thymine has been researched along with Stomach Neoplasms in 36 studies
Stomach Neoplasms: Tumors or cancer of the STOMACH.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece." | 8.12 | Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022) |
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece." | 4.12 | Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022) |
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, frequencies of any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age subgroups (80% each), although grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was more frequent in older patients [40% (≥ 65 and ≥ 75 years); 29% (< 65 years)]; AE-related discontinuation rates did not increase with age [14% (< 65 years), 12% (≥ 65 years), and 12% (≥ 75 years)]." | 3.11 | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS). ( Alsina, M; Benhadji, KA; Cicin, I; Doi, T; Hosaka, H; Ilson, DH; Longo, F; Makris, L; Özgüroğlu, M; Ozyilkan, O; Park, D; Pericay, C; Santoro, A; Shitara, K; Thuss-Patience, P; Zaanan, A, 2022) |
" Common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutrophil count decreased (27 [82%] in cohort A and 23 [74%] in cohort B), white blood cell count decreased (eight [24%] and seven [23%]), and platelet count decreased (eight [24%] and four [13%])." | 3.01 | Safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. ( Amagai, K; Ando, T; Fujita, J; Fujitani, K; Hosaka, H; Kawazoe, A; Koeda, K; Nishikawa, K; Ogata, K; Shitara, K; Watanabe, K; Yamamoto, Y, 2021) |
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 122 of 145 patients (84." | 2.94 | Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Beretta, GD; Catenacci, D; Doi, T; Fujitani, K; George, B; Ghidini, M; Ilson, DH; Makris, L; Mansoor, W; McGuigan, S; Prokharau, A; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Thuss-Patience, P; Van Cutsem, E; Zhavrid, E, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil is a compound drug, approved in 2015 by the US FDA, and in 2016 by the EMA, for the treatment of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancers, after the phase III RECOURSE trial demonstrated significant benefit." | 2.82 | Trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of gastric cancer. ( Arkenau, HT; Fostea, RM, 2022) |
"TAS-102 is a preconstituted drug combination comprising an oral fluoropyrimidine (trifluridine, TFT) and a potent inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI)." | 2.66 | TAS-102 in gastric cancer: Development and perspectives of a new biochemically modulated fluroropyrimidine drug combination. ( Aprile, G; Cianchi, F; Fancelli, S; Gatta Michelet, MR; Lavacchi, D; Mini, E; Nobili, S; Roviello, F; Roviello, G, 2020) |
"Gastric cancer is a global health problem with high incidence rate and mortality rate." | 1.62 | The effect of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. ( He, X; Wu, L; Wu, Y; Zhang, T; Zhou, X, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was more cost-effective than nivolumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer." | 1.62 | Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan. ( Doi, T; Igarashi, A; Shitara, K; Takushima, Y; Yoshihara, H, 2021) |
"Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis." | 1.62 | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Azcue, P; Catenacci, DVT; Doi, T; Fornaro, L; Fougeray, R; Ilson, DH; Lorenzen, S; Moreno, SR; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; Zaanan, A, 2021) |
"The study population included 177 gastric cancer patients and 224 healthy control subjects." | 1.33 | A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP-9 promoter affects tumor progression and invasive phenotype of gastric cancer. ( Chayama, K; Imai, K; Kitadai, Y; Matsumura, S; Matsusaki, K; Nakachi, K; Nakayama, H; Oue, N; Yamaguchi, Y; Yasui, W; Yoshida, K, 2005) |
" Our hypothesis was that a relatively short and high dosage of TAS-102 results in an additional mechanism of FTD incorporation into DNA other than thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition." | 1.32 | A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. ( Emura, T; Fukushima, M; Ohshimo, H; Suzuki, N; Yamaguchi, M, 2004) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 3 (8.33) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 2 (5.56) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 6 (16.67) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 7 (19.44) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 18 (50.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Shitara, K | 12 |
Doi, T | 11 |
Hosaka, H | 2 |
Thuss-Patience, P | 3 |
Santoro, A | 1 |
Longo, F | 1 |
Ozyilkan, O | 1 |
Cicin, I | 1 |
Park, D | 2 |
Zaanan, A | 2 |
Pericay, C | 1 |
Özgüroğlu, M | 1 |
Alsina, M | 6 |
Makris, L | 7 |
Benhadji, KA | 5 |
Ilson, DH | 9 |
Fostea, RM | 1 |
Arkenau, HT | 9 |
Van Cutsem, E | 7 |
Hochster, H | 3 |
Mayer, R | 3 |
Ohtsu, A | 4 |
Falcone, A | 3 |
Yoshino, T | 3 |
George, B | 4 |
Tabernero, J | 8 |
Prokharau, A | 3 |
Ghidini, M | 3 |
Fujitani, K | 3 |
Beretta, GD | 3 |
Mansoor, W | 4 |
Zhavrid, E | 3 |
Catenacci, D | 1 |
McGuigan, S | 1 |
Dvorkin, M | 3 |
Faustino, C | 2 |
Gorbunova, V | 2 |
Nishikawa, K | 3 |
Ando, T | 3 |
Yalçın, Ş | 2 |
Sabater, J | 1 |
Skanji, D | 1 |
Leger, C | 1 |
Amellal, N | 1 |
Arigami, T | 1 |
Matsushita, D | 1 |
Okubo, K | 1 |
Yanagita, S | 1 |
Ehi, K | 1 |
Sasaki, K | 1 |
Noda, M | 1 |
Kita, Y | 1 |
Mori, S | 1 |
Kurahara, H | 1 |
Uenosono, Y | 1 |
Ishigami, S | 1 |
Natsugoe, S | 1 |
Roviello, G | 1 |
Fancelli, S | 1 |
Gatta Michelet, MR | 1 |
Aprile, G | 1 |
Nobili, S | 1 |
Roviello, F | 1 |
Cianchi, F | 1 |
Mini, E | 1 |
Lavacchi, D | 1 |
Giuliani, J | 1 |
Bonetti, A | 1 |
Narita, Y | 1 |
Shoji, H | 1 |
Kawai, S | 1 |
Mizukami, T | 1 |
Nakamura, M | 1 |
Moriwaki, T | 1 |
Yamanaka, T | 1 |
Sunakawa, Y | 1 |
Kawakami, H | 1 |
Nishina, T | 2 |
Misumi, T | 1 |
Muro, K | 2 |
He, X | 1 |
Zhang, T | 1 |
Wu, L | 1 |
Wu, Y | 1 |
Zhou, X | 1 |
Hamada, S | 1 |
Komatsu, S | 1 |
Shibata, R | 1 |
Konishi, T | 1 |
Matsubara, D | 1 |
Soga, K | 1 |
Shimomura, K | 1 |
Ikeda, J | 1 |
Taniguchi, F | 1 |
Shioaki, Y | 1 |
Kawazoe, A | 1 |
Fujita, J | 1 |
Koeda, K | 1 |
Amagai, K | 1 |
Ogata, K | 1 |
Watanabe, K | 1 |
Yamamoto, Y | 1 |
Zhu, M | 1 |
Sonbol, MB | 1 |
Yoon, HH | 1 |
Cuffe, S | 1 |
Van Den Eynde, M | 1 |
Zaniboni, A | 1 |
Gourzoulidis, G | 1 |
Koulentaki, M | 1 |
Koumarianou, A | 1 |
Samadas, E | 1 |
Androulakis, N | 1 |
Xynogalos, S | 1 |
Papakotoulas, P | 1 |
Boukovinas, I | 1 |
Karamouzis, M | 1 |
Souglakos, J | 1 |
Chotzagiannoglou, V | 1 |
Beletsi, A | 1 |
Kourlaba, G | 1 |
Takushima, Y | 1 |
Igarashi, A | 1 |
Yoshihara, H | 1 |
Lorenzen, S | 1 |
Fornaro, L | 1 |
Catenacci, DVT | 1 |
Fougeray, R | 1 |
Moreno, SR | 1 |
Azcue, P | 1 |
Nienhüser, H | 1 |
Schmidt, T | 1 |
Hosokawa, A | 1 |
Cutsem, EV | 1 |
Winkler, RE | 1 |
McCaw, ZR | 1 |
Kim, DH | 1 |
Tian, L | 1 |
Fu, H | 1 |
Wei, LJ | 1 |
Zhou, K | 1 |
Zhou, J | 1 |
Zhang, M | 1 |
Liao, W | 1 |
Li, Q | 1 |
Borzenko, BG | 1 |
Bakurova, EM | 1 |
Popovich, YA | 1 |
Sidyuk, EA | 1 |
Popovich, AY | 1 |
Nukatsuka, M | 2 |
Nakagawa, F | 3 |
Saito, H | 1 |
Sakata, M | 1 |
Uchida, J | 1 |
Takechi, T | 2 |
Bando, H | 1 |
Yasui, H | 1 |
Yamaguchi, K | 1 |
Takahashi, S | 1 |
Nomura, S | 1 |
Kuno, H | 1 |
Sato, A | 1 |
Goto, M | 1 |
Shinmura, K | 1 |
Igarashi, H | 1 |
Kobayashi, M | 1 |
Konno, H | 1 |
Yamada, H | 1 |
Iwaizumi, M | 1 |
Kageyama, S | 1 |
Tsuneyoshi, T | 1 |
Tsugane, S | 1 |
Sugimura, H | 1 |
Yan, L | 1 |
Yanan, D | 1 |
Donglan, S | 1 |
Na, W | 1 |
Rongmiao, Z | 1 |
Zhifeng, C | 1 |
Emura, T | 2 |
Fujioka, A | 1 |
Ohshimo, H | 2 |
Kitazato, K | 1 |
Suzuki, N | 1 |
Yamaguchi, M | 1 |
Fukushima, M | 1 |
Matsumura, S | 1 |
Oue, N | 1 |
Nakayama, H | 1 |
Kitadai, Y | 1 |
Yoshida, K | 1 |
Yamaguchi, Y | 1 |
Imai, K | 1 |
Nakachi, K | 1 |
Matsusaki, K | 1 |
Chayama, K | 1 |
Yasui, W | 1 |
Yang, M | 1 |
Guo, Y | 1 |
Zhang, X | 1 |
Miao, X | 1 |
Tan, W | 1 |
Sun, T | 1 |
Zhao, D | 1 |
Yu, D | 1 |
Liu, J | 1 |
Lin, D | 1 |
Akimov, AA | 1 |
Lazarev, NV | 1 |
Matsuda, A | 1 |
Dan, A | 1 |
Minakawa, N | 1 |
Tregear, SJ | 1 |
Okazaki, S | 1 |
Sugimoto, Y | 1 |
Sasaki, T | 1 |
Kobayashi, K | 1 |
Sumi, S | 1 |
Kidouchi, K | 1 |
Mizuno, I | 1 |
Mohri, N | 1 |
Fukui, T | 1 |
Akamo, Y | 1 |
Takeyama, H | 1 |
Manabe, T | 1 |
Deng, GR | 1 |
Lu, YY | 1 |
Chen, SM | 1 |
Miao, J | 1 |
Lu, GR | 1 |
Li, H | 1 |
Cai, H | 1 |
Xu, XL | 1 |
E, Z | 1 |
Liu, PN | 1 |
Rusakov, VI | 1 |
Vishagurov, KK | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Treatments[NCT02500043] | Phase 3 | 507 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-02-24 | Completed | ||
Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT04923529] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-03-01 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase I/II Trial of TS-1 and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00531245] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 77 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2006-08-31 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma[NCT04059562] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-10-28 | Active, not recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). The assessment of DCR was based on Investigator review of radiologic images and following RECIST criteria (version 1.1, 2009). (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 44.1 |
Placebo+BSC | 14.5 |
"Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to < 10 mm.~PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference." (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 4.5 |
Placebo+BSC | 2.1 |
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last follow-up or cut-off date, whichever comes first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the data cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 5.7 |
Placebo+BSC | 3.6 |
PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for target lesions were defined as target lesions with at least 20 % relative increase in the sum of diameters with reference to the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum and this sum demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions or Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All alive participants with no disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at the last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 2.0 |
Placebo+BSC | 1.8 |
The ECOG performance status was used to evaluate participant's disease progression and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0 = normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for < 50% of the time; 3= in bed for > 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to >=2, or from 2 to >=3. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: At the time of randomization (Day 1 Cycle 1) and within 24 hours prior to start of study treatment in every cycle (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 4.3 |
Placebo+BSC | 2.3 |
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Cycle 9 | Cycle 10 | Cycle 11 | Cycle 12 | Cycle 13 | Last Collection Cycle | Safety Follow-Up | |
TAS-102+BSC | -2.7 | -5.9 | -4.1 | -3.6 | -5.9 | -8.8 | -9.5 | -4.3 | 2.4 | -14.4 | -16.7 | -8.3 | 0.0 | -8.8 | -16.5 |
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Cycle 9 | Cycle 10 | Cycle 11 | Cycle 12 | Cycle 13 | Cycle 14 | Cycle 15 | Last Collection Cycle | Safety Follow-Up | |
Placebo+BSC | -5.9 | -7.3 | -1.4 | -1.7 | 11.1 | 15.6 | 20.0 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | -9.8 | -8.9 |
The Quality of Life Questionnaire Stomach Cancer Module 22 (QLQ-STO22) assessed symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, dietary restrictions, pain QS22, reflux, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste problems, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1='Not at all', 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4='Very much'). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dysphagia | Dietary Restrictions | Pain QS22 | Reflux | Anxiety | Dry Mouth | Body Image | Hair Loss | Taste Problems | |
Placebo+BSC | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 |
TAS-102+BSC | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.4 | 85.8 | 86.6 | 86.6 |
Any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication was considered an adverse event (AE). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs/TESAEs were defined as events that started on or after treatment or started before treatment and worsened after the start of treatment through 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
TEAE | TESAE | |
Placebo+BSC | 151 | 70 |
TAS-102+BSC | 319 | 143 |
2 reviews available for thymine and Stomach Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of gastric cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Combinatio | 2022 |
TAS-102 in gastric cancer: Development and perspectives of a new biochemically modulated fluroropyrimidine drug combination.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biochemical Phenomena; Drug Combinations; Humans; Py | 2020 |
9 trials available for thymine and Stomach Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS).
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Esoph | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Gastrectomy | 2020 |
Health-related quality of life associated with trifluridine/tipiracil in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: results from TAGS.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro | 2020 |
REVIVE study: a prospective observational study in chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for advanced gastric cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans | 2021 |
Safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal junction cancer: a subgroup analysis from the phase 3 TAGS study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Combinations; E | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat | 2018 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat | 2018 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat | 2018 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat | 2018 |
A multicenter phase II study of TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1201).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv | 2016 |
25 other studies available for thymine and Stomach Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Response Rate and Prognostic Impact of Salvage Chemotherapy after Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot | 2020 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. A perspective based on pharmacological costs.
Topics: Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine | 2020 |
The effect of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Clinical Protocols; Drug Combinations; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Midd | 2021 |
[Long-Term Survivor with Recurrent Gastric Cancer Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil as a Late-Line Chemotherapy].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo | 2020 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus ramucirumab in gastric cancer.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Ramucirumab; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Tr | 2021 |
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Greece; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Quality-A | 2022 |
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Co | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil | 2021 |
9 weeks that matter for patients with gastric cancer.
Topics: Double-Blind Method; Gastrectomy; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine | 2018 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic gastric cancer.
Topics: Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridi | 2019 |
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Humans; Markov Chain | 2020 |
Activity of thymidilate "salvage pathway" enzymes in human gastric cancer and blood serum: correlation with treatment modalities.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Middle Aged; Serum; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymidine; Thymidine | 2013 |
Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, with irinotecan hydrochloride on human colorectal and gastric cancer xenografts.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal | 2015 |
Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy Using a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, TAS-102, with Oxaliplatin on Human Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Xenografts.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2015 |
Altered expression of the human base excision repair gene NTH1 in gastric cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blotting, Western; Case-Control Studies; Deoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidi | 2009 |
Polymorphisms of XRCC1 gene and risk of gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenine; Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Arginine; Cardia; Case-Control Studies; Codon; Cytosine; DNA R | 2009 |
Thymidine kinase and thymidine phosphorylase level as the main predictive parameter for sensitivity to TAS-102 in a mouse model.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Division; Drug Combinations; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; M | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop | 2004 |
A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP-9 promoter affects tumor progression and invasive phenotype of gastric cancer.
Topics: Aged; Case-Control Studies; Cytosine; Female; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; | 2005 |
Interaction of P53 Arg72Pro and MDM2 T309G polymorphisms and their associations with risk of gastric cardia cancer.
Topics: Aged; Amino Acid Substitution; Arginine; DNA Primers; Female; Genes, Reporter; Genotype; Guanine; Hu | 2007 |
[On the experimental study of stomach ulcer in rats].
Topics: Animals; Cytosine; Male; Pyrimidines; Rats; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomach Ulcer; Thiouracil; Thymine; U | 1966 |
Nucleosides and nucleotides. 123. Synthesis of 1-(2-deoxy-2-isocyano-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)cytosine and related nucleosides as potential antitumor agents.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cytarabine; Deoxycytidine; Drug Stability; Humans; Isocyanates; Leuk | 1993 |
[A case of gastric cancer with decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity].
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP); Female; F | 1998 |
Activated c-Ha-ras oncogene with a guanine to thymine transversion at the twelfth codon in a human stomach cancer cell line.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Base Sequence; Cell Line; Cloning, Molecular; Codon; D | 1987 |
[Use of methyluracil in stomach surgery].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptic Ulcer; | 1972 |