ticagrelor and Acute-Coronary-Syndrome

For acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the choice of the duration and kind of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) offering the most accurate balance between ischemic and bleeding risk remains unknown.. A network meta-analysis was performed including all Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing different DAPT regimens and duration in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Trial-defined MACE and major bleedings were the primary endpoints. Stroke, stent thrombosis (ST), all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) represented secondary endpoints.. 13 RCTs encompassing 46145 patients were included. Mean age was 62 (61-64) years old, 42% being admitted with STEMI, 33% with NSTEMI and 25% with UA. The competitive arms were: clopidogrel and aspirin for 12 months (6 arms/18183 patients), clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months (4/3329), clopidogrel and aspirin >12 months (3/2238), ticagrelor and aspirin for 12 months (6/12942) and prasugrel and aspirin for 12 months (3/9453). Trial-defined MACE and major bleedings, stroke and death were similar among the different arms. DAPT with prasugrel and aspirin for 12 months reduced MI compared to aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54.0.94) and reduced the risk of ST compared to ticagrelor (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.90). Both prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced ST as compared to clopidogrel and aspirin for 12 months.. Different DAPT strategies yield similar risk of MACE, major bleeding, death and stroke in ACS patients. Prasugrel and aspirin for 12 months proved to be the most effective strategy regarding ST and MI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Oral P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Recent guidelines regarding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have advocated for use of prasugrel and ticagrelor over clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome. However, analyses from multiple databases have shown that clopidogrel continues to be the most commonly prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor. We aimed to evaluate the trends in utilization and cost of P2Y12 inhibitors for Medicare beneficiaries using data from Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Data Event set from 2011 to 2018 for P2Y12 inhibitors. Medicare part D total beneficiaries for P2Y12 receptor inhibitors increased from 2011 to 2018 by 34.8% from 2.45 million to 3.31 million. The total cost for P2Y12 antiplatelets decreased from $ 3.72 billion in 2011 to $ 0.72 billion in 2018 by 80.4%. The availability of generic clopidogrel drove the considerable total cost reduction. Clopidogrel was the most prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor since its introduction accounting for more than 90% of the Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2018. Overall, the number of beneficiaries on newer P2Y12 inhibitors showed a steady increase with 5.9% beneficiaries on brilinta in 2018 and 2.1 % on prasugrel. The total cost of brilinta beneficiaries grew exponentially accounting for 59.2% of total cost in 2018 and average cost per beneficiary increased by 465% in study period. Despite the availability of generic version clopidogrel and prasugrel, 2,161,175 beneficiaries were on brand plavix and 87,174 on effient which contributed to the increased total expenditure. Earlier introduction and transition to generic versions of medication may help to reduce the drug cost and potentially enhance medication compliance.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Medicare; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; United States

Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) may be associated with better outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to other current-generation limus-eluting stents (LES).. To compare BP-BES with other current-generation LES in ACS patients undergoing PCI.. We pooled individual data of Non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS patients from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). The BP-BES groups consisted mostly of GLASSY patients, while the control group (other current-generation LES) included exclusively TWILIGHT patients. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis; the key secondary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF). To account for trial design differences, outcomes were assessed at 3 months (short-term) and between 3 and 12 months (long-term) after PCI and subsequently pooled to estimate the 12-month hazards.. Of 7107 and 6053 NSTE-ACS patients included in the short- and long-term analysis, 32.7% and 36.5% received a BP-BES, respectively. Risk of MACE associated with BP-BES versus other LES was similar at short-term (1.1% vs 1.3%, adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.53-1.38), lower at long-term (1.7% vs 3.1%, adjusted HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.34-0.72), and lower in the entire 12-month period (pooled adjusted HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.45-0.82). The cumulative 12-month risk of TVF was reduced with BP-BES (adjusted HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.70).. BP-BES was associated with lower 12-month risks of MACE and TVF compared to other current generation LES among NSTE-ACS patients treated with abbreviated or standard ticagrelor-based DAPT. These non-randomized findings are hypothesis-generating.. Differences in clinical outcomes may exist between biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and other current-generation limus-eluting stent (LES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We pooled individual data of about 7000 Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients undergoing PCI and treated with ticagrelor with or without aspirin from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). BP-BES patients derived very largely from GLASSY and other LES patients from TWILIGHT. In this population, BP-BES compared to other current generation LES, were associated with a lower 12-month risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and target-vessel failure.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Stents; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The treatment strategy for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor has been controversial in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our meta-analysis aimed to demonstrate whether intensified antithrombotic regimens with ticagrelor plus aspirin have more beneficial effects and fewer adverse events compared to those of clopidogrel plus aspirin in East Asian patients with ACS undergoing PCI.. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of DAPT with ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin for secondary prevention of ACS in East Asian patients undergoing PCI. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the metrics of choice for assessing treatment effects. The primary endpoint was bleeding events, and the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke), all-cause death, and definite/probable/possible stent thrombosis. The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity.. Six RCTs involving a total of 2,725 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of all bleeding events with ticagrelor was higher than that with clopidogrel (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07), but the incidence of MACCE was not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.16). All-cause death (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.67-1.79), cardiovascular death (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.68-2.98), nonfatal MI (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.48-1.78), stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.40-2.50), and stent thrombosis (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.19-2.98) were not statistically different between the two groups.. Ticagrelor increased the risk of bleeding and did not increase treatment efficacy compared to that of clopidogrel in the East Asian population who have ACS treated with PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; East Asian People; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet agents are among the most frequently used medications in cardiovascular medicine. Although in patients with atherosclerotic disease manifestations, in particular those treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, antiplatelet agents are beneficial for the prevention of ischemic events, they inevitably increase the risk of bleeding. Furthermore, 5-15% of patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention may need a surgical procedure within 2 years, creating challenges to safe and effective antiplatelet drug management. Importantly, major spontaneous or procedural-related bleedings are associated with increased hospital admission, length, costs, and poor prognosis. Although the effects of other antithrombotic therapies, such as direct oral anticoagulants, can be reversed by approved specific agents, there are no approved reversal agents for any antiplatelet drugs. The fact that many antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and prasugrel), bind irreversibly to their targets represents a challenge for the development of a drug-specific reversal agent. In contrast, ticagrelor is a non-thienopyridine with a plasma half-life of 7-9 h that reversely binds the P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

For patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), prasugrel was recommended over ticagrelor in a recent randomized controlled trial, although more data are needed on the rationale. Here, the effects of P2Y12 inhibitors on ischemic and bleeding events in patients with NSTE-ACS were investigated.. Clinical trials that enrolled patients with NSTE-ACS were included, relevant data were extracted, and a network meta-analysis was performed.. This study included 37,268 patients with NSTE-ACS from 11 studies. There was no significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor for any end point, although prasugrel had a higher likelihood of event reduction than ticagrelor for all end points except cardiovascular death. Compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel was associated with decreased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99) and myocardial infarction (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) but not an increased risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.97-1.74). Similarly, compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94) and an increased risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00-1.77; P = .049). For the primary efficacy end point (MACE), prasugrel showed the highest likelihood of event reduction (P = .97) and was superior to ticagrelor (P = .29) and clopidogrel (P = .24).. Prasugrel and ticagrelor had comparable risks for every end point, although prasugrel had the highest probability of being the best treatment for reducing the primary efficacy end point. This study highlights the need for further studies to investigate optimal P2Y12 inhibitor selection in patients with NSTE-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Review the clinical outcomes of different antithrombotic strategies in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Patients with HBR after PCI include those with advanced age (e.g. >75 years of age), a prior history of major bleeding, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and those with indications for long-term anticoagulation. Strategies that successfully decrease bleeding risk in this population include shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; of 1-3 months) followed by single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or a P2Y 12 inhibitor, or de-escalating from a more potent P2Y 12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) to less potent antiplatelet regimens (aspirin with clopidogrel or half-dose ticagrelor or half-dose prasugrel). Patients on DAPT, and a full dose anticoagulation for other indications, have a lower risk of major bleeding without an increase in 1-2-year adverse ischemic events, when rapidly switched from DAPT to a single antiplatelet therapy (within a week after PCI) with aspirin or clopidogrel. Longer term data on the benefits and risks of these strategies is lacking.. In patients with HBR after PCI, shorter durations of DAPT (1-3 months) decrease the risk of major bleeding without increasing the risk of adverse ischemic events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The worldwide prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significantly increased in the past decades. Scientific reports have shown CKD to be an enhancing risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is the leading cause of premature death in patients with CKD. Clinical practice guidelines are ambiguous in view of the use of antiplatelet drugs in patients with CKD because patients with moderate-to-severe CKD were often excluded from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes that were observed with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel use in patients with CKD and cardiovascular disease.. Electronic databases including Web of Science, Google Scholar, http://www.. gov , Cochrane database, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were carefully searched for English-based articles comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with CKD. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints in this study. The latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis.. A total of 15,664 participants were included in this analysis, whereby 2456 CKD participants were assigned to ticagrelor and 13,208 CKD participants were assigned to clopidogrel. Our current analysis showed that major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71-1.03; P = 0.09), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57- 1.18; P = 0.29), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56-1.23; P = 0.35), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07; P = 0.19), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58-1.11; P = 0.18), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.38-2.99; P = 0.91) were not significantly different in CKD patients who were treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-defined minor (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.53; P = 0.68) and TIMI major bleeding (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.69-1.76; P = 0.67) were also not significantly different. However, bleeding defined according to the academic research consortium (BARC) bleeding type 1 or 2 (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.13-3.37; P = 0.02) and BARC bleeding type 3 or 5 (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.17-2.48; P = 0.006) were significantly higher with ticagrelor.. When compared with clopidogrel, even though ticagrelor was not associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients with CKD, it was associated with significantly higher BARC bleeding. Therefore, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor still require further evaluation in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should only be confirmed with more powerful results that could usually only be achieved using large-scale randomized trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Short-term (≤6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and DAPT de-escalation become attractive for patients with acute coronary syndrome.. A systemic search identified randomized controlled trials that included patients with acute coronary syndrome treated using (1) standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel, prasugrel (standard/low dose), or ticagrelor; (2) extended DAPT (≥18 months); (3) short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by P2Y. This meta-analysis included 32 randomized controlled trials with 103 497 patients. While there were no differences in efficacy between short, unguided de-escalation and guided selection strategies, unguided de-escalation was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.67 [0.49-0.93] and 0.68 [0.50-0.93]). Both short DAPT followed by P2Y. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, unguided de-escalation was associated with the lowest risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding outcomes, while short DAPT followed by P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The function of coronary microcirculation is an important factor in predicting the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) therapy. Ticagrelor, a type of oral P2Y12 inhibitor, is widely prescribed to ACS patients and can improve prognosis compared to clopidogrel. However, the efficacy of ticagrelor on coronary microcirculation, compared to clopidogrel, remains unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of ticagrelor on coronary microcirculation.. The PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were comprehensively searched to identify studies until November 2022. Data was pooled using the fixed effects model or random effects model based on the level of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed to measure the effects of potential confounders.. After screening, 16 trials with a total of 3676 participants were ultimately included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to clopidogrel, patients receiving ticagrelor exhibited a more significant reduction in the IMR (WMD: -6.23, 95% CI: -8.41 to -4.04), a reduction in the cTFC (WMD: -1.88; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.45), and greater increases in CFR (WMD: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.57), MBG (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.48), and TIMI (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06).. Our findings suggest that, compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor has a significant effect in reducing coronary microcirculatory resistance, enhancing coronary blood flow reserve, and improving myocardial perfusion.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Microcirculation; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Ticagrelor

Limited data comparing prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome are available. Online databases, including MEDLINE and Cochrane Central, were queried to compare these drugs. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, and stroke. The secondary outcome is major bleeding. A total of 9 studies, including 94,590 patients (prasugrel group = 32,759; ticagrelor group = 61,831), were included in this meta-analysis. The overall mean age was 62.73 years, whereas the mean age for the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups was 63.80 and 61.65 years, respectively. Prasugrel is equally effective as compared with ticagrelor in preventing MI. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, prasugrel is equally effective when compared with ticagrelor in preventing MI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs in chronic coronary syndromes patients.. Electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases) were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs (aspirin, aspirin + clopidogrel, aspirin + clopidogrel + cilostazol, clopidogrel/prasugrel + aspirin, aspirin + rivaoxaban 2.5 mg, aspirin + ticagrelor 60 mg, aspirin + ticagrelor 90 mg, clopidogrel or rivroxaban 5 mg) versus placebo for treatment chronic coronary syndromes patients. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, all cause death, major bleeding and myocardial infarction. A random-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted for outcomes of interest, and results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals. The NMA was performed using R Software with a GeMTC package. A Bayesian NMA was performed and relative ranking of agents was assessed using surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities.. Ten randomized controlled trials met criteria for inclusion and finally included in this NMA. In head-to-head comparison, no significant difference was observed between all antithrombotic treatment strategies with respect to primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events. In head-to-head comparison, no significant difference was observed between all antithrombotic treatment strategies with respect to all cause death. Clopidogrel/prasugrel + aspirin (OR = 3.8, 95% credible intervals [CrI]: 1.3-12.0, P < .05) and aspirin + rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (OR = 3.1, 95%CrI: 1.1-9.5, P < .05) was associated with an increase of the major bleeding. Compared with aspirin alone, aspirin + clopidogrel (OR = 0.42, 95%CrI: 0.22-0.76, P < .05) and aspirin + ticagrelor 90 mg (OR = 0.42, 95%CrI: 0.17-0.95, P < .05) was associated with a decrease of the myocardial infarction.. Myocardial infarction was significantly lower when adding clopidogrel or ticagrelor 90 mg to aspirin than those in the aspirin alone group. However, clopidogrel/prasugrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg was associated with an increase of the major bleeding than aspirin alone.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Bayes Theorem; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of a de-escalation strategy from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel versus continuation of prasugrel or ticagrelor along with aspirin in both strategies for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to analyze the effect of the recently published randomized clinical trial (RCT) by Park et al., which included the largest sample size ever and the largest switched number of patients, on current guidelines and practices.. The PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically from inception to May 2021 by using the search terms ('de-escalation' OR 'switching') AND ('antiplatelet' OR 'clopidogrel' OR 'ticagrelor' OR 'prasugrel') AND ('percutaneous coronary intervention' OR 'PCI'' OR 'Acute coronary syndrome' OR 'ACS').. We included RCTs that reported the primary outcomes, i.e. net clinical benefits and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or higher bleeding. A combination of both ischemic and bleeding events was defined as a net clinical benefit.. A total of four RCTs were included, with 5952 patients. A random-effects meta-analysis revealed that a de-escalation strategy was associated with lower ischemic and bleeding events (net clinical benefits; risk ratio [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.85; p = 0.003), and lower BARC type 2 or higher bleeding (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91; p = 0.02) when compared with a continuation strategy.. The current guidelines recommend potent P2Y12 prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months despite their association with a high risk of bleeding. Our meta-analysis updates cardiologists, providing them with the best available evidence in managing patients with ACS who underwent PCI.. Among patients with ACS treated with PCI, a de-escalation strategy (prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel) is associated with lower ischemic and bleeding events (net clinical benefits) and lower BARC type 2 or higher bleeding; however, due to the limited number of included studies, further high-quality studies are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of the de-escalation strategy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

After more than 10 years of routine clinical use, a debate about the preference of prasugrel over ticagrelor has been unveiled following publication of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial, an investigator-initiated trial directly comparing both substances as part of dual anti-platelet therapy following interventional treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Both substances had been tested in trials, approved by authorities and subsequently recommended by guidelines according to the strategy applied in the respective approval trial. This resulted in prasugrel tested in TRITON only be given after diagnostic coronary angiography in the absence of ST-segment elevations (NSTE-ACS) and ticagrelor tested in PLATO being administered even before diagnostic coronary angiography in all forms of acute coronary syndromes. Whichever way was safest and most efficient, had never been clarified before. ISAR-REACT 5 showed superior efficacy of prasugrel over ticagrelor in general, and of deferred administration of prasugrel over pre-treatment with ticagrelor in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Subsequently, in 2020 the European guidelines for NSTE-ACS adopted both positions in recommending the respective preference. Afterwards, a confrontational debate erupted between those favouring the ISAR-REACT 5 results and their implementation in guidelines and others still preferring the generalized interpretation of the overall study results from PLATO. In this review, we reflect the history leading to trial design of TRITON and PLATO and the way this subsequently impacted on clinical practice and guideline recommendations.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

There have been inconsistent data on the direct comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the current available evidence.. We performed a meta-analysis (PROSPERO-registered CRD42020166810) of randomized trials up to February 2020 that compared prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome with respect to the composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular death and secondary endpoints including MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or above), stent thrombosis, all-cause death, and other safety outcomes.. Of the 11 eligible RCTs with 6,098 patients randomized to prasugrel (n = 3,050) or ticagrelor (n = 3,048), 180 and 207 had the composite endpoint events in the prasugrel arm and the ticagrelor arm, respectively, over a weighted mean follow-up period of 11 ± 2 months. Compared with prasugrel, the ticagrelor group had similar risk in the primary composite endpoint (risk ratio [RR] = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.96-1.42; p = 0.12, I2 = 0%). Compared to prasugrel, there was no significant difference associated with the ticagrelor groups with respect to stroke (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.66-1.67; p = 0.84, I2 = 0%), cardiovascular death (RR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.75-1.36; p = 0.95, I2 = 0%), BARC type 2 or above bleeding (RR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.89-1.52; p = 0.26, I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (RR = 1.58; 95% CI = 0.90-2.76; p = 0.11, I2 = 0%), and all-cause death (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.86-1.43; p = 0.45, I2 = 0%) except MI (RR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.05-1.81; p = 0.02, I2 = 0%) Conclusion: Compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor did not reduce the primary composite endpoint of MI, stroke, and cardiovascular death at a weighted mean follow-up of 11 months. There was no significant difference between the secondary outcomes except MI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The combination of oral anticoagulants with platelet inhibitors has been widely investigated in patients with coronary stenting and concomitant atrial fibrillation. In these patients, default therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome is clopidogrel plus non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, omitting aspirin. However, in view of the high thromboembolic risk associated with acute coronary syndrome and the number of poor metabolizers for clopidogrel, investigation of alternative P2Y12-inhibitors is mandatory. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, registry-based, randomized, controlled trial aims to show the non-inferiority of dabigatran plus ticagrelor versus dabigatran plus clopidogrel in patients on chronic anticoagulants who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome. The primary end point is major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding definition.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Guidelines recommend the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel for the reduction of ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, this comes at the expense of increased bleeding. A guided selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy has the potential to overcome this limitation. We aimed at evaluating the comparative safety and efficacy of guided vs. routine selection of potent P2Y12 inhibiting therapy in patients with ACS.. We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different oral P2Y12 inhibitors currently recommended for the treatment of patients with ACS (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). RCTs including a guided approach (i.e. platelet function or genetic testing) vs. standard selection of P2Y12 inhibitors among patients with ACS were also included. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. P-scores were used to estimate hierarchies of efficacy and safety. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint was all bleeding. A total of 61 898 patients from 15 RCTs were included. Clopidogrel was used as reference treatment. A guided approach was the only strategy associated with reduced MACE (IRR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98) without any significant trade-off in all bleeding (IRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.96-1.55). A guided approach and prasugrel were associated with reduced myocardial infarction. A guided approach, prasugrel, and ticagrelor were associated with reduced stent thrombosis. Ticagrelor was also associated with reduced total and cardiovascular mortality. Prasugrel was associated with increased major bleeding. Prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with increased minor bleeding. The incidence of stroke did not differ between treatments.. In patients with an ACS, compared with routine selection of potent P2Y12 inhibiting therapy (prasugrel or ticagrelor), a guided selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy is associated with the most favourable balance between safety and efficacy. These findings support a broader adoption of guided approach for the selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy in patients with ACS.. This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021258603).. A guided selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy using platelet function or genetic testing improves outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Nevertheless, the comparative safety and efficacy of a guided versus routine selection of potent P2Y12-inhibiting therapy in acute coronary syndrome has not been explored.. In a comprehensive network meta-analysis including the totality of available evidence and using clopidogrel as treatment reference, a guided approach was the only strategy associated with reduced major adverse cardiovascular events without any significant trade-off in bleeding. Prasugrel and ticagrelor increased bleeding and only ticagrelor reduced mortality.. A guided selection of P2Y12-inhibiting therapy represents the strategy associated with the most favourable balance between safety and efficacy. These findings support a broader adoption of guided P2Y12 inhibiting therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet medications remain a cornerstone of therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. In primary prevention (patients with cardiovascular risk factors but no documented events, symptoms or angiographic disease), there is little evidence of benefit of any antiplatelet therapy, and such therapy carries the risk of excess bleeding. Where there is documented disease (secondary prevention), stable patients benefit from long-term antiplatelet monotherapy, aspirin being first choice in those with coronary heart disease and clopidogrel in those with cerebrovascular disease; moreover, recent evidence shows that low-dose rivaroxaban in combination with aspirin confers added benefit, in patients with stable cardiovascular and peripheral arterial disease. In patients with acute cerebrovascular disease, aspirin combined with clopidogrel reduces subsequent risk, while in acute coronary syndrome, dual antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin and a P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Clopidogrel is the most frequently used P2Y12 inhibitor as a component of the dual antiplatelet regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prior studies have shown the variable efficacy of clopidogrel due to genotypic differences in the CYP2C19 enzyme function, which converts clopidogrel to its active metabolite. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of genotype testing-guided P2Y12 inhibitor prescription therapy to patients after PCI for ACS compared to non-genotype guided conventional treatment.. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify relevant trials. Summary effects were calculated using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals for all the clinical endpoints.. Seven studies with 9617 patients were included. Genotype-guided strategy arm included prasugrel or ticagrelor prescription to patients with loss of function (LOF) of CYP219 alleles (most commonly alleles being *2 and *3) and clopidogrel prescription to those without the LOF allele. The conventional arm included patients treated with clopidogrel without genotype testing. Comparison of genotype arm with conventional arm showed decreased major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), improved cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and reduced incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in the genotype arm, and a similar stroke incidence in the two arms. Regarding adverse events, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the genotype arm than the conventional arm.. Our analysis illustrates the possible advantages of genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor prescription strategy compared to non-genotype-guided strategy with reductions in MACE, CV mortality, MI, and stent thrombosis. This analysis can be used as a stepping stone to conducting further trials determining the efficacy of this treatment strategy in various ACS subtypes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The risk of bleeding is high in East Asians, whether East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome choose ticagrelor or clopidogrel is still controversial. In this study, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library database, and other sources were systematically searched. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause death, the primary safety outcomes were any bleeding, PLATO major bleeding, and fatal bleeding. The secondary outcomes included vascular-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and dyspnea. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials with 3597 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor had significantly higher incidence of any bleeding [risk ratio (RR), 1.63; 1.33-1.99; P < 0.00001], PLATO major bleeding (RR 1.56; 1.15-2.12; P = 0.004), and dyspnea (RR 2.60; 1.68-4.00; P < 0.00001). However, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly reduced risk of stent thrombosis (RR 0.42; 0.19-0.92; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause death (RR 0.87; 0.64-1.24; P = 0.44), fatal bleeding (RR 2.49; 0.79-7.86; P = 0.12), vascular-cause death (RR 0.88; 1.60-0.30; P = 0.52), myocardial infarction (RR 0.89; 0.65-1.23; P = 0.49), and stroke (RR 0.84; 0.47-1.50; P = 0.56) between the 2 groups. The present findings demonstrated that ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of any bleeding, PLATO major bleeding, and dyspnea compared with clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, it significantly reduced the risk of stent thrombosis. (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD42021255215).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Canada; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor

The efficacy and safety of clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor as part of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients, and in older patients, with acute coronary syndrome is reviewed. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and HTA databases were searched (September 2, 2020) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Pooled risk differences (clopidogrel minus ticagrelor) were estimated using random-effects meta-analyses, and certainty of evidence was assessed according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. In all, 29 RCTs were identified. The risk difference for all-cause mortality was 0.6% (-0.03% to 1.3%), cardiovascular (CV) mortality: 0.6% (95% confidence interval: 0.01% to 1.1%), myocardial infarction (MI): 0.9% (0.4% to 1.3%), stent thrombosis: 0.7% (0.4 to 1.1%), clinically significant bleeding: -1.9% (-3.7% to -0.2%), major bleeding: -0.9% (-1.6% to -0.1%), and dyspnea: -5.8% (-7.7% to -3.8%). In older patients, there were no differences between the comparison groups regarding all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and MI, whereas the risk of clinically significant bleeding and major bleeding was lower in the clopidogrel group, -5.9% (-11 to -0.9%, 1 RCT) and -2.4% (-4.4% to -0.3%), respectively. Compared with ticagrelor, clopidogrel may result in little or no difference regarding all-cause mortality. Although not evident in older patients, it cannot be excluded that clopidogrel may be slightly less efficient in reducing the risk of CV mortality and MI, whereas ticagrelor is probably more efficacious in reducing the risk of stent thrombosis. Clopidogrel results in a reduced risk of dyspnea and clinically significant bleeding and in older people probably in a reduced risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is one of the most recent antiplatelet agents used to inhibit platelet aggregation via blocking the ADP receptors of the subtype P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

For patients after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), clopidogrel combined with aspirin is a conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) method. Because the genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 gene leads to clopidogrel resistance, guidelines for antiplatelet recommendations in CYP2C19 of ultrarapid metabolizers (UM), extended metabolizers (EM) and poor metabolizers (PM) are clear. However, there is no clear recommendation as to whether ticagrelor or double dose clopidogrel is the best antiplatelet regimen for CYP2C19 of intermediate metabolizers (IM). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor (combined with aspirin) and high-dose clopidogrel (combined with aspirin) in patients after PCI with CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles.. We searched the following databases to select RCTs of comparing ticagrelor with high-dose clopidogrel in patients after PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles: CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Clinical trials, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), platelet function and TIMI bleeding event were defined as the outcomes. revman 5.3 software was used to perform meta-analysis.. A total of 14 RCTs with 2351 patients were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that compared with high-dose clopidogrel, ticagrelor had reduced incidence of MACEs (OR = 0.32, 95% Cl: 0.23-0.44, p < 0.00001), stent thrombosis (OR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.13-0.44, p < 0.00001), myocardial infarction OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.22-0.80, p = 0.008), revascularization (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.10-0.82, p = 0.02) and unstable angina (OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.29-0.77, p = 0.003) in patients after PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles. A subgroup analysis showed that ticagrelor reduced the risk of MACEs compared with high-dose clopidogrel regardless of the type of metabolizer. Compared with high-dose clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of MACE with longer follow-up period (more than 3 months) without increasing the risk of bleeding (OR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.53-1.49, p = 0.30), while elevated dyspnoea (OR: 5.62, 95%CI: 3.07-10.28, p < 0.00001).. For patients carrying CYP2C19 LOF alleles after PCI, ticagrelor may be better than high-dose clopidogrel in reducing the risk of MACEs, while dyspnoea incidents should be alerted.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Currently, potent P2Y. To compare oral P2Y. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science to identify studies that compared different oral P2Y. Nine studies (n=35 441 patients) were included in the systematic review. There was no difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor in the composite cardiovascular end point (prasugrel vs ticagrelor HR=0.80, 95% CI=0.61 to 1.06) in all patients with NSTE-ACS. In patients intended to receive invasive management, prasugrel resulted in a reduction of the composite cardiovascular end point both versus clopidogrel (HR=0.76, 95% CI=0.61 to 0.95) and ticagrelor (HR=0.74, 95% CI=0.56 to 0.98). Inconsistency was moderate and non-significant (I. In patients with NSTE-ACS intended to receive invasive management, an antiplatelet strategy based on prasugrel is more efficient than a similar strategy based on ticagrelor on a moderate level of evidence. This analysis supports the current recommendations by the ESC guidelines.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

 To investigate outcomes with selective, clopidogrel-based therapies versus conventional treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially for acute coronary syndrome..  Safety and efficacy of alternative, selective, clopidogrel-based therapies after PCI are not robustly established..  We performed a study-level meta-analysis on six randomized trials investigating selective clopidogrel-based therapies (three on unguided de-escalation,.  The incidence of major bleeding and MACE was similar in the selective, clopidogrel-based therapy versus the conventional treatment arm (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-1.01,.  As compared with prasugrel/ticagrelor treatment, alternative, selective, clopidogrel-based approaches provide a similar protection from cardiovascular events, reduce the risk of any bleeding, and are associated with a greater net benefit. These beneficial effects were prevalent with unguided de-escalation to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this review is to discuss cardiovascular mortality as clinical outcome in the setting of both acute and chronic coronary syndromes (ACS and CCS) with a focus on the clinical evidence supporting the mortality benefit of ticagrelor across multiple subpopulations.. Papers considered for this review were retrieved from a PubMed search, using different combinations of keywords (e.g., mortality AND coronary syndrome AND dual antiplatelet therapy AND ticagrelor), without limitations in terms of publication date and language.. Prevention of ischemic events and death is of outmost relevance in patients with ACS and CCS, given the high rate of recurrence of such events and fatalities. Owing to the evolving nature of patients with CCS, characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical presentations and previous medical history, as well as the advances in the therapeutic and invasive management of ACS, greater attention to the rate of hard clinical outcomes, improvement in the long-term prognosis, and reduction in the residual risk of recurrent events are increasingly reported among cardiologists. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy aimed at lowering the rate of ischemic events and death in patients treated both conservatively and invasively after ACS, as well as improving prognosis in patients with CCS. Significant differences are emerging among oral P2Y12 inhibitors with regards to mortality benefit.. Ticagrelor is an effective and well-tolerated option to attain a meaningful and clinically relevant reduction in cardiovascular mortality in both acute and chronic settings across a broad range of high-risk patient subpopulations with an acceptable payoff in terms of bleeding risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

P2Y12 inhibitors, including aspirin, are key components of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which is the optimal therapeutic strategy for preventing arterial thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who underwent stent implantation. Ticagrelor is a cyclopentyl-triazole pyrimidine antiplatelet drug that was the first reversible oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor exerts a faster onset and offset of function by reversible and selective inhibition of platelet aggregation in ACS patients, including those with coronary artery blood revascularization. Despite improvement in stent materials, stent thrombosis (ST) due to high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to clopidogrel continues to occur. In addition to antiplatelet aggregation, ticagrelor displays pleiotropic cardioprotective effects, including improving coronary blood flow, reducing myocardial necrosis after an ischemic event, and anti-inflammatory effects. The benefits of ticagrelor over clopidogrel were consistent in the PLATO results, with lower incidence of the primary endpoint. Also, in 2020, the findings from the phase 3 THALES trial (NCT03354429) showed that aspirin combined with 90 mg of ticagrelor significantly reduced the rates of stroke and death compared with aspirin alone in patients with AIS or TIA. Here, we review recent research on the superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel, discuss the pharmacological mechanism, and present future perspectives. This review aims to present the roles of ticagrelor in the management of acute coronary syndrome, acute thrombotic disease, and other diseases.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Although current guidelines recommend ticagrelor to clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome, its benefit and risk are unclear for East Asians. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome.. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases were searched from inception to July, 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome. Major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding events were assessed by using Mantel-Haenszel-pooled risk ratio and 95% con- fidence interval.. Five randomized controlled trials identified 2752 patients with acute coronary syndrome. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor had no statistical difference of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.52-1.45; P = .58), all cause death (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.32; P = .60), cardiovascular death (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.47-1.72; P = .74), myo- cardial infarction (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.52-1.58; P = .73), and stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.48-1.57; P = .64). Despite ticagrelor did not increase the incidence of fatal bleeding (RR 2.49, 95% CI 0.79-7.87; P = 0.12), the risks of all bleeding (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.16; P < .00001), major bleeding (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.12-2.04; P = .007), non-coronary artery bypass grafting major bleeding (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.23-2.71; P = .003), and minor bleeding (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.40-2.64; P < .0001) were significantly higher.. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of fatal bleed- ing, ticagrelor displayed similar efficacy and dramatically increased the risk of otherbleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines do not recommend pretreatment for nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with unclear coronary anatomy, which is inconsistent with our routine preoperative approach to loading P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (e.g., preoperative loading of 300 mg of clopidogrel).. The purpose of our study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of P2Y12 inhibitors administered before coronary angiography or at least before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with during or after PCI.. Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. The primary effect endpoint and safety endpoint were any-cause death and major bleeding, respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and revascularization were also analyzed.. Our search identified 9 trials. P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment was associated with lower death from any cause (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.72, P < 0.00001) without increasing the risk of bleeding (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.80-1.30, P = 0.89). However, prasugrel or ticagrelor pretreatment was not associated with a lower risk of mortality (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.31-1.59, P = 0.40) and increased the risk of bleeding (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.10-2.54, P = 0.02).. In summary, clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with significantly lower mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and revascularization with no increase in major bleeding. However, these advantages were not observed with prasugrel or ticagrelor pretreatment.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has remained the cornerstone for management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) over the years. Clopidogrel has been the quintessential P2Y12 receptor (platelet receptor for Adenosine 5' diphosphate) inhibitor for the past two decades. With the demonstration of unequivocal superior efficacy of prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel, guidelines now recommend these agents in priority over clopidogrel in current management of ACS. Cangrelor has revived the interest in injectable antiplatelet therapy too. Albeit the increased efficacy of these newer agents comes at the cost of increased bleeding and this becomes more of a concern when combined with aspirin. Which P2Y12i is superior over another has been intensely debated over last few years after the ISAR-REACT 5 study with inconclusive data. Three novel antiplatelet agents are already in the pipeline for ACS with all of them succeeding in phase II studies. The search for an ideal antiplatelet remains a need of the hour for optimal reduction of ischemic events in ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor and clopidogrel are antiplatelet drugs that act by binding to the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Previous studies have compared between them regarding the endothelial function effect.. This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence comparing the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).. In August 2021, the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched systematically for eligible trials. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with CAD.. Seven trials (n = 511) were included in our systematic review. Ticagrelor resulted in a greater elevation of the level of progenitor cells CD34+ KDR+ and CD34+ 133+ (P = 0.036 and P = 0.019, respectively), with a lower rate of endothelial cell apoptosis rate (P < 0.001). Moreover, ticagrelor showed superiority regarding nitric oxide, radical oxygen species, and soluble P-selectin levels (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, and P = 0.019, respectively). Flow-mediated dilation findings differed between the studies (P = 0.004 vs. P = 0.39).. Ticagrelor appears to exert an additional improvement in endothelial function compared with clopidogrel in patients with coronary heart disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. The safety and efficacy of DAPT in elderly patients with ACS is not well characterized.. We performed a systematic literature review to identify clinical studies that reported safety and efficacy outcomes after DAPT for ACS in elderly patients. The primary outcomes of primary efficacy endpoint rates and bleeding event rates were reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval. No prior ethical approval was required since all data are public.. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel is associated with a higher risk of bleeding events in elderly patients with ACS. There was no difference in the primary efficacy endpoints between the two treatment groups.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Emergency Medical Services; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The role of P2Y12 inhibition in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been well described in literature. However, the agent of choice is less clear among elderly patients (>65 years) who are at increased risk of bleeding. This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors vs. clopidogrel in this population.. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov (inception through February 25, 2021) were searched for randomized studies comparing potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors to clopidogrel in elderly population presenting with ACS. Study endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and p<0.05 was considered significant. Eight randomized studies with a total 10,081 patients were included in the final analysis. At mean follow up of 26 months, there were no significant differences between potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors and clopidogrel in MACE (HR 0.97, 95% CI [0.82-1.15]; p=0.73), all-cause mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI [0.75-1.10]; p=1.00), MI (HR 0.95, 95% CI [0.78-1.17]; p=0.64), and stroke (HR 1.24, 95% CI [0.82-1.86]; p=0.31). However, potent oral P2Y. In comparison with clopidogrel, the use of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors in elderly patients with ACS, is associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular mortality with increased risk of bleeding events and no significant change in MACE outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Thrombotic complications following coronary interventions (PCI) used to be frequent specifically in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. In recent years complication rates have significantly fallen due to improved stent technology, catheterisation techniques and intravascular visualisation. Therefore, the shortest necessary duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising aspirin and a P2Y. Thrombotische Komplikationen nach Koronarinterventionen (PCI) waren insbesondere bei akutem Koronarsyndrom (ACS) häufig. Durch verbesserte Stents, Kathetertechniken und intravaskuläre bildgebende Kontrollen ist die Komplikationsrate deutlich gefallen. Daher ist die unbedingt erforderliche Dauer einer dualen Antiplättchentherapie (DAPT) bestehend aus Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) und einem P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Previous studies and meta-analyses have assessed optimal P2Y12 inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome in overall trial cohorts. However, there are insufficient data for the elderly cohort who are prone to high bleeding and ischemic events. We aimed to assess the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor therapy for older patients.. PubMed, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception through July 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials and propensity-matched observational studies including older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) that reported study-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or major bleeding events. Outcomes at the mid-term follow-up were pooled to conduct a frequentist network meta-analysis.. Fourteen studies involving 12,953 older patients were included in our analysis. No significant difference was observed with MACE when all three P2Y12 inhibitors were compared with each other. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly increased the risk of major bleeding (risk ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.67) while prasugrel did not (risk ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.57). A sensitivity analysis of only randomized controlled trials yielded similar results for both MACE and major bleeding. The P score displayed prasugrel (0.5871) as the best treatment for MACE, while clopidogrel (0.7701) was the best P2Y12 inhibitor to decrease the risk of major bleeding. Ticagrelor (0.0634) was ranked the lowest because of an increased bleeding risk.. No significant difference is observed between the three P2Y12 inhibitors in study-defined MACE. Ranking by p-score suggests prasugrel as the best P2Y12 inhibitor to reduce the risk of MACE while clopidogrel is a better alternative than ticagrelor in older patients with acute coronary syndrome to decrease the risk of major bleeding. Because of a lack of individual-patient data analysis and heterogeneity amongst studies, future studies representing older patients with acute coronary syndrome are required to strengthen evidence regarding optimal antithrombotic therapy in this cohort.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Bleeding is an untoward outcome in the management of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although the potent oral P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor is clinically beneficial, its association with bleeding events in elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) is poorly understood.. We conducted a systematic search of 7 databases up to May 20, 2020 to identify studies which examined the risk of bleeding (defined according to each study) among elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) receiving ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Summary risk ratios (RR) were estimated using the random effects model.. Eight studies consisting of 5 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials involving 7032 elderly patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 12 months. Overall, the pooled RRs showed higher risk of a bleeding event with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (RR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.40; P = .017). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (Q = 6.93; P = .44; I2 = 0). Also, pooled RRs did not show a higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.92; P = .15) or minor bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76-1.58; P = .64) when comparing the ticagrelor to the clopidogrel group.. There is a 20% increased risk of a bleeding event in elderly ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel; for such patients, clopidogrel may be considered as an alternative agent to ticagrelor due to its lower risk of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Saudi Arabia; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Despite the developments of single or dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and/or clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor, post-acute coronary syndrome a room for potential improvement towards optimal prevention persist. The addition of a direct oral anticoagulant to the antiplatelet treatment of patients with the acute coronary syndrome is clinically practiced in cases where anticoagulation is indicated by high thromboembolic risk.. The main objective of this review was to explore the role of supplementation with a direct oral anticoagulant to antiplatelet (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor) in patients with the acute coronary syndrome.. We have searched the Medline for studies involving direct oral anticoagulant use in acute coronary syndrome. We have reviewed specific relevant 9 meta-analyses between the years 2012 to 2019.. Our review of nine meta-analyses has revealed that the addition of direct oral anticoagulant to antiplatelet therapy compared with antiplatelet alone was beneficial about the composite endpoints of major ischemic events in patients with the acute coronary syndrome. Furthermore, the combined regimen of single antiplatelet plus direct oral anticoagulant is as effective as the triple regimen of dual antiplatelet plus direct oral anticoagulant and results in less bleeding.. Cardiologists should balance the efficacy with a higher risk of bleeding with more intensified DOAC therapy. Better risk characterization and timely adaptation of the regime to the patient's need should be tested. Recurrent ischemic events and bleeding event risk scoring should guide individualized treatment.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Humans; Immunologic Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor has been shown to reduce the risk of pneumonia and improve lung function, but the findings across studies were inconsistent. The objective is to investigate the relative safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel on infection outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases.. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 15 October 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel that reported infection outcomes were included. The primary outcome was pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and sepsis. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by independent authors. Random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random-effects model. Out of 5231 citations, 10 trials with altogether 37 514 patients were included. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.95) compared to clopidogrel. There were no statistically significant differences for URTI (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.34-1.48), UTI (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.73-1.64), or sepsis (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.50-1.26).. Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor reduces the risk of pneumonia, but not URTI, UTI, or sepsis. Our study provides further evidence for recommending ticagrelor to patients with acute coronary syndrome at risk of pneumonia, although the mechanism by which ticagrelor reduces the risk of pneumonia merits further research.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor or prasugrel is the mainstay of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to systematically perform a head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in terms of efficacy and safety.. We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events and secondary outcome was bleeding events. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain the pooled estimate of each outcome.. Nine RCTs with a total number of 6990 patients (3550 treated with prasugrel and 3481 treated with ticagrelor) were included. No significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor was observed in terms of mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.13, P = 0.28), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.03, P = 0.10), non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.06, P = 0.11), stroke (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.72, P = 0.95), stent thrombosis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.21, P = 0.25), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) defined major (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.19 to 4.67, P = 0.94), minor (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.62, P = 0.18) and minimal (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.18, P = 0.11) bleeding and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined bleeding (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.36, P = 0.68).. In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar cardiovascular outcomes and adverse bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a novel antiplatelet agent that is frequently used for secondary prevention in coronary artery disease and has emerging evidence in stroke after the recent results of SOCRATES and THALES trials. The use of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients on ticagrelor is a topic of debate as the safety profile of ticagrelor in this setting is not well established.. We identified consecutive AIS patients taking ticagrelor who received intravenous alteplase at a comprehensive stroke center from January 2016 to December 2019. We then performed a literature search to capture all known published cases of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients on ticagrelor.. Of the 3896 patients who were treated for AIS at our local comprehensive stroke center during this time period, two patients received intravenous alteplase while on ticagrelor. Both patients had posterior circulation acute strokes and were successfully treated with intravenous alteplase without a systemic or intracranial bleeding event. Only five other cases of intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients on ticagrelor have been reported in the literature. Among these cases, four of the five cases had a hemorrhagic complication.. Despite prior reports of hemorrhagic complications with use of IV alteplase in setting of pre-treatment with ticagrelor, we report the safe use of intravenous thrombolysis in two cases presenting with acute ischemic stroke. Until safety is established in large studies, decision for thrombolysis should be made on case-by-case basis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor has been shown to offer potential outcome benefits in acute coronary syndromes and for the long-term cardiovascular prevention, reducing mortality and the recurrence of ischemic events. However, data from real-world and recent meta-analyses have suggested that the anti-ischemic benefits of ticagrelor could be lower than expected, potentially outweighed by an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic impact of ticagrelor as compared to the conventional antiplatelet agents (ASA and clopidogrel) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), enclosing patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable CAD.. Literature and main scientific session abstracts were searched for studies comparing a ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimen vs different antiplatelet agents in patients with CAD. The primary efficacy endpoint was mortality, and the primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).. We included 15 randomized clinical trials, with a total population of 73,402 patients (55% randomized to ticagrelor). At a mean follow-up of 15 ± 11.3 months, the ticagrelor based strategy did not significantly reduce mortality as compared to the traditional therapy (OR[95%CI] = 0.88[0.70,1.09], p = 0.24; phet<0.00001), with comparable results and no interaction according to patients' presentation (p interaction = 0.80). A similar result was achieved for cardiovascular mortality, whereas the reduction of recurrent myocardial infarction was significant (OR[95%CI] = 0.84[0.78,0.90], p < 0.00001; phet = 0.76). As for the risk of stroke, the largest reduction was observed in stable patients, while a neutral effect was observed in the ACS subgroup (p int = 0.35). Major bleeding events were increased in ticagrelor-treated patients (OR [95%CI] = 1.40 [1.06, 1.84], p = 0.02; phet<0.00001), especially ICH (OR [95% CI] = 1.45[1.13,1.84], p = 0.003; phet = 0.93), and mainly among non-ACS patient. No interaction for any outcome endpoint was observed according to patients' age.. Based on the current meta-analysis, a ticagrelor-based strategy for the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease is associated to a significant increase in major bleeding complications and especially for intracranial hemorrhage, as compared to a strategy based on conventional antiplatelet agents, while resulting in a neutral effect on survival. However, a significant reduction of recurrent myocardial infarction was observed with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and subsequent P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Whether guided selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is effective in improving outcomes compared with standard antiplatelet therapy remains controversial. We assessed the safety and efficacy of guided versus standard selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI.. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, from Aug 20 to Oct 25, 2020, we searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for randomised controlled trials and observational studies published in any language that compared guided antiplatelet therapy, by means of platelet function testing or genetic testing, versus standard antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were used with random-effects or fixed-effect models according to the estimated heterogeneity among studies assessed by the I. 3656 potentially relevant articles were screened. Our analysis included 11 randomised controlled trials and three observational studies with data for 20 743 patients. Compared with standard therapy, guided selection of antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0·78, 95% CI 0·63-0·95, p=0·015) and reduced bleeding, although not statistically significant (RR 0·88, 0·77-1·01, p=0·069). Cardiovascular death (RR 0·77, 95% CI 0·59-1·00, p=0·049), myocardial infarction (RR 0·76, 0·60-0·96, p=0·021), stent thrombosis (RR 0·64, 0·46-0·89, p=0·011), stroke (RR 0·66, 0·48-0·91, p=0·010), and minor bleeding (RR 0·78, 0·67-0·92, p=0·0030) were reduced with guided therapy compared with standard therapy. Risks of all-cause death and major bleeding did not differ between guided and standard approaches. Outcomes varied according to the strategy used, with an escalation approach associated with a significant reduction in ischaemic events without any trade-off in safety, and a de-escalation approach associated with a significant reduction in bleeding, without any trade-off in efficacy.. Guided selection of antiplatelet therapy improved both composite and individual efficacy outcomes with a favourable safety profile, driven by a reduction in minor bleeding, supporting the use of platelet function or genetic testing to optimise the choice of agent in patients undergoing PCI.. None.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States with an annual incidence of approximately 1 million. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) reduces cardiovascular event rates after ACS.. In 2016, the updated guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommended aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for at least 12 months for patients with ACS. Since these recommendations were published, new randomized clinical trials have studied different regimens and durations of antiplatelet therapy. Recommendations vary according to the risk of bleeding. If bleeding risk is low, prolonged DAPT may be considered, although the optimal duration of prolonged DAPT beyond 1 year is not well established. If bleeding risk is high, shorter duration (ie, 3-6 months) of DAPT may be reasonable. A high risk of bleeding traditionally is defined as a 1-year risk of serious bleeding (either fatal or associated with a ≥3-g/dL drop in hemoglobin) of at least 4% or a risk of an intracranial hemorrhage of at least 1%. Patients at higher risk are 65 years old or older; have low body weight (BMI <18.5), diabetes, or prior bleeding; or take oral anticoagulants. The newest P2Y12 inhibitors, prasugrel and ticagrelor, are more potent, with high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity of about 3% vs 30% to 40% with clopidogrel and act within 30 minutes compared with 2 hours for clopidogrel. Clinicians should avoid prescribing prasugrel to patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack because of an increased risk of cerebrovascular events (6.5% vs 1.2% with clopidogrel, P = .002) and should avoid prescribing it to patients older than 75 years or who weigh less than 60 kg. The ISAR-REACT-5 trial found that prasugrel reduced rates of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year compared with ticagrelor among patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (9.3% vs 6.9%, P = .006) with no significant difference in bleeding. Recent trials suggested that discontinuing aspirin rather than the P2Y12 inhibitor may be associated with better outcomes.. Dual antiplatelet therapy reduces rates of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Specific combinations and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy should be based on patient characteristics-risk of bleeding myocardial ischemia.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is an oral antiplatelet drug that can reversibly bind to the platelet P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4 and produces a rapid blood concentration-dependent platelet inhibitory effect. Unlike other P2Y12 receptor antagonists, many clinical features of ticagrelor are not related to P2Y12 receptor antagonism.. This review aims to gather existing literature on the clinical effects of ticagrelor after inhibiting adenosine uptake.. The current study reviewed literature related to the effects of ticagrelor on adenosine metabolism. The review also examined the drug's biological effects and clinical characteristics to see how it could be used in a clinical setting.. Many studies have shown that ticagrelor can inhibit equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1). This inhibition leads to intracellular adenosine uptake, increased adenosine half-life and plasma concentration levels and an enhanced adenosine-mediated biological effect.. Based on the studies reviewed, it was found that ticagrelor essentially inhibits adenosine absorption of adenosine into cells through ENT1, which increases the concentration in the blood and subsequently increases the protection of the heart muscle by adenosine. It also prevents platelet aggregation, and extends the biological effects of coronary arteries. Moreover, it leads to a lower mortality rate in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tablets; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients undergoing CABG remains unclear. This is the first meta-analysis investigating the clinical outcomes associated with ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimens in patients receiving CABG.. Relevant scientific databases were searched for studies investigating antiplatelet regimens after CABG from inception until April 1, 2019. Studies which randomly assigned CABG patients to either ticagrelor-based or control antiplatelet regimens were eligible. The primary outcome of this analysis was all-cause death. The main secondary outcome was MI. Other outcomes of interest were cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events, stroke and bleeding. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42019122192.. Five trials comprising 3996 patients (2002 assigned to ticagrelor-based and 1994 to control antiplatelet regimens) were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The median follow-up was 12 months. Control antiplatelet regimens consisted of either aspirin or clopidogrel or both. As compared to control, ticagrelor-based regimens reduced the risk of all-cause death [0.61 (0.43-0.87); P = 0.007], cardiac death [0.58 (0.39-0.86); P = 0.007] and major adverse cardiac events [0.79 (0.63-0.98); P = 0.03], without difference in the risk of MI [0.76 (0.50-1.18); P = 0.22], stroke [0.99 (0.56-1.78); P = 0.98] or bleeding [1.04 (0.95-1.14); P = 0.41]. There was a treatment effect modification for the primary outcome associated with trials enrolling predominantly patients with acute coronary syndrome (P for interaction = 0.038).. In patients receiving CABG, ticagrelor-based regimens reduce mortality and major adverse cardiac events without excess bleeding risk as compared with aspirin monotherapy or the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel. The benefit of ticagrelor-based regimens is more relevant in those studies enrolling predominantly patients with acute coronary syndrome. These findings require further confirmation in randomized trials focused on this subset of patients and powered for clinical outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with a long-term indication for anticoagulation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare randomised trials' outcomes of these patients, focussing on dual versus triple antithrombotic and non vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K oral anticoagulants regimens.. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2019 yielding 309 articles, and after careful screening, five randomized trials totalling 10 643 patients were included for analysis.. Dual antithrombotic regimens were associated with significantly less thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71], with no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.22) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.19). NOAC regimens had significantly lower TIMI major and minor bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66), with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.16) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26).. Dual antithrombotic and NOAC regimens have reduced bleeding without compromising the risk of cardiovascular events or mortality, and should be preferred for patients with ACS or PCI also needing long-term anticoagulation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Antiplatelet therapy, the cornerstone of post coronary stenting antithrombotic therapy, reduces the rate of hard clinical endpoints in patients treated both conservatively and invasively following an acute coronary syndrome, as well as in those patients with chronic stable coronary disease who receive a coronary stent. The development of newer antiplatelet and direct anticoagulant agents provides new options in the antithrombotic management of patients with coronary artery disease, enabling different therapeutic combinations to be tailored to an individual patient's bleeding and ischemic risk profile. In this review, we will summarize the history of dual antiplatelet therapy, discuss the latest evidence and future perspectives in treating patients with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor

Although current guidelines recommend ticagrelor in addition to aspirin as the antiplatelet strategy for medically managed acute coronary syndrome (MMACS) patients, clinical evidence specific to this special population is lacking. Whether potent oral P2Y. We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify studies exploring the efficacy or safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel versus clopidogrel or placebo in MMACS patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined by each study, and the safety endpoint was TIMI non-CABG major bleeding.. A total of 6102 records were screened, and 4 studies including 46,346 patients were finally included. The use of potent oral P2Y. Potent oral P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Clopidogrel is widely used after the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and requires activation by cytochrome P450 (CYP), primarily CYP2C19. Patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles are at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, while more expensive novel antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor and prasugrel) are unaffected by the CYP2C19 mutations. This systematic review aims to answer the question about whether overall evidence supports the genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy as a cost-effective strategy in post-PCI ACS.. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, EconLit, and PharmGKB was done to identify all the economic evaluations related to genotype-guided therapy compared to the universal use of antiplatelets in ACS patients. Quality of Health Economic Studies tool was used for quality assessment.. The search identified 13 articles, where genotype-guided treatment was compared to universal clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and/or prasugrel. Six studies showed that genotype-guided therapy was cost-effective compared to universal clopidogrel, while 5 studies showed that it was dominant. One study specified that genotype-guided with ticagrelor is cost-effective only in both CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizers. Genotype-guided therapy was dominant when compared to universal prasugrel, ticagrelor, or both in 5, 1, and 3 studies, respectively. Only 2 studies reported that universal ticagrelor was cost-effective compared to genotype-guided treatment. All the included articles had good quality.. Based on current economic evaluations in the literature, implementing CYP2C19 genotype-guided therapy is a cost-effective approach in guiding the selection of medication in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clinical Decision-Making; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Costs; Humans; Patient Selection; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Predictive Value of Tests; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Coronary artery disease remains the major cause of mortality worldwide. Antiplatelet drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are cornerstone treatments for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Clopidogrel has long been the gold standard but has major pharmacological limitations such as a slow onset and long duration of effect, as well as weak platelet inhibition with high inter-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. There has been a strong need to develop potent P2Y12 receptor antagonists with more favorable pharmacological properties. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent and have a faster onset of action; however, they have shown an increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor is highly potent and has a very rapid onset and offset of effect; however, its indication is limited to P2Y12 antagonist-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Two novel P2Y12 receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development, namely vicagrel and selatogrel. Vicagrel is an analog of clopidogrel with enhanced and more efficient formation of its active metabolite. Selatogrel is characterized by a rapid onset of action following subcutaneous administration and developed for early treatment of a suspected acute myocardial infarction. This review article describes the clinical pharmacology profile of marketed P2Y12 receptor antagonists and those under development focusing on pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction liability.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy combining aspirin with a P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Ticagrelor

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel with those of clopidogrel in CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers.. PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or cohort studies up to January 2020. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular (CV) death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and stroke. The secondary endpoint was bleeding. Pooled effects were measured by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's regression test and adjusted by trim and fill method.. Twelve studies comprising 5829 CV patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were included. Patients who received ticagrelor or prasugrel showed a lower risk of MACE than those who received clopidogrel (RR 0.524; 95% CI: 0.375, 0.731). The former also had lower risks of CV death (RR 0.409; 95% CI: 0.177, 0.946), all-cause death (RR 0.441; 95% CI: 0.263, 0.739), MI (RR 0.554; 95% CI: 0.414, 0.741) and stent thrombosis (RR 0.587; 95% CI: 0.348, 0.988) than the latter patient group. The risk of stroke was not significantly different between patients receiving the alternatives and those receiving clopidogrel (RR 0.605; 95% CI: 0.257, 1.425). Major and minor bleeding risk was not significantly different between patients treated with alternatives and clopidogrel (RR 1.019; 95% CI: 0.827, 1.260 and RR 1.235; 95% CI: 0.581, 2.628, respectively).. CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers can expect better clinical outcome on using prasugrel or ticagrelor rather than clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Alleles; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a P2Y12 inhibitor added to aspirin is considered the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI). Prasugrel and ticagrelor are commonly used P2Y12 inhibitors, and a few head-to-head randomized control trials (RCTs) have been performed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these RCTs to compare the efficacy and adverse effects between these two agents when used in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library for RCTs comparing prasugrel to ticagrelor in ACS. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, major bleeding, and all bleeding event. Estimates were calculated as random effects risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. Six trials with 6807 patients were included. There were no significant difference of MACE (RR 0.93; 95% CI [0.72-1.20]; p = 0.59; I. There are no significant difference of MACE, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, stent thrombosis, and bleeding between prasugrel and ticagrelor when added to aspirin among patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study found that ticagrelor plus aspirin (TA) was more effective than clopidogrel plus aspirin (CA), without an increase in the risk of massive bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data from other studies indicate that the conclusion is controversial with the results obtained by PLATO.. To investigate the efficacy and safety of TA, compared with CA, in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after PCI.. A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to compare the efficacy and safety of CA and TA treatment in patients with ACS after PCI. The endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and bleeding events. The data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The standards of reporting were in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.. 13 studies with a total of 58,062 patients were included in this study with a subgroup analysis of the European/American and Asian populations. In terms of effectiveness for MACEs, the European, American and Asian populations benefitted more from the TA treatment than the CA treatment (European and American populations, OR = 0.82, P = 0.0002; Asian, OR = 0.66, P < 0.0001; total, OR = 0.78, P < 0.0001). In terms of specific effectiveness indicators, such as stroke, MI, and stent thrombosis, the results of TA and CA groups in the European, American, and Asian populations were not consistent. In terms of safety, there was no statistical difference in total bleeding events between TA and CA treatments (OR = 1.19, P = 0.21). However, in the Asian population, the incidence of total bleeding events (OR = 1.52, P = 0.0004) in the TA group was higher than that in the CA group.. The TA treatment in the European and American populations is more beneficial and safer than CA treatment. However, although the Asian population has this benefit, the risk of bleeding is significantly increased as well, and antiplatelet drugs should be chosen carefully.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y. A meta-analysis was conducted from randomized trials (2001-2020) that studied discontinuation of aspirin 1 to 3 months after PCI with continued P2Y. The study population included 32 145 patients: 14 095 (43.8%) with stable coronary artery disease and 18 046 (56.1%) with acute coronary syndrome. In the experimental arm, background use of a P2Y. Discontinuation of aspirin with continued P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Withholding Treatment

Our aim was to examine clinical trials, provide guidance to practitioners and estimate the efficacy and safety of two agents by comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. We systematically looked through Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data and CNKI for trials comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with ACS since the database was created. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary endpoint for safety was the rate of major bleeding events. We also evaluated platelet function between low dose ticagrelor and standard dose clopidogrel in ACS patients. From 6744 articles, 16 studies including 1629 patients met the inclusion criteria. In contrast with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly reduced MACEs (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26, 0.58) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). No difference was noted for major bleeding events (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.43, 3.08) between the two agents (p=0.77). In addition, low dose ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than clopidogrel (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.68, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.53) (p<0.01). Platelet reaction units for low dose ticagrelor were much lower than those for standard dose clopidogrel (SMD -2.46, 95% CI -2.85 to -2.07) (p<0.01). In comparison with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly lowered the incidence of MACEs, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular end diastolic dimension and did not expand the risk of major bleeding events or minor or minimal bleeding events in ACS patients with a considerable safety and efficacy profile. In addition, low dose ticagrelor was associated with dramatically lower platelet aggregation compared with standard dose clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Off-Label Use; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to determine the relative merits of 1 agent over the other. Multiple databases were queried to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies. Random-effects model was used to calculate an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for major adverse cardiovascular and cerbrovascular events (MACCE) and its components. A total of 27 (7 RCTs, 20 observational cohort studies) studies comprising 118,266 (prasugrel 62,716, ticagrelor 51,196) patients were included. At 30 days, prasugrel was associated with a significantly lower odds of MACCE (OR 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.85, p ≤0.0001) and mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.71, p ≤0.0001). At 1 year, the overall odds of mortality favored prasugrel (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92, p = 0.002), but no significant interdrug difference was seen in terms of MACCE (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.05, p = 0.16). There was no significant difference in the odds of overall myocardial infarction, revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding events between the 2 groups on both 30-day and 1-year follow-up. A subgroup analysis of RCTs data showed no significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor in terms of any end point at all time points. In conclusion, prasugrel might have lower odds of MACCE and mortality at 30 days. However, there was no difference in the safety and efficacy end points of 2 drugs at 1 year. The observed transient prasugrel-related mortality benefits were subject to the bias of nonrandomized assignment.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Therapy, Combination; Global Health; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y. A search of PubMed was performed to identify articles published in the last 20 years that addressed the role of DAPT beyond 12 months' duration.. A number of studies have shown ischemic benefits associated with prolonging DAPT beyond 12 months, but this finding is dependent on the patient population studied and the quality of the study design. Many studies also show that longer duration therapy has been associated with increased bleeding risk. In patients with previous myocardial infarction completing at least 1 year of DAPT, continuing DAPT with a reduced dose of ticagrelor 60 mg BID is a regimen to be considered for these patients; in general ACS patients, a reduced dose of 60 mg BID of ticagrelor after the first year of DAPT should be considered; and in the post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients, DAPT beyond 1 year should be considered after careful evaluation of the patient's thrombotic and bleeding risks.. The duration of DAPT, and the choice of P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of prasugrel and ticagrelor on high (HTPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. HTPR and LTPR were evaluated on the basis of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI) and P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs). HTPR and LTPR were analyzed using risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI were used to calculate the pooled effect size of platelet reactivity (PR).. Fourteen eligible studies were obtained, which included 2629 patients treated with ticagrelor (n = 1340) and prasugrel (n = 1289). The pooled results showed that the prasugrel-treated patients had higher platelet reactivity than the ticagrelor-treated patients (PRU: WMD = - 32.26; 95% CI: - 56.48 to - 8.76; P < 0.01; VASP-PRI: WMD = - 9.61; 95% CI: - 14.63 to - 4.60; P = 0.002). No significant difference in HTPR based on PRU was identified between the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups (P = 0.71), whereas a lower HTPR based on VASP-PRI was found in the ticagrelor-treated patients than in the prasugrel-treated patients (RR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.75; P = 0.010). In addition, the results showed a lower LTPR was observed in the prasugrel group than in the ticagrelor group (RR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08-1.81; P = 0.01).. Prasugrel might enable higher platelet reactivity than ticagrelor. Ticagrelor could lead to a decrease in HTPR and increase in LTPR. However, this result was only obtained in pooled observational studies. Several uncertainties such as the nondeterminancy of the effectiveness of ticagrelor estimated using VASP-PRI or the definition of HTPR (a high or modifiable risk factor) might have affected our results.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Female; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The optimization of antithrombotic therapy for acute stroke treatment and secondary prevention is an evolving process based on an increasing array of studies that provide an evidence-based approach. Options have increased dramatically with the release of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and with the results of recent randomized clinical trials designed to assess potential benefits versus risks for patients in an individualized fashion. Recent studies have provided important information to guide choice and dosing of antiplatelet agents as well as the length of treatment. Anticoagulant use is particularly pertinent for stroke prevention in patients at higher risk of atrial fibrillation and may have a place in certain other stroke mechanisms. One important focus of study is the potential benefit of combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Options for our patients, when the initial choice of therapy does not demonstrate benefit or is not well tolerated, clearly, are valuable. For example, short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke and transient ischemic attack is being adopted, but with the recognition that longer-term combined therapy is not worth the increased risk of bleeding. Alternative antiplatelet choices, such as cilostazol and possibly ticagrelor, may be of benefit for refractory patients and this could affect the decision-making process. This review represents an effort to incorporate the information from more recent stroke prevention and treatment studies with information gleaned from prior studies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a reversible P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Costs; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

To construct a model to optimise and personalise recommendations for antiplatelet prescription for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Acknowledging that emergency physicians work with diagnostic uncertainty, we sought to identify the point at which the probability of ACS is sufficiently high that the benefits of antiplatelet treatment outweigh the risks. Second, we evaluated the projected clinical impact of this approach by using a clinical prediction model (Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS)) to calculate the probability of ACS.. We conducted three systematic reviews, quantifying the effects of ticagrelor, clopidogrel or aspirin-alone treatment strategies for ACS (November 2017). We extracted data for (a) clinical outcomes and (b) weighted patient preferences (utilities) for each outcome. We then constructed utilitarian models, simulating the probability of clinical outcomes with different treatment strategies. This identified the threshold probability of ACS at which each treatment strategy became superior.We validated this approach in a prospective diagnostic study including patients with suspected ACS that was conducted at two large UK teaching hospitals (St George's Hospital London recruited October 2015 to June 2017 and Manchester Royal Infirmary: February 2015 to August 2017). We calculated the probability of ACS using T-MACS. The diagnosis of ACS was adjudicated based on serial high-sensitivity troponin testing and 30-day follow-up.. We constructed three models using data from six studies. Prescribing ticagrelor had greatest overall benefit when the probability of ACS exceeded 8.0%. Below that threshold, aspirin alone yielded greater benefit. The validation study included 660 patients, of which 87 (13.2%) had ACS. Prescription of combined antiplatelet strategy to patients with >8% probability of ACS had greater utility than aspirin alone.. Treatment with ticagrelor appears to yield greater net benefit for patients when the probability of ACS >8%. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of this 'precision medicine' approach warrants further study.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Humans; London; Monte Carlo Method; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

The newer P2Y. We compared prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. MEDLINE and the Cochrane library were queried for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing prasugrel with ticagrelor in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Random-effects pooling was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses were stratified by duration of follow-up (short term [≤ 3 months] and long term [≥ 1 year]) and study design.. In total, 14 studies (six RCTs, eight observational studies), including 40,188 patients, met eligibility criteria. Pooled analysis did not indicate that prasugrel significantly decreased all-cause mortality compared with ticagrelor in the short term (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.20-1.20; p = 0.11) or long term (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48-1.15; p = 0.38). Pooled observational studies showed significantly lower long-term all-cause mortality (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.92; p = 0.02) and short-term stent thrombosis (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.28-0.75; p = 0.002) with prasugrel. No significant difference was observed in the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, bleeding, or repeat revascularization between the two groups. Results remained similar after stratification according to follow-up and study design.. The present analysis suggests that prasugrel might have a better efficacy profile than ticagrelor in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. However, this advantage was only seen in pooled observational studies and is likely to be affected by selection bias.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Antithrombotic treatment is a key component of secondary prevention following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although dual antiplatelet therapy is standard therapy post-ACS, duration of treatment is the subject of ongoing debate. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients with history of myocardial infarction reduced the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death. Similarly, in patients with stable coronary artery disease, two-thirds of whom had a history of myocardial infarction, dual antithrombotic therapy with very-low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin also resulted in improved ischaemic outcomes. In the absence of head-to-head comparison, choosing the most appropriate treatment strategy can be challenging, particularly when it comes to balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding. We aim to review the evidence for currently available antithrombotic treatments and provide a practical algorithm to aid the decision-making process.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Algorithms; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Decision Making; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor following percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute coronary syndrome remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of ticagrelor as part of dual-antiplatelet treatment for these patients.. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and other Internet sources were searched for eligible citations. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, consisting of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The secondary end point was the occurrence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). The risk of bleeding was chosen to be the safety end point.. Eleven clinical trials - six randomized trials and five observational trials - were finally analyzed. A tendency toward reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was observed only with respect to ticagrelor (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66-1.03;. As part of dual-antiplatelet treatment following percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and ST in acute coronary syndrome patients, but at the cost of bleeding. More powerful relevant randomized trials are still warranted to guide clinical decision-making.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Early administration of P2Y12-receptor inhibitors is recommended in all patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management, with the aim to achieve the fastest and most effective platelet inhibition. Several trials investigated alternative methods of P2Y12-receptor inhibitor administration (mainly chewed or crushed) aimed at ensuring faster and higher platelet inhibition. Thus, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing efficacy and safety of alternative P2Y12-receptor inhibitor administration strategies.. Systematic research was performed on Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and Web of Science databases. We included randomized or observational trials testing at least one P2Y12-receptor inhibitor alternative administration. The primary outcome of the study was the value of the platelet reactivity unit (PRU) at 1 h after drug administration, assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 test (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, CA). Secondary outcomes were adverse bleeding events (safety outcome).. Fourteen studies were selected for qualitative analysis. Five studies, all focused on ticagrelor, were selected for quantitative efficacy analyses. These five studies compared the administration of crushed/chewed ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD) with the standard whole tablets LD. The pooled mean difference between the two administrations was -59.24 PRU (95% CI from -30.61 to -87.87 PRU) in favor of the crushed/chewed administration, corresponding to a 25% mean relative PRU reduction between alternative and standard P2Y12-receptor inhibitor administrations at 1 h after drug intake. A similar relationship was found in other studies on alternative administration of clopidogrel and prasugrel, not included in the quantitative analysis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Safety; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Background As reports on the influence of cigarette smoking, an important cardiovascular risk factor, on platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors lack consistency, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors influenced by smoking status. Methods and Results PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE , Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until June 2018. Among the 5076 citations retrieved, 22 studies, including 163 011 patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention, were included for meta-analysis. Compared with nonsmokers within the first year of follow-up, the reductions of stroke and major adverse cardiovascular event rate were 18% ( P=0.008) and 26% ( P=0.02), respectively. A 20% reduction in stroke ( P=0.02) and a 34% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular event ( P=0.0001) rates were observed in smoking patients without percutaneous coronary intervention. No significant difference was observed in clinical outcome rates among prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in different smoking status. No significant difference was found in myocardial infarction and bleeding event incidence between current smokers and nonsmokers. Conclusions We concluded that current smokers had a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke events than did nonsmokers, particularly in the early period (1 year) and among patients without percutaneous coronary intervention. However, because of the lack of original adjusted data, smoker's paradox still needs to consider the impact of age and other covariates. Thus, a differential risk-benefit evaluation should be considered, according to different smoking status, patient conditions, and therapy time points.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cigarette Smoking; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

 The timing of P2Y12 inhibitor loading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a matter of debate. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral P2Y12 inhibitors: clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel administered at two different time points in relation to PCI: early (> 2 hours pre-PCI) versus late (< 2 hours pre-PCI or post-PCI)..  This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies were included. Outcomes evaluated were combined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, death and bleeding complications. Summary estimates of the relative risks with therapy were calculated..  Twenty-three studies met the selection criteria and included 60,907 patients. Early P2Y12 inhibitor loading was associated with a 22% relative risk reduction (RRR) of MACE (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68-0.89;.  Early clopidogrel loading is associated with a better efficacy and similar safety, whereas timing of ticagrelor or prasugrel loading had no effects on ischaemic events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clinical Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Survival Analysis; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may occur for a variety of reasons, including side effects (bleeding and non-bleeding) and costs. This study sought to assess the prevalence of de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel and the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes following de-escalation. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world studies in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. Real-world data on the prevalence of de-escalation during hospitalization or at discharge, after hospital discharge, and during the whole study period were included for meta-analysis. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding events occurring after de-escalation were also assessed. A total of 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis of the prevalence of de-escalation. De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy occurred with a mean prevalence of 19.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-28.4%]. De-escalation occurred more frequently in-hospital or at discharge than after hospital discharge (23.7% vs. 15.8%). For assessment of clinical outcomes, a total of six studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean rate of MACE for patients with de-escalation was 2.1% (95% CI 1.1-4.1%) and the rate of major bleeding events was 1.3% (95% CI 0.4-4.5%). In conclusion, de-escalation commonly occurs in real-world practice. Although rates of major cardiovascular and bleeding events in this analysis were generally low, the profile of patients suitable for de-escalation, the impact of de-escalation on adverse clinical outcomes and how this is affected by the timing after index ACS warrants further large-scale investigation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Patient Discharge; Prevalence; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a cornerstone of modern antithrombotic therapy alongside aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Adverse effects such as bleeding and dyspnea have been associated with premature ticagrelor discontinuation, which may limit any potential advantage of ticagrelor over clopidogrel. The randomized trials of ticagrelor captured adverse events, offering the opportunity to more precisely quantify these effects across studies. Therefore, a meta-analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials of ticagrelor conducted between January 2007 and June 2017 was performed to quantify the incidence and causes of premature ticagrelor discontinuation. Among 66,870 patients followed for a median 18 months, premature ticagrelor discontinuation was seen in 25%; bleeding was the most common cause of discontinuation followed by dyspnea. Versus the comparators, the relative risk of dyspnea-related discontinuation during follow-up was 6.4-fold higher, the relative risk of bleeding was 3.2-fold higher, and the relative risk of discontinuation due to any adverse event was 59% higher for patients receiving ticagrelor. Understanding these potential barriers to adherence to ticagrelor is crucial for informed patient-physician decision making and can inform future efforts to improve ticagrelor adherence. This review discusses the incidence, causes, and biological mechanisms of ticagrelor-related adverse effects and offers strategies to improve adherence to ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Atherosclerosis; Humans; Medication Adherence; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a dangerous and urgent clinical pattern of coronary artery disease. Aspirin and adenosine diphosphate P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

To estimate the absolute treatment effects of newer P2Y. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials of oral P2Y. From 9277 articles, nine fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Three trials compared newer P2Y. Newer P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Scotland; Sex Characteristics; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To determine whether ticagrelor or clopidogrel provides the best outcomes for East-Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Identification and interrogation of electronic databases through 26 July 2016 revealed fully randomized and controlled trials wherein primary efficacy end points were major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause death among East-Asian patients with ACS. Major bleeding and noncoronary artery bypass grafts major bleeding were primary safety end points.. Two studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor has no statistical difference in the end points of major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio [RR]: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.62-1.91; p = 0.7260), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.200; 95% CI: 0.64-2.24; p = 0.5669), stroke (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.46-2.66; p = 0.8165), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.48-1.65; p = 0.7150), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.43-1.96; p = 0.8252). When compared with clopidogrel, it was found that ticagrelor provoked marked increases in major bleeding (RR: 1.48; p = 0.0430) and noncoronary artery bypass grafts-associated major bleeding (RR: 1.62; p = 0.0454).. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel displayed similar efficacies in ACS presenting patients from East Asia. Administration of ticagrelor also displays some side effects including an increased risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Asia; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The duration and combination of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation, consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, is among the most intensely investigated therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular medicine. While initial studies have mainly focused on the efficacy and safety of individual antithrombotic agents, the increased need for a personalized, risk-based approach to define the optimal duration of antithrombotic treatment according to the estimated ischemic and bleeding risk was then recognized. Recent recommendations for the optimal duration of antithrombotic combination therapies following coronary stent implantation in various clinical scenarios have substantially changed. The aim of the present article is to discuss the recent evidence from randomized clinical trials and observational studies with respect to antithrombotic treatment regimens in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We will focus on optimal treatment duration and a personalized approach based on ischemic and bleeding risk assessment.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a first drug of a new chemical class cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidines. It is an antiplatelet agent with a unique mechanism of action, allowing a direct and reversible competitive inhibition of P2Y. This review is a comprehensive and thorough summary of the most important findings on ticagrelor. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, drug-drug interactions, adverse effects, efficacy in specific patient populations and off-label properties of ticagrelor are discussed in this paper. Moreover, the results from pivotal clinical trials are presented.. Introduction of ticagrelor, a first directly-acting and reversible P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Interactions; Dyspnea; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

According to ACC/ AHA guidelines, a minimum of 1 year of dual anti- platelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a platelet ADP-receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) is recommended for patients presenting acute coronary syndromes (ACS), regardless of which type of revascularization is performed during the acute event.. The purpose of this presentation was to review the present data either from a direct randomized comparison among the three compounds and also large prospective observational registries and meta-analysis were analyzed in detail. With this aim, we performed an extensive large search from PubMed/Medline Journals identifying studies comparing fashion the new P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ACS including ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in direct and indirect manner.. Pivotal large randomized clinical trials (RCT) in patients with ACS including STEMI, comparing clopidogrel, a first generation P2Y12 inhibitor against the newer prasugrel and ticagrelor showed major efficacy advantages of the latters although both drugs had more bleeding risk than clopidogrel. Direct comparisons of prasugrel and ticagrelor from large RCT are not yet available, however, several observational registries and metaanalysis reported results from an indirect comparison between both compounds. Major findings and limitations of each of these studies were identified, highlighted and discussed.. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are both more effective than clopidogrel to prevent adverse cardiac events in patients with ACS. Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel appears to be more effective in patients with STEMI, although lack of randomized data didn't allow to draw definitive conclusions.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Ticagrelor

Platelet activation plays a central role in triggering and complicating acute coronary syndromes, especially in case of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction. On top of aspirin, P2Y12- inhibitors are successfully used to treat and prevent these events for a duration of one year after an acute coronary episode or 6 months after drug-eluting stent implantation. However, patients with acute coronary syndromes remain at heightened risk for recurrent ischemic events after the recommended durations of P2Y12-inhibitors and therefore, prolonging treatment is often considered in clinical practice. However, the higher risk for bleeding limits the utility of such approach to a restricted group who is still poorly defined by available measures. This review aims to discuss potential benefits and highlight important pitfalls of prolonged treatment with P2Y12-inhibitors, with a focus on ticagrelor, an attractive reversible P2Y12-inhibitor in patients after myocardial infarction.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clinical Decision-Making; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Bleeding complications are associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Compared to Whites, several studies demonstrated a higher risk of bleeding in Asians who present with acute myocardial infarction. To date, the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in East Asian population have not been well established.. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared ticagrelor and clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrial.gov database.. Three randomized controlled trials, including a total of 1552 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Study countries included Japan, South Korea, and China. All studies defined primary efficacy endpoint and major bleeding events in accordance with the PLATO definition. Ticagrelor was associated with a numerically lower, albeit statistically nonsignificant, risk of primary efficacy endpoint defined as a composite of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke (odds ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.63; p = 0.60). Ticagrelor was associated with a significantly higher risk of PLATO-defined major bleeding compared to clopidogrel (odds ratio 1.52; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.23; p = 0.03).. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to clopidogrel in East Asian patients with ACS. Further studies evaluating the role of ticagrelor in management of ACS in East Asian patients are warranted.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in the world. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common form of CVD presentation, but the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is increasing. Patients with polyvascular disease comprise a very high-risk population that has been infrequently studied. Areas covered: The authors review the current evidence of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in the setting of acute coronary syndrome and stable patients post-MI with and without PAD and summarize its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and regulatory issues. Expert opinion: Randomized studies showed that ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and is superior to placebo in the chronic phase (>1 year) post-myocardial infarction. Sub-analyses of these studies suggest that patients with myocardial infarction and PAD, compared to patients without these characteristics, may have greater benefit with ticagrelor. Nonetheless, the global evidence about the role of ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction and PAD remains relatively sparse, and a prospective randomized trial testing this hypothesis would be necessary to provide more definite data regarding the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in this very high-risk population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Government Regulation; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The introduction of ticagrelor, one of the first directly-acting oral antiplatelet drugs, provided new possibilities in the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor in dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin over clopidogrel for prevention of stent thrombosis in patients with ACS. Moreover, in the management of ACS, lipid-lowering treatment with high-intensity statin therapy is advised for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events over the long term. Despite the apparent advantages of combined antiplatelet and lipid-lowering treatments, a possible interaction between statins and ticagrelor may lead to myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. In this review, relevant information was gathered on the ticagrelor-statin interaction that might lead to this life-threatening condition. This review focuses on the most widely used statins-simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin. Possible mechanisms of this interaction are discussed, including CYP3A4 isoenzymes, organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATPs), P-glycoprotein and glucuronidation. PubMed database was searched for relevant case reports and all data gathered from the introduction of ticagrelor to March 2018 are presented and discussed. In summary, co-administration of statins and ticagrelor was found to be relatively safe in routinely prescribed doses. However, caution should be exercised, especially in elder populations.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Muscular Diseases; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rhabdomyolysis; Risk; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

 The clinical benefit of anti-platelet agents in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. In addition, the risk-benefit ratio of potent oral P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists (PPAs), namely, prasugrel and ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel in CKD patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unknown..  We performed a meta-analysis of all studies comparing the clinical outcomes of PPA and clopidogrel therapy in CKD patients suffering from ACS..  We searched PubMed, the Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Clinical trial.org and the abstracts of international cardiology congresses from April 2000 to October 2017. Clinical studies comparing PPA with clopidogrel in ACS patients with CKD were selected. Our literature research identified five studies which were included in the meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at the latest follow-up available. Secondary endpoint included bleedings..  Compared with clopidogrel, PPAs were associated with a reduced rate of MACE without increased bleedings in CKD patients with ACS. Among invasively managed patients, this benefit from PPA included a reduction in mortality.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Survival Analysis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor has been acknowledged as a new oral antagonist of P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor, as a strategy with more rapid onset as well as more significant platelet inhibition function in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The clinical benefit of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel remains controversial. The current meta-analysis was conducted to better evaluate the role of ticagrelor in comparison of clopidogrel in treating ACS patients.. The publications involving the safety as well as the efficacy of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor were screened and identified updated to June 2018. After rigorous review, eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were extracted and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted. To analyze the summary odds ratios (ORs) of the endpoints of interest, we applied Meta-analysis Revman 5.3 software.. There were a total of 10 studies that met our inclusion criteria, of which the risk of bleeding rate (P = 0.43), MI (P = 0.14), and stroke (P = 0.70) had no association with significant differences between patients receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Nonetheless, higher rate of dyspnea was observed in ticagrelor group (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.70-2.05, P<0.00001 = .. Our present findings suggest similar efficacy and safety profiles for clopidogrel and ticagrelor Ticagrelor should be considered as a valuable option to reduce the risk of bleeding, MI and stroke, whereas potentially increases the incidence of dyspnea. Given the metabolic process, ticagrelor may be a valid and even more potent antiplatelet drug than clopidogrel, as an alternative strategy in treating patients with clopidogrel intolerance or resistance.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To provide an overview of selected randomized studies reported over the last 2 years evaluating antiplatelet therapies in patients with either acute or stable manifestations of atherosclerosis.. From large outcome trials included evidence for reduced risk of ischemic events associated with use of ticagrelor and aspirin versus aspirin alone, albeit with an increased bleeding risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease and history of myocardial infarction. No benefit regarding ischemic outcomes could be demonstrated for ticagrelor monotherapy compared with aspirin or clopidogrel in patients with stroke or peripheral vascular disease, respectively. Results from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies suggest that switching from prasugrel to ticagrelor is safe, regardless of the use of a loading dose, and that loading with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel leads to more prompt and potent platelet inhibition in patients undergoing ad hoc percoutaneous coronary intervention. No evidence could be demonstrated for the prognostic value of routine platelet function monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy.. Large outcome trials demonstrated various effects of antithrombotic strategies including ticagrelor on clinical outcomes across patient populations. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies confirmed a more prompt and potent platelet inhibition after loading with the new P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel, and suggested the safety of switching from prasugrel to ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Blood Platelets; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In this study, a systematic evaluation was conducted to estimate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor for treating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in general ACS patients and a diabetes mellitus (DM) group.. A search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CNKI databases was conducted to analyze relevant randomized controlled trails (RCTs) of ticagrelor treating ACS during 2007 to 2015. Article screening, quality accessing and data extracting was independently undertaken by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in general ACS patients, and a meta-regression analysis was taken to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in DM patients compared with general ACS patients.. Twenty-two studies with 35004 participants were included. The meta-analysis result implicated that ticagrelor could: 1) reduce the incidence of the composite endpoint [OR = 0.83, 95%CI (0.77, 0.90), P<0.00001] and the incidence of myocardial infarction [OR = 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89), P = 0.0001]; 2) not statistically reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death, the incidence of stroke and the incidence of bleeding events; 3) increase the incidence of dyspnea [OR = 1.90, 95%CI (1.73, 2.08), P<0.00001] compared with clopidogrel. Meanwhile, compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor could 1) reduce the platelet reactivity of patients at maintenance dose [MD = -44.59, 95%CI (-59.16, -30.02), P<0.00001]; 2) not statistically reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death, the platelet reactivity of patients 6 hours or 8 hours after administration, or the incidence of bleeding events; 3) induce the incidence of dyspnea [OR = 13.99, 95%CI (2.58, 75.92), P = 0.002]. Furthermore, the result of meta-regression analysis implicated that there was a positive correlation between DM patients and the platelet reactivity of patients 6 hours and 8 hours after administration, but there was no obvious correlation between DM patients and general ACS patients in other endpoints.. Ticagrelor could reduce the incidence of composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke as well as platelet reactivity in DM patients with ACS, while not increasing the risk of bleeding. Because there are differences in platelet reactivity between DM patients and general ACS patients, we suggest that caution is needed when using ticagrelor in clinical applications.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Regression Analysis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The newer oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists (i.e. prasugrel and ticagrelor) are recommended over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) going for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). As the superiority of one agent over the other remains unclear, we designed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these agents in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.. PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL and manual search were performed through 11/02/2016. Mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis (ST) and BARC bleeding ≥2 were the major outcomes.. A total of 9 studies with 21,360 total patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel was associated with lower rate of MI [0.8% vs. 1.9%; 0.54 (0.29-0.99); P=0.05] but no difference was noted in mortality [2.1% vs. 2.4%; 0.84 (0.64-1.09); P=0.19], repeat revascularization [1.6% vs. 2.1%; 0.82 (0.61-1.10); P=0.19] and stroke [0.2% vs. 0.3%; 0.68 (0.25-1.83); P=0.44] between two agents. In addition, prasugrel was associated with lower risk of BARC ≥2 bleeding [2.5% vs. 3.8%; 0.75 (0.59-0.95); P=0.02] and showed a trend toward a lower risk of ST [0.3% vs. 0.6%; 0.55 (0.28-1.07); P=0.08] in comparison with ticagrelor.. Based on this meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies, prasugrel appears to be equivalent or superior to ticagrelor in patients with ACS undergoing PCI on the 30-day follow up. Larger randomized trials with longer follow-ups are needed to establish superiority of one agent over the other.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Prasugrel and Ticagrelor are emerging antiplatelet drugs that might have the potential to replace currently used antiplatelet agents. Previous analyses comparing prasugrel with ticagrelor mainly focused on an indirect comparison whereas direct comparison was reported only in a few recently published trials. We aimed to systematically carry out a head to head comparison of the adverse clinical outcomes which were associated with prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Studies comparing prasugrel with ticagrelor (head to head comparison) were searched from online databases. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were considered as the primary endpoints whereas bleeding outcomes were considered as the secondary endpoints in this analysis. The latest version of the RevMan software was used to carry out subgroup analyses whereby odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the calculated probability (P) were generated.. Four studies with a total number of 563 patients (2012 - 2016) were included (282 patients were treated with prasugrel and 281 patients were treated with ticagrelor). Results of this analysis did not show any significant difference in mortality between prasugrel and ticagrelor with OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.42 - 5.45; P = 0.52. In addition, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, stroke and stent thrombosis were also not significantly different with OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.08 - 4.58; P = 0.62, OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.37 - 2.21; P = 0.83, OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.08 - 4.58; P = 0.62 and OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.08 - 4.58; P = 0.62 respectively. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) defined minor bleeding, and minimal bleeding were also not significantly different between these two newer antiplatelet agents with OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 0.48 - 19.94; P = 0.23, and OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 0.35 - 16.42; P = 0.38 respectively. Moreover, bleeding defined by the academic research consortium was also similarly manifested with OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.39 - 2.13; P = 0.84.. In patients with ACS, both prasugrel and ticagrelor showed similar adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events. No significant difference was observed between these two newer antiplatelet agents during this head to head comparison. However, upcoming trials with long term follow up periods might be expected to completely solve this important clinical issue.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

The risk and benefit of GP-IIb/IIIa Inhibition (GPI) in combination with recent antiplatelet regimens in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain unassessed. The advent of fast-acting highly active oral P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Platelet P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Postoperative Complications; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aftercare; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Imaging Techniques; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Disease; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prosthesis Design; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stents; Thrombectomy; Ticagrelor; Time-to-Treatment; Tissue Scaffolds

We review the use of oral antiplatelet (OAP) therapies in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management for nurse practitioners (NPs), focusing on current guideline recommendations.. Treatment guidelines and clinical articles from PubMed.. Guidelines recommend that dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y. Enhanced NP understanding of OAP agents and current guidelines could contribute to improved ACS patient management.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Arylsulfonates; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Disease Management; Humans; Nurse Practitioners; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

A review of the literature was conducted for clinical trials evaluating the antiplatelet P2Y12 receptor antagonists, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, as well as the guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or myocardial infarction. Clinical guidelines recommend that patients with ACS be treated with dual oral antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. The selection of an appropriate antiplatelet agent depends on the treatment approach and a patient's bleeding risk and clinical history. With respect to antiplatelet activity, prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate greater potency and less interpatient variability than clopidogrel. In phase III clinical trials, prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced the incidence of ischemic events in patients with ACS compared with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were associated with a similar risk of major bleeding, whereas patients receiving prasugrel had an increased risk of major bleeding versus those receiving clopidogrel. Pharmacists can provide guidance on the appropriate use of antiplatelet agents as well as the use of concomitant medications, while being vigilant for any potential drug interactions.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Stent thrombosis is a morbid complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces stent thrombosis risk. However, the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel - the most frequently used ADP receptor antagonist in post-PCI patients - varies among individuals. High on-treatment platelet reactivity was repeatedly associated with the risk of stent thrombosis. Ticagrelor is a novel ADP receptor blocker that has shown greater, more rapid and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. This agent offers a unique mechanism of action, no relevant pharmacological interactions, consistent platelet inhibition, and a good safety profile. This article reviews the prospective use of ticagrelor in the treatment of stent thrombosis in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI of culprit coronary lesion.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Resistance; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Stents; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HcPR) during dual-antiplatelet therapy is a marker of vascular risk, in particular stent thrombosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Genetic determinants (CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), advanced age, female gender, diabetes and reduced ventricular function are related to a higher risk to develop HcPR. In addition, inflammation and increased platelet turnover, as revealed by the elevated percentage of reticulated platelets in patients' blood, that characterize the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes, are associated with HcPR. To overcome the limitation of clopidogrel, new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) were developed and the demonstration of their superiority over clopidogrel was obtained in the two randomized trials, TRITON TIMI 38 and PLATO. Emerging evidence is accumulating on the role of high-on aspirin platelet reactivity (HaPR), especially in the clinical context of diabetes. Finally, the presence of new, potent antiplatelet drugs has shifted the focus from thrombotic to bleeding risk. Recent data document that low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) is associated with a significantly higher bleeding risk. Due to the current possibility to choose between multiple antiplatelet strategies, the future perspective is to include in the management of ACS, in addition to clinical data and classical risk factors, the definition of platelet function during treatment in order to set a tailored therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Sex Factors; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors occurs each time clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor are given to patients with suspected coronary artery disease before definition of the coronary anatomy. In acute coronary syndromes, the practice of administering oral P2Y12 inhibitors upstream has been the object of significant controversy in recent years, following the publication of two trials of pretreatment in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, respectively. The introduction in the market of cangrelor - the first intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor - represents a new opportunity but also a new challenge for clinicians. This article reviews current recommendations and supporting evidence surrounding pretreatment with oral and intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors are commonly used drugs in patients on hemodialysis (HD) to treat acute coronary syndrome with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and patients with stable coronary artery disease after PCI. Clopidogrel is the most commonly prescribed P2Y12 receptor inhibitor because it is effective in the general population and is not as costly as newer FDA-approved agents (prasugrel, ticagrelor). However, increasing evidence is accumulating that clopidogrel may not be as effective in reducing mortality and preventing future ischemic events in patients with kidney disease. In this review, we will explore some of the studies that form the basis for this statement and discuss potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic reasons why clopidogrel might be less effective in HD patients, as well as explore potential risks and benefits of alternatives to clopidogrel therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Dialysis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor (P2Y12 receptor antagonist) is presently indicated for preventing atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and patients with a history of myocardial infarction. The PARTHENON clinical development program comprises five randomized, controlled, cardiovascular, indication-seeking outcome studies, aiming to evaluate ticagrelor across the spectrum of patients with atherothrombotic disease. Results of two large-scale trials support a benefit for ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (PLATO; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00391872) and in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (PEGASUS-TIMI 54; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01225562). Ongoing trials will provide information on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (SOCRATES; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01994720), peripheral artery disease (EUCLID; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01732822) and coronary artery disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (THEMIS: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01991795).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Atherosclerosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

It is estimated that in the United States, each year, approximately 620,000 persons will experience an acute coronary syndrome and approximately 70% of these will have non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular disease still accounts for 1 of every 3 deaths in the United States, and there is an urgent need to improve the prognosis of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular mortality and ischemic complications are common after acute coronary syndrome, and the advent of newer antithrombotic therapies has reduced ischemic complications, but at the expense of greater bleeding. The new antithrombotic agents also raise the challenge of choosing between multiple potential therapeutic combinations to minimize recurrent ischemia without a concomitant increase in bleeding, a decision that often varies according to an individual patient's relative propensity for ischemia versus hemorrhage. In this review, we will synthesize the available information to arm health care providers with the contemporary knowledge on antithrombotic therapy and individualize treatment decisions.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polymorphism, Genetic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

After acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the so-called dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which usually consists of low-dose of aspirin in combination with a thienopyridine (clopidogrel, prasugrel) or with a cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine (ticagrelor), reduces the risk of ischemic events. Ticagrelor, un particular, is an effective drug as it isn' a prodrug, doesn't require metabolic activation and demonstrates a rapid onset and faster offset of action. Areas covered: This article evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety and tolerability of ticagrelor during DAPT after ACS and its potential use beyond the canonical twelve months after PCI. The review discusses studies comparing: ticagrelor and clopidogrel (DISPERSE, DISPERSE-2, PLATO, RESPOND Trial, ONSET/OFFSET Trials), ticagrelor and placebo (PEGASUS TIMI 54 Trial). Expert opinion: For ACS patients, the PLATO trial showed that ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in the reduction of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. PEGASUS TIMI 54 showed that patients in whom ischemic events and cardiovascular death outweigh the risk of life-threatening bleeding, may benefit from prolonged ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy, over 12 months. This strategy has been recently approved by the ACC/AHA guidelines. Further studies are needed to evaluate and eventually validate the role of the prolonged DAPT in patients treated with new generation stents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

A P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The occurrence of dyspnoea in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients has always been considered a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic clinical scenario. P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitors (i.e., clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) are currently the cornerstone of treatment of ACS patients. Thus, in the last few years, the potential association between ACS and dyspnoea has also become more challenging with the increasing use of ticagrelor in these patients due to its beneficial effects on ischaemic event prevention and mortality, since ticagrelor can induce dyspnoea as a side effect. The present article is intended to review the current literature regarding dyspnoea occurrence in ACS patients, especially those treated with ticagrelor, and to propose ticagrelor-associated dyspnoea management recommendations based on current knowledge.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Dyspnea; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet agent widely prescribed for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and it is activated by the CYP enzyme system to active metabolite. CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) allele(s) affect the responsiveness of clopidogrel, but not the new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor). We reviewed the pharmacoeconomic studies on genotype-guided use of new antiplatelet agents.. A literature search was conducted between the period of 2000 and 2014. Seven studies including cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit analyses of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients were reviewed. Genotype-guided prasugrel was found to be cost-effective when compared with universal antiplatelet therapy in four studies. Three studies showed genotype-guided ticagrelor to be cost-effective in ACS patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and universal ticagrelor to be cost-effective in ACS patients. Drug cost of antiplatelet agents and relative risk of the new antiplatelet versus clopidogrel for clinical events were common influential factors of cost-effectiveness analyses.. All studies in the present review focused on selecting antiplatelet agents for carriers of CYP2C19 LOF allele(s). Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided use of antiplatelets was demonstrated in high-risk ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor (Brilique™, Brilinta®), a cyclopentyl-triazolopyrimidine, is an orally active, reversible, and selective adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist indicated for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor has a faster onset of action and provides greater inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. In the large well-designed, PLATO study in adult patients with ACS, 12 months' treatment with ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in reducing the incidence of the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular (CV) death. Ticagrelor also reduced all-cause mortality relative to clopidogrel, although statistical significance of this was not confirmed in hierarchical testing. Benefit with ticagrelor was seen both in invasively and noninvasively managed patients. Ticagrelor was generally well tolerated and was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding relative to clopidogrel. However, the incidences of non-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related bleeding, and major or minor bleeding, as well as some non-hemorrhagic adverse events, including dyspnea (usually of mild or moderate severity) and ventricular pauses (largely asymptomatic) were higher with ticagrelor. In addition, the ATLANTIC study showed that although pre-hospital administration of ticagrelor did not improve pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) coronary reperfusion in ACS patients relative to in-hospital administration, ticagrelor was safe in both instances, with no significant between-group differences in non-CABG-related major and minor bleeding events. Although further comparative studies with other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel, are required to position it more definitively, current evidence indicates that ticagrelor is a useful option for the prevention of thrombotic CV events in ACS patients managed invasively or noninvasively.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aging; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Artery Bypass; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Platelet-mediated thrombosis is a major pathophysiological mechanism that underlies acute coronary syndromes, and therefore, antiplatelet therapy is an important foundation in the treatment and prevention of recurrence of these syndromes. Nearly 30 years ago, aspirin was the first agent to show a benefit for acute coronary syndromes and is still a key therapeutic agent. The landmark CURE trial showed that the addition of a P2Y12 antagonist, clopidogrel, to aspirin was beneficial in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. Despite substantial benefits with clopidogrel, limitations include the slow speed of onset, variable response, and a modest antiplatelet effect. Next-generation P2Y12 antagonists, prasugrel and ticagrelor, overcome these limitations and have been shown, in large-scale clinical trials for acute coronary syndromes, to reduce ischaemic events more than clopidogrel, at the expense of an increase in bleeding. Additional agents that target platelets by alternate mechanisms, including the protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist vorapaxar, have shown ischaemic benefit. These large-scale trials inform treatment decisions that need to balance ischaemic benefit and bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This Series paper describes major trial results, implications for clinical practice, and summarises continuing controversy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Despite advancements in treatments for acute coronary syndromes over the last 10 years, they continue to be life-threatening disorders. Currently, the standard of treatment includes dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. The thienopyridine class of P2Y12 receptor antagonists, clopidogrel and prasugrel, have demonstrated efficacy. However, their use is associated with several limitations, including the need for metabolic activation and irreversible P2Y12 receptor binding causing prolonged recovery of platelet function. In addition, response to clopidogrel is variable and efficacy is reduced in patients with certain genotypes. Although prasugrel is a more consistent inhibitor of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel, it is associated with an increased risk of life-threatening and fatal bleeding. Ticagrelor is an oral antiplatelet agent of the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine class and also acts through the P2Y12 receptor. In contrast to clopidogrel and prasugrel, ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation and binds rapidly and reversibly to the P2Y12 receptor. In light of new data, this review provides an update on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profiles of ticagrelor in different study populations. Recent studies report that no dose adjustment for ticagrelor is required on the basis of age, gender, ethnicity, severe renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment. The non-P2Y12 actions of ticagrelor are reviewed, showing indirect positive effects on cellular adenosine concentration and biological activity, by inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 independently of the P2Y12 receptor. CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genotypes do not appear to influence ticagrelor pharmacodynamics. A summary of drug interactions is also presented.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is recommended in local and international guidelines as first-line therapy in combination with aspirin in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance regarding the use of ticagrelor in this setting.. Ticagrelor, a direct-acting, reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist, has a faster onset, and a more potent and predictable antiplatelet effect compared with clopidogrel. The authors recommend considering the use of ticagrelor in moderate-to-high risk ACS patients treated with an invasive approach and those managed non-invasively who have elevated troponin levels. Consistent with outcomes observed in the PLATO trial overall, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease, a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, the elderly, and patients requiring surgical revascularization.. When switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor, patients established on clopidogrel therapy can be switched directly without loading; patients not loaded with clopidogrel and not taking maintenance dose clopidogrel for at least 5 days should first be loaded with ticagrelor. Guidelines recommend discontinuing ticagrelor 5 days before surgery if antiplatelet effects are not desired and recommencing therapy as soon as safe following surgery. Ticagrelor should be avoided in individuals with a history of intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment, high bleeding risk, within 24 hours of thrombolytic therapy, and in those treated with oral anticoagulants. Local, real-world experience suggests low bleeding rates with ticagrelor therapy. Dyspnoea is a common symptom in patients with ACS and is also a side-effect of ticagrelor therapy. Discontinuation of ticagrelor due to dyspnoea has been uncommon in clinical trials. However, local registry data suggest higher discontinuation rates (2-9%) related to dyspnoea in the real-world setting, indicating that clinicians may need to consider other potential causes of dyspnoea before discontinuing ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors are more potent and have faster onset of action than clopidogrel. However, the efficacy and safety in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are not well studied. A systemic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials comparing newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) to clopidogrel in patients with NSTE-ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke (major cardiovascular events [MACE]). Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding. A total of 31,470 patients with NSTE-ACS from 4 randomized clinical trials were included (newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors: 15,951; clopidogrel: 15,519). Newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly decreased MACE (relative risk [RR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.95) and MI (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96) and showed a trend toward reduction of cardiovascular death (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01). There was a significant increase in TIMI major bleeding (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.50) and TIMI major or minor bleeding (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42). Results were largely similar when stratified by ticagrelor versus prasugrel (pinteraction >0.05) except for increased TIMI major/minor bleeding with prasugrel than ticagrelor (pinteraction = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with NSTE-ACS, newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors decrease MACE and MI at the expense of a significant increase in the risk of bleeding. Treatment of 1,000 patients with newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors will prevent 16 MACE and 13 MIs at the expense of increase in 6 major bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Humans; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelets play a significant role in the management of patients with coronary disease. Novel inhibitors of the platelet P2Y12 receptor have more rapid, potent, and consistent inhibitory effect on platelets compared with clopidogrel. Evidence from large clinical studies have defined populations in which novel agents are superior to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor or prasugrel in addition to aspirin should be used preferentially for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction because of significant anti-ischemic benefits. In patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, ticagrelor has proven superiority over clopidogrel whether or not an invasive strategy is adopted, and prasugrel has been shown to be beneficial when started at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. Of note, neither prasugrel nor ticagrelor have been studied in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease or those who required 'triple therapy.' In these situations, clopidogrel should remain the default until further data are available. Prolonged use of clopidogrel in patients with drug-eluting stents beyond 12 months is emerging as a novel indication for the agent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Algorithms; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Coronary thrombosis is a frequent cause of death and myocardial infarction most often explained by superimposition of a platelet-rich thrombus on existing coronary artery disease. Therefore, antiplatelet drugs are essential in the treatment and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and during percutaneous coronary intervention. Several novel antiplatelet drugs are now available.. For several years, aspirin and clopidogrel remained the cornerstone of treatment for ACS. However, prasugrel and ticagrelor have a more consistent, faster-acting and more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel, which translates into improved clinical outcomes, although at the expense of an increased bleeding risk. Importantly, some patients experience cardiovascular events despite current antiplatelet treatment, because platelet activation may occur via pathways not inhibited by these agents. Therefore, improved antiplatelet strategies are warranted.. Despite undisputable benefits of current antiplatelet strategies, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse thrombotic events, although clinical outcomes have been improved with new oral P2Y₁₂ antagonists. New drugs have been developed, including intravenous P2Y₁₂ antagonists and oral antagonist targeting the protease-activated receptor-1 platelet activation pathway stimulated by thrombin. This review provides an overview of current and novel antiplatelet strategies and also discusses unmet needs related to antiplatelet therapy for ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The optimal utilization of antiplatelet therapy in patients with renal impairment (RI) following acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represents an urgent, unmet and yet unsolved need with regards to the choice of agents, duration of treatment and potential dose/regimen adjustment. The lack of any large randomized trials designed and powered specifically in such high-risk patients, absence of the uniformed efficacy and safety data reporting policy to the FDA and endless overoptimistic publications based on post hoc analyses of primary trials sometimes exaggerating benefits and hiding risks, clouds reality. In addition, triaging RI patients is problematic due to ongoing kidney deterioration and the fact that such patients are prone to both vascular occlusions and bleeding. The authors summarize available FDA-confirmed evidence from the latest trials with approved antiplatelet agents, namely clopidogrel (CAPRIE, CURE, CREDO, CLARITY, CHARISMA); prasugrel (TRITON, TRILOGY); ticagrelor (PLATO, and PEGASUS); and vorapaxar (TRACER and TRA2P) in RI patient cohorts on top of aspirin as part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We deliberately avoided any results unless they were verified by the FDA, with the exception of the recent PEGASUS, since Agency reviews are not yet available. Despite differences among the trials and DAPT choices, RI patients universally experience much higher (HR = 1.3-3.1) rates of primary endpoint events, and bleeding risks (HR = 1.7-3.6). However, only ticagrelor increases creatinine and uric acid levels above that of clopidogrel; has the worst incidence of serious adverse events, more adverse events, and inferior outcomes in patients with severe (eGFR <30 ml/min), especially in the lowest (eGFR <15 ml/min) RI subsets. Clopidogrel, prasugrel and vorapaxar appear safer. Moreover, less aggressive half dose (5 mg/daily) prasugrel and strict DAPT, are well justified in RI, but not predominantly triple strategies with vorapaxar as tested in TRA2P and especially in TRACER. In conclusion, data from clinical trials, their sub-studies and affiliated FDA reviews indicate that RI cause more vascular occlusions and bleeding in ACS patients treated with DAPT. Among the novel antiplatelet agents, prasugrel and vorapaxar, but probably not ticagrelor, offer advantage in RI patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lactones; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Renal Insufficiency; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

P2Y12 receptor antagonists have become cornerstone pharmacological agents in antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. While clopidogrel remains in extensive use in clinical practice, it cannot meet the needs in many clinical conditions because of its pharmacological limitations. In recent years, newly developed P2Y12 antagonists, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have proven to be of higher efficacy and less resistance. With the introduction of these new medicines, the current antiplatelet strategy is undergoing a transitional period. Insufficient platelet inhibition (high platelet reactivity) leads to an increased risk of ischemic events whereas exceeding platelet inhibition can lead to an increased risk of bleeding. This review discusses the pharmacological features, benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness of different P2Y12 antagonists in various clinical settings. A balance between these factors will determine the choice of P2Y12 antagonists for personalized antiplatelet therapy. We conclude that it is a promising option to apply the new drugs, due to their superior therapeutic performance versus that of clopidogrel in the long run.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of maintenance medication following invasive treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ST elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina). Over the last decade, P2Y12 inhibition in addition to low-dose acetylsalicylic acid has been intensively debated. The debate was enriched by the results of the large phase III clinical trials for prasugrel (TRITON) and ticagrelor (PLATO) compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This article summarizes the critical details und subanalyses of both study programmes and highlights on clinical decision making when using the three P2Y12 blockers in acute coronary syndromes. A special focus is on higher risk patients such as those with ST elevation myocardial infarction and those with coexisting diabetes, but also on minimizing relevant bleedings, which are common during more intense platelet inhibition.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs are the mainstay of treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The last 30 years have seen the development of various agents, a deeper understanding of the pathobiology of this disease, and an evolution in its treatment. We review the role of contemporary agents in ACS and highlight key clinical trials of these agents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Morpholines; Peptide Fragments; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polysaccharides; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

New P2Y12 inhibitors can be classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous drugs (cangrelor and elinogrel). These P2Y12 inhibitors might be superior to clopidogrel for reducing ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new oral or intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients.. Twelve randomized, placebo-controlled studies and two subgroup analyses of included studies on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were included. The database consisted of 82,784 patients, with 43,875 (53%) on new oral P2Y12 inhibitors and 38909 (47%) on intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly decreased MACEs (odds ratio: 0.85, p<0.0001 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.04 for STEMI) and all-cause death (OR: 0.88, p=0.04 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.01 for STEMI). Among new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors, only cangrelor significantly decreased the risk of MACEs. An increase in TIMI major bleeding was observed only by prasugrel among the new P2Y12 inhibitors.. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors reduce ischemic events, but there is no obvious increase in major bleeding in patients with CAD, and the risk/benefit ratio is particularly favorable for STEMI patients. Moreover, only cangrelor is beneficial for ischemic events in patients on new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Controlled trials estimate treatment effects averaged over the reference population of subjects. However, physicians are interested in whether the treatment effect varies across subgroups (effect heterogeneity) in order to target specific subgroups to maximise the benefit of treatment and minimise harm. Therefore, large clinical trials of antiplatelet agents include subgroup analyses that examine whether treatment effects differ between subgroups of subjects identified by baseline characteristics. Reporting subgroup is pervasive and often accompanied by claims of difference of treatment effects between subgroups with potential important implications for clinical practice. However, subgroup-specific analyses of clinical trial data have inherent limitations that reduce their reliability. These include reduced statistical power, failure to specify the subgroups of interest a priori, failure to account for examining large numbers of subgroups, lack of strong rationale for biological response modification, and performing analyses based on variables measured post randomisation or in trials showing no overall difference between treatments. Rules for interpretation of subgroup findings in subgroups have been suggested but are frequently not applied. In this article we draw attention to the pitfalls of subgroup analyses in the context of recent trials of antiplatelet agents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Israel; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Population Groups; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Reproducibility of Results; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Effective antagonism of the P2Y12 platelet receptor is central to the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, especially in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting. According to consensus guidelines, early revascularization and intensive antiplatelet therapy are key to reducing the complications that arise from myocardial ischaemia and the recurrence of cardiovascular events. Until recently, clopidogrel was the key P2Y12 antagonist advocated, but due to several limitations as an antiplatelet agent, newer drugs with more predictable, rapid and potent effects have been developed. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are now the recommended first-line agents in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation ACS and ST-segment elevation ACS, due to large-scale randomized trials that demonstrated net clinical benefit of these agents over clopidogrel, as stated in the European guidelines. Although no study has directly compared the two agents, analysis of the data to date suggests that certain patient types, such as diabetics, those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or renal failure and the elderly may have a better outcome with one agent over the other. Further studies are needed to confirm these differences and answer pending questions regarding the use of these drugs to optimize efficacy while minimizing adverse events, such as bleeding. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current P2Y12 receptor antagonists in the treatment of ACS, with a focus on issues of appropriate agent selection, timing of treatment, bleeding risk and the future role of personalized treatment using platelet function and genetic testing.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetes Complications; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Renal Insufficiency; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

P2Y12 receptor antagonist therapy is recommended in addition to ASA for up to 1 year after acute coronary syndrome to reduce ischemic events. In contrast, the benefit of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year remains unclear. Ticagrelor is a potent, reversibly binding P2Y12 receptor-antagonist that has been shown to be superior to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for up to 1 year.. PEGASUS-TIMI 54 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in addition to aspirin (75-150 mg) for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction and risk factors. Patients with a history of spontaneous myocardial infarction within 1 to 3 years are randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily, or matching placebo, all with low dose ASA, until the end of the study. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Recruitment began in October 2010 and completed in April 2013 with a sample size of over 21,000 patients. The trial is planned to continue until the latest of either 1,360 adjudicated primary end points are accrued or the last patient randomized has been followed for at least 12 months.. PEGASUS-TIMI 54 is investigating whether the addition of intensive antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor to low-dose aspirin reduces major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with a history of myocardial infarction.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor

Numerous clinical trials testing the efficacy of aspirin for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease have been published. We reviewed the literature pertaining to aspirin dose in acute coronary syndrome patients. Clinical trials assessing the comparative efficacy of different doses of aspirin are scarce. This complex antiplatelet therapy landscape makes it difficult to identify the best aspirin dose for optimizing efficacy and minimizing risk of adverse events, while complying with the various guidelines and recommendations. Despite this fact, current evidence suggests that aspirin doses of 75-100 mg/day may offer the optimal benefit:risk ratio in acute coronary syndrome patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

This review constitutes a critical evaluation of recent publications that have described an additional mode of action of the P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor. The effect is mediated by inhibition of the adenosine transporter ENT1 (type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter), which provides protection for adenosine from intracellular metabolism, thus increasing its concentration and biological activity, particularly at sites of ischemia and tissue injury where it is formed. Understanding the mode of action of ticagrelor is of particular interest given that its clinical profile, both in terms of efficacy and adverse events, differs from that of thienopyridine P2Y12 antagonists.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The P2Y12 inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, are administered in fixed doses without laboratory monitoring. Randomized trials in acute coronary syndrome have shown that prasugrel and ticagrelor are more effective than standard-dose clopidogrel. Nonetheless, standard-dose clopidogrel remains widely used because it causes less bleeding and is less expensive. Patients treated with standard-dose clopidogrel have substantial variability in platelet inhibition, which is partly explained by genetic polymorphisms encoding CYP2C19, the hepatic enzyme involved in biotransformation of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. Some advocate tailoring P2Y12 inhibitor therapy according to the results of routine laboratory testing. Although there is good evidence for analytic, biological, and clinical validity of several phenotypic and genotypic biomarkers, the benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine biomarker testing over standard of care without such testing remains unproven. Appropriately designed, adequately powered trials are needed but face the challenges of feasibility, cost, and the progressive switch from clopidogrel to prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Substitution; Genetic Testing; Humans; Piperazines; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The introduction of clopidogrel was a milestone in the development of modern antiplatelet therapy. However, the shortcomings in the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel have led to the development of alternative substances.. The two new drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor were included in the current guidelines for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome. These potent platelet inhibitors, however, are associated with an increased rate of bleeding events, which is of particular importance in critically ill patients. However, the new platelet inhibitors are less effective in patients with cardiogenic shock or patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia.. Recent studies underscore the assessment of the net clinical benefit in patient management. Since there is only a thin line between efficacy and safety in critically ill patients, future studies for risk stratification of antiplatelet therapy in terms of personalized medicine are mandatory.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Germany; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypothermia, Induced; Intensive Care Units; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Risk Assessment; Shock, Cardiogenic; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy, composed of aspirin plus a P2Y12 -receptor antagonist, is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A number of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved P2Y12 -receptor antagonists are available for treating patients with ACS, including the thienopyridine compounds clopidogrel and prasugrel. Ticagrelor, the first of a new class of antiplatelet agents, is a noncompetitive, direct-acting P2Y12 -receptor antagonist. Unlike the thienopyridine compounds, ticagrelor does not require metabolism for activity. Also, whereas clopidogrel and prasugrel are irreversible inhibitors of the P2Y12 receptor, ticagrelor binds reversibly to inhibit receptor signaling and subsequent platelet activation. In pharmacodynamic studies, ticagrelor demonstrated faster onset and more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. These properties of ticagrelor may contribute to reduced rates of thrombotic outcomes compared with clopidogrel, as demonstrated in a phase III clinical trial. However, in addition to bleeding, distinctive adverse effects of this new chemical entity have not been reported with the thienopyridine P2Y12 -receptor inhibitors. Although ticagrelor represents an advancement in P2Y12 -receptor inhibition therapy, a thorough understanding of this compound as an antiplatelet therapy remains to be elucidated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular disease and in particular, acute coronary syndromes are one of the principle causes of death in the industrialized countries. In the setting of acute coronary syndromes (both ST - segment or non ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction), platelets aggregation plays a key and central role in their development. Platelets are the mediators of hemostasis at sites of vascular injury, but they also mediate pathologic thrombosis; activated platelets stimulate thrombus formation in response to rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque or endothelial cell erosion promoting atherothrombotic disease. Recent patent relates to the methods and devices for treating atherosclerosis and to prevent in-stent restenosis or thrombosis. Because of the importance of platelets involvement in the initiation and propagation of thrombosis, antiplatelet drugs have a source of research; in the recent past, new antiplatelet drugs (such as ticagrelor) have been studied and placed in the routine therapy. The aim of this paper is to summarize the pharmacological properties and the clinical characteristics of ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Patents as Topic; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Early Medical Intervention; General Practice; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The 3 main clinical manifestations of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are unstable angina, non-ST-segment myocardial infarction, and ST-segment myocardial infarction. Together they comprise a major cause of emergency care and hospitalization in the United States. Consequently, all hospital-based physicians should be familiar with current recommendations regarding the diagnosis and management of ACS. Effective inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation is central to the treatment of ACS, and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended in all patients with ACS. Recently, the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation published focused updates to their guidelines for the management of ACS patients. These updates included changes in antiplatelet therapy arising from the introduction of prasugrel and ticagrelor as alternatives to clopidogrel for the P2Y12 inhibitor component of dual antiplatelet therapy. Among the P2Y12 inhibitors recommended for each indication, the guidelines do not advocate any one P2Y12 inhibitor over another, but instead recommend that therapy is individualized based on each patient's demographic and clinical characteristics. This article presents a clinical case study to illustrate the hospital management of ST-segment myocardial infarction and unstable angina/non-ST-segment myocardial infarction with particular reference to the latest changes in antiplatelet therapy guidelines. This article outlines key differences in the indications and recommendations for P2Y12 inhibitors and summarizes clinical data from the pivotal studies of prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aspirin; Body Weight; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Quality of Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Factors associated with platelet reactivity (PR) during ticagrelor maintenance dose (MD) are not well defined. We aimed to examine factors that influence levels of PR during chronic ticagrelor therapy.. We performed individual participant data meta-analysis of 445 patients from 8 studies who had PR assessment with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, Inc, San Diego, CA) while on ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day MD for at least 14 days.. Distribution of PR during ticagrelor MD was highly skewed toward lower values. No case of high PR (≥230 P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]) was observed. Age and body mass index (BMI) positively affected PR, with every increase in decade and 5 units of BMI resulting in 7.9% and 4.1% increase in PR, respectively. Current smoking status negatively affected PR with 13.7% decrease in PR in current smokers, compared with nonsmokers. Low PR (LPR) was defined as the lowest quartile of PR values (<10 PRU). In multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus and age >70 years were independently associated with lower probability for LPR with a relative risk (95% CIs) of 0.570 (0.361-0.899) and 0.554 (0.325-0.944), P = .016 and P = .030, respectively.. Age, BMI, and current smoking status affect PR during ticagrelor MD. Diabetes mellitus and age >70 years were found to be associated with lower probability for LPR. Further research is required to assess the clinical implications of these findings in ticagrelor-treated patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Humans; Platelet Activation; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Mortality and morbidity in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), caused principally by plaque erosion or rupture leading to thrombus formation and myocardial ischemia, have been reduced by a combination of antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants) and early revascularization. Aspirin is the foundation antiplatelet agent. New P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have clear benefits compared with clopidogrel for dual antiplatelet therapy, and cangrelor or vorapaxar, a thrombin receptor inhibitor, may be of value in specific settings. Anticoagulation uses 1 of 4 choices: bivalirudin, unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux. Moreover, some patients (such as those who have chronic atrial fibrillation) require triple therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, plus an anticoagulant, frequently a vitamin K antagonist. New oral anticoagulants have been shown to be at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation and led to fewer bleeding complications. Finally, the combination of aspirin, clopidogrel, and low-dose rivaroxaban has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency (but not the Food and Drug Administration) for secondary prevention after ACS. Several strategies have been developed to balance the potential benefit of antithrombotic therapy against the risk of bleeding complications, for example, radial access in coronary angiography or restricted use of combination therapy, and others are under investigation, such as discontinuation of aspirin. This overview summarizes the current status of antithrombotic therapy in ACS and describes strategies currently explored to optimize its benefit/risk ratio.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enoxaparin; Eptifibatide; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Lactones; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polysaccharides; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptors, Thrombin; Recombinant Proteins; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Tirofiban; Tyrosine; Warfarin

Despite the improvement in stent technology, stent thrombosis (ST), a potentially catastrophic event, still occurs. Among several risk factors for ST, high on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel has been demonstrated to play a role, occurring in about one-third of the patients. In order to overcome this limitation, prasugrel and ticagrelor, newer P2Y12 inhibitors, have been developed and approved for clinical use. Two large clinical trials, TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibitioN with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI) 38 and Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), evaluated these drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), showing a significant improvement in efficacy end points (including a prominent reduction in ST occurrence) compared to clopidogrel. In contrast, the TRILOGY ACS trial found no benefit with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in patients with medically treated ACS. The aim of this review is to consider decision-making strategies between prasugrel and ticagrelor in daily clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Coronary Thrombosis; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) inhibitor, which belongs to a novel chemical class of antiplatelet agents named cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidines. Ticagrelor administered with acetylsalicylic acid has been shown to reduce the rate of the composite end point of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction or stroke without an increase in the rate of overall major bleeding compared with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes. In addition to these clinical findings, it has been shown that the cost per quality-adjusted life year with ticagrelor is below the generally acceptable thresholds for cost-effectiveness compared with clopidogrel. Healthcare decision-makers need to consider the costs and cost-effectiveness when prioritizing treatments among scarce healthcare resources. This is of particular importance in cases similar to ticagrelor, where the novel treatment is expected to improve effectiveness at a higher acquisition cost. In this article, the authors review and discuss the health-economic evidence of ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy is essential for the management of acute coronary syndrome. In particular, combination therapy using aspirin with a platelet ADP (i.e. P2Y12 ) receptor inhibitor, such as clopidogrel, prasugrel or, more recently, ticagrelor, has been recommended for patients with acute coronary syndrome. Pharmacological agents that reversibly inhibit platelet aggregation without metabolic activation in the liver are believed to reduce cardiovascular mortality compared with the current drug of choice for antiplatelet therapy, namely clopidogrel. These findings are based on a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial. Numerous factors are postulated to contribute to the improved survival of patients who take ticagrelor compared with those taking clopidogrel, including the risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia and bleeding. In addition, clopidogrel may lead to a much higher incidence of infection. Although ticagrelor has recently been approved for use in the US and exhibits superiority over other antiplatelet agents, certain concerns remain regarding its use, including lung injury and dyspnoea, thus raising the issue of its true superiority over clopidogrel or prasugrel. Recent studies into ticagrelor report conflicting data, with certain aspects of its mechanisms of action still not fully understood. Ticagrelor has beneficial effects following its clinical application, such as achieving overall higher reductions in mortality compared with the use of clopidogrel and prasugrel. Harmful effects associated with the use of ticagrelor include a higher incidence of dyspnoea and major bleeding compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

The novel oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have been incorporated into the recently updated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) guidelines, as an adjunct antiplatelet treatment to aspirin. The studies involving the use of new oral antiplatelet agents that are more potent, predictable and faster platelet inhibitors than clopidogrel have demonstrated superiority with respect to the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, non-lethal myocardial infarction, stroke) for both prasugrel and ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. The subgroup analysis of the relevant studies showed that these new agents differ in their level of efficacy in different ACS patient subgroups: (1) Mortality was reduced with ticagrelor; (2) Ticagrelor is especially more effective in intermediate-and high-risk non-ST elevation ACS patients in whom early invasive strategy is selected; (3) Prasugrel should be especially preferred in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after diagnostic angiography; and (4) Prasugrel is more effective in diabetic patients. While clopidogrel is recommended for ACS patients who are followed with a non-invasive strategy or who have not undergone percutaneous revascularization, it is the last line choice or an alternative to the P2Y12 inhibitor therapy for patients undergoing invasive strategy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor, an oral, direct, reversibly binding, P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, is approved for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with ACS. In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor was associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel. A subanalysis of PLATO trial data identified a geographic region interaction (p = 0.045), indicating reduced efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in North American patients. This effect could be due to chance, but may be explained by an interaction of ticagrelor with high aspirin doses, which are commonly used in the United States. In patients taking low-dose maintenance aspirin, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in decreasing cardiovascular events regardless of the geographic region. A proposed hypothetical mechanism for the interaction between ticagrelor and higher aspirin dose is linked to the level of P2Y₁₂ inhibition and the potential prothrombotic effects of high-dose aspirin through the suppression of prostacyclin. A review of data regarding aspirin use for secondary prevention of events in ACS demonstrated that low aspirin doses (75 to 160 mg/day) are consistently favored for short- and long-term use because of the lack of a dose-response relationship between increasing aspirin dose and improved efficacy, and a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding with increasing aspirin dose. The use of low aspirin doses reflects good clinical practice and is encouraged in current guidelines.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States

Aspirin is a cornerstone of therapy in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of stent thrombosis and cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of patients with ACS. Recently, there has been debate as to which antiplatelet agent should be added to aspirin in the ACS treatment regimen. This review summarizes the pharmacologic and clinical data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, and provides a practical guide to clinicians for determining which antiplatelet to use for patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a guideline mandated for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite its use, thrombotic events continue to occur both early and late. Platelet function testing has been used to define the in vitro effects of new antiplatelet agents, and it has been suggested that it be used to choose therapy. The role of platelet function testing, particularly with newer antiplatelet agents, remains unclear.. We review the rationale for platelet function testing and its application in monitoring patients on antiplatelet therapy. We also review recent clinical trials of newer antiplatelet agents. On the basis of this review, we reach conclusions on the current role of antiplatelet function testing in monitoring modern antiplatelet therapy and the role of the new antiplatelet agents in the treatment of ACS.. We reviewed recent publications on platelet function testing and clinical trials of newer antiplatelet therapies compared with clopidogrel.. Platelet function testing is complex, but there is now a bedside test, VerifyNow. High platelet reactivity has been associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Recent clinical trials have not found any advantage in outcomes in patients who have their therapy adjusted by monitoring their platelet function. Newer agents, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cangrelor, produce more rapid, complete, less variable effects on platelet function than clopidogrel. Prasugrel was found to improve outcomes compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous intervention. Ticagrelor is beneficial in all patients with ACS and reduces cardiovascular mortality compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor improves outcomes in patients undergoing stenting. Recent studies to assess the role of platelet function monitoring of the effects of clopidogrel and modifying treatments have not been successful.. Recent clinical trials have indicated that newer antiplatelet agents have advantages over clopidogrel in the treatment of ACS. Platelet function testing gives us a guide to the timing, efficacy, and variability of therapy and can correlate with poor patient outcomes; however, the use of antiplatelet function testing to tailor therapy does not seem appropriate.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The initial 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy in the Outpatient Setting were published in May 2011. As part of a planned re-evaluation within 2 years, we conducted an extensive literature search encompassing all topics included in the 2010 CCS Guidelines, and concluded that there were sufficient new data to merit revisiting the guidance on antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in the first year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting, and the interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. In addition, new clinical trials information about the efficacy and safety of combining novel oral anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy in ACS justified the addition of a new section of recommendations to the Guidelines. In this focused update, we provide recommendations for the use of clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel in non-ST elevation ACS, avoidance of prasugrel in patients with previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, higher doses of clopidogrel (j) /day) for the first 6 days after ACS, and the preferential use of prasugrel or ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS. For non-ACS stented patients, we recommend acetylsalicylic acid/clopidogrel for 1 year, with at least 1 month of therapy for bare-metal stent patients and 3 months for drug-eluting stent patients unable to tolerate year-long double therapy. We also consider therapy for patients with a history of stent thrombosis, the indications for longer-term treatment, discontinuation timing preoperatively, indications for changing agents, the management of antiplatelet therapy before and after bypass surgery, and use/selection of proton pump inhibitors along with antiplatelet agents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Contraindications; Coronary Artery Bypass; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Platelets play a key role in the initiation of hemostatic mechanisms during vascular injury. When contemplating prescription of antiplatelet agents (APAs) for patients as primary prevention for cardiovascular events, the physician should carefully weigh the potential benefits of cardiovascular risk reduction with the likelihood of harm, related mostly to hemorrhagic complications. The role of APAs in secondary prevention of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease is well established, however, optimal duration of therapy and intensity of patient treatment are not settled and probably need to be individualized per patient. We describe the data emerging from contemporary trials on the efficacy and safety of the use of oral APAs in various patient subpopulations. We also discuss the advantages and potential roles of new APAs during and following acute coronary syndromes, percutaneous coronary interventions, and symptomatic atherosclerosis. We propose certain strategies and directions for future research to enhance the safety and efficacy prevention by optimizing the beneficial effects of APAs along with other contemporary treatment modalities of primary and secondary prevention.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are two new antiplatelet agents being used in the management of acute coronary syndromes. The number of patients in the community managed on these medications is growing, and thus, it is essential that general practitioners have a good understanding of these agents and their evidence-based applications.. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of common and new antiplatelet agents will be reviewed, along with the evidence supporting their use. Safety and side effect profiles will be discussed, and some common general practice case scenarios presented.. Aspirin is still the mainstay of therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The addition of clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor can reduce morbidity and mortality in selected patients. Patient factors including bleeding risk, renal function and time since coronary stent insertion must be reviewed before these agents are initiated and before making any changes to the medication regimen.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is a potent P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist characterized by a rapid onset, consistent and reversible antiplatelet effect, and an acceptable safety profile compared with existing adenosine diphosphate receptor blockers. In the large Phase III trial, PLATO, ticagrelor significantly reduced the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke as well as cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. With its favorable impact on mortality, ticagrelor changes the landscape of anti-thrombotic therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; United States

Acute coronary syndrome plays a major role in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. New agents have been developed and introduced into clinical practice while dual antiplattelet therapy has been limited with clopidogrel until recently. In this review we summarize the efficacy of ticagrelor, a new antiplatelet agent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Ticagrelor

Antiplatelet agents are among the most important drug classes in reducing mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor is the first reversible and direct acting P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor with an earlier onset of action compared to clopidogrel. The PLATO study (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) with ticagrelor was conducted with a design providing consistency with the current clinical practice, including all forms of ACS and a wide spectrum of treatment options in 18624 patients from 862 centers in 43 countries. Of these patients, 13408 underwent interventional procedures (ticagrelor/clopidogrel; 6732/6676) (PLATO-INVASIVE). As reported by the investigator, non-invasive treatment strategy was planned for 5216 patients (ticagrelor/clopidogrel; 2601/2615). However, 2040 patients in this group received interventional treatment during the follow-up (PLATO-NON-INVASIVE/MEDICAL TREATMENT). 1261 patients requiring surgical treatment underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 7 days after the discontinuation of study treatment (ticagrelor/clopidogrel; 632/629) (PLATO-CABG). The results of these three subgroups were consistent with the main PLATO study results, demonstrating that ticagrelor reduced the primary (cardiovascular death, myocardial Infarction and stroke) and secondary composite endpoints without increasing bleeding compared with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor fulfills an important unmet need regarding antiplatelet effectiveness in patients with ACS. This review evaluates the INVASIVE and MEDICAL subgroup studies of the PLATO study.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel is the most widely used P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor. Despite the clinical benefits associated with adjunctive clopidogrel therapy, a considerable number of patients continue to experience recurrent cardiovascular events. Importantly, the interindividual response to clopidogrel is variable and is affected by multiple factors, including genetic polymorphisms and drugs that interfere with the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. The individual variability to clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects has significant clinical implications that can result in an increased risk of atherothrombotic recurrences, including stent thrombosis. The introduction of novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, characterized by more potent and consistent platelet inhibitory effects, represents an opportunity for clinicians to consider these alternative therapies to overcome the limitations of clopidogrel. Understanding the strategies and implications of switching antiplatelet treatment regimens is, therefore, key in the clinical setting. This article provides an overview of the literature on switching antiplatelet treatment strategies and practical considerations for the interventional cardiologist.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Until a few years ago, the mainstay of anti-platelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel, a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, current clinical practice has now changed with the introduction of ticagrelor, a more potent cardiovascular drug than clopidogrel, without the limitations related to clopidogrel therapy. In this review, we provide a critical overview of ticagrelor in ACS, highlight the results with ticagrelor in several subgroups of patients and discuss the future trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Administration of a P2Y 12 -receptor antagonist in addition to aspirin is mandatory in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce the occurrence of thrombotic events; however, their impact on mortality and stroke is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the influence of moderate (clopidogrel) or potent (prasugrel/ticagrelor) P2Y 12 -receptor inhibition on major cardiovascular outcomes among patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Systematic literature search was performed to find randomised, controlled clinical trials comparing the clinical impact of clopidogrel with placebo or prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Outcome measures included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), total stroke and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Random-effects model with Mantel-Heanszel weighting was used to pool outcomes into a meta-analysis. Four studies comparing clopidogrel with placebo and five trials comparing clopidogrel with new P2Y 12 -receptor inhibitors were identified including a total of 107,473 patients. Compared to placebo, clopidogrel reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.99, p=0.02), MI (OR 0.80; 95%CI 0.74-0.88, p<0.00001) and stroke (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.97, p=0.02), without influencing risk for ICH (OR 0.96; 95%CI 0.69-1.33, p=0.79). Treatment with prasugrel/ticagrelor provided additional benefit over clopidogrel regarding cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78-0.94, p=0.002) and MI (OR: 0.83; 95%CI 0.74-0.93, p<0.001), but no advantage in stroke (OR: 1.06; 95%CI 0.88-1.26, p=0.55) and in ICH (OR: 1.16; 95%CI 0.75-1.81; p=0.49) was observed. Increased potency of P2Y 12 -receptor inhibition is associated with decreased risk in cardiovascular death and MI; however, this association is not true in case of stroke, where potent P2Y 12 -receptor antagonists have no incremental benefit over clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a standard of care for treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Combination therapy with aspirin and one of the P2Y(12) inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or most recently, ticagrelor ) has been recommended by both ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines for ACS patients.. Ticagrelor is the first generation of a new class of reversible P2Y(12) inhibitors, recently added to updated ACC and ESC guidelines for use in patients with ACS. The authors review the studies that evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in comparison to currently available antiplatelet agents.. Ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg b.i.d. is significantly more efficacious and, in general, as safe as clopidogrel in the treatment of all patients with an ACS regardless of treatment strategy. In addition, besides aspirin compared to placebo, it is the only pharmaceutical intervention shown to have a cardiovascular mortality benefit within 1 year in a broad ACS population. Whether this surprising benefit is realized in other populations is currently being tested.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Blood platelets are highly activated in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This fact mandates the need for potent platelet inhibition in ACS patients and especially in patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 2 nd generation thienopyridine clopidogrel has been the standard of treatment in the past. Due to its pharmacological properties including a delayed onset of action, a large response variability and an insufficient antiplatelet action in some patients (low responsiveness or high on-treatment platelet reactivity), there was a need to develop, to study and to introduce more potent agents with a fast, reliable and potent antiplatelet action. With the 3rd generation thienopyridine prasugrel and with ticagrelor two potent agents for antiplatelet treatment of ACS patients are available now. Both drugs have demonstrated their superiority compared to clopidogrel in terms of thrombotic risk reduction in large-scale randomized trials. However, for these agents and in line with the expectations towards a more potent antiplatelet treatment regimen, a higher risk for bleeding was observed for prasugrel and ticagrelor. Further on, the new antiplatelet agents have their own and characteristic contraindications and numerous issues to be considered in clinical practice.This review aims to provide an overview on the state of the art P2Y12 receptor directed inhibition in ACS patients with a focus on patients undergoing a coronary stenting procedure.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Patients with unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction have an acute coronary syndrome. These patients should be treated with dual antiplatelet therapy with the use of aspirin plus either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor, depending on the clinical circumstances. Prasugrel must not be used in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. If ticagrelor is used, the dose of aspirin must not be > 100 mg daily. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors should not be used as part of triple antiplatelet therapy if there is an increased risk for bleeding or in non-high-risk patients, such as those with a normal baseline cardiac troponin level, those without diabetes, and those aged ≥ 75 years for whom potential benefit may be significantly offset by the potential risk for bleeding. Clinical trial data do not support the use of intravenous cangrelor or oral vorapaxar in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes are responsible for approximately 1 million admissions to U.S. hospitals and twice as many to European hospitals each year. Thus, they are among the most common serious illnesses in adults, and are associated with an in-hospital mortality of approximately 5%. The most common cause is rupture of an atherosclerotic coronary plaque, resulting in subtotal coronary occlusion. Diagnosis is based on the clinical picture of retrosternal chest pain, aided by electrocardiographic findings of ST segment deviations and biomarker abnormalities (elevation of troponin and natriuretic peptides) and cardiac imaging (myocardial scans showing perfusion defects). Treatment involves antiischemic agents (nitrates and β blockers), antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, P2Y(12), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers), and anticoagulants (unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins). Patients should undergo risk stratification, and those with high-risk factors should undergo coronary arteriography promptly with the intent to carry out coronary revascularization. Those at low risk should continue to receive intensive antiischemic and antithrombotic therapy. At discharge, patients should receive intensive lipid-lowering therapy with high doses of a statin, as tolerated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angina, Unstable; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Thrombosis risk necessitates dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, in patients who have acute coronary syndrome. Current guidelines emphasize the critical role of dual antiplatelet therapy in both medical management and invasive strategy, especially in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. With the availability of multiple ADP-receptor antagonists, it is crucial to select the most appropriate agent for each patient.. The pertinent trials were identified through a MEDLINE search, in addition to a manual search from the articles retrieved. This review examines the differences between clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in terms of their pharmacological/pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, drug interactions and safety parameters.. Prasugrel and ticagrelor exhibit greater platelet inhibition and superior efficacy compared with clopidogrel, at the expense of higher bleeding risk. Prasugrel and ticagrelor should be preferred over clopidogrel in patients who are at a high risk of thrombotic events with low risk of bleeding. Additionally, these two agents may offer advantage over clopidogrel in those patients who might have risk for drug resistance due to CYP2C19 polymorphism. In selecting the ideal agent for patients, clinicians should tailor the antiplatelet regimen by considering individual risk factors and medication characteristics.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Drug Interactions; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

InforMatrix is an interactive matrix model, in which pharmacotherapeutic strategies are supported in a rational manner, by means of a transparent selection methodology.. In this paper, InforMatrix is applied to ADP antagonists, including clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. These drugs are important additions to the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. The drugs are compared using the following selection criteria: efficacy, safety, tolerability, ease of use, applicability and cost. All direct comparative studies, as well as placebo-controlled or double-blind comparisons with other drugs, were used in the assessment.. By means of the interactive program, users may assign their own individual weight to each criterion and to the properties of the individual drugs, which stimulates concrete discussions on the relative importance of the various aspects of the drugs. When applied to ADP antagonists, the discussion focuses on the documentation of relative efficacy, safety and acquisition cost. The extensive clinical experience with clopidogrel must be balanced against the potential advantages of the other two compounds concerning efficacy. In those countries where generic clopidogrel is available, there are also major differences in acquisition cost between generic clopidogrel and patented prasugrel and ticagrelor. The interactive program provides the opportunity to quantify existing differences in opinion on the (importance of) various properties of the drugs, which greatly facilitates concrete discussions and rational formulary decision making.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Drug Information Services; Drugs, Generic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Admissions to emergency care centres with acute coronary syndromes remain one of the principal burdens on healthcare systems in the Western world. Early pharmacological treatment in these patients is crucial, lessening the impact on both morbidity and mortality, with the cornerstone of management being antiplatelet agents. While aspirin and clopidogrel have been the drugs of choice for nearly a decade, an array of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents are now available or in late stage development. Data are rapidly gathering suggesting these agents have superior anti-ischaemic properties, improving patient outcomes, but that for some agents increased vigilance and appropriate patient selection may be necessary to guard against bleeding complications. In this review, the authors aim to deliver an overview of the changing field of antiplatelet therapy and provide information about the relative risks and benefits of these newer agents, many of which will be entering widespread clinical use imminently.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Emergency Treatment; Female; Humans; Male; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet therapy is used widely with proven benefit for the prevention of further ischemic cardiac complications in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The limitations of conventional antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel, as well as the fact that rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high with use of these agents, underscore the need to investigate alternate agents that may further reduce event rates while limiting bleeding risk. The selection of antiplatelet therapy is further influenced by the following: ticagrelor was approved in July 2011 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and clopidogrel is slated to become available as a generic productin 2012. We provide an overview of emerging agents for the treatment of CAD and ACS, including the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel, and a new class of oral protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) inhibitors, vorapaxar and atopaxar.The recently approved P2Y(12) antagonists prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate enhanced ability to prevent adverse cardiac outcomes. However, this comes at a cost of a potential increased risk of bleeding. New adverse effects have also emerged, including dyspnea for all of the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists (ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel) and ventricular pauses for ticagrelor. In addition, the newer P2Y(12) antagonists have a faster onset and offset. Two of these agents, cangrelor and elinogrel, are available as intravenous formulations, which may provide additional benefits in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Trials with the PAR-1 inhibitors have also shown trends toward reductions in cardiac events, but not without the possibility of increased bleeding. More than ever, as the arsenal of antiplatelet therapy expands, health care providers need to understand the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic differences between conventional and emerging antiplatelet therapies for patients with ACS and CAD. Health care providers must also carefully assess patient-specific factors such as risk of thrombosis, concomitant disease states, age, drug adherence, and aspirin dose, and plan for those patients who will be undergoing CABG when selecting antiplatelet therapy in order to optimally balance bleeding and thrombosis risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain life-threatening disorders associated with high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in treatment over the last decade. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation via P2Y(12) receptors plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ACS. The current standard of treatment involves dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and the thienopyridine clopidogrel. Numerous studies and wide use in clinical practice have established the value of this approach in the treatment of ACS. However, clopidogrel treatment has a number of limitations, including a delayed onset of action due to the need for metabolic activation, variable and reduced antiplatelet effects in patients with certain genotypes, and prolonged recovery of platelet function due to irreversible P2Y(12) receptor binding. Prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, has demonstrated more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) than clopidogrel, although this thienopyridine also requires metabolic activation and treatment is associated with a significantly increased risk of life-threatening and fatal bleeding. The recently approved oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of current therapy due to its unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. It is a member of a new chemical class, the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidines, and is a potent P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. Ticagrelor is rapidly absorbed, with a median time to maximum concentration of 1.3-2.0 hours. Ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation to an active form and binds rapidly and reversibly to the P2Y(12) receptor. As well as exerting effects via platelet P2Y(12) receptors, ticagrelor may confer additional benefits via inhibition of non-platelet P2Y(12) receptors. The pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor is not significantly affected by age, gender or administration with food, nor by prior treatment with, or responsiveness to, clopidogrel. Ticagrelor is primarily metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme, rapidly produces plasma concentration-dependent IPA that is greater and more consistent than that observed with clopidogrel, and can also enhance platelet inhibition and overcome non-responsiveness in patients previously treated with clopidogrel. Importantly, the pharmacodynamic characteristics of ticagrelor are not influenced by CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genotypes. This article summarizes our current knowledge r

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Interactions; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The clinical benefits of dual antiplatelet treatment (aspirin + clopidogrel) in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are well established. However, clopidogrel is a prodrug that requires hepatic activation. Concerns regarding its delayed onset of action, variability in antiplatelet effects, and prolonged recovery of platelet function after discontinuation have prompted the development of P2Y(12) receptor antagonists. Ticagrelor is the most recently developed P2Y(12) receptor antagonist available in the United States. Ticagrelor is a nonthienopyridine antiplatelet agent and is the first reversible oral antagonist of the P2Y(12) receptors.. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of ticagrelor use in management of ACS.. Peer-reviewed clinical trials, review articles, and relevant treatment guidelines published from 1966 to March 15, 2012, were identified from the MEDLINE and Current Content databases using the search terms ticagrelor, ACS, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacoeconomics, and cost-effectiveness. Citations from available articles were also reviewed for additional references.. Nine pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics studies in humans and 1 clinical study were identified. In addition, the findings from 6 subanalyses based on the clinical study were included. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly reduced composite rate of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke (ticagrelor, 9.8%; clopidogrel, 11.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < 0.001). The difference in the rates of major bleeding was not significant (ticagrelor, 11.6%; clopidogrel, 11.2%). Ticagrelor was associated with a higher rate of non-coronary artery bypass graft surgery related major bleeding (4.5% vs 3.8%; P = 0.03), including fatal intracranial bleeding (0.1% vs 0.01%; P = 0.02), and fewer cases of other types of fatal bleeding (0.1% vs 0.3%; P = 0.03). Other adverse events reported with ticagrelor use included dyspnea (13.8%), headache (6.5%), and bradyarrhythmia (5.8%). The effects of ticagrelor have not been compared to those of other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel.. Based on the findings from the present review, ticagrelor provides reversible inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, with a faster onset of action than clopidogrel, and is effective in the treatment of patients with ACS. More data are required to definitively position ticagrelor with respect to other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Antiplatelet treatment is a cornerstone for patients with acute coronary syndromes treated invasively or conservatively to reduce the risk of early and late occurring ischemic complications and to improve survival. Compared to clopidogrel, the novel antiplatelet agents prasugrel and ticagrelor provide faster and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation and result in substantially improved clinical outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes but also an increased bleeding risk. Therefore, balancing the rope between safety and efficacy of treatment is crucial for optimizing outcome. An understanding of the similarities but also differences in pharmacological effect, clinical trial design, and outcome is crucial for understanding which patient populations benefit the most from novel antiplatelet treatments. This review provides recommendations for their optimal use.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Non-ST elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction and unstable angina are the most common clinical presentations of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Platelet activation is central to the pathogenesis of NSTE-ACS and consensus guidelines that advocate early revascularization supported by intensive antiplatelet therapy. This review examines the drugs used concurrently with aspirin as dual antiplatelet therapy in the NSTE-ACS setting. Clopidogrel represented an important therapeutic advance. However, variations in platelet response and a relatively slow onset of action compromise outcomes with clopidogrel. Evidence reviewed in this article shows that in NSTE-ACS patients, ticagrelor and prasugrel are more effective than clopidogrel and are relatively well tolerated, with an acceptable and manageable bleeding risk. The literature suggests several differences between ticagrelor and prasugrel that should allow clinicians to better tailor treatment to the patient. Head-to-head comparisons are now needed to compare directly the risks and benefits of ticagrelor and prasugrel in NSTE-ACS. Further studies also need to address other outstanding issues such as the benefits and risks of prasugrel pre-treatment and to stratify efficacy and tolerability according to diabetes mellitus (DM) and other co-morbidities. In the meantime, the issues discussed in this review should enhance clinicians' ability to optimize and individualize NSTE-ACS treatment, thereby further reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with this common cardiovascular condition.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Biological Availability; Clopidogrel; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Drug Monitoring; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Humans; Pharmacovigilance; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y; Risk Assessment; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Since novel antiplatelet treatments (prasugrel, ticagrelor, high-dose clopidogrel) have been predominantly tested against standard-dose clopidogrel, data on direct comparisons between these therapies are scarce. We therefore indirectly compared their efficacy and safety in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Electronic databases were searched systematically to identify head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Network meta-analysis was performed using generalised linear mixed models with adjustment for length of follow-up. Findings were corroborated by mixed treatment comparison through Bayesian methods. Fourteen RCTs were identified and included in the analysis (high- vs. standard-dose clopidogrel: 9 trials, prasugrel vs. high-dose clopidogrel: 2 trials, prasugrel vs. standard-dose clopidogrel: 2 trials, ticagrelor vs. standard-dose clopidogrel: 1 trial). No significant differences were found for efficacy outcomes except for stent thrombosis favouring prasugrel (vs. ticagrelor: odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 0.94; vs. high-dose clopidogrel: OR 0.70, 95%CI: 0.48, 1.01). Prasugrel exhibited a similar bleeding risk as high-dose clopidogrel, but more major (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.07, 1.90) and major or minor bleeding (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.09, 1.69) compared to ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was also associated with less major or minor bleeding compared to high-dose clopidogrel (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.69, 0.96). No differences were seen for non CABG-related major bleeding between the three strategies. Results were corroborated in a subgroup analysis comprising only patients with acute coronary syndromes. In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, network meta-analysis suggests potentially relevant differences in efficacy and bleeding risk among novel antiplatelet treatments and may thereby advance understanding of their differential therapeutic properties.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Primary Health Care; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Agents that inhibit platelet function are used routinely in the treatment and prevention of acute coronary syndromes. The main antiplatelet treatments used combine aspirin with one of the thienopyridine P2Y(12) antagonists, either clopidogrel or prasugrel. By blocking the synthesis of thromboxane A(2) in platelets and by blocking the effects of ADP, respectively, these agents reduce platelet activity, platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Ticagrelor (marketed by AstraZeneca as Brilinta™ in the USA, and as Brilique(®) or Possia(®) in Europe) is a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, a new chemical class of P2Y(12) antagonist that is now approved for use in the wide spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. In this article we provide an overview of ticagrelor. We discuss the differences in mode of action compared with other P2Y(12) antagonists, examine its pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety profile, and summarize the various clinical trials that have provided information on its efficacy in combination with aspirin. Ticagrelor appears to overcome some of the difficulties that have been encountered with other antiplatelet treatments, clopidogrel in particular.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Anti-platelet agents have left an indelible impression in the management of a wide range of pathologies. From the earliest therapeutic agents such as aspirin, to the cutting edge agents still undergoing development, they have the capability to powerfully manipulate platelet biology, a central player in thrombosis. The use of these agents is still subject to a number of important limitations that two newer agents, prasugrel and ticagrelor, aim to address. Both have recently received licensing for use in acute coronary syndromes and promise to improve outcomes for patients. Here, we examine the rationale for the development and clinical integration of antiplatelet agents focusing upon prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug Design; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

P2Y12 adenosine di-phosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists are critical to reduce thrombotic recurrences in acute coronary syndromes patients and for those undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that the level of on-treatment platelet reactivity inhibition with P2Y12 ADP receptor antagonists correlates with thrombotic recurrences. Recent studies observed a relationship between excessive platelet reactivity inhibition and bleedings. Together these data support the potential of platelet reactivity measurement to prevent thrombotic events without increasing bleeding. In the present review we aimed to summarize evidences of a therapeutic window for P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists and the potential of platelet reactivity monitoring and individualized antiplatelet therapy to optimize the clinical outcome in patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Phenotype; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Predictive Value of Tests; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

ADP plays a pivotal role in localized platelet activation and recruitment, and, with that, in the maintenance of thrombus integrity, making it a suitable target for the control of intravascular thrombosis. The limited distribution of one of its receptors, the P2Y12 receptor, primarily to platelets makes it an especially attractive pharmacologic target. For the last several decades the thienopyridine family of P2Y12 antagonists have provided the vast majority of clinical data confirming the clinical benefit of selective P2Y12 inhibition. Recently, new thienopyridine plus nonthienopyridine P2Y12 antagonists have become available or are being studied that will further improve our treatment of patients with coronary disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Stents; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor, an oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist used as part of dual antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has many favorable characteristics when compared with the more frequently used P2Y(12) receptor antagonist clopidogrel. Ticagrelor binds reversibly, with a rapid onset and offset of action, and produces high levels of platelet inhibition without variation secondary to genetic polymorphism. Ticagrelor produces increased platelet inhibition and an overall reduction in adverse cardiac events compared with clopidogrel. Clinically relevant side effects include an increase in non-CABG-related bleeding events as well as off-target adverse effects including ventricular pauses and dyspnea.. This article details ticagrelor's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, development and chemical properties. The authors review relevant clinical trials looking at the efficiency and safety of ticagrelor focusing predominantly on the management of patients with ACS. Finally, the review article concludes with discussion of ticagrelor's current role and future integration into clinical practice.. Ticagrelor is a promising P2Y(12) receptor antagonist with characteristics that offer advantages for patients beyond those currently demonstrated by other P2Y(12) receptor antagonists. The challenge for prescribers is to identify those most likely to benefit from ticagrelor treatment while minimizing unnecessary bleeding events for 'real-world' ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is a novel, non-thienopyridine ADP inhibitor that reversibly blocks the P2Y(12) receptor, preventing platelet activation and aggregation. It is the first ADP inhibitor to show a mortality benefit in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Its major safety concern, as with the other ADP blockers, is bleeding. Other common adverse effects of ticagrelor such as dyspnea and ventricular pauses appear to be mild and self-limited.. The pharmacological properties of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel are explored in this article. In addition, the relevant clinical trials in which ticagrelor was investigated are described, with an emphasis on efficacy and safety end points.. Although some patients suffer from dyspnea when administered with ticagrelor, there is no evidence of any untoward effects on the cardiovascular or pulmonary systems. Given that the majority of these episodes are mild to moderate and self-limiting, patients should be encouraged to continue the medication, as symptoms may resolve. Furthermore, patients with underlying heart failure or lung disease do not appear to be at an increased risk of developing ticagrelor-induced dyspnea. Its overall mortality benefit among patients with ACS, along with its ability to inhibit platelet aggregation more rapidly and consistently, makes it the preferred agent over clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Despite improvements in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in Europe and the United States. Antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, play an important role in the treatment of those patients. Several new alternatives have been tested in clinical trails and some of them have been approved for routine treatment of patients with ACS in Switzerland and the European Union. The latter include Prasugrel (Efient®) and Ticagrelor (Brilique®). Those substances provide more rapid and consistent platelet inhibition but increase the risk of bleeding in some patient subgroups. Thus, the main challenge is to tailor treatment for each patient by taking into consideration patient characteristics, comorbidities, underlying short- and long-term risk factors, ischemic and bleeding risks, and expected individual responses to different medications. This ambitious new approach will be a challenge for in daily clinical work and may ultimately require prioritization among several treatment alternatives. In this article, we review the new antiplatelet agents being developed as well as their pharmacological characteristics, key interactions and side effects and potential clinical indications in subpopulations.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Approval; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance; Drugs, Investigational; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

High platelet reactivity (HPR) during dual-antiplatelet therapy is a marker of vascular risk, in particular stent thrombosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Genetic determinants (CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), advanced age, female gender, diabetes and reduced ventricular function are related to a higher risk to develop HPR. In addition, inflammation and increased platelet turnover, as revealed by the elevated percentage of reticulate platelets in patients' blood, that characterize the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome are associated with HPR. To overcome the limitation of clopidogrel, new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) were developed and the demonstration of their superiority over clopidogrel was obtained in the two randomized trials, TRITON TIMI 38 and PLATO. Due to the current possibility not a choice between multiple antiplatelet strategies, the future prospect is to include, in addition to clinical data and classical risk factors, the definition of platelet function during treatment in order to set a tailored therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidol; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Clopidogrel is beneficial after ACS. Recent data suggest the superiority of prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. However, there is no comparison of prasugrel vs. ticagrelor. We performed an adjusted indirect meta-analysis comparing prasugrel vs. ticagrelor for acute coronary syndromes (ACSs).. Randomized trials were searched in PubMed. The primary end-point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Odds ratios (OR) were computed (95% confidence intervals).. Three trial (32,893) patients were included. Overall, either prasugrel or ticagrelor appeared significantly superior to clopidogrel for the 12-month risk of death, MI or stroke (OR=0.83 [0.77-0.89], p<0.001), death (OR=0.83 [0.74-0.93], p=0.001), MI (OR=0.79 [0.73-0.86], p<0.001), and stent thrombosis (OR=0.61 [0.51-0.74], p<0.001), without any significant difference in stroke or major bleeding (both p>0.05), despite more frequent drug discontinuation (OR=1.12 [1.05-1.19], p<0.001). Head-to-head comparison of prasugrel vs. ticagrelor showed no significant differences in overall death, MI, stroke, or their composite (all p>0.05). Prasugrel was associated with a significantly lower risk of stent thrombosis (OR=0.64 [0.43-0.93], p=0.020). Ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower risk of any major bleeding (OR=1.43 [1.10-1.85], p=0.007), and major bleeding associated with bypass grafting (OR=4.30 [1.73-10.6], p=0.002). However, the more clinically relevant risk of major bleeding not related to bypass surgery was similar with either prasugrel or ticagrelor (OR=1.06 [0.77-1.45], p=0.34).. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are superior to clopidogrel for ACS. Head-to-head comparison suggests similar efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor, but prasugrel appears more protective from stent thrombosis, while causing more bleedings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Inhibiting platelet function is a key therapeutic principle in cardiology because platelets play a pivotal role in triggering cardiovascular events. In addition to acetylsalicylic acid, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, ADP-receptor blockers are frequently used for anti-platelet therapy. This therapy does not abolish platelet activation and aggregation. Platelets may still be activated by alternative routes such as the thrombin receptor-mediated pathway. New, more potent inhibitors of platelet function continue to lower the risk of ischaemic events but several trials and clinical registries have also shown that this advantage was frequently offset by an increased risk of bleeding complications. As a consequence, the individual risk of ischaemia and bleeding of a patient must be taken into consideration to select the platelet inhibitor offering the best benefit-risk ratio. Modern laboratory diagnostics may help to achieve this goal by complementing functional platelet tests with pharmacogenomic analyses consistent with the idea of "personalized medicine".

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Current clinical guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet agents namely aspirin and clopidogrel for the treatment of patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). But the efficacy of clopidogrel is variable as it is a pro-drug, which has to be metabolized to become an active drug thus exhibiting variable platelet inhibition, increases risk of bleeding, stent thrombosis, and ischemia. To overcome this limitation, prasugrel was developed with increased antiplatelet activity thereby reducing the risk of myocardial ischemia and stent thrombosis. This action of prasugrel was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. Finally, a novel reversible and direct-acting oral adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, ticagrelor was developed that showed consistent and increased P2Y12 inhibition with similar incidence of bleeding but greater reduction in cardiac events compared to clopidogrel. The focus of this article is to review ticagrelor as a new class of P2Y12 inhibitor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Clinical nonresponse to clopidogrel has been associated with variability in response. This has led to the development of other P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, with different pharmacokinetic characteristics that influence their pharmacodynamics.. Clopidogrel response variability is attributable to its complex pharmacokinetics and is vulnerable to genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in absorption, metabolism and drug-drug interactions (i.e., proton pump inhibitors). Prasugrel which has a simpler metabolism, leading to greater bioavailability, seems to be less affected by genetic or drug-drug interactions and achieves a greater antiplatelet effect. Ticagrelor is the most novel compound approved with a simpler metabolism. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor reached their antiplatelet effect faster and to a much greater extent than clopidogrel. All these differences observed in kinetics explain, to some degree, the efficacy and safety profile observed in clinical trials for these molecules associated with other antiplatelet agents (aspirin, gpIIb/IIIa inhibitors) and anticoagulants.. Clopidogrel is still the best standard of care. However, the pharmacokinetic advantages of both prasugrel and ticagrelor allow clinicians to center patient management by selecting the best drug for the appropriate subject.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Standard of Care; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Acute coronary syndromes reflect a spectrum of disease related, most commonly, to the sudden reduction in blood flow to a portion of myocardium. The underlying pathogenesis of the reduction in coronary flow is related to the sudden rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque, with subsequent thrombus formation leading to either vascular occlusion or microembolization. Clinicians combat this process with antithrombotic therapy, which typically includes both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, and mechanical therapies, such as percutaneous coronary interventions, nearly always using stents. This review focuses on P2Y12 antagonists as one component of our armamentarium of antiplatelet therapies, specifically on data addressing in whom, when, which agent, and in what dose such agents should be administered.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Humans; Integrin alpha2; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor (Brilique™; Brilinta™), a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine antiplatelet agent, is the first oral antagonist of the P2Y(12) receptor to offer reversible receptor binding. It is indicated in the EU for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adults with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non-STEMI), including those managed medically or with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Ticagrelor provides selective and reversible inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, with a faster onset and offset of action than that of clopidogrel, and is effective in the treatment of patients with ACS, with or without ST-segment elevation. In the large, randomized, double-blind, multicentre PLATO trial conducted in this patient population, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing ischaemic events over 12 months, providing a significantly lower risk of the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from vascular causes, and was associated with an overall mortality benefit. The risk of major bleeding with ticagrelor, including bleeds related to CABG, did not differ from that seen with clopidogrel in this study, although ticagrelor was associated with more non-CABG-related major bleeds and fatal intracranial bleeding, albeit the latter bleeding events were rare. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to definitively position ticagrelor with respect to other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel. However, the clinical data currently available indicate that ticagrelor is a promising option for the treatment of patients with ACS and may be of particular use in those at high risk of ischaemic events or unresponsive to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and their inhibition remains a mainstay therapy in this setting. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials to evaluate the benefits of new oral antiplatelet regimens to block platelet ADP-receptors compared to standard-dose clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg/daily).. We obtained results from all randomized trials enrolling patients with ACS. Primary endpoint was mortality. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction and definite in-stent thrombosis. Safety endpoint was the risk of major bleeding complications. We prespecified subanalyses according to new antiplatelet drugs (prasugrel/ticagrelor), high-dose clopidogrel (600 mg) and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. A total of seven randomized trials were finally included in the meta-analysis (n = 58 591). We observed a significant reduction in mortality (2.9% vs. 3.4%, OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.95, P = 0.002), recurrent myocardial infarction (4.2% vs. 5.2%, OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.0001), definite in-stent thrombosis (0.9% vs. 1.7%, OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.63, P < 0.0001). The benefits in mortality and reinfarction were driven by the treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor, without a significant difference in terms of major bleeding complications as compared to standard-dose clopidogrel (5% vs. 4.7%, OR = 1.06 95% CI 0.96-1.17, P = 0.25).. This meta-analysis showed that new oral antiplatelet regimens are associated with a significant reduction in mortality, reinfarction and in-stent thrombosis in ACS patients without an overall increase of major bleeding when treated with new antiplatelet drugs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The interaction of ADP with its platelet receptor P2Y12 plays a crucial role in platelet activation and thrombogenesis. This article reviews the pharmacology and clinical trials of specific antagonists of P2Y12. Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine with proven antithrombotic efficacy, but it has some important drawbacks: i) it is a pro-drug that needs to be metabolized to its active metabolite; ii) it has a delayed onset and offset of action; iii) there is high inter-individual variability in pharmacological response. Prasugrel is also a thienopyridine, with faster onset of action and more uniform inhibition of platelet function compared to clopidogrel, accounting for lower incidence of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and higher incidence of both non-CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) related bleeding complications. Two direct and reversible P2Y12 antagonists, cangrelor and ticagrelor, are characterized by rapid onset and reversal of platelet inhibition. Cangrelor did not prove superior to clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic events in patients undergoing PCI. Ticagrelor proved to be superior to clopidogrel in preventing major adverse cardiac events in ACS patients, but was, like prasugrel, was associated with higher frequency of non-CABG-related bleeding complications. A shorter period of drug discontinuation before surgery was necessary in ticagrelor-treated patients compared to clopidogrel-treated patients to limit the severity of post-surgical bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Catheter Ablation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is a well-established standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Whether there are other drug strategies or therapies that will achieve fewer ischemic events, and at the same time be associated with fewer bleeding complications, is a question recurrently asked. Finding the appropriate pharmacologic calibration of antiplatelet potency and applying such a pharmacodynamic effect to all patients has only been partially successful. The shadow of this one-size-fits-all dilemma is now being recast with the arrival of newer antiplatelet agents, which are attempting to decouple antithrombotic potency from bleeding liability. Novel antiplatelet agents that act faster and have more consistent pharmacokinetics and higher potency are steadily emerging. Additionally, newer agents that target unique sites, such as the thrombin receptor on platelets, are being studied in large-scale clinical trials. Each of these new agents has the potential to extend net clinical benefits beyond those provided by aspirin and clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Quinazolinones; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Sulfonamides; Tetrazoles; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Various definitions of major bleeding have been used to evaluate safety in randomized controlled trials of antiplatelet therapy. We compared the definitions and rates of major bleeding in phase III randomized controlled trials of oral P2Y(12) inhibitors in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. Electronic searches identified six phase III randomized controlled oral P2Y(12) inhibitor trials published between 2001 and 2010 involving 119 020 patients with ACS. The trials compared clopidogrel standard-dose (300-mg loading dose, 75-mg daily thereafter) vs. placebo (CURE, CLARITY-TIMI 28, COMMIT), clopidogrel standard-dose vs. prasugrel (TRITON-TIMI 38) or ticagrelor (PLATO) and clopidogrel standard-dose vs. clopidogrel double-dose (600-mg loading dose, 150-mg daily for 6-days, 75-mg daily thereafter) (CURRENT-OASIS 7). Using the trial definition, major bleeding rates in patients treated with standard-dose clopidogrel ranged from 0.6% in COMMIT to 11.2% in PLATO. The contrast in bleeding rates of standard-dose clopidogrel among the trials was attenuated when using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) definition for major bleeding (range 1.1-7.7%) and bleeding rates in all the trials were less than 2% when comparing 30 day rates of non-coronary artery bypass graft surgery-related TIMI major bleeding (range 0.3-1.9%).. Differences in major bleeding rates between trials of P2Y(12) inhibitors in patients with ACS are minimized after standardization of bleeding definitions, timing of reporting of bleeding outcomes, and procedure rates. Interpretation of the risk of bleeding associated with different P2Y(12) inhibitors would be facilitated by a consistent approach to the definition and reporting of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Use of the ADP (P2Y(12))-receptor antagonist clopidogrel is a cornerstone of dual platelet inhibition in acute coronary syndromes and following stent implantation. Because of the metabolization into its active form and the irreversible inhibition of the ADP receptor there are disadvantages to clopidogrel which could limit its efficacy in reducing clinical events. This is particularly problematic in so-called poor responders with reduced metabolizing activity and hence reduced platelet inhibition. Two novel drugs for platelet inhibition in acute coronary syndrome could become relevant in clinical practice. The irreversible ADP-receptor antagonist prasugrel led to stronger platelet inhibition, fewer ischemic events but more bleeding complications compared to clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI-38 trial. The reversibly binding, direct-acting ADP-receptor antagonist ticagrelor, which is effective without metabolization, is also superior over clopidogrel in reducing platelet aggregation and decreased the number of ischemic events in the PLATO-trial. However, it did not increase the rate of overall major bleeding and was shown to reduce total mortality. This review article summarizes current data on novel platelet inhibitors and delineates their potential influence on clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin plus either clopidogrel or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, such dual therapy increases the likelihood of bleeding compared to that with aspirin alone. Ticagrelor (Brilique - Astra-Zeneca) is a new oral antiplatelet drug recently licensed in the UK (since publication of the NICE guidelines) for use with aspirin in patients with ACS, including those managed medically or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here we review the place of ticagrelor in the management of people with ACS, and whether it offers advantages over standard therapy in terms of greater efficacy or lower likelihood of bleeding complications.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Contraindications; Drug Costs; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and acetyl-salicylic acid has become the standard of care for patients with ACS in the last 2 decades. However, clopidogrel has drawbacks including delayed therapeutic effect, significant interindividual variability of platelet aggregation inhibition or reduced action on thrombocytes due to interaction with other drugs or genetic polymorphisms. Consequently, new antiplatelet drugs have been developed. Two of these drugs, namely prasugrel and ticagrelor, have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and are already available in many European countries. For each substance a "mega-trial" has been published. Both agents were clearly superior compared to clopidogrel and should be therefore preferred in patients with ACS. However, no study has directly compared efficacy as well as safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor so far. Hence, clinicians will be claimed to decide which one to choose in everyday practice. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the current literature and to provide a guide for individual decision-making between prasugrel and ticagrelor in ACS in daily routine.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is an oral, reversible blocker of the P2Y12 adenosine receptor. In clinical trials the antiplatelet agent reduced significantly vascular mortality and death from any cause when compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Interactions; Humans; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the leading cause of mortality in Western countries. Until a few years ago, the antiplatelet drug to be administered in association with aspirin was indisputably clopidogrel. Recent data from randomized trials conducted in ACS patients have shown that the new oral antiplatelet regimens, prasugrel and ticagrelor, are associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events, as compared to clopidogrel. Moreover ticagrelor reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as compared to clopidogrel in the PLATO trial. However, there are intrinsic differences between the trials design and among the enrolled ACS populations, that make complex the generalization of the mortality results in the whole spectrum of ACS patients. We aimed to provide further insights into the unresolved mortality issues raised in the PLATO and TRITON-TIMI 38 trials, by analysing the effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel in the ACS populations included in the respective trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy, a combination of aspirin and a P2Y(12) inhibitor, for 6?12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation in all patients and for 1 year in all patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), irrespective of revascularization strategy. Clopidogrel has a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile that results in a delayed and/or subtherapeutic antiplatelet effect, and wide variability in antiplatelet response. New P2Y(12) inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have favorable pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy over clopidogrel and offer an alternative antiplatelet treatment strategy in specific patients. Prasugrel has more potent, rapid, and consistent effects on inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. Ticagrelor also appears to have more rapid and consistent antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel. The higher levels of antiplatelet inhibition provided by prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with standard-dose clopidogrel result in improved ischemic outcomes in patients with ACS. Despite an increase in bleeding risk, prasugrel and ticagrelor appear to have a better net clinical benefit, especially in higher-risk patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent and affects an ever-increasing proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients with CKD have a higher risk of ACS and significantly higher mortality, and are also predisposed to increased bleeding complications. Antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs form the bedrock of management of patients with ACS. Most randomized trials of these drugs exclude patients with CKD, and current guidelines for management of these patients are largely based on these trials. We aim to review the safety and efficacy of these drugs in patients with CKD presenting with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Peptide Fragments; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polysaccharides; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recombinant Proteins; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Uremia

Ticagrelor is a direct-acting, oral, reversibly binding P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. As a cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine, ticagrelor represents a new chemical class of agents that do not require metabolic activation and have consistent ability to inhibit platelet aggregation. The phase 3 PLATelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial (NCT00391872) evaluated ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in 18 624 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of death from vascular causes/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke with ticagrelor (9.8% vs 11.7% with clopidogrel [hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.92]; P < 0.001) without a significant increase in PLATO-defined major bleeding (11.6% vs 11.2%, respectively; P = 0.43). Myocardial infarction and death from vascular causes were separately significantly reduced, and death from any cause and stent thrombosis reductions achieved nominal statistical significance. Ticagrelor showed benefit over clopidogrel in almost all patient subgroups, including patients who had previously received clopidogrel, patients with both planned invasive or noninvasive treatment, patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, patients with non-STEMI, and patients who underwent bypass surgery. Hence, the PLATO population reflected specifically those patients who would ordinarily receive thienopyridine-based antiplatelet therapy in a clinical setting. Although there are limitations in directly translating trial findings to clinical practice, the findings of PLATO suggest that for every 1000 ACS patients admitted to hospital, using ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel for 12 months would result in 14 fewer deaths or 11 fewer MIs. This review places the PLATO data in context, and assesses the role that ticagrelor may play in treating patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Interactions; Genotype; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Recent publications of TRITON-TIMI (prasugrel) as well as PLATO (ticagrelor) have introduced new and potent antiplatelet agents, but at the same time have left clinicians with multiple choices without clear directions regarding the most appropriate use of these agents.. 1. To review the randomized controlled trial evidence examining the role of the three antiplatelet gents in acute coronary syndromes is presented. 2. To provide recommendations for the practicing physician for their optimal use in clinical practice.. CURE, TRITON-TIMI 38 and PLATO trials.. Selection Large randomized placebo controlled trials of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes. Data Extraction From original trials.. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor are potent antiplatelet agents with improved ischaemic benefits in comparison with clopidogrel. The improved benefit, however, comes at the price of increased bleeding. As such, careful patient selection and balancing of benefit-risk is warranted to optimise their use in clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Forecasting; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To summarize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ticagrelor, a selective P2Y12 receptor antagonist, and evaluate its role in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (1966-November 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-November 2009), and EMBASE (1990-November 2009) using the MeSH terms and key words AZD6140, ticagrelor, P2Y12 receptor antagonist, cardiovascular disease, ACS, atherothrombosis, and platelets.. Selected studies evaluated the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of ticagrelor for the treatment of ACS.. Ticagrelor selectively and reversibly blocks the P2Y12 receptor, inhibiting platelet aggregation and preventing amplification of platelet activation. Optimal dosing strategy as determined by ticagrelor's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile is a loading dose of 180 mg followed by 90 mg by mouth twice daily. At these doses, greater platelet inhibition is observed with ticagrelor as compared to clopidogrel 75 mg once daily in both clopidogrel-experienced and -naïve patients. Studies in patients experiencing ACS concluded that ticagrelor reduced the rate of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and overall mortality compared to clopidogrel without increasing major bleeding when administered with standard therapy for ACS. There was no significant difference in the risk of stroke with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel; however, intracranial bleeding was more common with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor is well tolerated; however, minor bleeding, dyspnea, hypotension, nausea, and ventricular pauses were reported more frequently than with clopidogrel. Reversible inhibition with ticagrelor may allow for more rapid surgical intervention after discontinuation, suggesting greater flexibility in treatment of ACS.. Ticagrelor's improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile builds upon the limitations of currently available P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Ticagrelor represents a promising approach for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Inhibition of the platelet ADP P2Y(12) receptor has shown to be associated with a marked risk reduction of atherothrombotic events in high-risk settings, including patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Clinical and laboratory experiences have led to a better comprehension of the drawbacks of currently available P2Y(12) receptor antagonists, stimulating the development of novel agents. Ticagrelor (AZD6140) is the first drug of a new chemical class called cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine, which is administered orally and has a reversible P2Y(12) receptor inhibitory effect. Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies have shown ticagrelor to be characterized by a rapid, greater and consistent antiplatelet effect with a favorable safety profile. Recent findings from large-scale Phase III trials showed ticagrelor to be more effective in preventing ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome patients without an increased risk of protocol-defined major bleeding, but with an increase in the rate of nonprocedure-related bleeding, compared with currently recommended treatment regimens. This article provides an overview of the pharmacologic properties and clinical development of ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are common and carry a high risk of death and serious complications. Over the past three decades, the international cardiology community has collaborated in numerous large, well-designed randomized trials evaluating promising new treatments leading to important improvements in care for patients with ACS. Industry has funded most of the ACS trials of new pharmacologic treatments, but there are many independently funded trials evaluating treatment strategies such as percutaneous coronary intervention. Improvements in ACS care have led to challenges in demonstrating the efficacy of new treatments and many current trials are comparing one active treatment against another, although new paradigms including anti-inflammatory treatments and stem cell infusions are being tested against placebo. Developing new drugs for ACS is a very expensive process with many trials not showing any benefit, and much of this expense is related to the cost of large multicenter phase 3 trials. Reducing the administrative burden and associated costs of ACS trials is an important immediate goal if the strong tradition of large collaborative trials is to continue, as well as the need for health care providers to engage more actively in the clinical research process and support large multinational independently funded trials. We discuss methodologic issues of ACS trials with recent examples and provide some perspectives for the future.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cyclic N-Oxides; Eptifibatide; Heart Diseases; Humans; Peptides; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Research Design; Research Support as Topic; Risk Factors; Sample Size; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United Kingdom

Standard double antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) used in patients with coronary artery disease during acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or in conjunction with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has some limitations. Relatively large proportion of patients has "laboratory" resistance to clopidogrel - an essential component of standard therapy. Basic weakness of this agent is necessity to be converted into active metabolite by CYP 450 enzymes. Other drugs potentially interfere with this conversion. The puzzle of clinical value of obvious laboratory interaction of clopidogrel with its conjecturally almost obligatory companions proton pump inhibitors is still unresolved. It has been shown recently that loss of function alleles of some CYP450 genes especially CYP2C19*2 are responsible for reduced reaction of platelets to clopidogrel. Detection of this allele is possible. However practical application of such genetic testing is subject of disagreement among experts. Another way for therapy guidance is use of platelet function testing. But at present there is no agreement concerning preferable test. Studies aimed at clarification of practical role of some laboratory test are close to completion. Recognition of resistance by any method calls forth administration of higher doses of clopidogrel or use of novel agents. CURRENT trial has recently demonstrated advantages of clopidogrel double dose in ACS patients subjected to PCI. Novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor have been shown to be superior to clopidogrel in large randomized trials. Direct P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor seems to be especially attractive because of effect on total mortality and acceptable rate of bleeding. Among agents under study thrombin receptor blockers appear most promising.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptor, PAR-1; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Antithrombotic therapy constitutes the basis of the management of acute coronary syndromes. It combines antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Antiplatelet agents should combine aspirin and agents acting through the ADP pathway such as clopidogrel; newer antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel or ticagrelor have superior anti-ischemic efficacy, compared with clopidogrel. Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may be used in selected patients at high risk undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Unfractionated heparin constitutes the reference anticoagulant treatment. Enoxaparin provides slightly better anti-ischemic efficacy. Newer agents, such as bivalirudin or fondaparinux, reduce bleeding complications, with no improvement in anti-ischemic efficacy. The combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents should be chosen according to the patients' characteristics and the management strategy of the acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Disease Management; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enoxaparin; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polysaccharides; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Platelet aggregation is one of the most important underlying mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Antiplatelet therapy is considered as a cornerstone therapy and is widely used in these patients. Clopidogrel is currently a class I indication in patients with ACS. However, different degrees of resistance to clopidogrel have been the subject of many recent studies that led to higher dosing regimens of clopidogrel. Failure of clopidogrel to provide consistent platelet aggregation inhibition in all patients made the emergence of new more reliable agents crucial. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are the 2 new antiplatelet agents that have recently been compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS. This article reviews the current evidence that supports the use of each of those agents and provides clinicians with an objective summary supporting their use.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the leading cause of mortality and one of the main reasons for hospital admissions in the developed nations. Due to high rates of mortality and reinfarction, ACS represent a major public health concern. Platelets play a central role in atherothrombosis, the main pathologic substrate in ACS. Sufficient inhibition of platelet aggregation is therefore one of the key targets in the treatment of ACS. Blockade of the P2Y12 subtype of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor on platelet cell membranes has been established as a key mechanism of platelet inhibition. Clopidogrel, an ADP receptor antagonist and a second-generation thienopyridine, has been demonstrated to be of clinical benefit in patients with ACS when added to aspirin. A delayed onset of action due to two-step conversion to the active metabolite, irreversible binding to P2Y12 receptors, and broad interindividual variability in levels of platelet response are the main limitations of clopidogrel. Prasugrel, a novel third-generation thienopyridine, provides faster and stronger inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopigodrel. However, like the active metabolite of clopidogrel, prasugrel binds irreversibly to the P2Y12 ADP receptor site, causing inhibition of platelet aggregation for the life of the platelet. Although in a randomized, double-blind trial prasugrel demonstrated superiority for multiple cardiovascular endpoints compared with standard-dose clopidogrel, it was also associated with an increased bleeding risk, including fatal bleeding. This review discusses the optimal antiplatelet regimens for management of patients with ACS, with special focus on ticagrelor, the first oral agent in a new chemical class of nonthienopyridine antiplatelet agents termed cyclopentyltriazolo-pyrimidines. Faster and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel, quick recovery of platelet function, and high efficacy regardless of clopidogrel response status, are the obvious advantages of ticagrelor as compared with thienopyridines. The prospective, randomized Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes trial has established the clinical utility, enhanced efficacy, and similar safety of ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel in a wide range of patients with ACS managed with contemporary antithrombotic therapies and invasive strategies when indicated. Dyspnea, ventricular pauses ≥3 seconds, and elevation of serum creatinine and uric acid are the most common known adverse effects associ

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor (AZD6140), a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine, is the first orally available antagonist of the ADP receptor of the P2Y12 subtype. Ticagrelor inhibits platelets in a reversible manner and does not require hepatic bioactivation. The pharmacology of ticagrelor indicates that it provides more consistent, more rapid and more potent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. Preclinical and clinical studies with ticagrelor have demonstrated that this drug has excellent oral bioavailability. The Phase III clinical study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) has shown that ticagrelor reduced ischemic events and all-cause mortality without an increase in major bleeding complications. Potential advantages of ticagrelor include more flexibility in its use if rapid onset of action is needed before percutaneous coronary interventions or when cessation is required before coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Potential disadvantages include more side effects such as dyspnea, ventricular pauses or an increase in concentrations of uric acid and creatinine. However, ticagrelor did not only reduce death due to vascular causes but also all-cause mortality. Further clinical trials in indications other than acute coronary syndrome are awaited.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of management of acute coronary syndromes. Currently used antiplatelet drugs present several limitations that provoke new searches. These limitations include resistance, delay in the onset of action, risk for bleeding, variations in the individual response, and interaction with other medications (i.e. proton pump inhibitors, calcium channel blockers). New concepts and medications have emerged for the effective inhibition of platelets. Prasugrel, AZD6140 (ticagrelor), cangrelor, and SCH 530348 (thrombin receptor antagonist) are among some of the novel agents that survived randomized trials. In this review, we aimed to summarize novel concepts and agents in antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Humans; Lactones; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptors, Thrombin; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). More than 40 million patients worldwide receive clopidogrel, but about 20% of them are nonresponders or poor responders. Many studies using different techniques, platelet agonists and definitions have shown that patients who are poor responders to clopidogrel have an increased risk of death, reinfarction and stent thrombosis. The mechanisms leading to poor responsiveness are not fully elucidated and are likely multifactorial: genetic factors, accelerated platelet turnover, up-regulation of the P2Y12 pathways, high baseline platelet reactivity, poor compliance, underdosing and drug-drug interactions. The management of these patients is very difficult, but evidence does exist showing that a strategy of higher maintenance dose or switch to different thienopyridines (e.g. ticlopidine or prasugrel) or use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during PCI may be helpful to overcome poor responsiveness and improve the long-term clinical outcome. This review describes the impact of poor responsiveness to clopidogrel on clinical outcomes, the mechanisms leading to poor effect, and the different assays to assess it. Finally, current and future options for its management are discussed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Drug Interactions; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet agents are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The current "gold standard" consists of a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel administered orally shortly before invasive procedures and then continued in the form of maintenance doses. Not all patients respond optimally to standard therapy. Resistance to the antiplatelet activity of both drugs when used either singly or in combination has been observed and may lead to treatment failure, including further atherothrombotic events. Potential limitations associated with the combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel have inspired clinical investigation into several promising new antiplatelet agents as potential additions or alternatives to standard therapy. The candidates include prasugrel, which has a mechanism similar to that of clopidogrel but with superior pharmacokinetics; ticagrelor, a nonthienopyridine that binds reversibly to the platelet P2Y(12) receptor; cangrelor, an intravenously administered analogue of ticagrelor; and various thrombin receptor antagonists.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Signal Transduction; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet agents like aspirin and clopidogrel are treatment cornerstones for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Drawbacks of dual therapy with these agents include slow onset and offset of effect and wide response variability. Clopidogrel may provide little benefit if administered too close to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and increase major bleeding risk if given too close to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or other surgery. It may not provide sufficient antiplatelet coverage prior to CABG if stopped too long before intervention and leave patients without antiplatelet coverage due to hyporesponsiveness. Prasugrel has made steps towards addressing these limitations by exhibiting more efficient metabolism, more rapid onset of effect, and greater and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. The TRITON-TIMI38 trial in ACS patients undergoing PCI showed prasugrel produced greater ischemic event protection than clopidogrel but significantly increased major bleeding risk. AZD6140, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) inhibitor, provides more rapid onset of effect and greater and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. In DISPERSE2, a phase II trial in ACS patients, AZD6140 did not increase bleeding risk, reduced bleeding risk among CABG patients, and produced numerical reductions in myocardial infarction risk. AZD6140 is being compared with clopidogrel in PLATO, a phase III trial in approximately 18000 ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor (AZD6140) is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist that blocks ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Unlike thienopyridines, which irreversibly bind to the P2Y(12) receptor for the lifetime of the platelet, ticagrelor binds reversibly to the receptor and exhibits rapid onset and offset of effect, which closely follow drug exposure levels. Animal models indicate greater separation between antithrombotic effects and bleeding effects with ticagrelor than with thienopyridines. Unlike the thienopyridines, ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation. It is quickly absorbed and exhibits a rapid antiplatelet effect, with higher and more consistent levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) being maintained across the dosing interval than with clopidogrel. IPA levels decline with plasma drug levels after discontinuation of dosing. In the phase II DISPERSE-2 trial of 990 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), ticagrelor treatment with 90 mg and 180 mg twice daily showed comparable rates of major and minor bleeding compared with clopidogrel 75 mg while there were numerically fewer myocardial infarctions. Ticagrelor resulted in greater IPA in clopidogrel-naïve patients and produced substantial additional reductions in platelet aggregation activity in patients pretreated with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor treatment was well tolerated in DISPERSE-2, and discontinuation rates were comparable to those observed for clopidogrel. An increased risk of mild to moderate dyspnea and mostly asymptomatic ventricular pauses were observed in phase II studies. The mechanisms for these effects are currently being investigated. The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor are being further evaluated in the phase III PLATO trial, involving approximately 18,000 patients with ACS, including both ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Vasoconstriction

Despite recent advances in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine during the acute phase and for secondary prevention, this condition remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The limitations of the currently available antiplatelet agents have triggered the development of newer drugs. In this review we summarize the mechanisms of actions and results of current clinical trials of novel antiplatelet agents. These include prasugrel, a thienopyridine prodrug which has a mechanism similar to that of clopidogrel but superior pharmacokinetic features; ticagrelor, a non-thienopyridine that binds reversibly to the platelet P2Y(12) receptor; cangrelor, an intravenously administered analog of ticagrelor; the thrombin receptor antagonist SCH 53048; and terutroban (S18886), a thromboxane A(2) receptor inhibitor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Humans; Lactones; Naphthalenes; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prodrugs; Propionates; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Antiplatelet agents play an essential role in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines are a class of drugs that function via inhibition of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 platelet receptors. Currently, clopidogrel, a second generation thienopyridine, is the main drug of choice and the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is administered orally for the treatment of ACS. Clopidogrel, is a pro-drug that needs to be metabolized in the liver and intestines to form active metabolites. Prasugrel, a third generation thienopyridine, was approved for use in Europe in February 2009, and is currently available in the United Kingdom. All thienopyridines however, have pharmacological limitations that lead to a search for more effective non-thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitors. Promising results have been reported with ticagrelor, an oral first reversible, direct-acting inhibitor of the P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor is the first oral P2Y12 receptor binding antagonist that does not require metabolic activation. Furthermore, ticagrelor has at last 1 active metabolite, which has very similar pharmacokinetics to the parent compound. Therefore, ticagrelor has more rapid onset and more pronounced platelet inhibition than other antiplatelet agents. The safety and efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in ACS patient has been recently evaluated by the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel had a significantly greater reduction in the death rate from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke without major bleeding. There was however, an increase in non-procedure related bleeding, dyspnoea and ventricular pauses in the first week of treatment. Further studies on new antiplatelet agents are needed to establish a new "gold standard" antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Biotransformation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lactones; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The incidence of new coronary events in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (e.g. cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors such as aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid; ASA]) and ADP receptor blockers (e.g. clopidogrel) is high. Therefore, it is critical to identify patients who require more intense treatment such as those with poor tolerance to existing drugs, those with genotypes that predict treatment resistance, diabetic patients, and smokers. The new ADP receptor blockers (prasugrel, cangrelor, Ticagrelor) can provide greater efficacy but it should not be associated with increased bleeding. Thrombin receptor antagonists (e.g. SCH530348) are another alternative that is currently being tested in randomized trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Humans; Lactones; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Three novel nonthienopyridine antiplatelet agents--cangrelor, ticagrelor (AZD6140), and SCH 530348--are in advanced clinical testing in patients with coronary artery disease. Cangrelor and ticagrelor are direct and reversible inhibitors of the platelet adenosine 5'-diphosphate P2Y12 receptor, whereas SCH 530348 is a thrombin receptor antagonist. Clinical data available to date for each of these compounds suggest that they have safety and efficacy profiles that will be advantageous to patients with acute coronary syndromes or undergoing percutaneous intervention. We review the clinical features of these new platelet inhibition therapies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Lactones; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptors, Thrombin; Ticagrelor

Elderly status is steadily increasing among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the cornerstone of treatment to prevent recurrent thrombotic complications in patients with ACS. However, DAPT in older patients is challenged by a concurrent heightened risk of ischemia and bleeding. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of a lower dose of ticagrelor (60 mg twice daily) among elderly patients during the early phase of ACS.. PLINY THE ELDER (PLatelet INhibition with two different doses of potent P2y12 inhibitors in THE ELDERly population) (NCT04739384) is a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of a lower dose of ticagrelor (60 mg twice daily) compared with a standard dose (90 mg twice daily) among elderly patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 50 patients, aged 75 years or more, with indication to potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors will be randomized within 3 days from PCI for the index ACS. Patients with indication to oral anticoagulant therapy, treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, or active bleeding will be excluded. The primary endpoint is platelet reactivity determined by P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) (VerifyNow, Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) after treatment with ticagrelor 60 or 90 mg twice daily for 14 days. Secondary endpoints will include other pharmacodynamic tests of ADP-induced aggregation (light transmittance aggregometry and multiple electrode aggregometry) and determination of pharmacokinetic profile (plasma levels of ticagrelor and its metabolite AR-C124910XX) by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.. The PLINY THE ELDER trial will determine whether a lower dose of ticagrelor confers non-inferior platelet inhibition compared with the standard dose in the early phase of ACS among elderly patients undergoing PCI, informing future clinical investigation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This study evaluated whether patient support, administered via an electronic device-based app, increased adherence to treatment and lifestyle changes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with ticagrelor in routine clinical practice.. Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with diagnosed ACS treated with ticagrelor co-administered with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid were randomized into an active group (with support tool app for medication intake reminders and motivational messages) and a control group (without support tool app), and observed for 48 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02615704). Patients were asked to complete the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Lifestyle Changes Questionnaire (LSQ), and were assessed for blood pressure and body mass index (BMI) at baseline (visit 1) and at the end of the study (visit 2). Medication adherence was measured using the Brilique Adherence Questionnaire (BAQ).. Patients (N = 676) were randomized to an active (n = 342) or a control (n = 334) group. BAQ data were available for 174 patients in the active group and 174 patients in the control group. Over the 48-week period, mean (standard deviation) adherence for the active and control groups was 96.4% (13.2%) and 91.5% (23.1%), respectively (effect of app intervention, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood pressure and BMI between visits. General improvements in SF-36 and LSQ scores were observed for both groups.. The patient support tool app was associated with significant improvements in patient-reported treatment adherence compared with a data collection app alone in patients prescribed ticagrelor for ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Humans; Medication Adherence; Smartphone; Ticagrelor

To assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presenting during off- and on-hours.. The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with ACS according to time of hospital presentation remain unknown.. This post hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included 1565 patients with ACS presenting off-hours and 2453 patients presenting on-hours, randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 bleeding, both at 12 months.. In patients with ACS planned to undergo an invasive treatment strategy, time of presentation (off-hours vs. on-hours) does not interact significantly with the relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel.. NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The effect of a prasugrel vs. a ticagrelor based strategy on total (including both first and recurrent) ischaemic and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has not been evaluated. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the treatment effect of a prasugrel vs. a ticagrelor based strategy in patients with ACS undergoing an invasive management strategy when both first and recurrent non-fatal ischaemic and bleeding events are taken into account.. This is a post-hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 randomized control trial, including all 4018 patients in the trial. The main clinical endpoints of interest included ischaemic events [myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke] and bleeding events [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 to 5 bleeding]. An additional endpoint of interest was definite/probable stent thrombosis. The effect of the prasugrel vs. ticagrelor based strategies on these endpoints was evaluated on both time-to-first event and total events analyses. Patients in the prasugrel group had a lower risk of MI in comparison to the ticagrelor group on both time-to-first event [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.85] and total events [HR = 0.62 (0.45-0.86)] analysis. The risk of BARC type 3 to 5 bleeding was comparable between the prasugrel and ticagrelor groups on both time-to-first event [HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.25)] and total events [HR = 0.99 (0.76-1.31)] analysis.. A prasugrel based strategy was associated with a reduction in total MI events in comparison to a ticagrelor based strategy in patients with ACS undergoing invasive assessment. Total BARC type 3 to 5 bleeding events were comparable between the two groups. Given the importance of this topic, future studies to confirm these findings would be welcome. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Immature or reticulated platelets are associated with impaired efficacy of antiplatelet drugs and adverse events in cardiovascular patients. Their role as a predictive biomarker in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with potent P2Y. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) was assessed within 48 hours after randomization. Patients were divided based on the IPF median values: the IPF. Independently from drug treatment, IPF was associated with the primary end point and therefore is a promising biomarker for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.. https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Blood Platelets; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The TACSI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03560310) tests the hypothesis that 1-year treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor is superior to only ASA after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The TACSI trial is an investigator-initiated pragmatic, prospective, multinational, multicenter, open-label, registry-based randomized trial with 1:1 randomization to dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor or ASA only, in patients undergoing first isolated CABG, with a planned enrollment of 2200 patients at Nordic cardiac surgery centers. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of time to all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new coronary revascularization within 12 months after randomization. The primary safety end point is time to hospitalization due to major bleeding. Secondary efficacy end points include time to the individual components of the primary end point, cardiovascular death, and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes. High-quality health care registries are used to assess primary and secondary end points. The patients will be followed for 10 years. The TACSI trial will give important information useful for guiding the antiplatelet strategy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with CABG.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We sought to explore the sex differences in clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor monotherapy after ticagrelor-based 3-month versus 12-month dual-antiplatelet therapy.. This was a post hoc analysis of the TICO trial (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome; n=3056)-a randomized controlled trial for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stent. The primary outcome was a net adverse clinical event (composite of major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target-vessel revascularization) 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.. There were 27.3% (n=628) women in the TICO trial; they were older with lower body mass index and higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease than men. Compared with men, women had higher risk of net adverse clinical events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89 [95% CI, 1.34-2.67]), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.07-2.68]), and major bleeding (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.25-3.35]). Among the groups stratified by sex and dual-antiplatelet therapy strategy, the incidences of primary and secondary outcomes were significantly different and the highest in women with ticagrelor-based 12-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (. After percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome, women demonstrated worse clinical outcomes than men. Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy was associated with significantly lower risk of net adverse clinical events in women without sex interaction.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sex Characteristics; Ticagrelor

About 5%-15% of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing stent implantation have concomitant atrial fibrillation and need both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. The optimal antithrombotic regimen remains uncertain in this scenario.. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (OPtimal management of anTIthroMbotic Agents [OPTIMA]-4) is designed to test the hypothesis that, for ACS patients with concomitant nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and having low-to-moderate risk of bleeding, clopidogrel is comparable in efficacy but superior in safety compared to ticagrelor while being used in combination with dabigatran after new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.. ACS patients who have low-to-moderate risk of bleeding (e.g., HAS-BLED score ≤ 2) and require anticoagulation therapy (CHA. The first enrollment occurred on March 12, 2018. The recruitment is anticipated to be completed before December 31, 2024.. The OPTIMA-4 trial offers an opportunity to assess the optimal dual antithrombotic regimen in ACS patients with concomitant NVAF after the implantation of new-generation DES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is currently the standard of care after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent studies suggest that reducing DAPT to 1-3 months followed by an aspirin-free single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) strategy with a potent P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Peripheral endothelial dysfunction is an independent predictor of adverse long-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. Data are lacking on the effects of oral P2Y12-inhibitors on peripheral endothelial function in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Furthermore, the relation between peripheral endothelial function and invasive indexes of coronary microvascular function in NSTEACS is unclear. Between March 2018 and July 2020, hospitalized patients with NSTEACS were randomized (1:1) to ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Peripheral endothelial function was assessed with brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). Invasive indexes of coronary microvascular function were obtained using an intracoronary pressure-temperature sensor-tipped wire. In 70 patients included, mean age was 58.6 years, 78.6% (n = 55) were male and 20% (n = 14) had diabetes mellitus. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly improved FMD (14.2 ± 5.4% vs 8.9 ± 5.3%, p <0.001) after a median treatment time of 41.2 hours. The FMD was significantly correlated with the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) measured in the infarct-related artery (r = -0.38, p = 0.001), with a stronger correlation found in those who did not have percutaneous coronary intervention (r = -0.52, p = 0.03). Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an FMD of 8.2% identified an IMR of >34 as the threshold, with 77.6% sensitivity and 52.4% specificity. In patients who did not have a percutaneous coronary intervention, an FMD of 11.49% identified an IMR of >34 with 84.6% sensitivity and 80% specificity. In conclusion, ticagrelor significantly improved peripheral endothelial function compared with clopidogrel in patients with NSTEACS. There was a significant correlation between brachial artery FMD and IMR of the infarct-related artery.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Infarction; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Crushed formulations of specific antiplatelet agents produce earlier and stronger platelet inhibition. We studied the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its relative efficacy compared with integral clopidogrel, crushed and integral ticagrelor.. We aimed to compare the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Overall, 142 patients with suspected ACS were randomly assigned to receive crushed or integral formulations of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Platelet inhibition at baseline and 1 and 8 h was assessed using the VerifyNow assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) ≥ 235 P2Y. The PRU and percentage inhibition median (interquartile range) at 1 h for the different formulations were as follows: crushed clopidogrel: 196.50 (155.50, 246.50), 9.36 (- 1.79, 25.10); integral clopidogrel: 189.50 (159.00, 214.00), 2.32 (- 2.67, 19.89); crushed ticagrelor: 59.00 (10.00, 96.00), 75.53 (49.12, 95.18); and integral ticagrelor: 126.50 (50.00, 168.00), 40.56 (25.59, 78.69). There was no significant difference in PRU or percentage platelet inhibition between the crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel (p = 0.990, p = 0.479); both formulations of ticagrelor were superior to the clopidogrel formulations (p < 0.05). On paired comparison, crushed ticagrelor showed robust early inhibition of platelets compared with the integral formulation (p = 0.03). Crushed clopidogrel exhibited the maximal HTPR of 34.3%, but was < 3% for both formulations of ticagrelor.. The platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel is not superior to integral preparation in patients with ACS. Crushed ticagrelor produced maximal platelet inhibition acutely. HTPR rates in ACS are similar and very low with both formulations of ticagrelor, and maximal with crushed clopidogrel. Clinical Trials Registry of India identifier number CTRI/2020/06/025647.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

After a brief period of dual antiplatelet therapy, P2Y. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of ticagrelor or prasugrel P2Y. This was a proof-of-concept pilot trial. ACS patients treated with drug-eluting stents were included. On the day after PCI, low-dose colchicine (0.6 mg daily) was administered in addition to ticagrelor or prasugrel maintenance therapy, whereas aspirin therapy was discontinued. The primary outcome was any stent thrombosis at 3 months. The key secondary outcomes were platelet reactivity measured by the VerifyNow assay (Accriva) before discharge and a reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) over 1 month.. In ACS patients undergoing PCI, it is feasible to discontinue aspirin therapy and administer low-dose colchicine on the day after PCI in addition to ticagrelor or prasugrel P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; C-Reactive Protein; Colchicine; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Whether the access site influences the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing invasive treatment strategy remains unstudied.. This post-hoc analysis included ACS patients undergoing invasive treatment via radial or femoral access and randomized to either ticagrelor or prasugrel in the ISAR-REACT 5 trial. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, safety endpoint was BARC 3 to 5 bleeding. Outcomes were assessed out to 12 months after randomization.. Out of 4018 patients, 3984 underwent invasive treatment via radial or femoral access. 1479 had coronary angiography via radial access (ticagrelor, N = 748; prasugrel, N = 731) and 2505 via femoral access (ticagrelor, N = 1245; prasugrel, N = 1260). There was no interaction between access route and assignment to either ticagrelor or prasugrel regarding the primary efficacy or safety endpoints (P for interaction≥0.616). In the radial group, the primary efficacy endpoint (7.6% versus 5.8%, HR: 1.32 [0.88-1.97], P = 0.151) and the safety endpoint (4.3% versus 3.0%, HR: 1.36, [0.73-1.31], P = 0.300) were not statistically different in patients receiving either ticagrelor or prasugrel. In the femoral group, the primary efficacy endpoint occurred more frequently in patients assigned to ticagrelor as compared to prasugrel (10.3% versus 7.3%, HR: 1.44 [1.10-1.88], P = 0.006) without significant difference in terms of safety endpoint (6.4% versus 5.8%, HR: 1.14, [0.81-1.60], P = 0.470).. In patients with ACS undergoing an invasive treatment strategy, the access route does not influence the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel.. NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To assess whether the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) are influenced by pre-admission treatment with aspirin and/or clopidogrel.. Patients (n = 4018) were categorized into two groups: pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel group (n = 1455) and no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel group (n = 2563). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the secondary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 bleeding, both at 1 year. Patients in the pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel group had a higher risk of ischaemic events, but a similar risk of bleeding to patients in the no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel group (cumulative incidences 10.5% vs. 6.7%, and 5.7% vs. 5.7%, respectively). The primary endpoint occurred in 81/717 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 69/738 patients assigned to prasugrel in the pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel group [11.5% vs. 9.5%; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.69], and in 103/1295 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 68/1268 patients assigned to prasugrel in the no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel group [8.0% vs. 5.4%; HR = 1.50 (1.10-2.03); Pint = 0.38]. BARC type 3-5 bleeding events did not differ between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients in the pre-admission aspirin and/or clopidogrel (6.2% vs. 4.5%) or no pre-admission aspirin or clopidogrel (5.3% vs. 5.1%) group (Pint = 0.54).. In patients with ACS, pre-admission therapy with aspirin and/or clopidogrel has no influence on the relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Current guidelines recommend that patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who have successfully undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should continue to use dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months. The long-term use of standard-dose dual antiplatelet therapy will increase the risk of bleeding. An optimized antiplatelet strategy that can prevent ischemic events and reduce the risk of bleeding remains to be explored.. The study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study involving 2090 patients from six clinical centers in China. Through the interactive web response system (IWRS), ACS patients undergoing successful PCI will be randomly divided into the low-dose ticagrelor group or the normal-dose ticagrelor group, after taking 100 mg aspirin and 90 mg ticagrelor bid for 1 week. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, and stroke. The secondary endpoints are bleeding events of grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] criteria, cardiovascular death, acute myocardium infarction, and coronary revascularization at 1 year.. Recent studies have confirmed that 90 mg ticagrelor alone can safely and effectively reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events of patients with ACS after PCI. Compared with standard-dose DAPT, whether low-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin can ensure the anti-ischemic effect while reducing the bleeding risk remains unclear in Chinese patients. The TIGER study will be the first large-scale, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose and standard-dose ticagrelor combined with aspirin in ACS patients 1 week after successful PCI.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04255602. Registered on 5 February 2020.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Coronary microvascular dysfunction after acute coronary syndrome is an important predictor of long-term prognosis. Data is lacking on the effects of oral P2Y. Hospitalized non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients were randomized (1:1) to ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio were obtained using an intracoronary pressure-temperature sensor-tipped wire.. In total, 128 patients were randomized between March 2018 and July 2020. Mean age 59.2±11.8 years, 84% were male, mean Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score was 93.7±24.5. Intracoronary physiological measurements were obtained in 118 patients (60 ticagrelor, 58 clopidogrel). In the infarct-related artery, the ticagrelor group had lower baseline index of microcirculatory resistance (22.0 [13.0-34.9] versus 27.7 [19.3-29.8];. In non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients, ticagrelor significantly improved coronary microvascular function before and after PCI compared with clopidogrel.. URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12618001610224.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Long-term antiplatelet agents including the potent P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor are indicated in patients with a previous history of acute coronary syndrome. We sought to compare the effect of ticagrelor with that of aspirin monotherapy on vascular endothelial function in patients with prior acute coronary syndrome.. This was a prospective, single center, parallel group, investigator-blinded randomized controlled trial. We randomized 200 patients on long-term aspirin monotherapy with prior acute coronary syndrome in a 1:1 fashion to receive ticagrelor 60 mg BD (n=100) or aspirin 100 mg OD (n=100). The primary end point was change from baseline in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were changes to platelet activation marker (CD41_62p) and endothelial progenitor cell (CD34/133) count measured by flow cytometry, plasma level of adenosine, IL-6 (interleukin-6) and EGF (epidermal growth factor), and multi-omics profiling at 12 weeks.. After 12 weeks, brachial flow-mediated dilation was significantly increased in the ticagrelor group compared with the aspirin group (ticagrelor: 3.48±3.48% versus aspirin: -1.26±2.85%, treatment effect 4.73 [95% CI, 3.85-5.62],. In patients with prior acute coronary syndrome, ticagrelor 60 mg BD monotherapy significantly improved brachial flow-mediated dilation compared with aspirin monotherapy and was associated with significant changes in metabolomic and lipidomic signatures.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT03881943.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Epidermal Growth Factor; Humans; Interleukin-6; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

European treatment guidelines recommend prasugrel over ticagrelor for treating patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), prompting several Swedish administrative regions to transition from ticagrelor to prasugrel as the preferred treatment for patients with ACS. We aim to systematically evaluate this transition to determine the relative efficacy of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in a real-world cohort of patients with ACS.. The SWITCH SWEDEHEART trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized clinical trial, in which administrative regions in Sweden will constitute the clusters. At the start of the study, all clusters will use ticagrelor as the P2Y12 inhibitor drug of choice for ACS. The order in which the clusters will implement the transition from ticagrelor to prasugrel will be randomly assigned. Every 9 months, 1 cluster will switch from ticagrelor to prasugrel as the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice for patients with ACS. The primary endpoint is the composite 1-year rate of the death, stroke, or myocardial infarction.. The SWITCH SWEDEHEART study will provide an extensive randomized comparison between ticagrelor and prasugrel. Novel therapies are frequently costly and supported by evidence from few or small studies, and systematic evaluation after the introduction is rare. This study will establish an important standard for introducing and evaluating the effects of health care changes within our societies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The optimal P2Y. We identified 22,120 hospitalized ACS patients with HBR treated with aspirin combined with either clopidogrel (n = 17,420) or ticagrelor (n = 4700) in the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS (CCC-ACS) project between November 2014 and December 2019.. The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range, 7-14 days). Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital TIMI major or minor bleeding (4.8% vs 3.8%; adjusted OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.41; P = 0.022). The incidence of TIMI major bleeding (1.7% vs 1.1%, P = 0.005) and intracranial bleeding (0.8% vs 0.5%, P = 0.005) were also higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group. There was no significant difference in the rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke) with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel therapy (4.2% vs 4.3%; adjusted OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.90-1.28; P = 0.411). Outcomes in the propensity-matched cohorts and in sensitivity analyses were consistent with the those of the main analysis.. Among ACS patients with HBR, ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital major bleeding without a significant reduction in in-hospital MACCE.. https://www.. gov. Unique identifier: NCT02306616.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To estimate the incidence and HRs for bleeding for different dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) in a real-world population with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in England.. A retrospective, population-based cohort study emulating a target randomised controlled trial (tRCT).. Linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).. Primary and secondary care.. Patients ≥18 years old with ACS undergoing emergency PCI.. Aspirin and clopidogrel (AC, reference) versus aspirin and prasugrel (AP) or aspirin and ticagrelor (AT); AP evaluated only in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).. Primary: any bleeding up to 12 months after the index event (HES- or CPRD- recorded). Secondary: HES-recorded bleeding, CPRD-recorded bleeding, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, mortality from bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, additional coronary intervention and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).. In ACS, the rates of any bleeding for AC and AT were 89 per 1000 person years and 134 per 1000 person years, respectively. In STEMI, rates for AC, AP and AT were 93 per 1000 person years, 138 per 1000 person years and 143 per 100 person years, respectively. In ACS, compared with AC, AT increased the hazard of any bleeding (HR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.82) but did not reduce MACCE (HR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.27). In STEMI, compared with AC, AP and AT increased the hazard of any bleeding (HR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.59 and HR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.05, respectively) but did not reduce MACCE (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.51 and HR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.51, respectively). Non-adherence to the prescribed DAPT regimen was 28% in AC (29% in STEMI only), 31% in AP (STEMI only) and 33% in AT (32% in STEMI only).. In a real-world population with ACS, DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel are associated with increased bleeding compared with DAPT with clopidogrel.. ISRCTN76607611.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adolescent; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Dinucleoside Phosphates; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor

Oral activated factor XI (FXIa) inhibitors may modulate coagulation to prevent thromboembolic events without substantially increasing bleeding. We explored the pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of the oral FXIa inhibitor asundexian for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (MI).. We randomized 1601 patients with recent acute MI to oral asundexian 10, 20, or 50 mg or placebo once daily for 6 to 12 months in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2, dose-ranging trial. Patients were randomized within 5 days of their qualifying MI and received dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor. The effect of asundexian on FXIa inhibition was assessed at 4 weeks. The prespecified main safety outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding comparing all pooled asundexian doses with placebo. The prespecified efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis comparing pooled asundexian 20 and 50 mg doses with placebo.. The median age was 68 years, 23% of participants were women, 51% had ST-segment-elevation MI, 80% were treated with aspirin plus ticagrelor or prasugrel, and 99% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention before randomization. Asundexian caused dose-related inhibition of FXIa activity, with 50 mg resulting in >90% inhibition. Over a median follow-up of 368 days, the main safety outcome occurred in 30 (7.6%), 32 (8.1%), 42 (10.5%), and 36 (9.0%) patients receiving asundexian 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo, respectively (pooled asundexian versus placebo: hazard ratio, 0.98 [90% CI, 0.71-1.35]). The efficacy outcome occurred in 27 (6.8%), 24 (6.0%), 22 (5.5%), and 22 (5.5%) patients assigned asundexian 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo, respectively (pooled asundexian 20 and 50 mg versus placebo: hazard ratio, 1.05 [90% CI, 0.69-1.61]).. In patients with recent acute MI, 3 doses of asundexian, when added to aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, resulted in dose-dependent, near-complete inhibition of FXIa activity without a significant increase in bleeding and a low rate of ischemic events. These data support the investigation of asundexian at a dose of 50 mg daily in an adequately powered clinical trial of patients who experienced acute MI.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT04304534; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search; Unique identifier: 2019-003244-79.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Double-Blind Method; Factor XIa; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The relative efficacy and safety of more potent P2Y. This post hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 5) included patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel, in whom HBR was defined as per Academic Research Consortium criteria. The primary (efficacy) end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary (safety) end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 to 5 bleeding. Outcomes were assessed 12 months after randomization.. Out of the 3239 patients included in this analysis, 486 fulfilled the criteria for Academic Research Consortium-HBR definition (HBR group; ticagrelor, n=230 and prasugrel, n=256), while 2753 did not (non-HBR group; ticagrelor, n=1375 and prasugrel, n=1378). Compared with the non-HBR group, the HBR group had a higher risk for the primary (hazard ratio [HR]=3.57 [95% CI, 2.79-4.57];. In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, HBR status increased both ischemic and bleeding risk without significant impact on the relative efficacy and safety of either ticagrelor or prasugrel. These results warrant confirmation in larger cohorts.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), there is residual and variable risk of recurrent ischemic events.. This study aimed to develop biomarker-based prediction models for 1-year risk of cardiovascular (CV) death and myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. We included 10,713 patients from the PLATO (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial in the development cohort and externally validated in 3,508 patients from the TRACER (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial. Variables contributing to risk of CV death/MI were assessed using Cox regression models, and a score was derived using subsets of variables approximating the full model.. An 8-item score for the prediction of CV death/MI was developed and validated for patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The ABC-ACS ischemia score showed good calibration and discrimination and might be useful for risk prediction and decision support in patients with ACS. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872; Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar [SCH 530348; MK-5348] in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome [TRACER]; NCT00527943).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Growth Differentiation Factor 15; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Data regarding prognosis and management after nuisance bleeding (NB) is limited. The purpose was to examine the prognostic significance of NB in patients receiving potent dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) after acute myocardial infarction and the impact of de-escalation of DAPT on clinical outcomes thereafter.. From the TALOS-AMI trial (Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Stabilized Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)' 2583 patients were used to investigate the clinical impact of NB (defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] 1 bleeding) during 1-month treatment with ticagrelor-based DAPT after acute myocardial infarction. We assessed the associations between NB within 1 month and BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) from 1 to 12 months. We also evaluated the effect of de-escalation to clopidogrel in patients with or without NB.. NB occurred in 416 patients (16.7%) after 1 month of ticagrelor-based DAPT. At 1 year, NB was not associated with increase in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (hazard ratio [HR]' 1.29 [95% CI' 0.7-2.14]) and major adverse cardiovascular event (HR' 1.72 [95% CI' 0.87-3.39]). However, patients with NB had an increased risk of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 6 months (HR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.08-3.48];. NB was frequent in patients with acute myocardial infarction on 1-month ticagrelor-based DAPT and was associated with an early increase of bleeding. DAPT de-escalation after NB may reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02018055.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The evidence for the comparative effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in older patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is limited, especially in the acute phase of ACS. This study aimed to compare the in-hospital outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in older patients with ACS.. Hospitalised ACS patients aged ≥75 years who were recruited to the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project between November 2014 and December 2019 and received aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitors within 24 h after first medical contact were included. The primary outcomes were in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.. Of 18,244 ACS patients, 18.5% received ticagrelor. Multivariable-adjusted analysis revealed comparable risks of in-hospital MACE between patients receiving ticagrelor and clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.35). However, ticagrelor use was associated with 45% higher risk of in-hospital major bleeding compared with clopidogrel use (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.91). Similar results were found in the IPTW analysis.. ACS patients aged ≥75 years receiving ticagrelor during the acute phase had similar risk of in-hospital MACE, but higher risk of in-hospital major bleeding compared with those receiving clopidogrel. More evidence is needed to guide the use of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors during hospitalisation in older patients with ACS.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02306616.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality Improvement; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Numerous worldwide clinical trials have proven the indisputably negative influence of morphine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether oral coadministration of an anti-opioid agent, naloxone, can be considered a successful approach to overcome 'the morphine effect'.. Consecutive unstable angina patients receiving ticagrelor and morphine with or without orally administered naloxone underwent assessment of platelet reactivity using Multiplate analyzer as well as evaluation of the pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor and its active metabolite, AR-C124910XX, at 9 pre-defined time points within the first 6 hours following oral intake of the ticagrelor loading dose.. The trial shows no significant differences regarding the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor between both study arms throughout the study period. AR-C124910XX plasma concentration was significantly higher 120 min after the ticagrelor loading dose administration (p = 0.0417). However, the evaluation of pharmacodynamics did not show any statistically significant differences between the study arms.. To conclude, this trial shows that naloxone co-administration in ticagrelor-treated acute coronary syndrome patients on concomitant treatment with morphine shows no definite superiority in terms of ticagrelor pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Sex-specific analyses of direct head-to-head comparisons between newer P2Y. This pre-specified analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included 956 women and 3,062 men with ACS randomly assigned to either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the safety endpoint was the 12-month incidence of bleeding (type 3-5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]).. Although there was no significant interaction between sex and treatment effect of study drugs, the superior efficacy of prasugrel was more evident among men. No difference in bleeding between the two study groups was seen for both women and men.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The CD36 scavenger receptor is a mediator of both atherogenesis and thrombosis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CD36+ microparticles (MPs) released from platelets for cardiovascular event presentation in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and the effects of different antiplatelet drugs on MPs.. A total of 101 aspirin-treated CAD patients, who were planned to undergo coronary angiography (CAG), were randomized to either a standard clopidogrel regimen or ticagrelor treatment. Total Annexin V-(AV)+ MPs, CD61+/AV+ MPs, and CD36+/CD61+/AV+ MPs were quantified by flow cytometry at baseline, before and immediately after the operation. The ADP-induced platelet inhibition rate was measured by thromboelastogram (TEG) examination 1 h before the operation.. The high levels of CD36+ MPs derived from activated platelets are related to an increased risk of PCI in CAD patients. Ticagrelor significantly reduced the number of CD61+/AV+ MPs and CD36+/CD61+/AV+ MPs. This trial registration number is ChiCTR1800014908 and the date of registration is 2018.05.01.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Coronary vascular function of a chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO) immediately after recanalization is known to be poor and to be partially improved by pre-treatment with loading dose of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel. It is unknown if this vascular dysfunction is maintained at long-term follow-up and may be improved by 1-year dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).. The TIGER is a prospective, open-label, two parallel-group controlled clinical trial, which 1:1 randomized 50 CTO patients to pre-PCI loading dose and subsequent 1-year DAPT with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel. Coronary blood flow (CBF) under stepwise adenosine infusion was assessed after drug loading dose and at follow-up and compared between the two drug groups, adjusting for time of follow-up.. Out of 50 patients with index CBF evaluation, 38 (76%) patients underwent angiographic follow-up (23 and 15 at 1 and 3-year, respectively) and Doppler data was available in 35 (70%). A high CBF area under the curve (AUC), already observed after loading dose in ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel group (p = 0.027), was maintained at follow-up (AUC 34815.22 ± 24,206.06 vs. AUC 22712.47 ± 13,768.95; p = 0.071). Specifically, whereas high ticagrelor loading dose-related CBF was sustained at follow-up (p = 0.933), clopidogrel loading dose-related CBF increased at follow-up (p = 0.039).. The TIGER trial showed that DAPT with ticagrelor maintained a non-significantly higher CBF in a recanalized CTO as compared to clopidogrel, whose treated patients exhibit a lower CBF immediately after PCI with a significant increase at follow-up. The clinical value of such sustained high coronary flow should be evaluated in a larger group of patients.. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02211066 (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02211066).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher risk of ischaemic events. However, no study has analysed the effect of PCI complexity on outcomes in a contemporary cohort of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with a dual anti-platelet therapy regimen based on potent P2Y12-inhibitors. Therefore, we performed the current analysis.. This analysis included all ACS patients treated with PCI in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 trial. Complex PCI was defined as at least one of: multi-vessel PCI, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, and total stented length >60 mm. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke at 12 months; the safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3-5 bleeding at 12 months. Overall, 3377 patients were included in this analysis (complex PCI, n = 1429; non-complex PCI, n = 1948). The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in the complex PCI group than the non-complex PCI group [10.1% vs. 7.2%, hazard ratio (HR): 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.14-1.82), P = 0.002], driven primarily by a higher risk of MI [HR: 1.62, (1.17-2.26), P = 0.004]. The safety endpoint was not statistically different between patients undergoing complex vs. non-complex PCI, although it was numerically higher in the complex PCI group [6.7% vs. 5.3%, HR: 1.28, (0.97-1.70), P = 0.08].. Acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing complex PCI have an increased incidence of ischaemic events compared with ACS patients undergoing non-complex PCI.. NCT01944800, Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Vs. Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome-Full-Text View-ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

The increased thrombotic risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and diabetes highlights the need for adequate antithrombotic protection. We aimed to compare the 6-month clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS and diabetes.. The study was a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, and controlled registry trial. A total of 270 ACS patients with diabetes were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to either the ticagrelor group or the clopidogrel group. Follow-up was performed for 6 months, and the data on efficacy outcomes and bleeding events were collected. At 6 months, complete follow-up data were available for 266 (98.5%) of 270 patients, and 4 were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference in the survival rate of the effective endpoints between the ticagrelor group (. Ticagrelor did not improve the composite of nonfatal MI, target vessel revascularization, rehospitalization, stroke, and death from any cause; however, it significantly increased the incidence of bleeding events defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria in Chinese patients with ACS and diabetes during the 6-month follow-up compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Background We aimed to evaluate the age-dependent effect of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results From the TICO trial (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome), which randomized 3056 patients (median age, 61 years) to the ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT group or ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT group, this post hoc analysis evaluated the age-dependent effect of the treatment strategies on the primary end point (a composite of major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target-vessel revascularization) using the subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot. The cutoff age for distinguishing patients with greater benefit from this strategy was also determined. The risk reduction effect of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT versus ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT on the primary end point gradually increased with age and was more marked from the subpopulation of age 64 years with the change point. With this cutoff value of 64 years, the occurrence of the primary end point was significantly lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT group than in the ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT group (4.4% versus 9.0%;

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Distribution; Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the risk of ischaemic complications is highest in the early phase (during the first 30 days), while most bleeding events occur predominantly during the maintenance phase of treatment (after the first 30 days). Data on the de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy by switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in stabilised AMI patients are limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in AMI patients with no adverse event during the first month after the index PCI with newer-generation DES.. TALOS-AMI is a multicentre, randomised, open-label study enrolling 2,590 AMI patients with no adverse events during the first month after the index PCI. One month after the index PCI, eligible patients are randomly assigned either to 1) aspirin 100 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily, or to 2) aspirin 100 mg plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, and bleeding type 2, 3 or 5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria from 1 to 12 months after the index PCI.. The TALOS-AMI trial is the first large-scale, multicentre, randomised study exploring the efficacy and safety of the de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy by switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in stabilised AMI patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Patients undergoing staged percutaneous coronary intervention (SPCI) are exposed to extended duration of antiplatelet therapy, and a novel aspirin-free antiplatelet regimen after SPCI should be specifically evaluated among these patients. This is a prespecified substudy of the GLOBAL LEADERS which is a randomized, open-label trial, comparing an experimental regimen of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; ticagrelor and aspirin) followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy to a reference regimen of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. Patients were stratified according to whether or not SPCI was performed. The impact of the timing of SPCI on clinical outcomes was also investigated. Of 15,968 randomized patients, 1,651 patients underwent SPCI within 3 months. These patients with SPCI had a significantly higher risk of bleeding and ischemic endpoints than those without SPCI. In patients undergoing SPCI, the primary endpoint (composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years) and secondary safety endpoint (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]-defined bleeding 3 or 5) were similar in the 2 regimens. However, in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the experimental regimen reduced a risk of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (1.8% vs 4.5%; HR 0.387; 95% CI 0.179 to 0.836; p = 0.016). In patients undergoing SPCI later than 10 days after index procedure, this risk reduction was still prominent (0.8% vs 2.3%; HR 0.321; 95% CI 0.116 to 0.891; p = 0.029). In conclusion, patients undergoing SPCI are at high risk and may need special attention from clinicians. In ACS patients undergoing SPCI, a novel aspirin-free antiplatelet regimen appears to be associated with a lower bleeding risk than with standard DAPT.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains the cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management, and ticagrelor is one of the commonly used second antiplatelet agents. There is some evidence to suggest that morphine may reduce the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor.. In a single-center, randomized controlled trial, we compared the effect of morphine and fentanyl on platelet aggregation (PA) among patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was studied by automated light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) at baseline, and at 2 h after ticagrelor loading. The primary outcome was the difference in the maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation [IPA(%)] between the groups at 2 h. Pain relief, and drug-related adverse events were secondary outcomes. Of 136 patients randomized, 70 received fentanyl and 66 received morphine. At baseline, the median (IQR) platelet aggregation [61.35% (54.6 to 70) Vs. 58.8% (52.7 to 72.9)] were comparable between the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the fentanyl and the morphine groups in IPA at 2-h [85.88%(64.65-98.16) and 81.93%(44.2-98.03), p = 0.09]. However, morphine use was independently associated with a PA of >30% at 2 h (p < 0.009). There was no difference in adverse events.. In patients with ACS, there was no significant difference between the use of fentanyl or morphine on the effect of ticagrelor on PA. (CTRI/2018/04/013423).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Fentanyl; Humans; Morphine; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

Controversy remains regarding the optimal antiplatelet regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and aspirin monotherapy in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data on 4,453 patients were pooled from SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE randomized trials. Antiplatelet therapy regimens were categorized as P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT), conventional DAPT (12-month or longer DAPT), and aspirin monotherapy (aspirin monotherapy after 6-month DAPT). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). Inverse-probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed. At 1 year, patients in the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy had a comparable risk of MACCE compared with those in the conventional DAPT (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.655; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.393 to 1.094; p = 0.106), and tended to have a lower risk of MACCE than those in the aspirin monotherapy (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.606; 95% CI, 0.347 to 1.058; p = 0.078). The adjusted hazard for the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5 bleeding was significantly lower in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy than in conventional DAPT (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.341; 95% CI, 0.190 to 0.614; p < 0.001) and in aspirin monotherapy (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.359; 95% CI, 0.182 to 0.708; p = 0.003). In conclusion, among patients with ACS undergoing PCI, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT reduced risk of bleeding compared with conventional DAPT and aspirin monotherapy after 6-month DAPT without increasing MACCE.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

The risk of ischemic events gradually decreases after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), reaching a stable level after 1 month, while the risk of bleeding remains steady during the whole period of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). Several de-escalation strategies of antiplatelet treatment aiming to enhance safety of DAPT without depriving it of its efficacy have been evaluated so far. We hypothesized that reduction of the ticagrelor maintenance dose 1 month after ACS and its continuation until 12 months after ACS may improve adherence to antiplatelet treatment due to better tolerability compared with the standard dose of ticagrelor. Moreover, improved safety of treatment and preserved anti-ischemic benefit may also be expected with additional acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) withdrawal. To evaluate these hypotheses, we designed the Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Ticagrelor-based De-escalation Antiplatelet Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndrome - a randomized clinical trial (ELECTRA-SIRIO 2), to assess the influence of ticagrelor dose reduction with or without continuation of ASA versus DAPT with standard dose ticagrelor in reducing clinically relevant bleeding and maintaining anti-ischemic efficacy in ACS patients. The study was designed as a phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, investigator-initiated clinical study with a 12-month follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04718025; EudraCT number: 2020-005130-15).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel according to smoking status in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not known. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel according to smoking status in patients with ACS undergoing invasive management.. This pre-specified analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included 1349 smokers and 2652 nonsmokers randomized to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary endpoint was the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the secondary endpoint was the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 to 5 bleeding (both endpoints assessed at 12 months).. There was no significant treatment arm-by-smoking status interaction regarding the efficacy outcome. The primary endpoint occurred in 47 patients (7.0%) in the ticagrelor group and 41 patients (6.2%) in the prasugrel group in smokers (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.75; P = 0.510) and in 133 patients (10.2%) in the ticagrelor group and 94 patients (7.2%) in the prasugrel group in nonsmokers (HR = 1.44 [1.10-1.87]; P = 0.007; P for interaction = 0.378). The secondary endpoint occurred in 27 patients (4.6%) in the ticagrelor group and 33 patients (5.6%) in the prasugrel group in smokers (HR = 0.81 [0.49-1.35]; P = 0.412) and in 66 patients (6.0%) in the ticagrelor group and 46 patients (4.4%) in the prasugrel group in nonsmokers (HR = 1.38 [0.94-2.01]; P = 0.097).. In patients with ACS undergoing an invasive management strategy, the smoking status did not significantly interact with the relative treatment effect of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel.. NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Non-Smokers; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Smokers; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

It is unclear whether ticagrelor or prasugrel hydrochloride is superior for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. To assess the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs prasugrel for patients with ACS treated with PCI.. A prespecified analysis was performed of a postrandomization subgroup of 3377 patients who presented with ACS and were treated with PCI in the investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase 4, open-label Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 5 randomized clinical trial, conducted from September 1, 2013, to February 28, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from September 1, 2020, to January 30, 2021. Analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.. Patients were randomly assigned to a ticagrelor-based or prasugrel-based strategy. This analysis focuses on the subgroup of patients who underwent PCI that was formed after randomization.. The primary end point was a composite consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months. The safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 to 5 bleeding.. The ticagrelor group comprised 1676 patients (1323 men [78.9%]; mean [SD] age, 64.4 [12.0] years), and the prasugrel group comprised 1701 patients (1341 men [78.8%]; mean [SD] age, 64.7 [12.0] years). The primary end point occurred for 162 patients (9.8%) in the ticagrelor group and 120 patients (7.1%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.78; P = .005). Myocardial infarction occurred in 88 patients (5.3%) in the ticagrelor group compared with 55 patients (3.8%) in the prasugrel group (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.19-2.34; P = .003). The safety end point, BARC type 3 to 5 bleeding, occurred in 84 of 1672 patients (5.3%) in the ticagrelor group and 78 of 1680 patients (4.9%) in the prasugrel group (HR; 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.50; P = .54).. Among patients presenting with ACS who were treated with PCI, the incidence of the primary composite end point occurred less frequently for patients who received prasugrel compared with those who received ticagrelor. The incidence of bleeding events was comparable between the 2 groups. These results suggest that, for patients presenting with ACS who undergo PCI, a prasugrel-based strategy is superior to a ticagrelor-based strategy. However, because these observations are based on a postrandomization subgroup, these findings should be regarded as hypothesis generating and dedicated randomized clinical trials may be warranted to confirm these findings.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01944800.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clinical Decision-Making; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Stents; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Untargeted metabolomics is used to refine the development of biomarkers for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Myocardial infarction (MI) has major individual and societal consequences for patients, who remain at high risk of secondary events, despite advances in pharmacological therapy. To monitor their differential response to treatment, we performed untargeted plasma metabolomics on 175 patients from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, two common P

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated; Female; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Metabolomics; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Early Medical Intervention; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Impaired endogenous fibrinolysis is novel biomarker that can identify patients with ACS at increased cardiovascular risk. The addition of Very Low Dose Rivaroxaban (VLDR) to dual antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events but at a cost of increased bleeding and is therefore not suitable for all-comers. Targeted additional pharmacotherapy with VLDR to improve endogenous fibrinolysis may improve outcomes in high-risk patients, whilst avoiding unnecessary bleeding in low-risk individuals. The VaLiDate-R study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03775746, EudraCT: 2018-003299-11) is an investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, single centre trial comparing the effect of 3 antithrombotic regimens on endogenous fibrinolysis in 150 patients with ACS. Subjects whose screening blood test shows impaired fibrinolytic status (lysis time > 2000s), will be randomised to one of 3 treatment arms in a 1:1:1 ratio: clopidogrel 75 mg daily (Group 1); clopidogrel 75 mg daily plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (Group 2); ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (Group 3), in addition to aspirin 75 mg daily. Rivaroxaban will be given for 30 days. Fibrinolytic status will be assessed during admission and at 2, 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the change in fibrinolysis time from admission to 4 weeks follow-up, using the Global Thrombosis Test. If VLDR can improve endogenous fibrinolysis in ACS, future large-scale studies would be required to assess whether targeted use of VLDR in patients with ACS and impaired fibrinolysis can translate into improved clinical outcomes, with reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in this high-risk cohort.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolysis; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombelastography; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

In a randomized, parallel, blinded study, we investigate the impact of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor on peripheral endothelial function in patients undergoing stenting for an acute coronary syndrome.. The primary endpoint of the study was the change in endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) following stenting. A total of 90 patients (age 62 ± 9 years, 81 males, 22 diabetics, 49 non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions) were enrolled. There were no significant differences among groups in any clinical parameter. Acutely before stenting, all three drugs improved FMD without differences between groups (P = 0.73). Stenting blunted FMD in the clopidogrel and ticagrelor group (both P < 0.01), but not in the prasugrel group. During follow-up, prasugrel was superior to clopidogrel [mean difference 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-3.58; P = 0.0047] and ticagrelor (mean difference 1.57, 95% CI 0.31-2.83; P = 0.0155), but this difference was limited to patients who received the study therapy 2 h before stenting. Ticagrelor was not significantly superior to clopidogrel (mean difference 0.55, 95% CI -0.73 to 1.82; P = 0.39). No significant differences were seen among groups for low-flow-mediated dilation. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively) and platelet aggregation reactivity in response to adenosine diphosphate (P = 0.002 and P = 0.035) were lower in the prasugrel compared to clopidogrel and ticagrelor group.. As compared to ticagrelor and clopidogrel, therapy with prasugrel in patients undergoing stenting for an acute coronary syndrome is associated with improved endothelial function, stronger platelet inhibition, and reduced IL-6 levels, all of which may have prognostic implications. This effect was lost in patients who received the study medication immediately after stenting.. 2011-005305-73.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Vessels; Endothelium; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Impaired renal function (IRF) is associated with increased risks of both ischemic and bleeding events. Ticagrelor has been shown to provide greater absolute reduction in ischemic risk following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in those with versus without IRF.. A pre-specified sub-analysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial (n = 15,991) comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy (after 1-month ticagrelor and aspirin dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT]) with 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients stratified according to IRF (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m. At 2 years, patients with IRF (n = 2171) had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality or centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI](hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.98, p. IRF negatively impacted long-term prognosis after PCI. There were no differential treatment effects found with regard to all-cause death or new Q-wave MI after PCI in patients with IRF treated with ticagrelor monotherapy.. The trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01813435.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The PLEIO (comParison of ticagreLor and clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in patients with acute cOronary syndrome) study showed that 6 months of ticagrelor therapy significantly improved microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with stent implantation compared to clopidogrel. Improved microvascular function may affect myocardial blood flow (MBF). We compared the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on MBF over a 6-month follow-up period among patients diagnosed with ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. In the PLEIO trial, 120 participants were randomized to receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily after at least 6 months. 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was performed in 94 patients to measure MBF at the 6-month follow-up visit.. On a per-patient level, MBF (1.88 ± 0.52 versus 1.67 ± 0.64 mL/min per gram, P = .01) was significantly higher with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the hyperemic state, but not under resting state (0.75 ± 0.24 versus 0.75 ± 0.19 mL/min per gram, P = .84). On a culprit-vessel analysis, the resting MBF was similar (0.69 ± 0.20 versus 0.70 ± 0.21, P = .89) between the two groups. However, the hyperemic MBF and myocardial flow reserve in the ticagrelor group were significantly higher compared with clopidogrel (1.75 ± 0.46 versus 1.52 ± 0.59, P = .03 and 2.71 ± 0.89 versus 2.20 ± 0.81, P = .02, respectively). These differences were not observed in non-culprit vessels.. Maintenance treatment of ticagrelor increased the hyperemic MBF and myocardial flow reserve compared with clopidogrel.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02618733.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Ammonia; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Vessels; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

This study assessed the ability of the dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score in stratifying ischemic and bleeding risk in a contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) population.. The DAPT score is recommended by guidelines as a tool to stratify ischemic and bleeding risk. Its utility in contemporary PCI is unknown.. The study studied patients in GLOBAL LEADERS (A Clinical Study Comparing Two Forms of Anti-platelet Therapy After Stent Implantation) who were free of major ischemic and bleeding events and adhered to antiplatelet strategy during the first year after PCI. The primary ischemic endpoint was the composite of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. The primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5. Outcomes from 12 to 24 months after PCI were compared according to the DAPT score.. Of 11,289 patients that were event-free after the first year, 6,882 and 4,407 patients had low (<2) and high (≥2) DAPT scores, respectively. Compared with a low DAPT score, patients with a high DAPT score had a higher rate of the composites of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis (0.70% vs. 1.55%; p < 0.0001). The rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding was 0.54% and 0.30% in the low and high DAPT score groups, respectively (p = 0.058). The effect of ticagrelor versus aspirin monotherapy on primary ischemic and bleeding endpoints during the second year were no different among the 2 groups.. The DAPT score can stratify ischemic but not bleeding risk in a contemporary PCI population during the second year. The score did not provide additional value for selection of antiplatelet strategy beyond the first year.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clinical Decision Rules; Clinical Decision-Making; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Progression-Free Survival; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

The presence and severity of upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions have not been evaluated using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients receiving ticagrelor plus aspirin or alone after myocardial revascularization. We assessed upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury and the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients receiving 1 year of antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).. In this single-center prospective substudy of a randomized trial, 231 patients completing 1-year antiplatelet therapy (ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily, ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, or aspirin 100 mg once daily, in 81, 80, and 70 patients, respectively) after CABG underwent. Among 231 patients, EGD showed 28 (12.1%) with ulcers ≥ 5 mm, which were detected in 13.6% (11/81) of ticagrelor plus aspirin recipients, 8.8% (7/80) of ticagrelor recipients, and 14.3% (10/70) of aspirin recipients, and 24 (10.4%) had reflux esophagitis. Eighty-eight (38.1%) patients had a positive. Severe upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions were more frequently observed in patients treated with ticagrelor plus aspirin and aspirin monotherapy than in patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy for 1 year post-CABG. Prophylactic use of PPIs might be inadequate.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastric Mucosa; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Stomach Ulcer; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; China; Clopidogrel; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Single-Blind Method; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in older patients are scarce. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor or prasugrel in older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).. We did the open-label, randomised controlled POPular AGE trial in 12 sites (ten hospitals and two university hospitals) in the Netherlands. Patients aged 70 years or older with NSTE-ACS were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using an internet-based randomisation procedure with block sizes of six to receive a loading dose of clopidogrel 300 mg or 600 mg, or ticagrelor 180 mg or prasugrel 60 mg, and then a maintenance dose for the duration of 12 months (clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, or prasugrel 10 mg once daily) on top of standard care. Patient and treating physicians were aware of the allocated treatment strategy, but the outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Primary bleeding outcome consisted of PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO; major or minor bleeding [superiority hypothesis]). Co-primary net clinical benefit outcome consisted of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, PLATO major and minor bleeding (non-inferiority hypothesis, margin of 2%). Follow-up duration was 12 months. Analyses were done on intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL3804), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02317198), and EudraCT (2013-001403-37).. Between June 10, 2013, and Oct 17, 2018, 1002 patients were randomly assigned to clopidogrel (n=500) or ticagrelor or prasugrel (n=502). Because 475 (95%) patients received ticagrelor in the ticagrelor or prasugrel group, we will refer to this group as the ticagrelor group. Premature discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 238 (47%) of 502 ticagrelor group patients randomly assigned to ticagrelor, and in 112 (22%) of 500 patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel. Primary bleeding outcome was significantly lower in the clopidogrel group (88 [18%] of 500 patients) than in the ticagrelor group (118 [24%] of 502; hazard ratio 0·71, 95% CI 0·54 to 0·94; p=0·02 for superiority). Co-primary net clinical benefit outcome was non-inferior for the use of clopidogrel (139 [28%]) versus ticagrelor (161 [32%]; absolute risk difference -4%, 95% CI -10·0 to 1·4; p=0·03 for non-inferiority). The most important reasons for discontinuation were occurrence of bleeding (n=38), dyspnoea (n=40), and the need for treatment with oral anticoagulation (n=35).. In patients aged 70 years or older presenting with NSTE-ACS, clopidogrel is a favourable alternative to ticagrelor, because it leads to fewer bleeding events without an increase in the combined endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. Clopidogrel could be an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor especially for elderly patients with a higher bleeding risk.. ZonMw.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and cardiovascular death. CKD patients suffering from ACS are exposed to an increased risk of thrombotic recurrences and a higher bleeding rate than patients with normal renal function. However, CKD patients are excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, determining the optimal antiplatelet strategy in this population is of utmost importance. We designed the TicagRelor Or Clopidogrel in severe or terminal chronic kidney patients Undergoing PERcutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome (TROUPER) trial: a prospective, controlled, multicenter, randomized trial to investigate the optimal P2Y12 antagonist in CKD patients with ACS. Patients with stage ≥3b CKD are eligible if the diagnosis of ACS is made and invasive strategy scheduled. Patients are randomized 1:1 between a control group with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by a 75-mg/d maintenance dose for 1 year and an experimental group with a 180-mg loading dose of ticagrelor followed by a 90-mg twice daily maintenance dose for the same duration. The primary end point is defined by the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke at 1 year. Safety will be evaluated by the bleeding rate (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium). To demonstrate the superiority of ticagrelor on major adverse cardiovascular events, we calculated that 508 patients are required. The aim of the TROUPER trial is to compare the efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in stage >3b CKD patients presenting with ACS and scheduled for an invasive strategy. RCT# NCT03357874.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Secondary Prevention; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Young Adult

Diabetes and CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) alleles are associated with the variable antiplatelet activity of the prodrug clopidogrel. We conducted a randomized trial (NCT03613857) to compare the combined and individualized effects of diabetes and CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the antiplatelet reactivity of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients (948, 1 year follow-up 943) were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clopidogrel or ticagrelor, after PCI; patients were subdivided into 8 subgroups according to the diabetes and/or CYP2C19 allele status. The study outcomes were recurrent ACS, maximum platelet aggregation (MPA), high platelet reactivity index (PRI), and incidence of major bleeding events. Diabetic patients with LOF alleles taking clopidogrel had the highest recurrent ACS rate (6 of 33 patients) versus all other study groups (P < 0.05). However, both drugs had similar proportions of recurrent ACS in all other subgroups. Similarly, both PRI and MPA were significantly higher in the diabetic patients having LOF alleles and receiving clopidogrel versus all their study groups (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, ticagrelor caused higher rates of major bleeding versus clopidogrel (P < 0.001). PCI-treated ACS patients with diabetes and CYP2C19 LOF alleles are at a higher risk of recurrent ACS and high PRI/MPA, when treated with clopidogrel versus ticagrelor, but almost comparable outcomes are recorded in the absence of 1 or the 2 risk factors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Diabetes Mellitus; Egypt; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The efficacy and safety of a reduced dose of prasugrel versus a standard dose of ticagrelor in elderly patients or those with a low body weight presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are unknown.. To investigate the effect of an age- and weight-adapted dose of prasugrel versus a standard dose of ticagrelor in patients with ACS. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01944800).. Prespecified analysis of the multicenter, randomized ISAR-REACT 5 trial.. 23 centers in Germany and Italy.. 3997 patients with ACS planned for invasive management.. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a standard dose of ticagrelor or prasugrel (reduced dose in the elderly or low-weight group and standard dose in the neither elderly nor low-weight group).. The efficacy end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the safety end point was bleeding, both at 12 months.. In the elderly or low-weight group, the efficacy end point occurred in 12.7% of patients assigned to receive prasugrel and 14.6% of those assigned to receive ticagrelor (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.14]); in the neither elderly nor low-weight group, the efficacy end point occurred in 4.8% of patients assigned to receive prasugrel and 7.3% of those assigned to receive ticagrelor (HR, 0.65 [CI, 0.48 to 0.88];. The study is a subgroup analysis.. In elderly or low-weight patients with ACS, a reduced dose of prasugrel compared with the standard dose of ticagrelor is associated with maintained anti-ischemic efficacy while protecting these patients against the excess risk for bleeding.. German Center for Cardiovascular Research and Deutsches Herzzentrum München.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Body Weight; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Atherosclerosis; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Cysteine Endopeptidases; Cysteine Proteases; Death; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 loss-of-function (LOF) variants treated with clopidogrel have increased risk of ischemic events. Whether genotype-guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy improves ischemic outcomes is unknown.. To determine the effect of a genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor strategy on ischemic outcomes in CYP2C19 LOF carriers after PCI.. Open-label randomized clinical trial of 5302 patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were enrolled at 40 centers in the US, Canada, South Korea, and Mexico from May 2013 through October 2018; final date of follow-up was October 2019.. Patients randomized to the genotype-guided group (n = 2652) underwent point-of-care genotyping. CYP2C19 LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor and noncarriers clopidogrel. Patients randomized to the conventional group (n = 2650) were prescribed clopidogrel and underwent genotyping after 12 months.. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia at 12 months. A secondary end point was major or minor bleeding at 12 months. The primary analysis was in patients with CYP2C19 LOF variants, and secondary analysis included all randomized patients. The trial had 85% power to detect a minimum hazard ratio of 0.50.. Among 5302 patients randomized (median age, 62 years; 25% women), 82% had ACS and 18% had stable CAD; 94% completed the trial. Of 1849 with CYP2C19 LOF variants, 764 of 903 (85%) assigned to genotype-guided therapy received ticagrelor, and 932 of 946 (99%) assigned to conventional therapy received clopidogrel. The primary end point occurred in 35 of 903 CYP2C19 LOF carriers (4.0%) in the genotype-guided therapy group and 54 of 946 (5.9%) in the conventional therapy group at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43-1.02]; P = .06). None of the 11 prespecified secondary end points showed significant differences, including major or minor bleeding in CYP2C19 LOF carriers in the genotype-guided group (1.9%) vs the conventional therapy group (1.6%) at 12 months (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P = .58). Among all randomized patients, the primary end point occurred in 113 of 2641 (4.4%) in the genotype-guided group and 135 of 2635 (5.3%) in the conventional group (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.07]; P = .16).. Among CYP2C19 LOF carriers with ACS and stable CAD undergoing PCI, genotype-guided selection of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with conventional clopidogrel therapy without point-of-care genotyping, resulted in no statistically significant difference in a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia based on the prespecified analysis plan and the treatment effect that the study was powered to detect at 12 months.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742117.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Inhibitors; Female; Genotype; Genotyping Techniques; Hemorrhage; Heterozygote; Humans; Loss of Function Mutation; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Point-of-Care Testing; Precision Medicine; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Approximately 15% of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) occlude during the first year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) despite aspirin use. The POPular CABG trial (The Effect of Ticagrelor on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery) investigated whether ticagrelor added to standard aspirin improves SVG patency at 1 year after CABG.. In this investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, patients with ≥1 SVGs were randomly assigned (1:1) after CABG to ticagrelor or placebo added to standard aspirin (80 mg or 100 mg). The primary outcome was SVG occlusion at 1 year, assessed with coronary computed tomography angiography, in all patients that had primary outcome imaging available. A generalized estimating equation model was used to perform the primary analysis per SVG. The secondary outcome was 1-year SVG failure, which was a composite of SVG occlusion, SVG revascularization, myocardial infarction in myocardial territory supplied by a SVG, or sudden death.. Among 499 randomly assigned patients, the mean age was 67.9±8.3 years, 87.1% were male, the indication for CABG was acute coronary syndrome in 31.3%, and 95.2% of procedures used cardiopulmonary bypass. Primary outcome imaging was available in 220 patients in the ticagrelor group and 223 patients in the placebo group. The SVG occlusion rate in the ticagrelor group was 10.5% (51 of 484 SVGs) versus 9.1% in the placebo group (43 of 470 SVGs), odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.73-2.30];. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the addition of ticagrelor to standard aspirin did not reduce SVG occlusion at 1 year after CABG. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02352402.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Double-Blind Method; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Saphenous Vein; Ticagrelor; Vascular Patency

Although oral P2Y. The purpose of this study was to compare downstream and upstream oral P2Y. We performed a randomized, adaptive, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive pre-treatment with ticagrelor before angiography (upstream group) or no pre-treatment (downstream group). Patients in the downstream group undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were further randomized to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary hypothesis was the superiority of the downstream versus the upstream strategy on the combination of efficacy and safety events (net clinical benefit).. We randomized 1,449 patients to downstream or upstream oral P2Y. Downstream and upstream oral P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on clinically relevant bleeding and major ischaemic events in relation to clinical presentation with and without non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES).. We conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis of The Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention (TWILIGHT) trial, which enrolled 9006 patients with high-risk features undergoing PCI with DES. After 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor plus aspirin, 7119 adherent and event-free patients were randomized in a double-blind manner to ticagrelor plus placebo versus ticagrelor plus aspirin for 12 months. The primary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding while the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke was the key secondary outcome. Among patients with NSTE-ACS (n = 4614), ticagrelor monotherapy reduced BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding by 53% [3.6% vs. 7.6%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.61; P < 0.001) and in stable patients (n = 2503) by 24% (4.8% vs. 6.2%; HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.54-1.06; P = 0.11; nominal Pint = 0.03). Rates of all-cause death, MI, or stroke among those with (4.3% vs. 4.4%; HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.74-1.28; P = 0.84) and without (3.1% vs. 3.2%; HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.61-1.49; P = 0.85) NSTE-ACS were similar between treatment arms irrespective of clinical presentation (Pint = 0.96).. Among patients with or without NSTE-ACS who have completed an initial 3-month course of DAPT following PCI with DES, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced clinically meaningful bleeding events without increasing ischaemic risk as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin. The benefits of ticagrelor monotherapy with respect to bleeding events were more pronounced in patients with NSTE-ACS.. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02270242.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend intensified platelet inhibition by prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with unstable angina (UA) or non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction (MI).. This study sought to investigate the benefits and risks of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and planned invasive management.. This post hoc analysis combines the pre-specified subgroups of UA and NSTEMI of the randomized ISAR-REACT 5 trial. It included 1,179 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1,186 assigned to prasugrel. Ticagrelor was started immediately after randomization and prasugrel after coronary angiography. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, MI, or stroke during 1-year follow-up, and the safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium class 3-5.. The primary endpoint was reached in 101 (8.7%) patients in the ticagrelor and in 73 (6.3%) patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.90). The HR for all-cause death was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.93 to 2.21) and that for MI 1.43 (95% CI: 0.94 to 2.19). The safety endpoint occurred in 49 (5.2%) patients in the ticagrelor and in 41 (4.7%) patients in the prasugrel group (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.65). Landmark analysis revealed persistence of the efficacy advantage with prasugrel after the first month.. In patients with NSTE-ACS, we found that prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor in reducing the combined 1-year risk of death, MI, and stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding. Due to the post hoc nature of the analysis, these findings need confirmation by further studies. (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT01944800).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

The optimal timing to administer a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients presenting with a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome remains a topic of debate. Pretreatment with ticagrelor before coronary anatomy is known as a widely adopted strategy. However, there is poor evidence on how this compares with administration of a P2Y12 inhibitor after defining coronary anatomy (i.e., downstream administration). Moreover, there are limited head-to-head comparisons of the two P2Y12 inhibitors-ticagrelor and prasugrel-currently recommended by the guidelines.. DUBIUS is a phase 4, multicenter, parallel-group, double randomized study conducted in NSTE-ACS patients designed to compare a pretreatment strategy (including only ticagrelor) versus a downstream strategy (including prasugrel or ticagrelor) and to compare downstream prasugrel with downstream ticagrelor. A total of 2520 patients will be randomly assigned to pretreatment with ticagrelor or to no pretreatment. The PCI group of the downstream arm will be further randomized to receive prasugrel or ticagrelor. The two primary hypotheses are that the downstream strategy is superior to the upstream strategy and that downstream ticagrelor is non-inferior to downstream prasugrel, both measured by the incidence of a composite efficacy and safety endpoint of death from vascular causes, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3, 4, and 5 bleedings.. The DUBIUS study will provide important evidence related to the benefits and risks of pretreatment with ticagrelor compared with a strategy of no pretreatment. Moreover, the clinical impact of using downstream ticagrelor compared with downstream prasugrel will be assessed.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02618837 . Registered on 1 December 2015.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Arachidonic Acid; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Thromboxane A2, Prostaglandin H2; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor is recommended for at least 12 months in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, its underuse and premature discontinuation are common in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the impact of a dedicated follow-up strategy with clinical visits and counselling on adherence levels to ticagrelor in patients after ACS.. PROGRESS (PROmotinG dual antiplatelet therapy adheREnce in the setting of acute coronary Syndromes) is a prospective, randomized trial enrolling 400 ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. Patients were randomized to be followed-up in a dedicated outpatient clinic (In-person follow-up group, [IN-FU], n=200), or with scheduled for phone interviews only (Telephone follow-up group [TEL-FU], n=200), to assess ticagrelor adherence and related complications. DAPT disruption was defined as an interruption of the administration of the drug due to complications or other reasons of non-adherence, and divided according to the duration into short (1-5 days), temporary (6-30 days) and permanent (≥30 days) disruption. The primary endpoint was the rate of DAPT disruption at 1-year follow-up.. The rate of ticagrelor disruption at 1 year follow-up was higher in the TEL-FU group than in the IN-FU group (19.6 vs 5.5%; p<0.0001). The IN-FU group reported a significantly lower rate of short (3.0 vs 8.5%; p=0.012) and permanent (2.0 vs 9.6%; p=0.012) disruption than TEL-FU group. The rate of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (p=0.450).. The PROGRESS trial showed a net reduction in DAPT disruption in patients followed-up with clinical (in-person) follow-up visits in a dedicated outpatient clinic compared with those scheduled for phone interviews only.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Appointments and Schedules; Aspirin; Drug Administration Schedule; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Telephone; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the impact of an experimental strategy [23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)] vs. a reference regimen (12-month aspirin monotherapy following 12-month DAPT) after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. In the present post hoc analysis of the Global Leaders trial, the primary endpoint [composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI)] at 2 years was assessed in patients with complex PCI, which includes at least one of the following characteristics: multivessel PCI, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation PCI with ≥2 stents, or total stent length >60 mm. In addition, patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) (composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, or any revascularization) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) [composite of POCE or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 3 or 5 bleeding] were explored. Among 15 450 patients included in this analysis, 4570 who underwent complex PCI had a higher risk of ischaemic and bleeding events. In patients with complex PCI, the experimental strategy significantly reduced risks of the primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.85] and POCE (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93), but not in those with non-complex PCI (Pinteraction = 0.015 and 0.017, respectively). The risk of BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding was comparable (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.67-1.40), resulting in a significant risk reduction in NACE (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.92; Pinteraction = 0.011).. Ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month DAPT could provide a net clinical benefit for patients with complex PCI. However, in view of the overall neutral results of the trial, these findings of a post hoc analysis should be considered as hypothesis generating.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Case-Control Studies; Cause of Death; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The relative merits of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom invasive evaluation is planned are uncertain.. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes and for whom invasive evaluation was planned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. A major secondary end point (the safety end point) was bleeding.. A total of 4018 patients underwent randomization. A primary end-point event occurred in 184 of 2012 patients (9.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 137 of 2006 patients (6.9%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.70; P = 0.006). The respective incidences of the individual components of the primary end point in the ticagrelor group and the prasugrel group were as follows: death, 4.5% and 3.7%; myocardial infarction, 4.8% and 3.0%; and stroke, 1.1% and 1.0%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.3% of patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1.0% of patients assigned to prasugrel, and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Major bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale) was observed in 5.4% of patients in the ticagrelor group and in 4.8% of patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.51; P = 0.46).. Among patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was significantly lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research and Deutsches Herzzentrum München; ISAR-REACT 5 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01944800.).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Stroke; Ticagrelor

A novel smartphone-based patient support tool was developed to increase the adherence to antiplatelet therapy and lifestyle changes in patients after coronary angioplasty for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The eMocial study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02615704) investigates whether an electronic support tool will improve adherence to comedication and lifestyle changes in ACS patients. The primary hypothesis of this trial is that an electronic support tool can increase adherence to comedication (primary endpoint) thereby supporting positive lifestyle changes (secondary endpoints). Patients hospitalized with ACS (ST elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-ST elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], or unstable angina pectoris) and treated with ticagrelor coadministered with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid will be randomized 1:1 to an active group receiving the patient support tool via a smartphone-based application or to a control group without the patient support tool. Patient questionnaires to evaluate lifestyle changes and quality of life will be used at baseline and at the end of the 48-week observation phase. Patients are asked to fill out questionnaires to determine their adherence, treatment attitudes, health-care utilization and risk factors on a monthly basis. The study was started in February 2016 and the completion date is scheduled for October 2019. For final analysis 664 patients are expected be available. Preliminary baseline demographics were unstable angina pectoris (13.7%), NSTEMI (49.9%), STEMI (36.4%), male gender (86.3%), and diabetes mellitus (17.6%). Our study could significantly help to understand how inadequate adherence to antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients could be improved with a smartphone-based application.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Period; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Smartphone; Surveys and Questionnaires; Telemedicine; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor reduced the rate of myocardial infarction and death compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, little is understood about chronic treatment of ticagrelor on microvascular dysfunction. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of ticagrelor maintenance treatment on microvascular system and coronary flow in comparison with clopidogrel.. This study was a nonblinded, open-label, parallel-group, prospective, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 120 patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring stent implantation. Patients were randomized into the ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300 to 600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter) group. The primary end point was coronary microvascular dysfunction as measured by an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at 6 months after treatment.. The baseline clinical characteristics and physiological parameters, such as fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and IMR, did not differ between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. Six-month follow-up physiological data showed that the IMR value was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group than the clopidogrel group (15.57±5.65 versus 21.15±8.39,. Compared with clopidogrel, 6 months of ticagrelor therapy significantly improved microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome patients with stent implantation.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02618733.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Circulation; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The role of aspirin as part of antiplatelet regimens in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) needs to be clarified in the context of newer potent P2Y12 antagonists.. To evaluate the benefit and risks of aspirin in addition to ticagrelor among patients with ACS beyond 1 month after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. This is a nonprespecified, post hoc analysis of GLOBAL LEADERS, a randomized, open-label superiority trial comparing 2 antiplatelet treatment strategies after PCI. The trial included 130 secondary/tertiary care hospitals in different countries, with 15 991 unselected patients with stable coronary artery disease or ACS undergoing PCI. Patients had outpatient visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after index procedure.. The experimental group received aspirin plus ticagrelor for 1 month followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy; the reference group received aspirin plus either clopidogrel (stable coronary artery disease) or ticagrelor (ACS) for 12 months, followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. In this analysis, we examined the clinical outcomes occurring between 31 days and 365 days after randomization, specifically in patients with ACS who, within this time frame, were assigned to receive either ticagrelor alone or ticagrelor and aspirin.. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction.. Of 15 968 participants, there were 7487 patients with ACS enrolled; 3750 patients were assigned to the experimental group and 3737 patients to the reference group. Between 31 and 365 days after randomization, the primary outcome occurred in 55 patients (1.5%) in the experimental group and in 75 patients (2.0%) in the reference group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.03; P = .07); investigator-reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined bleeding type 3 or 5 occurred in 28 patients (0.8%) in the experimental group and in 54 patients (1.5%) in the reference arm (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.81; P = .004).. Between 1 month and 12 months after PCI in ACS, aspirin was associated with increased bleeding risk and appeared not to add to the benefit of ticagrelor on ischemic events. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis generating; however, they pave the way for further trials evaluating aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies after PCI.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01813435.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Continuity of Patient Care; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Internationality; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis; Tertiary Care Centers; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The dose and time point for switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor remain controversial, especially for Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with complicated coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, the purpose of this study was to further explore the optimal dose and time point for the switching strategy to balance the increase in platelet inhibition and the decrease in adverse events in Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. From July 2017 to December 2017, the prospective, randomized, open-label study (the SwitcHIng from clopidogrel to ticagrelor study) assigned the eligible Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI (n = 102) for 90 mg of ticagrelor at 12 h (T-90 mg-12 h), 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h (T-90 mg-24h) or 180 mg ticagrelor at 24 h (T-180 mg-24 h) after the last dose of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the comparison of maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) values at 2 h after switching strategies among the three groups. In addition, the MPA values at baseline, 8 h and before discharge and the rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were evaluated, the incidences of bleeding episodes and dyspnea during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up in our study were also recorded. The MPA was measured by light transmittance aggregometry in our study. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model and one-way ANOVA were used to compare data for the primary endpoint.. The MPA values were significantly decreased in the T-180 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group (P = 0.017) and decreased numerically compared with the T-90 mg-24 h group (P = 0.072) at 2 h. In particular, the MPA values were markedly reduced in the T-90 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group at 8 h after switching treatment (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference among the three groups in all bleedings and dyspnea events.. The optimal treatment strategy recommended in this study for Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI is 180 or 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last dose of clopidogrel. In addition, a negative interaction was detected in this study between the overlap for clopidogrel and ticagrelor at 12 h after the last dose of clopidogrel.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03577652; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03577652.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Objective- The Wnt/wingless signaling antagonist DKK1 (dickkopf-1) regulates platelet-mediated inflammation and may contribute to plaque destabilization. We hypothesized that DKK1 would be associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Approach and Results- We determined DKK1 levels in serum samples obtained before randomization, at discharge, and 1 and 6 months in a subset of 5165 patients with acute coronary syndromes in the PLATO trial (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes; NCT00391872). The median (interquartile range) DKK1 concentrations were 0.61 (0.20-1.27) ng/mL at baseline and increased during follow-up. The hazard ratio (95% CIs) for the composite end point (cardiovascular death, nonprocedural spontaneous myocardial infarction, or stroke) during 1 year of follow-up, per 50% increase in baseline DKK1 concentration, was 1.06 (1.02-1.10), P=0.0011, and remained significant in fully adjusted analysis with 14 conventional clinical and demographic and 6 biochemical variables, including NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), hs-TnT (high-sensitivity troponin T), and GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15; 1.05 [1.00-1.09]; P=0.028). This association was mainly driven by the association with cardiovascular death, where a gradual increase in event rates was observed with increasing quartiles of DKK1 (2.7%, 3.0%, 4.3%, and 5.0%) and remained significant and unmodified in fully adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 1.10 [1.04-1.17]; P=0.002). Change in DKK1 and levels at 1 month were unrelated to outcomes. A modifying effect of ticagrelor on DKK1 discharge levels was observed but not associated with prognosis. Conclusions- In patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with dual antiplatelet treatment, admission DKK1 levels were independently associated with a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke and with cardiovascular death alone.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Prognosis; Ticagrelor

After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation, safety and efficacy with dabigatran dual therapy were evaluated in pre-specified subgroups of patients undergoing PCI due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI, and those receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel treatment.. In the RE-DUAL PCI trial, 2725 patients were randomized to dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg with P2Y12 inhibitor, or warfarin with P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. Mean follow-up was 14 months, 50.5% had ACS, and 12% received ticagrelor. The risk of the primary endpoint, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, was reduced with both dabigatran dual therapies vs. warfarin triple therapy in patients with ACS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.47 (0.35-0.63) for 110 mg and 0.67 (0.50-0.90) for 150 mg]; elective PCI [0.57 (0.43-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.76 (0.56-1.03) for 150 mg]; receiving ticagrelor [0.46 (0.28-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.59 (0.34-1.04) for 150 mg]; or clopidogrel [0.51 (0.41-0.64) for 110 mg and 0.73 (0.58-0.91) for 150 mg], all interaction P-values >0.10. Overall, dabigatran dual therapy was comparable to warfarin triple therapy for the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or unplanned revascularization, with minor variations across the subgroups, all interaction P-values >0.10.. The benefits of both dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy in reducing bleeding risks were consistent across subgroups of patients with or without ACS, and patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

High platelet reactivity (HPR) is a risk factor for stent thrombosis, a potentially lethal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. HPR is also associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and death in invasively-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). HPR occurs even in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor, a state-of-the-art antiplatelet agent, especially during the first hours of treatment. Patient-level pharmacodynamic data obtained from 102 ACS subjects enrolled in two prospective, pharmacodynamic trials were analysed in order to identify clinical features related with increased odds of on-ticagrelor HPR during the first two hours after ticagrelor loading dose in ACS patients. Presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (versus non-ST-segment elevation ACS) and morphine co-administration were the strongest predictors of HPR at 1 and 2 hours after ticagrelor loading dose according to linear regression analyses, multiple backward stepwise logistic regression analyses and generalized estimating equation model. By pinpointing simple to recognize clinical features, the results of this study facilitate identification of ACS patients who have the highest odds of HPR during the initial phase of treatment with ticagrelor, and who could potentially benefit from alternative treatment strategies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Cardiovascular; Morphine; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; United States

Ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may optimize ischemic and bleeding risks, particularly for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, because its strategy is less potent than ticagrelor-based DAPT but more potent than aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy.. The TICO randomized open-label trial will evaluate whether ticagrelor monotherapy following 3-month DAPT is superior to 12-month ticagrelor-based DAPT in terms of net adverse clinical events (NACE) including efficacy and safety in ACS patients treated with ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES). Patients undergoing BP-SES implantation for ACS treatment will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the (1) ticagrelor monotherapy group after 3-month DAPT; or the (2) 12-month DAPT group. The primary endpoint is NACE within 12 months of percutaneous coronary intervention, which includes major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) plus major bleeding as defined by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. MACCE includes the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included each component of the primary endpoint.. The TICO trial is an ongoing trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy following 3-month DAPT exclusively in ACS patients treated with uniform BP-SES. It may provide novel insights regarding the need for adjusted use of DAPT for rebalancing risk-benefit in current practice and changing from the conventional concept of aspirin maintenance to a ticagrelor-based regimen in the management of ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Ticagrelor is an intriguing antiplatelet agent with a potentially beneficial impact on endothelial dysfunction and confers a mortality benefit beyond 1 month after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, little data exist on whether ticagrelor improves endothelial dysfunction in stable patients who survive the acute period and receive guideline-directed medical therapy.. This study is a prospective, randomized, parallel, open-labeled study that enrolled 30-day survivors of non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Forty patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to ticagrelor or clopidogrel groups. The primary end point was the change in the percentage brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (baFMD) from baseline. Baseline characteristics were not different between the 2 groups. The median time from the stent implantation to screening was 269 days. After 30 days of study medication administration, the change in the percentage baFMD value was similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (-0.08 [1.42] vs 0.30 [1.69],. This dual time point baFMD study demonstrated that treatment with ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel for improving endothelial dysfunction in stabilized patients with NSTE-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Blood Platelets; Brachial Artery; Clopidogrel; Endothelium, Vascular; Humans; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Republic of Korea; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after clopidogrel administration in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Our previous studies reported that half-dose ticagrelor provides a similar inhibitory effect on adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation as standard-dose ticagrelor, but half-dose of ticagrelor has not been studied in Chinese ACS patients with HTPR. This study aimed to compare the antiplatelet action of half-dose ticagrelor with high-dose clopidogrel in ACS patients with HTPR.. In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 80 (of 418 screened, 19.13%) ACS patients with HTPR while on clopidogrel were randomized to either half-dose ticagrelor (90 mg LD, then 45 mg twice daily) or high-dose clopidogrel (150 mg once daily). Platelet function was assessed by thromboelastography (TEG) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and adverse events were monitored throughout the study for 30 days.. The ADP-induced platelet inhibition rate (IR) as measured by TEG was significantly higher for half-dose ticagrelor compared with high-dose clopidogrel (70.40% [61.10%-91.70%] vs. 44.25% [34.67%-79.07%], p = 0.001). The repeated HTPR rate was dramatically higher for high-dose clopidogrel compared with half-dose ticagrelor (6 of 32, 18.75% vs. 1 of 35, 2.85%; p = 0.04). No patients in either treatment group exhibited a major bleeding event or other adverse events.. In ACS patients with HTPR, half-dose ticagrelor is more effective than high-dose clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity (NCT03062462).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Heart failure (HF) following acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is associated with worse prognosis; however, the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with HF and if ticagrelor influences the risk of new-onset HF are unknown.. We examined the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS in the randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subdivided by strata: (1) previous HF and/or clinical signs of HF on admission or (2) no HF on admission. The primary outcome was the combination of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models. The safety outcome was major bleeding. New-onset HF was defined as an HF event after discharge in patients without previous HF.. Data were available in 18,556 patients, whom 2,862 (15.4%) patients had HF, including 1,584 (8.5%) patients with previous HF. Patients randomized to ticagrelor had lower risk of the composite end point regardless of HF status: hazard ratio (HR) 0.87 (95% CI: 0.73-1.03) in patients with HF and HR 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.93) in patients with no HF (P = .76). Corresponding HR for major bleeding were HR 1.08 (95% CI: 0.87-1.34) and HR 1.03 (95% CI: 0.94-1.14) (P = .71). There was no difference in new-onset HF at 12 months between patients randomized to ticagrelor (4.1%, n = 278) or clopidogrel (4.0%, n = 276).. In patients with ACS, ticagrelor is more efficacious in protecting against new ischemic events and mortality than clopidogrel irrespective of the presence of HF. There is no difference between ticagrelor or clopidogrel treatment in new-onset HF post-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Physician behavior in response to knowledge of a patient's CYP2C19 clopidogrel metabolizer status is unknown.. To investigate the association of mandatory reporting of CYP2C19 pharmacogenomic testing, provided to investigators with no direct recommendations on how to use these results, with changes in P2Y12 inhibitor use, particularly clopidogrel, in the Randomized Trial to Compare the Safety of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin in Addition to Either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome (GEMINI-ACS-1) clinical trial.. The GEMINI-ACS-1 trial compared rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice daily, with aspirin, 100 mg daily, plus open-label clopidogrel or ticagrelor (provided), in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The trial included 371 clinical centers in 21 countries and 3037 patients with ACS. Data were analyzed between May 2017 and February 2019.. Investigators were required to prestipulate their planned response to CYP2C19 metabolizer status. In response to a regulatory mandate, results for all patients were reported to investigators approximately 1 week after randomization.. Reasons for switching P2Y12 inhibitors and occurrence of bleeding and ischemic events were collected.. Of 3037 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.0] years; 2275 men [74.9%], and 2824 white race/ethnicity [93.0%]), investigators initially treated 1704 (56.1%) with ticagrelor and 1333 (43.9%) with clopidogrel. Investigators prestipulated that they would use CYP2C19 metabolizer status to change P2Y12 inhibitor in 48.5% of genotyped clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 642 of 1324) and 5.5% of genotyped ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 93 of 1692). P2Y12 inhibitor switching for any reason occurred in 197 patients and was more common in patients treated with ticagrelor (146 of 1704 [8.6%]) compared with clopidogrel (51 of 1333 [3.8%]). Of patients initially treated with ticagrelor, only 1 (0.1% overall; 0.7% of all who switched) was switched based on CYP2C19 status. Of patients initially treated with clopidogrel, 23 (1.7% overall,;45.1% of all who switched) were switched owing to metabolizer status. Of 48 patients (3.6%) with reduced metabolizer status treated initially with clopidogrel, 15 (31.3%) were switched based on metabolizer status, including 48.1% (13 of 27) in which switching was prestipulated.. Physicians were evenly split on how to respond to knowledge of CYP2C19 metabolizer status in clopidogrel-treated patients. Mandatory provision of this information rarely prompted P2Y12 inhibitor switching overall, including a minority of patients with reduced metabolizer status. These findings highlight the clinical equipoise among physicians regarding use of this information and the reluctance to use information from routine genotyping in the absence of definitive clinical trial data demonstrating the efficacy of this approach.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02293395.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor

'Real world' bleeding in patients exposed to different regimens of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and triple therapy (TT, DAPT plus an anticoagulant) have a clinical and economic impact but have not been previously quantified.. We will use linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data to assemble populations eligible for three 'target trials' in patient groups: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); conservatively managed (medication only) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients ≥18 years old will be eligible if, in CPRD records, they have: ≥1 year of data before the index event; no prescription for DAPT or anticoagulants in the preceding 3 months; a prescription for aspirin or DAPT within 2 months after discharge from the index event. The primary outcome will be any bleeding event (CPRD or HES) up to 12 months after the index event. We will estimate adjusted HR for time to first bleeding event comparing: aspirin and clopidogrel (reference) versus aspirin and prasugrel or aspirin and ticagrelor after PCI; and aspirin (reference) versus aspirin and clopidogrel after CABG and ACS. We will describe rates of bleeding in patients prescribed TT (DAPT plus an anticoagulant). Potential confounders will be identified systematically using literature review, semistructured interviews with clinicians and a short survey of clinicians. We will conduct sensitivity analyses addressing the robustness of results to the study's main limitation-that we will not be able to identify the intervention group for patients whose bleeding event occurs before a DAPT prescription in CPRD.. This protocol was approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee for the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency Database Research (protocol 16_126R) and the South West Cornwall and Plymouth Research Ethics Committee (17/SW/0092). The findings will be presented in peer-reviewed journals, lay summaries and briefing papers to commissioners/other stakeholders.. 76607611; Pre-results.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; United Kingdom

Pivotal clinical trials found that ticagrelor reduced ischaemic complications to a greater extent than clopidogrel, and also that the benefit gradually increased with the reduction in creatinine clearance. However, the underlying mechanisms remains poorly explored.. This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized clinical trial involving 60 hospitalized Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml min. Baseline characteristics were well matched between the two groups. Our results indicated a markedly lower PRU in patients treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel at 30 days (32.6 ± 11.29 vs. 203.7 ± 17.92; P < 0.001) as well as at 2 h, 8 h and 24 h after the loading dose (P < 0.001). Ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX showed a similar time to reach maximum concentration (C. Ticagrelor showed much more potent platelet inhibition in comparison with clopidogrel in patients with CKD and NSTE-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Creatinine; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Elimination; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Elevated levels of osteoprotegerin, a secreted tumor necrosis factor-related molecule, might be associated with adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. We measured plasma osteoprotegerin concentrations on hospital admission, at discharge, and at 1 and 6 months after discharge in a predefined subset (n=5135) of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial.. The associations between osteoprotegerin and the composite end point of cardiovascular death, nonprocedural spontaneous myocardial infarction or stroke, and non-coronary artery bypass grafting major bleeding during 1 year of follow-up were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models. Event rates of the composite end point per increasing quartile groups at baseline were 5.2%, 7.5%, 9.2%, and 11.9%. A 50% increase in osteoprotegerin level was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.42) for the composite end point but was not significant in adjusted analysis (ie, clinical characteristics and levels of C-reactive protein, troponin T, NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide], and growth differentiation factor-15). The corresponding rates of non-coronary artery bypass grafting major bleeding were 2.4%, 2.2%, 3.8%, and 7.2%, with an unadjusted HR of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.36-1.69), and a fully adjusted HR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.09-1.46). The multivariable association between the osteoprotegerin concentrations and the primary end point after 1 month resulted in an HR of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.89-1.33); for major bleeding after 1 month, the HR was 1.33 (95% CI, 0.91-1.96).. In patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, osteoprotegerin was an independent marker of major bleeding but not of ischemic cardiovascular events. Thus, high osteoprotegerin levels may be useful in increasing awareness of increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving antithrombotic therapy.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoprotegerin; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation

It has been previously demonstrated that ticagrelor can reduce mortality compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, the mechanism for this mortality reduction remains uncertain. The objective of the present study is to assess the impact of chronic ticagrelor treatment on microvascular circulation. A total of 120 participants aged 20-85 years with clinical diagnosis of ACS will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the following two groups: ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily; clopidogrel 75 mg once daily. To evaluate the status of microcirculation, the primary end point is coronary microvascular dysfunction measured using an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at 6 months after receiving the study agent. The purpose of this trial is to investigate whether ticagrelor, beyond its antiplatelet efficacy, could improve coronary microcirculation more effectively than clopidogrel for patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Circulation; Female; Humans; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Republic of Korea; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Resistance; Young Adult

To determine whether fibrin clot properties are associated with clinical outcomes following acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Plasma samples were collected at hospital discharge from 4354 ACS patients randomized to clopidogrel or ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. A validated turbidimetric assay was employed to study plasma clot lysis time and maximum turbidity (a measure of clot density). One-year rates of cardiovascular (CV) death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) and PLATO-defined major bleeding events were assessed after sample collection. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. After adjusting for CV risk factors, each 50% increase in lysis time was associated with CV death/spontaneous MI [HR 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.31; P < 0.01] and CV death alone (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17-1.59; P < 0.001). Similarly, each 50% increase in maximum turbidity was associated with increased risk of CV death (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50; P = 0.024). After adjustment for other prognostic biomarkers (leukocyte count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, high-sensitivity troponin T, cystatin C, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, and growth differentiation factor-15), the association with CV death remained significant for lysis time (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.42; P = 0.042) but not for maximum turbidity. These associations were consistent regardless of randomized antiplatelet treatment (all interaction P > 0.05). Neither lysis time nor maximum turbidity was associated with major bleeding events.. Fibrin clots that are resistant to lysis independently predict adverse outcome in ACS patients. Novel therapies targeting fibrin clot properties might be a new avenue for improving prognosis in patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Coagulation; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrin; Fibrin Clot Lysis Time; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is an orally administered, reversibly binding, direct-acting P2Y. Patients hospitalized with an ACS received ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) plus low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/day) for up to 12 months. Safety was evaluated via PLATO-defined bleeding events, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and laboratory measurements. The incidence of major CV events was also evaluated.. The safety population included 2001 patients. During ticagrelor treatment, 426 (21.3%) patients had at least one PLATO-defined bleeding AE, mainly minimal bleedings (n = 333). Major bleeding events occurred in 27 (1.3%) patients, including fatal/life-threatening bleeding in 17 (0.8%) patients and other major bleeding in 11 (0.5%) patients, with a Kaplan-Meier estimate of patients with the event (95% CI) of 1.6% (1.1-2.3%). In total, 784 (39.2%) patients had at least one non-bleeding AE, the majority of which were mild in severity. The composite endpoint of CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke occurred in 83 (4.1%) patients.. Ticagrelor plus low-dose aspirin for up to 1 year was associated with a low rate of major bleeding events and a low incidence of major CV events (CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke) in Chinese patients with ACS. The overall safety profile of ticagrelor in this population was in line with current prescribing information.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; China; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Biomarkers; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Monitoring; Dyspnea; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

The prospective observational CHANGE DAPT study compared clopidogrel versus ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet (DAPT) regimens in consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES). During the ticagrelor period (TP, May 2014-August 2015) there were more major bleedings than during the clopidogrel period (CP, December 2012-April 2014).. To evaluate whether the excess of major bleedings during TP may be limited to high bleeding risk (HBR) patients, we performed an explorative analysis of all 2062 CHANGE DAPT participants, of whom 547(26.5%) were classified as HBR (CP, n = 245; TP, n = 302). In HBR and non-HBR patients, we assessed the impact of CP versus TP on propensity score-adjusted rates of major bleeding and a pre-defined ischemic endpoint (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 1-year follow-up. Among HBR patients, the rate of major bleeding was significantly higher during TP (1.7% vs. 5.0%; HR. Among consecutive ACS patients, the increased risk of major bleeding during ticagrelor-based DAPT was limited to HBR patients. In both HBR and non-HBR patients, ticagrelor-based DAPT did not reduce ischemic outcomes following treatment with contemporary DES implantation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

The study sought to assess whether treatment with ticagrelor, as compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel, improves endothelium-dependent dilation throughout the course of the treatment and other vascular biomarkers, including systemic adenosine plasma levels.. The in vivo off-target effects of ticagrelor in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remain poorly characterized.. Fifty-four stable post-ACS patients were sequentially exposed to each of the 3 oral P2Y. Reactive hyperemia index did not differ after ticagrelor (1.970 ± 0.535) as compared with prasugrel (2.007 ± 0.640; p = 0.557) or clopidogrel (2.072 ± 0.646; p = 0.685), nor did systemic adenosine plasma levels or vascular biomarkers at any time points. P2Y. Ticagrelor did not improve endothelial function or increased systemic adenosine plasma levels as compared with prasugrel and clopidogrel in stabilized patients who suffered from an ACS. (Hunting for the Off-Target Properties of Ticagrelor on Endothelial Function in Humans [HI-TECH]; NCT02587260).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Coronary Vessels; Cross-Over Studies; Endothelium, Vascular; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation

Although bradyarrhythmias have been observed with ticagrelor and its use with advanced atrioventricular block is not recommended, questions arise regarding its use in patients with mild conduction abnormalities. The objectives were to compare rates of clinically relevant arrhythmias in relation to any mild baseline conduction abnormality in patients with acute coronary syndrome randomized to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel.. We included all subjects in the electrocardiographic (ECG) substudy of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes trial, excluding those with missing baseline ECG or with a pacemaker at baseline (N = 15,460). Conduction abnormality was defined as sinus bradycardia, first-degree atrioventricular block, hemiblock, or bundle-branch block. The primary arrhythmic outcome was the composite of any symptomatic brady- or tachyarrhythmia, permanent pacemaker placement, or cardiac arrest through 12 months.. Patients with baseline conduction abnormalities (n = 4,256, 27.5%) were older and more likely to experience the primary arrhythmic outcome. There were no differences by ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in the composite arrhythmic end point in those with baseline conduction disease (1-year cumulative incidence rate: 17% for both study arms; hazard ratio: 0.99 [0.86-1.15]) or without baseline conduction disease (1-year cumulative incidence rate: clopidogrel 12.8% vs ticagrelor 12.4%; hazard ratio: 0.98 (0.88-1.09). There were also no statistically significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the rates of bradycardic (or any individual arrhythmic) events in patients with baseline conduction abnormalities.. Ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel did not increase arrhythmic events even in subjects with acute coronary syndrome who present with mild conduction abnormalities on their baseline ECG.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiac Conduction System Disease; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Ticagrelor

 Ticagrelor is an anti-platelet agent that is indicated for prevention of thrombosis after acute coronary syndrome or intra-coronary artery stent implantation, but it increases the risk of bleeding. Platelet transfusion has the potential to treat or prevent bleeding in patients taking ticagrelor, but the optimal quantity of platelets and timing of administration have not been fully defined..  Ten healthy subjects took ticagrelor in combination with acetylsalicylic acid for 5 days, and had blood collected prior to treatment and at 2, 10, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after the last doses. The potential of platelet transfusion to prevent or reverse bleeding was evaluated by mixing subject and donor platelet-rich plasma in vitro in nine different proportions, and measuring adenosine diphosphate-mediated aggregation by light transmission aggregometry. Spontaneous offset of the anti-aggregant effect of ticagrelor occurred gradually and was complete at 72 hours after the last dose. The addition of donor platelets enhanced the recovery. The addition of the equivalent of six apheresis platelet units produced a 50% relative reversal at 10 hours, and > 90% reversal at 24 hours..  Donor platelets enhance reversal of the anti-aggregant effect of ticagrelor in vitro. Donor platelets given in clinically relevant amounts partially reversed ticagrelor at 10 hours after the last dose, and almost fully reversed ticagrelor at 24 hours. The results inform on the potential to reverse ticagrelor in patients who develop bleeding or require emergency surgery.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Adult; Blood Platelets; Cells, Cultured; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Risk; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Young Adult

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Blood Platelets; Cells, Cultured; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Morphine; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard antithrombotic treatment following acute coronary syndromes. The factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban reduced mortality and ischaemic events when added to DAPT, but caused increased bleeding. The safety of a dual pathway antithrombotic therapy approach combining low-dose rivaroxaban (in place of aspirin) with a P2Y12 inhibitor has not been assesssed in acute coronary syndromes. We aimed to assess rivaroxaban 2·5 mg twice daily versus aspirin 100 mg daily, in addition to clopidogrel or ticagrelor (chosen at investigator discretion before randomisation), for patients with acute coronary syndromes started within 10 days after presentation and continued for 6-12 months.. In this double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial (GEMINI-ACS-1) done at 371 clinical centres in 21 countries, eligible patients were older than 18 years with unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with positive cardiac biomarkers and either ischaemic electrocardiographic changes or an atherosclerotic culprit lesion identified during angiography. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) within 10 days after admission for the index acute coronary syndromes event to either aspirin or rivaroxaban based on a computer-generated randomisation schedule. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks with size of four and was stratified based on the background P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) intended to be used at the time of randomisation. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment assignment. Patients received a minimum of 180 days of double-blind treatment with rivaroxaban 2·5 mg twice daily or aspirin 100 mg daily. The choice of clopidogrel or ticagrelor during trial conduct was not randomised and was based on investigator preference. The primary endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) clinically significant bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; major, minor, or requiring medical attention) up to day 390. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02293395.. Between April 22, 2015, and Oct 14, 2016, 3037 patients with acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned; 1518 to receive aspirin and 1519 to receive rivaroxaban. 1704 patients (56%) were in the ticagrelor and 1333 (44%) in the clopidogrel strata. Median duration of treatment was 291 days (IQR 239-354). TIMI non-CABG clinically significant bleeding was similar with rivaroxaban versus aspirin therapy (total 154 patients [5%]; 80 participants [5%] of 1519 vs 74 participants [5%] of 1518; HR 1·09 [95% CI 0·80-1·50]; p=0·5840).. A dual pathway antithrombotic therapy approach combining low-dose rivaroxaban with a P2Y12 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes had similar risk of clinically significant bleeding as aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. A larger, adequately powered trial would be required to definitively assess the efficacy and safety of this approach.. Janssen Research & Development and Bayer AG.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is related to major bleeding when measured at initial presentation in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. It is unknown whether follow-up measurements provide additional information. The objective of this study was to investigate whether GDF-15 measured 1 month after an ACS provides additional information beyond the baseline levels with regard to the risk of major bleeding.. GDF-15 was measured at baseline and at 1 month after an ACS in 4049 patients included in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. The association between 1-month GDF-15 level and non-coronary artery bypass grafting surgery-related major bleeding was assessed by a multivariable Cox model, adjusting for baseline GDF-15, age, anemia, impaired renal function, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, and sex. Elevated GDF-15 (>1800 ng/L) at 1 month was associated with an increased risk of non-coronary artery bypass grafting-related major bleeding (3.9% versus 1.2%; hazard ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.89-6.06), independent of baseline GDF-15. Patients who had elevated GDF-15 levels at baseline and subsequent nonelevated GDF-15 at 1 month had a similar risk as patients who had nonelevated levels at both measurements.. GDF-15 at 1 month after an ACS is related to the risk of bleeding during DAPT and provides additional information on the bleeding risk beyond baseline GDF-15 levels. GDF-15 levels may therefore be useful as part of decision support concerning long-term antithrombotic treatment in patients post-ACS.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Growth Differentiation Factor 15; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation

Newer P2Y12 blockers (prasugrel and ticagrelor) demonstrated significant ischaemic benefit over clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, both drugs are associated with an increase in bleeding complications. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) from aspirin plus a newer P2Y12 blocker to aspirin plus clopidogrel 1 month after ACS.. We performed an open-label, monocentric, and randomized trial. From March 2014 to April 2016, patients admitted with ACS requiring coronary intervention, on aspirin and a newer P2Y12 blocker and without adverse event at 1 month, were assigned to switch to aspirin and clopidogrel (switched DAPT) or continuation of their drug regimen (unchanged DAPT). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, urgent revascularization, stroke and bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification ≥2 at 1 year post ACS. Six hundred and forty six patients were randomized and 645 analysed, corresponding to 322 patients in the switched DAPT and 323 in the unchanged DAPT group. The primary endpoint occurred in 43 (13.4%) patients in the switched DAPT group and in 85 (26.3%) patients in the unchanged DAPT (HR 95%CI 0.48 (0.34-0.68), P < 0.01). No significant differences were reported on ischaemic endpoints, while BARC ≥ 2 bleeding occurred in 13 (4.0%) patients in the switched DAPT and in 48 (14.9%) in the unchanged DAPT group (HR 95%CI 0.30 (0.18-0.50), P < 0.01).. A switched DAPT is superior to an unchanged DAPT strategy to prevent bleeding complications without increase in ischaemic events following ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Tablets; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Guidelines suggest that "upstream" P2Y. Early use of ticagrelor in patients managed with an invasive strategy would be more effective than clopidogrel because of its more rapid onset of action and greater potency.. In the PLATO trial, 6792 NSTE-ACS patients were randomized to ticagrelor or clopidogrel (started prior to angiography) and underwent angiography within 72 hours of randomization. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel as a function of "early" (<3h) vs "late" (≥3h) time to angiography. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models evaluated interaction between randomized treatment and time from randomization to angiography on subsequent outcomes.. Overall, a benefit of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel for cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke was seen at day 7 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, P = 0.002), day 30 (HR: 0.81, P = 0.042), and 1 year (HR: 0.80, P = 0.0045). There were no significant interactions in the <3h vs ≥3h groups at any timepoint. For major bleeding, overall there was no significant increase (HR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.27); but there was a significant interaction with no difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the early group (HR: 0.79), but higher bleeding risk with ticagrelor in the late angiography group, at 7 days (HR: 1.51, P. The benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel was consistent in those undergoing early and late angiography, supporting upstream use of ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial showed that treatment with ticagrelor reduced the rate of death due to vascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke when compared to clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). While the comparative benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel increased over time, event rates accrued in both groups during the study period. The purpose of our biomarker-based exploratory analysis was to determine whether long-term platelet inhibition may be associated with platelet adaptation. A sample of 4000 participants from the PLATO trial also consented to participate in a prospectively designed biomarker substudy. Blood samples were procured at baseline, immediately prior to hospital discharge and at 1 and 6 months. Markers of platelet activity, including platelet count, serum CD40-ligand and soluble P-selectin were analyzed. Mean levels were compared at discharge, 1 and 6 months following study drug initiation-first for all patients and subsequently stratified by treatment group. A linear mixed model was used to estimate the short-term change rate (baseline to 1 month) and long-term change rate (1-6 months) for each biomarker. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios for each change in biomarker over the two time periods examined: baseline to 1 month and 1 to 6 months. Prior to randomized treatment (baseline), sCD40 ligand and sP-selectin levels were elevated above the normal range of the assay (0.39 and 33.5 µg/L, respectively). The mean level of each biomarker was significantly different at 1 month compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). When stratified by treatment group, at 1 month patients treated with ticagrelor had a larger increase in platelet count compared to those treated with clopidogrel (p < 0.0001). Similarly, when comparing biomarker levels for all patients at 6 months with those at 1 month, each differed significantly (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between treatment groups during this time period. The rate of change for both platelet count and sP-selectin were significantly different between baseline and 1 month when compared to the 1 to 6-month time period (p < 0.0001). When comparing treatment groups, the rate of increase in platelets from baseline to 1 month was greater for patients treated with ticagrelor (p < 0.0001). This was no longer observed in the 1 to 6-month interval. Using a Cox proportional ha

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; CD40 Ligand; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; P-Selectin; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Count; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines advise waiting 5 to 7 days before operating on P2Y. After baseline platelet testing (Multiplate Analyzer and VerifyNow), cardiovascular disease patients (n=20; 56.9±7.9 years; 65% men; 75% diabetic) received dual antiplatelet therapy as a single loading dose (ticagrelor 180 mg plus aspirin 325 mg) and as daily/maintenance treatment for 5 to 7 days (maintenance therapy: ticagrelor 90 mg BID plus aspirin 81 mg QD). At 4, 6, 24, and 48 hours from (last) dosing, patients' blood samples were supplemented with concentrated platelets from healthy donors in vitro, raising platelet counts by 0% (unsupplemented control), 25%, 50%, and 75%, and the function retested. Reactivity in supplemented samples was compared with respective 0% sample and with the pretreatment baseline. Results under loading dose and maintenance therapy regimens were nearly identical. Platelet reactivity was higher (. Platelet reactivity of ticagrelor-treated patients can be restored using concentrated platelets after a loading dose/maintenance therapy in a time-dependent manner under in vitro testing. Although statistically significant improvements are evident 6 hours after (last) dosing, ≥24 hours maybe needed for clinically meaningful restoration in platelet function.. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02201394.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

This study compared adenosine-associated pleiotropic effects of the 2 P2Y. Both ticagrelor and prasugrel have potent antiplatelet effects. However, only ticagrelor inhibits cellular uptake of adenosine.. Using a randomized, crossover design with 10-week follow-up ticagrelor or prasugrel was administered to type 2 diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome requiring stent implantation. A total of 62 patients underwent randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel for 5 weeks followed by a direct cross over to the alternative treatment for 5 additional weeks. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, inflammatory markers, and number of circulating EPCs were compared.. Improvement in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was greater in the ticagrelor group (0.15 ± 0.19 mm vs. -0.03 ± 0.18 mm; p < 0.001). Moreover, ticagrelor compared with prasugrel decreased interleukin 6 (-0.58 ± 0.43 pg/ml vs. -0.05 ± 0.24 pg/ml; p < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor alpha (-5.62 ± 4.40 pg/ml vs. -0.42 ± 2.64 pg/ml; p < 0.001), and increased adiponectin (2.31 ± 2.00 μg/ml vs. 0.08 ± 1.50 μg/ml; p < 0.001) during 10-week follow-up. Other inflammatory cytokines like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were decreased in both groups. Ticagrelor compared with prasugrel significantly increased absolute numbers of circulating EPCs CD34+/KDR+ (42.5 ± 37.8 per μl vs. -28.2 ± 23.7 per μl; p < 0.001), CD34+/CD117+ (51.9 ± 77.2 per μl vs. -66.3 ± 45.2 per μl; p < 0.001), and CD34+/CD133+ (55.2 ± 69.2 per μl vs. -28.0 ± 34.1 per μl; p < 0.001).. Compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor significantly decreased inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha and increased circulating EPCs, contributing to improved arterial endothelial function in diabetic non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Thus, data support that pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor beyond its potent antiplatelet effects could contribute to additional clinical benefits. (Comparison of Ticagrelor vs. Prasugrel on Inflammation, Arterial Stiffness, Endothelial Function, and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Diabetic Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome [NSTE-ACS] Requiring Coronary Stenting; NCT02487732).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biomarkers; Brachial Artery; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Female; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Seoul; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation

We hypothesized that a high ticagrelor loading dose (LD) may improve platelet inhibition in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. This interventional multicentre open-label trial randomized 278 patients with NSTE-ACS to a high (360 mg) or conventional (180 mg) ticagrelor LD. The primary outcome was the platelet reactivity index (PRI) 1 hour after administration of the LD. Secondary outcomes included PRI at 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 8 hours, and 24 hours; periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI); major cardiac adverse events; and bleeding events.. Two hundred sixty-two patients completed the major end points. PRI was lower in the high-LD group than in the conventional-LD group at any time point (all, P < 0.05), including at 1 hour (12.2% vs 16.7%; P = 0.023). At 0.5 hour, the high-LD group showed a lower high-platelet reactivity rate (49.6% vs 60.2%; P = 0.013) and a higher low-platelet reactivity rate (24.8% vs 12.8%; P = 0.017) than did the conventional LD group. No significant differences in the bleeding rates were found between the 2 groups (14% vs 14.3%). Four cases of PMI and 1 death in each group, as well as 1 acute myocardial infarction in the conventional LD group, occurred. There was no stroke, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel revascularization.. Doubling the ticagrelor LD achieved faster onset and greater platelet inhibition without an increase in adverse events in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study sought to evaluate the impact of initial platelet reactivity on the benefit of switched strategy.. TOPIC (Timing Of Platelet Inhibition after acute Coronary Syndrome) study suggested that switched dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) could improve net clinical benefit after acute coronary syndrome by preventing bleeding.. Acute coronary syndrome patients, 1 month after coronary stenting and event free, were randomly assigned to aspirin and clopidogrel (switched DAPT) or continuation of drug regimen (unchanged DAPT). All patients underwent platelet function testing at this time and were classified as low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) (platelet reactivity index vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein ≤20%) or non-LTPR (platelet reactivity index vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein >20%). The primary endpoint aimed to evaluate the impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes and benefit of switched DAPT strategy.. A total of 645 patients were included, 305 (47%) of whom were classified as LTPR. LTPR patients were less often diabetic (p = 0.01), had lower body mass index (p < 0.01), and were more often on ticagrelor (p < 0.01). Patients defined as LTPR and randomized to unchanged DAPT were at the highest risk of primary endpoint occurrence (31%; p < 0.01). Conversely, in the switched arm, LTPR patients had no significant difference in primary outcome incidence compared with non-LTPR patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40 to 1.49; p = 0.45). The switched strategy was associated with important reduction in primary endpoint incidence in LTPR patients (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.51; p < 0.01) and only numerically lower incidence in non-LTPR patients (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.35; p = 0.39).. Switched DAPT was superior regardless of initial platelet reactivity but the benefit was greater in LTPR patients. Indeed, the switched strategy was highly effective in this group, which had impaired prognosis with unchanged DAPT but similar prognosis after switching.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Clopidogrel; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor has been endorsed by guidelines as the P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ontario; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

It was the study objective to evaluate whether chewing a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor versus an equal dose of traditional oral administration, enhances inhibition of platelet aggregation 1 hour (h) after administering a ticagrelor loading dose in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Dual anti-platelet therapy represents standard care for treating NSTEMI patients. Ticagrelor is a direct acting P2Y12 inhibitor and, unlike clopidogrel and prasugrel, does not require metabolic activation. Fifty NSTEMI patients were randomised to receive either a chewing loading dose of 180 mg ticagrelor or an equal standard oral dose of ticagrelor. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by VerifyNow at baseline, 1 and 4 h post-loading dose. Results are reported in P2Y12 reaction units. Patients then continued to receive standard 90 mg oral ticagrelor twice daily. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. P2Y12 reaction units in the chewing group compared with the standard group at 0, 1 and 4 h after ticagrelor loading dose were: 245 vs 239 (p=0.59), 45 vs 130 (p=0.001) and 39 vs 60 (p=0.12), respectively, corresponding to a relative inhibition of platelet aggregation of 83 % vs only 47 % at 1 h (p< 0.001), and 84 % vs 77 % (p=0.59) at 4 h. Major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events at 30 days were low (2 %), occurring in only one patient in the standard group. In conclusion, chewing a 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose is feasible and facilitates both faster and improved early inhibition of platelet aggregation in NSTEMI patients, compared with a standard oral-loading dose.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Platelets; Deglutition; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Mastication; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Objective The CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) allele is present in half of the East Asian population and is associated with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). This study aimed to investigate whether a rapid genotyping-guided approach is feasible and efficacious for selecting P2Y12 receptor blockers in Chinese patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label study. A total of 132 patients with ACS were randomized to the rapid genotyping-guided treatment group (GG, N = 65) or the standard treatment group (SG, N = 67). Patients in the GG group were genotyped by the Verigene system. Patients with the CYP2C19 LoF allele were switched to ticagrelor and all remaining patients continued on clopidogrel. The endpoints were HTPR at 24 hours after the first loading dose of clopidogrel and 1 month afterwards. Results Forty patients in the GG group switched to ticagrelor, while others continued on clopidogrel. The incidence of HTPR in the GG vs SG groups was 9.2% vs 40.3% at 24 hours and 6.5% vs 32.3% at 1 month, respectively. Rapid point-of-care genotyping showed 100% concordance with conventional genotyping by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Conclusions In Chinese patients suffering from ACS, the rapid genotyping-guided approach for selecting P2Y12 receptor blockers is feasible and reduces the incidence of HTPR. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01994941.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Alleles; Asian People; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Gene Expression; Gene Frequency; Genotype; Genotyping Techniques; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) has been associated with a 2-9 fold increased risk of acute ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes or coronary stenting. However, the mechanism of suboptimal platelet inhibition are still poorly understood. Aim of present study was to evaluate the role of the percentage of reticulated platelets on HRPR with ticagrelor. In patients treated with ASA (100-160 mg) and ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction, IPF) were assessed at 30-90 days after acute coronary syndrome. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined as ADP test >417 AU*min. Our population is represented by 190 patients, divided according to tertiles values of IPF (<2.5; 2.5-3.99; ≥4 %). Higher IPF was associated to a larger platelet volume and lower platelets count (p < 0.001), and inversely related with a history of previous coronary revascularization (p = 0.03). Twenty-one out of 190 (11.0 %) patients displayed HRPR. No difference in the levels of circulating IPF was found in patients with or without HRPR (p = 0.25), with no correlation between the rate of reticulated platelets and platelet reactivity at ADP test (r = -0.084, p = 0.26). In fact no association was observed between high levels of IPF and the occurrence of HRPR (adjusted OR[95 % CI] = 0.69[0.34-1,37], p = 0.28), even after correction for baseline differences. In patients treated with ticagrelor, the levels of circulating reticulated platelets assessed at 30-90 days post-ACS are not associated with platelet reactivity or the occurrence of HRPR.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Ticagrelor

Addition of a potent P2Y12 inhibitor to aspirin is the standard therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, together with antiplatelet therapy, may be considered as part of initial therapy in NSTE-ACS patients with high-risk features. This study investigated the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor loading dose (LD) versus tirofiban bolus injection with a post-bolus infusion on top of aspirin among NSTE-ACS patients planned to PCI. NSTE-ACS patients were randomised to receive either ticagrelor (n = 47) or tirofiban (n = 48). Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry at 0, 2, 8, and 24 hours (h) after treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA, 20 µM ADP, final extent) at 2 h after LD therapy, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. The prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was also compared at 0, 2, 8, and 24 h. The mean difference in IPA between ticagrelor and tirofiban was -9.9% (95% confidence interval: -25.7% to 5.9%) at 2 h, -1.6% (-8.0% to 4.8%) at 8 h, and -3.3% (-18.4% to 12.0%) at 24 h. The prevalence of HPR did not differ between the two groups at any time point (all p values ≥ 0.059), which was almost abolished by 8 h post-LD (< 5%). In conclusion, the antiplatelet effect during the early phase (~2 h) after ticagrelor LD appeared to be relatively strong, but it did not reach that of tirofiban in NSTE-ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Republic of Korea; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Tirofiban; Treatment Outcome; Tyrosine

The GLOBAL LEADERS trial is a superiority study in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a uniform use of Biolimus A9-eluting stents (BES) and bivalirudin. GLOBAL LEADERS was designed to assess whether a 24-month antithrombotic regimen with ticagrelor and one month of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), compared to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), improves outcomes.. Patients (n >16,000) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily for 24 months plus ASA ≤100 mg for one month versus DAPT with either ticagrelor (acute coronary syndrome) or clopidogrel (stable coronary artery disease) for 12 months plus ASA ≤100 mg for 24 months. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal, new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 24 months. The key safety endpoint is investigator-reported class 3 or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definitions. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out to explore potential differences in outcome across geographic regions and according to specific angiographic and clinical risk estimates.. The GLOBAL LEADERS trial aims to assess the role of ticagrelor as a single antiplatelet agent after a short course of DAPT for the long-term prevention of cardiac adverse events, across a wide spectrum of patients, following BES implantation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Drug Combinations; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Sirolimus; Ticagrelor; Time; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is common after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a marker of increased risk of arrhythmogenic death. However, the prognostic significance of NSVT when evaluated with other contemporary risk markers and at later time points after ACS remains uncertain.. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, continuous ECGs were performed during the first 7 days after ACS (n=2866) and repeated for another 7 days at day 30 (n=1991). Median follow-up was 1 year. There was a time-varying interaction between NSVT and cardiovascular death such that NSVT was significantly associated with increased risk within the first 30 days after randomization (22/999 [2.2%] versus 16/1825 [0.9%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-5.79; P=0.004) but not after 30 days (28/929 [3.0%] versus 42/1734 [2.4%]; P=0.71). Detection of NSVT during the convalescent phase (n=428/1991; 21.5%) was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, and was most marked within the first 2 months after detection (1.9% versus 0.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 5.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-28.20; P=0.01), and then decreasing over time such that the relationship was no longer significant by ≈5 months after ACS.. NSVT occurred frequently during the acute and convalescent phases of ACS. The risk of cardiovascular death associated with NSVT was the greatest during the first 30 days after presentation; however, patients with NSVT detected during the convalescent phase were also at a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death that persisted for an additional several months after the index event.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Biomarkers; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Many low-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are not pre-treated with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are often performed on an ad hoc basis in this population. Pharmacodynamic (PD) studies comparing ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing ad hoc PCI are lacking.. This study sought to assess PD effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel loading dose (LD) in the peri-procedural period among troponin-negative ACS patients undergoing ad hoc PCI.. This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, phase IV PD study. One hundred P2Y12 inhibitor-naïve patients presenting with biomarker-negative ACS and undergoing ad hoc PCI, on a background of aspirin therapy, were randomized to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg LD or clopidogrel 600 mg LD. Platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]; VerifyNow assay) was measured at 5 time points: pre-LD, at 0.5, 2, and 8 h post-LD, and at end of PCI. The primary endpoint was PRU levels 2 h post-LD; secondary endpoints included PRU levels at all other time points and inhibition of platelet aggregation; an exploratory analysis evaluated rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) (PRU >208).. At 2 h, PRU levels were significantly lower with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (98.4 ± 95.4 vs. 257.5 ± 74.5; p < 0.001; primary endpoint). PRU levels diverged as early as 0.5 h post-LD, with significant differences observed by the end of PCI (mean 0.6 h post-LD) and maintained up to 8 h post-LD. HPR rates were also significantly reduced with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel at the end of PCI (p = 0.030), and at 2 h (p < 0.001) and 8 h (p < 0.001) after LD.. In low-risk ACS patients undergoing ad hoc PCI, ticagrelor LD provides more prompt and potent platelet inhibition, and lower HPR rates, compared with clopidogrel LD. (Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Study in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: NCT01603082).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Troponin

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the combination of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, given for 12 months remains the standard of care after presentation with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) because it has been shown to be associated with a significant reduction in ischemic events compared with aspirin monotherapy. The factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was shown to be associated with a significant reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, and resulted in a nominal reduction in cardiovascular death, when added to background DAPT in the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial; however, there was excessive bleeding with this "triple-therapy" approach. The combination of rivaroxaban with P2Y12 inhibition in a "dual-pathway" approach may be an effective therapeutic regimen for the treatment of ACS, given the known importance of P2Y12 inhibition after stenting and intriguing data that the combination of an anticoagulant with clopidogrel after stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation appears an attractive option to this patient population. GEMINI-ACS-1 is a prospective, randomized, double-dummy, double-blind, active-controlled trial that will assess the safety of dual antithrombotic therapy (rivaroxaban [2.5 mg twice daily] + P2Y12 inhibitor) as compared with DAPT (aspirin [100 mg] + P2Y12 inhibitor) within 10 days of an ACS event in 3,000 patients. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio stratified by intended P2Y12 inhibitor use (clopidogrel 75 mg daily or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily), with 1500 patients expected in each P2Y12 inhibitor strata. The primary end point is Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction clinically significant bleeding (major, minor, or requiring medical attention). The exploratory efficacy determination will be a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and stent thrombosis. GEMINI-ACS-1 will assess the safety and feasibility of dual antithrombotic therapy with rivaroxaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor compared with conventional DAPT for the treatment for patients with recent ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study sought to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of switching to ticagrelor patients who were treated with prasugrel after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome.. In clinical practice, there is a frequent need to switch between P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. However, concerns on drug interactions have emerged when switching therapies. To date, the PD effects of switching from prasugrel to ticagrelor have yet to be investigated.. This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, 3-arm, parallel-design study conducted in patients (n = 82) on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (81 mg QD) and prasugrel (10 mg QD). Patients were randomized to continue prasugrel 10 mg QD or switch to ticagrelor 90 mg bid, with or without a 180 mg loading dose (LD), for 1 week. PD assessments included P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) by VerifyNow, platelet reactivity index by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), and platelet aggregation by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) at a total of 6 time points: baseline, 2 h, 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 1 week after randomization.. After switching to ticagrelor, PRU levels decreased as early as 2 h after drug administration. Mean PRU levels remained low during the study time course, without evidence of drug interactions. The primary endpoint of noninferiority of ticagrelor (2 arms combined) versus prasugrel measured by PRU at 1 week was met (least squares mean difference: -18; 95% confidence interval: -41 to 5). There was no increase in rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (PRU >208), which were overall very low throughout the study time course. Similar levels of platelet reactivity were observed irrespective of the use of a ticagrelor LD. Parallel findings were observed with VASP and LTA.. Switching from prasugrel to ticagrelor leads to transiently higher levels of platelet inhibition, irrespective of the use of a LD, without evidence of drug interactions. (Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Switching From Prasugrel to Ticagrelor [SWAP3]; NCT02016170).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Florida; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Arteries; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Extremities; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Long-awaiting PHILO trial, conducted in 2011-2012 has been submitted and published late in 2015. In contrast to overall PLATO results, but similar to PLATO-US cohort, PHILO revealed numerical inferiority of ticagrelor with regard to death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding over clopidogrel. Hence, we comprehend the PHILO results in light of the PLATO-US evidence. To assess the PHILO (n=801) outcomes, applied statistics, and trial conduct, matching them with the PLATO-US (n=1413) patients. The Asian, predominantly Japanese ticagrelor patients had worsened outcomes even when compared to the negative American cohort with regard to death (OR=1.44 (PHILO) vs. 1.17 (PLATO-US); myocardial infarction (OR=1.63 vs. 1.38); and composite primary endpoint (OR=1.60 vs. 1.27); but not for stroke (OR=1.51 vs. 1.75). Moreover, in contrast to the trend in PLATO-US (OR=1.11; CI=0.84-1.48, p=0.46), PHILO revealed significant excess of PLATO-defined composite of major and minor bleeding events (OR=1.83; CI=1.27-2.63,p=0.0014). PLATO-defined "net clinical benefit" in PHILO was also significantly (OR=1.61; CI=1.11-2.34, p=0.0145) inferior for ticagrelor. The "number needed to harm" suggests that for every 29 PHILO patients treated for 12months with ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel, one will suffer an additional major bleeding event. Finally, unexplained premature closure of PHILO just after 200-210days mean drug exposure, and short 240days mean follow-up seems deliberate and concerning with regard to unblinding. Aside from some information censoring, early trial closure, and creative statistics, Asian ticagrelor patients did consistently worse in PHILO, than even in the negative PLATO-US cohort. Especially alarming is a significant bleeding inferiority justifying a necessity for a separate outcome-driven low-dose ticagrelor trial in Asian post-PCI patients. This strategy was successfully implemented with the low-dose prasugrel in Japan. Regulatory authorities in Asia may consider conducting an independent review of PHILO dataset to ensure adequate ticagrelor safety.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Asian People; Aspirin; Black People; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States; White People

Ticagrelor is an orally administered antiplatelet agent used to reduce thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Data from two studies in patients with acute coronary syndromes with large amounts of pharmacokinetic (PK) data (phase IIb DISPERSE-2 study (n = 609)); phase III PLATO PK substudy (n = 6,381)), along with non-linear mixed effects modeling software, were used to develop population PK models for ticagrelor and its metabolite, AR-C124910XX, and to evaluate the impact of demographic and clinical factors on the PK of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX.. 32 covariates relating to disease history, biomarkers, clinical chemistry, and concomitant medications were assessed.. A one-compartment model with population mean PK parameters of firstorder absorption rate constant (0.67/h), apparent systemic clearance (14 L/h), and apparent volume of distribution (221 L) was shown to best describe the PK profile of ticagrelor. Patients co-administered moderate CYP3A inducers or inhibitors increased (by 110%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 52 - 192%) or decreased (by 64%, 95% CI, 39 - 73%) apparent ticagrelor clearance, respectively, while habitual smoking decreased apparent ticagrelor clearance by 22% (95% CI, 19 - 25%). Ticagrelor bioavailability was 21% (95% CI, 19 - 22%) lower at treatment initiation (visit 1) versus subsequent visits. Compared with Caucasian patients, ticagrelor bioavailability was 39% (95% CI, 33 - 46%) higher in Asian patients and 18% (95% CI, 6 - 28%) lower in Black patients.. In the current analyses, the population PK models developed for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX described the data obtained in the DISPERSE-2 and PLATO studies well, and were consistent with previous phase I PK studies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Biological Availability; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Nonlinear Dynamics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Tissue Distribution; White People; Young Adult

Ticagrelor is a direct acting on the P2Y12 receptor blocker, which provides faster and greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. However, several studies suggested that in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ticagrelor exhibits initial delay in the onset of antiplatelet action. Unlike ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), management pathways are highly variable, and some patients may require surgery. Effect of higher loading dose (LD) of ticagrelor in patients with NSTE-ACS in providing faster and stronger inhibition of platelet aggregation is unknown and needs to be explored further.The AntiPlatelet Effect of different Loading dOse of Ticagrelor trial is an interventional, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase IV trial designed to evaluate whether a high LD (360 mg) of ticagrelor compared with the conventional LD (180 mg) will result in a higher inhibition of platelet aggregation without increasing bleeding events in NSTE-ACS participants undergoing PCI.A total of 250 NSTE-ACS participants will be randomized to receive a ticagrelor LD (360 or 180 mg), followed by a maintenance dose of 90 mg twice a day (bid) starting 12 hours after the LD. The primary endpoint is platelet reactivity index measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation 2 hours after the LD, and the secondary endpoints include occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction and bleeding events.The AntiPlatelet Effect of different Loading dOse of Ticagrelor trial will provide important information on the risks and benefits of a high LD (360 mg) of ticagrelor in achieving a faster and stronger platelet inhibition compared with the conventional LD (180 mg) in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Function Tests; Preoperative Care; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor reduced cardiovascular events compared with clopidogrel in PLATO without increasing overall major bleeding. We evaluated whether the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) impacts the relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel.. PLATO randomized 18,624 subjects with acute coronary syndrome to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. The primary efficacy end point was cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke, and the primary safety end point was major bleeding. The use of GPI was at the physician's discretion and open-label. We evaluated outcomes at 30 days stratified by GPI use in the subgroup of 9,983 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 72 hours.. A total of 4,020 (40%) received a GPI. Those receiving a GPI were more likely to be younger, be male, and undergo multivessel PCI. There was no interaction between treatment and GPI use for the primary efficacy and safety end points. Patients treated without GPI had a lower rate of definite stent thrombosis and higher rate of minor/major bleeding with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (P < .05), whereas there was no such difference with GPI (P interaction < .05).. In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early PCI, the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel were not modified by GPI use according to the primary efficacy and safety end point of the trial, although there were indications of greater benefit on definite stent thrombosis and more major or minor bleeding with ticagrelor in patients without (vs with) GPI treatment.

Topics: Abciximab; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Eptifibatide; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptides; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Tirofiban; Tyrosine

To compare three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists (GPIs) in terms of platelet inhibition and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and assess the rate of bleeding and MACEs between GPIs and coadministered P2Y12 agents.. Eighty-three acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with planned GPI use were randomized to receive high-dose bolus tirofiban, double-bolus eptifibatide, or abciximab followed by a 12-hour infusion. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibition was measured at baseline and at 10 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours postbolus dose. Major adverse cardiac events and bleeding complications at 30 days were documented. The incidence of MACEs and bleeding in patients receiving ticagrelor or prasugrel were compared to those given clopidogrel.. There were no statistically significant differences in platelet inhibition between GPIs at 10 minutes (P=.085) and 1 hour (P=.337). At 24 hours, abciximab achieved statistically significantly higher median [interquartile range] platelet inhibition (75 [65-88]%) compared to tirofiban (28 [3-56]%; P<.0001) and eptifibatide (44 [31-63]%; P=.007). There were no differences in bleeding or MACEs depending on GPI or P2Y12 inhibitor administered.. Glycoprotein receptor inhibitors achieve similar levels of platelet inhibition at 10 minutes and 1 hour; however, abciximab maintains this benefit 24 hours after bolus dose. We did not witness an increased rate of bleeding in patients given new potent P2Y12 inhibitors and a GPI in the modern era.

Topics: Abciximab; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eptifibatide; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments; Male; Middle Aged; New South Wales; Peptides; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Tirofiban; Treatment Outcome; Tyrosine

Background. Circulating microRNAs are appealing biomarkers to monitor several processes underlying cardiovascular diseases. Platelets are a major source for circulating microRNAs. Interestingly, the levels of specific microRNAs were reported to correlate with the level of platelet activation. The aim of the present study was to test whether the treatment with the novel antiplatelet agent, ticagrelor, is associated with modulation in the levels of key platelet-derived microRNAs. Methods and Results. Patients were randomly selected from those participating in the SHIFT-OVER study, in which we had previously evaluated the effect of the therapeutic switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor on platelet aggregation. Circulating levels of selected microRNAs were measured before and after the therapeutic switch from a dual antiplatelet therapy including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel to the more potent ticagrelor. Interestingly, the circulating levels of miR-126 (p = 0.030), miR-223 (p = 0.044), and miR-150 (p = 0.048) were significantly reduced, while the levels of miR-96 were increased (p = 0.038). No substantial differences were observed for the remaining microRNAs. Conclusions. Switching from a dual antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel to ticagrelor is associated with significant modulation in the circulating levels of specific microRNAs. If confirmed in larger, independent cohorts, our results pave the way for the use of circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of platelets activity in response to specific pharmacological treatments.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Female; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Male; MicroRNAs; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with drug eluting stents (DES) is still under debate. Recent meta-analyses on ≤6months versus 12months DAPT suggest that bleeding rates can be reduced, without a higher rate of thrombotic complications. In particular, the COMBO dual therapy stent, being associated with early re-endothelialization, may allow for a reduction of the duration of DAPT without increasing the thrombotic risk, while reducing the risk of bleeding complications.. The aim of the REDUCE trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a combined efficacy and safety endpoint of a short-term 3months DAPT strategy as compared to standard 12-month DAPT strategy in ACS patients treated with the COMBO stent.. A prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to enroll 1500 patients with ACS treated with the COMBO stent. Patients will be randomized before discharge in a 1:1 fashion to either 3 or 12months of DAPT. A clinical follow-up is scheduled at 3, 6, 12, and 24months. The primary endpoint is the time to event as defined by the occurrence of one of the following: all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, target vessel revascularization or bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Council type II, III and V) within 12months. The study has recruited patients since July 2014, and the results are expected in 2017.. A reduction of the DAPT duration in ACS patients after PCI without affecting the thrombotic risk is an attractive option with regard to the associated bleeding risk. The REDUCE trial will be the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of a 3-month DAPT strategy compared to a 12-month DAPT strategy in an ACS only population treated with the COMBO stent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; China; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is an antagonist of the platelet P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Megakaryocytes; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The optimal timing of discontinuation of ticagrelor before cardiac surgery is controversial.. To evaluate the safety of preoperative use of ticagrelor with or without aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with aspirin alone.. This prospective, multicenter clinical trial was performed at 15 European centers of cardiac surgery. Participants were patients with ACS undergoing isolated CABG from the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry between January and September 2015.. Before surgery, patients received ticagrelor with or without aspirin or aspirin alone.. Severe bleeding as defined by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) and E-CABG bleeding classification criteria. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for differences in baseline and operative covariates.. Of 2482 patients from the E-CABG registry, the study cohort included 786 (31.7%) consecutive patients with ACS (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [9.3] years; range, 32-88 years), and 132 (16.8%) were female. One-to-one propensity score matching provided 215 pairs, whose baseline and operative covariates had a standardized difference of less than 10%. Preoperative use of ticagrelor was associated with a similar risk of bleeding according to the UDPB and E-CABG bleeding classifications, but the incidence of platelet transfusion was higher in the ticagrelor group (13.5% [29 of 215] vs 6.0% [13 of 215]). Compared with those receiving aspirin alone, continuing ticagrelor up to the time of surgery or discontinuing its use less than 2 days before surgery was associated with a higher risk of platelet transfusion (22.7% [5 of 22] vs 6.4% [12 of 187]) and E-CABG bleeding grades 2 and 3 (18.2% [4 of 22] vs 5.9% [11 of 187]) and tended to have an increased risk of UDPB grades 3 and 4 (22.7% [5 of 22] vs 9.6% [18 of 187]). Among patients in whom antiplatelet drug use was discontinued at least 2 days before surgery, the incidence of platelet transfusion was 12.4% (24 of 193) in the ticagrelor group and 3.6% (1 of 28) in the aspirin-alone group.. In propensity score-matched analyses among patients with ACS undergoing CABG, the use of preoperative ticagrelor with or without aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with more platelet transfusion but similar degree of bleeding; in patients receiving ticagrelor 1 day before or up until surgery, there was an increased rate of severe bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to prevent thrombosis yet increases bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Antiplatelet monotherapy with a potent P2Y. TWILIGHT is a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet monotherapy versus DAPT in up to 9000 high-risk patients undergoing PCI with DES. Upon enrollment after successful PCI, all patients will be treated with open label low-dose aspirin (81-100 mg daily) plus ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) for 3 months. Event-free patients will then be randomized in a double-blind fashion to low-dose aspirin versus matching placebo with continuation of open-label ticagrelor for an additional 12 months. The primary hypothesis is that a strategy of ticagrelor monotherapy will be superior with respect to the primary endpoint of bleeding academic research consortium type 2, 3 or 5, while maintaining non-inferiority for ischemic events compared with ticagrelor plus ASA.. TWILIGHT is the largest study to date that is specifically designed and powered to demonstrate reductions in bleeding with ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus ASA beyond 3 months post-procedure in a high-risk PCI population treated with DES. The trial will provide novel insights with respect to the potential role of ticagrelor monotherapy as an alternative for long-term platelet inhibition in a broad population of patients undergoing PCI with DES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Restenosis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Adjustment; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to observe the effects of genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 on inhibitory effects of ticagrelor (Tic) and clopidogrel (Clo) towards post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) platelet aggregation (IPA) and major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). MATERIAL AND METHODS From August 2013 to March 2014, 166 patients with ACS undergoing PCI were selected. The patients were randomly grouped into the Tic group and the Clo group. IPA was detected by thromboelastography (TEG) at 1 week after taking the pills. Genotyping of CYP2C19 gene was determined by analysis of gene sequence detection. Patients were followed up for 1 month and MACE was observed. RESULTS The total IPA in the Clo group was significantly increased compared with the Tic group (P<0.05). The IPAs in the 3 subgroups of Clo group were all significantly increased compared with the 3 subgroups of the Tic group (all P<0.05). MACE was not significantly different between Clo and Tic groups (P>0.05). MACE had no significant difference among the 3 subgroups of the Tic group (P>0.05). MACE in the low metabolism subgroup of the Clo group was significantly increased compared with the fast metabolism subgroup and middle metabolism subgroup of Clo group (P<0.05). MACE was not significant different between the fast metabolism subgroup and the middle metabolism subgroup of the Clo group (P>0.05). MACE in the low metabolism subgroup of the Tic group was significantly decreased compared with the low metabolism subgroup of the Clo group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Ticagrelor has a better effect on inhibition platelet aggregation than Clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To determine the effect of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. PLATO (n = 18,624) was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial in ACS, that showed a 16% reduction in cardiovascular death (CV-death), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, without significant increase in overall major bleeding. We performed a post-hoc analysis of cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in PLATO according to reported PAD status at baseline. At one year, CV death, MI or stroke occurred in 19.3% of patients with PAD (n = 1144) compared to 10.2% in patients without PAD (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier one year event rate for the primary endpoint of CV death, MI or stroke in PAD patients treated with ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel, was 18% vs 20.6% (HR: 0.85 95% CI 0.64-1.11; for PAD status by treatment interaction, p = 0.99) and for death from any cause 8.7% vs 11.9%, (HR: 0.74 95% CI 0.50-1.08; interaction p = 0.73). PLATO-defined major bleeding event rates at one year were 14.8% for ticagrelor compared to 17.9% for clopidogrel, (HR: 0.81 95% CI 0.59-1.10; interaction p = 0.09).. PAD patients have a high rate of ischaemic and bleeding events post ACS. The reduction of CV death, MI or stroke with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in PAD patients was consistent with the overall trial result although it did not reach statistical significance. Overall major bleeding was similar between the therapies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the cost effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study who were scheduled for non-invasive management.. A previously developed cost effectiveness model was used to estimate long-term costs and outcomes for patients scheduled for non-invasive management. Healthcare costs, event rates and health-related quality of life under treatment with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel over 12 months were estimated from the PLATO study. Long-term costs and health outcomes were estimated based on data from PLATO and published literature sources. To investigate the importance of different healthcare cost structures and life expectancy for the results, the analysis was carried out from the perspectives of the Swedish, UK, German and Brazilian public healthcare systems.. Ticagrelor was associated with lifetime quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains of 0.17 in Sweden, 0.16 in the UK, 0.17 in Germany and 0.13 in Brazil compared with generic clopidogrel, with increased healthcare costs of €467, €551, €739 and €574, respectively. The cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor was €2747, €3395, €4419 and €4471 from a Swedish, UK, German and Brazilian public healthcare system perspective, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor was below conventional threshold values of cost effectiveness with a high probability.. Treatment of patients with ACS scheduled for 12 months' non-invasive management with ticagrelor is associated with a cost per QALY gained below conventional threshold values of cost effectiveness compared with generic clopidogrel.. NCT000391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Brazil; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Management; Electrocardiography; Female; Germany; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Secondary Prevention; Sweden; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United Kingdom

We sought to describe the differential effect of bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) on short- and long-term mortality according to their type and severity.. The PLATO trial randomised 18,624 ACS patients to clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Post-randomisation bleeding events were captured according to bleeding type (spontaneous or procedure-related), with PLATO, TIMI, and GUSTO definitions. The association of bleeding events with subsequent short-term (<30 days) and long-term (>30 days) all-cause mortality was assessed using time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models. A model was fitted to compare major and minor bleeding for mortality prediction. Of 18,624 patients, 2,189 (11.8%) had at least one PLATO major bleed (mean follow-up 272.2±123.5 days). Major bleeding was associated with higher short-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 9.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.50-11.48) but not with long-term mortality (adjusted HR 1.28; 95% CI: 0.93-1.75). Spontaneous bleeding was associated with short-term (adjusted HR 14.59; 95% CI: 11.14-19.11) and long-term (adjusted HR 3.38; 95% CI: 2.26-5.05) mortality. Procedure-related bleeding was associated with short-term mortality (adjusted HR 5.29; 95% CI: 4.06-6.87): CABG-related and non-coronary-procedure-related bleeding were associated with a higher short-term mortality, whereas PCI or angiography-related bleeding was not associated with either short- or long-term mortality. Similar results were obtained using the GUSTO and TIMI bleeding definitions.. Major bleeding is associated with high subsequent mortality in ACS. However, this association is much stronger in the first 30 days and is strongest for spontaneous (vs. procedure-related) bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Based on results of the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel therapy, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved ticagrelor in 2011 for reducing thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with the proviso that it be taken with low-dose aspirin.. This study sought to assess the cost and cost effectiveness of ticagrelor therapy relative to clopidogrel in treating ACS patients from the perspective of the U.S. health care system.. We estimated within-trial resource use and costs using U.S. low-dose aspirin patients in PLATO (n = 547). Quality-adjusted life expectancy was estimated using the total PLATO population (n = 18,624), combined with baseline risk and long-term survival data from an external ACS patient cohort. Study drugs were valued at current costs. Cost effectiveness was assessed, as was the sensitivity of results to sampling and methodological uncertainties.. One year of ticagrelor therapy, relative to that of generic clopidogrel, cost $29,665/quality-adjusted life-year gained, with 99% of bootstrap estimates falling under a $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Results were robust to extensive sensitivity analyses, including variations in clopidogrel cost, exclusion of costs in extended years of life, and a recalibrated estimate of survival reflecting a lower underlying mortality risk in the United States.. For PLATO-eligible ACS patients, a U.S. perspective comparison of the current standard of dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin with clopidogrel versus aspirin plus ticagrelor showed that the ticagrelor regimen increased life expectancy at an incremental cost well within accepted benchmarks of good value for money. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States

The clinical benefit of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in ACS patients suggested off-target property. Such pleiotropic effect could be mediated by circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) which are critical for vascular healing. We aimed to investigate the impact of ticagrelor on EPC in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. We prospectively randomized 106 ACS patients to ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Sub-populations of CD34+ circulating progenitor cells (PC) were analyzed by flow cytometry allowing one to determine the levels of CD34+ PC, CD34+CD45+ Hematopoietic PC, CD34+133+ immature PC and CD34+KDR+ EPC on admission and at 1 month. Changes in PC level were calculated as the difference between 1 month and baseline value.. The 2 groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics including PC numbers on admission. The 2 groups had similar change in overall CD34+ PC and hematopoietic CD34+45+ PC level (p=0.2). On the contrary, when considering CD34+133+ PC and CD34+KDR+ EPC, we observed that patients treated by ticagrelor had a significantly higher increase in levels of these PC subtypes compared to those treated by clopidogrel (0.23 (-0.33; 0.79) vs 0.00 (-0.5; 0.34); p=0.04 and 0.01 (-0.04; 0.05) vs -0.01 (-0.06; 0.03); p=0.02). Changes in the level of CD34+CD133+ PC correlated with platelet activity measured by the VASP index (r=-0.30; p=0.008). By contrast the increase in the level of CD34+KDR+ EPC in the ticagrelor group was independent of platelet activity.. Ticagrelor increases the number of EPC in ACS patients suggesting a benefit on endothelial regeneration that may participate in the pleiotropic property of the drug.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Antigens, CD34; Body Mass Index; Clopidogrel; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor, a direct-acting P2Y12-receptor antagonist, is rapidly absorbed and partly metabolized to the major metabolite AR-C124910XX (ARC). To identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and clinical outcomes, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in patients treated with ticagrelor in the PLATO trial.. A two-stage design was used for the GWAS with discovery (discovery phase: n = 1812) and replication cohorts (replication phase: n = 1941). The steady-state area under the curve (AUCss) values, estimated by the population pharmacokinetic (PK) models, were log transformed and analysed on a genome-wide scale using linear regression. SNPs were analysed against clinical events using Cox-regression in 4990 patients. An SNP (rs113681054) in SLCO1B1 was associated with levels of ticagrelor (P = 1.1 × 10(-6)) and ARC (P = 4.6 × 10(-13)). This SNP is in linkage disequilibrium with a functional variant (rs4149056) that results in decreased OATP1B1 transporter activity. Ticagrelor levels were also associated with two independent SNPs (rs62471956, P = 7.7 × 10(-15) and rs56324128, P = 9.7 × 10(-12)) in the CYP3A4 region. Further, ARC levels were associated with rs61361928 (P = 3.0 × 10(-14)) in UGT2B7. At all loci, the effects were small. None of the identified SNPs that affected ticagrelor PK were associated with the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death myocardial infarction, and stroke), non-CABG-related bleeds or investigator-reported dyspnoea.. In patients with ACS, ticagrelor pharmacokinetics is influenced by three genetic loci (SLCO1B1, UGT2B7, and CYP3A4). However, the modest genetic effects on ticagrelor plasma levels did not translate into any detectable effect on efficacy or safety during ticagrelor treatment.. NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Female; Genome-Wide Association Study; Genotype; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Liver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1; Male; Middle Aged; Organic Anion Transporters; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In the PLATO trial, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in reducing cardiovascular events among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at the expense of increased nonfatal bleeding. Because Asian patients, when compared with non-Asian patients, are believed to be more susceptible to bleeding, we evaluated the effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in Asian (n=1,106) and non-Asian (n=17,515) patients with acute coronary syndrome enrolled in the PLATO study.. Interaction between Asian/non-Asian and primary efficacy end point (a composite of vascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and net clinical benefit (composite of primary efficacy end point and coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery or non-CABG-related major bleeding) were evaluated with a Cox proportional hazards model. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were different between Asians and non-Asians. The overall cardiovascular event rates were higher in Asians, but bleeding rates were similar. Despite these observed differences, the effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel were not significantly different between Asians and non-Asians with respect to the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio for Asians vs non-Asians, 0.84 [95% CI 0.61-1.17] vs 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.93], P=.974), net clinical benefit (0.85 [95% CI 0.65-1.11] vs 0.93 [95% CI 0.86-0.99], P=.521), or individual efficacy end points. There was no significant interaction for bleeding (PLATO major bleeding, 1.02 [95% CI 0.70-1.49] vs 1.04 [95% CI 0.95-1.14], P=.938) and other related adverse events with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel between Asians and non-Asians.. We observed consistency of effects in Asian patients receiving ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the PLATO study. The relatively modest number of Asian patients in this analysis supports further investigation of larger cohorts to confirm our observations.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Guidelines recommend a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) before PCI or a prasugrel LD at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in intermediate and high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, achieving an optimal PR inhibition at the time of PCI is critical to prevent adverse events and depends on the timing of LD intake in relation to PCI. We aimed to compare the rate of myonecrosis related to PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS receiving ticagrelor pretreatment versus prasugrel at the time of intervention. We prospectively randomized 213 patients with NSTE-ACS to a 180 mg of ticagrelor LD given as soon as possible after admission and before PCI or to a 60 mg LD of prasugrel given at the time of PCI. The primary end point was the rate of periprocedural myonecrosis as defined by an increase of >5 times the ninety-ninth percentiles in troponin-negative patients or a 20% increase in troponin-positive patients. The 2 groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics including clinical setting (p = 0.2). Procedural characteristics were also identical including the number of treated vessels and stenting procedures. Patients in the prasugrel group more often required emergent PCI (p = 0.001). Patients in the ticagrelor group had less periprocedural myonecrosis compared with those in the prasugrel group (19.8% vs 38.3%; p = 0.03). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥2 at 1-month follow-up was low and similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, a ticagrelor LD as soon as possible before PCI is superior to prasugrel at the time of PCI to prevent periprocedural myonecrosis in NSTE-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ticagrelor dosing regimens on pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles in patients on maintenance ticagrelor therapy.. Many patients on maintenance P2Y12-inhibiting therapies may require coronary revascularization procedures, raising a common clinical question with regard to the dosing regimen of the P2Y12-inhibiting agent to be used. To date, investigations assessing dosing regimens of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients on maintenance therapy have been only assessed with thienopyridines, but not with ticagrelor.. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the PD effects of 2 dosing regimens of ticagrelor in patients on standard aspirin and ticagrelor maintenance therapy. A total of 60 patients were randomized to either 90 mg (maintenance dose [MD] group) or 180 mg (loading dose [LD] group) dose of ticagrelor. PD assessments were conducted at 3 time points (baseline, 1 h and 4 h). PD assessments were defined according to the platelet reactivity index (PRI) (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay), P2Y12 reaction unit (VerifyNow P2Y12 assay) and adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation by light transmittance aggregometry.. There were no differences in baseline levels of platelet reactivity with all assays. Intergroup comparisons by means of repeated-measures analysis adjusted for baseline PRI values showed that the LD group had significantly lower PRI levels compared with the MD group during the overall study time course (p = 0.031). Consistent findings were found for P2Y12 reaction unit (p = 0.026) and light transmittance aggregometry (p = 0.004). Intragroup comparisons showed that a more prompt and sustained platelet inhibitory effect was achieved more consistently with an LD regimen compared with a MD regimen.. In patients on maintenance ticagrelor therapy, a 180-mg LD regimen of ticagrelor is associated with more potent and prompt platelet inhibition compared with a 90-mg MD. (Impact of Ticagrelor Re-Load Pharmacodynamic Profiles; NCT01731041).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Florida; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The influence of reticulated platelets (RPs) on platelet inhibition by ticagrelor when compared with prasugrel is unknown. We aimed to determine the influence of RPs on adenosine diphosphate- (ADP-) induced platelet aggregation in patients with acute coronary syndrome who were randomly assigned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel for P2Y12 receptor inhibition.. One hundred and twenty-four patients were prospectively enrolled. The immature platelet fraction (IPF) was measured by an automated haematoanalyzer and platelet aggregation was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry. In a subgroup of patients (n = 28) ADP-induced P-selectin expression was measured in dependence of the time point of study drug intake in RPs that were discriminated from mature platelets by thiazole-orange (TO) staining. The primary endpoint was the correlation of platelet aggregation and IPF in ticagrelor- vs. prasugrel-treated patients. Platelet aggregation significantly correlated with IPF in patients who received prasugrel (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). In contrast, no correlation between IPF and platelet aggregation was observed in ticagrelor-treated patients (r = 0.08, P = 0.51, P for difference of correlation coefficients P = 0.05). Within the TO-positive RP fraction, P-selectin expression was significantly higher in prasugrel when compared with ticagrelor-treated individuals (prasugrel 18.6 ± 16.0% vs. ticagrelor 11.5 ± 6.0%, P = 0.047). A time-dependent P-selectin expression was observed in prasugrel but not in ticagrelor-treated patients (prasugrel early 11.9 ± 9.4% vs. late 26.3 ± 19.0%, P = 0.031, ticagrelor early 9.6 ± 4.9% vs. late 13.5 ± 6.6%, P = 0.127).. Reticulated platelets show a greater impact on platelet reactivity in response to prasugrel when compared with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; P-Selectin; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Pretreatment with a loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel or ticagrelor before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is supported by the guidelines, but debated following a recent meta-analysis on clopidogrel pretreatment and the ACCOAST trial. In this trial prasugrel pretreatment failed to reduce ischaemic events. The timing of optimal platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition of ticagrelor and prasugrel in non ST-elevation ACS (NSTE ACS) is yet undetermined. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the delay required to reach optimal PR inhibition in NSTE ACS following a LD of ticagrelor or prasugrel. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for NSTE ACS were randomised in this monocentre study. The Vasodilator-phosphoprotein index (VASP) was used to measure PR before the LD and then at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4 and 24 hours (h) post-LD. Optimal PR inhibition was defined as a VASP < 50%. We randomised 24 patients to ticagrelor or prasugrel LD. One hour after the LD, 29% of patients had a VASP > 50% (ticagrelor and prasugrel: 25 vs 33%; p=0.7). Optimal PR inhibition was obtained 2 h after the LD in both groups (12/12 with ticagrelor and 11/12 with prasugrel). At that time, the mean VASP index was 19 ± 16% (95%CI: 12-25). Maximal PR inhibition was reached after 4 h: 11 ± 10% (95%CI: 6-15). In NSTE ACS undergoing PCI a LD of ticagrelor or prasugrel given during the procedure provides optimal P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade in 2 h and maximal inhibition within 4 h.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; France; Humans; Microfilament Proteins; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Few data on the relative efficacy and safety of new P2Y12inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor in Japanese, Taiwanese and South Korean patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) exist.. The multicenter, double-blind, randomized PHILO trial compared the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in 801 patients with ACS (Japanese, n=721; Taiwanese, n=35; South Korean, n=44; unknown ethnicity, n=1). All were planned to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and randomized within 24 h of symptom onset. Primary safety and efficacy endpoints were time to first occurrence of any major bleeding event and to any event from the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from vascular causes, respectively.At 12 months, overall major bleeding occurred in 10.3% of ticagrelor-treated patients and in 6.8% of clopidogrel-treated patients (hazard ratio (HR), 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-2.53); the composite primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 9.0% and in 6.3% of ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-treated patients, respectively (HR, 1.47; 95% CI: 0.88-2.44). For both analyses, the difference between groups was not statistically significant.. In ACS patients from Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, event rates of primary safety and efficacy endpoints were higher, albeit not significantly, in ticagrelor-treated patients compared with clopidogrel-treated patients. This observation could be explained by the small sample size, imbalance in clinical characteristics and low number of events in the PHILO population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Stroke; Taiwan; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor treatment has the side effect of increased incidence of dyspnea. Adenosine-induced dyspnea is augmented by ticagrelor and can be alleviated with the adenosine antagonist theophylline. Caffeine is a closely related xanthine derivative.. The primary objective of the TROCADERO is to evaluate the effect of caffeine versus placebo on ticagrelor-associated dyspnea, measured by the visual analog scale area under the curve in patients with ongoing ticagrelor treatment after an acute coronary syndrome event.. After a run-in period of 1 to 7 days of absence of caffeine intake, acute coronary syndrome patients with ticagrelor-induced dyspnea (planned inclusion 416) are randomized in a blinded fashion to either caffeine 200 mg twice daily or matching placebo with a treatment duration of 1 week. The primary efficacy end point is change in visual analog scale area under the curve for dyspnea, and the primary safety end point is occurrence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.. This trial will determine if adenosine antagonism by caffeine can alleviate ticagrelor-related dyspnea, without impairing the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Caffeine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Electrocardiography; Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experiencing acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are at high risk for clinical events. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor versus clopidogrel reduced the primary endpoint of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke after ACS, but increased the incidence of dyspnea, which may lead clinicians to withhold ticagrelor from COPD patients.. In 18 624 patients with ACS randomized to treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel, history of COPD was recorded in 1085 (5.8%). At 1 year, the primary endpoint occurred in 17.7% of patients with COPD versus 10.4% in those without COPD (P<0.001). The 1-year event rate for the primary endpoint in COPD patients treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel was 14.8% versus 20.6% (hazard ratio [HR]=0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54 to 0.97), for death from any cause 8.4% versus 12.4% (HR=0.70; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.04), and for PLATO-defined major bleeding rates at 1 year 14.6% versus 16.6% (HR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.17). Dyspnea occurred more frequently with ticagrelor (26.1% vs. 16.3%; HR=1.71; 95% CI: 1.28 to 2.30). There was no differential increase in the relative risk of dyspnea compared to non-COPD patients (HR=1.85). No COPD status-by-treatment interactions were found, showing consistency with the main trial results.. In this post-hoc analysis, COPD patients experienced high rates of ischemic events. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel reduced and substantially decreased the absolute risk of ischemic events (5.8%) in COPD patients, without increasing overall major bleeding events. The benefit-risk profile supports the use of ticagrelor in patients with ACS and concomitant COPD.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid in combination with a more potent P2Y12- inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) to prevent atherothrombotic complications. The evidence on which this recommendation is based shows that ticagrelor and prasugrel reduce atherothrombotic events at the expense of an increase in bleeding events when compared with clopidogrel. However, it remains unclear whether ticagrelor or prasugrel has a better net clinical benefit in elderly patients with NSTE-ACS when compared with clopidogrel. The POPular AGE trial is designed to address the optimal antiplatelet strategy in elderly NSTE-ACS patients.. POPular AGE is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial that aims to include 1000 patients ≥70years of age with NSTE-ACS. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either clopidogrel or a more potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel). The first primary end point is any bleeding event requiring medical intervention. The second primary end point is the net clinical benefit, a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, "PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes" major bleeding, or "PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes" minor bleeding. Patients will be followed for 1 year after randomization, and analyses will be performed on the basis of intention to treat.. The POPular AGE is the first randomized controlled trial that will assess whether the treatment strategy with clopidogrel will result in fewer bleeding events without compromising the net clinical benefit in patients ≥70years of age with NSTE-ACS when compared with a treatment strategy with ticagrelor or prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Allogenic platelet transfusions (PT) are administered to treat excessive bleeding in patients on P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (RI). We assessed the effect of ex vivo and in vivo PT on platelet activation and aggregation in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.. In the Antagonize P2Y12 Treatment Inhibitors by Transfusion of Platelets in an Urgent or Delayed Timing After Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Presentation-Acute Coronary Syndrome (APTITUDE-ACS) study, patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome or for elective percutaneous coronary intervention, receiving loading doses of clopidogrel (600 mg, n=13 or 900 mg, n=12), prasugrel 60 mg (n=10), or ticagrelor 180 mg (n=10) were included. PT was performed ex vivo by mixing platelet-rich plasma from blood sampling performed at baseline in increasing proportions with platelet-rich plasma sampled 4 hours after loading dose. The percentage restoration of residual platelet aggregation achieved with 80% proportion PT (residual platelet aggregation 80% PT mix/residual platelet aggregation baseline×100) significantly decreased with increasing potency of P2Y12 RI (83.9±11%, 73±14%, 66.3±15%, 40.9±19% for clopidogrel 600 mg, clopidogrel 900 mg, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, respectively; P for trend <0.0001). In the APTITUDE-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (APTITUDE-CABG) study, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-platelet reactivity index, a specific marker of the P2Y12 RI drug-effect, was assessed before and after in vivo PT administered for excessive bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery while on a maintenance dose of aspirin and clopidogrel (n=45), prasugrel (n=6), or ticagrelor (n=3). When compared with baseline, there was a significant relative increase of 23.1% in platelet activation after PT transfusion (42.2±23.6% versus 56.6±18.2%; P=0.0008).. PT restores platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome/percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on P2Y12 RI while bleeding with a less effect with increasing potency of P2Y12 inhibition.. URL: http://www.recherche-biomedicale.sante.gouv.fr/pro/comites/coordonnees.htm and http://www.cnil.fr/. Unique identifiers: No. 301111 and No. 1547216v0.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Platelet Transfusion; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin has previously been the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but international guidelines have been evolving over the last 4 years with the introduction of prasugrel and ticagrelor. In October 2009, prasugrel was approved in the UK by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for use in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), diabetic patients with non-ST-elevation (NSTE) ACS undergoing PCI and patients with stent thrombosis while other ACS patients were to continue receiving clopidogrel. Ticagrelor was approved in October 2011 by NICE for use in patients with moderate-to-high risk NSTE ACS and STEMI undergoing primary PCI and was recommended in preference to clopidogrel in European guidelines. These recommendations were adopted in our region, constituting a population of 1.8 million. We studied the effect of changing patterns of P2Y12 inhibitor usage on levels of platelet inhibition during maintenance therapy. Patients admitted to Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, with NSTE ACS or STEMI managed with primary PCI were enrolled over two periods of time: May 2010 to November 2011 (T1); and October 2012 to February 2013 (T2). Venous blood samples were obtained at 1 month after the onset of ACS. Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) was performed and maximum aggregation response to ADP 20 μM was determined. A total of 116 patients were enrolled in T1 of whom 82 were receiving clopidogrel and 34 were receiving prasugrel. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in T2, all of whom were receiving ticagrelor. Mean LTA results according to treatment with clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor were 57 ± 18%, 41 ± 20%, and 31 ± 12%, respectively. Prasugrel was associated with significantly lower platelet aggregation responses than clopidogrel (p < 0.001) and ticagrelor was associated with significantly lower platelet aggregation responses than both prasugrel (p = 0.015) and clopidogrel (p < 0.001). We conclude that international guidelines and NICE approval have led to increasing levels of P2Y12 inhibition in ACS patients in this UK centre between May 2010 and February 2013. Ticagrelor was associated with significantly greater P2Y12 inhibition than both clopidogrel and prasugrel during maintenance therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United Kingdom

Optimal P2Y12 receptor blockade is critical to prevent ischaemic recurrence in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the level of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition achieved by prasugrel and ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in diabetic acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI. We performed a single-center prospective open-label randomised trial. Patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing PCI for an ACS were randomised to receive prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg. The primary endpoint of the study was the level of platelet reactivity (PR) assessed between 6 and 18 hours post-LD using the VASP index. We randomised 100 diabetic patients undergoing PCI for an ACS. No difference was observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. In particular, the rate of patient receiving insulin therapy was identical (25 vs 28.6%; p =0.7). Ticagrelor achieved a significantly lower PR compared to prasugrel loading dose (17.3 ± 14.2 vs 27.7 ± 23.3%; p=0.009). In addition the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, defined by a VASP ≥50%, tend to be lower in the ticagrelor group although the difference did not reach statistical significance (6 vs 16%; p=0.2). The rate of low on treatment PR was identical (60 vs 54%; p=0.8). The present study demonstrates that ticagrelor LD is superior to prasugrel LD to reduce PR in ACS patients with diabetes mellitus. Whether the higher potency of ticagrelor could translate into a clinical benefit should be investigated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; France; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphoproteins; Pilot Projects; Piperazines; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Risk stratification and the use of specific biomarkers have been proposed for tailoring treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). We investigated the prognostic importance of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in relation to randomized treatment (ticagrelor versus clopidogrel) and management strategy (with or without revascularization) in the NSTE-ACS subgroup of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.. Of 18 624 patients in the PLATO trial, 9946 had an entry diagnosis of NSTE-ACS and baseline blood samples available. During index hospitalization, 5357 were revascularized, and 4589 were managed without revascularization. Hs-TnT, NT-proBNP, and GDF-15 were determined and assessed according to predefined cutoff levels. Median follow-up was 9.1 months. Increasing levels of hs-TnT were associated with increasing risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in medically managed patients (P<0.001), but not in those managed invasively. NT-proBNP and GDF-15 levels were associated with the same events independent of management strategy. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel reduced the rate of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with NSTE-ACS and hs-TnT ≥14.0 ng/L in both invasively and noninvasively managed patients; in patients with hs-TnT <14.0 ng/L, there was no difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the noninvasive group. Hs-TnT, NT-proBNP, and GDF-15 are predictors of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with NSTE-ACS managed noninvasively, and NT-proBNP and GDF-15 also in those managed invasively. Elevated hs-TnT predicts substantial benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel both in invasively and noninvasively managed patients, but no apparent benefit was seen at normal hs-TnT.. URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Electrocardiography; Growth Differentiation Factor 15; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Myocardial Revascularization; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Troponin T

This study aimed to investigate the impact of ticagrelor on adenosine plasma concentration (APC) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.. Ticagrelor is a direct-acting P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker. The clinical benefit of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in ACS patients suggests that the drug has non-platelet-directed properties. Animal and in vitro models suggested that the "pleiotropic" properties of ticagrelor may be related to an interaction with adenosine metabolism.. We prospectively randomized 60 ACS patients to receive ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The APC was measured by liquid chromatography. To assess the mechanism of APC variation, we measured adenosine deaminase concentration, adenosine uptake by red blood cells, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate production by cells overexpressing adenosine receptors. The P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor blockade was assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index.. Patients receiving ticagrelor had significantly higher APC than patients receiving clopidogrel (1.5 μM [interquartile range: 0.98 to 1.7 μM] vs. 0.68 μM [interquartile range: 0.49 to 0.78 μM]; p < 0.01). The APC was not correlated with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (p = 0.16). Serum-containing ticagrelor inhibited adenosine uptake by red blood cells compared with clopidogrel or controls (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Adenosine deaminase activity was similar in serum of patients receiving clopidogrel or ticagrelor (p = 0.1). Ticagrelor and clopidogrel had no direct impact on adenosine receptors (p = not significant).. Ticagrelor increases APC in ACS patients compared with clopidogrel by inhibiting adenosine uptake by red blood cells.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Deaminase; Aged; C-Reactive Protein; Chromatography, Liquid; Clopidogrel; Cyclic AMP; Erythrocytes; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), a dual antiplatelet regimen with an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist plus aspirin has become the cornerstone of treatment. The third-generation thienopyridine prasugrel and the cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine ticagrelor provide a greater, more rapid and consistent platelet inhibition compared to their predecessor clopidogrel. Based on their advantages over clopidogrel in two landmark studies, both drugs received a class I recommendation for their use in ACS patients with and without ST segment elevation. Due to differences in ACS populations and conditions investigated, the relative merits of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in the treatment of ACS patients with planned invasive strategy cannot be reliably estimated from independent trials. To date, no direct head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel in terms of clinical outcome exists. The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial is to assess whether ticagrelor is superior to prasugrel in ACS patients with planned invasive strategy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Protocols; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Germany; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Research Design; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Time-to-Treatment; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor outperforms clopidogrel in preventing cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome. Despite the inclusion of a loading dose in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial for all patients randomized to ticagrelor, it may not be necessary in patients receiving ongoing clopidogrel therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess whether a ticagrelor loading dose is associated with a further platelet inhibition during the switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving ongoing antiplatelet treatment.. Fifty patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving aspirin and clopidogrel treatment were randomly assigned to a starting dose of ticagrelor (group 1, 90 mg; group 2, 180 mg). Platelet aggregation was measured using multiple electrode aggregometry and standard light transmission aggregometry just before the switch and at 2, 6, 24, and 72 hours. No relevant difference in platelet aggregation was observed between the 2 study arms at baseline (P=0.256). Residual platelet aggregation was significantly reduced in both arms 2 hours after the first administration of ticagrelor (P<0.001 for both), with no difference in aggregation between groups (multiple electrode aggregometry, 17.6±7.2 versus 18.1±6 U; P=0.281). Similar results were observed with LTA.. Switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor without a reloading dose is feasible, and it does not hinder platelet aggregation inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical relevance of our findings.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01795820.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Substitution; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor reduces thrombotic events compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but may also increase bleeding complications. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related bleeding complications have not previously been compared in clopidogrel and ticagrelor-treated patients outside the controlled environment of clinical trials.. Four hundred and five consecutive CABG patients with acute coronary syndrome were included in a prospective observational study. The patients were treated with aspirin and ticagrelor (n = 173) or aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 232). Ticagrelor/clopidogrel was discontinued 5 days before surgery whenever deemed possible. Major bleeding complications according to modified blood conservation using antifibrinolytics in a randomized trial criteria (postoperative blood loss >1500 ml/12 h, re-exploration, red blood cell transfusion >10 units or death because of bleeding) were compared in all patients and when ticagrelor/clopidogrel was discontinued ≥5 days (n = 280), 2-4 days (n = 40) or 0-1 day before surgery (n = 85).. Major bleeding complications did not differ significantly between ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-treated patients when all patients were compared (14.5 vs 13.8%, P = 0.89). Likewise, there were no significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel when either drug was discontinued ≥5 days before surgery (6.8 vs 9.9%, P = 0.40) or 2-4 days before surgery (6.3 vs 25.0%, P = 0.21). When ticagrelor/clopidogrel was discontinued 0-1 day before surgery, there was a strong trend towards higher incidence of major bleeding in ticagrelor-treated patients (41.0 vs 21.7%, P = 0.063).. There was no difference in major bleeding complications overall or when ticagrelor or clopidogrel was used in accordance with guidelines. In patients on dual antiplatelet medication up to 1 day before surgery, there tended to be more bleeding complications in ticagrelor-treated patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

This study sought to report the treatment effect of ticagrelor on myocardial infarction (MI) and the strategy for and impact of event adjudication in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial.. In PLATO, ticagrelor reduced cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. A clinical events committee (CEC) prospectively defined and adjudicated all suspected MI events, on the basis of events reported by investigators and by triggers on biomarkers. Treatment comparisons used CEC-adjudicated data, and per protocol, excluded silent MI.. Overall, 1,299 (610 ticagrelor, 689 clopidogrel) MIs reported by the CEC occurred during the trial. Of these, 1,097 (504 ticagrelor, 593 clopidogrel) contributed to the primary composite endpoint. Site investigators reported 1,198 (580 ticagrelor, 618 clopidogrel) MIs. Ticagrelor significantly reduced overall MI rates (12-month CEC-adjudicated Kaplan-Meier rates: 5.8% ticagrelor, 6.9% clopidogrel; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.95). Nonprocedural MI (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.01) and MI related to percutaneous coronary intervention or stent thrombosis tended to be lower with ticagrelor. MIs related to coronary artery bypass graft surgery were few, but numerical excess was observed in patients assigned ticagrelor. Analyses of overall MIs using investigator-reported data showed similar results but did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.00).. In patients with ACS, ticagrelor significantly reduced the incidence of MI compared with clopidogrel, with consistent results across most MI subtypes. CEC procedures identified more MI endpoints compared with site investigators. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) for 12 months with ticagrelor compared with generic clopidogrel in Sweden and Denmark.. Decision-analytic model to estimate lifetime costs, life-expectancy, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Event rates, healthcare resource use, and health-related quality of life during 12 months of therapy were estimated from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Beyond 12 months, quality-adjusted survival and costs were estimated conditional on events occurring during the 12 months of therapy. When available, country-specific data were employed in the analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are presented from a healthcare perspective and a broader societal perspective including costs falling outside the healthcare sector in 2010 local currency.. The cost per QALY with ticagrelor compared with generic clopidogrel was SEK 25 022 and DKK 26 892 for Sweden and Denmark, respectively, from a healthcare perspective. The cost per QALY from a broader societal perspective was SEK 24 290 and DKK 25 051 for Sweden and Denmark, respectively.. The cost per QALY of treating ACS-patients with ticagrelor compared with generic clopidogrel is below the conventional thresholds of cost-effectiveness in Sweden and Denmark.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Denmark; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Sweden; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between sex and clinical outcomes and treatment-related complications in patients with ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) randomized to treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.. The associations between sex subgroup and the primary composite outcomes, secondary outcomes, and major bleeding endpoints as well as interaction of sex subgroup with treatment effects were analysed using Cox proportional-hazards models.. Sex was not significantly associated with the probability of the primary composite endpoint [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.02 (0.91-1.16)], or other adverse cardiovascular endpoints. Ticagrelor was similarly more effective than clopidogrel in reducing rates of the primary endpoint in women 11.2 vs. 13.2% [adjusted HR: 0.88 (0.74-1.06)] and men 9.4 vs. 11.1% [adjusted HR: 0.86 (0.76-0.97)] (interaction P-value 0.78), all-cause death in women 5.8 vs. 6.8% [adjusted HR: 0.90 (0.69-1.16)] and men 4.0 vs. 5.7% [adjusted HR: 0.80 (0.67-0.96)] (interaction P-value 0.49), and definite stent thrombosis in women 1.2 vs. 1.4% [adjusted HR: 0.71 (0.36-1.38)] and men 1.4 vs. 2.1% [adjusted HR: 0.63 (0.45-0.89)] (interaction P-value 0.78). The treatments did not differ for PLATO-defined overall major bleeding complications in women [adjusted HR: 1.01 (0.83-1.23)] or men [adjusted HR: 1.10 (0.98-1.24)]. Sex had no significant association with these outcomes (interactions P = 0.43-0.88).. Female sex is not an independent risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in moderate-to-high risk ACS patients. Ticagrelor has a similar efficacy and safety profile in men and women.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Sex Factors; Stents; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The optimal platelet inhibition strategy for ACS patients managed without revascularization is unknown. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in the non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) subgroup of the PLATO trial, in the total cohort, and in the subgroups managed with and without revascularization within 10 days of randomization.. We performed a retrospective analysis of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke. Among 18 624 PLATO patients, 11 080 (59%) were categorized as NSTE-ACS at randomization. During the initial 10 days, 74% had angiography, 46% PCI, and 5% CABG. In NSTE-ACS patients, the primary endpoint was reduced with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel [10.0 vs. 12.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74-0.93], as was myocardial infarction (6.6 vs. 7.7%; HR 0.86; 95% CI = 0.74-0.99), cardiovascular death (3.7 vs. 4.9%; HR 0.77; 95% CI = 0.64-0.93), and all-cause death (4.3 vs. 5.8%; HR 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64-0.90). Major bleeding rate was similar between treatment groups (13.4 vs. 12.6%; HR 1.07; 95% CI = 0.95-1.19), but ticagrelor was associated with an increase in non-CABG major bleeding (4.8 vs. 3.8%; HR 1.28; 95% CI = 1.05-1.56). Within the first 10 days, 5366 (48.4%) patients were managed without revascularization. Regardless of revascularization or not, ticagrelor consistently reduced the primary outcome (HR 0.86 vs. 0.85, interaction P = 0.93), and all-cause death (HR 0.75 vs. 0.73, interaction P = 0.89) with no significant increase in overall major bleeding.. In patients with NSTE-ACS, benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in reducing ischaemic events and total mortality was consistent with the overall PLATO trial, independent of actually performed revascularization during the initial 10 days.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Particularly in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, the interplay between vascular and platelet function has been postulated to have direct clinical implications. The present trial is designed to test the effect of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor on multiple parameters of vascular function, platelet aggregation, oxidative and inflammatory stress before and up to 4 weeks after coronary artery stenting.. The study is designed as a three-arm, parallel design, randomised, investigator-blinded study. Patients with unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent will be randomised to receive 600 mg clopidogrel, 60 mg prasugrel or 180 mg ticagrelor followed by oral therapy with the same drug. The primary endpoint of the trial is the impact of antiplatelet treatments on endothelial function as assessed by flow-mediated dilation at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month in patients who have undergone stenting. Secondary endpoints include the impact of study medications on parameters of macrovascular and microvascular function, platelet reactivity, oxidative and inflammatory stress. The study recruitment is currently ongoing and, after an interim analysis which was performed at 50% of the initially planned population, it is planned to continue until July 2015.. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. The trial will provide important pathophysiological insight on the relationship between platelet aggregation and endothelial function, two parameters that have been shown to influence patients' prognosis.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01700322; EudraCT-Nr.: 2011-005305-73. Current V.1.3, from 24 February 2014.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxidative Stress; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Single-Blind Method; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Only limited data exist about the role of point of care CYP2C19 testing in the acute setting in the early phase of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the impact of CYP2C19 loss-of-function point-of-care (POC) genotyping in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy in the emergency setting.. 137 subjects with ACS scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention were consecutively enrolled. Pre- and on-treatment platelet aggregation was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Patients were loaded according to current guideline adherent indications and contraindications for use of P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS. POC genotyping for CYP2C19*2 was performed in the emergency room after obtaining a buccal swab using the Spartan RX CYP2C19 system and obtaining patient's informed consent. Prasugrel and ticagrelor treated patients had significantly lower PR compared to clopidogrel-treated patients. The benefits of prasugrel and ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel treated patients in terms of platelet inhibition were more pronounced in CYP2C19*2 carriers. Non-carriers showed similar inhibition regardless of particular P2Y12 inhibitor treatment. Statistical analyses adjusting for factors associated with response (e.g. smoking) revealed that CYP2C19*2 allele carrier status and loading with different type of P2Y12 receptor blockers were significant predictors of on-treatment platelet reactivity in the early phase of ACS.. The results of this pilot study of treatment of patients in the early phase of ACS indicate that CYP2C19*2 POC genotyping might help to identify patients at risk with poor response to clopidogrel treatment, thereby benefiting from reloading and switching to alternative P2Y12 receptor inhibition.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Humans; Male; Pilot Projects; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Point-of-Care Systems; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Although prompt reperfusion treatment restores normal epicardial flow, microvascular dysfunction may persist in some patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Impaired myocardial perfusion is caused by intraluminal platelets, fibrin thrombi and neutrophil plugging; antiplatelet agents play a significant role in terms of protecting against thrombus microembolization. A novel antiplatelet agent, ticagrelor, is a non-thienopyridine, direct P2Y12 blocker that has shown greater, more rapid and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. However, the effects of ticagrelor on the prevention of microvascular dysfunction are uncertain. The present study is a comparison between clopidogrel and ticagrelor use for preventing microvascular dysfunction in patients with ST elevation or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI, respectively).. The TIME trial is a single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study designed to demonstrate the superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel. A total of 152 patients with a spectrum of STEMI or NSTEMI will undergo prospective random assignment to clopidogrel or ticagrelor (1:1 ratio). The primary endpoint is an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) measured after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); the secondary endpoint is wall motion score index assessed at 3 months by using echocardiography.. The TIME trial is the first study designed to compare the protective effect of clopidogrel and ticagrelor on coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02026219. Registration date: 24 December 2013.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Protocols; Clopidogrel; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Vessels; Humans; Microcirculation; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography

Extensive coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with higher risk. In this substudy of the PLATO trial, we examined the effects of randomized treatment on outcome events and safety in relation to the extent of CAD.. Patients were classified according to presence of extensive CAD (defined as 3-vessel disease, left main disease, or prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery). The trial's primary and secondary end points were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression.. Among 15,388 study patients for whom the extent of CAD was known, 4,646 (30%) had extensive CAD. Patients with extensive CAD had more high-risk characteristics and experienced more clinical events during follow-up. They were less likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (58% vs 79%, P < .001) but more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery (16% vs 2%, P < .001). Ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, reduced the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with extensive CAD (14.9% vs 17.6%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.85 [0.73-0.98]) similar to its reduction in those without extensive CAD (6.8% vs 8.0%, HR 0.85 [0.74-0.98], Pinteraction = .99). Major bleeding was similar with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel among patients with (25.7% vs 25.5%, HR 1.02 [0.90-1.15]) and without (7.3% vs 6.4%, HR 1.14 [0.98-1.33], Pinteraction = .24) extensive CAD.. Patients with extensive CAD have higher rates of recurrent cardiovascular events and bleeding. Ticagrelor reduced ischemic events to a similar extent both in patients with and without extensive CAD, with bleeding rates similar to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To describe specific causes of death and evaluate whether bleeding events and infection contributed to mortality in all ticagrelor-treated and clopidogrel-treated patients with acute coronary syndromes.. In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor significantly reduced rates of vascular and total death compared with clopidogrel. In the 905 patients who died postenrolment in the PLATO trial (n=18 624), reviewers, blinded to study treatment, subclassified direct causes of death and evaluated whether infection or bleeding events contributed to fatal events.. Among vascular deaths, there were significantly fewer sudden deaths (63 (0.7%) vs 98 (1.1%), p<0.01) but no significant difference in deaths caused by acute myocardial infarction (179 (1.9%) vs 194 (2.1%), p=0.43) or heart failure (31 (0.3%) vs 42 (0.5%), p=0.20) with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. For non-vascular deaths, there was no difference between treatments in deaths directly caused by infection. Although, patients treated with ticagrelor were at lower risk for death where infection was either a direct cause or contributed to death (51 (0.5%) vs 76 (0.8%), HR 0.67 (0.47 to 0.95), p<0.05) but not for bleeding (42 (0.5%) vs 42 (0.5%), HR 0.99 (0.65 to 1.53), p=0.98).. In this post hoc analysis, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced total and cardiovascular mortality, which appeared to be mainly mediated by a reduction in sudden death. Importantly, bleeding causing or contributing to death did not differ between treatments.. NCT00391872 (http://www.clinicaltrial.gov).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Confidence Intervals; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Survival Analysis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Platelet reactivity (PR) and bleeding events following therapy with ticagrelor vs prasugrel have not been adequately studied. We aimed to compare PR and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) while on ticagrelor vs prasugrel for one month. Consecutive patients who were discharged either on ticagrelor 90 mg bid maintenance dose (MD) or prasugrel 10 mg MD were invited for PR assessment (VerifyNow, in PRU) at one month. High PR (HPR) was defined as >208 PRU. Bleeding events [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification] were monitored. Out of 937 screened patients, 512 were analysed, 278 under ticagrelor MD and 234 under prasugrel MD. PR at 30 days (C-statistic of the propensity score model 0.63, 0.58-0.67 95% CI, p<0.001) was lower when on ticagrelor compared with prasugrel (33.3, 95% CI 29.3-37.3 vs 84.6, 95% CI 73.6-95.6, p<0.001). In the analysed population more BARC type 1 bleeding events were observed with ticagrelor compared to prasugrel (36.7% vs 28.2%, p=0.047). In 221 propensity score matched pairs, BARC type 1 bleeding rate was marginally higher in ticagrelor vs prasugrel treated patients (35.7% vs 27.1%, p=0.05). BARC type ≥2 events did not differ between groups 5 (2.3%) vs 5 (2.3%). HPR rate was higher for prasugrel-treated patients (5.4% vs 0%, p<0.001). In conclusion, in patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor MD produces a significantly higher platelet inhibition compared to prasugrel MD. This pharmacodynamic difference might be associated with more nuisance bleeding events with ticagrelor use.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this health economic analysis was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel within the German health care system. A two-part decision model was adapted to compare treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in a low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) cohort (≤150 mg) for all ACS patients and subtypes NSTEMI/IA and STEMI. A decision-tree approach was chosen for the first year after initial hospitalization based on trial observations from a subgroup of the PLATO study. Subsequent years were estimated by a Markov model. Following a macro-costing approach, costs were based on official tariffs and published literature. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. One-year treatment with ticagrelor is associated with an estimated 0.1796 life-years gained (LYG) and gained 0.1570 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), respectively, over the lifetime horizon. Overall average cost with ticagrelor is estimated to be EUR 11,815 vs. EUR 11,387 with generic clopidogrel over a lifetime horizon. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was EUR 2,385 per LYG (EUR 2,728 per QALY). Comparing ticagrelor with Plavix(®) or the lowest priced generic clopidogrel, ICER ranges from dominant to EUR 3,118 per LYG (EUR 3,567 per QALY). These findings are robust under various additional sensitivity analyses. Hence, 12 months of ACS treatment using ticagrelor/ASA instead of clopidogrel/ASA may offer a cost-effective therapeutic option, even when the generic price for clopidogrel is employed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Atherosclerosis; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Double-Blind Method; Drugs, Generic; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; Humans; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

It has been postulated that prasugrel might be the preferred treatment option in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic action of ticagrelor versus prasugrel.. In a prospective, single-center, single-blind, crossover study, 30 consecutive ACS patients with DM who had been pretreated with clopidogrel were randomized to either 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily or 10 mg prasugrel once daily with a 15-day treatment period. Platelet reactivity (PR) was assessed with the VerifyNow P2Y12 function assay, measured in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU).. PR was significantly lower after ticagrelor (45.2 PRU [95% CI 27.4-63.1]) compared with prasugrel (80.8 PRU [63.0-98.7]), with a least squares mean difference of -35.6 PRU (-55.2 to -15.9, P = 0.001). High PR rate was 0% for ticagrelor and 3.3% for prasugrel (P = 1.0).. In DM patients with ACS who had been pretreated with clopidogrel and who undergo PCI, ticagrelor achieves a significantly higher platelet inhibition than prasugrel. Both antiplatelet agents effectively treat high PR. The relevance of these findings to the clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in DM patients needs further elucidation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Single-Blind Method; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Prasugrel and ticagrelor provide a superior anti-ischemic action than clopidogrel, with some of ticagrelor's benefits possibly attributed to adenosine-mediated mechanisms. We aimed to compare the effect of maintenance dose of ticagrelor versus prasugrel on coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) during increasing doses of intravenously administered adenosine.. In a prospective, single-center, single-blind, crossover study, 56 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to receive either ticagrelor 90 mg BID or prasugrel 10 mg OD with a 15-day treatment period. At the end of each treatment period, CBFV by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was assessed at baseline and under incremental doses (50 μg/kg per minute, 80 μg/kg per minute, 110 μg/kg per minute, and 140 μg/kg per minute) of adenosine infusion. Maximal CBFV area under the curve was higher for ticagrelor-treated than for prasugrel-treated patients, with a least squares mean difference of 7.16 (95% confidence interval, 2.61-11.7; P=0.003). Maximal CBFV/baseline CBFV ratio was higher with ticagrelor than prasugrel at 50, 80, and 110 μg/kg per minute but not at 140 μg/kg per minute adenosine infusion rate, with mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 0.17 (0.08-0.26; P<0.001), 0.21 (0.02-0.41; P=0.03), 0.24 (0.01-0.47; P=0.04), and 0.14 (-0.12 to 0.4; P=0.3), respectively.. In patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor augments CBFV to a greater extent than prasugrel when incremental doses of adenosine are administered. Although exploratory, these results may represent a pleiotropic action of ticagrelor, possibly contributing to its beneficial effects in such patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Area Under Curve; Blood Flow Velocity; Coronary Circulation; Cross-Over Studies; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Greece; Humans; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents

We evaluated whether electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics were aligned with clinical outcomes and the effect of ticagrelor within the diverse spectrum of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients enrolled in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.. There were 8884 PLATO patients who had baseline ECGs assessed by a core laboratory; of these, 4935 had an ECG at hospital discharge that also was assessed. Associations with study treatment on vascular death or myocardial infarction within 1 year were examined.. At baseline, most patients had either no or ≤0.5 mm of ST-segment depression (57%); 26% had 1.0 mm, and 17% had more extensive depression (>1.0 mm). Across the baseline ST-segment depression strata, there was a consistent treatment benefit with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on vascular death/myocardial infarction. The extent of residual ST-segment depression at discharge was similar in the treatment groups, and the treatment effect did not differ by the extent of discharge ST-segment depression. There was a progressive increase in vascular death/myocardial infarction with increasing extent of baseline ST-segment depression (1.0 mm [vs no/0.5 mm]: hazard ratio [HR] 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.45; >1.0 mm: HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.24-1.78; P <.001) and at discharge (HR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.61; HR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.54-2.95; P <.001).. The treatment effect of ticagrelor among non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients was consistently expressed across all baseline ST-segment depression strata. There was no indication of an anti-ischemic benefit of ticagrelor as reflected on the discharge ECG. Our data affirm the independent prognostic relationship of both baseline and hospital discharge ST-segment depression on outcomes within 1 year in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on health-related quality of life in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.. The PLATO trial showed that ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel for the prevention of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in a broad population of patients with acute coronary syndromes.. HRQOL in the PLATO study was measured at hospital discharge, 6-month visit, and end of treatment (anticipated at 12 months) by using the EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire. All patients who had an EQ-5D questionnaire assessment at discharge from the index hospitalization (n = 15,212) were included in the study. Patients who died prior to the end-of-treatment visit were assigned an EQ-5D questionnaire value of 0.. The EQ-5D questionnaire value at discharge among 7631 patients assigned to ticagrelor was 0.847 and among 7581 patients assigned to clopidogrel was 0.846 (P = 0.71). At 12 months, the mean EQ-5D questionnaire value was 0.840 for ticagrelor and 0.832 for clopidogrel (P = 0.046). Excluding patients who died resulted in mean EQ-5D questionnaire values of 0.864 among ticagrelor patients and 0.863 among clopidogrel patients (P = 0.69).. In patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a lower mortality but otherwise no difference in quality of life relative to treatment with clopidogrel. The improved survival and reduction in cardiovascular events with ticagrelor are therefore obtained with no loss in quality of life.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

The PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) angiographic substudy sought to compare the efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel with respect to angiographic outcomes before and after PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome.. Greater platelet inhibition has been associated with improved angiographic outcomes before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it was hypothesized that treatment with ticagrelor, which achieves more rapid, higher, and more consistent platelet inhibition, would be associated with improved angiographic outcomes when compared with those of clopidogrel treatment.. The angiographic cohort consists of 2,616 patients drawn from the 18,624-patient PLATO trial. Clopidogrel naïve or pre-treated patients were randomized to 180 mg of ticagrelor or 300 mg of clopidogrel (75 mg for clopidogrel pre-treated patients). PCI patients were administered, as per treatment group: 1) an additional 90 mg of ticagrelor if >24 h following the initial loading dose; or 2) an optional further 300 mg of clopidogrel or placebo (total 600 mg) prior to PCI. The substudy primary endpoint was the incidence of post-PCI TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMPG 3) among patients who received a study drug prior to PCI.. In total, 21.3% of patients were pretreated with clopidogrel prior to randomization. There was a short time interval between randomization and PCI (median: 0.68 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.30 to 2.21] h) among all patients. Post-PCI TMPG 3 was similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (47.1% vs. 46.9%; p = 0.96). Likewise, the following pre-PCI outcomes were similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively: TMPG 3 (30.5% vs. 31.2%), TIMI flow grade 3 (37.1% vs. 39.3%), corrected TIMI frame count (median: 100 vs. 71 frames), TIMI thrombus grade 0 (24.1% vs. 27.6%), minimum lumen diameter (median: 0.3 [IQR: 0.0 to 0.6] vs. 0.3 [IQR: 0.0 to 0.6] mm) and percentage of diameter stenosis (median: 89 [IQR: 78 to 100] vs. 89 [IQR: 77 to 100]).. Neither coronary flow nor myocardial perfusion, evaluated on coronary angiograms performed before or following PCI procedures within a few hours after the start of oral antiplatelet treatment in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, demonstrated a difference with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to describe the effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on stent thrombosis in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.. Of 18 624 patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes, 11 289 (61%) had at least 1 intracoronary stent. Ticagrelor reduced stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel across all definitions: definite, 1.37% (n=71) versus 1.93% (n=105; hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.90; P=0.0091); definite or probable, 2.21% (n=118) versus 2.87% (n=157; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P=0.017); and definite, probable, and possible, 2.94% (n=154) versus 3.77 (n=201; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95). The reduction in definite stent thrombosis was consistent regardless of acute coronary syndrome type, presence of diabetes mellitus, stent type (drug-eluting or bare metal stent), CYP2C19 genetic status, loading dose of aspirin, dose of clopidogrel before randomization, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors at randomization. The reduction in stent thrombosis with ticagrelor was numerically greater for late (>30 days; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96) and subacute (4 hours-30 days; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93) compared with acute (<24 hours; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.43-2.05) stent thrombosis or for patients compliant to therapy (ie, taking blinded study treatment ≥80% of the time) compared with less compliant patients. Randomization to ticagrelor was a strong independent inverse predictor of definite stent thrombosis (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88).. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes, with consistent benefit across a broad range of patient, stent, and treatment characteristics.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Diseases; Humans; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ascertain platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial conduct.. We examined information from the FDA complete response review.. FDA Medical Review indicated that (1) patients on ticagrelor monitored by the study sponsor had a lower odds ratio for the primary endpoint (p = 0.0004) versus ticagrelor patients monitored by a third party Clinical Research Organisation (CRO) independent of the study sponsor, (2) a significant interaction existed between ticagrelor and regions monitored by the study sponsor for all cause mortality through study end in favor of ticagrelor (p = 0.006), (3) ticagrelor faired worse than clopidogrel when regions were monitored independent of the study sponsor by a third party Contract Research Organisation (United States, Russia and Georgia), (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.59, p = 0.2022), (4) 46% of all primary endpoint events favoring ticagrelor came from just two countries (Poland and Hungary), (5) PLATO was easy to unblind by breaking open a clopidogrel/dummy clopidogrel tablet with at least 452 patients being unblinded prior to the database lock, (6) significantly more cardiac events submitted for clopidogrel counted in the primary analysis as a myocardial infarction (MI) compared to those submitted for ticagrelor (p < 0.0001), (7) significantly more ticagrelor subjects hospitalized after an index event/hospitalization were not being reported as having a primary event compared to clopidogrel (p = 0.002 in favor of ticagrelor), (8) site-reported MI was not significantly reduced with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, (9) an estimated 23 definite or possible cardiovascular events or deaths on ticagrelor were either not submitted for adjudication, inactivated, deleted or were downgraded to "softer" endpoints (this was not shown in the FDA review for clopidogrel), and (10) four FDA reviewers voted for non-approval of ticagrelor.. The FDA report highlights what appear to be multiple serious deficiencies in the reporting of the PLATO results, which clinicians will not have gleaned from the primary publication alone. Individual clinicians may therefore wish to carefully reconsider their practice of ticagrelor prescription for this indication. Guideline bodies should also evaluate the information in its totality.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Endpoint Determination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Reproducibility of Results; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Few data exist about the implementation of contemporary oral antiplatelet treatment guidelines in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. GReek AntiPlatelet rEgistry (GRAPE), initiated on January 2012, is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study focusing on contemporary use of P2Y12 inhibitors. In 1434 patients we evaluated appropriateness of P2Y12 selection initially and at discharge by applying an eligibility-assessing algorithm based on P2Y12 inhibitors' contraindications/specific warnings and precautions.. Appropriate, less preferable and inappropriate P2Y12 inhibitor selections were made initially in 45.8%, 47.2% and 6.6% and at discharge in 64.1%, 29.2% and 6.6% of patients, respectively. The selection of clopidogrel was most commonly less preferable, both initially (69.7%) and at discharge (75.6%). Appropriate selection of newer agents was high initially (79.2%-82.8%), with further increase as selection at discharge (89.4%-89.8%). Inappropriate selection of the newer agents was 17.2%-20.8% initially, decreasing to 10.2%-10.6% at discharge. Conditions and co-medications related to increased bleeding risk, presentation with ST elevation myocardial infarction and the absence of reperfusion within the first 24h were the most powerful predictors of appropriate P2Y12 selection initially, whereas age ≥75 years, conditions and co-medications related to increased bleeding risk and regional trends mostly affected appropriate P2Y12 selection at discharge.. In GRAPE, adherence with the recently released guidelines on oral antiplatelet therapy was satisfactory. Clopidogrel was most commonly used as a less preferable selection, while prasugrel or ticagrelor selection was mostly appropriate. Certain factors may predict initial and at discharge guideline implementation. Clinical Trial Registration-clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01774955 http://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practolol; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Registries; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) who present with an acute coronary syndrome have a high risk for recurrent events. Whether intensive antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor might be beneficial compared with clopidogrel is unknown. In this substudy of the PLATO trial, we studied the effects of randomized treatment dependent on history of CABG.. Patients participating in PLATO were classified according to whether they had undergone prior CABG. The trial's primary and secondary end points were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression.. Of the 18,613 study patients, 1,133 (6.1%) had prior CABG. Prior-CABG patients had more high-risk characteristics at study entry and a 2-fold increase in clinical events during follow-up, but less major bleeding. The primary end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was reduced to a similar extent by ticagrelor among patients with (19.6% vs 21.4%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [0.67, 1.24]) and without (9.2% vs 11.0%; adjusted HR, 0.86 [0.77, 0.96]; P(interaction) = .73) prior CABG. Major bleeding was similar with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel among patients with (8.1% vs 8.7%; adjusted HR, 0.89 [0.55, 1.47]) and without (11.8% vs 11.4%; HR, 1.08 [0.98, 1.20]; P(interaction) = .46) prior CABG.. Prior-CABG patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome are a high-risk cohort for death and recurrent cardiovascular events but have a lower risk for major bleeding. Similar to the results in no-prior-CABG patients, ticagrelor was associated with a reduction in ischemic events without an increase in major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor and generic clopidogrel as add-on therapy to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), from a Swiss perspective.. Based on the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, one-year mean healthcare costs per patient treated with ticagrelor or generic clopidogrel were analysed from a payer perspective in 2011. A two-part decision-analytic model estimated treatment costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years and the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor and generic clopidogrel in patients with ACS up to a lifetime at a discount of 2.5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were performed.. Over a patient's lifetime, treatment with ticagrelor generates an additional 0.1694 QALYs and 0.1999 life years at a cost of CHF 260 compared with generic clopidogrel. This results in an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of CHF 1,536 per QALY and CHF 1,301 per life year gained. Ticagrelor dominated generic clopidogrel over the five-year and one-year periods with treatment generating cost savings of CHF 224 and 372 while gaining 0.0461 and 0.0051 QALYs and moreover 0.0517 and 0.0062 life years, respectively. Univariate sensitivity analyses confirmed the dominant position of ticagrelor in the first five years and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed a high probability of cost-effectiveness over a lifetime.. During the first five years after ACS, treatment with ticagrelor dominates generic clopidogrel in Switzerland. Over a patient's lifetime, ticagrelor is highly cost-effective compared with generic clopidogrel, proven by ICERs significantly below commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Diagnostic Imaging; Double-Blind Method; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Health Care Costs; Hospitalization; Humans; Markov Chains; Myocardial Reperfusion; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Switzerland; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are well documented in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes trial (PLATO). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of treating ACS patients for 12 months with ticagrelor compared with generic clopidogrel.. Event rates, health-care costs, and health-related quality of life during 12 months of therapy with either ticagrelor or generic clopidogrel were estimated from PLATO. Beyond 12 months, quality-adjusted survival and costs were estimated conditional on whether a non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), a non-fatal stroke, or no MI or stroke occurred during the 12 months of therapy. Lifetime costs, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for both treatment strategies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were presented from a health-care perspective in 2010 Euros (€) applying unit costs and life tables from a Swedish setting in the base-case analysis. Treatment with ticagrelor was associated with increased health-care costs of €362 and a QALY gain of 0.13 compared with generic clopidogrel, yielding a cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor of €2753. The cost per life year gained was €2372. The results were consistent in major subgroups. Sensitivity analyses showed a cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor of ∼€7300 under certain scenarios.. Based on clinical and health-economic evidence from the PLATO study, treating ACS patients with ticagrelor for 12 months is associated with a cost per QALY below generally accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Life Expectancy; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

We sought to evaluate the effect of potent platelet inhibition after acute coronary syndrome on total (ie, first and recurrent) occurrences of any of the primary outcome events (e.g., cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) as well as on other ischemic events, such as urgent revascularization, (severe) recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attacks, and arterial thrombotic events.. In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study, 18 624 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes randomly received ticagrelor (n=9333) or clopidogrel (n=9291). Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate time to first event and hazard ratios. Total events were compared using a Poisson regression model, and time to second event or death was calculated with the Wei Lin Weissfeld method. Patients randomized to ticagrelor had 1057 total primary end point events versus 1225 for patients on clopidogrel (rate ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.93; P=0.003). The number of additional events was numerically lower for ticagrelor (189 versus 205; P=0.40), resulting in a hazard for time to second event/death of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.90; P<0.001) and a number needed to treat of 54. For cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke/(severe) recurrent ischemia/transient ischemic attack/arterial thrombotic events, total events were fewer with ticagrelor (2030 versus 2290; rate ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.95; P<0.001), with fewer recurrent events with ticagrelor (740 versus 834; P=0.01) and a highly significant concurrent reduction in hazard for time to second event or death of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.91; P<0.001). Recurrent PLATO major or Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major non-coronary artery bypass graft bleeding events were infrequent and not different between the two therapies (P=0.96 and 0.38, respectively).. In PLATO, treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel resulted in a reduction in total events, including first and subsequent recurrent cardiovascular events, when compared with clopidogrel. These types of analyses demonstrate an even greater absolute benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel than previously reported.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

We evaluated the predictive ability of cystatin C and creatinine-based estimations of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), including the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation, in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with (STE-ACS) or without (NSTE-ACS) ST elevation in a large contemporary ACS population.. Concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine, as well as eGFR at randomization, were measured in 16 401 patients in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study and evaluated as predictors of the composite end point of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction within 1 year. Two Cox proportional hazards models were used, the first adjusting for clinical characteristics and the second for clinical characteristics plus the biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin I, and C-reactive protein.. The median cystatin C value was 0.83 mg/L. Increasing quartiles of cystatin C were strongly associated with poor outcome (6.9%, 7.1%, 9.5%, and 16.2%). The fully adjusted hazard ratios per SD of cystatin C in the NSTE-ACS and STE-ACS populations were 1.12 (95% CI 1.04-1.20) (n=8053) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.97-1.17) (n=5278), respectively. There was no significant relationship of cystatin C with type of ACS (STE or NSTE). c Statistics ranged from 0.6923 (cystatin C) to 0.6941 (CKD-EPI).. Cystatin C concentration contributes independently in predicting the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in NSTE-ACS, with no interaction by type of ACS. CKD-EPI exhibited the largest predictive value of all renal markers. Nevertheless, the additive predictive value of cystatin C or creatinine-based eGFR measures in the unselected ACS patient is small.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Clopidogrel; Creatinine; Cystatin C; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Precursors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Troponin I

Ticagrelor, when compared with clopidogrel, reduced the 12-month risk of vascular death/myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. This prespecified ECG substudy explored whether ticagrelor's association with vascular death and myocardial infarction within 1 year would be amplified by (1) the extent of baseline ST shift and (2) subsequently associated with fewer residual ST changes at hospital discharge.. ECGs were evaluated centrally in a core laboratory in 3122 ticagrelor- and 3084 clopidogrel-assigned patients having at least 1 mm ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads as identified by site investigators on the qualifying ECG. Patients with greater ST-segment shift at baseline had higher rates of vascular death/myocardial infarction within 1 year. Among those who also had an ECG at hospital discharge (n=4798), patients with ≥50% ΣST-deviation (ΣST-dev) resolution had higher event-free survival than those with incomplete resolution (6.4% versus 8.8%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.69 (0.54-0.88), P=0.003). The extent of ΣST-dev resolution was similar irrespective of treatment assignment. The benefit of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on clinical events was consistent irrespective of the extent of baseline ΣST-dev (P(interaction)=0.728). When stratified according to conventional times from symptom onset, ie, ≤3 hours, 3 to 6 hours, >6 hours, the extent of baseline ΣST-dev declined progressively over time. As time from symptom onset increased beyond 3 hours, the benefit of ticagrelor appeared to be more pronounced; however, the interaction between time and treatment was not significant (P=0.175).. Ticagrelor did not modify ΣST-dev resolution at discharge nor was its benefit affected by the extent of baseline ΣST-dev. These hypothesis-generating observations suggest that the main effects of ticagrelor may not relate to the rapidity or the completeness of acute reperfusion, but rather the prevention of recurrent vascular events by more powerful platelet inhibition or other mechanisms.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Baseline Q waves may provide additional value compared with time from the onset of symptoms in predicting outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation. We evaluated whether baseline Q waves superseded time from symptom onset as a prognostic marker of one-year mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Our study was derived from data from patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes trial. Q waves on the baseline electrocardiogram were evaluated by a blinded core laboratory. We assessed the associations between baseline Q waves and time from symptom onset to percutaneous coronary intervention with peak biomarkers, ST-segment resolution on the discharge electrocardiogram, and one-year all-cause and vascular mortality.. Of 4341 patients with ST-segment elevation, 46% had baseline Q waves. Compared to those without Q waves, those with baseline Q waves were older, more frequently male, had higher heart rates, more advanced Killip class and had a longer time between the onset of symptoms and percutaneous coronary intervention. They also had higher one-year all-cause mortality than patients without baseline Q waves (baseline Q waves: 4.9%; no baseline Q waves: 2.8%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.45, p < 0.001). Complete ST-segment resolution was greatest and all-cause mortality lowest among those with symptom onset three hours or less before percutaneous coronary intervention and no baseline Q waves. After multivariable adjustment, baseline Q waves, but not time from symptom onset, were associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-2.01, p = 0.046) and vascular mortality (adjusted HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.28, p = 0.02).. The presence of baseline Q waves provides useful additional prognostic insight into the clinical outcome of patients with ST-segment elevation. Clinical Trials.gov registration no. NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Creatine Kinase, MB Form; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Survival Analysis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Troponin I; Troponin T

Ticagrelor is a new, direct acting, reversibly binding P2Y12 receptor antagonist with more potent inhibition of platelets than clopidogrel and which does not require metabolic activation. It was compared with clopidogrel, on a background of the standard of care in a randomized trial in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study, on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety results from the global, prospective trial in a broad population [ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients] with ACS.. The main findings were a significant reduction of the primary outcome (death from vascular causes/myocardial infarction/stroke) with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel [9.8 versus 11.7% (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.92); P < 0.001] without a significant increase in PLATO-defined major bleeding (11.6 versus 11.2%, respectively; P = 0.43), but a higher occurrence of noncoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) related major bleeding (4.5 versus 3.8%; P = 0.026). In addition, there was a significant reduction in vascular mortality (4.0 versus 5.1%; P = 0.001). The findings were consistent in all subgroups, such as for STEMI, NSTEMI, planned invasive or noninvasive strategy, diabetes, renal function, and CABG.. Among patients with an ACS with or without ST-segment elevation, treatment with ticagrelor, as compared with clopidogrel, significantly reduced the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke without an increase in the rate of overall major bleeding but with an increase in the rate of nonprocedure-related bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Statistics as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States

Patients with acute coronary syndromes and history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) have an increased rate of recurrent cardiac events and intracranial hemorrhages.. We evaluated treatment effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome with and without a history of prior stroke or TIA in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Of the 18 624 randomized patients, 1152 (6.2%) had a history of stroke or TIA. Such patients had higher rates of myocardial infarction (11.5% versus 6.0%), death (10.5% versus 4.9%), stroke (3.4% versus 1.2%), and intracranial bleeding (0.8% versus 0.2%) than patients without prior stroke or TIA. Among patients with a history of stroke or TIA, the reduction of the primary composite outcome and total mortality at 1 year with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel was consistent with the overall trial results: 19.0% versus 20.8% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.13; interaction P=0.84) and 7.9% versus 13.0% (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.91). The overall PLATO-defined bleeding rates were similar: 14.6% versus 14.9% (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.37), and intracranial bleeding occurred infrequently (4 versus 4 cases, respectively).. Patients with acute coronary syndrome with a prior history of ischemic stroke or TIA had higher rates of clinical outcomes than patients without prior stroke or TIA. However, the efficacy and bleeding results of ticagrelor in these high-risk patients were consistent with the overall trial population, with a favorable clinical net benefit and associated impact on mortality.. URL: http://www.clinicatrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The study aimed to compare the antiplatelet action of ticagrelor with prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) while on clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor provide stronger platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel. Both agents are efficacious in patients with HTPR while on clopidogrel, but direct comparison between them has not yet been reported.. In a prospective, single-center, single-blind study, 44 (of 139 screened, 31.7%) ACS patients with HTPR while on clopidogrel 24 h post-PCI were randomized to either ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or prasugrel 10 mg once daily for 15 days with a crossover directly to the alternate treatment for another 15 days. HTPR was defined as platelet reactivity units (PRU) ≥ 235 as assessed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 function assay.. The primary endpoint of platelet reactivity at the end of the 2 treatment periods was lower for ticagrelor (32.9 PRU, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.7 to 47.2) compared with prasugrel (101.3 PRU, 95% CI: 86.8 to 115.7) with a least squares mean difference of -68.3 PRU (95% CI: -88.6 to -48.1; p < 0.001). The secondary endpoint of HTPR rate was 0% for ticagrelor and 2.4% for prasugrel (1 of 42, p = 0.5). No patient exhibited a major bleeding event at either treatment group.. In patients with ACS exhibiting HTPR while on clopidogrel 24 h post-PCI, ticagrelor produces a significantly higher platelet inhibition compared with prasugrel. (Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT01360437).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Habitual smoking has been associated with increased platelet reactivity, increased risk of thrombotic complications and greater efficacy of clopidogrel therapy over placebo. In the PLATO trial, ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reduced the primary composite end point of vascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, without increasing overall rates of major bleeding. We evaluated the results in relation to smoking habits.. Interactions between habitual smokers (n = 6678) and in ex/nonsmokers (n = 11,932) and the effects of randomized treatments on ischemic and bleeding outcomes were evaluated by Cox regression analyses.. Habitual smokers had an overall lower risk profile and more often ST-elevation ACS. After adjustment for baseline imbalances, habitual smoking was associated with a higher incidence of definite stent thrombosis (adjusted HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.07-1.94]); there were no significant associations with other ischemic or bleeding end points. The effects of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel were consistent for all outcomes regardless of smoking status. Thus, there was a similar reduction in the primary composite end point for habitual smokers (adjusted HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.68-1.00]) and ex/nonsmokers (adjusted HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-1.00]) (interaction P = .50), and in definite stent thrombosis for habitual smokers (adjusted HR, 0.59 [0.39-0.91]) and ex/nonsmokers (adjusted HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.45-1.07]) (interaction P = .61).. In patients hospitalized with ACS, habitual smoking is associated with a greater risk of subsequent stent thrombosis. The reduction of vascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis by ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel is consistent regardless of smoking habits.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Smoking; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome are at high risk of recurrent ischemic events and death, and for both antithrombotic therapy and catheter-based complications. This prespecified analysis investigates the effect and treatment-related complications of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients (≥75 years of age) with acute coronary syndrome compared with those <75 years of age.. The association between age and the primary composite outcome, as well as major bleeding were evaluated in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial using Cox proportional hazards. Similar models were used to evaluate the interaction of age with treatment effects. Hazard ratios were adjusted for baseline characteristics. The clinical benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel was not significantly different between patients aged ≥75 years of age (n=2878) and those <75 years of age (n=15 744) with respect to the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (interaction P=0.56), myocardial infarction (P=0.33), cardiovascular death (P=0.47), definite stent thrombosis (P=0.81), or all-cause mortality (P=0.76). No increase in PLATO-defined overall major bleeding with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel was observed in patients aged ≥75 years (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.27) or patients aged <75 years (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.15). Dyspnea and ventricular pauses were more common during ticagrelor than clopidogrel treatment, with no evidence of an age-by-treatment interaction.. The significant clinical benefit and overall safety of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients in the PLATO cohort were not found to depend on age.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Patient Safety; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study investigated the differences in specific causes of post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) deaths in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial.. In the PLATO trial, patients assigned to ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel and who underwent CABG had significantly lower total and cardiovascular mortality.. In the 1,261 patients with CABG performed within 7 days after stopping study drug, reviewers blinded to treatment assignment classified causes of death into subcategories of vascular and nonvascular, and specifically identified bleeding or infection events that either caused or subsequently contributed to death.. Numerically more vascular deaths occurred in the clopidogrel versus the ticagrelor group related to myocardial infarction (14 vs. 10), heart failure (9 vs. 6), arrhythmia or sudden death (9 vs. 3), and bleeding, including hemorrhagic stroke (7 vs. 2). Clopidogrel was also associated with an excess of nonvascular deaths related to infection (8 vs. 2). Among factors directly causing or contributing to death, bleeding and infections were more common in the clopidogrel group compared with the ticagrelor group (infections: 16 vs. 6, p < 0.05, and bleeding: 27 vs. 9, p < 0.01, for clopidogrel and ticagrelor, respectively).. The mortality reduction with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel following CABG in the PLATO trial was associated with fewer deaths from cardiovascular, bleeding, and infection complications. (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes [PLATO]; NCT00391872).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To investigate if ticagrelor treatment and other clinical characteristics were associated with increased cystatin C concentrations and if a deterioration in estimated renal function was associated with worse outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. Plasma cystatin C concentrations were determined within 24 hours of admission (baseline), at discharge, 1 month, and 6 months in the PLATO trial. The changes over time in relation to randomized treatment were analyzed by analysis of covariance. C-statistics and the relative Integrated Discrimination Improvement of the cystatin C concentrations regarding the primary outcome (cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction) was evaluated by multivariable analysis including background characteristics and biomarkers: N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and Troponin I.. Mean cystatin C concentrations in 2133 ticagrelor- and 2162 clopidogrel-treated patients were at baseline (0.86 mg/L and 0.86 mg/L), discharge (1.01 mg/L and 0.98 mg/L) (P < .0005), 1 month (1.00 mg/L and 0.98 mg/L) (P = .12), and 6 months (1.00 mg/L and 0.99 mg/L) (P = .17), respectively. Age, heart failure, and type of ACS were major determinants of the cystatin C concentration. c Statistics and the relative Integrated Discrimination Improvement of the primary outcome for the baseline cystatin C concentration were 0.687 and 5.2%, compared to 0.684 and 4.5% at discharge (n = 4034) and 0.693 and 5.1% at one month (n = 3096), respectively.. Mean cystatin C concentrations increased in ACS patients, most importantly determined by age. The initial greater increase in ticagrelor-treated patients was not sustained over time. Risk prediction did not improve with serial measurements of renal markers.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Cystatin C; Female; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to determine whether ticagrelor increased the risk of ventricular pauses compared with clopidogrel and whether these pauses were associated with any clinical bradycardic events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.. Ticagrelor, an oral reversibly binding P2Y(12) inhibitor, provides more potent and consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel but in a phase II study was associated with increased risk for ventricular pauses. A prospective continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) assessment was therefore performed within the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) study comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes.. Patients in the cECG assessment had planned 7-day cECG recording initiated at the time of randomization (week 1), which was within 24 h of symptom onset, and then repeated at 1 month after randomization during the convalescent phase. The principal safety endpoint was the incidence of ventricular pauses lasting at least 3 s. Investigators also reported symptomatic bradycardic adverse events during the entire study duration (median 277 days).. A total of 2,908 patients were included in the cECG assessment, of whom 2,866 (98.5%) had week 1 recordings, 1,991 (68.4%) had 1-month recordings, and 1,949 (67.0%) had both. During the first week after randomization, ventricular pauses ≥3 s occurred more frequently in patients receiving ticagrelor than clopidogrel (84 [5.8%] vs. 51 [3.6%]; relative risk: 1.61; p = 0.006). At 1 month, pauses ≥3 s occurred overall less frequently and were similar between treatments (2.1% vs. 1.7%). Most were ventricular pauses, and the greatest excess associated with ticagrelor were asymptomatic, sinoatrial nodal in origin (66%), and nocturnal. There were no differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the incidence of clinically reported bradycardic adverse events, including syncope, pacemaker placement, and cardiac arrest.. In the PLATO cECG assessment, more patients treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel had ventricular pauses, which were predominantly asymptomatic, sinoatrial nodal in origin, and nocturnal and occurred most frequently in the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes. There were no apparent clinical consequences related to the excess in ventricular pauses in patients assigned to ticagrelor. (A Comparison of AZD6140 and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Bradycardia; Clopidogrel; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in patients in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial who at randomisation were planned for a non-invasive treatment strategy.. Pre-specified analysis of pre-randomisation defined subgroup of prospective randomised clinical trial.. 862 centres in 43 countries.. 5216 (28%) of 18,624 patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome who were specified as planned for non-invasive management.. Randomised treatment with ticagrelor (n=2601) versus clopidogrel (2615).. Primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke; their individual components; and PLATO defined major bleeding during one year.. 2183 (41.9%) patients had coronary angiography during their initial hospital admission, 1065 (20.4%) had percutaneous coronary intervention, and 208 (4.0%) had coronary artery bypass surgery. Cumulatively, 3143 (60.3%) patients had been managed non-invasively by the end of follow-up. The incidence of the primary end point was lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (12.0% (n=295) v 14.3% (346); hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.00; P=0.04). Overall mortality was also lower (6.1% (147) v 8.2% (195); 0.75, 0.61 to 0.93; P=0.01). The incidence of total major bleeding (11.9% (272) v 10.3% (238); 1.17, 0.98 to 1.39; P=0.08) and non-coronary artery bypass grafting related major bleeding (4.0% (90) v 3.1% (71); 1.30, 0.95 to 1.77; P=0.10) was numerically higher with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel.. In patients with acute coronary syndrome initially intended for non-invasive management, the benefits of ticagrelor over clopidogrel were consistent with those from the overall PLATO results, indicating the broad benefits of P2Y12 inhibition with ticagrelor regardless of intended management strategy.. Clinical trials NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

AIMS To describe the incidence of dyspnoea and its associations with demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study. METHODS AND RESULTS In the PLATO study, 18 624 patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel [300-600 mg loading dose (LD), 75 mg daily] or ticagrelor (180 mg LD, 90 mg b.i.d.). The occurrence of reported dyspnoea adverse events (AEs) was analysed in the 18 421 patients who received at least one dose of study medication in relation to demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes and other associations of patients with and without dyspnoea. A total of 1339 ticagrelor-treated patients (14.5%) and 798 clopidogrel-treated patients (8.7%) had a dyspnoea AE following randomization, with respectively 39 (0.4%) and 24 (0.3%) classified as severe in intensity. Excluding dyspnoea AEs occurring after the secondary endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), the yearly rates of the efficacy endpoints in dyspnoea AE patients in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups were: for the primary composite of CV death, MI, and stroke, 8.8 and 10.4% (unadjusted P = 0.25; adjusted P = 0.54); for CV death, 3.1 and 4.8% (unadjusted P = 0.024; adjusted P = 0.18); and for total death 3.7 and 6.2% (unadjusted P = 0.004; adjusted P = 0.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Ticagrelor-related dyspnoea is usually mild or moderate in intensity and does not appear to be associated with differences concerning any efficacy or safety outcomes with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel therapy in ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial showed that ticagrelor reduced the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared to clopidogrel but was associated with increased incidence of dyspnea. This substudy assessed whether ticagrelor affects pulmonary function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: 199 patients enrolled in the PLATO trial and receiving randomized treatment with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 101) or clopidogrel 75 mg/day (n = 98) took part in the pulmonary function substudy. Patients with advanced lung disease, congestive heart failure, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery after the index event were excluded. Pulse oximetry (blood oxygen saturation), spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity before and 20 minutes after inhalation of a β(2) agonist), lung volumes (total lung capacity, functional residual capacity, residual volume), and diffusion capacity were performed after patients received study medication for 30 to 40 days. Tests were then repeated <10 days before and approximately 30 days after the discontinuation of study medication. After a mean treatment duration of 31 days, there were no differences between the groups for any of the pulmonary function parameters. At the end of treatment (mean 211 days) and after the discontinuation of study medication (mean 32 days after the last dose), there was also no evidence of a change in pulmonary function in either group. For example, forced expiratory volume in 1 second values before β(2) agonist inhalation in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups were 2.81 ± 0.73 and 2.70 ± 0.84 L, respectively, at the first visit and did not change significantly at subsequent visits. In conclusion, no effect of ticagrelor on pulmonary function was seen in this cohort of patients with acute coronary syndromes compared to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxygen Consumption; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Respiratory Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

AIMS More intense platelet-directed therapy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may increase bleeding risk. The aim of the current analysis was to determine the rate, clinical impact, and predictors of major and fatal bleeding complications in the PLATO study. METHODS AND RESULTS PLATO was a randomized, double-blind, active control international, phase 3 clinical trial in patients with acute ST elevation and non-ST-segment elevation ACS. A total of 18 624 patients were randomized to either ticagrelor, a non-thienopyridine, reversibly binding platelet P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, or clopidogrel in addition to aspirin. Patients randomized to ticagrelor and clopidogrel had similar rates of PLATO major bleeding (11.6 vs. 11.2%; P = 0.43), TIMI major bleeding (7.9 vs. 7.7%, P = 0.56) and GUSTO severe bleeding (2.9 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.22). Procedure-related bleeding rates were also similar. Non-CABG major bleeding (4.5 vs. 3.8%, P = 0.02) and non-procedure-related major bleeding (3.1 vs. 2.3%, P = 0.05) were more common in ticagrelor-treated patients, primarily after 30 days on treatment. Fatal bleeding and transfusion rates did not differ between groups. There were no significant interactions for major bleeding or combined minor plus major bleeding between treatment groups and age ≥75 years, weight <60 kg, region, chronic kidney disease, creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, aspirin dose >325 mg on the day of randomization, pre-randomization clopidogrel administration, or clopidogrel loading dose. CONCLUSION Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar total major bleeding but increased non-CABG and non-procedure-related major bleeding, primarily after 30 days on study drug treatment. Fatal bleeding was low and did not differ between groups.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Variation in and irreversibility of platelet inhibition with clopidogrel has led to controversy about its optimum dose and timing of administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We compared ticagrelor, a more potent reversible P2Y12 inhibitor with clopidogrel in such patients.. At randomisation, an invasive strategy was planned for 13 408 (72.0%) of 18 624 patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndromes (with or without ST elevation). In a double-blind, double-dummy study, patients were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to ticagrelor and placebo (180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice a day), or to clopidogrel and placebo (300-600 mg loading dose or continuation with maintenance dose followed by 75 mg per day) for 6-12 months. All patients were given aspirin. The primary composite endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00391872.. 6732 patients were assigned to ticagrelor and 6676 to clopidogrel. The primary composite endpoint occurred in fewer patients in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (569 [event rate at 360 days 9.0%] vs 668 [10.7%], hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94; p=0.0025). There was no difference between clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups in the rates of total major bleeding (691 [11.6%] vs 689 [11.5%], 0.99 [0.89-1.10]; p=0.8803) or severe bleeding, as defined according to the Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded coronary arteries, (198 [3.2%] vs 185 [2.9%], 0.91 [0.74-1.12]; p=0.3785).. Ticagrelor seems to be a better option than clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom an early invasive strategy is planned.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Inflammation is a key factor in the development of atherosclerotic disease and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The P2Y(12) receptor antagonists ticagrelor (AZD6140) and clopidogrel may have anti-inflammatory effects. The objective of this analysis from the Dose Confirmation Study Assessing Anti-Platelet Effects of AZD6140 vs Clopidogrel in NSTEMI 2 (DISPERSE 2) trial was to compare ticagrelor and clopidogrel for effects on the inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L).. Ticagrelor inhibits the P2Y(12) receptor and inflammation to a greater extent than clopidogrel in nonST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients.. In a double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial, 990 patients who had been hospitalized within the previous 48 hours with NSTE-ACS were randomized to receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, ticagrelor 180 mg twice daily, or clopidogrel 300 mg initially and then 75 mg once daily. Within the ticagrelor groups, patients were also randomized to receive or not receive a loading dose of ticagrelor 270 mg initially. All patients received standard treatment for ACS, which included 325 mg aspirin initially and 75 to 100 mg aspirin each day subsequently. Inflammatory biomarkers were measured at baseline, upon hospital discharge, and after 4 weeks.. Inflammatory biomarker measurements were not significantly different among treatment groups at baseline, discharge, and 4 weeks.. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel appeared not to differ in this study with respect to the inflammatory biomarkers CRP, IL-6, MPO, and sCD40L in patients with NSTE-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; CD40 Ligand; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Interleukin-6; Male; Middle Aged; Peroxidase; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have high platelet reactivity and are at increased risk of ischaemic events and bleeding post-acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor reduced the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, but with similar rates of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel. We aimed to investigate the outcome with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with DM or poor glycaemic control.. we analysed patients with pre-existing DM (n = 4662), including 1036 patients on insulin, those without DM (n = 13 951), and subgroups based on admission levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; n = 15 150). In patients with DM, the reduction in the primary composite endpoint (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76-1.03), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.01), and stent thrombosis (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.36-1.17) with no increase in major bleeding (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.81-1.12) with ticagrelor was consistent with the overall cohort and without significant diabetes status-by-treatment interactions. There was no heterogeneity between patients with or without ongoing insulin treatment. ticagrelor reduced the primary endpoint, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis in patients with HbA1c above the median (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91; HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.93; and HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-1.00, respectively) with similar bleeding rates (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.12).. ticagrelor, when compared with clopidogrel, reduced ischaemic events in ACS patients irrespective of diabetic status and glycaemic control, without an increase in major bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Glucose; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Reduced renal function is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes and may therefore alter the risk-benefit ratio with antiplatelet therapies. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 12 months but with similar major bleeding rates.. Central laboratory serum creatinine levels were available in 15 202 (81.9%) acute coronary syndrome patients at baseline, and creatinine clearance, estimated by the Cockcroft Gault equation, was calculated. In patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min; n=3237), ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced the primary end point to 17.3% from 22.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.90) with an absolute risk reduction greater than that of patients with normal renal function (n=11 965): 7.9% versus 8.9% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02). In patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced total mortality (10.0% versus 14.0%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89). Major bleeding rates, fatal bleedings, and non-coronary bypass-related major bleedings were not significantly different between the 2 randomized groups (15.1% versus 14.3%; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30; 0.34% versus 0.77%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.54; and 8.5% versus 7.3%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.68). The interactions between creatinine clearance and randomized treatment on any of the outcome variables were nonsignificant.. In acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces ischemic end points and mortality without a significant increase in major bleeding but with numerically more non-procedure-related bleeding.. URL:http://www.clinicatrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chronic Disease; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy aimed to compare the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes.. The PLATO study demonstrated superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes.. Patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose [LD], 75 mg/day) or ticagrelor (180-mg LD, 90 mg twice daily). The effects of maintenance therapy were studied in 69 patients pre- and 2 to 4 h post-dose after at least 28 days. The LD effect was studied in 24 clopidogrel-naive patients. Light transmittance aggregometry (adenosine diphosphate 5 to 20 μM), VerifyNow P2Y12, and VASP phosphorylation assays were performed.. During maintenance therapy, ticagrelor achieved greater suppression of platelet reactivity compared with clopidogrel. The mean maximum light transmittance aggregometry responses (adenosine diphosphate 20 μM) post-maintenance dose were 44±15% for clopidogrel and 28±10% for ticagrelor (p<0.001). High platelet reactivity was seen more frequently in the clopidogrel group. Proton pump inhibitor use was associated with higher platelet reactivity with clopidogrel but not ticagrelor. The ticagrelor LD also achieved greater inhibition of platelet aggregation compared with the clopidogrel LD.. Ticagrelor achieves greater antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, both in the first hours of treatment and during maintenance therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Aspirin and clopidogrel are recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing coronary stenting. Ticagrelor, a reversible oral P2Y12-receptor antagonist, provides faster, greater, and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and may be useful for patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention.. Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), a randomized, double-blind trial, compared ticagrelor with clopidogrel for the prevention of vascular events in 18 624 ACS patients. This report concerns the 7544 ACS patients with STE or left bundle-branch block allocated to either ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose (with provision for 300 mg clopidogrel at percutaneous coronary intervention) followed by 75 mg daily for 6 to 12 months. The reduction of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (10.8% versus 9.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.01; P=0.07) was consistent with the overall PLATO results. There was no interaction between presentation with STE/left bundle-branch block and randomized treatment (interaction P=0.29). Ticagrelor reduced several secondary end points, including myocardial infarction alone (HR, 0.80; P=0.03), total mortality (HR, 0.82; P=0.05), and definite stent thrombosis (HR, 0.66; P=0.03). The risk of stroke, low in both groups, was higher with ticagrelor (1.7% versus 1.0%; HR,1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.48; P=0.02). Ticagrelor did not affect major bleeding (HR, 0.98; P=0.76).. In patients with STE-ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the effects of ticagrelor were consistent with those observed in the overall PLATO trial.. URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Electrocardiography; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The striking success of ticagrelor in PLATO when compared with recent important but far less impressive antiplatelet trials suggests the fundamental difference of ticagrelor from thienopyridines, such as ticlopidone, clopidogrel, and prasugrel. In fact, being a P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor, ticagrelor does not belong to the thienopyridines. The agent is a carbocyclic nucleoside, representing a 'first-in-class' cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine. The chemical structure of ticagrelor indicates that its primary mechanism of action may be via up-regulating plasma and intracellular adenosine content, especially considering the obvious similarity of their molecules. Since ticagrelor does not require hepatic metabolization, an adenosine-promoting mechanism of action is the most likely responsible pathway. Some of the delayed and growing mortality advantage of ticagrelor over clopidogrel cannot be explained by pure antiplatelet properties of the drug, but may be attributed to the off-target pleiothropic effects of the novel agent. An adenosine-mediated mechanism is most likely responsible for the fundamental difference of ticagrelor from established antiplatelet agents, and resulted in less heart failure deaths, and reduction of fatal arrhythmias. However, massive prevention of vascular death mismatched with conventional myocardial infarction rates, and reduction of sepsis-related mortality still lacks reasonable explanation, being under the scope of the regulatory agencies around the world. Future randomized trials of ticagrelor in acute heart failure, sudden death prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation are warranted, and may expand our understanding of the mechanism of action of pyrimidines in general, and ticagrelor in particular.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Antiplatelet therapy is essential treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Current therapies, however, have important limitations affecting their clinical success. Ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, provides faster, greater, and more consistent adenosine diphosphate-receptor inhibition than clopidogrel. The phase III PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial is designed to test the hypothesis that ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel will result in a lower risk of recurrent thrombotic events in a broad patient population with ACS.. PLATO is an international, randomized, double-blind, event-driven trial involving >18,000 patients hospitalized for ST-elevation ACS with scheduled primary percutaneous coronary intervention or for non-ST-elevation ACS. After loading doses of ticagrelor 180 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion (with provision for additional 300 mg clopidogrel at percutaneous coronary intervention), patients will receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for 6 to 12 months on top of acetylsalicylic acid. The primary efficacy end point is time to first occurrence of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety variable is PLATO-defined major bleeding. An extensive substudy program will explore the pathophysiology of ACS, indicators of prognosis and response to treatment, mechanisms of effect and safety of the study medications, health economics, and quality of life.. The PLATO study will provide a pivotal comparison of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor with those of clopidogrel in ACS patients, together with extensive information on treatment outcomes in different subsets of ACS in a broad patient population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is an oral, reversible, direct-acting inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y12 that has a more rapid onset and more pronounced platelet inhibition than clopidogrel.. In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) and clopidogrel (300-to-600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in 18,624 patients admitted to the hospital with an acute coronary syndrome, with or without ST-segment elevation.. At 12 months, the primary end point--a composite of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke--had occurred in 9.8% of patients receiving ticagrelor as compared with 11.7% of those receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.92; P<0.001). Predefined hierarchical testing of secondary end points showed significant differences in the rates of other composite end points, as well as myocardial infarction alone (5.8% in the ticagrelor group vs. 6.9% in the clopidogrel group, P=0.005) and death from vascular causes (4.0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.001) but not stroke alone (1.5% vs. 1.3%, P=0.22). The rate of death from any cause was also reduced with ticagrelor (4.5%, vs. 5.9% with clopidogrel; P<0.001). No significant difference in the rates of major bleeding was found between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (11.6% and 11.2%, respectively; P=0.43), but ticagrelor was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting (4.5% vs. 3.8%, P=0.03), including more instances of fatal intracranial bleeding and fewer of fatal bleeding of other types.. In patients who have an acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation, treatment with ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel significantly reduced the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke without an increase in the rate of overall major bleeding but with an increase in the rate of non-procedure-related bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00391872.)

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Electrocardiography; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Our goal was to compare the safety and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS).. AZD6140 achieves higher mean levels of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease.. A total of 990 patients with NSTE-ACS, treated with aspirin and standard therapy for ACS, were randomized in a 1:1:1 double-blind fashion to receive either twice-daily AZD6140 90 mg, AZD6140 180 mg, or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose plus 75 mg once daily for up to 12 weeks.. The primary end point, the Kaplan-Meier rate of major or minor bleeding through 4 weeks, was 8.1% in the clopidogrel group, 9.8% in the AZD6140 90-mg group, and 8.0% in the AZD6140 180-mg group (p = 0.43 and p = 0.96, respectively, vs. clopidogrel); the major bleeding rates were 6.9%, 7.1%, and 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.91 and p = 0.35, respectively, vs. clopidogrel). Although not statistically significant, favorable trends were seen in the Kaplan-Meier rates of myocardial infarction (MI) over the entire study period (MI: 5.6%, 3.8%, and 2.5%, respectively; p = 0.41 and p = 0.06, respectively, vs. clopidogrel). In a post-hoc analysis of continuous electrocardiograms, mostly asymptomatic ventricular pauses >2.5 s were more common, especially in the AZD6140 180-mg group (4.3%, 5.5%, and 9.9%, respectively; p = 0.58 and p = 0.01, respectively, vs. clopidogrel).. This initial experience with AZD6140 in patients with ACS showed no difference in major bleeding but an increase in minor bleeding at the higher dose with encouraging results on the secondary end point of MI. This agent is currently being studied in a large outcomes trial in 18,000 patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is labelled as a reversible, direct-acting platelet P2Y. Studies were performed in human platelets, with P2Y. Initial studies revealed that a range of P2Y. Ticagrelor binding to P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Blood Platelets; Diphosphates; Drug Inverse Agonism; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor

CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection can reduce cardiovascular (CV) events and bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 12-month cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection for Veterans post-ACS/PCI was evaluated from the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) perspective.. Using average annualized PCI volumes and P2Y12 inhibitor use from VA data, a decision-analytic model simulated CYP2C19 testing vs. no testing outcomes in 2800 hypothetical Veterans receiving PY212 inhibitor for 12 months post-ACS/PCI (74% clopidogrel, 5% prasugrel, and 21% ticagrelor use at baseline without testing). CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) carrier prevalence was 28%. Model inputs were from studies (bleeding/ischaemic events, CYP2C19-guided therapy effect, health state utilities, CYP2C19 LOF carrier prevalence) and VHA administrative data (costs of events, drugs, CYP2C19 testing; PCI volumes, and P2Y12 inhibitor prescriptions). The primary outcome was cost (2020 US${\\$}$) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Base-case scenarios, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were completed. CYP2C19-guided therapy resulted in 496 (24%) escalations (clopidogrel to prasugrel/ticagrelor) and 465 (65%) de-escalations (prasugrel/ticagrelor to clopidogrel). CYP2C19 testing averted 1 stroke, 27 myocardial infarctions, 8 CV-related deaths, and caused 3 bleeds. CYP2C19 testing (vs. no testing) was dominant in the base-case scenario (0.0027 QALYs gained, ${\\$}$527 saved/person) and in 97.1% of simulations, making it cost-effective and high-value. In scenario analyses, de-escalation in conjunction with escalation is required for CYP2C19 testing to be cost-effective and high-value.. In Veterans post-ACS/PCI, CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection can improve CV outcomes and lower costs for the VHA within 12 months of implementation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Veterans

Increased bleeding risks have been documented in patients exposed to P2Y. Clinical outcomes were assessed in 2075 isolated CABG patients, including 375 who had received P2Y. P2Y. Clopidogrel exposure within 5 days of CABG is an independent predictor of BARC-4 bleeding, whereas major ticagrelor bleeding effects are confined to drug exposure within 3 days of surgery.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

No study has so far evaluated the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) with ticagrelor and their prognostic consequences, that were therefore the aim of the present study.. Patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA+ticagrelor (90mg/twice a day) after percutaneous coronary revascularization for ACS were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. The primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome (MI), target vessel revascularization) at the longest available follow-up.. We included 396 patients, that were divided according to CKD (eGFR

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aftercare; Clopidogrel; Humans; Patient Discharge; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the mainstay regimen for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate DAPT compliance and switching patterns in ACS patients prescribed ticagrelor and aspirin. Secondly, we evaluated the impact of a pilot strategy of close surveillance telephone calls.. The study enrolled 150 consecutive ACS patients who underwent PCI and were prescribed DAPT (aspirin and ticagrelor). This cohort, the "close surveillance arm," then received telephone calls from a healthcare professional to inquire about DAPT for up to one year. These findings, and clinical outcomes, were then compared to a "historical arm" of ACS patients (n = 505) who received PCI and were prescribed DAPT before initiation of the program. Finally, healthcare providers were surveyed about their experience with prescribing DAPT.. The rate of ticagrelor cessation trended lower in the close surveillance arm (22.00 % versus 31.70 %, p = 0.0783). The most common reasons for ticagrelor cessation were adverse medication reaction (dyspnea), bleeding, and financial burden. Nevertheless, the adverse events were few and similar between the two groups during follow-up. Over 96 % of healthcare providers surveyed stated that they worry about their patients' DAPT compliance post-PCI.. Noncompliance and switching medications are still common for patients who undergo PCI for ACS. A close surveillance program identified patients at risk for medication cessation or switching and could potentially mitigate this phenomenon and improve quality of care.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Comparative effectiveness evaluation of newer P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) compared with clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is limited in real-world US populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular events based on ticagrelor, prasugrel, and clopidogrel use in a real-world patient setting. This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan database (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018) to create three propensity score-matched pairs: ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel (N = 21,719), prasugrel vs. clopidogrel (N = 11,513), and prasugrel vs. ticagrelor (N = 11,065). The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial ischemia, unstable angina, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization. These groups were compared in a time-to-event analysis for the primary outcome at 30, 90, and 180 days following P2Y12 inhibitors initiation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor use suggested a 10% reduction in the primary outcome at 90 days (hazard ratio (HR): 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.99). There were no differences for all other matched pairs or follow-up combinations. In the subgroup analysis of females, the results suggested a risk reduction of 27% for prasugrel at 30 days (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.53-1.00) and 17% for ticagrelor at 90 days (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.98) when compared with clopidogrel. Among patients treated with bare-metal stents, the results suggested that prasugrel vs. ticagrelor was associated with a 55% and 33% reduced risk for the primary outcome at 30 days and 180 days, respectively. With limited evidence in the United States comparing these drugs, this study helps inform clinicians when choosing P2Y12 inhibitors after ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

The first 3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a high-risk period for adverse events, including ischemic and bleeding events, which decrease greatly with time. It is worth investigating whether the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors is necessary after the early stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in stable patients without ischemic or major bleeding events during the first 3 months after PCI.. Data for this study were obtained from the PHARM-ACS registry (NCT04184583). Patients who were free from ischemic and major bleeding events in the first 3 months after PCI were enrolled. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to compare the differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were considered the primary end point, and major bleeding was considered the secondary end point.. A total of 6662 patients were included in this study. Of these, 3465 were treated with clopidogrel plus aspirin (clopidogrel group) and 3197 with ticagrelor plus aspirin (ticagrelor group). There were no significant differences in MACCE after IPTW adjustment for baseline variables (IPTW-adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25) or major bleeding events (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.67-1.41) between the 2 groups. However, the incidence of minor bleeding in the clopidogrel group was significantly lower than that in the ticagrelor group (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59-0.71).. In patients with ACS who were free from ischemic or major bleeding events during the first 3 months after PCI, the subsequent clopidogrel treatment might reduce minor bleeding events without increasing the risk of MACCE compared with ticagrelor. However, the results still need to be confirmed by large randomized controlled studies in the future.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In closely monitored randomized controlled trials (RCTs), newer P2Y12 agents (ticagrelor and prasugrel) reduced cardiovascular outcomes compared with clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome. However, these RCTs indicated a higher bleeding risk with these newer agents. This study evaluated the comparative safety of each P2Y12 inhibitor on hospitalizations due to major bleeding in a real-world population. This retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study utilized the IBM MarketScan database over 6 years (2013-2018) to identify incident users of P2Y12 inhibitors with age ≥18 years. The primary safety outcome was hospitalization due to any major bleeding event including gastrointestinal, intracranial, and other serious forms of bleeding. In pairwise comparisons using Cox-proportional hazards models, ticagrelor, prasugrel, and clopidogrel users were compared for the primary safety outcome at 30, 90, and 180 days following the first prescription of P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI. There were 21,719 (ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel), 11,513 (prasugrel vs. clopidogrel), and 11,065 (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor) PSM pairs. Overall, the risk of major bleeding was similar for all P2Y12 inhibitors. Hospitalization for major bleeding was generally lower among ticagrelor users vs. clopidogrel and higher among prasugrel users compared with clopidogrel. Importantly, a 66% higher risk of major bleeding at 90 days is suggested with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel (hazard ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.48). This study indicated a higher short-term bleeding risk with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel, which concurs with the results of RCTs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adolescent; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Pharmacological inhibition of the platelet ADP-receptor P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Blood Platelets; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Potent P2Y. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI for CCS.. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for CCS at a tertiary centre between 2014 and 2019 who were discharged on prasugrel or ticagrelor were compared with those on clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the composite of death and myocardial infarction (MI), with secondary outcomes including rates of bleeding, stroke, and target vessel revascularisation at 1 year.. Ticagrelor and prasugrel are increasingly used in patients with CCS undergoing PCI with similar 1-year efficacy and safety when compared to clopidogrel. Whether use of these agents can be beneficial in patients undergoing PCI for CCS with a high thrombotic and low bleeding risk warrants further study.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Early P2Y. In this single-arm pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy directly following PCI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).. Patients received a loading dose of ticagrelor or prasugrel before undergoing platelet function testing and subsequent PCI using new-generation drug-eluting stents. The stent result was adjudicated with optical coherence tomography in the first 35 patients. Ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy was continued for 12 months. The primary ischaemic endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis or stroke within 6 months. The primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding within 6 months.. From March 2021 to March 2022, 125 patients were enrolled, of whom 75 ultimately met all in- and exclusion criteria (mean age 64.5 years, 29.3% women). Overall, 70 out of 75 (93.3%) patients were treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy directly following PCI. The primary ischaemic endpoint occurred in 3 (4.0%) patients within 6 months. No cases of stent thrombosis or spontaneous myocardial infarction occurred. The primary bleeding endpoint occurred in 7 (9.3%) patients within 6 months.. This study provides first-in-human evidence that P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Data available for pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) of ticagrelor and significant endogenous/exogenous factors or biomarkers related to bleeding events in both healthy and clinical patients are limited.. Based on PK and PD data from multicenter healthy subjects and patients, we aimed to establish an integrated approach towards population PK (pop PK) and the PD model of ticagrelor.. This study was conducted as a multicenter, prospective clinical registration study involving both healthy subjects and clinical patients. The integrated Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models were characterized based on PK/PD [ticagrelor concentration, aggregation baseline (BASE), P2Y12 response unit (PRU) and inhibition rate (INHIBIT)] data from 175 healthy volunteers. The model was corrected by sparse PD (BASE, PRU and INHIBIT) data from 208 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The correlations between PD biomarkers and clinically relevant bleedings in 1 year were explored.. A one-compartment, linear model with first-order absorption was adopted as PK model. Food status (FOOD) and body weight (WT) significantly influenced clearance and improved the fitting degree of the PK model, while SEX was selected as the covariates of the PD model. For patients taking ticagrelor 90 mg, the peak value [mean (95% CI)] of PRU was 355.15 (344.24-366.06) and the trough value was 3.64 (3.14-4.15). The PRU mean parameters were basically within the expected range (80-200) of the literature suggestions.. A fixed dose of ticagrelor, without adjusting the dosing regimen other than covariates of FOOD/WT/SEX, could be used in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and the standard regimen could be used in Chinese patients from the perspective of exposure.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Recent data indicate that ticagrelor, used in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus sp. and other effects that may help management of infection. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of ticagrelor in patients who have had an ACS event and the risk of developing Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) compared to a propensity-matched cohort receiving clopidogrel.. This study was a retrospective, nationwide analysis of all patients presenting to any percutaneous coronary intervention-performing Veterans Affairs Medical Center with an ACS episode and resultant prescription for clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The primary outcome was the comparative rate of SAB in patients receiving ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel.. Analysis involved 24 456 patients on ticagrelor and 277 277 patients on clopidogrel. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing SAB between the propensity-matched groups (32 [0.13%] of 24 456 for ticagrelor vs. 71 [0.29%] of 24 456 for clopidogrel; odds ratio (OR), 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.65; P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that receipt of clopidogrel, comorbid dermatologic condition, comorbid hematologic condition, and baseline anemia were independently associated with the development of SAB.. The study findings align with recent reports that ticagrelor may have a beneficial role in the prevention of SAB.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent coronary intervention.. Between November 2011 and December 2015, a total of 13,104 patients with AMI were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry. Among them, 4,696 patients who received DAPT for more than 24 months were categorized into two groups: the clopidogrel group (n = 4,053) and ticagrelor or prasugrel group (n = 643). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the bias due to confounding variables. Following PSM, the impacts of P2Y12 inhibitors on the clinical outcomes in both groups were compared during a 36-month clinical follow-up period.. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes in terms of cardiac death (7.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.101), stroke (1.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.436), major bleeding (0.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.478), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (21.6% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.626), and net adverse cardiac event (NACE) (22.1% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.731) between the groups. The ticagrelor or prasugrel group had a lower incidence of recurrent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (12.2% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.006) than the clopidogrel group. However, no differences were observed in the cumulative incidences of 3-year NACE between the ticagrelor or prasugrel and clopidogrel groups.. Cumulative incidences of long-term NACE did not differ between the two groups. Therefore, the type and duration of DAPT should be customized for each patient with AMI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Excess mortality remains the cornerstone concern despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute coronary syndrome. Some data suggest that shorter periods than 12 months of DAPT diminish bleeding risks yet still provide adequate vascular protection and improving survival. However, the precise timing of deaths after acute coronary syndrome has not been mapped in many studies. This knowledge may be critical for defining optimal treatment duration.. Access was gained to the data set for the Platelet Inhibition and Outcomes (PLATO) trial, which was issued by the Food and Drug Administration, in which post hoc analyses of timing of death events during DAPT (with either aspirin/ticagrelor or aspirin/clopidogrel) were performed. All-cause individual deaths were counted and plotted over time from day 1 to day 365 after the index event.. Among 18,624 enrollees, 938 total deaths were reported to the Food and Drug Administration in PLATO. After exclusion of deceased patients with missing dates, randomization errors, and deaths beyond 1 year of follow-up, 913 fatalities (509 after clopidogrel and 404 after ticagrelor) were analyzed. The PLATO records did not indicate where exactly deaths occurred making impossible to triage in the hospital versus outpatient fatalities. Most frequent deaths occurred within the Day 1 (n = 41); Day 2 (n = 48); and Day 3 (n = 33) and overall during the first week (n = 202; 22.1%) after the index acute coronary syndrome, with a gradual decline after Day 10 and Day 60, reaching background counts after Day 220.. Focusing on mortality reduction, this large data set may support a shorter than 12 months' duration of DAPT.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Background Effectiveness estimates from observational studies on ticagrelor use in routine clinical care are conflicting, with some contrary to the results of the pivotal randomized controlled trial of ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of implementing and using ticagrelor in routine clinical care in patients with myocardial infarction using a natural experimental approach. Methods and Results This is a retrospective cohort study including patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction in Sweden between 2009 and 2015. The study exploited differences in the timing and speed of ticagrelor implementation between treatment centers as a source of random treatment assignment. The effect of implementing and using ticagrelor was estimated based on the admitting center's likelihood of treating patients with ticagrelor, measured as the proportion of patients treated in the 90 days before patient admission. The main outcome was 12-month mortality. The study included 109 955 patients, of whom 30 773 were treated with ticagrelor. Being admitted to a treatment center with higher past ticagrelor use was associated with a reduction in 12-month mortality (2.5 percentage points for 100% versus 0% past use [95% CI, 0.2-4.8]). The results are in line with the findings from the ticagrelor pivotal trial. Conclusions Using a natural experiment, this study finds that the implementation and use of ticagrelor in routine clinical care has reduced 12-month mortality in patients admitted to the hospital with myocardial infarction in Sweden and supports the external validity of randomized evidence on ticagrelor effectiveness.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Sweden; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). A total of 3528 consecutive patients with ACS treated with PPCI were divided into the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups based on their dual antiplatelet therapy regimen at hospital discharge. Patient follow-up visits were completed 1, 6, and 12 months after PPCI treatment. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding events were assessed in both groups. In total, 2501 cases were included in the ticagrelor group, and 817 cases were included in the clopidogrel group. The incidence of MACEs was lower in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (P < .05). The ticagrelor group had lower incidence of all-cause death and cardiac death compared with the clopidogrel group, and the difference was significant (P < .05). The incidences of study end points, including recurrent myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization, were not significantly different between the groups (P > .05). The incidences of BARC total and major bleeding events were not significantly different between the groups (P > .05). However, the incidences of BARC type 1 and 2 bleeding events were lower in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (P < .05). The multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that ticagrelor could decrease all-cause death compared with clopidogrel (P = .021). In patients with ACS treated with PPCI, ticagrelor could significantly reduce the risk of MACEs compared with clopidogrel, without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to define the association between altitude and ticagrelor-associated dyspnea in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. We studied consecutive patients with de novo ACS who were admitted to two centers at a low altitude (18 and 25 m, n = 65) and two centers at a high altitude (1313 and 1041 m, n = 136). We managed them with ticagrelor between May 2017 and September 2017. Patients with ACS underwent an interventional procedure within <90 minutes in those with ST elevation and within <3 hours in those without ST elevation. We recorded the incidence of dyspnea in patients with ACS receiving ticagrelor therapy.. The mean age was 59.5 ± 10 years, and the mean ejection fraction was 43% ± 18%. A total of 110 (56.7%) patients had ST elevation and 84 (43.3%) did not. There were no significant differences in cardiac risk factors, concurrent medications, or procedural variables between the two groups. Dyspnea developed during hospitalization in 53 (38%) patients from high-altitude centers and in 13 (20%) patients from low-altitude centers (66 patients represented 32% of the total ACS cohort).. Dyspnea is a common multifactorial symptom in patients following development of ACS. Ticagrelor-induced dyspnea appears to be associated with altitude.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Altitude; Dyspnea; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

A platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12) inhibitor plus aspirin is standard therapy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor are associated with superior antiatherothrombotic effects but increased bleeding risk; with recent guideline updates, it is important to describe current treatment patterns and the role of bleeding risk in treatment choice.. To describe secular trends and determinants of initial P2Y12 inhibitor choice and switching, including deescalation (switch from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel).. This retrospective cohort study used MarketScan Commercial Claims Data from 2010 to 2019 for patients aged 18 years or older who underwent PCI for ACS, had no P2Y12 inhibitor use in the past year, and filled a P2Y12 inhibitor prescription within 30 days after PCI hospitalization discharge. Data were analyzed from February to May 2022.. Clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, with determinants including bleeding risk measured using Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk criteria, sociodemographic characteristics, P2Y12 inhibitor copays, and bleeding events during follow-up.. The prevalence of each P2Y12 inhibitor among patients who initiated the drugs and the prevalence of switching within 12 months after PCI were evaluated. The association between baseline bleeding risk and bleeding manifestations during follow-up and initial treatment and deescalation were calculated using multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models.. Between 2010 and 2019, 62 423 patients were identified who initiated P2Y12 inhibitors (females, 22.4%; males, 77.6%; mean [SD] age, 54.32 [7.13] years). The prevalence of clopidogrel as initial therapy decreased from 77.5% in 2010 to 29.6% in 2019, while initial use of prasugrel or ticagrelor increased from 22.5% to 60.4%. Within 1 year after PCI, 11.0% of patients switched therapy, mostly for deescalation. Deescalation prevalence increased from 1.8% in 2010 to 12.6% in 2018. Between 2016 and 2018, 8588 of 22 886 (37.5%) patients had major baseline bleeding risk, which decreased the selection of prasugrel or ticagrelor as initial therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). Among 11 285 patients who initiated prasugrel or ticagrelor, major bleeding risk at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.23) and the occurrence of bleeding during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.42; 95% CI, 3.62-5.93) were associated with deescalation.. A strong shift in preference for prasugrel and ticagrelor as initial therapy following PCI for ACS was observed. Deescalation increased over the study period. Major bleeding risk at baseline was moderately associated with initial treatment choice but had a limited association with deescalation. The increasing use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors emphasizes opportunities to enhance preemptive patient-centered treatment strategies to maintain optimal antiplatelet activity while reducing bleeding risk during the subacute period following PCI for ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

A simple HPLC method was developed for the determination of antiplatelet drug ticagrelor (TCG) in blood. Sample preparation and extraction conditions were investigated and optimized. The preparation of blood plasma was investigated by protein precipitation using perchloric acid, methanol, acetonitrile (ACN), and trifluoroacetic acid. Protein precipitation using ACN was found to be the most suitable. Chromatographic separation of TCG was performed on a C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of ACN and 15 mM ammonium acetate buffered at pH 8.0. The method was applied to determine TCG in blood plasma of patients who had a heart attack. Blood samples were collected 1.5 h after the administration of the initial loading dose of the antiplatelet drug. The average concentration of TCG was found to be 0.97 ± 0.53 μg/ml. The developed method proved to be very selective, without interferences from other endogenous substances and the influences of possible coadministered drugs. The limits of detection and quantification estimated by the signal-to-noise ratio in real samples were 0.24 and 0.4 μg/ml, respectively. The developed method is simple and can be easily applied in clinics and emergency cardiac situations after the initial loading dose of TCG in the first few hours of a heart attack.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Plasma; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 inhibitor has become a mainstay of therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although higher-potency P2Y12 inhibitors are preferred over clopidogrel in major society guidelines, recent evidence has questioned the extent of the benefit. It is important to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors in a real-world setting. This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent PCI for ACS in a Canadian province from January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2020. Baseline characteristics, including co-morbidities, medications, and bleeding risk, were obtained. Propensity matching was used to compare patients who received ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. The primary outcome was occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 12 months, defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, stroke, and all-cause hospitalization. A total of 6,665 patients were included; 2,108 received clopidogrel and 4,214 received ticagrelor. Patients who received clopidogrel were older, had more co-morbidities, including cardiovascular risk factors, and had a higher bleeding risk. In 1.925 propensity score-matched pairs, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio 0.79, 0.67 to 0.93, p <0.01) and hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.85, 0.77 to 0.95, p <0.01). No difference was observed in the risk of major bleeding. A statistically nonsignificant trend toward reduced risk of all-cause mortality was noted. In conclusion, in a real-world high-risk cohort, ticagrelor was associated with decreased risk of MACE and all-cause hospitalization compared with clopidogrel after PCI for ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Canada; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Antithrombotic drugs, including the P2Y. We used a Markov model to analyze the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the hemoadsorption device in three cohorts: (1) surgery within 1 day from last ticagrelor dose; (2) surgery between 1 and 2 days from last ticagrelor dose; and (3) a combined cohort. The model analyzed costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were interpreted as both incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and net monetary benefits (NMBs) at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000/QALY. We analyzed parameter uncertainty using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. The hemoadsorption device was dominant for each cohort. Patients with less than 1 day of washout in the device arm gained 0.017 QALYs at a savings of $1748 (USD), for an NMB of $3434. In patients with 1-2 days of washout, the device arm yielded 0.014 QALYs and a cost savings of $151, for an NMB of $1575. In the combined cohort, device gained 0.016 QALYs and a savings of $950 for an NMB of $2505. Per-member-per-month cost savings associated with device was estimated to be $0.02 for a one-million-member health plan.. This model found the hemoadsorption device to provide better clinical and economic outcomes compared with the standard of care in patients who required surgery within 2 days of ticagrelor discontinuation. Given the increasing use of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome, incorporating this novel device may represent an important part of any bundle to save costs and reduce harm.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Artery Bypass; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain associated with several risk factors including trauma, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pregnancy, and anticoagulation as it can be iatrogenic. Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), combined usage of a P

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Hematoma; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

It remains controversial whether to extend the course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We conducted a study to investigate the benefits and risks of applying DAPT for different durations after PCI in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients in China. What's more, we explored the efficacy of extended DAPT regimen based on ticagrelor.. This single-center prospective cohort study used data obtained from the PHARM-ACS Patient Registration Database. We included all patients who were discharged between April and December 2018. All patients had at least 18 months of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of DAPT: a 1-year group and a >1-year group. Potential bias between the two groups was adjusted for by propensity score matching using logistic regression. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke occurring from 12 months after discharge to follow-up visit. The safety endpoint was any significant bleeding event (BARC ≥ 2).. Of 3,205 patients enrolled, 2,201 (68.67%) had DAPT prolonged beyond one year. A total of 2,000 patients were successfully propensity score-matched; patients who received DAPT > 1-year (n = 1000), compared with DAPT = 1-year patients (n = 1000), had a similar risk of MACCE (adjusted HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.10) and significant bleeding events (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.24). The DAPT > 1-year group had a higher risk of revascularization (adjusted HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.64-6.87).. Prolonged DAPT may not be of sufficient benefit to ACS patients within 12-18 months after the index PCI to offset the increased risk of significant bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Randomized trials have shown superiority of the novel P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but clinical benefit in the community remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel to ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and were discharged with clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel from 2012 to 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We used Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score matching to evaluate the association of the P2Y12 agent with the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and bleeding events.. The study included 15,476 patients (93.1% on clopidogrel, 3.6% on ticagrelor and 3.2% on prasugrel). Compared to the clopidogrel group, ticagrelorand prasugrel patients were younger with less comorbidities. In multivariable models with propensity-score matching, we found a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the ticagrelor vs the clopidogrel group (HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.20-0.92)), but no differences in the other endpoints, and no difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel among any endpoints. A larger proportion of patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel switched to an alternative P2Y12 agent vs. clopidogrel (. Among patients with ACS who underwent PCI, we observed a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients treated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, but no difference in other clinical endpoints nor any differences in endpoints between prasugrel vs. clopidogrel users. These results suggest that further study is needed to identify an optimal P2Y12 inhibitor in a real-world population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This study evaluated the association among the plasma concentration of ticagrelor, ARC124910XX, aspirin, and salicylic acid with the risk of recent bleeding in patients with the acute coronary syndrome. To this end, we developed an accurate model to predict bleeding.. A total of 84 patients included in this study cohort between May 2021 and November 2021. The risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses, and statistically significant risk factors identified in the multivariate analysis were included in the nomogram. We used the calibration curve and the receiver operating characteristic curve to verify the accuracy of the prediction model.. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that ticagrelor concentration (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-4.75, P = 0.002), ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (OR: 32.2, 95% CI, 2.37-780, P = 0.016), and lipid-lowering drugs (OR: 11.52, 95% CI, 1.91-110, P = 0.015) were positively correlated with bleeding. However, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (OR: 0.04, 95% CI, 0.004-0.213, P < 0.001) was negatively correlated with bleeding. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that ticagrelor concentration and these factors together predict the occurrence of bleeding (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.945, 95% CI, 0.896-0.994) and that ticagrelor concentration >694.90 ng/mL is the threshold of bleeding concentration (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.696, 95% CI, 0.558-0.834).. In patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, ticagrelor concentration >694.90 ng/mL was an independent risk factor for bleeding (OR: 2.47, 95% CI, 1.51-4.75, P = 0.002), but ARC124910XX and salicylic acid concentration did not affect bleeding risk ( P > 0.05).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; East Asian People; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Salicylic Acid; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants have significant impact on response to clopidogrel. The efficacy and safety of tailored antiplatelet therapy under the guidance of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms remains elusive for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. The aims of the present study were to investigate the impact of clinical implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping on the selection of oral P2Y. Data from a single-center registry enrolling 41,090 consecutive PCI patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI were analyzed. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding events within 12 months after PCI were compared across CYP2C19 genotype and antiplatelet therapy groups using Cox proportional hazards models.. CYP2C19 genotyping was successfully achieved for 9081 patients, of whom baseline characteristics significantly differed from non-genotyped patients. A higher proportion of genotyped patients were prescribed ticagrelor compared with non-genotyped patients (27.0 % vs. 15.5 %, P < 0.001). CYP2C19 metabolic status was an independent predictor for use of ticagrelor (P < 0.001). Ticagrelor was significantly associated with a lower risk of MACEs in poor metabolizers (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95 % confidence interval 0.42 to 0.92, P = 0.017), but not in intermediate metabolizers or normal metabolizers. The interaction was not statistically significant (P for interaction = 0.252).. Genotype information on CYP2C19 metabolic status was associated with an increase in the use of potent antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients. Patients prescribed with clopidogrel has a higher risk of MACEs among poor metabolizers, which suggested the potential application of genotype-guided P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; East Asian People; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor and aspirin is a common dual antiplatelet therapy regimen for patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite its ability to significantly reduce cardiovascular complications, ticagrelor response may be altered by other medications causing subtherapeutic effects. Traditionally, ticagrelor is thought to have fewer drug-drug interactions compared to other thienopyridine antiplatelet medications such as clopidogrel. Primidone, metabolized into phenobarbital, is a strong CYP-3A inducer that can reduce serum concentrations of ticagrelor resulting in ineffective antiplatelet therapy. We present a 67-year-old male who suffered in-stent thrombosis after percutaneous intervention possibly due to the interaction between primidone and ticagrelor.. Ticagrelor and aspirin is a common antiplatelet regimen for patients who undergo coronary intervention and stent implantation. Ticagrelor is typically less associated with drug–drug interactions; however, our case illustrates an interaction between ticagrelor and primidone causing acute in-stent thrombosis to recently implanted drug-eluting stents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primidone; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

As a part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), prasugrel or ticagrelor is prescribed along with aspirin to patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess if the PRECISE-DAPT score, which provides prediction of bleeding during DAPT, could be used to choose between prasugrel and ticagrelor for DAPT initiation. 181 patients out of which 71 received prasugrel and 110 received ticagrelor were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for everyone and was used to dichotomize patients into two subgroups (score <25 and ≥25). After balancing potential confounders in baseline characteristics of the subgroups using propensity scores, comparison of a composite outcome of 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (4P-MACE) (i.e., cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or coronary revascularization due to stent thrombosis) and bleeding (any type as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) within 1-year post-PCI was performed among the subgroups using Cox proportional hazards regression. Prasugrel was associated with lower and comparatively higher 4P-MACE events in subgroups with score ≥25 (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77) and score <25 (HR: 3.58; 95% CI, 0.62-20.70) respectively. For bleeding outcome, prasugrel trended towards more clinical benefit for scores ≥25 (HR: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.10-1.93) than <25 (HR: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.13-6.58). Therefore, prasugrel was associated with better clinical effectiveness and trended towards a lower bleeding risk compared to ticagrelor within 1-year post-PCI for those with a high PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25). This finding requires validation through larger studies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the effect of different DAPTs in patients with ACS undergoing PCI, and to identify the most efficient DAPT to reduce the risk of ischemia and bleeding after PCI. Between March 2017 and December 2021, 1598 patients with ACS who underwent PCI were included in the study. The DAPT protocol included the clopidogrel group (aspirin 100 mg + clopidogrel 75 mg), ticagrelor group (aspirin 100 mg + ticagrelor 90 mg), de-escalation Group 1 (reduced dose of ticagrelor [from 90 mg to 60 mg]) after 3 months of oral DAPT [aspirin 100 mg + ticagrelor 90 mg]), and de-escalation Group 2 (switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after 3 months of oral DAPT [aspirin 100 mg + ticagrelor 90 mg]). All patients received a 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACEs) that included the composite endpoints of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stroke, and bleeding events. There were 2 secondary endpoints, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of NACEs between the 4 groups at the average 12-month follow-up (15.7% vs 19.2% vs 16.7% vs 20.4%). Cox regression analysis revealed that DAPT ticagrelor group regimen (hazard ratio [HR] 0.547; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.334-0.896; P  = .017) were associated with a lower risk of MACCEs. Age (HR 1.024; 95% CI: 1.003-1.046; P  = .022). DAPT de-escalation Group 2 regimen (HR 1.665; 95% CI: 1.001-2.767; P  = .049) were marginally associated with a higher risk of MACCEs. Ticagrelor group regimen (HR 1.856; 95% CI: 1.376-2.504; P  < .001) was associated with higher risk of bleeding events. Ticagrelor group regimen (HR 1.606; 95% CI: 1.179-2.187; P  = .003) were associated with a higher risk of minor bleeding events. For patients with ACS underwent PCI, there were no significant difference in the incidence of NACEs between 3 and 12 months after PCI between de-escalation and non-de-escalation therapies. Compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT, there was no significant difference in MACCEs and bleeding events in patients receiving de-escalation treatment (ticagrelor reduction from 90 to 60 mg, 3 months after PCI).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate potential gains in outcomes from ticagrelor-based strategy according to risk stratification by Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score.. A total of 19,704 patients discharged alive post-acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received ticagrelor or clopidogrel between March 2016 and March 2019 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was ischemic events at 12 months, composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and/or stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 to 5 and 3 to 5 bleeding.. The ticagrelor group comprised 6432 (32.6%) patients and the clopidogrel group comprised 13,272 (67.4%) patients. During the follow-up period, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of ischemic events in patients treated using ticagrelor who had excessive risk of bleeding. According to the GRACE score, among low-risk patients, ticagrelor use compared with clopidogrel was not associated with decreased ischemic events (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.17; P=.27) with excessive risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 to 5 bleeding (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.17; P=.004). The risk of ischemic events (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.89; P=.01) were lower in the intermediate- to high-risk patients treated with ticagrelor without significant difference in BARC type 3 to 5 bleeding risk (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.65; P=.61).. There was still a gap between guideline-indicated therapy and the clinical practice in a sizable subset of patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. The GRACE risk score could identify patients who would derive benefit from the ticagrelor-based antiplatelet strategy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; China; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Bleeding among populations undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting and among conservatively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome exposed to different dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy (i.e. dual antiplatelet therapy plus an anticoagulant) has not been previously quantified.. The objectives were to estimate hazard ratios for bleeding for different antiplatelet and triple therapy regimens, estimate resources and the associated costs of treating bleeding events, and to extend existing economic models of the cost-effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy.. The study was designed as three retrospective population-based cohort studies emulating target randomised controlled trials.. The study was set in primary and secondary care in England from 2010 to 2017.. Participants were patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (for acute coronary syndrome), or conservatively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome.. Data were sourced from linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics.. Coronary artery bypass grafting and conservatively managed acute coronary syndrome: aspirin (reference) compared with aspirin and clopidogrel. Percutaneous coronary intervention: aspirin and clopidogrel (reference) compared with aspirin and prasugrel (ST elevation myocardial infarction only) or aspirin and ticagrelor.. Primary outcome: any bleeding events up to 12 months after the index event. Secondary outcomes: major or minor bleeding, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, mortality from bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, additional coronary intervention and major adverse cardiovascular events.. The incidence of any bleeding was 5% among coronary artery bypass graft patients, 10% among conservatively managed acute coronary syndrome patients and 9% among emergency percutaneous coronary intervention patients, compared with 18% among patients prescribed triple therapy. Among coronary artery bypass grafting and conservatively managed acute coronary syndrome patients, dual antiplatelet therapy, compared with aspirin, increased the hazards of any bleeding (coronary artery bypass grafting: hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.69; conservatively-managed acute coronary syndrome: hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.57) and major adverse cardiovascular events (coronary artery bypass grafting: hazard ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 3.46; conservatively-managed acute coronary syndrome: hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.38 to 1.78). Among emergency percutaneous coronary intervention patients, dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor, compared with dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel, increased the hazard of any bleeding (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.82), but did not reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.27). Among ST elevation myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention patients, dual antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel, compared with dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel, increased the hazard of any bleeding (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.12), but did not reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.51). Health-care costs in the first year did not differ between dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy among either coronary artery bypass grafting patients (mean difference £94, 95% confidence interval -£155 to £763) or conservatively managed acute coronary syndrome patients (mean difference £610, 95% confidence interval -£626 to £1516), but among emergency percutaneous coronary intervention patients were higher for those receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor than for those receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel, although for only patients on concurrent proton pump inhibitors (mean difference £1145, 95% confidence interval £269 to £2195).. This study suggests that more potent dual antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of bleeding without reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. These results should be carefully considered by clinicians and decision-makers alongside randomised controlled trial evidence when making recommendations about dual antiplatelet therapy.. The estimates for bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events may be biased from unmeasured confounding and the exclusion of an eligible subgroup of patients who could not be assigned an intervention. Because of these limitations, a formal cost-effectiveness analysis could not be conducted.. Future work should explore the feasibility of using other UK data sets of routinely collected data, less susceptible to bias, to estimate the benefit and harm of antiplatelet interventions.. This trial is registered as ISRCTN76607611.. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in. People who have a heart attack are treated with a stent to open up the blocked artery that caused the heart attack, with surgery to bypass the blocked artery or with medication only. Whatever the treatment, they are prescribed one or more antiplatelet drugs, either aspirin only or aspirin and an additional antiplatelet (clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor), for 12 months after the heart attack. Antiplatelets are given to prevent another heart attack, but increase the risk of bleeding. We used a large general practice database and a database describing patients’ attendances and admissions to hospital to determine how many people bleed with different antiplatelet combinations. We found that, overall, up to 1 in 10 people taking antiplatelets (rising to 2 in 10 if also taking an anticoagulant such as warfarin or dabigatran) reported a bleed. Among patients treated with surgery or medication only, we compared aspirin only (which is a less potent therapy) with aspirin and clopidogrel (a more potent therapy). Among patients treated with stents, we compared aspirin and clopidogrel (less potent therapy) with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (more potent therapy). In all three populations, the more potent therapy increased the risk of bleeding by about one and a half times, but this was not offset by a reduced risk of having a subsequent heart attack. This may be explained by low adherence to the medication: between one-third and almost half of all patients did not adhere to their regimen, and non-adherence was generally higher among patients taking a more potent therapy. It may also be explained by bias inherent in the study, for example if the groups prescribed different antiplatelet regimens had different risks of having another heart attack. Nevertheless, the results show that doctors should be cautious about prescribing more potent antiplatelet therapy because it may increase serious bleeds without necessarily reducing the number of heart attacks.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor

P2Y12 inhibitors (i.e., clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) are effective at reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes post-revascularization in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the choice of a specific P2Y12 inhibitor may vary according to the patient's characteristics, and trends in the use of different P2Y12 inhibitors are not well studied in real-world settings. The objective of this study is to determine trends in the prescription patterns of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with CAD. We studied 137,073 patients with CAD cross-sectionally using the IBM MarketScan database (2013-2018). Patients with CAD prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors within 14 days of index revascularization were included to compare the utilization of P2Y12 inhibitors based on age and clinical characteristics. There were differences in prescription patterns by age. Among patients aged less than or equal to 65 years (N = 92,734), a continuously increased utilization of ticagrelor was observed from 13.7% to 45.6% replacing clopidogrel as the most prescribed medication by 2018. Similarly, ticagrelor was the choice of drug among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the patients at high bleeding risk, clopidogrel remained the most prescribed medication with use in 50.6% of patients in 2018 in patients aged less than or equal to 65 years. Contrarily, among the older adults with age 65 or above (N = 44,339), although ticagrelor use increased with time, clopidogrel remained the most utilized drug and was used by 66.2% of patients in 2018. Additionally, clopidogrel was the preferred medication among patients with stroke history. With the increasing use of ticagrelor in real-world practice, further research is needed to observe its impact on cardiovascular outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prescriptions; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

To date, no studies have specifically examined the efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) exhibiting a high risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This was a retrospective cohort study of ACS exhibiting a high GI bleeding risk after PCI admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of the Jiangnan University from August 2016 to December 2019. Of the 308 enrolled patients, 269 were found eligible and were assigned to the ticagrelor monotherapy (TIC) arm (n = 128) and to ticagrelor plus aspirin (TIC + ASP) arm (n = 141) treatment for a 1-year period. The primary study outcome was a composite end point, including bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events; 8 (6.3%) in the TIC group and 14 (9.9%) in the combination treatment group reached the primary ischemic end point within 1 year with no significant difference between these groups. BARC type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding events affected significantly more patients in the combination group relative to the TIC group (38 [27.0%] vs. 11 [8.6%], P < 0.001). As the follow-up interval was prolonged, the cumulative BARC type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding incidence in the TIC group remained significantly below than that in the combination treatment group ( P < 0.05). These results indicate that TIC is associated with a lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding events among ACS with a high risk of GI bleeding after PCI relative to combination TIC + ASP treatment, although ischemic outcomes in these 2 groups were similar.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

From the restriction of access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention, about 46% of patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STE-ACS) received fibrinolytic therapy as a reperfusion strategy; streptokinase is frequently used in Thailand. Despite the guidelines recommending potent P2Y12 inhibitors among these patients, the data are limited, especially among patients with STE-ACS post streptokinase therapy. The study was proposed to describe factors for P2Y12 inhibitors selection and evaluate outcomes of pharmacoinvasively treated STE-ACS receiving ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in Thailand. We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with STE-ACS post streptokinase therapy followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stent placement and receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel as P2Y12 inhibitor treatment from January 2017 to June 2021. The primary outcomes described factors for P2Y12 inhibitor selection and evaluated safety outcomes with inverse probability weight (IPW) adjustment. The secondary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and stroke. The median time from streptokinase therapy to initiating ticagrelor in the switch group was 25.7 (IQR, 1.9-4.4) hours. The factors related to switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor included young age, history of coronary artery disease (CAD), dose of streptokinase and use of intravascular imaging. Any bleeding events occurred among 83 patients (41.71%) in the switch group and 83 patients (41.09%) in the no switch group (adjusted HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.75-1.44; p = 0.826). The composite of efficacy outcomes occurred in 6 patients in the switch group (3.02%) and 12 patients (5.94%) in the no switch group (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.21-1.57; p = 0.279). Conclusion: In real practice, ticagrelor switching among patients with STE-ACS post streptokinase therapy did not differ regarding safety outcomes and composite of efficacy outcomes compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Streptokinase; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We investigated whether combination of glenzocimab, a GPVI inhibitor, with aspirin and ticagrelor provides additional antithrombotic effects, as GPVI has a critical role in atherothrombosis but minimal involvement in hemostasis.. We investigated the effects of glenzocimab (monoclonal antibody Fab fragment) using blood from healthy donors and patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with aspirin and ticagrelor. Platelets were stimulated with multiple agonists, including atherosclerotic plaque, from patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.. Aspirin and ticagrelor partially inhibited atherosclerotic plaque-induced platelet aggregation by 48% compared with control (34 ± 3 vs 65 ± 4 U; P < .001). Plaque-induced platelet aggregation, adhesion, secretion, and activation were critically dependent on GPVI activation. Glenzocimab alone reduced plaque-induced aggregation by 75% compared with control (16 ± 4 vs 65 ± 4 U; P < .001) and by >95% when combined with aspirin and ticagrelor (3 ± 1 vs 65 ± 4 U; P < .001). Glenzocimab reduced platelet aggregation, adhesion, and thrombin generation when added to blood of aspirin- and ticagrelor-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome. Glenzocimab shared several antithrombotic effects with the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide with less effect on general hemostasis assessed by rotational thromboelastometry. In a murine intravital model of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, genetic depletion of GPVI reduced microvascular thrombosis.. Addition of glenzocimab to aspirin and ticagrelor enhances platelet inhibition via multiple mechanisms of atherothrombosis. Compared with a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, glenzocimab shares multiple antithrombotic effects, with less inhibition of mechanisms involved in general hemostasis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Animals; Aspirin; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Mice; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Medication nonadherence to dual antiplatelet therapy increases major cardiovascular events. In this study, we investigated patients' post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) medication adherence to clopidogrel and ticagrelor over a 12-month period. Furthermore, we also examined the factors that may affect medication adherence in this patient population.. This study included 509 patients who were scheduled for dual antiplatelet therapy for one year following ACS (October 2018-December 2019). A proportion of days covered (PDC) method, based on a pharmacy database system, was used to determine their medication adherence. Medication adherence was defined as > 80% PDC.. No difference was found between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in terms of medication adherence (68.3% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.39). Moreover, higher education levels (B = 3.24, CI: 1.17-8.9, p = 0.023) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a revascularization option (B = 0.35, CI: 0.17-0.71, p = 0.004) predicted medication adherence independently.. In this research, medication adherence was found to be similar between the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups. It was also predicted by higher education levels and revascularization with PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Medication Adherence; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

A high risk of bleeding is observed in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, the choice between two antiplatelet therapy drugs, ticagrelor and clopidogrel, remains controversial in this population with ACS. This study aimed to use a large cohort database to assess the clinical outcomes of ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapy, including major bleeding, recurrent ACS, and mortality, in this population.. Between January 2009 and December 2019, 43,696 patients were diagnosed with ACS based on the medical history (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] code) of the Chang Gung Research Database. After excluding patients without percutaneous coronary intervention, with concurrent medical problems, and on non-standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or a single antiplatelet agent, 18,046 patients were recruited for analysis. Ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT were administered to 3666 patients and 14,380 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 4225 patients were defined as a high-bleeding-risk subgroup according to Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) score (met one major or two minor criteria), of which 466 and 3759 patients received ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT, respectively.. Before propensity score matching (PSM), younger age, higher prevalence of male sex, and higher body mass index were noted in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group in the whole cohort and high-bleeding-risk subgroup. After PSM, no difference in baseline characteristics and comorbidities between ticagrelor-based and clopidogrel-based DAPT groups in the whole cohort and high-bleeding-risk subgroup was noted. The Kaplan-Meier curves of recurrent ACS and major bleeding were significantly lower in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group than in the clopidogrel-based DAPT group, and that of cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences. After PSM, in the high-bleeding-risk subgroup, the Kaplan-Meier curve of recurrent ACS was significantly lower in the ticagrelor-based DAPT group than in the clopidogrel-based DAPT group, and that of major bleeding, CV, and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences.. In this large cohort study, patients receiving ticagrelor-based DAPT were at lower risk of recurrent ACS compared to those receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, especially in the patients with myocardial infarction. Ticagrelor-based DAPT did not result in a higher risk of major bleeding in the whole ACS population and high-bleeding-risk subgroup. The rate of CV and all-cause mortality were similar between both the groups.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

To explore the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy on the mean platelet volume-to-lymphocyte ratio (MPVLR), maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet-fibrin clots (MAADP), and arachidonic acid (AA) inhibition rates in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A total of 120 patients with ACS undergoing elective PCI in our hospital between March 2020 and November 2021 were recruited. Patients were divided into 2 groups using the random number table method, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received clopidogrel + aspirin dual antiplatelet therapy, while the study group received ticagrelor + aspirin dual antiplatelet therapy. MPVLR, MAADP, and AA inhibition rates were compared between the 2 groups. Platelet activation indices, platelet micro PNA-223, and platelet gelsolin levels were measured before and 4 weeks after PCI. Changes in cardiac function indices, bleeding rates, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between groups.. The MAADP score of the study group was lower than that of the control group 3 days after surgery (P < .05). Compared with before surgery, CD62p, CD63, miR-223, PAC-1, platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex, and gelsolin levels markedly decreased in both groups 4 weeks after surgery (P < .05). The platelet activation index and platelet miR-223 and gelsolin levels were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group 4 weeks after surgery (P < .05). The overall platelet inhibition effect was significantly better in the study group than in the control group (P < .05). Compared with before surgery, the left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume were significantly increased, and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter significantly decreased in both groups 4 weeks after surgery (P < .05). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of the incidence of bleeding events or MACE (P > .05).. Ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel for platelet inhibition after PCI in patients with ACS and is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Arachidonic Acid; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Gelsolin; Humans; Mean Platelet Volume; MicroRNAs; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Ticagrelor; Ventricular Function, Left

The benefits of de-escalation of P2Y. We investigated the efficacy and safety of de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after PCI by HBR status.. This is a non-prespecified post hoc analysis of the TicAgrelor Versus CLOpidogrel in Stabilized Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (TALOS-AMI) trial. Net adverse clinical events (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] bleeding type 2, 3, or 5) at 1 year post-PCI were compared between the de-escalation (clopidogrel plus aspirin) and the active control (ticagrelor plus aspirin) groups by HBR status, as defined by the modification of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria.. A total of 2,625 patients in the TALOS-AMI trial were analysed. Of these, 589 (22.4%) met the modified ARC-HBR criteria. The de-escalation group had lower primary endpoint rates than the control group in both HBR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.84) and non-HBR (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84) patients. There were no differences in treatment effect for the primary endpoint regardless of HBR status (p for interaction=0.904). BARC bleeding type 3 or 5 was less common in the de-escalation than the control group among HBR patients only (HR 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.84).. In stabilised acute myocardial infarction patients, unguided de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel was associated with a lower rate of net adverse clinical outcomes irrespective of HBR status. The effect of de-escalation of P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

It is unknown whether there are age- and gender-related differences in the safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian populations with a different bleeding or ischemic propensity. Using data from the TICAKOREA (Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Asian/Korean Patients with ACS Intended for Invasive Management) trial comparing ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for 800 Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome, the safety and efficacy outcomes were compared according to age (<75 vs ≥75 years) and gender (men vs women). The primary bleeding end point was clinically significant bleeding, and the primary ischemic end point was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) at 12 months. The incidences of clinically significant bleeding were significantly higher after ticagrelor than after clopidogrel in patients aged <75 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40 to 4.67) but not in patients aged ≥75 years (adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.38). The incidences of MACEs were significantly higher after ticagrelor than after clopidogrel in patients aged ≥75 years (adjusted HR 6.14, 95% CI 1.40 to 26.90) but not in patients aged <75 years (adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.73). The incidences of clinically significant bleeding were significantly higher after ticagrelor than after clopidogrel in men (adjusted HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.24) but not in women (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.46). The adjusted risks of MACEs after ticagrelor or clopidogrel were not significantly different between men and women. In conclusion, there were substantial age- and gender-related differences in bleeding and ischemic outcomes after ticagrelor or clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02094963.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; East Asian People; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Dyspnea; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Inflammation plays a critical role in atherosclerosis. This study examines the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on inflammatory parameters, obtained from complete blood count (CBC) and biochemical measurements, in patients with acute coronary syndrome.. One hundred acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients were included in the study and grouped according to clopidogrel (. NLR, MHR, PLR, and SII levels were lower in ACS patients treating with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor may improve these inflammatory parameters in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated ACS patients compared to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Inflammation; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

To examine methodologies that address imbalanced treatment switching and censoring, 6 different analytical approaches were evaluated under a comparative effectiveness framework: intention-to-treat, as-treated, intention-to-treat with censor-weighting, as-treated with censor-weighting, time-varying exposure, and time-varying exposure with censor-weighting. Marginal structural models were employed to address time-varying exposure, confounding, and possibly informative censoring in an administrative data set of adult patients who were hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome and treated with either clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The effectiveness endpoint included first occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. These methodologies were then applied across simulated data sets with varying frequencies of treatment switching and censoring to compare the effect estimate of each analysis. The findings suggest that implementing different analytical approaches has an impact on the point estimate and interpretation of analyses, especially when censoring is highly unbalanced.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Computer Simulation; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Latent Class Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Selection Bias; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Switching

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Carbidopa; Drug Combinations; Humans; Levodopa; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Emergency Medical Services; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to describe characteristics of new users of ticagrelor or clopidogrel following a recent coronary event, and to compare incidences of selected safety outcomes.. This observational cohort study used data from national Swedish registers. Patients first dispensed ticagrelor or clopidogrel (June 2011-December 2013) were identified from the Prescribed Drug Register and followed until censoring or 31 December 2014. Cohorts were restricted to patients with a recent coronary event-related hospital contact identified in the Patient Register.. The study included 45 987 unique, naïve users of ticagrelor (73% men; mean age 66 years) or clopidogrel (69% men; mean age 69 years). Corresponding to indication, diagnoses before initiation were acute coronary syndrome (93%), myocardial infarction (76%), and percutaneous coronary intervention (69%). The most common medications used in the year before initiation of study therapy were antithrombotic agents (clopidogrel 62%, ticagrelor 43%), mainly low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. Ticagrelor users had a higher incidence (per 1000 person-years) of respiratory bleeding (24.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.1-27.3]; vs clopidogrel users: 14.4 [13.1-15.8]) and dyspnea (25.9 [23.3-28.7]; vs clopidogrel users: 16.8 [15.4-18.4]). Epistaxis accounted for 83-93% of respiratory bleeds. Adjusted analyses found increased risks of gout and acute renal failure with ticagrelor.. Clopidogrel users were older with a higher prevalence of concomitant medications than ticagrelor users. Our study showed increased incidences of dyspnea and respiratory bleeding (mainly epistaxis) among current ticagrelor users compared with clopidogrel users, and increased risks of gout and acute renal failure after adjustment.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sweden; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to compare the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention treated with prasugrel versus ticagrelor.. Among 7,233 patients enrolled to the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) between 2010 and 2018, we identified 1,126 eligible patients treated with prasugrel and 817 with ticagrelor. Comparison between the groups was performed separately in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, propensity score matched (PSM) STEMI patients, and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients.. In-hospital complication rates, including rates of stent thrombosis, were not significantly different between groups. In PSM STEMI patients, 30-day re-hospitalization rate (p < 0.05), 30-day MACE (the composite of death, MI, stroke, and urgent revascularization, p = 0.006), and 1-year mortality rates (p = 0.08) were higher in the ticagrelor group compared to the prasugrel group; in NSTE-ACS patients, outcomes were not associated with drug choice. In Cox regression analysis applied on the entire cohort, prasugrel was associated with lower 1-year mortality in STEMI patients but not in NSTE-ACS patients (p for interaction 0.03).. Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel was associated with superior clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, but not in NSTE-ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Israel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Body Size; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the difference in net clinical benefit of clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin after 12 months in patients in mainland China with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs).. In this multicenter, retrospective, real-world study, the data were sourced from three databases: BRIC-ACS(I) study, COSTIC study, and 301 Hospital PCI patient database from January 2014 to October 2017. The primary endpoint of the study was net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE) comprised of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥ 2 (excluding BARC type = 4) bleeding, whereas the secondary end point was evaluation of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and BARC type ≥ 2 bleeding events.. A total of 7862 ACS patients were included in the final analysis, of whom propensity score matching (PSM) analysis yielded 2165 patients in each cohort. After PSM analysis, cumulative incidence of NACCE was significantly lower with clopidogrel and aspirin than with ticagrelor and aspirin [117 (5.4%) vs. 180 (8.3%), P < 0.001] at 12 months. Effect estimates showed reduced risk of NACCE occurrence in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.77, P < 0.001]. Incidence of bleeding was significantly lower in the clopidogrel cohort than in the ticagrelor cohort (aHR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.66, P < 0.001). Clopidogrel and aspirin therapy was comparable to ticagrelor and aspirin in reducing the incidence of MACE after PSM analysis.. In Chinese ACS patients who underwent PCI with second-generation DESs, outpatient use of clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with reduction in NACCE and bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; China; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To establish the safety and efficacy of different dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combinations in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) according to their baseline ischaemic and bleeding risk estimated with a machine learning derived model [machine learning-based prediction of adverse events following an acute coronary syndrome (PRAISE) score].. Incidences of death, re-acute myocardial infarction (re-AMI), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3-5 bleeding with aspirin plus different P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel or potent P2Y12 inhibitors: ticagrelor or prasugrel) were appraised among patients of the PRAISE data set grouped in four subcohorts: low-to-moderate ischaemic and bleeding risk; low-to-moderate ischaemic risk and high bleeding risk; high ischaemic risk and low-to-moderate bleeding risk; and high ischaemic and bleeding risk. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the outcome measures were derived with inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. Among patients with low-to-moderate bleeding risk, clopidogrel was associated with higher rates of re-AMI in those at low-to-moderate ischaemic risk [HR 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-2.51; P = 0.006] and increased risk of death (HR 3.2, 1.45-4.21; P = 0.003) and re-AMI (HR 2.23, 1.45-3.41; P < 0.001) in those at high ischaemic risk compared with prasugrel or ticagrelor, without a difference in the risk of major bleeding. Among patients with high bleeding risk, clopidogrel showed comparable risk of death, re-AMI, and major bleeding vs. potent P2Y12 inhibitors, regardless of the baseline ischaemic risk.. Among ACS patients with non-high risk of bleeding, the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with a lower risk of death and recurrent ischaemic events, without bleeding excess. Patients deemed at high bleeding risk may instead be safely addressed to a less intensive DAPT strategy with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. It remains inconclusive whether ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing complex PCI in real-world practice.. Based on an all-comers PCI registry, we compared the long-term effectiveness and safety between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing complex PCI, defined as PCI procedures for complex lesions including bifurcation, chronic total occlusion, ostial, tortuous, calcific, diffused, thrombus-containing, and restenotic lesions. The primary ischemic outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The safety outcome comprised Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias.. Among ACS patients who underwent complex PCI, 4373 (35.2%) and 8065 (64.8%) received dual antiplatelet therapy based on ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. The incidences of composite ischemic events (before PSM: 1.74% vs. 2.84%; after PSM: 1.50% vs. 2.65%; p < 0.01 for both) and all-cause death (before PSM: 1.23% vs. 2.12%, p < 0.01; after PSM: 1.09% vs. 1.81%, p = 0.02) were significantly lower in the ticagrelor-treated than in the clopidogrel-treated group. There was no significant difference in BARC types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding between groups.. Whilst the risk of major bleeding was comparable between the two drugs, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic events than clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing complex PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (Ticagrelor and Prasugrel) in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin in elderly acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remains unclear.. All ACS patients aged 75 years and older treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) from PRAISE dataset were included. The safety and efficacy of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel was evaluated with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Sensitivity analysis was performed for patients older or equal than 85 years old. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint, while myocardial infarction (MI), Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 bleedings and Major and Net Adverse Clinical and Cardiac Events (MACE and NACE) were the secondary ones.. 4287 patients were included, 3197 treated with Clopidogrel and 1090 with Ticagrelor. After 16 ± 3 months, Ticagrelor showed neutral effect on NACE and mortality (HR 0.98; 0.63-1.52, p = 0.94 and HR 0.38; 0.14-1.04, p = 0,06), reduced risk of MACE and MI (HR 0.82; 0.23-0.91, p = 0.03 and HR 0.43; 0.14-0.89, p = 0.04) and increased risk of BARC 3-5 bleeding (HR 2.14; 1.19-3.85, p = 0.001). In very elderly patients (≥85 years) Ticagrelor decreased risk of MI and increased risk of bleeding (HR 0.69; 0.22-0.95, p = 0.04 and HR 2.36; 1.02-5.52, p = 0.04, all 95%CI) with neutral effect on NACE and MACE.. In elderly ACS patients treated with PCI, Ticagrelor was associated with neutral effect on all-cause mortality, lower risk MACE and MI compared with Clopidogrel. Such benefit was counterbalanced by increased risk of major bleedings. These results were consistent among patients aged 85 years and older.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Although current literature indicates both a clinical and a cost-effective benefit of routine genotype-guided treatment of patients treated with clopidogrel, this strategy is not recommended in guidelines. In cardiology, but also in neurology and vascular surgery, the current scientific evidence for this is still insufficient. Nevertheless, the role of pharmacogenetics will gain importance in today's medical world, where the demand for personalised medicine is on the rise. The implementation of genotyping in the clinic will nonetheless be a practical challenge due to a lack of clarity about who will bear the associated costs. In patients with coronary artery disease and a higher bleeding risk, it is valuable to determine the CYP2C19 genotype prior to treatment with clopidogrel. Pending further studies, we recommend that specialists prescribing clopidogrel should determine the CYP2C19 genotype in patients at high risk of recurrent ischemic events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Fibrinolytic Agents; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor or prasugrel are recommended to reduce ischemic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in clinical practice, patients are often switched from a potent P2Y12 inhibitor to clopidogrel prior to or at discharge ('de-escalation'). We sought to assess the incidence and predictors of de-escalation.. Consecutive patients who received either a ticagrelor or prasugrel loading dose for AMI PCI at two tertiary centers between Jan 2015-Mar 2019 who survived to discharge were included. Data were obtained from the electronic health record and institutional NCDR CathPCI data. Patients who were de-escalated to clopidogrel were compared with those who remained on potent P2Y12 inhibitors through the time of discharge.. Of the1818 patients in the cohort, 1146 (63%) were de-escalated. Patients in the de-escalation group were older, more often Black, had lower prevalence of co-morbidities, less often had private insurance, and had less complex PCI. After adjustment, older age remained positively associated (OR 1.2, CI 1.08-1.34, p = .001) and Caucasian race (OR 0.5, CI 0.33-0.77, p = .002), prior MI (OR 0.7, CI 0.5-0.97, p = .032), bifurcation lesion (OR 0.71, CI 0.53-0.95, p = .019), and greater number of stents (OR 0.82, CI 0.75-0.91, p = .0001) were negatively associated with de-escalation. In de-escalated patients, the rationale was not documented in 75.9% of cases.. De-escalation occurred frequently in patients with AMI and was associated with both non-clinical and clinical factors. Medical decision making was poorly documented and represent an area for improvement.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hospitals; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Stroke after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be devastating. It is uncertain whether the risks of ischaemic stroke or intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) are associated with different choices of P2Y12 inhibitors (potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel vs clopidogrel). Even though East Asians are known to have different thrombotic and haemorrhagic profiles from Caucasians, data on Chinese patients are sparse.. This was a retrospective cohort study conducting in Chinese patients with ACS who underwent first-ever percutaneous coronary intervention from 14 hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2017. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischaemic stroke. The secondary efficacy endpoint was a composite outcome of thrombotic events including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. The primary safety endpoint was ICH. The secondary safety endpoint was a composite of major bleeding events.. After adjustment of baseline characteristics by 1:1 propensity score matching, a total of 6220 patients (3110 on each group) were analysed. Compared with clopidogrel, potent P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.87; p=0.008) and a lower risk of thrombotic events (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.90; p=0.001). Potent P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with similar risk of ICH (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.25, p=0.20) and major bleeding (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.01, p=0.069).. Potent P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with a lower adjusted risk of ischaemic stroke and thrombotic events, compared with clopidogrel. The risks of ICH and major bleeding were similar.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Brain Ischemia; China; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) P2Y12 inhibitor non-adherence is common and associated with greater risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Non-adherence can follow different trajectories from an inability to initiate, implement, or continue therapy for the intended duration. We aimed to evaluate P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectories among ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), their frequency, and association with MACE.. We conducted a cohort study of adults discharged alive after PCI for ACS (2012-16) using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry linked with administrative data. The primary outcome was P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectory in the year after PCI assessed using group-based trajectory modelling. We used logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards regression to assess associations of trajectories with risk factors and MACE, respectively. We included 12 844 patients (mean age 62.4 years, 23.6% female). Five trajectories were identified: early consistent non-adherence (11.0%), rapid decline (7.7%), delayed initiation (6.0%), gradual decline (20.5%), and persistent adherence (54.8%). Compared with persistent adherence, rapid decline [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.49] and delayed initiation (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.12-1.78) were associated with higher MACE in the overall cohort, whereas early consistent non-adherence was associated with higher MACE only in the subgroup receiving a drug-eluting stent (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.60-3.71).. After PCI for ACS, patients followed one of five distinct P2Y12 inhibitor adherence trajectories. Rapid decline and delayed initiation were associated with a higher risk of MACE, whereas early consistent non-adherence was only associated with higher MACE risk in patients with a drug-eluting stent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Despite implementation of new interventional techniques and therapeutic advances, elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continue to be susceptible to in-hospital bleeding compared with younger ones. Thus, we investigated the incidence of in-hospital bleeding events and associated risk factors in elderly (≥ 75°years) ACS patients. We also wanted to define the bleeding sites, characteristics, and associated mortality. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification type 2, 3, or 5 was used to define bleeding events. Overall, 539 patients were included in the study (mean age: 82.5 ± 4.8°years; 282 (52.3%) females). Of these patients, 69 (12.8%) developed in-hospital bleeding. Factors that were independently related with in-hospital bleeding were age (odds ratio (OR): 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.011.14,

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Tirofiban; Treatment Outcome

In order to reduce the risk of bleeding in patients on P2Y. This IPD-MA consists of secondary analyses of existing non-identifiable data and meets the criteria for waiver of ethics review by the local Research Ethics Committee. Data sharing and transfer will be subject to a confidentiality agreement and a data use agreement. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.. CRD42022291946.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Ticagrelor

Age is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes due both to a higher risk of bleeding and ischemia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor in elderly patients.. Patients ≥75 years of age admitted to our center from January, 2015 to December, 2019 who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were included in our study. Eligible patients were divided into clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups according to the P2Y. Of 1505 patients enrolled in this study, 442 were assigned to ticagrelor group and 1063 were assigned to clopidogrel group. The incidence of BARC 2, 3, and 5 bleeding (HR, 2.304; 95% CI, 1.540-3.447), and any bleeding (HR, 2.476; 95% CI, 1.802-3.403) in ticagrelor group was significantly higher than clopidogrel group. There were no significant difference between the two groups with respect to BARC 3 and 5 bleeding (HR, 1.566; 95% CI, 0.767-3.198) and MACCEs (HR, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.702-1.305).. Compared with clopidogrel, DAPT with ticagrelor significantly increased the risk of BARC 2, 3, and 5 bleeding without reducing MACCEs in elderly patients who underwent PCI.. The study was retrospectively registered in

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We compared P2Y. Overall, there were no differences of P2Y. Prasugrel and ticagrelor inhibit P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated; Ticagrelor

Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reduces recurrent ischaemic events compared to aspirin alone. Further reductions in events have been demonstrated when clopidogrel is replaced by ticagrelor or prasugrel albeit with increases in bleeding. There are few studies documenting the patterns of use of P2Y12 inhibitors or their association with outcomes in the Australian population.. To describe the patterns of use of each P2Y12 inhibitor and to determine the associations between initial P2Y12 inhibitor use and outcomes.. Data were extracted from Cooperative National Registry of ACS, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE)-a prospective database of patients presenting to 43 sites across Australia with ACS. Patients were stratified based on first antiplatelet agent received. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared between these patient groups and hospital investigations, management as well as in-hospital and 12 months outcomes (death, a composite of cardiac-related death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, and major bleeding) were compared between the three treatment cohorts after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics.. Mean ages of the clopidogrel (n=7,537), ticagrelor (n=1,878), and prasugrel (n=347) cohorts were 65, 63, and 58 yrs respectively (p<0.0001), the mean Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores were 107, 104, and 102 (p=0.0016). The ticagrelor and prasugrel cohorts were more likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (clopidogrel 52%, ticagrelor 66%, prasugrel 88%, p<0.0001), and evidence based medications (≥4 guideline indicated medications: clopidogrel 76%, ticagrelor 82%, prasugrel 93%, p<0.0001). Patients treated with ticagrelor and prasugrel were less likely to experience in-hospital death (clopidogrel 2.5%, ticagrelor 1.4%, prasugrel 1.2%, p=0.05), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (clopidogrel 5.1%, ticagrelor 3.0%, prasugrel 3.5% [p=0.01]), or bleeding (clopidogrel 8.4%, ticagrelor 4.6%, prasugrel 7.5% [p<0.001]) compared to clopidogrel. These differences were no longer apparent after multivariable adjustment. There was no difference in outcomes between cohorts at 12 months.. In Australia, ticagrelor and prasugrel are used in younger patients who are more likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and receive evidence based therapy. Patients receiving clopidogrel were more likely to experience in hospital ischaemic or bleeding events but this was explained by their higher baseline risk. Selection of therapy was not associated with any difference in outcomes at 12-month follow-up, but our findings suggest there is room for improvement towards guideline-driven usage of P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Australia; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The risk of ticagrelor-related bleeding events remains a major clinical concern, especially in East Asian populations. Previous studies have reported higher ticagrelor exposure in Asian patients than in Caucasians. This prompted us to investigate the correlation between ticagrelor concentrations and bleeding events.. Patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome and receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and ticagrelor) were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. Trough plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and a major active metabolite were assayed, and 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ticagrelor pharmacokinetics and safety were also identified.. A total of 631 patients were included and 133 patients had bleeding academic research consortium type 1 or 2 bleeding event. The median ticagrelor concentration (interquartile range) was significantly higher in patients with bleeding events than that in patients without bleeding events (322.6 ng/mL [196.2-458.0 ng/mL] vs. 222.1 ng/mL [140.4-341.9 ng/mL], P < .001). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cut-off value for ticagrelor levels predicting bleeding events was 363.3 ng/mL (area under the curve = 0.65; P < .001, 95% Cl: 0.595-0.700). Pharmacogenomics results showed that P2Y12 (rs6787801, P = .024) and P2Y12 (rs6785930, P = .048) were statistically associated with ticagrelor levels and bleeding events, respectively.. Ticagrelor plasma concentrations were associated with bleeding events in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; China; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The POPular AGE trial showed that clopidogrel significantly reduced bleeding risk compared with ticagrelor without any signs of an increase in thrombotic events. The aim of this analysis was to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor in these patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).. A 1-year decision tree based on the POPular AGE trial in combination with a lifelong Markov model was developed to compare clopidogrel with ticagrelor in terms of clinical outcomes, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in elderly patients (above 70 year) with NSTE-ACS. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from a Dutch healthcare system perspective. Events rates and utility data observed in the POPular AGE trial were combined with lifetime projections to evaluate costs and effects for a fictional cohort of 1000 patients. Treatment with clopidogrel instead of ticagrelor led to a cost saving of €1484 575 (€1485 per patient) and a decrease of 10.96 QALYs (0.011 QALY per patient) in the fictional cohort. In an alternative base case with equal distribution over health states in the first year, treatment with clopidogrel led to an increase in QALYs. In all scenario analyses, treatment with clopidogrel was cost-saving.. Clopidogrel is a cost-saving alternative to ticagrelor in elderly patients after NSTE-ACS, though regarding overall cost-effectiveness clopidogrel was not superior to ticagrelor, as it resulted in a small negative effect on QALYs. However, based on the results of the alternative base case and clinical outcomes of the POPular AGE trial, clopidogrel could be a reasonable alternative to ticagrelor for elderly NSTE-ACS patients with a higher bleeding risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Background Despite improved outcomes associated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), many studies have demonstrated slow adoption of ticagrelor in the United States because of its increased cost. Less is known about how ticagrelor is adopted when there is no added cost consideration. Our objectives were to determine patterns of use of ticagrelor, hospital-level adoption of ticagrelor use, and factors associated with its use after ACS in a publicly funded health care system. Methods and Results We conducted a population-based cohort study including patients (≥65 years) hospitalized with their first ACS from April 2014 to March 2018 in Ontario, Canada. We determined temporal trends in ticagrelor use and hospital-level adoption of its use post-ACS discharge. Using hierarchical regression models, we identified significant predictors of ticagrelor use. There were 23 962 patients with ACS (mean age 76.3 years, 59.7% men) hospitalized in 156 hospitals. Overall ticagrelor use increased from 32.6% in 2014/2015 to 51.8% in 2017/2018. There was substantial variation in ticagrelor use post-ACS across hospitals, with hospital-specific prescribing rates ranging from 0% to 83.6%. Lower odds of ticagrelor use was associated with advanced age and the presence of comorbidities. Besides patient factors, being admitted to a rurally located hospital more than halved the odds of being prescribed ticagrelor (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.77). Being managed by a cardiologist during the index ACS hospitalization was associated with higher odds of having a ticagrelor prescription after ACS (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.36-3.33). Conclusions Ticagrelor use rates varied substantially across hospitals and were strongly associated with physician and hospital factors independent of patient characteristics.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Male; Ontario; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In this study, we aimed to determine whether potent agents affect in-hospital bleeding and mortality compared to clopidogrel in patients with the acute coronary syndrome in whom tirofiban and P2Y12 inhibitor are used together.. Patients who were treated interventionally between 2015 and 2020 and were using tirofiban were retrospectively screened. Clinical, laboratory, and angiographic findings were obtained from the hospital database. Patients were analyzed by dividing them into clopidogrel and prasugrel/ticagrelor groups.. Acute coronary syndrome patients (n = 227) who were treated interventionally were included in this retrospective study. Clopidogrel was given to 93 (41%), ticagrelor to 112 (49.3%), and prasugrel to 22 of the patients (9.7%). Compared to the ticagrelor/prasugrel group, the clopidogrel group was older and more were women, and the history of hypertension and previous coronary artery disease was higher (P, respectively: <.001; .001; .008; .0045). The creatinine value was higher, the basal hemoglobin was lower, and the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) and CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) scores were higher (P, respectively: .026; .002; .002; <.001). The in-hospital bleeding rate was signifi- cantly higher in the clopidogrel group (P < .001). Although the in-hospital mortality rate was higher, it was not statistically significant (P = .07). Regression analysis showed that GRACE score and gender were associated with in-hospital mortality (P < .001; P=.031, respectively), and only age was associated with in-hospital bleeding (P < .001). No relationship was found with P2Y12 inhibitor.. In our study, we found that the combined use of potent P2Y12 inhibitor with tiro- fiban in acute coronary syndrome patients treated interventionally was not different from the use of clopidogrel in terms of in-hospital bleeding and mortality.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Tirofiban; Treatment Outcome

Patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention receive dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. Recurrent myocardial infarction or bleedings are possibly due to under- or overdosing of antiplatelet therapy in relation to body size.. We correlated residual platelet aggregation with body mass index, body surface area, lean body mass and blood volume in 220 patients on prasugrel (n = 121) or ticagrelor (n = 99).. Platelet aggregation outside the recommended window was recorded in 85 patients, but not correlated with any of the body indices.. Body size does not affect platelet response to prasugrel or ticagrelor at the guideline-recommended fixed dosages.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Body Size; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is guideline therapy following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Novel, potent P2Y. The latest statistical data collected by the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS), Australia, was reviewed. PBS codes for coronary indications were selected. Yearly total prescriptions and cost were then compared between all three P2Y. Total yearly P2Y. Clopidogrel remains the most prescribed P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Australia; Clopidogrel; Health Expenditures; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prescriptions; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend the use of potent antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in severe renal insufficiency patients are scarce. The purpose of this study is to determine if ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency treated with PCI.. We retrospectively enrolled patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min·1.73 m. A total of 276 patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency who were treated with PCI with ticagrelor (. Ticagrelor did not improve the major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality when compared to clopidogrel, but significantly increased the risk of bleeding in Chinese patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Taking ischemic and bleeding risks into consideration, insufficient data exist on dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease.. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor in comparison with clopidogrel on a background of aspirin for elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention.. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Selected from patients with coronary artery disease aged ≥ 75 years from January 2010 to July 2019, 908 eligible subjects receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for up to 12 months were consecutively enrolled in the study. The included patients received ticagrelor in combination with aspirin (n = 264) or clopidogrel in combination with aspirin (n = 644). Effectiveness endpoints were evaluated by the major adverse cardiovascular events, encompassing all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and clinically driven revascularization. The safety endpoints were recorded as the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding.. The patients who were treated with ticagrelor were slightly younger than those who were treated with clopidogrel (79.1 ± 3.7 vs 80.7 ± 4.5 years, p < 0.01). The ticagrelor cohort contained a higher percentage of patients undergoing a prior percutaneous coronary intervention (37.9% vs 24.5%, p < 0.01), and a lower percentage of smokers (19.3% vs 27.2%, p < 0.05), compared with the clopidogrel cohort. The levels of glucose, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in the ticagrelor group were higher while the level of triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were lower (p < 0.05) than those in the clopidogrel group. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention was performed more frequently among the ticagrelor-treated patients (23.5% vs 9.3%, p < 0.01), while patients in the clopidogrel group underwent more left circumflex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.3% vs 23.1%, p < 0.01). We found that ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than clopidogrel using the inverse probability of treatment weighting model (odds ratio, 0.493; 95% confidence interval 0.356-0.684). There was no difference in terms of the risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding between the two groups (p > 0.05).. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than clopidogrel at 12 months in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease, without a significant increase of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; China; Cholesterol; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is associated with widespread microvascular thrombosis, low platelet count, and hemolysis. Ticagrelor is a relatively new agent which functions as a reversible inhibitor of the P2Y12 receptor working to prevent platelet aggregation and is used with or without aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. We describe the case of an 80-year-old man with ischemic heart disease who developed this rare and potentially fatal adverse reaction known as TTP following treatment with ticagrelor. CASE REPORT We report the case of an 80-year-old man who presented with an acute change in mental status 4 months after initiating ticagrelor following percutaneous coronary intervention. Laboratory testing on presentation revealed evidence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated creatinine levels, suggestive of acute renal failure. The combination of his clinical symptoms and laboratory findings were concerning for TTP, likely secondary to ticagrelor use. The patient was treated with therapeutic plasma exchange, systemic steroids, and hemodialysis, which led to resolution of the hemolysis and recovery of renal function. CONCLUSIONS Although the association between ticagrelor and TTP is rare, early recognition of this life-threatening complication is essential to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with TTP. Since ticagrelor is now more commonly used, it is important that clinicians be aware of this complication.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged, 80 and over; Hemolysis; Humans; Male; Plasma Exchange; Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic; Ticagrelor

The benefits of potent antithrombotic therapy usually come at the expense of a higher risk of bleeding. The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in elderly East Asian populations remains debated due to the concerns about the imbalance of ischemic and bleeding risks. This study aimed to compare the impact of clopidogrel with ticagrelor on clinical outcomes in East Asian patients aged ≥75 years with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using data from an institutional registry. We assessed the treatment effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel based on propensity scores and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 2775 ACS patients were included, of which 235 (8.5%) were treated with ticagrelor. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 11.9% of patients treated with ticagrelor versus 8.8% treated with clopidogrel. There was no significant association between treatment with ticagrelor and a lower risk of the primary efficacy outcome (p = .156). However, the incidences of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.79) and major bleeding (adjusted HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.56) were significantly higher in patients treated with ticagrelor than clopidogrel. In elderly patients with ACS from East Asia, the efficacy of clopidogrel was comparable to ticagrelor, while ticagrelor is associated with an increased risk of mortality and major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dimaprit; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel or ticagrelor increased bleeding complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to compare the bleeding risks between patients treated with clopidogrel and ticagrelor preoperatively and investigate the influence of discontinuation of clopidogrel and ticagrelor on bleeding risk in off-pump CABG (OPCABG).. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with DAPT who underwent OPCABG. The propensity score matching was performed given the baseline differences between clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Bleeding was assessed by chest tube drainage volume and universal definition of perioperative bleeding.. This study included 836 patients. Five hundred and fifty patients were treated with clopidogrel and 286 patients treated with ticagrelor before surgery. After matching, 275 patients treated with clopidogrel and 275 patients with ticagrelor were included. There were no significant differences in bleeding between clopidogrel and ticagrelor group. Patients who discontinued clopidogrel before surgery <3 d had a higher risk of severe perioperative bleeding compared with those who discontinued ≥5 d (16.4 % vs. 5.0 %, P = 0.045). By contrast, the risk of severe perioperative bleeding was comparable among patients who discontinued ticagrelor for <3 d, ≥3-5 d and ≥5 d preoperatively (16.2 % vs. 9.1 % vs. 10.1 %, P = 0.317). The multivariable analysis confirmed that time since discontinuation (<3 d vs. ≥5 d: OR = 2.732, 95 % CI: 1.332-5.605, P = 0.006) but not the types of P2Y. There were no significant differences in severe perioperative bleeding between clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups. Discontinuation of clopidogrel <3 d before OPCABG increased the risk of severe perioperative bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Analgesics, Opioid; Drug Interactions; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Potential benefit with potent platelet inhibition in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been discussed. The aim of this study was to compare a potent P2Y12 inhibition strategy using ticagrelor with clopidogrel in CCS patients referred for coronary angiography (CA) and PCI if feasible.. In this retrospective real-world study, patients referred for outpatient CA due to suspected CCS were included. To adjust for group differences, a propensity score reflecting the probability of being treated with ticagrelor was calculated and added to the logistic regression outcome model.. In total, 1,003 patients were included in the primary analysis (577 treated with clopidogrel and 426 with ticagrelor). Among clopidogrel-treated patients, 132 (22.9%) experienced a bleeding complication compared with 93 (21.8%) among ticagrelor-treated patients, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.70). There was no difference in bleeding severity. Furthermore, we observed no statistically significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or stroke]) (1.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.17). A subgroup analysis restricted to patients undergoing PCI ad hoc displayed a similar pattern. Also, patients undergoing CA without PCI ad hoc frequently experienced a bleeding complication, with no difference between the two treatments (21.0% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.27). Propensity score adjusted analyses confirmed the results.. In patients with CCS referred for CA and PCI if feasible, a more potent P2Y12 inhibition strategy with ticagrelor was not associated with bleeding complications or MACE compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

East Asians have a higher risk of bleeding than Europeans when treated with ticagrelor. This study aimed to explore genetic indicators related to the high bleeding propensity in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using ticagrelor.. A multicenter prospective cohort study.. Four sub center hospitals participating the study.. Between March 2018 and July 2021, 208 patients with ACS were administered ticagrelor and underwent genetic testing.. Patients were enrolled and followed up for bleeding events for 12 months. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected using whole-exome sequencing. SNPs significantly associated with cumulative bleeding events within 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were selected (p < 0.01). Among these, SNPs showing a difference of ≥2 fold in their distribution frequency among East Asians and Europeans were selected.. Among all patients, 96.60% received ticagrelor plus aspirin or cilostazol, and 42.3% suffered from bleeding events during 12-month follow-up. Furthermore, 22 SNPs of 15 genes were found to have a significant association with cumulative bleeding events within 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Among these SNPs, FIG4 rs2295837 (A>T) variant had the strongest association with bleeding events within 1 month (p = 1.28 × 10. Fifteen genes, including PROK2, HRNR, and FIG4, were potential biomarkers of high bleeding propensity in East Asian patients with ACS using ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Calcium-Binding Proteins; East Asian People; Flavoproteins; Gastrointestinal Hormones; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intermediate Filament Proteins; Neuropeptides; Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is one of the most deleterious complications of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).. We systematically analyzed the clinical characteristics of STEMI patients with IHCA, as well as predictors and treatments associated with risk of IHCA, using a nationwide database.. In the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project (2014-2019), we stratified patients presenting with STEMI within 24 hours after symptom onset according to IHCA or no IHCA during the index hospitalization. We analyzed patients' clinical characteristics, mortality, and independent correlates of IHCA.. Of 40,670 STEMI patients, 2.2% (95% CI: 2.1%-2.4%) experienced IHCA. Among IHCA patients, the in-hospital mortality was 53.0% (95% CI: 49.7%-56.3%). IHCA represents 55.0% (95% CI: 51.6%-58.4%) of inpatient deaths. Age ≥75 years, female, nonsmoker, prior diabetes mellitus, prior renal failure, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and Killip IV were identified as predictors of IHCA. IHCA patients were less likely to receive β-blockers and ticagrelor during the first 24 hours after first medical contact and were less likely to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. After adjustment, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.95), β-blockers (adjusted HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86), and ticagrelor (adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.76) were associated with a reduced risk of IHCA.. IHCA is rare in STEMI but is associated with high mortality. Multiple modifiable and unmodifiable factors are associated with its occurrence, suggesting that early intervention and rational drug treatment may improve its prognosis. (CCC Project- Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT02306616).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Humans; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor

Pleiotropic effects have been implicated in clinical benefits of ticagrelor compared to thienopyridine P2Y. Biochemical indices of endothelial dysfunction/activation and platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry were compared in 126 stable post-ACS subjects (mean age: 65 ± 10 years, 92 men and 34 women), including patients with (n = 61) or without (n = 65) coexistent type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on uneventful maintenance DAPT with either ticagrelor (90 mg b.d.) or clopidogrel (75 mg o.d.) in addition to low-dose aspirin. Exclusion criteria included a complicated in-hospital course, symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and relevant coexistent diseases except for well-controlled diabetes, mild renal insufficiency or hypertension.. Clinical characteristics were similar in patients on ticagrelor (n = 62) and clopidogrel (n = 64). The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation and circulating soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) were decreased in ticagrelor users irrespective of T2DM status (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for platelet reactivity and sP-selectin, respectively). Plasma levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) were lower in T2DM subjects on ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel (758 ± 162 vs. 913 ± 217 µg/L, p < 0.01). In contrast, plasma sVCAM-1 was similar in non-diabetic patients on ticagrelor and clopidogrel (872 ± 203 vs. 821 ± 210 µg/L, p > 0.7). The concentrations of sE-selectin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and asymmetric dimethylarginine did not differ according to the type of P2Y. Our preliminary findings may suggest an association of ticagrelor-based maintenance DAPT with favorable endothelial effects compared to clopidogrel users in stable post-ACS patients with T2DM. If proven, this could contribute to more pronounced clinical benefits of ticagrelor in diabetic subjects.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Ticagrelor; Ventricular Function, Left

Long term dual antiplatelet therapy (LTDAPT), with ticagrelor 60 mg and low-dose aspirin, is indicated after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in high-risk patients with a history of ACS of at least 1 year. LTDAPT had a good tolerability and safety profile, but the risk of TIMI major bleeding was increased. However, even non-significant bleeding may be important because it has an effect on the quality of life and therefore may lead to treatment discontinuation. We, therefore, evaluated patients' experiences with LTDAPT and the impact of nuisance bleeding on quality of life and treatment adherence. We retrospectively reviewed 225 patients in follow-up after ACS with at least one high-risk condition, treated with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (after 90 mg twice daily for 12 months). The outpatient follow-up program after hospitalization provides a visit on day 30 after discharge, then after 3 months, continuing with six-monthly checks. We assessed the presence and intensity of bleeding, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), at each visit. The TIMI score was used to determine the severity of the bleeding. Any overt bleeding event that did not meet the major and minor criteria was labeled "minimal" and could be framed as "nuisance bleeding." The HRQoL was assessed by the EuroQol-5 and Dimension (EQ-5D) visual analog scale (VAS) score. Minimal bleedings were present in 49 patients (21%), but only in one case (by decision of the patient) there was a cause for discontinuation of therapy. However, 39 (79%) subjects had asked for opinions on stopping the therapy during the telephone consultation. Factors influencing LTDAPT knowledge included access to medication counselling, engaging with information communicated during medication counselling, and access to timely, relevant and expert information and advice after discharge from the hospital. All adverse events, judged to be "not serious" in trials, may have an effect on the quality of life and therefore may lead to treatment discontinuation. The authors underline the importance of careful outpatient follow-up and ongoing counselling, to check out compliance and possible adverse effect of LTDAPT.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Referral and Consultation; Retrospective Studies; Telephone; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Potent P2Y. The authors compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world contemporary PCI cohort.. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 2014 and 2019 discharged on either prasugrel or ticagrelor were included from the prospectively collected institutional PCI registry. Primary endpoint was the composite of death and myocardial infarction (MI), with secondary outcomes including rates of bleeding, stroke, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year.. Overall, 3,858 patients were included in the study (ticagrelor: n = 2,771; prasugrel: n = 1,087), and a majority (48.4%) underwent PCI in the context of CCS. Patients prescribed ticagrelor were more likely to be female, have a history of cerebrovascular disease, and have ACS presentation, while those receiving prasugrel were more likely to be White with a higher prevalence of prior revascularization. No difference in the risk of death or MI was noted across the groups (ticagrelor vs prasugrel: 3.3% vs 3.1%; HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.54-1.43; P = 0.59). Rates of target vessel revascularization were significantly lower in the ticagrelor cohort (9.3% vs 14.0%; adjusted HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.91; P = 0.007) with no differences in stroke or bleeding. The results were consistent in patients with CCS (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.46-1.54) and ACS (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.46-1.54), without evidence of interaction (P = 0.37), and confirmed across multivariable adjustment and propensity score stratification analysis.. In this contemporary patient population undergoing PCI, prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar 1-year efficacy and safety.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a frequently prescribed platelet aggregation inhibitor used in patients with acute coronary syndrome. A rare side effect is severe dyspnoea.. A 76 year old woman experiences severe shortness of breath three weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention because of acute myocardial infarction. Physical examination and additional investigation showed no pulmonary or cardiac explanation for her complaints. Shortly after cessation of ticagrelor, her complaints disappeared.. Ticagrelor-related severe dyspnoea in post-myocardial infarction patients is a diagnosis by exclusion of other reasonable causes of dyspnoea. Unfamiliarity with this side effect can lead to excess diagnostics and unnecessary referrals.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; COVID-19; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Pandemics; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Prasugrel is usually preferred over Clopidogrel to reduce the risk of recurrent coronary thrombosis in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary interventions during an acute coronary syndrome owing to its more potent and more rapid antithrombotic activation. Little is known about Prasugrel-induced hepatotoxicity, although mild-to-moderate alanine transaminase (ALT) and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) elevations have been noticed in post-marketing surveillance. Herein, we report the case of a patient with Prasugrel-related hepatotoxicity that was reverted after switching from Prasugrel to Ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the 1-year risks of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB), sepsis, and pneumonia in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel.. In this nationwide observational cohort study, 26 606 patients who underwent urgent or emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (January 2011-December 2017) and initiated treatment with ticagrelor [N = 20 073 (75.5%); median age 64 years (25th-75th percentile 55-72 years); 74.8% men] or clopidogrel [N = 6533 (24.5%); median age 68 years (25th-75th percentile 58-77 years); 70.2% men] were identified using Danish nationwide registries. The 1-year standardized absolute risks of outcomes was calculated based on cause-specific Cox regression models, and average treatment effects between treatment groups were obtained as standardized differences in absolute 1-year risks. The absolute 1-year risk of SAB was 0.10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.15%] in the ticagrelor group and 0.29% (95% CI, 0.17-0.42%) in the clopidogrel group. Compared with clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower absolute 1-year risk of SAB [absolute risk difference -0.19% (95% CI, -0.32% to -0.05%), P value 0.006]. Likewise, treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower absolute 1-year risk of sepsis [0.99% (95% CI, 0.83-1.14%) vs. 1.49% (95% CI, 1.17-1.80%); absolute risk difference -0.50% (95% CI, -0.86% to -0.14%), P value 0.007] and pneumonia [3.13% (95% CI, 2.86-3.39%) vs. 4.56% (95% CI, 4.03-5.08%); absolute risk difference -1.43% (95% CI, -2.03% to -0.82%), P value < 0.001] compared with clopidogrel.. Treatment with ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of SAB, sepsis, and pneumonia compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Bacteremia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Clopidogrel is the most commonly prescribed P2Y. To determine which factors most greatly influence cardiology-provider and patient selection of P2Y. Single-center study assessed survey responses from 32 cardiology-providers who prescribed and 105 patients who received clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor for ACS or stent placement. Respondents ranked factors influencing P2Y. Cardiology-providers ranked risk of bleeding, comfort/experience, and cost as most influential. Patients ranked risk of drug interaction, adverse effects, and reduction in myocardial infarction as most influential. Significant differences between cardiology-providers and patients were found for 5 of 8 factors. Cardiology-providers ranked once daily administration (p = 0.01), risk of bleeding (p = 0.002), and cost (p < 0.001) as more important than patients. Patients ranked risk of adverse effects (p = 0.007) and drug interactions (p = 0.005) as more important than cardiology-providers. Cardiology-providers prescribed ticagrelor 42.3% of the time following ACS, though 78.1% ranked it as their preferred agent. Patients were prescribed ticagrelor 9.3% of the time, though 55.7% ranked it as their preferred agent. Use of SDM was reported by 21.6% of patients and 88.5% were unaware that multiple P2Y. Significant differences exist between cardiology-providers and patients regarding factors influencing P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Preference; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

It remains unclear whether low-dose ticagrelor offers better safety and similar efficacy for Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of low-dose ticagrelor vs standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational cohort study, a total of 2110 ACS patients who were event-free at 3 months after the index PCI were divided into standard-dose ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) (n = 1830) or low-dose ticagrelor (45 mg twice daily) (n = 280) on a background of aspirin 100 mg once daily for at least another 9 months. The primary end point was type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria over a 1-year follow-up period post-PCI. Predictors of the primary end point were identified. Both Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were used. The cumulative incidence of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was lower in the low-dose ticagrelor group vs the standard-dose group either before (adjusted HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.77;

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; China; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with renal dysfunction.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients on chronic dialysis and whose admission diagnosis between 1 July 2013 and 31 December 2016 included ACS. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the primary safety endpoint was a major bleeding event. The application of propensity scores through the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to the study groups. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (aHRs) of study endpoints. In addition, the competing risk was adjusted using the Fine and Gray competing risk model.. There were 1915 patients in the clopidogrel group and 270 patients in the ticagrelor group. At 12 months, the ticagrelor group had higher risks for MACE (aHR with IPTW: 1.29; 95% CI 1.16-1.44); death (aHR with IPTW: 1.65; 95% CI 1.47-1.86) and cardiac death (subdistribution HR [SHR] with IPTW: 1.64; 95% CI 1.41-1.91), compared with those in the clopidogrel group. For major bleeding event, the risk was significantly higher with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (SHR with IPTW: 1.49; 95% CI 1.34-1.65). In terms of the risk for any bleeding event, there was no significant difference between the two groups (SHR with IPTW: 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-1.17).. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with higher MACE, death, cardiac death and major bleeding risk within 12 months in patients with ACS and on dialysis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Dialysis; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

 This article compares the clinical outcomes of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles and investigates whether clopidogrel could be an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor without increasing the risk of ischemic events..  Patients were divided into the clopidogrel-treated group and the ticagrelor-treated group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) calculated by propensity scores was used to adjust confounding covariates. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) within 12 months. The secondary outcomes were MACCEs plus unstable angina, and clinically significant bleeding events..  Finally, 2,199 patients were included. Of them, 1,606 were treated with clopidogrel, and 593 were treated with ticagrelor. The mean age of the original cohort was 59.92 ± 9.81 years. During the 12-month follow-up period, MACCEs occurred in 89 patients (4.0%). No significant differences were observed in MACCEs (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.18), MACCEs plus unstable angina (IPTW-adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91-1.59), or clinically significant bleeding events (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.53-1.23) between the clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated groups..  In patients with ACS without CYP2C19 LOF alleles, clopidogrel was not associated with a higher risk of MACCEs when compared with ticagrelor. The main findings of this study support use of clopidogrel in CYP2C19 LOF noncarriers as an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor, which may reduce medical expenses and adverse reactions caused by more potent P2Y12 inhibitors in these patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Alleles; Angina, Unstable; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The prognostic value of in-hospital haemoglobin drop in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing invasive therapy remains insufficiently investigated.. This observational study included 3838 patients with ACS with admission and in-hospital nadir haemoglobin values available. Haemoglobin drop was defined as a positive difference between admission and nadir haemoglobin values. The primary endpoint was one-year all-cause mortality.. In-hospital haemoglobin drop occurred in 3142 patients (82%). Patients were categorized into 4 groups: no haemoglobin drop (n = 696 patients), <3 g/dl haemoglobin drop (n = 2703 patients), 3 to <5 g/dl haemoglobin drop (n = 344 patients) and ≥5 g/dl haemoglobin drop (n = 95 patients). The primary endpoint occurred in 156 patients: 17 patients (2.5%) in the group with no haemoglobin drop, 81 patients (3.0%) in the group with <3g/dl haemoglobin drop, 37 patients (10.9%) in the group with 3 to <5 g/dl haemoglobin drop and 21 patients (22.2%) in the group with ≥5 g/dl haemoglobin (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.45; p < .001 for one g/dl haemoglobin drop). The association of haemoglobin drop with one-year mortality remained significant after exclusion of patients with in-hospital overt bleeding (adjusted HR = 1.27 [1.11-1.46]; p < .001 for one g/dl haemoglobin drop). The lowest haemoglobin drop associated with mortality was 1.23 g/dl in all patients (HR = 1.03 [1.02-1.04]) and 1.13 g/dl in patients without overt bleeding (HR = 1.03 [1.01-1.04]).. In patients with ACS, in-hospital haemoglobin drop was associated with higher risk of one-year mortality even in the absence of overt bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemoglobins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

No abstract present.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is anantiplatelet agent which acts through reversible binding to the P2Y12 adenosine-diphosphate receptors. In acute coronary syndromes it has been shown to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, stroke and death. Although some hemorrhagic, kidney, liver and respiratory complications have been described in detail with the use of ticagrelor, other less frequent adverse effects are not so well clarified. We report the case of a patient with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome secondary to the use of ticagrelor.. El ticagrelor es un antiagregante plaquetario que actúa a través de la unión reversible a los receptores P2Y12 de la adenosina-difosfato. En el síndrome coronario agudo, ha demostrado reducir el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores como infarto de miocardio, accidente cerebrovascular y muerte. Si bien se han descripto en detalle ciertas complicaciones hemorrágicas, renales, hepáticas y respiratorias por el uso del ticagrelor, otros efectos adversos menos frecuentes de la droga no han sido adecuadamente esclarecidos. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con un síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica secundario al uso de ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor has a Class I recommendation for use following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, ticagrelor needs to be taken twice a day, as compared to clopidogrel. Its adverse effects, such as dyspnea or bleeding, are known to be more common than with clopidogrel. Dyspnea may tend to be uncomfortable and limit activity. Major bleeding often leads to hospitalization or transfusions, and frequent minor bleeding, which might not result in patients seeking medical care, can make ACS patients feel unhealthy. Thus, these characteristics may affect the health-related quality of life (HQOL).. In the PLEIO (comParison of ticagreLor and clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in patients with acute cOronary syndrome) trial, we randomized 120 participants to receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for at least 12 months. We carried out an HQOL assessment with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire on the day of discharge following PCI, as well as six months later.. At discharge, the HQOL measures were similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, both having a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS) score. A six-month HQOL follow-up assessment showed that there were no differences between the two study groups in either the PCS or the MCS scores. In both groups, the PCS scores significantly increased over six months of treatment (both p < 0.01). However, the MCS score did not differ significantly. A baseline MCS score is an independent predictor of better physical and mental health status at six months.. Ticagrelor, as compared to clopidogrel, did not significantly reduce the HQOL during the six months following PCI in patients with ACS. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02618733.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a potent, oral P2Y12 inhibitor used as a part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). New evidence has emerged for its use in ACS, which may be crucial for the Indian context. This brought together nearly 150 experts in ACS management across the country who reviewed the current evidence and discussed the same through a series of 10 meetings on an online platform. With all experts' agreement, the key expert opinions for the P2Y12 inhibitors use in ACS management were finalized. These include the following. In ACS patients aged <75 years, with diabetes, a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, and chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor may be preferred over other P2Y12 inhibitors. It may also be preferred in the elderly above 75 years with clopidogrel is a suitable alternative in patients at high-risk of bleeding. Rates of stent thrombosis are lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel. In patients managed with fibrinolysis, use ticagrelor after 48 hours if streptokinase was the fibrinolytic agent or it can be used after 12 to 24 hours if fibrin-specific fibrinolytic was used. Rates of major bleeding in patients treated with fibrinolysis are similar to clopidogrel. Prehospital administration may be preferred over in-hospital administration with expected bleeding rates similar to clopidogrel. Switching among P2Y12 inhibitors should be done with due consideration of their pharmacodynamics. At present, DAPT should be continued for 12 months with discontinuation after three to six months in patients with high bleeding risk. The use of low dose ticagrelor may be considered in cases with high-bleeding risk. DAPT or ticagrelor continuation beyond one year should be individualized considering ischemic and bleeding risks. Dyspnea is a common, mild, and transient and does not necessitate ticagrelor discontinuation. Severe dyspnea should be investigated thoroughly. In conclusion, ticagrelor (180 mg, 90 mg, and 60 mg doses), a potent antiplatelet is expected to reshape the antiplatelet use in the management of ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Expert Testimony; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Hemorrhagic complications are often reported following antiplatelet therapy; however, simultaneous multifocal hemorrhages in both legs are uncommon. The patient was a 75-year-old man diagnosed with ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the right coronary artery. He was prescribed oral acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor. Three days after initial drug treatment, he complained of bilateral leg pain that was aggravated by walking and moving his ankle across a broad range of motion. No deep vein thrombosis was detected on Doppler ultrasonography; however, muscular hemorrhage was suspected according to musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Multifocal muscular hemorrhage was confirmed in the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles on magnetic resonance imaging. To reduce the risk of bleeding, we changed the medication from ticagrelor to clopidogrel. The patient performed leg elevation exercises, compression, and applied an ice pack. He also performed range of motion exercises and gait training in addition to receiving drug treatment. With these therapies, his pain score improved from 5 to 3 on a visual analog scale, without further complications. Multifocal muscular hemorrhage rarely occurs bilaterally; however, when it does occur, an appropriate treatment plan can be developed based on musculoskeletal ultrasonography.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Leg; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Periprocedural myocardial infarction is a common complication following percutaneous coronary intervention. The present study was conducted with an aim to compare the safety and efficacy of loading doses of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in preventing periprocedural myocardial infarction in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.. A total of 114 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention were assigned to clopidogrel group (n = 57, the loading and maintenance doses were 300 and 75 mg qd for clopidogrel, and 300 and 100 mg qd for aspirin), or ticagrelor group (n = 57, the loading and maintenance doses were 180 and 90 mg bid for ticagrelor, and 300 and 100 mg qd for aspirin). Cardiac biomarkers were measured before, 8 hours, and 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention. The percutaneous coronary intervention-related periprocedural myocardial infarction was defined according to the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).. The overall incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention-related periprocedural myocardial infarction was 21.1%. The ticagrelor group showed a significantly lower incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (12.3% vs 29.8%, p = 0.022) and numerically lower bleeding events (3.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.242) as compared with clopidogrel group. No patient had major adverse cardiovascular events during the 1-month follow-up. The levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05), indicating that the benefits of ticagrelor were not from its anti-inflammatory effects. Multivariable analysis showed that the use of ticagrelor (odds ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.87; p = 0.014) and number of stents (odds ratio: 2.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.25-6.06; p = 0.012) were independent predictors of periprocedural myocardial infarction.. Pretreatment with a loading dose of ticagrelor seems to be superior in reducing the incidence of percutaneous coronary intervention-related periprocedural myocardial infarction in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome as compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Animals; CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins; Chlorides; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Inflammasomes; Inflammation; Macrophages; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Models, Biological; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein; Protein Multimerization; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Signal Transduction; Ticagrelor

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome remains debated. We sought to investigate the use of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in HBR patients with acute coronary syndrome and their impact on ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year. In the START-ANTIPLATELET registry (NCT02219984), consecutive patients with ≥ 1 HBR criteria were stratified by DAPT type in clopidogrel versus ticagrelor groups. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoints (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. Of 1209 patients with 1-year follow-up, 553 were defined at HBR, of whom 383 were considered eligible for the study as on DAPT with clopidogrel (174 or 45.4%) or ticagrelor (209 or 54.6%). Clopidogrel was more often administered in patients at increased ischemic and bleeding risk, while ticagrelor in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean DAPT duration was longer in the ticagrelor group. At 1 year, after multivariate adjustment, no difference in NACEs was observed between patients on clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (19% vs. 11%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 0.71-2.27], p = 0.429). Age, number of HBR criteria, and mean DAPT duration were independent predictors of NACEs. In a real-world registry of patients with acute coronary syndrome, 45% were at HBR and frequently treated with clopidogrel. After adjustment for potential confounders, the duration of DAPT, but not DAPT type (stratified by clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor), was associated with the risk of ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor presents less thrombotic risk compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes. However, its role in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)-naive patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) undergoing elective percutaneous intervention (PCI) remains unclear, including uncertainty in the method of conversion to clopidogrel for adequate coverage without increased bleeding risk.. Determine the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor loading and transitioning to clopidogrel in patients with SIHD undergoing elective PCI.. This is a retrospective cohort review of patients with SIHD who underwent elective PCI. The Switch Rx patients were treated with ticagrelor immediately before PCI, converted to clopidogrel 300 mg the day after, and discharged with clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Standard Rx patients, who received a clopidogrel load and received clopidogrel 75 mg daily after the procedure, were analyzed as a matched comparator cohort. The safety outcomes were any bleeding event at 24 hours and 30 days. The efficacy outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24 hours and 30 days.. Five Switch Rx patients (n = 54) experienced bleeding academic research consortium type I bleeding within 24 hours, with no subsequent bleeding observed out to 30 days. When comparing the Switch Rx patients (n = 39) to their matched Standard Rx cohort (n = 39), no MACEs occurred within 30 days and there were no significant differences in safety and efficacy outcomes.. In DAPT-naive patients undergoing elective PCI for SIHD, a strategy of in-lab ticagrelor transitioning to clopidogrel with a 300-mg load was not associated with increased bleeding or other adverse events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dyspnoea often occurs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with ticagrelor compared with other anti-platelet agents and is a cause of drug discontinuation. We aimed to explore the contribution of central apnoeas (CA) and chemoreflex sensitization to ticagrelor-related dyspnoea in patients with ACS.. Sixty consecutive patients with ACS, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and no history of obstructive sleep apnoea, treated either with ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d. (n = 30) or prasugrel 10 mg o.d. (n = 30) were consecutively enrolled. One week after ACS, all patients underwent two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography, pulmonary static/dynamic testing, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity assessment, 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring for hypopnoea-apnoea detection, and evaluation of the chemosensitivity to hypercapnia by rebreathing technique. No differences were found in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, echocardiographic, and pulmonary data between the two groups. Patients on ticagrelor, when compared with those on prasugrel, reported more frequently dyspnoea (43.3% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.001; severe dyspnoea 23.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.005), and showed higher apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and central apnoea index (CAI) during the day, the night and the entire 24-h period (all P < 0.001). Similarly, they showed a higher chemosensitivity to hypercapnia (P = 0.001). Among patients treated with ticagrelor, those referring dyspnoea had the highest AHI, CAI, and chemosensitivity to hypercapnia (all P < 0.05).. Central apnoeas are a likely mechanism of dyspnoea and should be screened for in patients treated with ticagrelor. A drug-related sensitization of the chemoreflex may be the cause of ventilatory instability and breathlessness in this setting.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Dyspnea; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sleep Apnea, Central; Stroke Volume; Ticagrelor; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pneumonia; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Hyperuricemia carries an increased risk of atherothrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This may at least in part be due to inadequate P2Y12 inhibition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the potential association between hyperuricemia and decreased platelet inhibition by P2Y12 antagonists.. Levels of uric acid as well as on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were assessed in 301 clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing elective angioplasty and stenting, and in 206 prasugrel- (n = 118) or ticagrelor-treated (n = 88) ACS patients following acute PCI. Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity (HRPR) were based on previous studies showing an association of test results with clinical outcomes.. Hyperuricemia was significantly associated with increased on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients in univariate analyses and after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics by multivariate regression analyses. In contrast, ticagrelor-treated patients without and with hyperuricemia showed similar levels of on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP. HRPR occurred more frequently in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients with hyperuricemia than in those with normal uric acid levels. In contrast, hyperuricemic patients receiving ticagrelor did not have a higher risk of HRPR compared with those with normal uric acid levels.. Hyperuricemia is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by thienopyridines but a normal response to ticagrelor. It remains to be established if lowering uric acid increases the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and prasugrel in hyperuricemic patients with HRPR.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Angioplasty; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Female; Genotype; Humans; Hyperuricemia; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Thienopyridines; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Uric Acid

Ticagrelor is a potent and orally active P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

A strong association between on-thienopyridine platelet reactivity (PR) and the risk of both thrombotic and bleeding events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been demonstrated. However, no study has analyzed the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR and clinical outcome in this clinical setting.. We aimed to investigate the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR, assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index, and clinical outcome in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.. We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients undergoing PCI for ACS. PR was measured using the VASP index following ticagrelor loading dose. The primary study endpoint was the rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥2 at 1 year. The key secondary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and urgent revascularization.. We included 570 ACS patients, among whom 33.9% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction. BARC type ≥2 bleeding occurred in 10.9% and MACE in 13.8%. PR was not associated with BARC ≥2 or with MACE (. On-ticagrelor PR measured by the VASP was not associated with bleeding or thrombotic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI. PR measured by the VASP should not be used as a surrogate endpoint in studies on ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Secondary Prevention; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; United Kingdom

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a genotype-guided strategy among patients with acute coronary syndromes using a decision-tree model based on the Singapore healthcare payer's perspective over a 1-year time horizon. Three dual antiplatelet strategies were considered: universal clopidogrel, genotype-guided, and universal ticagrelor. The prevalence of loss-of-function alleles was assumed to be 61.7% and model inputs were identified from the literature. Our primary outcome of interest was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to universal clopidogrel. Both genotype-guided (72,158 SGD/QALY) and universal ticagrelor (82,269 SGD/QALY) were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of SGD 88,991. In our secondary analysis, the ICER for universal ticagrelor was 114,998 SGD/QALY when genotype-guided was taken as a reference. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that genotype-guided was the most cost-effective strategy when the WTP threshold was between SGD 70,000 to 100,000. Until more data are available, our study suggests that funding for a once-off CYP2C19 testing merits a consideration over 1 year of universal ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Costs; Genotype; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Singapore; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Bayes Theorem; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Reduced levels of hemoglobin (Hb) represent an established marker of impaired outcomes and increased cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease, challenging the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, while anemia has emerged as an independent predictor of suboptimal platelet inhibition in patients receiving clopidogrel, no study has so far evaluated the impact of Hb levels on high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) with ticagrelor and their prognostic consequences, that were the aim of the present study.. Patients on DAPT with ASA + Ticagrelor (90 mg/twice a day) after percutaneous coronary revascularization for ACS were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by multiple electrode aggregometry. Suboptimal platelet inhibition (HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). The primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome [MI], target vessel revascularization) at longest available follow-up.. We included 397 patients that were divided according to tertiles values of Hb (< 12.7, 12-7-14.09, ≥14.1 g/dl). Patients with lower Hb were older and displayed a more severe cardiovascular risk profile. Mean levels of platelet reactivity were enhanced in patients with lower Hb after stimulation with TRAP peptide (TRAP test, p = .03) and ADP (p = .02). Elevated platelet reactivity (HRPR) on Ticagrelor was more frequent among patients with reduced Hb (16.4% vs. 12% vs. 5.4%, p = .005, adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.71[0.996;3.01], p = .056). At a mean follow-up of 820.9 ± 553.4 days, 21.4% of the patients experienced the primary composite endpoint, with a higher rate of events in patients with lower Hb (27.6% vs. 22.6% vs. 13.5%, p = .006, adjusted HR [95%CI] = 1.51[1.12; 2.03], p = .006), mainly driven by a higher rate of recurrent ACS. After correction for baseline differences lower Hb tertiles but not HRPR emerged as independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR [95%CI] = 0.98[0.50; 1.92], p = .95).. In the present study, we demonstrated that among patients on DAPT with ASA and ticagrelor after PCI for ACS, lower Hb levels are independently associated with a higher rate of HRPR and an increased rate of major ischemic events, and especially for recurrent ACS, although with no impact on survival. Neutral prognostic effect of HRPR was observed across Hb tertiles.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aftercare; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Patient Discharge; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of combined glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) and ticagrelor versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). An observational study was conducted using the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project. Totally, 13,264 patients with ACS and received combination therapy or ticagrelor therapy were analyzed. The primary outcome was the composite of major cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction [MI], stent thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, and ischemic stroke), and secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, MI, stent thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, and ischemic stroke. The multivariable adjusted analysis indicated that combination therapy was associated with an increased risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) (P = 0.001), any bleeding (P<0.001), and major bleeding (P = 0.005). Moreover, the multivariable adjusted for propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis suggested that combination therapy produced additional risk of MACE (P = 0.014), any bleeding (P<0.001), and major bleeding (P = 0.005). Moreover, PSM analysis suggested that combination therapy was associated with greater risk of stent thrombosis (P = 0.012) and intracranial bleeding (P = 0.020). Combined GPI and ticagrelor therapies did not have any beneficial effects on MACE, stent thrombosis, intracranial bleeding, any bleeding, or major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Ticagrelor

Patients having CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and receiving clopidogrel are at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Ticagrelor is an effective antiplatelet that is unaffected by the CYP2C19 polymorphism. The main aim of the current research is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness among CYP2C19 genotype-guided therapy, universal ticagrelor, and universal clopidogrel after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A two-part decision-analytic model, including a one-year model and a 20-year follow-up Markov model, was created to follow the use of (i) universal clopidogrel, (ii) universal ticagrelor, and (iii) genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy. Outcome measures were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, cost/success) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR, cost/quality-adjusted life years [QALY]). Therapy success was defined as survival without myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, and no therapy discontinuation because of adverse events, i.e. major bleeding and dyspnea. The model was based on a multivariate analysis, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model outcomes, including against variations in drug acquisition costs.. Against universal clopidogrel, genotype-guided therapy was cost-effective over the one-year duration (ICER, USD 6102 /success), and dominant over the long-term. Genotype-guided therapy was dominant against universal ticagrelor over the one-year duration, and cost-effective over the long term (ICUR, USD 1383 /QALY). Universal clopidogrel was dominant over ticagrelor for the short term, and cost-effective over the long-term (ICUR, USD 10,616 /QALY).. CYP2C19 genotype-guided therapy appears to be the preferred antiplatelet strategy, followed by universal clopidogrel, and then universal ticagrelor for post-PCI patients in Qatar.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Qatar; Ticagrelor

By modifying the apneic threshold, the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor could promote central sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (CSAHS). We aimed to assess the association between CSAHS and ticagrelor administration.. Patients were prospectively included within 1 year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), if they had no heart failure (and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 45%) and no history of sleep apnea. After an overnight sleep study, patients were classified as "normal" with apnea hypopnea index (AHI) < 15, "CSAHS patients" with AHI ≥ 15 mostly with central sleep apneas, and "obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients" with AHI ≥ 15 mostly with obstructive sleep apneas.. CSA prevalence after ACS is high and seems promoted by ticagrelor administration. Results from monocentric study suggest a preliminary signal of safety. CLINICAL TRIALS.. NCT03540459.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sleep Apnea, Central; Stroke Volume; Ticagrelor; Ventricular Function, Left

The association between elevated creatine kinase (CK) and bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains incompletely investigated. We undertook this study to assess whether there is an association between elevated CK activity and the risk for bleeding in contemporary patients with ACS.. This post hoc analysis of a randomized trial included 3368 patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. CK was measured serially in all patients until hospital discharge. The main outcome was 30-day incidence of major bleeding (type 3 to 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria).. Patients were categorized in groups according to the peak CK tertiles: 1st tertile (CK ≤259 U/L; n = 1127 patients), 2nd tertile (CK ≥260 to 990 U/L; n = 1119 patients), and 3rd tertile (CK ≥ 991 U/L; n = 1122 patients). Peak CK activity was higher in patients with bleeding than those without bleeding (771 [316-1845] U/L vs. 496 [190-1357] U/L; P <.001). Bleeding occurred in 26 patients (2.3%) with peak CK within 1st tertile, 39 patients (3.5%) with peak CK within 2nd tertile, and 54 patients (4.8%) with peak CK within 3rd tertile (univariable hazard ratio [HR]=1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 1.81, P =.012, per tertile increment in CK values). After adjustment, peak CK activity remained significantly associated with the 30-day bleeding (HR = 1.67 [1.16-2.41]; P =.006 per unit increment in logarithmic CK values). The C statistic of the multivariable model with CK activity was 0.807 [0.770-0.842].. In patients with ACS, peak CK activity was independently associated with increased 30-day incidence of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Creatine Kinase; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Ticagrelor

This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in acute coronary artery syndrome (ACS) patients stratified by the Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (OPT-CAD) risk score.. Although they provide a promising basis for treatment decisions, risk scores have not been utilized to optimize P2Y12 inhibitors for ACS patients.. In 2016-2019, 16,343 ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were enrolled and classified as low-risk (n = 9,841) or intermediate- to high-risk (n = 6,502) according to OPT-CAD risk score. Clinical outcomes for patients receiving clopidogrel or ticagrelor were compared within risk levels. Primary endpoint was ischemic events at 12 months. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance groups.. The risk of ischemic events (2.73% vs. 3.89%, p = .02) and all-cause mortality (1.75% vs. 2.86%, p = .01) were lower in the intermediate- to high-risk patients treated with ticagrelor than those treated with clopidogrel, without an excessive risk of major bleeding (3.71% vs. 3.95%, p = .65). Among low-risk patients, ticagrelor was associated with significantly increased bleeding risk (4.13% vs. 2.85%, p < .01) compared to clopidogrel, with no difference in ischemic risk (1.04% vs. 1.25%, p = .36). Results were consistent in PSM cohorts.. Ticagrelor improves ischemic prognosis in intermediate- to high-risk patients but shows worse safety in low-risk patients compared to clopidogrel, supporting the effectiveness of risk score-guided decision making.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and bleeding risks following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not well defined in individuals with heart failure (HF). We followed 1,145 individuals in the Pharmacogenomic Resource to improve Medication Effectiveness Genotype Guided Antiplatelet Therapy cohort for MACE and bleeding events following PCI for ACS. We constructed Cox proportional hazards models to compare MACE and bleeding in those with versus without HF, adjusting for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and medications. We also determined predictors of MACE and bleeding events in both groups. 370 (32%) individuals did and 775 (68%) did not have HF prior to PCI. Mean age was 61.7 ± 12.2 years, 31% were female, and 24% were African American. After a median follow-up of 0.78 years, individuals with HF had higher rates of MACE compared to those without HF (48 vs. 24 events per 100 person years) which remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.72). Similarly, bleeding was higher in those with versus without HF (22 vs. 11 events per 100 person years), although this was no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.93). Diabetes and peripheral vascular disease were predictors of MACE, and end-stage renal disease was a predictor of bleeding among participants with HF. MACE risk is higher in individuals with versus without HF following PCI for ACS. However, the risk of bleeding, especially among those with end-stage renal disease , must be considered when determining post-PCI anticoagulant strategies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), the experts proposed to put an end to the equipoise of ticagrelor and prasugrel in addition to aspirin in patients with NSTE-ACS who proceed to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). They gave a strong level of recommendation (IIa) in favor of prasugrel over ticagrelor in these patients. We challenge this proposition, which was mainly driven by the results of ISAR-REACT 5, an open-label prospective head-to-head study of a prasugrel-based strategy compared with a ticagrelor-based strategy in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. In addition to the methodological concerns regarding the ISAR-REACT 5 study, we also question this decision in light of the ISAR-REACT 5 diabetes mellitus subgroup analysis and previous studies and meta-analysis that showed no difference between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS. Although we agree with the "one size does not fit all" concept for antiplatelet regimens in patients with ACS who proceed to PCI, we believe that the decision to strongly favor prasugrel was premature and not supported enough by the ISAR-REACT 5 results. In our opinion, equipoise remains between the ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based strategies and more data are needed to settle the debate.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

[Figure: see text].

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood Platelets; Fentanyl; Humans; Morphine; Papaver; Ticagrelor

Antiplatelet therapy is paramount to reduce the risk of coronary stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Newer agents are reliable and have a fast onset of action, but have significantly higher cost, leading to compliance concerns. We adopted and evaluated an acute agent-switching strategy, using prasugrel or ticagrelor for rapid and reliable periprocedural antiplatelet action, followed by a switch to generic clopidogrel.. This large, single-center study included all patients who underwent PCI between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. Study endpoints were 30- day mortality and bleeding events.. A total of 5007 patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 63.5 ± 12.5 years. Prior to PCI, 54.8% of patients were preloaded with ticagrelor, 8.5% with prasugrel, and 36.7% with clopidogreI. The majority of patients (93%) loaded with ticagrelor and more than half (58%) of those loaded with prasugrel were subsequently switched prior to hospital discharge to clopidogrel for long-term therapy. Patients pretreated with ticagrelor or prasugrel and switched to clopidogrel had overall lowest bleeding rates (0.9% and 0.8%, respectively). The highest rates of bleeding were noted in patients maintained on ticagrelor or clopidogrel throughout (2.5% and 1.7%, respectively). After accounting for additional periprocedural use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, the lowest bleeding rates were observed in patients loaded with ticagrelor and switched to clopidogrel (0.75%), with the highest bleeding observed in patients maintained on ticagrelor throughout. There were no events of acute stent thrombosis.. A strategy of using newer, fast-acting, and reliable antiplatelet agents prior to PCI and acutely switching to long-term clopidogrel therapy appears safe and efficacious. Although the superiority of the newer antiplatelet agents for long-term post-PCI dual-antiplatelet therapy in a trial setting is well established, the impact of increased adherence to lower-cost clopidogrel therapy in the real-world setting merits further consideration.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hospitals; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Antagonists of the Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) receptor, P2Y12, may inhibit platelet aggregation as a result of stimulation with arachidonic acid (AA). The potent P2Y12 blocker, Ticagrelor has greater anti-platelet effects than Clopidogrel. We explored the effects of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel on mean maximum aggregation ratios (MAR%) in response to AA stimulation in patients receiving aspirin in conventional doses. A total of 613 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients were followed from October 2017 to October 2018. At the one- and six-month follow-up visit, mean AA-MAR% was lower in the Ticagrelor group when compared with the Clopidogrel group (28.9% vs 31.7%, 28.4% vs 31.0%, p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). BARC1-2 bleeding occurred with greater frequency with Ticagrelor than in patients treated with Clopidogrel (29.3% vs 9.5%, p<0.001; 23.5% vs 9.3%, p<0.001). Excessive platelet inhibition and decreased AA-MAR% were considered the main reasons for the severe subcutaneous/dermal bleeding in Ticagrelor treated patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Arachidonic Acid; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; England; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) represents a major tool of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) management. The real-world usage of potent P2Y12 inhibitors within DAPT in middle-income countries is poorly described.. To assess the factors that influence P2Y12 inhibitor choice at discharge in invasively managed NSTE-ACS patients, without an indication for oral anticoagulation, treated across Romania.. The Romanian National NSTE-ACS Registry allows the consecutive enrollment of NSTE-ACS patients admitted in 11 (of 24) interventional centers reimbursed from public funds.. NSTE-ACS patients that received DAPT at discharge were identified. Deceased patients, those with an indication for oral anticoagulation or not receiving DAPT at discharge, were excluded. P2Y12 inhibitor choice was analyzed based on demographic, clinical, and invasive management characteristics.. One thousand fifty (63 ± 10 years, 73% male) of 1418 patients enrolled between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. The P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment rate was 90%. Obstructive coronary artery disease was found in 95.3% of patients. 84.6% underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Single vessel PCI was reported in 84% of PCI patients. The clopidogrel usage rate was 49.6%, ticagrelor 50.0%, and prasugrel 0.4%. Overall, higher ticagrelor usage was associated with: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (P 0.035), age below 65 (P < 0.001), prior treatment with ticagrelor (P < 0.001), PCI during admission (P < 0.001), and its full 12-month reimbursement (since November 2017). Reimbursement increased the use of ticagrelor from 23.7% in 2016-2017 to 56.9% in 2018-2019 (P < 0.001). In PCI patients, ticagrelor use was associated with PCI with stenting (P 0.016) and multivessel PCI (0.013).. DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment, and single vessel PCI are the standards of care in invasively managed NSTE-ACS patients in Romania. Besides the clinical and invasive characteristics that favor its use, the full reimbursement of ticagrelor introduced in November 2017 doubled its yearly usage.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Romania; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sleep Apnea, Central; Ticagrelor

溃疡性结肠炎患者通常处于高凝状态且存在消化道出血，若同时合并急性心肌梗死则在药物及介入治疗方面存在诸多矛盾，通常预后较差，目前尚无公认的最佳治疗方案。该文报道1例重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎合并消化道出血的患者，院内发生急性下壁心肌梗死合并交界性心律及低血压，行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗，于右冠状动脉病变行血栓抽吸及球囊扩张。术后予替格瑞洛90 mg（2次/d）抗血小板单药治疗，随访14个月无心绞痛发作，未出现便血加重。.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles derive less benefit from clopidogrel treatment. Despite this, in elderly patients, clopidogrel might be preferred over more potent P2Y. Patients aged 70 years and older with known CYP2C19*2 and *3 genotype were identified from the POPular Genetics and POPular Age trials. Noncarriers of loss-of-function alleles treated with clopidogrel were compared to patients, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype, treated with ticagrelor and to clopidogrel treated carriers of loss-of-function alleles. We assessed net clinical benefit (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) major bleeding), atherothrombotic outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) and bleeding outcomes (PLATO major and minor bleeding).. A total of 991 patients were assessed. There was no significant difference in net clinical benefit (17.2% vs. 15.1%, adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.44), atherothrombotic outcomes (9.7% vs. 9.2%, adjHR 1.00, 95%CI 0.66-1.50), and bleeding outcomes (17.7% vs. 19.8%, adjHR 0.80, 95%CI 0.62-1.12) between clopidogrel in noncarriers of loss-of-function alleles and ticagrelor respectively.. In ACS patients aged 70 years and older, there was no significant difference in net clinical benefit and atherothrombotic outcomes between noncarriers of a loss-of-function allele treated with clopidogrel and patients treated with ticagrelor. The bleeding rate was numerically; though not statistically significant, lower in patients using clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The rates of very elderly patients (≥85 years old) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are rapidly increasing. They are under-represented in clinical trials, and those who are included may not reflect the real-world population. We aim to review the clinical characteristics of very elderly patients undergoing PCI for ACS and identify factors associated with adverse outcomes.. All very elderly patients undergoing PCI for ACS in the Auckland region between January 2014 to December 2016 were included. Baseline clinical and procedural details were obtained, and the primary endpoint was all-cause mortality measured up to a maximum of 4 years. Secondary endpoints include recurrent myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation, stroke and major bleeding.. A total of 186 patients were included for analysis (mean age 87.6±2.8 years, 51.6% male). Indications for PCI were ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 74 (39.8%), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in 97 (52.2%) and unstable angina in 15 patients (8.1%). Successful PCI was completed in 180 patients. At a maximal follow-up of 4 years (mean 23.4 mo), the rates of all-cause mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction were 22.0% and 14.0% respectively. The risk of mortality was increased by the presence of diabetes (44.8% vs 17.8%, HR=3.0, 95%CI: 1.6-5.9, p=0.001), STEMI (33.8% vs 13.5%, HR=3.1, 95%CI: 1.6-5.9, p=0.001), and reduced eGFR (every -10 mL/min/1.73m. Very elderly patients who undergo PCI for ACS have acceptable survival outcomes. STEMI, diabetes and impaired renal function were predictive of mortality in this elderly cohort.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Alleles; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Observational studies comparing ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have yielded contradictory results, but these studies often did not consider differential censoring (eg, for treatment switching or insurance disenrollment) or confounding by time-dependent factors.. Our objective was to conduct a comparative effectiveness and safety analysis of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients who underwent PCI after being hospitalized for an ACS.. This study used the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics. Included in the analysis were 2559 patients initiated on ticagrelor and 4456 patients initiated on prasugrel following PCI. Patients initiated on ticagrelor were 10% more likely to have eligibility disenrollment (Ticagrelor: 57%, Prasugrel: 47%, p < 0.01) and 7 percentage-points more likely to switch medication (Ticagrelor: 35%, Prasugrel: 28%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for multiple factors, including time-varying exposure and censoring imbalance, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death, MI, or stroke when compared to prasugrel (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04-1.68). Similarly, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk in bleeding events when compared with prasugrel (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.19-2.17).. When compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel use following PCI for ACS was associated with a lower risk of death, MI, or stroke, as well as a reduced risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor ticagrelor is widely used in patients following acute coronary syndromes or in those who have received coronary stents. Bentracimab is a monoclonal antibody-based reversal agent that is being formally evaluated in a Phase 3 clinical trial. Here, we probe the knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns of cardiac surgeons regarding their perioperative management of ticagrelor and potential application of a ticagrelor reversal agent.. A questionnaire was developed by a working group of cardiac surgeons to inquire into participants' practices and beliefs regarding ticagrelor and disseminated to practicing, Canadian-trained cardiac surgeons.. A total of 70 Canadian-trained cardiac surgeons participated. Bleeding risk was identified as the most significant consideration when surgically revascularizing ticagrelor-treated patients (90%). There is variability in the duration of withholding ticagrelor before coronary artery bypass graft procedure in a stable patient; 44.3% wait 3 days and 32.9% wait 4 days or longer. Currently, 15.7% of cardiac surgeons prophylactically give platelet transfusions and fresh frozen plasma intraoperatively following protamine infusion in patients who have recently received ticagrelor. Interestingly, 47.1% of surveyed surgeons were aware of a reversal agent for ticagrelor, 91.4% of cardiac surgeons would consider utilizing a ticagrelor reversal agent if available, and 51.4% acknowledged that the introduction of such an agent would be a major advance in clinical practice.. The present survey identified ticagrelor-related bleeding as a major concern for cardiac surgeons. Surgeons recognized the significant unmet need that a ticagrelor reversal agent would address.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Canada; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Surgeons; Ticagrelor

Clinical evidence of prasugrel/ticagrelor in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in Asian acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of prasugrel/ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel as part of DAPT in Hong Kong ACS population for 10 years.. Prasugrel/ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel, reduces risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) in Hong Kong ACS population.. The retrospective observational cohort study included patients admitted to seven institutions under Hospital Authority Hong Kong with diagnosis of ACS during 2008-2017. Risk of MACE, defined as composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non-fatal stroke, and risk of any bleeding leading to hospitalization were examined. Baseline characteristics difference was adjusted by propensity score (PS) matching. Adjusted Cox regression model was used to estimate hazard ratio of interested outcome.. In PS matched cohort including 944 patients in each group, MACE risk reduction of 40% from 1 year to 5 years after index ACS event was observed in prasugrel/ticagrelor group (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.91, p = .015). The risk reduction was highly driven by MI reduction (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.91, p = .019). Lower bleeding risk was observed in prasugrel/ticagrelor group compared to clopidogrel from 1 year to 5 years (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-1.00, p = .051).. Prasugrel/ticagrelor showed MACE risk reduction over clopidogrel as part of DAPT up to 5 years after index event, while prasugrel/ticagrelor was not associated with increased bleeding risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Hong Kong; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial (NCT00391872) demonstrated that ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel significantly reduced the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction or stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in ACS patients from a Vietnamese healthcare payers' perspective.. A two-part cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Cardiovascular event rates, hospital bed days, interventions, investigations, study drug utilization and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) data were derived from the PLATO trial. Unit costs of medical services were derived from the Vietnamese governmental price list, and drug costs were based on the weighted average price from the Vietnamese social security report (in VND; 10.000 VND = 0.405 USD). An annual discount rate of 3% was used. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate uncertainty of the results.. Ticagrelor was associated with an incremental cost of VND 5.34 million (USD 216.49) and a QALY gain of 0.11. This resulted in a cost per QALY gained of VND 49.58 million (USD 2009.96) from the Vietnamese healthcare payers' perspective. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates that ticagrelor has 59% probability of being cost-effective compared with clopidogrel when using a willingness-to-pay threshold of one gross domestic products (GDP) per capita. Deterministic sensitivity analysis using clinical outcomes from the Asian sub-population of PLATO resulted in a cost per QALY of VND 42.25 million (USD 1712.80).. Ticagrelor can be considered a cost-effective treatment for ACS compared with clopidogrel from a Vietnamese healthcare payers' perspective.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

[Figure: see text].

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor & prasugrel) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is a class I recommendation. We performed a sex-specific analysis comparing the difference in efficacy and safety outcomes between ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world ACS population.. Data from the multicenter REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) for 4424 ACS patients who underwent PCI and were treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel between 2012 to 2016 were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 17±9 months.. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of primary endpoint of net adverse cardiac events between ticagrelor and prasugrel in men (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.69-1.29; P=0.71), or women (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.63-2.20; P=0.62; P interaction [sex] = 0.40). Similarly, no differences were found in the occurrence of any of the secondary endpoints (MACE, all cause death, re-infarction, stent thrombosis, BARC major bleeding and BARC any bleeding) between the two P2Y12 groups between men and women.. In this real-world ACS population, no relative difference in efficacy or safety outcomes were found between ticagrelor and prasugrel between sexes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Preventive antiplatelet therapy is recommended for patients with cardiac or cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Ticagrelor has an improved safety and efficacy profile in patients with acute coronary syndrome; however, data regarding stroke prevention remain controversial. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare ticagrelor with other receptor antagonists (P2Y12) inhibitors and aspirin in monotherapy or combination in the treatment of patients with high risk for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, defined as coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral artery disease.. Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were conducted until August 1, 2020. Search terms included ticagrelor, AZD 6140, and stroke. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration assessment tool. Random-effects model was used to combine risk estimates across trials and risk ratio with 95% CIs served as summary statistics. The influence of individual components was evaluated in an additive network meta-analysis model. The primary efficacy end point was the occurrence of stroke. The safety end points included bleeding and all-cause mortality.. Twenty-six randomized clinical trials comprising 124 495 patients were analyzed. When compared with controls, ticagrelor plus aspirin significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke by 20% (risk ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71–0.89]). Treatment with ticagrelor monotherapy did not significantly affect ischemic stroke (risk ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–1.00]; P=0.05). Compared with aspirin alone, major bleeding was in similar ranges with antiplatelet monotherapies while the relative risk was twice higher with combined antiplatelet therapies. There was no considerable difference in the risk of mortality with ticagrelor plus aspirin (risk ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.91–1.07]).. Ticagrelor on top of aspirin may provide more favorable outcomes on secondary stroke prevention in patients with vascular risk factors; however, this benefit may come with the price of increased bleeding risk including intracranial bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Higher risk of bleeding with ticagrelor over clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been suggested. We assessed the incidence of major bleedings (MB), reinfarction (re-MI), and all-cause death to evaluate safety and efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in such population.. Real-world registries RENAMI and BleeMACS were merged. The pooled cohort was divided into two groups, clopidogrel versus ticagrelor. Statistical analysis considered patients <75 versus ≥75 years old. Endpoints were BARC 3-5 MB, re-MI, and all-cause death at 1-year follow-up. The study included 16,653 patients (13,153 < 75 and 3500 ≥ 75 years). Ticagrelor was underused in elderly patients (16.3% versus 20.8%, P < 0.001). Using propensity score matching (PSM), two treatment groups of 1566 patients were included in the final analysis.. Ticagrelor was able to prevent re-MI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.6; P < 0.001) and all-cause death (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = 0.026) irrespective of age. In patients ≥75 years, ticagrelor reduced all-cause death (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = 0.012) and re-MI (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1, P = 0.072). Moreover, even with the limit of the low number of events, ticagrelor did not significantly increase the incidence of MB (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.70-3.0; P = 0.257). At multiple Cox regression, age (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < 0.001) resulted an independent risk factor for bleeding.. In our study, reflecting the results from two large retrospective, real-world registries, Ticagrelor did not significantly increase MB compared with clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS treated with PCI, while significantly improving 1-year survival. Further studies on elderly patients are suggested.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) which has proven benefits in patients with acute coronary syndrome especially in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, like most other drugs, it can lead to undesired and adverse effects such as dyspnoea, easy bruising and gastrointestinal bleeding. We present a case of 70-year-old woman who developed diarrhoea following initiation of DAPT comprising of aspirin and ticagrelor following PCI. After excluding more common causes, it was attributed to ticagrelor administration and completely resolved after it was replaced with another oral antiplatelet agent. On follow-up, the patient reported complete resolution of symptoms.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Diarrhea; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Compounding; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

To compare the degree of platelet inhibition between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.. Platelet function was assessed by impedance aggregometry after 30-90 days of therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor and over 15 days after switching to prasugrel. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) was defined for ADP test results above the upper limit of normal.. A total of 105 patients were included, 81.9% males and 33.3% people with diabetes, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 8.1 years. Mean platelet reactivity was not significantly different between the two antiplatelet strategies, as the prevalence of HRPR (8.6 vs 12.3%, P = 0.50). Switching between the two antiplatelet agents was safe and well tolerated, and effectively reduced platelet reactivity in over 95% of the patients (only 3.8% of the study population displaying ineffective response to both drugs).. Ticagrelor and prasugrel have a similar effect on platelet reactivity. Switching between the two drugs can be safely done.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

[Figure: see text].

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the evidence for these recommendations is weak.. To compare midterm outcomes after CABG in patients with ACS treated postoperatively with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor or with ASA monotherapy.. This cohort study used merged data from several national registries of Swedish patients who were diagnosed with ACS and subsequently underwent CABG. All included patients underwent isolated CABG in Sweden between 2012 and 2017 with an ACS diagnosis less than 6 weeks before the procedure, survived 14 days after discharge from hospital, and were treated postoperatively with ASA plus ticagrelor or ASA monotherapy. A multivariable Cox regression model was used for the main analysis, and propensity score-matched models were performed as sensitivity analysis. Data were analyzed between May and September 2020.. Postoperative antiplatelet treatment, defined as filled prescriptions, with either ASA and ticagrelor or ASA only.. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke, and major bleeding, at 12 months and at the end of follow-up.. A total of 6558 patients (5281 [80.5%] men; mean [SD] age at surgery, 67.6 [9.3] years) were included; 1813 (27.6%) were treated with ASA plus ticagrelor and 4745 (72.4%) were treated with ASA monotherapy. Crude MACE rate was 3.0 per 100 person years (95% CI, 2.5-3.6 per 100 person years) in the ASA plus ticagrelor group and 3.8 per 100 person years (95% CI, 3.5-4.1 per 100 person years) in the ASA group. After adjustment, there was no significant difference in MACE risk between ASA plus ticagrelor vs ASA only, neither during the first 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.21; P = .34) or during total follow-up (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.11; P = .29). The use of ASA plus ticagrelor was associated with a significantly increased risk for major bleeding during the first 12 months (aHR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16-3.13; P = .011). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results.. In patients with ACS who survived 2 weeks after CABG, no significant difference in the risk of death or ischemic events could be demonstrated between ASA plus ticagrelor and patients treated with ASA only, while the risk for major bleeding was higher in patients treated with ASA plus ticagrelor. Sufficiently powered prospective randomized trials comparing different antiplatelet therapy strategies after CABG are warranted.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Bypass; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Sweden; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Ticagrelor

The aim of the present study was to establish the safety and efficacy profile of prasugrel and ticagrelor in real-life acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with renal dysfunction.. All consecutive patients from RENAMI (REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction) and BLEEMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registries were stratified according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower or greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Death and myocardial infarction (MI) were the primary efficacy endpoints. Major bleedings (MBs), defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding types 3 to 5, constituted the safety endpoint. A total of 19 255 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 63 ± 12; 14 892 (77.3%) were males. A total of 2490 (12.9%) patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Mean follow-up was 13 ± 5 months. Mortality was significantly higher in CKD patients (9.4% vs. 2.6%, P < 0.0001), as well as the incidence of reinfarction (5.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001) and MB (5.7% vs. 3%, P < 0.0001). At Cox multivariable analysis, potent P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced the mortality rate [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.96; P = 0.006] and the risk of reinfarction (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.95; P = 0.033) in CKD patients as compared to clopidogrel. The reduction of risk of reinfarction was confirmed in patients with preserved renal function. Potent P2Y12 inhibitors did not increase the risk of MB in CKD patients (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.59-1.68; P = 0.985).. In ACS patients with CKD, prasugrel and ticagrelor are associated with lower risk of death and recurrent MI without increasing the risk of MB.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Despite the use of the new generation P2Y12 inhibitors (Ticagrelor and Prasugrel) with aspirin is the recommended therapy in acute NSTE-ACS patients, their current use in clinical practice remains quite low and might be related, among several variables, with increased comorbidity burden. We aimed to assess the prevalence of these treatments and whether their use could be associated with comorbidity.. A multicentric prospective registry was conducted at 8 Cardiac Intensive Care Units (October 2017-April 2018) in patients admitted with non ST elevation myocardial infarction. Antithrombotic treatment was recorded and the comorbidity risk was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. We created a multivariate model to identify the independent predictors of the use of new inhibitors of P2Y12.. A total of 629 patients were included, median age 67 years, 23.2% women, 359 patients (57.1%) treated with clopidogrel and 40.6% with new P2Y12 inhibitors: ticagrelor (228 patients, 36.2%) and prasugrel (30 patients, 4.8%). Among the patients with very high comorbidity (Charlson Score > 6) clopidogrel was the drug of choice (82.6%), meanwhile in patients with low comorbility (Charlson Score 0-1) was the ticagrelor or prasugrel (63.6%). Independent predictors of the use of ticagrelor or prasugrel were a low Charlson Comorbidity Index, a low CRUSADE score and the absence of prior bleeding.. Antiplatelet treatment with Ticagrelor or Pasugrel was low in patients admitted with NSTE-ACS. Comorbidity calculated with Charlson Comorbidity Index was a powerful predictor of the use of new generation P2Y12 inhibitors in this population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Real-life data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor for unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are lacking, as are data for the temporal distribution of ischemic and bleeding risks.. A total of 19,825 patients were enrolled from the RENAMI and BleeMACS registries. Both were multicenter, retrospective, observational registries including the data and outcomes of consecutive patients with ACS who underwent primary PCI and were discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We evaluated the long-term outcome stratified by the different antiplatelet agents.. A total of 14,105 patients (71.2%) were treated with clopidogrel, 2364 patients (11.9%) with prasugrel and 3356 patients (16.9%) with ticagrelor. After propensity score matching, at 1 year, prasugrel reduced the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE; a composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI] and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] 3-5 bleeding) (4.2% vs.7.6%, p = 0.002) and of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite endpoint of death and MI) compared with clopidogrel (2.6% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.007). Ticagrelor decreased rates of MACE compared with clopidogrel (2.7% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001), but not of NACE (6.6% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.07). Ticagrelor presented similar performance in terms of MACE compared with prasugrel (2.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.56), with a trend towards a reduction in MI (0.2% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.56), but with higher risk of BARC 3-5 bleedings (3.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.04). In the daily risk analysis, clopidogrel presented a binomial distribution with a peak of ischemic risk at 3 months, which decreased towards bleedings; prasugrel had a constant equivalence between opposite risks; and ticagrelor constantly reduced recurrent MIs despite higher risk of BARC 3-5 events.. In real life, ticagrelor is more effective in reducing ischemic events during the first year after ACS, despite an increased risk of major bleedings, while prasugrel assures a better balance between ischemic and bleeding recurrent events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Risk Adjustment; Therapeutic Equivalency; Ticagrelor

This study aims to determine frequency and reasons for prematurely discontinuing or switching antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients admitted with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).. Patients of 75 years or older admitted with suspected NSTE-ACS were included between 2013 and 2016. Information was extracted from the patients' medical files.. A total of 544 patients were included, 17.3% discontinued aspirin within one year, predominantly (57%) within 30 days. The most common reason was the start of a (non-vitamin-K) oral anticoagulant [(N)OAC], either combined with a P2Y12-inhibitor (43%) or as monotherapy (16%). The P2Y12-inhibitor was discontinued in 31.2% of patients within one year, of which 46% within 30 days. The most common reason was undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 22%). Switching of clopidogrel seldom occurred; however, ticagrelor was switched in 50/179 patients mainly due to dyspnoea (42%). Independent predictors for prematurely discontinuing antiplatelet therapy were undergoing CABG [odds ratio (OR) 3.257 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.836-5.779)], need for (N)OAC [OR 2.167 (95% CI 1.423-3.300)] and type II ACS as final diagnosis [OR 3.793 (95% CI 1.721-8.361)]. Undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [OR 0.393 (95% CI 0.243-0.634)] and use of clopidogrel [OR 0.441(95% CI 0.293-0.662)] were independent predictors of continuing antiplatelet therapy.. In elderly patients of at least 75 years with NSTE-ACS, antiplatelet therapy is frequently discontinued prematurely, most often within 30 days. Main reasons for discontinuing are need for (N)OAC, undergoing CABG or type II ACS as final diagnosis and suffering from dyspnoea while on ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Deprescriptions; Drug Substitution; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Dyspnea; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Use of oral antiplatelets (OAPs) is essential for preventing thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor may be enhanced due to pharmacodynamic interactions, but as CYP substrates, they are prone to pharmacokinetic interactions too. The aim was to study polypharmacy in ACS patients following hospital discharge.. This observational drug utilization study linked patient-level data from nationwide registers. The study population consisted of adult ACS patients discharged from Finnish hospitals in 2009-2013. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of drug-drug interactions with odd ratios for predefined predictors such as age, gender, and ACS type.. In the cohort of 54,416 ACS patients, 91% of those treated with OAP received clopidogrel. Of clopidogrel-treated patients, 12% purchased warfarin at least once while on clopidogrel treatment. Old age, male sex, ST-elevation myocardial infarction as index event, and a history of previous ACS events were associated with an increased risk of warfarin-OAP interaction (p < 0.001 for all). Ibuprofen, and serotonergic drugs tramadol, citalopram, and escitalopram were the next most common drugs causing pharmacodynamic interactions. In general, concomitant use of drugs known to cause pharmacokinetic interactions was rare, but both esomeprazole and omeprazole were prescribed in more than 6% of clopidogrel-treated patients.. Warfarin and ibuprofen were the most commonly used concomitant medications causing pharmacodynamic interactions and potentially increasing the risk of bleeding in OAP-treated patients. Esomeprazole and omeprazole were used in clopidogrel-treated patients although there are alternatives available for gastric protection.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Finland; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polypharmacy; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Recurrent atherothrombotic events have been reported in certain higher risk subsets of patients even with ticagrelor, a potent first-line antiplatelet agent for the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hyperhomocysteinemia is a known determinant of platelet function abnormalities. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of homocysteine (Hcy) levels on platelet reactivity in patients receiving Ticagrelor.. Patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization and on dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA + Ticagrelor (90mg/twice a day) were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA). Suboptimal platelet inhibition HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). We included 432 patients, divided according to Hcy tertiles. Higher Hcy levels were associated with age, renal failure, creatinine levels and use diuretics (p < 0.001). Patients with higher Hcy levels displayed a higher platelet reactivity at COL test (p = 0.002), and ADP test (p = 0.04), with a linear relationship between Hcy and platelet aggregation after stimulation with collagen (r = 0.202, p < 0.001), thrombin receptor peptide (r = 0.104, p = 0.05) and ADP (r = 0.145, p = 0.006). However, Hcy levels did not significantly affect the rate of HRPR with Ticagrelor (9.9% vs 13.7% vs 10.7%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = [0.616-1.51], p = 0.99).. Among patients with ACS, despite the elevated platelet reactivity associated to hyperhomocysteinemia, DAPT with ticagrelor could overcome such phenomenon, achieving an adequate platelet inhibition in the majority of the patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Homocysteine; Humans; Hyperhomocysteinemia; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS risk scores (RSs) were recently developed to help clinicians at individualizing the optimal dual antiplatelet therapy duration (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nevertheless, external validation of these RSs it has not yet been performed in ACS (acute coronary syndrome) patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor in a real- world scenario.. 4424 ACS patients who underwent PCI and survived to hospital discharge, from January 2012 to December 2016 at 12 European centers, were included. PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS bleeding RS, as well as PARIS ischemic RS, were computed, and their performance at predicting major bleeding (MB; BARC type 3 or 5) and ischemic events (MI and stent thrombosis) during follow up was compared.. After a median follow-up of 14 (interquartile range 12-20.9) months, 83 (1.88%) patients developed MB and 133 (3.0%) suffered an ischemic episode. PRECISE-DAPT performed better than PARIS bleeding RS (c-statistic = 0.653 vs. 0.593; p = .01 for comparison) in predicting MB. The RSs performance for MB prediction remained consistent in STEMI patients (c-statistic = 0.632 vs 0.575) or in those treated with prasugrel (c-statistic = 0.623 vs 0.586). PARIS ischemic RS exhibited superior discrimination in predicting ischemic complications compared to PRECISE-DAPT (c-statistic = 0.604 vs 0.568 p = .05 for comparison).. Our data provide support to the use of PRECISE-DAPT in MB risk stratification for patients receiving DAPT in form of aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor whereas the PARIS ischemic RS has potential to complement the risk prediction with respect to ischemic events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The risk of recurrent ischemia and bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may vary during the first year of follow-up according to clinical presentation, and medical and interventional strategies.. BleeMACS and RENAMI are 2 multicenter registries enrolling patients with ACS treated with PCI and clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. The average daily ischemic and bleeding risks (ADIR and ADBR) in the first year after PCI were the primary end points. The difference between ADBR and ADIR was calculated to estimate the potential excess of bleeding/ischemic events in a given period or specific subgroup.. A total of 19,826 patients were included. Overall, in the first year after PCI, the ADBR was 0.008085%, whereas ADIR was 0.008017% (P = .886). In the first 2 weeks ADIR was higher than ADBR (P = .013), especially in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or incomplete revascularization. ADIR continued to be, albeit non-significantly, greater than ADBR up to the third month, whereas ADBR became higher, although not significantly, afterward. Patients with incomplete revascularization had an excess in ischemic risk (P = .003), whereas non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients and those on ticagrelor had an excess of bleeding (P = .012 and P = .022, respectively).. In unselected ACS patients, ADIR and ADBR occurred at similar rates within 1 year after PCI. ADIR was greater than ADBR in the first 2 weeks, especially in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients and those with incomplete revascularization. In the first year, ADIR was higher than ADBR in patients with incomplete revascularization, whereas ADBR was higher in non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients and in those discharged on ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recurrence; Registries; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

Patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are often treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with insertion of coronary artery stents and a majority receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), usually a combination of a COX-1 inhibitor (aspirin) and a P2Y. In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study including 24 patients, venous blood was obtained from patients on day 0, before stopping maintenance dose of 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily, and then on days 1, 3, 5, and 8, after discontinuation. Samples were analyzed using Multiplate. Discontinuation of ticagrelor for 3 days resulted in return of adequate platelet function in all patients on Multiplate

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is an antagonist of both platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Vessels; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Guidelines currently recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on randomized clinical trial data in which ticagrelor reduced major adverse coronary events (MACE) vs clopidogrel but increased bleeding and dyspnea.. To compare the risk of MACE with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), to compare major bleeding and dyspnea, and to evaluate the association between P2Y12 inhibitor adherence and MACE.. Population-based cohort study using data of patients discharged alive after PCI for ACS from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2016, with follow-up to 1 year. Analysis began April 2018.. Outpatient prescription for ticagrelor or clopidogrel within 31 days after PCI. Adherence was defined as a medication refill adherence value of 80% or higher.. Major adverse coronary events, a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for ACS, unplanned coronary revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 365 days after index PCI. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization for major bleeding and emergency department visit for dyspnea.. Of 11 185 individuals who underwent PCI, the median (interquartile range) age was 61 (54-71) years, and 2760 (24.7%) were women. Ticagrelor users (4076 [36.4%]) were generally younger and had fewer cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities than clopidogrel users. Ticagrelor was not associated with lower risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10); however, it was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.29-1.78) and dyspnea (aHR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.47-2.65). A total of 3328 ticagrelor users (81.6%) were adherent during the study vs 5256 of clopidogrel users (73.9%) (P < .001; χ2 = 86.4). In the full cohort, adherence was associated with a lower MACE risk (aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90 for adherence of ≥80% vs <80%). Differences in other secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were consistent with primary analyses.. In this population-based cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI, outpatient use of ticagrelor was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in MACE vs clopidogrel; however, it was associated with more major bleeding and dyspnea.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Clopidogrel; Dyspnea; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitors following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CYP2C19 genotype can guide DAPT selection, prescribing ticagrelor or prasugrel for loss-of-function (LOF) allele carriers (genotype-guided escalation). Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) are traditionally grounded in clinical trial data. We conduct a CEA using real-world data using a 1-year decision-analytic model comparing primary strategies: universal empiric clopidogrel (base case), universal ticagrelor, and genotype-guided escalation. We also explore secondary strategies commonly implemented in practice, wherein all patients are prescribed ticagrelor for 30 days post PCI. After 30 days, all patients are switched to clopidogrel irrespective of genotype (nonguided de-escalation) or to clopidogrel only if patients do not harbor an LOF allele (genotype-guided de-escalation). Compared with universal clopidogrel, both universal ticagrelor and genotype-guided escalation were superior with improvement in quality-adjusted life years (QALY's). Only genotype-guided escalation was cost-effective ($42,365/QALY) and demonstrated the highest probability of being cost-effective across conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds. In the secondary analysis, compared with the nonguided de-escalation strategy, although genotype-guided de-escalation and universal ticagrelor were more effective, with ICER of $188,680/QALY and $678,215/QALY, respectively, they were not cost-effective. CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet prescribing is cost-effective compared with either universal clopidogrel or universal ticagrelor using real-world implementation data. The secondary analysis suggests genotype-guided and nonguided de-escalation may be viable strategies, needing further evaluation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Humans; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Since ticagrelor inhibits the cellular uptake of adenosine, thereby increasing extracellular adenosine concentration and biological activity, we hypothesized that ticagrelor has adenosine-dependent antiplatelet properties. In the current study, we compared the effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel on platelet activation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), the toll-like receptor (TLR)-1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4, the TLR-4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 agonist SFLLRN, and the PAR-4 agonist AYPGKF were measured by flow cytometry in blood from 80 ticagrelor- and 80 prasugrel-treated ACS patients on day 3 after percutaneous coronary intervention. Residual platelet aggregation to arachidonic acid (AA) and ADP were assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry and light transmission aggregometry.. ADP-induced platelet activation and aggregation, and AA-induced platelet aggregation were similar in patients on ticagrelor and prasugrel, respectively (all p ≥ 0.3). Further, LPS-induced platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa did not differ significantly between ticagrelor- and prasugrel-treated patients (both p > 0.4). In contrast, Pam3CSK4-induced platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa were significantly lower in ticagrelor-treated patients (both p ≤ 0.005). Moreover, SFLLRN-induced platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa were significantly less pronounced in patients on ticagrelor therapy compared to prasugrel-treated patients (both p < 0.03). Finally, PAR-4 mediated platelet activation as assessed by platelet surface expression of activated GPIIb/IIIa following stimulation with AYPGKF was significantly lower in patients receiving ticagrelor (p = 0.02).. Ticagrelor inhibits TLR-1/2 and PAR mediated platelet activation in ACS patients more strongly than prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; P-Selectin; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated; Signal Transduction; Ticagrelor; Toll-Like Receptors; Treatment Outcome

Bleeding risk stratification is an unresolved issue in older adults. Anemia may reflect subclinical blood losses that can be exacerbated after percutaneous coronary intervention . We sought to prospectively determine the contribution of anemia to the risk of bleeding in 448 consecutive patients aged 75 or more years, treated by percutaneous coronary interventions without concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation. We evaluated the effect of WHO-defined anemia on the incidence of 1-year nonaccess site-related major bleeding. The prevalence of anemia was 39%, and 13.1% of anemic and 5.2% of nonanemic patients suffered a bleeding event (hazard ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.54, p = 0.004). Neither PRECISE-DAPT nor CRUSADE scores were superior to hemoglobin for the prediction of bleeding. In conclusion, anemia is a powerful predictor of bleeding with potential utility for simplifying tailoring therapies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Angina, Unstable; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Stents; Ticagrelor; Urologic Diseases

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cause of Death; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Republic of Korea; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Republic of Korea; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Republic of Korea; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Risk stratification with specific biomarkers is proposed for tailored P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in patients with STEMI.. This nationwide registry and quality improvement study is from November 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. In total, 11,512 STEMI patients received aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) and underwent PCIs in hospitals. Of the patients, 2992 were prescribed ticagrelor and 8520 clopidogrel. The primary effectiveness outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, in-hospital ischemic stroke). The primary safety outcome was in-hospital major bleeding.. MACCE incidence was lower in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (0.8% versus 1.2%; P=0.046), but under different NT-proBNP levels, cumulative hazards of MACCE were without statistical significance. Bleeding rates were higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (all bleeding: 9.9% versus 6.9%, P<0.001; major bleeding: 4.0% versus 2.7%, P<0.001). The higher cumulative hazard of bleeding could be identified in the Kaplan-Meier curves. In the multivariate analysis, ticagrelor increased bleeding events, compared with clopidogrel, at NT-proBNP >1800 ng/L patients (all bleeding: HR 1.46; 95%CI, 1.07-2.01; major bleeding: HR 1.68, 95%CI, 1.03-2.74), but a low effect was found in those with lower NT-proBNP level. Subgroup analyses show that ticagrelor increased major bleeding in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.50 (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.61-6.74) (interaction p=0.03).. We found that ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, increased bleeding complications in hospitalized patients with NT-proBNP>1800 ng/L, especially in patients with EF < 0.50.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aging; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with the most severe forms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) require invasive therapies such as extracorporeal life support. The risk of bleeding in ICU patients with ACS treated with a dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and ticagrelor is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare the bleeding risk of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ICU patients with ACS.. We conducted a retrospective study based on a propensity score and a proportional hazards model. All patients with ACS hospitalized in the ICU of a French university hospital between January 2013 and January 2017 were included in the study. Bleeding during ICU stay was defined as all Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major or minor events. A total of 155 patients were included in the study. According to propensity score matching, 57 patients treated with aspirin and ticagrelor were matched with 57 patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Median (first-third quartile) Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 61.5 (41.0-85.0). Bleeding during ICU stay occurred in 12 patients (21.1%) treated with clopidogrel and in 35 patients (61.4%) treated with ticagrelor (p<0.0001). This significant association was found for both TIMI major bleeding (12.3% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.004) and TIMI minor bleeding (8.8% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.01). The relative risk of bleeding occurrence during ICU stay was 2.60 (confidence interval 95%: 1.55-4.35) for ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. No significant difference in ICU mortality was found between the two groups (45.6% in the clopidogrel group vs. 29.8% in the ticagrelor group, p = 0.08).. Bleeding complications are frequent and serious in ICU patients with ACS. A dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with a higher risk of bleeding compared to a dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Propensity Score; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Although previous clinical trials demonstrated that ticagrelor could reduce cardiovascular events and mortality versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the real-world evidence of its clinical impacts on East Asian Diabetic population has rarely been investigated.Between November 2013 and June 2015, 1534 patients were recruited into the Acute Coronary Syndrome-Diabetes Mellitus Registry of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC ACS-DM registry). After propensity score matching, a total of 730 patients undergoing successful revascularization and discharged on ticagrelor (N = 365) or clopidogrel (N = 365) were analyzed. The primary and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization, respectively. The all-cause death associated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel was 3.6% vs 7.4% (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.34 [0.15-0.80]; P = .0138) at 24 months. The re-hospitalization rate at 24 months was 38.9% vs 39.2% (P = .3258).For diabetic patients with ACS, ticagrelor provided better survival benefit than clopidogrel without an increase of re-hospitalization in 24 months after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. This study in real-world circumstance provided valuable complementary data to externally validate platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) finding especially in Asian diabetic population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Registries; Secondary Prevention; Taiwan; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The combination of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients who receive a coronary stent reduces the rate of stent thrombosis and the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events. The newer P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have better efficacy than clopidogrel. Prasugrel provides greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and has a rapid onset of action. Current acute coronary syndrome guidelines recommend the use of both newer P2Y12 inhibitors. However, emerging data have shown that prasugrel is more efficient than ticagrelor in reducing the incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death, without increased risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy after one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or conventional DAPT in patients with or without acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-StudY (GLASSY).. Risk estimates were expressed as rate ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 3,840 ACS and 3,745 stable ischaemic heart disease (SIHD) patients were included. At two years, rates of the co-primary efficacy endpoint, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or urgent target vessel revascularisation, were 7.94% in the experimental and 9.68% in the control group (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.01) among ACS patients and 6.31% in the experimental and 7.14% in the control group (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.69-1.13) among SIHD patients (pint=0.63). Trends for lower and higher risk of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding with the experimental strategy in ACS (2.27% vs 3.00%, RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.51-1.12) and SIHD (2.70% vs 1.96%, RR 1.39, 95% CI: 0.91-2.12) patients, respectively, were observed with significant interaction testing (pint=0.039). A net clinical benefit endpoint, the composite of both co-primary study endpoints, favoured the experimental treatment among ACS patients only.. Ticagrelor monotherapy after one-month DAPT provided consistent treatment effects on ischaemic endpoints in patients with or without ACS but only the former experienced a net clinical benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03231059.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the long-term clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. In this prospective multicenter observational study, we enrolled 708 patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel (n = 137), ticagrelor (n = 260) or prasugrel (n = 311). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; over 1 year) and long-term mortality (median: 5.6 years; interquartile range [IQR] 4.9-6.5 years) were assessed. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) was used to measure adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation.. Type of P2Y12 inhibitor emerged as an independent predictor of long-term mortality and MACE: patients treated with potent platelet inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor were at lower risk for long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.92; P = .028) or MACE (adjusted HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.73; P = .004) than those treated with clopidogrel independent from clinical risk factors. In contrast, the efficacy of clopidogrel decreased with increasing severity of ACS: platelet aggregation was 37% higher in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 25% higher in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) compared to patients with unstable angina (P = .039). Patients with diabetes achieved less potent ADP- and AA-induced platelet inhibition under clopidogrel, compared to patients without diabetes (P = .045; P = .030, respectively).. In the setting of ACS, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel reduced long-term mortality and 1-year MACE as compared to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Arachidonic Acid; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased thrombotic events and seems to influence platelet reactivity. Conflicting results have been published on platelet response in CKD patients with stable coronary artery disease. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of CKD on platelet aggregation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, included the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors.. We enrolled 206 patients with ACS, divided in two groups, according to the presence or the absence of moderate/severe CKD. Platelet aggregation was performed with light transmission aggregometry and results are expressed as percentage of maximum platelet aggregation. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) was defined as maximum platelet aggregation more than 59%.. Patients with CKD [estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m, n = 28] were prevalent older, diabetic, had previous coronary revascularization. In these patients, platelet aggregation was significantly higher than in those with eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m (ADP 10 μmol/l: 28.46 ± 26.19 vs. 16.64 ± 12.79, P < 0.001; ADP 20 μmol/l: 30.07 ± 25.89 vs. 17.46 ± 12.82, P < 0.001). HRPR was observed in 4.4% of patients, with higher prevalence in those with eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m [21.4 vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 15.91 (3.71-68.17), P < 0.001]. At multivariate analysis, after correction for baseline confounders, eGFR [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.91-0.98), P = 0.007], together with the use of clopidogrel [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 23.59 (4.01-138.82), P < 0.001], emerged as determinants of HRPR.. In patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, CKD is associated with an increasing ADP-induced platelet aggregation and higher prevalence of HRPR, which is mainly correlated to clopidogrel use.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Resistance; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Blood Platelets; Humans; Kidney; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on aspirin and ticagrelor as dual antiplatelet therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective case-control study included 50 patients with ACS (25 with reported bleeding events and 25 without) on aspirin and ticagrelor. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and arachidonic acid (ACA)-induced platelet aggregation rates were measured using light transmission aggregometry. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PEAR1, GP1BA, and GSTP1 were genotyped. RESULTS ACA-induced platelet aggregation rates were obviously lower in patients with bleeding events than in those without (13.28±8.46% vs. 24.93±9.89%, P<0.001). No significant differences in ADP-induced platelet aggregation rates were observed between the 2 groups (16.17±9.74% vs. 16.88±12.69%, P>0.05). Among those with bleeding events and among controls, 70% and 80% had an ACA-induced platelet aggregation rate of 0-18% and 18-50%, respectively. Mutation rates of rs6065 in GP1BA and rs1695, rs4891, and rs8191439 in GSTP1 also differed significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Lower ACA-induced platelet aggregation rates are associated with increased risk of bleeding in patients with ACS who are on aspirin and ticagrelor. An ACA-induced platelet aggregation rate of 18% may be considered the cutoff point for identifying high risk of aspirin-associated bleeding events in patients with ACS. SNP genotyping may also help predict the risk of bleeding in patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Arachidonic Acid; Aspirin; Case-Control Studies; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Genotype; Glutathione S-Transferase pi; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIb-IX Complex; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Cell Surface; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

To compare the effect of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in reducing the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events in patients with late or very late stent thrombosis (LST/VLST) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A total of 4538 patients with acute coronary syndrome were screened for angiographically determined LST/VLST. Two hundred and forty-one patients were included in the analysis and grouped according to ticagrelor (n = 81) or clopidogrel (n = 160) at discharge. The clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and revascularization during the 1-yr follow-up period.. After propensity score matching, 65 pairs were generated. The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group compared with the clopidogrel group (9.3% vs. 21.5%, log-rank p = 0.048). However, no difference was observed in event rates of death, MI, ischemic stroke, and revascularization between the ticagrelor group and the clopidogrel group.. Following successful primary PCI, patients with LST/VLST who received ticagrelor had fewer ischemic cardiovascular events at 1-yr follow-up, compared with those who received clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Patients with acute coronary syndrome are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy containing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and P2Y12 antagonists. In case of urgent coronary artery bypass grafting this might be associated with increasing risks of bleeding complications.. Data from 1200 consecutive urgent operations between 2010 and 2018 were obtained from our institutional patient database. For this study off-pump surgery was excluded. The primary composite end point major bleeding consisted of at least one end point: transfusion ≥ 5 packed red blood cells within 24 hours, rethoracotomy due to bleeding, chest tube output >2000 mL within 24 hours. Demographic data, peri-, and postoperative variables and outcomes were compared between patients treated with mono antiplatelet therapy, ASA + clopidogrel (ASA-C) +ticagrelor (ASA-T) or +prasugrel (ASA-P) < 72 hours before surgery. Furthermore, we compared patients with dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA monotherapy.. From 1,086 patients, 475 (44%) received dual antiplatelet therapy. Three-hundred seventy-two received ASA-C (77.7%), 72 ASA-T (15%), and 31 ASA-P (6.5%). Major bleeding (44 vs. 23%,. Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with higher rates of major bleeding. Further studies should examine the difference in the prevalence of major bleeding complications in the different dual antiplatelet therapy regimes in patients requiring urgent surgery.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Transfusion; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Databases, Factual; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Although ticagrelor has been well-known to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and its effectiveness and safety have not been well evaluated in Chinese patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor in Chinese patients. In order to find potential effect modifiers on the drug effects, a decision tree method was performed to detect interactions between treatment and patient characteristics in an automatic and systematic manner.. This retrospective study included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent PCI and received either ticagrelor (N = 250) or clopidogrel (N = 291) while hospitalized between August 2014 and August 2015. After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study the event-free survival against major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, primary efficacy outcome, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, restenosis and target vessel revascularization [TVR]), re-hospitalization, the need for urgent re-PCI (secondary efficacy outcome) and bleeding events (safety outcome) within 12 months of the PCI date. To search for effect modifiers of the two antiplatelet therapies, a machine-learning decision tree algorithm was conducted to predict re-hospitalization status.. After propensity score matching (N = 442), ticagrelor and clopidogrel had no significant difference in MACE, re-hospitalization and bleeding. The decision tree analysis showed that the number of diseased vessels modulated the effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on re-hospitalization rates. In single-vessel disease (SVD) patients, ticagrelor was associated with lower hazards than clopidogrel for all efficacy outcomes: MACE (HR = 0.190, 95% CI: 0.042-0.866), re-hospitalization (HR = 0.296, 95% CI: 0.108-0.808), urgent re-PCI (HR = 0.249, 95% CI: 0.069-0.895), bleeding (HR = 1.006, 95% CI: 0.063-16.129). However, in multi-vessel disease (MVD) patients, the two treatments did not show significant difference.. In the general patient population, there was no significant difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel on the hazard of MACE. However, ticagrelor achieved a better effectiveness than clopidogrel in patients with SVD. This pilot study provides scientific basis to call for a large-scale prospective study in this population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Algorithms; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Data Mining; Decision Trees; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Machine Learning; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) frequently occurs following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with the prescription of P2Y. To compare GIB rates associated with clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor using national medical and pharmacy claims data from privately insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees .. Propensity score and inverse probability treatment weighting were used to balance baseline characteristics among treatment groups. The 1-year GIB risk was calculated using weighted Cox proportional hazard models and expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and number needed to harm (NNH).. We identified 37 019 patients with ACS (non-ST elevation ACS [NSTE-ACS] and ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]) within 14 days of a PCI (mean age 63 years and 70% male). Clopidogrel prescription was most common (69%) with prasugrel (16%) and ticagrelor (14%) prescribed less frequently. When compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a 34% risk reduction (HR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.54-0.81) in GIB overall and with NSTE-ACS, and a 37% GIB risk reduction (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.93) in STEMI patients. When compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel was associated with a 21% risk reduction (HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.97) overall, a 36% GIB risk reduction (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49-0.85) in STEMI patients but no reduction of GIB risk in NSTE-ACS patients.. In the first year following PCI, ticagrelor or prasugrel are associated with fewer GIB events than clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Thromboembolism; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Sweden; Ticagrelor

Background Ticagrelor reduces ischaemic end points in acute coronary syndromes. However, outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in real-world patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. We sought to examine whether treatment with ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in unselected patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with PCI. Methods and Results We used data from SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) for PCI performed in Västra Götaland County, Sweden. The database contains information about all PCI performed at 5 hospitals (∼20% of all data in SCAAR). All procedures between January 2005 and January 2015 for unstable angina/non‒ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction were included. We used instrumental variable 2-stage least squares regression to adjust for confounders. The primary combined end point was mortality or stent thrombosis at 30 days, secondary end points were mortality at 30 days and 1-year, stent thrombosis at 30 days, in-hospital bleeding, in-hospital neurologic complications and long-term mortality. A total of 15 097 patients were included in the study of which 2929 (19.4%) were treated with ticagrelor. Treatment with ticagrelor was not associated with a lower risk for the primary end point (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87-1.61;

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Sweden; Ticagrelor

In light of recent studies describing the antibacterial properties of ticagrelor, the association between treatment with ticagrelor and subsequent risk for infection following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is taking on increased importance. A single center, retrospective, matched cohort analysis was performed. All patients older than 30 years of age admitted between January 1, 2013 and November 1, 2019 for an ACS and discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were included. The primary outcome was defined as hospital admissions due to infections likely caused by gram-positive bacteria up to 1 year following the ACS hospitalization. The base cohort included 3,909 patients. About 2,035 (52.1%) were treated with ticagrelor and 1,874 (47.9%) with clopidogrel. Patients treated with ticagrelor had a 64% lower risk of gram-positive infection during the first year following hospitalization after adjusting for demographic and co-morbidity factors compared with those treated with clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.61; p <0.001). In a cohort starting from 1 year (conclusion of DAPT period) and up to 3 years following ACS hospitalization, the risk of gram-positive infection was comparable in both groups (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.19; p = 0.182). Treatment with ticagrelor was not associated with a reduced risk of gram-negative infections (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.06; p = 0.07). In conclusion, DAPT regimen that includes aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with reduced risk of gram-positive infection compared with the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a useful and easy-to-assess prognostic tool and biomarker of cardiovascular risk. However, few studies have evaluated its role on platelet inhibition among patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and especially in the settings of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed at assessing the impact of NLR on platelet reactivity and the risk of major ischemic events at long-term follow-up among ACS patients on DAPT with ticagrelor.. Patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA + ticagrelor (90 mg/twice a day) after percutaneous coronary revascularization for ACS were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA). Suboptimal platelet inhibition (HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). The primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome, target vessel revascularization) at longest available follow-up.. We included 397 patients, that were divided according to NLR tertiles. Patients with higher NLR were older (p < .001), less frequently smokers (p = .03), with higher rates of renal failure (p = .001), previous bypass surgery (p = .05) and use of statins (p = .03) and diuretics (p = .01). Higher white blood cells count and C-reactive protein (p < .001) and lower haemoglobin (p = .001) were associated with NLR. Mean platelet reactivity and the prevalence of high platelet reactivity (HRPR) on ticagrelor were significantly associated to higher NLR tertiles values (7% vs 12% vs 14.3%, p = .04), with a significant relationship between NLR and platelet reactivity being confirmed for all the different activating stimuli. At a mean follow-up of 939 ± 581.4 days, 21.2% of the patients experienced the primary composite endpoint, with a trend for a higher risk of events across NLR tertiles (15.4% vs 24.2% vs 24.4%, p = .09), that became statistically significant after correction for baseline confounders (adjusted HR[95%CI] = 1.13[1.008-1.26], p = .036). Moreover, NLR was significantly associated to overall mortality and recurrent ACS (adjusted p = .008, p = .06 and p = .02 respectively).. In the present study we found that among ACS patients treated with ASA and ticagrelor after PCI, suboptimal platelet inhibition despite DAPT was significantly increased for higher values of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio. Moreover, mortality and the risk of recurrent major ischemic events at long-term were associated to NLR.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Lymphocyte Count; Lymphocytes; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Patients; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reference Standards; Ticagrelor; Weights and Measures

Aim      To compare hemorrhagic safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) after thrombolytic therapy (TLT).Material and methods  This nonrandomized study included 183 patients followed up for 30 days. Hemorrhagic safety was compared in a group of patients with STEACS (n=71) after a thrombolytic treatment with alteplase and early ticagrelor treatment (180 mg followed by switching to 90 mg twice daily) and in a group of patients (n=112) with STEACS receiving TLT with alteplase and clopidogrel (loading dose, 600 mg followed by switching to 75 mg daily). Primary endpoint was hemorrhage associated with TLT; patients were followed up for 30 days.Results During the follow-up period, TLT-associated hemorrhages were observed in 11.3% of patients in the ticagrelor treatment group and in 10.7% of patients in the clopidogrel treatment group (p=0.9; odds ratio, 1.06 at 95 % confidence interval, from 0.41 to 2.73). Intracranial hemorrhages and fatal hemorrhages were absent in both groups.Conclusion      There were no significant differences in hemorrhagic safety between patients with STEACS after the TLT treatment with alteplase and early treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

The comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in older patients with myocardial infarction (MI) has received limited study.. We performed an observational analysis of all patients ≥80 years (n=14 005) who were discharged alive with aspirin combined with either clopidogrel (60.2%) or ticagrelor (39.8%) after a MI between 2010 and 2017 registered in the national registry SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies). Inverse probability treatment weighting was used in Cox regression models to adjust for differences in demographics, in-hospital therapies, and medications. The primary ischemic outcome (death, MI, or stroke), and bleeding were obtained from national registries at 1 year. A sensitivity analysis in <80-year-old patients was performed.. In patients ≥80 years, the incidence of the primary ischemic outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.88-1.06]) was similar for ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-treated patients. Ticagrelor was associated with a 17% and 48% higher risk of death (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.32]) and bleeding (HR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.25-1.76]), but a lower risk of MI (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.92]) and stroke (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56-0.93]). In <80-year-old patients, the incidence of the primary ischemic outcome was 17% (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.77-0.89]) lower with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was associated with 15% (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]) lower risk of death, 32% higher risk of bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.18-1.47]), but lower risk of MI (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.91]) and stroke (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.98]).. Ticagrelor use among elderly patients with MI was associated with higher risk of bleeding and death compared with clopidogrel. A randomized study of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in the elderly is needed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Prognosis; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The positive interaction of ticagrelor with the metabolism of adenosine has been claimed for the large antithrombotic and antiischemic benefits of this antiplatelet agent in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Adenosine catabolism is regulated by the activity of the adenosine deaminase enzyme (ADA), for which several polymorphisms have been identified. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore the impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of ADA gene on platelet reactivity in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor.. We included consecutive patients receiving ASA and ticagrelor after an ACS and coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by impedance aggregometry at 30-90 days post-discharge. The genetic analysis was carried out by PCR and RFLP. Clinical endpoints were mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization at the maximum available follow-up.. Our population is represented by 464 patients, of whom 33.4% were A-heterozygotes and 6 homozygotes. A-allele carriers showed a greater prevalence of renal failure (p = 0.02) and a lower rate of previous coronary artery bypass graft (p = 0.03) and statin treatment (p = 0.02). No differences in the mean values of platelet reactivity or HRPR on ticagrelor were found according to the ADA genotype (11.3%vs13.9%, p = 0.45; adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.17[0.64-2.14], p = 0.61). At follow up, patients carrying the A-allele showed a non-significantly lower incidence of ACS and repeated unplanned revascularization, although with no effect on mortality.. In the present study the rs73598374 polymorphism of the ADA gene did not affect platelet reactivity or the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Deaminase; Aftercare; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Patient Discharge; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Baldetti L, Melillo F, Moroni F, et al.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Gimbel M, Qaderdan K, Willemsen L, et al.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patients; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

To describe from a noninterventional registry (Utilization of Ticagrelor in the Upstream Setting for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome), the short-term ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) are managed with a loading dose (LD) of a P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12i) given at least 4 hours before diagnostic angiography and delineation of coronary anatomy. Prior data on the effects of such "upstream loading" have been inconsistent.. In 53 US hospitals, we evaluated the in-hospital care and outcomes of patients with confirmed non-ST elevation MI managed with an interventional strategy and loaded upstream (at least 4 h before diagnostic angiography) with oral P2Y12i therapy. Patients entered into the database were grouped into 1 of 4 cohorts for analysis: (1) overall cohort, (2) thienopyridine (clopidogrel or prasugrel) load, (3) ticagrelor load, and (4) ticagrelor-consistent. The fourth cohort is a subset of cohort 3 that received ticagrelor throughout the index hospital stay and at discharge. We evaluated in-hospital clinical course and ischemic and bleeding outcomes in all patients and also 30-day outcomes in the ticagrelor-consistent cohort.. A total of 3355 patients were enrolled, of whom 1087 had 30-day follow-up. The mean (±SD) age was 63.3 ± 12.5 years, and 62.6% were male. Thrombolysis in MI and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events scores placed these patients in the intermediate risk range, and CRUSADE scores were in the moderate risk range. The LD in Utilization of Ticagrelor in the Upstream Setting for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome was clopidogrel in 45.6%, ticagrelor in 53.6%, and prasugrel in 0.8%. The median upstream interval (LD to angiography) was 17:27 hours and did not change appreciably over the course of the data collection period (2/15-10/19). Access was radial in 48.6% and femoral in 51.4%. Postangiography management was medical only in 32.3%, percutaneous coronary intervention in 59.4%, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 8.3%. Median length of stay was 2.7 days, and median time from angiography to coronary artery bypass grafting was 3.6 days. In-hospital mortality was 0.51%, and major bleeding (thrombolysis in MI) was 0.24%; the in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 0.7%, and stent thrombosis occurred in 0.18%. No significant differences were seen between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel cohorts in hospital, but 16% received more than 1 P2Y12i in-hospital. On follow-up (93.2% response), 86.7% of patients reported taking ticagrelor as directed.. Upstream loading of P2Y12i was associated with very low rates of bleeding and short length of stay in a large cohort of non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI) patients managed invasively.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in whom invasive therapy was planned.. The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with ACS with DM undergoing invasive treatment remain unknown.. This pre-specified analysis of the ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) 5 trial included 892 patients with ACS with DM and 3,124 patients with ACS without DM randomized to prasugrel or ticagrelor. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5 bleeding (both assessed 12 months after randomization).. DM seems to affect the efficacy of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS. In patients with DM, the efficacy of ticagrelor was comparable with that of prasugrel. (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [ISAR-REACT 5]; NCT01944800).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The increased risk of non-cardiovascular death in patients receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel in comparison with the placebo group in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) trial in contrast to the decreased risk of cardiovascular death and all-cause death seen in patients treated with low-dose ticagrelor in the EU label population of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial, resulted in inclusion in the 2020 ESC NSTE-ACS guidelines the recommendation for use of clopidogrel or prasugrel only if the patient is not eligible for treatment with ticagrelor. The prevalence of the primary outcome composed of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction was lower in the low-dose rivaroxaban and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) group than in the ASA-alone group in the COMPASS trial. Moreover, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates were lower in the rivaroxaban-plus-ASA group. Comparison of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 and COMPASS trial patient characteristics clearly shows that each of these treatment strategies should be addressed at different groups of patients. A greater benefit in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with a high risk of ischemic events and without high bleeding risk may be expected with ASA and ticagrelor 60 mg b.i.d. when the therapy is continued without interruption or with short interruption only after ACS. On the other hand, ASA and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. seems to be a better option when indications for dual antithrombotic therapy (DATT) appear after a longer time from ACS (more than 2 years) and/or from cessation of DAPT (more than 1 year) and in patients with multiple vascular bed atherosclerosis. Thus, both options of DATTs complement each other rather than compete, as can be presumed from the recommendations. However, a direct comparison between these strategies should be tested in future clinical trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cardiology; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Kim BK, Hong SJ, Cho YH, et al.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Navarese EP, Khan SU, Kolodziejczak M, et al.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor as the preferred P2Y12 platelet inhibitor for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), primarily based on a single large randomized clinical trial. The benefits and risks associated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in routine practice merits attention.. To determine the association of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel with ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS in clinical practice.. A retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and received ticagrelor or clopidogrel was conducted using 2 United States electronic health record-based databases and 1 nationwide South Korean database from November 2011 to March 2019. Patients were matched using a large-scale propensity score algorithm, and the date of final follow-up was March 2019.. Ticagrelor vs clopidogrel.. The primary end point was net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 12 months, composed of ischemic events (recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, or ischemic stroke) and hemorrhagic events (hemorrhagic stroke or gastrointestinal bleeding). Secondary outcomes included NACE or mortality, all-cause mortality, ischemic events, hemorrhagic events, individual components of the primary outcome, and dyspnea at 12 months. The database-level hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled to calculate summary HRs by random-effects meta-analysis.. After propensity score matching among 31 290 propensity-matched pairs (median age group, 60-64 years; 29.3% women), 95.5% of patients took aspirin together with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The 1-year risk of NACE was not significantly different between ticagrelor and clopidogrel (15.1% [3484/23 116 person-years] vs 14.6% [3290/22 587 person-years]; summary HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.10]; P = .06). There was also no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (2.0% for ticagrelor vs 2.1% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.81-1.16]; P = .74) or ischemic events (13.5% for ticagrelor vs 13.4% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.98-1.08]; P = .32). The risks of hemorrhagic events (2.1% for ticagrelor vs 1.6% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.13-1.61]; P = .001) and dyspnea (27.3% for ticagrelor vs 22.6% for clopidogrel; summary HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.17-1.26]; P < .001) were significantly higher in the ticagrelor group.. Among patients with ACS who underwent PCI in routine clinical practice, ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, was not associated with significant difference in the risk of NACE at 12 months. Because the possibility of unmeasured confounders cannot be excluded, further research is needed to determine whether ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in this setting.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Aspirin; Case-Control Studies; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Databases, Factual; Dyspnea; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor; United States

To evaluate the effect of individualized antiplatelet therapy based on CYP2C19 genotype and platelet function on the prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with conventional antiplatelet therapy.. Patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital from December 2014 to December 2017 were included in this prospective study and randomly divided into conventional (CA) and individualized antiplatelet therapy group (IA) at 1:1 ratio. Patients in the CA group received clopidogrel 75 mg once a day (QD). Group IA was divided into extensive, intermediate, and poor metabolizers according to the results of the CYP2C19 gene test. Three genotypes were given clopidogrel 75 mg QD, 75 mg twice daily (BID) and ticagrelor 90 mg BID respectively. After taking these medicines for a period of time, platelet function was monitored by thromboelastography (TEG) and MAADP values were recorded. MAADP indicates the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) induced platelet function that not inhibited by medicine. High platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as MAADP > 47mm, indicating a high risk of thrombus, and MAADP ≤ 31 mm indicates a high risk of hemorrhage. For extensive metabolizers (EMs) and intermediate metabolizers (IMs) patients with HPR, the antiplatelet therapy would be changed by the clinician according to the patient's conditions. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hemorrhage events were monitored during 1-year follow-up.. The patients with MAADP > 47 mm were 89 (28.6%) in the IA group. There were 50 EMs patients with MAADP > 47 mm (33.3%). Of which, there were 2 cases which changed the dosage of clopidogrel to 75 mg BID, 14 cases who changed clopidogrel to ticagrelor. There were 36 IMs patients with MAADP > 47 mm (30.8%). Of which, there were 19 cases who changed clopidogrel to ticagrelor. There was no significant difference in the value of MAADP between EMs and IMs patients. Within 1 year after PCI, the occurrence of MACE in the IA group was significantly lower than that in the CA group (p=0.010).. (1) Patients with a CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) gene who take double doses of clopidogrel overcome the decreased efficacy of clopidogrel which partly due to CYP2C19 LOF gene, without increasing the risk of hemorrhage. (2) Individualized antiplatelet therapy based on CYP2C19 genotype and platelet function can significantly reduce the occurrence of MACE (mainly acute non-fatal myocardial infarction) after PCI without increasing the risk of moderate or severe hemorrhage.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Although premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic complications, patients may present with an urgent need for surgery that would require interruption of DAPT. Antiplatelet bridge therapy using cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Aspirin; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Perioperative Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The benefits of short versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on the third generation P2Y12 antagonists prasugrel or ticagrelor, in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention remain to be clearly defined due to current evidences limited to patients treated with clopidogrel.. All acute coronary syndrome patients from the REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with aspirin, prasugrel or ticagrelor were stratified according to DAPT duration, that is, shorter than 12 months (D1 group), 12 months (D2 group) and longer than 12 months (D3 group). The three groups were compared before and after propensity score matching. Net adverse clinical events (NACEs), defined as a combination of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and major bleedings (including therefore all cause death, myocardial infarction and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 bleeding), were the primary end points, MACEs (a composite of all cause death and myocardial infarction) the secondary one. Single components of NACEs were co-secondary end points, along with BARC 2-5 bleeding, cardiovascular death and stent thrombosis.. A total of 4424 patients from the RENAMI registry with available data on DAPT duration were included in the model. After propensity score matching, 628 patients from each group were selected. After 20 months of follow up, DAPT for 12 months and DAPT for longer than 12 months significantly reduced the risk of NACE (D1 11.6%. In unselected real world acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor prolonged beyond 12 months markedly reduces fatal and non-fatal ischaemic events, offsetting the increased risk deriving from the higher bleeding risk. On the contrary, patients >75 years old and female ones showed a less favourable risk-benefit ratio for longer DAPT due to excess of bleedings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Drug Administration Schedule; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), treatment using ticagrelor demonstrated significant ischemic benefits over clopidogrel; however, it was associated with increased bleeding complications leading to frequent de-escalation to clopidogrel. The objective of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of de-escalation in early and late phase after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a retrospective study of 4678 ACS patients from March 2016 to April 2017 who initially received ticagrelor then de-escalated to clopidogrel and categorized them into Group 1: early phase (1-30 days) and Group 2: late phase (>30 days-1 year) switching groups. The primary efficacy endpoints included cardiovascular death, definite/probable stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke. The safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification 3 or 5 bleeding events within 1 year after PCI. The incidence of switching occurred in 1019 patients; 380 (37.3%) in Group 1 (median 14 days, interquartile range 4-30 days) versus 639 (62.7%) in Group 2 (median 180 days, interquartile range 90-270 days). The ischemic endpoints occurred in 53 (13.9%) patients in Group 1 versus 35 (5.4%) in Group 2 (HR 1.93,95%CI 1.22-3.08, p < .0001). There were no significant differences of major bleeding events (HR 0.91; 95%CI, 0.58-1.43, p = .90) seen between the groups. The main cause for switching between the two groups was due to BARC 1 or 2 bleeding types. Early de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel during the initial 30 days after ACS was associated with higher risk of ischemic events when compared with switching beyond 30 days.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; China; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Electrocardiography; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Hemodynamics; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared; Switzerland; Ticagrelor; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, is used in combination with aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease. Recent reports suggest that ticagrelor might induce central sleep apnea (CSA) by increasing chemosensitivity to hypercapnia. We herein describe the case of a patient with positive airway pressure (PAP)-treated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), in whom PAP-telemonitoring revealed the emergence of CSA and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) after initiation of ticagrelor for an acute coronary syndrome with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Ticagrelor-associated shift from OSA to CSA was confirmed by respiratory polygraphy after PAP withdrawal, and was associated with an increased chemosensitivity to hypercapnia. Ticagrelor discontinuation was associated with the recurrence of pure OSA and the normalization of hypercapnic ventilatory response. A transient recurrence of CSA and CSR was identified by PAP-telemonitoring after accidental reintroduction of the drug. Further studies are required to determine the mechanisms, incidence, and consequences of ticagrelor-associated CSA.. Paboeuf C, Priou P, Meslier N, Roulaud F, Trzepizur W, Gagnadoux F. Ticagrelor-associated shift from obstructive to central sleep apnea: a case report. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(8):1179-1182.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Humans; Male; Sleep Apnea, Central; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Ticagrelor

In July 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a drug safety communication regarding errors in prescribing and dispensing of the antidepressant Brintellix (vortioxetine) and the antiplatelet Brilinta (ticagrelor) that arose due to proprietary drug name confusion. Brintellix is indicated for major depressive disorder; Brilinta is indicated to reduce cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or history of myocardial infarction. Brintellix was renamed to Trintellix in May 2016. Using Brilinta and Brintellix as a proof-of-concept feasibility use case, we assessed whether drug name confusion errors between the pair could be identified in electronic health care data via the combination of a claims-based algorithm and limited manual claims data review.. Using data from the Sentinel System, we defined potential errors as Brintellix users without an on- or off-label indication for Brintellix, without a dispensing for a drug with the same indications as Brintellix, and with an on- or off-label indication for Brilinta between -365 and +30 days after index Brintellix dispensing; the reverse was done for Brilinta. We manually reviewed claims profiles of potential cases.. We identified 27 (0.1%) potential errors among 21 208 Brintellix users; 16 appeared to be likely errors based on claims profile review. Fifty-one (0.3%) of the 16 779 Brilinta users were identified as potential errors, and four appeared to be likely errors.. A claims-based algorithm combined with manual review of claims profiles could identify potential drug name confusion errors, and narrow down likely errors that warrant further investigation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Algorithms; Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Labeling; Drug Prescriptions; Electronic Health Records; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Medication Errors; Off-Label Use; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Proof of Concept Study; Ticagrelor; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Vortioxetine

Many patients with acute coronary syndrome may experience recurrent myocardial infarction although they are receiving optional therapy, but they are still associated with poor clincial outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess different antiplatelet strategies in these patients.. This retrospective trial compared ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90-mg BID maintenance dose) and clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose, 150-mg daily maintenance dose) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in 1083 patients with acute coronary syndrome and recurrent myocardial infarction admitted to the hospital undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. At the 24-month follow-up, a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) occurred in 10.5% of patients receiving ticagrelor compared with 13.2% in the clopidogrel group (P = 0.023). Meanwhile, ticagrelor caused a higher rate of minor bleeding (18.1% vs 15.3%; P = 0.008). A survival analysis showed that ticagrelor decreased the incidence of MACCE (log-rank test, P < 0.001) and all-cause death (log-rank test, P = 0.001). The advantage of ticagrelor was also presented according to analysis of Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores.. In patients with recurrent myocardial infarction, the ticagrelor antiplatelet strategy significantly reduced the MACCE rate without increasing the risk of major bleeding, although patients did have a higher risk of minor bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Survivors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The threshold of sufficient evidence for adoption of clinically- and genomically-guided precision medicine (PM) has been unclear.. To evaluate evidence thresholds for clinically guided PM versus genomically guided PM.. We develop an "evidence threshold criterion" (ETC), which is the time-weighted difference between expected value of perfect information and incremental net health benefit minus the cost of research, and use it as a measure of evidence threshold that is proportional to the upper bound of disutility to a risk-averse decision maker for adopting a new intervention under decision uncertainty. A larger (more negative) ETC value indicates that only decision makers with low risk aversion would adopt new intervention. We evaluated the ETC plus cost of research (ETCc), assuming the same cost of research for both interventions, over time for a pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing intervention and avoidance of a drug-drug interaction (aDDI) intervention for acute coronary syndrome patients indicated for antiplatelet therapy. We then examined how the ETC may explain incongruous decision making across different national decision-making bodies.. The ETCc for PGx increased over time, whereas the ETCc for aDDI decreased to a negative value over time, indicating that decision makers with even low risk aversion will have doubts in adopting PGx, whereas decision makers who are highly risk-averse will continue to have doubts about adopting aDDI. National recommendation bodies appear to be consistent over time within their own decision making, but had different levels of risk aversion.. The ETC may be a useful metric for assessing policy makers' risk preferences and, in particular, understanding differences in policy recommendations for genomic versus clinical PM.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Decision Making; Drug Interactions; Humans; Models, Economic; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Assessment; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Ticagrelor; Uncertainty

Ticagrelor is a drug widely used in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) that specifically increases the plasma level of adenosine, which is likely to cause atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, in this study we aimed to investigate the electrocardiographic and echocardiographic predictors of AF development after P2Y12 receptor antagonists in ACS patients.. This cross-sectional study included 831 patients with ACS (486 [58.5%] with ST elevated myocardial infarction [STEMI] and 345 [41.5%] with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]). Patients were divided into ticagrelor (n = 410) and clopidogrel (n = 421) groups. P wave properties including P wave dispersion and atrial electromechanical conduction properties were measured as AF predictors with surface ECG and tissue Doppler imaging.. Baseline characteristics such as age, sex, heart rate, blood pressure, and laboratory parameters were almost the same in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. The statistical analysis showed no significant difference in P wave dispersion (PWD) between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (40.98 ± 12 ms versus 40.06 ± 12 ms, P = 0.304). Subgroups analysis according to ACS types also showed no significant difference in PWD (NSTEMI: 41.16 ± 13.8 ms versus 40.76 ± 13.55 ms, P = 0.799; STEMI: 40.9 ± 12.62 ms versus 39.19 ± 11.18 ms, P = 0.132). In addition, we did not find significant difference in atrial electromechanical delay (EMD) with tissue Doppler imaging (interatrial EMD 24.11 ± 3.06 ms versus 24.46 ± 3.23 ms, P = 0.279).. In conclusion, we did not find any difference in detailed electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters as AF predictors between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups in patients with ACS

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Cross-Sectional Studies; Echocardiography, Doppler; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Republic of Korea; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor

International guidelines recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel as preferred antiplatelet agent in patients following coronary stenting. However, no large real-life evidence is available in East Asians in general, and Chinese in particular, with regard to associated clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to assess the early and delayed outcomes after ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in post stenting Chinese patients.. We conducted the pre-specified interim analysis of Comparison Of Efficacy and Safety Between TIcagrelor and Clopidogrel In Chinese (COSTIC), the ongoing prospective, observational, single-center trial. Primary outcomes include first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular death and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) scale bleeding event. Propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between treatment arms.. In total, 4,465 patients were enrolled. After PSM, the patients prescribed with ticagrelor had a lower incidence of primary efficacy endpoint relative to those with clopidogrel (0.6% vs. 1.4%, HR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.22-0.89, p = 0.019) at 1 month, but similar at 7 days, 6 months and 12 months. Further analysis indicated that the difference only exists in the subgroup of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. With regard to safety, ticagrelor consistently increased the risk of BARC type 2 bleeding compared to clopidogrel at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months.. These preliminary data indicate that ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel with regard to major vascular thrombotic outcomes at 1 month, especially in the AMI population, but both groups are similar at 7 days, 6 months and 12 months. Ticagrelor consistently caused significantly more BARC type 2 bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Asian People; China; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The platelet aggregation inhibitor ticagrelor, a P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Arrest; Humans; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Eptifibatide; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Ticagrelor; Troponin

Impact of sex-related differences in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with new P2Y12 inhibitors is not adequately characterised. We aimed to analyse gender-based differences in dual antiplatelet therapy, and adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding.. Prospective-observational study of the consecutive ACS patients treated with stent from July 2016 to January 2016, with a follow-up of 1 year.. We examined 283 patients, 75 (26.5%) women and 208 (73.5%) men. Women were older than men (71 ± 13 vs. 66,5 ± 13 years). There were 44% of women and 52% of men presenting with ST-elevation ACS (p = 0.21). Women had a higher bleeding risk (CRUSADE), without differences in the ischaemic risk (GRACE and TIMI). More women were treated with drug-eluting stent (88.9 vs. 75.5%, p = 0.04). There was a lower rate of ticagrelor prescription in women (42.6 vs. 50.9%, p = 0.29), in favour of clopidogrel. No differences were observed in prasugrel prescription. No significant differences were observed after a year of follow up, but women had a tendency towards lower mortality (1.4 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.19) and higher bleeding rates (23.3 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.27).. In our study of patients presenting with ACS treated with stent, clopidogrel was preferred in women, whereas ticagrelor was the most frequent prescription in men. No significant differences were noted in clinical outcomes, but women experienced a tendency towards less mortality and more bleeding events.. El interés sobre la influencia del sexo en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo (SCA) tratados con stent y nuevos antiagregantes inhibidores de P2Y12 en la práctica clínica es creciente. Se analizan las diferencias en función del sexo en el tratamiento con doble antiagregación plaquetaria (DAPT) y los eventos adversos isquémicos y hemorrágicos.. Estudio prospectivo de pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico de SCA tratados con stent coronario desde julio de 2015 hasta enero de 2016.. De un total de 283 pacientes incluidos, 75 (26.5%) correspondió a mujeres y 208 (73.5%) a hombres. La edad media fue de 71 ± 13 y 66.5 ± 13 años, respectivamente. Un 44% de mujeres se presentó como SCA con elevación del segmento ST contra un 52.4 de los hombres, p = 0.21. Las mujeres mostraron un mayor riesgo de sangrado (CRUSADE), sin diferencias en el riesgo isquémico (GRACE y TIMI). Se usaron stents farmacoactivos con más frecuencia en mujeres (88.9 vs. 75.5%, p = 0.04). Se observó una tendencia de menor prescripción del ticagrelor en mujeres (42.6 vs. 50.9%, p = 0.29) en favor de un mayor uso del clopidogrel. No se identificaron diferencias en cuanto a la prescripción del prasugrel. Las mujeres presentaron al año una menor mortalidad (1.4 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.19), aunque mayor sangrado (23.3 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.27).. En este estudio de pacientes consecutivos con SCA tratados con stent se registró una mayor prescripción de clopidogrel en las mujeres que en los hombres. Las mujeres presentaron una menor incidencia anual de mortalidad, pero mayor sangrado en comparación con los hombres, no significativo.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Sex Factors; Stents; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In secondary prevention of adverse events and death following acute coronary syndrome, patients may benefit from adhering to a ticagrelor treatment.. The authors assessed the proportion of new ticagrelor users who completed 12 months of treatment, explored the factors associated with treatment completion and, among the completers, evaluated the 12-month treatment implementation.. A retrospective administrative health database inception cohort study was conducted in a population that included Quebec residents ≥18 years of age who initiated ticagrelor between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2014. A patient still on ticagrelor at the end of the 12-month period after treatment initiation was considered to have completed the treatment. Factors associated with treatment completion were identified using log-binomial regression. Implementation was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC).. Of the 3,600 patients, 2,235 (62.1%) completed 12 months of treatment. The patients who were more likely to complete their treatment included those who had visited a general practitioner, had a percutaneous coronary intervention, used a statin or fibrate, and those who used an antihypertensive drug during the year preceding the ticagrelor treatment initiation. Older patients, those with atrial fibrillation, those who had ≥ 6 physician visits and those who used an anticoagulant were less likely to complete the 12-month treatment. The median PDC was 96.2%.. Treatment completion might be improved. Among patients who completed the treatment, implementation was high. The factors associated with completion could help to identify patients who might benefit from interventions that aim to optimize treatment completion.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with P2Y. We examined clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients in relation to the timing of CABG following P2Y. Among 508 patients (95 ticagrelor, 413 clopidogrel), the timing of CABG following P2Y. CABG within 72 h after P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Angiography; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Registries; Spain; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor

There is little evidence on rates of stent thrombosis (ST) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor or prasugrel. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and predictors of ST after an acute coronary syndrome among patients receiving DAPT with ticagrelor vs prasugrel.. We used data from the RENAMI registry (REgistry of New Antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute Myocardial Infarction), analyzing a total of 4123 acute coronary syndrome patients discharged with DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel in 11 centers in 6 European countries. The endpoint was definite ST within the first year. A competitive risk analysis was carried out using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competitive event.. A total of 2604 patients received DAPT with ticagrelor and 1519 with prasugrel; ST occurred in 41 patients (1.10%), with a similar cumulative incidence between ticagrelor (1.21%) and prasugrel (0.90%). The independent predictors of ST were age (sHR, 1.03; 95%CI, 1.01-1.06), ST segment elevation (sHR, 2.24; 95%CI, 1.22-4.14), previous myocardial infarction (sHR, 2.56; 95%CI, 1.19-5.49), and serum creatinine (sHR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.08-1.54).. Stent thrombosis is infrequent in patients receiving DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel. The variables associated with an increased risk of ST were advanced age, ST segment elevation, previous myocardial infarction, and serum creatinine.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prosthesis Failure; Retrospective Studies; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

The PARIS score allows combined stratification of ischemic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with ischemic heart disease treated with coronary stenting and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Its usefulness in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel is unknown. We investigated this issue in an international registry.. Retrospective multicenter study with voluntary participation of 11 centers in 6 European countries. We studied 4310 patients with ACS discharged with DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel. Ischemic events were defined as stent thrombosis or spontaneous myocardial infarction, and hemorrhagic events as BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) type 3 or 5 bleeding. Discrimination and calibration were calculated for both PARIS scores (PARIS. During a period of 17.2 ± 8.3 months, there were 80 ischemic events (1.9% per year) and 66 bleeding events (1.6% per year). PARIS. In patients with ACS treated with DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel, the PARIS model helps to properly evaluate the ischemic-hemorrhagic risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet agents are the cornerstone of medical treatment in acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical epidemiology of patients after an acute coronary syndrome treated with different antiplatelet agent regimens in a large real community setting.. The ARCO database, including more than 12 million inhabitants, was evaluated. Antiplatelet agent prescriptions were analysed as follows: aspirin, clopidogrel, other antiplatelet agents used alone; the free and fixed combination of clopidogrel and aspirin; the free combination of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents. Healthcare costs included drug prescriptions (prices reimbursed by the Italian National Health System), outpatient specialist services and hospitalisations (Italian national tariffs).. From 1 January to 31 December 2014, 26,834 patients were discharged after an acute coronary syndrome. Of these, 19,333 (77%) were prescribed with an antiplatelet agent. Among patients undergoing a revascularisation procedure either percutaneous or surgical (47% of the total population), antiplatelet agents were prescribed in 90% of cases. Dual antiplatelet agent therapy was prescribed in 49.6% of the total population and in 68.5% of those treated invasively. Prescription continuity was observed in just 75% of patients. The highest adherence was observed for the fixed combination of aspirin/clopidogrel (81.5%). Throughout one year of follow-up re-hospitalisation occurred in 47.9% of the patients and the direct cost per patient treated with an antiplatelet agent was €13,297 versus €16,647 in patients not treated with antiplatelet agents.. This study highlights that antiplatelet agent prescriptions, specifically dual antiplatelet agent therapy, are at least suboptimal as well as in prescription continuity. Hospitalisations were frequent and were the main driver of the costs, accounting for 84% of the total costs for the Italian National Health System.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Care Costs; Hospitalization; Humans; Italy; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

To compare the prescription rates, safety, and efficacy of contemporary P2Y. From 9684 ACS patients who underwent PCI in a nationwide, real-world registry, we compared prescription rates, bleeding, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke) according to ticagrelor, prasugrel, or clopidogrel use.. The prescription rates of ticagrelor, prasugrel, and clopidogrel were 15.2%, 11.7%, and 73.0%, respectively. In-hospital bleeding occurred in 565 (5.8%) patients, with 108 (7.3%), 80 (7.9%), and 377 (5.3%) patients using ticagrelor, prasugrel, and clopidogrel, respectively, with significantly higher incidence in ticagrelor (p = 0.008) and prasugrel (p = 0.026) users than in clopidogrel users. Ticagrelor and prasugrel were not different in terms of in-hospital bleeding (p = 0.159). MACEs occurred in 804 patients (8.3%), with 82 (5.6%), 69 (6.1%), and 653 (9.2%) patients in ticagrelor, prasugrel, and clopidogrel, respectively (median follow-up, 468 days). Ticagrelor (p = 0.001) and prasugrel (p = 0.001) were associated with fewer MACEs than clopidogrel; the difference between ticagrelor and prasugrel for fewer MACEs was nonsignificant (p = 0.235).. In real-world ACS patients following PCI, ticagrelor and prasugrel were not prescribed at higher rates than clopidogrel, but were found to improve clinical outcomes, albeit they induced bleeding more frequently. No differences were observed in bleeding and outcomes in ticagrelor versus prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Drug Prescriptions; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Republic of Korea; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor

The safety and efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting with acute coronary syndrome and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention remain to be assessed.. All diabetes patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in the REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) were compared before and after propensity score matching. Net adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and BARC 3-5 bleedings) and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, stroke and myocardial infarction) were the co-primary endpoints. Single components of primary endpoints were secondary endpoints.. Among 4424 patients enrolled in RENAMI, 462 and 862 diabetes patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively, were considered. After propensity score matching, 386 patients from each group were selected. At 19±5 months, major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse cardiovascular events were similar in the prasugrel and ticagrelor groups (5.4% vs. 3.4%,. Diabetes patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome seem to benefit equally in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events from ticagrelor or prasugrel use. Ticagrelor was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause death and bleedings, without differences in recurrent ischaemic events, which should be confirmed in dedicated randomised controlled trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Angiography; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Recurrence; Registries; Safety; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Our goal was to evaluate the impact of the discontinuation times of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor on postoperative bleeding rates and the use of blood products in patients undergoing isolated urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).. We retrospectively analysed 334 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing urgent CABG at the University Hospital Basel. A total of 262 patients continued to take dual antiplatelet therapy during the surgery (72 received clopidogrel; 68, prasugrel; and 122, ticagrelor). They were stratified by the discontinuation time of dual antiplatelet therapy (<24 h, 24-48 h, 48-72 h and >72 h). Seventy-two patients taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) as monotherapy served as a comparison group.. Median postsurgical bleeding rates were significantly higher with ticagrelor if it was discontinued <24 h [1220 ml, interquartile range (IQR) 978-1520 ml; P < 0.001], 24-48 h (1200 ml, IQR 800-1550 ml; P < 0.001) and 48-72 h (1100 ml, IQR 845-1245 ml; P = 0.036) but not if discontinued >72 h (700 ml, IQR 520-825 ml; P = 0.22) and with prasugrel if discontinued <24 h (1320 ml, IQR 900-1950 ml; P < 0.001) but not if discontinued 24-48 h (1050 ml, IQR 638-1438 ml; P = 0.089) or >72 h (750 ml, IQR 488-1040; P = 0.63) compared to ASA monotherapy (800 ml, IQR 593-1043 ml). The postsurgical use of blood products compared to ASA monotherapy (0, IQR 0-2 units) was significantly higher with ticagrelor and prasugrel if discontinued <24 h (2.5 units, IQR 0-6; P < 0.001 and 2 units, IQR 1-6; P < 0.001, respectively).. Discontinuation of ticagrelor and prasugrel for more than 72 h before urgent CABG was not associated with higher bleeding rates compared to treatment with ASA monotherapy. In contrast, discontinuation for less than 24 h was associated with higher use of blood products. For ticagrelor, this study supports evidence and recent guidelines proposing a shorter discontinuation time of 3 days and raises the question of whether the same could be true for prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Inpatients; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Preoperative testing of platelet function predicts bleeding risk in cardiac surgery patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, but the value of postoperative platelet function testing, reflecting both preoperative antiplatelet therapy and perioperative changes in platelet function, has not been evaluated.. Seventy-four patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor within 5 days before cardiac surgery were included in a prospective observational study. Platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate, arachidonic acid and thrombin receptor-activating peptide was assessed with multiple electrode impedance aggregometry immediately before surgery and 2 h after weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine any association between platelet aggregation and severe bleeding according to the universal definition of perioperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgery.. Severe bleeding occurred in 25 of 74 patients (34%). Preoperative and postoperative adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregations were associated with bleeding, with comparable areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve [0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.89) vs 0.75 (0.62-0.87)]. Postoperative arachidonic acid- and thrombin receptor-activating peptide-induced aggregation had markedly smaller areas under the curve. There were significant correlations between preoperative and postoperative platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (r2 = 0.77, P <  0.001), arachidonic acid (r2 = 0.24, P  <  0.001) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (r2 = 0.21, P  < 0.001) but with large interindividual variations.. Poor postoperative platelet function was associated with severe bleeding, with accuracy comparable to that of preoperative platelet function. There was a correlation between preoperative and postoperative platelet function, but the predictability in an individual patient was limited.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor

Balancing ischemic and bleeding risk is an evolving framework.. Our objectives were to simulate changes in risks for adverse events and event-driven costs with use of ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel according to varying levels of ischemic and bleeding risk. Using the validated PARIS risk functions, we estimated 1-year ischemic (myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis) and bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 or 5) event rates among PARIS study participants who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation for an acute coronary syndrome and were discharged with aspirin and clopidogrel (n=1497). Simulated changes in adverse events with ticagrelor or prasugrel were calculated by applying treatment effects from randomized trials for a 1-year time horizon. Event costs were estimated using National Inpatient Sample data. Net costs were calculated between antiplatelet therapy groups according to level of ischemic and bleeding risk. After weighting events for quality-of-life impact, we calculated event rates and costs for risk-tailored treatment versus clopidogrel under multiple drug pricing assumptions. One-year rates (per 1000 person-years) for ischemic events were 12.6, 24.1, and 66.1, respectively, among those at low (n=630), intermediate (n=536), and high (n=331) ischemic risk. Analogous bleeding rates were 11.0, 23.9, and 66.2, respectively, among low (n=728), intermediate (n=634), and high (n=135) bleeding risk patients. Mean per event costs were $22 174 (ischemic) and $12 203 (bleeding). When risks for ischemia matched or exceeded bleeding, simulated utility-weighted event rates favored ticagrelor/prasugrel, whereas clopidogrel reduced utility-weighted events when bleeding exceeded ischemic risk. One-year costs were sensitive to drug pricing assumptions, and risk-tailored treatment with either agent progressed from cost incurring to cost saving with increasing generic market share.. Tailoring antiplatelet therapy intensity to patient risk may improve health utility and could produce cost savings in the first year after percutaneous coronary intervention.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00998127.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Decision-Making; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Dual antiplatelet therapy is one of the main treatments in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Switching antiplatelet agents may be necessary in some patients to improve efficacy or safety. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, predictors, and implications of clinical switching in patients during hospital admission and 1-year follow-up at discharge.. Observational, prospective, multicenter registry study in patients discharged following an admission for ACS and followed up for 1 year. We analyzed ischemic and bleeding events as well as treatment changes.. We recruited 1717 patients; in-hospital switching occurred in 425 (24.8%): 15.1% to clopidogrel and 84.9% to newer antiplatelet drugs (prasugrel or ticagrelor). Those switched to newer antiplatelets were younger, with lower scores on the GRACE and CRUSADE scales, admitted more frequently for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and underwent more invasive management and percutaneous revascularization. The clinical cardiologist was responsible for most in-hospital switching to newer antiplatelets (79.6%). The loading dose of the second antiplatelet did not affect incidence of bleeding events. Post-discharge switching was infrequent (2%) and depended mainly on clinical indications; only 30% was related to a new ACS.. In a contemporary registry with ACS, in-hospital switching of antiplatelet drugs was frequent. Those switched to newer antiplatelets were younger and admitted more frequently for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Post-discharge switching was infrequent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prevalence; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor

We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel or prasugrel on recurrence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in real-life conditions, as requested by regulatory authorities at the time of marketing.. We performed a cohort study in SNDS, the French national healthcare database. All patients with a hospital admission for ACS in 2013 were followed one year. Patients on ticagrelor, clopidogrel or prasugrel were matched 1:1 using age, gender, index ACS type, and high-dimensional propensity scores (hdPS). Outcomes were ACS, stroke, all-cause death, and major bleeding, compared within matched groups using Cox proportional hazards models analysis during treatment.. 54,048 ACS were hospitalized in 2013. At discharge, 19,796 were dispensed clopidogrel, 8242 prasugrel, and 13,916 ticagrelor. Per group, 9224 ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel, 6752 ticagrelor vs. prasugrel, and 4676 prasugrel vs. clopidogrel patients were matched. Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a lower hazard ratio of death 0.73 [0.59-0.90] and composite criterion (0.88, 95% CI [0.79-0.99] but not ACS 0.92 [0.80-1.06], stroke (0.96 [017-5.53]) or major bleeding (1.02 [0.82-1.26]). Prasugrel was not different from ticagrelor or clopidogrel for any outcome, in matched patients.. Ticagrelor in real-life conditions in matched populations was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death than clopidogrel, and a lower risk of composite outcome, as in the main pivotal clinical trial. Ticagrelor and prasugrel were not different, nor were prasugrel and clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Clopidogrel; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Databases, Factual; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug Eruptions; Hand; Hidradenitis; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Coronary artery disease is the top cause of death among the Chinese population. With the establishment of a Chinese prediction model, it is urgent to assess factors related to the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome at extremely high risk.. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 601 patients assessed as being of extremely high risk, according to specific criteria from the China-PAR (Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk) project, and investigated various clinical parameters using Cox multivariate analysis to establish a risk nomogram. C-index and calibration curves were involved to assess the internal identification. By using the all-cause death risk model, we stratified patients by risk level and compared the effects of clopidogrel and ticagrelor on end points.. We identified several factors, including body mass index, angiopathy, smoking status, β-blocker usage, history of myocardial infarction, total number of stents, and usage of antiplatelet agents, related to ischemic end points, all-cause death, cardiovascular events, and cardiac death. A C-index of >0.7 and the calibration curve demonstrated good concordance. In a subsequent analysis, we used the all-cause death model to stratify patients by risk level, and compared the effects of clopidogrel and ticagrelor. In the subgroup with a 2-year death rate of >50%, ticagrelor showed a positive effect (P = 0.045), but in the subgroup with a 2-year death rate of <50%, the difference between clopidogrel and ticagrelor was not significant. Considering the duration of effect of antiplatelet agents, we also compared these 2 agents at 1-year follow up, with ticagrelor showing no advantage.. We determined the probability of ischemic risk in patients at extremely high ischemic risk and developed new risk models for this specific group. Ticagrelor, compared with clopidogrel, may improve the prognosis of patients at high risk for death after 2 years.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; China; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Risk; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Ticagrelor

Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions can potentially lead to higher risk of ischemic events than the nonbifurcation ones, thus calling for further optimization of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes from ticagrelor and clopidogrel in bifurcation lesions patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. A total of 553 patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel combined with aspirin were recruited for 1-year follow-up. The incidences of primary endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]: a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI] or stroke), secondary endpoints (the individual component of the primary endpoint or definite/probable stent thrombosis), and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]≥3 bleeding events) were evaluated. To minimize the selection bias, a propensity score-matched population analysis was also conducted.. The risks of both primary endpoint (8.15% and 12.01% for the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively; adjusted hazards ratio [HR]: 0.488, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.277-0.861, P=0.013) and MI (4.44% and 8.48% for the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.341, 95% CI: 0.162-0.719, P=0.005) were significantly reduced in the ticagrelor group as compared with those of the clopidogrel counterpart, whereas the risk of major bleeding was comparable (2.96% and 2.47% for the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.972, 95% CI: 0.321-2.941, P=0.960). Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed such findings.. For patients with bifurcation lesions after PCI, ticagrelor treatment shows lower MACE and MI rates than the clopidogrel one, along with comparable major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Limited data are available concerning differences in clinical outcomes for real-life patients treated with ticagrelor versus prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Our objective was to determine and compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world population.. RENAMI was a retrospective, observational registry including the data and outcomes of consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent primary PCI and were discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) between January 2012 and January 2016. The mean follow-up period was 17 ± 9 months. In total, 11 university hospitals from six European countries participated. After propensity-score matching, there were no substantial differences in the baseline clinical and interventional features. All patients were treated with acetylsalicylic acid plus prasugrel 10 mg once daily or acetylsalicylic acid plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. Mean duration of DAPT was 12.04 ± 3.4 months with prasugrel and 11.90 ± 4.1 months with ticagrelor (p = 0.47). The primary and secondary endpoints were long-term net adverse clinical events (NACE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), respectively, along with their single components. Subgroup analysis for freedom from NACE and MACE was performed according to length of DAPT and clinical presentation [ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-ACS versus non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)-ACS].. In total, 4424 patients (2725 ticagrelor, 1699 prasugrel) were enrolled. After propensity-score matching, 1290 patients in each cohort were included in the analysis. At 12 months, the incidence of both NACE and MACE was lower with prasugrel (NACE: 5.3% vs. 8.5% [p = 0.001]; MACE: 5% vs. 8.1% [p =  0.001]) mainly driven by a reduction in recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) (2.4 vs. 4.0%; p = 0.029) and a lower rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 bleeding (1.5 vs. 2.9%; p = 0.011). The benefit of prasugrel was confirmed for patients with NSTEMI and for those discharged with a DAPT regimen of ≤ 12 months. Only a trend in the reduction of NACE and MACE was noted for STEMI or for those treated with longer DAPT.. Comparison of these drugs suggested that prasugrel is safer and more efficacious than ticagrelor in combination with aspirin after NSTEMI but not STEMI. No differences were found for events occurring after 12 months. The nonrandomized design of the present research means further studies are required to support these findings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Advanced age and diabetes represent summative conditions in the determination of cardiovascular risk, and especially for the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), often requiring balancing between bleeding and thrombotic complications. However, few studies have so far evaluated the impact of age on platelet reactivity and suboptimal platelet inhibition (high-on treatment platelet reactivity-HRPR) on DAPT among diabetic patients, that was, therefore the aim of the present study. In diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor) platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). Elderly patients were considered ≥ 75 years of age. We included 462 patients, among them 149 (32.2%) were ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more often females (p = 0.006), with lower body size (p = 0.04), acute coronary syndrome at presentation and renal failure (p < 0.001), non-smokers (p = 0.002), in therapy with insulin (p = 0.02) and diuretics (p < 0.001) and lower rate of betablockers (p = 0.02). Age directly related with C reactive protein (p = 0.01), creatinine levels and inversely with hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and triglycerides (p = 0.003). No association was found at linear regression analysis for platelet reactivity and age with different activating stimuli, but for ASPI test (r = 0.12; p = 0.03). No significant difference in HAPR was found in elderly patients (2.4 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.76, OR[95% CI] = 0.45[0.1-2.11], p = 0.31). HRPR for ADP antagonists was similarly not affected by age (30.1% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.28, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 0.78[0.47-1.29], p = 0.33). Comparable results were obtained when considering separately the DAPT strategies with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, or when adjusting our results according to propensity score values. Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, age does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of high-on treatment platelet reactivity. Similar results were obtained for ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) (stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD] or coronary artery disease [CAD]) are at high risk of serious events and mortality. Current clinical guidelines recommend new antiplatelet drugs (NADs) for high cardiovascular risk patients with ACS; however, these drugs are underused in different scenarios.. This study included 1717 ACS patients from 3 tertiary hospitals. Of them, 641 (37.33%) suffered from previous CVD: 149 patients with stroke, 154 patients with PAD and 541 patients with CAD. Bleeding, mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year of follow-up after hospital discharge were analyzed.. NADs administration during hospital stay and at discharge was less frequent in patients with previous CVDs (P<0.001, for both). Cox analysis in this cohort of patients showed that clopidogrel prescription at discharge was independently associated with MACEs (HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 1.03-2.45]; P=0.036) and with death (HR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.00-3.98]; P=0.049) in multivariate analysis. More specifically, when ticagrelor prescription at discharge was compared with clopidogrel, a significant death reduction was found in both, the univariate and the multivariate Cox analysis (HR: 4.54 [95% CI: 2.26-9.13]; P<0.001 and HR: 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.90]; P=0.021, respectively).. New antiplatelet drugs, especially ticagrelor, showed lower rates of mortality in patients with CVD without differences for bleeding. Despite the recommendations of current clinical guidelines for high risk patients with ACS, the use of NADs is very low in "real-life" patients with previous CVD.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aftercare; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Disease; Drug Utilization; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Smoking; Spain; Stroke; Tertiary Care Centers; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is an oral, reversible, direct-acting P2Y. YINGLONG, a single-arm, phase-IV, 1-year, non-interventional study, described the safety of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily in Chinese patients (≥ 18 years) with ACS treated with ≥ 1 dose of ticagrelor. Primary outcomes were the incidence of adverse events (AEs), in particular, PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO)-defined bleeding AEs, and other serious AEs during the 1-year follow-up. Key secondary outcomes were the incidence of major cardiovascular events.. Patients (n = 1041, median age 61.0 years) had started ticagrelor and had post-dose data. Median duration of ticagrelor treatment was 357 days; 577 patients (55.4%) completed 1-year ticagrelor treatment; 973 patients (93.5%) completed 1-year follow-up. Overall, 38.7% of patients reported an AE during treatment. The most common AEs were dyspnea (n = 37, 3.6%), petechiae (n = 30, 2.9%), and chest discomfort (n = 28, 2.7%). Serious AEs, excluding bleeding, were reported in 9.8% of patients during treatment. Incidence of PLATO-defined major bleeding events was 1.1% (n = 11). Of the 21 deaths that occurred during the study (8 post-treatment), 1 was a fatal bleed. Major cardiovascular events were reported in 37 patients (3.6%).. Ticagrelor was well tolerated with a low rate of PLATO-defined major bleeding events in Chinese ACS patients. Safety results were consistent with the known ticagrelor profile.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02430493.. AstraZeneca Investment (China) Co., Ltd.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; China; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and predictors of premature discontinuation or switch of ADP receptor blockers and its association with serious adverse events. For this purpose 571 consecutive ACS patients receiving ticagrelor (n = 258, 45%) or prasugrel (n = 313, 55%) undergoing PCI were enrolled in this prospective, observational, multicenter ATLANTIS-SWITCH substudy. Predictors of premature discontinuation or switch of antiplatelet therapy and their association with major adverse cardiovascular events and TIMI bleeding events were evaluated. Premature stop/switch was found in 72 (12.6%) patients: 34 (5.9%) stopped and 38 (6.7%) switched the ADP blocker. Ticagrelor treated patients were significantly more likely to stop/switch therapy as compared to prasugrel (15.9% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.016). We identified 4 independent predictors for stop/switch of ADP blocker: major surgery, need for oral anticoagulation (OAC), TIMI major bleeding and drug intolerance. TIMI major bleeding was a driver of stop/switch actions and occurred in 4.3% vs 0.2% in patients with vs without stop/switch (p = 0.001). The majority of stop/switch actions (75%) were physicians driven decisions. Importantly, stop/switch of therapy was not associated with increased risk of MACE (p = 0.936). In conclusion premature switch/stop of ADP blockers appears to be safe when mainly driven by physician's decision and clinical indication.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor

Hypovitaminosis D represents an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, and especially among higher-risk subsets of patients, such as in those with diabetes mellitus. The anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic properties of vitamin D, in fact, could be even more beneficial among diabetics, where platelet hyperreactivity and suboptimal response to antiplatelet drugs has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, no study has so far evaluated the impact of vitamin D levels on platelet reactivity and high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients receiving dial antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).. Our population is represented by a consecutive cohort ofdiabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients).. We included 440 patients, that were divided according to quartiles values of vitamin D (< 9.4; 9.4-15.59; 15.6-21.64; ≥ 21.65 ng/ml). Among them, 31 were excluded as chronically treated with vitamin D supplementation. Lower vitamin D quartiles were associated with more advanced age (p = 0.01), female gender (p = 0.04), renal failure (p = 0.005), history of previous MI (p = 0.01), CABG and use of diuretics (p = 0.003), severe coronary disease (p = 0.002), but lower ejection fraction (p = 0.001), treatment with statins (p = 0.04) and new ADP-antagonists (p = 0.002). Vitamin D levels related with higher HbA1c (p = 0.001), cholesterol (p = 0.02) and creatinine (p = 0.004) and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.004). The prevalence of HRPR with ASA was low and not related to vitamin D quartiles (3.4% vs 2.7% vs 1.8% vs 2.1%, p = 0.44; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.16[0.60-2.26], p = 0.67). The prevalence of HRPR for ADP antagonists was associated to hypovitaminosis D (40.2% vs 29.1% vs 29.4% vs 25.5%, p = 0.03; (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.76[1.04-2.98], p = 0.036for I vs II-IV quartile). The impact of vitamin D quartiles, was significant only in patients on new ADP antagonists (n = 225, of whom 81 on prasugrel 5 mg; p = 0.03; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 3.12[1.34-7.49], p = 0.009) but not with clopidogrel (p = 0.85, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05[0.49-2.24], p = 0.89).. Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, severe vitamin D deficiency is associated with a higher ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and rate of HRPR, and especially for new ADP-antagonists over clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Drug Substitution; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polysomnography; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Sleep Apnea, Central; Ticagrelor

To study the comparative efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the "double" antiplatelet therapy (DATT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the early and late periods in real clinical practice, and to assess adherence to treatment.. The study included 109 patients with ACS, who underwent PCI. Patients were divided into two groups: the 1st group (n=57) - received ticagrelor and the 2nd group (n = 52) - received clopidogrel in the DATT for 12 months. The frequency of ischemic events (death from cardiovascular causes, repeated myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST)) and hemorrhagic events was analyzed during hospitalization, in 3 months, 6 months and in 12 months. Also, the reasons of repeated hospitalizations during the year were analyzed. The adherence of patients was assessed using the Moriski-Green scale.. There were no significant differences in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (8.8% vs. 11.5%, p=0.87) for the incidence of stent thrombosis (ST). In the correlation analysis, in half of all cases of subacute ST in the total sample (n=109) (in 4 (3.65%) cases from 8 (7.3%)), the main reason for its development was the lack of adherence of patients to DATT (τ=0,6; p<0,001). The frequency of minor bleeding significantly prevailed in the ticagrelor group versus the clopidogrel group (38.6% vs. 21.2%, p=0.047). No significant difference in the rates of major bleeding was found between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (1.8% and 1.9%, p=0.52). However, the difference in the rates of fatal bleeding, including more instances of fatal intracranial bleeding (1.8% vs. 0%; p=0,34), allows us to talk about the best hemorrhagic safety of clopidogrel.. In this study, ticagrelor and clopidogrel were comparable in their effectiveness. Ischemic events and repeated hospitalizations in both groups are associated with the progression of atherosclerosis, confirmed by angiography; the development of stent restenosis, as well as low adherence, which is the main predictor of subacute TS. In addition, clopidogrel versus ticagrelor showed better hemorrhagic safety in the frequency of development of minor bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor (TIC), a P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12)-receptor antagonist, has been widely used to treat patients with acute coronary syndrome. Although animal studies suggest that TIC protects against atherosclerosis, it remains unknown whether it does so through its potent platelet inhibition or through other pathways. Here, we placed hypercholesterolemic Ldlr-/-Apobec1-/- mice on a high-fat diet and treated them with either 25 mg/kg/day of clopidogrel (CLO) or 180 mg/kg/day of TIC for 16 weeks and evaluated the extent of atherosclerosis. Both treatments equally inhibited platelets as determined by ex vivo platelet aggregation assays. The extent of atherosclerosis, however, was significantly less in the TIC group than in the CLO group. Immunohistochemical staining and ELISA showed that TIC treatment was associated with less macrophage infiltration to the atherosclerotic intima and lower serum levels of CCL4, CXCL10, and TNFα, respectively, than CLO treatment. Treatment with TIC, but not CLO, was associated with higher serum activity and tissue level of paraoxonase-1 (PON1), an anti-atherosclerotic molecule, suggesting that TIC might exert greater anti-atherosclerotic activity, compared with CLO, through its unique ability to induce PON1. Although further studies are needed, TIC may prove to be a viable strategy in the prevention and treatment of chronic stable human atherosclerosis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Animals; Aryldialkylphosphatase; Atherosclerosis; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hypercholesterolemia; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, LDL; Ticagrelor

Dual-antiplatelet therapy is recommended for all patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), regardless of performance of revascularization. Ticagrelor (T) was shown to be superior to clopidogrel (C) in a large, randomized clinical trial, but data from real-world practice are lacking. We identified ACS patients from our institutional registry who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received one of the two drugs at hospital discharge based on physician preference. Among 1439 patients, there were 774 patients (53.8%) in the C group and 665 patients (46.2%) in the T group. T and C patients were similar except for a higher incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and lower frequency of prior MI in the T group (P<.05 for both). The primary endpoint - 1-year all-cause death - occurred in 58 C patients and 48 T patients (6.9% vs 7.9%, respectively; P=.42). Sixty percent of these deaths (n = 62; 31 C and 31 T) were considered cardiovascular in nature based on chart review. By multivariable logistic regression model, only dialysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-4.64; P=.01), age (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.49-2.24 per 10 years; P<.001), and prior heart failure (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.12-2.82; P=.02) were independent predictors of 1-year death. Treatment with T was not a predictor of death (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.81-1.82; P=.35) or cardiovascular death (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.72-1.94; P=.52). Landmark analysis from day 10 showed similar results (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.71-1.84; P=.59). Thus, we conclude that C and T have similar rates of 1-year all-cause mortality, which is predominantly affected by age, end-stage renal disease, and pre-existing heart failure.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Despite great advances with the introduction of ticagrelor and prasugrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the risk of thrombosis and bleeding remains significant and affects the choice of clinicians in the treatment of the single patient. Large registries are effective tools to explore patterns of drug administration and adherence to guideline recommendations in real-world clinical practice.. START- antiplatelet is a prospective, observational registry carried out by seven Italian cardiology institutions on patients admitted for ACS aimed to document the real world treatment of ACS patients, adding also data on 12-month follow-up. We present data on the first 1050 patients who have completed 1-year follow-up on a total of 1537 patients. Primary end-points were: 1) MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events) including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, non fatal MI, urgent revascularization, TIA and ischemic stroke; 2) Major and minor bleeding according to TIMI, GUSTO and ISTH classifications.. The dual antiplatelet treatment most prescribed was aspirin plus ticagrelor (47.9%) and aspirin plus clopidogrel (32.1%). At a mean follow-up was 335±131 days, both ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a statistically significant reduced total and cardiovascular mortality. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor do not show a significant increased incidence of major and minor bleedings with respect to clopidogrel. Patients with monotherapy had significantly higher incidence of both ischemic stroke and major bleedings.. The analysis of the register has documented that both ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a statistically significant reduced total and cardiovascular mortality but both do not show a significant increased incidence of major and minor bleedings with respect to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Background Prior reports indicate that the effect of P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Asian People; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in preventing recurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and major bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Retrospective cohort analysis.. Truven Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims database (2011-2016).. Study consisted of adults with ACS who newly initiated ticagrelor or prasugrel within 7 days of their first ACS diagnosis and had no prior use for at least 12 months; after propensity score matching, 10,073 patients were in each group.. The primary study outcomes, first occurrence of a recurrent nonfatal CVD event (composite of myocardial infarction and stroke) and occurrence of a major bleeding event, were compared between the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of minor bleeding events, defined based on the presence of bleeding events in outpatient claims. Cox proportional hazards models after propensity score matching were used to obtain the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). In the Cox proportional hazards model, the use of ticagrelor was associated with a decreased risk of recurrent nonfatal CVD events (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92) and major bleeding events (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.70) compared with prasugrel. Additionally, the use of ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of minor bleeding events compared with prasugrel (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.78).. In this population-based cohort of incident ACS patients, ticagrelor was associated with a reduced rate of recurrent nonfatal CVD events, major and minor bleeding events compared with prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Comorbidity; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Sex Factors; Ticagrelor; United States

Ticagrelor induces more potent platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition with reduced interindividual variability compared to clopidogrel. Although on-clopidogrel PR was shown to correlate with ischemia and bleeding events, no study has investigated the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR and outcome.. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR, assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index (VASP), and thrombotic and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. We performed a prospective, multicenter observational study on patients treated with PCI for ACS. The VASP index was used to assess PR after ticagrelor loading dose (LD). The primary endpoint was the link between major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and PR.. Among the 530 patients with ACS included, 183 (34.5%) were admitted for ST elevation myocardial infarction. We observed high potency and limited interindividual variability after the ticagrelor LD (VASP 19.1% ± 16.6%). At 1 month, 21 (3.8%) MACE and 29 (5.5%) bleedings ≥ 2 according to the Bleedings Academic Research Consortium (BARC) scale were recorded. Neither MACE nor bleeding was associated with PR (P = .34 and P = .78, respectively). However, there was a strong association between PR and the occurrence of definite acute stent thrombosis (P = .03). Platelet reactivity was the only factor associated with acute definite stent thrombosis.. In patients receiving a ticagrelor LD while undergoing PCI for ACS, PR using the VASP did not predict MACE or bleeding, but it was significantly associated with the occurrence of definite acute stent thrombosis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphoproteins; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stents; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Labeling; Drug Monitoring; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

To investigate the protective effect of ticagrelor on the myocardium of patients with ST-elevated acute coronary syndrome accompanied by diabetes mellitus.. 210 patients with diabetes mellitus receiving emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to ST-elevated acute coronary syndrome from December 2014 to June 2018 in the Hospital were selected and randomly divided into ticagrelor group and clopidogrel group. The myocardial microcirculation perfusion was evaluated via ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) in electrocardiogram (ECG) and myocardial blush grade (MBG). Myocardial necrosis markers, including creatine kinase (CK), CK-MB, and cardiac troponin I (cTnI), were evaluated. Moreover, the cardiac function was assessed using brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Finally, patients were followed up for one month on average, and the adverse cardiovascular and bleeding events were recorded.. The results showed that CK, CK-MB, cTnI, and BNP levels in ticagrelor group were lower than those in clopidogrel group, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grading after the operation had no statistically significant difference between the two groups, and the usage rate of tirofiban in ticagrelor group was lower than that in clopidogrel group (p<0.05). Besides, the myocardial microcirculation perfusion level after the operation in ticagrelor group was significantly higher than that in clopidogrel group. The proportions of STR ≥50% in ECG and MBG2 in ticagrelor group were significantly higher than those in clopidogrel group (p<0.01). The incidence rate of mild bleeding in ticagrelor group was higher than that in clopidogrel group (p<0.05).. The application of ticagrelor in the treatment of ST-elevated acute coronary syndrome accompanied by diabetes mellitus can increase the level of myocardial microcirculation perfusion and improve the left heart function.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Atrial Function, Left; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Random Allocation; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Genetic Testing; Genetic Variation; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Data on the use of GPIIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients presenting with cardiogenic shock and/or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is sparse. The aim of the study was to establish the possible influence of the adjunctive use of GPI on 30-day and 1-year mortality in these high-risk patients.. Acute coronary syndrome patients (261), who presented with cardiogenic shock and/or were cardiopulmonary resuscitated on admission, were analysed. Groups receiving (170 patients) and not receiving (91 patients) GPI were compared regarding 30-day and 1-year mortality.. Our study suggests that the adjunctive usage of GPI may be beneficial in this high-risk group of patients in whom a delayed onset of action of oral antiplatelet therapy would be expected.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Shock, Cardiogenic; Slovenia; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Current clinical guidelines of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) recommend the use of potent antiplatelet therapy, prasugrel or ticagrelor, because both drugs consistently reduce cardiovascular events.. The aim of this study was to examine temporal changes in the use of optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS.. A total of 1717 consecutive patients admitted for ACS in 3 tertiary hospitals from February 2014 to December 2015 were enrolled. We divided these 23 months into 4 semesters: period I (0-5 months), period II (6-11 months), period III (12-17 months), and period IV (17-23 months). Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected both at admission and at discharge.. Treatment with clopidogrel remained constant throughout the periods (52%, 50%, 44%, and 50% for periods I, II, III, and IV, respectively), whereas a progressive increase in ticagrelor treatment was observed (15%, 25%, 26%, and 28%; P = .001). Indeed, new P2Y12 agents showed an increase from 47% at the first semester to 65% in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and in patients younger than 75 years from 36% to 53%. However, for patients older than 75 years, diabetic, and patients with end-stage kidney disease, clopidogrel was the second most commonly used antiplatelet agent.. In this real-life registry of patients with ACS, we observed there is still a high rate of use of clopidogrel, despite guidelines recommendations, and our analyses also showed a trend toward the use of ticagrelor. Patients who received new antiplatelet agents were patients with STEMI, younger than 75 years, and with less comorbidities. However, the use of ticagrelor and prasugrel remains low, highlighting a therapeutic inertia with considerable gap between evidence-based clinical guidelines and daily clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

We compared the clinical outcome of diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) registry.. GRAPE is a prospective observational study, focusing on contemporary antiplatelet use in moderate-risk to high-risk ACS patients receiving PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), (composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition) at 1 year of follow-up were analyzed using propensity score adjustment. A subanalysis according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status was performed.. Out of 2047 registered patients, 469 (22.9%) were diabetic. Complete 1-year follow-up was available in 95.1% of patients. MACE occurred in 12.2 and 7.2% of those patients with and without DM, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27 (0.89-1.79), P=0.2]. Observed BARC type ≥3 bleeding risk was not higher in diabetic patients: adjusted HR (95% CI)=1.20 (0.79-1.84). In the subgroup of clopidogrel-treated patients (N=238), MACE rate was significantly higher in diabetic compared with nondiabetic cohort [13.4 vs. 9%, adjusted HR (95% CI)=1.68 (1.07-2.64), P=0.03]. In the subgroup of ticagrelor-treated or prasugrel-treated patients (N=228), MACE rate did not differ significantly between diabetic and nondiabetic patients: 9.6 versus 5%, adjusted HR (95% CI)=1.35 (0.77-2.37), P=0.38.. In 'real-life' ACS undergoing PCI, diabetic patients have higher - although not significantly - MACE rate and no difference in bleeding events. This difference in MACE was significant among clopidogrel-treated patients, whereas when newer antiplatelet agents were used the negative impact of DM on ischemic events was eliminated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Greece; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Count; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged, 80 and over; Electrocardiography; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) guidelines recommend the use of newer P2Y. Retrospective analysis of a multicenter ACS registry; 3515 consecutive patients were included. The association between risk scores and prescription of newer P2Y. A total of 1021 patients (29%) were treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. On multivariate analyses, both GRACE (OR per 10 points, 0.89; 95%CI, 0.86-0.92; P < .001) and CRUSADE (OR per 10 points, 0.96; 95%CI, 0.94-0.98; P < .001) risk scores were inversely associated with the use of newer P2Y. New P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Drug Prescriptions; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Patient Discharge; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Bradycardia; Critical Care; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

No direct comparisons of ticagrelor and prasugrel with 1-year clinical follow-up have been reported.. Our objective was to compare 1-year clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and treated with either ticagrelor or prasugrel in a real-world setting.. This retrospective study included patients from a payer database who were aged ≥18 years and had ACS managed with PCI with no history of transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke. Data were propensity matched for prasugrel use with a 3:1 prasugrel:ticagrelor ratio. Post-discharge net adverse clinical event (NACE) rate at 1 year was evaluated for noninferiority using a pre-defined 20% margin. NACE was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or rehospitalization for bleeding.. In total, 15,788 ACS-PCI patients were included (prasugrel 12,797; ticagrelor 2991). Prasugrel-treated patients were younger; less likely to be female, have prior myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes, or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI); and more likely to have unstable angina (UA) than ticagrelor-treated patients. Prior to matching, NACE and MACE (P < 0.01) were lower, with no difference in bleeding with prasugrel compared with ticagrelor. After matching, there was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. Noninferiority was demonstrated for NACE, MACE, and bleeding between prasugrel and ticagrelor. NACE and MACE were significantly lower with prasugrel use, primarily driven by heart failure, with no significant difference in all-cause death, MI, UA, revascularization, TIA/stroke, or bleeding.. In this retrospective study, physicians preferentially used prasugrel rather than ticagrelor in younger ACS-PCI patients with lower risk of bleeding or comorbidities. After propensity matching, clinical outcomes associated with prasugrel were noninferior to those with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) polymorphism on adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in Hakka patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving clopidogrel who had undergone coronary drug-eluting stent placement after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in southern China.. Genotyping of CYP2C19 and MACE of 934 ACS patients with PCI on clopidogrel maintenance therapy were analyzed. Patients who carried loss-of-function CYP2C19 were treated with a 150-mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel or 90 mg of ticagrelor antiplatelet therapy, and patients who were non-carriers received clopidogrel therapy daily at a maintenance dose of 75 mg and the patients were followed-up for at least 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization and stroke.. The allelic frequency of CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 of Hakka patients in the current study was 31.64 and 5.19%, respectively. The CYP2C19 wild-type homozygotes (*1/*1) were the most predominant among the patients (40.36%), followed by the CYP2C19*2 heterozygotes (*1/*2) (40.26%). The distribution of CYP2C19 phenotypes was divided into extensive metabolizers (EM; 40.36%), intermediate metabolizers (IM; 45.61%), and poor metabolizers (PM; 14.03%). Based on the genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy, there was no significant association between the carrier status and the clinical outcome at 1, 6, and 12 months. In addition, no significant difference in the rates of bleeding was found among the three groups. After logistic regression analysis, hypertension was the only independent predictor of cardiovascular events (relative risk, 1.501; 95% CI, 1.011 to 2.229; P = 0.044).. Our results shed new light on the important benefit of testing CYP2C19 polymorphisms before prescribing clopidogrel in patients treated with drug-eluting stent implantation after PCI. The testing may help to optimize pharmacotherapy effectiveness by providing individualized treatment to the Chinese population. Our findings mandate further studies aimed at initiating genome-based personalized antiplatelet therapy in a Hakka population in southern China.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Asian People; Chi-Square Distribution; China; Clinical Decision-Making; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Gene Frequency; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hemorrhage; Heterozygote; Homozygote; Humans; Hypertension; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Phenotype; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Precision Medicine; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute coronary syndromes have a greater level of platelet aggregation and a poor response to oral antiplatelet drugs. Clopidogrel is still widely used in clinical practice, despite the current evidence favoring ticagrelor and prasugrel.. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of clopidogrel use in the population of the multicenter prospective 'Acute Coronary Syndrome and Diabetes Registry' carried out during a 9-week period between March and May 2015 at 29 Hospitals.. A total of 559 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients [mean age: 68.7±11.3 years, 50% ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)], with 'known DM' (56%) or 'hyperglycemia' at admission, were included in the registry; 460 (85%) patients received a myocardial revascularization.. At hospital discharge, dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed to 88% of the patients (clopidogrel ticagrelor and prasugrel to 39, 38, and 23%, respectively). Differences in P2Y12 inhibitor administration were recorded on the basis of history of diabetes, age, and clinical presentation (unstable angina/non-STEMI vs. non-STEMI). On univariate analysis, age older than 75 years or more, known DM, peripheral artery disease, previous myocardial infarction, previous revascularization, complete revascularization, previous cerebrovascular event, creatinine clearance, unstable angina/non-STEMI at presentation, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score, EuroSCORE, CRUSADE Bleeding Score, and oral anticoagulant therapy were significantly associated with clopidogrel choice at discharge. On multivariate analysis, only oral anticoagulant therapy and the CRUSADE Bleeding Score remained independent predictors of clopidogrel prescription.. In the present registry of a high-risk population, clopidogrel was the most used P2Y12 inhibitor at hospital discharge, confirming the 'paradox' to treat sicker patients with the less effective drug. Diabetic status, a marker of higher thrombotic risk, did not influence this choice; however, bleeding risk was taken into account.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Registries; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy constitutes a key point in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. In particular, ticagrelor, an ADP-antagonist, can provide a more potent and predictable platelet inhibition as compared to clopidogrel, and adenosine-mediated pathways have been involved in its beneficial effects on mortality and myocardial perfusion. However, a quote of patients still displays a suboptimal platelet inhibition on ticagrelor, and, while the role of genetics in conditioning clopidogrel resistance is well established, few data have been reported for ticagrelor. We investigated the impact of rs5751876 C > T polymorphism of adenosine A2a receptor (ADORA2a) on platelet reactivity in patients during chronic treatment with ticagrelor. We included patients treated with ASA and ticagrelor for a recent ACS or elective coronary revascularization. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR for ticagrelor was defined as ADP-test results >417 AU*min. Genetic analysis was performed to assess the presence of rs5751876 C > T polymorphism of ADORA2a receptor. We included 244 patients in our study, 174 (71.3%) patients carried the polymorphism (T allele), 51 (20.9%) of them in homozygosis (T/T). C-allele carriers (homozygotes C/C and heterozygotes C/T) showed no difference in baseline characteristics but for lower HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.01). An absolute lower rate of HRPR on ticagrelor was observed in homozygotes T/T (p = 0.03). At multivariate analysis, C allele carriage was independently associated with the rate of HRPR on ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 4.63[1.02-21.01], p = 0.048). Our study results showed a significant independent association between rs5751876 allele C carriage and a higher rate of high residual platelet reactivity in patients on ticagrelor after a recent ACS or PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Receptor, Adenosine A2A; Ticagrelor

This study aims to evaluate outcomes associated with different P2Y12 agents in Saphenous Vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. SVG PCI is associated with greater risks of ischemic complications, compared with native coronary PCI. Outcomes associated with the use of potent P2Y12 blocking drugs, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor, in SVG PCI are unknown.. Patients included in the study underwent SVG PCI in the United Kingdom between 2007 and 2014 for acute coronary syndrome and were grouped by P2Y12 antiplatelet use. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding and 30-day and 1-year mortality were examined. Multiple imputations with chained equations to impute missing data were used. Adjustment for baseline imbalances was performed using (1) multiple logistic regression (MLR) and (separately) (2) propensity score matching (PSM).. Data weres analyzed from 8,119 patients and most cases were treated with Clopidogrel (n = 7,401), followed by Ticagrelor (n = 497) and Prasugrel (n = 221). In both MLR and PSM models, there was no significant evidence to suggest that either Prasugrel or Ticagrelor was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with Clopidogrel. The odds ratios reported from the multivariable analysis were 1.22 (95% CI: 0.60-2.51) for Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20-1.16) for Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel. No significant differences were seen for in-hospital ischemic or bleeding events.. Our real world national study provides no clear evidence to indicate that use of potent P2Y12 blockers in SVG PCI is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Databases, Factual; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Saphenous Vein; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

Poor health outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients is an area of concern among policymakers and administrators. In an effort to determine the best strategy to improve outcomes among elderly patients who underwent PCI, several studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy compared with universal use of any one of the antiplatelet drugs indicated for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent PCI. The results have either been in favor of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy or universal use of ticagrelor. However, no study has yet evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-provided face-to-face medication therapy management (MTM) combined with point-of-care genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy (POCP) when compared with universal use of ticagrelor or clopidogrel for the elderly after PCI.. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a pharmacist integration of MTM with POCP (MTM-POCP) when compared with universal use of ticagrelor or clopidogrel combined with MTM (MTM-ticagrelor or MTM-clopidogrel).. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the U.S. health care system. A hybrid model, consisting of a 1-year decision tree and a 20-year Markov model, was used to simulate a cohort of elderly patients (aged at least 65 years) with ACS who underwent PCI. Treatment strategies available to patients were POCP, POCP-MTM, MTM-clopidogrel, or MTM-ticagrelor. Data used to populate the model were obtained from the PLATO trial and other published studies. Outcome measures were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost per QALY gained. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for the joint uncertainty around the key parameters of the model. Finally, a benchmark willingness to pay of $50,000-200,000 was considered.. The use of PCOP (with dual antiplatelet therapy) resulted in 5.29 QALYs, at a cost of $50,207. MTM-clopidogrel resulted in 5.34 QALYs, at a cost of $50,011. The use of POCP-MTM resulted in 5.36 QALYs, at a cost of $50,270. Finally, MTM-ticagrelor resulted in 5.42 QALYs, at a cost of $53,346. MTM-ticagrelor was found to be cost-effective compared with MTM-clopidogrel or MTM-POCP, irrespective of the willingness to pay. The deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case analysis.. The combination of MTM-ticagrelor was cost-effective when compared with MTM-POCP or MTM-clopidogrel. The transitional probabilities, however, were mostly based on published studies. Analysis based on a prospective randomized clinical study, comparing all the treatment strategies included in this study, is warranted to confirm our findings.. No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Study concept and design were contributed by Okere and Diaby. Ezendu took the lead in data collection, along with Okere. Data interpretation was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was written by Okere, Diaby, and Berthe and revised by Okere and Diaby.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Clopidogrel; Community Pharmacy Services; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Drug Costs; Female; Genetic Testing; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Medication Therapy Management; Models, Economic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Point-of-Care Testing; Precision Medicine; Predictive Value of Tests; Program Evaluation; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on clopidogrel therapy, high on-treatment platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) reactivity was observed in numerous studies, with significant increases in non-fatal myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, or cardiovascular mortality. Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor provide more potent platelet inhibition. Whether new P2Y12 inhibitors reduce thrombotic events in a similar manner compared to the rate observed with appropriate P2Y12 inhibition by clopidogrel must still be determined. This study sought to compare long-term outcomes between clopidogrel responders (platelet reactivity index [PRI] vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein [VASP] ＜61%) and patients under prasugrel or ticagrelor therapy following PCI-treated ACS.. 730 ACS patients undergoing urgent PCI were prospectively enrolled into two groups: clopidogrel responders (n=448) and those under ticagrelor or prasugrel therapy (n=282). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke; the secondary endpoint comprised major hemorrhagic events.. The median follow-up was 260±186 days. Clopidogrel patients were older and more likely to present non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk factors, atrial fibrillation, or prior vascular disease. After propensity score matching, the primary endpoint was met in 7.1% of the clopidogrel group and 4.1% of the prasugrel/ticagrelor group (p=0.43). Minor bleeding events were significantly reduced in the clopidogrel group (1.1% vs. 3%; p=0.03). In a multivariate analysis, the antiplatelet treatment strategy was not an independent primary endpoint predictor.. In PCI-treated ACS patients, clopidogrel therapy and PRI VASP ＜61% were not associated with increased risks of thrombotic events compared to prasugrel or ticagrelor therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Few data exist on temporal evolution of antithrombotic agent use in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Italy. We sought to compare data from the most recent prospective, multicenter, nationwide registries conducted in Italy, namely EYESHOT and SCOPE.. EYESHOT enrolled 2585 consecutive ACS patients, both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), admitted to 203 Italian coronary care units over a 3-week period (2-22 Dec 2013 and 27 Jan-16 Feb 2014). Among patients enrolled in EYESHOT, 1755 (67.9%) underwent PCI (52.6% with STEMI and 47.4% with NSTE-ACS). In the SCOPE registry, a total of 1363 patients undergoing PCI were enrolled over 3 months (15 Feb-15 Apr 2016) in 39 Italian cath lab centers at medium to high PCI volume: 331 (24.3%) with a diagnosis of STEMI and 1032 (75.7%) with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS.. Over 2 years, the use of clopidogrel in the cath lab significantly decreased (from 11% to 8% in STEMI; p=0.06 and from 9% to 5% in NSTE-ACS; p=0.0002), while the administration of ticagrelor dramatically increased (from 14% to 37%; p<0.0001 in STEMI and from 7% to 44%; p<0.0001 in NSTE-ACS). At discharge, a significant decrease in the use of clopidogrel (from 32% to 21% in STEMI; p=0.02, and from 47% to 24% in NSTE-ACS; p<0.0001) and a concomitant increase in the novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitor prescription occurred, particularly among NSTE-ACS patients (from 8% to 14% for prasugrel; p=0.002 and from 43% to 58% for ticagrelor; p=0.03).. From the present analysis on ACS patients undergoing PCI enrolled in EYESHOT and SCOPE registries, a significant increase in the use of novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors was observed, both at the time of PCI and at discharge.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Italy; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

The aim of the current study was to define the rate of emergency department visits for late-onset dyspnea in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with ticagrelor.. We conducted a population-based study on about 850 000 residents of Florence metropolitan area, by using data from healthcare records.. Between 2012 and 2014, 1073 subjects in Florence metropolitan area had at least one prescription of ticagrelor. Two-hundred and thirty-four patients were diagnosed with 'respiratory system or other chest symptoms' or 'other diseases of lung', and among them we identified 20 subjects with ticagrelor-related late-onset dyspnea. These, and the 979 nonevent subjects (receiving ticagrelor but not developing dyspnea), contributed to 413 person-years overall. The dyspnea rate was 4.84 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval: 3.12-7.51).. Late-onset dyspnea rate is notably lower than early-onset one; nevertheless prescribing clinicians should be aware that about one in 20 outpatients with a stabilized ticagrelor treatment might develop a dyspnea leading to an emergency department visit, and they should consider ticagrelor replacement only in patients who cannot tolerate dyspnea.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dyspnea; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk for ischemic and bleeding events. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of dual loading antiplatelet therapy for patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS.. The Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project was a collaborative study of the American Heart Association and Chinese Society of Cardiology. A total of 5887 patients 75 years and older with ACS who had percutaneous coronary intervention and received dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y. A dual loading dose of antiplatelet therapy was associated with increased major bleeding risk but not with decreased major adverse cardiovascular events risk among patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS in China.. URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02306616.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; China; Clopidogrel; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality Improvement; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

A poor ability of recommended risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding has been reported in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). No study assessed the prediction of post-discharge bleeding in the elderly. The new BleeMACS score (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome), was designed to predict post-discharge bleeding in ACS patients. We aimed to assess the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score in elderly patients.. We assessed the incidence and characteristics of severe bleeding after discharge in ACS patients aged ≥ 75 years. Bleeding was defined as any intracranial bleeding or bleeding leading to hospitalization and/or red blood transfusion, occurring within the first year after discharge. We assessed the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score according to age by Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression analysis, calculating receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curves (AUC).. Elderly patients with ACS had a significantly higher incidence of post-discharge bleeding. Despite a lower predictive ability in older patients, the BleeMACS score exhibited an acceptable performance in these patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Asia; Brazil; Canada; Clopidogrel; Decision Support Techniques; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Europe; Female; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The economic outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients are still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the economic outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong.. A two-phase model consisting of a 1-year decision tree and a lifetime Markov model was used to estimate the economic outcomes. The data from the East Asian subgroup of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) and PHILO studies were used for the calculation of the events rate for ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the first 12 months, whereas the costs were obtained from East Asian sources and utility from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model robustness.. Ticagrelor showed the marginal lifetime quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 0.0050, 0.0091, 0.0107, 0.0050, and 0.0050 in China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong compared with clopidogrel, with marginal healthcare costs of (all values in US dollars) $562, $595, $975, $611, and $672, respectively. The marginal cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor was $112,051, $65,692, $91,207, $121,838, and $133,953 from a public healthcare system perspective of China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results.. Treatment of ACS for 12 months with ticagrelor is not a cost-effective option for the prevention of thrombotic events in East Asia.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Asia; China; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Female; Health Care Costs; Hong Kong; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Republic of Korea; Taiwan; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Although ticagrelor has improved clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome compared with clopidogrel, adherence to this new antiplatelet agent in real-world practice has not been fully investigated.. Premature ticagrelor cessation in routine clinical practice occurred in 1 of 6 patients and was primarily related to adverse effects among which bleeding and dyspnea were the most frequent. Although premature ticagrelor cessation was not associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, this finding requires careful interpretation in view of the modest sample size.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02241291.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Dyspnea; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Switzerland; Tertiary Care Centers; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor and prasugrel are recommended as first line therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, patients with anemia are commonly treated with clopidogrel in routine clinical practice. The RENAMI registry (REgistry of New Antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute Myocardial Infarction) included ACS patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor at hospital discharge. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of anemia and characteristics and outcomes of these patients according to anemia status.. Consecutive patients with ACS from 11 centers were included. All patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <130 g/L in men and <120 g/L in women. The incidence of ischemic and bleeding events and all-cause mortality were assessed at one year.. From 4424 patients included, 405 (9.2%) fulfilled criteria of anemia. Patients with anemia were significantly older, had a higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease, previous bleeding and renal disfunction and higher bleeding risk (PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25: 37.3% vs 18.8%, p < 0.001) The incidence of BARC 3/5 bleeding was moderately higher in patients with anemia (5.4% vs 1.5%, p = 0.001). The incidence of stent thrombosis or reinfarction was not significantly different according to anemia status. Anemia was independently associated with mortality (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.03-2.91, p = 0.022).. A not negligible proportion of patients treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel met criteria for anemia. Anemia was an independent predictor of mortality. Despite their higher bleeding risk profile, patients with anemia had an acceptable rate of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anemia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Little is known about the adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and reasons for discontinuation in real life. Therefore, we evaluated the 12-month course of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and ticagrelor during the acute phase.. A total of 614 patients included into the prospective ALKK-PCI Registry between 2014 and 2015 surviving for at least 12 months after discharge provided informations about duration of ticagrelor therapy. In total, 133 patients (21.7%) discontinued ticagrelor prematurely: nine patients before discharge and 124 (20.2%) at a mean 131 days after PCI. Independent baseline predictors for early discontinuation were age >75 years, atrial fibrillation, and prior stroke. Side effects such as dypnoea or bradycardias and bleeding leading to a premature discontinuation of ticagrelor were reported in less than 3% and less than 2% of the total patient population, respectively. In 50% of patients, there was no replacement with another platelet inhibitor after early discontinuation of ticagrelor, while in 28.2% it was replaced by clopidogrel. Bleeding events were observed more often (10.4% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (5.3% vs. 0, 4%, P < 0.001) was performed more often in patients with early discontinuation.. In this real-life experience of ticagrelor in patients with ACS 22% of patients discontinued ticagrelor early. Side effects were the cause for discontinuation in only 3%, while age >75 years, prior stroke, atrial fibrillation, CABG, and bleeding during follow-up were associated with premature discontinuation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a P2Y. Our contemporary analysis shows a modest but significant increase in the use of ticagrelor and a high rate of adherence to the use of low-dose aspirin at discharge.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Discharge; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Incidence; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Sweden; Ticagrelor

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), newer antiplatelet agents prasugrel and ticagrelor have lower rates of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in economic outcomes when comparing these agents in ACS-PCI patients.. To assess aggregated costs and medical resource utilization among ACS-PCI patients prescribed prasugrel, ticagrelor, or generic clopidogrel, using a large commercial insurance claims database.. Costs attributable to any medical and pharmacy service and resource utilization including number of admissions, length of hospital stay, emergency room visits, and office visits over the 180-day postdischarge period were compared. All-cause and cardiovascular health care costs and resource utilization were separately analyzed for patients enrolled in the data over the continuous follow-up (CFU) period, and for patients continuously taking their initial treatment for 6 months (CTX). Potential confounders collected over a 6-month baseline assessment period were controlled for, using a generalized linear model.. Over the 180-day follow-up, prasugrel and ticagrelor patients underwent fewer admissions (rate ratio [RR] = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80-0.95) from CFU and RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.71-0.89 from CTX) compared with clopidogrel patients. The newer agent cohort incurred more overall health care costs than the generic clopidogrel group, with added costs of $957 (95% CI = $236-$1,725) in the CFU group and $1,122 (95% CI = $455-$1,865) in the CTX group, which were smaller than the increase in all-cause outpatient pharmacy costs associated with the newer agents versus clopidogrel (CFU: $1,175, 95% CI = $1,079-$1,278 and CTX: $1,360, 95% CI = $1,256-$1,487). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the economic outcomes associated with prasugrel and ticagrelor. There were, however, significant correlations between all-cause and cardiovascular-related outcomes.. The higher price of prasugrel and ticagrelor was partially offset by a decrease in hospital admission compared with generic clopidogrel over a 6-month postdischarge period. Aggregated medical costs and resource utilization were not significantly different between prasugrel and ticagrelor patients.. No funding was received for this study. DiDomenico has received an honorarium from Amgen for preparation of a heart failure drug monograph for Pharmacy Practice News and serves as an advisory board member for a heart failure program at Otsuka America Pharmaceuticals and for Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Touchette has received unrestricted grant funding from Cardinal Health, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda and has served as a consultant to and director of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Practice-Based Research Network on a study funded by Pfizer. Walton has served as a paid consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Baxter, Merck, Genentech, Primus, Takeda, and Abbott. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Costs and Cost Analysis; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Period; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is a state-of-the-art antiplatelet agent used for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Unlike remaining oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation to exert its antiplatelet action. Still, ticagrelor is extensively metabolized by hepatic CYP3A enzymes, and AR-C124910XX is its only active metabolite. A post hoc analysis of patient-level (n = 117) pharmacokinetic data pooled from two prospective studies was performed to identify clinical characteristics affecting the degree of AR-C124910XX formation during the first six hours after 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose in the setting of ACS. Both linear and multiple regression analyses indicated that ACS patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or suffering from diabetes mellitus are more likely to have decreased rate of ticagrelor metabolism during the acute phase of ACS. Administration of morphine during ACS was found to negatively influence transformation of ticagrelor into AR-C124910XX when assessed with linear regression analysis, but not with multiple regression analysis. On the other hand, smoking appears to increase the degree of ticagrelor transformation in ACS patients. Mechanisms underlying our findings and their clinical significance warrant further research.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; Smoking; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Ticagrelor

There was still conflict on the antithrombotic advantage of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel among East Asian population with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We considered that the baseline bleeding risk might be an undetected key factor that significantly affected the efficacy of ticagrelor.. A total of 20,816 serial patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from October 2011 to August 2014 in the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region were enrolled in the present study. Patients receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel were further subdivided according to basic bleeding risk. The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACEs) defined as major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCE, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or stroke) and any bleeding during 1-year follow-up. Comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel was adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM).. Among the 20,816 eligible PCI patients who were included in this study, there were 1578 and 779 patients in the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups, respectively, after PSM, their clinical parameters were well matched. Patients receiving ticagrelor showed comparable NACE risk compared with those treated by clopidogrel (5.3% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.842). Furthermore, ticagrelor might reduce the MACCE risk in patients with low bleeding risk but increase MACCE in patients with moderate-to-high bleeding potential (ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel, low bleeding risk: 2.5% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.022; moderate-to-high bleeding risk: 4.8% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.225; interaction P = 0.021), with vast differences in all bleeding (low bleeding risk: 1.5% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.210; moderate-to-high bleeding risk: 4.8% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.002; interaction P = 0.296).. Among real-world Chinese patients with ACS treated by PCI, ticagrelor only showed superior efficacy in patients with low bleeding risk but lost its advantage in patients with moderate-to-high bleeding potential.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate "real life" incidence and independent predictors of major bleeding defined in ACS patients treated with PCI and current standard antithrombotic therapy with prasugrel or ticagrelor.. The RENAMI project is a multicenter retrospective observational registry enrolling 4424 patients with ACS treated with PCI and prasugrel or ticagrelor plus aspirin. Primary endpoint was MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events). Secondary endpoints included each component of MACE, cardiovascular death (CV death), recurrence of ACS (reACS) and stroke. Eighty three (1.8%) patients developed out of hospital major bleedings after 14.1 ± 6.2 months. These patients had higher rates of MACE (14.5% vs 4.4%; p = 0.001) and of all-cause death (11% vs 2.1%; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of major bleeding were age >75 years (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.18-3.41; p = 0.010) and female sex (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.02-2.70; p = 0.041). BARC 3-5 bleeding was independently associated with all-cause mortality (OR 3.46; 95% CI 1.64-7.31; p 0.001).. In ACS patients treated with PCI and ticagrelor or prasugrel, BARC 3-5 bleedings despite being uncommon negatively impacted on prognosis. Old and female patients are at increased risk, offering clinical indications for tailoring dual antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Comparative outcomes of treatment with antiplatelet drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and co-morbid diabetes mellitus (DM) are not well studied.. We performed a cohort study using US commercial claims data (2009-2015) and conducted the following pairwise comparisons in ACS patients with DM: prasugrel vs clopidogrel, ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, and prasugrel vs ticagrelor. Outcomes of interest included (1) a composite effectiveness endpoint including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or inpatient mortality; (2) a composite safety endpoint including major bleeding events requiring hospitalization; and (3) pneumonia hospitalizations as a negative control endpoint. We used calendar time-specific propensity score matching to account for confounding and applied Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. Comparative risk of the effectiveness endpoint was lower among prasugrel initiators compared to clopidogrel initiators (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, N = 7011 matched pairs), but no different between ticagrelor and clopidogrel (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.76-1.37, N = 3013 pairs) or prasugrel and ticagrelor (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.18, N = 2207 pairs). Bleeding risk was higher among prasugrel initiators when compared to clopidogrel initiators within the first month of treatment (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03-3.35); no other comparison indicated any difference. No differences in the negative control outcomes were noted after PS matching for all comparisons, indicating adequate confounding control.. Prasugrel was associated with superior cardiovascular outcomes and a higher risk of short-term bleeding compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS and DM. Comparative outcomes were similar between ticagrelor and clopidogrel or prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Present study was to evaluate whether switching ticagrelor to clopidogrel would impact platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).A total of 202 ACS patients after PCI were enrolled and prescribed ticagrelor. Before discharge, 138 (68%) patients were switched to clopidogrel. Peripheral blood was obtained before switching and at 48 hours after switching to measure platelet reactivity. Patients were followed for 30 days to evaluate cardiovascular events.Compared to ticagrelor group, patients in clopidogrel group were more likely to be male (69.6% vs 65.6%), smokers (34.1% vs 31.3%) and had higher prevalence of hypertension (75.4% vs 71.9%). The frequency of right coronary artery lesion was significantly higher in ticagrelor group (34.4% vs 30.4%). There were no significant differences in baseline platelet reactivity (37.6 ± 5.2% vs 38.4 ± 4.9%). Forty-eight hours after switching to clopidogrel, platelet reactivity in clopidogrel group was significantly higher (46.3 ± 5.6% vs 38.1 ± 5.0%, P <.05). Patients in clopidogrel group had significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular events (3.6% vs 1.6%, P <.05). However, after further adjusted for platelet reactivity at 48 hours of switching, clopidogrel switching was not significantly associated with composite outcomes, with hazard ratio 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.21, P = .063), indicating that platelet reactivity was a critical mediator between antiplatelet drug switching and cardiovascular outcomes.ACS patients after PCI treatment, early switching ticagrelor to clopidogrel results in increased platelet reactivity and higher incidence of short-term cardiovascular events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The level of platelet reactivity during P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist is associated with ischemic and bleeding risks following percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome. Determining platelet reactivity inhibition may be valuable for confirming effective platelet inhibition for individual patients and identifying patients at risk of bleeding. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay offers unique advantages over other methods and has not been used in the Chinese population. We enrolled 10 healthy volunteers and 54 patients with acute coronary syndrome. The volunteers received no treatment, and patients were administered a loading dose of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The platelet reactivity index (PRI) was measured using flow cytometry (FC)-VASP and ELISA-VASP at baseline and 8-hour postloading dose. Blood samples of healthy volunteers and clopidogrel- or ticagrelor-treated patients were frozen and stored for 1, 2, and 4 weeks after initial activation. All frozen samples were tested using ELISA-VASP. The PRI assessed by FC-VASP and ELISA-VASP correlated well showing a high degree of consistency in identifying high or low on-treatment platelet reactivity. No significant time-dependent changes in PRI results were observed in frozen samples stored up to 4 weeks compared to nonfrozen samples. The PRI of ticagrelor-treated patients was lower than that of clopidogrel-treated patients. The ELISA-VASP effectively assesses the PRI, and results obtained from frozen specimens are unaffected by storage and shipment prior to assay. Ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in decreasing the PRI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Asian People; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Clopidogrel; Cryopreservation; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Humans; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Middle Aged; Phosphoproteins; Phosphorylation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Vasodilator Agents

The choice of antiplatelet therapy among Asian populations for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is complicated owing to the high prevalence of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genetic polymorphism that has been associated with reduced efficacy of clopidogrel. Ticagrelor is a potent but more expensive alternative antiplatelet agent that is not affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, from the Hong Kong health-care provider's perspective, of CYP2C19*2 genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy compared with the universal use of clopidogrel or ticagrelor among ACS patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the present study, a two-part model consisting of a 1-year decision tree and a lifetime Markov model was built to simulate the progress of a typical cohort of 60-year-old Chinese patients until age 85 years and compare three treatment strategies: (i) generic clopidogrel or ticagrelor based on CYP2C19*2 genotype, (ii) universal use of generic clopidogrel or (iii) universal use of ticagrelor for all patients. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of <1 gross domestic product per capita locally (US dollar (USD)42 423/quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) were considered cost-effective. Base-case results showed universal ticagrelor use was cost-effective compared with universal clopidogrel, but was dominated by genotype-guided treatment. Genotype-guided treatment was cost-effective compared with universal clopidogrel use (ICER of USD2560/QALY). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that with the cost of genotype testing up to USD400, CYP2C19*2 genotype-guided antiplatelet treatment remained a cost-effective strategy compared with either universal use of generic clopidogrel or ticagrelor in post-PCI ACS patients in Hong Kong.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Asian People; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ticagrelor

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with enhanced platelet reactivity and impaired response to oral antiplatelet therapy, including clopidogrel. This post hoc analysis investigated the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel loading dose (LD) in troponin-negative acute coronary syndrome patients with or without DM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Ad Hoc PCI study.. Patients randomized (1:1) to receive ticagrelor 180 mg LD or clopidogrel 600 mg LD were assessed by diabetic status. Platelet reactivity (P2Y. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor achieved faster, enhanced platelet inhibition and reduced high on-treatment platelet reactivity rates, in DM and non-DM patients.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01603082.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Troponin

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Discharge; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Vitamin D deficiency represents a major health problem in general population, especially for its association with cardiovascular disorders and thrombotic risk, even in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Vitamin D Binding Protein (VDBP) is the main transporter of vitamin D in the bloodstream and genetic polymorphisms of this protein have been shown to account for a significant variability of vitamin D levels and its systemic effects. Contrasting data have linked the rs7041 T→G substitution with cardiovascular disease. However, no study has so far addressed the role of rs7041 polymorphism on platelet reactivity in patients on DAPT, that was the aim of the present study.. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) for an ACS or elective PCI were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90days post-discharge. Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate® (Roche Diagnostics AG), and VDBP genetic status by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. Fasting samples were obtained for main chemistry parameters and vitamin D levels assessment.. We included 400 patients, 187 (46.8%) receiving clopidogrel and 213 (53.2%) ticagrelor. The genetic polymorphism rs7041 (T→G) was observed in 318 patients, (79.5%), in 38.7% of them in homozygosis. Main clinical and chemistry features did not significantly differ according to genetic status, but for a higher rate of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers use among the carriers of the G allele (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively). VDBP genetic status did not affect the rate of HRPR with ADP-antagonists (25.6% vs 24.6% vs 28.5%, p=0.59; adjusted OR[95%CI]=0.94[0.52-1.7], p=0.83 for T/G patients; adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.14[0.6-2.2], p=0.67 for G homozygotes). However, the rate of HRPR with ADP-antagonists was influenced by severe hypovitaminosis D (< 10ng/ml) only in patients carrying the G allele, especially in homozygosis (T/T: 25.9% vs 26.1%, p=0.99; G carriers: 22.1% vs 35.3%, p=0.02, p. The present study shows that rs7041 polymorphism of Vitamin D Binding Protein does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of HRPR among patients receiving DAPT. However the carriage of the G allele could condition the impact of hypovitaminosis D on the response to antiplatelet agents, increasing the occurrence of HRPR especially in homozygotes, thus suggesting a more significant role of vitamin D deficiency among these patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gene Frequency; Genotype; Heterozygote; Homozygote; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Phenotype; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin D-Binding Protein

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay of care for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients; however, uncertainty exists in real-world practice about comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes.. To evaluate outcomes of different oral P2Y12 inhibitors in PCI patients.. We retrospectively studied patients treated between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013. Patients received clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or more than 1 antiplatelet (switch) during PCI. Outcomes were evaluated for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding at 1 year. Propensity score matching with Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine predictors of MACE and bleeding.. A total of 8127 patients were included: clopidogrel (n = 6872), prasugrel (n = 605), ticagrelor (n = 181), and switch (n = 469). Treatment with prasugrel was associated with the lowest risk of MACE using multivariate regression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.36-0.92; P = 0.02). In the propensity score-matched analysis, only the prasugrel group was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with the clopidogrel group. Clopidogrel was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding using multivariate regression (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.42-0.98; P = 0.042). Both ticagrelor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.11-3.59) and the switch groups (HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.09-2.50) were associated with a greater risk of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel. However, no differences were found in the propensity score-matched analysis.. Dual antiplatelet therapies differed in both MACE and bleeds in a real-world setting of PCI. Prasugrel was associated with fewer MACE, whereas clopidogrel had fewer major bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Retrospective Studies; Safety; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Evaluation of antithrombotic treatments for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) requires balancing ischemic and bleeding risks to assess net benefit. We sought to compare the relative effects of ischemic and bleeding events on mortality.. In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, we compared spontaneous ischemic events (myocardial infarction or stroke) with spontaneous major bleeding events (PLATO major, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] major, Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries [GUSTO] severe) with respect to risk of mortality using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. The comparison was performed using ratio of hazard ratios for mortality increase after ischemic vs bleeding events.. A total of 822 patients (4.4%) had ≥1 spontaneous ischemic event; 485 patients (2.6%), ≥1 spontaneous PLATO major bleed, 282 (1.5%), ≥1 spontaneous TIMI major bleed; and 207 (1.1%), ≥1 spontaneous severe GUSTO bleed. In patients who had both events, bleeding occurred first in most patients. Regardless of classification, major bleeding events were associated with increased short- and long-term mortality that were not significantly different from the increase associated with spontaneous ischemic events: ratio of hazard ratios (95% CIs) for short- and long-term mortality after spontaneous ischemic vs bleeding events: 1.46 (0.98-2.19) and 0.92 (0.52-1.62) (PLATO major); 1.26 (0.80-1.96) and 1.19 (0.58-2.24) (TIMI major), 0.72 (0.47-1.10) and 0.83 (0.38-1.79) (GUSTO severe) (all P>0.05) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS on dual antiplatelet therapy, spontaneous major bleeding events seem "prognostically equivalent" to spontaneous ischemic complications. This result allows quantitative comparisons between both actual and predicted bleeding and ischemic risks. Our findings help to better define net clinical benefit of antithrombotic treatments and more accurately estimate mortality after ischemic and bleeding events in patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Streptokinase; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor

In randomized controlled trials, prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced cardiovascular complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with clopidogrel. However, limited head-to-head comparisons have been conducted across the three antiplatelet agents using real-world data. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of three strategies during a 1-year period after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Rates of all-cause and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalizations were compared retrospectively using an insurance claims database. Patients who filled a prescription for an oral antiplatelet agent between September 2011 and December 2013 for post ACS-PCI care were identified. Time to all-cause and AMI hospitalization for a 365-day postdischarge period was compared using Cox proportional hazard models controlling for potential confounders within a propensity score matched cohort.. A matched cohort of 9504 clopidogrel, 7128 prasugrel, and 2376 ticagrelor patients was analyzed. The 1-year hazard ratio (HR) for the two newer agents versus clopidogrel was 0.84 (0.78-0.91). The HR for the newer agents versus clopidogrel of admission with AMI as the primary diagnosis was 0.78 (0.61-1.03), and for AMI as any diagnosis during a hospitalization was 0.88 (0.77-1.00). The HR of all-cause admission for ticagrelor versus prasugrel was 0.97 (0.84-1.13), and the HRs of AMI-related admission were not statistically significant between the two agents. Robustness checks across statistical methods to control for potential confounders did not influence the conclusion.. This real-world study demonstrated that use of the newer agents following PCI was associated with a decrease in all-cause and AMI-related hospitalizations. However, no significant difference was found in the rate of admission between ticagrelor versus prasugrel. Due to concerns regarding statistical power, future studies should examine larger cohorts to obtain more precise estimates for AMI hospitalization for ticagrelor and prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Period; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States

The incorporation of the new antiplatelet agents (NAA) prasugrel and ticagrelor into routine clinical practice is irregular and data from the "real world" remain scarce. We aimed to assess the time trend of NAA use and the clinical safety and efficacy of these drugs compared with those of clopidogrel in a contemporary cohort of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted in patients with ACS admitted to coronary care units and prospectively included in the ARIAM-Andalusia registry between 2013 and 2015. In-hospital rates of major cardiovascular events and bleeding with NAA vs clopidogrel were analyzed using propensity score matching and multivariate regression models.. The study included 2906 patients: 55% received clopidogrel and 45% NAA. A total of 60% had ST-segment elevation ACS. Use of NAA significantly increased throughout the study. Patients receiving clopidogrel were older and were more likely to have comorbidities. Total mortality, ischemic stroke, and stent thrombosis were lower with NAA (2% vs 9%, P < .0001; 0.1% vs 0.5%, P = .025; 0.07% vs 0.5%, P = .025, respectively). There were no differences in the rate of total bleeding (3% vs 4%; P = NS). After propensity score matching, the mortality reduction with NAA persisted (OR, 0.37; 95%CI, 0.13 to 0.60; P < .0001) with no increase in total bleeding (OR, 1.07; 95%CI, 0.18 to 2.37; P = .094).. In a "real world" setting, NAA are selectively used in younger patients with less comorbidity and are associated with a reduction in major cardiac events, including mortality, without increasing bleeding compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Coronary Care Units; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. An Italian Consensus Document indicated 'three specific must' to obtain in this subgroup of patients: optimal oral antiplatelet therapy, early invasive approach and a tailored strategy of revascularization for unstable angina/non-ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI); furthermore, glycemia at admission should be managed with dedicated protocols.. To investigate if previous recommendations are followed, the present multicenter prospective observational registry was carried out in Lombardia during a 9-week period between March and May 2015.. A total of 559 consecutive ACS patients (mean age 68.7 ± 11.3 years, 35% ≥75 years, 50% STEMI), with 'known DM' (56%) or 'hyperglycemia', this last defined as blood glucose value ≥ 126 mg/dl at admission, were included in the registry at 29 hospitals with an on-site 24/7 catheterization laboratory. Patients with known diabetes mellitus received clopidogrel in 51% of the cases, whereas most patients with hyperglycemia (72%) received a new P2Y12 inhibitor: according to clinical presentation in case STEMI prasugrel/ticagrelor were more prescribed than clopidogrel (70 vs. 30%, P < 0.001); on the contrary, no significant difference was found in case of UA/NSTEMI (48 vs. 52%, P = 0.57).Overall, 96% of the patients underwent coronary angiography and 85% received a myocardial revascularization (with percutaneous coronary intervention in 92% of cases) that was however performed in fewer patients with known diabetes mellitus compared with hyperglycemia (79 vs. 90%, P = 0.001).Among UA/NSTEMI, 85% of patients received an initial invasive approach, less than 72 h in 80% of the cases (51% <24 h); no difference was reported comparing known diabetes mellitus to hyperglycemia. Despite similar SYNTAX score, patients with known diabetes mellitus had a higher rate of Heart Team discussion (29 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) and received a surgical revascularization in numerically more cases.Most investigators (85%) followed a local protocol for glycemia management at admission, but insulin was used in fewer than half of the cases; diabetes consulting was performed in 25% of the patients and mainly in case of known diabetes mellitus.. Based on data of the present real world prospective registry, patients with ACS and known diabetes mellitus are treated with an early invasive approach in case of UA/NSTEMI and with a tailored revascularization strategy, but with clopidogrel in more cases; glycemia management is taken into account at admission.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Diabetes Mellitus; Disease Management; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

To this day, there is no data concerning guideline adherence on P2Y12-inhibitors in Austria. Prasugrel and ticagrelor have been shown to be superior to clopidogrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, recent data from European registries showed a reluctant prescription policy with rates of clopidogrel at discharge ranging from 35 to 55%.. In this prospective, multi-centre registry we assessed prescription rates of P2Y12-inhibitors in patients with ACS in four Austrian PCI centres. Parameters associated with the use of clopidogrel have been evaluated in multivariate logistic regression.. Between January and June 2015, 808 patients with ACS undergoing PCI were considered for further analysis. 416 (51.5%) presented with STEMI and 392 (48.5%) with NSTE-ACS. Mean age was 65.7 ± 12.4 and 240 (30.9%) were female. Twenty-eight (3.5%) died during the hospital stay. At discharge, 212 (27.2% of all patients) received clopidogrel, 260 (32.2%) prasugrel and 297 (36.8%) ticagrelor, while 11 (1.4%) did not receive any P2Y12-inhibitor. Of those patients, who were discharged with clopidogrel, 117 (55.2%) had no absolute contraindication against a more potent P2Y12-inhibitor. Diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (p<0.001), COPD (p = 0.049), and age (p<0.001) next to factors contributing to absolute contraindication were positively associated with the use of clopidogrel.. Despite a high level of care, a considerable number of patients were not treated with the more potent P2Y12-inhibitors. Parameters associated with a presumably higher risk of bleeding and side-effects against the more effective P2Y12 inhibitors were the most prominent factors for the prescription of clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Austria; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prescription Drugs; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Platelet transfusion is an effective option to reverse platelet inhibition in thienopyridine-treated patients suffering from bleedings or requiring urgent surgery. However, in ticagrelor-treated patients, the previous studies revealed significant clinical effects to platelet rich plasma (PRP) but poor response to pooled platelets (PP) as used in clinical routine. The aim of this study was to elucidate a potential pathomechanism to explain the poor response of ticagrelor to PP.. From 79 whole blood samples of patients treated with ticagrelor, prasugrel, or clopidogrel, the PRI-VASP was determined before and after in vitro platelet supplementation of PP or PRP at increasing concentrations. Compared to prasugrel- and clopidogrel-treated patients, the PRI-VASP of ticagrelor-treated patients showed no significant increase after in vitro administration of PP. PRI-VASP was performed in ticagrelor-treated samples after in vitro addition of 1: centrifuged PRP platelets resuspended in PP buffer, 2: PP with human serum, 3: human serum alone. Surprisingly, PP with human serum or human serum alone were able to significantly increase PRI-VASP in samples of ticagrelor-treated patients (11.7 ± 10.9 → 61.3 ± 10.9%, p = 0.006; 11.7 ± 10.9 → 54.1 ± 2.7%, p < 0.001). This effect could also be shown using human albumin (18.9 ± 5.1% → 80 g/l human albumin: 48.1 ± 8.3%, p < 0.001).. The present study demonstrates that addition of human serum and human albumin alone is able to reverse the ticagrelor effects in vitro and supports our novel hypothesis of the importance of proteins in reversing the effects of ticagrelor by binding active ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To describe contemporary trends of P2Y12 inhibitor use in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD) who have a higher risk of recurring ACS and may benefit from treatment with higher efficacy third-generation agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor).. Observational cohort study.. A large U.S. commercial insurance program (2009-2015).. P2Y12 inhibitor initiated within 2 weeks after an ACS event.. We identified 98,649 P2Y12 inhibitor initiators, of whom 24.5% had comorbid DM (no CKD), 10.5% had CKD (no DM), and 12.6% had DM and CKD. Overall, 85.2% of patients initiated clopidogrel, followed by prasugrel (11.6%) and ticagrelor (3.2%). Prasugrel use decreased over time irrespective of preexisting DM and/or CKD; ticagrelor use increased. In logistic regression models accounting for patient demographics and clinical covariates, preexisting DM alone was not associated with prasugrel or ticagrelor versus clopidogrel treatment initiation; however, having CKD with or without DM significantly reduced the likelihood of receiving prasugrel versus clopidogrel (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.88 for CKD alone; OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.98 for DM and CKD). Comorbid DM and CKD reduced the odds of initiating ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92).. We observed lower or similar use of prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS and comorbid DM and/or CKD. Given the potential for worse clinical outcomes with clopidogrel in these patients, our findings highlight the need to investigate the implications of these trends on recurrent ACS and bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Utilization Review; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Humans; Inflammation; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

P2Y12 antiplatelet therapy (APT) is highly efficacious in reducing the incidence of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, it is associated with several adverse complications. Data on P2Y12-associated complications and adherence to APT are sparse.. To describe the characteristics, frequency of P2Y12-associated complications, adherence and persistence to P2Y12 APT, and health care utilization among ACS patients on P2Y12 APT.. This retrospective observational study of the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who were discharged from an ACS hospitalization in 2012-2014 and initiated P2Y12 APT (ticagrelor, prasugrel, or clopidogrel). The proportion of patients within each treatment group who experienced P2Y12-associated complications within 1 year and who were adherent to APT were determined. Frequencies of all-cause health care utilization (i.e., hospitalization, length of stay, emergency room [ER] visits, outpatient visits, cardiac events, and transfusions) were evaluated for each treatment group. Poisson regressions were conducted to evaluate the association between nonad-herence with P2Y12 APT and health care utilization, after adjusting for demographics (age and gender), health insurance type, and comorbidities.. Among 11,629 ACS patients, most were male; 44.6% had hypertension; 20.6% had diabetes; and 53.4% had hyperlipidemia. Clopidogrel use was common (62.6%), with ticagrelor use less common (9.0%). Among all groups, approximately one third experienced P2Y12-associated complications. One-year adherence to APT was suboptimal (68% overall), with 73.3% adherence among prasugrel users, followed by 71.4% adherence among ticagrelor users and 65.6% adherence among clopidogrel users. Switching was most common with ticagrelor users. Inpatient hospitalizations, cardiac events, and transfusions were more common in clopidogrel users compared with prasugrel and ticagrelor users. Nonadherent patients experienced significantly more hospitalizations, ER visits, and transfusions (1.34, 1.09, and 1.85 [P < 0.05], respectively) compared with adherent patients. These trends of association remained consistent across all treatment groups. Also, patients not adherent to ticagrelor experienced 1.9 times as many cardiac events as adherent patients. However, this association was not significant for clopidogrel and prasugrel users. Patients not adherent to P2Y12 APT experienced significantly lower outpatient visits compared with adherent patients.. Complications associated with P2Y12 in ACS patients treated with P2Y12 APT were common, with dyspnea, heart block, and major or life-threatening bleeding as the most common. Adherence was significantly associated with lower health care utilization. Increased adherence to secondary prevention therapy among these very high-risk patients is crucial. Disease management strategies to improve adherence and reduce treatment-associated adverse events through individualized patient care, alternative secondary treatment options, and physician awareness should be designed, implemented, and sustained.. Data analysis was conducted by Merck & Co., the manufacturer of vorapaxar (ZONTIVITY). At the time of this study, Vyas was an employee of Rutgers University, which received grant funding from Merck & Co. for this study, and is now employed with the University of Rhode Island. Patel was employed by Symphony Solutions and the University of North Carolina during the drafting and revising of the manuscript. Bash is employed by Merck & Co. Simpson received consulting fees from Merck & Co. for work on this study and has received fees for research from Amgen and Pfizer. Study concept and design were contributed by Vyas, Bash, Patel, and Simpson. Patel took the lead in data collection, assisted by the other authors. All the authors contributed equally to data analysis and manuscript preparation. The abstract for this study was presented as a poster at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2016; November 12-16, 2016; New Orleans, Louisiana.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

We studied clinical outcomes and discontinuation rates in a 'real-world' population presenting with myocardial infarction treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.. Between January 2012 and May 2015, 992 patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing invasive management and adequately pre-treated with dual antiplatelet therapy were prospectively enrolled. Platelet aggregation was measured using the Multiplate analyser. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes and 1-year outcomes were collected.. Patients treated with ticagrelor were younger and less likely to be diabetic, have a previous myocardial infarction or present with a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (all P < 0.05). Those treated with ticagrelor also had lower CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines; 20 ± 9.4 vs 23 ± 10.1, P < 0.0001) and GRACE (119 ± 28 vs 126 ± 32, P = 0.002) scores. High platelet reactivity was greatly reduced with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (16.1% vs 37.0%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Non-coronary artery bypass grafting-related thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major and minor bleeding occurred at similar rates in those treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Rates of drug discontinuation in those treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel were similar in hospital (20.2% vs 16.2%, P = 0.18) and between discharge and 1 year (29.9% vs 27.9%, P = 0.63). However, discontinuation due to dyspnoea, (3.3% vs 0%, P < 0.0001) and discontinuation due to any possible drug-related adverse event (9.3% vs 2.2%, P = 0.0001) was more common in those treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor is paradoxically being used in lower-risk patients rather than those most likely to benefit. Ticagrelor was associated with similar rates of bleeding but higher discontinuation rates due to adverse effects compared to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

Aim of the study was to compare four different strategies of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with PCI. DAPT with Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor and Prasugrel has proved to be effective in patients with ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by reducing major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE). However, the effect of the different strategies in a real-world population deserves further verification. A retrospective analysis of 2404 discharged ACS patients treated with PCI was performed, with a median follow-up of 1 year. The study population was stratified in four drug treatment cohorts: ASA + Clopidogrel (A-C), ASA + Plavix (A-PLx), ASA + Ticagrelor (A-T), ASA + Prasugrel (A-P). We assessed the incidence of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE): all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke and bleeding during follow-up. At 1-year, the use of A-C and A-PLx was associated with the highest cumulative incidence of NACE in comparison with A-T and A-P therapies (respectively 14.8 and 29.6% vs. 9.2 and 6%). This difference was mainly driven by the mortality and TVR outcomes. Considering selection bias and differences in the patients baseline characteristics, the association of A-T and A-P seems to be superior in comparison with a DAPT strategy of A-C and A-PLx in low risk ACS-PCI patients from real world. In our Region the prescription is consistent with guidelines recommendations and Clopidogrel and Plavix are still predominantly used in older patients with more comorbidities, and this could partially explain the inferiority of this association.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor and prasugrel were found to be superior to clopidogrel for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the comparative effectiveness of these 2 drugs remains unknown. We compared postdischarge outcomes among older patients treated with ticagrelor versus prasugrel after PCI for ACS. We linked clinical data from PCIs performed in older patients (age ≥65) for ACS at 47 Michigan hospitals to Medicare fee-for-service claims from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, to ascertain rates of 90-day readmission and long-term mortality. We used propensity score matching to adjust for the nonrandom use of ticagrelor and prasugrel at discharge. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare rates of 90-day readmission and long-term mortality, respectively. Patients discharged on ticagrelor (n = 1,243) were more frequently older, female, had a history of cerebrovascular disease, and presented with ST- or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared with prasugrel (n = 1,014). After matching (n = 756 per group), there were no significant differences in the rates of 90-day readmission (16.7% ticagrelor vs 14.6% prasugrel; adjusted odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.55, p = 0.35) or 1-year mortality (5.4% ticagrelor vs 3.7% prasugrel; hazard ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.8 to 2.2, p = 0.31). In conclusion, we found no significant differences in the rates of 90-day readmission or long-term mortality between older patients treated with ticagrelor and patients treated with prasugrel after PCI for ACS. In the absence of randomized data to the contrary, these 2 treatments appear similarly effective.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Medicare; Michigan; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; United States

The performance of the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy) risk scores for the prediction of major bleeding in ticagrelor-treated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. The aim of the present study is to validate the performance of both scores in a contemporary Chinese cohort of ACS patients hospitalized for PCI and administrated with ticagrelor. From January 2013 to December 2014, a total of 629 ticagrelor-treated ACS patients who underwent PCI were recruited consecutively. The overall rate of major bleeding defined by the BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) criteria was 1.7%. This incidence increased with the risk category of both the CRUSADE (very low, 0.6%; low, 1.3%; moderate, 1.1%; high, 7.0%; and very high, 13.0%;

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Area Under Curve; China; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ROC Curve; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

With this study, we sought to identify patient characteristics associated with clopidogrel prescription and its relationship with in-hospital adverse events in an unselected cohort of ACSs patients.. We studied all consecutive patients admitted at our institution for ACSs from 2012 to 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on clopidogrel or novel P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) prescription and the relationship between clopidogrel use and patient clinical characteristics and in-hospital adverse events was evaluated using logistic regression analysis.. The population median age was 68 years (57-77 year) and clopidogrel was prescribed in 230 patients (46%). Patients characteristics associated with clopidogrel prescription were older age, female sex, non-ST-elevation ACS diagnosis, the presence of diabetes mellitus and anemia, worse renal and left ventricular functions and a higher Killip class. Patients on clopidogrel demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (4.8%) than prasugrel and ticagrelor-treated patients (0.4%), while a nonstatistically significant trend emerged considering bleeding events. However, on multivariable logistic regression analysis female sex, the presence of anemia and Killip class were the only variables independently associated with in-hospital death.. Patients treated with clopidogrel showed a higher in-hospital mortality. However, clinical variables associated with its use identify a population at high risk for adverse events and this seems to play a major role for the higher in-hospital mortality observed in clopidogrel-treated patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Utilization Review; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Italy; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) guidelines have been changed, favouring more potent antiplatelet drugs. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a ticagrelor- instead of a clopidogrel-based primary dual antiplatelet (DAPT) regimen in ACS patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).. CHANGE DAPT (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03197298) assessed 2,062 consecutive real-world ACS patients, treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the primary composite endpoint being net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE: all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke or major bleeding). In the clopidogrel (CP; December 2012-April 2014) and ticagrelor periods (TP; May 2014-August 2015), 1,009 and 1,053 patients were treated, respectively. TP patients were somewhat older, underwent fewer transfemoral procedures, and received fewer glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In the TP, the one-year NACCE rate was higher (5.1% vs. 7.8%; HR 1.53 [95% CI: 1.08-2.17]; p=0.02). Assessment of non-inferiority (pre-specified margin: 2.7%) was inconclusive (risk difference: 2.64 [95% CI: 0.52-4.77]; pnon-inferiority=0.48). TP patients had more major bleeding (1.2% vs. 2.7%; p=0.02) while there was no benefit in ischaemic endpoints. Propensity score-adjusted multivariate analysis confirmed higher NACCE (adj. HR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.20-2.55]; p=0.003) and major bleeding risks during TP (adj. HR 2.75 [95% CI: 1.34-5.61]; p=0.01).. In this observational study, the guideline-recommended ticagrelor-based primary DAPT regimen was associated with an increased event risk in consecutive ACS patients treated with newer-generation DES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The initial EROSION study (Effective Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Without Stenting: Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Management in Plaque Erosion) demonstrated that patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion might be stabilized with aspirin and ticagrelor without stenting for ≤1 month. However, a long-term evaluation of outcomes is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess whether the initial benefit of noninterventional therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion is maintained for ≤1 year.. Among 53 patients who completed clinical follow-up, 49 underwent repeat optical coherence tomography imaging at 1 year. Median residual thrombus volume decreased significantly from 1 month to 1 year (0.3 mm. One-year follow-up optical coherence tomography demonstrated a further decrease in thrombus volume between 1-month and 1-year follow-up. A majority (92.5%) of patients with acute coronary syndrome caused by plaque erosion managed with aspirin and ticagrelor without stenting remained free of major adverse cardiovascular event for ≤1 year.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02041650.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aspirin; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombectomy; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme might be associated with increased activation of platelets. We aimed to assess the relationship between PCSK9 levels, platelet reactivity and ischemic outcomes.. Consecutive ACS patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in a prospective, observational study. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was determined by Multiplate Analyzer in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, ischemic stroke were evaluated at 12months.. A direct association was found between increased PCSK9 serum levels and platelet reactivity (r=0.30; p=0.004). When assessed according to tertile values of PCSK9, there was a significant increase in platelet reactivity in the upper vs lower tertile (p=0.02). Clinical outcome was available at follow-up in 178 subjects. In the upper PCSK9 tertile 13/59 (22.03%) patients experienced a clinical MACE at one year, vs 2/59 (3.39%) patients in the lower PCSK9 tertile. At one-year follow-up, PCSK9 was independently associated with increased ischemic MACEs: hazard ratio for upper vs lower PCSK9-level tertile was 2.62 (95% confidence interval 1.24-5.52; p=0.01).. These findings suggest that increased PCSK9 levels are associated with higher platelet reactivity and are a possible predictor of ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Biomarkers; Coronary Angiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proprotein Convertase 9; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended as a standard antiplatelet strategy in acute coronary syndrome. For those with reduced pharmacologic response to clopidogrel, strengthening antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel 150mg daily) may reduce adverse clinical events. Ticagrelor is a direct-acting inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y12 that has a more rapid onset and offset than clopidogrel.. In this retrospective study, we compared ticagrelor (180mg loading dose 90mg twice daily thereafter), clopidogrel (300mg loading dose, 75mg or 150mg daily thereafter) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in 273 high-risk patients admitted to coronary care unit with acute coronary syndrome.. The rate of IST in hospital was significantly reduced in patients of ticagrelor group comparing with those receiving clopidogrel 75mg (0.69% vs 8.2%, p=0.009). Moreover, the TVR rate was less in the ticagrelor group than clopidogrel 75mg group (2.7% vs 13.1%, p=0.007) 6months follow-up. The incidence of MACCE has no difference between the two clopidogrel groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis of MACCE-free indicated that there was no difference between the three groups. Ticagrelor significantly increased the rate of minor bleeding compared with clopidogrel 75mg daily during hospital (45.5% vs 26.2%,p=0.012) and 6-month follow-up (66.9% vs 45.9%,p=0.004).Bleeding-free prognosis was significantly better in the clopidogrel 75mg daily group.. In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI, the rate of in-stent thrombosis and TVR were significantly reduced treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel 75mg daily, without an increase of overall major bleeding, but with an increase of minor bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the use of ticagrelor as a substitute for clopidogrel for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in Chile.. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on a Markov model: Safety and effectiveness data of ticagrelor were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Costs are expressed in Chilean pesos (CLP) as of 2013. The evaluation was conducted from the payer standpoint. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis comprising discount rates and national cost variability was done. A budget impact analysis estimated for 2015 was conducted to calculate the total cost for both treatments.. The ICER with a discount rate of 6% for ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel was CLP 4,893,126 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (=9,689 US$). In the budget impact analysis for the baseline scenario, considering 100% of treatment, coverage, and adherence, ticagrelor represented an additional cost of CLP 5,233,854,272, for 979 QALYs gained compared with clopidogrel.. Ticagrelor is cost-effective in comparison with clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome. These findings are similar to those reported in other international cost-effectiveness studies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Epidemiologic Studies; Female; Humans; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) affects 4% to 12% of women in reproductive age, representing a clinical condition that could predispose to cardiovascular diseases. We report a case of a 34-year-old woman with PCOS, presenting with chest pain, onset two days before, and ST segment-elevation myocardial infarction. She was not pregnant or in a postpartum state. Subsequent cardiac angiography revealed spontaneous left anterior descending coronary artery dissections, managed by conservative approach. The patient was discharged in medical therapy after 5days. This is the first observation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection occurring in a PCOS patient.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aspirin; Chest Pain; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessel Anomalies; Coronary Vessels; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Vascular Diseases

Recent trials demonstrated the efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the reduction of cardiovascular complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it is unclear how use of the 3 antiplatelet medications has changed in commercially insured patients since the advent of the new agents.. To (a) describe the adoption of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the onset of ACS and (b) explore patient factors associated with the selection of the drug to provide insight into utilization patterns of these antiplatelet agents.. Patients who received a new dispensing of an antiplatelet agent following a hospitalization for a PCI administered for ACS were identified from insurance claims between 2009 and 2013. Demographics and comorbid conditions were determined based on a 6-month period before the ACS event. Longitudinal trends in antiplatelet agent selection were illustrated using descriptive statistics segmented by month and quarter. Using logistic regressions with stepwise model selection, factors associated with use of the newer medications, as well as with the selection between ticagrelor and prasugrel, were identified.. The analysis included 66,335 subjects. The use of clopidogrel decreased from 100% to roughly 65% of total antiplatelet agent use by the end of 2011 and leveled off thereafter. The introduction of ticagrelor in 2011 coincided with a drop in prasugrel initiation from 35%-18% by December 2013. The use of new agents as opposed to use of clopidogrel was associated with younger age (< 65 years), male gender, and a diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In addition, conditions increasing mortality and risk of cardiovascular complication were associated with higher odds of using clopidogrel. The odds of using ticagrelor over prasugrel increased with older age and history of a cerebrovascular event.. In 2013, clopidogrel remained the most prescribed agent. Meanwhile, ticagrelor had gradually replaced a substantial portion of prasugrel initiation. Further investigation into outcomes associated with the newer agents, as well as reasons behind the conservative use of the antiplatelet agents, is warranted.. No funding was received for the conduct of this study. DiDomenico received an honorarium from Amgen for the preparation of a heart failure drug monograph for Pharmacy Practice News and was a co-investigator on funded research for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. DiDomenico also serves as an advisory board member for a heart failure program at Otsuka America Pharmaceuticals and as an advisory board member at Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Touchette has received unrestricted grant funding from Cardinal Health and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals and has also served as a consultant to and director of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Practice-Based Research Network on a study funded by Pfizer. None of the authors of this study are involved in financial or personal relationships with agencies, institutions, or organizations that inappropriately influenced the statistical analysis plan or interpretation of the results. Study concept and design were contributed by Kim, Lee, Touchette, and Walton, with assistance from DiDomenico and Ardati. Kim and Lee collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Lee, DiDomenico, and Ardati, along with Kim and Walton and assisted by Touchette. The manuscript was written by Kim and Walton, with assistance from the other authors, and revised by Kim, Walton, and Lee, with assistance from the other authors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Outcome Assessment; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor produces a more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel and inhibits cellular uptake of adenosine, which is associated with several cardiovascular consequences. We aimed to explore the correlation between adenosine and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) plasma concentration and antiplatelet effect by clopidogrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We conducted a prospective, observational and single-centre cohort study enrolling 68 patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS from January 2016 to May 2016. We monitored the inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) and assessed adenosine, adenosine deaminase (ADA) and cAMP plasma concentrations by immunoassay on admission and 48 hr after coronary angiography. The demographic and clinical data were collected by reviewing their medical records. The two groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics including adenosine, ADA and cAMP. The mean IPA in patients receiving ticagrelor was significantly higher than that in patients receiving clopidogrel (93.5% versus 67.2%; p = 0.000). Also, we observed that patients treated with ticagrelor had a significantly higher increase in levels of adenosine and cAMP compared with those treated with clopidogrel (1.04 (0.86; 1.41) versus 0.04 (-0.25; 0.26); p = 0.029 and 0.78 (-1.67; 1.81) versus 0.60 (-1.91; 4.60); p = 0.037, respectively). And there was a weak correlation between IPA and adenosine as well as cAMP plasma concentration (r = 0.390, p = 0.001 and r = 0.335, p = 0.005, respectively). Ticagrelor increased adenosine and cAMP plasma concentration compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Deaminase; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cyclic AMP; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor is a reversible and direct-acting oral antagonist of the adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y12. Possible adenosine-mediated effects of ticagrelor on inflammation are complex and incompletely understood. To our knowledge, ticagrelor-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) has not yet been described.. We report the case of an 84 years old patient presenting with SIRS subsequent to initiation of ticagrelor after implantation of two drug eluting stents. A broad diagnostic work-up for alternative causes and therapeutic measures were unrevealing. Discontinuation of the agent was followed by rapid improvement in clinical and laboratory signs of SIRS.. After exclusion of other causes, ticagrelor needs to be considered as a possible causative agent for SIRS. Due to the widespread use of ticagrelor, clinicians should be aware of this possible adverse drug reaction.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Ticagrelor

To explore platelet reactivity on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients infected with HIV.. Acute coronary syndrome patients infected with HIV (n = 80) were matched to ACS patients without HIV (n = 160) on age, sex, diabetes, and DAPT (aspirin 100%, clopidogrel 68%, prasugrel 31%, ticagrelor 1%). Platelet reactivity was evaluated after ACS (>30 days) by measuring residual platelet aggregation (RPA) to aspirin and to P2Y12 inhibitors with light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow aspirin assay (ARU), and P2Y12 assay (PRU) and with the VASP platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI). Proportion of patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HPR) was evaluated. HIV-infected ACS patients had higher levels of platelet reactivity in response to P2Y12 inhibitors (RPA: 23.8 ± 2.7% vs. 15.3 ± 1.3%; P = 0.001; PRU: 132 ± 10 vs. 107.4 ± 6.6; P = 0.04; and VASP-PRI: 45.2 ± 2.6% vs. 32.0 ± 2.0%; P < 0.001) and to aspirin (RPA: 3.6 ± 1.5% vs. 0.4 ± 0.1%; P = 0.004 and ARU: 442 ± 11 vs. 407 ± 5; P = 0.002) compared with non-HIV. HIV-infection was independently associated with increased platelet reactivity regardless of the test used (RPA: P = 0.005; PRU: P < 0.001 and VASP-PRI: P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of HPR (OR = 7.6; P < 0.001; OR = 2.06; P = 0.06; OR = 2.91; P = 0.004, respectively) in response to P2Y12 inhibitors. Similar results were found with aspirin. Protease inhibitors use was associated with increased platelet reactivity and higher rate of HPR.. Acute coronary syndrome patients infected with HIV have increased levels of platelet reactivity and higher prevalence of HPR to P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin than non-HIV patients. These results could provide potential explanations for the observed increase risk of recurrent ischemic events in the HIV-infected population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Anti-HIV Agents; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

This study is a real world, observational study evaluating the treatment persistence of oral antiplatelet (OAP) therapy during a one-year follow-up in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. Data on diagnosis, comorbidities, follow-up, OAP treatment, reasons, and decision maker for treatment discontinuation in patients who were discharged from a hospital in Belgium after an ACS between 1 July 2012 and 1 June 2013 were collected by cardiologists from 18 centres, up to 360 days from discharge. Out of the 671 patients surveyed, 295 patients were included in the persistence analysis. The remainder was excluded from the analysis due to the lack of precise information on OAP stopping date. The proportion of patients still using OAPs after 90, 180, 270, and 360 days was 92, 89, 83, and 73%, respectively. OAP persistence was higher for patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. At 360 days, 79% of patients with a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 66% of patients with a non-STEMI were still adhering to the prescribed course of treatment. Among the 79 patients with early treatment discontinuation, the mean treatment duration was 197.0 ± 125.18 days. The main decision taker in premature treatment cessation was the cardiologist (31% of cases), while the most frequently cited reasons included surgery (25%) and perceived high bleeding risk (19%).. Treatment persistence with OAPs after ACS in Belgium is high throughout the recommended period. Discontinuation was observed more often in patients treated with clopidogrel and was mainly initiated by the cardiologist.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Belgium; Cardiologists; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In 'real life' acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and receiving contemporary antiplatelet treatment, data on dyspnea occurrence and impact on persistence with treatment are scarce. In a prospective, multicenter, cohort study, ACS patients undergoing PCI were recruited into the GReekAntiPlatElet (GRAPE) registry. During 1-year follow up, overall, 249/1989 (12.5%) patients reported dyspnea, more frequently at 1-month and decreasing thereafter. Multivariate analysis showed that ticagrelor administration (n = 738) at discharge was associated with the occurrence of dyspnea: Odds ratio 2.46 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.87-3.25), p < 0.001. Older age, lower hematocrit, and prior bleeding event were also associated with dyspnea reports. Persistence, switching, and cessation rates were 68.3%, 20.9%, and 10.8% vs 76.7%, 12.5%, and 10.9% among patients reporting dyspnea compared with those who did not, p for trend = 0.002. In conclusion, in ACS patients undergoing PCI and treated with a P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Dyspnea; Female; Greece; Hematocrit; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor, a potent platelet inhibitor, has primarily been studied in white patients. Platelet reactivity among black patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on ticagrelor, however, is unknown. Our objective was to compare platelet reactivity in black versus white patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor. We conducted a prospective, pharmacodynamic study of 29 black patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 1, 4, and 8 hours after a loading dose of ticagrelor 180 mg and at 30 days on a maintenance dose of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. Assays included light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein. We provided comparison with a historical white cohort. Platelet reactivity among blacks with ACS on ticagrelor was similar to that in whites, except that blacks had lower values at 4 hours, 8 hours, and on maintenance therapy for light transmission aggregometry with 20 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate. Among blacks, high-on-treatment platelet reactivity for all 3 assays was uncommon at 1 hour and nonexistent at 4 hours, 8 hours, and while on maintenance therapy. Blacks preloaded with clopidogrel (n = 17) had significantly lower results of VerifyNow (64 ± 65 vs 198 ± 86, p <0.001) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (12.8 ± 21.6 vs 58.9 ± 19.9, p <0.001) at 1 hour compared with those with no clopidogrel preload. In conclusion, among patients with ACS receiving ticagrelor, levels of platelet reactivity in blacks are similar to that in whites. This suggests that the cardiovascular benefits of ticagrelor observed in the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial are likely to be observed in blacks and whites.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Black People; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; White People

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Low adherence to secondary prevention medications (ATM) of patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, literature provides limited data on assessment of ATM and risks associated with poor in Chinese patients with ACS. In the current work, ATM was assessed in consecutively recruited patients with ACS in Tongji Hospital from November 5, 2013 to December 31, 2014. A total of 2126 patients were classified under low adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC) C< 50%) and high adherence (PDC>50%) groups based on their performance after discharge. All patients were followed up at the 1st, 6th, and 12th month of discharge while recording ATM and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Bivariate logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with ATM. Cox regression was used to analyze the association between ATM and MACE within one year after discharge. Results showed that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone had significantly lower proportion of high adherence to P2Y12 antagonists (83.0% vs. 90.7%, P < 0.01) than patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) only. Moreover, in patients undergoing PCI, high adherence to P2Y12 antagonists decreased the risk of MACE (hazard ratio = 0.172, 95% confidence interval: 0.039-0.763; P = 0.021). In conclusion, PCI-treated patients are more prone to remaining adherent to medications than CABG-treated patients. High adherence to P2Y12 antagonists was associated with lower risk of MACE.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; China; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Coma; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The beneficial use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and P2Y12 õinhibitors has been established for patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the optimal duration of DAPT is under debate. The aim of the present study was to investigate the long-term utilization and clinical outcome of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in patients with ACS from 2009 to 2014 in Austria.. We analysed data from 13 Austrian health insurance funds for the years 2009 to 2014, on 72,676 patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of ACS. The primary end point was recurrence of ACS or death >30days after the index event.. 32,830 subjects received a prescription of a P2Y12 inhibitor within 30days after the index ACS. 18,640 (56.8%) subjects were discharged with clopidogrel, 6683 (20.4%) with prasugrel, and 7507 (22.9%) with ticagrelor, respectively. Data from 32,174 patients with 4975 events during a median follow-up period of 24.9months were available for survival analysis. The cumulative incidence for recurrence of ACS or death at two years was 18.7% in patients receiving clopidogrel, and 8.7% and 12.0% in those receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor, respectively.. Utilization of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ACS was consistent with guideline recommendations. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are increasingly used in ACS patients and associated with a lower number of recurrence of ACS or death compared to clopidogrel. However, clopidogrel was predominantly used in older patients with more co-morbidities.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Austria; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Patient Discharge; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recurrence; Survival Analysis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) predicts outcomes and major cardiovascular events. Ticagrelor has provided pharmacological and clinical evidence of more predictable and more potent antiplatelet effect as compared to clopidogrel. However, so far, few data have investigated the prevalence and predictors of HRPR in unselected patients treated with ticagrelor, that is therefore the aim of the current study.. Our population is represented by 195 patients undergoing coronary stenting for ACS and receiving ASA and ticagrelor. Platelet function was assessed by multiplate impedance aggregometry (MEA) between 1 and 3months after stenting. Main clinical features and biochemistry parameters were collected. HRPR for ticagrelor was defined for aggregation>417 AUC after MEA-ADP stimulation. A total of 26 patients, (13.3%), displayed HRPR with ticagrelor. Older age (≥70years, p=0.002), hypertension (p=0.02) previous myocardial infarction (p=0.04), therapy with nitrates and beta-blockers (p=0.02), diuretics (p=0.03) and fasting glycaemia (p=0.05) were associated to HRPR with ticagrelor. By multivariate analysis, age≥70years (OR [95%CI]=4.6[1.55-13.8], p=0.006), concomitant therapy with beta-blockers (OR [95%CI]=3.2[1.06-9.6], p=0.04) and platelets count (OR[95%CI]=1.0007 [1-1.016], p=0.05) were identified as independent predictors of HRPR with ticagrelor.. The present study firstly demonstrates that the occurrence of HRPR in patients treated with ticagrelor is not so futile, as it was observed in 13% of patients treated with ticagrelor. Older age, beta-blockers administration and platelets count are independent predictors of HRPR with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Blood Platelets; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Count; Predictive Value of Tests; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bradyarrhythmic events associated with ticagrelor combination therapy in the management of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).. The study comprised 300 patients with NSTEMI who were treated via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the clopidogrel group (initial dose of 300 mg and then maintenance dose of 75 mg once daily, n = 151) and the ticagrelor group (initial dose of 180 mg and then maintenance dose of 90 mg twice daily, n = 149). All patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic. Follow-up included 12-lead electrocardiography and 24-h Holter monitoring performed 1, 6, and 12 months after the revascularization procedure.. Of the 300 patients, 112 patients (36.7 %) had a decrease in heart rate at the 12-month follow-up. Of these, 80 patients were in the ticagrelor group (53.3 %) vs. 32 patients in the clopidogrel group (24.7 %; p < 0.05). However, the difference was not statistically significant at the 1-month and 6-month follow-up visits. After adjusting for potential confounders, the reduction in heart rate with ticagrelor combination therapy remained independently associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95 % CI, 1.90-2.23), while ticagrelor therapy reduced the risk to a level equivalent to that of patients in the clopidogrel group.. Ticagrelor can lower the resting heart rate of patients and cause bradyarrhythmias in the 12th month after PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Bradycardia; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Electrocardiography; Female; Germany; Humans; Male; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Prevalence; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of platelet reactivity values in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor. This prospective observational study enrolled 200 patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was determined by multiple electrode aggregometry after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Only 3% of patients in the prasugrel group and 2% of study participants in the ticagrelor group had high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). The majority of patients displayed low on treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR; prasugrel: 69%; ticagrelor: 64%). The pharmacodynamic effect was similar in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor: the median level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was 15U (interquartile range IQR 9-21U) under prasugrel treatment and 17U (IQR 8-24U) under ticagrelor treatment (p=0.370). In conclusion, our study suggests that there is some degree of variability in ADP-induced platelet aggregation under treatment with prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The 30-day clinical outcomes with prasugrel or ticagrelor were compared using a US payer database in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrated superior efficacy with increased non-coronary artery bypass graft major bleeding compared with clopidogrel in randomized clinical trials. No direct randomized or observational studies have compared clinical outcomes between prasugrel and ticagrelor.. Patients hospitalized for ACS-PCI between August 1, 2011 and April 30, 2013 and prescribed prasugrel or ticagrelor were selected. Drug treatment cohorts were propensity matched based upon demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary objective compared 30-day net adverse clinical events (NACE) in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients using a prespecified 20% noninferiority margin. Secondary objectives included comparisons of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding.. Data were available for 16,098 patients (prasugrel, n = 13,134; ticagrelor, n = 2,964). In unmatched cohorts, prasugrel-treated patients were younger with fewer comorbidities than ticagrelor-treated patients, and 30-day NACE rates were 5.6 and 9.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). Following propensity matching, NACE was noninferior (P < 0.001) and 22% lower in prasugrel-treated than in ticagrelor-treated patients (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94). A 30-day adjusted MACE (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98) and major bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.95) were also lower in prasugrel-treated patients compared with ticagrelor-treated patients.. In this "real-world," retrospective, observational study, physicians appear to preferentially use prasugrel in younger patients with lower risk of bleeding or comorbidities compared with ticagrelor. Following adjustment, clinical outcomes associated with prasugrel use appear as good, if not better, than those associated with ticagrelor in ACS-PCI patients. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Comorbidity; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Atrioventricular Block; Electrocardiography; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pacemaker, Artificial; Prognosis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Because coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is associated with a high turnover of platelets, assessment of platelet function should enable assessment of the effect of young (RNA-containing) platelets on platelet reactivity. This study was designed to assess platelet reactivity 1 day after CABG in patients treated previously with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.. Patients (n=18) with acute coronary syndrome who required urgent CABG and had been treated for up to 2 days before surgery with aspirin plus clopidogrel (n=13) or aspirin plus ticagrelor (n=5) were enrolled. Care was not altered by participation, which entailed review of medical records and taking one sample of blood 1 day after surgery. The percentage of RNA-containing platelets was quantified using thiazole orange, and platelet function was assessed by flow cytometry.. Young platelets constituted, on average, 24% of platelets (range 4-54%) and were more likely to be activated in the absence or presence of an agonist (P<0.001). Differences between RNA-containing (young) and non-RNA-containing platelets were evident in patients treated previously with clopidogrel (P<0.001), whereas a nonsignificant trend was apparent in patients treated previously with ticagrelor. A high but variable prevalence of young platelets was seen 1 day after CABG.. Young platelets were more reactive and, consistent with the irreversible binding of clopidogrel to P2Y12, this effect was more pronounced after treatment with clopidogrel. The reversible binding of ticagrelor to the platelet P2Y12 receptor may be advantageous in patients with a high platelet turnover.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Predictive Value of Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a novel direct-acting P2Y12 receptor antagonist used for preventing atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The current recommended dose is 90 mg bid, but a low dose of ticagrelor has not been previously studied in Chinese ACS patients. Therefore, we performed this study to observe the different effects of half- and standard-dose ticagrelor on platelet aggregation in Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS. Sixty-two NSTE-ACS subjects were assigned to half-dose ticagrelor (n = 20), standard-dose ticagrelor (n = 22) and clopidogrel (n = 20) groups. Five days after drug administration, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay was performed to test P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). High-platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as a PRU > 208. The adverse events, including bleeding events and dyspnoea, were monitored throughout the study. PRU values in the half-dose (44.55 ± 32.88) and standard-dose (39.10 ± 40.02) ticagrelor were dramatically lower than those in the clopidogrel group (189.20 ± 65.22; P < 0.0001). The half-dose (84% ± 10%) and standard-dose (86% ± 13%) ticagrelor both showed greater IPA than clopidogrel (33% ± 20%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in PRU and IPA between the two ticagrelor groups (P = 0.3085 and 0.4028, respectively). HPR rates were significantly lower in the two ticagrelor groups (0% for both) than those in the clopidogrel group (35%). In conclusion, half-dose ticagrelor had a similar inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation as standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS, which was significantly stronger than that of clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Comorbidity; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular risk is still underestimated in women, experiencing higher mortality and worse prognosis after acute cardiovascular events. Gender differences have been reported in thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), thus suggesting a potential variability in platelet reactivity according to sex. The aim of the present study was to assess the role of gender on platelet function and the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) during DAPT in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary revascularization.. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists).. We included 541 patients on DAPT, 122 (22.6 %) of whom were females. Females were older (p < 0.001), displayed more frequently hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.003), renal failure (p = 0.04), acute presentation (p < 0.001), higher cholesterol levels and platelets count (p < 0.001). Inverse association was demonstrated with smoking (p < 0.001), previous PCI (p = 0.04) and statin use (p = 0.03), creatinine and haemoglobin (p < 0.001). Female gender did not influence mean platelet reactivity or the prevalence of HRPR for ASA (1.7 % vs 1.4 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.14[0.17-4.36], p = 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.54[0.20-11.6], p = 0.68) or ADP-antagonists (26.3 % vs 22.8 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.52-1.34], p = 0.45, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05[0.59-1.86], p = 0.87). Results did not change when considering separately the 309 patients treated with clopidogrel (34 % vs 31.3 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.13[0.62-2.07], p = 0.76, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.35[0.63-2.9], p = 0.44 for females vs males), or patients (n = 232) on ticagrelor (20.4 % vs 11.1 %, OR[95%CI] = 2.27[0.99-5.17], p = 0.06 for females vs males), confirmed after correction for baseline differences (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.28-2.29], p = 0.68).. In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, gender does not impact on the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) with the major antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Risk Factors; Sex Characteristics; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Guidelines recommend prasugrel or ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).. We sought to describe the trends in uptake of the newer agents and analyse the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients treated with clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor.. We analysed the temporal trends of antiplatelet use since the availability of prasugrel (2009-2013) in patients with ACS from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. To assess clinical characteristics and outcomes, we included 1850 patients from 2012 to 2013, corresponding to the time all three agents were available. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The safety end-point was in-hospital bleeding.. For the period of 2009-2013, the majority of patients were treated with clopidogrel (72%) compared with prasugrel (14%) or ticagrelor (14%). There was a clear trend towards ticagrelor by the end of 2013. Patients treated with clopidogrel were more likely to present with non-ST-elevation ACS, be older, and have more comorbidities. There was no difference in unadjusted 30-day mortality (0.9 vs 0.5 vs 1.0%, P = 0.76), myocardial infarction (2 vs 1 vs 2%, P = 0.52) or MACE (3 vs 3 vs 4%, P = 0.57) between the three agents. There was no difference in in-hospital bleeding (3 vs 2 vs 2%, P = 0.64).. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are increasingly used in ACS patients treated with PCI, predominantly in a younger cohort with less comorbidity. Although antiplatelet therapy should still be individualised based on the thrombotic and bleeding risk, our study highlights the safety of the new P2Y12 inhibitors in contemporary Australian practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Australia; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the impact of novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors including prasugrel or ticagrelor on platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and provide clinical data for novel oral P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors use among Chinese patients.. Between October 2011 to February 2014, 174 consecutive patients (135 males; (67.8±11.8) years old) with ACS undergoing PCI in Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau were prospectively enrolled in this study. Oral aspirin and one P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor were administered for 5 days or above after PCI, patients were divided into clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor groups in accordance with the agent administered. Platelet reactivity of the patients was detected by VerifyNow P2Y(12) reaction unit (PRU); and the high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and non-HPR were defined as PRU≥208 and PRU<208 respectively. Patients with HPR during clopidogrel therapy were switched either to prasugrel or ticagrelor, or continued the same treatment; and then the platelet reactivity was monitored again.. There were 113 clopidogrel cases (64.9%), 20 prasugrel cases (11.5%) and 41 ticagrelor cases (23.6%). Fifty-seven cases (32.8%) were defined as HPR post P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor use, in which 55 cases (55/113, 48.7%) were treated with clopidogrel. The degree of inhibition of platelet reactivity was significantly different in patients on clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor therapy, percent inhibition assayed by the VerifyNow P2Y(12) system was 28.2%±23.5%, 61.4%±26.7% and 81.3%±19.8% respectively (P<0.05). Different degree of platelet reactivity was achieved by the 3 P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors at multiple time points. The among-group differences in platelet reactivity became apparent at the early treatment stage (P<0.05). Platelet aggregation decreased significantly in patients switched from clopidogrel to prasugrel or ticagrelor (P<0.05).. Novel oral P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors are more effective in inhibiting platelet reactivity in ACS patients, and our results show that novel oral P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors provide a new option for ACS patients with HPR post clopidogrel or high-risk features of ischemic complications, including stent thrombosis and post-PCI ischemic events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Contrasting data have been reported so far on the role of reticulated platelets in suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapies. In particular, still unexplored is whether they may contribute to explain the higher risk of thrombotic complications observed in diabetic patients. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on the levels of reticulated platelets and its relationship with high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients treated with ASA (100-160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) or ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction, IPF) were assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. We included 386 patients, 158 (40.9 %) diabetics. The percentage of IPF was similar in diabetic and non diabetic patients, both at baseline (3.5 ± 2.5 vs 3.6 ± 2.7 %, p = 0.91) and at 30-90 days re-assessment (3.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.5 ± 2.5 %, p = 0.30), with diabetes not emerging as an independent predictor of IPF above III tertile (adjusted OR [95 %CI] = 0.58 [0.30-1.09], p = 0.10). Diabetic patients displayed an enhanced platelet reactivity and a higher rate of HRPR with ADP antagonists (32.8 vs 22.5 %, p = 0.009). However, no association was found between the percentage of IPF and platelet function (r = -0.004; p = 0.95 for ASPI test, r = -0.04; p = 0.59 for ADP-mediated aggregation), or the rate of HRPR for ADP antagonsist across IPF tertiles. Results were similar for diabetics both receiving clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Diabetic patients display a higher platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to ADP-antagonists. However, the rate of reticulated platelets is neither influenced by diabetic status nor associated with an increased platelet reactivity among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for a recent acute coronary syndrome or PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Essentials The comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agents in 'real life' is not clear. We recruited acute coronary syndrome patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention. At 1-year follow-up, prasugrel offers better anti-ischemic protection than clopidogrel. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are accompanied by more frequent bleeding events.. Background The comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet treatment outside randomized trials is not clear. Objectives To investigate long-term efficacy and safety in 'real-life' acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary use of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study, 2047 patients were recruited into the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) Registry and were followed-up for 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization and stroke) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] classification). Results Exposure to clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor by PCI occurred in 959, 363 and 717 patients, respectively. After adjustment, the rate of MACE (primary outcome endpoint) was lower in prasugrel-treated patients (4.4%) than in clopidogrel-treated patients (10.1%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.91), although not significantly different between ticagrelor (6.8%) and clopidogrel groups (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.12). Any type of BARC-classified bleeding (secondary outcome endpoint) was more frequent in prasugrel-treated patients (51.2%) than in clopidogrel-treated patients (37.6%) (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.33-1.95) and more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients (56.9%) than in clopidogrel-treated patients (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.55-2.10). An adjusted comparison between prasugrel and ticagrelor-treated groups did not reveal differences in any outcome measure. After adjustment, the death rate was more reduced by novel agents in comparison with clopidogrel (2.9% vs. 6.2%). Conclusions In ACS/PCI patients, prasugrel offered better anti-ischemic protection than clopidogrel, whereas use of both novel agents is accompanied by more frequent bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Greece; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of the research is to give the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor in combination with acetylsalicylic acid as preoperative treatment of primary stenting in patients with ACS. We have investigated 42 patients with ACS, 3 of which were diagnosed with cardiogenic shock, age from 38 to 82 years (63 ± 6.5 years). The ACS diagnosis was verified using the results of the ECG, a troponin test and x-ray contrast coronary angiography. The purpose of preoperative antiplatelet treatment prior to primary PCI ticagrelor was administered in the dose of 180 mg and aspirin at a dose of 200 mg. Emergency coronary angiography and primary PCI was performed 15-90 minutes from the time of diagnosis. TIMI III flow in the infarct-related coronary arteries was achieved in all patients. None of the patients the phenomenon of "No-Reflow" has not developed. The appointment of the antiplatelet drug ticagrelor before primary PCI contributes to the achievement of full blood flow restoration in the infarct-related coronary artery, and also reduces the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Restenosis; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

In randomized clinical trials, ticagrelor has been substituted in roughly one-third of the patients during follow-up. To date, there are no studies addressing safety and modalities of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel. The aim of our study is to describe the occurrence, causes, and outcome of the switch from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in a real-life scenario. From June 2013 to March 2015, 586 patients were treated with ticagrelor in our centre. Overall, 101 (17%) patients were switched to clopidogrel through a standardized protocol, and they were followed-up for 12 months. Ischemic and bleeding events were prospectively recorded. The switch from ticagrelor to clopidogrel occurred mostly after discharge (69 ± 40 days), and the most frequent cause was the need of oral anticoagulation treatment, followed by bleeding events. Patients requiring ticagrelor discontinuation were older, more frequently female, with lower body mass index and creatinine clearance if compared to the "non-switched" group. In the 10 days after the switch, we did not observe ischemic adverse events. No definite/probable stent thrombosis was recorded. Before the switch, there was a significant higher occurrence of BARC bleedings in the "switched" group, particularly BARC 1 and 2. Our data confirm that the switch from ticagrelor to clopidogrel is common, and it occurs for several reasons. Our analysis did not demonstrate a significant increase in adverse cardiovascular events in the days following the switch from ticagrelor to clopidogrel, although larger studies are needed to validate our findings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiography; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Drug Substitution; Female; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Atrioventricular Block; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

High-residual-on-treatment platelet reactivity still represents a challenging issue, potentially vanishing the benefits of dual antiplatelet treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. However, very few is known on the determinants of suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents. Recent interests have emerged on the potential prothrombotic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the impact of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI.. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30- to 90-days postdischarge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists).. We included 362 patients on DAPT, 125 (34.5%) receiving clopidogrel, and 237 (65.5%) on ticagrelor. Patients were divided according to PTH quartiles values (<45.8; 45.8-60.3; 60.4-88; ≥88.1 pg/mL). Higher PTH was associated with older age (P = 0.001); renal failure (P < 0.001), higher HDL cholesterol (P = 0.006) and creatinine (P < 0.001) and lower 25-OH cholecalciferol (P < 0.001). Suboptimal response to ASA was infrequent (2.8%), and not influenced by the levels of PTH (P = 0.57). ADP-mediated platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with higher PTH (P = 0.03), with an absolute increase in the prevalence of HRPR to ADP antagonists for higher PTH (24.7% vs. 40%, P = 0.007 for 4th vs. 1-3rd quartiles, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.04[1.14-3.64], P = 0.02). By the use of the ROC curve, we identified PTH levels above 96.7 pg/mL as the best predictor of HRPR with ADP antagonists (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.52[1.31-4.87], P = 0.006). Higher rate of HRPR was confirmed for PTH >96.7 pg/mL among the subgroup of patients on clopidogrel (51.5 vs. 85.7%, P = 0.001; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 12.5[2.6-60.9], P = 0.002), but not among ticagrelor-treated patients (11.3 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.31; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.55[0.56-4.6], P = 0.42).. In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease, higher PTH levels are associated with an increased ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to clopidogrel, especially for values above 96.7 pg/mL, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Databases, Factual; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Homeodomain Proteins; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Transcription Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

New antithrombotic therapies have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), where the introduction of ticagrelor has provided the greatest mortality benefits. However, ticagrelor treatment has been associated with a potential increase in the serum uric acid (SUA) levels, which may influence endothelial dysfunction and prothrombotic status, thereby affecting the risk of acute cardiovascular events in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The present study aimed to compare the impact of antiplatelet agents such as ticagrelor or clopidogrel on SUA levels and their effect on platelet reactivity.. We included patients admitted for ACS or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and discharged with ASA (acetylsalicylic acid; 100-160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) or ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day). Chemistry was assessed at admission (baseline) and after a 30-90-day period of DAPT (together with platelet reactivity). The absolute and percentage variations of SUA after DAPT introduction were considered. Multiple-electrode aggregometry was used to assess platelet function. A total of 378 patients were enrolled, with 145 treated with aspirin and clopidogrel (AC) and 233 with aspirin and ticagrelor (AT). The AC patients were older (p = 0.003) and more often showed elective PCI as an indication to DAPT (<0.001); they received chronic therapy with ARB (angiotensin II receptor blocker; p = 0.001), nitrates (p = 0.044), CCB (calcium channel blocker; p = 0.005) and diuretics (p = 0.044). The AT patients displayed a higher percentage of ACS diagnosis (p < 0.001) and received chronic therapy with ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors (p = 0.001), beta blockers (p = 0.001) and statins (p = 0.013). The AC patients displayed higher platelet reactivity at COL (collagen) test, ASPI test and ADP (adenosine diphosphate) test (p = 0.03, 0.001 and <0.001, respectively) and a higher percentage of HRPR (high residual platelet reactivity) in the ADP test (p = 0.001). No difference was found in the baseline uric acid and creatinine levels between AC and AT patients. At 30-90 days, a significant absolute and percentage increase in the SUA levels was found in AT as compared to AC patients (0.204 mg/dl vs. -0.165 mg/dl, p = 0.034; 6.26% vs. -0.005%, p = 0.018, respectively). Results were not influenced by variations in renal function. At multivariate analysis, in fact, ticagrelor therapy emerged as an independent predictor of increase in the uric acid levels (odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.79 (1.66-4.67), p < 0.001). However, the variation in the SUA levels did not affect platelet reactivity or HRPR in both AC and AT patients.. An increase in the SUA levels at 30-90 days was observed in patients receiving chronic DAPT with ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel treatment. However, the changes in the SUA levels do not influence platelet aggregation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation; Uric Acid

This study aimed to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacogenetic-guided (PG-guided) and platelet reactivity testing-guided antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. A decision-analytic model was simulated including four antiplatelet strategies: universal clopidogrel 75 mg daily, universal alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor), PG-guided therapy, and platelet reactivity testing-guided therapy.. PG-guided therapy was the preferred option with lowest cost (US$75,208) and highest quality-adjusted life years gained (7.6249 quality-adjusted life years). The base-case results were robust in sensitivity analysis.. PG-guided antiplatelet therapy showed the highest probability to be preferred antiplatelet strategy for acute coronary syndrome patients with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Glucose; Blood Platelets; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical to prevent thrombotic events. In patients under chronic P2Y12 blockers, the use of additional loading dose (LD) before an elective PCI is debated. We aimed to investigate the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients undergoing elective PCI during chronic clopidogrel or ticagrelor therapy.. We performed a sub-group analysis of a randomized trial comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI. Multi-vessel disease patients requiring a staged PCI one month after the ACS were included. The VASP (vasodilatatory phosphoprotein) index, which is a specific and reproducible platelet assay to measure P2Y12-ADP receptor activity, was used to assess the biological efficacy of the maintenance dose (MD) of ticagrelor and clopidogrel before PCI. Forty-one patients in each group of randomization required a staged PCI. They were similar regarding the baseline demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics. The mean VASP index in the ticagrelor group was 20.7±8.8% compared to 51.8±17% in the clopidogrel group (p<0.001) before PCI. No patients had a VASP index ≥50% in the ticagrelor group compared to 56% in the clopidogrel group (p<0.001). Following PCI the rate of peri-procedural MI was higher in the clopidogrel group (p=0.02).. Unlike clopidogrel MD, ticagrelor MD achieves an optimal PR inhibition in all patients during a staged PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Platelet Activation; Platelet Function Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Early stent thrombosis (EST) (≤ 30 days after stent implantation) is a relatively rare but deleterious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Administration of newer P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) combined with aspirin has been shown to reduce the incidence of sub-acute and late stent thrombosis, compared with clopidogrel. We investigated the "real life" incidence of EST in patients from a large acute coronary syndrome (ACS) national registry, where newer P2Y12 inhibitors are widely used. Patients were derived from the ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS), conducted during 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2013. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30days were defined as all-cause death, recurrent ACS, EST and stroke.Of the 4717 ACS patients who underwent PCI and stenting, 83% received clopidogrel and 17% newer P2Y12 inhibitors. The rate of EST was similar in both groups (1.7% in the newer P2Y12 inhibitor group vs. 1.4% in the clopidogrel-treated patients, p = 0.42). Results were consistent after multivariate analysis (adjusted HR = 1.06 [p = 0.89]). MACE occurred in 6.4% in the newer P2Y12 inhibitor group compared with 9.2% in the clopidogrel group (P<0.01). However, multivariate logistic regression modeling showed that treatment with newer P2Y12 inhibitors was not significantly associated with the secondary endpoint of MACE when compared with clopidogrel therapy [OR = 1.26 95%CI (0.93-1.73), P = 0.136]. The incidence of "real life" EST at 1month is relatively low, and appears to be similar in patients who receive newer P2Y12 inhibitors as well as in those who receive clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Early Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Registries; Stents; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The goal of this study was to explore the polymorphisms of CYP2C19 (CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on clopidogrel therapy in Zhengzhou city for guidance on clinical medication and reduction in the incidence of thromboembolic events. Two hundred and thirty-four ACS patients undergoing PCI were included in the study, including 171 males (average age = 64.13 ± 12 years) and 63 females (average age = 67.86 ± 10.20 years). Pyrosequencing analysis detected CYP2C19*2/*3 genotypes, which were divided into wild-type homozygous C/C, mutant heterozygous C/T, and mutant homozygous T/T. This study further explored the relationship between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clopidogrel resistance in ACS patients. Gene frequencies of C/C, C/T, and T/T for CYP2C19*2 were 39.74, 50, and 10.26%, respectively, while the frequencies of C/C, C/T, and T/T for CYP2C19*3 were 94.02, 5.55, and 0.43%, respectively. According to platelet aggregation analysis, 203 cases normally responded to clopidogrel (86.8%) and 31 cases were clopidogrel resistant (13.2%). There was a correlation between gender and genotype distribution but none between age and genotype. In addition, patients with clopidogrel resistance were treated with ticagrelor antiplatelet therapy instead of clopidogrel, and only 1 case in all patients suffered thrombotic events during a 3-12 month follow-up. In conclusion, CYP2C19*2/*3 polymorphisms may be associated with clopidogrel resistance. Wild-type homozygote and single mutant heterozygote of CYP2C19*2/*3 can be given a normal dose of clopidogrel, while carriers with single mutant homozygote or double mutant heterozygote require ticagrelor antiplatelet therapy as an alternative.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Alleles; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Resistance; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Platelet adhesion and aggregation are key functions leading to thrombus formation. The effect of aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor on platelet aggregation has been well established, however, there is limited data on the effect of these drugs on platelet adhesion. We therefore evaluated the effect of these drugs on platelet adhesion in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Citrated blood was collected from 50 ACS patients loaded with 325 mg of aspirin (baseline) and at 5 days after the administration of aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, 75 mg/day) (n = 26) or ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg × 2/day) (n = 24). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to clopidogrel was estimated by vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay. Platelet adhesion to collagen was studied for 6 min under high shear stress and was evaluated using the time to platelet recruitment (TPR), the perimeter and average area of each adherent object, number of adherent objects, and the total percent of surface coverage (SC%). Six ACS patients exhibited HTPR to clopidogrel and excluded from the platelet adhesion assays. TPR and SC% values were similar among patient groups at baseline and controls. However, all other adhesion parameters were different in ACS patients, indicating the formation of more aggregates in regard to controls. At 5 days post-treatment with either clopidogrel or ticagrelor, the TPR values were increased and the SC% values were reduced to a similar extent compared with baseline. However, significant differences were observed in the ticagrelor group in the perimeter, number of adherent objects, and the average area of each adherent object indicating a more potent inhibition of adherence-induced platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. In conclusion, aspirin does not affect platelet adherence to collagen, whereas clopidogrel and ticagrelor inhibit to a similar extent dynamic platelet adhesion at 5 days post-treatment in ACS patients. However, ticagrelor exhibits a greater inhibitory effect on reducing adhesion-induced platelet aggregation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Blood Platelets; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Adhesiveness; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome has not previously been evaluated in an Eastern Asian population, which is recognized to have a different response to P2Y12 antagonists compared with the Caucasian population in real-life situations.. A multicenter retrospective pilot study was performed to evaluate 928 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome, receiving aspirin and one P2Y12 antagonist (324 ticagrelor or 604 clopidogrel). Using propensity score matching, 448 patients were selected and divided into two equal groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study patient survival and event-free status using the log-rank test. Independent covariates were identified using univariate in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.. In the overall cohort, significant differences were observed for certain variables between the two groups. During the mean 164.3 (±116.4)-day follow-up in the overall cohort, ticagrelor treatment had no significant effect on the primary efficacy endpoint (myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death); however, in the matched cohort, ticagrelor showed a lower incidence of primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.30-1.04; p = 0.07) and stroke (hazard ratio: 0.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.02-1.24; p = 0.08) with marginal statistical significance, and a similar bleeding rate. The protective effect of ticagrelor treatment was consistent for all subgroups. More patients treated with ticagrelor experienced dyspnea (21.0% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.007), and P2Y12 antagonist treatment was consequently discontinued.. Ticagrelor treatment could provide a marginally favorable effect at the expense of an increased risk of dyspnea in real-life situations. This pilot study provides a scientific basis to call for a larger, suitably powered Phase 4 prospective or observational study in this ethnic population.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor may exert pleiotropic actions, beyond platelet inhibition, which are possibly adenosine-mediated. It has been suggested that in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) ticagrelor may influence endothelial function.. We aimed to assess the possibility of endothelial function deterioration following ticagrelor treatment cessation.. This was a prospective, observational study, in stable CAD patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome manifested 1 year earlier, under ticagrelor maintenance dose (90 mg bid) and due to discontinue ticagrelor. Endothelial function was assessed by Peripheral Arterial Tonometry (EndoPat 2000 system, Itamar Medical, Caesarea, Israel) immediately after receiving the last tablet of ticagrelor (Day 0) and at Day 2 and Day 5 post-ticagrelor cessation. Reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) was calculated by automated software and endothelial dysfunction (ED) was defined as a RHI <1.67.. We identified 30 eligible patients with endothelial function assessment pre- and post-ticagrelor cessation (86.7% men, 13.3% with diabetes and 33.3% current smokers; mean age: 63.6±11.5 years). The study's primary endpoint of RHI at Day 5 did not differ significantly compared with RHI at Day 0, 1.69 (1.45-2.23) vs 1.81 (1.59-2.13). ED rate did not differ significantly between Day 5 and Day 0, 40 vs 33.3%, p=0.8, respectively. No differences in RHI or ED rate were observed between Day 2 and Day 0, 1.64 (1.54-2.04) vs 1.8 1(1.59-2.13), p=0.3 and 53.3 vs 33.3%, p=0.2, respectively. In stable CAD patients there is no evidence of deterioration in endothelial function after discontinuing ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Drug Administration Schedule; Endothelium, Vascular; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Hyperemia; Male; Manometry; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation

Ticagrelor reduces ischaemic events and mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs. clopidogrel. We wished to study clinical outcomes in a large real-world population post-ACS.. We performed a prospective cohort study in 45 073 ACS patients enrolled into Swedish Web system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies who were discharged on ticagrelor (N = 11 954) or clopidogrel (N = 33 119) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, re-admission with myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, secondary outcomes as the individual components of the primary outcome, and re-admission with bleeding. The risk of the primary outcome with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel was 11.7 vs. 22.3% (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.85 [95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.93]), risk of death 5.8 vs. 12.9% (adjusted HR 0.83 [0.75-0.92]), and risk of MI 6.1 vs. 10.8% (adjusted HR 0.89 [0.78-1.01]) at 24 months. Re-admission with bleeding with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel occurred in 5.5 vs. 5.2% (adjusted HR 1.20 [1.04-1.40]). In a subset of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel the PCI-related in-hospital bleeding was 3.7 vs. 2.7% (adjusted odds ratio, OR, 1.57 [1.30-1.90]).. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel post-ACS was associated with a lower risk of death, MI, or stroke, as well as death alone. Risk of bleeding was higher with ticagrelor. These real-world outcomes are consistent with randomized trial results.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The platelet inhibitor ticagrelor is strongly recommended during 12 months post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in European guidelines. We analysed clinical characteristics of patients given ticagrelor for ACS in the real world.. We studied the use of ticagrelor in patients admitted for ACS in Sweden between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 who were enrolled in the Swedish Web system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART). Clinical characteristics were investigated for patients prescribed ticagrelor at discharge as well as for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who were prescribed ticagrelor. Independent factors associated with selecting ticagrelor were analysed in logistic regression. We found that 44.0% (n = 12 601) out of a total of 28 639 patients had been prescribed ticagrelor at discharge. After adjusting for age and sex, prior cardiovascular disease was less common in patients discharged on ticagrelor (myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and peripheral vascular disease; P for all <0.001). The risk of death as predicted by GRACE score and the risk of major bleeding as predicted by CRUSADE score were both lower in ticagrelor-treated patients vs. others (median 99 vs. 126 and median 23 vs. 25, respectively; P for both < 0.001). The intended treatment duration at discharge was 12 months in 82.5% of patients and <12 months in 9.3%.. Ticagrelor is preferentially being used in patients at lower risk. A minority of patients are recommended ticagrelor during <12 months.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Thrombosis; Databases, Factual; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Assessment; Sweden; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the effect of switching P2Y12 inhibitors between the loading dose and therapy after discharge is not well described.. This post-hoc analysis of a prospectively collected registry included 3219 consecutive ACS patients who underwent PCI. Patients were categorized into four groups: clopidogrel at load and discharge (C-C), loading dose of clopidogrel and discharged on prasugrel/ticagrelor (C-PT), loading dose of prasugrel/ticagrelor and discharged on clopidogrel (PT-C), and prasugrel/ticagrelor at load and discharge (PT-PT).. While 77.6% of patients received the C-C treatment regimen and 13.6% received the PT-PT strategy, the strategy of P2Y12 switching was fairly common with 6.2% in the PT-C group and 2.6% in the C-PT group. While C-C was the most common treatment regimen, PT-C and PT-PT were more commonly used in STEMI patients than in NSTEMI or unstable angina patients. A significantly lower unadjusted incidence of the composite outcome (death, MI, and repeat revascularization) was appreciated in both the PT-C (1.0%) and PT-PT (2.3%) groups than the C-C group (4.0%). Propensity-score matched analysis still showed significantly reduced risk (HR=0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.93, p=0.04) in the PT-C group vs. a matched group of C-C controls.. The strategy of utilizing a newer P2Y12 inhibitor and then switching to clopidogrel in ACS patients following PCI is used with some frequency in routine clinical practice and further studies should evaluate the safety and efficacy of such a strategy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aftercare; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In the management of Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the comparative cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor and prasugrel, referenced to generic clopidogrel, is unknown.. To assess the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor and prasugrel as compared with generic clopidogrel in patients with ACS in Singapore.. A Markov model simulating a typical cohort of 62-year-old patients with ACS was constructed from a patient's perspective over a lifetime horizon. Treatment effects and adverse events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, major bleeding related to non-coronary artery bypass grafting, dyspnea, or death, were estimated from pivotal trials comparing clopidogrel with ticagrelor and prasugrel, respectively. Costs were estimated from a tertiary hospital with more than 1500 admissions for ACS per year.. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per life-year gained for ticagrelor was about three times more favorable than for prasugrel (Singapore dollar [SGD] 13,276 vs. SGD 38,809). The ICER per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for prasugrel and ticagrelor, however, was comparable at SGD 18,921 and SGD 18,647, respectively. Deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed that the ICER per QALY gained for prasugrel and ticagrelor was most sensitive to the hazard ratio of all-cause mortality and utility for dyspnea, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that compared with clopidogrel, the probabilities of prasugrel and ticagrelor being cost-effective are 87.1% and 88.3% based on the willingness-to-pay value of SGD 65,000 (one time the gross domestic product per capita in Singapore).. Ticagrelor is more cost-effective than prasugrel in reducing all-cause mortality in patients with ACS. The cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor and prasugrel become similar, however, when accounting for the impact of dyspnea on QALY.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Singapore; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Uncertainty

Aspirin in combination with platelet P2Y12 receptor blocker has become the mainstay antiplatelet treatment strategy for the prevention of stent thrombosis. Ticlopidine was the first widely used P2Y12 receptor blockers, but clopidogrel has mostly replaced the use of ticlopidine due to its more favorable adverse event profile on bone marrow. However, when clopidogrel induced bone marrow toxicity occurs, little is known about the efficacy and safety of alternative treatments, and thus, in these cases, medical decisions may be very difficult. We report a case of clopidogrel-induced severe neutropenia in a patient treated with coronary stent and safety of alternative treatment with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Humans; Male; Neutropenia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are potent P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists which are superior to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes. To date no clinical trial directly compared these two drugs. Platelet reactivity correlates with ischemic and bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Recent pharmacological studies have observed a delayed onset of action of these two drugs in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We provide the first adequately powered pharmacological study comparing PR following ticagrelor and prasugrel loading dose (LD) in STEMI patients when the maximal biological effect is reached. In the present study, ticagrelor was associated with a lower rate of high on-treatment PR compared to prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Comatose survivors after cardiac arrest are treated with mild induced hypothermia and potent platelet- inhibiting drugs after coronary stenting. Previous studies have shown an increased incidence of stent thrombosis during clopidogrel and aspirin treatment in conjunction with induced hypothermia. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro effect of induced hypo- and hyperthermia on blood from patients undergoing ticagrelor- and aspirin-mediated platelet inhibition.. Whole blood from 15 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were treated with ticagrelor and aspirin and from eight healthy volunteers was incubated for 1 hour at 28, 33, 37, and 39°C.. In blood from patients with acute coronary syndrome, the activated clotting time (Sonoclot) was prolonged in mild hypothermic (33°C) compared to normothermic (37°C) samples. Sonoclot, clotting rate and platelet function were decreased in hypothermic compared to normothermic samples. Platelet-induced activation and aggregation (Multiplate) was unchanged in mild hypothermic compared to normothermic samples. In contrast, mild hypothermia supported increased platelet activation as measured with flow cytometry with up-regulation of PAC-1 and P-selectin on the platelet surface.. In acute coronary syndrome patients treated with ticagrelor and aspirin, in vitro hypothermia to 33°C markedly increased platelet activity measured with flow cytometry, whereas viscoelastic coagulation test (Sonoclot) revealed a hypocoagulative response. Prospective clinical trials studying platelet inhibition at different temperatures and correlating changes in platelet function to bleeding or stent occlusion are needed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Case-Control Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Hemostasis; Homeostasis; Humans; Hypothermia, Induced; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Treatment with warfarin in combination with clopidogrel has been shown to reduce the incidence of major bleeding as compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TT; warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin). However, there are uncertainties regarding the risk for thrombosis since poor-responsiveness to clopidogrel is common. Ticagrelor is a more potent platelet inhibitor, but data supporting concurrent use of ticagrelor and warfarin (dual antithrombotic therapy, DT) is limited. This study therefore sought to evaluate the risk of bleeding and thrombosis associated with DT after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. We identified all ACS patients on DT upon discharge from Helsingborg Hospital and Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and Lund, Sweden, during 2013. Patients on DT were compared with historical controls discharged with TT. Major bleeding was defined in accordance with the HAS-BLED derivation study. Patients were retrospectively followed for three months.. In total, 107 DT patients were identified and compared with 159 controls on TT. Mean HAS-BLED bleeding risk score and duration of treatment were similar between the groups (HAS-BLED 2.2+/-0.8 vs 2.2+/-1.0 units, p=NS; duration 2.7+/-0.8 vs 2.5+/-0.9months, p=NS; DT vs TT). The incidence of spontaneous major bleeding was similar between the groups, as was a composite of all thrombotic events, i.e. peripheral embolism, stroke/TIA and acute coronary syndrome (bleeding 8/106 (7.5%) vs 11/157 (7.0%), p=NS; thrombosis 5/106 (4.7%) vs 5/157 (3.2%), p=NS; DT vs TT).. Rates of thrombotic and bleeding events were similar in patients with TT and patients with ticagrelor and warfarin.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ticagrelor in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina or myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation), including patients treated medically and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting.. A short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model were used to simulate the evolution of patients' life-cycles. Clinical effectiveness data were collected from the PLATO trial and resource use data were obtained from the Hospital de Santa Marta database, disease-related group legislation and the literature.. Ticagrelor provides increases of 0.1276 life years and 0.1106 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient. From a societal perspective these clinical gains entail an increase in expenditure of €610. Thus the incremental cost per life year saved is €4780 and the incremental cost per QALY is €5517.. The simulation results show that ticagrelor reduces events compared to clopidogrel. The costs of ticagrelor are partially offset by lower costs arising from events prevented. The use of ticagrelor in clinical practice is therefore cost-effective compared to generic clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Secondary Prevention; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Antidotes; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Male; Platelet Count; Platelet Transfusion; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Atrioventricular Block; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Electrocardiography; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Antiplatelet responses to clopidogrel and prasugrel are highly variable and subject to significant rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The proportion of circulating young reticulated platelets (RPs) inversely correlates with responsiveness to both agents. We aimed to determine the relationship between RPs and on-treatment platelet reactivity in ticagrelor-treated patients. Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) treated with PCI and ticagrelor were tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and multiplate aggregometry. RPs levels were determined using flow cytometry with thiazole orange staining. Tests were performed at 2-4 and 30 days post-PCI. Fifty three patients were included (mean age 62.6 ± 9.8 years, 18.9 % women, 35.8 % diabetes), of which 41 patients (77 %) completed follow-up. Variability in response to ticagrelor was very low according to both assays with no identified cases of HTPR at either time-point. In addition, there were no differences in platelet reactivity, as analyzed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, or in the proportion of RPs between the two time points (p > 0.5). With the multiplate assay, platelet reactivity increased between the two time-points (8.6 ± 6.0 vs. 15.5 ± 11 AU*min; p = 0.0007). There was no significant correlation between RPs and platelet reactivity at both time-points and using both assays (p > 0.5). There were no cases of HTPR up to 30-days post-PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS treated with ticagrelor. In this cohort, no correlation between % RPs and platelet reactivity was observed. Attenuation of RP-induced platelet reactivity as a novel mechanism for ticagrelor's benefit requires further investigation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Statistics as Topic; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Aspirin is an important drug in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, its use is contraindicated in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency (risk for haemolytic anaemia). We report the management of 2 patients with class II G6PD deficiency and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS).. The two patients were safely and efficiently treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT, aspirin plus ticagrelor) and PCI using new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) despite G6PD deficiency.. NSTE-ACS management with DAPT and DES is probably safe and effective in class II G6PD-deficient patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Dyspnea; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

ADP-induced platelet activation via P2Y12 receptor plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and acute coronary syndrome. The value of dual antiplatelet therapy with the addition of the thienopyridine clopidogrel to aspirin has been widely established. Prasugrel, another thienopyridine, has demonstrated more potent platelet inhibition and efficacy than clopidogrel, although this drug requires metabolic activation and is associated with increased risk of bleedings.. In this article, we discuss the role of ticagrelor in the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes treatment. We describe the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of this drug and the extensive data obtained by preclinical and Phase II and III clinical studies.. Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor, in addition to aspirin, for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes at moderate to high-risk regardless of initial therapeutic strategy. Benefit of ticagrelor, as regard mortality, may be related to off-target effects of the drug, especially those involving the metabolism of adenosine. Ticagrelor represents a cost-effective alternative in the spectrum of P2Y12 inhibitors; however, further studies are required to enable the physician to choose the most appropriate antiplatelet agent for each patient.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Managing bleeding in patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitors is challenging. Few data are available regarding the efficacy of platelet transfusion in patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimal amount of platelet supplementation (in terms of ratio of non-inhibited platelets to inhibited platelets) necessary to restore platelet reactivity in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) of patients treated with aspirin and a prasugrel or ticagrelor loading dose for an acute coronary syndrome. PRP samples from patients were mixed ex vivo with increasing proportions of pooled PRP from healthy volunteers. Platelet reactivity was challenged with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid, collagen or thrombin receptor activating peptide using light transmission aggregometry. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient samples recovering an ADP-induced maximal aggregation (ADP-Aggmax) value above 40%. In patients treated with prasugrel (n = 32), ADP-Aggmax increased progressively with supplements of pooled PRP, with an average increase of 7.9% (95% CI [7.1; 8.8], p < 0.001) per each 20% increase in the ratio of non-inhibited platelets to inhibited platelets. A ratio of 60% was associated with 90% of patients reaching the primary endpoint. In patients treated with ticagrelor (n = 15), ADP-Aggmax did not significantly increase with any level of supplements. In conclusions, ex vivo addition of non-inhibited platelets significantly improved ADP-Aggmax in patients treated with prasugrel with a dose-dependent effect. There was no evidence of such a reversal in patients treated with ticagrelor. These results suggest that platelet transfusion may be more effective in blunting bleeding in patients treated with prasugrel, than those treated with ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The present study aimed to compare characteristics related to selection of a P2Y₁₂ antagonist, investigate initiation of therapy with new-generation drugs, and identify predictors of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with stent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Data from 589 patients in the LAPCOR (Laboratory AntiPlatelet efficacy and Clinical Outcome Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02264912) registry was analyzed. P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist efficacy was measured by VASP phosphorylation 24 ± 4 hours after a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg, N=407), prasugrel (60 mg, N=106), or ticagrelor (180 mg, N=76) and expressed by platelet reactivity index (PRI). HTPR was defined as PRI ≥50%. Patients treated with prasugrel were significantly younger and had significantly higher hemoglobin levels than those who received clopidogrel or ticagrelor, while chronic kidney disease was significantly more prevalent in the ticagrelor group. Almost all invasively managed patients given new-generation drugs received a loading dose after coronary angiography. Mean residual PRI and HTPR were significantly higher after clopidogrel (44.2 ± 23.1% and 42.2%, respectively) vs. prasugrel (17.7 ± 18.0% and 9.4%, respectively) or ticagrelor (18.8 ± 17.0% and 7.9%, respectively; all p<0.001). Among multiple variables tested, HTPR in patients treated with the new agents significantly related only to platelet count (p=0.014) and mean platelet volume (p=0.03).. Safety is the most important aspect under consideration in choosing new agents for an individual patient. Other than platelet count and mean platelet volume, factors known as predictors of higher platelet reactivity, did not influence the efficacy of new-generation P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Drug Design; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Count; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Registries; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis; Adenosine; Aged; Biopsy; Clopidogrel; Drug Eruptions; Female; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Electrocardiography; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Male; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Sick Sinus Syndrome; Sinoatrial Node; Ticagrelor

The influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on platelet reactivity (PR) in prasugrel or ticagrelor treated patients is not well studied.. In an observational study involving 777 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention treated by either prasugrel 10 mg od (n = 315) or ticagrelor 90 mg bid (n = 462), platelet function was assessed using the VerifyNow P2Y12 function assay (in PRU) at one month post intrvention.. In the overall population, ticagrelor and insulin-treated DM affected PR, with a decrease in log by 0.88 (corresponding to a 58 % decrease in PR) compared to prasugrel-treated patients (p < 0.001), and an increase in log by 0.26 (corresponding to a 30 % increase in PR) compared to non-diabetic patients (p = 0.01), respectively. PR in prasugrel-treated patients differed significantly by DM status: 70.0 (36.3-113.0) in non-diabetic vs 69.0 (44.5-115.3) in non insulin-treated diabetic vs 122.0 (69.0-161.0) in insulin-treated diabetic patients, p for trend = 0.01. No differences were observed in ticagrelor-treated patients. By multivariate analysis, in prasugrel-treated patients insulin-treated DM was the only factor predicting PR, with log of PR increased by 0.42 (corresponding to a 52 % increase in PR) compared to non-diabetic patients (p = 0.001). No factor was found to affect PR in ticagrelor-treated patients.. Patients with insulin-treated DM treated with prasugrel post PCI have higher PR, than patients without DM or non insulin-treated diabetic patients treated with this drug. Ticagrelor treated patients have overall lower PR than patients on prasugrel, independent of DM status or insulin treatment.. Clinical Trials Gov. NCT01774955.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is considered essential in clinical management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization or acute coronary syndromes. However, the optimal platelet inhibition is not always obtained, with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) increasing stent thrombosis and recurrent ischemic events. Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on platelet reactivity in patients on DAPT.. We included patients treated with acetylsalycilic acid (ASA) (100-160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) or ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) for acute coronary syndromes or drug-eluting stent implantation. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days postdischarge by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) antagonists was defined as ADP test results >417 AU*min. HRPR for ASA was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min.. Our population is represented by 498 patients, 308 (61.8%) were treated with clopidogrel and 190 (38.2%) with ticagrelor. Overall, higher BMI was related with younger age (P = 0.003), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.017), hypertension (P < 0.001), chronic therapy with angiotensin-receptor blockers (P = 0.019), calcium channel blockers (P = 0.003). Higher values of BMI directly related with hemoglobin (P = 0.02), triglycerides (P < 0.001), glycemia (P = 0.035), HbA1c (P < 0.001), and inversely related with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.01). BMI did not influence the effectiveness of ASA, whereas it was associated to a nonsignificant trend for higher platelet reactivity (r = 0.08, P = 0.08) for ADP antagonists. In fact, 111 patients (22.3%) displayed HRPR at ADP test (>417 AU*min) with no statistically significant difference according to BMI {20.3% vs. 27.1% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.28; adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.19 [0.86-1.64], P = 0.30}. However, results were different when considering separately patients receiving clopidogrel or ticagrelor. In the clopidogrel-treated subgroup, significantly higher ADP-mediated aggregation values were found in patients with higher BMI (r = 0.14, P = 0.023) that emerged as an independent predictor of HRPR with clopidogrel [OR (95% CI), 1.45 (1.01-2.12), P = 0.049]. On the contrary, no impact of BMI was observed in the ticagrelor-treated subgroup for platelet reactivity (r = -0.036, P = 0.62) or the prevalence of HRPR [adjusted OR (95% CI), 0.73 (0.39-1.36), P = 0.32].. This study shows that among patients treated with DAPT for coronary artery disease, higher BMI is related to increased platelet reactivity and a higher prevalence of HRPR in clopidogrel-treated patients while not significantly influencing the effectiveness of ticagrelor or ASA.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Body Mass Index; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with a two- to ninefold increased risk of recurrent ischemic events among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for coronary artery disease. However, its determinants are still poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of mean platelet volume (MPV) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI.. Patients treated with DAPT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30 - 90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test > 862 aggregation units (AU)*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥ 417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists).. Our population is represented by a total of 487 patients on DAPT, divided according to MPV tertiles (< 10.4 fl; 10.4 - 11.29 fl; ≥ 11.3 fl). Larger-sized platelets were associated with use of statins (p < 0.001) and beta-blockers (p = 0.03), higher hemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower platelets count (p < 0.001). Higher platelet reactivity was observed at ASPI test in patients with higher MPV (r = 0.12, p = 0.008), but not for ADP-mediated aggregation (r = -0.007, p = 0.88). However, a low prevalence of HRPR was observed with ASA, with no impact of MPV tertiles (1.2 vs 1.1 vs 1.6%, p = 0.70, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.51 - 1.77], p = 0.87). MPV did not influence the prevalence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (25.9 vs 1 vs 26.5%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.1 [0.84 - 1.45], p = 0.50) with similar results among the 259 patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.15 [0.82 - 1.62], p = 0.43) and the 228 patients on ticagrelor (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.46 [0.84 - 2.55], p = 0.18).. In patients receiving DAPT, MPV does not affect the response to major antiplatelet therapies. In fact, MPV elevation does not influence the risk of HRPR with clopidogrel, ticagrelor or ASA.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Mean Platelet Volume; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.. Hospital charge master data were used to identify ACS-PCI patients aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 1 in-hospital claim for prasugrel or ticagrelor between August 1, 2011-April 30, 2013. Treatment groups were propensity matched for baseline and index hospitalization characteristics. HCRU and costs were assessed through 90-days post-discharge. Costs were determined based on hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios and adjusted to 2013 US dollars.. Before matching, ticagrelor patients were older, more-often female, and had increased cardiovascular (CV) and bleeding risks compared with prasugrel patients. Propensity-matched length of index hospital stay (4.7 vs 4.9 days, p = 0.23) and risk for all-cause [30-day: relative risk (RR) = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.73-1.0; 90-day: RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.80-1.0, and CV-related (30-day: RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.59-1.0; 90-day: RR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.73-1.1) re-hospitalizations did not significantly differ between prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. Compared to ticagrelor, the propensity-matched risk of re-hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) (30-day: RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.21-0.75; 90-day: RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34-0.81) and an outpatient medical encounter for dyspnea (30-day: RR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33-0.74; 90-day: RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.80) were significantly lower for prasugrel patients, with no significant differences in bleeding encounters between groups (30-day: RR =  0.87; 95% CI = 0.54-1.40; 90-day: RR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.71-1.50). Matched total healthcare costs were not significantly different between groups during the index hospitalization ($36,011 vs $37,247, p = 0.21), 30-days post-discharge ($2007 vs $2522, p = 0.48), 90-days post-discharge ($4564 vs $5242, p = 0.49), and aggregate of the index hospitalization through 90-day follow-up ($40,576 vs $42,494, p = 0.09) timeframes.. Re-hospitalization for MI and outpatient encounters for dyspnea were lower in prasugrel treated than in ticagrelor treated ACS-PCI patients up to 90-days post-index hospitalization discharge, with no difference in bleeding encounters or healthcare costs between the two populations. This data supports the utility of prasugrel in routine clinical practice. These findings should be considered within limitations of observational research.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Dyspnea; Female; Health Services; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy is an established standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to reduce thrombotic risk. Reduced CYP2C19 activity impairs clopidogrel bio-activation and increases risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with poor and intermediate CYP2C19 metabolizers treated with clopidogrel incur higher cardiovascular event rates, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis, following ACS than patients with normal CYP2C19 function. Tests are available to identify the CYP2C19 genotype and can be used to support individualization of antiplatelet therapy. . To estimate the financial impact of CYP2C19 genotyping in a theoretical cohort of 1,000 patients with ACS, who received percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary stent implantation and were treated with clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor in a managed care setting. . Differences in overall and average cost per patient were estimated based on the rate of CYP2C19 genotyping in a theoretical cohort of 1,000 patients. Sensitivity analysis was carried out for varying costs, adherence, and the percentage of patients treated according to genotyping results. All clinical event costs were reported in terms of 2012 U.S. dollars. The budget impact analysis used published event rates from primary literature to estimate costs of events analysis for 3 different scenarios: Scenario A, no CYP2C19 genotyping; Scenario B, 50% of patients received CYP2C19 genotyping with appropriate treatment based on genotype; and Scenario C, 100% of patients received CYP2C19 genotyping with appropriate treatment based on genotype. . According to this model, there was no change in the market share for the 3 antiplatelet agents in Scenario A. Initial market share for clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor was 93%, 5%, and 2%, respectively; however, use of CYP2C19 genotyping is expected to shift market share from clopidogrel to either prasugrel or ticagrelor. In Scenario B, where 50% of the patients received genotyping, clopidogrel market share was reduced to 83%, while prasugrel increased to 12.1% and ticagrelor increased to 4.9%. In Scenario C, where all patients received genotyping, clopidogrel market share was reduced to 73%, prasugrel increased to 19.3%, and ticagrelor increased to 7.7%. Total estimated cost differences when all possible patients were genotyped included annual savings of roughly $444,852.. Important financial benefits may be realized through use of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy to reserve prasugrel or ticagrelor use for patients with reduced CYP2C19 activity to avoid costs associated with adverse cardiac events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genetic Testing; Genotype; Humans; Managed Care Programs; Models, Economic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The International Central Adjudication Committee (ICAC) is responsible for blinded independent assessment of complex clinical events in randomized trials. In this study, we analyze the constituence and impact of the ICAC in the PLATO trial. The PLATO ICAC was entirely governed by two academic institutions, Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) and Uppsala Clinical Research Center (UCRC). Both co-chairman, all coordinators and half of the adjudicators in the PLATO ICAC belonged to either DCRI or UCRC. Among the other adjudicators representing USA, Canada and Australia, majority had DCRI ties, including at least five former Duke cardiology fellows. Furthermore, both co-chairmen are listed as adjudicators, representing obvious conflict. In the PLATO trial, the sponsor representatives were involved in selecting the ICAC members. Finally, 21 out of the 50 adjudicators represented Sweden, the homeland of the PLATO sponsor and primary investigator. Heavy selection bias in the ICAC constituence, lack of independence and potential control of the ICAC by the study sponsor may influence PLATO outcomes, and should be avoided in the future.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Biomedical Research; Clopidogrel; Conflict of Interest; Humans; Peer Review; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selection Bias; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cardiac Catheterization; Humans; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

After the successful PLATO, failed both PHILO and ATLANTIC, PEGASUS trial assessed efficacy and safety of ticagrelor (120 mg/day and 180 mg/day) on top of aspirin versus aspirin alone beyond 1 year in patients with stable coronary disease. Similar to PLATO, PEGASUS revealed reduction of composite primary endpoint after ticagrelor at expense of extra bleeding. However, there were major fundamental differences between the trial outcomes. Hence, the shift of evidence with ticagrelor from PLATO to PEGASUS trials has been comprehended. In contrast to PLATO, in PEGASUS there were more premature permanent ticagrelor discontinuations (PPTD): RR=1.35; 95%CI 1.29-1.42, p<0.0001; significant excess of cancer deaths (RR=1.46; 95%CI 1.02-2.06,p=0.034), trend to more sepsis deaths (RR=1.29; 95%CI 0.76-2.20), and most importantly identical all-cause mortality (RR=1.00; 95%CI 0.86-1.16, p=0.99) versus placebo. Applied conservative TIMI bleeding classification in PEGASUS did not correspond with PPTD rate, with potential heavy underreporting of hemorrhagic events. Finally, unexplained late addition of 198 primary events in PEGASUS is concerning. PEGASUS failed to confirm ticagrelor mortality benefit reported in PLATO, but rather discover additional shortcomings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Neoplasms; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sepsis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Newer P2Y12 inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, have greater antiplatelet efficacy but may increase the risk of bleeding. In this study, we compared the pharmacodynamic efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. We selected 83 ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who were discharged with 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (n = 24), 10 mg prasugrel daily (n = 39) or 5 mg prasugrel daily (n = 20). After 2 to 4 weeks, on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) was assessed in terms of P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics). We compared East Asian (85 < PRU ≤ 275) and Caucasian (85 < PRU ≤ 208) criteria for assessing the therapeutic window of OPR.. OPR was lowest in the ticagrelor group, followed by the 10 mg prasugrel and 5 mg prasugrel groups (49.1 ± 29.9 vs. 83.7 ± 57.1 vs. 168.5 ± 60.8, respectively; p < 0.001). The 5 mg prasugrel group had the highest proportion of patients with OPR values within the therapeutic window, followed by the 10 mg prasugrel and ticagrelor groups (90.0% vs. 46.2% vs. 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.001 for East Asian criteria; 60.0% vs. 43.6% vs. 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.001 for Caucasian criteria).. Short-term administration of 5 mg prasugrel facilitated maintenance within the therapeutic window of OPR compared with the 10 mg prasugrel and ticagrelor groups. Thus, 5 mg prasugrel daily may be the optimal antiplatelet regimen for stabilized East Asian ACS patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Asian People; Blood Platelets; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; White People

Our objective was to compare 1-year real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU), associated charges, and antiplatelet treatment patterns among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel.. Using the ProMetis-Lx database, adult ACS-PCI patients treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel post-discharge were identified between 1 August 2011 and 31 May 2013 and propensity matched to adjust for baseline differences.. Before matching, ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 2991) were older with increased baseline ischemic and bleeding risks compared with prasugrel-treated patients (n = 12,797). After matching, ticagrelor patients had higher all-cause HRU (2.5 vs. 2.4 per patient per month; P = 0.012) and cardiovascular (CV) HRU (0.4 vs. 0.3 per patient per month; P = 0.026), with the difference in CV rehospitalizations (17.7 vs. 15.7 %; P = 0.011) primarily driven by congestive heart failure (CHF) (4.9 vs. 3.8 %; P = 0.02). All-cause charges within 1 year did not significantly differ between groups ($US5456 vs. 4844 per patient per month; P = 0.37), but dyspnea-related total charges were significantly higher with ticagrelor ($US139 vs. 95 per patient per month; P = 0.005). Although infrequent, switching was slightly higher with ticagrelor (8.3 vs. 6.0 %; P < 0.001) at 1 year, and mean persistence was slightly longer with prasugrel (150 vs. 159 days; P = 0.002), with no significant difference in mean adherence (61 vs. 63 %; P = 0.17).. Overall monthly HRU was slightly lower with prasugrel than with ticagrelor, with no significant difference in bleeding HRU. Prasugrel was associated with slightly higher pharmacy charges, but lower dyspnea charges, resulting in no significant difference in total charges. Patients receiving prasugrel tended to use it for longer than those receiving ticagrelor as less switching occurred. These findings may aid decision making, but must be tempered due to inherent study limitations.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Anticoagulants; Comorbidity; Female; Health Services; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor

We examined the cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19 genotype plus platelet reactivity-guided antiplatelet therapy (PG-PRT) from the perspective of US healthcare providers.. A decision-analytic model was used to simulate life-long medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of three antiplatelet strategies in a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old patients with acute coronary syndrome after a percutaneous coronary intervention: (a) universal clopidogrel (75 mg daily), (b) universal alternative antiplatelet therapy (prasugrel or ticagrelor), and (c) all PG-PRT patients were genotyped. Noncarriers of the CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) allele received clopidogrel 75 mg daily. CYP2C19 LOF allele(s) carriers who were poor metabolizers received prasugrel or ticagrelor. CYP2C19 LOF allele(s) carriers who were intermediate metabolizers (IM) received high-dose clopidogrel (225 mg daily) and were tested for high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). IM patients with HTPR were switched to prasugrel or ticagrelor. Model inputs were derived from the literature.. In base-case analysis, PG-PRT was the least costly (USD 71,887) strategy with highest QALYs gained (7.886 QALYs). Sensitivity analyses found universal clopidogrel to be the preferred strategy if the prevalence of the CYP2C19 LOF allele was less than 2.6% or the incidence of HTPR in IM patients was greater than 82.8%. In 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, PG-PRT was less costly than universal clopidogrel by USD 91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 83-99; P=0.0499], with higher QALYs by 0.0257 (95% CI: 0.0256-0.0258; P<0.001). Compared with universal alternative antiplatelet therapy, PG-PRT was less costly by USD 2208 (95% CI: 2195-2221; P<0.001) and gained 0.0085 QALYs (95% CI: 0.0083-0.0087; P=0.0260).. PG-PRT seems to be cost-saving and effective for guiding selection of antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Alleles; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Genotype; Health Care Costs; Heterozygote; Humans; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Long-Term Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Age Factors; Aged; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In the search of a potential backup for clopidogrel, we have initiated a HTS campaign designed to identify novel reversible P2Y12 antagonists. Starting from a hit with low micromolar binding activity, we report here the main steps of the optimization process leading to the identification of the preclinical candidate SAR216471. It is a potent, highly selective, and reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist and by far the most potent inhibitor of ADP-induced platelet aggregation among the P2Y12 antagonists described in the literature. SAR216471 displays potent in vivo antiplatelet and antithrombotic activities and has the potential to differentiate from other antiplatelet agents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Administration, Oral; Animals; Binding, Competitive; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Humans; Indoles; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Models, Chemical; Molecular Structure; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridazines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thrombosis

Platelet reactivity assays (PRAs) can predict patients' likely response to clopidogrel. As ticagrelor and prasugrel are typically considered first-line agents for acute coronary syndrome in Europe, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of universal compared to PRA-driven selection of these agents. A Markov model was used to calculate five-year costs (2013£/€), quality-adjusted life-years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for one-year of universal ticagrelor or prasugrel (given to all) compared to each agents' corresponding PRA-driven strategy (ticagrelor/prasugrel in those with high platelet reactivity [HPR, >208 on the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay], others given generic clopidogrel). We assumed patients had their index event at 65-70 years of age and had a 42.7% incidence of HPR 24-48 hours post-revascularisation. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and United Kingdom) and used a one-year cycle length. Event data for P2Y12 inhibitors were taken from multinational randomised trials and adjusted using country-specific epidemiologic data. Neither universal ticagrelor nor prasugrel were found to be cost-effective (all ICERs >40,250€ or £36,600/QALY) compared to their corresponding PRA-driven strategies in any of the countries evaluated. Results were sensitive to differences in P2Y12 Inhibitors costs and drug-specific relative risks of major adverse cardiac events. Monte Carlo simulation suggested universal ticagrelor or prasugrel were cost-effective in only 25-44% and 11-17% of 10,000 iterations compared to their respective PRA-driven strategies, when applying a willingness-to-pay threshold = €30,000 or £20,000/QALY. In conclusion, the universal use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors is not likely cost-effective compared to PRA-driven strategies.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Coagulation Tests; Blood Platelets; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Europe; Humans; Incidence; Markov Chains; Medication Adherence; Monte Carlo Method; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Revascularization; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Female; Humans; Male; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

P2Y12 inhibitor switching has appeared in clinical practice as a consequence of prasugrel and ticagrelor availability, apart from clopidogrel, for use in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. In the context of the GReek AntiPlatelet REgistry (GRAPE) we assessed the prevalence, predictive factors and short-term outcome of in-hospital P2Y12 inhibitor switching in 1794 ACS patients undergoing PCI.. Switching occurred in 636 (35.5%) patients of which in the form of clopidogrel to a novel agent, novel agent to clopidogrel and between prasugrel and ticagrelor in 574 (90.4%), 34 (5.3%) and 27 (4.3%) patients, respectively. Presentation to non PCI-capable hospital, bivalirudin use, age ≥75 years (inverse predictor), and regional trends emerged as predictive factors of switching to a novel agent. At combined in-hospital and one-month follow-up, propensity matched pairs analysis showed no differences in major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) or bleeding events between switching from clopidogrel to a novel agent vs novel agent constant administration. More Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 1, type 2 and any type events and fewer MACE were seen when switching from clopidogrel to a novel agent vs only clopidogrel administration (23.7%, 3.8%, 30.6%, 1.2% vs 8.9%, 1.2%, 12.0%, 3.8% with P < .001, P = .03, P < .001 and P = .03 respectively).. In a real-life experience with contemporary antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients undergoing PCI, in-hospital switching represents common clinical practice. Clinical factors and regional practice differences seem to affect this strategy's choice, while switching to a novel agent may be associated with higher risk of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The results of major indication seeking Phase 3 clinical trials are reported at international meetings, and simultaneously published In top medical journals. However, the data presented during such dual release do not disclose all the trial findings, suffer from overoptimistic interpretations heavily favoring the study sponsor. Ironically, after the New Drug Application is submitted for regulatory approval, and when the FDA secondary reviews become available for public, the benefit/risk assessment of a new drug is usually considered much less impressive. However, the community may ignore pivotal unreported findings later outlined in the government documents taking for granted the facts presented in the primary publication. The discrepancies between initial publication and the FDA files are not only confusing to the readership, but hold additional risks for patients. Indeed, if physicians are impressed with the initial interpretation of the trial, and do not have broad access to the FDA verified facts, chances are new agents will be prescribed based on exaggerated benefit and less safety concerns. The current pattern also hurts the reputation of the journal publishers, editors and reviewers challenging their trust and credibility. We here outline the disparity between the primary PLATO trial publication in the New England Journal of Medicine against the FDA verified numbers, and discuss how to avoid such mismatches in the future.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Congresses as Topic; Humans; Information Dissemination; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Major indication-seeking phase 3 clinical trials usually include numerous subanalyses and substudies designed to facilitate the interpretation of results, often providing putative mechanisms that might explain clinical outcomes. Such subanalyses and/or substudies may focus on socioeconomic implications, cost-effectiveness, biomarker applicability, subgroup analyses, etc. Novel antiplatelet agents may benefit from substudies aimed at elucidating the effects on platelets, while angiographic data are also essential for the adequate assessment of coronary flow. Ideally, the data yielded from substudies should correlate well with the main results of the trial. However, in the PLATO (PLATelet Inhibition and Clinical Outcomes) trial, official angiographic data (PLATO-A) contradict platelet (PLATO-P) substudy results. While the large (n = 2,616) PLATO-A concluded that coronary flow and myocardial perfusion were almost identical after ticagrelor or clopidogrel, the small (n = 24) single-center PLATO-P suggested that ticagrelor achieved a highly significantly greater antiplatelet effect compared to clopidogrel after loading in patients enrolled in the same trial and at similar time points. In contrast to PLATO-P, PLATO-A corresponds well with clinical outcomes including the early percutaneous coronary intervention 'ticagrelor death paradox' in PLATO-USA patients and the lack of an early ticagrelor benefit in the overall invasive PLATO cohort reported by the FDA. The discrepancy between PLATO-A and PLATO-P is obvious and lacks a reasonable explanation: platelet activity and coronary flow are generally inversely related, as consistently shown for other antiplatelet regimens, and should be particularly matched when assessed in the frame of the same trial.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Circulation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

We report a case of significant pulmonary hemorrhage developing shortly after commencing ticagrelor and aspirin therapy and requiring coronary artery bypass grafting to safely cease the antiplatelet therapy. Lung biopsy findings were consistent with drug-induced lung injury. Clinicians should be aware of this significant adverse event with this drug class.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Biopsy; Coronary Artery Bypass; Diagnosis, Differential; Hemoptysis; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pneumonia; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Dyspnea; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The choice of antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is complicated: Ticagrelor and prasugrel are novel alternatives to clopidogrel, patients with some genotypes may not respond to clopidogrel, and low-cost generic formulations of clopidogrel are available.. To determine the most cost-effective strategy for dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS.. Decision-analytic model.. Published literature, Medicare claims, and life tables.. Patients having percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS.. Lifetime.. Societal.. Five strategies were examined: generic clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and genotyping for polymorphisms of CYP2C19 with carriers of loss-of-function alleles receiving either ticagrelor (genotyping with ticagrelor) or prasugrel (genotyping with prasugrel) and noncarriers receiving clopidogrel.. Direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years(QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).. The clopidogrel strategy produced$179 301 in costs and 9.428 QALYs. Genotyping with prasugrel was superior to prasugrel alone, with an ICER of $35 800 per QALY relative to clopidogrel. Genotyping with ticagrelor was more effective than genotyping with prasugrel ($30 200 per QALY relative to clopidogrel). Ticagrelor was the most effective strategy($52 600 per QALY relative to genotyping with ticagrelor).. Stronger associations between genotype and thrombotic outcomes rendered ticagrelor substantially less cost-effective ($104 800 per QALY). Genotyping with prasugrel was the preferred therapy among patients who could not tolerate ticagrelor.. No randomized trials have directly compared genotyping strategies or prasugrel with ticagrelor.. Genotype-guided personalization may improve the cost-effectiveness of prasugrel and ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS, but ticagrelor for all patients may bean economically reasonable alternative in some settings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Alleles; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Decision Support Techniques; Direct Service Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Two oral antiplatelet agents have been recently introduced for acute coronary syndromes indication providing alternatives for dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. In fact, worldwide prasugrel has been on the market for four years, and ticagrelor for over two years. Despite declared benefits over clopidogrel, including hypothetical cost saving advantages, in real life, the clinical utilisation of both agents is small. Generic clopidogrel, and price differences are claimed as major obstacles to prevent broader prasugrel and ticagrelor use. However, these economic difficulties are barely supported by available evidence, and served mostly to protect questionable management spending, as an exuse to explain why in reality cardiologists are so sceptical about both novel agents, and to convince the sharehoders that their money is not wasted, misleading the owners with regard to future success. Importantly, brand Plavix® is used worldwide 5-10 times more often than new agents, despite heavy generic competition. The future of prasugrel outside Japan, where much lower reasonable dose will be used is not impressive due to lack of further outcome studies, negative results of the latest trials, and less than four years left before patent expiration. The fate of ticagrelor will depend on verification of deaths numbers in the ongoing United States Department of Justice PLATO investigation, and confirmation of the mortality benefit in the PEGASUS TIMI-54 trial.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Utilization; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Japan; Marketing; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Economic Competition; Humans; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Costs and Cost Analysis; Drug Utilization; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; International Cooperation; Marketing; Patient Satisfaction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist designed to reduce clinical thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor has been proven to significantly reduce the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke without an increase in the rate of overall major bleeding in patients who have an ACS with or without ST-segment elevation (STEMI and NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA).. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and healthcare costs associated with secondary prevention of ACS using ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients after STEMI, NSTEMI and UA.. An economic model based on results from the PLATO trial was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of one-year therapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The structure of the model consisted of two parts, i.e. the decision tree with one-year PLATO results and the Markov model with lifelong estimations, which exceeded PLATO follow-up data. The model was adjusted to Polish settings with country-specific data on death rates in the general population and direct medical costs calculated from the public payer's perspective. Costs were derived from the National Health Fund (NHF) and the Ministry of Health and presented in PLN 2013 values. Annual mean costs of second and subsequent years after stroke or MI were obtained from the literature. Uncertainty of assumed parameters was tested in scenarios and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The adopted model allowed the estimation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for life years gained (LYG) and an incremental cost-utility ratio for quality adjusted life years (QALY).. Total direct medical costs to the public payer at a one year horizon were 2,905 PLN higher with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. However, mean healthcare costs at a one year horizon (excluding drug costs and concomitant drugs) were 690 PLN higher for patients treated with clopidogrel. In a lifetime horizon, results indicated that ticagrelor was the more cost-effective option compared to generic clopidogrel, with an incremental cost per LYG estimated at 21,566 PLN and an incremental costper QALY estimated at 24,965 PLN.. In a lifetime horizon, which should be used when comparing technologies with different impacts on mortality, cost-effectiveness evaluation resulted in more favourable economic outcomes for ticagrelor than for generic clopidogrel, with the cost per QALY well below the recommended willingness to pay threshold in Poland (24,965 PLN vs. 111,381 PLN).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Poland; Secondary Prevention; State Medicine; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Twice daily dosing is often perceived as inferior to once daily dosing due to a higher likelihood of missing a dose. However, more important is the extent to which drug action is maintained when doses are delayed or missed. We compared the estimated inhibition of platelet aggregation (eIPA) for ticagrelor twice daily and clopidogrel once daily, based on their pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic relationships and patient dosing history data.. Drug dosing histories of 5014 patients prescribed cardiovascular medications (primarily antihypertensive medicines) were extracted from an electronically compiled dosing history database. eIPA levels were simulated for 677 twice daily and 677 once daily dosing histories over a 30 day period, based on published onset/offset models for ticagrelor and clopidogrel IPA characteristics.. While many patients treated twice daily missed at least one dose in 30 days, only 25.7% missed two consecutive doses. By comparison, 46.8% of patients treated once daily missed at least one dose. Simulations based on patient adherence over time showed that the average mean eIPA for ticagrelor twice daily remained significantly higher than for clopidogrel once daily (81.1% vs. 55.0%, P < 0.001). Ticagrelor twice daily patients had an eIPA below 10% for 0.20% of the 30 day period compared with 2.05% for clopidogrel once daily (P = 0.0001).. The projected level of platelet inhibition remained higher for ticagrelor twice daily than clopidogrel once daily, mainly due to the higher eIPA level achieved with ticagrelor and the relatively low likelihood of missing two consecutive twice daily doses. This modelling and simulation study suggests a therapeutic benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel when taking into account the most common dosing omissions.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Medication Adherence; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In the cardiovascular area, the rate of occurrence of relevant clinical events decreased over the last decades due to the large adoption of evidence-based treatments. This implies that large numbers of patients are needed to provide reliable answers to research open questions. Therefore, the conduction of multinational large-scale studies became necessary. In this setting, it is not infrequent to find relevant differences in the trial results across countries. The interpretation of these differences should be extremely cautious to avoid the well known mistakes related to subgroup analyses. To believe in differences, it is necessary to adopt appropriate methodologies in the analysis of data but, even more important, to find a biological plausibility that can explain the observed difference. A further confirmation from other studies can also help in the interpretation. In the literature there are some examples of such differences that, in some cases, produced erroneous interpretations of the results of a trial, and also induced regulatory authorities to take decisions based on these differences.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Americas; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Ethnicity; Europe; Female; Georgia (Republic); Heart Failure; Humans; Internationality; Male; Metoprolol; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Russia; Sample Size; Spironolactone; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Tolvaptan

No published information exists to support the safe use of ticagrelor in patients with a clopidogrel allergy. This study involved an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients with a documented clopidogrel allergy who subsequently received ticagrelor between July 2011 and February 2014. We report the cases of two patients with a history of hypersensitivity to clopidogrel in whom ticagrelor was used successfully without documented incident. In addition, principles suggesting a lack of cross-sensitivity between ticagrelor and clopidogrel are reviewed. These cases combined with theoretical evidence support the use of ticagrelor in patients with hypersensitivity to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The PLATO study evaluated the efficacy of adding ticagrelor, instead of clopidogrel, to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome, which showed surprisingly positive results making the drug acceptable to regulatory agencies and specialty societies worldwide. Notwithstanding the aforementioned success, contradictory information supplied by critical analysis was submitted by the sponsor. The controversial findings revealed several aspects that are difficult to explain, threatening the veracity of the study's conclusions. Mortality rate pattern, excessive benefit not comparable to prior studies, unexplained loss of follow-up development and inconsistency in findings in accordance with the country, the type of events arbitrator and monitoring committee are some of the most questionable issues. Dubious reaction to this trial is based on the fact that the information could not be found in published articles. This complex situation poses a challenge to the critical analysis of the text and raises questions as to how far the conflicts of financial interest influenced the development of the study, the communication of its results and probably, acceptance of the drug for commercial use.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Conflict of Interest; Evidence-Based Medicine; Financial Support; Humans; Publication Bias; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Postoperative Care; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

To assess the cost-effectiveness relationship of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel for the management of acute coronary syndrome in Spain.. The data from the PLATO study were used for the calculation of the events rate and health-related quality of life for Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel for the first 12 months, whereas the costs were obtained from Spanish sources. Quality of life-adjusted survival and costs were estimated according to the fact that the patients did not suffer any thrombotic event (myocardial infarction or ictus) or this one was not fatal. The lifetime cots, life years gained, and the quality of life-adjusted survival were estimated for both treatment arms. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were assessed through the perspective of the Spanish healthcare system for 2013, by using a macro-costs strategy based on published literature and the survival tables for the Spanish population.. Treatment with Ticagrelor was associated to an incremental cost of 1,228 Euros per year, an increase in 0.1652 life years gained, and 0.1365 years adjusted by quality of life, as compared to Clopidogrel. The cost for one quality of life-adjusted life year was 8,997 Euros and the cost per one gained life year of 7,435 . The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results.. Treatment of acute coronary syndrome for 12 months with Ticagrelor was associated with a cost per 1 life year of quality of life-adjusted cost below the cost-effectiveness limits generally accepted in Spain.. Evaluar la relación coste-efectividad de ticagrelor frente a clopidogrel en el tratamiento del síndrome coronario agudo en España. MÉTODOS: Para el cálculo de la tasa de eventos y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud para ticagrelor y clopidogrel durante los doce primeros meses se utilizaron los datos del estudio PLATO, mientras que los costes se obtuvieron de fuentes españolas. La supervivencia ajustada por calidad de vida y los costes se estimaron en función de que los pacientes no sufrieran ningún evento trombótico (infarto de miocardio o ictus) o éste fuese no mortal. El coste a lo largo de toda la vida, los años de vida ganados y la supervivencia por calidad de vida se estimaron para ambos brazos de tratamiento. Los ratios de coste-efectividad incremental se presentaron desde la perspectiva del sistema sanitario español en 2013, empleando una estrategia de macrocostes basada en la bibliografía publicada y utilizando las tablas de supervivencia de la población española.. El tratamiento con ticagrelor se asoció con un coste incremental de 1.228 anuales, un aumento de 0,1652 años de vida ganados y 0,1365 años de vida ajustados por calidad comparado con clopidogrel. Se obtuvo un coste por año de vida ajustado por calidad de 8.997y un coste por año de vida ganado de 7.435 . El análisis de sensibilidad mostró resultados consistentes.. El tratamiento durante 12 meses del síndrome coronario agudo con ticagrelor se asoció a un coste por año de vida ajustado por calidad por debajo de los límites de costeefectividad generalmente aceptados en España.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Spain; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Blood Platelets; Body Mass Index; Female; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor, a potent antiplatelet, has been shown to be beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes in a randomised controlled trial published in a highly ranked peer reviewed journal. Accordingly it has entered guidelines and has been approved for clinical use by authorities. However, there remains a controversy regarding aspects of the PLATO trial, which are not immediately apparent from the peer-reviewed publications. A number of publications have sought to highlight potential discrepancies, using data available in publicly published documents from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) leading to disagreement regarding the value of open science and data sharing. We reflect upon potential sources of bias present in even rigorously performed randomised controlled trials, on whether peer review can establish the presence of bias and the need to constantly challenge and question even accepted data.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Bias; Humans; Peer Review, Research; Publishing; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Scientific Misconduct; Ticagrelor; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

To evaluate the clinical utility of individualising dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comers population, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.. Tertiary care single centre registry.. 1008 consecutive PCI patients with stent implantation, without exclusion criteria.. Peri-interventional individualisation of DAPT, guided by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), to overcome high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to ADP-induced (≥50 U) and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced aggregation (>35 U).. The primary efficacy end point was definite stent thrombosis (ST) at 30 days. The primary safety end point was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding. Secondary end points were probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and the combined end point: major cardiac adverse event (MACE).. 53% of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (9% STEMI, 44% non-ST-elevation). HPR to ADP after 600 mg clopidogrel loading occurred in 30% of patients (73±19 U vs 28±11 U; p<0.001) and was treated by prasugrel or ticagrelor (73%), or clopidogrel (27%) reloading (22±12 U; p<0.001). HPR to ADP after prasugrel loading occurred in 2% of patients (82±26 U vs 19±10 U; p<0.001) and was treated with ticagrelor (34±15 U; p=0.02). HPR to AA occurred in 9% of patients with a significant higher proportion in patients with HPR to ADP (22% vs 4%, p<0.001) and was treated with aspirin reloading. Definite ST occurred in 0.09% of patients (n=1); probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and MACE occurred in 0.19% (n=2), 0.09% (n=1) and 1.8% (n=18) of patients. TIMI major and minor bleeding did not differ between patients without HPR and individualised patients (2.6% for both).. Individualisation of DAPT with MEA minimises early thrombotic events in an all-comers PCI population to an unreported degree without increasing bleeding. A randomised multicentre trial utilising MEA seems warranted.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01515345.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Prospective Studies; Registries; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Guideline recommendations on the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been formulated by both the ACC/AHA and the ESC. These recommendations are based primarily on large, phase III, randomized, controlled trials of the P2Y12 inhibitors clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. However, few East Asian patients have been included in the trials to assess the use of these agents, particularly the newer agents prasugrel and ticagrelor. Additionally, an increasing body of data suggests that East Asian patients have differing risk profiles for both thrombophilia and bleeding compared with white patients, and that a different 'therapeutic window' of on-treatment platelet reactivity might be appropriate in East Asian patients. Furthermore, a phenomenon referred to as the 'East Asian paradox' has been described, in which East Asian patients have a similar or even a lower rate of ischaemic events after PCI compared with white patients, despite a higher level of platelet reactivity during DAPT. Recognizing these concerns, the World Heart Federation has undertaken this evidence-based review and produced this expert consensus statement to determine the antiplatelet treatment strategies that are most appropriate for East Asian patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Asia, Eastern; Cardiology; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Societies, Medical; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; World Health Organization

Much emphasis has been placed on a ticagrelor-aspirin (ASA) interaction in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, despite this particular interaction being inconclusive. However, a potential ticagrelor-statin interplay occurred and may be important in PLATO, especially considering the remarkable and yet unexplained mortality advantage.. To explore the ticagrelor-statin interaction in the PLATO trial.. The background statin use in hospital or at discharge was similar between ticagrelor (89.7%) and clopidogrel (89.2%) PLATO arms, respectively. In patients on statins, ticagrelor significantly decreased all-cause mortality (30 day and through study end), vascular mortality (30 day and through study end) and exhibited a trend in benefit for 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to clopidogrel: hazard ratio, HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.36-0.84 (p = 0.005), and HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.52-0.92 (p = 0.012); HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96 (p = 0.030), and HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.49-0.94 (p = 0.020), and HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.55-1.01 (p = 0.057), respectively. These results may be attributed to the fact that ticagrelor, in contrast to clopidogrel, significantly increases the potency of CYP3A4-metabolized statins, which in turn may increase the vascular benefit derived from the statin, giving an unfair advantage to ticagrelor. Moreover, inappropriate statin dosing restrictions (underdosing of simvastatin and lovastatin) were deliberately utilized in PLATO, potentially contributing to the beneficial effect of ticagrelor.. In patients on statins, both vascular and all-cause mortality rates were significantly reduced with ticagrelor in the PLATO trial. However, this benefit may in part be driven by an increased efficacy of CYP3A4-metabolized statins on top of ticagrelor and/or from the inappropriate dose restriction of simvastatin and lovastatin in the clopidogrel arm.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lovastatin; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Simvastatin; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Ticagrelor is a reversible inhibitor of platelet-aggregation, and is used instead of clopidogrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Ticagrelor has documented better outcomes as shown in the PLATO-study, when compared to clopidogrel. However, more major non-CABG bleedings are observed with ticagrelor. Treatment of ACS with platelet-inhibitors is the standard, but there is no antidote for ticagrelor or clopidogrel, making haemostasis problematic in the case of a major bleeding. The following case describes a 76-year-old woman, who after admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ACS, was treated with ticagrelor and developed a major gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Ticagrelor is a novel antiplatelet drug developed to reduce atherothrombosis. The PLATO trial compared ticagrelor and aspirin to clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor was found to be superior in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke, without increasing major bleeding events. The current study estimates the lifetime cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor relative to generic clopidogrel from a Singapore public healthcare perspective.. This study used a two-part cost-effectiveness model. The first part was a 12-month decision tree (using PLATO trial data) to estimate the rates of major cardiovascular events, healthcare costs and health-related quality of life. The second part was a Markov model estimating lifetime quality-adjusted survival and costs conditional on events during the initial 12 months. Daily drug costs applied were SGD 1.05 (generic clopidogrel) and SGD 6.00 (ticagrelor). Cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was estimated from a Singapore public healthcare perspective using life tables and short-term costs from Singapore, and long-term costs from South Korea. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.. Ticagrelor was associated with a lifetime QALY gain of 0.13, primarily driven by lower mortality. The resulting incremental cost per QALY gained was SGD 10,136.00. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that ticagrelor had a > 99% probability of being cost-effective, given the lower recommended WHO willingness-to-pay threshold of one GDP/capita per QALY.. Based on PLATO trial data, one-year treatment with ticagrelor versus generic clopidogrel in patients with ACS, relative to WHO reference standards, is cost-effective from a Singapore public healthcare perspective.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Drug Costs; Humans; Markov Chains; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Republic of Korea; Singapore; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The novel P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor inhibits adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation more potently than clopidogrel and reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and total death in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Furthermore, ticagrelor inhibits adenosine reuptake and increases coronary flow reserve during adenosine infusion in man. We wanted to determine whether ticagrelor improves peripheral arterial function in patients with a previous ACS compared to patients treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel.. 127 patients with a previous ACS (>3 months to <3 years ago) on maintenance dose of (1) no ADP blocker (n = 35); (2) clopidogrel 75 mg (n = 35); (3) prasugrel 10 mg (n = 32), or (4) ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 25) were evaluated with peripheral arterial tonometry after forearm ischemia.. Ticagrelor improves peripheral arterial function compared to the other groups [(1) controls 1.78 ± 0.53; (2) clopidogrel 1.78 ± 0.45; (3) prasugrel 1.64 ± 0.33, and (4) ticagrelor 2.25 ± 0.54 (means ± SD)] with a significance of p < 0.01 for ticagrelor versus no ADP blocker, p < 0.01 for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, and p < 0.001 for ticagrelor versus prasugrel. There were fewer patients with endothelial dysfunction (<1.67 reactive hyperemia index) in the ticagrelor group (12%) compared to aspirin (51%), clopidogrel (46%), and prasugrel (53%) (p < 0.01).. Treatment with ticagrelor improves peripheral endothelial function compared to no ADP blocker, clopidogrel, or prasugrel treatment.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Blood Pressure; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Assays monitoring P2Y12 platelet reactivity can accurately predict which patients will have a poor response to clopidogrel. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of using platelet reactivity assays (PRAs) to select a dual-antiplatelet regimen for patients with acute coronary syndrome. A hybrid decision tree Markov model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of universal clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel (given to all patients) or PRA-driven ticagrelor or prasugrel (given to patients with high platelet reactivity, defined as >230 on the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay; the others received generic clopidogrel). We assumed a cohort of 65-year-old patients with acute coronary syndrome and an incidence of high platelet reactivity of 32% and 13% at ~24 to 48 hours after revascularization and 1 month, respectively. The 5-year costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for PRA-driven ticagrelor and prasugrel compared with universal clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel. PRA-driven ticagrelor and prasugrel were cost-effective compared with universal clopidogrel (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $40,100 and $49,143/quality-adjusted life-year, respectively); however, universal ticagrelor and prasugrel were not (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $61,651 and $96,261/quality-adjusted life-year, respectively). Monte Carlo simulation suggested PRA-driven ticagrelor, PRA-driven prasugrel, universal ticagrelor, and universal prasugrel would have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year in 52%, 40%, 23%, and 2% of the iterations compared with universal clopidogrel, respectively. Universal ticagrelor and prasugrel were not cost-effective compared with their respective PRA-driven regimens (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $68,182; $116,875/quality-adjusted life-year, respectively). Monte Carlo simulation suggested universal ticagrelor and prasugrel would have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year in 26% and 4% of iterations compared with their respective PRA-driven regimens. The results were most sensitive to differences in agent costs and drug-specific relative risks of death. In conclusion, even with generic clopidogrel, PRA-driven selection of antiplatelet therapy appeared to be a cost-effective strategy with the potential to decrease the overall acute coronary syndrome-associated healthcare costs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Female; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Myocardial Revascularization; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Survival Rate; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Care; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug Industry; Drugs, Generic; Forecasting; Germany; Humans; National Health Programs; Patents as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The level of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition obtained after P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonist loading dose (LD) is associated with the ischemic and bleeding risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. We aimed to evaluate the level of PR inhibition achieved by a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor and the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in ACS patients undergoing PCI.. We performed a multicentre prospective observational study enrolling ACS patients undergoing PCI. Patients were included if they were admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non ST-elevation ACS. To assess PR, a VASP index was measured at least 6 and within 24 hours following a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor. HTPR was defined as a VASP index ≥50%.. One hundred and fifteen patients were included: 31.3% of STEMI, 49.6% of NSTEMI and 19.1% of unstable angina. Following ticagrelor LD the mean VASP index was 17±14%. However the response to ticagrelor was not uniform with a small inter-individual variability: inter quartile range: 7.6-22.8% and a rate of HTPR of 3.5%. A high number of patients, 65.6%, had a VASP index <16%. None of the baseline characteristics of the study population was associated with PR. In addition, PR was similar in STEMI, NSTEMI and unstable angina (p=0.9).. In ACS patients the level of PR inhibition achieved by a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor is not uniform and the rate of HTPR is 3.5%. A high proportion of patients exhibited a VASP index <16%.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Activation; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor, a novel reversible antiplatelet agent, has a black box warning to avoid maintenance doses of aspirin>100mg. However, a significant ticagrelor-early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) interaction exists.. To discuss the inappropriateness of the black box warning for aspirin doses>100mg with ticagrelor and the appropriateness (and need) for a black box warning for ticagrelor patients needing early (within 24 hours of randomization) PCI.. The FDA Complete Response Review for ticagrelor indicates that aspirin doses ≥ 300 mg/daily was not a significant interaction. In the ticagrelor-aspirin ≥ 300 mg cohort, all-cause mortality (through study end) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (through study end) were not significantly increased (HR=1.27; 95% CI, 0.84-1.93, p=0.262 and HR=1.39; 95% CI:0.87-2.2, p=0.170), respectively. However, in patients treated with early (within 24 hours) PCI, ticagrelor significantly increased all-cause mortality (30 day: HR=1.89; 95% CI: 1.26-2.81, p=0.002, and through study end, HR=1.41; 95% CI,1.08-1.84, p=0.012) and increased CV mortality (30 day: HR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.97-1.77, p=0.075, and through study end, HR=1.35; 95% CI, 0.995-1.82, p=0.054) compared to clopidogrel.. Early-PCI was more prevalent in the US versus outside-US regions (61% versus 49%). The black box warning for the use of maintenance aspirin doses over 100mg/daily with ticagrelor is inappropriate and ignores the more important, credible, and highly significant ticagrelor-early PCI adverse interaction in PLATO.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Time Factors

Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines declare superiority of prasugrel and ticagrelor over clopidogrel in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and STEMI patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The recommendations for NSTEMI and especially STEMI are based on a subgroup analyses yielded from a single trial with either prasugrel (TRITON), or ticagrelor (PLATO). In contrast, the United States (US) Guidelines present a more balanced, conservative, and evidence-based outlook suggesting no proven extra benefit of one P2Y12 antagonist over the other(s). It was the purpose of this study to scrutinise the evidence leading to the current ESC ACS Guidelines on oral antiplatelet agents and compare them with US recommendations. Matching the evidence from TRITON and PLATO primary publications with the data reported in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official reviews in light of their impact on current regional ACS Guidelines on antiplatelet P2Y12 inhibitors. The available body of evidence on the efficacy and safety of the new oral P2Y12 inhibitors challenge the ESC Guidelines, and supports the US recommendations. Some of the pivotal data with regard to the newer P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) on event definition, adjudication, questionable efficacy, and serious safety concerns were ignored by the European Task Force Members, while the other "beneficial" findings were exaggerated to a disproportional extent. We conclude that current ESC Guidelines, with regard to their recommendation of superiority of prasugrel or ticagrelor over clopidogrel, in contrast to the US, are overoptimistic, and not evidence based. Low clinical utilisation of prasugrel and especially ticagrelor worldwide in general, and Europe in particular suggests mismatch of prescription habits with issued ESC recommendations.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Europe; Evidence-Based Medicine; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Europe; Evidence-Based Medicine; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines offer a choice of P2Y12 receptor antagonist among clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor on top of aspirin (ASA) for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, the comparative risks of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events during DAPT are not clear. Two large ACS trials (TRITON and PLATO) provide a valuable opportunity to directly match the risks of GI complications among current antiplatelet regimens. We compared the rates of GI adverse events after prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical safety reviews. When compared with ticagrelor, clopidogrel is safer with regard to GI-related risks including fewer overall GI/anal bleeding events and spontaneous GI hemorrhagic episodes, less nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and diarrhea, and a lower rate of presence of Helicobacter pylori. Among GI symptoms, only constipation was more common after clopidogrel than following ticagrelor. There were extrahepatic risks observed with ticagrelor but not with prasugrel when compared to clopidogrel. Prasugrel unquestionably caused more bleeding from the GI tract and GI malignancies than clopidogrel. However, the entire spectrum of GI effects of prasugrel is much less well known and mostly based on sponsor analysis rather than FDA-verified numbers. Among 3 DAPT options on top of ASA, clopidogrel seems to represent the safest alternative, although comprehensive data on direct prasugrel-associated GI effects are lacking or inconclusive.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) randomized trial (NCT00391872) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reported that ticagrelor (in addition to aspirin) reduced the rate of the composite end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular death compared with clopidogrel (in addition to aspirin) by 16% over 12 months (P < 0.001). No significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding was noted, but ticagrelor was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting.. By extrapolating the key findings of PLATO, we sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of ACS in a contemporary Australian setting.. A Markov model with 4 health states (free from further ACS events, MI, stroke, and death) was developed to simulate the long-term costs and outcomes associated with ACS. Event risks were based on data derived directly from PLATO, and costs and utilities were drawn from published sources. A 10-year time horizon was simulated, and future costs and benefits were discounted at a 5% annual rate. However, treatment with ticagrelor and clopidogrel was only assumed for the first 12 months, with no benefits applied beyond drug cessation. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken based on variations to key data inputs. All costs for resource use applied in the analysis were based on published Australian prices (in 2010/2011 dollars [A$]).. Over 10 years, the estimated quality-adjusted life-years lived per-patient were 5.74 and 5.68 for ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. Net costs were A$19,132 for ticagrelor and A$18,428 for clopidogrel. These equated to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of A$9031 per quality-adjusted life-year gained for ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Sensitivity analyses indicated the result to be robust.. When assessed from the perspective of the Australian health care system, ticagrelor is likely to be cost-effective compared with clopidogrel in preventing downstream morbidity and mortality associated with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Australia; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Bypass; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness in Australia of screening CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) alleles to guide selection of clopidogrel or ticagrelor for individuals with acute coronary syndrome who are likely to undergo coronary stenting.. Three treatment strategies were compared: universal clopidogrel therapy, universal ticagrelor therapy and genotyping CYP2C19 with use of ticagrelor for individuals with a LoF allele and clopidogrel for individuals without a LoF allele. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years for each treatment strategy were estimated using a Markov model. The risks of events were primarily derived from the genetic substudy of the pivotal randomized controlled trial.. CYP2C19 genotyping resulted in greater effectiveness and was cost-effective when compared with universal use of clopidogrel. However, universal use of ticagrelor was the most effective strategy overall and the incremental cost-effectiveness compared with the genotyping strategy was generally within what is considered acceptable.. Ticagrelor is likely to be cost-effective even for individuals not carrying a CYP2C19 LoF allele.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Alleles; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Australia; Clopidogrel; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Genotype; Humans; Markov Chains; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Greece; Humans; Medication Adherence; Platelet Activation; Platelet Function Tests; Predictive Value of Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Smoking; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

A routine secondary pharmacology screen indicated that reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist ticagrelor could inhibit adenosine uptake in human erythrocytes, suggesting that ticagrelor may potentiate adenosine-mediated responses in vivo. The aim of this study was to further characterize the adenosine uptake inhibition in vitro and study possible physiological consequences of adenosine uptake inhibition by ticagrelor in an anesthetized dog model of coronary blood flow compared to dipyridamole.. We measured [2-3H]adenosine uptake in purified human erythrocytes and several cell lines in the presence of ticagrelor or the known uptake inhibitor dipyridamole as a comparator. Using an open-chest dog model (beagles), we measured the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery blood flow during reactive hyperemia after 1 minute occlusion or intracoronary infusion of adenosine before and after administration of vehicle, ticagrelor, or dipyridamole (each n = 8). Ticagrelor concentration-dependently inhibited adenosine uptake in human erythrocytes and in cell lines of rat, canine, or human origin. In the dog model, ticagrelor and dipyridamole dose-dependently augmented reactive hyperemia after LAD occlusion, as assessed by percentage repayment of flow debt relative to control (both Ps < .05). Ticagrelor and dipyridamole also dose-dependently augmented intracoronary adenosine-induced increases in LAD blood flow relative to control (both Ps < .05).. Ticagrelor inhibits adenosine uptake in vitro and subsequently augments cardiac blood flow in a canine model of reactive hypoxia- or adenosine-induced blood flow increases. These findings suggest that ticagrelor may have additional benefits in patients with acute coronary syndrome beyond inhibition of platelet aggregation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Animals; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Coronary Circulation; Dipyridamole; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Erythrocytes; Female; Humans; Hyperemia; Male; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rats; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Drug Approval; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Reperfusion; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

On July 20, 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ticagrelor (Brilinta™) for use during acute coronary syndromes. The drug labeling includes a 'black box' warning for bleeding risks, conventional for antithrombotics, and a unique warning that higher than 100 mg/daily maintenance treatment with aspirin may reduce ticagrelor effectiveness. The approval was granted following ticagrelor secondary reviews, and review of complete response by FDA officials.. To summarize the recommendations of different FDA reviewers, and their impact on drug approval.. Review of the Platelet Inhibition and Clinical Outcomes (PLATO) trial comparing the efficacy of ticagrelor versus standard care treatment with clopidogrel. Patients (n = 18,624) with moderate- to high-risk acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary intervention or being medically managed were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-600-mg loading dose followed by 75 mg once daily) for 6-12 months.. The facts outlined in official reviews suggest that ticagrelor has been approved despite objections from both clinical primary reviewers assessing drug efficacy and safety. In addition, the statistical reviewer and cross-discipline team leader also recommended against approval. The putative grounds for their concerns were retrieved from the public FDA records and are briefly outlined here.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Approval; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration