ticagrelor and Chronic-Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent and affects an ever-increasing proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients with CKD have a higher risk of ACS and significantly higher mortality, and are also predisposed to increased bleeding complications. Antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs form the bedrock of management of patients with ACS. Most randomized trials of these drugs exclude patients with CKD, and current guidelines for management of these patients are largely based on these trials. We aim to review the safety and efficacy of these drugs in patients with CKD presenting with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Peptide Fragments; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polysaccharides; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recombinant Proteins; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Uremia

To explore the role of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in coronary blood flow normalization immediately after chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO) recanalization.. Coronary vascular function of a CTO immediately after recanalization is demonstrated to be poor.. The TIGER BVS is a prospective, double-randomized, open-label, two parallel-group controlled clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in improving vascular function of coronary segment distal to CTO immediately after CTO recanalization. A total of 50 patients who receive CTO PCI will be randomized 1:1 to receive ticagrelor versus clopidogrel at least 3 days before the procedure. Immediately after CTO recanalization with Absorb BVS implantation, a specific study of vascular function under adenosine infusion will be performed. Patients will be therefore randomized 1:1 to receive angiographic follow-up with vascular function and optical coherence tomography analyses at 1- or 3-year follow-up. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02211066.. The TIGER BVS trial will provide the first randomized comparison between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in recovering vascular function in CTO patients. It will also provide important data on vascular restoration therapy of Absorb BVS in this scenario.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Chronic Disease; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Occlusion; Female; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Reduced renal function is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes and may therefore alter the risk-benefit ratio with antiplatelet therapies. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 12 months but with similar major bleeding rates.. Central laboratory serum creatinine levels were available in 15 202 (81.9%) acute coronary syndrome patients at baseline, and creatinine clearance, estimated by the Cockcroft Gault equation, was calculated. In patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min; n=3237), ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced the primary end point to 17.3% from 22.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.90) with an absolute risk reduction greater than that of patients with normal renal function (n=11 965): 7.9% versus 8.9% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02). In patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced total mortality (10.0% versus 14.0%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89). Major bleeding rates, fatal bleedings, and non-coronary bypass-related major bleedings were not significantly different between the 2 randomized groups (15.1% versus 14.3%; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30; 0.34% versus 0.77%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.54; and 8.5% versus 7.3%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.68). The interactions between creatinine clearance and randomized treatment on any of the outcome variables were nonsignificant.. In acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces ischemic end points and mortality without a significant increase in major bleeding but with numerically more non-procedure-related bleeding.. URL:http://www.clinicatrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chronic Disease; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) require effective antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Ticagrelor has more pronounced platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. However, the most appropriate dose of ticagrelor in East Asian populations remains unclear.. We compared ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter and 120 mg loading dose, 60 mg twice daily thereafter) and clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter) for prevention of cardiovascular events in 525patients with CTO undergoing PCI.. The rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) was not different between the groups. At 1-year follow-up, target vessel revascularization (TVR) in both ticagrelor groups were significantly lower than that in the clopidogrel group (p = 0.047); TVR was significantly decreased in 60 mg ticagrelor compared to standard dose clopidogrel (p = 0.046). At 1-year follow-up, overall MACCE in both ticagrelor groups were significantly lower than that in the clopidogrel group (p = 0.023). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed MACCE-free survival was significantly higher in both ticagrelor groups than in the clopidogrel group (p = 0.024). During hospitalization, minor bleeding was significant increased in the 90 mg ticagrelor group (p = 0.021). At 1-year follow-up, risk of major and minor bleeding were significantly increased in the 90 mg ticagrelor group.. In East Asian patients with CTO undergoing PCI, 60 mg ticagrelor was as effective as 90 mg, at the same time significantly reduced risk of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; China; Chronic Disease; Clopidogrel; Coronary Occlusion; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chronic Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor