efficacious as triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with diabetes following percutaneous coronary intervention.. In RE-DUAL PCI, 2,725 patients with atrial fibrillation (993 with diabetes) who had undergone PCI were assigned to warfarin triple therapy (warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin) or dabigatran dual therapy (dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily and clopidogrel or ticagrelor). Median follow-up was 13 months. The primary outcome was the composite of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and the main efficacy outcome was the composite of death, thromboembolic events, or unplanned revascularization.. Among patients with diabetes, the incidence of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 15.2% in the dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy group versus 27.5% in the warfarin triple therapy group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 0.67) and 23.8% in the dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy group versus 25.1% in the warfarin triple therapy group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.22). Risk for major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was also reduced with both dabigatran doses among patients without diabetes (dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy: HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.70; dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy: HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.83). Risk for the efficacy endpoint was comparable between treatment groups for both patients with and those without diabetes. No interaction between treatment and diabetes subgroup could be observed, either for bleeding or for composite efficacy endpoints.. In this subgroup analysis, dabigatran dual therapy had a lower risk for bleeding and a comparable rate of the efficacy endpoint compared with warfarin triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with or without diabetes following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We performed this study to observe the effects of different doses of ticagrelor and standard-dose clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and endothelial function in diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Sixty type 2 diabetic patients were assigned to one-quarter standard-dose ticagrelor, half standard-dose ticagrelor, standard-dose ticagrelor and standard-dose clopidogrel groups. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and VerifyNow assay were used to measure platelet function. Endothelial function was assessed by measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels were detected. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) examined the Interleukin-8(IL-8) and IL-10. The results suggested that the one-quarter dose (34.0%± 14.7%), half-dose (26.9%± 11.6%) and standard-dose (17.3%± 10.3%) ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than clopidogrel (52.8%± 18.3%;

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The expression level of platelet microRNAs (miRNAs) correlates with heart disease and may be altered by antiplatelet therapy. This study aims to assess whether certain miRNAs are associated with treatment response by platelets in patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention and antiplatelet therapy. The dynamic expression of certain miRNAs in patients receiving different antiplatelet regimens was also investigated.. Healthy subjects (N = 20) received no-stent or antiplatelet therapy (as control), and patients (N = 155) who underwent stent implant and received treatment regimens that included aspirin plus clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or cilostazol were included. The association of miR-96-5p, miR-495-3p, miR-107, miR-223-3p, miR-15a-5, miR-365-3p, and miR-339-3p levels with treatment response, SYNTAX score, and HTPR was determined.. Of the different treatment regimens, ticagrelor was the most efficacious. At 24 h following drug administration, ROC analysis revealed that miR-339-3p and miR-365-3p had the highest sensitivity (74.3% and 90.0%, respectively) and specificity (71.4% and 93.3%) for detecting HTPR compared with the five other miRNAs. The SYNTAX score positively correlated with miR-223-3p and miR-365-3p levels at 24 h (P ≤ 0.006) and with miR-365-3p levels 7 days following drug administration (P = 0.014). The expression of all three miRNAs reached the highest levels in hyperresponsive (P2Y12 reaction unit < 85) followed by hyporesponsive (P2Y12 reaction unit ≥ 208) and then normoreactive. The normoreactive value was very close to that of controls.. Our data suggest that miR-365-3p expression level correlates with the antiplatelet treatment response.. NCT02101437.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; MicroRNAs; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Single-Blind Method; Stents; Taiwan; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In the setting of prior myocardial infarction, the oral antiplatelet ticagrelor added to aspirin reduced the risk of recurrent ischemic events, especially, in those with diabetes mellitus. Patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes are also at elevated risk and might benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy. The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in diabEtes Mellitus patients Intervention Study (THEMIS, NCT01991795) is a Phase 3b randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of ticagrelor vs placebo, on top of low dose aspirin. Patients ≥50 years with type 2 diabetes receiving anti-diabetic medications for at least 6 months with stable coronary artery disease as determined by a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention, bypass grafting, or angiographic stenosis of ≥50% of at least one coronary artery were enrolled. Patients with known prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke were excluded. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety endpoint is Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. A total of 19 220 patients worldwide have been randomized and at least 1385 adjudicated primary efficacy endpoint events are expected to be available for analysis, with an expected average follow-up of 40 months (maximum 58 months). Most of the exposure is on a 60 mg twice daily dose, as the dose was lowered from 90 mg twice daily partway into the study. The results may revise the boundaries of efficacy for dual antiplatelet therapy and whether it has a role outside acute coronary syndromes, prior myocardial infarction, or percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation, safety and efficacy with dabigatran dual therapy were evaluated in pre-specified subgroups of patients undergoing PCI due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI, and those receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel treatment.. In the RE-DUAL PCI trial, 2725 patients were randomized to dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg with P2Y12 inhibitor, or warfarin with P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. Mean follow-up was 14 months, 50.5% had ACS, and 12% received ticagrelor. The risk of the primary endpoint, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, was reduced with both dabigatran dual therapies vs. warfarin triple therapy in patients with ACS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.47 (0.35-0.63) for 110 mg and 0.67 (0.50-0.90) for 150 mg]; elective PCI [0.57 (0.43-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.76 (0.56-1.03) for 150 mg]; receiving ticagrelor [0.46 (0.28-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.59 (0.34-1.04) for 150 mg]; or clopidogrel [0.51 (0.41-0.64) for 110 mg and 0.73 (0.58-0.91) for 150 mg], all interaction P-values >0.10. Overall, dabigatran dual therapy was comparable to warfarin triple therapy for the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or unplanned revascularization, with minor variations across the subgroups, all interaction P-values >0.10.. The benefits of both dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy in reducing bleeding risks were consistent across subgroups of patients with or without ACS, and patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

The GLOBAL LEADERS is an open-label, pragmatic and superiority randomised controlled trial designed to challenge the current treatment paradigm of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months followed by aspirin monotherapy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. By design, all study endpoints are investigator reported (IR) and not subject to formal adjudication by an independent Clinical Event Committee (CEC), which may introduce detection, reporting or ascertainment bias.. We designed the GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-StudY (GLASSY) to prospectively implement, in a large sample of patients enrolled within the GLOBAL LEADERS trial (7585 of 15 991, 47.5%), an independent adjudication process of reported and unreported potential endpoints, using standardised CEC procedures, in order to assess whether 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice daily) after 1-month DAPT is non-inferior to a standard regimen of DAPT for 12 months followed by aspirin monotherapy for the primary efficacy endpoint of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or urgent target vessel revascularisation and superior for the primary safety endpoint of type 3 or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria.This study will comprehensively assess the comparative safety and efficacy of the two tested antithrombotic strategies on CEC-adjudicated ischaemic and bleeding endpoints and will provide insights into the role of a standardised CEC adjudication process on the interpretation of study findings by quantifying the level of concordance between IR-reported and CEC-adjudicated events.. GLASSY has been approved by local ethics committee of all study sites and/or by the central ethics committee for the country depending on country-specific regulations. In all cases, they deemed that it was not necessary to obtain further informed consent from individual subjects.. NCT01813435.

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endpoint Determination; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Stroke; Ticagrelor

In the RE-DUAL PCI trial of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dabigatran dual therapy (110 or 150 mg bid, plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor) reduced International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding events compared with warfarin triple therapy, with noninferiority in overall thromboembolic events. This analysis assessed outcomes in relation to patient bleeding and stroke risk profiles, based on the modified HAS-BLED and CHA. The primary endpoint, major bleeding event (MBE) or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event (CRNMBE), was compared across study arms in patients categorized by modified HAS-BLED score 0-2 or ≥3. The composite endpoint of death, thromboembolic event, and unplanned revascularization rates was compared in patients categorized by CHA. Risk of MBE or CRNMBE was lower with dabigatran dual therapy (both doses) versus warfarin triple therapy, irrespective of modified HAS-BLED category (treatment-by-subgroup interaction P-value 0.584 and 0.273 for dabigatran 110 and 150 mg dual therapy, respectively, vs warfarin). Risk of the composite thromboembolic endpoint was similar across CHA. Dabigatran dual therapy reduced bleeding events irrespective of bleeding risk category and demonstrated similar efficacy regardless of stroke risk category when compared with warfarin triple therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Background We compared the acute and midterm effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on aortic stiffness. Methods and Results We studied 117 patients in a randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group trial. The acute effect of ticagrelor was studied in 58 patients randomized (1:1) to receive a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) or ticagrelor (180 mg). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf PWV ) was measured before, 3, and 24 hours after the loading dose. The midterm effect (30-day treatment period) was studied in 59 subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were randomized to either clopidogrel (75 mg, OD) or ticagrelor (90 mg BID). cf PWV was measured before and at 30 days of treatment. Circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial function were measured at all study points. Repeated-measures analysis showed a significant main effect for treatment ( P=0.03), with the ticagrelor showing a reduction in cf PWV after treatment. cf PWV at 24 hours was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group compared with the clopidogrel group ( P=0.017) (maximal response reduction by 0.42±0.26 m/s). At 30 days, cf PWV decreased in the ticagrelor group, whereas there was no change with clopidogrel (-0.43±0.57 versus 0.12±0.14 m/s, P=0.004). There were no significant changes in both the acute and midterm study period in the pro-inflammatory and endothelial function parameters. Conclusions URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02071212. Ticagrelor decreases cf PWV for 24 hours after the loading dose and at 1 month post-percutaneous coronary intervention compared with clopidogrel. Considering that aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events, this finding may have clinical implications regarding the beneficial effect of ticagrelor. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02071212.

Topics: Aged; Aorta; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Single-Blind Method; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Vascular Stiffness

The aim of this study was to assess if intravenous methylnaltrexone can counteract the effects of morphine on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of ticagrelor.. Morphine delays the onset of action of oral P2Y. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease (n = 30) were randomized to receive methylnaltrexone (0.3 mg/kg intravenous) or matching placebo. After methylnaltrexone or placebo administration, all patients received morphine (5 mg intravenous). This was followed 15 min later by a 180-mg loading dose of ticagrelor. Patients crossed over to the alternative study treatment after 7 ± 2 days of washout. PK and PD assessments were performed at 12 time points (6 pre- and 6 post-crossover). PK analysis included measurement of plasma levels of ticagrelor and its major active metabolite (AR-C124910XX). PD assessments included VerifyNow P2Y. Only marginal changes in plasma levels of ticagrelor (and its major active metabolite) were observed with ticagrelor: maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration were 38% and 30% higher, respectively, in patients receiving methylnaltrexone compared with those receiving placebo, but no differences in time to maximum plasma concentration were observed. There were no differences in P2Y. In patients with coronary artery disease receiving morphine, intravenous administration of the peripheral opioid receptor antagonist methylnaltrexone leads to only marginal changes in plasma levels of ticagrelor and its major metabolite, without affecting levels of platelet reactivity. (Effect of Methylnaltrexone on the PK/PD Profiles of Ticagrelor in Patients Treated With Morphine; NCT02403830).

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Female; Florida; Gastric Emptying; Gastrointestinal Absorption; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Morphine; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are at high risk for recurrent coronary events.. The authors investigated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus placebo in patients with MVD in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 54) trial.. Patients with a history of MI 1 to 3 years before inclusion in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial were stratified in a pre-specified analysis based on the presence of MVD. The effect of ticagrelor (60 mg and 90 mg) on the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]), as well as the composite of coronary death, MI, or stent thrombosis (coronary events), and on TIMI major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and fatal bleeding were evaluated over a median of 33 months.. A total of 12,558 patients (59.4%) had MVD. In the placebo arm, compared with patients without MVD, those with MVD were at higher risk for MACE (9.37% vs. 8.57%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR. Patients with prior MI and MVD are at increased risk of MACE and coronary events, and experience substantial relative and absolute risk reductions in both outcomes with long-term ticagrelor treatment relative to those without MVD. Ticagrelor increases the risk of TIMI major bleeding, but not ICH or fatal bleeding. For patients with prior MI and MVD, ticagrelor is an effective option for long-term antiplatelet therapy. (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events [e.g., Death From Heart or Vascular Disease, Heart Attack, or Stroke] in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin [PEGASUS]; NCT01225562).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Reticulated platelets are associated with impaired antiplatelet response to irreversibly acting P2Y. This study randomized 110 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with use of cangrelor to different oral transitioning strategies loading with prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg at the start of cangrelor (. Platelet inhibition is not influenced by levels of reticulated platelets during infusion of cangrelor independent of oral P2Y

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Count; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thienopyridines; Ticagrelor

Switching between different classes of P2Y. This was a prospective, randomized, open-label study conducted in patients on maintenance dosing (MD) of aspirin (81 mg/d) and clopidogrel (75 mg/d). After a 7-day run-in with ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose [LD] followed by 90 mg twice daily MD), patients (n=80) were randomized into 1 of 4 groups: group A, clopidogrel 600 mg LD 24 hours after the last MD of ticagrelor (C-600 mg-24h); group B, clopidogrel 600 mg LD 12 hours after the last MD of ticagrelor (C-600 mg-12h); group C, clopidogrel 75 mg/d MD 24 hours after the last MD of ticagrelor (C-75 mg-24h); and group D, ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily MD (T-90 mg twice daily). MD of the randomized treatment was maintained for 10±3 days. Pharmacodynamic assessments were performed at baseline, after run-in, and at 2, 24, 48, and 72 hours and 10 days with P2Y. T-90 mg twice daily led to lower platelet reactivity than any clopidogrel regimen using all assays at all time points. P2Y. De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy is associated with an increase in platelet reactivity. The use of an LD before the initiation of an MD regimen of clopidogrel mitigates these observations, although this is not affected by the timing of its administration after ticagrelor discontinuation.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02287909.

Topics: Aged; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Saphenous vein graft disease remains a major limitation of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Up to 20% of vein grafts will occlude within the first year after CABG despite standard aspirin antiplatelet therapy. However, more potent postoperative platelet inhibition with ticagrelor may improve graft patency. The goal of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor, as compared to aspirin, for the prevention of saphenous vein graft occlusion following CABG.. The Ticagrelor Antiplatelet Therapy to Reduce Graft Events and Thrombosis (TARGET) study is a multi-center double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolling patients who have undergone multi-vessel CABG with at least one saphenous vein graft. Patients are being randomized to receive either aspirin 81 mg twice per day or ticagrelor 90 mg twice per day for 2 years starting within 7 days after surgery. The projected enrollment is 150 patients in each arm (300 total patients). Patients will undergo computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography at 1 and 2 years after surgery to assess the incidence of vein graft occlusion and stenosis.. To our knowledge, this trial is the first prospective study to evaluate the impact of early postoperative ticagrelor on 1- and 2-year graft patency after CABG. Furthermore, it is also the first trial to use a novel antiplatelet agent as a standalone, without aspirin, after CABG. Should ticagrelor reduce the incidence of postoperative graft occlusion, the results of this study will redefine modern antiplatelet management following coronary bypass surgery (ClinicalTrials.govNCT02053909).

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Double-Blind Method; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Saphenous Vein; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Vascular Patency

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at heightened risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the risk of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with symptomatic PAD versus PAD without diagnosed CAD, and whether ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing that risk. The EUCLID trial randomized 13,885 patients with PAD to antithrombotic monotherapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. CAD was defined as prior myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Median follow-up was 30 months. Among 4032 (29%) patients with PAD and CAD, 63% had prior MI, 54% prior PCI, and 38% prior CABG. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients with PAD and CAD had significantly higher rates of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death/MI/stroke, 15.3% vs 8.9%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-1.99; p=0.005), but no statistically significant increase in acute limb ischemia (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.57-2.85; p=0.55) or major bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.49-2.48; p=0.81) versus PAD without CAD. Among patients with PAD and CAD, there was no differential treatment effect between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for the primary efficacy endpoint (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.19; p=0.84), acute limb ischemia (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.63-1.69; p=0.89), or major bleeding (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.66-1.69; p=0.81). There was a statistically significant interaction between prior coronary stent placement and study treatment ( p=0.03) with a numerical reduction in the primary efficacy endpoint with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (13.8% vs 16.8%, HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65-1.03; p=0.09). Patients with PAD and prior CAD had higher composite rates of cardiovascular death, MI, and ischemic stroke versus PAD without diagnosed CAD. There were no significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in cardiovascular events or major bleeding. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We hypothesised that ticagrelor, in combination with aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor alone, improves outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with standard antiplatelet regimens.. GLOBAL LEADERS was a randomised, open-label superiority trial at 130 sites in 18 countries. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a biolimus A9-eluting stent for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned (1:1) to 75-100 mg aspirin daily plus 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily for 1 month, followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy, or standard dual antiplatelet therapy with 75-100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for patients with stable coronary artery disease) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for patients with acute coronary syndromes) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months. Randomisation was concealed, stratified by centre and clinical presentation (stable coronary artery disease vs acute coronary syndrome), and blocked, with randomly varied block sizes of two and four. The primary endpoint at 2 years was a composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction as assessed by a core lab in a blinded manner. The key secondary safety endpoint was site-reported bleeding assessed according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria (grade 3 or 5). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01813435, and is closed to new participants, with follow-up completed.. Between July 1, 2013, and Nov 9, 2015, 15 968 participants were randomly assigned, 7980 to the experimental group and 7988 to the control group. At 2 years, 304 (3·81%) participants in the experimental group had died or had a non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction, compared with 349 (4·37%) participants in the control group (rate ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·75-1·01]; p=0·073]). There was no evidence for a difference in treatment effects for the primary endpoint across prespecified subgroups of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease (p=0·93). Grade 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 163 participants in the experimental group and 169 in the control group (2·04% vs 2·12%; rate ratio 0·97 [95% CI 0·78-1·20]; p=0·77).. Ticagrelor in combination with aspirin for 1 month followed by ticagrelor alone for 23 months was not superior to 12 months of standard dual antiplatelet therapy followed by 12 months of aspirin alone in the prevention of all-cause mortality or new Q-wave myocardial infarction 2 years after percutaneous coronary intervention.. AstraZeneca, Biosensors, and The Medicines Company.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Anticoagulants; Apoptosis; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytokines; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Male; Middle Aged; Nitric Oxide; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Reactive Oxygen Species; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In diabetic patients a predisposed coronary microcirculation along with a higher risk of distal particulate embolization during primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) increases the risk of peri-procedural microcirculatory damage. However, new antiplatelet agents, in particular Ticagrelor, may protect the microcirculation through its adenosine-mediated vasodilatory effects.. PREDICT is an original, prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled study designed to investigate the protective effect of Ticagrelor on the microcirculation during PCI in patient with diabetes mellitus type 2 or pre-diabetic status. The primary endpoints of this study aim to test (i) the decrease in microcirculatory resistance with antiplatelet therapy (Ticagrelor > Clopidogrel; mechanistic effect) and (ii) the relative microcirculatory protection of Ticagrelor compared to Clopidogrel during PCI (Ticagrelor < Clopidogrel; protective effect).. PREDICT will be the first multicentre clinical trial to test the adenosine-mediated vasodilatory effect of Ticagrelor on the microcirculation during PCI in diabetic patients. The results will provide important insights into the prospective beneficial effect of this drug in preventing microvascular impairment related to PCI ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov No. NCT02698618).

Topics: Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clinical Protocols; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Circulation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Microcirculation; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Research Design; Risk Factors; Spain; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Hyperemia; Male; Manometry; Microvessels; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Plethysmography; Ticagrelor; Vascular Stiffness

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diagnostic Errors; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prognosis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Assessment; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin (ASP) and a P2Y. To compare TIC with TIC + ASP, we have initiated a single centre, open-label randomised controlled trial (TEMPLATE study) in adults receiving DAPT following PCI with a sample size of 110 patients. Patients are invited to join the study when, as part of standard care, they are due to switch from DAPT (ASP + any P2Y. This is the first study to compare in detail the extent of platelet inhibition in patients who are receiving TIC compared with TIC + ASP. The study findings will complement larger-scale trials of the clinical efficacy and safety of TIC compared to TIC + ASP.. ISRCTN registry, identifier ISRCTN84335288 . Registered on 23 June 2014.

Topics: Adenosine; Aspirin; Clinical Protocols; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; England; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Research Design; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The pharmacokinetics after a 180-mg loading dose (LD) of ticagrelor has not been thoroughly investigated in NSTEMI patients. We aimed to compare the ticagrelor uptake and on-treatment platelet reactivity between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients and a control group of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed an observational, prospective, single-center study including 40 NSTEMI patients and 20 SCAD controls. Key exclusion criteria included ongoing opioid treatment. Both groups received a 180-mg ticagrelor LD, and blood samples were taken pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-LD. Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX were determined by validated methods. Platelet aggregation was tested using ADP-induced multiple electrode aggregometry. The primary endpoint was the time to maximal ticagrelor concentration (T

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Biotransformation; Blood Platelets; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Sweden; Ticagrelor

We evaluated the relationship of renal function and ischaemic and bleeding risk as well as the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI).. Patients with a history of MI 1-3 years prior from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 were stratified based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) pre-specified for analysis of the effect of ticagrelor on the primary efficacy composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE) and the primary safety endpoint of TIMI major bleeding. Of 20 898 patients, those with eGFR <60 (N = 4849, 23.2%) had a greater risk of MACE at 3 years relative to those without, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, HRadj 1.54, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.27-1.85, P < 0.001). The relative risk reduction in MACE with ticagrelor was similar in those with eGFR <60 (ticagrelor pooled vs. placebo: HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.96) vs. ≥60 (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77-1.00, Pinteraction = 0.44). However, due to the greater absolute risk in the former group, the absolute risk reduction with ticagrelor was higher: 2.7 vs. 0.63%. Bleeding tended to occur more frequently in patients with renal dysfunction. The absolute increase in TIMI major bleeding with ticagrelor was similar in those with and without eGFR <60 (1.19 vs. 1.43%), whereas the excess of minor bleeding tended to be more pronounced (1.93 vs. 0.69%).. In patients with a history of MI, patients with renal dysfunction are at increased risk of MACE and consequently experience a particularly robust absolute risk reduction with long-term treatment with ticagrelor.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor loading dose (LD) increases adenosine plasma levels, which might interfere with fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment because the latter is based on adenosine-induced hyperemia. In a prospective study, consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography with at least 1 de novo stenosis >50% and <90% in severity amenable to intervention underwent FFR assessment using intravenous adenosine 140 μg/kg/min for 3 minutes. Patients were subsequently randomized to either ticagrelor 180 mg (n = 38) or control thienopyridine (n = 38) (prasugrel 60 mg [n = 28] or clopidogrel 600 mg [n = 10]), followed by a second FFR assessment of the target lesion 2 hours after drug. Pre-drug, steady hyperemia FFR (sFFR, median, first to third quartiles) was 0.82 (0.75 to 0.88) and 0.81 (0.75 to 0.88), p = 0.9, whereas post-drug, 0.82 (0.72 to 0.87) and 0.79 (0.73 to 0.86), p = 0.5, in thienopyridine and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. The primary end point of percent relative change in sFFR between pre- and post-drug periods was greater in ticagrelor- than thienopyridine-treated patients, -1.24 (-5.54 to 0.0) versus -0.51 (-3.68 to 3.21), p = 0.03, respectively. Absolute change in sFFR between pre- and post-drug periods was marginally higher in ticagrelor- than thienopyridine-treated patients -0.01 (-0.04 to 0.0) versus -0.005 (-0.03 to 0.02), p = 0.048, respectively. Reclassification of treatment decision at the sFFR ≤ 0.80 cutoff post-drug occurred in 6 (15.8%) versus 5 (13.2%) of ticagrelor- and thienopyridine-treated patients, respectively. In conclusion, after ticagrelor LD, an absolute and relative reduction in sFFR compared with thienopyridine LD is observed. Administration of ticagrelor should be considered as a potential source, albeit minor, of FFR variability.

Topics: Adenosine; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Pharmacodynamic (PD) studies comparing prasugrel and ticagrelor have reached inconsistent findings. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation comparing the PD effects of prasugrel vs. ticagrelor after switching from clopidogrel therapy, exploring both loading dose (LD) and maintenance dose (MD) regimens represented the aim of this study.. Patients (n = 110) with coronary artery disease were randomized to prasugrel (60 mg LD/10 mg MD q.d.) or ticagrelor (180 mg LD/90 mg MD b.i.d) therapy for 1 week. Pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using three assays (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, VerifyNow P2Y12, and light transmittance aggregometry, LTA) at baseline, 30 min, 2, 24 h, and 1 week. The impact of initiating ticagrelor MD 12 vs. 24 h after LD administration was also assessed. Switching clopidogrel-treated patients to an LD of prasugrel or ticagrelor was associated with a reduction in platelet reactivity at 30 min and was sustained at all time points up to 1 week with the MD (P < 0.001 for all assays). Platelet reactivity was similar with prasugrel and ticagrelor with all assays at 30 min, 2 h, and 1 week (P > 0.05 for all time points), with the exception of LTA at 30 min (lower with prasugrel; P = 0.003). At 24 h, platelet reactivity was lower among patients initiating ticagrelor MD after 12 vs. 24 h post-LD. Rates of high platelet reactivity (HPR) were markedly reduced and similar between groups.. Prasugrel and ticagrelor exert similar levels of P2Y12 inhibition achieving more potent PD effects and reduced HPR rates compared with clopidogrel which are reached promptly following LD and sustained with MD.. NCT01852175.

Topics: Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor was shown to reduce mortality in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but its effect on graft patency is unknown.. We performed a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, comparing ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily versus placebo for 3 months added to aspirin 81 mg/day, following isolated CABG. Aspirin was started within 12 h, and study medication within 72 h after CABG. Primary outcome was graft occlusion on CT angiography (CTA) performed 3 months post CABG. Patients were followed to 12 months for death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularisation and bleeding.. The study was terminated prematurely after randomising 70 patients between September 2011 and August 2014 because of slow recruitment. CTA was performed in 56 patients who completed >1 month of study drug. Graft occlusion occurred in 7/25 (28.0%) patients on ticagrelor and 17/31 (48.3%) on placebo, p=0.044. Of 207 analysable grafts, graft occlusion occurred in 9/87 (10.3%) with ticagrelor and 22/120 (18.3%) with placebo, p=0.112. Graft occlusion or stenosis ≥50% occurred in 10/87 (11.5%) ticagrelor vs 32/120 (26.7%) placebo, p=0.007. There was no major bleeding, but minor bleeding was higher with ticagrelor (31.4% vs 2.9%, p=0.003). In univariate analysis, ticagrelor use reduced graft occlusion (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.97, p=0.047), which remained significant on multivariable analysis (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.073 to 0.873, p=0.03).. Ticagrelor added to aspirin after CABG reduced the proportion of patients with graft occlusion, and was a significant univariate and multivariable predictor of graft occlusion. These results are hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in larger studies.. NCT01373411: Results.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; British Columbia; Chi-Square Distribution; Computed Tomography Angiography; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

Treatment with clopidogrel is subject to wide variability in response, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is associated with increased risk of ischemic events. Ticagrelor has been shown to have antiplatelet effects superior to those of clopidogrel, with subsequent reduced clinical ischemic events. However, the efficacy of ticagrelor in high-risk patients with coronary disease who have high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with clopidogrel has not been examined.. We recruited 201 patients (mean age, 64 ± 10 years; 20% women) with stable/unstable angina who were receiving clopidogrel treatment and in whom coronary catheterization was planned. Platelet reactivity was tested using VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA) (HTPR defined as P2Y12 reaction units [PRU] ≥ 208). Patients with HTPR were randomized to receive either additional clopidogrel 300 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg before coronary angiography, and persisted with the respective treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary end point was the rate of troponin elevation after PCI, and the secondary end point was the change in platelet reactivity 24 hours after PCI. In addition, clinical outcomes at 30 days were evaluated.. Eighty-four (42%) patients had HTPR (mean PRU, 270.8 ± 46.5) and were randomly assigned to clopidogrel or ticagrelor treatment. Subsequently, 49 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (26 receiving ticagrelor and 23 receiving clopidogrel). After PCI, the mean PRU in the ticagrelor group declined significantly (ticagrelor, 59.3 ± 49 vs clopidogrel, 202.4 ± 60.4; P < 0.0001). The rate of cardiac troponin elevation and clinical ischemic events were similar between the groups.. In high-risk patients with coronary disease and HTPR on clopidogrel, ticagrelor was highly effective in platelet inhibition and overcoming HTPR compared with continued clopidogrel treatment but had no apparent effect on troponin release or short-term clinical outcomes.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Troponin

The aim of the study was to assess ticagrelor's effects on inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRU, measure of platelet P2Y12 receptor blockade), pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and safety in Chinese patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).. This was an open label, single centre, randomized study. Thirty-six patients on low dose aspirin (75-100 mg day(-1) ) received ticagrelor 45, 60 or 90 mg (single dose, days 1 and 7; twice daily, days 3-6). IPA (final extent), PRU and ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX plasma concentrations were determined.. On day 1, peak IPA >80% occurred 2-6 h post-dose (all doses). PRU was markedly reduced at 1 h vs. baseline (all doses). With ticagrelor 45 and 90 mg twice daily, maximum IPA (mean, SD) was 91% (13%), and 99% (3%), and maximum PRU reduction from baseline (mean, SD) was 82% (17%) and 92% (9%), respectively. Approximate dose-proportional increases (mean [%CV]; 45 vs. 90 mg twice daily) in ticagrelor Cmax (616 [37] vs. 1273 [43] ng ml(-1) ) and AUC (3882 [42] vs. 8206 [51] ng ml(-1) h) and AR-C124910XX parameters were seen. Pharmacodynamic and PK differences between 45 and 60 mg were small. No safety issues were identified.. In Chinese patients with CAD, ticagrelor (45, 60 and 90 mg) markedly reduced platelet aggregation. The IPA and PRU magnitude increased generally with increasing doses. However, the mean pharmacodynamic differences between 45 and 60 mg doses were small. Following single and multiple doses, the mean Cmax and AUC values of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX increased approximately dose proportionally between 45 and 90 mg doses.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Area Under Curve; Asian People; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor has been demonstrated to provide a more rapid and powerful inhibition of platelet aggregation compared with clopidogrel in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. In our previous study, we found that half-dose ticagrelor produced similar inhibitory effects on platelet aggregation as standard-dose ticagrelor and exerted significantly stronger effects than clopidogrel in Chinese patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. Therefore, we performed this study to observe the efficacy of one-quarter standard-dose ticagrelor in comparison to standard-dose clopidogrel in Chinese patients with stable CAD.. In a randomized, single-blind, crossover trial, 30 patients with stable CAD were randomized to one-quarter standard-dose ticagrelor (22.5mg BID for 7days) or standard-dose clopidogrel (75mg QD for 7days). Following a 2-week washout period, patients switched regimens. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and VerifyNow assay were used to measure platelet function.. The platelet aggregation rate (PAgR) was obviously lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel (17.70%±12.67% versus 27.63%±13.10%, P<0.05). The % inhibition levels in the ticagrelor group exhibited significantly greater than that in the clopidogrel group (65.33%±21.31% versus 36.23%±23.01%, P<0.01). PRU values in the ticagrelor group were dramatically lower than that in the clopidogrel group (87.03±51.38 versus 163.77±58.66, P<0.01). High-platelet reactivity (HPR) (≥208 PRU) was 0% with ticagrelor and 16.67% with clopidogrel.. One-quarter standard-dose ticagrelor provided greater degree of platelet inhibition than standard-dose clopidogrel in Chinese patients with stable CAD.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; China; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Single-Blind Method; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel are at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the ISAR-ADAPT-PF study was to assess the antiplatelet efficacy of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with HTPR on clopidogrel. In a prospective and randomized clinical study, 70 patients with HTPR on clopidogrel loading dose (LD) within 24 h post PCI were assigned to receive either ticagrelor [180 mg LD followed by 90 mg maintenance dose (MD) twice daily] or prasugrel (60 mg LD followed by 10 mg MD once daily). The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation assessed on the Multiplate analyzer on day 2 after randomization (primary end point) was as follows: the mean difference between the two treatment groups was 6 aggregation units (AU) × min with an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of 41 AU × min, which was greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of 18 AU × min (P for noninferiority = 0.29). However, no significant differences in absolute platelet reactivity levels between ticagrelor- versus prasugrel-treated patients at that time point were observed (138 ± 100 AU × min vs. 132 ± 64 AU × min, P for superiority = 0.77). In conclusion, neither drug was statistically more effective for inhibition of platelet aggregation in patients with HTPR on clopidogrel post PCI, although the study could not formally demonstrate the assumed noninferiority of ticagrelor versus prasugrel.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with drug eluting stents (DES) is still under debate. Recent meta-analyses on ≤6months versus 12months DAPT suggest that bleeding rates can be reduced, without a higher rate of thrombotic complications. In particular, the COMBO dual therapy stent, being associated with early re-endothelialization, may allow for a reduction of the duration of DAPT without increasing the thrombotic risk, while reducing the risk of bleeding complications.. The aim of the REDUCE trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a combined efficacy and safety endpoint of a short-term 3months DAPT strategy as compared to standard 12-month DAPT strategy in ACS patients treated with the COMBO stent.. A prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to enroll 1500 patients with ACS treated with the COMBO stent. Patients will be randomized before discharge in a 1:1 fashion to either 3 or 12months of DAPT. A clinical follow-up is scheduled at 3, 6, 12, and 24months. The primary endpoint is the time to event as defined by the occurrence of one of the following: all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, target vessel revascularization or bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Council type II, III and V) within 12months. The study has recruited patients since July 2014, and the results are expected in 2017.. A reduction of the DAPT duration in ACS patients after PCI without affecting the thrombotic risk is an attractive option with regard to the associated bleeding risk. The REDUCE trial will be the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of a 3-month DAPT strategy compared to a 12-month DAPT strategy in an ACS only population treated with the COMBO stent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of atherothrombotic events, underscoring the importance of effective platelet inhibiting therapies. Prasugrel and ticagrelor reduce thrombotic complications to a greater extent than clopidogrel. Subgroup analyses of pivotal clinical trials testing prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel showed DM patients to have benefits that were consistent with the overall trial populations, although the magnitude of the ischemic risk reduction appeared to be enhanced with prasugrel. Whether these findings may be attributed to differences in the pharmacodynamic profiles of these drugs in DM patients remains poorly explored and represented the aim of this study.. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover pharmacodynamic study, aspirin-treated DM patients (n=50) with coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to receive prasugrel (60 mg loading dose [LD]/10 mg maintenance dose once daily) or ticagrelor (180 mg LD/90 mg maintenance dose twice daily) for 1 week. Pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using 4 different assays, including VerifyNow P2Y12, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, light transmittance aggregometry, and Multiplate, which allowed us to explore ADP- and non-ADP-induced (arachidonic acid-, collagen-, thrombin receptor-activating, peptide-induced) platelet signaling pathways. The acute (baseline, 30 minutes, and 2 hours post-LD) and maintenance (1 week) effects of therapy were assessed. The primary end point of the study was the comparison of P2Y12 reaction units determined by VerifyNow P2Y12 at 1 week between prasugrel and ticagrelor.. ADP- and non-ADP-induced measures of platelet reactivity reduced significantly with both prasugrel and ticagrelor LD and maintenance dose. P2Y12 reaction units defined by VerifyNow were similar between prasugrel and ticagrelor at 30 minutes and 2 hours post-LD. At 1 week, P2Y12 reaction units were significantly lower with ticagrelor than with prasugrel (52 [32-72] versus 83 [63-103]; least-square means difference: -31; 95% confidence interval, -57 to -4; P=0.022; primary end point). Pharmacodynamic assessments measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, light transmittance aggregometry, and Multiplate were similar between prasugrel and ticagrelor at each time point, including at 1 week. Rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were similar between groups with all assays at all time points.. In DM patients with coronary artery disease, ticagrelor exerts similar or greater inhibition of ADP-induced platelet reactivity in comparison with prasugrel in the acute and chronic phases of treatment, whereas the inhibition of measures of non-ADP-induced platelet reactivity was not significantly different between the 2 agents.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852214.

Topics: Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

In the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54), ticagrelor reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events when added to low-dose aspirin in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction, resulting in the approval of ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily for long-term secondary prevention. We investigated the incidence of stroke, outcomes after stroke, and the efficacy of ticagrelor focusing on the approved 60 mg twice daily dose for reducing stroke in this population.. Patients were followed for a median of 33 months. Stroke events were adjudicated by a central committee. Data from similar trials were combined using meta-analysis.. Of 14 112 patients randomly assigned to placebo or ticagrelor 60 mg, 213 experienced a stroke; 85% of these strokes were ischemic. A total of 18% of strokes were fatal and another 15% led to either moderate or severe disability at 30 days. Ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.98; P=0.034), driven by a reduction in ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.02). Hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 9 patients on placebo and 8 patients on ticagrelor. A meta-analysis across 4 placebo-controlled trials of more intensive antiplatelet therapy in 44 816 patients with coronary disease confirmed a marked reduction in ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.81; P=0.0001).. High-risk patients with prior myocardial infarction are at risk for stroke, approximately one-third of which are fatal or lead to moderate-to-severe disability. The addition of ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily significantly reduced this risk without an excess of hemorrhagic stroke but with more major bleeding. In high-risk patients with coronary disease, more intensive antiplatelet therapy should be considered not only to reduce the risk of coronary events, but also of stroke.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT01225562.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

For patients with coronary artery disease undergoing coronary bypass surgery, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) currently represents the gold standard of antiplatelet treatment. However, adverse cardiovascular event rates in the first year after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) still exceed 10%. Graft failure, which is predominantly mediated by platelet aggregation, has been identified as a major contributing factor in this context. Therefore, intensified platelet inhibition is likely to be beneficial. Ticagrelor, an oral, reversibly binding and direct-acting P2Y12 receptor antagonist, provides a rapid, competent, and consistent platelet inhibition and has shown beneficial results compared with clopidogrel in the subset of patients undergoing bypass surgery in a large previous trial.. Ticagrelor is superior to ASA for the prevention of major cardiovascular events within 1 year after CABG.. The TiCAB trial (NCT01755520) is a multicenter, phase III, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial comparing ticagrelor with ASA for the prevention of major cardiovascular events within 12 months after CABG. Patients undergoing CABG will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or ASA 100 mg once daily. The study medication will be started within 24 hours after surgery and maintained for 12 months. The primary end point is the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization at 12 months after CABG. The sample size is based on an expected event rate of 13% of the primary end point within the first 12 months after randomization in the control group, a 2-sided α level of .0492 (to preserve the overall significance level of .05 after planned interim analysis), a power of 0.80%, 2-sided testing, and an expected relative risk of 0.775 in the active group compared with the control group and a dropout rate of 2%. According to power calculations based on a superiority design for ticagrelor, it is estimated that 3,850 patients should be enrolled.. There is clinical equipoise on the issue of optimal platelet inhibition after CABG. The TiCAB trial will provide a pivotal comparison of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared with ASA after CABG.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The objective was to compare the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of ticagrelor with clopidogrel among subjects of Hispanic ethnicity, as the PD and PK effects of antiplatelet agents among Hispanics are not specifically known. This was a randomised, open-label, crossover PD/PK study of 40 Hispanic subjects with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Subjects were allocated to either ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD)/90 mg twice-daily maintenance dose (MD) followed by clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg once-daily MD with an intervening washout period, or vice versa. The primary endpoint was on-treatment reactivity (OTR) at 2 h post-LD according to the VerifyNow P2Y12 test. OTR was significantly lower at 2 h post-LD with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (34 PRU vs. 201 PRU, least square means difference = -167 PRU [95 % CI, -197, -137], P < 0.001). OTR was also lower with ticagrelor at 30 min and 8 h post-LD (P < 0.001). The greater magnitude of antiplatelet effect with ticagrelor persisted after 7 days of MD (52 PRU [95 % CI, 30, 73] vs. 182 PRU [95 % CI, 160, 205], P < 0.001). Mean plasma concentration of ticagrelor and its active metabolite were greatest at 2 h post-LD, with similar levels at 2 h post-MD after 7 days of MD. Among Hispanic subjects with stable CAD, ticagrelor provides a more rapid onset of platelet inhibition and a significantly greater antiplatelet effect compared with clopidogrel during both the loading and maintenance phases of treatment.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still controversial, and the role of novel antithrombotic agents has nerve been tested. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate and overall safety and efficacy profile of the combination of rivaroxaban and ticagrelor in this particular population.. The RT-AF study is an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter clinical trial with up to 420 subjects enrolled in 5 centers. Eligible patients, who have a history or new onset paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular AF, referred to the study centers with indications for PCI will be randomly assigned to receive triple therapy (including warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin) or dual therapy (rivaroxaban and ticagrelor). All subjects will have clinical follow-up at discharge, at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. The primary end point is major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events at 12 months. The major secondary end point is the composite efficacy outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke.. The study will be sufficiently powered to provide data primarily regarding the safety of dual therapy with rivaroxaban and ticagrelor over the traditional triple therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI at 12 months. It will also provide important information regarding the efficacy of the two different antithrombotic regimens. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02334254).

Topics: Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) is high in blacks, highlighting the need for clinical research of antiplatelet agents in this population. We sought to evaluate platelet reactivity during loading and maintenance dosing of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, and the pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor and its metabolite AR-C124910XX, in black patients with stable CAD taking low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid).. In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study, 34 blacks with stable CAD receiving acetylsalicylic acid 75 to 100 mg/d were randomized to clopidogrel (600 mg, then 75 mg QD for 7-9 days) or ticagrelor (180 mg, then 90 mg BID for 7-9 days). After washout 10 to 14 days, patients switched regimens. The primary end point was platelet reactivity 2 hours post loading dose (P2Y12 reactivity units [PRU] measured by the VerifyNow assay). Least-squares mean PRU at 2 hours post loading dose was lower with ticagrelor (27.6) versus clopidogrel (211.2); least-squares mean difference was -183.6 (95% confidence interval, -213.9 to -153.3; P<0.001). At all time points, the least-squares mean PRU was significantly lower, and the percent reduction in PRU from baseline was statistically greater, with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. At 2 hours post dose, the prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (≥208 PRU) was lower with ticagrelor (0%) than with clopidogrel (57.1%). Pharmacokinetic profiles of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were consistent with previous reports in stable CAD populations.. In black patients with stable CAD receiving low-dose acetylsalicylic acid, ticagrelor provided a faster onset and greater degree of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01523392.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Diabetes mellitus (DM) disproportionately affects Hispanic patients. DM patients have enhanced platelet reactivity and reduced sensitivity to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor demonstrated a more rapid onset and greater magnitude of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in Hispanic patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). This subgroup analysis examined the onset and level of platelet inhibition of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Hispanic patients with DM.. This was a subgroup analysis of a randomized, open-label, crossover study in which 40 Hispanic patients with stable CAD received ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD)/90 mg twice-daily maintenance dose (MD) then clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg once-daily MD, or vice versa. The primary end point was on-treatment platelet reactivity at 2 hours post-LD using the VerifyNow™ P2Y12 test.. 21 patients had DM and 19 were non-diabetic. At 2 hours post-LD, mean platelet reactivity in the diabetic group was 34.5 PRU with ticagrelor versus 219.3 PRU with clopidogrel (P<0.001), and in the non-diabetic group was 33.7 PRU with ticagrelor versus 181.0 PRU with clopidogrel (P<0.001). In both diabetic and non-diabetic subgroups, mean platelet reactivity declined to a significantly greater extent with ticagrelor than clopidogrel at all time points evaluated (0.5, 2, and 8 hours post LD and after 7-9 days of MD). Patients were significantly more likely to have high on-treatment platelet reactivity (≥208 PRU) during treatment with clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor, regardless of diabetic status.. Among Hispanic patients with stable CAD, ticagrelor achieves a faster onset and greater magnitude of platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel, irrespective of diabetic status.

Topics: Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Regression Analysis; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States

In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study of patients with acute coronary syndromes, ticagrelor reduced mortality compared to clopidogrel but the mechanisms for this mortality reduction remain uncertain. We analysed adverse events (AEs) consistent with either pulmonary infection or sepsis, and subsequent mortality, in 18,421 PLATO patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. AEs occurring within 7 days of last dose of study medication were defined as "on-treatment". Serial measurements of blood leukocyte counts, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were performed. Fewer on-treatment pulmonary AEs occurred in the ticagrelor compared to the clopidogrel group (275 vs. 331 respectively; p = 0.019), with fewer deaths following these AEs (33 vs. 71; p < 0.001), particularly in those who remained on study medication three days after AE onset (10 vs. 43; p < 0.001). There were fewer deaths attributed to sepsis in the ticagrelor group (7 vs. 23; p = 0.003). Leukocyte counts were lower in the clopidogrel group during treatment (p < 0.0001 at 1, 3 and 6 months) but not at 1 month post-discontinuation. C-reactive protein increased more at discharge in the ticagrelor group (28.0 ± 38.0 vs. 26.1 ± 36.6 mg/l; p < 0.001) and interleukin-6 remained higher during the first month of treatment with ticagrelor. We conclude that the mortality risk following pulmonary AEs and sepsis in acute coronary syndrome patients appears to be lower during ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel therapy. Further work should assess whether ticagrelor and clopidogrel have differential effects on immune signalling.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pneumonia; Sepsis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of switching patients from ticagrelor to prasugrel.. Clinicians may need to switch between more potent P2Y12 inhibitors because of adverse effects or switch to the use of a once-daily dosing regimen due to compliance issues.. After a 3- to 5-day run-in phase with a ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose (LD) followed by a ticagrelor 90-mg twice-daily maintenance dose (MD), aspirin-treated patients (N = 110) with stable coronary artery disease were randomized to continue ticagrelor or switch to prasugrel 10-mg once-daily MD, with or without a 60-mg LD. Pharmacodynamic assessments were defined according to P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) (P2Y12 assay) and platelet reactivity index (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay) at baseline (before and after the run-in phase) and 2, 4, 24, and 48 h and 7 days after randomization.. Platelet reactivity was significantly greater at 24 and 48 h after switching to prasugrel versus continued therapy with ticagrelor, although to a lesser extent in those receiving an LD. Mean PRU remained significantly higher in the combined prasugrel groups versus the ticagrelor group (least-squares mean difference: 46 [95% confidence interval 25 to 67]) and did not meet the primary noninferiority endpoint (upper limit of the confidence interval ≤45), although PRU in the prasugrel cohort was lower at 7 days than at 24 or 48 h. Accordingly, rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were higher at 24 and 48 h in both prasugrel groups. At 7 days, there was no difference in high on-treatment platelet reactivity rate between the combined prasugrel and ticagrelor groups.. Compared with continued ticagrelor therapy, switching from ticagrelor to prasugrel therapy was associated with an increase in platelet reactivity that was partially mitigated by the administration of an LD.

Topics: Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Platelets; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study sought to determine pharmacodynamic effects during transition from intravenous cangrelor to oral ticagrelor and from oral ticagrelor to intravenous cangrelor.. Cangrelor is an intravenous antagonist of P2Y12 and its use will require transition to and from oral agents.. Patients (n = 12) with stable coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin 81 mg daily were recruited. On study day 1, they received a bolus plus 2-h infusion of cangrelor plus a 180-mg dose of ticagrelor at either 0.5 h (n = 6) or 1.25 h (n = 6). Pharmacodynamic effects (light transmission platelet aggregation in response to 20 and 5 μmol/l adenosine diphosphate, VerifyNow, P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index, and flow cytometry) were assessed during and after the cangrelor infusion. Patients took 90 mg of ticagrelor twice daily for either 6 (n = 6) or 7 (n = 6) doses. On study day 5, pharmacodynamic effects were assessed before and during a bolus plus 2-h infusion of cangrelor.. During cangrelor infusion, extensive inhibition of platelet function reflected by limited residual platelet reactivity was apparent. After cangrelor was stopped, the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor were preserved despite a modest increase in platelet reactivity.. Ticagrelor given before or during infusion of cangrelor did not attenuate the pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor. The pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor were preserved when ticagrelor was given during infusion of cangrelor. Consistent with the reversible binding of ticagrelor, this oral P2Y12 antagonist can be administered before, during, or after treatment with cangrelor.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Phosphorylation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Vermont

This randomized, active-controlled, double-blind study assessed the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of ticagrelor in Japanese patients and a smaller cohort of non-Japanese Asian patients. The study recruited patients aged 20-80 years who had received aspirin 75-100 mg/day for ≥2 weeks and had percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome >3 months previously. Patients received 4 weeks' treatment with ticagrelor 45 mg bid, ticagrelor 90 mg bid or clopidogrel 75 mg qd (all with aspirin). The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA, final-extent) and pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor were assessed on days 1 and 28. Overall, 139 Asian patients were randomized (ticagrelor 45 mg bid, n = 50; ticagrelor 90 mg bid, n = 43; clopidogrel, n = 46) of whom 118 were Japanese. Mean final-extent IPA was greater with ticagrelor 90 mg bid versus ticagrelor 45 mg bid and with both ticagrelor doses versus clopidogrel. At the end of the dosing interval on day 28, mean final-extent IPA was 10.0% higher (95% confidence interval 0.5-19.5%) for ticagrelor 90 mg bid versus ticagrelor 45 mg bid, 15.1% higher (5.8-24.4%) for ticagrelor 45 mg bid versus clopidogrel, and 25.1% higher (15.5-34.7%) for ticagrelor 90 mg bid versus clopidogrel. In Japanese patients, exposure to ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX increased dose-proportionally. The safety profile of ticagrelor was consistent with previous studies. Ticagrelor was associated with enhanced IPA versus clopidogrel in Japanese patients.

Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Young Adult

Ticagrelor, the first reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) compared with clopidogrel. In the ONSET-OFFSET study (parallel group trial) and the RESPOND study (crossover trial), the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor were compared with clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We now report the pharmacokinetic analyses of ticagrelor, and the exposure-inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) relationships from these studies.. Patients were treated with ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, 75 mg once daily maintenance dose) in addition to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) [75-100 mg once daily]. Ticagrelor administration was for 6 weeks in ONSET-OFFSET. In RESPOND, ticagrelor was given for 14 days before or after 2 weeks of clopidogrel in patients classified as clopidogrel responders or non-responders. Pharmacokinetics and IPA were evaluated following the loading and last maintenance doses. Exposure-IPA relationships were evaluated using a sigmoid maximum effect (E(max)) model.. The outcome measures were ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX (active metabolite) pharmacokinetics and exposure-IPA relationships in both trials, including the effect of prior clopidogrel exposure, and effects in clopidogrel responders and non-responders in RESPOND.. In ONSET-OFFSET, maximum (peak) plasma concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (t(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 8 hours (AUC(8)) for ticagrelor were 733 ng/mL, 2.0 hours and 4130 ng · h/mL, respectively; and for AR-C124910XX were 210 ng/mL, 2.1 hours and 1325 ng · h/mL, respectively. E(max) estimates were IPA >97%. Trough plasma ticagrelor (305 ng/mL) and AR-C124910XX (121 ng/mL) concentrations were 5.2 and 7.7 times higher than respective concentration producing 50% of maximum effect (EC(50)) estimates. In RESPOND, ticagrelor mean C(max) and AUC(8) following 2-week dosing were comparable between clopidogrel responders (724 ng/mL and 3983 ng · h/mL, respectively) and non-responders (764 ng/mL and 3986 ng · h/mL, respectively). Pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor were unaffected by prior clopidogrel dosing. E(max) estimates were IPA >96% for both responders and non-responders. Trough plasma concentrations were sufficient to achieve high IPA.. Ticagrelor pharmacokinetics in stable CAD patients were comparable to previous findings in stable atherosclerotic and ACS patients, and were not affected by prior clopidogrel exposure or clopidogrel responsiveness. Ticagrelor effectively inhibited platelet aggregation, and trough plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were sufficient to result in high IPA in stable CAD patients.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The rate of recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of P2Y(12) inhibitors depends on the reversibility of the antiplatelet effect and the extent of the on-treatment response. P2Y(12) inhibition increases the bleeding risk in patients requiring surgery.. To evaluate recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with high levels of platelet inhibition (HPI) during the ONSET/OFFSET study.. Patients received aspirin 75-100 mg per day and either ticagrelor 90 mg twice-daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily for 6 weeks. This subanalysis included patients with HPI after the last dose of maintenance therapy, defined as: inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) > 75% 4 h post-dose (ADP 20 μm, final extent); < 120 P2Y(12) reaction units 8 h post-dose (VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay); or platelet reactivity index < 50% 8 h post-dose (VASP-P assay).. IPA > 75% was observed in 39 out of 47 ticagrelor-treated and 17 out of 44 clopidogrel-treated patients. The rate of offset of IPA over 4-72 h was greater with ticagrelor (IPA %/hour slope: -1.11 vs. -0.67 for clopidogrel; P < 0.0001). Mean IPA was significantly lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel between 48 and 168 h post-dose (P < 0.01). Similar findings were observed with the other assays. The average time for IPA to decline from 30% to 10% was 50.8 h with ticagrelor vs. 110.4 h with clopidogrel.. In patients with HPI, recovery of platelet function was more rapid after discontinuation of ticagrelor than clopidogrel leading to significantly greater platelet reactivity by 48 h after the last dose in the ticagrelor group.

Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) in coronary artery disease patients enrolled in the ONSET/OFFSET and RESPOND studies.. HPR has been linked to the occurrence of adverse events after stenting in patients treated with clopidogrel (C) and aspirin. Prevalence of HPR after treatment with ticagrelor (T), a reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist developed to overcome the limitations of C, is unknown.. Patients were treated with T (n = 106) or C (n = 103) on top of aspirin therapy. HPR was defined by published cutoff points associated with post-percutaneous coronary intervention ischemic risk: >59% 20 μM adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation (light transmittance aggregometry), >235 P2Y12 reaction unit by VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay (VerifyNow, San Diego, CA), and >50% platelet reactivity index by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay (VASP-P). Proportion differences for T versus C were analyzed by χ(2) test for each time point. Correlations (R) were analyzed by the Pearson method.. Ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of HPR (0%-8%) compared with C (21%-81%) at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours and ≥2 weeks postdosing (P < .0001, for all assays). The R values between light transmittance aggregometry and VerifyNow/VASP-P were all ≥0.43, P < .0001.. The above data represent the largest serial pharmacodynamic evaluation of the comparative effects of T versus C. Ticagrelor was rapidly and consistently associated with a very low prevalence of HPR compared with C, as determined by multiple established methods to measure platelet reactivity. These results provide a mechanism for the lower ischemic event rate associated with T therapy reported in the PLATO trial.

Topics: Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The antiplatelet effects of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial dose of ticagrelor in patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel and after they switch agents are unknown.. Patients with stable coronary artery disease on aspirin therapy received a 300-mg clopidogrel load; nonresponders were identified by light transmittance aggregometry. In a 2-way crossover design, nonresponders (n=41) and responders (n=57) randomly received clopidogrel (600 mg/75 mg once daily) or ticagrelor (180 mg/90 mg twice daily) for 14 days during period 1. In period 2, all nonresponders switched treatment; half of the responders continued the same treatment, whereas the others switched treatment. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was higher in nonresponders treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (P<0.05). Treatment with ticagrelor among nonresponders resulted in a >10%, >30%, and >50% decrease in platelet aggregation from baseline in 100%, 75%, and 13% of patients, respectively. Platelet aggregation fell from 59+/-9% to 35+/-11% in patients switched from clopidogrel to ticagrelor and increased from 36+/-14% to 56+/-9% in patients switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel (P<0.0001 for both). Platelet reactivity was below the cut points previously associated with ischemic risk measured by light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation in 98% to 100% of patients after ticagrelor therapy versus 44% to 76% of patients after clopidogrel therapy.. Ticagrelor therapy overcomes nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel, and its antiplatelet effect is the same in responders and nonresponders. Nearly all clopidogrel nonresponders and responders treated with ticagrelor will have platelet reactivity below the cut points associated with ischemic risk. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00642811.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Phosphorylation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The influence of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype on platelet function in patients treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel is unknown.. CYP2C19 (*1, *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *17) genotyping was performed in patients with coronary artery disease treated with ticagrelor (180-mg load, 90 mg BID) (n=92) or clopidogrel (600-mg load, 75 mg/d) (n=82). All patients received 75 to 100 mg/d aspirin. Platelet function was measured by aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation assay at predose, 8 hours postloading, and maintenance. In each treatment group, patients were categorized according to 2C19 genotype carrier status (loss-of-function, gain-of-function) and metabolizer status. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare platelet function among these categories for each treatment, and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare platelet function between the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups for each category. There was no statistically significant influence of genotype on platelet function during aspirin therapy alone. Ticagrelor exhibited lower platelet reactivity than clopidogrel by all assays irrespective of 2C19 genotype or metabolizer status (P<0.01). Loss-of-function carriers had greater platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy. The influence of genotype on platelet reactivity was greatest during clopidogrel maintenance and best demonstrated by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.. This report is the first to demonstrate the superior pharmacodynamic effect of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype. Whereas CYP2C19 genotype influenced the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, there was no effect of CYP2C19 genotype during ticagrelor therapy.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Double-Blind Method; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacokinetics; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. This is the first study to compare the onset and offset of platelet inhibition (IPA) with ticagrelor using the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) trial loading dose (180 mg) with a high loading dose (600 mg) of clopidogrel.. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, 123 patients with stable coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin therapy (75 to 100 mg/d) received ticagrelor (180-mg load, 90-mg BID maintenance dose [n=57]), clopidogrel (600-mg load, 75-mg/d maintenance dose [n=54]), or placebo (n=12) for 6 weeks. Greater IPA (20 micromol/L ADP, final extent) occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after loading and at 6 weeks (P<0.0001 for all); by 2 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients achieved >50% IPA (98% versus 31%, P<0.0001) and >70% IPA (90% versus 16%, P<0.0001) in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group, respectively. A faster offset occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (4-to-72-hour slope [% IPA/h] -1.04 versus -0.48, P<0.0001). At 24 hours after the last dose, mean IPA was 58% for ticagrelor versus 52% for clopidogrel (P=NS). IPA for ticagrelor on day 3 after the last dose was comparable to clopidogrel at day 5; IPA on day 5 for ticagrelor was similar to clopidogrel on day 7 and did not differ from placebo (P=NS).. Ticagrelor achieved more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than high-loading-dose clopidogrel; this was sustained during the maintenance phase and was faster in offset after drug discontinuation.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Phosphorylation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To appraise all available antithrombotic treatments within or after 12 months following coronary revascularization and/or acute coronary syndrome in two network meta-analyses.. Forty-three (N = 189 261 patients) trials within 12 months and 19 (N = 139 086 patients) trials beyond 12 months were included for efficacy/safety endpoints appraisal. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.88], aspirin and ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), or aspirin, clopidogrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) were the only treatments associated with lower cardiovascular mortality, compared with aspirin and clopidogrel, without or with greater bleeding risk for the first and the other treatment options, respectively. Beyond 12 months, no strategy lowered mortality; compared with aspirin; the greatest reductions of myocardial infarction (MI) were found with aspirin and clopidogrel (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61-0.95), especially ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92), and of stroke with VKA (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76) or aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76). All treatments increased bleeding except P2Y12 monotherapy, compared with aspirin.. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg monotherapy was the only treatment associated with lower mortality, without bleeding risk trade-off compared with aspirin and clopidogrel. Beyond 12 months, P2Y12 monotherapy, especially ticagrelor 90 mg, was associated with lower MI without bleeding trade-off; aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg most effectively reduced stroke, with a more acceptable bleeding risk than VKA, compared with aspirin.Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifiers: CRD42021243985 and CRD42021252398.

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiology; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor

P2Y12 inhibitors (i.e., clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) are effective at reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes post-revascularization in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the choice of a specific P2Y12 inhibitor may vary according to the patient's characteristics, and trends in the use of different P2Y12 inhibitors are not well studied in real-world settings. The objective of this study is to determine trends in the prescription patterns of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with CAD. We studied 137,073 patients with CAD cross-sectionally using the IBM MarketScan database (2013-2018). Patients with CAD prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors within 14 days of index revascularization were included to compare the utilization of P2Y12 inhibitors based on age and clinical characteristics. There were differences in prescription patterns by age. Among patients aged less than or equal to 65 years (N = 92,734), a continuously increased utilization of ticagrelor was observed from 13.7% to 45.6% replacing clopidogrel as the most prescribed medication by 2018. Similarly, ticagrelor was the choice of drug among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the patients at high bleeding risk, clopidogrel remained the most prescribed medication with use in 50.6% of patients in 2018 in patients aged less than or equal to 65 years. Contrarily, among the older adults with age 65 or above (N = 44,339), although ticagrelor use increased with time, clopidogrel remained the most utilized drug and was used by 66.2% of patients in 2018. Additionally, clopidogrel was the preferred medication among patients with stroke history. With the increasing use of ticagrelor in real-world practice, further research is needed to observe its impact on cardiovascular outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prescriptions; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Current ESC guidelines recommend the use of intra-coronary pressure guidewires for functional assessment of intermediate-grade coronary stenoses. Angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method of assessing these stenoses, and guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. The PIONEER IV trial is a prospective, all-comers, multi-center trial, which will randomize 2,540 patients in a 1:1 ratio to PCI guided by angiography-derived physiology or usual care, with unrestricted use in both arms of the Healing-Targeted Supreme sirolimus-eluting stent (HT Supreme). The stent's fast, biologically healthy, and robust endothelial coverage allows for short dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); hence the antiplatelet regimen of choice is 1-month DAPT, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy. In the angiography-derived physiology guided arm, lesions will be functionally assessed using on-line QFR, with stenting indicated in lesions with a QFR ≤0.80. Post-stenting, QFR will be repeated in the stented vessel(s), with post-dilatation or additional stenting recommended if the QFR<0.91 distal to the stent, or if the delta QFR (across the stent) is >0.05. Usual care PCI is performed according to standard clinical practice. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, or any clinically, and physiologically driven revascularization with a non-inferiority risk-difference margin of 3.2%, at 1-year post-procedure. Clinical follow-up will be up to 3 years.. The PIONEER IV trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of QFR-guided PCI to usual care PCI with respect to POCE at 1-year in patients treated with HT Supreme stents and ticagrelor monotherapy.. ClinicalTrials.gov UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT04923191 CLASSIFICATIONS: Interventional Cardiology.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Stents; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Saphenous Vein; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The THEMIS trial demonstrated that in high-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes without previous myocardial infarction or stroke, ticagrelor, in addition to aspirin, reduced the incidence of ischemic events but increased major bleeding. Identification of patients who could derive the greatest net benefit from the addition of ticagrelor appears important. We used the CRUSADE bleeding risk score to risk stratify the THEMIS population.. The population was divided into tertiles: score ≤22, 23 to 33, and ≥34. In each tertile, primary efficacy (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and safety (TIMI major bleeding) outcomes were analyzed. NACE (net adverse clinical events) was defined as the irreversible harm composite, in which all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, amputations, fatal bleeds, and intracranial hemorrhage were counted.. In patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke, only those at the lower end of the bleeding risk spectrum according to the CRUSADE score derived net benefit from ticagrelor.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Taking ischemic and bleeding risks into consideration, insufficient data exist on dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease.. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor in comparison with clopidogrel on a background of aspirin for elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention.. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Selected from patients with coronary artery disease aged ≥ 75 years from January 2010 to July 2019, 908 eligible subjects receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for up to 12 months were consecutively enrolled in the study. The included patients received ticagrelor in combination with aspirin (n = 264) or clopidogrel in combination with aspirin (n = 644). Effectiveness endpoints were evaluated by the major adverse cardiovascular events, encompassing all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and clinically driven revascularization. The safety endpoints were recorded as the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding.. The patients who were treated with ticagrelor were slightly younger than those who were treated with clopidogrel (79.1 ± 3.7 vs 80.7 ± 4.5 years, p < 0.01). The ticagrelor cohort contained a higher percentage of patients undergoing a prior percutaneous coronary intervention (37.9% vs 24.5%, p < 0.01), and a lower percentage of smokers (19.3% vs 27.2%, p < 0.05), compared with the clopidogrel cohort. The levels of glucose, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in the ticagrelor group were higher while the level of triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were lower (p < 0.05) than those in the clopidogrel group. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention was performed more frequently among the ticagrelor-treated patients (23.5% vs 9.3%, p < 0.01), while patients in the clopidogrel group underwent more left circumflex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.3% vs 23.1%, p < 0.01). We found that ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than clopidogrel using the inverse probability of treatment weighting model (odds ratio, 0.493; 95% confidence interval 0.356-0.684). There was no difference in terms of the risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding between the two groups (p > 0.05).. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than clopidogrel at 12 months in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease, without a significant increase of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; China; Cholesterol; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Inflammation increases the risk of thrombosis in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and affects the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel. C1q interacts with platelets to activate platelets and induce thrombosis by participating in and regulating the inflammatory response. Whether C1q affects adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy was unclear and our study aimed to explore the issue.. We enrolled 1,334 CAD patients receiving clopidogrel therapy and evaluated the association between C1q level and high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) using logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS). HRPR was defined as ADP-induced maximum amplitude (MA. A total of 516 patients (38.7%) performed HRPR. The frequency of HRPR increases with the increase in C1q level (26.3%, 38.4%, 43.2%, and 46.7% for the 1st to 4th quartile of C1q). The result of multivariate logistic regression demonstrated elevated C1q as an independent predictor for HRPR (2. The current research is the first to explore the association of C1q and ADP-induced platelet reactivity and to demonstrate elevated C1q as an independent risk factor for HRPR in CAD patients during clopidogrel therapy.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Clopidogrel; Complement C1q; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary intervention are at higher bleeding risk due to the concomitant need for oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The RE-DUAL PCI trial demonstrated better safety with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: dabigatran 110 or 150 mg b.i.d., clopidogrel or ticagrelor) compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin). We explored the impact of baseline bleeding risk based on the PRECISE-DAPT score for decision-making regarding DAT vs. TAT.. A score ≥25 points qualified high bleeding risk (HBR). Comparisons were made for the primary safety endpoint International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thrombo-embolic events, or unplanned revascularization, analysed by time-to-event analysis. PRECISE-DAPT was available in 2336/2725 patients, and 37.9% were HBR. Compared to TAT, DAT with dabigatran 110 mg reduced bleeding risk both in non-HBR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.57] and HBR (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94), with a greater magnitude of benefit among non-HBR (Pint = 0.02). Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran 150 mg vs. TAT reduced bleeding in non-HBR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80), with a trend toward less benefit in HBR patients (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34; Pint = 0.08). The risk of ischaemic events was similar on DAT with dabigatran (both 110 and 150 mg) vs. TAT in non-HBR and HBR patients (Pint = 0.45 and Pint = 0.56, respectively).. PRECISE-DAPT score appeared useful to identify AF patients undergoing PCI at further increased risk of bleeding complications and may help clinicians identifying the antithrombotic regimen intensity with the best benefit-risk ratio in an individual patient.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Current guidelines favor dual anti-platelet therapy with ticagrelor 90 mg BID (T90BID) over clopidogrel 75 mg QD (C75QD) in addition to aspirin for acute coronary syndrome. However, an increased risk of ticagrelor-related adverse events prompted the evaluation of low-dose regimens. This study (NCT03381742) retrospectively analyzed the data from 11 hospitals on 3,043 patients with coronary artery disease, who received C75QD, T90BID, ticagrelor 45 mg BID (T45BID), or ticagrelor 90 mg QD (T90QD). Compared with C75QD, both T45BID and T90QD showed significantly higher inhibition of platelet aggregation (

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor plus aspirin could reduce the risks of major adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCD), and yet it also increases bleeding risk. This study would compare the cost and effectiveness of aspirin and ticagrelor plus aspirin therapies in diabetic patients with SCD from a US healthcare sector perspective.. A state-transition Markov model was developed to project probabilities of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, bleeding, and death with and without ticagrelor among all diabetic patients with SCD as the overall population, and those with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a sub-population. Model inputs were extracted from published sources. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were measured. The clinical benefits and bleeding risk of ticagrelor added to aspirin were translated into additional 0.08 QALYs at incremental costs of $19 580 in the overall population, yielding an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $260 032/QALY. In the sub-population with an additional 0.43 QALYs at an incremental cost of $20 189, the ICUR was $46 426/QALY. Two-way sensitivity showed the clinical benefits of ticagrelor plus aspirin was counterbalanced by its risk of major bleeding. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were generally robust except the all-cause death reduction.. The results indicated that ticagrelor plus aspirin is likely to be a cost-effective option in the diabetic patients with a history of PCI. Diabetes management can be improved by carefully prescribing ticagrelor to individuals with low risk of bleeding and high risk of ischaemic events.

Topics: Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain uncertain. Thus, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with SCAD treated with PCI.. A total of 9,379 patients with SCAD undergoing PCI who received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were consecutively enrolled in two groups, namely, ticagrelor (n=1,081) and clopidogrel (n=8,298) groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding events according to ticagrelor or clopidogrel use were compared.. After propensity matching (n=1,081 in each group), ticagrelor was associated with fewer MACCEs compared with clopidogrel (3.6% vs. 5.7%, hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93, p=0.019), and the difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for bleeding events was nonsignificant (4.0% vs. 3.2%, HR=1.24, 95% CI 0.79-1.93, p=0.356). On the other hand, the difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for net adverse clinical events was significant (4.1% vs. 6.0%, HR=0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98, p=0.039). In a multivariate analysis, the use of ticagrelor, number of stents, previous history of diabetes, previous history of smoking, and ACC/AHA type B2 or C lesions were considered independent predictors of MACCEs, while radial artery access, previous history of stroke, and weight ＜60kg were independent predictors of bleeding events. Conclusions Ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of MACCEs without an increased risk of bleeding events in patients with SCAD receiving PCI.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a potent and orally active P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a recommended P2Y. Patients with a previous ACS were studied with flow mediated dilatation of the left brachial artery to determine the degree of endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury before and after discontinuation of ticagrelor treatment, which had been continuous since 1 year. Each patient underwent 3 identical examinations. The first examination (Visit A) was at the end of ticagrelor treatment and the following 2 (Visit B and C) were after cessation of this treatment with an interval of 2 to 4 weeks.. Ischemia and reperfusion induced significant impairment of endothelial function at all 3 occasions (absolute decline in flow mediated dilatation 3.0% ± 0.7 at Visit A (. Chronic ticagrelor treatment in patients 1 year after an ACS does not protect against endothelial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Nor is it associated with better basal endothelial function compared to after discontinuation of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Reperfusion Injury; Ticagrelor

Preventive antiplatelet therapy is recommended for patients with cardiac or cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Ticagrelor has an improved safety and efficacy profile in patients with acute coronary syndrome; however, data regarding stroke prevention remain controversial. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare ticagrelor with other receptor antagonists (P2Y12) inhibitors and aspirin in monotherapy or combination in the treatment of patients with high risk for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, defined as coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral artery disease.. Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were conducted until August 1, 2020. Search terms included ticagrelor, AZD 6140, and stroke. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration assessment tool. Random-effects model was used to combine risk estimates across trials and risk ratio with 95% CIs served as summary statistics. The influence of individual components was evaluated in an additive network meta-analysis model. The primary efficacy end point was the occurrence of stroke. The safety end points included bleeding and all-cause mortality.. Twenty-six randomized clinical trials comprising 124 495 patients were analyzed. When compared with controls, ticagrelor plus aspirin significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke by 20% (risk ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71–0.89]). Treatment with ticagrelor monotherapy did not significantly affect ischemic stroke (risk ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–1.00]; P=0.05). Compared with aspirin alone, major bleeding was in similar ranges with antiplatelet monotherapies while the relative risk was twice higher with combined antiplatelet therapies. There was no considerable difference in the risk of mortality with ticagrelor plus aspirin (risk ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.91–1.07]).. Ticagrelor on top of aspirin may provide more favorable outcomes on secondary stroke prevention in patients with vascular risk factors; however, this benefit may come with the price of increased bleeding risk including intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Patients treated with ticagrelor and aspirin usually suffer from bleeding events, especially mild bleeding which is one of the main factors reducing patients' adherence to ticagrelor. The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor combined with a lower dose of aspirin (50 mg) than that recommended by guidelines (75-100 mg). In this study, we prospectively enrolled 1220 patients who take ticagrelor in the hospital. After excluding the patients who did not take ticagrelor after discharge or lost to follow-up, the remaining 1066 patients were divided into two aspirin dose groups: 75-100 mg (

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is an antiplatelet agent used for treatment of coronary artery disease via inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor. Based on limited literature the safety of intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in patients with ticagrelor pretreatment is unknown. We present two patients established on ticagrelor treated with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke complicating coronary intervention.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We evaluated the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on outcomes after multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).. In a post hoc, non-randomized analysis of the TiCAB (Ticagrelor in CABG; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01755520) trial, we compared event rates for ticagrelor versus aspirin in patients undergoing MAG and SAG. Primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or repeat revascularization 1 year after CABG. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary end point, all-cause death and bleeding.. Among 1753 patients, 998 patients underwent MAG and 755 patients underwent SAG. There was no significant difference in the 1-year primary composite outcome for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG [7.2% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.43; P = 0.66] or SAG (12.3% vs 8.6%; HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93-2.31; P = 0.10). Event rates for cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, repeat revascularization and all-cause death were similar for both treatment groups with MAG and SAG. No significant difference in major bleeding was observed for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG (2.6% vs 2.7%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.44-2.05; P = 0.90) or SAG (5.8% vs 4.0%; HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.77-2.89; P = 0.24).. In patients undergoing either MAG or SAG in the TiCAB trial, ticagrelor monotherapy compared with aspirin did not affect the rate of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke or repeat revascularization, or the rate of bleeding, at 1 year after CABG.

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The RE-DUAL PCI trial reported that dabigatran dual therapy (110/150 mg twice daily, plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor) reduced bleeding events versus warfarin triple therapy (warfarin plus aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, with noninferiority in composite thromboembolic events. In this prespecified analysis, risks of first major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event and composite end point of death, thromboembolic events, or unplanned revascularization were compared between dabigatran dual therapy and warfarin triple therapy in older (≥ 75 years) and younger (< 75 years) patients, using Cox proportional hazard regression. Of 2,725 patients randomized to treatment, 1,026 (37.7%) were categorized into older and 1,699 (62.3%) into younger age groups. Dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy lowered bleeding risk versus warfarin triple therapy in older (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89) and younger patients (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.54); interaction p value: 0.0125. Dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy lowered bleeding risk versus warfarin triple therapy in younger patients (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74), whereas no benefit could be observed in older patients (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.77); interaction p value: 0.0013. For the thromboembolic end point, there was a trend for a higher risk with dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy in older patients, compared with warfarin triple therapy, whereas the risk was similar in younger patients. For dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy, the thromboembolic risk versus warfarin triple therapy was similar in older and younger patients. In conclusion, the benefits of dabigatran dual therapy differed in the 2 age groups, which may help dose selection when using dabigatran dual therapy.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ticagrelor

Bleeding risk stratification is an unresolved issue in older adults. Anemia may reflect subclinical blood losses that can be exacerbated after percutaneous coronary intervention . We sought to prospectively determine the contribution of anemia to the risk of bleeding in 448 consecutive patients aged 75 or more years, treated by percutaneous coronary interventions without concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation. We evaluated the effect of WHO-defined anemia on the incidence of 1-year nonaccess site-related major bleeding. The prevalence of anemia was 39%, and 13.1% of anemic and 5.2% of nonanemic patients suffered a bleeding event (hazard ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.54, p = 0.004). Neither PRECISE-DAPT nor CRUSADE scores were superior to hemoglobin for the prediction of bleeding. In conclusion, anemia is a powerful predictor of bleeding with potential utility for simplifying tailoring therapies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Angina, Unstable; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Stents; Ticagrelor; Urologic Diseases

To compare the risk of cardiovascular events between patients with two CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles who were prescribed ticagrelor or clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Patients with two loss-of-function alleles based on the CYP2C19 genotype were selected from patients enrolled in a retrospective institutional registry. Propensity score matching using logistic regression was performed to adjust for bias between patients prescribed ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Multivariate Cox regression was used to compare the risk of adverse events in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events plus any repeat target vessel revascularization within 12 months after PCI. The safety outcomes were minor and major bleeding events.. From 1518 patients carrying two loss-of-function alleles based on the CYP2C19 genotype who underwent PCI, 638 patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel were successfully propensity-score matched. The primary outcome occurred in 25 patients (7.8%) in the ticagrelor group and 47 (14.7%) in the clopidogrel group. The risk of the primary outcome was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group versus the clopidogrel group (HR 0.466, 95% CI 0.286-0.759, p = 0.002). The incidence of major bleeding events did not significantly differ between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (0.3% and 0.9%, respectively), while the ticagrelor group had a higher risk of minor bleeding events (HR 1.959, 95% CI 1.396-2.750, p < 0.001).. In patients with two CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in preventing cardiovascular events, while the two antiplatelet agents were associated with similar incidences of major bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of joint pain and disability, and effective treatments are lacking. Extracellular adenosine has antiinflammatory effects and can prevent and treat OA in animal models. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel are both used in patients with coronary artery disease, but only ticagrelor increases extracellular adenosine levels. This study was undertaken to determine whether treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of OA.. We conducted a 1:2 propensity score-matching analysis using data from 2011-2017 in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Patients who had received either ticagrelor or clopidogrel for ≥90 days were included in our study, and patients with a prior diagnosis of OA or inflammatory arthritis were excluded. OA was identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis of OA after treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel.. Our propensity score-matched cohort consisted of 7,007 ticagrelor-treated patients and 14,014 clopidogrel-treated patients, with a median number of days receiving treatment of 287 and 284, respectively. For both groups, the mean age was 64 years, and 73% of the patients were male. Multivariate Cox regression analysis estimated a hazard ratio for developing OA of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.79) (P < 0.001) after treatment with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel.. Treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a 29% lower risk of developing OA compared to treatment with clopidogrel over 5 years of follow-up. We hypothesize that the reduction in OA seen in patients who received ticagrelor may in part be due to increased extracellular adenosine levels.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Coronary endarterectomy (CE) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be the only option for complete revascularization in some patients with diffuse coronary artery disease. Unfortunately, CE can cause the lack of endothelium, resulting in increased risk of thrombotic events. Therefore, antithrombotic therapy is very important after surgery. However, there's no consistent protocol exists till now. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) including aspirin plus clopidogrel (AC) or ticagrelor (AT) after CE + CABG.. A total of 137 continuous patients (mean age 60.0 ± 9.0 years) underwent CE + CABG from January 2016 to July 2018 in our center, and patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after surgery (n = 121) were included in this study. All of the patients received aspirin 100 mg daily therapy after surgery, and 67 of the patients received extra clopidogrel 75 mg (AC) daily therapy, whereas 54 received extra ticagrelor 90 mg (AT) twice daily. All patients continued aspirin monotherapy after 1 year. Occurrence of ischemic events and bleeding events between two groups were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival was used to compare freedom from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) between two groups, and log-rank test was used to confirm statistical difference.. Follow-up was completed by 99.2%, and median follow-up time was 30.0(22.5, 35.2) months. No operative death was observed, while perioperative myocardial infarction was observed in 2(1.7%) patients (AC 1.5% vs. AT 1.9%, p = ns). One patient in AC group suffered from cardiac tamponade. During the follow-up period, no death was observed. Ischemic events including nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and ischemic stroke were observed in 6(5.0%) patients (AC 4.5% vs. AT 5.6%, p = ns). Overt bleeding had occurred in 3(2.5%) patients (AC 3.0% vs. AT 1.9%, p = ns). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that MACCE-free survival of the two groups at 3 years was 97.0% in the AC group versus 94.1% in the AT group (p = ns).. In patients undergoing CE + CABG, DAPT therapy can be effective and safe with comparable results between AC and AT therapy in terms of ischemic and bleeding events. Further studies are needed.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Endarterectomy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Patients with both diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are a subpopulation characterized by ultrahigh ischemic and bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention. There are limited data on the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy among these patients.. In this post hoc analysis of the GLOBAL-LEADERS trial, the treatment effects of the experimental (one-month dual-antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) versus the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin alone) were analyzed according to DM/CKD status. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2-years. The patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) was defined as the composite of all-cause death, any stroke, site-reported MI and any revascularization, whereas net adverse clinical events (NACE) combined POCE with BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events.. At 2 years, the DM + /CKD + patients had significantly higher incidences of the primary endpoint (9.5% versus 3.1%, adjusted HR 2.16; 95% CI [1.66-2.80], p < 0.001), BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events, stroke, site-reported myocardial infraction, all revascularization, POCE, and NACE, compared with the DM-/CKD- patients. Among the DM + /CKD + patients, after adjustment, there were no significant differences in the primary endpoints between the experimental and reference regimen; however, the experimental regimen was associated with lower rates of POCE (20.6% versus 25.9%, HR 0.74; 95% CI [0.55-0.99], p = 0.043, p. Among patients with both DM and CKD, ticagrelor monotherapy was not associated with lower rates of all-cause death or new Q-wave, or major bleeding complications; however, it was associated with lower rates of POCE and NACE. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01813435).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia; Australia; Brazil; Canada; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Extracellular vesicles (EV) act as a cellular communication tool by carrying lipids, proteins and micro RNA (miR) between cells, thereby playing a pivotal role in thromboembolic processes. The effect of P2Y

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Extracellular Vesicles; Female; Humans; Male; MicroRNAs; Middle Aged; Phosphatidylserines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Safety; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

European Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization recommend clopidogrel loading dose added to acetylsalicylic acid in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, there is few evidence supporting this recommendation and other P2Y12 inhibitors have not been tested in these patients.. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different loading doses of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients without double antiplatelet therapy and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing elective PCI.. Retrospective study of 147 consecutive patients with SCAD undergoing elective PCI. Loading P2Y12 inhibitor doses evaluated were: clopidogrel 600 mg, clopidogrel 300 mg, clopidogrel 150 mg, and ticagrelor 180 mg. We analyzed the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events and periprocedural myocardial infarction.. One hundred twenty-five patients were treated with clopidogrel (16 with clopidogrel 150 mg, 7 with clopidogrel 300 mg, and 93 with clopidogrel 600 mg) and 21 with ticagrelor 180 mg at the catheterization laboratory. The ticagrelor group had a significantly lower postprocedural peak of troponin-I (0.7 ± 3.4 vs. 0.3 ± 0.7 ng/mL; P = 0.02). There were no differences between groups in terms of major bleeding and hemoglobin drop after PCI (0.6 ± 0.8 vs. 4 ± 0.6; P = 0.8). The median of follow-up was 17 months (interquartile range 9-32.7). At the end of follow-up, major adverse cardiovascular event rate was not different between groups.. In patients without dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing elective PCI, the use of ticagrelor showed lower postprocedural myocardial injury without more bleeding complications.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To characterize ticagrelor exposure-response relationship for platelet inhibition in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of myocardial infarction (MI), using nonlinear mixed effects modelling and simulation.. Platelet function data were integrated with plasma concentration data of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C1249010XX in a population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) model, based on two clinical studies. In the ONSET/OFFSET study, PK and platelet function were assessed in 123 CAD patients receiving placebo, ticagrelor (180 mg followed by 90 mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (600 mg followed by 75 mg once daily). In the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 platelet function substudy, PK and platelet function were assessed during maintenance dosing in 180 prior MI patients receiving placebo, ticagrelor 60 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily.. Platelet inhibition by ticagrelor was described by a sigmoidal E. In patients with stable CAD or a history of MI, near maximal platelet inhibition is achieved with both ticagrelor 60 and 90 mg twice daily. At modelled doses <60 mg, the response is reduced overall, more variable between patients, and patients will display greater peak-to-trough variability.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Although used routinely to reduce thrombotic events in patients with coronary disease, the effects of P2Y

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Fibrin Clot Lysis Time; Fibrinolysis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Steel; Ticagrelor

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a consolidated treatment in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) for both symptom control and improvement of prognosis. The patency of venous grafts is still the most vulnerable point of the surgical treatment since it presents a high prevalence of occlusion both in the immediate postoperative period and in the long-term follow-up. Aspirin plays a well-established role in this setting, and for a long time, clopidogrel use has been restricted to patients allergic to aspirin. Recently, subgroup analyses of studies with different anti-platelet therapies have shown reduced mortality and cardiovascular events in patients on dual anti-platelet antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) undergoing CABG, although such studies have not been designed to evaluate this patient profile. However, there is still an insufficient number of randomized studies using DAPT in this context, resulting in a disagreement between the European and American cardiology societies guidelines regarding their indication and generating doubts in clinical practice.

Topics: Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Circulating platelet micro-RNAs (miRNAs) may be used to monitor platelet function during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Aim of the study was to measure plasma levels of specific miRNAs (miRNA-223, -150, -21 and -126) after physician-driven cessation of chronic P2Y12 inhibition and to study differences in the expression levels of these miRNAs between the different oral P2Y12 inhibitors clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively.. Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on DAPT maintenance dose (including aspirin 100 mg OD, plus clopidogrel 75 mg OD, or prasugrel 10 mg OD, or ticagrelor 90 mg BID) were prospectively enrolled before cessation of the P2Y12-inhibitor therapy. MiRNA-223, -150, -21 and -126 were determined at baseline (=last day of P2Y12-inhibitor intake) and 10, 30 and 180 days thereafter.. Cessation of P2Y12-inhibitor therapy did not significantly change miRNA levels. However, in ticagrelor-treated patients, miRNA levels were significantly increased at baseline (miRNA-223 and -21), day 10 (miRNA-223, -150, -21, -126) and day 30 (miRNA-223, -150, -21, -126) as compared to prasugrel, and at day 10 (miRNA-150 and -21) and day 30 (miRNA-150) as compared to clopidogrel (all P < 0.05). At day 180, only miRNA-126 levels differed significantly with respect to the P2Y12 inhibitor used (P < 0.05). After adjustment for confounders, choice of P2Y12-inhibitor was the strongest predictor of miRNA levels (P < 0.001), while cessation of P2Y12-inhibitor therapy did not significantly impact miRNA levels.. In patients with CAD, ticagrelor intake is associated with increased levels of platelet miRNAs as compared to clopidogrel and prasugrel. Platelet miRNAs are not useful to monitor platelet function after cessation of P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; MicroRNAs; Middle Aged; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Morphine; Naltrexone; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Count; Ticagrelor

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Artery Disease; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Nausea; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rhabdomyolysis; Ticagrelor; Vomiting

Topics: Cheyne-Stokes Respiration; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polysomnography; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Sleep Apnea, Central; Ticagrelor

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Steel; Ticagrelor

Vitamin D deficiency represents a major health problem in general population, especially for its association with cardiovascular disorders and thrombotic risk, even in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Vitamin D Binding Protein (VDBP) is the main transporter of vitamin D in the bloodstream and genetic polymorphisms of this protein have been shown to account for a significant variability of vitamin D levels and its systemic effects. Contrasting data have linked the rs7041 T→G substitution with cardiovascular disease. However, no study has so far addressed the role of rs7041 polymorphism on platelet reactivity in patients on DAPT, that was the aim of the present study.. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) for an ACS or elective PCI were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90days post-discharge. Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate® (Roche Diagnostics AG), and VDBP genetic status by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. Fasting samples were obtained for main chemistry parameters and vitamin D levels assessment.. We included 400 patients, 187 (46.8%) receiving clopidogrel and 213 (53.2%) ticagrelor. The genetic polymorphism rs7041 (T→G) was observed in 318 patients, (79.5%), in 38.7% of them in homozygosis. Main clinical and chemistry features did not significantly differ according to genetic status, but for a higher rate of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers use among the carriers of the G allele (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively). VDBP genetic status did not affect the rate of HRPR with ADP-antagonists (25.6% vs 24.6% vs 28.5%, p=0.59; adjusted OR[95%CI]=0.94[0.52-1.7], p=0.83 for T/G patients; adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.14[0.6-2.2], p=0.67 for G homozygotes). However, the rate of HRPR with ADP-antagonists was influenced by severe hypovitaminosis D (< 10ng/ml) only in patients carrying the G allele, especially in homozygosis (T/T: 25.9% vs 26.1%, p=0.99; G carriers: 22.1% vs 35.3%, p=0.02, p. The present study shows that rs7041 polymorphism of Vitamin D Binding Protein does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of HRPR among patients receiving DAPT. However the carriage of the G allele could condition the impact of hypovitaminosis D on the response to antiplatelet agents, increasing the occurrence of HRPR especially in homozygotes, thus suggesting a more significant role of vitamin D deficiency among these patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gene Frequency; Genotype; Heterozygote; Homozygote; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Phenotype; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin D-Binding Protein

Patients with acute myocardial infarction pretreated with prasugrel or ticagrelor may require urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, prasugrel and ticagrelor withdrawal period is recommended for 5-7 days before planned CABG to enable full platelet recovery. We hypothesized that monitoring sequential platelet reactivity (PR) could identify patients with early platelet recovery who may benefit from earlier surgery before the guideline-recommended 5-7 day delay.. We performed preoperative PR assays in 35 patients with acute myocardial infarction who received prasugrel (60%) or ticagrelor (40%) and required an urgent CABG. When platelet inhibition levels were favorable, on the basis of the VerifyNow assay, surgery was endorsed. CABG-related bleeding parameters were collected and compared with two matched control groups composed of patients who received fewer potent antiplatelet regimens.. On the basis of platelet function monitoring, we identified 21 (56.7%) patients with a relatively earlier platelet recovery who underwent CABG before the end of the conventional washout period (5-7 days). For these patients, the washout periods were shortened to an average time of 2.6±1.0 days for ticagrelor and 3.8±1.5 days for prasugrel. CABG-related bleeding parameters were comparable with the two matched control groups.. A strategy of performing preoperative PR assays can identify patients who recover platelet function in less than 5-7 days after ticagrelor or prasugrel discontinuation. This strategy may provide the basis for performing urgent CABGs earlier than the currently recommended delay. Future, larger studies are required to establish these preliminary findings.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Blood Loss, Surgical; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pilot Projects; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Point-of-Care Testing; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Preoperative Period; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Time-to-Treatment; Treatment Outcome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) guidelines have been changed, favouring more potent antiplatelet drugs. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a ticagrelor- instead of a clopidogrel-based primary dual antiplatelet (DAPT) regimen in ACS patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).. CHANGE DAPT (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03197298) assessed 2,062 consecutive real-world ACS patients, treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the primary composite endpoint being net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE: all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke or major bleeding). In the clopidogrel (CP; December 2012-April 2014) and ticagrelor periods (TP; May 2014-August 2015), 1,009 and 1,053 patients were treated, respectively. TP patients were somewhat older, underwent fewer transfemoral procedures, and received fewer glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In the TP, the one-year NACCE rate was higher (5.1% vs. 7.8%; HR 1.53 [95% CI: 1.08-2.17]; p=0.02). Assessment of non-inferiority (pre-specified margin: 2.7%) was inconclusive (risk difference: 2.64 [95% CI: 0.52-4.77]; pnon-inferiority=0.48). TP patients had more major bleeding (1.2% vs. 2.7%; p=0.02) while there was no benefit in ischaemic endpoints. Propensity score-adjusted multivariate analysis confirmed higher NACCE (adj. HR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.20-2.55]; p=0.003) and major bleeding risks during TP (adj. HR 2.75 [95% CI: 1.34-5.61]; p=0.01).. In this observational study, the guideline-recommended ticagrelor-based primary DAPT regimen was associated with an increased event risk in consecutive ACS patients treated with newer-generation DES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The initial EROSION study (Effective Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Without Stenting: Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Management in Plaque Erosion) demonstrated that patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion might be stabilized with aspirin and ticagrelor without stenting for ≤1 month. However, a long-term evaluation of outcomes is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess whether the initial benefit of noninterventional therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion is maintained for ≤1 year.. Among 53 patients who completed clinical follow-up, 49 underwent repeat optical coherence tomography imaging at 1 year. Median residual thrombus volume decreased significantly from 1 month to 1 year (0.3 mm. One-year follow-up optical coherence tomography demonstrated a further decrease in thrombus volume between 1-month and 1-year follow-up. A majority (92.5%) of patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion managed with aspirin and ticagrelor without stenting remained free of major adverse cardiovascular event for ≤1 year.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02041650.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aspirin; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombectomy; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Aspirin together with thienopyridine P2Y. Traditional light transmission aggregometry, cytometry, advanced flow cytometric imaging, and confocal microscopy were used to follow the interactions of populations of platelets from healthy volunteers and patients with stable cardiovascular disease. Newly formed, reticulated platelets overproportionately contributed to, and clustered at, the core of forming aggregates. This phenomenon was particularly observed in samples from patients treated with aspirin plus a thienopyridine, but was absent in samples taken from patients treated with aspirin plus ticagrelor.. Reticulated platelets are more reactive than older platelets and act as seeds for the formation of platelet aggregates even in the presence of antiplatelet therapy. This is coherent with the emergence of an uninhibited subpopulation of reticulated platelets during treatment with aspirin plus thienopyridine, explained by the short pharmacokinetic half-lives of these drugs. This phenomenon is absent during treatment with ticagrelor, because of its longer half-life and ability to act as a circulating inhibitor. These data highlight the important influences of pharmacokinetics on antiplatelet drug efficacies, especially in diseases associated with increased platelet turnover.

Topics: Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thienopyridines; Thrombopoiesis; Ticagrelor; Young Adult

To compare the clinical effects between individual antiplatelet therapy guided by CYP2C19 genetic testing and conventional dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.. In total of 628 coronary artery disease patients who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention were included in this study. Patients were consecutively divided into routine group (n = 319) and individual group (n = 309) because of weather received CYP2C19 genetic testing. The individual group was divided again into extensive metabolizer group, intermediate metabolizer group, and poor metabolizer group according to CYP2C19 genotype. Then extensive metabolizer group received 75 mg daily of clopidogrel, intermediate metabolizer group received 150 mg daily of clopidogrel, and poor metabolizer group received ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. Routine group was treated with clopidogrel 75 mg daily conventionally. The primary end points were defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), namely a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Safety end points were bleeding events classified by GUSTO.. All the 628 patients were followed for an average of 12 months and clinical outcomes were analyzed at 1, 6, and 12 months after discharge. The morbidity rates of MACE in individual group were all lower than those in routine group at 1, 6, and 12 months (1.3% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.003; 3.2% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.012; 4.2% vs. 9.4%, P = 0.010). No significant difference in the rates of bleeding was found between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Even performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the benefit of individual antiplatelet therapy remained.. Individual antiplatelet therapy guided by CYP2C19 genetic testing significantly reduced the rate of MACE without an increase in the rate of bleeding in the near term in this Chinese population.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Biotransformation; Chi-Square Distribution; China; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Monitoring; Female; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Phenotype; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Polymorphism, Genetic; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is still an important challenge, despite the advent of new potent ADP-antagonists. Therefore it is of extreme importance to identify factors that can influence platelet activation. Serum uric acid (SUA) has been largely addressed in the past as a possible risk factor for coronary artery disease, with a possible association with platelets hyperreactivity. So far no studies have assessed the role of serum uric acid on the response to dual antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of uric acid levels on platelet function in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.. We scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor) for an ACS or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet function was assessed by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate(®)-Roche Diagnostics AG), HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU(∗)min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU* min (for ADP-antagonists).. We included a total of 493 patients (262 were on ASA and clopidogrel and 231 on ASA and ticagrelor). Patients were divided according to quartiles of serum uric acid levels measured at the time of platelet aggregation assessment (Group 1 <4.6 mg/dL, n = 114; Group 2, 4.7-5.8 mg/dL, n = 133; Group 3, 5.9-6.8 mg/dL, n = 124; Group 4, >6.9, n = 122). Patients with higher uric acid levels were older, more often smokers, with history of hypertension and previous coronary artery bypass surgery and renal failure and were more often on therapy with diuretics at admission. Patients with higher SUA had higher triglycerides and fibrinogen. Uric acid levels did not influence ASPI, COL, TRAP and ADP tests. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) was observed in 1.5% of patients treated with ASA, with no difference according to SUA quartiles (p = 0.60), confirmed at multivariate analysis after correction for baseline confounders (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05 [0.44-2.52], p = 0.90). HRPR for ADP-antagonists was observed in 23.6% of patients, with no difference according to SUA quartiles (p = 0.47); this result was confirmed also after correction for baseline confounders (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.04 [0.84-1.28], p = 0.73). Moreover, no association was found between HRPR and uric acid levels both among patients treated with clopidogrel (p = 0.35) or ticagrelor (p = 0.74), that was confirmed after correction for baseline confounding factors (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.18 [0.90-1.55], p = 0.23) and (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.96 [0.63-1.47], p = 0.85). The absence of association between SUA and platelet reactivity was confirmed at linear regression analysis both with clopidogrel (r = 0.03, p = 0.55) or ticagrelor (r = -0.01, p = 0.85).. This is the first large study showing that in patients receiving DAPT, uric acid levels do not influence response to ticagrelor and clopidogrel or the effectiveness of ASA.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Fibrinogen; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Triglycerides; Uric Acid

Practice in patients undergoing invasive evaluation for coronary artery disease is variable regarding choice of P2Y12 inhibitor and timing of treatment initiation and is usually dictated by institutional or even individual operator preference. Limited data are available on the actual patterns of P2Y12 inhibitor use in contemporary practice in the United States. We used electronic medical records from the Cerner "Health Facts" database of adults who underwent coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2008 to June 2013 and who received a loading dose of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor at any time from 48 hours before the start of procedure up to 6 hours after. Timing of P2Y12 inhibitor administration was categorized as >2 hours before, 0 to 2 hours before (pretreatment groups), or after the start of procedure. Results were also evaluated according to type of P2Y12 inhibitor and patient clinical presentation. A total of 37,964 patients underwent coronary angiography, and 28,306 proceeded to PCI. Pretreatment with a P2Y12 inhibitor was observed in 28% and 23% in the overall and PCI populations, respectively. Moderate variability of pretreatment rates was noted relative to clinical presentation and P2Y12 inhibitor type. Pretreatment rates remained fairly constant over time with the exception of a decreasing trend with prasugrel. In conclusion, among patients referred for invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment was low in contemporary US practice, an observation consistent over time and for all available agents and clinical presentations.

Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Referral and Consultation; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States

High-residual-on-treatment platelet reactivity still represents a challenging issue, potentially vanishing the benefits of dual antiplatelet treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. However, very few is known on the determinants of suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents. Recent interests have emerged on the potential prothrombotic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the impact of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI.. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30- to 90-days postdischarge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists).. We included 362 patients on DAPT, 125 (34.5%) receiving clopidogrel, and 237 (65.5%) on ticagrelor. Patients were divided according to PTH quartiles values (<45.8; 45.8-60.3; 60.4-88; ≥88.1 pg/mL). Higher PTH was associated with older age (P = 0.001); renal failure (P < 0.001), higher HDL cholesterol (P = 0.006) and creatinine (P < 0.001) and lower 25-OH cholecalciferol (P < 0.001). Suboptimal response to ASA was infrequent (2.8%), and not influenced by the levels of PTH (P = 0.57). ADP-mediated platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with higher PTH (P = 0.03), with an absolute increase in the prevalence of HRPR to ADP antagonists for higher PTH (24.7% vs. 40%, P = 0.007 for 4th vs. 1-3rd quartiles, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.04[1.14-3.64], P = 0.02). By the use of the ROC curve, we identified PTH levels above 96.7 pg/mL as the best predictor of HRPR with ADP antagonists (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.52[1.31-4.87], P = 0.006). Higher rate of HRPR was confirmed for PTH >96.7 pg/mL among the subgroup of patients on clopidogrel (51.5 vs. 85.7%, P = 0.001; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 12.5[2.6-60.9], P = 0.002), but not among ticagrelor-treated patients (11.3 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.31; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.55[0.56-4.6], P = 0.42).. In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease, higher PTH levels are associated with an increased ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to clopidogrel, especially for values above 96.7 pg/mL, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Databases, Factual; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Homeodomain Proteins; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Transcription Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation

New antithrombotic therapies have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), where the introduction of ticagrelor has provided the greatest mortality benefits. However, ticagrelor treatment has been associated with a potential increase in the serum uric acid (SUA) levels, which may influence endothelial dysfunction and prothrombotic status, thereby affecting the risk of acute cardiovascular events in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The present study aimed to compare the impact of antiplatelet agents such as ticagrelor or clopidogrel on SUA levels and their effect on platelet reactivity.. We included patients admitted for ACS or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and discharged with ASA (acetylsalicylic acid; 100-160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) or ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day). Chemistry was assessed at admission (baseline) and after a 30-90-day period of DAPT (together with platelet reactivity). The absolute and percentage variations of SUA after DAPT introduction were considered. Multiple-electrode aggregometry was used to assess platelet function. A total of 378 patients were enrolled, with 145 treated with aspirin and clopidogrel (AC) and 233 with aspirin and ticagrelor (AT). The AC patients were older (p = 0.003) and more often showed elective PCI as an indication to DAPT (<0.001); they received chronic therapy with ARB (angiotensin II receptor blocker; p = 0.001), nitrates (p = 0.044), CCB (calcium channel blocker; p = 0.005) and diuretics (p = 0.044). The AT patients displayed a higher percentage of ACS diagnosis (p < 0.001) and received chronic therapy with ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors (p = 0.001), beta blockers (p = 0.001) and statins (p = 0.013). The AC patients displayed higher platelet reactivity at COL (collagen) test, ASPI test and ADP (adenosine diphosphate) test (p = 0.03, 0.001 and <0.001, respectively) and a higher percentage of HRPR (high residual platelet reactivity) in the ADP test (p = 0.001). No difference was found in the baseline uric acid and creatinine levels between AC and AT patients. At 30-90 days, a significant absolute and percentage increase in the SUA levels was found in AT as compared to AC patients (0.204 mg/dl vs. -0.165 mg/dl, p = 0.034; 6.26% vs. -0.005%, p = 0.018, respectively). Results were not influenced by variations in renal function. At multivariate analysis, in fact, ticagrelor therapy emerged as an independent predictor of increase in the uric acid levels (odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.79 (1.66-4.67), p < 0.001). However, the variation in the SUA levels did not affect platelet reactivity or HRPR in both AC and AT patients.. An increase in the SUA levels at 30-90 days was observed in patients receiving chronic DAPT with ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel treatment. However, the changes in the SUA levels do not influence platelet aggregation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation; Uric Acid

Suboptimal platelet inhibition still represents an important challenge, especially for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, very few are known so far on the predictors of high-residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) despite antiplatelet strategies. Increasing attention has been paid in the last years to the role of vitamin D in atherothrombosis. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of vitamin D levels on platelet function in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) after a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Platelet function was assessed by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®-Roche Diagnostics AG), HRPR was considered for ASPI test values > 862 AU*min (for ASA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). Fasting samples were obtained for main chemistry parameters and vitamin D level assessment. Our population is represented by 503 patients, who were divided according to vitamin D quartiles (≤9.1; 9.2-14.4; 14.5-21.7; >21.7 ng/ml). Lower vitamin D levels related with age (p = 0.04), diabetic status (p = 0.05), and previous coronary surgery (p = 0.007), therapy with beta-blockers and statins (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02). Vitamin D inversely related to the levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.01), triglycerides (p < 0.001), hemoglobin (p = 0.05), and HbA1c (p < 0.001). Significantly higher platelet reactivity was observed after platelet stimulation with ADP (p = 0.01), but not with other platelet activators. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low (1.2%) and not conditioned by Vitamin D levels (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.56[0.71-3.5], p = 0.27). HRPR with ADP-antagonists was observed in 26% of patients, and the rate increased with lower vitamin D quartiles (37.3% vs 22.2% vs 24.4% vs 20.2%, p = 0.005, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.23[1.02-1.49], p = 0.04). An absolute increase in HRPR with lower vitamin D levels was similarly observed among patients receiving ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.40[0.95-2.06], p = 0.08), and those on clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.31[0.99-1.75], p = 0.06). Thus, lower vitamin D levels are associated with higher platelet reactivity and impaired effectiveness of ADP-antagonists, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA. Future studies will tell whether vitamin D sup

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Vitamin D

We describe, to the best of our knowledge, the first incidence of stent thrombosis in a patient treated with ticagrelor, who exhibited high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) according to platelet reactivity testing. He was on clopidrogel and tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The test showed a PRU of 249 and only 12% platelet inhibition. The patient was then switched to ticagrelor, with a loading dose of 180 mg given. The patient had stent thrombosis three weeks later with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). The patient had good platelet inhibition when started on Ticagrelor treatment (PRU=33), but had HTPR when the stent thrombosis occurred three weeks later (PRU=339).

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Angina, Stable; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stents; Ticagrelor

Aspirin is the key treatment in the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis. Interindividual variability of response has been linked to a higher risk for ischemic events. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and biologic factors predicting high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HPR) in a high-risk, "real-world" population of vascular patients. All platelet testing performed from 2011 to 2013 in consecutive patients receiving long-term treatment with aspirin for coronary or cerebrovascular disease was retrospectively analyzed. Indications for platelet testing were recurrent ischemic events or high-risk angioplasty. HPR was defined as aggregation intensity≥20% using light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid 0.5 mg/ml. Collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis was also performed (threshold<165 seconds). Cardiovascular risk factors, usual biologic parameters, and antiplatelet treatment were recorded. A total of 1,508 patients were included (mean age 63 years, 71% men, 23% with diabetes). Antiplatelet treatment was aspirin alone in 333 patients and dual-antiplatelet therapy in 1,175 patients. HPR was found in 11.1% of patients. In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors of HPR on light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39 to 3.16), age (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.47), fibrinogen level (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42), and von Willebrand factor level (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09). On light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid and collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis, fibrinogen remained the main factor associated with HPR (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61). Similar results were found in patients treated with aspirin alone or dual-antiplatelet therapy. A fibrinogen level>4.0 g/L was associated with a 3.9-fold increased risk for HPR in patients aged <75 years. In conclusion, fibrinogen level was the major predictor of HPR on aspirin in this large population of high-risk vascular patients.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinogen; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with a two- to ninefold increased risk of recurrent ischemic events among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for coronary artery disease. However, its determinants are still poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of mean platelet volume (MPV) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI.. Patients treated with DAPT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30 - 90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test > 862 aggregation units (AU)*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥ 417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists).. Our population is represented by a total of 487 patients on DAPT, divided according to MPV tertiles (< 10.4 fl; 10.4 - 11.29 fl; ≥ 11.3 fl). Larger-sized platelets were associated with use of statins (p < 0.001) and beta-blockers (p = 0.03), higher hemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower platelets count (p < 0.001). Higher platelet reactivity was observed at ASPI test in patients with higher MPV (r = 0.12, p = 0.008), but not for ADP-mediated aggregation (r = -0.007, p = 0.88). However, a low prevalence of HRPR was observed with ASA, with no impact of MPV tertiles (1.2 vs 1.1 vs 1.6%, p = 0.70, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.51 - 1.77], p = 0.87). MPV did not influence the prevalence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (25.9 vs 1 vs 26.5%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.1 [0.84 - 1.45], p = 0.50) with similar results among the 259 patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.15 [0.82 - 1.62], p = 0.43) and the 228 patients on ticagrelor (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.46 [0.84 - 2.55], p = 0.18).. In patients receiving DAPT, MPV does not affect the response to major antiplatelet therapies. In fact, MPV elevation does not influence the risk of HRPR with clopidogrel, ticagrelor or ASA.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Mean Platelet Volume; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Low response to antiplatelet agents has been associated to an increased risk of thrombotic complications and recurrent ischemic events. Platelet size has been proposed as a potential marker of platelet reactivity. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of platelet Larger Cell Ratio (p-LCR) on platelet aggregation and the prevalence of residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after a recent acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization.. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) or ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists) using impedance aggregometry.. Our population consisted of 530 patients receiving DAPT, who were divided in tertiles according to values of p-LCR (< 27.6; 27.6-34.7; ≥34.7 l). p-LCR was related with use of beta-blockers (p = 0.02) and statins (p = 0.002), and inversely with acute presentation (p = 0.05). Higher platelet count (p < 0.001) and haemoglobin levels (p = 0.001) were observed in higher p-LCR tertiles. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low and not significantly different across tertiles of p-LCR (1.1 vs 1.1 vs 1.7%, p = 0.66; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.68[0.66-4.29], p = 0.27). Moreover, p-LCR did not influence the occurrence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (24.4% vs 20.9% vs 25.6 %%, p = 0.80, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.88[0.67-1.17], p = 0.38) and similar results were obtained when considering separately patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.86-1.69], p = 0.29) or ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.69-2], p = 0.56).. In patients receiving DAPT for coronary artery disease, p-LCR does not impact platelet reactivity. Larger platelets did not influence the prevalence of high-on treatment platelet reactivity with the antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

To evaluate the clinical utility of individualising dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comers population, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.. Tertiary care single centre registry.. 1008 consecutive PCI patients with stent implantation, without exclusion criteria.. Peri-interventional individualisation of DAPT, guided by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), to overcome high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to ADP-induced (≥50 U) and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced aggregation (>35 U).. The primary efficacy end point was definite stent thrombosis (ST) at 30 days. The primary safety end point was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding. Secondary end points were probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and the combined end point: major cardiac adverse event (MACE).. 53% of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (9% STEMI, 44% non-ST-elevation). HPR to ADP after 600 mg clopidogrel loading occurred in 30% of patients (73±19 U vs 28±11 U; p<0.001) and was treated by prasugrel or ticagrelor (73%), or clopidogrel (27%) reloading (22±12 U; p<0.001). HPR to ADP after prasugrel loading occurred in 2% of patients (82±26 U vs 19±10 U; p<0.001) and was treated with ticagrelor (34±15 U; p=0.02). HPR to AA occurred in 9% of patients with a significant higher proportion in patients with HPR to ADP (22% vs 4%, p<0.001) and was treated with aspirin reloading. Definite ST occurred in 0.09% of patients (n=1); probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and MACE occurred in 0.19% (n=2), 0.09% (n=1) and 1.8% (n=18) of patients. TIMI major and minor bleeding did not differ between patients without HPR and individualised patients (2.6% for both).. Individualisation of DAPT with MEA minimises early thrombotic events in an all-comers PCI population to an unreported degree without increasing bleeding. A randomised multicentre trial utilising MEA seems warranted.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01515345.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Prospective Studies; Registries; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Platelet activation and aggregation play important roles in ischemic event occurrences in patients with coronary artery disease. In the absence of a disease state and drug administration, platelet reactivity has been shown to be stable over time, indicating a high level of heritability. Interindividual variability in platelet response to agonists and in response to aspirin and clopidogrel administration along with the influence of different single nucleotide polymorphisms on platelet reactivity based on candidate gene and genome-wide association studies have been demonstrated in healthy subjects. Reduced pharmacodynamic effect and reduced clinical efficacy of clopidogrel have been well documented in high-risk coronary artery disease patients carrying a loss-of-function allele of the CYP2C19 gene. These factors are recognized by the recent American and European treatment guidelines. However, prasugrel and ticagrelor are associated with superior and predictable pharmacodynamic responses and better clinical outcomes compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Adenosine; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aryldialkylphosphatase; Aspirin; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Despite the proven efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and one of the first-generation P2Y(12) antagonists (clopidogrel, prasugrel) in patients with atherothrombotic disease, residual ischemic risk remains substantial, and bleeding rates are increased. Incomplete protection against ischemic events can be attributed to the fact that these therapies each target a single platelet activation pathway, allowing continued platelet activation via other pathways, including the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) pathway stimulated by thrombin. Increased bleeding with dual antiplatelet therapy can be attributed to blockade of the thromboxane A(2) (by aspirin) and adenosine diphosphate (by P2Y(12) antagonist) platelet activation pathways that are essential to hemostasis. The second-generation P2Y(12) inhibitor ticagrelor plus aspirin demonstrated superior ischemic outcomes, including reduction in total mortality, versus clopidogrel plus aspirin, but event rates remain high, and major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting is increased. The novel P2Y(12) antagonist elinogrel, available in intravenous and oral formulations, may have a more favorable benefit-to-risk profile than existing agents in this class because of reversible and competitive binding to the P2Y(12) receptor. Inhibition of PAR-1 is an attractive, novel approach in antiplatelet therapy because it may provide incremental ischemic protection without increasing bleeding. The PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar (SCH 530348) has been associated with favorable efficacy and safety in phase 2 trials. Two phase 3 trials are evaluating the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and in patients with documented atherothrombotic disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Quinazolinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, PAR-1; Sulfonamides; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Resistance; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the single leading cause of death in the U.S. Therapies for CAD have been developed to inhibit platelet aggregation underlying atherogenesis. Clinical benefit has been shown with antagonists of the P2Y(12) receptor, such as clopidogrel. However, concerns over patient resistance to treatment and relatively slow onset and offset of action have indicated the need for further pharmacotherapeutic development. Ticagrelor (formally AZD-6140) is a novel, reversible oral P2Y(12) antagonist developed by AstraZeneca. In vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed that ticagrelor provides rapid, enhanced and maintained antiplatelet effects. These findings have translated to clinical trial investigations with further evidence for a significantly reduced mortality rate associated with cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, and a favourable safety profile. Key clinical trials to date include the DISPERSE, DISPERSE2, PLATO, ONSET/OFFSET and RESPOND. Ticagrelor has been put forward for approval to the European Medical Agency (EMEA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an investigational oral antiplatelet treatment for the reduction of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor